Document
Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended October 31, 2016
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                      .
Commission File Number: 001-36261
CHC Group Ltd.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Cayman Islands

 
98-0587405
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
190 Elgin Avenue
George Town
Grand Cayman, KY1-9005
Cayman Islands
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(604) 276-7500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x     No   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
¨
 
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
As of October 31, 2016, there were 2,731,877 ordinary shares issued and outstanding, excluding unvested restricted shares of 834.

1
Table of Contents


CHC GROUP LTD.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
October 31, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
Page Number
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
 
 
ITEM 1.
ITEM 1A.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
 
 
 

2
Table of Contents


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

TRADEMARKS
CHC Helicopter and the CHC Helicopter logo are trademarks of CHC Capital (Barbados) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of CHC Group Ltd. All other trademarks and service marks appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective holders. All rights reserved. The absence of a trademark or service mark or logo from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q does not constitute a waiver of trademark or other intellectual property rights of CHC Group Ltd., its subsidiaries, affiliates, licensors or any other persons.
GLOSSARY
Adjusted EBITDAR
Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, helicopter lease and associated costs, restructuring expense (recovery), asset impairments, gain (loss) on disposal of assets, foreign exchange gain (loss), other financing income (charges) and reorganization items, net, or total revenue plus earnings from equity accounted investees less direct costs, excluding helicopter lease and associated costs, and general and administration costs. This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
 
 
Adjusted EBITDAR margin
Adjusted EBITDAR margin is calculated as Adjusted EBITDAR divided by total revenue less reimbursable revenue. Cost reimbursements from customers are recorded as reimbursable revenue with the related reimbursement expense in direct costs. This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
 
 
EMS
Emergency medical services.
 
 
Heavy helicopter
A category of twin-engine helicopters that requires two pilots, can accommodate 16 to 26 passengers and can operate under instrument flight rules, which allow daytime and nighttime flying in a variety of weather conditions. The greater passenger capacity, larger cabin, longer flight range, and ability to operate in adverse weather conditions make heavy helicopters more suitable than single engine helicopters for offshore support. Heavy helicopters are generally utilized to support the oil and gas sector, construction and forestry industries and SAR and EMS customer requirements.
 
 
Long-term contracts
Contracts of three years or longer in duration.
 
 
Medium helicopter
A category of twin-engine helicopters that generally requires two pilots, can accommodate eight to 15 passengers and can operate under instrument flight rules, which allow daytime and nighttime flying in a variety of weather conditions. The greater passenger capacity, longer flight range, and ability to operate in adverse weather conditions make medium helicopters more suitable than single engine helicopters for offshore support. Medium helicopters are generally utilized to support the oil and gas sector, construction and forestry industries and SAR and EMS customer bases in certain jurisdictions. Medium helicopters can also be used to support the utility and mining sectors, as well as certain parts of the construction and forestry industries, where transporting a smaller number of passengers or carrying light loads over shorter distances is required.
 
 
MRO
Maintenance, repair and overhaul.
 
 
New technology
When used herein to classify our helicopters, a category of higher-value, recently produced, more sophisticated and more comfortable helicopters, including Airbus Helicopters H225, H135, H145 and H155; AgustaWestland’s AW139; and Sikorsky’s S76C++ and S92A.
 
 
OEM
Original equipment manufacturer.
 
 
PBH
Power-by-the-hour. A program where a helicopter operator pays a fee per flight hour to an MRO provider as compensation for repair and overhaul components required in order for the helicopter to maintain an airworthy condition.
 
 
Rotables
Helicopter parts that can be repaired and reused such that they typically have an expected life approximately equal to the helicopters that they support.
 
 
SAR
Search and rescue.
 
 

3
Table of Contents


ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
266,130

 
$
287,694

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.1 million and $9.3 million, respectively (note 3(a)(ii))
182,507

 
183,437

Income taxes receivable
5,962

 
6,812

Inventories (note 6)
92,249

 
95,114

Prepaid expenses
38,766

 
29,702

Other assets (note 7)
40,059

 
35,725

 
625,673

 
638,484

Property and equipment, net
967,619

 
841,820

Investments (note 3(b)(i))
37,640

 
7,304

Intangible assets
82,898

 
82,735

Restricted cash
25,082

 
15,885

Other assets (note 7)
367,481

 
197,430

Deferred income tax assets
2,570

 
80

Assets held for sale
5,305

 
3,516

 
$
2,114,268

 
$
1,787,254

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit
 
 
 
Liabilities not subject to compromise:
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Payables and accruals
$
279,028

 
$
205,826

Deferred revenue
34,413

 
23,601

Income taxes payable
37,960

 
6,664

Current facility secured by accounts receivable (note 3(a)(ii))
22,339

 
—

Other liabilities (note 8)
70,540

 
3,859

Current portion of debt obligations (note 9)
1,633,377

 
—

 
2,077,657

 
239,950

Debt obligations (note 9)
25,886

 
—

Deferred revenue
56,701

 
27,577

Other liabilities (note 8)
242,711

 
63,190

Deferred income tax liabilities
8,775

 
8,553

Total liabilities not subject to compromise
2,411,730

 
339,270

 
 
 
 
Liabilities subject to compromise (note 11)
—

 
2,656,288

Total liabilities
2,411,730

 
2,995,558

 
 
 
 
Redeemable non-controlling interests (note 3(a)(i))
18,867

 
18,343

Redeemable convertible preferred shares: Par value $0.0001
 
 
 
Authorized: 6,000,000; Issued: 671,189 and 671,189; Dividends in arrears: $7.1 million and $7.9 million
643,967

 
643,967

Capital stock: Par value $0.003 (ordinary), $0.0001 (preferred):
 
 
 
Authorized: 544,000,000; Issued: 2,721,592 and 2,731,877
8

 
8

Additional paid-in capital (note 3(a)(i))
1,914,560

 
1,913,914

Deficit
(2,510,277
)
 
(3,473,239
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(364,587
)
 
(311,297
)
 
(960,296
)
 
(1,870,614
)
 
$
2,114,268

 
$
1,787,254

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
See table in note 3(a)(i) for certain amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to variable interest entities.

4
Table of Contents


CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Revenue
$
360,753

 
$
249,536

 
$
736,690

 
$
519,972

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct costs
(287,380
)
 
(229,387
)
 
(601,550
)
 
(476,248
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees (note 3(b)(i))
1,338

 
12,131

 
2,771

 
12,392

General and administration costs
(18,097
)
 
(12,756
)
 
(34,453
)
 
(28,184
)
Depreciation
(35,537
)
 
(42,146
)
 
(75,818
)
 
(77,844
)
Restructuring recovery (expense) (note 4)
(16,211
)
 
2,416

 
(35,590
)
 
11

Asset impairments (note 5)
(10,459
)
 
(2,691
)
 
(10,459
)
 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
(1,419
)
 
(599
)
 
(2,406
)
 
(1,724
)
 
(367,765
)
 
(273,032
)
 
(757,505
)
 
(574,288
)
Operating loss
(7,012
)
 
(23,496
)
 
(20,815
)
 
(54,316
)
Interest on debt obligations (note 9(a))
(27,286
)
 
(6,891
)
 
(54,232
)
 
(15,482
)
Foreign exchange loss
(9,551
)
 
(30,667
)
 
(19,630
)
 
(49,099
)
Other financing income (charges) (note 13)
5,827

 
(7,110
)
 
15,921

 
390

Reorganization items, net (note 10)
—


(50,526
)
 
—

 
(835,916
)
Loss before income tax
(38,022
)
 
(118,690
)
 
(78,756
)
 
(954,423
)
Income tax expense (note 14)
(3,942
)
 
(11,166
)
 
(9,850
)
 
(11,225
)
Net loss
$
(41,964
)
 
$
(129,856
)
 
$
(88,606
)
 
$
(965,648
)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(44,116
)
 
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(97,478
)
 
$
(962,962
)
Non-controlling interests
2,152

 
(2,243
)
 
8,872

 
(2,686
)
Net loss
$
(41,964
)
 
$
(129,856
)
 
$
(88,606
)
 
$
(965,648
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Computation of basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to controlling interest
$
(44,116
)
 
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(97,478
)
 
$
(962,962
)
Redeemable convertible preferred share dividends including cumulative effect of dividends in arrears of $0.2 million, $nil, $0.4 million, and $0.8 million
(13,608
)
 
—

 
(26,932
)
 
(784
)
Adjustment of redeemable non-controlling interest to redemption amount (note 3(a)(i))
2,154

 
(2,017
)
 
18,530

 
(1,945
)
Net loss available to common stockholders
$
(55,570
)
 
$
(129,630
)
 
$
(105,880
)
 
$
(965,691
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss per ordinary share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted
$
(20.45
)
 
$
(47.53
)
 
$
(39.00
)
 
$
(354.45
)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding - basic and diluted
2,716,933

 
2,727,294

 
2,714,730

 
2,724,466

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.


5
Table of Contents


CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Net loss
$
(41,964
)
 
$
(129,856
)
 
$
(88,606
)
 
$
(965,648
)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net foreign currency translation adjustments
(12,151
)
 
39,385

 
(36,810
)
 
48,361

Net change in defined benefit pension plan, net of income tax
1,091

 
1,424

 
2,695

 
6,863

Comprehensive loss
$
(53,024
)
 
$
(89,047
)
 
$
(122,721
)
 
$
(910,424
)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(55,546
)
 
$
(87,620
)
 
$
(141,985
)
 
$
(909,672
)
Non-controlling interests
2,522

 
(1,427
)
 
19,264

 
(752
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(53,024
)
 
$
(89,047
)
 
$
(122,721
)
 
$
(910,424
)
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.


6
Table of Contents


CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Cash provided by (used in):
 
 
 
Operating activities:
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(88,606
)
 
$
(965,648
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation
75,818

 
77,844

Loss on disposal of assets
2,406

 
1,724

Asset impairments (note 5)
10,459

 
2,691

Earnings from equity accounted investees less dividends received
(2,186
)
 
(11,785
)
Deferred income taxes
185

 
2,624

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
1,850

 
1,299

Net gain on debt extinguishment (note 13)
(17,799
)
 
—

Amortization of long-term debt and lease deferred financing costs
5,003

 
2,071

Unrealized net gain on derivative financial instruments
(19,925
)
 
(2,119
)
Non-cash defined benefit pension expense (income) (note 15)
(343
)
 
1,630

Defined benefit contributions and benefits paid
(16,429
)
 
(12,122
)
Unrealized loss on foreign currency exchange translation
18,544

 
57,544

Reorganization items, net, non-cash (note 10)
—

 
813,870

Other
(6,967
)
 
(8,773
)
Change in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Receivables, net of allowance
18,555

 
(7,593
)
Income taxes receivable and payable
985

 
1,747

Inventories
(2,088
)
 
(6,034
)
Prepaid expenses
(829
)
 
7,347

Payables and accruals
(8,325
)
 
80,862

Deferred revenue
3,501

 
15,575

Other assets and liabilities
(705
)
 
(21,556
)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(26,896
)
 
31,198

Financing activities:
 
 
 
Sold interest in accounts receivable, net of collections
8,305

 
(21,620
)
Debt proceeds
326,400

 
—

Debt and capital lease repayments
(215,748
)
 
(2,189
)
Repurchases of senior unsecured notes
(22,101
)
 
—

Increase in deferred financing costs
(4,868
)
 
—

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
91,988

 
(23,809
)
Investing activities:
 
 
 
Property and equipment additions
(106,952
)
 
(27,452
)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
28,470

 
1,844

Helicopter deposits net of lease inception refunds
(32,607
)
 
—

Proceeds from sale of equity accounted investees (note 3(b)(i))
—

 
35,518

Restricted cash
(8,736
)
 
8,483

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(119,825
)
 
18,393

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(11,172
)
 
(4,218
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period
(65,905
)
 
21,564

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
134,297

 
266,130

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
68,392

 
$
287,694

 
 
 
 
Supplemental cash flow information:
 
 
 
Assets acquired through non-cash capital leases
$
18,055

 
$
—

Non-cash settlement of obligations by letters of credit (note 9(b))
—

 
39,416

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

7
Table of Contents


CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars except share information)
(Unaudited)
 
Six months ended October 31, 2015
 
Capital stock
 
Additional paid-in capital
 
Deficit
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 
Total
shareholders’
deficit
 
Redeemable
non-
controlling
interests
 
Redeemable convertible preferred shares
 
Number of shares
 
Amount
 
Number of shares
 
Amount
April 30, 2015
 
2,708,312

 
$
8

 
$
1,961,007

 
$
(2,070,254
)
 
$
(316,227
)
 
$
(425,466
)
 
$
16,940

 
617,045

 
$
589,823

Issuance of capital stock for stock option and service vesting shares
 
9,204

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Foreign currency translation
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(46,177
)
 
(46,177
)
 
9,367

 
—

 
—

Stock-based compensation expense
 
—

 
—

 
1,850

 
—

 
—

 
1,850

 
—

 
—

 
—

Defined benefit plan, net of income tax
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,670

 
1,670

 
1,025

 
—

 
—

Redeemable convertible preferred share dividends
 
—

 
—

 
(26,503
)
 
—

 
—

 
(26,503
)
 
—

 
26,503

 
26,503

Adjustment of redeemable non-controlling interest to redemption amount (note 3(a)(i))
 
—

 
—

 
18,530

 
—

 
—

 
18,530

 
(18,530
)
 
—

 
—

Net earnings (loss)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(97,478
)
 
—

 
(97,478
)
 
8,872

 
—

 
—

October 31, 2015
 
2,717,516

 
$
8

 
$
1,954,884

 
$
(2,167,732
)
 
$
(360,734
)
 
$
(573,574
)
 
$
17,674

 
643,548

 
$
616,326

Six months ended October 31, 2016
 
Capital stock
 
Additional paid-in capital
 
Deficit
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 
Total
shareholders’
deficit
 
Redeemable
non-
controlling
interests
 
Redeemable convertible preferred shares
 
Number of shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of shares
 
Amount
April 30, 2016
 
2,721,592

 
$
8

 
$
1,914,560

 
$
(2,510,277
)
 
$
(364,587
)
 
$
(960,296
)
 
$
18,867

 
671,189

 
$
643,967

Issuance of capital stock for stock option and service vesting shares
 
10,285

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Foreign currency translation
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
47,664

 
47,664

 
697

 
—

 
—

Stock-based compensation expense
 
—

 
—

 
1,299

 
—

 
—

 
1,299

 
—

 
—

 
—

Defined benefit plan, net of income tax
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
5,626

 
5,626

 
1,237

 
—

 
—

Adjustment of redeemable non-controlling interest to redemption amount (note 3(a)(i))
 
—

 
—

 
(1,945
)
 
—

 
—

 
(1,945
)
 
1,945

 
—

 
—

De-consolidation of variable interest entity (note 3(a)(i))
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,717
)
 
—

 
—

Net loss
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(962,962
)
 
—

 
(962,962
)
 
(2,686
)
 
—

 
—

October 31, 2016
 
2,731,877

 
$
8

 
$
1,913,914

 
$
(3,473,239
)
 
$
(311,297
)
 
$
(1,870,614
)
 
$
18,343

 
671,189

 
$
643,967

See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

8
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 



1.
Voluntary filing under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code ("Chapter 11"):
We have incurred net losses since our acquisition on September 16, 2008 of the entity formerly known as CHC Helicopter Corporation. We have a substantial level of indebtedness and operating lease commitments and have experienced a significant decline in consolidated revenues due to the downturn in the oil and gas industry since mid-2014. As a result of this, on May 5, 2016 (the “Petition Date”), CHC Group Ltd. and a number of its subsidiaries (cumulatively referred to as the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions (the “Bankruptcy Petitions” or the “Petitions”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”), seeking relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Bankruptcy Court entered an order providing for the joint administration of the Bankruptcy Cases under the caption In re CHC Group Ltd., et al., which we refer to together as the “Bankruptcy Cases”.
The Petitions filed by the Debtors seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code constituted an event of default that accelerated our obligations under the indenture, dated October 4, 2010, that governs the 9.250% Senior Secured Notes Due 2020 (the “senior secured notes”); the indenture, dated May 13, 2013, that governs the 9.375% Senior Notes Due 2021 (the “senior unsecured notes”); our senior secured revolving credit facility, dated as of January 23, 2014 (the “revolving credit facility”) and our asset-based revolving credit facility, dated June 12, 2015 (the “ABL Facility”). In addition, this also caused an event of default under the terms of all of our helicopter lease agreements and certain other obligations.
The Debtors have filed motions, net of withdrawn motions, for the rejection or abandonment of 87 helicopters in our fleet which we no longer need in the operation of our business. This includes 82 leased helicopters and 5 helicopters financed under our ABL Facility. The revised abandonment motion for 5 helicopters financed under our ABL Facility included a motion to restructure the financing terms of the remaining 8 helicopters with an amended principal balance, which was approved by the Bankruptcy Court by order dated December 5, 2016. As of December 13, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 74 helicopter lease rejections. Discussions with our lenders and lessors remain ongoing, the status of those discussions remain fluid, and the outcome of such discussions cannot be assured.
On October 11, 2016, the Debtors entered into a plan support agreement (as has and may be amended the “PSA”) with respect to the terms of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) with holders representing 67.6% of the senior secured notes and 73.6% of the senior unsecured notes (including the Consenting Creditor Parties (as hereinafter defined)), the official committee of unsecured creditors (“UCC”) in the Bankruptcy Cases, and Milestone Aviation Group Limited and its affiliates (the “Lead Lessor”) (collectively, the “Consenting Creditor Parties”). On November 11, 2016, the Debtors filed the Plan and the related disclosure statement (the “Disclosure Statement”) with the Bankruptcy Court. The Consenting Creditor Parties, other than the UCC, have agreed to vote to accept the Plan, except in certain circumstances, and the UCC has agreed to support the Plan and recommend that unsecured creditors vote to accept it. The PSA and related agreements are subject to customary closing conditions, approval by the Bankruptcy Court, receipt of a Bankruptcy Court approved disclosure statement and solicitation materials, and contain termination rights upon the occurrence of certain events. The Plan is subject to acceptance by the Debtors’ creditors (as and to the extent required under the Bankruptcy Code) and confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court.
The principal provisions of the Plan are as follows:
•
The Company has agreed to solicit participation in a $300.0 million rights offering (the “Rights Offering”) of second lien convertible notes (the “Second Lien Convertible Notes”) to eligible holders of senior secured and senior unsecured notes, with $280.0 million allocated to eligible holders of senior secured notes and $20.0 million allocated to eligible holders of senior unsecured notes.
•
The Second Lien Convertible Notes will be issued at a 10% original issuance discount and include a $100.0 million premium for the equitization of the secured notes secured claims, resulting in a total of $433.3 million in aggregate principal amount. The Second Lien Convertible Notes will have a 3.5 year maturity and are mandatorily convertible into 85.4% of the New Membership Interests (“New Membership Interests”) to be issued by a newly-formed Cayman limited liability company (the “Reorganized Company”) on a fully diluted basis (but subject to dilution by the management incentive plan of the Reorganized Company (“MIP”)) upon maturity or certain specified conditions.

9
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


•
The Second Lien Convertible Notes will rank second to the collateral securing a new credit facility in a principal amount to be determined (the “Exit Credit Facility”) to be provided to holders of claims of the revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Agreement Claims”); will not bear or pay interest other than in connection with an event of default; and will have the same rights with respect to dividends and voting as New Membership Interests on an as-converted basis.
Holders of the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes and general unsecured claims will receive the following general treatment under the Plan:
•
In addition to the ability to participate in the Rights Offering allocated to the senior secured notes, all holders of senior secured notes will receive their pro rata share of 79.5% of New Membership Interests (prior to dilution by Second Lien Convertible Notes and the MIP), which equates to 11.6% of New Membership Interests (fully diluted on account of the Second Lien Convertible Notes, but excluding the MIP).
•
All holders of the senior unsecured notes will receive their pro rata share of 8.9% of New Membership Interests (prior to dilution by the Second Lien Convertible Notes and the MIP), which equates to 1.3% of New Membership Interests (fully diluted on account of the Second Lien Convertible Notes, but excluding the MIP).
•
All other holders of allowed general unsecured claims of the Company will receive their share of (a) 11.6% of New Membership Interests (prior to dilution by the Second Lien Convertible Notes and the MIP), which equates to 1.7% of New Membership Interests (fully diluted on account of the Second Lien Convertible Notes, but excluding the MIP), and (b) $37.5 million in new unsecured notes of the Reorganized Company, less the amount of cash distributed to certain holders of allowed general unsecured claims who are to receive cash for administrative convenience (“New Unsecured Notes”). The New Unsecured Notes will have a seven year maturity and an interest rate of 5.0%, payable in kind until the conversion of the Second Lien Convertible Notes and thereafter payable in cash. The New Unsecured Notes will rank pari passu with the Second Lien Convertible Notes and will be deemed senior indebtedness of the Reorganized Company, but will not have the benefit of any security or be convertible into New Membership Interests.
•
Upon the effective date, the Reorganized Company will adopt the MIP, including a reservation of ten percent (10%) of the New Membership Interests on a fully diluted basis for distribution thereunder.
•
Holders of allowed Revolving Credit Agreement Claims will receive their pro rata share of the Exit Credit Facility or such treatment that would otherwise satisfy Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code. The terms of the Exit Credit Facility are under negotiation.
•
The Plan does not provide for any distribution to holders of the Company’s existing equity securities, including its ordinary shares and preferred shares.
The Plan distinguishes between a Primary General Unsecured Claim and a Secondary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan).  The Plan provides that each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan) against the Debtors will receive, in full and final satisfaction and discharge of such holder’s rights with respect to and under such Allowed General Unsecured Claim, and, in accordance with the Restructuring Transactions as provided in the Disclosure Statement to the Plan: (i) on account of its Allowed Primary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan), its Pro Rata share of the Primary General Unsecured Claims Distribution (as defined in the Plan), plus (ii) on account of any Allowed Secondary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan), against one or more Secondary Recovery Debtors (as defined in the Plan), if applicable, its Pro Rata share of the Secondary General Unsecured Claims Distribution (as defined in the Plan) allocated to the applicable Secondary Recovery Debtor against which it holds an Allowed Secondary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan).  For the avoidance of doubt, if a holder of Allowed General Unsecured Claims holds an Allowed Secondary General Unsecured Claim against any Debtor that is not a Secondary Recovery Debtor, such holder will not receive any additional recoveries on account of such claim.
In connection with the Plan, the Company has entered into a backstop agreement (the “Backstop Agreement”) pursuant to which certain of the Consenting Creditor Parties have agreed to backstop the Rights Offering (the “Backstop Commitment”). Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment, certain of the Consenting Creditor Parties, severally and not jointly, have agreed to fully participate in the Rights Offering and purchase the Second Lien Convertible Notes in

10
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


accordance with the percentages set forth in the Backstop Agreement to the extent unsubscribed under the Rights Offering in exchange for a principal amount of $30.8 million of Second Lien Convertible Notes (the “Put Option Premium”). Upon certain triggering events, the Put Option Premium will become fully due and payable in two equal installments of approximately $10.665 million.
In addition, as part of the Plan, the Company has entered into an agreement with the Lead Lessor, pursuant to which, among other things, the Lead Lessor has agreed to restructure its existing aircraft fleet leasing arrangements with the Company and to provide a new $150.0 million asset-based debt facility. The key terms of this agreement include the restricting of lease rental for the helicopters that will remain in the Debtors’ fleet, the consensual return of certain helicopters, extension options for certain of the retained helicopters, leases for additional helicopters and the payment of certain fees and expenses.
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have operated their business as “debtors-in-possession.” The Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. Any efforts by creditors to enforce such payment obligations as existed before the Petition Date are automatically stayed as a result of the filing of the Petitions, and the holders’ rights of enforcement are subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court has approved certain motions for the payment of certain pre-petition obligations, including those related to certain taxes, employee wages, severance and helicopter part repair orders.
These conditions result in material uncertainty that gives rise to substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We believe that we will require significant debt, lease and other restructuring to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon the Bankruptcy Court and our creditors’ approval of the Plan or alternative successful restructuring. Our ability to continue as a going concern will also be dependent on our ability to implement the Plan, to maintain existing management, customer, vendor and other relationships, and to maintain sufficient liquidity throughout the Chapter 11 proceedings, amongst other factors.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements (“interim financial statements”) have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities or any other adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern or as a consequence of the Bankruptcy Cases. While operating as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court, we may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, or as otherwise permitted in the ordinary course of business, for amounts other than those reflected in the accompanying interim financial statements.

2.
Significant accounting policies:
(a)
Basis of presentation:
The interim financial statements include the accounts of CHC Group Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. The interim financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, these interim financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. Results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the entire year.
The financial information as of April 30, 2016 is derived from our annual audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended

11
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


April 30, 2016, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on July 15, 2016.
(b)
Bankruptcy accounting and disclosures:
As a result of the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions, we have applied the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852 Reorganizations in preparing our interim financial statements. ASC 852 requires that financial statements distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the bankruptcy proceedings have been recorded in a reorganization line item in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the pre-petition obligations that may be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process have been classified on the balance sheet as liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities are reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.
In connection with an emergence from the Bankruptcy Cases, the Company may be required to adopt fresh-start accounting, upon which the Company’s assets and liabilities will be recorded at their fair value. The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities as of that date may differ materially from the recorded values of its assets and liabilities as reflected in our historical consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company’s adoption of fresh-start accounting may materially affect its results of operations following the fresh-start reporting dates as the Company may have a new basis in its assets and liabilities. Consequently, the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable with the financial statements prior to that date and the historical financial statements may not be reliable indicators of its financial condition and results of operations for any period after it adopts fresh-start accounting. The Company is in the process of evaluating the potential impact of the fresh-start accounting on its consolidated financial statements.
(c)
Foreign currency:
The currencies which most influence our foreign currency translations and the relevant exchange rates were: 
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Average rates:
 
 
 
£/US $
1.547129

 
1.341183

CAD/US $
0.780275

 
0.767048

NOK/US $
0.124142

 
0.120810

AUD/US $
0.741495

 
0.751323

€/US $
1.116105

 
1.117435

Period end rates:
 
 
 
£/US $
1.544218

 
1.221294

CAD/US $
0.764351

 
0.746102

NOK/US $
0.118092

 
0.121167

AUD/US $
0.713292

 
0.761322

€/US $
1.104181

 
1.096172

(d)
Comparative figures:
In December 2015, our Board of Directors and shareholders approved a reverse share split, by way of consolidation, whereby all of the Company’s ordinary shares of capital stock (issued and unissued) were adjusted to reflect the reverse share split ratio of 30:1 (that is, each 30 shares of stock were consolidated into one share). The reverse share split was effective on December 11, 2015. The principal effects of the reverse share split were as follows:

12
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


•
all capital stock par value and authorized and issued per share information were adjusted retroactively for all prior periods presented to reflect the reverse share split ratio. This includes the calculations of our weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding and net loss per ordinary share available to common stockholders;
•
proportional adjustments were made to the number of ordinary shares available for issuance under the CHC Group Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 Incentive Plan”) and those subject to outstanding equity awards (including stock options, time-based restricted stock units, performance based restricted stock units, service vesting stock options and shares and share price performance options and shares). Additionally, the exercise price of any stock options outstanding under the 2013 Incentive Plan and those subject to other outstanding equity awards were proportionally adjusted to reflect the reverse share split ratio; and
•
proportional adjustments were made to the per-share conversion price of the Company’s redeemable convertible preferred shares (“preferred shares”) in accordance with the Rights and Restrictions of the Redeemable Convertible Preferred Shares. The reverse share split had no impact on the total number of authorized preferred shares nor the number of preferred shares issued and outstanding or its par value.
(e)
Recent accounting pronouncements adopted:
Consolidation:
On May 1, 2016, we adopted the amendment to the accounting guidance on the consolidation standard. The amendment includes updates relating to the criteria to determine whether a service provider or decision maker is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), whether a decision maker is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, or whether a related party has the characteristics of a primary beneficiary of a VIE. We determined that there was no material impact on our financial results from the adoption of this standard.
Debt issuance costs:
On May 1, 2016, we adopted the accounting guidance on debt issuance costs. The new guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability rather than as an asset and must be applied retrospectively. As a result, we presented the $26.2 million of deferred financing costs previously classified in other assets at April 30, 2016 as an offset to debt obligations. This had no impact on our net loss or operating cash flows as previously reported.
Share-based compensation:
On May 1, 2016, we adopted amended guidance for accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendment requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that such performance condition would be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. There was no material impact on our financial results from the adoption of this standard.

13
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


(f)
Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted:
Revenue recognition:
In May 2014, the FASB issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard which will supersede previous existing revenue recognition guidance. The standard creates a five-step model for revenue recognition to achieve the objective of recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The five-step model includes (1) identifying the contract, (2) identifying the separate performance obligations in the contract, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations and (5) recognizing revenue when each performance obligation has been satisfied. The standard also requires expanded disclosures surrounding revenue recognition.
The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period; companies are permitted to early adopt the standard for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2018. Companies are allowed to use either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. We are currently evaluating which transition approach to use and the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Going concern:
In August 2014, the FASB issued a new standard that requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide disclosures when certain criteria are met. The standard is effective for fiscal periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Inventories:
In July 2015, the FASB issued an amendment that requires management to reduce inventory to the lower of cost and net realizable value rather than the lower of cost or market value. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein and early application is permitted. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Financial instruments:
In January 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the standard for the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities which introduces new reporting requirements and simplifies some of the existing reporting requirements. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years and early application is permitted. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2018. Companies should apply the amendment using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, and using a prospective approach for amendments to equity securities with fair values that are not readily determinable. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Leases:
In February 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the standard for the recognition and measurement of leases. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years and early application is permitted. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Share-based compensation:
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments to simplify the standard for employee share-based payment accounting. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods and early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period providing all amendments are adopted in the same period. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2017.

14
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Derivatives and hedging:
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the standard for derivatives and hedging clarifying the requirements for assessing whether contingent put and call options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2017. Companies should adopt the standard on a modified retrospective basis to existing debt instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of financial instruments:
In June 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that adds an impairment model called the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model for financial instruments within the scope of the guidance, which includes loans, trade receivables, debt securities classified as Held to Maturity and net investments in leases recognized by a lessor. Under the new guidance, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity would be required to recognize an allowance that reflects the entity’s current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial instrument. The standard does not make changes to the existing impairment models for non-financial assets such as fixed assets, intangibles and goodwill. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2020. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
Statement of cash flows:
In August 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify the standard for classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments. In November 2016, the FASB issued further amendments which require all entities that have restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The revised standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. We will adopt the standard on May 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.
3.
Variable interest entities:
(a)
VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary:
(i)
Local ownership VIEs:
Certain areas of operations are subject to local governmental regulations that may limit foreign ownership of aviation companies. Accordingly, operations in certain jurisdictions may require the establishment of local ownership entities that are considered to be VIEs. The nature of our involvement with consolidated local ownership entities is as follows:
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 contains a description of our principal involvement with VIEs and the accounting policies regarding determination of whether we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. As of October 31, 2016, there have been no significant changes in either the nature of our involvement with, or the accounting policies associated with the analysis of VIEs as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, with the exception of Atlantic Aviation Limited and Atlantic Aviation FZE (collectively “Atlantic Aviation”).
On June 16, 2016, the Company, Atlantic Aviation and the Nigerian Company entered into a Termination and Exit Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) which replaces the framework

15
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


agreement but does not immediately terminate the other related agreements in place between the Company, Atlantic Aviation Limited and the Nigerian Company. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, the Company has agreed to work with Atlantic Aviation and the Nigerian Company to ensure an orderly wind-down of operations in Nigeria and the ultimate dissolution of Atlantic Aviation (and all associated agreements between the Company and Atlantic Aviation). During the three months ended July 31, 2016 we deconsolidated Atlantic Aviation, which, net of the redeemable non-controlling interest, had no material impact to our results.
The following table shows the redeemable non-controlling interests relating to the local ownership VIEs that are included in the interim consolidated financial statements:
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
EEA Helicopters Operations B.V.
$
17,150


$
18,343

Atlantic Aviation Limited and Atlantic Aviation FZE
1,717


—

 
$
18,867

 
$
18,343

We have assessed that under the terms of the put and call arrangements with the holder of the non-controlling interest of EEA Helicopter Operations B.V.’s (“EHOB”) that it is probable that the non-controlling interest will become redeemable and accordingly, it is recorded at its redemption amount. We have elected to recognize any changes in the redemption amount immediately as they occur and adjust the carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest to equal the redemption amount at the end of the reporting period. Reductions in the carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest are only recorded if we have previously recorded increases in the carrying amount of the redeemable non-controlling interest. The change in redemption amount is recognized in additional paid-in capital and as a deduction or addition to the numerator of the net loss per ordinary share calculation. The redemption amount is based on a formula of $14.5 million plus an amount representing compounded interest, commencing October 31, 2014, which increases from 10% for the first year to 20% for the fifth year and thereafter.
Under the amended Shareholders’ Agreement, the put and call options will be exercisable on the earlier of: (a) an exit event, being the entering into an agreement with another investor to acquire the Class A shareholder’s interest in EHOB anytime after October 30, 2016, (b) one year after First Reserve Management, L.P. (“First Reserve”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (“CD&R”) own less than 5% of our issued shares, and (c) October 30, 2020. Furthermore, the Class A shareholder also holds a call option over our Class B shares which is exercisable only in the event of bankruptcy. The right to immediate exercise of the put and call option by the Class A shareholder, due to the Debtors filing Petitions with the Bankruptcy Court on May 5, 2016, has been waived until December 16, 2016, subject to certain terms and conditions. We are in the process of finalizing a longer term waiver.
Financial information of local ownership VIEs
All of the local ownership VIEs and their subsidiaries have the same purpose and are exposed to similar operational risks and are monitored on a similar basis by management. As such, the financial information reflected on the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations for all local ownership VIEs has been presented in the aggregate below, including intercompany amounts with other consolidated entities: 

16
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents
$
61,396

 
$
69,141

Receivables, net of allowance
58,687

 
52,106

Other current assets
34,279

 
36,258

Other long-term assets
125,181

 
117,129

Total assets
$
279,543

 
$
274,634

 
 
 
 
Payables and accruals
$
57,419

 
$
60,231

Intercompany payables
119,019

 
145,917

Other current liabilities
22,570

 
9,209

Accrued pension obligations
58,452

 
44,505

Long-term intercompany payables
119,429

 
119,658

Other long-term liabilities
29,394

 
26,207

Total liabilities
$
406,283

 
$
405,727

 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Revenue
$
229,245

 
$
174,876

 
$
466,849

 
$
353,514

Net earnings (loss)
10,211

 
(5,544
)
 
24,342

 
(20,852
)
(ii)
Accounts receivable securitization:
As described in note 3(a)(ii) of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, we entered into trade receivables securitization transactions to raise financing, through the sale of pools of receivables, or beneficial interests therein, to a VIE, Finacity Receivables – CHC 2009, LLC (“Finacity”), which we have determined we are required to consolidate as we are the primary beneficiary. Our trade receivables securitization arrangement ended in April 2016, as the Petitions filed with the Bankruptcy Court on May 5, 2016 constituted a termination event under the terms of our receivable purchase agreements.
The following table shows the assets and the associated liabilities related to the securitization arrangements that are included in the interim financial statements:
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Restricted cash
$
9,637

 
$
—

Transferred receivables
32,876

 
—

Current facility secured by accounts receivable
22,339

 
—

(iii)
Trinity Helicopters Limited:
As at October 31, 2015 and 2016, we leased two helicopters from Trinity Helicopters Limited (“Trinity”), an entity considered to be a VIE, which we have determined we are required to consolidate as we are the primary beneficiary.
(b)
VIEs of which we are not the primary beneficiary:
(i)
Local ownership VIEs:
Thai Aviation Services (“TAS”)
As described in note 3(b)(i) of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, we had a 29.9% interest in the ordinary

17
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


shares of TAS, which we have determined to be a VIE that we are not required to consolidate as we are not the primary beneficiary. Under the terms of the shareholder agreement we exercised our right to require the majority shareholder in TAS to purchase our ordinary share interest. The transaction was completed on October 6, 2016 for net proceeds of $35.5 million. A gain on sale of $11.8 million was recognized and presented within earnings from equity accounted investees during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016.
The following table summarizes the amounts recorded for TAS in the consolidated balance sheets prior to the date of sale: 
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
 
Carrying
amounts
 
Maximum
exposure to
loss
 
Carrying
amounts
 
Maximum
exposure to
loss
Receivables, net of allowance
$
3,733

 
$
3,733

 
$
—

 
$
—

Equity method investment
29,508

 
29,508

 
—

 
—

As of October 31, 2015 and 2016, we leased eight helicopters and five helicopters, respectively, to TAS and provided crew, insurance, maintenance and base services. The total revenue earned from providing these services was $11.9 million and $23.5 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015, respectively, and $5.1 million for the period from August 1, 2016 to the date of sale and $14.9 million for the period from May 1, 2016 to the date of sale.
(ii)
Other VIE lessors:
We have determined that the activity that most significantly impacts the economic performance of the lessor VIEs is the remarketing of the helicopters at the end of the lease term. As we do not have the power to make remarketing decisions, we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the lessor VIEs.
As at October 31, 2015 and 2016, we leased from various entities considered to be VIEs 103 helicopters and 70 helicopters, respectively. All 103 and 70 leases were considered to be operating leases as at October 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively, some of which are subject to rejection motions filed by the Debtors as detailed in note 10.
4.
Restructuring:
We are undergoing a comprehensive review of our operations, organizational structure and fleet with the view to reducing operating costs. In connection with the ongoing review, we have incurred restructuring expenses consisting of employee related severance costs and other associated costs. The majority of the payments relating to the accrual as at October 31, 2016 will be made in fiscal 2017.
We have also incurred restructuring expenses related to contractual lease, maintenance and other costs on specific leased helicopters we have permanently ceased use of in operations and do not form part of our prospective fleet strategy. All restructuring amounts related to leased aircraft have either been charged to reorganization items, net, as these have been approved for rejection by the Bankruptcy Court or adjusted to restructuring expense, as we have re-evaluated our assessment that we have permanently ceased use of these leased helicopters due to changes in our fleet plans.
The following table summarizes the activity of the restructuring liability for the six months ended October 31, 2016:

18
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


 
Employee related severance and other costs
 
Lease associated costs
 
Total
Balance at April 30, 2016
$
10,956

 
$
58,311

 
$
69,267

Restructuring expense (recovery) (i)
4,947

 
(4,958
)
 
(11
)
Reorganization items, net (ii)
—

 
(49,090
)
 
(49,090
)
Non-cash charges and foreign exchange
(160
)
 
(2,265
)
 
(2,425
)
Cash payments
(12,548
)
 
(1,998
)
 
(14,546
)
Balance at October 31, 2016
$
3,195

 
$
—

 
$
3,195

(i)
The restructuring expense (recovery) includes certain estimates related to the timing and costs of restructuring activities. Any adjustments to these estimates, including as a result of changes in our fleet plans, are reflected at each period end.
(ii)
We have adjusted the restructuring liability for leases which have been approved for rejection by the Bankruptcy Court. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded the expected allowed claim from the lessors on approval of the lease rejections (note 10).
As of October 31, 2016, we have expensed $90.7 million of employee related severance and other costs and $84.3 million of lease associated costs cumulatively to date under this restructuring review.

5.
Asset impairments: 
During the three and six months ended October 31, 2015, we recorded an impairment charge of $10.5 million to increase our provision for obsolete and excess inventories on certain consumable inventories. This impairment charge resulted from the identification of consumable inventories that were in excess of our requirements. This was driven primarily by the significant and longer than initially expected decline in the price of oil and gas, which impacts our view of future utilization of these parts and resulting changes to our fleet and inventory management strategies. Excess consumable inventories have been measured at estimated market value, based on our experience with sales of surplus consumable inventories and our assessment of resale market conditions. 
During the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.7 million to write-down the carrying value of one H155 helicopter to its fair value.

6.
Inventories: 
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Work-in-progress for long-term maintenance contracts under completed contract accounting
$
5,749

 
$
12,104

Consumables
100,667

 
98,932

Provision for obsolete and excess inventories
(14,167
)
 
(15,922
)
 
$
92,249

 
$
95,114



19
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


7.
Other assets:
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Current:
 
 
 
Helicopter operating lease funded residual value guarantees (b)
$
2,757

 
$
1,226

Foreign currency embedded derivatives (a)
14,063

 
12,078

Mobilization costs
5,502

 
5,765

Deferred lease financing costs (b)
2,969

 
1,647

Prepaid helicopter rentals (b)
3,783

 
1,525

Residual value guarantees (b)
2,110

 
166

Foreign currency forward contracts
62

 
—

Other receivables
8,813

 
13,318

 
$
40,059

 
$
35,725

Non-current:
 
 
 
Helicopter operating lease funded residual value guarantees (b)
$
146,460

 
$
2,922

Helicopter deposits
66,170

 
66,170

Security deposits (b)
39,465

 
21,579

Deferred lease financing costs (b)
12,899

 
7,150

Foreign currency embedded derivatives (a)
20,301

 
21,586

Long-term income tax receivable
30,570

 
34,286

Prepaid helicopter rentals (b)
12,780

 
5,809

Accrued pension asset
9,764

 
15,917

Mobilization costs
9,801

 
8,711

Pension guarantee assets
7,998

 
7,815

Residual value guarantees (b)
6,765

 
490

Foreign currency forward contracts
46

 
—

Other
4,462

 
4,995

 
$
367,481

 
$
197,430

(a)
We enter into long-term revenue agreements, which provide for pricing denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the parties to the contract. This pricing feature was determined to be an embedded derivative which has been bifurcated for valuation and accounting purposes. The embedded derivative contracts and forward contracts are measured at fair value and included in other assets and/or other liabilities (note 8). The gains and losses due to the change in fair value are recognized in the statement of operations as part of other financing income (charges) (note 13). The fair value of the foreign currency embedded derivatives is determined to be a recurring Level 2 fair value measurement determined using a present value model. There were no transfers between categories in the fair value hierarchy.    
(b)
As of October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 71 helicopter lease rejections. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded the expected allowed claim from the lessors on the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the lease rejection (note 11) with all lease related assets and liabilities adjusted to reorganization items, net (note 10). The lessors’ rights of enforcement for those claims will be subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.


20
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


8.
Other liabilities: 
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Current:
 
 
 
Restructuring (c)
$
44,242

 
$
3,195

Foreign currency forward contracts (b)
7,092

 
—

Deferred gains on sale-leasebacks of helicopters (c)
13,987

 
—

Residual value guarantees (c)
3,359

 
—

Foreign currency embedded derivatives (a)
441

 
24

Contract inducement
724

 
288

Other
695

 
352

 
$
70,540

 
$
3,859

Non-current:
 
 
 
Accrued pension obligations
$
103,895

 
$
45,134

Deferred gains on sale-leasebacks of helicopters (c)
68,178

 
—

Residual value guarantees (c)
19,654

 
—

Restructuring (c)
25,025

 
—

Insurance claims accrual
10,776

 
9,546

Contract inducement
6,304

 
2,379

Foreign currency forward contracts (b)
813

 
—

Foreign currency embedded derivatives (a)
261

 
—

Other
7,805

 
6,131

 
$
242,711

 
$
63,190

(a)
The fair value of the foreign currency embedded derivatives is determined to be a recurring Level 2 fair value measurement determined using a present value model. There were no transfers between categories in the fair value hierarchy.
(b)
All of our foreign currency forward contracts were terminated and have been classified as liabilities subject to compromise as at October 31, 2016.
(c)
As of October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 71 helicopter lease rejections. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded the expected allowed claim from the lessors on the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the lease rejection (note 11) with all lease related assets and liabilities adjusted to reorganization items, net (note 10). The lessors’ rights of enforcement for those claims will be subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.


21
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


9.
Debt obligations:
 
Principal
Repayment terms
 
Facility maturity
dates
 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Senior secured notes (a)
At maturity
 
October 2020
 
$
1,007,539

 
$
1,014,289

Senior unsecured notes (a)
At maturity
 
June 2021
 
94,732

 
94,732

Revolving credit facility (a), (b):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
US LIBOR plus a 4.5% margin
At maturity
 
January 2019
 
327,500

 
327,500

CDOR plus a 6.5% margin
At maturity
 
January 2019
 
—

 
17,671

EURIBOR plus a 6.5% margin
At maturity
 
January 2019
 
—

 
20,859

Asset-based revolving credit facility (a)
At maturity
 
June 2020
 
139,000

 
139,000

Capital lease obligations (USD)
Quarterly
 
November 2016 - September 2018
 
75,190

 
43,439

Capital lease obligations (Euro)
Quarterly
 
September 2025
 
14,872

 
—

Boundary Bay financing – 6.93% (CAD)
Monthly
 
April 2035
 
26,587

 
24,570

Unamortized deferred financing costs (a)
 
 
 
 
(26,157
)
 
—

Total debt obligations
 
 
 
 
1,659,263

 
1,682,060

Less: Liabilities subject to compromise
 
 
 
 
—

 
(1,682,060
)
Less: Current portion of debt obligations
 
 
 
 
(1,633,377
)
 
—

Long-term portion of debt obligations
 
 
 
 
$
25,886

 
$
—

(a)
Event of default:
On May 5, 2016, the Debtors filed Petitions seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code, which constituted an event of default that accelerated our obligations under the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility as described in note 1.
As a result of the Petitions filed by the Debtors seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code on May 5, 2016 and based on our Plan, the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility, the ABL Facility and all of our capital lease obligations were reclassified as liabilities subject to compromise in accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations. We have ceased recognition of interest expense on the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility from the Petition Date. The aggregate contractual interest due under the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility was $27.3 million and $54.8 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, respectively. All unamortized deferred financing costs on these obligations were charged to reorganization items, net, during the six months ended October 31, 2016.
(b)
Revolving credit facility:
During the six months ended October 31, 2016, certain letters of credit provided to third parties prior to the Petition Date were drawn on our revolving credit facility.
During the three months ended October 31, 2016, we reclassified the revolving credit facility as a liability subject to compromise based on our Plan and charged to reorganization items, net, all unamortized deferred financing costs on this facility. We have continued recognition of interest expense on this facility in accordance with the Plan. See note 10 for further information on reorganization items, net and note 11 for further information regarding liabilities subject to compromise.
(c)
Carrying value of other financial instruments, measured at other than fair value:
The carrying values of the other financial instruments, which are measured at other than fair value, approximate fair value due to the short term to maturity, collateral and security ranking, except for non-revolving debt obligations. The carrying value, excluding deferred financing costs, and fair value of non-revolving debt obligations were as follows:

22
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


 
April 30, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
 
Fair value
 
Carrying value
 
Fair value
 
Carrying value
Senior secured notes
$
461,502

 
$
1,007,539

 
$
500,176

 
$
1,014,289

Senior unsecured notes
6,158

 
94,732

 
18,591

 
94,732

The fair value of the senior secured and senior unsecured notes is determined based on market information provided by third parties which is considered to be a Level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy.

10.
Reorganization items, net:
Transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization are required, under the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, to be separately disclosed and distinguished from those of the ongoing operations of the business. We have used the classification “Reorganization items, net” on the consolidated statements of operations to reflect expenses, gains and losses that are the direct result of the reorganization of our business.
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Adjustments to debt obligations (a)
$
(3,891
)
 
$
(30,942
)
Adjustments to allowed claims for rejected leases (b)
(23,292
)
 
(739,974
)
Adjustments to other allowed claims (c)
—

 
(16,986
)
Professional fees (d)
(23,343
)
 
(48,014
)
Total reorganization items, net
$
(50,526
)
 
$
(835,916
)
(a)
Adjustments to debt obligations:
Due to the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions and based on our Plan, the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility were reclassified as liabilities subject to compromise. Following the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have expensed $3.9 million and $30.9 million related to the deferred financing costs and unamortized net discount on these obligations during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016.
(b)
Adjustments to allowed claims for rejected leases:
The Debtors have filed motions, net of withdrawn motions, for the rejection or abandonment of 87 helicopters in our fleet which we no longer need in the operation of our business. This includes 82 leased helicopters and 5 helicopters financed under our ABL Facility.
As of October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 71 helicopter lease rejections. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded the expected allowed claim from the lessors on approval of the lease rejections of $668.2 million. The expected allowed claim has been determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable lease agreement, and generally includes the present value of all future lease payments for the remaining contract term, or a default termination amount, plus damages, including those related to the return condition of the helicopter.
Our estimate of the expected amount of the allowed claim is a significant estimate. As the estimation process is inherently uncertain, future actions and decisions by the Bankruptcy Court may differ significantly from our own estimate, potentially having material future effects on our financial statements. Furthermore, these liabilities are reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. There may be significant variation between the settled amount and the expected amount of the allowed claim. The lessors’ rights of enforcement for those claims will be subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
We have also charged to reorganization items all lease related assets and liabilities on the approved lease rejections. These balances include capitalized modifications, deferred lease financing costs, prepaid helicopter

23
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


rentals, security deposits, funded and unfunded residual value guarantees, deferred gains on sale-leasebacks of helicopters, capital lease assets and obligations and restructuring liabilities.
The Bankruptcy Court has approved interim lease deals with several lessors. On approval of the final terms of these leases by the Bankruptcy Court, the lessors may have a claim for the reduction in rentals and other costs associated with these leases. We will recognize the expected amount of these allowed claims upon Bankruptcy Court approval of these agreements.
(c)
Adjustments to other allowed claims:
The commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases constituted an event of default with our Canadian Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreements with certain plan participants, who could demand payment under one or more renewable letters of credit related to the participant’s benefit liabilities. As a result, we recognized a settlement loss of approximately $13.0 million during six months ended October 31, 2016, comprised of the net reduction in projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss.
All of our foreign currency forward contract arrangements were terminated during the three months ended July 31, 2016. We have recorded the adjustment from the fair value to the expected amount of the allowed claim for these derivative liabilities of $4.0 million during the six months ended October 31, 2016.
(d)
Professional fees:
During the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, we incurred $23.3 million and $48.0 million related to professional advisors who are assisting us with the bankruptcy process, respectively.

11.
Liabilities subject to compromise:
As a result of the Petitions filed by the Debtors seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code on May 5, 2016 and based on our Plan, the Debtors’ pre-petition liabilities, including our obligations under the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility, were classified as subject to compromise based on our assessment of these obligations following the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations.
Pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise are required to be reported at the amount expected to be allowed as a claim by the Bankruptcy Court, regardless of whether they may be settled for lesser amounts and remain subject to future adjustments based on negotiated settlements with claimants, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, rejection of executory contracts, proofs of claims or other events. The following table reflects pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise as at October 31, 2016:
 
October 31, 2016
Payables, accruals and other liabilities
$
305,997

Debt obligations (note 9)
1,682,060

Estimated allowed claim on lease rejections (note 10)
668,231

Total liabilities subject to compromise
$
2,656,288


12.
Condensed combined and consolidated debtor-in-possession financial information:
The financial statements below represent the condensed combined financial statements of the Debtors. The non-filing entities are accounted for as non-consolidated subsidiaries in these financial statements and, as such, their net loss is included using the equity method of accounting. Intercompany transactions among the Debtors have been eliminated in the financial statements presented below. Intercompany transactions among the Debtors and the non-filing entities have not been eliminated.


24
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Debtors’ Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)


October 31, 2016
Assets
 
Current assets:
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
164,172

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
124,923

Receivables due from non-filing entities
820,431

Income taxes receivable
2,707

Inventories
90,283

Prepaid expenses
15,350

Other assets
10,837

 
1,228,703

Property and equipment, net
696,471

Investments
423,987

Intangible assets
81,409

Restricted cash
5,182

Other assets
117,148

Long-term receivables due from non-filing entities
42,590

Assets held for sale
3,516

 
$
2,599,006

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit
 
Liabilities not subject to compromise:
 
Current liabilities:
 
Payables and accruals
$
136,486

Deferred revenue
15,539

Income taxes payable
656

Current payables due to non-filing entities
228,587

Other liabilities
2,483

 
383,751

Deferred revenue
7,194

Other liabilities
3,480

Deferred income tax liabilities
647

Total liabilities not subject to compromise
395,072

Liabilities subject to compromise
2,656,288

Liabilities subject to compromise due to non-filing entities
757,026

Total liabilities
3,808,386

 
 
Redeemable non-controlling interests
18,343

Redeemable convertible preferred shares
643,967

Shareholders’ deficit
(1,871,690
)
 
$
2,599,006




25
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Debtors’ Combined and Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)


Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2016
Revenue
$
165,573

 
$
338,703

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
Direct costs
(142,431
)
 
(274,249
)
Earnings (loss) from equity accounted investees
187

 
(4,357
)
General and administration costs
(15,117
)
 
(32,457
)
Depreciation
(34,561
)
 
(63,274
)
Restructuring recovery
3,501

 
2,899

Asset impairments
(2,691
)
 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
(576
)
 
(1,639
)
 
(191,688
)
 
(375,768
)
Operating loss
(26,115
)
 
(37,065
)
Financing charges
(48,811
)
 
(87,735
)
Reorganization items, net
(50,526
)
 
(835,916
)
Loss before income tax
(125,452
)
 
(960,716
)
Income tax expense
(2,161
)
 
(2,246
)
Net loss
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(962,962
)
Net loss attributable to:
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(962,962
)
Non-controlling interests
—

 
—

Net loss
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(962,962
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(87,620
)
 
$
(909,672
)




26
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Debtors’ Combined and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2016
Cash provided by operating activities
$
18,920

Financing activities:
 
Debt and capital lease repayments
(2,189
)
Cash used in financing activities
(2,189
)
Investing activities:
 
Property and equipment additions
(26,518
)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
1,819

Restricted cash
172

Dividends received from non-filing entities
1,000

Cash used in investing activities
(23,527
)
Cash provided by operations
(6,796
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(898
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period
(7,694
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
171,866

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
$
164,172


13.
Other financing income (charges): 
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Amortization of deferred financing costs
$
(1,866
)
 
$
(535
)
 
$
(3,727
)
 
$
(2,667
)
Net gain on debt extinguishment (a)
3,112

 
—

 
17,799

 
—

Net gain (loss) on fair value of foreign currency forward contracts
447

 
—

 
(15,079
)
 
—

Net gain (loss) on fair value of foreign currency embedded derivatives
4,543

 
(6,667
)
 
18,252

 
2,119

Amortization of guaranteed residual values
(815
)
 
(41
)
 
(963
)
 
(348
)
Interest expense
(4,008
)
 
(416
)
 
(8,390
)
 
(508
)
Interest income
5,929

 
693

 
11,719

 
2,594

Other
(1,515
)
 
(144
)
 
(3,690
)
 
(800
)
 
$
5,827

 
$
(7,110
)
 
$
15,921

 
$
390

(a)
During July and August 2015, one of our subsidiaries repurchased $40.6 million of the senior unsecured notes on the open market at prices ranging from 50.50% to 55.25% of the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest of $0.5 million. A gain on extinguishment of $3.1 million and $17.8 million related to the discount on repurchase, net of the unamortized deferred financing costs, was recognized during the three and six months ended October 31, 2015, respectively.


27
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


14.
Income taxes:
During the three months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016, we recorded income tax expense of $3.9 million and $11.2 million, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of (10.4)% and (9.4)%, respectively. During the six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016, we recorded income tax expense of $9.9 million and $11.2 million, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of (12.5)% and (1.2)%, respectively.
During the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, we recorded an additional accrual of $1.8 million for a new uncertain tax position. There was also a release of $3.1 million of an uncertain tax position during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016. The income tax expense reflects primarily the current corporate income taxes in taxable jurisdictions and withholding taxes. For most jurisdictions we determined that the deferred tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized and therefore we continue to recognize a valuation allowance in respect of these deferred tax assets.
As of October 31, 2016, there was $27.5 million in unrecognized tax benefits, of which $21.8 million would have an impact on the effective tax rate, if recognized.
The total amount of interest and penalties accrued on the consolidated balance sheets at April 30, 2016 and October 31, 2016 was $10.2 million and $9.5 million, respectively.

15.
Employee pension plans:
The net defined benefit pension plan expense (income) is as follows:
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
 
October 31, 2015
 
October 31, 2016
Current service cost
$
3,831

 
$
3,567

 
$
7,874

 
$
7,085

Interest cost
5,654

 
4,691

 
11,492

 
9,711

Expected return on plan assets
(10,346
)
 
(8,559
)
 
(21,102
)
 
(17,266
)
Amortization of net actuarial and experience losses
1,214

 
1,529

 
2,461

 
3,078

Amortization of past service credits
(124
)
 
(103
)
 
(248
)
 
(214
)
Employee contributions
(399
)
 
(385
)
 
(820
)
 
(764
)
 
$
(170
)
 
$
740

 
$
(343
)
 
$
1,630


16.
Guarantees:
We have provided limited guarantees to third parties under some of our operating leases relating to a portion of the residual helicopter values at the termination of the leases, which have terms expiring between fiscal 2017 and 2024. Our exposure under the asset value guarantees including guarantees in the form of funded and unfunded residual value guarantees is approximately $171.8 million as at April 30, 2016 and $10.8 million at October 31, 2016, exclusive of $165.8 million of funded and unfunded residual value guarantees for helicopter lease rejections which were approved by the Bankruptcy Court as at October 31, 2016.

17.
Commitments:
We have helicopter operating leases for 154 helicopters and 86 helicopters at April 30, 2016 and October 31, 2016, respectively. As at October 31, 2016, these leases had expiry dates ranging from fiscal 2017 to 2025. For those helicopters where we have an unexercised option to purchase them for agreed amounts, the purchase options do not constitute bargain purchase options and we do not have a commitment to exercise the options.
As at October 31, 2016, we have commitments with respect to operating leases for helicopters, buildings, land and equipment. The Debtors have filed motions for the rejection of leases for 82 helicopters in our fleet which are no longer required in the operations of our business. As of October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 71

28
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


helicopter lease rejections. Approved helicopter lease rejections have been reflected in reorganization items, net, at the expected amount of the allowed claim (note 10).
The minimum lease rentals required under operating leases are payable in the following amounts over the following years ended October 31, exclusive of approved helicopter lease rejections but inclusive of lease rejections still subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, which may substantially alter our minimum lease rentals. The May 5, 2016 filing of the Petitions by the Debtors in the Bankruptcy Court caused an event of default under the terms of all of our helicopter lease agreements. Any efforts by creditors to enforce such payment obligations as existed before the Petition Date are automatically stayed as a result of the filing of the Petitions, and the holders’ rights of enforcement are subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. We continue to make the required payments for the post-petition period for helicopter leases for which we have not filed motions for rejection with the Bankruptcy Court.
 
Helicopter operating
leases (i)
 
Building, land and
equipment operating
leases
 
Total operating
leases
2017
$
149,915

 
$
12,851

 
$
162,766

2018
142,391

 
9,137

 
151,528

2019
124,183

 
6,623

 
130,806

2020
102,716

 
4,095

 
106,811

2021
79,916

 
3,802

 
83,718

Thereafter
65,037

 
28,798

 
93,835

 
$
664,158

 
$
65,306

 
$
729,464

(i)
The helicopter operating lease commitment excludes all lease rejections approved by the Bankruptcy Court (note 10). These commitments do not reflect the reduction in lease obligations as a result of Bankruptcy Court approved interim lease arrangements, with final lease terms subject to agreement with the respective lessors and approval by the Bankruptcy Court.
As at October 31, 2016, we have a total commitment of $236.8 million for the purchase of new helicopters, for which we have contractual commitments to pay in fiscal 2017 ($170.6 million) and 2018 ($66.2 million). We also have additional flexible orders of $247.5 million which allow us to monitor the market recovery before confirming dates and the type of aircraft for deliveries. Our additional flexible orders can also be cancelled with no further payment, subject to periodic forfeitures of deposits paid to date, up to a maximum of $28.9 million in forfeitures. Each of these contracts are subject to ongoing negotiations and/or rejection as part of our reorganization process.

18.
Contingencies:
(a)
Legal proceedings:
One or more of our subsidiaries are, from time to time, named as defendants in lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business. Such disputes may involve, for example, breach of contract, employment, wrongful termination and tort claims. We maintain adequate insurance coverage to respond to most claims. We cannot predict the outcome of any such lawsuits with certainty, but we do not expect the outcome of pending or threatened legal matters to have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.
On May 5, 2016, the Debtors filed the Petitions commencing the Bankruptcy Cases. As a result of the commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases, attempts to prosecute, collect, secure or enforce remedies with respect to pre-petition claims against the Debtors are subject to the automatic stay provisions of Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, including litigation relating to the Debtors. Notwithstanding the general application of the automatic stay described above, certain foreign governmental authorities, foreign courts and foreign parties may argue that the automatic stay does not apply in their jurisdiction and seek to continue any ongoing litigation.
The two securities class action lawsuits that were previously filed against the Company were consolidated into a single action, Rudman et al. v. CHC Group et al., which is pending in federal district court for the Southern District of New York.  A consolidated amended complaint was filed on November 6, 2015. The

29
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


amended complaint alleges that the Company and others failed to disclose in our IPO materials that one of our major customers, Petrobras, had suspended payments on certain contracts due to the global stand-down of Airbus H225 aircraft. By opinion dated November 7, 2016, the Court dismissed all claims with prejudice.  The time for plaintiffs to appeal that dismissal has not yet expired. Defendants have reached an agreement-in-principal to resolve all claims, which will be incorporated into a settlement agreement and submitted for Court approval. The settlement amount would be fully paid by the Company’s insurer. 
In addition, from time to time, we are involved in tax and other disputes with various government agencies. The following summarizes certain of these pending disputes:
On May 2, 2008, Brazilian customs authorities seized one of our helicopters (customs value of $10.0 million) as a result of allegations that we violated Brazilian customs law by failing to ensure our customs agent and the customs agent’s third-party shipping company followed approved routing of the helicopter during transport. We secured release of the helicopter and are disputing through court action any claim for penalties associated with the seizure and the alleged violation. We preserved our rights by filing a civil action against our customs agent for any losses that may result. The State Court of São Paulo has ruled that our agent will be responsible for the value of the helicopter if the government’s seizure is upheld. That decision is under appeal. At October 31, 2016, it is not possible to determine the ultimate outcome of this matter, or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our Brazilian subsidiary is disputing claims from the Brazilian tax authorities that it was not entitled to certain credits in 2004 and 2007. The tax authorities are seeking up to $2.4 million in additional taxes plus interest and penalties. We believe that based on our interpretation of tax legislation and well established aviation industry practice we are in compliance with all applicable tax legislation and plan to defend this claim vigorously. At October 31, 2016, it is not possible to determine the outcome of this matter or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our Brazilian subsidiary is also disputing assessments from the municipal governments in Macaé and Cabo Frio related to cross-border flights and invoicing. The municipalities are seeking up to $4.8 million in taxes and penalties. We do not believe the Company is liable for these amounts and will continue to dispute these assessments at the administrative level before the Municipal Tax Secretary in each jurisdiction. At October 31, 2016, it is not possible to determine the outcome of this matter or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
On July 30, 2014, the United Kingdom Treasury Solicitors filed a claim against us and various other parties involved in the SAR-H procurement process, which was terminated by the Ministry of Transport in February 2011. The claim is for recovery of the Ministry of Transport’s wasted procurement costs of £15.8 million ($19.3 million) in respect of the SAR-H bid. We dispute the bases for the claim and intend to vigorously defend against it. The trial is listed to start in April or May 2017. At October 31, 2016, it is not possible to determine the outcome of this matter, or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
(b)
Contingent professional fees:
We have entered into fee arrangements with financial advisors to assist us with our Bankruptcy filing. The arrangements include contingent fee payments up to $14.2 million, payable upon completion of Chapter 11 reorganization. At October 31, 2016, no contingent fee amounts were accrued.

19.     Segment information:
We operate under the following segments:
•
Helicopter Services;
•
Heli-One;
•
Corporate and other.
We have provided information on segment revenues and Adjusted EBITDAR because these are the financial measures used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making operating decisions and assessing performance.

30
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Information on segment assets has not been disclosed as this information is not reviewed by the CODM.
The Helicopter Services segment includes flying operations around the world serving offshore oil and gas, EMS/SAR and other industries and the management of the fleet.
Heli-One, the maintenance, repair and overhaul segment, includes facilities in Norway, Canada, Poland, and the United States that provide helicopter maintenance, repair and overhaul services for our fleet and for an external customer base primarily in Europe, Asia and North America.
Corporate and other includes corporate office costs in various jurisdictions and is not considered a reportable segment.
Three months ended October 31, 2015
Helicopter
Services
 
Heli-One
 
Corporate and
other
 
Inter-segment
eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue from external customers
$
324,879

 
$
35,874

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
360,753

Add: Inter-segment revenues
—

 
16,903

 
—

 
(16,903
)
 
—

Total revenue
324,879

 
52,777

 
—

 
(16,903
)
 
360,753

Direct costs (i)
(192,394
)
 
(46,534
)
 
—

 
14,829

 
(224,099
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees
1,338

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,338

General and administration costs
—

 
—

 
(18,097
)
 
—

 
(18,097
)
Adjusted EBITDAR (ii)
133,823

 
6,243

 
(18,097
)
 
(2,074
)
 
119,895

Helicopter lease and associated costs
(63,281
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(63,281
)
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(35,537
)
Restructuring expense (note 4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(16,211
)
Asset impairments (note 5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(10,459
)
Loss on disposal of assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,419
)
Operating loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7,012
)
Interest on debt obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(27,286
)
Foreign exchange loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(9,551
)
Other financing income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,827

Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,942
)
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(41,964
)
 
(i)
Direct costs in the segment information presented excludes helicopter lease and associated costs. In the consolidated statements of operations these costs are combined.
(ii)
Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, helicopter lease and associated costs, restructuring expense (recovery), asset impairments, gain (loss) on disposal of assets, foreign exchange gain (loss), other financing income (charges) and reorganization items, net, or total revenue plus earnings from equity accounted investees less direct costs, excluding helicopter lease and associated costs, and general and administration costs.


31
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Three months ended October 31, 2016
Helicopter
Services
 
Heli-One
 
Corporate and
other
 
Inter-segment
eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue from external customers
$
228,345

 
$
21,191

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
249,536

Add: Inter-segment revenues
—

 
21,619

 
—

 
(21,619
)
 
—

Total revenue
228,345

 
42,810

 
—

 
(21,619
)
 
249,536

Direct costs (i)
(171,306
)
 
(43,621
)
 
—

 
21,262

 
(193,665
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees
12,131

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12,131

General and administration costs
—

 
—

 
(12,756
)
 
—

 
(12,756
)
Adjusted EBITDAR (ii)
69,170

 
(811
)
 
(12,756
)
 
(357
)
 
55,246

Helicopter lease and associated costs
(35,722
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(35,722
)
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(42,146
)
Restructuring recovery (note 4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,416

Asset impairments (note 5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(599
)
Operating loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(23,496
)
Interest on debt obligations (note 9(a))
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6,891
)
Foreign exchange loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(30,667
)
Other financing charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7,110
)
Reorganization items, net (note 10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(50,526
)
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(11,166
)
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(129,856
)
 
(i)
Direct costs in the segment information presented excludes helicopter lease and associated costs. In the consolidated statements of operations these costs are combined.
(ii)
Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, helicopter lease and associated costs, restructuring expense (recovery), asset impairments, gain (loss) on disposal of assets, foreign exchange gain (loss), other financing income (charges) and reorganization items, net, or total revenue plus earnings from equity accounted investees less direct costs, excluding helicopter lease and associated costs, and general and administration costs.



32
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Six months ended October 31, 2015
Helicopter
Services
 
Heli-One
 
Corporate and
other
 
Inter-segment
eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue from external customers
$
665,379

 
$
71,311

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
736,690

Add: Inter-segment revenues
—

 
44,269

 
—

 
(44,269
)
 
—

Total revenue
665,379

 
115,580

 
—

 
(44,269
)
 
736,690

Direct costs (i)
(413,084
)
 
(101,973
)
 
—

 
41,462

 
(473,595
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees
2,771

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,771

General and administration costs
—

 
—

 
(34,453
)
 
—

 
(34,453
)
Adjusted EBITDAR (ii)
255,066

 
13,607

 
(34,453
)
 
(2,807
)
 
231,413

Helicopter lease and associated costs
(127,955
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(127,955
)
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(75,818
)
Restructuring expense (note 4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(35,590
)
Asset impairments (note 5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(10,459
)
Loss on disposal of assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,406
)
Operating loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(20,815
)
Interest on debt obligations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(54,232
)
Foreign exchange loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(19,630
)
Other financing income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15,921

Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(9,850
)
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(88,606
)

(i)
Direct costs in the segment information presented excludes helicopter lease and associated costs. In the consolidated statements of operations these costs are combined.
(ii)
Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, helicopter lease and associated costs, restructuring expense (recovery), asset impairments, gain (loss) on disposal of assets, foreign exchange gain (loss), other financing income (charges) and reorganization items, net, or total revenue plus earnings from equity accounted investees less direct costs, excluding helicopter lease and associated costs, and general and administration costs.




33
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Six months ended October 31, 2016
Helicopter
Services
 
Heli-One
 
Corporate and
other
 
Inter-segment
eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue from external customers
$
470,277

 
$
49,695

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
519,972

Add: Inter-segment revenues
—

 
39,055

 
—

 
(39,055
)
 
—

Total revenue
470,277

 
88,750

 
—

 
(39,055
)
 
519,972

Direct costs (i)
(337,917
)
 
(88,004
)
 
—

 
38,631

 
(387,290
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees
12,392

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12,392

General and administration costs
—

 
—

 
(28,184
)
 
—

 
(28,184
)
Adjusted EBITDAR (ii)
144,752

 
746

 
(28,184
)
 
(424
)
 
116,890

Helicopter lease and associated costs
(88,958
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(88,958
)
Depreciation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(77,844
)
Restructuring recovery (note 4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11

Asset impairments (note 5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,724
)
Operating loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(54,316
)
Interest on debt obligations (note 9(a))
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(15,482
)
Foreign exchange loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(49,099
)
Other financing income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
390

Reorganization items, net (note 10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(835,916
)
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(11,225
)
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
(965,648
)
 
(i)
Direct costs in the segment information presented excludes helicopter lease and associated costs. In the consolidated statements of operations these costs are combined.
(ii)
Adjusted EBITDAR is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, helicopter lease and associated costs, restructuring expense (recovery), asset impairments, gain (loss) on disposal of assets, foreign exchange gain (loss), other financing income (charges) and reorganization items, net, or total revenue plus earnings from equity accounted investees less direct costs, excluding helicopter lease and associated costs, and general and administration costs.

20.
Supplemental condensed consolidated financial information:
The Company and certain of its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis certain outstanding indebtedness of CHC Helicopter S.A. (the “Issuer”), one of our subsidiaries. The following consolidating schedules present financial information as of October 31, 2016 and for the six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016, based on the guarantor structure that was in place at October 31, 2016.
The Parent columns in the condensed consolidated financial information are for CHC Group Ltd. on a standalone basis (the “Parent”) and the equity method of accounting is used to reflect ownership interest in its subsidiary.


34
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Balance Sheets as at April 30, 2016
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
87

 
$
3,138

 
$
27,581

 
$
238,462

 
$
(3,138
)
 
$
266,130

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
45

 
113

 
88,406

 
94,852

 
(909
)
 
182,507

Current intercompany receivables
115

 
821,992

 
730,082

 
551,552

 
(2,103,741
)
 
—

Income taxes receivable
—

 
—

 
2,084

 
3,878

 
—

 
5,962

Inventories
—

 
—

 
87,330

 
4,919

 
—

 
92,249

Prepaid expenses
7,041

 
125

 
16,104

 
15,621

 
(125
)
 
38,766

Other assets
—

 
35,016

 
53,540

 
55,395

 
(103,892
)
 
40,059

 
7,288

 
860,384

 
1,005,127

 
964,679

 
(2,211,805
)
 
625,673

Property and equipment, net
—

 
—

 
623,825

 
343,794

 
—

 
967,619

Investments
—

 
—

 
665,220

 
29,503

 
(657,083
)
 
37,640

Intangible assets
—

 
—

 
81,476

 
1,422

 
—

 
82,898

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
5,415

 
19,667

 
—

 
25,082

Other assets
36

 
—

 
294,152

 
73,293

 
—

 
367,481

Long-term intercompany receivables
—

 
96,596

 
59,474

 
399,307

 
(555,377
)
 
—

Deferred income tax assets
—

 
—

 
1,976

 
594

 
—

 
2,570

Assets held for sale
—

 
—

 
5,305

 
—

 
—

 
5,305

 
$
7,324

 
$
956,980

 
$
2,741,970

 
$
1,832,259

 
$
(3,424,265
)
 
$
2,114,268

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accruals
$
4,385

 
$
58,592

 
$
181,322

 
$
93,317

 
$
(58,588
)
 
$
279,028

Deferred revenue
—

 
—

 
27,347

 
7,066

 
—

 
34,413

Income taxes payable
—

 
12

 
33,863

 
4,097

 
(12
)
 
37,960

Current intercompany payables
57,481

 
309,040

 
529,617

 
694,817

 
(1,590,955
)
 
—

Current facility secured by accounts receivable
—

 
—

 
—

 
22,339

 
—

 
22,339

Other liabilities
68

 
33,860

 
98,530

 
40,819

 
(102,737
)
 
70,540

Current portion of debt obligations
—

 
1,407,553

 
1,498,315

 
135,062

 
(1,407,553
)
 
1,633,377

 
61,934

 
1,809,057

 
2,368,994

 
997,517

 
(3,159,845
)
 
2,077,657

Debt obligations
—

 
—

 
25,886

 
—

 
—

 
25,886

Long-term intercompany payables
—

 
—

 
398,593

 
60,188

 
(458,781
)
 
—

Accumulated losses of unconsolidated investees in excess of investment
261,719

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(261,719
)
 
—

Deferred revenue
—

 
—

 
32,982

 
23,719

 
—

 
56,701

Other liabilities
—

 
—

 
168,019

 
74,692

 
—

 
242,711

Deferred income tax liabilities
—

 
—

 
565

 
8,210

 
—

 
8,775

Total liabilities
323,653

 
1,809,057

 
2,995,039

 
1,164,326

 
(3,880,345
)
 
2,411,730

Redeemable non-controlling interests
—

 
17,150

 
17,150

 
(41,495
)
 
26,062

 
18,867

Redeemable convertible preferred shares
643,967

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
643,967

Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
(960,296
)
 
(869,227
)
 
(270,219
)
 
709,428

 
430,018

 
(960,296
)
 
$
7,324

 
$
956,980

 
$
2,741,970

 
$
1,832,259

 
$
(3,424,265
)
 
$
2,114,268





35
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Balance Sheets as at October 31, 2016
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
46

 
$
535

 
$
36,155

 
$
251,493

 
$
(535
)
 
$
287,694

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
46

 
113

 
124,877

 
59,208

 
(807
)
 
183,437

Current intercompany receivables
3,408

 
125,323

 
1,246,401

 
1,037,502

 
(2,412,634
)
 
—

Income taxes receivable
—

 
—

 
2,707

 
4,105

 
—

 
6,812

Inventories
—

 
—

 
90,283

 
4,831

 
—

 
95,114

Prepaid expenses
3,719

 
125

 
11,631

 
14,352

 
(125
)
 
29,702

Other assets
—

 
59,562

 
70,399

 
33,287

 
(127,523
)
 
35,725

 
7,219

 
185,658

 
1,582,453

 
1,404,778

 
(2,541,624
)
 
638,484

Property and equipment, net
—

 
—

 
524,447

 
317,373

 
—

 
841,820

Investments
—

 
—

 
535,494

 
—

 
(528,190
)
 
7,304

Intangible assets
—

 
—

 
81,409

 
1,326

 
—

 
82,735

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
5,182

 
10,703

 
—

 
15,885

Other assets
—

 
—

 
117,148

 
80,282

 
—

 
197,430

Long-term intercompany receivables
—

 
—

 
43,403

 
334,873

 
(378,276
)
 
—

Deferred income tax assets
—

 
—

 
—

 
162

 
(82
)
 
80

Assets held for sale
—

 
—

 
3,516

 
—

 
—

 
3,516

 
$
7,219

 
$
185,658

 
$
2,893,052

 
$
2,149,497

 
$
(3,448,172
)
 
$
1,787,254

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payables and accruals
$
28,492

 
$
10,218

 
$
107,976

 
$
69,391

 
$
(10,251
)
 
$
205,826

Deferred revenue
—

 
—

 
15,539

 
8,062

 
—

 
23,601

Income taxes payable
—

 
343

 
656

 
6,008

 
(343
)
 
6,664

Current intercompany payables
30,104

 
19,306

 
498,271

 
1,052,561

 
(1,600,242
)
 
—

Other liabilities
30

 
8,398

 
10,851

 
60,938

 
(76,358
)
 
3,859

 
58,626

 
38,265

 
633,293

 
1,196,960

 
(1,687,194
)
 
239,950

Long-term intercompany payables
—

 
—

 
—

 
42,605

 
(42,605
)
 
—

Accumulated losses of unconsolidated investees in excess of investment
1,113,349

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,113,349
)
 
—

Deferred revenue
—

 
—

 
7,194

 
20,383

 
—

 
27,577

Other liabilities
—

 
—

 
3,480

 
59,710

 
—

 
63,190

Deferred income tax liabilities
—

 
—

 
647

 
7,988

 
(82
)
 
8,553

Total liabilities not subject to compromise
1,171,975

 
38,265

 
644,614

 
1,327,646

 
(2,843,230
)
 
339,270

Liabilities subject to compromise
980

 
1,534,559

 
2,515,540

 
139,743

 
(1,534,534
)
 
2,656,288

Liabilities subject to compromise - intercompany
60,911

 
328,211

 
836,404

 
144,781

 
(1,370,307
)
 
—

Total liabilities
1,233,866

 
1,901,035

 
3,996,558

 
1,612,170

 
(5,748,071
)
 
2,995,558

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redeemable non-controlling interests
—

 
18,343

 
18,343

 
(43,964
)
 
25,621

 
18,343

Redeemable convertible preferred shares
643,967


—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
643,967

Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
(1,870,614
)
 
(1,733,720
)
 
(1,121,849
)
 
581,291

 
2,274,278

 
(1,870,614
)
 
$
7,219

 
$
185,658

 
$
2,893,052

 
$
2,149,497

 
$
(3,448,172
)
 
$
1,787,254


36
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended October 31, 2015
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
235,953

 
$
247,866

 
$
(123,066
)
 
$
360,753

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct costs
—

 
—

 
(179,546
)
 
(230,900
)
 
123,066

 
(287,380
)
Earnings (loss) from equity accounted investees
(39,466
)
 
(27,420
)
 
6,717

 
1,256

 
60,251

 
1,338

General and administration costs
(3,949
)
 
(320
)
 
(12,618
)
 
(1,530
)
 
320

 
(18,097
)
Depreciation
—

 
—

 
(27,241
)
 
(8,296
)
 
—

 
(35,537
)
Restructuring expense
(707
)
 
—

 
(13,178
)
 
(2,326
)
 
—

 
(16,211
)
Asset impairments
—

 
—

 
(10,185
)
 
(274
)
 
—

 
(10,459
)
Loss on disposal of assets
—

 
—

 
(1,223
)
 
(196
)
 
—

 
(1,419
)
 
(44,122
)
 
(27,740
)
 
(237,274
)
 
(242,266
)
 
183,637

 
(367,765
)
Operating income (loss)
(44,122
)
 
(27,740
)
 
(1,321
)
 
5,600

 
60,571

 
(7,012
)
Financing income (charges)
3

 
(10,896
)
 
(33,222
)
 
2,209

 
10,896

 
(31,010
)
Loss before income tax
(44,119
)
 
(38,636
)
 
(34,543
)
 
7,809

 
71,467

 
(38,022
)
Income tax recovery (expense)
3

 
(566
)
 
(4,923
)
 
978

 
566

 
(3,942
)
Net loss
$
(44,116
)
 
$
(39,202
)
 
$
(39,466
)
 
$
8,787

 
$
72,033

 
$
(41,964
)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(44,116
)
 
$
(39,202
)
 
$
(39,466
)
 
$
6,635

 
$
72,033

 
$
(44,116
)
Non-controlling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,152

 
—

 
2,152

Net loss
$
(44,116
)
 
$
(39,202
)
 
$
(39,466
)
 
$
8,787

 
$
72,033

 
$
(41,964
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(55,546
)
 
$
(49,946
)
 
$
(50,896
)
 
$
2,524

 
$
100,840

 
$
(53,024
)


37
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the six months ended October 31, 2015
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
477,578

 
$
500,040

 
$
(240,928
)
 
$
736,690

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct costs
—

 
—

 
(369,806
)
 
(472,672
)
 
240,928

 
(601,550
)
Earnings (loss) from equity accounted investees
(87,119
)
 
(71,627
)
 
(32,685
)
 
2,472

 
191,730

 
2,771

General and administration costs
(8,021
)
 
(800
)
 
(27,876
)
 
1,444

 
800

 
(34,453
)
Depreciation
—

 
—

 
(60,753
)
 
(15,065
)
 
—

 
(75,818
)
Restructuring expense
(2,428
)
 
—

 
(28,099
)
 
(5,063
)
 
—

 
(35,590
)
Asset impairments
—

 
—

 
(10,185
)
 
(274
)
 
—

 
(10,459
)
Loss on disposal of assets
—

 
—

 
(1,805
)
 
(601
)
 
—

 
(2,406
)
 
(97,568
)
 
(72,427
)
 
(531,209
)
 
(489,759
)
 
433,458

 
(757,505
)
Operating income (loss)
(97,568
)
 
(72,427
)
 
(53,631
)
 
10,281

 
192,530

 
(20,815
)
Financing income (charges)
87

 
(12,422
)
 
(23,802
)
 
(34,226
)
 
12,422

 
(57,941
)
Loss before income tax
(97,481
)
 
(84,849
)
 
(77,433
)
 
(23,945
)
 
204,952

 
(78,756
)
Income tax recovery (expense)
3

 
(1,162
)
 
(9,686
)
 
(167
)
 
1,162

 
(9,850
)
Net loss
$
(97,478
)
 
$
(86,011
)
 
$
(87,119
)
 
$
(24,112
)
 
$
206,114

 
$
(88,606
)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(97,478
)
 
$
(86,011
)
 
$
(87,119
)
 
$
(32,984
)
 
$
206,114

 
$
(97,478
)
Non-controlling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
8,872

 
—

 
8,872

Net loss
$
(97,478
)
 
$
(86,011
)
 
$
(87,119
)
 
$
(24,112
)
 
$
206,114

 
$
(88,606
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(141,985
)
 
$
(130,195
)
 
$
(131,626
)
 
$
(17,908
)
 
$
298,993

 
$
(122,721
)


38
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 



Cash flows for the six months ended October 31, 2015
(Expressed in thousands of US dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(98
)
 
$
56,662

 
$
95,443

 
$
(122,241
)
 
$
(56,662
)
 
$
(26,896
)
Financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sold interest in accounts receivable, net of collections
—

 
—

 
—

 
8,305

 
—

 
8,305

Net proceeds from issuance of capital stock
—

 
—

 
—

 
200

 
(200
)
 
—

Debt proceeds
—

 
312,000

 
312,000

 
14,400

 
(312,000
)
 
326,400

Debt and capital lease repayments
—

 
(214,000
)
 
(215,748
)
 
—

 
214,000

 
(215,748
)
Proceeds from bank indebtedness
—

 
—

 
—

 
130,447

 
(130,447
)
 
—

Repurchases of senior unsecured notes
—

 
(22,101
)
 
(22,101
)
 
—

 
22,101

 
(22,101
)
Increase in deferred financing costs
—

 
—

 
—

 
(4,868
)
 
—

 
(4,868
)
Cash provided by financing activities
—

 
75,899

 
74,151

 
148,484

 
(206,546
)
 
91,988

Investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and equipment additions
—

 
—

 
(53,407
)
 
(53,545
)
 
—

 
(106,952
)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
—

 
—

 
28,470

 
—

 
—

 
28,470

Helicopter deposits net of lease inception refunds
—

 
—

 
(32,050
)
 
(557
)
 
—

 
(32,607
)
Investment in subsidiaries
—

 
—

 
(200
)
 
—

 
200

 
—

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
1,337

 
(10,073
)
 
—

 
(8,736
)
Cash used in investing activities
—

 
—

 
(55,850
)
 
(64,175
)
 
200

 
(119,825
)
Cash provided by (used in) operations
(98
)
 
132,561

 
113,744

 
(37,932
)
 
(263,008
)
 
(54,733
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—

 
—

 
(11,347
)
 
175

 
—

 
(11,172
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period
(98
)
 
132,561

 
102,397

 
(37,757
)
 
(263,008
)
 
(65,905
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
112

 
82,458

 
96,428

 
37,757

 
(82,458
)
 
134,297

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
$
14

 
$
215,019

 
$
198,825

 
$
—

 
$
(345,466
)
 
$
68,392



39
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 



Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended October 31, 2016
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
165,573

 
$
177,145

 
$
(93,182
)
 
$
249,536

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Direct costs
—

 
(13
)
 
(145,490
)
 
(177,080
)
 
93,196

 
(229,387
)
Earnings (loss) from equity accounted investees
(99,682
)
 
(85,463
)
 
(14,771
)
 
11,930

 
200,117

 
12,131

General and administration costs
(5,014
)
 
234

 
(10,155
)
 
2,413

 
(234
)
 
(12,756
)
Depreciation
—

 
—

 
(25,591
)
 
(16,555
)
 
—

 
(42,146
)
Restructuring recovery (expense)
(421
)
 
4

 
3,922

 
(1,085
)
 
(4
)
 
2,416

Asset impairments
—

 
—

 
(2,691
)
 
—

 
—

 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
—

 
—

 
(576
)
 
(23
)
 
—

 
(599
)
 
(105,117
)
 
(85,238
)
 
(195,352
)
 
(180,400
)
 
293,075

 
(273,032
)
Operating loss
(105,117
)
 
(85,238
)
 
(29,779
)
 
(3,255
)
 
199,893

 
(23,496
)
Financing income (charges)
7

 
(12,724
)
 
(40,321
)
 
(4,354
)
 
12,724

 
(44,668
)
Reorganization items, net
(22,502
)
 
(4,792
)
 
(27,422
)
 
(601
)
 
4,791

 
(50,526
)
Loss before income tax
(127,612
)
 
(102,754
)
 
(97,522
)
 
(8,210
)
 
217,408

 
(118,690
)
Income tax expense
(1
)
 
(561
)
 
(2,160
)
 
(9,005
)
 
561

 
(11,166
)
Net loss
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(103,315
)
 
$
(99,682
)
 
$
(17,215
)
 
$
217,969

 
$
(129,856
)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Controlling interest
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(103,315
)
 
$
(99,682
)
 
$
(14,972
)
 
$
217,969

 
$
(127,613
)
Non-controlling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
(2,243
)
 
—

 
(2,243
)
Net loss
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(103,315
)
 
$
(99,682
)
 
$
(17,215
)
 
$
217,969

 
$
(129,856
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(87,620
)
 
$
(63,322
)
 
$
(59,689
)
 
$
(60,488
)
 
$
182,072

 
$
(89,047
)


40
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the six months ended October 31, 2016
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenue
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
338,703

 
$
363,678

 
$
(182,409
)
 
$
519,972

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct costs
—

 
(13
)
 
(280,367
)
 
(378,291
)
 
182,423

 
(476,248
)
Earnings (loss) from equity accounted investees
(903,823
)
 
(861,592
)
 
(44,543
)
 
12,282

 
1,810,068

 
12,392

General and administration costs
(10,797
)
 
(98
)
 
(21,689
)
 
4,302

 
98

 
(28,184
)
Depreciation
—

 
—

 
(52,507
)
 
(25,337
)
 
—

 
(77,844
)
Restructuring recovery (expense)
(2,562
)
 
(9
)
 
5,461

 
(2,888
)
 
9

 
11

Asset impairments
—

 
—

 
(2,691
)
 
—

 
—

 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
—

 
—

 
(1,639
)
 
(85
)
 
—

 
(1,724
)
 
(917,182
)
 
(861,712
)
 
(397,975
)
 
(390,017
)
 
1,992,598

 
(574,288
)
Operating loss
(917,182
)
 
(861,712
)
 
(59,272
)
 
(26,339
)
 
1,810,189

 
(54,316
)
Financing income (charges)
5

 
(21,159
)
 
(57,467
)
 
(6,729
)
 
21,159

 
(64,191
)
Reorganization items, net
(45,785
)
 
(27,995
)
 
(784,838
)
 
(5,292
)
 
27,994

 
(835,916
)
Loss before income tax
(962,962
)
 
(910,866
)
 
(901,577
)
 
(38,360
)
 
1,859,342

 
(954,423
)
Income tax expense
—

 
(1,123
)
 
(2,246
)
 
(8,979
)
 
1,123

 
(11,225
)
Net loss
$
(962,962
)
 
$
(911,989
)
 
$
(903,823
)
 
$
(47,339
)
 
$
1,860,465

 
$
(965,648
)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(962,962
)
 
$
(911,989
)
 
$
(903,823
)
 
$
(44,653
)
 
$
1,860,465

 
$
(962,962
)
Non-controlling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
(2,686
)
 
—

 
(2,686
)
Net loss
$
(962,962
)
 
$
(911,989
)
 
$
(903,823
)
 
$
(47,339
)
 
$
1,860,465

 
$
(965,648
)
Comprehensive loss
$
(909,672
)
 
$
(859,039
)
 
$
(850,533
)
 
$
(145,061
)
 
$
1,853,881

 
$
(910,424
)


41
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 



Cash flows for the six months ended October 31, 2016
(Expressed in thousands of US dollars)
Parent
 
Issuer
 
Guarantor
 
Non-guarantor
 
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(41
)
 
$
(2,603
)
 
$
35,188

 
$
(3,949
)
 
$
2,603

 
$
31,198

Financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sold interest in accounts receivable, net of collections
—

 
—

 
—

 
(21,620
)
 
—

 
(21,620
)
Debt and capital lease repayments
—

 
—

 
(2,189
)
 
—

 
—

 
(2,189
)
Dividends paid
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,000
)
 
1,000

 
—

Cash provided by financing activities
—

 
—

 
(2,189
)

(22,620
)
 
1,000

 
(23,809
)
Investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Property and equipment additions
—

 
—

 
(26,518
)
 
(934
)
 
—

 
(27,452
)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
—

 
—

 
1,819

 
25

 
—

 
1,844

Proceeds from sale of equity accounted investees
—

 
—

 
—

 
35,518

 
—

 
35,518

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
172

 
8,311

 
—

 
8,483

Dividends received
—

 
—

 
1,000

 
—

 
(1,000
)
 
—

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
—

 
—

 
(23,527
)
 
42,920

 
(1,000
)
 
18,393

Cash provided by (used in) operations
(41
)
 
(2,603
)
 
9,472

 
16,351

 
2,603

 
25,782

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—

 
—

 
(898
)
 
(3,320
)
 
—

 
(4,218
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period
(41
)
 
(2,603
)
 
8,574

 
13,031

 
2,603

 
21,564

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
87

 
3,138

 
27,581

 
238,462

 
(3,138
)
 
266,130

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
$
46

 
$
535

 
$
36,155

 
$
251,493

 
$
(535
)
 
$
287,694


42
Table of Contents

CHC Group Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession)
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars unless otherwise noted, except share and per share information)
 


21.
Subsequent events:

On November 30, 2016, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court to reject the lease for our Boundary Bay facility. In accordance with ASC 852 Reorganizations, we will record to reorganization items, net, the related leased assets and liabilities and our estimate of the allowed claim on approval of the motion by the Bankruptcy Court. Our operations from the Boundary Bay facility have been relocated to other nearby facilities.

By order dated December 5, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court approved a motion for the abandonment of 5 helicopters financed under our ABL Facility and approved a binding term sheet (the “ABL Term Sheet”) for revised terms to the ABL Facility. The terms of the ABL Term Sheet include, but are not limited to, an amended principal balance subdivided into portions among the 8 restructured aircraft, an amended termination date, continued monthly interim payments during the pendency of the Bankruptcy Cases in full satisfaction of all administrative expense and adequate protection claims, a catch-up payment within 5 business days of the effective date of the revised ABL Facility, and a $78.0 million general unsecured non-priority pre-petition claim on the effective date of the revised ABL Facility. The transaction remains subject to final documentation.
    



43
Table of Contents


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) is intended to provide an understanding of our results of operations, financial condition and where appropriate, factors that may affect future performance. The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the interim financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, filed with the SEC on July 15, 2016, and the MD&A contained therein. In the discussion that follows, the terms “prior year quarter” and “current year quarter” and “prior year period” and “current year period” refer to the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The following discussions include forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties, including those identified in the “Item 1A. Risk Factors” section to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016.
We have prepared the interim financial statements assuming that we will continue as a going concern, despite our recurring net losses, substantial level of indebtedness and operating lease commitments, significant decline in consolidated revenues and filing for bankruptcy protection on May 5, 2016 described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016. However, our independent registered public accountants Ernst & Young LLP have included an emphasis of matter paragraph in their auditors’ report, which states certain conditions exist which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern in relation to the above and incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016. The interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty. See “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our audited annual consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management. In some cases you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “plan,” “expect” or the negative or plural of these words or similar expressions. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
we filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and are subject to risks and uncertainties;

•
operating under Chapter 11 may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies;

•
our employees face considerable uncertainty due to the Chapter 11 proceedings;

•
we may suffer from a protracted restructuring;

•
our ability to emerge from Chapter 11 and operate profitably thereafter will depend on increasing our revenue, lowering our costs, and obtaining sufficient financing or other capital to operate successfully;

•
we have substantial liquidity needs and, due to our current Chapter 11 proceedings, may not be able to obtain any equity or debt financings in the capital market for the foreseeable future;

•
we may be subject to claims that will not be discharged in the Chapter 11 proceedings;

•
our restructuring efforts through the Chapter 11 proceedings may be expensive, take resources and distract management;

•
the PSA is subject to termination upon the occurrence of a number of termination events;

•
the Bankruptcy Court may not confirm the Plan;


44
Table of Contents


•
if the Effective Date does not occur by March 17, 2017, a Plan Support Termination Event will occur, which would result in the Debtors’ payment of the Put Option Premium in cash;

•
we are in the process of rejecting and abandoning a significant portion of our helicopter fleet through Chapter 11 proceedings, which may result in an inability to quickly respond to new opportunities and a significant loss of market share and profit margins;

•
our interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern, our independent registered public accounting firm has raised substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern, and we have not included any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty;

•
we have a history of net losses;

•
our substantial level of indebtedness, operating lease commitments, purchase and other commitments could materially adversely affect our ability to fulfill our obligations under our debt agreements, our ability to react to changes in our business and our ability to incur additional debt to fund future needs;

•
all flights with the aircraft type H225 and AS332 L2 have been temporarily grounded which may cause a material and adverse impact to our financial viability;

•
operating helicopters involves a degree of inherent risk and we are exposed to the risk of losses from safety incidents;

•
if we are unable to mitigate potential losses through a robust safety management and insurance coverage program, our financial condition would be jeopardized in the event of a safety or other hazardous incident;

•
failure to maintain standards of acceptable safety performance could have an adverse impact on our ability to attract and retain customers and could adversely impact our reputation, operations and financial performance;

•
our operations are largely dependent upon the level of activity in the offshore oil and gas industry;

•
the oil and gas industries on which we are largely dependent are suffering through a severe downturn, resulting in significant negative impact on demand for our services, and no assurance can be given that the downturn will not continue to be prolonged;

•
many of the markets in which we operate are highly competitive, and if we are unable to effectively compete, it may result in a loss of market share or a decrease in revenue or profit margins;

•
we rely on a limited number of large offshore helicopter support contracts with a limited number of customers. If any of these are terminated early or not renewed, our revenues could decline;

•
negative publicity may adversely impact us;

•
our fixed operating expenses and long-term contracts with customers could adversely affect our business under certain circumstances;

•
we depend on a small number of helicopter manufacturers and any safety issues can severely limit our ability to continue operating helicopters already in our fleet;

•
we depend on a limited number of third-party suppliers for helicopter parts and subcontract services;

•
restructuring of our operations and organizational structure may lead to significant costs;

•
our business requires substantial capital expenditures, lease and working capital financing, which we are currently blocked from accessing through the capital market and banks. Any further deterioration of current industry or business conditions, the capital and banking markets or a prolonged period in Chapter 11 proceedings generally could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations;

•
we rely on the secondary used helicopter market to dispose of our older helicopters and parts due to our ongoing fleet modernization efforts;

45
Table of Contents



•
our operations are subject to extensive regulations which could increase our costs and adversely affect us;

•
our MRO business, Heli-One, could suffer if licenses issued by OEMs and/or governmental authorities are not renewed or we cannot obtain additional licenses;

•
we derive significant revenue from non-wholly owned variable interest entities. If we are unable to maintain good relations with the other owners of such non-wholly owned entities, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected;

•
our operations may suffer due to political, regulatory, commercial and economic uncertainty;

•
our business in countries with a history of corruption and transactions with foreign governments increases the compliance risks associated with our international activities;

•
we are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws, rules, regulations and ordinances that could have an adverse impact on our business;

•
we are subject to many different forms of taxation in various jurisdictions throughout the world, which could lead to disagreements with tax authorities regarding the application of tax laws;

•
the offshore helicopter services industry is cyclical;

•
we are exposed to foreign currency risks;

•
our failure to hedge exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could unfavorably affect our financial performance;

•
we are exposed to credit risks;

•
our customers may seek to shift risk to us;

•
if oil and gas companies undertake cost reduction methods, there may be an adverse effect on our business;

•
reductions in spending on helicopter services by government agencies could lead to modifications of SAR and EMS contract terms or delays in receiving payments, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations;

•
failure to develop or implement new technologies and disruption to our systems could affect our results of operations;

•
we rely on information technology, and if we are unable to protect against service interruptions, data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches, our operations could be disrupted and our business could be negatively affected;

•
the loss of key personnel could affect our growth and future success;

•
labor problems could adversely affect us;

•
if the assets in our defined benefit pension plans are not sufficient to meet the plans’ obligations, we could be required to make substantial cash contributions and our liquidity could be adversely affected;

•
adverse results of legal proceedings could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations;

•
in the event we are or become treated as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our U.S. shareholders could be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences;

•
we are controlled by a shareholder group, which might have interests that conflict with ours or the interests of our other shareholders;

46
Table of Contents



•
due to our Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, our ordinary shares may have no value and any investment in our shares is highly speculative;

•
the market for our ordinary shares historically has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations;

•
we have not paid dividends on our ordinary shares historically and may not pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares or preferred shares for the foreseeable future;

•
pursuant to the terms of the preferred shares, which rank senior to our ordinary shares, we are required to pay regular cash dividends or issue shares in respect of amounts accrued as dividends on the preferred shares, and we may be required under certain circumstances to repurchase the preferred shares; we are currently unable to pay for such obligations while we are in Chapter 11 proceedings and are likely not to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future;

•
our preferred shares have rights, preferences and privileges that are not held by, and are preferential to the rights of, holders of our ordinary shares. Such preferential rights could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and may result in the interests of the holders of our preferred shares differing from those of the holders of our ordinary shares;

•
we are a holding company and, accordingly, are dependent upon distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations and pay dividends;

•
the requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract our management;

•
provisions of our articles of association and Cayman Islands corporate law may discourage or prevent an acquisition of us which could adversely affect the value of our ordinary shares;

•
our organizational documents contain a variety of anti-takeover provisions that could delay, deter or prevent a change in control;

•
shareholder rights under Cayman Islands law may differ materially from shareholder rights in the United States, which could adversely affect the ability of us and our shareholders to protect our and their interests;

•
as a shareholder, you might have difficulty obtaining or enforcing a judgment against us because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands; and

•
our Major Investors CD&R and First Reserve, may compete with us, and our articles of association contain a provision that expressly permits our non-employee directors to compete with us.

We caution you that the above list of cautionary statements is not exhaustive and should be considered with the risks identified in “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the “Item 1A. Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated. We disclaim any intentions or obligations to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “Company,” “CHC,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to CHC Group Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Our fiscal year ends on April 30, and we refer to fiscal years based on the end of such period (the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 is referred to as “fiscal 2016”). Certain operational terms used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are defined under the heading “Glossary.”
Overview of Business
Our mission is to provide the highest level of service in the industry. Our helicopters are primarily used to facilitate large, long-distance crew changes on offshore production facilities and drilling rigs. We also provide SAR and EMS to government agencies and our oil and gas customers.

47
Table of Contents


We provide MRO services through our Heli-One business to both our own Helicopter Services segment and to third-party customers. Our MRO capabilities enable us to perform heavy structural repairs, and maintain, overhaul and test helicopters and helicopter components globally across various helicopter types. Our MRO services include complete maintenance outsourcing solutions, parts sales and distribution, engineering services, design services and logistics support.

Voluntary Filing under Chapter 11
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions in the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code. This action was the result of our determination that the cost of our capital and leasing structure is no longer sustainable and we are unable to absorb the ongoing and precipitous decline in business demand from the oil and gas industry. Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have operated their business as “debtors-in-possession.” The Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. Any efforts by creditors to enforce such payment obligations as existed before the Petition Date are automatically stayed as a result of the filing of the Petitions, and the holders’ rights of enforcement are subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court has approved certain motions for the payment of certain pre-petition obligations, including those related to certain taxes, employee severance and helicopter part repair orders. Additional information about the Bankruptcy Cases, including which entities are Debtors, is available at www.kccllc.net/chc. Neither the foregoing website nor the information contained on the website nor the documents accessible through such website shall be deemed incorporated into, and neither shall form a part of this Quarterly Report.
The Debtors have filed revised motions, net of withdrawn motions, for the rejection or abandonment of 87 helicopters in our fleet which we no longer need in the operation of our business. This includes 82 leased helicopters and 5 helicopters financed under our ABL Facility. During the six months ended October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court approved 71 lease rejections, and as of December 13, 2016, 74 helicopter lease rejections had been approved and the motion to abandon the 5 aircraft under our ABL Facility was approved on by the Bankruptcy Court by order dated December 5, 2016. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded an expected allowed claim from the lessors on approval of the lease rejections as of October 31, 2016 of $668.2 million. As the estimation process is inherently uncertain, future actions and decisions by the Bankruptcy Court may differ significantly from our own estimate, potentially having material future effects on our financial statements. Furthermore, these liabilities are reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. There may be significant variation between the settled amount and the expected amount of the allowed claim. The lessors’ rights of enforcement for those claims will be subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The approved helicopter lease rejections have reduced our minimum lease rentals by approximately $640.0 million.
The Petitions filed by the Debtors seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code constituted an event of default that accelerated our obligations under the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility. As of the Petition Date, certain of the Debtors’ pre-petition liabilities, including the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility, were classified as liabilities subject to compromise. During the three months ended October 31, 2016, we reclassified the revolving credit facility as a liability subject to compromise based on our Plan. Following the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have expensed $30.9 million related to the deferred financing costs and unamortized net discount on these obligations during the six months ended October 31, 2016. We ceased recognition of interest expense on the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility, from the Petition Date. We continued recognition of interest expense on the revolving credit facility in accordance with our Plan. In addition, the commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases constituted an event of default with our Canadian Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreements with certain plan participants, who could demand payment under one or more renewable letters of credit related to the participant’s benefit liabilities. As a result we recognized a settlement loss of approximately $13.0 million during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, comprised of the net reduction in projected benefit obligation and accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Effective on the Petition Date, our ordinary shares ceased trading on the OTCQX International Market and began trading on the OTC Pink Marketplace, under the symbol “HELIQ”. We expect that our existing ordinary shares will be extinguished upon our emergence from Chapter 11, and existing shareholders will likely not receive consideration in respect of their share interests.

48
Table of Contents


Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
On October 11, 2016, the Debtors entered into the PSA with respect to the terms of the Plan representing holders of 67.6% of the senior secured notes and 73.6% of the senior unsecured notes, the UCC, and the Lead Lessor. On November 11, 2016, the Debtors filed the Plan and the Disclosure Statement with the Bankruptcy Court. The Consenting Creditor Parties, other than the UCC, have agreed to vote to accept the Plan, except in certain circumstances, and the UCC has agreed to support the Plan and recommend that unsecured creditors vote to accept it. The PSA and related agreements are subject to customary closing conditions, approval by the Bankruptcy Court, receipt of a Bankruptcy Court approved disclosure statement and solicitation materials, and contain termination rights upon the occurrence of certain events. The Plan is subject to acceptance by the Debtors’ creditors (as and to the extent required under the Bankruptcy Code) and confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court.
The principal provisions of the Plan are as follows:
•
The Company has agreed to solicit participation in a $300.0 million rights offering of the Second Lien Convertible Notes to eligible holders of senior secured and senior unsecured notes, with $280.0 million allocated to eligible holders of senior secured notes and $20.0 million allocated to eligible holders of senior unsecured notes.
•
The Second Lien Convertible Notes will be issued at a 10% original issuance discount and include a $100.0 million premium for the equitization of the secured notes secured claims, resulting in a total of $433.3 million in aggregate principal amount. The Second Lien Convertible Notes will have a 3.5 year maturity and are mandatorily convertible into 85.4% of the New Membership Interests on a fully diluted basis (but subject to dilution by the MIP) upon maturity or certain specified conditions.
•
The Second Lien Convertible Notes will rank second to the collateral securing the Exit Credit Facility to be provided to holders of Revolving Credit Agreement Claims; will not bear or pay interest other than in connection with an event of default; and will have the same rights with respect to dividends and voting as New Membership Interests on an as-converted basis.
Holders of the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes and general unsecured claims will receive the following general treatment under the Plan:
•
In addition to the ability to participate in the Rights Offering allocated to the senior secured notes, all holders of senior secured notes will receive their pro rata share of 79.5% of New Membership Interests to be issued by the Reorganized Company (prior to dilution by Second Lien Convertible Notes and the MIP), which equates to 11.6% of New Membership Interests (fully diluted on account of the Second Lien Convertible Notes, but excluding the MIP).
•
All holders of the senior unsecured notes will receive their pro rata share of 8.9% of New Membership Interests (prior to dilution by the Second Lien Convertible Notes and the MIP), which equates to 1.3% of New Membership Interests (fully diluted on account of the Second Lien Convertible Notes, but excluding the MIP).
•
All other holders of allowed general unsecured claims of the Company will receive their share of (a) 11.6% of New Membership Interests (prior to dilution by the Second Lien Convertible Notes and the MIP), which equates to 1.7% of New Membership Interests (fully diluted on account of the Second Lien Convertible Notes, but excluding the MIP), and (b) $37.5 million in New Unsecured Notes. The New Unsecured Notes will have a seven year maturity and an interest rate of 5.0%, payable in kind until the conversion of the Second Lien Convertible Notes and thereafter payable in cash. The New Unsecured Notes will rank pari passu with the Second Lien Convertible Notes and will be deemed senior indebtedness of the Reorganized Company, but will not have the benefit of any security or be convertible into New Membership Interests.
•
Upon the effective date, the Reorganized Company will adopt the MIP, including a reservation of ten percent (10%) of the New Membership Interests on a fully diluted basis for distribution thereunder.
•
Holders of allowed Revolving Credit Agreement Claims will receive their pro rata share of the Exit Credit Facility or such treatment that would otherwise satisfy Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code. The terms of the Exit Credit Facility are under negotiation.
•
The Plan does not provide for any distribution to holders of the Company’s existing equity securities, including its ordinary shares and preferred shares.
The Plan distinguishes between a Primary General Unsecured Claim and a Secondary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan).  The Plan provides that each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan) against the Debtors will receive, in full and final satisfaction and discharge of such holder’s rights with respect to and under such Allowed General Unsecured Claim, and, in accordance with the Restructuring Transactions as provided in the Disclosure Statement to the Plan: (i) on account of its Allowed Primary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan), its Pro Rata

49
Table of Contents


share of the Primary General Unsecured Claims Distribution (as defined in the Plan), plus (ii) on account of any Allowed Secondary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan), against one or more Secondary Recovery Debtors (as defined in the Plan), if applicable, its Pro Rata share of the Secondary General Unsecured Claims Distribution (as defined in the Plan) allocated to the applicable Secondary Recovery Debtor against which it holds an Allowed Secondary General Unsecured Claim (as defined in the Plan).  For the avoidance of doubt, if a holder of Allowed General Unsecured Claims holds an Allowed Secondary General Unsecured Claim against any Debtor that is not a Secondary Recovery Debtor, such holder will not receive any additional recoveries on account of such claim.
In connection with the Plan, the Company has entered into a backstop agreement pursuant to which certain of the Consenting Creditor Parties have agreed to backstop the Rights Offering. Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment, certain of the Consenting Creditor Parties, severally and not jointly, have agreed to fully participate in the Rights Offering and purchase the Second Lien Convertible Notes in accordance with the percentages set forth in the Backstop Agreement to the extent unsubscribed under the Rights Offering in exchange for the Put Option Premium. Upon certain triggering events, the Put Option Premium will become fully due and payable in two equal installments of approximately $10.665 million.
In addition, as part of the Plan, the Company has entered into an agreement with the Lead Lessor, pursuant to which, among other things, the Lead Lessor has agreed to restructure its existing aircraft fleet leasing arrangements with the Company and to provide a new $150.0 million asset-based debt facility. The key terms of this agreement include the restricting of lease rental for the helicopters that will remain in the Debtors’ fleet, the consensual return of certain helicopters, extension options for certain of the retained helicopters, leases for additional helicopters and the payment of certain fees and expenses.         
Segments
We report under two operating segments as well as a Corporate segment that provides general and administration functions. Our two operating segments are as follows:
Helicopter Services:
•
Our Helicopter Services segment consists of flying operations, primarily serving our offshore oil and gas customers and providing SAR and EMS to government agencies and to our oil and gas customers. The majority of our customers are major national and independent oil and gas companies. The majority of our revenue from oil and gas customers is from contracts tied to our customers’ offshore production operations, with a substantial portion related to transporting personnel to and from offshore drilling rigs.
•
Our operations are global. Approximately half of our Helicopter Services segment’s revenue is derived from the North Sea, from our main bases Aberdeen, Scotland and Stavanger, Norway.
Heli-One:
•
Our Heli-One segment includes a global network of helicopter maintenance, repair and overhaul facilities, and maintenance and engineering professionals, providing services for our fleet and for our external customer base primarily in Europe, Asia and North America. Although intersegment revenues are eliminated from the presentation of our consolidated financial information, operationally, Heli-One’s largest customer is our Helicopter Services segment.
•
Heli-One also provides single-source PBH support for aircraft models from multiple manufacturers, where the customer pays a ratable monthly charge, typically based on the number of hours flown, for all scheduled and un-scheduled maintenance.
Key Drivers Affecting our Results of Operations
    
Our results of operations and financial condition are affected by numerous factors, including those described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” section to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, and those described below:
•
General level of offshore production and drilling activity. Demand for our services depends primarily upon ongoing offshore hydrocarbon production and the capital spending of oil and gas companies and the level of offshore drilling activity. Higher activity levels can lead to greater utilization of our helicopters by our customers.

50
Table of Contents


•
Impact of fleet mix. Generally, contracts for our helicopter services requiring heavier and newer helicopters can provide an opportunity to generate greater profit than lighter and older helicopters. Consequently, we believe our revenue and profit opportunities can improve as we upgrade our fleet and enter into new contracts.
•
Timing of new contracts and our commencement of service under new contracts. Our results of operations in a particular period can be impacted by the timing of the execution of new contracts and our ability to provide services under new contracts.
Outlook
Since mid-2014, there has been a severe and prolonged decline in Brent crude oil prices due to a combination of sustained high supply from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and from North America, and more recently due to additional supply from Iran as a result of the lifting of sanctions, coupled with weaker demand due to economic uncertainty in China, Europe, and the United Kingdom. As the weakness in the price of oil has continued since mid-2014, the length and depth of the decline in oil and gas prices has put severe pressure on the industry. Our oil and gas customers continue to implement substantial reductions in their exploration projects and are actively reducing their capital and operating expenditure plans. As our customers are actively managing their costs, we have seen increased pricing pressure on us and the impact of changes in activity levels.
This continued downward pressure to reduce prices and the volatility in the oil and gas sector generally, and the potential impact of such volatility on offshore exploration and production, has had a significant negative impact on the demand for offshore helicopter transportation services. We have seen continued reductions in activity across all of our regions during the six months ended October 31, 2016, for both oil and gas production and exploration customers. We have terminated the arrangement with our partner in Nigeria. We have completed the disposal of our investment in Thai Aviation Services. However, we have been able to extend and win new contract work in Australia and in Norway during the current year period and we continue to look for new opportunities and work with our existing customers to provide solutions. We believe that helicopter service is the most efficient and often the only viable or permitted form of transportation in many jurisdictions. Though we believe that in the longer term oil platforms are increasingly moving further offshore, and new, larger and more complex platform designs will mean that long-term demand for new technology medium and heavy helicopters will increase, the continued significant economic uncertainty means that this longer-term demand for new technology medium and heavy helicopters has been significantly outweighed by continued cost reductions across the industry due to uncertainty over future Brent crude prices. The significant reduction in customer demand had resulted in an increasing number of our helicopters in our fleet becoming unproductive. However, during the six months ended October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court approved 71 helicopter lease rejections relating to unproductive aircraft in our fleet.
On April 29, 2016, one of our Airbus H225 helicopters was involved in an accident near the Flesland Airport in Bergen, Norway. Pending the outcome of the investigation, we have suspended, together with other operators, flying operations of the H225 and AS332 L2 helicopter types. The H225 helicopter is one of two types of heavy, new technology helicopters in our fleet. We have substituted Sikorsky S92A and other aircraft types where appropriate to continue to serve our customers’ needs. The Bankruptcy Court has approved the rejection of all of our leased H225 helicopters which has substantially reduced the number of H225 helicopters in our fleet. It is too early to determine the extent of the impact of the accident on our results of operations or financial condition based on information currently available. We are complying fully with all regulatory requirements. See “—Aviation Safety and Regulatory Developments” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 for further information.
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the EU. As a result of the referendum, it is expected that the United Kingdom will negotiate the terms of their future relationship with the EU. We face uncertainties regarding how the United Kingdom’s access to the EU Single Market and the wider trading, legal, regulatory and labor environments, especially in the United Kingdom and EU, will be impacted by the United Kingdom’s vote to exit the EU, including the resulting impact on our business and that of our customers. We are uncertain about the future regulatory implications of the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU. There could be increased regulatory complexities that may affect our business and how customers flying in the North Sea region may be impacted. Finally, the United Kingdom’s exit may also affect currency exchange rates and adversely impact our revenues leading to additional economic uncertainty. The foreign exchange loss in the prior year period increased by $29.5 million to a $49.1 million foreign exchange loss in the six months ended October 31, 2016, due in part to the significant decline in the British Pound Sterling since June 2016.
We conduct our business in various foreign jurisdictions, and as such, our cash flows, revenues and earnings are subject to fluctuations and related risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our reported results have been negatively impacted as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against most major currencies compared to the prior year,

51
Table of Contents


primarily because approximately half of our Helicopter Services’ revenue is derived from the North Sea region and is transacted primarily in the local currencies of that region. Throughout the six months ended October 31, 2016, our primary foreign currency exposures were related to the Norwegian Kroner, the Euro, the British Pound Sterling, the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar.
Aviation Safety and Regulatory Developments
On April 29, 2016, one of our Airbus H225 helicopters was involved in an accident near the Flesland Airport in Bergen, Norway. Authorities subsequently confirmed fatalities of the 11 passengers and two crew members on board. As with any similar event, this accident could result in legal and regulatory proceedings, liability and/or additional litigation and/or sanctions, which could materially adversely impact our revenue, profitability and/or operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Operating helicopters involves a degree of inherent risk and we are exposed to the risk of losses from safety incidents” for further information.
Following the incident, we immediately suspended all H225 helicopter flights, with the exception of those aircraft dedicated to life-saving SAR missions, in line with regulatory authorities in Norway and the United Kingdom, and out of respect for our work force and those of our customers, and to evaluate any implications associated with the accident.
Within a week of the accident, the Accident Investigation Branch Norway (“AIBN”) stated that based on the information available, the H225 helicopter suffered in-flight separation of the main rotor hub from the main gearbox. As a precautionary measure, and while investigations are ongoing, Airbus Helicopters issued Emergency Airworthiness Service Bulletin (“EASB”) 553-A-058 and Revision 1 to EASB 553-A-058, and the European Aviation Safety Agency (“EASA”) issued Emergency Airworthiness Directive (“EAD”) 2016-0089, for additional inspection regimes.
On June 1, 2016, the Norwegian Civil Aviation Authority (“CAA”) issued another Safety and Operational Directive, which confirmed that as a result of the updated preliminary report from the AIBN (published on June 1, 2016) and contact with the United Kingdom CAA, it was decided that the scope of their Airbus Helicopters H225 and AS332 L2 Safety Directives would be extended to all operations, including SAR operations. The United Kingdom CAA issued a similar Directive on June 2, 2016. Pending further investigation to determine the root cause of the accident, and development of mitigating measures by Airbus Helicopters, EASA decided, as an additional precautionary measure, to temporarily ground the fleet, but permit single ferry flights without passengers to recover aircraft to suitable maintenance locations if required. This was communicated via an EAD.
On June 28, 2016, the AIBN released another preliminary report regarding the likely cause of the accident, which is available at http://www.aibn.no/Aviation/Investigations/16-286. Neither the foregoing website nor the information contained on the website nor the report accessible through such website shall be deemed incorporated into, and neither shall be a part of, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Subsequently, EASA released a further EAD (number 2016-0199) on October 7, 2016 which lifted the temporary grounding with effect from October 13, 2016. Whilst the latest EAD permits a return to commercial operations, there remain technical issues on which CHC requires further detail to inform our Safety Case for any Return to Service. Both the Norwegian and United Kingdom CAAs have confirmed that their Operational Directives, prohibiting the commercial use of H225 and AS332 L2 aircraft in those two countries, remain in force. It is too early to determine the extent of the impact of the accident on our results of operations or financial condition based on information currently available. We are complying fully with all regulatory requirements.
On August 23, 2013, one of our Airbus Helicopters AS332 L2 helicopters was involved in an accident near Sumburgh in the Shetland Isles, United Kingdom. Authorities subsequently confirmed four fatalities and multiple injuries among the 16 passengers and two crew members on board. The cause of the accident was subject to full investigation by the United Kingdom Air Accident Investigation Branch (“AAIB”) and ongoing investigation by Police Scotland. As with any similar event, this accident could result in legal and regulatory proceedings, liability and/or additional litigation and/or sanctions, which could materially adversely impact our revenue, profitability and/or operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Operating helicopters involves a degree of inherent risk and we are exposed to the risk of losses from safety incidents” for further information.
On March 15, 2016, the United Kingdom AAIB issued its final report on this accident. A full copy of the final report is available at https://www.gov.uk/aaib-reports/aircraft-accident-report-aar-1-2016-g-wnsb-23-august-2013. Neither the foregoing website nor the information contained on the website nor the report accessible through such website shall be deemed incorporated into, and neither shall be a part of, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the final report, the United

52
Table of Contents


Kingdom AAIB did not identify technical fault as causal factors in the accident. It is too early to determine the extent of the impact of the accident on our results of operations or financial condition based on information currently available.
Fleet
We have continued efforts to right-size our fleet to match customer demand. Due to the downturn in the oil and gas industry, a significant portion of our fleet had become unproductive. As of October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 71 helicopter lease rejections. We are in the process of rejecting or abandoning a significant portion of our leased helicopter fleet which we no longer need in the operation of our business, including helicopters financed under our ABL Facility. We will continue to adjust our fleet size and mix to meet customer demand and requirements.
As of October 31, 2016, our fleet was comprised of the following helicopters, excluding the 71 helicopters which the Bankruptcy Court had approved the helicopter lease rejections:
Helicopter Type
Total
 
Cruise
Speed
(kts)
 
Approximate
Range
(nmi)
 
Passenger Capacity
 
Maximum
Weight
(lbs)
Helicopter Type
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Heavy:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sikorsky S92A
45
 
145
 
400
 
19
 
26,500
Airbus Helicopters H225
6
 
145
 
400
 
19
 
24,250
Airbus Helicopters (AS332 L, L1, and L2)
16
 
130-140
 
250-350
 
17-19
 
18,000-20,500
Total Heavy
67
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medium:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AgustaWestland AW139
35
 
145
 
280
 
12-15
 
15,000
Sikorsky S76C++
14
 
145
 
220
 
12
 
11,700
Sikorsky S76C+
18
 
145
 
175
 
12
 
11,700
Sikorsky S76A++
6
 
135
 
130
 
12
 
10,800
Bell 412
7
 
125
 
135
 
13
 
11,900
Airbus Helicopters AS365 Series/H155
4
 
120-145
 
80-120
 
11-13
 
9,500-10,800
Airbus Helicopters H135/H145
3
 
N/A(i)
 
N/A(i)
 
N/A(i)
 
N/A(i)
Total Medium
87
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Helicopters
154
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(i)
EMS only.
On April 29, 2016, one of our Airbus H225 helicopters was involved in an accident near the Flesland Airport in Bergen, Norway. Pending the outcome of the investigation, we have suspended, together with other operators, flying operations of the H225 and AS332 L2 helicopter types.
As at October 31, 2016, we have a total commitment of $236.8 million for the purchase of new helicopters, for which we have contractual commitments to pay in fiscal 2017 ($170.6 million) and 2018 ($66.2 million). We also have additional flexible orders of $247.5 million which allow us to monitor the market recovery before confirming dates and the type of aircraft for deliveries. Our additional flexible orders can also be cancelled with no further payment, subject to periodic forfeitures of deposits paid to date, up to a maximum of $28.9 million in forfeitures. Each of these contracts are subject to ongoing negotiations and/or rejection as part of our reorganization process.

53
Table of Contents


Summary Results of Operations

For the three and six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Operating revenue
$
332,795

 
$
227,222

 
$
679,823

 
$
475,629

Reimbursable revenue
27,958

 
22,314

 
56,867

 
44,343

Total revenue
360,753

 
249,536

 
736,690

 
519,972

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct costs (i)
(224,099
)
 
(193,665
)
 
(473,595
)
 
(387,290
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees
1,338

 
12,131

 
2,771

 
12,392

General and administration costs
(18,097
)
 
(12,756
)
 
(34,453
)
 
(28,184
)
Adjusted EBITDAR (ii)
119,895

 
55,246

 
231,413

 
116,890

Helicopter lease and associated costs (i)
(63,281
)
 
(35,722
)
 
(127,955
)
 
(88,958
)
Depreciation
(35,537
)
 
(42,146
)
 
(75,818
)
 
(77,844
)
Restructuring recovery (expense)
(16,211
)
 
2,416

 
(35,590
)
 
11

Asset impairments
(10,459
)
 
(2,691
)
 
(10,459
)
 
(2,691
)
Loss on disposal of assets
(1,419
)
 
(599
)
 
(2,406
)
 
(1,724
)
Operating loss
(7,012
)
 
(23,496
)
 
(20,815
)
 
(54,316
)
Interest on debt obligations
(27,286
)
 
(6,891
)
 
(54,232
)
 
(15,482
)
Foreign exchange loss
(9,551
)
 
(30,667
)
 
(19,630
)
 
(49,099
)
Other financing income (charges)
5,827

 
(7,110
)
 
15,921

 
390

Reorganization items, net
—

 
(50,526
)
 
—

 
(835,916
)
Loss before income tax
(38,022
)
 
(118,690
)
 
(78,756
)
 
(954,423
)
Income tax expense
(3,942
)
 
(11,166
)
 
(9,850
)
 
(11,225
)
Net loss
$
(41,964
)
 
$
(129,856
)
 
$
(88,606
)
 
$
(965,648
)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controlling interest
$
(44,116
)
 
$
(127,613
)
 
$
(97,478
)
 
$
(962,962
)
Non-controlling interests
2,152

 
(2,243
)
 
8,872

 
(2,686
)
Net loss
$
(41,964
)
 
$
(129,856
)
 
$
(88,606
)
 
$
(965,648
)
(i)
Direct costs in the information above excludes helicopter lease and associated costs. These costs are combined in the consolidated statements of operations, which are included in the interim financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(ii)
Adjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP measure. Additional information about our Adjusted EBITDAR, including a reconciliation of this measure to our consolidated financial statements is also provided in note 19 of our interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


54
Table of Contents


Consolidated Results Summary
For the three and six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Helicopter Services (i)
$
324,879


$
228,345

 
$
665,379

 
$
470,277

Heli-One
35,874


21,191

 
71,311

 
49,695

Total revenue
360,753


249,536

 
736,690

 
519,972

Direct costs (ii)
(224,099
)
 
(193,665
)
 
(473,595
)
 
(387,290
)
Helicopter lease and associated costs
(63,281
)
 
(35,722
)
 
(127,955
)
 
(88,958
)
Total direct costs
$
(287,380
)
 
$
(229,387
)
 
$
(601,550
)
 
$
(476,248
)
(i)
Includes revenue from the customer reimbursement of fuel costs of $13.5 million and $29.2 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and $10.8 million and $21.0 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016.
(ii)
Includes $13.3 million and $29.2 million in fuel costs for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and $10.8 million and $20.8 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016.

Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue
Consolidated revenue for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $111.2 million or 30.8% and $216.7 million or 29.4%, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. Revenue decreased in both our Helicopter Services and Heli-One segments. The changes in external revenue in our two segments are explained below.

Helicopter Services
The total external revenue for Helicopter Services for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $96.5 million or 29.7% and $195.1 million or 29.3%, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The significant reduction in global oil prices since mid-2014 has continued to have a negative impact on our results in the current year quarter and period as our customers reduced activity and capital spending, and in particular, reduced oil and gas exploration related activity. However, we have seen declines in revenues with both production and exploration customers. The key variances were as follows:
•
Contract completions and activity. Revenues decreased by $54.6 million and $101.9 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, due to contract completions, primarily in the North Sea, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Mozambique and Romania, for both production and exploration customers. In addition, there was a $17.1 million and $41.1 million decrease in revenue due to contract completions and reduced customer activity in Brazil and a net $7.0 million and $12.2 million decrease in revenue resulting from other activity changes, primarily in Norway and in Australia;
•
Contract modification. Revenues decreased by $16.1 million and $34.2 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. This was as a result of contract modifications with continuing oil and gas customers due to reductions in price and number of helicopters on contract, as our customers continue to implement cost reduction initiatives;
•
Foreign exchange. There was a $5.0 million and $12.0 million decrease for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, related to the impact of foreign currency translation on our reported results, primarily in the North Sea due to the significant decline in the British Pound Sterling since June 2016. In addition, the U.S. dollar strengthened against most currency groups in the current year period compared to the prior year period, which resulted in a decrease in reported U.S. dollar revenue amounts, where revenue was transacted primarily in the local currencies of our operations; and

55
Table of Contents


•
Reimbursable revenue. There was a $4.5 million and $10.2 million decrease in reimbursable revenue primarily due to lower flying activity for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. Reimbursable revenue includes customer reimbursement of fuel costs; offset by
•
New contracts. There was a $7.8 million and $16.5 million increase in revenue for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, respectively, compared to the prior year quarter and period, primarily from new contract wins for oil and gas customers in the North Sea and Australia.
On April 29, 2016, one of our Airbus H225 helicopters was involved in an accident near the Flesland Airport in Bergen, Norway. Pending the outcome of the investigation, we have suspended, together with other operators, flying operations of the H225 helicopter. The Bankruptcy Court has approved rejection of all of our leased H225 fleet. We have substituted Sikorsky S92A and other aircraft types where appropriate to continue to serve our customers’ needs in an effort to minimize the impact of the H225 suspension on our revenues.
Heli-One
Heli-One’s external revenue for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $14.7 million, or 40.9%, and $21.6 million, or 30.3%, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. Revenue decreased by $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, due to the impact of foreign exchange, primarily as a consequence of the strengthening U.S. dollar. PBH revenue for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $8.6 million and $10.8 million compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, primarily due to lower levels of flight hours and exchanges. MRO revenue for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $5.9 million and $10.3 million compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively due to the timing of maintenance events and decreased repair work.
Direct Costs
For the three and six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Crew costs
$
(76,855
)
 
$
(63,976
)
 
$
(165,007
)
 
$
(134,432
)
Base operations and other costs
(56,058
)
 
(46,018
)
 
(118,727
)
 
(92,422
)
Maintenance costs
(59,855
)
 
(56,561
)
 
(125,887
)
 
(106,352
)
Support costs
(31,331
)
 
(27,110
)
 
(63,974
)
 
(54,084
)
Total direct costs
$
(224,099
)
 
$
(193,665
)
 
$
(473,595
)
 
$
(387,290
)

Direct costs, which exclude helicopter lease and associated costs, for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $30.4 million and $86.3 million compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The decrease in direct costs was a result of both foreign exchange translation, due to the appreciation of the U.S. dollar, and our active management of costs due to changes in customer activity. The primary factors which impacted direct costs were as follows:
•
Crew costs, which include salaries, benefits, training and recruitment costs, decreased by $12.9 million and $30.6 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The decrease in crew costs was partially due to the impact of the strengthening U.S. dollar, which decreased crew costs by $0.8 million and $3.6 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The remaining decrease was as a result of lower crew requirements due to reduced activity, contract completions and cost saving initiatives, primarily in the North Sea, Brazil, Australia, Canada and several African countries. Crew costs were incurred only by our Helicopter Services segment.
•
Base operations and other costs, which include our base operations, reimbursable costs, insurance costs and other external expenses, decreased by $10.0 million and $26.3 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. This included an approximate $0.2 million and $1.6 million decrease related to the impact of the strengthening U.S. dollar for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. There was a decrease of $4.1 million and $9.4 million in rechargeable costs to customers, primarily due to lower flying hours, compared to the prior year quarter and

56
Table of Contents


period. Contract completions and reductions in activity, primarily in Africa, Brazil, Australia and the North Sea, in addition to the wind down of our operations in Nigeria, reduced costs by $5.7 million and $15.3 million compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. Base operations and other costs were incurred only by our Helicopter Services segment.
•
Maintenance costs decreased by $3.3 million and $19.5 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively due to a combination of reduced activity, suspension of H225 helicopters, and the timing of maintenance events. Maintenance costs include those related to repairs for owned and leased major components, spares and rotable and repairable parts, which are recognized when the costs are incurred. Our costs therefore can vary with the timing of the maintenance activity. A portion of our maintenance costs are externally subcontracted on a PBH basis and vary with flight hours, which were primarily incurred for our H225 aircraft in the prior year quarter and period.
•
Support costs decreased by $4.2 million and $9.9 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, due to a combination of foreign exchange translation, reduced headcount and lower levels of base support, driven by our cost saving initiatives and lower activity levels. The majority of support costs were incurred by our Helicopter Services segment, with $3.8 million and $7.2 million related to our Heli-One segment.
Helicopter Lease and Associated Costs
Helicopter lease and associated costs decreased by $27.6 million and $39.0 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the Bankruptcy Court approving the rejection of 71 helicopter leases during the current year period. We recorded lease expense on the rejected leases until the effective date of the lease rejection, the majority of which were June 30, 2016. See “Overview of Business - Voluntary Filing under Chapter 11” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information. In addition, helicopter lease costs decreased due to the reclassification of certain operating leases to capital leases, due to the modification of the lease agreements, during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016.
Earnings from Equity Accounted Investees
Earnings from equity accounted investees increased by $10.8 million and $9.6 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. This was primarily due to the gain on sale of our 29.9% interest in the ordinary shares of TAS of $11.8 million, which completed in October 2016. See note 3(b)(i) of our interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.
General and Administration Costs
General and administration costs decreased by $5.3 million and $6.3 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, primarily due to a decrease in salaries, professional, legal and consulting costs.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased by $6.6 million and $2.0 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The increase in depreciation expense was primarily due to helicopter acquisitions during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, accelerated depreciation on certain aircraft we plan to abandon, additional capital leases due to the modification of certain existing operating lease agreements during fiscal 2016, and an increase in the depreciation rates of our rotable and repairable assets. This was partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense primarily as a result of accelerated depreciation on certain aircraft in connection with our restructuring program in the first quarter of the prior year period and rejected capital leased helicopters during the current year period.
Restructuring Recovery (Expense)
We are undergoing a comprehensive review of our operations, organizational structure and fleet with the view of reducing operating costs. During the three and six months ended October 31, 2015, we incurred restructuring expenses of $16.2 million and $35.6 million related to lease and other contractual costs on leased helicopters which we had ceased to use in our operations, employee severance costs and other associated costs. During the three months ended October 31, 2016, we had

57
Table of Contents


restructuring recovery of $2.4 million and an insignificant recovery in the six months ended October 31, 2016. The recoveries in the current year period primarily relate to adjustments to the provision for leased helicopters. All restructuring amounts related to leased aircraft have either been charged to reorganization items, net, as these have been approved for rejection by the Bankruptcy Court or adjusted to restructuring expense, as we have re-evaluated our assessment that we have permanently ceased use of these leased helicopters due to changes in our fleet plans. See note 4 of our interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.
Asset Impairments
During the three and six months ended October 31, 2015, we recorded an impairment charge of $10.5 million to increase our provision for obsolete and excess inventories on certain consumable inventories. This impairment charge resulted from the identification of consumable inventories that were in excess of our requirements. This was driven primarily by the significant and longer than initially expected decline in the price of oil and gas, which impacts our view of future utilization of these parts and resulting changes to our fleet and inventory management strategies. Excess consumable inventories have been measured at estimated market value, based on our experience with sales of surplus consumable inventories and our assessment of resale market conditions. During the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.7 million to write-down the carrying value of one H155 helicopter to its fair value.
Interest on Debt Obligations
Interest on debt obligations decreased by $20.4 million and $38.8 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. We ceased recognition of interest expense on the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility effective from the Petition Date. This was partially offset by an increase in interest costs on our revolving credit facility, due to the higher balance on this obligation compared to the prior year period.
Foreign Exchange Loss
The foreign exchange loss for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 increased by $21.1 million and $29.5 million compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, primarily due to the significant decline in the British Pound Sterling since June 2016. This caused a loss in U.S. functional currency entities with British Pound Sterling denominated net monetary asset positions. In both the prior year period and the current year period, there was a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against most major currencies, which caused a loss in both U.S. functional currency entities with foreign denominated net monetary asset positions and in Norwegian and Australian functional currency entities with net liability positions denominated in U.S. dollars.
Other Financing Income (Charges)
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Amortization of deferred financing costs
$
(1,866
)
 
$
(535
)
 
$
(3,727
)
 
$
(2,667
)
Net gain on debt extinguishment
3,112

 
—

 
17,799

 
—

Net gain (loss) on fair value of foreign currency forward contracts
447

 
—

 
(15,079
)
 
—

Net gain (loss) on fair value of foreign currency embedded derivatives
4,543

 
(6,667
)
 
18,252

 
2,119

Amortization of guaranteed residual values
(815
)
 
(41
)
 
(963
)
 
(348
)
Interest expense
(4,008
)
 
(416
)
 
(8,390
)
 
(508
)
Interest income
5,929

 
693

 
11,719

 
2,594

Other
(1,515
)
 
(144
)
 
(3,690
)
 
(800
)
Total other financing income (charges)
$
5,827

 
$
(7,110
)
 
$
15,921

 
$
390

Other financing income (charges) decreased by $12.9 million and $15.5 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, primarily due to a $3.1 million and $17.8 million gain on debt extinguishment transactions for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015, due to the repurchase of $40.6 million of our senior unsecured notes on the open market at prices ranging from 50.50% to 55.25% of the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest of $0.5 million. In addition, the net gain on fair value of foreign currency embedded derivatives

58
Table of Contents


decreased by $11.2 million and $16.1 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period, due to foreign currency movements compared to the prior year period. This was partially offset by a $15.1 million net loss on fair value of foreign currency forward contracts in the prior year period. All of our foreign currency forward contract arrangements were terminated due to the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions. The balance of the change was due to banking fees, amortization expense on residual value guarantees and deferred financing costs, and other charges.
Reorganization Items, Net
We have used the classification “Reorganization items, net” to reflect expenses and gains and losses that are the direct result of the reorganization of our business. Reorganization items, net, is comprised as follows:
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Adjustments to debt obligations
$
—

 
$
(3,891
)
 
$
—

 
$
(30,942
)
Adjustments to allowed claims for rejected leases
—

 
(23,292
)
 
—

 
(739,974
)
Adjustments to other allowed claims
—

 
—

 
—

 
(16,986
)
Professional fees
—

 
(23,343
)
 
—

 
(48,014
)
Total reorganization items, net
$
—

 
$
(50,526
)
 
$
—

 
$
(835,916
)
During the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, we recognized $50.5 million and $835.9 million of reorganization items, respectively. During the three months ended October 31, 2016, we have expensed $3.9 million primarily related to the deferred financing costs on our revolving credit facility. For the six months ended October 31, 2016, we expensed $30.9 million related to the deferred financing costs and unamortized net discount on our senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, revolving credit facility, and ABL Facility.
As of October 31, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court had approved 71 helicopter lease rejections. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded the expected allowed claim from the lessors on approval of the lease rejections and adjustments to lease related assets and liabilities which total $740.0 million. Our estimate of the expected amount of the allowed claim is a significant estimate. As the estimation process is inherently uncertain, future actions and decisions by the Bankruptcy Court may differ significantly from our own estimate, potentially having material future effects on our financial statements. Furthermore, these liabilities are reported as the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. There may be significant variation between the settled amount and the expected amount of the allowed claim. The lessors’ rights of enforcement for those claims will be subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
Adjustments to other allowed claims include the loss on the settlement of our Canadian Supplemental Retirement Plan with certain plan participants of $13.0 million and $4.0 million adjustment of our terminated foreign currency forward contracts to the expected amount of the allowed claim. In addition, we incurred professional fees related to advisors assisting us with the Chapter 11 proceedings. See note 10 of our interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased by $7.2 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The effective tax rates were (10.4)% and (12.5)% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 compared to (9.4)% and (1.2)% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, respectively. The increase in income tax expense during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period was primarily due to withholding tax on the sale of our 29.9% interest in the ordinary shares of TAS. This was partially offset by a reduction in customer contract activity in Africa, where we are subject to branch and withholding taxes, lower levels of taxes in other foreign jurisdictions and a net reduction in uncertain tax positions compared to the prior year quarter and period.
The effective tax rate is the ratio of income tax expense to loss before income tax. Our effective income tax rate depends on various factors, such as the amount of income (loss) in each tax jurisdiction, tax regulations governing each jurisdiction, non-tax deductible expenses incurred as a percentage of pre-tax income, valuation allowances taken on losses in certain jurisdictions and the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies. As a result, the increase or decrease in loss before

59
Table of Contents


income tax will not have a significant impact on the income tax expense. The income tax expense is primarily comprised of withholding taxes as applicable and current income taxes in certain taxable jurisdictions.
Non-Controlling Interests
Net earnings allocated to non-controlling interests decreased by $4.4 million and $11.6 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016 compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, due to the results of EHOB. This was primarily driven by reduced revenue as a result of contract completions and lower gains on embedded derivatives, partially offset by lower direct and helicopter lease costs. For further details on EHOB, see note 3(a)(i) of our interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Segmented Results of Operations
Helicopter Services

For the three and six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Operating revenue
$
296,921

 
$
206,031

 
$
608,512

 
$
425,934

Reimbursable revenue
27,958

 
22,314

 
56,867

 
44,343

Total revenue
$
324,879

 
$
228,345

 
$
665,379

 
$
470,277

Direct costs
(192,394
)
 
(171,306
)
 
(413,084
)
 
(337,917
)
Earnings from equity accounted investees
1,338

 
12,131

 
2,771

 
12,392

Adjusted EBITDAR
$
133,823

 
$
69,170

 
$
255,066

 
$
144,752

Adjusted EBITDAR margin
45.1
%
 
33.6
%
 
41.9
%
 
34.0
%
Helicopter lease and associated costs
$
(63,281
)
 
$
(35,722
)
 
$
(127,955
)
 
$
(88,958
)

Helicopter Services Adjusted EBITDAR decreased by $64.7 million and $110.3 million and Adjusted EBITDAR margin decreased by 11.5% and 7.9% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The primary factors that impacted Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR margin for Helicopter Services compared to the prior year quarter and period were as follows:
•
The decrease in Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR margin was substantially due to contract completions and contract modifications reflecting changes in customer requirements and reduced flying activity across all regions. This was partially offset by small contract wins in the North Sea and Australia and cost savings through lower activity, reductions in headcount, lower maintenance costs and other cost saving initiatives; and
•
Earnings from equity accounted investees increased Adjusted EBITDAR by $10.8 million and $9.6 million and Adjusted EBITDAR margin by 1.9% and 0.7% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively, primarily as a result of the sale of our 29.9% interest in the ordinary shares of TAS in October 2016; and
•
The balance of the decrease in Adjusted EBITDAR and Adjusted EBITDAR margin compared to the prior year quarter and period was primarily related to the impact of foreign exchange translation on our reported results. The U.S. dollar strengthened against most currency groups in the current year period compared to the prior year period, which resulted in a decrease in reported U.S. dollar Adjusted EBITDAR amounts in these regions, where activities were transacted primarily in the local currencies of our operations. The majority of the impact of foreign exchange translation resulted from the North Sea due to the significant decline in the British Pound Sterling since June 2016.

60
Table of Contents


Heli-One
For the three and six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Three months ended October 31,
 
Six months ended October 31,
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
Third-party revenue
$
35,874

 
$
21,191

 
$
71,311

 
$
49,695

Internal revenue
16,903

 
21,619

 
44,269

 
39,055

Total revenue
$
52,777

 
$
42,810

 
$
115,580

 
$
88,750

Direct costs
(46,534
)
 
(43,621
)
 
(101,973
)
 
(88,004
)
Adjusted EBITDAR
$
6,243

 
$
(811
)
 
$
13,607

 
$
746

Adjusted EBITDAR Margin
11.8
%
 
(1.9
)%
 
11.8
%
 
0.8
%

Heli-One’s Adjusted EBITDAR decreased by $7.1 million and $12.9 million and Adjusted EBITDAR margin decreased by 13.7% and 11.0% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively. The primary changes for Heli-One compared to the prior year quarter and period were as follows:
•
An increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts decreased Adjusted EBITDAR by $3.3 million and $4.0 million and Adjusted EBITDAR margin by 6.4% and 3.4% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, compared to the prior year quarter and period respectively; and
•
Lower levels of external third-party PBH and MRO revenue and internal revenue with our Helicopter Services segment due to contract completions, reduction in flying activity and suspension of H225 aircraft, partially offset by cost control efforts and timing of maintenance costs.

Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity
Analysis of Historical Cash Flows
For the six months ended October 31,
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
Six months ended October 31,
 
2015
 
2016
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(26,896
)
 
$
31,198

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
91,988

 
(23,809
)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(119,825
)
 
18,393

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(11,172
)
 
(4,218
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the period
$
(65,905
)
 
$
21,564


Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the six months ended October 31, 2016 was $31.2 million, an increase of $58.1 million compared to the prior year period. Operating cash flows in the current year period benefited from the effects of the Bankruptcy Petitions filed by the Debtors, as we ceased interest payments on our debt obligations and the majority of any pre-petition liabilities of Debtors were not paid. As a result, changes in working capital contributed $70.3 million to operating cash flows in the current year period compared to only $11.1 million in the prior year period. In the current year period, we substantially reduced payments on our helicopter operating leases due to approved lease rejections; however, the cash benefit was offset by increased cash outflows to professionals assisting with our bankruptcy process.
No assurance can be given that our efforts to reduce operational cash requirements will be effective. The business may not generate sufficient net cash from operating activities and we may not be able to maintain sufficient liquidity throughout the

61
Table of Contents


Chapter 11 proceedings.  See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016.

Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities is driven by changes to debt obligations, including the impact of deferred financing costs, and accounts receivable securitization.
In the six months ended October 31, 2016, cash used in financing activities was $23.8 million, $21.6 million of which was due to the discontinuation of the accounts receivable securitization arrangement and $2.2 million due to payments on certain capital lease obligations.
In the six months ended October 31, 2015, the $92.0 million provided by financing activities was due to $8.3 million sold interest in accounts receivable under our securitization arrangement and $110.7 million net proceeds on the revolving credit facility and capital lease and other repayments, partially offset by $22.1 million on the repurchase by one of our subsidiaries of $40.6 million of the senior unsecured notes on the open market at prices ranging from 50.50% to 55.25% of the principal during July and August 2015, and $4.9 million of deferred financing costs incurred related to the ABL Facility.
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities is primarily attributable to property and equipment additions and disposals, helicopter deposits net of lease inception refunds, restricted cash, and proceeds from the sale of investments.
In the six months ended October 31, 2016, our focus was to actively reduce our fleet to align with the reduction in customer demand. Therefore, we had a substantial decline in the level of capital investment in aircraft in the current year period. The $18.4 million provided by investing activities was primarily due to $35.5 million received from the sale of our 29.9% interest in the ordinary shares of TAS in October 2016. In addition, we received $1.8 million in proceeds from property and equipment disposals and there was an $8.5 million decrease in restricted cash, primarily due to the discontinuation of our accounts receivable securitization arrangement. This was partially offset by $27.5 million of property and equipment additions, primarily related to rotable and repairable parts.
In the six months ended October 31, 2015, the $119.8 million used in investing activities was due to $107.0 million property and equipment additions, $32.6 million helicopter deposits net of lease inception refunds and an $8.7 million increase in restricted cash, primarily related to the timing of cash flows on our accounts receivable securitization arrangement, partially offset by $28.5 million proceeds from property and equipment disposals, the majority of which related to proceeds on helicopter sale and leaseback transactions.

Liquidity and Sources of Liquidity
Liquidity
As of April 30, 2016 and October 31, 2016, our liquidity totaled $266.1 million and $287.7 million, respectively. Our liquidity as of April 30, 2016 and October 31, 2016 was comprised only of cash and cash equivalents. Due to the commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases we had no further borrowing capacity as at October 31, 2016.
Pending the outcome of the Bankruptcy Cases and upon emergence from bankruptcy, we expect that our primary sources of liquidity will continue to be cash on hand and cash flows from operations. In addition to the cash requirements to fund ongoing operations, we have incurred and continue to incur significant professional fees and other costs in connection with preparation and handling of the Bankruptcy Cases. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant professional fees and costs for the duration of the Bankruptcy Cases.
Pre-Petition Sources of Liquidity
On May 5, 2016, the Debtors filed Petitions seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code, which constituted an event of default that accelerated our obligations under the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations and based on our Plan, the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility, the ABL Facility and all of our capital lease obligations were reclassified as liabilities subject to compromise. We have ceased recognition of interest expense on the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured

62
Table of Contents


notes, and the ABL Facility from the Petition Date. The aggregate contractual interest due under the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility was $27.3 million and $54.8 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2016, respectively. All deferred financing costs on the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility, and the ABL Facility were charged to reorganization items, net, during the six months ended October 31, 2016. See note 9, note 10 and note 11 of our interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and note 14 of our audited annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

Future Cash Requirements
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 includes disclosures of our contractual obligations and commitments and off-balance sheet arrangements as of April 30, 2016. There have been no material changes during the six months ended October 31, 2016 from the information disclosed in “Item 7. Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2016, except as noted below.
Operating Lease Commitments
We have helicopter operating leases in respect of 86 helicopters included in our fleet as of October 31, 2016. As at October 31, 2016, these leases had expiry dates ranging from fiscal 2017 to 2025. For those helicopters where we have an unexercised option to purchase them for agreed amounts, the purchase options do not constitute bargain purchase options and we do not have a commitment to exercise the options.
In addition to helicopter operating leases, we had operating lease commitments as of October 31, 2016 for buildings, land and other equipment with minimum lease payments of $65.3 million and expiry dates ranging from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2079.
As a result of the May 5, 2016 filing of the Petitions by the Debtors in the Bankruptcy Court, all of our helicopter lease financing agreements were in default subsequent to April 30, 2016.
The lease obligations as at October 31, 2016 reflect changes to our commitments related to 71 helicopter lease rejections approved by the Bankruptcy Court during the six months ended October 31, 2016. The remaining filed motions to reject certain additional helicopter leases with the Bankruptcy Court and any other subsequent motions may substantially alter our remaining minimum lease rentals. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have recorded the expected allowed claim from the lessors on approval of the lease rejection, with the rights of enforcement for those claims subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The approved helicopter lease rejections have reduced our minimum lease rentals by approximately $640.0 million. This reduction in minimal lease rentals does not reflect the reduction in lease obligations as a result of Bankruptcy Court approved interim lease arrangements, with final lease terms subject to agreement with the respective lessors and approval by the Bankruptcy Court.
New Helicopter Commitments
As at October 31, 2016, we have a total commitment of $236.8 million for the purchase of new helicopters, for which we have contractual commitments to pay in fiscal 2017 ($170.6 million) and 2018 ($66.2 million). We also have additional flexible orders of $247.5 million which allow us to monitor the market recovery before confirming dates and the type of aircraft for deliveries. Our additional flexible orders can also be cancelled with no further payment, subject to periodic forfeitures of deposits paid to date, up to a maximum of $28.9 million in forfeitures. Each of these contracts are subject to ongoing negotiations and/or rejection as part of our reorganization process.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company has variable interests in entities that are not consolidated, as we are not the primary beneficiary, which provide operating lease financing to us, and an entity that provides flying services to third-party customers. At October 31, 2016, we had operating leases for 70 helicopters with variable interest entities that were not consolidated. See note 3(b)(ii) of the interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

63
Table of Contents


Guarantees
The Company has provided limited guarantees to third parties under some of its operating leases relating to a portion of the residual helicopter values at the termination of the leases. The leases have terms expiring between fiscal 2017 and 2024. At October 31, 2016, the Company’s exposure under the asset value guarantees including guarantees in the form of funded and unfunded residual value guarantees is approximately $10.8 million.
Contingencies
We have exposure for certain legal matters as disclosed in note 18 to the interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no material changes in our exposure to contingencies.
We have entered into fee arrangements with financial advisors to assist us with our Bankruptcy filing. The arrangements include contingent fee payments up to $14.2 million payable upon completion of Chapter 11 reorganization. At October 31, 2016, no contingent fee amounts were accrued.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016.
In connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings, transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization are required, under the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, to be separately disclosed and distinguished from those of the ongoing operations of the business. We have used the classification “Reorganization items, net” on the consolidated statements of operations to reflect expenses, gains and losses that are the direct result of the reorganization of our business. See note 10 in the interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.
As a result of the Petitions filed by the Debtors seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code on May 5, 2016 and based on our Plan, our pre-petition liabilities, including our obligations under the senior secured notes, senior unsecured notes, revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility, were classified as subject to compromise based on our assessment of these obligations following the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations. Pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise are required to be reported at the amount expected to be allowed, regardless of whether they may be settled for lesser amounts and remain subject to future adjustments based on negotiated settlements with claimants, actions of the Bankruptcy Court, rejection of executory contracts, proofs of claims or other events.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See note 2 in the interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of October 31, 2016. Based upon this evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2016, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended October 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

64
Table of Contents


PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
One or more of our subsidiaries are, from time to time, named as defendants in lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business as discussed and previously reported in “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016. Developments in these previously reported ongoing matters, if any, are described in note 18 to the interim financial statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2015 and 2016 included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
As a smaller reporting company, as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this item. Our business faces many risks. However, for a detailed discussion of the risk factors that should be understood by any investor contemplating investment in our ordinary shares, please refer to the section titled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016. There have been no material changes in the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016 other than those set forth below.

The PSA is subject to termination upon the occurrence of a number of termination events.
 
The PSA may be terminated upon the occurrence of a number of termination events (each, a “Plan Support Agreement Termination Event”) as more specifically set forth in the PSA.  If a Plan Support Agreement Termination Event occurs and the PSA is terminated, all obligations of the parties to the PSA shall terminate (except as specifically provided in the PSA).
 
                Furthermore, upon termination of the PSA, any party to the PSA shall have all the rights and remedies that it would have had and shall be entitled to take all actions that it would have been entitled to take if it not entered into the Plan Support Agreement, and none of its rights or remedies shall be deemed waived pursuant to a claim of laches or estoppel.  Without the commitment provided by the Consenting Creditor Parties to vote in favor of the Plan, the Debtors may not be able to secure sufficient votes in favor of the Plan for confirmation.
 
The Bankruptcy Court may not confirm the Plan.
 
                Although the Company believes that the Plan will satisfy all requirements necessary for confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion.
 
                The Bankruptcy Code requires that a plan of reorganization comply with certain requirements (including, but not limited to, the requirements of section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code) for a plan of reorganization to be confirmed.  The Bankruptcy Court may determine that one or more of those requirements is not satisfied with respect to the Plan.  If the Bankruptcy Court were to make such a determination, the Debtors could be required to restart the solicitation process.  In such a situation, the Debtors could be required to (i) seek approval of a new disclosure statement, (ii) solicit or re-solicit votes from holders of Claims and/or Interests (as defined in the Plan), as applicable, and/or (iii) seek confirmation of the newly-proposed plan of reorganization.
 
                Further, denial of confirmation of the Plan by the Bankruptcy Court could give rise to a right of the Consenting Creditor Parties to terminate the PSA.  If such a termination were to occur, the Debtors’ efforts to reorganize would be delayed and possibly jeopardized.  Additionally, should the Plan fail to be approved, confirmed, or consummated, non-Debtor parties-in-interest may file alternative plans of reorganization pursuant to section 1121 of the Bankruptcy Code, and the Debtors would be responsible for paying the Put Option Premium in cash.
 
If the Effective Date does not occur by March 17, 2017, a Plan Support Agreement Termination Event will occur, which would result in the Debtors’ payment of the Put Option Premium in cash.
 
                Although the Company believes that the Effective Date (as defined in the Plan) will occur soon after the date on which the Bankruptcy Court enters its order confirming the Plan, there can be no assurance as to the timing of the Effective Date.  If the conditions precedent to the Effective Date set forth in the Plan have not occurred or have not been waived as set forth in Article IX of the Plan, then the Bankruptcy Court’s confirmation order may be vacated, in which event no distributions would be made under the Plan, the Debtors and all holders of Claims or Interests would be restored to the status quo as of the

65
Table of Contents


day immediately preceding the date of the confirmation order, and the Debtors’ obligations with respect to Claims and Interests would remain unchanged.  It is a termination event under the PSA if the Effective Date does not occur by March 17, 2017, and such termination would result in the Debtors’ payment of the Put Option Premium in cash.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
The Petitions filed by the Debtors seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code constituted an event of default that accelerated our obligations under the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes, the revolving credit facility and the ABL Facility. As of the Petition Date, certain of the Debtors pre-petition liabilities, including the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility, were classified as liabilities subject to compromise. During the three months ended October 31, 2016, we reclassified the revolving credit facility as a liability subject to compromise based on our Plan. Following the guidance of ASC 852 Reorganizations, we have expensed $3.9 million and $30.9 million related to the deferred financing costs and unamortized net discount on these obligations during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016. We ceased recognition of interest expense on the senior secured notes, the senior unsecured notes and the ABL Facility, from the Petition Date during the three and six months ended October 31, 2016. We continued recognition of interest expense on the revolving credit facility in accordance with the Plan.

                Pursuant to the terms of our preferred shares, which rank senior to our ordinary shares, we are required to pay regular cash dividends or issue shares in respect of amounts accrued as dividends on the preferred shares quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15 of each year. We are currently unable to pay such obligations while we are in Chapter 11 proceedings and are not likely to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future, resulting in the dividend rate increase to 11.5% per annum until such time as all accrued but unpaid dividends have been paid in full. In addition, the holders of our preferred shares have certain redemption rights, including upon certain change in control events involving us, which, if exercised, could require us to repurchase all of the outstanding preferred shares at the original purchase price of the preferred shares plus all accrued but unpaid dividends.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

66
Table of Contents


SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
CHC GROUP LTD.
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Lee Eckert
 
 
 
Name:
 
Lee Eckert
 
 
 
Title:
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer, Duly Authorized Officer)
Date: December 13, 2016


67
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.
Exhibit Description
Form
SEC File No.
Exhibit
Filing Date
Filed
Herewith
10.1
Plan Support Agreement by and among CHC Group Ltd. and the Parties identified therein dated as of October 11, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.1
10/12/2016
 
10.2
Backstop Agreement between CHC Group Ltd. and the Investors identified therein dated October 11, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.2
10/12/2016
 
10.3
Amendment to Plan Support Agreement by and among CHC Group Ltd. and the Parties identified therein dated as of November 3, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.1
11/4/2016
 
10.4
Amendment No.1 to Term Sheet between CHC Group Ltd. and The Milestone Aviation Group Limited dated November 3, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.2
11/4/2016
 
10.5
Amendment to Backstop Agreement by and among CHC Group Ltd. and the Investors identified therein dated November 3, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.3
11/4/2016
 
10.6
Amendment to Plan Support Agreement by and among CHC Group Ltd. and the Parties identified therein dated as of November 23, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.1
11/25/2016
 
10.7
Amendment No.2 to Term Sheet between CHC Group Ltd. and The Milestone Aviation Group Limited dated November 23, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.2
11/25/2016
 
10.8
Amendment to Backstop Agreement by and among CHC Group Ltd. and the Investors identified therein dated November 23, 2016.
8-K
001-36261
10.3
11/25/2016
 
31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
X
31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
 
X
32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 
 
 
 
X
32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 
 
 
 
X
99.1
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of CHC Group Ltd. and its Affiliated Debtors
8-K
001-36261
99.1
11/15/2016
 
99.2
Proposed Disclosure Statement for the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of CHC Group Ltd. and its Affiliated Debtors
8-K
001-36261
99.2
11/15/2016
 
99.3
First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of CHC Group Ltd. and its Affiliated Debtors
8-K
001-36261
99.1
12/7/2016
 
99.4
Revised Proposed Disclosure Statement for the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of CHC Group Ltd. and its Affiliated Debtors
8-K
001-36261
99.2
12/7/2016
 
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
 
X
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
 
X
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
X
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
X
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
X

68
Table of Contents


101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
 
X
* Furnished, not filed.


69