UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR
ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-28284
Tucows Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-2707366 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
96 Mowat Avenue |
|
M6K 3M1 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (416) 535-0123 |
||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None |
||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
||
Common Stock, no par value |
||
(Title of Class) |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of Act). Yes o No x
As of June 30, 2005 (the last day of our most recently completed second quarter), the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $42.8 million. Such aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing sale price per share of $1.01 as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board maintained by Nasdaq on such date. For purposes of making this calculation only, the registrant has defined affiliates as including all officers, directors, and beneficial owners of more than five percent of the common stock of the Company. In making such calculation, the registrant is not making a determination of the affiliate or non-affiliate status of any holders of shares of the registrants common stock.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of March 16, 2006 was 72,004,397.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the definitive Proxy Statement of Tucows Inc. to be used in connection with its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Proxy Statement), to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent provided herein. Except as specifically incorporated by reference herein, the Proxy Statement is not to be deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TUCOWS INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
3 |
||
|
|
18 |
||
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
34 |
||
|
|
35 |
||
|
|
35 |
||
|
|
36 |
||
|
|
36 |
||
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
39 |
|
|
|
56 |
||
|
|
57 |
||
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
||
|
|
58 |
||
|
|
58 |
||
|
|
58 |
||
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
||
|
|
58 |
||
|
|
59 |
Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Report on Form 10-K contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements by us with regard to our expectations as to financial results and other aspects of our business that involve risks and uncertainties and may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as may, should, anticipate, believe, plan, estimate, expect and intend, and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this report include statements regarding, among other things, the number of new, renewed and transferred-in domain names, the competition we expect to encounter as our business develops and competes in a broad range of Internet services, the effectiveness of our intellectual property protection, including our ability to license proprietary rights to network partners and to register additional trademarks and service marks, our belief that the market for domain name registration will trend upward gradually, our belief that it is more likely than not that net deferred assets will be realized; our expectations regarding our acquisition of the assets of Critical Path, Inc.; our expectations regarding the cost of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley and our belief that, by increasing the number of applications and services we offer, we will be able to generate higher revenues. These statements are based on managements current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Many factors affect our ability to achieve our objectives and to successfully develop and commercialize our services including:
Our ability to continue to generate sufficient working capital to meet our operating requirements;
Our ability to maintain a good working relationship with our vendors and customers
The ability of vendors to continue to supply our needs;
Actions by our competitors;
Our ability to achieve gross profit margins at which we can be profitable;
Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in our business;
Our ability to effectively manage our business;
Our ability to obtain and maintain approvals from regulatory authorities on regulatory issues;
Pending or new litigation; and
Factors set forth herein under the caption Item 1A Risk Factors.
This list of factors that may affect our future performance and financial and competitive position and also the accuracy of forward-looking statements is illustrative, but it is by no means exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us as of the date of this document, and we assume no obligation to update these cautionary statements or any forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance.
We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K by the foregoing cautionary statements.
2
We provide Internet services and downloadable software through a global distribution network of more than 6,000 customers. Our customers or Service Providers are primarily web hosting companies, ISPs and providers of other services over the Internet. These Service Providers are located in more than 100 countries. We are an accredited registrar with ICANN and generate revenue primarily through the provision of domain registration and other Internet services to Service Providers who offer such services to their own customers in a process known as wholesale distribution. We were in the first group of 34 registrars accredited by ICANN in 1999. As of February 28, 2006, the number of registrars accredited by ICANN is 574. ICANN maintains a list of accredited registrars at www.icann.org /registrars/accredited-list.html.
We are also a primary supplier of hosted messaging services, where we provide access to and host email and personal information management, such as calendar and contacts for enterprises and for certain services, consumers. Customers of our messaging services pay on a subscription basis for the services they choose to access.
Our goal is to strengthen our position as a supplier of Internet services to Service Providers. We believe that the market for Internet services will continue to grow and that our existing relationships provide us with an opportunity to expand our platform. We intend to expand the services we offer and increase our Service Provider relationships. Our goal is to implement this strategy while maintaining our high level of customer service and support.
Our Service Providers typically provide their customers, the end-users of the Internet, with a critical component to enable the customers use of the Internet. The Service Providers have a very high level of interaction with such end-users, who are typically individuals and businesses ranging from small businesses to large corporations. When a Service Provider has secured an end-user as a customer in one area of specialty, it has an opportunity to provide this customer with additional services. We believe that end-users will first contact their current Service Providers when they seek to purchase additional services. Since 1999, we have continued to expand our network of Service Providers and the Internet services we offer. These services currently include domain name registrations, digital certificates, billing, provisioning and customer care software solutions, email and anti-spam services, blogware and website building tools. We plan to continue to introduce additional Internet services in the future.
We primarily distribute our services to Service Providers using our open shared reseller system platform, or OpenSRS. OpenSRS provides a back-end infrastructure, complete with interfaces that Service Providers use to provision services, either for their own use or for end-users, while acting as a wholesale distributor. We believe that our wholesale offerings enable our Service Providers to focus on customer acquisition and retention while still being able to enhance per customer revenue by offering additional services along with their core services.
Although we primarily provide Internet Services for wholesale distribution by Service Providers, other registrars who do not want to incur the costs and complexities of building and maintaining their domain registration and management systems can utilize our open hosted registrar system platform, or OpenHRS. OpenHRS enables the Service Provider to provide domain registration and other services to their end-users.
In addition to generating revenue through the provision of domain registration and other Internet services, we generate advertising and other revenue through our website, www.tucows.com, which has the primary function of providing software for download. Advertising revenue is generated from third-party
3
advertisers and from software developers who rely on us as an important source of distribution for our shareware, freeware and online services. Software developers use the Author Resource Center, or ARC, to submit their products for inclusion in our libraries and to purchase promotional placement of their software in the library categories, as well as other promotional services on a cost-per-click or flat rate basis. The libraries are available to end-users around the world via our own Internet facilities and via a global network of Internet service companies who elect to mirror our software libraries locally. We also generate revenue from companies who contract with us to provide them with co-branded content.
On January 3, 2006 we completed the acquisition of substantially all of Critical Paths hosted messaging assets for up to $8.0 million in cash plus the assumption of some related contractual liabilities. We will maintain the existing hosted messaging data centers in Denver, Colorado and London, England. We believe that with this acquisition we become a leader in hosted email, especially hosted email for Internet service providers and web hosting companies and we also anticipate cost savings synergies in network and data center operations, technical support, account management and recruiting.
Industry Background and Analysis
The Internet has emerged as a global medium that enables millions of people to share information, communicate and conduct business electronically. We believe that the growth in the number of Internet users combined with the Internets extensive reach has created a powerful channel for conducting commerce, as well as marketing, gathering, consuming and sharing information and ideas. We believe that this growth in Internet use provides significant opportunities for organizations of all types and sizes to improve operational efficiencies and generate additional revenues through the use of Internet channels. We believe that the Internet has also given rise to additional competitive pressures due to shifting supplier and consumer demands, which have become increasingly diversified.
We believe that these pressures are leading organizations to adopt new Internet-based business models, requiring the use of a wide array of applications and services including:
· access to the Internet;
· domain registration;
· high performance web hosting and server hosting facilities;
· email and other advanced messaging or groupware applications; and
· electronic commerce enabling applications.
Providers of these applications and services are often Service Providers, which typically operate as:
· ISPs, which provide end-users with access to the Internet through dial-up, high speed and dedicated subscriber line hook-ups;
· web hosting companies, which offer corporate customers and individual users hosting of their website on a commercial web server at a unique domain registered to the customer;
· system and network management providers, which offer high-end server hosting facilities for web based businesses and corporations;
· domain registration Service Providers, which facilitate domain registrations;
· telecommunications companies and cable Service Providers;
4
· value added Service Providers of internal and external networks, which are typically consultants that assist companies with systems management, application procurement, installation, maintenance and training; and
· web designers that offer services helping businesses and organizations create and maintain websites.
Service Providers typically provide their customers, the end-users of the Internet, with a critical component to enable their use of the Internet and have a very high level of interaction with such end-user. End-users consist of individuals and businesses ranging from small businesses to large corporations. When a Service Provider has secured an end-user as a customer in one area of specialty, it has an opportunity to provide this customer with additional services. We believe that, in most cases, end-users will contact Service Providers as they are a trusted resource when they seek to learn more about, or to purchase additional, applications and services. We believe that providing a range of applications and services to end-users creates stronger relationships between Service Providers and end-users, increases the costs of switching to another Service Provider and leads to increased revenues per end-user.
As the Internet continues to grow and the number of available applications and services and the complexity of these services continue to increase, we anticipate that the value of our role as distributor will increase. We believe Service Providers will focus primarily on customer acquisition and retention and will find it difficult to continue to identify new profitable services, negotiate supply arrangements and integrate new services into their businesses while maintaining their existing business processes and services. We accordingly believe that our role in the industry will grow in importance as Service Providers seek to outsource these tasks.
Domain Registration Background
The Internet domain registration system is comprised of two principal components: the registry and the registrars. The registry maintains the database that contains the domains registered in the TLDs and their corresponding Internet protocol addresses. Registrars act as intermediaries between the registry and end user individuals and businesses, referred to as registrants, seeking to register domains.
The domain system is organized according to industry custom by levels, so that, for example, in the domain mybrand.com, .com is the TLD and mybrand is the second level domain. TLDs are classified as either generic, known as gTLDs, or country code, known as ccTLDs. The gTLDs that we currently support are .com, .net, .org, .info, .biz and .name and the ccTLDs are .at (Austria), .be (Belgium), .ca (Canada), .cc (Cocos (Keeling) Islands), .ch (Switzerland), .cn (China), .de (Germany), .fr (France), .it (Italy), .nl (Netherlands), .uk (United Kingdom), .tv (Tuvalu) and .us (United States).
There are approximately 240 different ccTLDs. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority maintains a list of these ccTLDs at www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htm. Each registry for country code domains is responsible for maintaining and operating its own database of registered domains. Some country code domains are unrestricted and allow anyone to register their domains on a first-come, first served basis. Others require that prospective registrants have a local presence in the country to be able to register domains in that country. While there have been movements directed at creating uniform domain registration rules and registrar administration guidelines, there is at present no international uniformity. This lack of uniformity increases the complexity and cost associated with being a registrar of the various ccTLDs. We choose which ccTLDs we will support based on the economic evaluation of market potential and expected costs.
From January 1993 until April 1999, Network Solutions, which was acquired by VeriSign, Inc. in June 2000, was the sole entity authorized by the U.S. government to act as both registrar and registry for domains in the .com, .net and .org gTLDs. In October 1998, the U.S. Department of Commerce called for the formation of a non-profit corporation to oversee the management of the .com, .net and .org domains,
5
and in November 1998 appointed ICANN in this regard. VeriSign, Inc. continues to act as the sole registry for the .com and .net domains, maintaining the files in the shared registration system for these domains and the directory databases and listing these domains and their numerical Internet protocol addresses. We became an ICANN accredited registrar in 1999 and in January 2000, began operation as an ICANN accredited registrar and began to register domains in the ..com, .net and .org domains.
We were in the first group of 34 registrars accredited by ICANN in 1999 and have subsequently established ourselves as a leading wholesale registrar. As of February 28, 2006, there were 574 ICANN accredited registrars.
ICANNs authority is based upon voluntary compliance by registrants with its consensus policies. While these policies do not constitute law in the United States or elsewhere, they have a significant influence on the domain registration system.
Registration of Domains
The only way to register and start using a domain name is to use the services of a registrar. To make entries into a registry database, the registrar must undergo a certification process, overseen and regulated by ICANN. Typically the registration, renewal or transfer of a domain is accomplished by using an online submission form provided by a registrar. If the application to register, renew or transfer the domain to a registrar is accepted, the end-user pays a fee to the registrar for the right to use the domain for a set period ranging between one and ten years. ICANN maintains its accreditation requirements which can be found at www.icann.org/registrars/accreditation.htm. The registrar in turn pays a fee to the registry for each registered domain.
When an end-user wants to register a domain, it must first ascertain if the domain is available and then, using the services of an accredited registrar, have that name reserved for its use in the registry.
The process of renewing a domain name is much like registering a new one and is accomplished by the registrant paying the renewal fee that covers a specific period of time.
If a registrant wants to transfer its domain from one accredited registrar to another, this can be done at any time prior to the domains expiration by the registrant following the transfer process of the gaining registrars transfer policy and paying the requisite fee for a set period, which is generally one year.
Growth in Domain Registrations
Because end-users typically require a domain name to receive, enhance or better personalize their use of new e-business applications and services, it is critical that Service Providers provide domain name registration and related support services. We believe that, despite volatility induced by the economic recession, the market for domain name registrations will continue to trend upward gradually because of the continuing growth of and convergence to the Internet and the development of the domain name registration industry, including the introduction of new gTLDs. We believe that there are three primary growth drivers for the domain registration industry:
· Trend toward online presence. We believe that businesses and individuals are increasing their use of the Internet in their operations and daily lives. Ever-smaller businesses are seeing the need for an Internet presence as it is often the first place potential customers go for information. Individuals are setting up blogs, personal webpages and personal email addresses as well as demanding other Internet services that rely on domain names for personalization and ease of navigation.
· Economic expansion. We believe that the need for domain registrations is positively correlated with growth in the economy. This is consistent with the observation that new businesses and new product and service introductions require domain registrations.
6
· International adoption. There are still many international markets in which Internet use is not as prevalent as in North America. We expect that many of these markets will continue to increase their Internet adoption to North American levels and beyond. Such growth would lead to a greater demand for domain registrations.
Our strategy is to strengthen our position as a supplier of Internet services to Service Providers. We intend to:
· expand Service Provider relationships;
· take advantage of the greater growth rates in international Internet markets;
· increase Service Providers customer retention and customer acquisition;
· expand the services we offer by broadening the network of supplier relationships;
· extend the range of current services; and
· continue to pursue acquisitions in a disciplined manner.
Expand Service Provider relationships
We intend to continue to leverage our knowledge of the Service Provider market and our brand and reputation to increase our market share and penetration. Our approach to attract Service Providers as customers varies depending on the size and geographic location of the Service Provider. We have account management resources dedicated to large Service Providers, European Service Providers and small Service Providers. As we broaden the services sold, we solidify our relationships which in turn furthers our knowledge and brand strengths.
Take advantage of greater growth rates in international Internet markets
We believe that our business model facilitates an enhanced ability to take advantage of the significantly greater growth rates present in international Internet markets. By enabling and empowering Service Providers and relying on them to deal with the problems located close to the end-users, we remove the need to manage items like local language, local currency, different taxation policies, different national legislation and local methods of payments. This allows us to grow internationally through local Service Providers by supplying them with various services that they can then tailor to local circumstances.
Increase Service Providers customer retention and customer acquisition
We believe that by enhancing the usability and reliability of our systems and services, we can improve the end-user experience and create greater usage and end-user satisfaction, thereby positively impacting service renewal rates and new user referrals. By focusing on reducing the complexity of Internet services, we believe we can increase usage. By improving reliability, we believe that we can reduce end-user frustration and take advantage of the high costs and inertia associated with changing ISPs.
Expand the services we offer by broadening the network of supplier relationships
Our network of suppliers provides access to new services and service developments. We will continue to broaden our network of suppliers and technology alliances. Our current relationships include GeoTrust, Inc., or GeoTrust, for digital certificates, Critical Path, Inc. for a software license used in our email service, Gozoom.com, Inc. and Panda Software International S.L. for services and software used in our email defense service and Akmin Technologies PVT Ltd. for website building tools. We expect to
7
continue to rely on existing and new suppliers to provide new services and service developments, allowing us to maintain our focus on tailoring such services for Service Providers. We expect to continue to enter into additional supplier relationships as we expand the number of services we offers.
Extend the range of current services
We currently provide Service Providers with domain registration services, email and anti-spam services, digital certificates, billing, provisioning and customer care software solutions, blogware and website building tools. We intend to extend each of these services as follows:
· Developing domain registration services for new TLDs, both gTLDs and ccTLDs and enhancing our opportunities in the market for expiring domain names, the market for secondary domain names and the market for tools that assist in the management of domain names;
· Extending our billing and provisioning software to integrate it with new products and services and offer similar functionality in a hosted model. We believe that this tighter integration will increase the ability and efficiency of our Service Providers in adding new Internet services; and
· Continuing the evolution of our ancillary services. A key component of our long-term strategy is the development and sale of our ancillary services. Revenues from ancillary services have increased to 8% of net revenues for the 2005 fiscal year, from 5% of net revenues for the 2004 fiscal year and 2% of net revenues for the 2003 fiscal year.
Continue to pursue acquisitions in a disciplined manner
In April 2004, we acquired and integrated Boardtown Corporation, a provider of billing, provisioning and customer-care software solutions. The acquisition enhanced our existing Service Provider solutions and added a significant number of Service Provider relationships.
In January 2006, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of Critical Paths hosted messaging assets, including the customer base, hosted messaging communications infrastructure, and other related assets. We expect the acquisition to significantly expand our presence in the email market. We intend to continue to pursue selective strategic acquisitions that will enhance the functionality of our service offerings and broaden and deepen our Service Provider relationships.
Our Solution for Service Providers
Our solution gives Service Providers the ability to offer a broad range of Internet services to their customers. Typically, offering a broad range of disparate services results in complex business processes for the purposes of:
· tracking of administration, billing and usage;
· integrating information and functionality from multiple sources;
· delivering content, applications and services in a robust, scalable and efficient manner;
· managing the life-cycle of the subscriber and the service from provisioning through renewal and transfer;
· ensuring system reliability and redundancy; and
· providing cost savings over in-house solutions by relieving Service Providers of the expense of acquiring and maintaining hardware and software and the associated administrative burden.
Our strategy is to simplify these complex business processes by providing a solution in which the above needs are addressed outright or in which tools are provided to help the Service Provider manage these
8
complexities. We believe that we have been successful in this strategy and that our Service Providers are better equipped to:
· focus on their customer acquisition and retention strategies thereby allowing them to provide a higher level of customer service and performance;
· enhance revenue per customer through offering additional services;
· avoid the costs and complexities of building in-house systems; and
· avoid regulatory and other complexity in their businesses through the outsourcing of business processes.
We believe that we can remain successful in simplifying complex business processes because our solution has been developed with the following key criteria in mind:
· Reliable. Our software platform has been in operation for many years, is constantly being improved and has a demonstrated performance capability;
· Scalable. We enable our Service Providers to offer domains and other easily integrated applications and services to their end-users and believe that this allows Service Providers to benefit from not having to engage in or concern themselves with capacity planning;
· Ease of Use. We allow our Service Providers to administer a variety of applications and services from easy to use interfaces;
· Robust and Flexible. We enable our Service Providers to offer a variety of applications and services from a range of suppliers and give Service Providers the ability to brand these applications and services themselves;
· Ease of Innovation and Integration. We develop our platform recognizing the heterogeneity of Service Providers and their need for customized solutions. We provide multiple methods of interacting with our platform and encourage and support our Service Providers in integrating with their own in-house systems; and
· Superior Customer Service. We seek to provide superior customer service by anticipating the technical requirements and business objectives. We also provide our Service Providers with technical advice to help them understand how our applications and services can be customized for their particular needs.
Barriers to Entry and Our Competitive Position
We believe that one of the most difficult aspects of successfully launching an Internet application or service is new user adoption and that the trusted business relationship, coupled with the technical integration we have with our Service Providers, will continue to make us a desirable partner for Internet service suppliers seeking to establish or expand their user base. We have invested over ten years in building deep relationships with our Service Providers and in building a brand intended to stand for trust and reliability. We believe that one of our key competitive advantages is our relationship and reputation with our Service Providers. We believe that our understanding of the Service Provider business has enabled us to earn their trust. This trust and understanding has contributed to our success in establishing and maintaining our network of Service Providers. We believe that our accumulated goodwill is not easily replicated and will continue to give the company a strong competitive advantage over the long term.
9
The market for Internet services, including domain registrations, messaging, billing software and services, digital certificates, publishing, software and content distribution, and other Internet applications and services, is rapidly evolving and is highly competitive. Our competition may be divided into groups consisting of:
· domain registrars who market domains primarily on a retail basis, such as Network Solutions, Register.com, Yahoo and GoDaddy, and who compete with Service Providers for end-users;
· other domain registrars, such as eNom, Inc. and Melbourne IT, who market wholesale private label offerings to Service Providers;
· providers of billing software and services to telecommunications companies and Service Providers, such as Portal Software and Rodopi;
· providers of messaging services to Service Providers, such as Google, Microsoft, Postini and Everyone.net ;
· providers of publishing services to Service Providers, such as Google, Xanga, Microsoft, Six Apart and CM4All; and
· providers of software downloads and other open source related content, such as CNET.
We expect to continue to experience significant competition from the companies identified above, and, as our business develops and we compete in an increasingly broad range of Internet services, we expect to encounter competition from other providers of Internet services. Service Providers, Internet portals, web hosting companies, email hosting companies, outsourced application companies, country code registries and major telecommunication firms may broaden their service offerings to include outsourced domain registrations and other Internet applications and service solutions.
We believe that the primary competitive factors in our domain registration and downloadable software distribution businesses are:
· providing superior customer service by anticipating the technical requirements and business objectives of the Service Providers and providing them with technical advice to help them understand how our applications and services can be customized for their particular needs;
· providing cost savings over in-house solutions by relieving Service Providers of the expense of acquiring and maintaining hardware and software and the associated administrative burden;
· providing greater functionality and access to Internet applications and services, which in turn enables Service Providers to choose the application that best suit their end-users needs;
· enabling Service Providers to better manage their relationships with their end-users;
· facilitating scalability through an infrastructure designed to support millions of transactions across millions of end-users; and
· our technology and infrastructure, consisting of advanced software and hardware that allows Service Providers to provide Internet services to their customers without having to make substantial investments in their own software or hardware.
Although we encounter pricing pressure in many markets in which we compete, we believe the effects of that pressure are mitigated by the fact that we deliver Service Providers a high degree of value through our business support practices and financial and technical integration. We believe our status as a trusted supplier also allows us to mitigate the effects of this type of competition. We believe that the long-term
10
relationships we have made with many Service Providers results in a sense of certainty that would not be available to the Service Provider through a competitor.
We seek to provide superior customer service by anticipating the technical requirements and business objectives of our Service Providers, such as customizable management of renewal processes, streamlining the process of adding additional services and providing solutions for dealing with the added administrative complexity of offering multiple services. We also provide our Service Providers with technical advice to help them understand how our applications and services can be customized for their particular needs. Service Providers may contact us by email or through our toll-free telephone number. An extensive library of frequently asked questions and answers is made available to all Service Providers through our website.
Our customer service team consists of trained technicians who draw on expertise throughout the organization to provide support in many languages and for an array of unique issues. These staff members handle general inquiries, investigate the status of orders and payments and answer technical questions about our applications and services. In response to customer inquiries, customer service representatives monitor site and network operations, refer complex problems to technical teams for resolution and make recommendations for future enhancements.
We pride ourselves on having developed a culture of customer service that pervades our entire organization. This can be attributed to the fact that we have always encouraged and provided easy means for our customers and resellers to communicate with anyone in the organization, as well as with each other. These communication avenues are monitored and utilized not only by support functions but also by our management.
We also use our own online discussion forums to communicate with our Service Providers. These forums have been used to discuss:
· suggestions or feedback on new features;
· marketing promotions; and
· domain policy positions.
These forums are open to the public, which increases the level of scrutiny we face and the standard to which we are held. We believe that this, in turn, produces credibility with Service Providers. Problems that are raised are often solved by other Service Providers who have faced similar situations. This greatly increases the speed and breadth of responses the Service Provider is able to receive in a cost effective manner.
For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, no single customer represented more than 10% of revenues.
We offer our services to our network of Service Providers and directly to end-users. Our principal applications and services fall under two broad headings: Domain Registration and Ancillary Services, and Advertising and Other Services.
11
Domain Registration and Ancillary Services
Domain registration services
Domain Registration Services encompass all of our offerings related to the provisioning of domains, including the markets for expiring and secondary domain names. We offer wholesale and retail domain registration services for numerous gTLDs and ccTLDs. Key components of our domain registration services include:
· Wholesale Domain Services. Tucows wholesale service is designed to enable Service Providers to register domains for their end-users using Tucows gTLD and ccTLD accreditations. Pricing is based on a per domain, per year charge. Tucows imposes no restrictions on the prices charged by Service Providers to their customers and offers this service through its OpenSRS Platform.
· Hosted Registrar Services. Hosted Registrar Services allow ICANN accredited registrars to use Tucows technical systems to process domain registrations with their accreditation. Hosted registrar services enable registrars to use a proven system without incurring the costs of building their own technical infrastructure. Hosted registrar services also include professional service elements, including custom development, data management and systems administration. This service is offered through Tucows OpenHRS platform and is offered as a fee-based service.
· Domain Direct. Tucows offers retail domain registration through Domain Direct at www.domaindirect.com. These services are designed to enable consumers to establish an Internet presence using Domain Directs control panel, which includes tools for domain registration, personalized email addresses, domain forwarding, domain marketing, blogware and web hosting that allow customers to register, develop, use and manage their websites.
Ancillary Services
Ancillary services include email and anti-spam services, digital certificates, billing, provisioning and customer care software solutions, blogware and website building tools. We offer these services to our Service Providers on a private label basis so that they may use their brands in selling Internet services to their end-users.
· Messaging Email. Our email service is a hosted service that provides email boxes that support post office protocol, or POP, Internet message access protocol, or IMAP, simple mail transfer protocol, or SMTP, and web-mail as methods of access and communication. Web-mail includes support for groupware functionality including shared calendaring, tasks, notes and email boxes. An email forwarding service is also provided.
· Anti-Spam. Our email defense anti-spam service is a Tucows hosted service that provides spam, virus, content and attachment filtering, as well as Denial of Service, or DoS, attack prevention.
· Digital Certificate Delivery. Digital certificates are required to facilitate any online transaction or exchange of sensitive information in a secure fashion. We have a partnership with GeoTrust to provide Service Providers with the ability to sell an array of digital certificates, also known as Secure Socket Layer, or SSL, certificates. Digital certificates consist of a public key and a private key. The public key is used to encrypt information and the private key is used to decipher it, a process that is known as an SSL handshake. Digital certificates are issued using identity verification procedures and, in combination with the trusted third-party infrastructure standard in the Internet industry, are used to enable secure electronic transactions and to otherwise verify online identities. This occurs when a browser points to a secured domain; an SSL handshake authenticates the server and the client and establishes an encryption method and a unique session key. They can then begin a secure session that guarantees message privacy and message integrity.
12
· Billing Services, Billing, Provisioning and Customer Care Solutions.
· Platypus Billing System, or Platypus, is a complete turnkey back-office solution for ISPs, Application Service Providers, or ASPs, web hosting companies and other companies that provide Internet services. Platypus handles billing, service provisioning, and customer account management. Web tools are provided so that customers can manage their customer accounts online.
· Wombat Help Desk System is a Platypus integrated Help Desk solution that provides total accountability for customer care needs. Wombat automatically routes, tracks and maintains customer care email and phone calls for optimal service desk performance.
· The Tucows Printing Service is an outsourced statement printing service offering Platypus Billing System customers statement printing, folding, stuffing and postage metering services.
· Blogware. Blogware is a proprietary hosted weblog content management system that makes it easy for end users to share information, photographs and other interactive content online via their website. We believe that Blogware is the only hosted blog or weblog content management system that was built exclusively for Service Providers and that takes into account their specific needs, including the ability to brand the service, to create and administer trials of the service and to manage and administer the service across their customer bases. We manage the entire Blogware service and provisioning infrastructure, as well as ongoing application development on an outsourced basis.
· Website Builder. Our website builder tool enables end-users to create a website using an easy to use template based tool. We manage the infrastructure allowing Service Providers to present a private label product to their end-user customers without the development effort or overhead expenses that would be required to design and manage such a service on their own.
Advertising and Other Services
Advertising and other services include revenues attributable to our content business. We generate revenue directly from users of its website through selling advertising through the following channels:
· Direct advertising on our website. Our website, www.tucows.com, is designed to provide customers with fast access to our extensive libraries of software and digital content and to provide them with help and information on using the Internet. We provide users with software for numerous platforms including Windows, Macintosh, Linux, personal digital assistants, mobile/cellular and online services. The main libraries contain a total of over 40,000 titles. Our staff checks each title for spyware and viruses. We provide a public forum where individuals can review or comment on the software products. Most titles are rated on a scale of one to five, five being the highest rating. Revenue is produced from our website through advertising and co-branding agreements. We do not generally enter into barter advertising agreements.
· Pay-per-click for content and search. We offer pay-per-click advertising on both the pages of our website and search result pages. When a user performs a search of our site, the user is presented with paid search results along with results directly from our website. Every time a user selects one of the paid-search results, we are paid a portion of the revenue collected by the search result provider. The search result provider is paid on a per-click basis by the advertiser.
· Our Author Resource Center. ARC provides software developers who rely on us as a primary source of distribution with the tools to manage and promote their software on our website through advertising services, including keyword search placements, banners, promotional placements and premium data services to our large, technologically sophisticated audience. The advertising sales
13
business model is based on both the cost charged to send a message to 1,000 receivers, or a cost-per-thousand, variable, and the cost charged when a user clicks on the advertisement, or a cost-per-click through, variable.
We employ advanced software and hardware, combining internal expertise with industry standard technology to create a proprietary platform for the offering of our services. Our provisioning infrastructure is a technical infrastructure that allows Service Providers to provide Internet services to their customers without having to make substantial investments in their own software or hardware. In 2000, our provisioning infrastructure was used primarily to provide domain registration services. Since then, a number of significant enhancements and architectural changes have been made to the infrastructure and its capabilities have been extended to the provisioning of additional Internet services as previously discussed.
The key components of our provisioning infrastructure are as follows:
· Our OpenSRS Platform. This platform acts as an interface between Service Providers, the Service Providers customers, third-party suppliers and our administration. Service Providers use the platform to provision services and recall and edit data with respect to already-provisioned services. To the extent permitted by the Service Providers business and technical infrastructure, the Service Providers customers can use the platform directly to manage their Internet services in an automated fashion. This includes the ability to add, delete, change and transfer domains. Third-party suppliers may have their services added to our OpenSRS platform at our discretion and only after a business evaluation has taken place. Our administrative staff use the OpenSRS platform to support Service Providers and their customers by accessing and, if appropriate, editing data about the provisioned services.
· Service Providers and end-users communicate with OpenSRS by any of the following means:
· Web Interfaces. The OpenSRS Platform has web interfaces that allow Service Providers, end-users and our employees to access the OpenSRS platform from anywhere, at any time, in a secure fashion. The web interfaces, while unbranded, cannot be branded or otherwise customized.
· Application Programming Interfaces, or APIs. The OpenSRS Platform has been designed to be rich in APIs. The APIs allow Service Providers to write software or web-based applications that perform at least substantially the same functions as would otherwise be available through the web interfaces, and often times with greater functionality. This in essence is how Service Providers brand or private-label our services. The existence of APIs empower Service Providers to write their own applications and fully integrate the provisioning of our services with the other services they provide on their website. APIs also enable the Service Providers to create a web interface for their customers in which the management of our services is seamlessly integrated with the management of services that they provide.
· Open Source Client Code. For Service Providers that do not want to write their own software or web-based applications using the APIs, we provide a set of written instructions, or Client Code, that Service Providers can install on their web servers to enable them to provision our services to their customers. Use of the Client Code is an efficient means of provisioning our services and the fact that it is open source gives the Service Provider flexibility in integrating and customizing the environment in which the
14
services are provisioned and managed. Use of either the APIs or the Client Code for the provisioning of services allows the Service Provider to fully preserve their brand.
· Our OpenHRS Platform. We provide a hosted application to registrars that allows them to register domains using their own accreditation. This hosted application has been built using OpenSRS technology and is desirable for registrars because it relieves them of the burden of developing and maintaining their own domain registration infrastructure. Further, the OpenSRS infrastructure, upon which OpenHRS has been built, has already been tested through use in high demand, real-world environments. This is a fee-based service, whereas OpenSRS is a transaction-based service.
Downloadable Software Distribution Network Architecture
We manage an extensive network for distributing software and other digital content using proprietary software and standard hardware. The key elements of the accelerated content delivery network include central servers that we own and servers owned by Service Providers located at their facilities. Bandwidth and update times are minimized by utilizing mirroring software that sends compressed and incremental updates to local Service Providers and affiliates, which results in Service Providers mirror sites being able to keep their libraries more current and provide customers with fresher content. Files are distributed among the mirror sites based on several proprietary algorithms that allow us to manage and host more files than could be maintained at any one location.
U.S. Government Regulation of Domain Names
Under a 1993 cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce, Network Solutions was authorized to act as the sole registry and sole registrar for domain names in the.com,.net and.org, top level domains. In October 1998, the Department of Commerce amended the Network Solutions cooperative agreement to call for the formation of a not-for-profit corporation to oversee the management of, and create policies about, domain names in the.com,.net and.org top level domains. The Department of Commerce also proposed that additional registrars be authorized to register domain names in these domains based upon the idea that competitive registrars would benefit consumers and businesses. ICANN was recognized as this not-for-profit corporation by the Department of Commerce in November 1998.
ICANNs authority is based upon voluntary compliance with its consensus policies. While these policies do not constitute law in the United States or elsewhere, they have a significant influence on the domain name registration system. On December 1, 1999, ICANNs first substantive policy, the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, became effective. This dispute resolution policy was created to address the problem of cybersquatting, or registering the trademark of another as a domain name with the intent to wrongfully profit from the goodwill in that name created by the trademark holder. As ICANN creates additional policies governing the domain name registration system, we will be affected by these policies.
Additionally, there have been ongoing legislative developments and judicial decisions concerning trademark infringement claims, unfair competition claims, and dispute resolution policies relating to the registration of domain names. To help protect ourselves from liability in the face of these ongoing legal developments, we have taken the following precautions:
· Our standard registration agreement requires that each registrant indemnify, defend and hold us harmless for any dispute arising from the registration or use of a domain name registered in that persons name; and
· Since December 1, 1999, we have required our Service Providers to ensure that all registrants are bound to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as approved by ICANN.
15
Despite these precautions, we cannot assure you that our indemnity and dispute resolution policies will be sufficient to protect us against claims asserted by various third parties, including claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition.
New laws or regulations concerning domain names and domain name registrars may be adopted at any time. Our responses to uncertainty in the industry or new regulations could increase our costs or prevent us from delivering our domain name registration services over the Internet, which could delay growth in demand for our services and limit the growth of our revenues. New and existing laws may cover issues such as:
· pricing controls;
· the creation of additional generic top level domains and country code domains;
· consumer protection;
· cross-border domain name registrations;
· trademark, copyright and patent infringement;
· domain name dispute resolution; and
· other claims based on the nature of content of domain names and domain name registration.
In November 1999, the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, or the ACPA, was enacted by the United States government. This law seeks to curtail a practice commonly known in the domain name registration industry as cybersquatting. A cybersquatter is generally defined in the ACPA as one who registers a domain name that is identical or similar to another partys trademark, or the name of another living person, with the bad faith intent to profit from use of the domain name. The ACPA states that registrars may not be held liable for registration or maintenance of a domain name for another person absent a showing of the registrars bad faith intent to profit from the use of the domain name. Registrars may be held liable, however, if they do not comply promptly with procedural provisions of the ACPA. For example, if there is litigation involving a domain name, the registrar is required to deposit a certificate representing the domain name registration with the court. If we are held liable under the ACPA, any liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We believe that we are well positioned in the content services and domain registration markets in part due to our highly recognized Tucows brand. Our success and ability to compete are dependent on our ability to develop and maintain the proprietary aspects of our brand name and technology. We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and copyright laws, as well as contractual restrictions, to protect our intellectual property rights. These legal protections cannot guarantee protection of our intellectual property. Despite precautions, third parties could obtain and use our intellectual property without authorization. The validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property in Internet-related industries is uncertain and still evolving, and the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States and Canada.
We have registered the Tucows trademark in the United States, Canada and the European Union and will seek to register additional service marks and trademarks as appropriate.
We seek to limit disclosure of our intellectual property by requiring all employees and consultants with access to our proprietary information to execute confidentiality, non-disclosure and work-for-hire agreements. All of our employees are required to execute confidentiality and non-use agreements, which provide that any rights they may have in copyrightable works or patentable technologies accrue to us. Before entering into discussions with potential content providers and network partners about our business
16
and technologies, we require these parties to enter into a non-disclosure agreement. If these discussions result in a license or other business relationship, we also generally require that the agreement containing the parties rights and obligations include provisions for the protection of its intellectual property rights.
Effective trademark, service mark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which our services are or will be made available. We also expect to license proprietary rights such as trademarks or copyrighted material to network partners during planned national and international expansion.
During the summer months and certain other times of the year, such as major holidays, Internet usage often declines. As a result, our websites may experience reduced user traffic. For example, our experience shows that new user registrations and site usage declines during the summer months and around the year-end holidays. Seasonality may also affect advertising and affiliate performance that could affect the performance of its websites. These seasonal effects could cause fluctuations in our financial results as well as our performance statistics reported and measured by leading Internet audience measurement services such as Media Metrix, Inc.
While Service Providers are capitalizing on the growth in Internet usage and the demand for new e-business applications and services, they also face significant competition from numerous other Service Providers offering similar applications and services. This has led to a greater focus on core competencies, as Service Providers are increasingly seeking to outsource non-core applications and services that they provide to their end-users. Outsourcing enables these Service Providers to focus better on their customer acquisition and retention efforts by eliminating the need to own, develop and support non-core applications in-house.
We believe that one of our strengths is the quality and dedication of our people and the shared sense of being part of a team. We strive to maintain a work environment that fosters professionalism, excellence, diversity and cooperation among our employees. As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately 160 full time employees. None of our employees are currently represented by a labor union. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth specific information regarding our executive officers as of March 16, 2006.
Name |
|
|
|
Age |
|
Position(s) |
Elliot Noss |
|
43 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
||
Michael Cooperman |
|
54 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
||
David Woroch |
|
43 |
|
Vice President, Sales |
||
Alain Chesnais |
|
49 |
|
Vice President, Product Development |
||
Judith Fields |
|
45 |
|
Vice President, Operations |
||
Carla Goertz |
|
48 |
|
Vice President, Human Resources |
Elliot Noss has served as our president and chief executive officer since May 1999 and served as vice president of corporate services for Tucows Interactive Limited, which was acquired by Tucows in May 1999, from April 1997 to May 1999.
17
Michael Cooperman has served as our chief financial officer since January 2000. From October 1997 to September 1999, Mr. Cooperman was the chief executive officer of Archer Enterprise Systems Inc., a developer of sales force automation software.
David Woroch has served as our vice president, sales since July 2001. From March 2000 to July 2001, Mr. Woroch served as our director of sales for North America. Before joining us, Mr. Woroch spent 13 years at IBM Canada in a variety of roles including sales, marketing, finance and strategic planning.
Alain Chesnais has served as our vice president, product development since July 2005. Before joining us, Mr . Chesnais held the position of director of software development programs at ATI Technologies Inc from April 2004 to July 2005. He held the position of vice president of engineering at TrueSpectra during the period of June 2000 to November 2003 and from May 1993 to June 2000; he held the position of director of engineering at Alias/Wavefront/TDI.
Judith Fields has served as our vice president, operations since July 2005. Prior to her promotion in July 2005 Ms. Fields held the position as our director of business systems since 2000. Prior to joining us Ms. Fields work for Loblaws Companies Limited from 1985 until 1999 were she held a variety of senior roles in both Information Services and Business Systems Development.
Carla Goertz has served as our vice president, human resources since August 2005. Before joining us Ms. Goertz held the position of director human resources at TechData Canada from April 2004 to July 2005. From November 2001 to July 2003 she held the position of vice president of human resources and administration for Castek Inc. Prior to joining Castek Inc. she held the role of vice president human resources at Systems Xcellence Inc.
The executive officers are elected or appointed by our board of directors to serve until the election or appointment and qualification of their successors or their earlier death, resignation or removal.
Our web site address is www.tucowsinc.com. We make available through our web site, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC.
The information on the web site listed above is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference in this document.
We were incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in November 1992. Our executive offices are located at 96 Mowat Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6K 3M1. Our telephone number is (416) 535-0123.
Our business faces significant risks. Some of the following risks relate principally to our business and the industry and statutory and regulatory environment in which we operate. Other risks relate principally to the securities markets and ownership of our stock. The risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risk factors actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer, and the trading price of our common stock could decline.
18
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We may not be able to maintain or improve our competitive position and may be forced to reduce our prices because of strong competition from other competitive registrars.
Before the introduction of competition into the domain registration industry in 1999, Network Solutions LLC, or Network Solutions, was the only entity authorized by the U.S. government to serve as the registrar for domains in the .com, .net and .org domains. This position allowed Network Solutions to develop a substantial customer base, which gives it advantages in securing customer renewals and in developing and marketing ancillary products and services. In addition to Network Solutions, we face significant competition from other existing registrars and the continued introduction of new registrars in the domain registration industry. As of February 28, 2006, ICANN had accredited 574 competitive registrars, including our company, to register domains in one or more of the generic top-level domains, or gTLDs, though not all of these accredited registrars are operational. The continued introduction of competitive registrars and Service Providers into the domain registration industry and the rapid growth of some competitive registrars and Service Providers who have already entered the industry may make it difficult for us to maintain our current market share. Some of these registrars may have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, particularly in international markets, or greater resources than us. We expect that competition will increase in the near term and that our primary long-term competitors may not yet have entered the market. As a result, we may not be able to compete effectively.
The market for domain registrations continues to be extremely competitive as participants strive to protect their current market share and improve their competitive position. VeriSign Global Registry Services, or VeriSign, currently charges registrars who use its shared registration system $6 for each registration, which most registrars, including our company, pass on to their customers. Some of our competitors offer registration services at a price level minimally above the registry and the ICANN fees for each domain registered in the .com and .net registry. Other competitors have reduced and may continue to reduce their pricing for domain registrations both for short-term promotions and on a permanent basis. Our competitors have also offered domain registrations free in a bundle of other products, deriving their revenues from other products and services. In addition, some of these competitors have experienced a significant increase in their registrations, suggesting that customers are becoming more price sensitive.
As our business model is premised upon selling multiple services through our Service Providers, we have competed aggressively to attract new clients and retain existing customers. As a result of these actions, our average selling prices have fallen and we may be required, by marketplace factors or otherwise, to reduce, perhaps significantly, the prices we charge for our core domain registration and related products and services. The decline in our average selling price has partially offset the impact of increased transaction volume on our revenue and profitability. The likelihood of further declines in our selling price will increase if our competitors who charge these reduced fees are able to maintain customer service comparable to ours. We may face continued pricing pressure in order to remain competitive, which would adversely impact our revenues and profitability. While we anticipate that the number of new, renewed and transferred-in domain registrations will incrementally increase, volatility in the market could result in our customers turning to other registrars, thereby impairing growth in the number of domains under our management and our ability to sell multiple services to such customers. Since our strategy is to expand the services we provide our customers, if we are unable to maintain our domain registrations, our ability to expand our business may be adversely effected.
Each registry and the ICANN regulatory body impose a charge upon the registrar for the administration of each domain registration. If these fees increase, this may have an impact upon our profits.
Each registry typically imposes a fee in association with the registration of each domain. For example, at present, the VeriSign registry charges a $6 fee. ICANN charges a $0.25 fee for each domain name
19
registered in the TLDs that fall within its purview. We have no control over these agencies and cannot predict when they may increase their respective fees. Any increase in these fees must either be included in the prices we charge to our Service Providers or it must be imposed as a surcharge. If we absorb such cost increases or if surcharges act as a deterrent to registration, we may find that our profits are adversely impacted by these third-party fees.
If we are unable to improve our sales of existing TLDs, improve our renewal rate or generate alternate revenue streams, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Although the overall number of registrations in each new gTLD that has been launched has been significantly lower than the number of .com registrations, the introduction of new gTLDs and ccTLDs have contributed to our revenues. We expect to launch the mobi gTLD and the .eu CCTLD in the near future but have no way to assess the contribution that any such incremental sales will generate. However, in order to grow our revenues, we need to increase sales of existing TLDs, renewals, transfers or other products and services in lieu of the opportunities that were presented by the new gTLDs in 2001 and early 2002. Our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if the market for existing TLDs does not develop, if additional new top-level domains are not introduced or if substantial numbers of our customers turn to other registrars for their registration needs.
We rely on our network of Service Providers to renew their domain registrations through us and to distribute our applications and services, and if we are unable to maintain these relationships or establish new relationships, our revenues will decline.
The growth of our business depends on, among other things, our Service Providers renewal of their customers domain registrations through us. Service Providers may choose to renew their domains with other registrars or their registrants may choose not to renew and pay for renewal of their domains. If Service Providers decide, for any reason, not to renew their registrations through us, our revenues from domain registrations will decrease.
We believe that companies operating on the Internet are facing a period of consolidation. In addition, some of our Service Providers may decide to seek ICANN accreditation. Both of these situations could reduce the number of our active Service Providers, in which case our revenues may suffer.
If any of our competitors merge with one another, they will present a stronger combined force in the market and may attract the business of both existing and prospective Service Providers. Service Providers may opt to build their own technical systems and seek ICANN accreditation in order that they may process domain applications themselves. If a number of our customers decide to pursue this option, our sales will decrease.
Our failure to secure agreements with country code registries or our subsequent failure to comply with the regulations of the country code registries could cause customers to seek a registrar that offers these services.
The country code top-level domain, or ccTLD, registries require registrars to comply with specific regulations. Many of these regulations vary from ccTLD to ccTLD. If we fail to comply with the regulations imposed by ccTLD registries, these registries will likely prohibit us from registering or continuing to register domains in their ccTLD. Any failure on our part to offer domain registrations in a significant number of ccTLDs or in a popular ccTLD would cause us to lose a competitive advantage and could cause Service Providers to elect to take their business to a registrar that does offer these services.
20
Our standard domain registration agreement may not be enforceable, which could subject us to liability.
We operate on a global basis and all of our Service Providers must execute our standard domain registration agreement as part of the process of registering a domain. This agreement contains provisions intended to limit our potential liability arising from our registration of domains on behalf of our Service Providers and their customers, including liability resulting from our failure to register or maintain domains. If a domestic, foreign or international court were to find that the registration agreement is unenforceable, we could be subject to liability.
If we cannot obtain or develop additional applications and services that are appealing to our customers, we may remain dependent on domain registrations as a primary source of revenue and our net revenues may fall below anticipated levels.
A key part of our long-term strategy is to diversify our revenue base by offering our Service Providers additional value-added products and services that address their evolving business needs. Although we have recently experienced increased sales for new products and services such as email and web certificates, our efforts to date have not resulted in substantial diversification. We cannot be sure that we will be able to license new applications and services at a commercially viable cost or at all, or that we will be able to cost-effectively develop the applications in-house. If we cannot obtain or develop these applications on a cost-effective basis and cannot expand the range of our service offerings, sales of our services may suffer as Service Providers turn to alternate providers that are able to more fully supply their business needs.
As part of our diversification strategy, we recently acquired the hosted messaging business of a leading email services providers. The acquisition expands our presence in the email market but also increases our exposure in this volatile business. As we integrate the new business into our existing operations, a number of factors are likely to contribute to fluctuations in our operating results; these include:
· the demand for outsourced messaging services;
· our ability to attract and retain customers and provide customer satisfaction;
· the ability to upgrade, develop and maintain our systems and infrastructure and to effectively respond to the rapid technological changes in the messaging market;
· the budgeting and payment cycles of our existing and potential customers;
· the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion of the messaging business; and
· the introduction of new or enhanced services by competitors.
In order to succeed in the hosted messaging business, our email product must remain competitive. We believe that some of the competitive factors affecting the market for hosted messaging services include:
· breadth of platform features and functionality of our offering and the sophistication and innovation of our competitors;
· scalability, reliability, performance and ease of expansion and upgrade;
· ease of integration with customers existing systems; and
· flexibility to enable customers to manage certain aspects of their systems and leverage outsourced services in other cases when resources , costs and time to market reasons favor an outsourced offering.
We believe competition will continue to be strong and further increase as our market attracts new competition, current competitors aggressively pursue customers, increase the sophistication of their
21
offerings and as new participants enter the market. Many of our current and potential customers have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition in the business and greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. Any delay in our development and delivery of new services or enhancement of existing services would allow our competitors additional time to improve their product offerings and provide time for new competition to develop and market messaging services. Increased competition could result in pricing pressures, reduced operating margins and loss of market share, any of which could cause our financial results to decline.
If we are unable to maintain our relationships with our customers, our revenue may decline.
We obtain revenues by distributing applications and services through our network of Service Providers. We also rely on our Service Providers to market, promote and sell our services. Our ability to increase revenues in the future will depend significantly on our ability to maintain our customer network, to sell more services through existing Service Providers and to develop our relationships with existing Service Providers by providing customer and sales support and additional products. Service Providers have no obligations to distribute our applications and services and may stop doing so at any time. If we are not able to maintain our relationships with Service Providers, our ability to distribute our applications and services will be harmed, and our revenue may decline.
With respect to our hosted messaging product, we rely on a limited number of customers for a high percentage of our revenues. The loss of one or several of these major customers, whether through termination of agreement, acquisition or bankruptcy, could have a significant impact on our revenues. Our agreements with our email customers typically have terms of one to three years often with automatic one-year renewals and can be terminated without cause upon certain notice periods that vary among our agreements and range from a period of 30 to 120 days notice.
We believe that part of our growth will be derived from Service Providers in international markets and may suffer if Internet usage does not continue to grow globally.
We believe that a major source of growth for Internet-based companies will come from individuals and businesses outside the United States where Internet access and use is less prevalent. A substantial number of our Service Providers are currently based outside the United States and we plan to grow our business in other countries. If Internet use in these jurisdictions does not increase as anticipated, our revenues may not grow as anticipated.
We currently license many third party technologies and may need to license further technologies which could delay and increase the cost of product and service developments
We currently license certain technologies from third parties and incorporate them into certain of our products and services including email, anti-spam, anti-virus and web site publishing tools. The internet services market is evolving and we may need to license additional technologies to remain competitive. We may not be able to license these technologies on commercially reasonable terms or at all. To the extent we cannot license necessary solutions, we may have to devote our resources to development of such technologies which could delay and increase the cost of product and service developments overall.
In addition, we may fail to successfully integrate licensed technology into our services. These third party licenses may expose us to increased risks, including risks related to the integration of new technology and potential intellectual property infringement claims. In addition, an inability to obtain needed licenses could delay product and service development until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed and integrated. Any delays in services or integration problems could hinder our ability to attract and retain customers and cause our business and operating results to suffer.
22
We depend on third parties for free and low cost web-based content.
We access and provide web-based content for certain of our content notification and other sites. We access this content mainly by searching selected websites and then providing links to relevant content from the individual sites. Typically, we pay no fee, or a nominal fee, for accessing web-based content in this manner. Our ability to continue to use web-based content in this manner without cost, or for nominal fees, is fundamental to our goal of providing free, or low cost, content notification sites. If the market changes and owners begin to charge more significant fees for accessing material from their websites, we will incur additional expenses to provide the service or we may decide to no longer provide the service.
Our advertising revenues may be subject to fluctuations.
We believe that Internet advertising spending, as in traditional media, fluctuates significantly with economic cycles and during any calendar year, with spending being weighted towards the end of the year to reflect trends in the retail industry. Our advertisers can generally terminate their contracts with us at any time. Advertising spending is particularly sensitive to changes in general economic conditions and typically decreases when economic conditions are not favorable. A decrease in demand for Internet advertising could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may acquire companies or make investments in, or enter into licensing arrangements with, other companies with technologies that are complementary to our business and these acquisitions or arrangements could disrupt our business and dilute your holdings in our company.
We may acquire companies or the rights to technologies in the future. Entering into these types of arrangements entails many risks, any of which could materially harm our business, including:
· diversion of managements attention from other business concerns;
· failure to effectively integrate the acquired technology or company into our business;
· the loss of key employees from either our current business or the acquired business; and
· assumption of significant liabilities of the acquired company.
· In addition, your holdings in our company will be diluted if we issue equity securities in connection with any acquisition or arrangement.
Our corporate culture has contributed to our success, and if we cannot maintain this culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, creativity and teamwork fostered by our culture, and our business may be harmed.
We believe that a critical contributor to our success has been our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, creativity and teamwork. As our organization grows and we are required to implement more complex organizational management structures, we may find it increasingly difficult to maintain the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. This could negatively impact our future success.
Our business depends on a strong brand. If we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand, our ability to expand our customer base will be impaired and our business and operating results will be harmed.
We believe that the brand identity we have developed has significantly contributed to the success of our business. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing the Tucows brand is critical to expanding our customer base. We anticipate that, as our market becomes increasingly competitive, maintaining and enhancing our brand may become increasingly difficult and expensive. Maintaining and enhancing our brand will depend largely on our ability to be a technology leader providing high quality products and services, which we may not do successfully. To date, we have engaged in relatively little direct brand
23
promotion activities. This enhances the risk that we may not successfully implement brand enhancement efforts in the future.
If we fail to protect our proprietary rights, the value of those rights could be diminished.
We rely upon copyright, trade secret and trademark law, confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements, invention assignment agreements and work-for-hire agreements to protect our proprietary technology. We cannot ensure that our efforts to protect our proprietary information will be adequate to protect against infringement and misappropriation by third parties, particularly in foreign countries where laws or law enforcement practices may not protect proprietary rights as fully as in the United States and Canada.
We have licensed, and may in the future license, some of our trademarks and other proprietary rights to others. Third parties may also reproduce or use our intellectual property rights without seeking a license and thus benefit from our technology without paying for it. Third parties could also independently develop technology, processes or other intellectual property that are similar to or superior to those used by us. Actions by licensees, misappropriation of the intellectual property rights or independent development by others of similar or superior technology might diminish the value of our proprietary rights or damage our reputation.
The unauthorized reproduction or other misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, including copying the look, feel and functionality of our website could enable third parties to benefit from our technology without us receiving any compensation.
The law relating to the use of and ownership in intellectual property on the Internet is currently unsettled and may expose us to unforeseen liabilities.
There have been ongoing legislative developments and judicial decisions concerning trademark infringement claims, unfair competition claims and dispute resolution policies relating to the registration of domains. To help protect ourselves from liability in the face of these ongoing legal developments, we have taken the following precautions:
Our standard registration agreement requires that each registrant indemnify, defend and hold us harmless for any dispute arising from the registration or use of a domain registered in that persons name; and
Since December 1, 1999, we have required our Service Providers to ensure that all registrants are bound to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as approved by ICANN.
Despite these precautions, we cannot assure you that our indemnity and dispute resolution policies will be sufficient to protect us against claims asserted by various third parties, including claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition.
New laws or regulations concerning domains and registrars may be adopted at any time. Our responses to uncertainty in the industry or new regulations could increase our costs or prevent us from delivering our domain registration services over the Internet, which could delay growth in demand for our services and limit the growth of our revenues. New and existing laws may cover issues such as:
· pricing controls;
· the creation of additional generic top level domains and country code domains;
· consumer protection;
· cross-border domain registrations;
24
· trademark, copyright and patent infringement;
· domain dispute resolution; and
· the nature or content of domains and domain registration.
An example of legislation passed in response to novel intellectual property concerns created by the Internet is the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act or ACPA enacted by the United States government in November 1999. This law seeks to curtail a practice commonly known in the domain registration industry as cybersquatting. A cybersquatter is generally defined in the ACPA as one who registers a domain that is identical or similar to another partys trademark, or the name of another living person, with the bad faith intent to profit from use of the domain. The ACPA states that registrars may not be held liable for registration or maintenance of a domain for another person absent a showing of the registrars bad faith intent to profit from the use of the domain. Registrars may be held liable, however, if they do not comply promptly with procedural provisions of the ACPA. For example, if there is litigation involving a domain, the registrar is required to deposit a certificate representing the domain registration with the court. If we are held liable under the ACPA, any liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Once any infringement is detected, disputes concerning the ownership or rights to use intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming to litigate, may distract management from operating the business, and may result in us losing significant rights and our ability to operate all or a portion of our business.
Claims of infringement of intellectual property or other rights of third parties against us could result in substantial costs. Third parties may assert claims of infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights against us concerning past, current or future technologies.
Content obtained from third parties and distributed over the Internet by us may result in liability for defamation, negligence, intellectual property infringement, product or service liability and dissemination of computer viruses or other disruptive problems. We may also be subject to claims from third parties asserting trademark infringement, unfair competition and violation of publicity and privacy rights relating specifically to domains. These claims may include claims under the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, or ACPA, which was enacted in the United States to curtail the registration of a domain that is identical or similar to another partys trademark or the name of a living person with the bad faith intent to profit from use of the domain.
These claims and any related litigation could result in significant costs of defense, liability for damages and diversion of managements time and attention. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims unless we are able to enter into agreements with the third parties making these claims. If a successful claim of infringement is brought against us and we fail to develop non-infringing technology or to license the infringed or similar technology on a timely basis, we may have to limit or discontinue the business operations which used the infringing technology.
We rely on technologies licensed from other parties. These third-party technology licenses may infringe on the proprietary rights of others and may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The loss of this technology could require us to obtain substitute technology of lower quality or performance standards or at greater cost, which could increase our costs and make our products and services less attractive to customers.
25
The law relating to the liability of online services companies for data and content carried on or disseminated through their networks is currently unsettled and could expose us to unforeseen liabilities.
It is possible that claims could be made against online services companies under U.S., Canadian or foreign law for defamation, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, or other theories based on data or content disseminated through their networks, even if a user independently originated this data or content. Several private lawsuits seeking to impose liability upon Internet service companies have been filed in U.S. and foreign courts. While the United States has passed laws protecting ISPs from liability for actions by independent users in limited circumstances, this protection may not apply in any particular case at issue. Our ability to monitor, censor or otherwise restrict the types of data or content distributed through our network is limited. Failure to comply with any applicable laws or regulations in particular jurisdictions could result in fines, penalties or the suspension or termination of our services in these jurisdictions. Our insurance may not be adequate to compensate or may not cover us at all in the event we incur liability for damages due to data and content carried on or disseminated through our network. Any costs not covered by insurance that are incurred as a result of this liability or alleged liability, including any damages awarded and costs of litigation, could harm our business and prospects.
Currency fluctuations may adversely affect us.
Our revenue is primarily realized in U.S. dollars and a significant portion of our operating expenses is paid in Canadian dollars. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar may have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results from operations. In particular, we may be adversely affected by a significant weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar on a quarterly and an annual basis. Our policy with respect to foreign currency exposure is to manage financial exposure to certain foreign exchange fluctuations with the objective of neutralizing some of the impact of foreign currency exchange movements by entering into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the exchange risk on a portion of our Canadian dollar exposure. We may not always enter into such forward contracts and such contracts may not always be available and economical for us. We do not account for these instruments as hedges in our consolidated financial statements.
If we do not maintain a low rate of credit card chargebacks, we will face the prospect of financial penalties and could lose our ability to accept credit card payments from customers, which would have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A substantial majority of our revenues originates from online credit card transactions. Under current credit card industry practices, we are liable for fraudulent and disputed credit card transactions because we do not obtain the cardholders signature at the time of the transaction, even though the financial institution issuing the credit card may have authorized the transaction. Under credit card association rules, penalties may be imposed at the discretion of the association. Any such potential penalties would be imposed on our credit card processor by the association. Under our contract with our processor, we are required to reimburse our processor for such penalties. Our current level of fraud protection, based on our fraudulent and disputed credit card transaction history, is within the guidelines established by the credit card associations. However, we face the risk that one or more credit card associations may, at any time, assess penalties against us or terminate our ability to accept credit card payments from customers, which would have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Forecasting our tax rate is complex and subject to uncertainty.
We are subject to income and other taxes in a number of jurisdictions and our tax structure is subject to review by both domestic and foreign tax authorities. We must make significant assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine our current provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance that may be recorded against our deferred tax assets. Although we believe that our
26
estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and may materially affect our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made. Our current and future tax liabilities could be adversely affected by:
· international income tax authorities, including the Canada Revenue Agency and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, challenging the validity of our arms-length related party transfer pricing policies or the validity of our contemporaneous documentation. Currently, we are undergoing a transfer pricing audit by the Canada Revenue Agency with respect to our 2000 and 2001 taxation years.
· changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets; or
· changes in tax laws or the interpretations of such laws.
While we believe we have adequate internal control over financial reporting, we are required to evaluate our internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any adverse results from such evaluation could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on the price of our shares of common stock.
We are currently in the process of planning for the evaluation, documentation and testing of our internal control systems in order to permit our management to be in a position to report on, and our independent auditors to attest to, our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, as currently required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley). While we believe our internal control over financial reporting is effective and are currently planning for timely completion of such documentation, testing and evaluation, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley by December 31, 2007. We cannot be certain that we will be able to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that such internal control is effective. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2007 (or if our auditors are unable to assert that our managements report is fairly stated or they are unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price. In addition, it could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. In addition, although the SECs Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies (Advisory Committee) has published for public comment an exposure draft of their final report and proposed recommendations in which reduced requirements under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley for non-accelerated filers such as ourselves are contemplated, no changes to the current requirements have been formally proposed nor is there any assurance that the Commission will propose or adopt such changes for any companies including non-accelerated filers. Should the Commission not adopt the changes recommended by the Advisory Committee, we anticipate that our costs relating to Sarbanes-Oxley will increase and become significant in future periods.
New accounting pronouncements may require us to change the way in which we account for our operational or business activities.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB, and other bodies that have jurisdiction over the form and content of our accounts are constantly discussing proposals designed to ensure that companies best display relevant and transparent information relating to their respective businesses. The effect of the pronouncements of FASB and other bodies may have the effect of requiring us to account for revenues and/or expenses in a different manner than at present. In particular, in fiscal 2006, FASB will require us to expense the fair value of stock options, resulting in increased expenses in our income statement and a reduction of our net income and earnings per share. The impact of applying a fair value method of
27
accounting for stock options on a pro-forma basis in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the impact of which may be different than SFAS No. 123R, is disclosed in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
We could suffer uninsured losses.
Although we maintain general liability insurance, claims could exceed the coverage obtained or might not be covered by our insurance. While we typically obtain representations from our technology and content providers and contractual partners concerning the ownership of licensed technology and informational content and obtain indemnification to cover any breach of these representations, we still may not receive accurate representations or adequate compensation for any breach of these representations. We may have to pay a substantial amount of money for claims that are not covered by insurance or indemnification or for claims where the existing scope or adequacy of insurance or indemnification is disputed or insufficient.
Current world events and economic trends may have a negative impact on our sales.
Our sales are subject to risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global economic conditions and fluctuations in consumer confidence and spending. As a result, our sales may decline as a result of factors beyond our control, such as war and terrorism. These events include ongoing armed conflicts and retaliatory terrorist attacks. Any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the global markets and economy. If any of the foregoing events occur, our sales may decline and our business may be adversely affected.
Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate and our future revenues and profitability are uncertain.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Our quarterly and annual operating results may be adversely affected by a wide variety of factors, including:
· our ability to maintain revenue growth at current levels or anticipate a decline in revenue from any of our services;
· our ability to identify and develop new technologies or services and to commercialize those technologies into new services in a timely manner;
· the mix of our services sold during the quarter or year;
· our ability to make appropriate decisions which will position us to achieve further growth;
· changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors and other competitive pressures on selling prices;
· our ability to identify, hire, train, motivate and retain highly qualified personnel, and to achieve targeted productivity levels;
· market acceptance of Internet services generally and of new and enhanced versions of our services in particular;
· our ability to establish and maintain a competitive advantage;
· the continued development of our global distribution channel and our ability to compete in multiple countries successfully as part of our sales and marketing strategy;
· the number and significance of service enhancements and new service and technology announcements by our competitors;
28
· our ability to identify, develop, deliver, and introduce in a timely manner new and enhanced versions of our current service offerings that anticipate market demand and address customer needs;
· changes in foreign currency exchange rates and issues relating to the conversion to the Canadian dollar;
· foreign, federal or state regulation affecting our business;
· our ability to continue to attract users to our website;
· our ability to attract software developers to participate in our Author Resource Center;
· our ability to continue to attract advertisers to place content on our website
· interruptions in our services;
· seasonality of the markets and businesses of our customers;
· news relating to our industry as a whole;
· our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights;
· our ability to manage internet fraud and information theft; and
· changes in methods used for the accounting of stock options.
Our operating expenses may increase. We base our operating expense budgets on expected revenue trends that are more difficult to predict in periods of economic uncertainty. We intend to continue our efforts to control discretionary spending; however, we will continue to selectively incur expenditures in areas that we believe will strengthen our position in the marketplace. If we do not meet revenue goals, we may not be able to meet reduced operating expense levels and our operating results will suffer. It is possible that in one or more future quarters, our operating results may be below our expectations and the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In that event, the price of our shares of common stock may fall.
Risks Related To the Internet and Our Technology
Our business could be materially harmed if the administration and operation of the Internet no longer rely upon the existing domain system.
The domain registration industry continues to develop and adapt to changing technology. This development may include changes in the administration or operation of the Internet, including the creation and institution of alternate systems for directing Internet traffic without the use of the existing domain system. Some of our competitors have begun registering domains with extensions that rely on such alternate systems. These competitors are not subject to ICANN accreditation requirements and restrictions. Other competitors have attempted to introduce naming systems that use keywords rather than traditional domains. The widespread acceptance of any alternative systems could eliminate the need to register a domain to establish an online presence and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
29
If Internet usage does not grow or if the Internet does not continue to expand as a medium for commerce, our business may suffer.
Our success depends upon the continued development and acceptance of the Internet as a widely used medium for commerce and communication. Rapid growth in the uses of, and interest in, the Internet is a relatively recent phenomenon and its continued growth cannot be assured. A number of factors could prevent continued growth, development and acceptance, including:
· the unwillingness of companies and consumers to shift their purchasing from traditional vendors to online vendors;
· the Internet infrastructure may not be able to support the demands placed on it, and its performance and reliability may decline as usage grows;
· security and authentication issues may create concerns with respect to the transmission over the Internet of confidential information; and
· privacy concerns, including those related to the ability of websites to gather user information without the users knowledge or consent, may impact consumers willingness to interact online.
Any of these issues could slow the growth of the Internet, which could limit our growth and revenues.
We may be unable to respond to the rapid technological changes in the industry, and our attempts to respond may require significant capital expenditures.
The Internet and electronic commerce are characterized by rapid technological change. Sudden changes in user and customer requirements and preferences, the frequent introduction of new applications and services embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices could make our applications, services and systems obsolete. The emerging nature of applications and services in the Internet application and services industry and their rapid evolution will require that we continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our applications and services. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability:
· to develop and license new applications, services and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our current and prospective customers; and
· to respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis.
The development of applications and services and other proprietary technology involves significant technological and business risks and requires substantial expenditures and lead-time. We may be unable to use new technologies effectively or adapt our internally developed technology and transaction-processing systems to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. Updating technology internally and licensing new technology from third parties may require us to incur significant additional capital expenditures.
We could experience system failures and capacity constraints which would cause interruptions in our services and ultimately cause us to lose customers.
Our ability to maintain our computer hardware and software and telecommunications equipment in working order and to reasonably protect them from error and interruption is critical to our success. Failures and interruptions of, and the slowing of response times on, these systems could be caused by:
· an increase in the traffic on our websites that outstrips our system capacity;
· natural disasters, power losses, telecommunications failures, break-ins and similar events;
30
· computer viruses and electronic break-ins;
· errors, defects and bugs in software;
· failure or inability to upgrade technical infrastructure to handle unexpected surges in customer levels and increases in customers usage of bandwidth;
· failure of third-party bandwidth providers to maintain the services they supply to us; and
· failure of infrastructure providers such as electricity providers.
Substantial or persistent system failures could result in:
· loss of customers;
· loss of or delay in revenue; and
· failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance.
Our systems face security risks, and any compromise of the security of these systems could result in liability for damages and in lost customers.
Our security systems may be vulnerable to unauthorized access by hackers or others, computer viruses and other disruptive problems. Someone who is able to circumvent security measures could misappropriate customer or proprietary information or cause interruptions in Internet operations. Internet and online service providers have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, interruptions in service because of the accidental or intentional actions of Internet users, current and former employees or others. We may need to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of security breaches or alleviate problems caused by breaches. Unauthorized persons may be able to circumvent the measures that are implemented in the future. Eliminating computer viruses and alleviating other security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessation of service to users accessing our websites and the web pages that deliver our content services. Repeated or substantial interruptions could result in the loss of customers and reduced revenues.
Users might circumvent the measures we take to protect customers private and confidential information, such as credit card numbers. Security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to litigation and possible liability, including claims for unauthorized purchases with credit card information, impersonation or other similar fraud claims and for other misuses of personal information, including for unauthorized marketing purposes. We may also incur significant costs to protect against security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission in the United States and state agencies have investigated various Internet companies regarding their use of personal information. The federal government has enacted legislation protecting the privacy of consumers nonpublic personal information. We cannot guarantee that our current information-collection procedures and disclosure policies will be found to be in compliance with existing or future laws or regulations. Our failure to comply with existing laws, including those of foreign countries, the adoption of new laws or regulations regarding the use of personal information that require us to change the way we conduct business or an investigation of our privacy practices, could increase the costs of operating our business.
Lack of consumer confidence in the security of on-line financial transactions could negatively impact our business.
Consumers may not adopt online services if they are not confident that financial transactions over the Internet can be undertaken securely and confidentially. Although there is security technology currently available for online transactions, many Internet users may not use the Internet for commercial transactions because of security concerns. These concerns may be heightened by well-publicized security breaches of
31
any Internet-related service, which could deter consumers from using our services provided by our solution. If consumers do not have confidence in the security for online services transactions that the current technologies provide, our revenue will not increase and may decrease.
We may be accused of intellectual property infringement of the technology we have employed to support both our back end platform and the products and services we offer to and through our Service Providers and may be sued for damages caused by actual use of the platforms or products and services and we may be required to pay substantial damage awards.
We seek to ensure that we have licensed or otherwise secured the necessary rights to use and offer for use all intellectual property relating to our platforms and the services we offer Service Providers through the platforms. Despite our efforts, we may be sued by third parties claiming rights in and to the technology we employ or by third parties who claim to have suffered as a result of any use, or inability to use, the platforms, products and services. If we are sued, defense of any such claims may require the resources of both our time and money. If a third-party is successful in its assertions, we may be required to pay damages that may have a material impact on our financial resources.
Governmental and Regulatory Risks
Governmental and regulatory policies or claims concerning the domain registration system, and industry reactions to those policies or claims, may cause instability in the industry and disrupt our domain registration business.
Before 1999, Network Solutions managed the domain registration system for the .com, .net and .org domains on an exclusive basis under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. government. In November 1998, the U.S. Department of Commerce authorized ICANN to oversee key aspects of the domain registration system. ICANN has been subject to strict scrutiny by the public and by the government in the United States. For example, in the United States, Congress has held hearings to evaluate ICANNs selection process for new top level domains. In addition, ICANN faces significant questions regarding its financial viability and efficacy as a private sector entity. ICANN may continue to evolve both its long term structure and mission to address perceived shortcomings such as a lack of accountability to the public and a failure to maintain a diverse representation of interests on its board of directors. We continue to face the risks that:
· the U.S. or any other government may reassess its decision to introduce competition into, or ICANNs role in overseeing, the domain registration market;
· the Internet community or the U.S. Department of Commerce or U.S. Congress may refuse to recognize ICANNs authority or support its policies, which could create instability in the domain registration system;
· ICANN may lose any one of the several claims pending against it in both the U.S. and international courts, in which case its credibility may suffer and its policies may be discredited;
· ICANN may attempt to impose additional fees on registrars if it fails to obtain funding sufficient to run its operations;
· the terms of the registrar accreditation process could change in ways that are disadvantageous to us; and
· international regulatory bodies, such as the International Telecommunications Union or the European Union, may gain increased influence over the management and regulation of the domain registration system, leading to increased regulation in areas such as taxation and privacy.
32
In addition, ICANN has established policies and practices for itself and the companies it accredits to act as domain registries and registrars. Some of ICANNs policies and practices, and the policies and practices adopted by registries and registrars, could be found to conflict with the laws of one or more jurisdictions.
If any of these events occur, they could create instability in the domain registration system. These events could also disrupt or suspend portions of our domain registration solution, which would result in reduced revenue.
We may be subject to government regulation that may be costly and may interfere with our ability to conduct business.
Although transmission of our websites primarily originates in Canada and the United States, the Internet is global in nature. Governments of foreign countries might try to regulate our transmissions or prosecute us for violations of their laws. Because of the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, federal, state and foreign governments may adopt laws or regulations in the future concerning commercial online services and the Internet, with respect to:
· user privacy;
· children;
· copyrights and other intellectual property rights and infringement;
· domains;
· pricing;
· content regulation;
· defamation;
· taxation; and
· the characteristics and quality of products and services.
Laws and regulations directly applicable to online commerce or Internet communications are becoming more prevalent. Laws and regulations such as those listed above or others, if enacted, could expose us to substantial liability and increase our costs of compliance and doing business.
We do not intend to declare dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We anticipate that for the foreseeable future, our earnings, if any, will be retained for use in the business and that no cash dividends will be paid on our common stock. Declaration of dividends on our common stock will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, our operating and financial condition, our capital requirements and general business conditions.
We are controlled by a limited number of principal shareholders, which may limit your ability to influence corporate matters.
As of December 31, 2005, our four principal shareholders beneficially own approximately 34% of our shares of common stock. These shareholders could control the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our shareholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and also could prevent or cause a change in control. The interests of these shareholders may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders.
33
Third parties may be discouraged from making a tender offer or bid to acquire us because of this concentration of ownership.
Our share price is volatile, which may make it difficult for shareholders to sell their shares of common stock when they want to, at an attractive price.
Our share price has varied recently and the price of our common stock may decrease in the future, regardless of our operating performance. Investors may be unable to resell their common stock following periods of volatility because of the markets adverse reaction to this volatility.
The following factors may contribute to this volatility:
· actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;
· interruptions in our services;
· seasonality of the markets and businesses of our customers;
· announcements of new technologies or new services by our company or our competitors;
· our ability to accurately select appropriate business models and strategies;
· the impact that terrorist acts or military action may have on global economic conditions and the impact that this will have on our customers or business;
· the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may view as comparable to us;
· news relating to our industry as a whole; and
· news relating to trends in our markets.
The stock market in general, and the market for Internet-related companies in particularr, including our company, has experienced extreme volatility. This volatility often has been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may cause the price of our shares of common stock to drop, regardless of our performance.
Future sales of shares of common stock by our existing shareholders could cause our share price to fall.
If our shareholders sell substantial amounts of shares of common stock in the public market, the market price of the shares of common stock could fall. The perception among investors that these sales will occur could also produce this effect.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
We do not own any real property. Our principal administrative, engineering, marketing and sales office totals approximately 26,937 square feet and is located in Toronto, Ontario under a lease that expires on December 31, 2011. We also maintain offices of approximately 5,000 square feet in Flint, Michigan, and approximately 4,000 square feet in Starkville, Mississippi.
Substantially all of our computer and communications hardware is located at our facilities or at server hosting facilities in Toronto, Ontario, Denver, Colorado and London, England.
34
We are involved in various investigations, claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, none of which, in our opinion will harm our business. We cannot assure that we will prevail in any litigation. Regardless of the outcome, any litigation may require us to incur significant litigation expense and may result in significant diversion of management attention.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
35
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock trades on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol TCX. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices for our common stock for the periods indicated.
Year |
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
2004 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
0.76 |
|
0.41 |
|
||
|
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
0.86 |
|
0.54 |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
0.63 |
|
0.45 |
|
||
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
0.79 |
|
0.47 |
|
||
2005 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
1.23 |
|
0.67 |
|
||
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
1.01 |
|
0.80 |
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
1.16 |
|
0.89 |
|
||
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
0.97 |
|
0.78 |
|
We were listed on the OTC Bulletin Board maintained by Nasdaq under the symbol TCOW through August 17, 2005. Our common stock began trading on the American Stock Exchange on August 18, 2005.
As of March 15, 2006, Tucows had 276 shareholders of record, which excludes shareholders whose shares are held in nominee or street name by brokers.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to do so in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. The financial data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated statement of operations data set forth below for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are derived from our consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated statement of operations data set forth below for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, but have been previously filed with the SEC.
36
The historical data is only a summary, and you should read it with our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
48,517 |
|
$ |
44,717 |
|
$ |
37,195 |
|
$ |
37,046 |
|
$ |
31,590 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
|
30,645 |
|
27,566 |
|
22,990 |
|
23,108 |
|
21,106 |
|
|||||
Sales and marketing |
|
4,855 |
|
5,068 |
|
3,850 |
|
3,771 |
|
6,380 |
|
|||||
Technical operations and development |
|
5,628 |
|
4,549 |
|
3,935 |
|
3,726 |
|
5,053 |
|
|||||
General and administrative |
|
4,346 |
|
4,108 |
|
3,998 |
|
4,523 |
|
4,013 |
|
|||||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
952 |
|
1,119 |
|
1,490 |
|
2,676 |
|
3,203 |
|
|||||
Loss on write-off of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
236 |
|
158 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
3,657 |
|
|||||
Write-down of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|||||
Total Expenses |
|
46,662 |
|
42,568 |
|
36,263 |
|
38,026 |
|
44,867 |
|
|||||
Income (loss) from operations |
|
1,855 |
|
2,149 |
|
932 |
|
(980 |
) |
(13,277 |
) |
|||||
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Interest income (expense), net |
|
462 |
|
201 |
|
131 |
|
102 |
|
(136 |
) |
|||||
Other income |
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gain on disposal of Electric Library subscription assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
|||||
Gain on disposal of Liberty Registry Management Services Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
|||||
Loss on disposal of Eklektix Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Write down of investment in bigchalk.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Total other income (expenses) |
|
765 |
|
201 |
|
1,131 |
|
2,847 |
|
(136 |
) |
|||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
2,620 |
|
2,350 |
|
2,063 |
|
1,867 |
|
(13,413 |
) |
|||||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes |
|
(152 |
) |
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) for the year |
|
$ |
2,772 |
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
$ |
2,063 |
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
$ |
(13,413 |
) |
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
Shares used in computing basic income (loss) per common share |
|
69,077,329 |
|
66,079,104 |
|
64,626,429 |
|
64,626,429 |
|
56,152,735 |
|
|||||
Shares used in computing diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
72,481,204 |
|
68,051,579 |
|
64,725,929 |
|
64,626,429 |
|
56,152,735 |
|
37
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash and short-term investments) |
|
$ |
19,180 |
|
$ |
14,375 |
|
$ |
13,045 |
|
$ |
9,782 |
|
$ |
4,814 |
|
Working capital (deficit) |
|
9,044 |
|
4,033 |
|
2,202 |
|
(1,066 |
) |
(6,947 |
) |
|||||
Total assets |
|
57,057 |
|
47,304 |
|
35,336 |
|
28,853 |
|
25,589 |
|
|||||
Deferred revenue |
|
37,870 |
|
33,251 |
|
28,589 |
|
24,361 |
|
22,714 |
|
|||||
Long-term obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|||||
Stockholders equity (deficiency) |
|
13,092 |
|
7,457 |
|
866 |
|
(1,360 |
) |
(3,390 |
) |
|||||
38
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere herein.
We provide Internet services and downloadable software through a global distribution network of more than 6,000 customers, or Service Providers, in more than 100 countries. We are an accredited registrar with the Internet Corporations for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, and we generate revenue primarily through the provision of domain registration and other Internet services to Service Providers who offer such services to their own customers in a process known as wholesale distribution
Our distribution network of Service Providers is comprised primarily of web hosting companies, Internet Service Providers, or ISPs, and providers of other services over the Internet. These Service Providers typically provide their customers, the end-users of the Internet, with a critical component to enable their use of the Internet. End-users typically consist of individuals and businesses ranging from small businesses to large corporations.
On January 3, 2006 we completed the acquisition of substantially all of Critical Paths hosted messaging assets for up to $8.0 million in cash plus the assumption of some related contractual liabilities. We will maintain the existing hosted messaging data centers in Denver, Colorado and London, England. We expect the acquisition to have a significant impact on our revenues and revenue mix, cost of revenues and operating expenses in the future, but we also anticipate cost savings synergies in network and data center operations, technical support, account management and recruiting. In addition, we expect to incur estimated transitional costs of $1.2 million to $1.5 million in the next fiscal year, primarily in the first two quarters of the year.
The discussion in this section of the Annual report on Form 10-K, as well as the financial statements contained herein, relate to Tucows as a standalone entity and do not reflect the impact of the acquisition.
We generate net revenues primarily through the provision of domain registration and ancillary services. Additional revenue is generated from advertising and other services.
Domain registration and ancillary services
We generate revenues from the provision of Internet services on both a wholesale and retail basis. To date, the majority of net revenues has been derived from the sale of services provided as an accredited domain registrar. As of December 31, 2005, we offered registration services for the generic top-level domains, or gTLDs, .com, .net, .org, .info, ..name and .biz and for the country code top-level domains, or ccTLDs .at, .be, ..ca, .cc, .ch, .cn, .de, .fr, .it, .nl, .uk, .tv, and .us.
We receive revenues for each domain registration or ancillary service processed through our system by Service Providers.
With respect to the sale of domain registrations, we earn registration fees in connection with each new, renewed and transferred-in registration and from providing provisioning services to Service Providers and registrars on a monthly basis. Domain registrations are generally purchased for terms of one to ten years. Payments for the full term of all services, or billed revenue, are received at the time of activation of
39
service and where appropriate are recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as earned ratably over the term of provision of service. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the quarters and the year.
Ancillary services currently consist of digital certificates, billing, provisioning and customer care software solutions, email and anti-spam services, blogware and website building tools which are used by our Service Providers to create bundles of Internet services for their end-users. We earn fees when an ancillary service is activated. Ancillary services are generally purchased for terms of one month to three years. Payments for domain registrations and ancillary services are for the full term of all services at the time of activation of service and where appropriate are recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as earned ratably over the term of provision of service. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the quarters and the year.
On a retail basis, we offer Internet services directly to end-users through our Domain Direct division. These services include domain registration, email, blogware, hosting and website creation. Depending on the service offered, Domain Direct receives standard fees for its services that are published on its website. In addition, Domain Direct offers referral commissions based on a percentage of net registration revenues to participants in its affiliate program.
Advertising and other revenue
We also generate advertising and other revenue through our online libraries of shareware, freeware and online services presented at our website, www.tucows.com. Advertising revenue is generated from third-party advertisers and from software developers who rely on us as a primary source of distribution. Software developers use our Author Resource Center, or ARC, to submit their products for inclusion in our software libraries and to purchase promotional placement of their software in the library categories, as well as purchase other promotional services on a cost-per-click through or flat rate basis. Software developers are able to promote their software through advertising services including keyword search placements, banners, promotional placements, expedited reviews and premium data services. Revenue is also generated from companies who contract with us to provide them with co-branded content. Advertising and other revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which it is presented.
The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies and methods. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties made by management that may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 includes further information on the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the application of these estimates, including those related to the recoverability of investments, useful lives of intangible assets, valuation of goodwill, product development costs, revenue recognition and deferred revenue and accounting for income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates.
40
We earn revenues from:
· Domain registration fees on both a wholesale and retail basis and ancillary services; and
· Advertising and other revenue.
With respect to the sale of domain registrations, we earn registration fees in connection with each new, renewed and transferred-in registration and from providing provisioning services to Service Providers and registrars on a monthly basis. We also enter into revenue arrangements in which a Service Provider may purchase a combination of services (multiple element arrangements). When fair value exists for all elements, we allocate revenue to each element based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. Fair value is established by the price charged when that element is sold separately. For arrangements where fair value exists only for the undelivered elements, we defer the full value of the undelivered elements and recognize the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered items as revenue, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Payments for the full term of all services, or billed revenue, are received at the time of activation of service and where appropriate are recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as earned ratably over the term of provision of service. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the quarters and the year.
We also generate advertising and other revenue through our online libraries of shareware, freeware and online services presented at our website, www.tucows.com. Advertising and other revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which it is presented. To the extent that the minimum number of impressions we guarantee to customers is not met, we defer recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impressions are achieved.
Changes to contractual relationships in the future could impact the amounts and timing of revenue recognition.
In those cases where payment is not received at the time of sale, additional conditions for recognition of revenue apply. The conditions are (i) that the collection of sales proceeds is reasonably assured and (ii) that we have no further performance obligations. We record expected refunds, rebates and credit card charge-backs as a reduction of revenues at the time of the sale based on historical experiences and current expectations. Should these expectations not be met, adjustments will be required in future periods.
We establish reserves for possible uncollectible accounts receivable and other contingent liabilities which may arise in the normal course of business. Historically, credit losses have been within our expectations and the reserves we have established have been appropriate. However, we have, on occasion, experienced issues which have led to accounts receivable not being fully collected. Should these issues occur more frequently, additional reserves may be required.
We account for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1: Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, as more fully described in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our policy on capitalizing internally developed software costs determines the timing of its recognition of certain development costs. In addition, this policy determines whether the cost is classified as development expense or depreciation of property and equipment. Management reassesses these judgments on an ongoing basis. Changes in managements assessment could impact the recognition of development costs in our accounts.
41
Valuation of intangible assets, goodwill and long-lived assets
Our business acquisitions typically result in goodwill and other intangible assets, which affect the amount of future period amortization expense and possible impairment expense that we may incur. The determination of the value of such intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements. In addition to annual evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill, we review our identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
· a significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
· a significant change in the manner of our use of the acquired asset or the strategy for our overall business; or
· a significant negative industry or economic trend.
When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles, long-lived assets or goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow model using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Management will base its estimates in preparing the discounted cash flows on historical experience and on various other assumptions, including current market trends and developments, ongoing customer developments and general economic factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. Under the asset and liability method, we recognize deferred tax assets or liabilities for the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the net deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, historical and future levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies are considered. In the event that it is determined that the deferred tax assets to be realized in the future would be in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be recorded. This adjustment would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should it be determined that all or part of a recorded net deferred tax asset would not be realized in the future, an adjustment to increase the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be charged to income in the period such determination would be made.
On a periodic basis, we evaluate the probability that our deferred tax asset balance will be recovered to assess its realizability. To the extent we believe it is more likely than not that some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, we will increase the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily upon future taxable income. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require possible material adjustments to these deferred tax assets, resulting in a reduction in net income or an increase in net loss in the period when such determinations are made.
42
Accounting for stock based employee compensation
We account for stock based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations, and comply with the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, or SFAS 123. Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation cost, if any, is recognized over the respective vesting period based on the difference between the deemed fair value of our common stock and the exercise price on the date of grant. The determination of the volatility, expected term and other assumptions used to determine the fair value of stock options granted under SFAS 123 for footnote disclosure purposes involves subjective judgment and the consideration of a variety of factors, including our historical stock price and option exercise activity to date.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment, or SFAS 123R, which requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of share based compensation. Accordingly, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of the intrinsic value method to account for share based compensation transactions as provided under APB Opinion No. 25. Under SFAS 123R, we are required to determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at date of adoption. We currently use the Black Scholes option pricing model to value options for pro-forma financial statement disclosure purposes. The use of a different model to value options may result in a different fair value than the use of the Black Scholes option pricing model. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R to assess what impact its adoption will have on our financial position and results of operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 AS COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
48,517,039 |
|
$ |
44,717,155 |
|
Increase over prior period |
|
$ |
3,799,884 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
8 |
% |
|
|
||
Total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased to $48.5 million from $44.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, no customer accounted for more than 5% of billed revenue, and one customer accounted for 11% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2005. Subsequent to the year end, all of the amounts owed by this customer were collected. Significant management judgment is required at the time of recording of revenue to assess whether the collection of the resulting receivables is reasonably assured. On an ongoing basis we assess the ability of our customers to make required payments. Based on this assessment, we expect the carrying amount of our outstanding receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, to be fully collected.
Domain name and ancillary services
Net revenues from domain name and ancillary services for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by $3.8 million, or 9%, to $45.3 million from $41.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily as a result of increased volumes from new and existing customers, as well as the additional revenue earned as a result of the April 2004 acquisition of Boardtown Corporation. This increase occurred despite the fact that during the year ended December 31, 2004, our revenue numbers included the
43
recognition of deferred domain name revenue of approximately $1.1 million that was recognized as a result of one of our resellers becoming an accredited registrar and transferring all of its domain names from our tag to its own tag. The impact of the transfer of these names, which included a large number of multiple year registrations, resulted in our having no future obligations in connection with these names. As a result, we recognized all deferred revenue previously recorded relating to these names during the year ended December 31, 2004. The customer continues to be a customer of ours, using our OpenHRS platform for its registration needs.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the number of domain names that we processed increased by approximately 300,000 to approximately 4.0 million new, renewed and transferred-in domain name registrations, compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. These increases were due primarily to the fact that we continued to compete aggressively to attract new clients and retain existing customers in order to protect our current market share and improve our competitive position. These actions have resulted in our average selling price declining, which has partially offset the impact of the increased transaction volume on our revenue and profitability. We may face continued pricing pressure in order to remain competitive, which would adversely impact our revenues and profitability.
The renewal rate for domain name registrations increased to approximately 70% for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to approximately 65% for the year ended December 31, 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, revenue from domain names, including Domain Direct, comprised 85.7% of total revenue, compared to 87.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2005, revenue from ancillary products comprised 7.7% of total revenue, compared to 5.1% for the year ended December 31, 2004.
While we anticipate that the number of new, renewed and transferred-in domain name registrations will incrementally increase, the volatility in the market could affect the growth of domain names under our management. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the total number of domain names under our management increased by approximately 500,000 to approximately 4.9 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2005 we provided provisioning services to five registrars on a monthly basis, as compared to six registrars at December 31, 2004, who use our technical systems to process domain registrations with their accreditation. As of December 31, 2005, we managed approximately 869,000 domain names, compared to approximately 316,000 at December 31, 2004, on their behalf.
Deferred revenue from domain name registrations and ancillary services at December 31, 2005 increased to approximately $37.9 million from approximately $33.3 million at December 31, 2004.
Advertising and other revenue
Advertising and other revenue for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 remained flat at approximately $3.2 million primarily due to the improved efficiency that users are experiencing in using our redesigned software download website that we completed during the second quarter of 2005. While the improved navigability and usability of the website is enabling users to more readily find the software download that best addresses their needs and is resulting in a steadily improving ratio of downloads per visit, it has also enabled users to find their desired download more readily which has resulted in a decrease in the number of searches, the number of times users click on paid placements and the number of times users click on syndicated pay-per-click results. We expect the growth rate for advertising and other revenue to continue to be impacted over the short-term. However, over the long-term we expect that the improved navigability and usability will result in increased traffic to the website, which will generate additional advertising and other revenue.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, revenue from advertising and other revenue comprised 6.6% of total revenue, compared to 7.2% for the year ended December 31, 2004.
44
Cost of revenues includes the costs associated with providing domain registration and ancillary services, advertising and other revenue and network costs.
Cost of revenues for domain registrations represents the amortization of registry fees on a basis consistent with the recognition of revenues from our customers, namely ratably over the term of provision of the service. Registry fees, the primary component of cost of revenues, are paid in full when the domain is registered, and are recorded as prepaid domain registry fees. Costs of revenues for ancillary services consist of fees paid to third-party service providers and are recognized ratably over the periods in which the services are provided. We have minimal direct cost of revenues associated with our advertising and other revenues. Therefore, the gross profit margin on advertising revenue is approximately 100% and, accordingly, any increase or decrease in advertising and other revenue represents an increase or a reduction of our gross profit of the same amount. Network costs include personnel and related expenses, including bandwidth and co-location expenses to support the supply of all our services. Bandwidth and co-location expenses are composed primarily of communication and provisioning costs related to the management and support of our network.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
30,645,004 |
|
$ |
27,566,066 |
|
Increase over prior period |
|
$ |
3,078,938 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
11 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
63 |
% |
62 |
% |
||
Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by approximately $3.1 million, or 11%, to $30.7 million from $27.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to higher costs attributable to higher volumes of domain registrations and ancillary services and to the November 2004 change in nature of the ICANN accreditation fee. This increase was partly offset by the recognition of the non-cash prepaid cost of goods recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately $800,000 that arose as a result of one of our resellers, as more fully described under Net Revenue above, becoming an accredited registrar and transferring all of its domain names from our tag to its own tag with the result that we no longer have any future obligations in connection with these names.
Registry fees, the primary component of cost of revenues, are paid in full when the domain is registered. Registry fees are recorded as prepaid domain registry fees and are recognized ratably over the term of provision of the service. Ancillary service costs and ICANN accreditation transaction fees are generally paid either monthly or quarterly. Services provided over periods longer than one month are recognized ratably over the term of provision of the service. Effective November 1, 2004, ICANNs members voted to change the basis whereby registrars pay their variable accreditation fee to a transaction based fee of $0.25 per domain year registered. As this fee is now being charged as a transaction fee, we are no longer expensing this fee to sales and marketing, but are allocating it to cost of goods sold and are recognizing it ratably over the term of provision of the service. We anticipate that cost of revenues will continue to increase in absolute dollars primarily as a result of continued growth in domain registration and ancillary services.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, direct cost of goods pertaining to domain names, including Domain Direct, comprised 90.7% of total cost of goods, compared to 91.9% for the year ended December 31, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2005, direct cost of goods pertaining to ancillary products comprised 4.8% of total cost of goods, compared to 3.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Prepaid domain registration and ancillary services fees at December 31, 2005 increased by approximately $3.8 million, to approximately $25.9 million from approximately $22.1million at December 31, 2004.
45
Cost of revenues includes the costs of network operations. These costs for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by $200,000, or 14%, to $1.4 million from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily as a result of additional people costs resulting from increased headcount and hours of operation, as well as increased network server maintenance and support contract costs.
The cost of network operations is comprised primarily of communication costs, equipment maintenance, and employee and related costs directly associated with the management and maintenance of the network. We expect communication costs to increase as our network expands geographically and network activity increases.
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs. These costs include commissions and related expenses of our sales, product management, public relations, call center, support and marketing personnel. Other sales and marketing expenses include customer acquisition costs, advertising and other promotional costs.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
4,855,050 |
|
$ |
5,067,841 |
|
Decrease over prior period |
|
$ |
(212,791 |
) |
|
|
|
Decreasepercentage |
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
10 |
% |
11 |
% |
||
Sales and marketing expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005 decreased by approximately $210,000, or 4%, to approximately $4.9 million compared to approximately $5.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2004.
The decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in ICANN fees, which decreased by approximately $490,000 due to this expense now being included under cost of goods sold (as discussed under Cost of revenues above).
In addition, personnel costs increased primarily as a result of additional personnel in sales and product management by approximately $212,000. This increase was net of an amount of approximately $198,000 recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004 in connection with the 2004 At Risk incentive compensation plan. No accrual has been recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005 as management has determined that we did not exceed the performance thresholds set by the compensation committee for senior managers and executive officers in our 2005 At Risk incentive compensation plan. This increase was also as a result of incremental expenses of approximately $81,000 incurred during the year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of additional marketing, supplies and other miscellaneous expenses. This was slightly offset by a decrease in travel expenses of approximately $16,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of less travel undertaken during the year.
We believe that sales and marketing expenses will continue to increase, in absolute dollars, as we adjust our marketing programs and sales strategies to meet future opportunities in the marketplace.
TECHNICAL OPERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
Technical operations and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and related expenses required to support the development of new or enhanced service offerings and the maintenance and upgrading of existing infrastructure. This includes expenses incurred in the research, design and development of technology that we use to register domain names and ancillary services and to distribute our digital content services. Editorial costs relating to the rating and review of the software content libraries are included in the costs of product development. In accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
46
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and primarily include personnel costs for employees directly related to the development project. All other costs are expensed as incurred.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Technical operations and development |
|
$ |
5,627,426 |
|
$ |
4,549,368 |
|
Increase over prior period |
|
$ |
1,078,058 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
24 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
12 |
% |
10 |
% |
||
Technical operations and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased approximately $1.1 million, or 24%, to approximately $5.6 million from approximately $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The increase was primarily the result of people related costs including contract and outside service costs, which increased by approximately $1.1 million (includes a cost of approximately $100,000 relating to a severance payment) and reflects our ongoing commitment to enhance and extend our OpenSRS platform. No accrual was included under technical operations and development expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005 for our 2005 At Risk incentive compensation plan as management has determined that we did not exceed the performance thresholds set by the compensation committee for senior managers and executive officers under the plan compared to approximately $101,000 included for the year ended December 31, 2004 under the 2004 At Risk incentive compensation plan. Also included in the increase in technical operations and development expenses is an increase of approximately $75,000 related to travel and other expenses. These amounts were partly offset by a decrease in technical operations and development expenses due to a decrease in stock-based compensation of approximately $70,000. This cost was incurred during the year ended December 31, 2004, as a result of a change to the terms of the options granted to one of our former officers.
We expect technical operations and development expenses to increase slightly, in absolute dollars, going forward as our business continues to grow and as we further develop our applications and services.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for managerial and administrative personnel, fees for professional services, public listing expenses, rent and other general corporate expenses.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
$ |
4,346,224 |
|
$ |
4,107,981 |
|
Increase over prior period |
|
$ |
238,243 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
6 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
9 |
% |
9 |
% |
||
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by approximately $240,000, or 6%, to $4.4 million from $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The increase in general and administrative expenses generally reflects the more sophisticated infrastructure needed to support the constantly evolving needs we experience as the size and scope of our business continues to grow. This resulted in increases in provision for doubtful accounts of approximately $46,000, increases in facility costs of approximately $111,000, and increases in public listing expenses, professional fees, telephone and supplies totaling approximately $136,000 (includes an incremental cost of $98,000 related to an outside management consultant). We also recorded a foreign exchange gain of
47
approximately $221,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to approximately $432,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, reflecting the continued strengthening in the Canadian dollar.
These increases were partially offset by decreases in people costs, including contract and outside services of approximately $89,000. This decrease in people costs reflects increases in people costs to support our growth being offset by our not including an accrual under general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005 for our 2005 At Risk incentive compensation plan as management has determined that we did not exceed the performance thresholds set by the compensation committee for senior managers and executive officers under the plan compared to approximately $353,000 included for the year ended December 31, 2004 under the 2004 At Risk incentive compensation plan. Directors and officers liability insurance, business and state taxes travel and other miscellaneous expenses also decreased by a total of approximately $177,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004.
We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase, in absolute dollars, as our business continues to grow and the impact of a higher Canadian dollar, more fully described in the risk factors above, is recognized.
DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
$ |
951,692 |
|
$ |
1,118,734 |
|
Decrease over prior period |
|
$ |
(167,042 |
) |
|
|
|
Decreasepercentage |
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
2 |
% |
3 |
% |
||
The decrease in depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 was primarily due to certain of our older computer software being fully depreciated and not requiring replacement.
We expect that depreciation of property and equipment will increase, in absolute dollars, as we continue to enhance and add functionality to our service offerings.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Amortization of intangible assets consists of amounts arising in connection with the acquisition of Boardtown Corporation in April 2004. The technology, brand and customer relationships purchased are amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years, while the non-competition agreements entered into with the former owners of Boardtown Corporation are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
$ |
236,160 |
|
$ |
157,760 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Other income (expenses), net |
|
$ |
765,158 |
|
$ |
200,501 |
|
48
Other income includes net interest income of approximately $462,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and approximately $201,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2005 we received approximately $303,000 in connection with settlements related to patents we acquired in the merger with Infonautics in 2001. We expect that during fiscal 2006 additional settlements related to the Infonautics patents will be reached and that we will have additional other income as a result.
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates of our current tax obligations and temporary differences resulting from differences in reporting items for financial statement and tax purposes. We recognize deferred taxes by the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred taxes are recognized for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities at enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances based on managements judgment are established when appropriate to reduce the carrying value of deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes |
|
$ |
(151,975 |
) |
$ |
(3,150,432 |
) |
We operate in various tax jurisdictions, and accordingly, our income is subject to varying rates of tax. Losses incurred in one jurisdiction cannot be used to offset income taxes payable in another. No provision for income taxes was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 because we had net operating losses to offset against our operating income. Our ability to use income tax loss carryforwards and future income tax deductions is dependant upon our operations in the tax jurisdictions in which such losses or deductions arise.
We are entitled to certain Canadian investment tax credits for qualifying research and development activities performed in Canada. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded a tax recovery, net of Canadian provincial taxes otherwise payable, in the amount of approximately $152,000, representing the actual investment tax credit payment received from the Canadian authorities with respect to research and development undertaken in 2001, 2002 and 2003.
Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
44,717,155 |
|
$ |
37,194,747 |
|
Increase over prior year |
|
$ |
7,522,408 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
20 |
% |
|
|
||
Total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased to $44.7 million from $37.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, no customer accounted for more than 10% of billed revenue, and two customers accounted for 19% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2004. Subsequent to the fiscal year end, these amounts were fully collected.
49
Domain name and ancillary services
Net revenues from domain name and ancillary services for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by $6.4 million, or 18.2%, to $41.5 million from $35.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, primarily as a result of increased volumes from new and existing customers, as well as the additional revenue earned as a result of the April 2004 acquisition of Boardtown Corporation.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the number of domain names we processed increased by approximately 500,000 to approximately 3.7 million new, renewed and transferred-in domain name registrations, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase was due primarily to the fact that we continued to compete aggressively to attract new clients and retain existing customers to protect our current market share and improve our competitive position. These actions have resulted in our average selling price declining, which has partially offset the impact of the increased transaction volume on our revenue and profitability. The renewal rate for domain name registrations increased to approximately 65% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to approximately 60% for the year ended December 31, 2003.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the total number of domain names under our management increased by approximately 600,000 to approximately 4.4 million.
Deferred revenue from domain name registrations and ancillary services at December 31, 2004 increased to approximately $33.2 million from approximately $28.6 million at December 31, 2003. During the year, one of our Service Providers become an accredited registrar and transferred the names under our tag to its own tag. The impact of the transfer of these names, which included a large number of multiple year registrations, is that we have no future obligations in connection with these names. As a result, we recognized all the deferred revenue previously recorded relating to these names of approximately $1.1 million as revenue during the year.
Advertising and other revenue
Advertising and other revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by approximately $1.2 million, or 57%, to approximately $3.2 million compared to approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was predominantly the result of growth in syndicated advertising revenue.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
27,566,066 |
|
$ |
22,990,227 |
|
Increase over prior year |
|
$ |
4,575,839 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
20 |
% |
|
|
||
Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by approximately $4.6 million, or 20%, to $27.6 million from $23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily the result of higher costs of approximately $4.1 million attributable to higher volumes of domain name registrations, and to a smaller extent as a result of the change in nature of the ICANN accreditation fee. Effective November 1, 2004, ICANNs members voted to change the basis whereby registrars pay their variable accreditation fee to a transaction based fee of $0.25 per domain year registered. As this fee is now being charged as a transaction fee, we are no longer expensing this fee to sales and marketing, but are allocating it to cost of goods sold and are recognizing it ratably over the term of provision of the service. In addition, cost of goods increased as a result of increased volumes of digital certificates and other ancillary services costs.
50
Registry fees, the primary component of cost of revenues, are paid in full when the domain name is registered, and are recorded as prepaid domain name registry fees and are recognized ratably over the term of provision of the service. In addition, ancillary service costs and ICANN accreditation transaction fees are paid either monthly or quarterly and if they have service periods longer than one month are also recognized ratably over the term of provision of the service. Prepaid domain name registration and ancillary services fees at December 31, 2004 increased to approximately $22.1 million from approximately $18.3 million at December 31, 2003. During the year, one of our Service Providers become an accredited registrar and transferred the names under our tag to its own tag. The impact of the transfer of these names, which included a large number of multiple year registrations, is that we have no future obligations in connection with these names. As a result, we recognized all the prepaid cost of revenues previously recorded relating to these names of approximately $800,000 as cost of revenue during the year.
Cost of revenues of digital content distribution services includes the costs of network operations. These costs decreased by approximately $73,000 to approximately $1.2 million, primarily as a result in decreased bandwidth costs. This decrease in bandwidth costs was offset in part by an increase in people costs primarily as a result of increased hours of operation and incentive compensation for senior managers paid under the 2004 At Risk incentive compensation plan. The cost of network operations is comprised primarily of communication costs, equipment maintenance, and employee and related costs directly associated with the management and maintenance of the network.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
5,067,841 |
|
$ |
3,850,081 |
|
Increase over prior year |
|
$ |
1,217,760 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
32 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of revenues |
|
11 |
% |
10 |
% |
||
Sales and marketing expenses during the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by approximately $1.2 million, or 32%, to approximately $5.1 million compared to approximately $3.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2003.
The increase was primarily the result of increased people costs, including contractors, of approximately $1.1 million, related to ongoing initiatives to improve customer service and expand our sales reach. In addition, our senior managers and executive officers have a significant portion of their total compensation at risk through our incentive compensation plan. As we exceeded the performance thresholds established by the compensation committee for the at risk portion of the fiscal 2004 At Risk incentive compensation plan, included in the increase in personnel costs is an amount of approximately $198,000 for senior managers and executive officers under this plan. Also included in the increase in sales and marketing expenses is an increase of approximately $107,000 primarily related to travel incurred as a result of efforts to extend our sales reach and increased ICANN fees of approximately $125,000, reflecting the larger levy imposed on us as a result of increases in the ICANN budget and the increased number of domain names we have under management.
The increase was partly offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation of approximately $93,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. This decrease resulted from the stock-based compensation being fully expensed by the end of March 2004.
51
Technical operations and development
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Technical operations and development expenses |
|
$ |
4,549,368 |
|
$ |
3,935,061 |
|
Increase over prior year |
|
$ |
614,307 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
16 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of revenues |
|
10 |
% |
11 |
% |
||
Technical operations and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased approximately $614,000, or 16%, to approximately $4.5 million from approximately $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The increase was primarily the result of people related costs including contract and outside service costs, which increased by approximately $506,000. Included in this increase in personnel costs was an amount of approximately $101,000 that was paid to senior managers and executive officers in 2004 under our fiscal 2004 At Risk incentive compensation plan. In addition, the increase in technical operations and development expenses includes an increase of approximately $70,000, representing stock-based compensation incurred as a result of a change to the terms of the options granted to one of our former officers.
These increases were offset by costs, primarily comprising a decrease in bandwidth and travel expenses of approximately $35,000 and by a decrease of approximately $73,000 in the level of expenditure for capitalized research and development, which decreased as a result of the maturing of our product offerings to approximately $338,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately $411,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
$ |
4,107,981 |
|
$ |
3,998,073 |
|
Increase over prior year |
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
|
|
|
Increasepercentage |
|
3 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of revenues |
|
9 |
% |
11 |
% |
||
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by approximately $110,000, or 3%, to $4.1 million from $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The increase resulted from an increase in people related costs, including contract and outside service costs of approximately $435,000. Included in this increase in people costs was an amount of approximately $353,000 that was paid to senior managers and executive officers in 2004 under our At Risk incentive compensation plan. In addition, there was an increase in credit card processing, bad debts, Directors and Officers liability insurance, investor and public relations expenses and miscellaneous fees of approximately $191,000. We also recorded a lower foreign exchange gain of approximately $432,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The gain from foreign exchange arose primarily as a result of the effect of the foreign exchange forward contracts that we entered into to mitigate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our Canadian dollar exposure. We entered into these forward exchange contracts as part of our policy to manage financial exposure to certain foreign exchange fluctuations with the objective of neutralizing some of the impact of foreign currency exchange movements.
These increases were offset in part by a decrease in professional fees of approximately $942,000, predominantly as a result of incurring costs for advice obtained in connection with the evaluation of
52
strategic alternatives and the protection of our intellectual property in the year ended December 31, 2003. In addition, facility costs, public listing, stock based compensation and other miscellaneous expenses during the year ended December 31, 2004 decreased by approximately $193,000 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
$ |
1,118,734 |
|
$ |
1,489,570 |
|
Decrease over prior year |
|
$ |
(370,836 |
) |
|
|
|
Decreasepercentage |
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
||
Percentage of revenues |
|
3 |
% |
4 |
% |
||
The decrease in depreciation was primarily due to certain of our older computer software being fully depreciated.
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists of amounts relating to the purchase of Boardtown Corporation in April 2004. The intangible assets include technology, brand customer relationship and non-competition agreements entered into with the former owners. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over their expected lives, being 7 years, with the exception of the non-competition agreements which are being amortized on a straight line basis over three years.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
$ |
157,760 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Other income, net |
|
$ |
200,501 |
|
$ |
1,131,703 |
|
Other income includes net interest income of approximately $201,000 and approximately $132,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In connection with the sale of its back-end registry management services assets in March 2002, we were entitled to earn contingent consideration of up to $1.0 million, based on each name registered or renewed in the .org registry. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we earned and received the full $1.0 million of contingent consideration.
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Income taxes (recovery) |
|
$ |
(3,150,432 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
We operate in various tax jurisdictions, and accordingly, our income is subject to varying rates of tax. Losses incurred in one jurisdiction cannot be used to offset income taxes payable in another. Our ability to use these income tax losses and future income tax deductions is dependant upon our operations in the tax jurisdictions in which such losses or deductions arise.
53
As of December 31, 2004, we had recognized deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, of $3.0 million (December 31, 2003Nil). The principal components of our gross deferred tax asset of $18.9 million primarily consist of accumulated operating loss carry forwards of $5.9 million, deferred revenue previously included in income for tax purposes of $3.6 million and amortization not yet recognized for tax purposes on acquired intangible assets purchased on the Tucows Interactive transaction of $9.5 million. Based on our assessment of factors such as historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income, the character of the income tax assets and ongoing tax planning strategies, we assessed that a valuation allowance of $15.9 million was required at December 31, 2004 (December 31, 2003$19.3 million).
We are entitled to certain Canadian investment tax credits (ITC) for qualifying research and development activities performed in Canada. During 2004, we recorded a tax recovery in the amount of approximately $150,000, representing the actual ITC payment received from the Canadian authorities with respect to research and development undertaken in 2000.
The following table summarizes selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the past eight quarters:
Tucows Inc.
Quarterly Results of Operations
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
11,801,706 |
|
$ |
12,002,138 |
|
$ |
12,054,796 |
|
$ |
12,658,399 |
|
Income from operations |
|
213,587 |
|
410,776 |
|
665,463 |
|
565,657 |
|
||||
Net income for the period |
|
442,810 |
|
507,632 |
|
788,218 |
|
1,033,956 |
|
||||
Basic and diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Shares used in computing basic income per common share |
|
66,883,487 |
|
67,863,978 |
|
69,602,723 |
|
71,898,247 |
|
||||
Shares used in computing diluted income per common share |
|
70,823,531 |
|
71,664,882 |
|
73,145,627 |
|
74,811,769 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||||||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
10,174,909 |
|
$ |
10,638,965 |
|
$ |
12,381,326 |
|
$ |
11,521,955 |
|
Income from operations |
|
111,480 |
|
623,455 |
|
613,710 |
|
800,760 |
|
||||
Net income for the period |
|
149,113 |
|
665,558 |
|
820,691 |
|
3,864,976 |
|
||||
Basic and diluted income per share |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Shares used in computing basic income per common share |
|
64,690,887 |
|
65,991,867 |
|
66,800,369 |
|
66,817,250 |
|
||||
Shares used in computing diluted income per common share |
|
72,098,757 |
|
72,370,411 |
|
68,477,632 |
|
68,893,918 |
|
Note 1:
The fourth quarter of 2004s results include a non-cash income tax benefit of $3.0 million or $0.04 per share, resulting from the reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
54
Liquidity and capital resources
At December 31, 2005, our principal source of liquidity was cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $19.1 million compared to approximately $13.9 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of approximately $5.2 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to approximately $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Net cash provided by operating activities for 2005 and 2004 resulted primarily from net income for those years and increases in deferred revenue and accreditation fees payable (representing cash received in advance of provision of the services). These increases were partially offset by an increase in prepaid domain name registry fees and accounts receivable and a decrease in accrued liabilities, primarily as a result of At Risk compensation accruals and payment of other annual accruals.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to approximately $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. This was primarily as a result of an increase in short-term investments of approximately $1.8 million and by our purchasing property and equipment, principally computers and related software of approximately $1.5 million during the year to meet our operational needs. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in restricted cash of approximately $400,000, as a result of a release to us of margin security against forward exchange contracts that had fully matured by December 31, 2005, as well as the release to us of approximately $388,000 that was held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the Boardtown purchase agreement.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. This was primarily as a result of $3.0 million for the acquisition of Boardtown Corporation in April 2004, $1.0 million for the purchase of property and equipment, principally computers and related software, to meet our operational needs and a net increase of $328,000 in restricted cash, of which $178,000 was the result of an increase in margin security against forward exchange contracts intended to mitigate the risk of exchange rate fluctuations of a portion of our Canadian dollar exposure and the remaining $150,000 was used as security against letters of credit to support our obligations to a registry. These letters of credit expired in November 2004, and in January 2005, the $150,000 was released and became unrestricted because the security obligation was no longer required by the registry.
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. On August 19, 2005, we sold 401,173 shares of common stock at $0.90 per share in a public offering. On August 31, 2005, the underwriters in the public offering exercised in full their over-allotment option to purchase an additional 2.9 million shares of common stock at $0.90 per share. The public offering resulted in net proceeds, after underwriting, legal, accounting, printing and other costs of approximately $1.6 million. In addition, we received proceeds of approximately $301,000 on the exercise of stock options under our employee stock purchase plan.
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $726,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, representing proceeds received on the exercise of stock options under our employee stock purchase plan.
Based on our operations, we believe that our cash flow from operations will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. We may then need to, or before that time we may choose to, raise additional funds or seek other financing arrangements to facilitate more rapid expansion, including significant increases in personnel and office facilities, to develop new or enhance existing products or services, to respond to competitive pressures, or to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, technologies, services or products.
If additional financing is required, we may not be able to raise it on acceptable terms, or at all, and additional financing may be dilutive to existing investors. We may also evaluate potential acquisitions of
55
other businesses, products and technologies. To complete potential acquisitions, we may issue additional securities or need additional equity or debt financing and any additional financing may be dilutive to existing investors. There are currently no material understandings, commitments or agreements about any acquisition of other businesses, products or technologies.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
We have not entered into any off balance sheet financial arrangements and have not established any special purpose entities as of December 31, 2005 nor have we guaranteed any debt or commitment of other entities. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. A summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2005 is presented in the table below. Purchase obligations include amounts committed under legally enforceable contracts or purchase orders.
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than |
|
|||||
Operating lease obligations |
|
$ |
2,004,000 |
|
$ |
354,000 |
|
$ |
643,000 |
|
$ |
660,000 |
|
$ |
347,000 |
|
||
Purchase obligations |
|
97,000 |
|
92,000 |
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,101,000 |
|
$ |
446,000 |
|
$ |
648,000 |
|
$ |
660,000 |
|
$ |
347,000 |
|
||
On January 3, 2006, Tucows.com Co, one of the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries, acquired substantially all of the hosted messaging assets of Critical Path, Inc., including the customer base, hosted messaging communications infrastructure, and other related assets for up to $8.0 million in cash and the assumption of some related contractual liabilities. $1.75 million of the purchase price is being held in escrow, contingent upon certain customer contracts being renewed through October 31, 2006.
As a result of the above, on January 3, 2006 and amount of $6.25 million was paid to Critical Path, Inc. and $1.25 million was paid into an escrow account.
See additional discussion under Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in connection with the forward foreign exchange contracts that we entered into in December 2005.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We develop products in Canada and sell these products in North America and Europe. Our sales are primarily made in U.S. dollars, while a major portion of expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. Our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of Canadian and U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in short-term instruments. Based on the nature of our short-term investments, we have concluded that there is no material interest rate risk exposure at December 31, 2005.
Although we have a functional currency of U.S. dollars, a substantial portion of our fixed expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. Our policy with respect to foreign currency exposure is to manage financial exposure to certain foreign exchange fluctuations with the objective of neutralizing some of the impact of foreign currency exchange movements. Accordingly, we have entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the exchange rate risk on portions of our Canadian dollar exposure. These contracts, entered into in July 2005, December 2005, January 2006 and February 2006 will be utilized over the year ending December 31, 2006.
Such foreign exchange forward contracts have not been treated as hedges for accounting purposes as we have not complied with the documentation requirements. We have accounted for the fair value of the
56
derivative instruments within the consolidated balance sheet as a derivative financial asset or liability and the corresponding change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. We have no other freestanding or embedded derivative instruments.
The impact of the fair value adjustment on unrealized foreign exchange forward contracts for the year ended December 31, 2005 was a net loss of approximately $30,000, and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the impact was a net gain of approximately $89,000, which is reflected on the consolidated statements of operations in general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2005,we had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts totaling $4.5 million, with exchange rates varying from US$1.00 to Cdn$1.1632 to US$1.00 to Cdn$1.2361.
Subsequent to the year end, on January 6, 2006, Tucows entered into a series of forward foreign exchange contracts with a notional value of $3.0 million, whereby $750,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis for April and May 2006 at foreign exchange rates varying from U.S.$1:Cdn$1.1595 to U.S.$1:Cdn$1.1609.
On February 15, 2006, Tucows entered into a series of forward foreign exchange contracts with a notional value of $8.5 million, whereby $250,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on July 11, 2006, and $750,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis from July 26, 2006 to December 2006 at foreign exchange rates varying from U.S.$1:Cdn$1.147 to U.S.$1:Cdn$1.1522.
We have performed a sensitivity analysis model for foreign exchange exposure over the year ended December 31, 2005. The analysis used a modeling technique that compares the U.S. dollar equivalent of all expenses incurred in Canadian dollars, at the actual exchange rate, to a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar, with all other variables held constant. Foreign currency exchange rates used were based on the market rates in effect during the year ended December 31, 2005. The sensitivity analysis indicated that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would result in a decrease in net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 of approximately $1.4 million. There can be no assurances that the above projected exchange rate decrease will materialize. Fluctuations of exchange rates are beyond the actions to hedge or mitigate these risks.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our consolidated financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the
57
objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
No change in Tucows internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item concerning directors is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement in connection with our 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Proxy Statement) or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. The information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 required by this item will be set forth under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
The information required by this item concerning executive officers is set forth under the caption Executive Officers of the Registrant in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have adopted a Code of Ethics policy, known as the Ethics Policy for Senior Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance. The Ethics Policy for Senior Officers is posted on our web site. The Internet address for out web site is www.tucowsinc.com. The Ethics Policy for Senior Officers may be found at the Investors page on our web site. The information on our web site is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
58
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
1. Financial Statements. The financial statements listed in the accompanying index to consolidated financial statements are filed as part of this Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules. Schedules are not submitted because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits. The Exhibits listed below are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K. Where so indicated by footnote, exhibits which were previously filed are incorporated by reference. For exhibits incorporated by reference, the location of the exhibit in the previous filing is indicated in the footnotes below.
Exhibit |
|
Description |
2.1 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2005, between Critical Path and Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with Tucows current report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on December 19, 2005). |
3.1 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with Tucows report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on September 6, 2001). |
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Tucows Inc.[(2] (Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.2 filed with Tucows registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-60306) (the Registration Statement), as filed with the SEC on May 4, 2001). |
10.1 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2004, by and between Tucows Inc., Boardtown Corporation and the shareholders of Boardtown named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with Tucows report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on May 11, 2004). |
10.2 |
|
Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2005, by and between Tucows Inc., Boardtown Corporation and the shareholders of Boardtown named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Tucows report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005). |
10.3 |
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Equity Compensation Plan Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 filed with Tucows registration statement on Form S-8, as filed with the SEC on November 27, 2001). |
10.4* |
|
Employment Agreement dated January 22, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Elliot Noss (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2004). |
10.5* |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Michael Cooperman (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2004). |
10.6* |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Supriyo Sen (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2004). |
59
10.7* |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Graham Morris (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on March 24, 2005). |
10.8 |
|
Lease between 707932 Ontario Limited and Tucows International Corporation, dated December 10, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.9 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2002). |
10.9 |
|
Lease extension between 707932 Ontario Limited and Tucows Inc. and Tucows.com Co., dated September 4, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on March 23, 2005). |
10.10* |
|
Description of Tucows Fiscal 2004 At Risk Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on March 23, 2005). |
10.11 |
|
Registrar Accreditation Agreement, effective as of June 25, 2005, by and between the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and Tucows.com Co. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed with Amendment No. 1 to Tucows registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-125843), as filed with the SEC on July 7, 2005). |
10.12 |
|
Registry-Registrar Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2001, by and between VeriSign, Inc. and Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 filed with Amendment No. 1 to Tucows registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-125843), as filed with the SEC on July 7, 2005). |
21.1# |
|
Subsidiaries of Tucows Inc. |
23.1# |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
31.1# |
|
Chief Executive Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
31.2# |
|
Chief Financial Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
32.1# |
|
Chief Executive Officers Section 1350 Certification. |
32.2# |
|
Chief Financial Officers Section 1350 Certification. |
* Management or compensatory contract required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(c) of the requirements for Form 10-K reports.
# Filed herewith.
60
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TUCOWS INC. |
||
|
By: |
/s/ ELLIOT NOSS |
|
|
Elliot Noss |
|
|
Name: Elliot Noss |
|
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons of behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
|
Title |
|
|
Date |
|
|||
/s/ ELLIOT NOSS |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal |
|
|
||||||
Elliot Noss |
|
Executive Officer) and Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ MICHAEL COOPERMAN |
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial |
|
|
||||||
Michael Cooperman |
|
and Accounting Officer) |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ STANLEY STERN |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Stanley Stern |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ EUGENE FIUME |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Eugene Fiume |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ EREZ GISSIN |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Erez Gissin |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ ALAN LIPTON |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Alan Lipton |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ LLOYD N. MORRISETT |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Lloyd N. Morrisett |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ JEFFREY SCHWARTZ |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Jeffrey Schwartz |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
||||||
/s/ ALLEN KARP |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Allen Karp |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2005 |
61
Consolidated Financial Statements of Tucows Inc.
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Tucows Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tucows Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficiency) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tucows Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP |
|
Chartered Accountants |
|
Toronto, Canada |
|
February 7, 2006 except as to note 11, |
|
which is as of February 15, 2006 |
F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,348,088 |
|
$ |
13,914,988 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
1,771,569 |
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash (note 10(c)) |
|
60,000 |
|
460,398 |
|
||
Interest receivable |
|
39,574 |
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $51,250 as of December 31, 2005 and $25,000 as of December 31, 2004 |
|
1,439,329 |
|
1,111,082 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
1,999,820 |
|
2,156,702 |
|
||
Prepaid domain name registry and ancillary services fees, current portion |
|
18,175,988 |
|
15,601,786 |
|
||
Deferred tax asset, current portion (note 9) |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
41,834,368 |
|
34,244,956 |
|
||
Prepaid domain name
registry and ancillary services fees, long-term |
|
7,701,939 |
|
6,471,916 |
|
||
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
46,034 |
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment (note 4) |
|
1,542,671 |
|
1,017,237 |
|
||
Deferred tax asset, long-term portion (note 9) |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
||
Intangible assets (note 5) |
|
1,006,080 |
|
1,242,240 |
|
||
Goodwill (note 3) |
|
1,951,067 |
|
964,467 |
|
||
Investment (note 6) |
|
353,737 |
|
353,737 |
|
||
Cash held in escrow (note 3) |
|
621,412 |
|
1,009,650 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
57,057,308 |
|
$ |
47,304,203 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,655,195 |
|
$ |
1,483,543 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
1,417,035 |
|
2,688,738 |
|
||
Customer deposits |
|
2,276,637 |
|
2,247,262 |
|
||
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
26,790,166 |
|
23,648,381 |
|
||
Accreditation fees payable, current portion |
|
651,811 |
|
144,483 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
32,790,844 |
|
30,212,407 |
|
||
Deferred revenue, long-term portion |
|
11,079,537 |
|
9,602,599 |
|
||
Accreditation fees payable, long-term portion |
|
94,785 |
|
31,816 |
|
||
Stockholders equity (note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stockno par value, 1,250,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stockno par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 71,945,303 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 66,817,250 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2004 |
|
12,403,422 |
|
9,541,277 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
50,061,866 |
|
50,061,866 |
|
||
Deficit |
|
(49,373,146 |
) |
(52,145,762 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
13,092,142 |
|
7,457,381 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
57,057,308 |
|
$ |
47,304,203 |
|
Subsequent events (notes 3 and 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net revenues (note 12) |
|
$ |
48,517,039 |
|
$ |
44,717,155 |
|
$ |
37,194,747 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
|
30,645,004 |
|
27,566,066 |
|
22,990,227 |
|
|||
Sales and marketing(*) |
|
4,855,050 |
|
5,067,841 |
|
3,850,081 |
|
|||
Technical operations and development(*) |
|
5,627,426 |
|
4,549,368 |
|
3,935,061 |
|
|||
General and administrative(*) |
|
4,346,224 |
|
4,107,981 |
|
3,998,073 |
|
|||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
951,692 |
|
1,118,734 |
|
1,489,570 |
|
|||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
236,160 |
|
157,760 |
|
|
|
|||
Total expenses |
|
46,661,556 |
|
42,567,750 |
|
36,263,012 |
|
|||
Income from operations |
|
1,855,483 |
|
2,149,405 |
|
931,735 |
|
|||
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest income, net |
|
462,424 |
|
200,501 |
|
131,703 |
|
|||
Other income, net |
|
302,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gain on disposal of Liberty Registry Management Servies Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|||
Total other income |
|
765,158 |
|
200,501 |
|
1,131,703 |
|
|||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
2,620,641 |
|
2,349,906 |
|
2,063,438 |
|
|||
Provision for (recovery of) income taxes (note 9) |
|
(151,975) |
|
(3,150,432) |
|
|
|
|||
Net income for the year |
|
$ |
2,772,616 |
|
$ |
5,500,338 |
|
$ |
2,063,438 |
|
Basic earnings per common share (note 2(o)) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Shares used in computing basic earnings per common share (note 2(o)) |
|
69,077,329 |
|
66,079,104 |
|
64,626,429 |
|
|||
Diluted earnings per common share (note 2(o)) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per common share (note 2(o)) |
|
72,481,204 |
|
68,051,579 |
|
64,725,929 |
|
|||
(*) Stock-based compensation has been included in operating expenses as follows: |
|
|||||||||
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
16,834 |
|
$ |
109,926 |
|
Technical operations and development |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
69,737 |
|
$ |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,759 |
|
$ |
52,778 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficiency)
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Common stock |
|
paid in |
|
Deferred stock-based |
|
|
|
equity |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Number |
|
Amount |
|
capital |
|
compensation |
|
Deficit |
|
(deficiency) |
|
|||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2002 |
|
64,626,429 |
|
$ |
8,540,687 |
|
$ |
49,992,129 |
|
|
$ |
(183,297 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,709,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,360,019 |
) |
|
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
162,704 |
|
|
|||||
Net income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,063,438 |
|
|
2,063,438 |
|
|
|||||
Balances, December 31, 2003 |
|
64,626,429 |
|
8,540,687 |
|
49,992,129 |
|
|
(20,593 |
) |
|
(57,646,100 |
) |
|
866,123 |
|
|
|||||
Exercise of stock |
|
1,834,275 |
|
726,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,050 |
|
|
|||||
Acquisition of Boardtown Corporation (note 3) |
|
356,546 |
|
274,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,540 |
|
|
|||||
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
69,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,737 |
|
|
|||||
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,593 |
|
|
|||||
Net income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500,338 |
|
|
5,500,338 |
|
|
|||||
Balances, December 31, 2004 |
|
66,817,250 |
|
9,541,277 |
|
50,061,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
(52,145,762 |
) |
|
7,457,381 |
|
|
|||||
Exercise of stock |
|
771,555 |
|
300,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,870 |
|
|
|||||
Acquisition of Boardtown Corporation (note 3) |
|
1,066,075 |
|
986,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
986,600 |
|
|
|||||
Net proceeds received on issuance of common stock, net of issue costs |
|
3,290,423 |
|
1,574,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,574,675 |
|
|
|||||
Net income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,772,616 |
|
|
2,772,616 |
|
|
|||||
Balances, December 31, 2005 |
|
71,945,303 |
|
$ |
12,403,422 |
|
$ |
50,061,866 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(49,373,146 |
) |
|
$ |
13,092,142 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5
Tucows Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income for the year |
|
$ |
2,772,616 |
|
$ |
5,500,338 |
|
$ |
2,063,438 |
|
Items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
951,692 |
|
1,118,734 |
|
1,489,570 |
|
|||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
236,160 |
|
157,760 |
|
|
|
|||
Unrealized change in the fair value of forward contracts |
|
30,119 |
|
(88,743 |
) |
(279,174 |
) |
|||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
69,737 |
|
|
|
|||
Amortization of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
20,593 |
|
162,704 |
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
(3,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|||
Gain on disposal of Liberty Management Services Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
|||
Change in non-cash operating working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest receivable |
|
(39,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts receivable |
|
(328,247 |
) |
(546,762 |
) |
(147,592 |
) |
|||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
126,763 |
|
(1,333 |
) |
(91,977 |
) |
|||
Prepaid domain name registry and ancillary services fees |
|
(3,804,225 |
) |
(3,732,942 |
) |
(3,495,233 |
) |
|||
Accounts payable |
|
171,652 |
|
(148,751 |
) |
26,664 |
|
|||
Accrued liabilities |
|
(1,271,703 |
) |
403,404 |
|
60,112 |
|
|||
Customer deposits |
|
29,375 |
|
77,772 |
|
202,944 |
|
|||
Deferred revenue |
|
4,618,723 |
|
4,661,788 |
|
4,228,175 |
|
|||
Accreditation fees payable |
|
570,297 |
|
176,299 |
|
|
|
|||
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
4,063,648 |
|
4,667,894 |
|
3,219,631 |
|
|||
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds received on exercise of stock options |
|
300,870 |
|
726,050 |
|
|
|
|||
Net proceeds received on issuance of common stock, net of issue costs |
|
1,574,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,875,545 |
|
726,050 |
|
|
|
|||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
(1,477,126 |
) |
(1,034,709 |
) |
(956,649 |
) |
|||
Investment in short-term investments |
|
(1,771,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Decrease (increase) in restricted cashbeing margin security against forward exchange contracts (note 10(c)) |
|
400,398 |
|
(327,898 |
) |
805,000 |
|
|||
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
(46,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Acquisition of Boardtown Corporation, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(2,019,510 |
) |
|
|
|||
Decrease (increase) in cash held in escrow |
|
388,238 |
|
(1,009,650 |
) |
|
|
|||
Proceeds on disposal of Liberty Registry Management Services Inc., net of cash disposed |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|||
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
(2,506,093 |
) |
(4,391,767 |
) |
848,351 |
|
|||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
3,433,100 |
|
1,002,177 |
|
4,067,982 |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
13,914,988 |
|
12,912,811 |
|
8,844,829 |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
17,348,088 |
|
$ |
13,914,988 |
|
$ |
12,912,811 |
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
166 |
|
$ |
383 |
|
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common stock issued on the acquisition of Boardtown Corporation |
|
$ |
986,600 |
|
$ |
274,540 |
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6
Tucows Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
1. Organization of the Company:
The Company is a global distributor of Internet services, including domain name registration, security and identity products through digital certificates and email, through its global Internet-based distribution network of Internet Service Providers, web hosting companies and other providers of Internet services to end-users.
2. Significant accounting policies:
These financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars, except where otherwise noted. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
(a) Basis of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
Investments over which the Company is unable to exercise significant influence, are recorded at cost and written down only when there is evidence that a decline in value that is other than temporary has occurred.
(b) Use of estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP necessarily requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to amounts recognized for or carrying values of revenues, bad debts, investments, goodwill, intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at the time they are made. Under different assumptions or conditions, the actual results will differ, potentially materially, from those previously estimated. Many of the conditions impacting these assumptions and estimates are outside of the Companys control.
(c) Cash and cash equivalents
All highly liquid investments, with an original term to maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition, are classified as cash equivalents.
(d) Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Amortization is provided on a straight-line basis so as to amortize the cost of depreciable assets over their estimated useful lives at the following rates:
Asset |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Computer equipment |
|
30 |
% |
||
Computer software |
|
100 |
% |
||
Furniture and equipment |
|
20 |
% |
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
Over term of lease |
|
F-7
The Company reviews the carrying values of its property and equipment for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount. If such assets are considered impaired, the amount of the impairment loss recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, with fair value being determined based upon discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset.
(e) Intangible assets
Intangible assets, which represent technology, brand value, customer relationships and non-compete arrangements related to the acquisition of Boardtown Corporation in 2004, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of three or seven years.
The Company reviews the carrying values of its intangible assets for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount. If such assets are considered impaired, the amount of the impairment loss recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying value for the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset, with fair value being determined based upon discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset.
(f) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair values of net identifiable assets acquired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company does not amortize goodwill but is required to evaluate goodwill annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Absent triggering factors during the year, the Company conducts its goodwill assessment in the fourth quarter to correspond with its measurement planning cycle. Impairment is tested at the reporting unit level by comparing the reporting units carrying amount to its fair value. The fair values of the reporting units are estimated using discounted cash flows based on historical experience and on various other assumptions, including current market trends and developments. To the extent a reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an impairment of goodwill exists. Impairment is measured by comparing the fair value of goodwill, determined in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, to its carrying value.
(g) Revenue recognition
The Companys revenues are derived from domain name registration fees on both a wholesale and retail basis and ancillary services and advertising and other revenue. Amounts received in advance of meeting the revenue recognition criteria described below are recorded as deferred revenue.
The Company earns registration fees in connection with each new, renewed and transferred-in registration and from providing provisioning services to Service Providers and registrars on a monthly basis. Service has been provided in connection with registration fees once the Company has confirmed that the requested domain name has been appropriately recorded in the registry under contractual performance standards. Domain names are generally purchased for terms of one to ten years. Registration fees charged for domain name registration and provisioning services are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contracted term. Registration fee revenues are net of any promotional rebates as the Company has a continuing obligation to provide services to customers throughout the registration period.
The Company also generates advertising and other revenue through its online libraries of shareware, freeware and online services presented on its website. Advertising and other revenues are recognized
F-8
ratably over the period in which it is presented. To the extent that minimum guaranteed impressions are not met, the Company defers recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impressions are achieved.
In those cases where payment is not received at the time of sale, additional conditions for recognition of revenue are that the collection of sales process is reasonably assured and the Company has no further performance obligations. The Company records costs that reflect expected refunds, rebates and credit card charge-backs as a reduction of revenues at the time of the sale based on historical experiences and current expectations.
The Company establishes reserves for possible uncollectible accounts receivable and other contingent liabilities which may arise in the normal course of business. Historically, credit losses have been within the Companys expectations and the reserves the Company has established have been appropriate. However, the Company has, on occasion, experienced issues which have led to accounts receivable not being fully collected. Should these issues occur more frequently, additional reserves may be required.
(h) Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue primarily relates to the unearned portion of revenues received in advance related to the unexpired term of registration fees from domain name registrations and ancillary services, net of external commissions. Revenue received in advance of the provision of services from advertising and Sleuth search technology is deferred and recognized in the month that the services are provided.
(i) Accreditation fees payable
Accreditation fees relate to the unpaid portion of accreditation fees paid to ICANN in connection with the registration of Generic Top-Level Domains.
(j) Prepaid domain name registry fees
Prepaid domain name registry and ancillary services fees represent amounts paid to registries, and country code domain name operators for updating and maintaining the registries, as well as to suppliers of ancillary services. Domain name registry and ancillary services fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contracted registration term.
(k) Translation of foreign currency transactions
The Companys functional currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities of the Company and of its wholly owned subsidiaries that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated into United States dollars (which is considered to be the measurement currency) at the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the historical exchange rates. Transactions included in operations are translated at the average rate for the year. Foreign exchange gains amounting to $250,714, $343,506 and $772,027 have been recorded in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), as amended. SFAS 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company has not complied with the documentation standards required for its forward foreign exchange contracts to be accounted for as hedges under SFAS 133 and has, therefore, accounted for such forward foreign exchange contracts at their fair value with a (loss)/gain recorded in the consolidated statement of operations of $(30,119), $88,743 and, $279,174 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
F-9
respectively, equal to the change in the fair value of such contracts. The fair value of the forward foreign exchange contracts is included in prepaid expenses in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
(l) Product development costs
Product development costs are expensed as incurred. The Company accounts for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Under this SOP, costs that are incurred in the preliminary stage of software development are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred during the application and development stage are capitalized and generally include external direct costs of materials and services consumed in the development and payroll and payroll- related costs for employees who are directly associated with the development project. Costs incurred in the post implementation and operation stage are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalized $328,300, $338,500 and $411,200 during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of such costs relating to the development of internal use software. The capitalized costs of computer software developed for internal use are amortized on a straight-line basis over one year from the date the software is put into use.
(m) Income taxes
Under the asset and liability method of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in the year that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded if it is not more likely than not that some portion of or all of a deferred tax asset will be realized.
The Company is entitled to earn investment tax credits (ITCs), which are credits related to specific qualifying expenditures as prescribed by Canadian Income Tax legislation. These ITCs relate primarily to research and development expenses. The ITCs are recognized once the Company has reasonable assurance that the amounts will be realized.
(n) Stock-based compensation
The Company has elected to follow the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, deferred stock-based compensation is recorded at the option grant date in an amount equal to the difference between the market value of a common share and the exercise price of the option. Deferred stock-based compensation resulting from employee option grants is amortized over the vesting period of the individual options, generally four years, in accordance with the accelerated measurement method in Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 28.
Stock options granted to consultants and other non-employees are accounted for using the fair value method under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation (SFAS 123). Under this method, the fair value of options granted is recognized as services are performed and options are earned.
F-10
The following table illustrates the effect on net income if the fair-value-based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each year.
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
2,772,616 |
|
$ |
5,500,338 |
|
$ |
2,063,438 |
|
Add stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax |
|
|
|
90,330 |
|
162,704 |
|
|||
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method for all rewards, net of tax |
|
(357,523 |
) |
(413,151 |
) |
(571,593 |
) |
|||
Net income, pro forma |
|
$ |
2,415,093 |
|
$ |
5,177,517 |
|
$ |
1,654,549 |
|
Earnings per common share, as reported |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Earnings per common share, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
To determine the fair value of each option on the grant date in 2005, 2004 and 2003, the following assumptions were used for the Companys stock option plan: dividend yield of 0.0% for each year, volatility of 120%, 132%, and 139%, respectively, a weighted average risk free interest rate of 3.8%, 3.2% and 2.8%, respectively, and a weighted average expected life of options of four years for each year. The weighted average grant date fair value for options issued in 2005, 2004 and 2003, with the exercise price equal to market value on the date of grant, were $0.69, $0.61 and $0.37, respectively.
(o) Income per common share
Basic income per common share has been calculated on the basis of income for the year divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted income per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding at the end of the year had been issued, converted or exercised at the later of the beginning of the year or their date of issuance. In computing diluted income per share, the treasury stock method is used to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the conversion of common stock equivalents or the proceeds of exercises of options.
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computation:
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income for the year |
|
|
$ |
2,772,616 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,500,338 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,063,438 |
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
69,077,329 |
|
|
|
66,079,104 |
|
|
|
64,626,429 |
|
|
|||
Effect of stock options |
|
|
3,403,875 |
|
|
|
1,972,475 |
|
|
|
99,500 |
|
|
|||
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
72,481,204 |
|
|
|
68,051,579 |
|
|
|
64,725,929 |
|
|
|||
Basic income per common share |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
Diluted income per common share |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
F-11
Options to purchase 105,510 shares of common stock were outstanding during 2005 (2004 : 864,310, 2003 : 8,554,754) but were not included in the computation of diluted income per common share because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares. The options which expire in years 2006 to 2015 were still outstanding at the end of 2005.
(p) Concentration of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable and forward foreign exchange contracts. Cash equivalents consist of deposits with, or guaranteed by, major commercial banks, the maturities of which are three months or less form the date of purchase. With respect to accounts receivable, the Company performs periodic credit evaluations of the financial condition of its customers and typically does not require collateral from them. The counterparty to the forward foreign exchange contracts is a major commercial bank which management believes does not represent a significant credit risk. Management assesses the need for allowances for potential credit losses by considering the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. No customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in 2005, 2004 or 2003. One customer accounted for 11% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2005. Two customers accounted for 27% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2004 and one customer accounted for 19% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2003. All of these accounts receivable have been collected.
(q) Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted cash, interest receivable, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the relatively short periods to maturity of the instruments.
(r) Comprehensive income
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130). This statement requires companies to classify items of their comprehensive income by their nature in the financial statements and display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from deficit and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of the balance sheet. There was no difference between net income and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
(s) Segment reporting
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131), which establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company operates in one business segment.
The Companys revenues are attributed to the country in which the contract originates, primarily Canada. Revenues from domain names issued from the Toronto, Canada location are attributed to Canada because it is impracticable to determine the country of the customer.
The Companys assets are located principally in Toronto, Canada.
F-12
(t) Reclassifications
Certain of the prior years comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in the current year.
(u) Recent accounting pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS 154 replaces APB 20, Accounting Changes and SFAS 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements and establishes retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on our financial statements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to expense the fair value of employee stock options and other forms of share-based compensation. Accordingly, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of the intrinsic value method to account for share-based compensation transactions as provided under APB Opinion No. 25. Under SFAS 123R, Tucows is required to determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be used at date of adoption. Tucows currently uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value options for pro-forma financial statement disclosure purposes in note 2 (n). The use of a different model to value options may result in a different fair value than the use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Tucows is required to adopt SFAS 123R in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Tucows is currently in the process of assessing the impact that SFAS No. 123R will have on our consolidated income statement in 2006. The historical pro forma income statement disclosure may not be indicative of future results due to the uncertainty of the number of new option grants as well as the assumptions and valuation method used.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47), which is an interpretation of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN 47 clarifies terminology within SFAS 143 and requires an entity to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liabilitys fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
3. Business acquisitions:
On April 27, 2004, the Company finalized the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Boardtown Corporation (Boardtown) for total purchase consideration of up to $4.0 million.
The total aggregate consideration paid until December 31, 2004 amounting to $2,321,782 is comprised of:
· $2,000,000 paid in cash;
· $274,540 (based on Tucows Inc.s average share price for the two days before and two days after April 21, 2004, the date of the announcement of the transaction, of $0.77 per share for 356,546 Tucows Inc. shares); and
· $47,242 of transaction costs.
F-13
The fair value of assets acquired based on the consideration paid, is as follows:
Current assets (including cash of $27,732) |
|
|
|
$ |
110,440 |
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
52,861 |
|
||
Intangible assets including: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Technology |
|
$ |
540,000 |
|
|
|
|
Brand |
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
||
Customer relationships |
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
||
Non-compete agreements |
|
190,000 |
|
1,400,000 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
964,467 |
|
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
(205,986 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,321,782 |
|
|
During 2005, the Company and the shareholders of Boardtown agreed that the shareholders of Boardtown had met certain of the performance milestones in which additional purchase consideration is contingent upon. Accordingly 1,066,075 shares of common stock were released from escrow to the shareholders of Boardtown. The release of the above shares has been recorded as additional goodwill within the consolidated balance sheets, in the amount of $986,600. In addition, as the net cash flow from existing operations performance milestone was not satisfied, the $400,000 of the cash contingent consideration was returned to the Company. At December 31, 2005, 3,569 shares of common stock and $600,000 of the contingent consideration remained in escrow. To the extent that the performance milestones pertaining to renewing or converting potential support customers are met, which are to be met at various dates by April 2007, this additional consideration will be released from escrow and its fair value will be recorded as additional goodwill at the time when the obligation becomes determinable. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, 3,569 shares of common stock and $40,699 was released from escrow.
The following unaudited supplemental pro-forma information is presented to illustrate the effects of the acquisition on the historical operating results for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the respective periods.
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
45,122,156 |
|
$ |
38,722,077 |
|
Net income |
|
5,520,199 |
|
2,224,488 |
|
||
Pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
F-14
4. Property and equipment:
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Computer equipment |
|
$ |
4,573,457 |
|
$ |
3,516,997 |
|
Computer software |
|
6,528,216 |
|
6,114,137 |
|
||
Furniture and equipment |
|
929,824 |
|
885,112 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
626,081 |
|
664,205 |
|
||
|
|
12,657,578 |
|
11,180,451 |
|
||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accumulated amortization |
|
10,984,907 |
|
10,033,214 |
|
||
Write-down of property and equipment |
|
130,000 |
|
130,000 |
|
||
|
|
11,114,907 |
|
10,163,214 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
1,542,671 |
|
$ |
1,017,237 |
|
5. Intangible assets:
Intangible assets consist of technology, brand, customer relationships and non-competition agreements, which were entered into with the former owners of Boardtown Corporation. These balances are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the intangible assets, being seven years, except the non-competition agreements which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over three years.
Acquired intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
Technology |
|
Brand |
|
Customer |
|
Non-compete |
|
Total |
|
|||||||||||
Acquisition of Boardtown Corporation in 2004 |
|
|
$ |
540,000 |
|
|
$ |
170,000 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
(51,320 |
) |
|
(16,480 |
) |
|
(47,800 |
) |
|
|
(42,160 |
) |
|
(157,760 |
) |
|||||
Net book value, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
488,680 |
|
|
153,520 |
|
|
452,200 |
|
|
|
147,840 |
|
|
1,242,240 |
|
|||||
Amortization expense |
|
|
(77,160 |
) |
|
(24,240 |
) |
|
(71,400 |
) |
|
|
(63,360 |
) |
|
(236,160 |
) |
|||||
Net book value, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
$ |
411,520 |
|
|
$ |
129,280 |
|
|
$ |
380,800 |
|
|
|
$ |
84,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,006,080 |
|
The following table shows the estimated amortization expense for each of the next 5 years, assuming no further additions to acquired intangible assets are made:
|
|
Year ending |
|
|||
2006 |
|
|
236,160 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
193,920 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
172,800 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
172,800 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
172,800 |
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
57,600 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
1,006,080 |
|
|
F-15
6. Investment:
The Company holds a 7% interest in Afilias, Limited (Afilias), a private company, which is a consortium of 18 domain name registrars.
7. Public Offering:
In August 2005, the Company completed a public offering whereby 3,290,423 shares of common stock (which includes the underwriters over-allotment of 2,889,250 shares) were issued and received net proceeds of $1,574,675 (after underwriters fees of $177,683 and related offering expenses of $1,209,023).
In addition, certain existing shareholders of Tucows, disposed of 21,823,827 shares of Tucows common stock and received net proceeds of $18,462,958 (after underwriters fees of $1,178,487). Tucows did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares sold by the selling shareholders.
8. 1996 Stock Option Plan:
The Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan was established for the benefit of the employees, officers, directors and certain consultants of the Company. The maximum number of common stock which may be set aside for issuance under the Plan is 11,150,000 shares, provided that the Board of Directors of the Company has the right, from time to time, to increase such number subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company when required by law or regulatory authority. Generally, options issued under the Plan vest over a four-year period.
Details of stock option transactions are as follows:
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
7,497,586 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
8,665,755 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
7,660,258 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
Granted |
|
228,875 |
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
1,479,250 |
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
6,315,235 |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|||
Exercised |
|
(771,555 |
) |
|
0.39 |
|
|
(1,834,275 |
) |
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Forfeited |
|
(450,019 |
) |
|
0.54 |
|
|
(392,735 |
) |
|
0.40 |
|
|
(5,309,738 |
) |
|
0.93 |
|
|
|||
Expired |
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
4.69 |
|
|
(420,409 |
) |
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Outstanding, end of year |
|
6,497,387 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
7,497,586 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
8,665,755 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
Options exercisable, end of year |
|
5,324,655 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
5,211,809 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
6,826,444 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
The stock options expire at various dates through 2015.
F-16
As of December 31, 2005, the exercise prices and weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding options were as follows:
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
Options exercisable |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise price |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted average |
|
Number |
|
Weighted average |
|
||||||||||
$0.26-$0.36 |
|
|
719,781 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
446,832 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
||
$0.37-$0.50 |
|
|
3,730,256 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
3,672,322 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
||
$0.52-$0.91 |
|
|
1,915,956 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
1,080,982 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
||
$0.93-$5.94 |
|
|
131,394 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
124,519 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
6,497,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,324,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The Company recorded no stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2005, recorded stock-based compensation amounting to $69,737 for the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of modification of the terms of certain options granted to a former employee and nil for the year ended December 31, 2003. Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation amounted to nil for the year ended December 31, 2005, $20,593 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $162,704 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
9. Income taxes:
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate of 35% to the income before provision for income taxes as a result of the following:
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|||||||||
Income for the
year before provision for |
|
|
$ |
2,620,641 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,349,906 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,063,438 |
|
|
Computed expected tax expense |
|
|
$ |
917,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
822,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
722,000 |
|
|
Reduction in income tax expense resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
State income taxes |
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|||
Permanent differences |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
|
(254,000 |
) |
|
|||
ITCs recovered |
|
|
(251,874 |
) |
|
|
(150,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Other |
|
|
(192,101 |
) |
|
|
(660,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Change in beginning of the year balance of the valuation allowance allocated to income tax expense |
|
|
(739,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,369,000 |
) |
|
|
(530,000 |
) |
|
|||
|
|
|
$ |
(151,975 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(3,150,432 |
) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
F-17
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 are presented below:
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net operating loss carried forward |
|
$ |
5,710,000 |
|
$ |
5,883,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
4,210,000 |
|
3,649,000 |
|
||
Reserves |
|
142,000 |
|
312,000 |
|
||
Capital losses |
|
45,000 |
|
45,000 |
|
||
Amortization |
|
8,068,000 |
|
9,025,000 |
|
||
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
18,175,000 |
|
18,914,000 |
|
||
Less valuation allowance |
|
(15,175,000 |
) |
(15,914,000 |
) |
||
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
Deferred income tax asset, current portion |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
Deferred income tax asset, long-term portion |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the years in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers projected future taxable income, uncertainties related to the industry in which the Company operates, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is appropriate to record a valuation allowance in the amount of $15.2 million at December 31, 2005 and a valuation allowance in the amount of $15.9 million at December 31, 2004.
As of December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $15,025,000 of losses available to reduce future years U.S. taxable income which expire on various dates between 2018 and 2022. In order to utilize the total gross deferred tax assets, the Company would have to earn taxable income of approximately $49.8 million.
10. Commitments and contingencies:
(a) The Company has several non-cancelable lease and purchase obligations primarily for general office facilities and equipment that expire over the next five years. Future minimum payments under these agreements are as follows:
2006 |
|
$ |
446,000 |
|
2007 |
|
335,000 |
|
|
2008 |
|
313,000 |
|
|
2009 |
|
324,000 |
|
|
2010 |
|
336,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
347,000 |
|
(b) In the normal course of operations, the Company is subject to various lawsuits and other claims. The Company believes that the outcome of any of the outstanding claims would not result in a material effect on the Companys financial position.
F-18
(c) To manage its exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the Company has entered into a series of forward foreign exchange contracts whereby amounts of $600,000 are converted into Canadian dollars on January 10, 2006 and January 26, 2006, an amount of $300,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on January 26, 2006, and amounts of $750,000 are converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis from February 2006 and March 2006 at foreign exchange rates varying from 1.1632 to 1.2299. The notional principal of the outstanding Contracts at December 31, 2005 is $4.5 million. As margin security against these Contracts, the Company has placed $60,000 into secured term deposits, which mature on a monthly basis in line with the Contracts and has been reflected as restricted cash on the balance sheet.
a) On January 3, 2006, Tucows.com Co, one of the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries, acquired substantially all of the hosted messaging assets of Critical Path, Inc., including the customer base, hosted messaging communications infrastructure, and other related assets for up to $8.0 million in cash and the assumption of some related contractual liabilities. Of the total consideration, $1.75 million of the purchase price is being held in escrow, contingent upon certain customer contracts being renewed through October 31, 2006. This acquisition will be accounted for as a business combination by the purchase method. The Company is in the process of obtaining fair value information on the acquired assets and assumed liabilities.
b) On January 6, 2006, Tucows entered into a series of forward foreign exchange contracts with a notional value of $3.0 million, whereby $750,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis for April and May 2006 at foreign exchange rates varying from U.S.$1:Cdn$1.1595 to U.S.$1:Cdn$1.1609.
c) On February 15, 2006, Tucows entered into a series of forward foreign exchange contracts with a notional value of $8.5 million, whereby $250,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on July 11, 2006, and $750,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis from July 2006 to December 2006 at foreign exchange rates varying from U.S.$1:Cdn$1.147 to U.S.$1:Cdn$1.1522.
(a) The following is a summary of the Companys revenue earned from each significant revenue stream:
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|||
Advertising and other revenue |
|
$ |
3,198,110 |
|
$ |
3,217,368 |
|
$ |
2,046,860 |
|
Domain name and ancillary services |
|
45,318,929 |
|
41,499,787 |
|
35,147,887 |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
48,517,039 |
|
$ |
44,717,155 |
|
$ |
37,194,747 |
|
F-19
(b) Valuation and qualifying accounts:
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
Write-offs |
|
Balance at |
|
||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
26,250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,250 |
|
2004 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
||||
2003 |
|
|
229,938 |
|
|
(116,000 |
) |
|
(83,938 |
) |
|
30,000 |
|
||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
$ |
15,914,000 |
|
|
$ |
(739,000 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,175,000 |
|
2004 |
|
|
19,283,000 |
|
|
(3,369,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
15,914,000 |
|
||||
2003 |
|
|
19,813,000 |
|
|
(530,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
19,283,000 |
|
F-20
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Description |
2.1 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2005, between Critical Path and Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with Tucows current report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on December 19, 2005). |
||
3.1 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with Tucows report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on September 6, 2001). |
||
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Tucows Inc.[(2] (Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.2 filed with Tucows registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-60306) (the Registration Statement), as filed with the SEC on May 4, 2001). |
||
10.1 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2004, by and between Tucows Inc., Boardtown Corporation and the shareholders of Boardtown named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with Tucows report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on May 11, 2004). |
||
10.2 |
|
Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2005, by and between Tucows Inc., Boardtown Corporation and the shareholders of Boardtown named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Tucows report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005). |
||
10.3 |
|
Amended and Restated 1996 Equity Compensation Plan Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 filed with Tucows registration statement on Form S-8, as filed with the SEC on November 27, 2001). |
||
10.4* |
|
Employment Agreement dated January 22, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Elliot Noss (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2004). |
||
10.5* |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Michael Cooperman (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2004). |
||
10.6* |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Supriyo Sen (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2004). |
||
10.7* |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 11, 2003 between Tucows.com Co. and Graham Morris (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on March 24, 2005). |
||
10.8 |
|
Lease between 707932 Ontario Limited and Tucows International Corporation, dated December 10, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.9 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2002). |
||
10.9 |
|
Lease extension between 707932 Ontario Limited and Tucows Inc. and Tucows.com Co., dated September 4, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on March 23, 2005). |
10.10* |
|
Description of Tucows Fiscal 2004 At Risk Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with Tucows report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC on March 23, 2005). |
10.11 |
|
Registrar Accreditation Agreement, effective as of June 25, 2005, by and between the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and Tucows.com Co. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed with Amendment No. 1 to Tucows registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-125843), as filed with the SEC on July 7, 2005). |
10.12 |
|
Registry-Registrar Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2001, by and between VeriSign, Inc. and Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 filed with Amendment No. 1 to Tucows registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-125843), as filed with the SEC on July 7, 2005). |
21.1# |
|
Subsidiaries of Tucows Inc. |
23.1# |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
31.1# |
|
Chief Executive Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
31.2# |
|
Chief Financial Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
32.1# |
|
Chief Executive Officers Section 1350 Certification. |
32.2# |
|
Chief Financial Officers Section 1350 Certification. |
* Management or compensatory contract required to be filed pursuant to Item 15(c) of the requirements for Form 10-K reports.
# Filed herewith.