---

---

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

 

FORM 10-Q 

 

 

Commission File Number: 001-33864 

________________________________

 

CARDTRONICS, INC. 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (832) 308-4000

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☑ No ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes ☑ No ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer'' and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑ 

 

Common Stock, par value: $0.0001 per share.  Shares outstanding on July 25, 2014: 44,472,002

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

CARDTRONICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

(1) General and Basis of Presentation 

 

General 

 

Cardtronics, Inc., along with its wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") provides convenient consumer financial services through its network of automated teller machines ("ATMs") and multi-function financial services kiosks. As of June 30, 2014, the Company provided services to over 83,600 devices across its portfolio, which included approximately 66,500 devices located in all 50 states of the United States ("U.S.") as well as in the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, approximately 12,000 devices throughout the United Kingdom ("U.K."), approximately 900 devices throughout Germany, approximately 2,000 devices throughout Canada, and approximately 2,200 devices throughout Mexico. In the U.S., certain of the Company’s devices are multi-function financial services kiosks that, in addition to traditional ATM functions such as cash dispensing and bank account balance inquiries, perform other consumer financial services, including bill payments, check cashing, remote deposit capture (which is deposit taking at ATMs using electronic imaging), and money transfers. Also included in the total count of 83,600 devices are approximately 14,700 devices for which the Company provides various forms of managed services solutions, which may include services such as transaction processing, monitoring, maintenance, cash management, communications, and customer service.

 

Through its network, the Company provides ATM management and equipment-related services (typically under multi-year contracts) to large, nationally and regionally-known retail merchants as well as smaller retailers and operators of facilities such as shopping malls and airports. In doing so, the Company provides its retail partners with a compelling automated financial services solution that helps attract and retain customers, and in turn, increases the likelihood that the devices placed at their facilities will be utilized.

 

In addition to its retail merchant relationships, the Company also partners with leading national financial institutions to brand selected ATMs and financial services kiosks within its network, including Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Sovereign Bank, N.A., PNC Bank, N.A., Frost Bank, The Bank of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”) in Canada, Mexico, and Puerto Rico, and Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A. de C.V. in Mexico. As of June 30, 2014,  approximately 21,300 of the Company’s devices were under contract with financial institutions to place their logos on those machines, and to provide convenient surcharge-free access for their banking customers.

 

The Company also owns and operates the Allpoint network (“Allpoint”), the largest surcharge-free ATM network within the U.S. (based on the number of participating ATMs). Allpoint, which has more than 56,100 participating ATMs globally, provides surcharge-free ATM access to customers of participating financial institutions that lack a significant ATM network in exchange for either a fixed monthly fee per cardholder or a set fee per transaction that is paid by the financial institutions who are members of the network. Allpoint includes a majority of the Company’s ATMs in the U.S., U.K., and Mexico, and approximately a quarter of the Company’s ATMs in Canada. Allpoint also works with financial institutions that manage stored-value debit card programs on behalf of corporate entities and governmental agencies, including general purpose, payroll and electronic benefits transfer (“EBT”) cards. Under these programs, the issuing financial institutions pay Allpoint a fee per issued stored-value card or per transaction in return for allowing the users of those cards surcharge-free access to Allpoint’s participating ATM network.

 

Finally, the Company owns and operates an electronic funds transfer (“EFT”) transaction processing platform that provides transaction processing services to its network of ATMs and financial services kiosks as well as other ATMs under managed services arrangements.

 

Basis of Presentation 

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this "Form 10-Q") has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") applicable to interim financial information. Because this is an interim period filing presented using a condensed format, it does not include all of the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"), although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading. You should read this Form 10-Q along with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "2013 Form 10-K"), which includes a summary of the Company's significant accounting policies and other disclosures.

 

The financial statements as of June 30, 2014 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are unaudited. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013 was derived from the audited balance sheet filed in the 2013 Form 10-K. In management's opinion, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's interim and prior period results have been made. Certain balances have been reclassified in the December 31, 2013 audited financial statements to present information consistently between periods. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company changed its accounting policy related to the presentation of certain upfront merchant payments by reclassifying such payments from Intangible Assets to the Other Assets line item on the consolidated balance sheet. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to this presentation. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.

---

 

 

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cardtronics, Inc. and it’s wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Because the Company owns a majority (51.0%) interest in, and realizes a majority of the earnings and/or losses of, Cardtronics Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (“Cardtronics Mexico”), this entity is reflected as a consolidated subsidiary in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, with the remaining ownership interests not held by the Company being reflected as noncontrolling interests.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and these differences could be material to the financial statements.

 

Cost of ATM Operating Revenues and Gross Profit Presentation 

 

The Company presents Cost of ATM operating revenues and Gross profit within its Consolidated Statements of Operations exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets related to ATMs and ATM-related assets. The following table sets forth the amounts excluded from Cost of ATM operating revenues and Gross profit for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

(2) Acquisitions 

 

Acquisition of the Cardpoint ATM Portfolio

 

On August 7, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Cardpoint Limited (“Cardpoint”) for approximately £105.4 million ($161.8 million) in cash. As a result of the Cardpoint acquisition, the Company significantly increased the size of its European operations by adding approximately 7,100 ATMs in the U.K. and approximately 800 ATMs in Germany, substantially all of which were owned by Cardpoint.  The Company has preliminarily allocated purchase consideration to the assets acquired and expects to complete its purchase accounting for this acquisition during the third quarter of 2014.

 

Pro Forma Results of Operations

 

The following table presents the unaudited pro forma combined results of operations of the Company and the acquired Cardpoint portfolios for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, after giving effect to certain pro forma adjustments including: (i) amortization of acquired intangible assets, (ii) the impact of certain fair value adjustments such as depreciation on the acquired property and equipment, and (iii) interest expense adjustment for historical long-term debt of Cardpoint that was repaid and interest expense on additional borrowings by the Company to fund the acquisition.

 

 

---

 

The unaudited pro forma financial results do not reflect the impact of other acquisitions consummated by the Company during 2013 and 2014, as the impact would not be material to its condensed consolidated results of operations. The unaudited pro forma financial results assume that the Cardpoint acquisition occurred on January 1, 2013, and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had those transactions been completed on that date. Furthermore, it does not reflect the impacts of any potential operating efficiencies, savings from expected synergies, or costs to integrate the operations. The unaudited pro forma financial results are not necessarily indicative of the future results to be expected for the consolidated operations.

 

Other Acquisitions

 

On February 6, 2014, the Company acquired the majority of the assets of Automated Financial, LLC (“Automated Financial”), an Arizona-based provider of ATM services to approximately 2,100 ATMs consisting primarily of merchant-owned ATMs. The Automated Financial acquisition did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.  

 

(3) Stock-Based Compensation 

 

The Company calculates the fair value of stock-based awards granted to employees and directors on the date of grant and recognizes the calculated fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, as compensation expense over the requisite service periods of the related awards. The following table reflects the total stock-based compensation expense amounts included in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

All grants during the periods above were made under the Company's Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2007 Stock Incentive Plan").

 

Restricted Stock Awards.  The number of the Company's outstanding Restricted Stock Awards (“RSAs”) as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2014, are presented below:

 

 

As of June 30, 2014, the unrecognized compensation expense associated with all outstanding RSAs was approximately $2.1 million, which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 2.1 years.

 

Restricted Stock Units.  In the first quarter of each year since 2011, the Company granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under its Long Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP"), which is an annual equity award program under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. The ultimate number of RSUs to be earned and outstanding are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Committee") on an annual basis, and are based on the Company's achievement of certain performance levels during the calendar year of its grant. The majority of these grants have both a performance-based and a service-based vesting schedule (“Performance-RSUs”), and the Company recognizes the related compensation expense based on the estimated performance levels that management believes will ultimately be met. Starting with the grants made in 2013, a portion of the awards have a service-based vesting schedule only (“Time-RSUs”), for which the associated expense is recognized ratably over four years. Performance-RSUs and Time-RSUs are convertible into the Company’s common stock after the passage of the vesting periods, which are 24, 36, and 48 months from January 31 of the grant year, at the rate of 50%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. Performance-RSUs will be earned only if the Company achieves certain performance levels. Although the RSUs are not considered to be earned and outstanding until at least the minimum performance metrics are met, the Company recognizes the related compensation expense over the requisite service period (or to an employee’s qualified retirement date, if earlier) using a graded vesting methodology. RSUs are also granted outside of the LTIP, with or without performance-based vesting requirements, in accordance with the terms of the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.

---

 

The number of the Company's non-vested RSUs as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2014, are presented below:

 

 

The above table only includes earned RSUs; therefore, the Performance-RSUs granted in 2014 but not yet earned are not included, but the Time-RSUs are included as granted.

 

As of June 30, 2014, the unrecognized compensation expense associated with earned RSUs was approximately $12.4 million, which will be recognized using a graded vesting schedule for Performance-RSUs and a straight-line vesting schedule for Time-RSUs, over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 2.28 years. 

 

Options.  The number of the Company's outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2014, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2014, are presented below: 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had no unrecognized compensation expense associated with outstanding options. 

 

(4) Earnings per Share 

 

The Company reports its earnings per share under the two-class method. Under this method, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share (as well as their related impact on the net income available to common stockholders) when their impact on net income available to common stockholders is anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 included all outstanding stock options and shares of restricted stock, which were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for these periods.    The potentially dilutive effect of outstanding warrants and the underlying shares exercisable under the Company’s convertible notes were excluded from diluted shares outstanding because the exercise price exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock. The effect of the note hedge the Company purchased to offset the underlying conversion option embedded in its convertible notes was also excluded, as the effect is anti-dilutive. 

 

Additionally, the shares of restricted stock issued by the Company under RSAs have a non-forfeitable right to cash dividends, if and when declared by the Company. Accordingly, restricted shares issued under RSAs are considered to be participating securities and, as such, the Company has allocated the undistributed earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 among the Company's outstanding shares of common stock and issued but unvested restricted shares, as follows:

---

 

 

Earnings per Share (in thousands, excluding share and per share amounts): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The computation of diluted earnings per share excluded potentially dilutive common shares related to restricted stock of 61,031 and 80,298 shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and 454,918 and 466,152 shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, because the effect of including these shares in the computation would have been anti-dilutive.

---

 

 

(5) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net is displayed as a separate component of Stockholders' equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following tables present the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014: 

 

 

 

 

 

____________

 

 

The Company records unrealized gains and losses related to its interest rate swaps net of estimated taxes in the Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net line item within Stockholders' equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets since it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to realize the benefits associated with its net deferred tax asset positions in the future.

 

The Company currently believes that the unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries will be reinvested for an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, no deferred taxes have been provided for the differences between the Company's book basis and underlying tax basis in these subsidiaries or on the foreign currency translation adjustment amounts.

---

 

(6) Intangible Assets 

 

Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives 

 

The following table presents the net carrying amount of the Company's intangible assets with indefinite lives as well as the changes in the net carrying amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2014, by segment:

 

____________

 

 

Intangible Assets with Definite Lives 

 

The following is a summary of the Company's intangible assets that were subject to amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

(7) Accrued Liabilities 

 

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8) Long-Term Debt 

 

The Company's long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

 

Revolving Credit Facility 

 

On April 24, 2014, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”).  The Credit Agreement provides for a $375 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and includes an accordion feature that will allow us to increase the available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility to $500 million, subject to the approval of one or more existing lenders or one or more lenders that become party to the Credit Agreement.  In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility includes a sub-limit of up to $30 million for letters of credit, a sub- limit of up to $25 million for swingline loans and a sub-limit of up to the equivalent amount of $125 million for loans in currencies other than U.S. Dollars.  The Revolving Credit Facility has a termination date of April 2019.

 

Borrowings (not including swingline loans and alternative currency loans) under the Revolving Credit Facility accrue interest at our option at either the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) or the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin depending on our most recent Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement).  Swingline loans bear interest at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin as described above. The alternative currency loans bear interest at the Adjusted LIBO Rate as described above.  Substantially all of our domestic assets, including the stock of our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries, are pledged to secure borrowings made under the Revolving Credit Facility. Furthermore, each of our material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries has guaranteed the full and punctual payment of our obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility. There are currently no restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends to us.

 

The primary restrictive covenants within the credit agreement governing our revolving credit facility include (1) limitations on the amount of senior secured net debt and total net debt that we can have outstanding at any given point in time and (2) the maintenance of a set ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as computed quarterly on a trailing 12-month basis, adjusted for the pro forma effect of acquisitions. Additionally, we are limited on the amount of restricted payments, including dividends, which we can make pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement; however, we may generally make restricted payments so long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing and the total net leverage ratio is less than 3.0 to 1.0 at the time such restricted payment is made.    

---

 

 

As of June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants and ratios under the Credit Agreement.  

 

As of June 30, 2014, $73.2 million was outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. Additionally, the Company has posted a $2.0 million letter of credit serving to secure the overdraft facility of its U.K. subsidiary (further discussed below) and a $0.1 million letter of credit serving to secure a third-party processing contract in Canada. These letters of credit, which the applicable third-parties may draw upon in the event the Company defaults on the related obligations, reduce the Company’s borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2014, the Company’s available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility totaled approximately $299.7 million.

 

$200.0 Million 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2018

 

The $200.0 million 8.25% senior subordinated notes due September 2018 (the "2018 Notes"), which are guaranteed by all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries, contain no maintenance covenants and only limited incurrence covenants, under which the Company has considerable flexibility. Interest under the 2018 Notes is paid semi-annually in arrears on March 1st and September 1st of each year. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants required under the 2018 Notes.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company repurchased $20.6 million of the 2018 Notes in the open market. In connection with the repurchase, the Company recorded a  $0.4 million pre-tax charge to write off a portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the repurchased 2018 Notes, which is included in the Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount line item in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.  Additionally, the Company recorded a $1.4 million pre-tax charge related to the premium paid for the repurchase, which is included in the Redemption costs for early extinguishment of debt line item in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

$287.5 Million 1.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 and Related Equity Instruments

 

On November 19, 2013, the Company issued $250.0 million of 1.00% convertible senior notes due December 2020 (the "Convertible Notes") at par value. The Company also granted to the initial purchasers the option to purchase, during the 13 day period following the issuance of the notes, up to an additional $37.5 million of Convertible Notes (the “Over-allotment Option”). The initial purchasers exercised the Over-allotment Option on November 21, 2013. The Company received $254.2 million in net proceeds from the offering after deducting underwriting fees paid to the initial purchasers and the amount paid to repurchase its outstanding common stock concurrently with the offering. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering to pay the net cost of the convertible note hedge transaction, as described below. The convertible note hedge and warrant transactions were entered into with the initial purchasers on November 19, 2013, concurrently with the pricing of the Convertible Notes, and on November 21, 2013, concurrent with the exercise of the Over-allotment Option. The Company pays interest semi-annually (payable in arrears) on June 1st and December 1st of each year, beginning on June 1, 2014. Under U.S. GAAP, certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion are required to be separately accounted for as liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. The Company, with assistance from a valuation professional, determined that the fair value of the debt component was $215.8 million and the fair value of the embedded option was $71.7 million as of the issuance date. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company recognizes effective interest expense on the debt component and that interest expense effectively accretes the debt component to the total principal amount due at maturity of $287.5 million. The effective rate of interest to accrete the debt balance is approximately 5.26%, which corresponds to the Company’s estimated conventional debt instrument borrowing rate at the date of issuance.

 

The Convertible Notes have an initial conversion price of $52.35 per share, which equals an initial conversion rate of 19.1022 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, for a total of approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock initially underlying the debt. The conversion rate, however, is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Conversion can occur: (1) any time on or after September 1, 2020; (2) after March 31, 2014, during any calendar quarter that follows a calendar quarter in which the price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 135% of the conversion price for at least 20 days during the 30 consecutive trading-day period ending on the last trading day of the quarter; (3) during the ten consecutive trading-day period following any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price of the Convertible Notes is less than 98% of the closing price of the Company’s common stock multiplied by the applicable conversion rate on each such trading day; (4) upon specified distributions to the Company’s shareholders upon recapitalizations, reclassifications or changes in stock; and (5) upon a make-whole fundamental change. A fundamental change is defined as any one of the following: (1) any person or group that acquires 50% or more of the total voting power of all classes of common equity that is entitled to vote generally in the election of the Company’s directors; (2) the Company engages in any recapitalization, reclassification or changes of common stock as a result of which the common stock would be converted into or exchanged for, stock, other securities, or other assets or property; (3) the Company engages in any share exchange, consolidation or merger where the common stock is converted into cash, securities or other property; (4) the Company engages in any sales, lease or other transfer of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets; or (5) the Company’s stock is not listed for trading on any U.S. national securities exchange.

 

As of June 30, 2014, none of the contingent conversion thresholds described above were met in order for the Convertible Notes to be convertible at the option of the note holders. As a result, the Convertible Notes have been classified as a noncurrent liability on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014. In future financial reporting periods, the classification of the Convertible Notes may change depending on whether any of the above contingent criteria have been subsequently satisfied.

---

 

 

Upon conversion, holders of the Convertible Notes are entitled to receive cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and common stock, at the Company’s election. In the event of a change in control, as defined in the indenture under which the Convertible Notes have been issued, holders can require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their Convertible Notes for 100% of the notes' par value plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

 

Interest expense related to the Convertible Notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The carrying value of the Convertible Notes consisted of the following as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

 

 

 

In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into separate convertible note hedge and warrant transactions with certain of the initial purchasers to reduce the potential dilutive impact upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes. The net effect of these transactions effectively raised the price at which dilution would occur from the $52.35 initial conversion price of the Convertible Notes to $73.29. Pursuant to the convertible note hedge, the Company purchased call options granting the Company the right to acquire up to approximately 5.5 million shares of its common stock with an initial strike price of $52.35. The call options automatically become exercisable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, and will terminate on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding December 1, 2020. The Company also sold to the initial purchasers warrants to acquire up to approximately 5.5 million shares of its common stock with a strike price of $73.29. The warrants will expire incrementally on a series of expiration dates subsequent to the maturity date of the Convertible Notes through August 30, 2021. If the conversion price of the Convertible Notes remains between the strike prices of the call options and warrants, the Company’s shareholders will not experience any dilution in connection with the conversion of the Convertible Notes; however, to the extent that the price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants on any or all of the series of related expiration dates of the warrants, the Company will be required to issue additional shares of its common stock to the warrant holders. The amounts allocated to both the note hedge and warrants were recorded in equity, within the Additional paid-in capital line item.

 

Other Borrowing Facilities

 

Cardtronics Mexico equipment financing agreements. Between 2007 and 2010, Cardtronics Mexico entered into several separate five-year equipment financing agreements with a single lender, of which four agreements have outstanding balances as of June 30, 2014. These agreements, which are denominated in pesos and bear interest at an average fixed rate of 9.79%, were utilized for the purchase of ATMs to support growth in the Company’s Mexico operations. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $8.0 million pesos ($0.6 million U.S.) were outstanding under the agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the loan agreements, the Company has issued guarantees for 51.0% of the obligations under these agreements (consistent with its ownership percentage in Cardtronics Mexico). As of June 30, 2014, the total amount of these guarantees was $4.1 million pesos ($0.3 million U.S.).

 

---

 

Cardtronics U.K. overdraft facility.  Cardtronics U.K. has a £1.0 million overdraft facility. This overdraft facility, which bears interest at 1.0% over the Bank of England’s base rate (0.5% as of June 30, 2014) and is secured by a letter of credit posted under our revolving credit facility, is utilized for general corporate purposes for our U.K. operations.  The letter of credit the Company has posted that is associated with this overdraft facility reduces the available borrowing capacity under its corporate revolving credit facility discussed above.  As of June 30, 2014, there were no amounts outstanding under the overdraft facility. 

 

(9) Asset Retirement Obligations 

 

Asset retirement obligations consist primarily of costs to deinstall the Company's ATMs and costs to restore the ATM sites to their original condition, which are estimated based on current market rates. In most cases, the Company is contractually required to perform this deinstallation and restoration work. For each group of ATMs, the Company has recognized the fair value of the asset retirement obligation as a liability on its balance sheet and capitalized that cost as part of the cost basis of the related asset. The related assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over five years, which is the estimated average time period that an ATM is installed in a location before being deinstalled, and the related liabilities are accreted to their full value over the same period of time.

 

The following table is a summary of the changes in the Company's asset retirement obligation liability for the six months ended June 30, 2014 (in thousands):

 

 

See Note 12, Fair Value Measurements for additional disclosures on the Company's asset retirement obligations with respect to its fair value measurements.

 

(10) Other Liabilities 

 

Other liabilities consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

(11) Derivative Financial Instruments 

 

Cash Flow Hedging Strategy 

 

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate risk associated with its vault cash rental obligations and, to a lesser extent, borrowings under its revolving credit facility. The Company is also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to its investments in its foreign subsidiaries. While the Company does not currently utilize derivative instruments to hedge its foreign currency exchange rate risk, it does utilize interest rate swap contracts to manage the interest rate risk associated with its vault cash rental obligations in the U.S. The Company does not currently utilize any derivative instruments to manage the interest rate risk associated with its vault cash rental obligations in U.K., Mexico, Canada, or Germany, nor does it utilize derivative instruments to manage the interest rate risk associated with borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility. 

 

The interest rate swap contracts entered into with respect to the Company's vault cash rental obligations serve to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of the Company's monthly floating rate vault cash rental obligations to a fixed rate. The Company has contracts in varying notional amounts through December 31, 2018 for the Company's U.S. vault cash rental obligations. By converting such amounts to a fixed rate, the impact of future interest rate changes (both favorable and unfavorable) on the Company's monthly vault cash rental expense amounts has been reduced. The interest rate swap contracts typically involve the receipt of floating rate amounts from the Company's counterparties that match, in all material respects, the floating rate amounts required to be paid by the Company to its vault cash providers for the portions of the Company's outstanding vault cash obligations that have been hedged. In return, the Company typically pays the interest rate swap counterparties a fixed rate amount per month based on the same notional amounts outstanding. At no point is there an exchange of the underlying principal or notional amounts associated with the interest rate swaps. Additionally, none of the Company's existing interest rate swap contracts contain credit-risk-related contingent features. 

 

For each derivative instrument that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedge transaction affects earnings.  Gains and losses on the derivative instrument representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components that are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in earnings. However, because the Company currently only utilizes fixed-for-floating interest rate swaps in which the underlying pricing terms agree, in all material respects, with the pricing terms of the Company’s vault cash rental obligations, the amount of ineffectiveness associated with such interest rate swap contracts has historically been immaterial. Accordingly, no ineffectiveness amounts associated with the Company’s effective cash flow hedges have been recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the current period.

 

The notional amounts, weighted average fixed rates, and terms associated with the Company's interest rate swap contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges that are currently in place (as of the date of the issuance of these financial statements) are as follows:

 

Accounting Policy 

 

The Company recognizes all of its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.    The accounting for changes in the fair value (e.g., gains or losses) of those derivative instruments depends on (1) whether these instruments have been designated (and qualify) as part of a hedging relationship and (2) the type of hedging relationship actually designated. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company designates the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. 

 

The Company has designated all of its interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges of the Company’s forecasted vault cash rental obligations.  Accordingly, changes in the fair values of the related interest rate swap contracts have been reported in the Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net line item within stockholders’ equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

The Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will be able to realize the benefits associated with its domestic net deferred tax asset positions in the future.    Therefore, the Company records the unrealized losses related to its domestic interest rate swaps net of estimated tax benefits in the Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net line item within Stockholders' equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. 

---

 

 

Tabular Disclosures 

 

The following tables depict the effects of the use of the Company's derivative contracts on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Balance Sheet Data 

 

 

 

Statements of Operations Data

 

 

 

 

 

The Company does not currently have any derivative instruments that have been designated as fair value or net investment hedges.    The Company has not historically, and does not currently; anticipate terminating its existing derivative instruments prior to their expiration dates. If the Company concludes that it is no longer probable that the anticipated future vault cash rental obligations that have been hedged will occur, or if changes are made to the underlying terms and conditions of the Company's vault cash rental agreements, thus creating some amount of ineffectiveness associated with the Company's current interest rate swap contracts, any resulting gains or losses will be recognized within the Other expense (income) line item of the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

As of June 30, 2014, the Company expected to reclassify $31.1 million of net derivative-related losses contained within accumulated OCI into earnings during the next twelve months concurrent with the recording of the related vault cash rental expense amounts.

 

See Note 12, Fair Value Measurements for additional disclosures on the Company's interest rate swap contracts in respect to its fair value measurements.

---

 

(12) Fair Value Measurements 

 

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 using the fair value hierarchy prescribed by U.S. GAAP. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.  Level 2 refers to fair values estimated using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using significant non-observable inputs.  An asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  

 

 

 

 

Additions to asset retirement obligation liability. The Company estimates the fair value of additions to its asset retirement obligation liability using expected future cash outflows discounted at the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate. Liabilities added to the asset retirement obligations line item in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are measured at fair value at the time of the asset installations on a non-recurring basis using Level 3 inputs, and are only reevaluated periodically based on current fair value.  Amounts added to the asset retirement obligation liability during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 totaled $3.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

 

Below are descriptions of the Company's valuation methodologies for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.  The methods described below may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values.  Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities. These financial instruments are not carried at fair value, but are carried at amounts that approximate fair value due to their short-term nature and generally negligible credit risk.

 

Acquisition-related intangible assets.  The estimated fair values of acquisition-related intangible assets are valued based on a discounted cash flows analysis using significant non-observable inputs (Level 3 inputs). The Company tests intangible assets for impairment on a quarterly basis by measuring the related carrying amounts against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related contract or portfolio of contracts.

 

Interest rate swaps. The fair value of the Company's interest rate swaps was a liability of $65.8 million as of June 30, 2014. These financial instruments are carried at fair value, calculated as the present value of amounts estimated to be received or paid to a marketplace participant in a selling transaction. These derivatives are valued using pricing models based on significant other observable inputs (Level 2 inputs), while taking into account the creditworthiness of the party that is in the liability position with respect to each trade. See Note 11, Derivative Financial Instruments for additional disclosures on the valuation process of this liability. 

 

Acquisition-related contingent consideration. Liabilities from acquisition-related contingent consideration are estimated by the Company using a discounted cash flow model.  Acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities are classified as Level 3 liabilities, because the Company uses unobservable inputs to value them, based on its best estimate of operational results upon which the payment of these obligations are contingent. Gains and losses related to the contingent consideration associated with acquisitions are included in other (income) expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.  As of June 30, 2014, there were no significant acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities outstanding.

 

Long-term debt. The carrying amount of the long-term debt balance related to borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility approximates fair value due to the fact that any borrowings are subject to short-term floating interest rates.  As of June 30, 2014, the fair value of the Company's 2018 Notes and the Convertible Notes (see Note 8, Long-Term Debt)  totaled $188.8 million and $263.8 million, respectively, based on the quoted market price (Level 1 input) for these notes as of that date.

---

 

 

(13) Commitments and Contingencies

 

Legal Matters 

 

National Federation of the Blind. Through its acquisition of the E*Trade ATM portfolio, the Company became the sole defendant in the June 2003 lawsuit filed by the National Federation of the Blind, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et. al. and certain individuals representing a class of similarly situated persons (the "Plaintiffs") against E*Trade Access, Inc., et al. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (“Massachusetts District Court”): Civil Action No. 03-11206-NMG (the “Lawsuit”).  The Plaintiffs sought to require, among other things, that ATMs deployed by E*Trade be voice-guided. In December 2007, the Company and Plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement (as modified in November 2010, the "Settlement Agreement").  In 2011, the Plaintiffs filed a motion of contempt with the Massachusetts District Court alleging that the Company had failed to fully comply with the requirements of the Settlement Agreement.  On December 15, 2011, the Massachusetts District Court issued an order that required the Company to bring all of its ATMs in compliance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement by March 15, 2012.  In August 2012, the Plaintiffs filed their second motion of contempt, which alleged, among other things, that the Company had failed to meet the Massachusetts District Court’s deadline and sought a fine of $50 per ATM for each month that the Massachusetts District Court determined the Company was not in compliance. 

 

In March 2013, the Massachusetts District Court issued an order that stated that sanctions would be imposed, but did not specify what violations had occurred. In April 2013, the Massachusetts District Court appointed a Special Master to determine how many of the Company’s ATMs were not in compliance with the Settlement Agreement as of March 15, 2012 and to determine an appropriate sanction or fine, if any, for such non-compliance.  Since his appointment, the Special Master has met numerous times with all the parties, reviewed all matters thought relevant by him and in December 2013, filed under seal his Report and Recommendation with the Court.  The Special Master is currently conducting negotiations among the parties to determine if an amended and restated settlement agreement can be agreed upon by the parties to resolve all outstanding issues.  The Company does not expect the outcome of this matter to have a material adverse effect upon its financial condition or results of operations.

 

Automated Transactions.    On August 16, 2010, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the “District Court”) entitled Automated Transactions LLC (“ATL”) v. IYG Holding Co., et al. 10 Civ. 0691 (D. Del.) (the "2010 Lawsuit"). The 2010 Lawsuit names the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardtronics USA, Inc. (“Cardtronics USA”), as one of the defendants. The 2010 Lawsuit alleges that Cardtronics USA and the other defendants infringed upon seven of the plaintiff's patents by providing retail transactions to consumers through their ATMs. The plaintiff, ATL, is seeking a permanent injunction, damages, treble damages and costs, including attorney's fees and expenses. ATL is a non-practicing entity that has initiated dozens of similar lawsuits across the nation. The allegations raised by the plaintiff in this suit are similar to the allegations made by the same plaintiff in an earlier suit (the "2006 Lawsuit") in the same District Court against us and other defendants, which prior allegations were rejected by the both District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals.  Additionally, in January 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences rejected on grounds of obviousness all claims relating to the underlying parent patent in both the 2006 and 2010 Lawsuits 

 

Notwithstanding these prior adverse decisions, ATL has continued initiating new patent infringement lawsuits across the country against primarily small financial institutions.  Upon motion by us and other similarly situated defendants, many of these cases have been consolidated in the same district court which rendered the adverse ruling in the 2006 Lawsuit against ATL.  The Company has always maintained that these ATL lawsuits have no merit, primarily because the asserted child patents have patent claims or limitations previously held invalid or not infringed by the U.S. Court of Appeals.  In June 2014, ATL unilaterally and without notice to us, filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice to its right to sue us with respect to the claims asserted in the above cases.  Concurrently, ATL also filed a covenant not to sue us or the other defendants.  We have objected to ATL’s actions for several reasons, including our contention that their proposed covenant not to sue is too narrow.  In any event, the Company continues to believe that the remaining lawsuits will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations and the Company will continue to vigorously defend its position.

 

In addition to the above legal proceedings, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of its business. The company has provided reserves where necessary for all claims and the Company’s management does not expect the outcome in any of these legal proceedings, individually or collectively, to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, the Company currently expenses all legal costs as they are incurred.  

 

Other Commitments 

 

Asset Retirement Obligations. The Company's asset retirement obligations consist primarily of deinstallation costs of the ATM and costs to restore the ATM site to its original condition. In most cases, the Company is legally required to perform this deinstallation and restoration work. The Company had $68.1 million accrued for these liabilities as of June 30, 2014. For additional information, see Note 9, Asset Retirement Obligations.

 

---

 

(14) Income Taxes 

 

Income tax expense based on the Company's income before income taxes was as follows:

 

 

The decrease in income tax expense and effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily attributable to the change in the mix of earnings across jurisdictions. The Company continues to maintain valuation allowances for its local net deferred tax asset positions for certain of its entities in the U.K. and Mexico, as the Company currently believes that it is more likely than not that these tax assets will not be realized.

 

The deferred taxes associated with the Company's unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments have been reflected within the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

---

 

 

 

 

(15) Segment Information

 

As of June 30, 2014, the Company's operations consisted of its U.S., Europe, and Other International segments.  The Company's operations in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are included in its U.S. segment.  The Other International segment currently is comprised of the Company’s operations in Mexico and Canada.  While each of these reporting segments provides similar kiosk-based and/or ATM-related services, each segment is currently managed separately as they require different marketing and business strategies.

 

Management uses Adjusted EBITDA, along with other U.S. GAAP-based measures, to assess the operating results and effectiveness of its segments.  Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure because it allows management to more effectively evaluate operating performance and compare its results of operations from period to period without regard to financing method or capital structure.  The Company excludes depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets as these amounts can vary substantially depending upon book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired.  Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect acquisition-related costs and the Company's obligations for the payment of income taxes, loss on disposal of assets, interest expense, certain other non-operating and nonrecurring items or other obligations such as capital expenditures.

 

Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by the Company, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies and is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  In evaluating the Company's performance as measured by Adjusted EBITDA, management recognizes and considers the limitations of this measurement.  Accordingly, Adjusted EBITDA is only one of the measurements that management utilizes.  Therefore, Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities or other income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Below is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to controlling interests:

 

____________

 

---

 

The following tables reflect certain financial information for each of the Company's reporting segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 

 

 

 

 

____________ 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

____________ 

 

Identifiable Assets:

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

(16) Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information

 

The Company's 2018 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, subject to certain customary release provisions, on a joint and several basis by all of the Company's 100% owned domestic subsidiaries. The following information sets forth the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 of (1) Cardtronics, Inc., the parent company and issuer of the 2018 Notes ("Parent"); (2) all of the Company's 100% owned domestic subsidiaries on a combined basis (collectively, the "Guarantors"); and (3) the Company's international subsidiaries on a combined basis (collectively, the "Non-Guarantors"):

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets

 

 

 

---

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets — continued

 

 

 

---

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

 

---

 

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows — continued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

(17)  New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued updated Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers Topic 606 (ASU 2014-09), to supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. Under ASU 2014-09, the core principle is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods and services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve the core principle, which includes identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. Further, an entity is required to disclose sufficient information to enable the user of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

 

(18) Subsequent Events

 

Acquisitions

 

On July 21, 2014, the Company announced a definitive agreement under which it will acquire the Welch ATM business for cash purchase consideration (paid at closing) of approximately $160.0 million.  The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals established by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, as well as the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.  The Company anticipates completing this transaction during the three months ending September 30, 2014.

 

Tender Offer of 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2018

 

On July 28, 2014, the Company announced that it had received tenders and consents from the holders of approximately $64.0 million in principal amount of the Company’s 8.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) pursuant to its previously announced cash tender offer for any and all of the outstanding $179.4 million principal amount of the notes.

 

Senior Debt Issuance

 

On July 28, 2014, the Company completed a private offering of $250.0 million of 5.125% senior notes due 2022.  The majority of the net proceeds from this offering will fund the Company’s tender offer and retirement of the Company’s 2018  Notes.  The remainder of the net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.

 

 

---

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain statements and information in this Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature.  These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, or forecasts concerning future developments and their potential effect on us.  While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, there can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we currently anticipate.  All comments concerning our expectations for future revenues and operating results are based on our forecasts for our existing operations and do not include the potential impact of any future acquisitions.  Our forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those summarized below:

 

 

For additional information regarding known material factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results, please see (1) Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q and (2) Part I, “Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the 2013 Form 10‑K.

 

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this document, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

---

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

Cardtronics, Inc. provides convenient automated consumer financial services through its network of automated teller machines (“ATMs”) and multi-function financial services kiosks. As of June 30, 2014, we were the world’s largest retail ATM owner, providing services to over 83,600 devices throughout the United States (“U.S.”) (including the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands), the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), Germany, Canada, and Mexico. In the U.S., certain of our devices are multi-function financial services kiosks that, in addition to traditional ATM functions such as cash dispensing and bank account balance inquiries, perform other consumer financial services including bill payments, check cashing, remote deposit capture (which is deposit taking at ATMs using electronic imaging), and money transfers.  Also included in the number of devices in our network as of June 30, 2014 were approximately 14,700 ATMs to which we provided various forms of managed services.  Under a managed services arrangement, retailers and financial institutions rely on us to handle some or all of the multiple elements that are required to operate and maintain ATMs, typically in exchange for a monthly service fee or fee per service provided.

 

We often partner with large, nationally and regionally-known retail merchants under multi-year contracts to place our ATMs and kiosks within their store locations.  In doing so, we provide our retail partners with a compelling automated financial services solution that helps attract and retain customers, and in turn increases the likelihood that our devices will be utilized.  We also partner with leading national and regional financial institutions to brand certain of our ATMs and financial services kiosks within our network.  As of June 30, 2014,  approximately 21,300 of our ATMs were under contract with financial institutions to place their logos on those machines and to provide convenient surcharge-free access for their banking customers. In return for the branding that we provide, we generally receive monthly fees on a per ATM basis from the branding institution, while retaining our standard fee schedule for non-customers of the financial institutions who use the branded ATMs.

 

Additionally, we own and operate the Allpoint network (“Allpoint”), the largest surcharge-free ATM network within the U.S. (based on the number of participating ATMs). Allpoint, which has more than 56,100 participating ATMs globally (including a majority of our ATMs in the U.S., U.K., Canada and Mexico), provides surcharge-free ATM access to customers of participating financial institutions, many of which lack a significant ATM network. In exchange for the surcharge-free access, member financial institutions pay us either a fixed monthly fee per cardholder or a set fee per transaction. Allpoint also works with financial institutions that manage stored-value debit card programs on behalf of corporate entities and governmental agencies, including general purpose, payroll, and electronic benefits transfer (“EBT”) cards. Under these programs, the issuing financial institutions pay Allpoint a fee per issued stored-value card or per transaction in return for allowing the users of those cards surcharge-free access to Allpoint’s participating ATM network.

 

Finally, we own and operate an electronic funds transfer (“EFT”) transaction processing platform that provides transaction processing services to our network of ATMs and financial services kiosks as well as ATMs owned and operated by third parties. For additional discussion of our operations and the manner in which we derive revenues, please refer to our 2013 Form 10-K. 

 

Strategic Outlook

 

Over the past several years, we have expanded our operations both domestically and internationally through acquisitions, continued to deploy ATMs in high-traffic locations under contracts with well-known retailers, expanded our relationships with leading financial institutions through growth of Allpoint and our bank branding programs, and made other strategic acquisitions and investments to expand and develop new product offerings and capabilities of our ATMs.

 

Since July 2011, we have completed acquisitions of the following: (1) seven domestic ATM operators, expanding our fleet in both multi-unit regional retail chains and individual merchant ATM locations in the U.S. by approximately 31,600 ATMs, (2) two Canadian ATM operators for a total of approximately 1,400 ATMs, which allowed us to enter into and expand our international presence in Canada and (3) in August 2013, Cardpoint Limited (“Cardpoint”), an ATM service provider operating in the U.K. and Germany, which further expanded our U.K. ATM operations by approximately 7,100 ATMs, and also allowed us to enter into the German market with approximately 800 ATMs.

 

In addition to the above ATM acquisitions, we have also made strategic acquisitions to enhance our product offerings, including: (1) Locator Search in August 2011, a leading domestic provider of location search technology deployed by financial institutions to help customers and members find the nearest, most appropriate and convenient ATM location based on the service they seek; (2) Complete Technical Services, Ltd. in January 2012, an ATM installation company in the U.K.; and (3) i-design group plc (“i-design”) in March 2013, a Scotland-based provider and developer of marketing and advertising software and services for ATM owners.

 

On July 21, 2014, we announced a definitive agreement to acquire the Welch ATM business for cash purchase consideration (to be paid at closing) of approximately $160.0 million.  The completion of the transaction is subject to regulatory approvals established by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as well as the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.  The Company anticipates that the transaction will be completed during the three months ending September 30, 2014. This acquisition will expand our U.S. ATM operations with national and regional merchants as well as with financial institutions.

 

---

 

While we will continue to explore potential acquisition opportunities in the future as a way to grow our business, we also expect to continue launching new products and services that will allow us to further leverage our existing ATM and financial services kiosk network.  In particular, we see opportunities to expand our operations through the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

Recent Events and Trends

 

Over the last several years, we have grown our business through a combination of organic growth through the strategies described above and with acquisitions. Since 2010, our compounded annual growth rate is 18%, which reflects a mix of growth from internal initiatives and acquisitions added.  During the first half of 2014, our revenues grew by 25% over the prior year, reflecting approximately 17% growth from acquisitions and 8% organic growth.

 

Withdrawal Transaction and Revenue Trends – United States. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, total same-store cash withdrawal transactions conducted on our domestic ATMs increased by 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively, over the comparable periods in 2013. We define same-store ATMs as all ATMs that were continuously transacting for both the current period and the comparable period in the prior year to ensure the exclusion of any new growth or mid-month installations.  The growth rate is impacted by a number of factors, including consumer behavior and preferences, economic factors, weather, and also company-specific initiatives, such as bank branding, growth in Allpoint (our surcharge free network), pricing and other products and services we may deploy.  This growth rate has varied somewhat over recent years but has typically fallen within a range of flat up to 5%.

 

Over the last several years, some of the large U.S. banks serving the market for consumer banking services have begun to aggressively compete for market share, and part of their competitive strategy has been to increase their number of customer touch points, including the establishment of an ATM network to provide convenient, surcharge-free access to cash for their customers.  As a result, in certain situations, we have faced direct competition from large U.S. banks for large ATM placement opportunities.  While a large owned-ATM network would be a key strategic asset for a bank, we believe it would be uneconomical for all but the largest banks to build and operate an extensive ATM network.  Bank branding of our ATMs and participation in our surcharge-free network allow financial institutions to rapidly increase surcharge-free ATM access for their customers at substantially lower cost than building their own ATM networks. We also believe there is an opportunity for a large non-bank ATM and financial services kiosk operator such as ourselves, with lower costs and an established operating history, to contract with financial institutions and retailers to manage their ATM networks. Such an outsourcing arrangement could reduce a financial institution’s operational costs while extending its customer service. Furthermore, we believe there are opportunities to provide selected services on an outsourced basis, such as transaction processing services, to other independent owners and operators of ATMs and financial services kiosks.  These factors have led to an increase in bank branding, participation in surcharge-free networks, and managed services arrangements, and we believe that there are opportunities for continued growth under these types of arrangements.

 

Withdrawal Transaction and Revenue Trends – United Kingdom. In recent periods, we have installed more free-to-use ATMs as opposed to surcharging “pay-to-use” ATMs in the U.K.  As a result of this mix shift, our overall withdrawal transactions in the U.K. (excluding the effect of the Cardpoint acquisition) have increased. Although we earn less revenue per cash withdrawal transaction on a free-to-use machine, the increase in the number of transactions conducted on free-to-use machines has generally translated into higher overall revenues.

 

Financial Regulatory Reform – United Kingdom. In March 2013, the U.K. Treasury department (the “Treasury”) issued a formal recommendation to further regulate the U.K. payments industry, including LINK, the nation’s formal ATM scheme.  In October 2013, the U.K. government responded by establishing the new Payment Systems Regulator (“PSR”) to oversee any payment system and its participants operating in the U.K. The ultimate impact of the establishment of the PSR will not be known until it is officially formed.

 

---

 

In July 2013, the European Commission put forward a new draft directive to regulate payment service providers operating in the European Union (“PSD2”). Broadly, PSD2 seeks to harmonize rules for the licensing of payment institutions and introduces certain common rules affecting all payment service providers (“PSPs”) throughout the European Union.  PSD2 sets out the rights and obligations of payment service users and PSPs together with transparency and security requirements to facilitate safe, efficient payment transactions.  Whereas the current Payment Services Directive exempts independent ATM deployers, PSD2 (as currently drafted) will apply to businesses of this nature.  PSD2 as currently drafted is still in Committee stage in the European Parliament and has not yet been properly considered by the Council.  We anticipate that the draft Directive will not be finalized until 2015 and that it will take up to an additional two years for member states to transpose it into domestic law.  In parallel with PSD2, the European Commission has introduced a new Regulation (“MIF Regulation”) aimed at reducing the level of interchange fees charged by card schemes for Point-of-Sale (“ POS ”) transactions, as well as altering certain of the business rules contained in card scheme rulebooks.  The fee caps in the MIF Regulation do not apply to cash withdrawal transactions at ATMs, but certain of the other provisions in the MIF Regulation could apply to ATM operators (although their precise effects are currently uncertain).  The MIF Regulation is also currently in Committee stage at the European Parliament and therefore at this time we cannot predict its final form, effective date, nor to what extent, if any, such regulation will impact ATM operators.

 

Europay, MasterCard, Visa (“EMV”). The EMV standard provides for the security and processing of information contained on microchips embedded in certain debit and credit cards, known as “smart cards.”  This standard has already been adopted in the U.K., Germany, Mexico, and Canada, and our ATMs in those markets are in compliance.  In the U.S., MasterCard implemented a liability shift in April 2013 from the issuers of these cards to the party that has not made the investment in EMV equipment (the acquirer) for fraudulent counterfeit International Maestro (MasterCard) cross-border transactions.  While the majority of our U.S. ATMs are not currently EMV-compliant, this liability shift has not had a significant impact on our business or results, as Maestro transactions comprise less than 0.2% of our U.S. transaction volume.  In response to the Maestro liability shift date of April 2013, we implemented additional fraud monitoring methods to minimize fraud losses and to date we have seen minimal fraud losses.  In February 2013, Visa announced plans for a liability shift to occur in October 2017 for all transactions types on domestic or international EMV-issued cards. MasterCard has also announced that liability shift for its domestic ATM transactions on EMV-issued cards will occur in October 2016. At this time, neither MasterCard nor Visa are requiring mandatory upgrades to ATM equipment; however, increased fraudulent activity on ATMs in the future or the shifting of liability for fraudulent activity on all ATM transactions without EMV readers, or other business or regulatory factors could cause us to upgrade or replace a significant portion of our existing U.S. ATM fleet. We continue to closely monitor the migration toward the EMV standard, and all of our recent ATM deployments have been with ATMs that are EMV-ready. At this time, through a combination of ordinary replacement of equipment, routine scheduled maintenance visits to our ATMs, and evolving technology to meet compliance, we do not expect the EMV migration to have a significant impact on our future capital investments and results from operations.  However, we currently estimate that the incremental potential cost to make our entire current Company-owned U.S. ATM fleet fully compliant with the EMV standard is approximately $30 million to $35 million, a portion of which will be incurred during 2014.  With the increased capital investments required as a direct result of EMV, our depreciation expense may increase in the future.  Additionally, there is a possibility that we could incur asset write-offs or accelerated depreciation expense on certain ATM units.  Furthermore, we could experience a higher rate of unit count attrition for our merchant-owned ATMs in the future as a result of certain merchants electing to not comply with this standard. 

 

Capital Investments. In the next twelve to twenty-four months, we are expecting a somewhat higher rate of capital investment than our recent run-rate but do not expect that this temporary increased level of capital investment will continue past mid-2016.  These expected temporary increases in capital spending levels are being driven by the upcoming EMV requirements discussed above, coupled with many other factors including: (1) our strategic initiatives to enhance the consumer experience at our ATMs and drive transaction growth; (2) increased demand from merchants and financial institutions for multi-function ATMs; (3) competition for new merchant and customer contracts and renewals of existing  merchant contracts; (4) certain software and hardware enhancements required to facilitate our strategic initiatives and to continue running supported versions; and (5) other compliance related matters.  As a result of the increased capital investments being planned, we are working to optimize our existing assets, but it is possible that as a result of this activity we could incur some asset write-offs or impairments and increased depreciation expense in the near term.  However, we are expecting that the long-term revenue benefits of the investments will drive increased profitability in future periods and allow us to expand our position in the United States as the leading ATM operator of non-bank branch locations.

 

Restrictions on EBT Cards.  In the U.S., recently released regulations at both the federal and state level prohibit the use of debit cards loaded with government benefit payments (commonly called “EBT cards”) from being used at ATMs established in certain locations, primarily casinos, liquor stores, and adult entertainment venues.  Since we have not seen a significant use of EBT cards in such locations, we do not believe these restrictions will have any meaningful impact upon our revenues.  However, if the scope and type of locations where EBT cards are prohibited were to expand, our transaction-based revenue may be adversely affected. 

 

---

 

United Kingdom Property Taxes. In the U.K., there is no requirement for property owners to declare ownership and valuation to taxing authorities for property tax purposes (referred to as “business rates” in the U.K.). Rather, the U.K. government sets the valuations on all the assessable properties that it is aware of and distributes the results to the various local government councils, who then may or may not send property tax bills to property owners at their discretion.  Through mid-2013, we had only received tax bills for a portion of our ATMs in the U.K. and these amounts were not significant in the past.  In May 2013, we received a notice from the U.K. governmental agency in charge of property taxes stating that it had obtained location and transaction count data for all ATMs in the U.K., and that it was in the process of creating or updating the valuations on many U.K. ATMs across the industry.  In September 2013, we received a listing of those proposed valuations on ATMs, which indicated an annual incremental assessment of approximately £1.8 million ($2.9 million), net of amounts that may be contractually recovered from merchants and potential reductions resulting from successfully challenging the assessments with the U.K. government and local authorities.  Under U.K. law, these taxes may be payable retroactive to April 2010 or to the date of first occupancy, whichever is later. As a result, we believe that it is probable that we will be assessed on significantly more ATMs than in the past, and as a result, we recorded an additional charge of $8.7 million in the third quarter of 2013 to account for not only 2013 taxes assessable but also an estimate for taxes assessable in previous years.  We believe there are several strategies to mitigate these property tax assessments and we are currently in the process of implementing several of these strategies to not only reduce the retroactive portion of such assessments, but to also minimize the potential ongoing impact of this change in approach by the U.K. taxing authorities.

 

Expansion into Germany.  As noted in the Strategic Outlook section above, we entered the German market in August 2013 through our acquisition of Cardpoint.  The German ATM market is highly fragmented and may be under-deployed based on its population’s use of cash relative to other markets in which we operate, such as the U.S. and U.K.  There are approximately 58,500 ATMs in Germany that are largely deployed in branch locations.  This fragmented and potentially under-deployed market dynamic is attractive to us, and as a result, we believe there are a number of opportunities for growth in this market and we plan to pursue many of them.

 

Mexico Operations. In September 2012, we completed a required migration of our U.S. dollar-dispensing ATMs in Mexico so that we could continue to settle our U.S. dollar-denominated transactions through Promoción y Operación S.A. de C.V.  This process change, combined with the overall recent downward trend in surcharge transactions in Mexico stemming from regulatory changes in 2010, has resulted in a reduction of the revenues and profits we earn from our ATMs in Mexico.  Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2013, in response to increased physical ATM theft attempts and lower profitability on certain ATMs in Mexico, we took a number of ATMs out of service for a period of time to enhance some security features.  As a result, we have reduced our ATM deployments in Mexico in recent years and we continue to evaluate each ATM’s revenue and profit contributions to our Mexico operations.  If the recent business performance trend was to continue and we are unable to capitalize on market opportunities in the near future, it is possible that we could incur asset write-offs, including fixed assets, goodwill and other assets, or incur accelerated depreciation expense on certain assets. However, we believe that there are several significant opportunities in this market to leverage our existing operations with both existing and new financial institution and retail customers.  Despite some of the recent challenges of operating in this market, we currently believe that the aforementioned business opportunities are at advanced stages and would significantly improve profitability of our operations in this market within the next twelve months. 

 

Convertible Note Offering.  In November 2013, we completed an underwritten private placement of convertible senior notes (“Convertible Notes”), generating gross proceeds of $287.5 million.  The Convertible Notes pay semi-annual interest at a rate of 1.0% per annum on the $287.5 million aggregate principal balance and mature in December 2020.  We are required to settle the principal balance of the Convertible Notes in cash and/or stock upon conversion or maturity at our election.

 

Simultaneous with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into hedging transactions designed to offset dilution to our common stock in the event of a conversion under the Convertible Notes.  The note hedge instruments (“Note Hedges”) have a strike price of $52.35 which is equal to the conversion rate under the Convertible Notes, are exercisable by us upon any conversion under the Convertible Notes, and expire in December 2020.  We also sold warrants (“Warrants”) in our common stock with a strike price of $73.29.  The net effect of the Note Hedges and Warrants was to raise the effective conversion price of the Convertible Notes to $73.29.

 

Senior Note Offering.  In July 2014, we completed an underwritten private placement of senior notes (“New Senior Notes”), generating gross proceeds of $250.0 million. The New Senior Notes pay semi-annual interest at a fixed rate of 5.125% and mature in 2022.

 

Simultaneous with the New Senior Notes offering, we launched a tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) for approximately $179.4 million principal amount of our outstanding 8.25% senior subordinated notes (“Old Senior Notes”).  For any Old Senior Notes not tendered to us, we intend to call and retire them shortly after the Tender Offer has expired.  We expect to use proceeds from the New Senior Notes to fund the Tender Offer.  The remaining proceeds from the New Senior Notes will be used for general corporate purposes and may be used to fund a portion of the Welch ATM acquisition (discussed above), which we expect to complete during the third quarter of 2014.

 

Factors Impacting Comparability between Periods

 

---

 

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth line items from our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated. Percentages may not add due to rounding.

_______________

 

 

---

 

Key Operating Metrics

 

We rely on certain key measures to gauge our operating performance, including total transactions, total cash withdrawal transactions, ATM operating revenues per ATM per month, and ATM operating gross profit margin.  The following table sets forth information regarding certain of these key measures for the periods indicated, excluding the effect of the acquisitions during the periods presented for comparative purposes.

____________

 

---

 

 

The following table sets forth information regarding certain of these key measures for the periods indicated, including the effect of the acquisitions in the periods presented for comparative purposes.

____________

 

---

 

Revenues

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

 

ATM operating revenues. ATM operating revenues generated during the three months ended June 30, 2014 increased $48.5 million, or 23.8%, from the three months ended June 30, 2013.  Below is the detail, by segment, of the changes in the various components of ATM operating revenues:

 

 

United States.  During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our U.S. operations experienced an $11.2 million, or 6.9%, increase in ATM operating revenues when compared to the same period in 2013.  Acquisitions completed since the beginning of 2013 accounted for $3.9 million, or 2.4%, of this increase. The results of these acquired businesses (or a portion thereof) were included in the consolidated financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2014, but not in the comparable period in 2013.  The remaining $7.3 million, or 4.5%, increase was due to growth achieved from a combination of revenue sources, including: (i) increased surcharge and interchange revenues primarily as a result of a higher machine count and total transaction count; (ii) an increase in bank branding and surcharge-free network revenues that resulted from the continued growth of participating banks and other financial institutions in our bank branding program and our Allpoint network; and (iii) an increase in managed services revenue as a result of an increase in new contracts entered into under this arrangement type.    

 

For additional information on recent trends that have impacted, and may continue to impact, the revenues generated by our U.S. operations, see Recent Events and Trends - Withdrawal Transaction and Revenue Trends – United States above.

 

Europe.  Our European operations, which include our operations in the U.K. and Germany, experienced a $38.4 million, or 118.3%, increase in ATM operating revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013.  Approximately $30.5 million, or 93.9%, of the increase, was attributable to our acquisition of Cardpoint, which was completed in August 2013.  Approximately $4.8 million, or 14.8%, of the increase was primarily driven by higher interchange revenues, as a result of an increase in the number of total ATMs in our U.K. business.  Foreign currency exchange rate movements accounted for approximately $3.1 million or approximately 9.6% of the increase from the prior year.

 

For additional information on recent trends that have impacted, and may continue to impact, the revenues generated by our U.K. operations, see Recent Events and Trends - Withdrawal Transaction and Revenue Trends – United Kingdom above.

 

Other International.  ATM operating revenues generated by our other international segment, which includes our Mexico and Canadian operations, declined $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013.  This decline was attributable to our Mexico operations, which generated $1.4 million less ATM operating revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to an 18% lower average transacting machine count.  The lower machine count was the result of an internal decision to remove a number of machines to improve profitability of the overall business.  As a result of the lower transacting ATM count, our transactions in this market experienced a similar percentage decline, resulting in the reduced revenues. Foreign currency exchange rate movements did not have a material effect on the reported ATM operating revenues in this segment.

---

 

 

ATM product sales and other revenues.  ATM product sales and other revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2014 totaled $8.0 million, representing an increase of $3.6 million from the same period in 2013.  This increase was primarily attributable to higher equipment and value-added reseller (“VAR”) program sales to merchants and distributors during the period due to the continued replacement of certain ATMs that were not ADA-compliant and the replacement of older equipment with new EMV-compliant equipment.  Under our VAR program, we primarily sell ATMs to associate VARs who in turn resell the ATMs to various financial institutions throughout the U.S. in territories authorized by the equipment manufacturer.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

 

ATM operating revenues.  ATM operating revenues generated during the six months ended June 30, 2014 increased $93.2 million, or 23.5%, from the six months ended June 30, 2013. Below is the detail, by segment, of changes in the various components of ATM operating revenues:

 

 

 

United States.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our U. S. operations experienced a $24.2 million, or 7.6%, increase in ATM operating revenues compared to the same period in 2013.  Acquisitions completed since the beginning of 2013 accounted for $9.0 million, or 2.8%, of the increase.  The results of these acquired businesses (or a portion thereof) were included in the consolidated financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2014, but not in the comparable period in 2013.  The remaining $15.2 million, or 4.8%, increase was primarily due to the following; (i) increased surcharge and interchange revenues primarily as a result of a higher machine count; (ii) an increase in bank branding and surcharge-free network revenues that resulted from the continued growth of participating banks and other financial institutions in our bank branding program and our Allpoint network; and (iii) an increase in managed services revenue as a result of an increase in new contracts entered into under this arrangement type.  The increase in other revenues in the U.S. is primarily from intercompany transaction processing services to foreign subsidiaries, which is eliminated in consolidation.

 

Europe.  Our European operations also contributed to the higher ATM operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014, which increased by $73.0 million, or 117.5%, from the six months ended June 30, 2013.  As was the case with the three month period, an increase of $57.1 million, or 91.9%, was attributable to our acquisition of Cardpoint, which were completed in March 2013 and August 2013, respectively.  Approximately $10.9 million, or 17.5%, increase was driven by higher interchange revenues, primarily as a result of growth in the number of total ATMs in our U.K. business.  Foreign currency exchange rate movements accounted for approximately $ 5.0 million or 8.1% of the year over year increase.    

 

Other International.   ATM operating revenues generated by our other international segment, which includes our Mexico and Canadian operations, declined $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013.  This decline was primarily attributable to our Mexico operations, which generated $3.0 million less ATM operating revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2014, than the same period in 2013, primarily due to a 20% lower average transacting machine count.  The lower machine count was the result of an internal decision to remove a number of machines to improve profitability of the overall business.  As a result of the lower transacting ATM count, our transactions in this market experienced a similar percentage decline, resulting in the reduced revenues. Foreign currency exchange rate movements did not have a material effect on the reported ATM operating revenues in this segment.

 

ATM product sales and other revenues.  ATM product sales and other revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014, totaled $14.9 million, representing an increase of $6.1 million from the same period in 2013.  This increase was primarily attributable to higher equipment and value-added reseller (“VAR”) program sales to merchants and distributors during the period due to the continued replacement of certain ATMs that were not ADA-compliant and the replacement of older equipment with new EMV-compliant equipment.  Under our VAR program, we primarily sell ATMs to associate VARs who in turn resell the ATMs to various financial institutions throughout the U.S. in territories authorized by the equipment manufacturer.

---

 

Cost of Revenues

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

 

Cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets).  The cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangibles assets) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 increased $29.9 million when compared to the same period in 2013.  The following is a detail, by segment, of changes in the various components of the cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets):

 

 

United States.  During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our U.S. operations experienced a $6.2 million, or 6.1% increase in the cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) when compared to the same period in 2013, of which approximately $2.6 million was attributable to the acquisitions completed in 2013 and 2014.  The remaining increase primarily resulted from higher transaction volumes and ATM unit growth driven by organic revenue growth, as well as other expenses from higher employee costs. Additionally, the increase in vault cash rental cost is attributable to higher interest rate swap expense associated with cash flow hedges that became effective on January 1, 2014.    

 

Europe.  During the three months ended June 30, 2014, our European operations experienced a $24.7 million, or 100.3% increase in the cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) when compared to the same period in 2013, of which approximately $17.7 million was a result of the acquisitions completed in 2013.  The remaining increase was the result of the increased number of transactions conducted on our machines in the European market as well as higher charges recorded in 2014 to accrue for estimated business rates (property taxes), which historically had not been as significant.  For further details on this matter, see Recent Events and Trends – United Kingdom Property Taxes.  

 

Other International.    The cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) from our Other International operations decreased by $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013. This decline was primarily the result of the lower average number of transacting ATMs in Mexico, as described above, which resulted in reduced transaction levels and operating costs on our ATMs in that market. 

 

---

 

Cost of ATM product sales and other revenues.  The cost of ATM product sales and other revenues increased by $3.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013.  This increase is consistent with the increase in related revenues, as discussed above, and is primarily related to increased equipment and VAR sales activity.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

 

Cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets). The cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) for the six months ended June 30, 2014, increased $60.1 million when compared to the same period in 2013.  Below is a detail, by segment, of changes in the various components of the cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets):

 

 

 

United States.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our U.S. operations incurred an $14.6 million, or 7.3% increase in the cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) when compared to the same period in 2013, of which approximately $6.0 million was attributable to the acquisitions completed in 2013 and 2014.  The remaining increase primarily resulted from higher transaction volumes and ATM unit growth driven by organic revenue growth, as well as other expenses from higher employee costs.  Additionally, the increase in vault cash rental cost is attributable to higher interest rate swap expense associated with cash flow hedges that became effective on January 1, 2014. 

 

Europe.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, our European operations experienced a $49.1 million, or 102.3% increase in the cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) when compared to the same period in 2013, of which approximately $34.5 million was a result of the acquisitions completed in 2013.  The remaining increase was the result of the higher ATM count in the U.K. as well as higher charges recorded in 2014 to accrue for estimated business rates (property taxes), which historically had not been as significant.  For further details on this matter, see Recent Events and Trends – United Kingdom Property Taxes.  

 

Other International.    The cost of ATM operating revenues (exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets) from our Other International operations decreased by $3.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013. This decline was primarily the result of the lower average number of transacting ATMs in Mexico, as described above, which resulted in reduced transaction levels and operating costs on our ATMs in that market.

 

Cost of ATM product sales and other revenues.  The cost of ATM product sales and other revenues increased by $6.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013.  This increase is consistent with the increase in related revenues, as discussed above, and is primarily related to increased equipment and VAR sales activity.

 

 

---

 

Gross Profit Margin

 

 

ATM operating gross profit margin.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, our ATM operating gross profit margin exclusive of depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets increased slightly when compared to the same periods in 2013.  The increase is primarily as a result of our revenue growth and higher incoming margins on the recently acquired businesses.

 

ATM product sales and other revenues gross profit margin.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, our gross profit margin on ATM product sales and other revenues declined by 0.8 and 2.3 percentage points, respectively, primarily as a result of increased expenses related to higher service revenues which are lower margin than our other ATM product sales.

 

 

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A expenses”), excluding stock-based compensation and acquisition-related expenses. SG&A expenses, excluding stock-based compensation and acquisition-related expenses, increased $8.0 million, or 48.4% and $13.5 million, or 41.5% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same periods in 2013.  This increase was due to the following: (i) higher payroll-related costs compared to the same periods in 2013 due to increased headcount, including employees added from the acquisitions completed since the beginning of 2013; (ii) increased incentive-based compensation; (iii) increased office and facilities costs, a portion of which is attributable to the acquisitions completed since the beginning of 2013; (iv) higher marketing and professional expenses; and (v) increased costs related to strengthening our information technology and product development organizations.

 

Stock-based compensation. The $1.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, was mostly attributable to the increase employee headcount. For additional details on equity awards, see Item 1. Financial Information, Note 3, Stock-Based Compensation.  

 

---

 

Acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition-related expenses increased $6.5 million, or 545.4% and $6.7 million, or 167.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the same periods in 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to certain nonrecurring integration and transition-related costs associated with our 2013 acquisitions, including the recognition of a liability of approximately $3.1 million for the estimated remaining lease payments associated with facilities no longer expected to yield an economic benefit in future periods and other costs related to recently completed and pending acquisitions. 

 

Depreciation and Accretion Expense

 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, depreciation expense increased $3.4, million or 22.6% and $5.4 million, or 17.3% when compared to the same periods in 2013 primarily as a result of the deployment of additional Company-owned ATMs over the past year as a result of our organic ATM unit growth and the ATMs acquired through various acquisitions in 2013 and 2014. 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014,  accretion expense increased $0.3 million, or 44.4% and $0.4 million, or 33.4% when compared to the same periods in 2013. The increase is due to our continued revenue growth, establishing additional asset retirement obligations in connection with newly deployed ATMs and acquired ATMs.  When we install our ATMs, we estimate the fair value of future retirement obligations associated with those ATMs, including the anticipated costs to deinstall, and in some cases refurbish, the ATMs at certain merchant locations.   Accretion expense represents the increase of this liability from the original discounted net present value to the amount we ultimately expect to incur. 

 

Amortization of Intangible Assets

 

Amortization of intangible assets relates primarily to merchant contracts and relationships recorded in connection with purchase price accounting valuations for completed acquisitions.  The increase of $2.4 million, or 39.2% and $4.9 million, or 41.0% in amortization of intangible assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 when compared to the same periods in 2013 was primarily due to the addition of intangible assets from the acquisitions completed since the beginning of 2013. 

 

Interest Expense, Net

 

Interest expense, net.  Interest expense, net increased $0.3 million, or 5.3% and $0.7 million, or 6.1% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013. This increase was primarily as a result of higher debt outstanding due to the Cardpoint acquisition completed in August 2013.  For additional details, see Item 1. Financial Information, Note 8, Long-Term Debt.

---

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount.  Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount increased $2.5 million and $5.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, over the same periods in 2013, primarily as a result of our issuance of $287.5 million of Convertible Notes in November 2013.   As the Convertible Notes contain an embedded option feature, we attributed $71.7 million of the proceeds to additional paid-in capital at the time of funding.  This resulted in an effective note discount, which is being accreted over the term of the Convertible Notes and drove the majority of the year-over-year increase in this expense.  We also incurred $5.2 million in fees in conjunction with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, which are being amortized over the life of the Convertible Notes.  Also contributing to the increase in the amortization of deferred financing costs during the current year were the modifications made to our $375.0 million revolving credit facility in August 2013, the costs of which are being amortized over the life of the revolver.  In April 2014, we amended and restated our existing credit agreement and incurred approximately $1.0 million in fees which will be amortized over the term of the revolving credit facility, which runs through April 2019.  Additionally, in July 2014 we incurred additional financing costs of approximately $4.1 million associated with the issuance of $250.0 million in senior notes. Going forward, we expect the amortization of deferred financing costs line item (which includes the note discount) to be higher as compared to prior periods, a result of the recent amendment and restatement of our credit agreement and new senior note issuance.

 

Other Income (Expense)

 

The increase in other income in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same periods in the prior year is primarily the result of a non-recurring gain as a result of a favorable settlement of a lawsuit during the quarter ended June 30, 2014.

 

Income Tax Expense

 

The decrease in income tax expense is primarily related to lower income before income taxes in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the change in the mix of earnings across jurisdictions.  We continue to maintain valuation allowances for our local net deferred tax asset positions for certain of our entities in the U.K. and Mexico, as we currently believe that it is more likely than not that these tax assets will not be realized.

 

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures 

 

Included below are certain non-GAAP financial measures that we use to evaluate the performance of our business. We believe that the presentation of these measures and the identification of unusual or certain non-recurring adjustments and non-cash items enhance an investor’s understanding of the underlying trends in our business and provide for better comparability between periods in different years. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, and Free Cash Flow are non-GAAP financial measures provided as a complement to results prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies.    The Company uses these non-GAAP financial measures in managing and measuring the performance of its business, including setting and measuring incentive based compensation for management.

 

Adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation, accretion, and amortization of intangible assets as these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures, and the method by which the assets were acquired. Adjusted EBITDA also excludes acquisition-related expenses, certain other non-operating and nonrecurring costs, loss on disposal of assets, our obligations for the payment of income taxes, interest expense or other obligations such as capital expenditures, and an adjustment for noncontrolling interest.  Adjusted Net Income represents net income computed in accordance with GAAP, before amortization of intangible assets, loss on disposal of assets, stock-based compensation expense, certain other expense (income) amounts, nonrecurring expenses, and acquisition-related expenses, and using an assumed tax rate of 32%  for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, and 35%  for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, with certain adjustments for noncontrolling interests. Adjusted EBITDA %, Adjusted Pre-tax %, and Adjusted Net Income % are calculated by taking the respective non-GAAP financial measures over GAAP total revenues. Adjusted Net Income per diluted share is calculated by dividing Adjusted Net Income by average weighted diluted shares outstanding. Free Cash Flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities less payments for capital expenditures, including those financed through direct debt but excluding acquisitions.  The measure of Free Cash Flow does not take into consideration certain other non-discretionary cash requirements such as, for example, mandatory principal payments on portions of our long-term debt.  

 

The non-GAAP financial measures presented herein should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities, or other income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

---

 

A reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income to Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests, their most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, and a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to cash provided by operating activities, the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, are presented as follows:

 

Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income

_______________

 

 

Calculation of Free Cash Flow

_______________

 

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Overview

 

As of June 30, 2014, we had $61.4 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand and $474.2 million in outstanding long-term debt.

 

We have historically funded our operations primarily through cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, and the issuance of debt and equity securities. Furthermore, we have historically used cash to invest in additional ATMs, either through the acquisition of ATM networks or through organically-generated growth.  We have also used cash to fund increases in working capital and to pay interest and principal amounts outstanding under our borrowings.  Because we collect a sizable portion of our cash from sales on a daily basis but generally pay our vendors on 30-day terms and are not required to pay certain of our merchants until 20 days after the end of each calendar month, we are able to utilize the excess available cash flow to reduce borrowings made under our revolving credit facility and to fund our ongoing capital expenditure program. Accordingly, it is not uncommon for us to reflect a working capital deficit position on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

We believe that our cash on hand and our current bank credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements and contractual commitments for the next 12 months.  We expect to fund our working capital needs from cash flows generated from our operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility, to the extent needed.  As we expect to continue to generate positive free cash flow in 2014 and beyond, we expect to repay the amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility absent any acquisitions. See additional discussion under Financing Facilities below.

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $56.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $80.4 million during the same period in 2013.  The year over year decrease in net cash provided by operating activities is attributable to the collection of a $13.4 million insurance receivable in the first quarter of 2013 and certain working capital increases that are not expected to continue.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $50.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $59.5 million during the same period in 2013.  The decrease in net cash used in investing activities is primarily the result of increased capital additions due to organic growth projects, offset with a decrease in acquisition expenditures in 2014.

 

Anticipated Future Capital Expenditures.  We currently anticipate that the majority of our capital expenditures for the foreseeable future will be driven by organic growth projects, including the purchase of ATMs for existing as well as new ATM management agreements and various compliance requirements as discussed in Recent Events and Trends – Capital Investments.  We currently expect that our capital expenditures for the remainder of 2014 will total approximately $64 million, the majority of which will be utilized to purchase additional ATMs for our Company-owned accounts, to deploy ATMs at new merchant locations, for technology upgrades and compliance purposes and to enhance our existing devices with additional functionalities.  We expect such expenditures to be funded primarily through cash generated from our operations.  In addition, we will continue to evaluate selected acquisition opportunities that complement our existing ATM network. We believe that significant expansion opportunities continue to exist in all of our current markets, as well as in other international markets, and we will continue to pursue those opportunities as they arise.  Such acquisition opportunities, individually or in the aggregate, could be material and may be funded by additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility or other financing sources that may be available to us.

 

---

 

Welch ATM Acquisition.  On July 21, 2014, we announced a definitive agreement to acquire the Welch ATM business for cash purchase consideration (to be paid at closing) of approximately $160.0 million.  The completion of the transaction is subject to regulatory approvals established by the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as well as the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.  The Company anticipates that the transaction will be completed during the third quarter of 2014.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $31.7 million and $12.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 2013 respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we repurchased $20.6 million of outstanding senior subordinated notes and repurchased $6.1 million in capital stock associated with the surrender of shares by employees to satisfy their personal income tax obligations. 

 

Financing Facilities

 

As of June 30, 2014, we had approximately $474.2 million in outstanding long-term debt, which was primarily comprised of: (1) $287.5 million of convertible notes of which $221.0 million was recorded on our balance sheet net of the unamortized note discount, (2) $179.4 million of 8.25% senior subordinated notes due September 2018, (3) $73.2 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and (4) $0.6 million in notes payable outstanding under equipment financing lines of Cardtronics Mexico.

 

Revolving Credit Facility.  As of June 30, 2014, we had a $375.0 million revolving credit facility that was led by a syndicate of banks including JPMorgan Chase, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. This revolving credit facility provides us with $375.0 million in available borrowings and letters of credit (subject to the covenants contained within the credit agreement governing the revolving credit facility) and can be increased to up to $500.0 million under certain conditions and subject to additional commitments from the lender group.  The revolving credit facility has an expiration date of April 2019.  

 

Borrowings under our revolving credit facility accrue interest at a variable rate based upon our Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) and the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) or the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined in the credit agreement) at our option. Additionally, we are required to pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. Substantially all of our domestic assets, including the stock of our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries, are pledged to secure borrowings made under the revolving credit facility. Furthermore, each of our material wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries has guaranteed the full and punctual payment of our obligations under the revolving credit facility. There are currently no restrictions on the ability of our wholly-owned subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends directly to us.

 

The primary restrictive covenants within the credit agreement governing our revolving credit facility include (1) limitations on the amount of senior secured net debt and total net debt that we can have outstanding at any given point in time and (2) the maintenance of a set ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as computed quarterly on a trailing 12-month basis, adjusted for the pro forma effect of acquisitions. Additionally, we are limited on the amount of restricted payments, including dividends, which we can make pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement; however, we may generally make restricted payments so long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing and the total net leverage ratio is less than 3.0 to 1.0 at the time such restricted payment is made.

 

As of June 30, 2014, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding revolving credit facility borrowings was approximately 2.2%. Additionally, as of June 30, 2014, we were in compliance with all the covenants contained within the facility and would continue to be in compliance even in the event of substantially higher borrowings or substantially lower earnings.  As of June 30, 2014, we had approximately $299.7 million in available borrowing capacity under the $375.0 million revolving credit facility.

 

Convertible Notes.  In November 2013, we completed a private placement of $287.5 million in Convertible Notes that pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 1.00% per annum and mature on December 1, 2020.  There are no restrictive covenants associated with these Convertible Notes.  In connection with the Convertible Notes, we also entered into Note Hedges at a purchase price of $72.6 million, and sold Warrants for proceeds of $40.5 million, the net effect of which was to raise the effective conversion price of the Convertible Notes to $73.29.  We are required to pay interest semi-annually on June 1st and December 1st, and to make principal payments on the Convertible Notes at maturity or upon conversion.  We are permitted to settle any conversion obligation under the Convertible Notes, in excess of the principal balance, in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, at our election.  We intend to satisfy any conversion premium by issuing shares of our common stock.  For additional details, see Part I. Financial Information, Item 1. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8. Long-Term Debt.

 

Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018. In August 2010, we issued $200.0 million of notes due 2018 (“2018 Notes”).    The 2018 Notes  are subordinate to borrowings made under the revolving credit facility and carry an 8.25% senior subordinated coupon.  Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears on March 1st and September 1st of each year.  The 2018 Notes, which are guaranteed by all of our 100% owned domestic subsidiaries, contain no maintenance covenants and only limited incurrence covenants, under which we have considerable flexibility.  Pursuant to the terms of the indenture, we are limited on the amount of restricted payments including dividends that we can make.  These limitations are generally governed by a fixed charge ratio incurrence test and an overall restricted payments basket.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we made open market repurchases for $20.6 million of the principal amount of these the 2018 Notes and subsequently cancelled the acquired notes.  In July 2014, we announced a tender offer for the remainder of our outstanding 2018 Notes ($179.4 million) to

---

 

be funded with proceeds from a new senior note issuance (see further discussion in the paragraph that follows).  For any 2018 Notes not tendered, we intend to call any remaining notes outstanding during the third quarter such that all remaining 2018 will be fully retired.

 

Senior Notes due 2022. In July 2014, we completed a private offering of $250.0 million of 5.125% senior notes due 2022.  The majority of the net proceeds from this offering will fund the Company’s pending tender offer and consent solicitation of the Company’s 8.25% senior subordinated notes due 2018.  The remainder of the net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.

 

As of June 30, 2014, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants required under the 2018 Notes.

 

Other Borrowing Facilities

 

 

 

New Accounting Standards

 

See Part I Financial Information, Item 1. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 17 New Accounting Pronouncements.  

 

 

---

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

The following market risk disclosures should be read in conjunction with the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in the 2013 Form 10-K.  

 

We are exposed to a variety of market risks, including interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. The following quantitative and qualitative information is provided about financial instruments to which we were a party at June 30, 2014, and from which we may incur future gains or losses from changes in market interest rates or foreign currency exchange prices. We do not enter into derivative or other financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

 

Hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currencies chosen for the following estimated sensitivity analysis are considered to be reasonably possible near-term changes generally based on consideration of past fluctuations for each risk category.  However, since it is not possible to accurately predict future changes in interest rates and foreign currencies, these hypothetical changes may not necessarily be an indicator of probable future fluctuations.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Vault cash rental expense. Because our ATM vault cash rental expense is based on market rates of interest, it is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates in the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Mexico, and Canada. In the U.S. and the U.K., we pay a monthly fee to our vault cash providers on the average amount of vault cash outstanding under a formula based on the relevant interest rate measures in effect for each operation.

 

As a result of the significant sensitivity surrounding the vault cash rental expense for our U.S. and U.K. operations, we have entered into a number of interest rate swaps to effectively fix the rate we pay on the amounts of our current and anticipated outstanding vault cash balances. The following swaps currently in place serve to fix the rate utilized for our vault cash rental agreements in the U.S. for the following notional amounts and periods:

 

---

 

The following table presents a hypothetical sensitivity analysis of our annual vault cash rental expense based on our average outstanding vault cash balances for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, (as we are invoiced monthly by the vault cash provider based on average balance outstanding) and assuming a 100 basis point increase in interest rates:

 

 

The table above does not reflect our ability to contractually pass on higher vault cash interest expense to certain of our merchants and financial institution partners, a portion of whom we have contractual rights to adjust payments to and from in the event of higher vault cash interest rates.  Our sensitivity to changes in interest rates in the U.K. is somewhat mitigated by the interchange rate setting methodology that impacts the majority of our U.K. interchange revenue.  Effectively, the interest rates and cash costs from two years prior is considered for determining the interchange rate (e.g. interest rates and other costs from 2012 are considered for determining the 2014 interchange rate).  As a result of this structure, should interest rates rise in the U.K., causing our operating expenses to rise, we would expect to see a rise in interchange rates (and our revenues), albeit with a lag.  We expect some growth in outstanding vault cash balances as a result of expected future business growth, and we may continue to seek ways to mitigate our exposure to floating interest rates by engaging in additional interest rate swaps in the future.

 

As of June 30, 2014, we had a net liability of $65.8 million recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet related to our interest rate swaps, which represented the fair value liability of the agreements, as derivative instruments are required to be carried at fair value. Fair value was calculated as the present value of amounts estimated to be received or paid to a marketplace participant in a selling transaction. These swaps are valued using pricing models based on significant other observable inputs (Level 2 inputs under the fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP), while taking into account the nonperformance risk of the party that is in the liability position with respect to each trade. These swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges; accordingly, changes in the fair values of the swaps have been reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net line item in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Due to our determination that net deferred tax assets are realizable in the future, we record the unrealized loss amounts related to our interest rate swaps net of estimated taxes in the Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net line item within Stockholders’ equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

As of June 30, 2014, we did not have any outstanding derivative financial instruments to hedge our variable interest rate exposure in the U.K., Mexico, Germany or Canada.  However, we may enter into derivative financial instruments in the future to hedge our interest rate exposure in those markets.

 

Interest expense. Our interest expense is also sensitive to changes in interest rates in the U.S., as borrowings under our revolving credit facility accrue interest at floating rates. Based on the $73.2 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2014, an increase of 100 basis points in the underlying interest rate would have had a $0.4 million impact on our interest expense in the six months then ended. However, there is no guarantee that we will not borrow additional amounts under our revolving credit facility in the future, and, in the event we borrow amounts and interest rates significantly increase, the interest that we would be required to pay would be more significant. We have not entered into interest rate hedging arrangements in the past to hedge our interest rate risk for our borrowings, and have no plans to do so. Due to fluctuating balances in the amount outstanding under our revolving credit facility, we do not believe such arrangements to be cost effective.

 

Outlook. If we continue to experience low short-term interest rates in the U.S. and the U.K., it will be beneficial to the amount of interest expense we incur under our bank credit facilities and our vault cash rental expense. Although we currently hedge a substantial portion of our vault cash interest rate risk, as noted above, we may not be able to enter into similar arrangements for similar amounts in the future, and any significant increase in interest rates in the future could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations by increasing our operating costs and expenses. However, we expect that the impact on our financial statements from a significant increase in interest rates would be partially mitigated by the interest rate swaps that we currently have in place associated with our vault cash balances in the U.S. and the U.K.

 

---

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

 

As a result of our operations in the U.K., Germany, Mexico, and Canada, we are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, specifically with respect to changes in the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound, Euro, Mexican peso, and the Canadian dollar. All of our international subsidiaries are consolidated into our financial results and are subject to risks typical of international businesses including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility. Furthermore, we are required to translate the financial condition and results of our international operations into U.S. dollars, with any corresponding translation gains or losses being recorded in other comprehensive income in our consolidated financial statements. As of June 30, 2014, this accumulated translation loss totaled approximately $14.3 million compared to approximately $18.4 million as of December 31, 2013.

 

Our consolidated financial results were not materially impacted by the change in value of the British pound, Euro, Mexican peso, or Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar during the three months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the prior year period. A sensitivity analysis indicates that, if the U.S. dollar uniformly strengthened or weakened 10% against the British pound, Euro, Canadian dollar or Mexican peso the effect upon our consolidated operating income would have been immaterial for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

Certain intercompany balances between our U.S. parent company and our U.K. operations are designated as short-term in nature, and the changes in these balances are translated in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as it relates to these intercompany balances. As of June 30, 2014, the intercompany payable balance from our U.K. operations to our U.S. parent company denominated in U.S. dollars totaled $102.4 million, of which $95.7 million was deemed to be short-term in nature. A sensitivity analysis indicates that, if the U.S. dollar uniformly strengthened or weakened 10% against the British pound, based on the intercompany payable balance as of June 30, 2014, the effect upon our Consolidated Statements of Operations would be approximately $9.5 million.  However, we manage the majority of this risk by borrowing in British pounds through the third-party credit facility in our U.S. operations. This structure effectively manages our foreign currency exposure of these short-term designated intercompany balances as currency gains or losses in the intercompany borrowings are largely offset by currency gains or losses on our third party borrowings.

 

We do not hold derivative commodity instruments, and all of our cash and cash equivalents are held in money market and checking funds.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Management’s Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2014 at the reasonable assurance level.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in our system of internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

For a description of our material pending legal and regulatory proceedings and settlements, see Part I. Financial Information, Item 1. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

The known material risks we face are described in our 2013 Form 10-K under Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors. There have been no material changes in our risk factors since that report.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers. The following table provides information about purchases of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the three months ended June 30, 2014:

 

 

_________

 

 

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

The exhibits required to be filed or furnished pursuant to the requirements of Item 601 of Regulation S-K are set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Form 10-Q.

---

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

---

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Each exhibit identified below is part of this Form 10-Q.

 

 

*  Filed herewith. 

 

†  Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

** Furnished herewith.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---