Table of Contents

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨		Preliminary Proxy Statement		¨		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x		Definitive Proxy Statement
¨		Definitive Additional Materials
¨		Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

The Charles Schwab Corporation

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x

No fee required.

 

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

  

 

 

¨

Fee previously paid with preliminary materials.

 

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount previously paid:

 

  

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

  

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

  

 

---

Table of Contents

 

---

Table of Contents

 

 

March 27, 2015

Dear Fellow Stockholders,

We cordially invite you to attend our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, May 13, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. The annual meeting will be held at www.schwabevents.com/corporation, or you also may attend in person at 211 Main Street, San Francisco, California. Please follow the registration instructions as outlined in this proxy statement to attend the meeting either virtually via the internet or in person.

At the annual meeting, we will conduct the items of business outlined in this proxy statement. We also will report on our corporate performance in 2014 and answer your questions.

Your vote is important. We encourage you to read this proxy statement carefully and to vote your shares as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the meeting. Voting instructions are contained on the proxy card or voting instruction form that you received with this proxy statement.

We look forward to your participation.

Sincerely,

CHARLES R. SCHWAB		WALTER W. BETTINGER II
CHAIRMAN		PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

---

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Proxy Summary			ii
Notice of 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders			vi
Proxy Statement			1
Attending the Annual Meeting			1
Voting Your Shares			1
Proposal One: Election of Directors			2
Members of the Board of Directors			2
Director Independence			7
Corporate Governance Information			7
Director Compensation			10
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			13
Director Nominations			13
Communications with the Board of Directors			14
Proposal Two: Ratification of the Selection of Independent Auditors			16
Auditor Fees			16
Audit Committee Report			18
Proposal Three: Advisory Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation			19
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			19
Compensation Committee Report			31
Executive Compensation Tables			32
2014 Summary Compensation Table			32
2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table			34
Narrative to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tables			35
2014 Termination and Change in Control Benefits Table			38
Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2014			41
2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table			48
2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table			48
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans			49
Proposal Four: Approval of the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan			51
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management			52
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance			54
Transactions with Related Persons			54
Proposals Five through Nine: Stockholder Proposals			55
Information about Voting Procedures			66
Information about the Proxy Statement and Proposals			70
Exhibit A: Corporate Executive Bonus Plan			71

 

i

---

Table of Contents

 

ii

---

Table of Contents

 

iii

---

Table of Contents

 

iv

---

Table of Contents

 

v

---

Table of Contents

		NOTICE OF 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Date:		Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Time:		2:00 p.m., Pacific Time
Location:		www.schwabevents.com/corporation,                               or 211 Main Street, San Francisco, California
Agenda:		·   elect five directors for three-year terms,   ·   vote to ratify the selection of independent auditors,   ·   vote for the approval, on an advisory basis, of compensation of named executive officers,   ·   vote to approve the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan,   ·   vote on five stockholder proposals, if properly presented, and   ·   consider any other business properly coming before the meeting.

Stockholders who owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on March 16, 2015 are entitled to attend and vote at the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. A complete list of registered stockholders will be available prior to the meeting at our principal executive offices at 211 Main Street, San Francisco, California 94105.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

DAVID R. GARFIELD

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,

GENERAL COUNSEL AND

CORPORATE SECRETARY

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of

Stockholders to be Held on May 13, 2015. The proxy statement and annual report to

security holders are available in the “Investor Relations” section of our website at

www.aboutschwab.com.

Your Vote is Important

Please vote as promptly as possible by following the instructions on your proxy card or voting

instruction form. If you plan to attend the meeting virtually via the internet or in person, you must

register by following the instructions contained in the “Attending the Annual Meeting”

section of this proxy statement.

 

vi

---

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors is sending these proxy materials to you on or about March 27, 2015. Stockholders who owned the company’s common stock at the close of business on March 16, 2015 may attend and vote at the annual meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote. There were 1,313,001,539 shares of common stock outstanding on March 16, 2015.

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

You must register in advance to attend the annual meeting virtually via the internet or in person. To register, please go to:

www.schwabevents.com/corporation.

You will be asked to provide your name, mailing address, email address and proof that you own Schwab shares (such as the Schwab account number in which you hold the shares, or the name of the broker and number of shares that you hold in an account outside of Schwab). You also may write the Assistant Corporate Secretary at the address in the “Corporate Governance Information” section of this proxy statement or call the Assistant Corporate Secretary at (415) 667-9979 if you plan to attend the in-person meeting.

If you register in advance to attend the virtual annual meeting, we will email you information on how to access the area of www.schwabevents.com where you will be able to submit questions and vote. While you may watch the webcast without registering in advance, you will not be able to access the area of the website where you can ask questions and vote.

If you plan to attend the in-person meeting, in accordance with our security procedures, you will be asked to present picture identification to enter the meeting. Attendance at the annual meeting is limited to stockholders or one named representative of a stockholder. Seating is limited and, therefore, admission to the in-person annual meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis. If you will be naming a representative to attend the meeting on your behalf, the name, address and telephone number of that individual also must be provided.

VOTING YOUR SHARES

You may vote by internet, telephone or mail in advance of the meeting by following the instructions on your proxy card or voting instruction form.

If you do not vote in advance and plan to submit your vote at the annual meeting, you will need a legal proxy to vote your shares if your shares are held in “street name” (e.g., through a bank or broker). You may obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker. If you plan to vote at the virtual meeting, please send your legal proxy to our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., by fax to (651) 450-4026 or email to wfssproxyteam@wellsfargo.com. If you plan to vote at the in-person meeting, please bring the legal proxy with you. If you hold shares registered in your name (e.g., in certificate form), you will not need a legal proxy to vote your shares at the annual meeting.

 

1

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL ONE:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees for directors this year are:

 

·

Nancy H. Bechtle

 

·

Walter W. Bettinger II

 

·

C. Preston Butcher

 

·

Christopher V. Dodds

 

·

Mark A. Goldfarb

Each nominee is presently a director of the company and has consented to serve a three-year term. Biographical information about each of the company’s directors, including the director nominees, is contained in the following section.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

JOHN K. ADAMS, JR.

DIRECTOR SINCE JANUARY 2015

Mr. Adams, age 59, served as managing director in the Financial Institutions Group at UBS Investment Bank, a financial services firm, from 2002 until 2013. Prior to joining UBS, Mr. Adams was with Credit Suisse’s Financial Institutions Group from 1985 until 2002. He currently serves on the board of directors of Navient Corporation, a loan management, servicing and asset recovery company. Mr. Adams’ term expires in 2016.

Mr. Adams has significant experience with respect to the financial services industry, investment banking, capital markets and mergers and acquisitions, having served as head of UBS’ North American banks practice and in Credit Suisse’s Financial Institutions Group.

NANCY H. BECHTLE

DIRECTOR SINCE 1992

Ms. Bechtle, age 77, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the San Francisco Symphony from 1987 until 2001 and has served as a member of the San Francisco Symphony Board of Governors since 1984. She was a director and Chief Financial Officer of J.R. Bechtle & Co., an international consulting firm, from 1979 to 1998. Ms. Bechtle has served as Chairman and a director of Sugar Bowl Corporation, a ski resort operator, since 1998. She was appointed a director of the Presidio Trust in 2008 and currently serves as its Chairman. She also served as a director of the National Park Foundation from 2002 until 2008 and was its Vice Chairman from 2005 until 2008. Ms. Bechtle is a nominee for election this year.

Ms. Bechtle brings leadership skills and financial experience to the board, having served as Chief Financial Officer of J.R. Bechtle & Co., Chairman of Sugar Bowl Corporation and Chief Executive Officer of the San Francisco Symphony. She has deep knowledge of the company and its business, having served on the board since 1992.

 

2

---

Table of Contents

WALTER W. BETTINGER II

DIRECTOR SINCE 2008

Mr. Bettinger, age 54, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Charles Schwab Corporation and a member of the Board of Directors since 2008. He also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Charles Schwab Bank and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., and as a trustee of The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, Schwab Capital Trust, Schwab Annuity Portfolios, Laudus Trust, Laudus Institutional Trust, and Schwab Strategic Trust, all registered investment companies. Prior to assuming his current role, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the company. He also served as Executive Vice President and President – Schwab Investor Services from 2005 until 2007, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – Individual Investor Enterprise from 2004 until 2005, Executive Vice President and President – Corporate Services from 2002 until 2004 and Executive Vice President and President – Retirement Plan Services from 2000 until 2002. Mr. Bettinger joined the company in 1995 as part of the acquisition of The Hampton Company, which he founded in 1983. Mr. Bettinger is a nominee for election this year.

Mr. Bettinger has significant financial services experience, having served in a senior executive role overseeing sales, service, marketing and operations. As Chief Executive Officer of the company, Mr. Bettinger works closely with the board in evaluating and enhancing the strategic position of the company.

C. PRESTON BUTCHER

DIRECTOR SINCE 1988

Mr. Butcher, age 76, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Legacy Partners (formerly Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc.), a real estate development and management firm, since 1998 and Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc., a real estate investment trust, since 2009. Mr. Butcher served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Regional Partner of Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. from 1967 until 1998. He served as a director of Northstar Realty Finance Corp until September 2014. Mr. Butcher is a nominee for election this year.

Mr. Butcher brings leadership skills and experience in complex financial transactions to the board as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Legacy Partners. He has deep knowledge of the company and its business, having served on the board since 1988.

CHRISTOPHER V. DODDS

DIRECTOR SINCE OCTOBER 2014

Mr. Dodds, age 55, has served as a senior advisor at The Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, since 2008. He also serves on the board of directors of Charles Schwab Bank, Investment Technology Group, Inc., an institutional securities brokerage firm, and Avalon Advisors, LLC, a wealth management firm. From 1986 to 2007, Mr. Dodds held several key positions at The Charles Schwab Corporation, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Dodds is a nominee for election this year.

Mr. Dodds brings leadership skills, knowledge of the financial services industry, and financial and accounting experience. He has deep knowledge of the company and its business, having served as its Chief Financial Officer from 1999 until 2007, and as a director of Charles Schwab Bank since 2007.

 

3

---

Table of Contents

STEPHEN A. ELLIS

DIRECTOR SINCE 2012

Mr. Ellis, age 52, served as Chief Executive Officer of Asurion, LLC, a provider of consumer technology protection services, from 2012 through 2014 and continues to serve on its Board of Directors. Prior to Asurion, Mr. Ellis served as Worldwide Managing Director of Bain & Company, a management consulting firm, from 2005 until 2012, and as Managing Partner for Bain’s West Coast offices from 1999 through 2004. Mr. Ellis joined Bain in 1993. Mr. Ellis’ term expires in 2016.

Mr. Ellis brings leadership skills and experience in global management consulting to the board, having served as Worldwide Managing Director of Bain & Company and Chief Executive Officer of Asurion, LLC.

MARK A. GOLDFARB

DIRECTOR SINCE 2012

Mr. Goldfarb, age 63, has served as a managing partner with BDO USA, LLP, an accounting and consulting firm, since January 2015. He was a founder of SS&G, Inc. (SS&G), an accounting and business consulting firm, and served as managing partner of SS&G from 1987 until 2012, and as senior managing director of SS&G from 2012 until January 2015, at which time SS&G merged with BDO USA, LLP. Mr. Goldfarb served on the Board of Trustees and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Schwab Strategic Trust, a registered investment company, from 2009 until 2012. He is also a past president of Cascade Capital Corporation. Mr. Goldfarb is a nominee for election this year.

Mr. Goldfarb brings financial and operational leadership experience to the board, having served as a founder and senior managing director of SS&G and a managing partner with BDO USA, LLP. His financial expertise is critical for his role as Audit Committee Chairman.

WILLIAM S. HARAF

DIRECTOR SINCE JANUARY 2015

Mr. Haraf, age 66, serves as a special advisor for Promontory Financial Group, a financial consulting firm. He was a managing director of Promontory Financial Group from 2012 until 2014. From 2008 until 2012, he served as Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Institutions. Mr. Haraf served as a member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council from 2010 until 2012, as managing director of Banc of America Securities from 1999 until 2003 and as Senior Vice President of Strategic Policy Development and Planning at Bank of America from 1994 until 1999. Mr. Haraf’s term expires in 2017.

Mr. Haraf brings substantial financial services and regulatory experience to the board, having served as managing director of Promontory Financial Group, Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Institutions and a member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council.

FRANK C. HERRINGER

DIRECTOR SINCE 1996

Mr. Herringer, age 72, has been Chairman of the Board of Transamerica Corporation, a financial services company, since 1996. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Transamerica from 1991 to 1999 and President from 1986 to 1999, when Transamerica was acquired by AEGON N.V. From the date of the acquisition until 2000, Mr. Herringer served on the Executive Board of AEGON N.V. and as Chairman of the Board of AEGON USA, Inc. Mr. Herringer is also a director of AEGON U.S. Corporation, the holding company for AEGON N.V.’s operations in the United States, Amgen Inc., a biotechnology company, and Cardax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biotechnology company. Mr. Herringer’s term expires in 2017.

 

4

---

Table of Contents

Mr. Herringer brings public company knowledge and leadership experience to the board, having served as Chief Executive Officer of Transamerica, and his service at Transamerica and AEGON contribute to his knowledge of the financial services industry. Mr. Herringer brings insights to the board from his service on other public company boards.

STEPHEN T. McLIN

DIRECTOR SINCE 1988

Mr. McLin, age 68, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of STM Holdings LLC, which offers merger and acquisition advice, since 1998. From 1987 until 1998, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of America First Financial Corporation, a finance and investment banking firm, and parent of EurekaBank. Before that, he was an Executive Vice President of Bank of America. Mr. McLin’s term expires in 2017.

Mr. McLin brings leadership experience to the board, having served as Chief Executive Officer of America First Financial Corporation and having extensive knowledge of the financial services industry through his experience at STM Holdings LLC, America First Financial Corporation and Bank of America.

ARUN SARIN

DIRECTOR SINCE 2009

Mr. Sarin, age 60, served as Chief Executive Officer of Vodafone Group Plc, a mobile telecommunications company, from 2003 until his retirement in 2008. Beginning in 1984, he held a variety of management positions with Pacific Telesis Group, a telecommunications company, and AirTouch Communications, Inc., a wireless telecommunications company, which was spun off from Pacific Telesis Group in 1994. He was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of AirTouch in 1997. In 1999, Mr. Sarin was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Vodafone’s US/AsiaPacific region. He left Vodafone in 2000 to become Chief Executive Officer of Infospace, Inc., an information technology company. From 2002 until 2003, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Accel-KKR Telecom, a private equity firm. He served as a non-executive director of the Court of the Bank of England from 2005 until 2009. Mr. Sarin is a director of Cisco Systems, Inc., a networking and communications technology company, and Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc., a pre-paid and payments network. Mr. Sarin’s term expires in 2016.

Mr. Sarin brings public company knowledge and leadership experience to the board, having served as President and Chief Operating Officer of AirTouch Communications, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Vodafone Group Plc. He brings insights to the board from his service on other public company boards.

CHARLES R. SCHWAB

DIRECTOR SINCE 1986

Mr. Schwab, age 77, has been Chairman and a director of The Charles Schwab Corporation since its incorporation in 1986. Mr. Schwab served as Chief Executive Officer of the company from 1986 to 1997 and from 2004 until 2008. He served as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the company from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Schwab was a founder of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. in 1971, has been its Chairman since 1978, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 2004 until 2008. Mr. Schwab is Chairman of Charles Schwab Bank and Chairman and trustee of The Charles Schwab Family of Funds, Schwab Investments, Schwab Capital Trust, Schwab Annuity Portfolios, Laudus Trust and Laudus Institutional Trust, all registered investment companies. He has served as a director of Yahoo! Inc., an Internet corporation, since June 2014. Mr. Schwab’s term expires in 2016.

Mr. Schwab is the founder of the company, was the Chief Executive Officer of the company, and has been the Chairman since its inception. His vision continues to drive the company’s growth.

 

5

---

Table of Contents

PAULA A. SNEED

DIRECTOR SINCE 2002

Ms. Sneed, age 67, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phelps Prescott Group, LLC, a strategy and management consulting firm. She served as Executive Vice President, Global Marketing Resources and Initiatives, of Kraft Foods, Inc., a global food and beverage company, from 2005 until her retirement in 2006; Senior Vice President, Global Marketing Resources and Initiatives from 2004 to 2005; and Group Vice President and President of E-Commerce and Marketing Services for Kraft Foods North America, part of Kraft Foods, Inc., from 2000 until 2004. She joined General Foods Corporation (which later merged with Kraft Foods) in 1977 and held a variety of senior executive positions, including Chief Marketing Officer, Executive Vice President and President eCommerce division, Executive Vice President and President Desserts division, and Senior Vice President and President Food Service division. Ms. Sneed is a director of Airgas, Inc., a national distributor of industrial, medical and specialty gases and related equipment, and TE Connectivity, Ltd., a manufacturer of engineered electronic components, network solutions, wireless systems and telecommunications systems. Ms. Sneed’s term expires in 2016.

Ms. Sneed brings marketing skills and general management and executive leadership experience to the board, having served in a variety of senior executive positions at Kraft Foods, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phelps Prescott Group. She brings insights to the board through her service on other public company boards.

ROGER O. WALTHER

DIRECTOR SINCE 1989

Mr. Walther, age 79, has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tusker Corporation, a real estate and business management company, since 1997. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ELS Educational Services, Inc., a provider in the United States and internationally of courses in English as a second language, between 1992 and 1997. Mr. Walther was President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of AIFS, Inc., which designs and markets educational and cultural programs internationally, from 1964 to 1993. Mr. Walther served as Chairman and a director of First Republic Bank from 1985 until 2007. Mr. Walther’s term expires in 2017.

Mr. Walther brings public company knowledge, leadership, and financial services industry experience to the board, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tusker Corporation, Chairman and a director of First Republic Bank, Chief Executive Officer of ELS Educational Services, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of AIFS, Inc.

ROBERT N. WILSON

DIRECTOR SINCE 2003

Mr. Wilson, age 74, is Chairman of Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. (formerly Still River Systems), a medical device company. Mr. Wilson was Chairman of Caxton Health Holdings, LLC, a healthcare-focused investment firm, from 2004 through 2007, and was Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Johnson & Johnson, a manufacturer of health care products, from 1989 until 2003. Mr. Wilson joined Johnson & Johnson in 1964. Mr. Wilson is a director of Hess Corporation, an integrated oil and gas company, and Synta Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a bio-pharmaceutical company. Mr. Wilson’s term expires in 2017.

Mr. Wilson brings public company knowledge and leadership experience to the board, having served as Vice Chairman of Johnson & Johnson, Chairman of Mevion Medical Systems, and Chairman of Caxton Health Holdings. He brings insights to the board as a director of other public company boards.

 

6

---

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We have considered the independence of each member of the board in accordance with New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. To assist us in our determination, we also adopted general guidelines for independence. The guidelines for independence are available on the company’s website at www.aboutschwab.com/governance.

Based on our guidelines and New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards, we have determined that the following directors are independent: John K. Adams, Jr., Nancy H. Bechtle, C. Preston Butcher, Christopher V. Dodds, Stephen A. Ellis, Mark A. Goldfarb, William S. Haraf, Frank C. Herringer, Stephen T. McLin, Arun Sarin, Paula A. Sneed, Roger O. Walther, and Robert N. Wilson.

In determining independence, the Board of Directors considers broadly all relevant facts and circumstances regarding a director’s relationships with the company. All non-employee directors receive compensation from the company for their service as a director, as disclosed in the section “Director Compensation,” and are entitled to receive reimbursement for their expenses in traveling to and participating in board and committee meetings. As disclosed in the “Transactions with Related Persons” section of this proxy statement, some directors and entities with which they are affiliated have credit transactions with the company’s banking and brokerage subsidiaries, such as mortgage loans, revolving lines of credit, or other extensions of credit. These transactions with directors and their affiliates are made in the ordinary course of business and to the extent permitted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Such transactions are on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the lender and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

In addition to the relationships outlined above, the board considered the following types of relationships for the following directors:

 

·

Nancy H. Bechtle: The director serves as a director of a nonprofit organization to which the company, its affiliates or its charitable foundation have made donations.

 

·

C. Preston Butcher: The director’s spouse serves as a director of a nonprofit organization to which the company, its affiliates or its charitable foundation have made donations.

 

·

Mark A. Goldfarb: The director serves as a director of a nonprofit organization to which the company, its affiliates or its charitable foundation have made donations.

 

·

William S. Haraf: The director serves as a special advisor of a consulting firm which the company has engaged.

 

·

Frank C. Herringer: The director’s spouse serves as a director of a nonprofit organization to which the company, its affiliates or its charitable foundation have made donations.

 

·

Steven T. McLin: The director’s son is employed by the company in a non-executive officer, non-managerial capacity.

 

·

Paula A. Sneed: The director serves as a director of a nonprofit organization to which the company, its affiliates or its charitable foundation have made donations.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

Board Leadership

The Chairman of the Board is Charles R. Schwab. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles are split, and Mr. Bettinger serves as Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman of the Board approves the agenda for board meetings

 

7

---

Table of Contents

and leads the board in its discussions. Mr. Schwab and Mr. Bettinger, as the only two management directors, do not participate in sessions of non-management directors. As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, non-management directors meet regularly in executive session without management. The Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee presides over the executive sessions of non-management directors. Mr. Herringer, as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2014, led the non-management directors in executive session.

The board has four standing committees (Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Risk) that are composed entirely of independent directors and are chaired by independent directors. Given the role and scope of authority of these committees, and that over 85% of the board is composed of independent directors, the board believes that its leadership structure, with the Chairman of the Board leading board discussions, and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee leading non-management executive sessions, is appropriate.

Risk Oversight

As part of its oversight functions, the Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of risk management at the company. The board has a Risk Committee, which assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the company’s risk management program and provides reports to the board and the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews reports from management and the Risk Committee concerning the company’s risk assessment and major risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Compensation Committee, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, separately reviews the compensation program with respect to incentives for risk-taking by employees. For further discussion of risk management at the company, please see “Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management” of the company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014.

Board Structure and Committees

The authorized number of directors is currently fifteen and the company has fifteen directors. Five directors are nominees for election this year and ten directors will continue to serve the terms described in their biographies.

Directors currently serve staggered terms. Each director who is elected at an annual meeting of stockholders serves a three-year term, and the directors are divided into three classes.

The board held seven meetings in 2014. Each director attended at least 75% of all applicable board and committee meetings during 2014. As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we expect directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. In 2014, eleven of the twelve directors attended the annual meeting.

We have an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Risk Committee. Each of these committees is composed entirely of “independent directors” as determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with its independence guidelines and New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. In addition to those standing committees, the board may from time to time establish ad hoc committees to assist in various matters.

The Audit Committee held thirteen meetings in 2014 and is composed of the following members: Mark A. Goldfarb (Chairman), John K. Adams, Jr., C. Preston Butcher, Christopher V. Dodds, William S. Haraf and Arun Sarin. Mr. Adams, Mr. Dodds and Mr. Haraf joined the Audit Committee in 2015. None of the directors on the Audit Committee is or, during the past three years, has been an employee of The Charles Schwab Corporation or any of its

 

8

---

Table of Contents

subsidiaries. None of the Audit Committee members simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies, including ours. The board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate in accordance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards and that Mark A. Goldfarb and Christopher V. Dodds are Audit Committee financial experts in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The Audit Committee:

 

·

reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditors the company’s annual and quarterly financial statements and the integrity of the financial reporting process,

 

·

reviews the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent auditors,

 

·

reviews the activities and performance of the internal auditors,

 

·

reviews reports from management and the Risk Committee regarding major risk exposures and steps management has taken to address such exposures, and

 

·

reviews compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2014 and is composed of the following members: Roger O. Walther (Chairman), Nancy H. Bechtle, Frank C. Herringer, Paula A. Sneed, and Robert N. Wilson. The Compensation Committee:

 

·

annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relating to compensation of executive officers and other senior officers,

 

·

evaluates the performance of executive officers and other senior officers and determines their compensation levels,

 

·

reviews and approves compensatory arrangements for executive officers and other senior officers, and

 

·

approves long-term awards for executive officers and other senior officers.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings in 2014 and is composed of the following members: Frank C. Herringer (Chairman), John K. Adams, Jr., Nancy H. Bechtle, C. Preston Butcher, Christopher V. Dodds, Stephen A. Ellis, Mark A. Goldfarb, William S. Haraf, Stephen T. McLin, Arun Sarin, Paula A. Sneed, Roger O. Walther and Robert N. Wilson. Mr. Adams, Mr. Dodds and Mr. Haraf joined the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2015. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:

 

·

identifies and evaluates individuals qualified to serve on the board,

 

·

recommends nominees to fill vacancies on the board and each board committee and recommends a slate of nominees for election or re-election as directors by the stockholders,

 

·

makes recommendations regarding succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and executive management, and

 

·

assesses the performance of the board and its committees and recommends corporate governance principles for adoption by the board.

The Risk Committee held four meetings in 2014 and is composed of the following members: Christopher V. Dodds (Chairman beginning in 2015), John K. Adams, Jr., Stephen A. Ellis, William S. Haraf, Stephen T. McLin (Chairman in 2014) and Robert N. Wilson. Mr. Adams and Mr. Haraf joined the Risk Committee in 2015. The Risk Committee:

 

·

reviews and discusses with management the company’s risk governance structure to identify, measure, monitor and mitigate risks,

 

·

reviews and approves the company’s enterprise-wide risk management framework,

 

·

reviews the performance and activities of the company’s operational risk management organization, and

 

9

---

Table of Contents

·

reviews key policies with respect to oversight of specific risks, including credit, operational, and capital and liquidity risk.

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Risk Committee have written charters. You may find a copy of these charters, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, on the company’s website at www.aboutschwab.com/governance. You also may obtain a paper copy of these items, without charge, from:

Assistant Corporate Secretary

The Charles Schwab Corporation

Mailstop SF211MN-05

211 Main Street

San Francisco, California 94105

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Mr. Schwab and Mr. Bettinger, who are employed by the company, receive no additional compensation for their service as directors. In 2014, non-employee directors received the following cash retainers and equity grants:

Cash Retainers

Each non-employee director received an annual cash retainer in the amount of $100,000. In addition, the Chairs of the Audit Committee and Risk Committee received an annual cash retainer of $25,000, and each other member of the Audit Committee and Risk Committee received an annual cash retainer of $10,000. The Chairs of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an annual cash retainer of $15,000, and each other member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an annual cash retainer of $5,000.

There are no fees for attendance at board or committee meetings, but the board retains the discretion to establish special committees and to pay a special retainer to the Chair and the members of any special committee. The board has authorized meeting fees for service on a special committee by Ms. Bechtle, Mr. Butcher and Mr. McLin. The meeting fees for that special committee consist of $500 per meeting held on the same day as a board meeting and $2,000 per meeting held on a day other than a board meeting.

Equity Grants

Each non-employee director received an annual equity grant under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan with an aggregate value of $140,000. Non-employee directors received this equity grant 50% in stock options and 50% in restricted stock units (RSUs).

Terms and Conditions

Non-employee directors receive the annual grants of options and RSUs on the second business day after the annual meeting of stockholders. In the event a new non-employee director is elected to the board during the year, a pro-rata amount of cash retainers and equity awards is granted to that individual for the first calendar year in lieu of the full amount. The non-employee director equity grants are subject to the following terms and conditions:

 

·

The annual grants of options and RSUs vest over the three-year period following the grant date, with 25% vesting on each of the first and second anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date. The options and RSUs become 100% vested in the event of the non-employee director’s death, disability or retirement.

 

10

---

Table of Contents

·

The number of RSUs for the annual grant is determined by dividing 50% of the aggregate value of the annual equity grant by the average of the high and low market price of the company’s common stock on the grant date.

 

·

The number of options for the annual grant of stock options is determined by dividing 50% of the aggregate value of the annual equity grant by the fair value of an option on the grant date.

 

·

Each stock option is designated as a nonqualified stock option and has an exercise price equal to the fair market value of common stock on the grant date.

 

·

Each stock option expires on the earliest of (1) the date ten years after the grant date, (2) the date three months after termination of service for any reason other than death, disability or retirement, or (3) the date one year after termination of service because of death or disability.

The company also has stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors. Under our guidelines, each non-employee director should own company stock with a fair market value equal to or exceeding $250,000. A new director should reach this target level upon completing five years of service. Once this target level is reached, the director is deemed to meet this target so long as he or she continues to hold an equivalent number of shares as on the date the target level was met. Shares owned outright, deferred shares and RSUs are counted in determining the threshold under our stock ownership guidelines, but stock options are not.

Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan

Non-employee directors also may participate in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan II. This plan allows them to defer receipt of all or a portion of their cash retainers and, at their election, either to:

(1) receive stock options that:

 

·

have a fair value equal to the amounts deferred (as determined under the valuation method used by the company to value stock options at the time of the deferral),

 

·

have an option exercise price equal to the closing price of common stock on the date the deferred amount would have been paid, and

 

·

vest immediately upon grant and generally expire ten years after the grant date,

– or –

 

(2)

receive RSUs that are funded by an equivalent number of shares of common stock to be held in a “rabbi” trust and distributed to the director when he or she ceases to be a director.

 

11

---

Table of Contents

The company does not provide any non-equity incentive plans, defined benefit and actuarial pension plans, or other defined contribution retirement plans for non-employee directors. The company does not offer above-market or preferential earnings under its nonqualified deferred compensation plans for directors. The following table shows compensation paid to each of our non-employee directors during 2014. Mr. Adams and Mr. Haraf are not included in the table as they began service as directors in 2015:

2014 Director Compensation Table

 

Name		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
		Cash1 ($)				Deferred into Restricted Stock Units or Options2, 6 ($)				Stock Awards3, 6 ($)				Option Awards4, 6 ($)				All Other Compen- sation5 ($)				Total ($)
Nancy H. Bechtle			110,000				—				70,000				70,000				2,066				252,066
C. Preston Butcher			—				115,000				70,000				70,000				2,066				257,066
Christopher V. Dodds			108,096				—				51,667				11,667				720				172,150
Stephen A. Ellis			57,500				57,500				70,000				70,000				1,240				256,240
Mark A. Goldfarb			130,000				—				70,000				70,000				1,172				271,172
Frank C. Herringer			—				120,000				70,000				70,000				2,066				262,066
Stephen T. McLin			78,000				130,000				110,000				70,000				2,787				390,787
Arun Sarin			115,000				—				70,000				70,000				2,066				257,066
Paula A. Sneed			110,000				—				70,000				70,000				2,066				252,066
Roger O. Walther			120,000				—				70,000				70,000				2,066				262,066
Robert N. Wilson			120,000				—				70,000				70,000				2,066				262,066

 

(1)

This column shows amounts earned or paid in cash for retainers. For Mr. Dodds and Mr. McLin, the amount in this column includes their cash retainer and meeting fees for service on the Charles Schwab Bank board of directors.

 

(2)

This column shows the dollar amount of retainers and meeting fees deferred into stock options or RSUs under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan II. The corresponding stock options or RSUs were as follows: 17,301 stock options for Mr. Butcher, 8,651 stock options for Mr. Ellis, 19,557 stock options for Mr. McLin and 4,397 RSUs for Mr. Herringer.

 

(3)

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of the RSU award. In 2014, non-employee directors who served the full year received an automatic grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $70,000. Mr. Dodds’ award was prorated from the time he joined the board on October 23, 2014. In addition, Mr. Dodds and Mr. McLin received a grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value of $40,000 for their service on the Charles Schwab Bank board.

 

(4)

The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of the stock option award. In 2014, non-employee directors who served the full year received an automatic grant of stock options with a grant date fair value of $70,000. The amount for Mr. Dodds represents the grant date fair value of the stock option award, prorated from the time he joined the board on October 23, 2014.

 

(5)

This column shows the dollar amount of dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs.

 

12

---

Table of Contents

(6)

The following table shows the aggregate number of outstanding stock option and RSU awards granted to the non-employee directors as of December 31, 2014:

 

Name		Stock Option     Awards				Restricted Stock     Unit Awards
Nancy H. Bechtle			97,926				8,627
C. Preston Butcher			307,222				36,562
Christopher V. Dodds			1,446				3,584
Stephen A. Ellis			36,192				12,010
Mark A. Goldfarb			26,199				5,741
Frank C. Herringer			97,926				111,622
Stephen T. McLin			219,136				42,276
Arun Sarin			65,347				8,053
Paula A. Sneed			97,926				53,458
Roger O. Walther			97,926				36,732
Robert N. Wilson			104,481				61,233

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

No member of the Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of the company or any of its subsidiaries. There were no Compensation Committee interlocks as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission rules during 2014.

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended all of the nominees for election included in this year’s proxy statement. The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Goldfarb as a director effective in December 2012 and Mr. Dodds in October 2014, and this is the first time they are standing for election since their appointment. Mr. Goldfarb previously served as an independent trustee of the Schwab Strategic Trust (ETFs), and Mr. Dodds was originally recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as a potential director by Mr. Schwab. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, comprised of independent directors, recommended Mr. Dodds and Mr. Goldfarb’s nomination as candidates.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a policy to consider candidates recommended by stockholders. The policy provides that stockholder recommendations must be in writing and include the following information: (i) the name, address and contact information of the recommending stockholder; (ii) proof of the stockholder’s share ownership; (iii) a resume or statement of the candidate’s qualifications; and (iv) a statement of the stockholder’s relationship with the proposed candidate or interest in the proposed candidacy. The written recommendation must be addressed to the Assistant Corporate Secretary at the address provided in the “Corporate Governance Information” section of this proxy statement.

Diversity

When identifying director nominees, the board considers the qualifications and skills represented on the board. As discussed in the “Director Qualifications” section below, one of the considerations evaluated by the board is the

 

13

---

Table of Contents

diversity of experience and background of directors. This consideration is broad, is consistent with our company’s non-discrimination policies, and includes diversity of skill sets and experience as well as background, including race and gender.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the structure and size of the board to assure that the proper skills are represented on the board. This assessment includes the effectiveness of board composition, including the qualifications, skills, and diversity represented on the board.

Director Qualifications

The qualifications for directors are described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on the company’s website at www.aboutschwab.com/governance. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the following specific, minimum qualifications must be met by a nominee for the position of director:

 

·

the ability to work together with other directors, with full and open discussion and debate as an effective group,

 

·

current knowledge and experience in the company’s business or operations, or contacts in the community in which the company does business and in the industries relevant to the company’s business, or substantial business, financial or industry-related experience, and

 

·

the willingness and ability to devote adequate time to the company’s business.

The committee also considers the following qualities and skills when making its determination whether a nominee is qualified for the position of director:

 

·

relationships that may affect the independence of the director or conflicts of interest that may affect the director’s ability to discharge his or her duties,

 

·

diversity of experience and background, including the need for financial, business, academic, public sector and other expertise on the board or board committees, and

 

·

the fit of the individual’s skills and experience with those of the other directors and potential directors in comparison to the needs of the company.

When evaluating a candidate for nomination, the committee does not assign specific weight to any of these factors or believe that all of the criteria necessarily apply to every candidate.

Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Director

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of board members in the context of the current composition of the board. Candidates considered for nomination to the Board of Directors may come from several sources, including current and former directors, professional search firms and stockholder recommendations. Nominees for director are evaluated, in consultation with the company’s Chairman, by the committee, which may retain the services of a professional search firm to assist it in identifying or evaluating potential candidates.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

If you wish to communicate with the board, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or with the independent directors as a group, you may send your communication in writing to the Assistant Corporate Secretary at the address provided in the “Corporate Governance Information” section of this proxy statement. You

 

14

---

Table of Contents

must include your name and address in the written communication and indicate whether you are a stockholder of the company.

The Assistant Corporate Secretary will compile all communications, summarize lengthy, repetitive or duplicative communications and forward them to the appropriate director or directors. The Assistant Corporate Secretary will not forward non-substantive communications or communications that pertain to personal grievances, but instead will forward them to the appropriate department within the company for resolution. In such cases, the Assistant Corporate Secretary will retain a copy of such communication for review by any director upon his or her request.

 

15

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL TWO:

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP and the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (collectively referred to as “Deloitte”) as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2015 fiscal year. Deloitte has served in this capacity since the company’s inception. We expect representatives of Deloitte to attend the annual meeting of stockholders, where they will respond to appropriate questions from stockholders and have the opportunity to make a statement.

As required by federal law, the Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain the independent auditors. Although we are not required to submit the selection of the independent auditors to stockholders, we are asking for your ratification as part of the Audit Committee’s evaluation process of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next fiscal year.

AUDITOR FEES

Fees for services provided by Deloitte in the last two fiscal years were:

 

		2014				2013
		(amounts in millions)
Audit Fees1		$	7.6			$	6.5
Audit-Related Fees2			2.3				2.0
Tax Fees3			0.1				0.1
All Other Fees4			None				None
Total		$	10.0			$	8.6

 

(1)

Audit fees are the aggregate fees for professional services billed by Deloitte in connection with their audits of the consolidated annual financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

 

(2)

Audit-Related fees include assurance and related services, such as reports on internal controls, review of Securities and Exchange Commission filings, merger and acquisition due diligence and related services.

 

(3)

Tax fees are limited by the Audit Committee to services by Deloitte for tax return review, preparation and compliance.

 

(4)

All other fees represent fees not included in “audit fees,” “audit-related fees,” and “tax fees.”

In addition to the services listed above, Deloitte provides audit services to certain unconsolidated affiliated mutual funds and foundations. The fees for such audit services are included in the expenses of the mutual funds and foundations and borne by the stockholders of the funds and foundations. Amounts billed by Deloitte for these services were $0.2 million in 2014 and 2013. These amounts are not included in the expenses of The Charles Schwab Corporation.

 

16

---

Table of Contents

Non-Audit Services Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy regarding non-audit services performed by Deloitte. The Audit Committee’s policy prohibits engaging Deloitte to perform the following services:

 

·

any contingent fee arrangement,

 

·

bookkeeping or other services relating to accounting records or financial statements of the audit client,

 

·

broker-dealer services,

 

·

actuarial services,

 

·

management and human resource functions (including executive search services),

 

·

legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit,

 

·

appraisal and valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports,

 

·

internal audit outsourcing,

 

·

financial information systems design and implementation,

 

·

tax consulting or advice or a tax opinion on an “aggressive” tax position or on a “listed transaction” or a “confidential transaction” as defined by U.S. Department of Treasury regulations, and

 

·

tax services to employees who have a financial reporting oversight role.

The policy requires the pre-approval of the Audit Committee for other non-audit services performed by Deloitte. The policy divides non-audit services into three separate categories, which the Audit Committee has pre-approved subject to an annual aggregate dollar limit for each category. Once the dollar limit in each of these three categories is reached, the Audit Committee will decide whether to establish an additional spending limit for the category or specifically pre-approve each additional service in the category for the remainder of the year. The three categories are:

 

·

accounting theory consultation (includes services such as guidance on the application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to various transactions and guidance on the effects of new accounting pronouncements),

 

·

assurance and due diligence (includes services such as certain reports on internal controls, review of Securities and Exchange Commission filings, merger and acquisition due diligence, employee benefit plan audits, and foreign statutory audits and regulatory reports), and

 

·

tax return review, preparation and compliance.

Services not subject to pre-approval limits in one of the three categories above require specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. Fees related to services requiring specific pre-approval are limited, on an annual basis, to 50% of the combination of audit fees, audit-related fees and tax fees.

The policy permits the Audit Committee to delegate pre-approval authority to one or more members of the Audit Committee, provided that the member or members report to the entire Audit Committee pre-approval actions taken since the last Audit Committee meeting. The policy expressly prohibits delegation of pre-approval authority to management.

In fiscal years 2014 and 2013, the Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services performed by Deloitte relating to “audit-related fees” and “tax fees.”

 

17

---

Table of Contents

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT   The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the company’s independent registered public accounting firm. As part of this process, the committee has:   ·   reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management,   ·   discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed pertaining to Public Company Accounting Oversight Board AS 16 (Communications with Audit Committees), and   ·   received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.   Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, for filing with the SEC.   AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS   Mark A. Goldfarb, Chairman John K. Adams, Jr. C. Preston Butcher William S. Haraf Arun Sarin

 

18

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL THREE:

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

This proxy statement contains detailed information in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and executive compensation tables regarding compensation of the named executive officers. The “named executive officers” are those executive officers who are listed in the Summary Compensation Table. We ask that you provide an advisory vote to approve the following, non-binding resolution on named executive officer compensation:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of The Charles Schwab Corporation approve the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related footnotes, and narrative disclosures.

The advisory approval of named executive officer compensation is required by federal law, and the company currently conducts annual advisory votes on that compensation. Although the vote is not binding on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee intends to consider the vote as part of its evaluation of executive compensation programs.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the company’s executive compensation program, policies and practices, which are designed to support the company’s strategic objectives.

Key Business Results

Our business strategy focuses on providing our clients – individual investors, registered investment advisors and employers – with advice and services to help them achieve their financial goals. By seeing our business through clients’ eyes and offering them a compelling combination of personalized relationships, superior service and great value, the company seeks to build enduring client loyalty. Loyal clients bring us more business and refer their friends, colleagues and family to us. By operating the business in a disciplined manner, and leveraging shared processes and technology, we are able to invest in new products and services for clients and deliver a meaningful return to stockholders.

Our 2014 client metrics demonstrate why focusing on investor needs remains the right strategy for Schwab.

 

·

Core net new assets of $124.8 billion marked the third consecutive year being over $100 billion and represented a 6% annual growth rate.

 

·

We ended the year with 9.4 million active brokerage accounts and 985,000 banking accounts, up 3% and 8%, respectively, over year-end 2013.

 

·

Of the $2.46 trillion in assets entrusted to us by clients as of December 31, 2014, approximately half ($1.23 trillion) are receiving some form of ongoing advisory service, up 12%. $1,045.6 billion are under the guidance of an independent advisor and $182.5 billion in client assets are enrolled in one of our retail advisory solutions, increases of 10% and 18%, respectively.

Our success with clients combined with our ongoing expense discipline in 2014 led to some of the strongest financial results in the company’s history.

 

·

Net revenues of $6.1 billion and net income of $1.3 billion.

 

·

Revenue growth of 11% that was over 5 percentage points higher than our 6% expense growth during the year.

 

19

---

Table of Contents

·

Pre-tax profit margin of 34.9%, up 3.5 percentage points over the prior year.

 

·

Earnings per share (EPS) of $0.95, up 22% over the prior year.

 

·

Return on common equity of 12%, up from 11% the prior year.

In 2014, by holding expense growth meaningfully behind a solid increase in revenues, we achieved an improved profit margin and higher earnings along with stronger business momentum. 2014 also reflected a year of strong total shareholder return of 17%, above the S&P 500 index increase of 14%, as reported by Bloomberg.

A more thorough discussion of our business and business strategy is provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is intended to support our success by:

 

·

attracting, motivating and retaining talented, highly capable executive officers,

 

·

rewarding executives for individual performance,

 

·

linking executive pay with the company’s financial performance, and

 

·

aligning incentives for executive officers with the interests of the company and its stockholders by linking pay with longer-term performance.

Our compensation program uses three elements – base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term incentive awards (LTI) – to achieve these objectives. As illustrated by the charts below, the majority of compensation is delivered through variable performance-based incentives. This approach maintains a strong link between executive pay and the company’s financial performance, only rewards executives when value has been created for stockholders, and drives long-term performance.

 

 

*

Pay mix is based on amounts in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

20

---

Table of Contents

Key Compensation Decisions

The company’s commitment to disciplined execution of our business strategy has delivered solid financial results in the years since the onset of the financial crisis of 2008. After a long period of progress partially masked by environmental headwinds, the company delivered strong financial performance in 2013 – a testament to both our continued client focus and commitment to expense discipline. This trend continued in 2014 as economic conditions improved and financial results exceeded the company’s initial expectations for the year and the targets set by the Compensation Committee. This strong financial performance resulted in higher payouts for incentive compensation than in previous years, with annual cash incentives paid out above target at 112.6%.

The Compensation Committee’s decisions for 2014 aligned with our disciplined focus on financial results. In 2014, the Compensation Committee:

 

·

Made no changes to the named executive officers’ target pay levels (i.e., base salary, target annual cash incentives, and target long-term incentives).

 

·

Continued to use EPS as the performance criterion for the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan, because it measures profitability and focuses executive officers on operating performance and decisions around capital structure.

 

·

Set the target EPS goal for 100% payout upon achieving the company’s financial plan approved by the board.

 

·

Set a threshold for payment of annual cash incentives at 50% of the target EPS.

 

·

Continued to use return on common equity (ROCE) equaling or exceeding cost of equity (COE) as the performance goal for the 2014 performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs), because it reflects the creation of financial value for stockholders in all phases of the business cycle and measures the earnings power of the company.

The Compensation Committee continuously reviews and evaluates the company’s compensation program and policies and considers stockholder views regarding executive compensation. For the 2015 program, the Compensation Committee made decisions that strengthen the relationship between compensation opportunity and the management team’s success in executing on our business strategy. For 2015, the Compensation Committee:

 

·

Increased the performance periods for future PBRSUs from one year to three years to ensure continued focus on long-term performance and retention.

 

·

Awarded PBRSUs in 2015 designed to transition to a three-year performance period and vesting schedule.

 

21

---

Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Our compensation program uses three key elements: base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term incentives. The table below identifies how each of these elements supports the objectives articulated above.

 

Objective		Element of Compensation
		Base Salary		Annual Cash Incentives		Long-Term Incentives
Attract, Motivate and Retain		ü		ü		ü
Reward Executives for Individual Performance				ü		ü
Link Pay with Company Financial Performance				ü		ü
Align Incentives with Long-term Interests of Stockholders						ü
Performance Metric				EPS measures profitability and reflects the annual impact of operational actions and decisions around capital structure.		PBRSUs: ROCE compared to COE measures earnings on stockholder equity and long-term profitability.   Stock options: reward share price appreciation by delivering compensation only when the stock price appreciates above the fair market value exercise price.

COMPENSATION PLANNING AND THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves compensation for the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, executive officers, and other senior officers, and it reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors compensation for the non-employee directors.

The Compensation Committee evaluates as a committee, or together with the other independent directors and the Chairman, the performance and compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also considers:

 

·

recommendations from the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer regarding compensation for the other executive officers and performance criteria for annual and long-term incentives, developed in consultation with the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer and, with respect to performance criteria and goals for annual and long-term incentives, the Chief Financial Officer,

 

·

advice from the Executive Vice President – Corporate Risk regarding the design and results of incentive compensation programs to ensure consistency with the company’s financial plan, strategic objectives and risk profile, and

 

·

guidance and advice of its independent compensation consultant, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (Semler Brossy).

While the Compensation Committee considers the information provided by management and its independent, third-party advisor, it does not delegate authority to management for executive compensation decisions.

The Compensation Committee’s review of executive compensation in January 2014 included consideration of:

 

·

the economic environment, market trends, and proposed regulations;

 

·

a competitive pay analysis of peer companies with data from proxy statements and the 2013 McLagan Top Management survey;

 

22

---

Table of Contents

·

each executive’s experience, responsibilities, individual performance, and pay relative to internal peers; and

 

·

reports prepared by the company’s Human Resources Department on each executive’s pay history with:

 

·

actual total compensation for 2010 to 2013,

 

·

projected 2014 compensation,

 

·

the value and vesting schedule of outstanding long-term awards,

 

·

each component of pay as a percentage of total compensation, and

 

·

401(k) balances, deferred compensation balances, and other cash compensation (e.g., relocation benefits, company match for the 401(k) plan, and wellness incentives).

The Compensation Committee does not use a formula or assign a weighting to various factors considered in setting compensation. It does not target a specific percentage mix between cash compensation and long-term incentives or any specific percentage of total compensation for each compensation component.

The Compensation Committee uses a peer group as a source of market data to assess the competitiveness of compensation; however, the data is not used to set compensation targets. Peers were selected considering the following factors:

 

·

Quantitative: revenue, market capitalization, and number of employees; and

 

·

Qualitative: business model, geographic coverage, and competition for customers and/or employees.

Because the company has few competitors comparable in terms of business model and geographic coverage, the peer group includes a mix of brokerage firms, banking and asset management companies, as well as companies that process a significant daily volume of consumer financial transactions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the peer group to ensure that it remains relevant as a market reference tool and modifies it as necessary to reflect changes at the company, among peers or within the industry. For 2014, the Compensation Committee reviewed and updated the peer group by adding BlackRock, Inc., KeyCorp, Regions Financial Corporation, and LPL Financial Holdings Inc., and removing Comerica, BB&T Corp, and Huntington Bancshares. These changes add relevant brokerage companies, increase the focus on asset managers, and ensure the banks included are comparable to Schwab in size. The peer group of 21 companies used for compensation for 2014 was:

 

 

23

---

Table of Contents

Compensation Consultant

Under its charter, the Compensation Committee is authorized to retain compensation consultants and to approve the terms of the engagement. In 2014, the Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy to review pay trends across the financial services industry and in our peer group, advise directly on Chief Executive Officer and Chairman compensation, review the company’s long-term incentives as well as the long-term incentives used by companies in the peer group, and provide general advice and counsel with respect to executive compensation programs, market practices and trends. Semler Brossy was engaged by the Compensation Committee directly and does not provide other services to the company. In 2014, the Compensation Committee reviewed information regarding potential conflicts of interest with Semler Brossy, including: other services they might provide to the company, fees they receive from the company as a percentage of their total revenue, their policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest, any business and/or personal relationships with members of the Compensation Committee, company stock they own, and any business and/or personal relationships between them and any executive officer of the company.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Base salary, annual cash incentives and long-term incentives are the key compensation elements for achieving the company’s objectives.

Base Salary

Base salaries are established at levels intended to attract, motivate and retain highly capable executive officers. As illustrated by the pay mix charts in the Executive Summary above, executive officers receive a small percentage of their overall compensation in base salary.

In 2014, the Compensation Committee did not increase the base salary of any named executive officer.

Annual Cash Incentives

Annual cash incentive awards for the named executive officers were made pursuant to the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan. In the first quarter of 2014, the Compensation Committee established the performance criterion, set performance goals and approved a target bonus award, expressed as a percentage of salary, for each named executive officer. For 2014, there were no increases in the target bonus awards for the named executive officers.

EPS was established as the performance criterion for all named executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes EPS provides a comprehensive measure of the company’s profitability and focuses executive officers on operating performance and decisions around capital structure. For purposes of the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan, EPS is calculated as fully diluted EPS in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, subject to categories of adjustments and exclusions approved by the Compensation Committee at the time the performance criterion was established. EPS goals were summarized in a matrix with potential payouts ranging from 50% to 200% of the target bonus award, with a 100% payout assigned to the EPS goal set by the Compensation Committee. Achieving EPS of less than 50% of the target EPS goal would result in no bonus payment; achieving EPS between 50% and 100% of the target EPS goal would result in a payout of between 50% and 100% of the target bonus award; and achieving EPS of more than the target EPS goal would result in a payout of between 100% and 200% of the target bonus award. The new threshold of 50% of target EPS was adopted to establish the minimum level of achievement for a bonus payment. When determining whether the performance goals have been achieved, the Compensation Committee reviews unusual gains and losses and whether results have been achieved in a manner

 

24

---

Table of Contents

consistent with the company’s risk profile. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to reduce payouts.

 

In 2014, the target EPS goal was $0.87; the maximum payment was 200% of the target bonus award for EPS of $1.74 or higher; the minimum payment was 50% of the target bonus award for EPS of $0.435. The target EPS goal of $0.87 was set to result in a payout of 100% of the target bonus award for performance in line with the company’s financial plans approved by the board. For 2014, the Compensation Committee approved payouts based on EPS of $0.98, which excluded a one-time charge relating to future changes in the company’s geographic footprint, and included the following non-recurring items: an insurance recovery, a gain related to net litigation proceeds, and a loss related to the sale of securities from the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio. The Compensation Committee determined that the company achieved these results while maintaining a low credit risk profile and remaining within its parameters for interest rate risk. The Compensation Committee did not reduce the cash incentive award for any individual named executive officer and approved funding at 112.6% of target for each of the named executive officers.

Long-Term Incentives

At its January 2014 meeting, the Compensation Committee granted equity awards to the named executive officers pursuant to the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan. Of the total target equity awards granted, 50% was granted in stock options and 50% was granted in PBRSUs to align the incentives of executives with the long-term interests of stockholders. This mix reflects a steady evolution over the past several years towards PBRSUs, moving from 30% PBRSUs in 2009, 2010, and 2011 to 40% in 2012, and 50% in 2013 and 2014.

For 2014, there were no increases in the target long-term incentive awards granted to the named executive officers.

Stock Options

The Compensation Committee approved stock options to be granted in three equal installments on the following predetermined dates: March 3, August 1, and November 3, 2014, with 25% of each installment vesting annually over four years.

 

25

---

Table of Contents

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

The Compensation Committee approved PBRSUs with the following features.

 

Feature		Comments
Grant Date		·  March 3, 2014
Vesting Schedule		·  25% annually on each anniversary of the grant date subject to Compensation Committee certification that the performance goal for that period has been met
Performance Periods		·  Performance periods ending December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017
Dividend Equivalent Payments		·  Dividend equivalent payments equal to the dividends paid on a share of company stock will accumulate and be paid in cash when, and if, the underlying units vest   ·  If the performance goals for the units are not met, the dividend equivalent payments are forfeited
Payment		·  The number of shares of company stock payable upon vesting will vary based upon performance   ·  200% of the target award is the maximum number of shares of company stock payable for each unit that vests
Performance Criteria		·  ROCE   ·  COE

The Compensation Committee approved performance goals based on ROCE and COE with variable payouts where the number of shares payable is determined by dividing ROCE by COE and multiplying the result times the funding levels summarized in a matrix. Shares are forfeited if the performance target is not met or paid in a range from 100% to 200% of the target award when performance equals or exceeds target. A 100% payout of the target award is achieved when ROCE equals or exceeds COE. Achieving ROCE greater than 200% of COE would result in payment between 100% and 200% of the target award, but in no event would the payment exceed 200% of the target award.

The Compensation Committee approved performance criteria based on ROCE equals or exceeds COE because it reflects the creation of financial value for stockholders in all phases of the business cycle and measures the earnings power of the company. The opportunity for a payout up to 200% of the target award incents executives to exceed target performance and directly links the magnitude of the payout to the company’s performance up to a cap of 200%. If the Compensation Committee certifies that the goal has been met for each performance period, then the tranche of the award that is due to vest for that performance period (25% of the total grant) will vest. If the goal has not been met, then the PBRSUs and associated dividend equivalent payments will be forfeited with no second opportunity to be earned.

ROCE is calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, subject to categories of adjustments and exclusions approved by the Compensation Committee at the time the performance criteria were established.

COE is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAP-M), which is a commonly used financial metric that incorporates the risk-free interest rate (the company uses the six-month average of the five-year Treasury rate), the beta of the company’s equity (a measure of the volatility of the company’s common stock relative to the broader equity market), and a market equity risk premium (an estimate of the expected excess return required for holding equities instead of a risk-free asset). At December 31, 2014, COE was 8.5%.

When determining whether the performance goals have been achieved, the Compensation Committee may exclude losses from discontinued operations, extraordinary losses, unusual losses, the cumulative negative effects of changes

 

26

---

Table of Contents

in accounting principles and laws, losses on acquisitions or divestitures, losses on foreign exchange transactions, and any unusual, non-recurring losses.

Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units for One-Year Performance Periods Ending September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014

In 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based equity awards with four one-year performance periods and one-fourth of these awards had a one-year performance period ending on December 31, 2014. In 2011 and 2010, the Compensation Committee granted performance-based equity awards that have four one-year performance periods and one-fourth of each of these awards had a one-year performance period ending on September 30, 2014. These awards only vest if the Compensation Committee certifies that the applicable performance goals have been achieved.

When granting the PBRSUs each year, the Compensation Committee selects appropriate measures of performance given the company’s business objectives and the economic environment. The Compensation Committee chose ROCE compared to COE as criteria that reflects the creation of financial value for stockholders in all phases of the business cycle and measures the earnings power of the company. In determining whether the performance goals are achieved, performance is calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Compensation Committee interpreted return on equity as ROCE for the quarters following the issuance of non-cumulative preferred stock in January 2012 to maintain continuity throughout the performance period by measuring results with respect to common equity. The Compensation Committee determined the achievement of the performance goals excluding a one-time charge relating to future changes in the company’s geographic footprint, and including the following non-recurring items: an insurance recovery, a gain related to net litigation proceeds, and a loss related to the sale of securities from the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio. The achievement of the performance goals for the tranches of those awards with performance periods ending in 2014 were:

 

Grant Year		Performance Goal		ROCE				COE				Performance Goal Met
2014		ROCE ³ COE			13.3%				8.2%			Yes
2013					13.3%				8.2%			Yes
2012		Cumulative ROCE >Cumulative COE			12.7%				8.2%			Yes
2011					13.5%				7.9%			Yes
2010					13.5%				7.9%			Yes

Other Compensation

Executive Benefits and Perquisites

The company provides limited executive perquisites. The Compensation Committee approved certain benefits for Mr. Bettinger in connection with his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer in 2008, including a car service for commuting purposes, which he has not used, parking, and use of fractionally owned aircraft consistent with company policies.

For named executive officers, the company:

 

·

does not provide financial planning assistance,

 

·

does not gross up payments to cover executives’ personal tax liability,

 

27

---

Table of Contents

·

does not offer executive retirement or medical plans, and

 

·

does not match contributions to the deferred compensation plan.

Employee Benefit Plans

The company offers no defined benefit plan, special retirement plan for executives or other nonqualified excess plans to named executive officers. Executive officers may participate in the company’s 401(k) plan and employee stock purchase plan available to all eligible employees subject to Internal Revenue Service limits (except Mr. Schwab, who is excluded from the employee stock purchase plan because he owns more than 5% of the company’s stock), and a deferred compensation plan available to officers and other key employees.

Severance

All employees, including executive officers other than Mr. Schwab, are eligible to receive severance benefits under the company’s Severance Pay Plan, which is described in the narrative following the Termination and Change in Control Benefits Table. Benefits are available under this plan only in the event of termination of employment on account of job elimination. Under the severance program, executive officers are eligible to receive 15 days of base salary for each year of service with a minimum of seven months and a maximum of 12 months of severance pay. Mr. Schwab is entitled to severance benefits pursuant to his employment agreement described in the narrative to the Summary Compensation Table.

Compensation Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines to promote significant equity ownership by executives and further align their long-term financial interests with those of other stockholders. Under the guidelines:

 

·

The Chief Executive Officer is expected to maintain an investment position in company stock equal to at least five times base salary.

 

·

All other executive officers are expected to maintain an investment position equal to at least three times base salary.

Shares owned directly, shares beneficially owned under company benefit plans, restricted stock, and restricted stock units are included in determining ownership levels, but stock options are not. The stock ownership guidelines allow the Compensation Committee to take action if the target ownership levels are not met within five years. For 2014, all of the named executive officers had stock ownership exceeding the guidelines.

Prohibition on Speculative Trading in Company Stock

Speculative trading in the company’s stock is prohibited. Prohibited speculative trading includes short-term trading, selling short, buying options to open a position and selling uncovered options.

Guidelines for Equity Awards

The company has no program, plan or practice to time the grant of stock-based awards relative to the release of material non-public information or other corporate events. All equity grants to directors and executive officers are approved by the Compensation Committee or the independent directors at regularly scheduled meetings or, in limited cases involving key recruits or promotions, by a special meeting or unanimous written consent. The grant date is the meeting date or a fixed, future date specified at the time of the grant. Under the terms of the company’s stock incentive plan, the exercise price of options cannot be less than the closing price of company stock on the grant date.

 

28

---

Table of Contents

Recoupment Policies

The company has a recoupment policy to recover incentive awards granted to executive officers in the event of a significant restatement of financial results due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements due to misconduct.

In addition, in the event of certain securities law violations, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to reduce or cancel equity awards or require executives to disgorge any profit realized from equity awards.

The company also reserves the right to cancel equity awards of employees who are terminated for cause.

Response to Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay and Stockholder Engagement

The Compensation Committee considers the result of the stockholders’ advisory say-on-pay vote when reviewing and evaluating the executive compensation program throughout the year. The Compensation Committee noted the strong support of the stockholders, who approved the company’s advisory vote by approximately 98% of the votes at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and believes this vote reflects broad support of our compensation program and policies.

The Compensation Committee continues to review and evaluate the company’s compensation program and policies in the context of our business, regulatory requirements, and evolving best practices. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration stockholder views regarding executive compensation that the company receives from time to time.

Risk Assessment

The Compensation Committee reviewed a report by management on incentive compensation practices and policies throughout the company and the potential impact on risk-taking by employees. The report assessed all employee incentive compensation programs with an emphasis on changes made in 2014, bank product incentives, and the oversight and approval process for new and existing incentive compensation plans. The report also summarized the implementation of regulations on incentive compensation practices in the banking industry. The report identified the following risk-mitigating factors currently in place:

 

·

approval of executive compensation by an independent board committee,

 

·

review of plan design and performance results for all executive incentive plans by the corporate risk officer,

 

·

performance-based long-term incentive awards,

 

·

a balanced suite of performance metrics with a strong link to stockholder value,

 

·

caps on annual incentive opportunities,

 

·

performance goals based on financial plans reviewed by the board,

 

·

a four-year vesting period for equity awards with limited opportunities for accelerated vesting,

 

·

meaningful executive stock ownership guidelines,

 

·

annual review of incentive plan performance, along with centralized design and administration of all incentive plans, and

 

·

modest severance benefits.

 

29

---

Table of Contents

In addition, when reviewing the design of and payments pursuant to incentive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers the review by the Executive Vice President – Corporate Risk regarding consistency with the company’s financial plan, strategic objectives and risk profile.

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)

Generally, plans are structured so that compensation is performance-based and deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code; however, depending on business needs, the Compensation Committee may approve compensatory arrangements that are not deductible under Section 162(m). In 2014, compensation of the named executive officers was deductible under Section 162(m) except for portions of compensation in excess of $1 million received by a named executive officer due to the taxable, imputed value of parking, spousal travel for a business event, and employer-provided life insurance.

Separation Agreement for Mr. Clendening

In December 2014, the company and Mr. Clendening entered into a “Separation Agreement, General Release and Waiver of Claims,” described in the Narrative to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tables, which provides for payments to Mr. Clendening under certain conditions as outlined in the agreement.

COMPENSATION DECISIONS MADE FOR 2015

2015 Annual Cash Incentives

In the first quarter of 2015, the Compensation Committee considered performance criteria for 2015 annual cash incentive awards under the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan. The Compensation Committee selected overall corporate performance as measured by EPS and established a threshold for payment at 50% of target EPS.

2015 Long-Term Incentives

In the first quarter of 2015, the Compensation Committee approved long-term equity awards of 50% stock options and 50% PBRSUs under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan to align the long-term incentives of the executives with the long-term interests of the stockholders.

The stock options were approved to be granted on March 2, 2015 with 25% vesting annually over four years. The Compensation Committee granted stock options to executive officers on a single annual grant date in 2015.

For the PBRSUs, the Compensation Committee decided to transition from one-year performance periods to three-year performance periods and from pro-rata vesting over four years to cliff-vesting at the end of three years. The 2015 PBRSUs will be transitional awards with one-sixth vesting based on a one-year performance period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015; one-sixth vesting based on a two-year performance period from January 1, 2015 to

 

30

---

Table of Contents

December 31, 2016; and two-thirds vesting based on a three-year performance period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The main features of the 2015 PBRSUs are summarized below.

 

Feature		Comments
Grant Date		·  March 2, 2015
Vesting Schedule		·  16.7% vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date   ·  16.7% vesting on the second anniversary of the grant date   ·  66.6% vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date   All vesting is subject to Compensation Committee certification that the performance goal for that period has been met
Performance Periods		·  16.7% based on performance from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015   ·  16.7% based on performance from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016   ·  66.6% based on performance from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017
Dividend Equivalent Payments		·  Dividend equivalent payments equal to the dividends paid on a share of company stock will accumulate and be paid in cash when, and if, the underlying units vest   ·  If the performance goals for the units are not met, the dividend equivalent payments are forfeited
Payment		·  The number of shares of company stock payable upon vesting will vary based upon performance   ·  200% of the target award is the maximum number of shares of company stock payable for each unit that vests
Performance Criteria		·  ROCE   ·  COE

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT   The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and the proxy statement on Schedule 14A.   COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS   Roger O. Walther, Chairman Nancy H. Bechtle Frank C. Herringer Paula A. Sneed Robert N. Wilson

 

31

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

The following tables show compensation information for the named executive officers: Walter W. Bettinger II, President and Chief Executive Officer, Joseph R. Martinetto, Chief Financial Officer, and the next three most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2014. It also contains information for John S. Clendening, who served in his position as Executive Vice President – Investor Services until November 2014.

2014 Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($)				Bonus1 ($)				Stock Awards2 ($)				Option Awards3 ($)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation4 ($)				All Other Compen- sation5 ($)				Total ($)
Walter W. Bettinger II President and Chief Executive Officer			2014 2013 2012				1,000,000 1,000,000 983,333				— — —				3,250,000 5,044,527 2,600,000				3,250,000 3,250,000 3,900,000				4,224,000 3,363,750 2,691,875				117,179 68,211 57,224				11,841,179 12,726,488 10,232,432
Joseph R. Martinetto Chief Financial Officer			2014 2013 2012				575,000 575,000 522,917				— — 3,976				750,000 1,244,116 560,000				750,000 870,000 840,000				1,133,440 902,606 572,594				36,302 25,665 18,862				3,244,742 3,617,387 2,518,349
Bernard J. Clark Executive Vice President – Advisor Services			2014				500,000				—				625,000				625,000				844,800				27,426				2,622,226
James D. McCool Executive Vice President – Client Solutions			2014 2013 2012				550,000 550,000 545,833				— — —				750,000 1,164,116 600,000				750,000 750,000 900,000				1,084,160 863,362 697,302				37,010 25,586 24,555				3,171,170 3,353,064 2,767,690
Charles R. Schwab6 Chairman			2014 2013 2012				500,000 500,000 500,000				— — —				1,500,000 2,328,240 1,200,000				1,500,000 1,500,000 1,800,000				1,408,000 1,121,250 912,500				61,301 38,542 25,072				4,969,301 5,488,032 4,437,572
John S. Clendening7 Former Executive Vice President – Investor Services			2014 2013 2012				525,000 520,833 495,833				— — —				750,000 1,164,116 560,000				750,000 750,000 840,000				887,040 700,781 542,937				34,529 23,832 18,467				2,946,569 3,159,562 2,457,237

 

(1)

The amounts paid in this column represent bonuses paid outside of the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan, a non-equity incentive plan, for officers who received an increase to their bonus target after the beginning of the performance period.

 

(2)

The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of PBRSUs and RSUs and do not reflect the amounts ultimately realized by the named executive officer. The values shown are as of the grant date determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718, which is the date on which all of the significant terms, including any performance criteria, were established. The values represent the aggregate compensation cost expected at the grant date to be recognized over the service period and are not adjusted for the effect of any estimated forfeitures. The maximum value of the 2014 PBRSU grants on the grant date, assuming the performance conditions are met at 200% of the target award, would be: $6,500,000 for Mr. Bettinger; $1,500,000 for Mr. Martinetto, Mr. McCool, and Mr. Clendening; $1,250,000 for Mr. Clark; and $3,000,000 for Mr. Schwab. The maximum value of the 2013 PBRSU grants on the grant date, assuming the performance conditions are met at 200% of the target award, would be: $9,083,217 for Mr. Bettinger; $2,096,144 for Mr. Martinetto, Mr. Clendening, and Mr. McCool; and $4,192,271 for Mr. Schwab.

 

32

---

Table of Contents

PBRSUs awarded in 2014, 2013 and 2012 only vest upon satisfaction of the performance conditions of those awards. For the 2014 and 2012 PBRSUs, the date the Compensation Committee granted the units and the date all significant terms of the award were finalized were the same. For the 2013 PBRSU grants, the Compensation Committee granted the units on January 30, 2013 and finalized performance criteria for the first tranche on March 1, 2013 and for the second, third and fourth tranches on December 10, 2013. The accounting grant dates for the 2013 PBRSUs are therefore March 1, 2013 for the first tranche and December 10, 2013 for the remaining tranches. The values reflected in the table for the grants are the number of units granted multiplied by the average of the high and low market price of the company’s common stock on the accounting grant date.

 

For further discussion of the company’s accounting for its equity compensation plans, including key assumptions, see “Part II – Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” and “– Note 19. Employee Incentive, Retirement, and Deferred Compensation Plans” from the company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014.

 

(3)

The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock option awards and not the amount ultimately realized by the named executive officer. For further discussion of the company’s accounting for its equity compensation plans, including key assumptions, see “Part II – Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” and “ – Note 19. Employee Incentive, Retirement, and Deferred Compensation Plans” from the company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014.

 

(4)

The amounts shown in this column include amounts earned under the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan.

 

(5)

The amounts shown in this column for 2014 include the following:

 

Named Executive Officer		Employer Matching Contributionsa ($)				Dividend Equivalentsb ($)
Walter W. Bettinger II			13,250				101,745
Joseph R. Martinetto			13,250				21,797
Bernard J. Clark			13,250				13,084
James D. McCool			13,250				22,559
Charles R. Schwab			13,250				46,959
John S. Clendening			13,250				20,133

 

(a)

The amounts in this column are employer match payments under the company’s defined contribution plan, the SchwabPlan Retirement Savings and Investment Plan, which is a 401(k) plan available to all eligible employees.

 

(b)

The amounts in this column are dividend equivalent payments on vested PBRSUs and unvested RSUs. These amounts are not included in the fair market value of the stock on the grant date shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

 

(6)

Mr. Schwab has had an employment contract with the company since 1987. His employment contract is described in the Narrative to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tables.

 

(7)

Mr. Clendening entered into a separation agreement with the company in December 2014. The separation agreement is described in the Narrative to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tables.

 

33

---

Table of Contents

2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

Name		Grant Date				Date of Action if Not Grant Date1				Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards2												Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards3												All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#)				All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options4 (#)				Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)				Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards ($)5
										Threshold ($)				Target ($)				Maximum ($)				Threshold (#)				Target (#)				Maximum (#)
Walter W. Bettinger II			1/30/2014 3/3/2014 3/3/2014 8/1/2014 11/3/2014				— 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014				1,875,000 — — — —				3,750,000 — — — —				7,500,000 — — — —				— — — — —				— 125,169 — — —				— 250,338 — — —				— — — — —				— — 154,321 146,002 135,080				— — 25.86 27.45 28.44				— 3,250,000 1,083,333 1,083,333 1,083,333
Joseph R. Martinetto			1/30/2014 3/3/2014 3/3/2014 8/1/2014 11/3/2014				— 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014				503,125 — — — —				1,006,250 — — — —				2,012,500 — — — —				— — — — —				— 28,886 — — —				— 57,772 — — —				— — — — —				— — 35,613 33,693 31,173				— — 25.86 27.45 28.44				— 750,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
Bernard J. Clark			1/30/2014 3/3/2014 3/3/2014 8/1/2014 11/3/2014				— 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014				375,000 — — — —				750,000 — — — —				1,500,000 — — — —				— — — — —				— 24,071 — — —				— 48,142 — — —				— — — — —				— — 29,678 28,078 25,977				— — 25.86 27.45 28.44				— 625,000 208,333 208,333 208,333
James D. McCool			1/30/2014 3/3/2014 3/3/2014 8/1/2014 11/3/2014				— 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014				481,250 — — — —				962,500 — — — —				1,925,000 — — — —				— — — — —				— 28,886 — — —				— 57,772 — — —				— — — — —				— — 35,613 33,693 31,173				— — 25.86 27.45 28.44				— 750,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
Charles R. Schwab			1/30/2014 3/3/2014 3/3/2014 8/1/2014 11/3/2014				— 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014				625,000 — — — —				1,250,000 — — — —				2,500,000 — — — —				— — — — —				— 57,771 — — —				— 115,542 — — —				— — — — —				— — 71,226 67,386 62,345				— — 25.86 27.45 28.44				— 1,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
John S. Clendening			1/30/2014 3/3/2014 3/3/2014 8/1/2014 11/3/2014				— 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014 1/30/2014				393,750 — — — —				787,500 — — — —				1,575,000 — — — —				— — — — —				— 28,886 — — —				— 57,772 — — —				— — — — —				— — 35,613 33,693 31,173				— — 25.86 27.45 28.44				— 750,000 250,000 250,000 250,000

 

(1)

This column shows the date that the Compensation Committee or the independent directors took action with respect to the award if that date is different than the grant date. If the grant date is not the meeting date, it is a fixed, future date specified at the time of the grant.

 

(2)

These columns show, for the January 30, 2014 grant date for each named executive officer, the range of possible payouts for annual cash incentive awards granted in 2014 under the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan. The actual annual cash incentive awards paid for 2014 performance under this plan are shown in the “non-equity incentive plan compensation” column to the Summary Compensation Table. The “threshold” column shows the bonus payment for achieving 50% of the target EPS goal; achieving less than 50% of the target EPS goal would result in no bonus payment.

 

34

---

Table of Contents

(3)

These PBRSU awards were granted under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in equal installments of 25% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided that a target performance goal based on ROCE divided by COE for the one-year performance period preceding the vesting date is met. Shares are forfeited if the performance target is not met or will be paid in a range from 100% to 200% of the target award when performance equals or exceeds target.

 

(4)

The stock option awards approved on January 30, 2014 with grant dates of March 3, 2014, August 1, 2014 and November 3, 2014 were granted under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan. All of the option awards vest in equal installments of 25% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date.

 

(5)

For option awards, the grant date fair value was determined by multiplying the number of shares granted by the fair value of the option as determined by a binomial option pricing model. The fair values of the options determined by the binomial pricing model on March 3, 2014, August 1, 2014 and November 3, 2014 were $7.02, $7.42 and $8.02, respectively. For PBRSU awards, the grant date fair value was determined by multiplying the number of units granted by the average of the high and low market price of the company’s common stock on the grant date of March 3, 2014, which was $25.96.

NARRATIVE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION AND GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLES

Defined Benefits and Deferred Compensation

The company does not offer defined benefit and actuarial pension plans, special retirement plans or other nonqualified excess plans for executives. The company does not offer above-market or preferential earnings under nonqualified deferred compensation plans or defined contribution plans.

All Other Compensation

Dividend equivalent payments on vested PBRSUs and on unvested RSU awards are included in the “all other compensation” section of the Summary Compensation Table because these dividend equivalent payments are not included in the fair value of the stock on the grant date as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

Employment Agreement for Mr. Schwab

The company and Mr. Schwab entered into an amended employment agreement, effective March 31, 2003. Stockholders approved the amended employment agreement. The amended agreement has an initial term of five years, and provides that as of each March 31, the term of the employment agreement is automatically extended by an additional year, under the same terms and conditions, unless beforehand either party provides notice to the other of an intention not to extend it. To address potential penalty taxes on deferred compensation pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and associated regulations, the Board of Directors and Mr. Schwab agreed to amendments to his employment agreement in 2008 to specify the timing of payments, establish definitions of triggering events that are consistent with the Internal Revenue Service’s guidance under Section 409A, and delay certain payments until six months after Mr. Schwab terminates employment, as required by Section 409A for certain employees. The amendments do not impact the amount of the payments.

The amended employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $900,000, subject to annual review by the board, and provides that Mr. Schwab will be entitled to participate in all compensation and fringe benefit programs made available to other executive officers, including stock-based incentive plans. Mr. Schwab’s bonus is determined under the Corporate Executive Bonus Plan, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

 

35

---

Table of Contents

The employment agreement also provides that certain compensation and benefits will be paid or provided to Mr. Schwab (or his immediate family or estate) if his employment is terminated involuntarily, except for cause. “Cause” is defined as the commission of a felony, or willful and gross negligence, or misconduct that results in material harm to the company. “Involuntary termination” includes a material change in Mr. Schwab’s capacities or duties at the company.

If an involuntary termination is not due to death, disability or cause:

 

·

Mr. Schwab will be entitled to receive for a period of 36 months all compensation to which he would have been entitled had he not been terminated, including his then current base salary and participation in all bonus, incentive and other compensation and benefit plans for which he was or would have been eligible (but excluding additional grants under stock incentive plans), and

 

·

all his outstanding, unvested shares and options under stock incentive plans will vest fully on the termination date.

If an involuntary termination is due to disability, Mr. Schwab will be entitled to receive:

 

·

his base salary and benefits, less any payments under the long-term disability plan, for a period of 36 months from the termination date, and

 

·

a prorated portion of any bonus or incentive payments for the year in which the disability occurs.

If an involuntary termination is due to death, a lump sum payment will be made to Mr. Schwab’s estate equal to five times his then base salary.

If Mr. Schwab voluntarily resigns his employment within 24 months of a change in control of the company, he will be entitled to receive his base salary up to the date of resignation, plus a prorated portion of any bonus or incentive payments payable for the year in which the resignation occurs. In addition, Mr. Schwab has the right (but not the obligation) to enter into a consulting arrangement with the company if he voluntarily resigns his employment upon 6 months’ written notice to the company, or within 24 months of a change in control of the company if he voluntarily resigns or his employment is involuntarily terminated. Under that arrangement, Mr. Schwab would provide certain consulting services to the company for a period of five years for an annual payment equal to $1 million or 75% of his then base salary, whichever is less.

For estimated termination and change in control payments and benefits to Mr. Schwab, please refer to the Termination and Change in Control Benefits Table.

The employment agreement prohibits Mr. Schwab from becoming associated with any business competing with the company during the term of the agreement and for a period of five years following a voluntary resignation of employment. (However, that restriction does not apply if Mr. Schwab resigns his employment within 24 months of a change in control of the company.)

License Agreement for Mr. Schwab

The company and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. also are parties to an assignment and license agreement with Mr. Schwab that was approved in July 1987 by the company’s non-employee directors. Under the agreement, Mr. Schwab has assigned to the company all service mark, trademark, and trade name rights to Mr. Schwab’s name (and variations on the name) and likeness. However, Mr. Schwab has the perpetual, exclusive, irrevocable right to use his name and likeness for any activity other than the financial services business, so long as Mr. Schwab’s use of his name does not cause confusion about whether the company is involved with goods or services actually created, endorsed, marketed or sold by Mr. Schwab or by third parties unrelated to the company. The assignment and license agreement defines the “financial services business” as the business in which Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. is currently

 

36

---

Table of Contents

engaged and any additional and related business in which that firm or the company is permitted to engage under rules and regulations of applicable regulatory agencies.

Beginning immediately after any termination of his employment, Mr. Schwab will be entitled to use his likeness in the financial services business for some purposes (specifically, the sale, distribution, broadcast and promotion of books, videotapes, lectures, radio and television programs, and also any financial planning services that do not directly compete with any business in which the company or its subsidiaries are then engaged or plan to enter within three months). Beginning two years after any termination of his employment, Mr. Schwab may use his likeness for all other purposes, including in the financial services business, as long as that use does not cause confusion as described above.

No cash consideration is to be paid to Mr. Schwab for the name assignment while he is employed by the company or, after his employment terminates, while he is receiving compensation under an employment agreement with the company. Beginning when all such compensation ceases, and continuing for a period of 15 years, Mr. Schwab or his estate will receive three-tenths of one percent (0.3%) of the aggregate net revenues of the company (on a consolidated basis) and those of its unconsolidated assignees and licensees that use the name or likeness. These payments may not, however, exceed $2 million per year, adjusted up or down to reflect changes from the cost of living prevailing in the San Francisco Bay Area in May 1987, and they will terminate if the company and its subsidiaries cease using Mr. Schwab’s name and likeness. For estimated payments to Mr. Schwab under his license agreement, please refer to the Termination and Change in Control Benefits Table below.

The license agreement permits the company to continue using Mr. Schwab’s name and likeness even after he is no longer affiliated with the company and, under most circumstances, limits Mr. Schwab’s separate use of his name and likeness in the financial services business. However, the company’s ability to assign the license agreement, or to permit others to use Mr. Schwab’s name and likeness, is limited during Mr. Schwab’s lifetime. Thus, without Mr. Schwab’s consent, the company may not transfer the license, or any of the company’s rights under the license, to a third party, including by means of mergers or reorganizations in which the stockholders who held shares prior to the transaction do not retain the ability to elect the majority of the board immediately following such transaction (among other circumstances).

Separation Agreement for Mr. Clendening

The company and Mr. Clendening entered into a Separation Agreement, General Release and Waiver of Claims effective December 10, 2014. The separation agreement provided continued employment until the earlier of March 31, 2015 or until Mr. Clendening accepts a position as an employee or acts as an independent contractor, consultant, sole proprietor, director, officer or partner of another company. During the employment period, Mr. Clendening was eligible to receive his base salary at his current rate (an aggregate value of $153,125, subject to required withholding, as of March 31, 2015), bonus eligibility for 2014, and employee benefits. The separation agreement also provided for lump-sum cash payments equal to $5,167,000, subject to required withholding, to be paid in two equal installments on March 15, 2015 and December 31, 2015, provided that he does not commence employment with or act in any capacity for a competitor business (defined to include specific companies, other regulated financial institutions and any business that is determined in the company’s discretion to be competitive with the business of the company or its subsidiaries or affiliates) on or before December 31, 2015. Mr. Clendening is also eligible for outplacement services as provided by the company’s outplacement program.

The separation agreement also includes: a standard release of all claims in favor of the company and all of its affiliates, subsidiaries, divisions, parent corporations, stockholders, officers, directors, partners, servants, agents, employees, representatives, attorneys, employee welfare and retirement plans and the respective plan administrators and fiduciaries, past, present, and future; a non-disparagement agreement; and confirmation of Mr. Clendening’s obligations under his existing confidentiality, non-solicitation and intellectual property ownership agreement.

 

37

---

Table of Contents

2014 Termination and Change in Control Benefits Table

 

Name		Event1		Salary and Bonus				Early Vesting of Stock Options2				Early or Continued Vesting of Restricted Stock Units2				Vesting of Cash LTIP Awards2				Other				Total
Walter W. Bettinger II		Termination under Severance Plan			1,182,053	3			11,592,886	4			8,972,559	4			—				19,394	5			21,766,892
		Change in control			—				17,343,013	6			12,373,372	6			4,000,000	7			—				33,716,385
		Death or disability			—				17,343,013	6			12,373,372	6			3,420,000	8			—				33,136,385
Joseph R. Martinetto		Termination under Severance Plan			666,405	3			2,215,251	4			1,199,841	4			—				19,216	5			4,100,713
		Change in control			—				4,087,487	6			2,895,915	6			1,437,500	7			—				8,420,902
		Death or disability			—				4,087,487	6			2,895,915	6			1,229,063	8			—				8,212,465
Bernard J. Clark		Termination under Severance Plan			573,709	3			2,624,530	11			2,129,663	11			—				18,993	5			5,346,895
		Change in control			—				2,624,530	6			2,129,663	6			1,250,000	7			—				6,004,193
		Death or disability			—				2,624,530	6			2,129,663	6			1,068,750	8			—				5,822,943
		Retirement or voluntary resignation			—				2,624,530	11			2,129,663	11			—				—				4,754,193
James D. McCool		Termination under Severance Plan			650,122	3			3,945,929	11			2,836,381	11			—				19,663	5			7,452,095
		Change in control			—				3,945,929	6			2,836,381	6			1,375,000	7			—				8,157,310
		Death or disability			—				3,945,929	6			2,836,381	6			1,175,625	8			—				7,957,935
		Retirement or voluntary resignation			—				3,945,929	11			2,836,381	11			—				—				6,782,310
Charles R. Schwab		Termination without cause			5,724,000	9			8,004,504	10			5,710,831	11			—				65,251,430	12			84,690,765
		Change in control			—				8,004,504	6			5,710,831	6			2,000,000	7			—				15,715,335
		Death			2,500,000	13			8,004,504	6			5,710,831	6			1,710,000	8			64,391,400	14			82,316,735
		Disability			1,500,000	15			8,004,504	6			5,710,831	6			1,710,000	8			64,391,400	14			81,316,735
		Resignation following a change in control			1,875,000	16			8,004,504	6			5,710,831	6			2,000,000	7			64,391,400	14			81,981,735
		Retirement or voluntary resignation			1,875,000	16			8,004,504	11			5,710,831	11			—				64,391,400	14			79,981,735

 

(1)

This table shows the amount of benefits due to termination or change in control to be paid to the named executive officers pursuant to existing agreements (assuming the event triggering the termination or change in control took place as of December 31, 2014).

 

The benefits payable to Mr. Schwab are based on the terms of his employment, license, and equity incentive award agreements. The events triggering payments are described more fully in the description of his employment and license agreements contained in the Narrative to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tables.

 

Except for Mr. Schwab, all other named executive officers are eligible for benefits in the event of job elimination under the Charles Schwab Severance Pay Plan (Severance Plan), and these benefits are included in amounts shown for “termination under severance plan.”

 

38

---

Table of Contents

Stock option and RSU agreements may contain provisions for accelerated vesting due to a change in control, death or disability, or retirement, and these accelerated amounts are included in amounts shown for “change in control,” “death or disability,” and “retirement or voluntary resignation.” As of December 31, 2014, Mr. Clark, Mr. McCool and Mr. Schwab met the eligibility criteria for retirement under existing equity award agreements.

 

PBRSU award agreements may contain provisions for continued vesting following either termination under the Severance Plan or retirement, subject to achievement of performance goals established at the time such awards were granted. The value of awards subject to these continued vesting and performance achievement provisions is included in amounts shown for “termination under severance plan” and “retirement or voluntary resignation” as applicable.

Cash LTIP award agreements may contain provisions for accelerated vesting due to a change in control and provisions for continued pro rata vesting due to death or disability, subject to the achievement of performance goals established at the time such awards were granted. The value of awards subject to these provisions is included in the amounts shown for “change in control,” and “death or disability.”

 

(2)

For stock options, the amounts are based on the spread between the exercise price and the closing price of a share of company common stock on December 31, 2014 ($30.19), multiplied by the number of shares subject to accelerated vesting. For RSUs, the amounts are based on the closing price of a share of company common stock on December 31, 2014 ($30.19), multiplied by the number of shares subject to accelerated vesting. For PBRSUs, the amounts are based on $30.19 multiplied by the target number of shares that would vest, to the extent not already forfeited, under accelerated vesting provisions (in the case of death, disability or change in control), or the number of shares that will continue to vest, to the extent not already forfeited, under continued vesting provisions (in the case of retirement or severance under the Severance Plan) subject to achievement of performance goals established at the time such awards were granted. For Cash LTIP awards, the amounts shown for accelerated vesting on change in control are the target value of the awards, and the amounts shown for continued vesting on death or disability are prorated amounts of the target awards, assuming the death or disability took place on December 31, 2014.

 

(3)

Includes base salary payable under the Severance Plan for the severance period and a 60-day notice period. Under the terms of the Severance Plan, an executive officer is eligible to receive a lump-sum severance benefit equal to base salary (at the December 31, 2014 rate) for a specified period (a minimum of 7 months and a maximum of 12 months) based upon years of service. In addition, the Severance Plan provides for base salary during the 60-day notice period. To receive the lump-sum severance benefit, an employee must execute a severance agreement that provides the company and its affiliates with a general release and waiver of claims.

 

(4)

Under the Severance Plan, amounts result from vesting of outstanding long-term awards that would have vested during the 60-day notice period, accelerated vesting of outstanding stock options and RSU awards upon termination, and continued vesting of PBRSU awards that may vest during the severance period after termination.

 

(5)

Under the Severance Plan, amounts represent a lump-sum payment to cover part of the cost of COBRA premiums based on group health plan COBRA rates for the severance period.

 

(6)

Under equity award agreements, these awards fully vest in the event of a change in control of the company, death or disability.

 

(7)

Under the Cash LTIP award agreements, these awards fully vest and are paid at the target level of performance in the event of a change in control.

 

(8)

Under the Cash LTIP award agreements, a prorated portion of these awards vests based on the number of days served during the performance period in the event of death or disability. Award payouts remain subject to

 

39

---

Table of Contents

achievement of performance goals. The amounts shown are based on accounting estimates regarding achievement of the performance goals and are prorated as of December 31, 2014.

 

(9)

Under Mr. Schwab’s employment agreement, includes 36 months of salary (at December 31, 2014 rate of $500,000) and bonus (at 2014 cash incentive of $1,408,000), to be paid in 36 monthly installments.

 

(10)

Under Mr. Schwab’s employment agreement, unvested stock options fully vest upon an involuntary separation from service other than for cause.

 

(11)

Under equity award agreements, if the employee meets the eligibility criteria for retirement at the time of termination, stock options vest and PBRSUs continue to vest based on the achievement of the related performance goals.

 

(12)

Under Mr. Schwab’s employment and license agreements, includes: annual installments of $4,292,760 (which represents $2 million adjusted to the consumer price index from 1987 as specified in his license agreement) for 15 years, and estimated cost of office space and secretarial support for 36 months of $860,030.

 

(13)

Under Mr. Schwab’s employment agreement, represents a lump-sum death benefit payable to Mr. Schwab’s estate in an amount equal to five times annual salary (at December 31, 2014 rate of $500,000).

 

(14)

Under Mr. Schwab’s license agreement, represents annual installments of $4,292,760 for 15 years payable to Mr. Schwab or his estate.

 

(15)

Under Mr. Schwab’s employment agreement, represents 36 months of annual salary (at December 31, 2014 rate of $500,000), to be paid in monthly installments. A prorated bonus is not included, as it is already included in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table and is not an additional expense to the company.

 

(16)

Under Mr. Schwab’s employment agreement, represents $1,875,000 payable in 60 monthly installments of $31,250 in the event that Mr. Schwab elects to provide consulting services following a voluntary resignation, or resignation or termination after a change in control. A prorated bonus is not included, as it is already included in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table and is not an additional expense to the company.

Charles Schwab Severance Pay Plan

Employees other than Mr. Schwab are eligible for benefits under the Severance Plan in the event of job elimination, as defined in the plan.

Under the Severance Plan, an executive officer is eligible to receive a lump-sum severance pay benefit of base salary equal to 15 business days multiplied by his or her full years of service, with a minimum of seven months and maximum of 12 months of the base salary that would have been payable to the executive officer. Prorated benefits will be provided for partial years of service. The lump-sum amount is in addition to base salary for the 60-day notice period.

An executive officer who becomes entitled to severance benefits under the plan is also eligible to receive a lump-sum payment to cover a portion of the cost of group health plan coverage. The amount of the payment is based upon the period of time for which he or she is eligible to receive severance pay and current COBRA rates for group health plan coverage. In addition, the portion of the executive officer’s long-term awards, except PBRSUs or similar performance-based awards, which would have vested had the officer remained employed during the severance period will vest following his or her termination date. Executive officers are treated as employees during their severance period for purposes of determining their vesting in PBRSUs to the extent performance goals are met or exceeded for the period.

 

40

---

Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014

 

		OPTION AWARDS																STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 ($)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested1 ($)
Walter W. Bettinger II			685,241 243,446 281,909 287,248 206,069 240,486 269,550 134,298 169,713 162,500 65,577 42,055 39,025				68,690 80,163 89,850 134,298 169,713 162,500 196,732 126,165 117,075 154,321 146,002 135,080	2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13			17.38 18.25 15.00 15.43 18.66 15.05 11.75 13.91 12.45 13.64 16.40 22.67 23.12 25.86 27.45 28.44				11/2/2019 3/1/2020 8/2/2020 11/1/2020 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 11/1/2021 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 11/1/2022 3/1/2023 8/1/2023 11/1/2023 3/3/2024 8/1/2024 11/3/2024				—				—				409,85015,16,17,18				12,373,372
Joseph R. Martinetto			122,920 126,507 44,944 52,045 53,031 41,214 48,097 53,910 28,926 36,554 35,000 7,042 15,133 9,705 9,006				13,738 16,033 17,970 28,926 36,554 35,000 21,128 45,400 29,115 27,018 35,613 33,693 31,173	2  3  4  5  6  7  14  8  9  10  11  12  13			19.36 17.38 18.25 15.00 15.43 18.66 15.05 11.75 13.91 12.45 13.64 15.08 16.40 22.67 23.12 25.86 27.45 28.44				11/3/2018 11/2/2019 3/1/2020 8/2/2020 11/1/2020 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 11/1/2021 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 11/1/2022 1/2/2023 3/1/2023 8/1/2023 11/1/2023 3/3/2024 8/1/2024 11/3/2024				4,04119				121,998				91,88215,16,17,18				2,895,915

 

41

---

Table of Contents

		OPTION AWARDS																STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 ($)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested1 ($)
Bernard J. Clark			28,810 25,987 28,090 65,056 33,144 26,947 31,448 11,750 17,562 11,097 21,250 12,611 8,087 7,505				8,983 10,483 11,750 17,562 22,194 21,250 37,833 24,263 22,515 29,678 28,078 25,977	2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13			19.36 17.38 18.25 15.00 15.43 18.66 15.05 11.75 13.91 12.45 13.64 16.40 22.67 23.12 25.86 27.45 28.44				11/3/2018 11/2/2019 3/1/2020 8/2/2020 11/1/2020 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 11/1/2021 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 11/1/2022 3/1/2023 8/1/2023 11/1/2023 3/3/2024 8/1/2024 11/3/2024				—				—				70,54215,16,17,18				2,129,663
James D. McCool			128,041 23,981 147,591 52,435 60,719 46,402 44,384 34,531 38,705 15,496 19,582 37,500 15,133 9,705 9,006				14,795 17,266 19,353 30,992 39,165 37,500 45,400 29,115 27,018 35,613 33,693 31,173	2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13			19.36 18.49 17.38 18.25 15.00 15.43 18.66 15.05 11.75 13.91 12.45 13.64 16.40 22.67 23.12 25.86 27.45 28.44				11/3/2018 12/10/2018 11/2/2019 3/1/2020 8/2/2020 11/1/2020 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 11/1/2021 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 11/1/2022 3/1/2023 8/1/2023 11/1/2023 3/3/2024 8/1/2024 11/3/2024				—				—				93,95115,16,17,18				2,836,381

 

42

---

Table of Contents

		OPTION AWARDS																STOCK AWARDS
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 ($)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested1 ($)
Charles R. Schwab			316,266 112,360 130,112 132,576 95,109 110,994 124,407 61,983 78,329 75,000 30,266 19,410 18,011				31,703 36,998 41,470 61,984 78,329 75,000 90,800 58,230 54,036 71,226 67,386 62,345	2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13			17.38 18.25 15.00 15.43 18.66 15.05 11.75 13.91 12.45 13.64 16.40 22.67 23.12 25.86 27.45 28.44				11/2/2019 3/1/2020 8/2/2020 11/1/2020 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 11/1/2021 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 11/1/2022 3/1/2023 8/1/2023 11/1/2023 3/3/2024 8/1/2024 11/3/2024				—				—				189,16315,16,17,18				5,710,831
John S. Clendening			38,667 115,964 41,199 47,708 48,612 39,629 46,248 17,279 28,926 36,554 35,000 15,133 9,705 9,006				13,210 15,416 17,279 28,926 36,554 35,000 45,400 29,115 27,018 35,613 33,693 31,173	2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13			19.36 17.38 18.25 15.00 15.43 18.66 15.05 11.75 13.91 12.45 13.64 16.40 22.67 23.12 25.86 27.45 28.44				11/3/2018 11/2/2019 3/1/2020 8/2/2020 11/1/2020 3/1/2021 8/1/2021 11/1/2021 3/1/2022 8/1/2022 11/1/2022 3/1/2023 8/1/2023 11/1/2023 3/3/2024 8/1/2024 11/3/2024				—				—				91,56715,16,17,18				2,764,408

 

(1)

Represents the market value of unvested RSUs or PBRSUs held as of December 31, 2014 based on the closing price of a share of common stock of $30.19 on December 31, 2014.

 

(2)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on March 1, 2011 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

43

---

Table of Contents

(3)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on August 1, 2011 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(4)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on November 1, 2011 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(5)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on March 1, 2012 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(6)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on August 1, 2012 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(7)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on November 1, 2012 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(8)

These nonqualified stock options were approved on January 24, 2013 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date of March 1, 2013 and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(9)

These nonqualified stock options were approved on January 24, 2013 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date of August 1, 2013 and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(10)

These nonqualified stock options were approved on January 24, 2013 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date of November 1, 2013 and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(11)

These nonqualified stock options were approved on January 30, 2014 under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date of March 3, 2014 and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(12)

These nonqualified stock options were approved on January 30, 2014 under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date of August 1, 2014 and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(13)

These nonqualified stock options were approved on January 30, 2014 under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan with a grant date of November 3, 2014 and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

(14)

These nonqualified stock options were granted on January 2, 2013 under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

 

44

---

Table of Contents

(15)

Includes PBRSU awards that were granted on November 1, 2011 and vest in increments of 25% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided that a performance goal of cumulative ROCE exceeding the cumulative COE for the one-year performance period preceding the vesting date is met. Any units that do not vest at the conclusion of the corresponding one-year performance period may vest at the conclusion of the fourth one-year period if the performance goal for the four-year period has been met. Any units that do not vest at the end of the fourth one-year period will be forfeited. Future vesting for these RSUs is as follows:

 

Name		Vesting Date				Number of Units
Walter W. Bettinger II			11/1/2015				41,070
Joseph R. Martinetto			11/1/2015				8,214
Bernard J. Clark			11/1/2015				5,371
James D. McCool			11/1/2015				8,846
Charles R. Schwab			11/1/2015				18,956
John S. Clendening			11/1/2015				7,899

 

(16)

Includes PBRSU awards that were granted on March 1, 2012 and vest in increments of 25% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided that a performance goal of cumulative ROCE exceeding the cumulative COE for the one-year performance period preceding the vesting date is met. Any units that do not vest at the conclusion of the corresponding one-year performance period may vest at the conclusion of the fourth one-year period if the performance goal of cumulative ROCE exceeds cumulative COE for the four-year period has been met. Any units that do not vest at the end of the fourth one-year period will be forfeited. Future vesting for these RSUs is as follows:

 

Name		Vesting Date				Number of Units
Walter W. Bettinger II			3/1/2015 3/1/2016				46,712 46,713
Joseph R. Martinetto			3/1/2015 3/1/2016				10,061 10,062
Bernard J. Clark			3/1/2015 3/1/2016				6,109 6,109
James D. McCool			3/1/2015 3/1/2016				10,780 10,780
Charles R. Schwab			3/1/2015 3/1/2016				21,559 21,560
John S. Clendening			3/1/2015 3/1/2016				10,061 10,062

 

45

---

Table of Contents

(17)

Includes PBRSU awards that were granted on March 1, 2013 and vest in increments of 25% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided that a target performance goal based on ROCE divided by COE for the one-year performance period preceding the vesting date is met. Shares are forfeited if the performance target is not met or paid in a range from 100% to 200% of the target award when performance equals or exceeds target. Based on a target of 100%, future vesting for these RSUs is as follows:

 

Name		Vesting Date				Number of Units
Walter W. Bettinger II			3/1/2015 3/1/2016 3/1/2017				50,062 50,062 50,062
Joseph R. Martinetto			3/1/2015 3/1/2016 3/1/2017				11,553 11,553 11,553
Bernard J. Clark			3/1/2015 3/1/2016 3/1/2017				9,627 9,627 9,628
James D. McCool			3/1/2015 3/1/2016 3/1/2017				11,553 11,553 11,553
Charles R. Schwab			3/1/2015 3/1/2016 3/1/2017				23,106 23,105 23,106
John S. Clendening			3/1/2015 3/1/2016 3/1/2017				11,553 11,553 11,553

 

46

---

Table of Contents

(18)

Includes PBRSU awards that were granted on March 3, 2014 and vest in increments of 25% on the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided that a target performance goal based on ROCE divided by COE for the one-year performance period preceding the vesting date is met. Shares are forfeited if the performance target is not met or paid in a range from 100% to 200% of the target award when performance equals or exceeds target. Based on a target of 100%, future vesting for these RSUs is as follows:

 

Name		Vesting Date				Number of Units
Walter W. Bettinger II			3/3/2015 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 3/3/2018				31,292 31,292 31,292 31,293
Joseph R. Martinetto			3/3/2015 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 3/3/2018				7,221 7,222 7,221 7,222
Bernard J. Clark			3/3/2015 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 3/3/2018				6,017 6,018 6,018 6,018
James D. McCool			3/3/2015 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 3/3/2018				7,221 7,222 7,221 7,222
Charles R. Schwab			3/3/2015 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 3/3/2018				14,442 14,443 14,443 14,443
John S. Clendening			3/3/2015 3/3/2016 3/3/2017 3/3/2018				7,221 7,222 7,221 7,222

 

(19)

Time-based vesting for these RSUs is as follows:

 

Name		Vesting Date				Number of Units
Joseph R. Martinetto			1/2/2015 1/2/2016 1/2/2017				1,347 1,347 1,347

 

47

---

Table of Contents

2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

 

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS

Name

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)

Value Realized on Exercise ($)1

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)

Value Realized on Vesting ($)2

Walter W. Bettinger II