Edgar Filing: TETON PETROLEUM CO

form_def14a-071604

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )

Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (As
Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[X] Definitive Proxy Statement

[ ] Definitive Additional Materials

[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[ ] No fee required

[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: $15.0 million

(5) Total fee paid: $1,900.50

[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or
schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid:

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) Filing Party:

(4) Date Filed:

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JULY 16, 2004

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY:

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders (the
"Annual Meeting") of Teton Petroleum Company to be held at The Pinnacle Club,
located at 555 17th St., Suite 3700, Denver, CO 80202 on July 16, 2004 at 9:30
AM (local time). At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to vote on the
following:

1. To elect five Directors to the Company's Board, to hold office until his
successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or
removal (Proposal No. 1);

2. To consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the Board's selection of
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC as the Company's independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 (Proposal No. 2);

3. To approve the sale of the Company's indirect equity interest in the
Siberian-Texan Joint Stock Company Goloil ("Goloil"), which constitutes
substantially all of the Company's assets within the meaning of Section 271
of the Delaware General Corporation Law, to the Open-Joint Stock Oil and
Gas Company RussNeft ("RussNeft"), the owner of the remaining interests in
Goloil; all as set forth in the Share Sale and Purchase Contract dated
April 20, 2004, between Goltech Petroleum LLC, our wholly owned subsidiary
and 35.30% owner of Goloil, and RussNeft. (Proposal No. 3);

4. To approve the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock (which may be issuable, exercisable or
convertible below the then current market value of the common stock) which
could result in an increase in outstanding shares of common stock of 20% or
more (Proposal No. 4);

5. To approve the 2004 Non-Employee Stock Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 5);
and

6. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

BECAUSE OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE PROPOSALS TO THE COMPANY AND ITS
STOCKHOLDERS, IT IS VITAL THAT EVERY STOCKHOLDER VOTES AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IN
PERSON OR BY PROXY.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement
that is attached and made a part of this Notice.

The Board has fixed the close of business on June 18, 2004 as the Record Date
for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual
Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or
not you plan to attend the meeting, please take the time to vote in one of these
ways:

o By mail - fill in, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it
promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
o By telephone - call the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card
to vote by phone.
o Via Internet - visit the website noted on your proxy card to vote via
the Internet.

You may attend the meeting and vote in person even if you have previously voted
by proxy in one of the three ways listed above. Your proxy is revocable in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Proxy Statement.

The Annual Report to stockholders for the Company's fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 has been mailed with or prior to this Proxy Statement. This Proxy
Statement and the enclosed proxy are expected to be mailed to stockholders on or
about June 23, 2004.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

H. Howard Cooper
Chairman

IMPORTANT

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID
ENVELOPE. IF A QUORUM IS NOT REACHED, THE COMPANY WILL HAVE THE ADDED EXPENSE OF
RE-ISSUING THESE PROXY MATERIALS. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING AND SO DESIRE, YOU
MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON. THANK YOU FOR ACTING PROMPTLY.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
-----------------

GENERAL INFORMATION
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS?
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
BOARD COMMITTEES
INFORMATION ABOUT STOCK OWNERSHIP
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
SALE OF GOLOIL
ISSUANCE OF SECURITIES
APPROVAL OF THE 2004 NON EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

APPENDIX A FINANCIAL SECTION
APPENDIX A-1 Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2004
APPENDIX A-2 Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements
APPENDIX A-3 Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Information
APPENDIX B 2004 NON-EMPLOYEE STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
APPENDIX C AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
APPENDIX D COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER
APPENDIX E CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
APPENDIX F GOVERNANCE & NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: Please SIGN, DATE, and RETURN the enclosed proxy or submit your proxy
by telephone or the Internet immediately whether or not you plan to attend the
Annual Meeting. A return envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the
United States, is enclosed for your convenience.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921

PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the
Board of Directors (the "Board") of Teton Petroleum Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), of proxies in the enclosed form for use in voting
at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held at The
Pinnacle Club, located at 555 17th St., Suite 3700, Denver, CO 80202 on July 16,
2004 at 9:30 AM (local time), and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

This section contains a summary of the material features of the sale of the
Company's indirect equity interest in the Siberian-Texan Closed Joint Stock
Company Goloil. This summary may not contain all of the information that is
important to you to understand the sale fully. This summary includes page
references in parentheses to direct you to more complete descriptions of the
topics presented in this summary.

o On April 20, 2004, Goltech Petroleum LLC ("Goltech"), a company
organized under the laws of Texas, our wholly owned subsidiary and
35.30% owner of Siberian-Texan Closed Joint Stock Company Goloil
("Goloil"), a company organized under the laws of the Russian
Federation, entered into a Share Purchase and Sale Contract with Open
Joint-Stock Oil and Gas Company RussNeft ("RussNeft"), a company
organized under the laws of the Russian Federation, the owner of the
remaining interest in Goloil. Under the terms of the Share Purchase
and Sale Contract, Goltech has agreed to sell our 35.30% indirect
equity interest in Goloil to RussNeft. The Company's interest in
Goloil constitutes substantially all of our assets within the meaning
of Section 271 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Completion of
the Goloil sale is subject to stockholder approval and other closing
conditions. (See p. 29-30) The sale is being made for the reasons set
forth under "Sale of Goloil Proposal No. 3" below.

o The purchase price for our 35.30% interest in Goloil is $8,960,229 in
cash. In connection with the Goloil sale, the Company also entered
into a separate agreement with Goloil for the repayment of all of the
outstanding advances owed to the Company by Goloil (the "loan
repayment agreement"). At the date of the loan repayment agreement,
the Company advances totaled $6,039,771 (including interest at 8%
through March 31, 2004) ($3,569,051 of the principal and $131,452 of
the accrued interest of which had been repaid as of April 2, 2004).
The remainder will be paid at the closing of the Goloil sale.
Accordingly, the gross proceeds of the Goloil sale and the loan
repayment to the Company will be $15,000,000. (See p. 29)

o The closing of the Goloil sale will take place shortly after the last
of the closing conditions is satisfied. (See p. 29)

o We have not sought or received an independent report, opinion or
appraisal regarding the fairness of the transaction. The Board
believes, however, that the consideration offered for our interest in
Goloil is fair and that the transaction is in the best interests of
our stockholders. (See p. 30)

o No proceeds from the Goloil sale will be distributed to stockholders.
(See p. 47)

o Immediately following the Goloil sale, our principal asset will be the
cash from the sale. We are currently seeking to acquire interests in
other oil and gas properties primarily focused on Russia and the
former Commonwealth of Independent States (the "CIS states"). We may
also consider opportunities outside our primary geographic focus. We
have from time to time engaged in preliminary negotiations regarding
possible acquisitions in Russia. However, no agreements have been
reached except for one transaction (described herein), which is not
likely to occur due to the exercise of a right of first purchase, by
an existing partner. (See p. 47)

o There are numerous risks associated with the Goloil sale. Stockholders
are urged to read and carefully consider the risk factors associated
with the Goloil sale. (See p. 45-49)

o The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote in favor of
the proposal to approve the Goloil sale. (See p. 49)

o Approval of the Goloil sale requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. (See p. 4)

SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement contains statements that plan for or anticipate the future.
In this prospectus, forward-looking statements are generally identified by the
words "anticipate," "plan," "believe," "expect," "estimate," and the like. The
forward-looking statements are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following:

o general economic conditions;

o completion of the sale of Goloil;

o our plans to acquire additional oil and gas properties;

o uncertainty created by differences of interpretation of the contracts
between us and our Russian partner RussNeft;

o our ability to fund our share of capital expenditures in Goloil;

o Goloil's ability to service its loan repayments to Goltech and Teton;

o our ability to raise additional capital, obtain debt financing, or
generate sufficient revenues to make acquisitions and fund our
operating and development plan;

o our success in completing development and exploration activities;

o political stability in Russia;

o changes in Russian law, currency regulations, and taxation;

o our present company structure;

o our accumulated deficit; and

o other factors discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Although we believe that any forward-looking statements we make in this Proxy
Statement are reasonable, because forward-looking statements involve future
risks and uncertainties, there are factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied. For example, a few of the
uncertainties that could affect the accuracy of forward-looking statements,
besides the specific factors identified under "Risk Factors" below, include:

o our ability to close the Goloil sale on a timely basis;

o our ability to complete acquisitions of additional oil and gas
properties;

o our ability to obtain financing to complete any such acquisitions;

o changes in general economic and business conditions affecting the
Company and the oil industry;

o developments that might make our oil products less competitive in
nearby markets; and

o changes in our business strategies.

In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking
statements made in this Proxy Statement, the inclusion of this information
should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our
objectives and plans will be achieved.

We are not undertaking any responsibility to release publicly any revisions to
these forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances
that occur after the date of this Proxy Statement. Additionally, we are not
undertaking any responsibility to update you on the occurrence of any
unanticipated events which may cause actual results to differ from those
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Proxy
Statement. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements,
which speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q: WHY IS THE COMPANY PROPOSING TO SELL SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF ITS ASSETS?

A: The Board is recommending the Goloil sale at this time because:

o Our minority position in Goloil does not allow us to maximize our
return on this investment, since RussNeft as majority owner
(after including reversionary interests) can control the decision
making at Goloil;

o RussNeft has since October 1, 2003 caused Goloil to sell its oil
production at a fixed price which does not allow the Company to
maximize the value of its investment in Goloil (whereas
previously, we had received a higher price for our oil);

o The Company would need to seek external financing to fund
Goloil's accelerated capital expenditure program;

o Legal remedies for minority stockholders in Russia are
significantly more limited than in the United States;

o Because of its majority position, RussNeft is the most logical
buyer for Goloil;

o The sale provides us with an opportunity to dispose of Goloil at
a significant gain currently estimated at approximately $12.6
million;

o We plan to use the proceeds of the Goloil sale to acquire oil
properties where we will have more control than we do with
respect to Goloil;

o We believe there are currently oil properties on the market at
reasonably attractive prices; and

o For the other reasons set forth under "Sale of Goloil Proposal
No. 3 - No Opinion of Financial Advisor - Fairness of the Goloil
Sale".

Q: HOW MAY STOCKHOLDERS BENEFIT FROM THE GOLOIL SALE?

A: Stockholders should benefit from the Goloil sale because we will be
able to sell Goloil at a significant gain and have the opportunity to
use the proceeds of the Goloil sale to acquire interests in other oil
projects with greater potential for future growth, which may enhance
the value of our Company.

Q: WHO IS THE PURCHASER?

A: The purchaser will be RussNeft. RussNeft is the owner through its two
subsidiaries, McGrady Assets Limited ("McGrady") and Limited Liability
Company InvestPetrol ("InvestPetrol") of the remaining 64.70% interest
in Goloil. RussNeft is a company organized under the laws of the
Russian Federation and is a large independent oil producer in Russia.

Q: WHAT IS THE PURCHASE PRICE FOR THE ASSETS OF OUR COMPANY?

A: The purchase price for our 35.30% interest in Goloil is $8,960,229 in
cash. In connection with the Goloil sale, the Company also entered
into an agreement with Goloil for the repayment of all of the
outstanding advances owed to the Company by Goloil. At the date of
this agreement, the Company advances totaled $6,039,771 including
interest at 8% ($3,569,051 of the principal and $131,452 of accrued
interest of which had been repaid as of April 2, 2004). Accordingly,
the gross proceeds of the Goloil sale and the loan repayment to the
Company will be $15,000,000.

Q: WILL ANY OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE GOLOIL SALE BE DISTRIBUTED TO STOCKHOLDERS?

A: No, the proceeds of the Goloil sale will not be distributed to
stockholders. We will use the proceeds of the Goloil sale, after the
payment of transaction expenses, to pursue possible acquisitions of
interests in other oil and gas properties primarily focused on Russia
and the former CIS states.

Q: WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF THE GOLOIL SALE IS APPROVED?

A: If the Goloil sale is approved, we will complete the sale of our
assets subject to satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in
the Share Purchase and Sale Contract. After the closing, we intend to
use the sale proceeds to seek to acquire interests in other oil and
gas properties primarily focused on Russia and the former CIS states.
We may also consider other opportunities outside our primary area of
geographic focus. Our stockholders will not directly receive any
consideration from the Goloil sale, and your stock will continue to
have the same rights as it did before the sale.

Q: WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF THE GOLOIL SALE IS NOT APPROVED?

A: Even if the Goloil sale is not approved, the Company plans to seek
other possible acquisitions in the oil industry, primarily focused on
Russia and the former CIS states. However, if the Goloil sale is not
completed, the Company may encounter significant future losses in
Goloil. In addition, the Company would have to contribute significant
additional capital to Goloil at a time when Goloil's revenues are not
sufficient to cover capital costs due to the fixed price at which
Goloil is selling its oil.

Q: WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH THE PROPOSED SAMSON TRANSACTION?

A: On April 5, 2004, the Company announced that it had signed a purchase
and sale agreement to acquire a majority (52%) interest in a producing
field in Russia. This transaction was announced on May 13, 2004 to
involve a proposed purchase of a majority interest in Samson/Vitol
(Cyprus) Limited ("SVC") which owns 100% of ZAO Pechoraneftgas ("PNG")
which in turn owns a producing field in Russia. A deposit of $3.85
million was paid by the Company to the proposed seller, Samson
International Resources ("Samson"). The closing of the acquisition was
subject to several conditions, including a right of first purchase
held by Samson's partner, Vitol Holding B.V. ("Vitol"), to acquire
Samson's interest in the field on the same terms offered by the
Company. Vitol elected to exercise this right in early May. As a
result, Samson refunded the Company's deposit, though the contract
between Samson and the Company technically remains in effect. In the
event that Vitol does not purchase Samson's 52% interest, the Company
and Samson could determine to proceed with the contemplated
transaction subject to the satisfactory completion of the Company's
due diligence and satisfaction of all other conditions. However, the
Company believes in light of the exercise of the first purchase right
by Vitol and the public announcement by Valkyries Petroleum of its
purchase of 50% of the project from Vitol that this transaction is
unlikely to occur.

Q: DO I HAVE APPRAISAL RIGHTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE GOLOIL SALE?

A: No. Under Delaware law, you will not have appraisal rights in
connection with the Goloil sale.

Q: WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE GOLOIL SALE?

A: Approval of the Goloil sale will require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Only votes
that are cast in favor of the Goloil sale will be counted towards the
majority needed to obtain approval of the Goloil sale. If a
stockholder does not vote on this proposal, the failure to vote will
have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Therefore, it is
important that you vote on this matter.

Q: WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSALS OTHER THAN THE GOLOIL SALE?

A: The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares of
the Company cast at the Annual Meeting is required for Election of
Directors (Proposal No. 1). The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of the Company present or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is required to
consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the Board's selection of
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC as the Corporation's independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 (Proposal No.
2). The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual
Meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve the issuance of
the Company's Common Stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for Common Stock which could result in an increase in
outstanding shares of our Common Stock of 20% or more (Proposal No.
4). The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual
Meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve the 2004
Non-Employee Stock Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 5).

Q: HOW DO I VOTE?

A: If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy and return it
to the Company, it will be voted as you direct. Unless contrary
instructions are given, shares will be voted in accordance with the
Board's recommendations on each of the enumerated proposals and in the
proxy holders' discretion with regard to any other matters that may be
properly presented at the meeting and all matters incident to the
conduct of the meeting. If you are a registered stockholder and attend
the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person.
"Street name" stockholders who wish to vote at the meeting will need
to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds their shares.
All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for
the meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative
votes, abstentions and executed proxies returned by a broker holding
shares of the Company's Common Stock in "street name" which indicate
that the broker does not have discretionary authority as to certain
shares to vote on one or more matters ("broker non-votes").

Q: CAN I VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR ELECTRONICALLY?

A: If you are a registered stockholder (that is, if you hold your stock
in certificate form), you may vote by telephone, or electronically
through the Internet, by following the instructions included with your
proxy card. If your shares are held in "street name," please check
your proxy card or contact your broker or nominee to determine whether
you will be able to vote by telephone or electronically. Please follow
the voting instructions on the enclosed proxy card. The deadline for
voting by telephone or electronically is 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard
Time) on July 14, 2004.

Q: CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I RETURN MY PROXY CARD?

A: A proxy may be revoked by giving the Secretary of the Company written
notice of revocation at any time before the voting of the shares
represented by the proxy. A stockholder who attends the meeting may
revoke a proxy at the meeting. Attendance at the meeting will not, by
itself, revoke a proxy.

Q: WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE MEETING?

A: Only holders of record of the Company's Common Stock and preferred
stock, $.001 par value per share, on June 18, 2004 will be entitled to
vote at the Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, the
Company had issued and outstanding 9,114,663 shares of Common Stock
and 269,966 shares of preferred stock. Stockholders of the Company are
entitled to one vote for each share held. Such shares may not be voted
cumulatively.

Q: WHO CAN ATTEND THE MEETING?

A: Only stockholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed
proxies, may attend the meeting, and each may be accompanied by one
guest. Seating, however, is limited. Admission to the meeting will be
on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration will begin at 8:30
a.m. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not
be permitted at the meeting.

For registered stockholders, the bottom portion of the proxy card
enclosed with the Proxy Statement is their Annual Meeting admission
ticket. Please note that if you hold your shares in "street name" you
will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your
stock ownership as of the Record Date and check in at the registration
desk at the meeting.

Q: WHY IS THE COMPANY SOLICITING PROXIES?

A: Because many of our stockholders are unable to personally attend the
Annual Meeting, the Board solicits the enclosed proxy so that each
stockholder is given an opportunity to vote. This proxy enables each
stockholder to vote on all matters, which are scheduled to come before
the meeting. When the proxy is returned properly executed, the
stockholder's shares will be voted according to the stockholder's
directions. Stockholders are urged to specify their choices by marking
the appropriate boxes on the enclosed proxy card.

The Company will bear the entire cost of preparing, assembling,
printing and mailing the proxy materials furnished by the Board to
stockholders. Copies of the proxy materials will be furnished to
brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians to be forwarded to the
beneficial owners of the Common Stock. In addition to the solicitation
of proxies by use of the mail, some of the officers, Directors and
regular employees of the Company may (without additional compensation)
solicit proxies by telephone or personal interview, the costs of which
the Company will bear.

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy is being sent
or given to stockholders on or about June 18, 2004.

Q: WHAT CONSTITUTES A QUORUM?

A: In accordance with the Company's bylaws, the presence of one third of
the shares entitled to vote, whether present in person or represented
by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions will be
treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote but against
any proposal submitted to stockholders. Broker non-votes will be
considered present but not entitled to vote on any proposal submitted
to stockholders.

WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS?

You may seek answers to your questions by calling or emailing:

Ms. Gillian Kane
Vice President, Investor Relations
Tel. (970) 870-1417
gkane@tetonpetroleum.com
------------------------

Or by writing or calling the Company at its principal executive offices:

Teton Petroleum Company
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921
Tel. (303) 542-1878
Fax. (303) 542-1817

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

The Board oversees our business affairs and monitors the performance of
management. In accordance with our corporate governance principles, the Board
does not involve itself in day-to-day operations. The Directors keep themselves
informed through discussions with the Chief Executive Officer, other key
executives and by reading the reports and other materials that we send them and
by participating in Board and committee meetings. Our Directors hold office
until their successors have been elected and duly qualified unless the director
resigns or by reason of death or other cause is unable to serve in the capacity
of director. Biographical information about our Directors is provided in
"Election of Directors Proposal No. 1" on page 11.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that all of the Directors and nominees who would serve
after July 16, 2004 are independent except for Mr. Cooper, the Company's
Chairman and Founder and Mr. Arleth, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary of the Company. The Board's determinations of independence were made
in accordance with Section 121A of the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") Company
Guide. The Company was a small business issuer within the meaning of Rule 12b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act") through
December 31, 2003. On that date the Company ceased to be a small business issuer
because its public float exceeded $25 million at the end of two consecutive
years. As a result, the Company ceased reporting as a small business issuer
commencing with the Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Small
business issuers are not required to have a majority of independent directors
until their first annual meeting of stockholders after July 1, 2005. However, as
a result of its ceasing to be eligible to report as a small business issuer, the
Company is now required to have a majority of independent directors within the
meaning of Section 121A of the AMEX Company Guide. The Directors the Board has
determined to be independent are Messrs. Woodcock, Connor and Conroy.

Board Meetings and Attendance

During 2003, the Board held five meetings. Except for one director, who could
not attend one meeting, all other Directors attended 100% of the meetings of the
Board and committees on which he served. The Board also approved certain actions
by unanimous written consent.

Annual Meeting Attendance

It is the Company's policy that Directors should make every effort to attend the
annual meeting of stockholders. In 2003, a blizzard in Denver prevented physical
attendance by Messrs. Connor, Conroy and Woodcock. The Directors who could not
attend in person, instead participated by telephone.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our
Directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of the
Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is included as Appendix E to this
Proxy Statement.

Nomination of Directors

As provided in the Governance and Nominating Committee's charter and our
Company's corporate governance principles, the Governance and Nominating
Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become
Directors. The Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to identify director
candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including (1) the
Governance and Nominating Committee members, (2) our other Directors, (3) our
stockholders, (4) our Chief Executive Officer or Chairman, and (5) third parties
such as professional search firms. In evaluating potential candidates for
director, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the entirety of each
candidate's credentials.

Qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the
particular areas of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing
composition of the Board. However, at a minimum, candidates for director must
possess:

o high personal and professional ethics and integrity;

o the ability to exercise sound judgment;

o the ability to make independent analytical inquiries;

o a willingness and ability to devote adequate time and resources to
diligently perform Board and committee duties; and

o the appropriate and relevant business experience and acumen.

In addition to these minimum qualifications, the Governance and Nominating
Committee also takes into account when considering whether to nominate a
potential director candidate the following factors:

o whether the person possesses specific industry expertise and
familiarity with general issues affecting our business;

o whether the person's nomination and election would enable the Board to
have a member that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert"
as such term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC");

o whether the person would qualify as an "independent" director under
the rules of the SEC and AMEX listing standards;

o the importance of continuity of the existing composition of the Board
to provide long-term stability and experienced oversight; and

o the importance of diversified Board membership, in terms of both the
individuals involved and their various experiences and areas of
expertise.

The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates
recommended by stockholders provided such recommendations are submitted in
accordance with the procedures set forth below. In order to provide for an
orderly and informed review and selection process for director candidates, the
Board has determined that stockholders who wish to recommend director candidates
for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee must comply with
the following:

o the recommendation must be made in writing to the attention of the
Company's Corporate Secretary, Karl F. Arleth;

o the recommendation must include the candidate's name, home and
business contact information, detailed biographical data and
qualifications, information regarding any relationships between the
candidate and the Company within the last three years and evidence of
the recommending person's ownership of the Company's Common Stock;

o the recommendation shall also contain a statement from the
recommending stockholder in support of the candidate; professional
references, particularly within the context of those relevant to Board
membership, including issues of character, judgment, diversity, age,
independence, expertise, corporate experience, length of service,
other commitments; and personal references; and

o a statement from the stockholder nominee indicating that such nominee
wants to serve on the Board and could be considered independent under
SEC rules and AMEX listing standards, as in effect at that time.

All candidates submitted by stockholders will be evaluated by the Governance and
Nominating Committee according to the criteria discussed above and in the same
manner as all other director candidates.

Complaints Regarding Accounting Matters

The Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention
and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls,
or auditing matters ("accounting matters"), and (ii) the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable
accounting or auditing matters.

Communications with Directors

The Board has approved procedures for stockholders to send communications to
individual Directors or the non-employee Directors as a group.

Written correspondence should be addressed to the director or Directors in care
of Ms. Gillian Kane at the address given under "Who Can Help Answer Your
Questions?" on page 8. All correspondence will be forwarded directly to the
intended recipient.

You may also contact individual employee Directors by calling the Company's
principal executive offices at (303) 542-1878.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL NO. 1

The Board proposes the election of the current Directors of the Company for an
additional term of one year. The following is information about each nominee,
including biographical data for at least the last five years. Should one or more
of these nominees become unavailable to accept nomination or election as a
director, the individuals named as proxies on the enclosed proxy card will vote
the shares that they represent for the election of such other persons as the
Board may recommend, unless the Board reduces the number of Directors.

The Board adheres to corporate governance principles designed to assure the
continued vitality of the Board and excellence in the execution of its duties.
The Board is responsible for supervision of the overall affairs of the Company.
Following the Annual Meeting, the Board will consist of five Directors. All
Directors are U.S. citizens. The term of each director continues until the next
annual meeting or until successors are elected. The nominees for director are:

Principal Occupation for the Past Five Years and
Name Current Directorships Age
H. Howard Cooper H. Howard Cooper has been our chairman and founder
since 1996. Mr. Cooper was our president and CEO 48
from 1996 until May 2003. Mr. Cooper founded
American Tyumen in November 1996. He served as a
director and president of American Tyumen until the
merger with the Company. Since the merger, he has
held these same positions with the Company. In 1994,
he was a principal with Central Asian Petroleum, an
oil and gas company with its primary operations in
Kazakhstan, located in Denver, Colorado. From 1992
to 1994 Mr. Cooper served with AIG, an insurance
group.

Karl F. Arleth Karl F. Arleth has been our president and Chief
Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary since May 55
2003 and a director since 2002. From 2002 to 2003,
Mr. Arleth was the Chief Operating Officer and a
Board member of Sefton Resources, Inc. Between 1999
and 2001, he served as Chairman and CEO of Eurogas,
Inc. Ending in 1999, Mr. Arleth spent 21 years with
Amoco and BP-Amoco. In 1998 he chaired the
Shareholder Board of the Azerbaijan International
Operating Company (AIOC) for BP-Amoco in Baku,
Azerbaijan. Concurrently, in 1998, he was also
President of Amoco Caspian Sea Petroleum Ltd. in
Azerbaijan. In 1997, he served as Director of
Strategic Planning for Amoco Corporations Worldwide
Exploration and Production Sector in Chicago. From
1992 to 1996 Mr. Arleth was President of Amoco Poland
Ltd. in Warsaw, Poland.

Thomas F. Conroy Thomas F. Conroy was our Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary from March 2002 until May 1, 66
2003, and a director since 2002. Since 2002, Mr.
Conroy has been a principal member of
Mann-Conroy-Eisenberg & Assoc. LLC, a life insurance
and reinsurance consulting firm and since 2001, has
been a managing principal of Strategic Reinsurance
Consultants International LLC, a life reinsurance
consulting and brokerage firm. Ending in 2001, Mr.
Conroy, spent 27 years with ING and its predecessor
organizations, serving in various financial positions
and leading two of its strategic business units as
President. As President of ING Reinsurance, he
established ING's international presence, setting up
facilities in The Netherlands, Bermuda, Ireland and
Japan. He also served as an Officer and Board Member
of Security Life of Denver Insurance Company and its
subsidiaries. Mr. Conroy is a certified public
accountant.

James J. James J. Woodcock has been a director since 2002 and
Woodcock Chairman of the Company's Compensation Committee. 65
Since 1981, Mr. Woodcock has been the owner and CEO
of Hy-Bon Engineering Company, based in Midland,
Texas. Hy-Bon is an engineering firm and manufacturer
of vapor recovery, gas boosters, and casing pressure
reduction systems for the oil industry. From 1997 to
2002, Mr. Woodcock was the chairman of Transrepublic
Resources, a private oil and gas exploration firm
located in Midland Texas. Since 1996, Mr. Woodcock has
been a board member of Renovar Energy, a private waste
to energy firm located in Midland Texas and was its
Chairman of the Board until 2003.

John T. Connor, John T. Connor, Jr. has been a director since 2003
Jr. and chairs the Board's audit committee. He is the 63
Founder and Portfolio Manager of the Third Millennium
Russia Fund, a US based mutual fund specializing in
the equities of Russian public companies, which he
founded in 1998. Mr. Connor is a member of the
Council on Foreign Relations and the American Law
Institute. He is a director of Port.ru., Inc., a
Delaware corporation, which operates the leading
internet portal in Russia, mail.ru. and is also a
member of the board of directors of Swissfone Ltd.,
based in Washington, D.C., an Irish company that is a
telecom wholesaler.

All officers hold office until the first meeting of the Board after the annual
meeting of stockholders next following his election or until his successor is
elected and qualified. A director or officer may also resign at any time.
Messrs. Connor, Conroy and Woodcock have been determined by the Board to be
independent Directors within the meaning of Section 121A of the AMEX Company
Guide. While Mr. Conroy currently qualifies as independent under that provision,
commencing December 1, 2004, it is possible he will no longer qualify due to a
more restrictive independence requirement which takes effect that day which
disqualifies Directors with an employee relationship within the last three years
rather than within the last year as under the current rules.

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the
shares of the Company cast at the Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL THE ABOVE NOMINEES.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Independent Directors are compensated as follows: $6,000 cash for each quarter
served, plus $2,500 in stock for each Board meeting attended, plus $1,000 in
stock for each teleconference call in which the director participates to a
maximum annual total of $35,000. The number of shares received for participating
in Board meetings and teleconferences is determined by the closing share price
at the end of each quarter during which the meeting or teleconference occurred.

In addition to these fees, Directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel
expenses, are eligible to participate in the Company's stock option plan, and
are covered by the Company's directors and officers insurance.

The outside Directors received no compensation during the first nine months of
2003. For the fourth quarter of 2003, they received $8,500 in the form of
Company stock based on the closing price of $4.98 on December 31, 2003.

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board has standing Audit, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating
committees. Each committee has a written charter. The charters are included as
appendices to this Proxy Statement. Information concerning the membership and
function of each committee is as follows:

Board Committee Membership
--------------------------
Governance and
Audit Compensation Nominating
Name Committee Committee Committee
---- --------- --------- ---------
Mr. Cooper
Mr. Arleth
Mr. Woodcock X X(2) X
Mr. Conroy(1) X X X(2)
Mr. Connor X(2)

---------------------

(1) Mr. Conroy was appointed to the Audit Committee, the Compensation
Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee on May 11, 2004.

(2) Chairman.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is responsible for determining the adequacy of the Company's
internal accounting and financial controls, reviewing the results of the audit
of the Company performed by the independent public accountants, and recommending
the selection of independent public accountants. The functions of the Audit
Committee and its activities during 2003 are described in more detail under
"Report of the Audit Committee" on page 21 as well as in the Committee's charter
included as Appendix E to this Proxy Statement. During the year, the Board
examined the composition of the Audit Committee in light of the adoption by the
AMEX of new listing standards governing audit committees. Based upon this
examination, the Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit
Committee is unrelated, is an outside member with no other current affiliation
with the Company, and is independent as defined by AMEX listing standards. The
Board has determined that Mr. John Connor is an "audit committee financial
expert" as that term is defined by the SEC and AMEX, and is "independent" from
the Company's management as that term is defined in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of
Regulation 14A promulgated under the 1934 Act. During 2003, the Audit Committee
held three meetings by teleconference.

During the year, the Board examined the composition of the Audit Committee in
light of the adoption by AMEX of new listing standards governing audit
committees. Based upon this examination, the Board has determined that Mr.
Connor and Mr. Woodcock are unrelated, are outside members with no other current
affiliation with the Company, and are independent as defined by AMEX listing
standards. Mr. Conroy was appointed to the Audit Committee in June 2004 as the
third member of the Committee pursuant to the Board's determination that he does
not have a material relationship with the Company that would interfere with the
exercise of his independent judgment. However, but for the exception described
below, Mr. Conroy would be deemed not independent for Audit Committee purposes
under AMEX listing standards because he served as chief financial officer of the
Company from March 2002 until May 2003. However, pursuant to exceptional and
limited circumstances, which are described below, the Board has determined that
it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders if Mr. Conroy
temporarily serves as the third member of the Committee.

A small business issuer is required to have only two members on its audit
committee. The Company ceased to be eligible to report as a small business
issuer in early 2004 and began reporting as a regular issuer when it filed its
quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2004. As described under
"Director Independence" on page 8, the Company was therefore required to appoint
a third member to the Audit Committee. As neither Mr. Cooper nor Mr. Arleth, by
virtue of their service as current executive officers, qualify for membership on
the Audit Committee under AMEX listing standards, the Company must appoint an
additional Board member. The Company believes it will take some time to identify
a suitable candidate. As a result, the Board has determined that it is in the
best interests of the Company and its shareholders for Mr. Conroy to serve on
the Audit Committee while the Company conducts the search for an appropriate,
qualified new Board member and until a suitable replacement is found. Under an
applicable exception in the AMEX listing standards, Mr. Conroy became eligible
for temporary service on the Audit Committee in May 2004 as (i) he satisfies the
independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the 1934 Act and (ii) he is not a
current officer or employee or an immediate family member of such officer or
employee. A director appointed to the Audit Committee pursuant to this exception
may not serve for in excess of two consecutive years and may not chair the Audit
Committee. In making such determination, the Board considered the fact that Mr.
Conroy is experienced in financial matters and is a certified public accountant.
The Board intends to appoint Mr. Conroy's replacement by the first quarter of
2005.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee determines matters pertaining to the compensation of
certain executive officers of the Company and administers the Company's stock
option and incentive compensation. During 2003, the Compensation Committee held
three meetings by teleconference. The Committee's report starts on page 16. The
Committee's charter is included as Appendix D to this Proxy Statement.

Governance and Nominating Committee

The Board has established a Governance and Nominating Committee for purposes of
nominating Directors and for all other purposes outlined in the Governance and
Nominating Committee charter, including nominees submitted to the Board by
stockholders. The Board has determined that each of the members of the
Governance and Nominating Committee is unrelated, is an outside member with no
other affiliation with the Company, and is independent as defined by AMEX. The
Committee's charter is included as Appendix F to this Proxy Statement.

INFORMATION ABOUT STOCK OWNERSHIP

The following tables set forth certain information as of May 31, 2004, available
to the Company with respect to the shares of the Company (i) held by those
persons known to the Company to be beneficial owners (as determined under the
rules of the SEC) of more than 5% of the Common Stock then outstanding and (ii)
held by each of the Directors, each of the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table below, and by all of the Directors and such executive
officers as a group. The business address for all Directors and executive
officers is c/o Teton Petroleum Company, 1600 Broadway, Suite 2400, Denver,
Colorado 80202.

5% BENEFICIAL OWNERS

(1) Includes (i) 145,857 shares of Common Stock, (ii) 458,335 shares underlying
warrants exercisable between $3.24 and $12.00, and (iii) 1,003,289 shares
underlying options exercisable between $3.48 and $3.60 per share.

(2) Includes (i) 75,772 shares of Common Stock, (ii) 197,995 shares underlying
warrants exercisable between $3.24 and $6.00, and (iii) 710,339 shares
underlying options exercisable between $3.48 and $3.60 per share.

(3) Includes (i) 102,948 shares of Common Stock, (ii) 234,262 shares underlying
warrants exercisable between $3.24 and $6.00, and (iii) 410,148 shares
underlying options exercisable between $3.48 and $3.60 per share.

(4) Includes (i) 185,539 shares of Common Stock owned indirectly, (ii) 183,554
shares underlying warrants exercisable between $3.24 and $6.00 owned
indirectly, and (iii) 175,000 shares underlying options exercisable between
$3.60 and $3.71 per share.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Common Stock
Beneficially Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Owned Class
----- -----
H. Howard Cooper (1) 1,607,481 15.2%
Karl F. Arleth (2) 984,106 9.8%
James J. Woodcock (3) 747,358 7.6%
John T. Connor (4) 544,093 5.7%
Igor Effimoff (5) 467,058 4.9%
John J. Mahar (6) 83,334 1.0%
Thomas F. Conroy (7) 159,950 1.7%
Ilia A. Gurevich (8) 66,668 0.7%
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group 4,660,048 46.52%

(5) Includes (i) 2,057 shares of Common Stock (ii) 35,186 shares underlying
warrants exercisable at $3.71 per share, and (iii) 429,815 shares
underlying options exercisable between $3.48 and $3.60 per share.

(6) Includes 83,334 shares underlying options exercisable at $3.48 per share.

(7) Includes (i) 17,957 shares of Common Stock (ii) 38,335 shares underlying
warrants exercisable between $3.24 and $6.00, and (iii) 103,658 shares
underlying options exercisable between $3.48 and $3.60 per share.

(8) Includes (i) 6,898 shares of Common Stock (ii) 12,314 shares underlying
warrants exercisable between $3.24 and $6.00, and (iii) 47,456 shares
underlying options exercisable between $3.48 and $3.60 per share.

The Company has furnished the following report concerning the philosophy
underlying the Company's compensation of executive officers.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Report of the Compensation Committee (the "Compensation Report") does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by
reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
1934 Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this
Compensation Report by reference therein.

The Company's executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and
motivate executive officers capable of leading the Company to meet its business
objectives, to align the interests of executive management with those of the
stockholders, and to provide incentives and reward both short and long term
performance based on the success of the Company in meeting its development
milestones and business objectives. The Compensation Committee places a
particular emphasis on variable, performance based components, such as the bonus
potential and stock option awards, the value of which could increase or decrease
to reflect changes in corporate and individual performance.

Components of Compensation

Each executive officer's compensation package is generally comprised of the
following elements: (1) a base salary which is established at levels considered
appropriate for the duties and scope of responsibilities of each officer's
position; (2) a performance-based annual bonus; and (3) periodic grants of stock
options to strengthen the mutuality of interests between the executive officers
and the Company's stockholders. Executive officers are also eligible to
participate in compensation and employee benefits generally available to all
employees of the Company.

The Compensation Committee believes that this approach best serves the interests
of the Company and its stockholders. It enables the Company to meet the
requirements of the highly competitive environment in which the Company operates
while ensuring that executive officers are compensated in a way that advances
both the short and long term interests of stockholders. Under this approach,
compensation for these officers involves a high proportion of pay that is "at
risk," namely, the annual bonus and stock options. The variable annual bonus is
also based, in significant part, on Company performance. Stock options relate a
significant portion of long term remuneration directly to stock price
appreciation realized by all of the Company's stockholders.

Base Salary

Base salaries for executive officers are set at levels believed by the Committee
to be sufficient to attract and retain qualified executive officers based on the
stage of development of the Company, the salary levels in effect for comparable
positions in similarly situated companies within relevant industries, and
internal comparability considerations. Base salaries for the Company's executive
officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, as well as changes in such
salaries, are based upon recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer, taking
into account such factors as competitive industry salaries, a subjective
assessment of the nature of the position and the contribution and experience of
the officer and the length of the officer's service. All such recommendations
are subject to approval or disapproval by the Compensation Committee. Other than
provisions provided for in employment agreements, changes in base salaries of
executives are based on an evaluation of the personal performance of the
executive, prevailing market practices, and the performance of the Company as a
whole. In determining base salaries, the Committee not only considers the short
term performance of the Company, but also the success of the executive officers
in developing and executing the Company's strategic plans, developing management
employees and exercising leadership in the development of the Company.

Cash-Based Incentive Bonus

The Committee believes that a portion of the total cash compensation for
executive officers should be based on the Company's success in meeting its short
term performance objectives and contributions by the executive officers that
enable the Company to meet its long term objectives, and has structured the
executive compensation program to reflect this philosophy. This approach creates
a direct incentive for executive officers to achieve desired short term
corporate goals that also further the long term objectives of the Company, and
places a significant portion of each executive officer's annual compensation at
risk.

Stock Options

The Compensation Committee believes that equity participation is a key component
of the Company's executive compensation program. Stock options are awarded by
the Committee to executive officers primarily based on potential contributions
to the Company's growth and development and marketplace practices. These awards
are designed to retain executive officers and to motivate them to enhance
stockholder value by aligning the financial interests of executive officers with
those of stockholders. Stock options provide an effective incentive for
management to create stockholder value over the long term because the full
benefits of the option grants cannot be realized unless an appreciation in the
price of the Company's Common Stock occurs over a number of years.

Variable Bonus

The Committee may award annual or interim special bonuses in the form of cash,
stock options, or restricted stock to executive management and employees for
achieving certain milestones, progress made in the staff and organizational
development of the Company, and advances in the market acceptance and
commercialization of the Company's technology.

CEO Compensation

With the framework described above, the Committee determines the salary and
bonus of the Chief Executive Officer based on his leadership, the execution of
business plans, and strategic results. The complexity of the business and his
experience are also key factors. The Committee has used the following metrics to
determine the CEO's compensation: the complexity of the Company's international
operations, the experience that the CEO brings to the Company and its business,
the CEO's ability to continuously improve the Company's results, and the CEO's
ability to evaluate and execute on acquisitions that will enable the Company to
grow its asset base in the near term. The Committee does not use narrow,
quantitative measures or formulas in determining the CEO's compensation. The
Committee meets annually to establish operational and financial goals and
objectives for the CEO and throughout the year regularly meets in executive
sessions and with the CEO to review performance against those objectives. A
final meeting of the Compensation Committee as well as with the entire Board is
held each year during the Board's December meeting to measure results of the
prior year as well as to set results and establish compensation benchmarks for
the subsequent year.

Thomas F. Conroy
James J. Woodcock

INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer are elected annually by our Board.
The remaining executive officers are approved by the executive committee and
hold office until their successors are elected and duly qualified.

The current executive officers of the Company are as follows:

Name Age Position
----- --- --------
H. Howard Cooper 48 Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Founder
Karl F. Arleth 55 Chief Executive Officer, President,
Secretary, and Director
Igor Effimoff 58 Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer
John Mahar 50 Executive Vice President of Finance
Patrick A. Quinn 50 Chief Financial Officer
Ilia Gurevich 40 Senior Controller - Russia
Gordon Phair 43 Controller - U.S.

H. Howard Cooper has been our chairman and founder since 1996. Mr. Cooper was
our president and CEO from 1996 until May 2003. Mr. Cooper founded American
Tyumen in November 1996. He served as a director and president of American
Tyumen until the merger with the Company. Since the merger, he has held these
same positions with the Company. In 1994, he was a principal with Central Asian
Petroleum, an oil and gas company with its primary operations in Kazakhstan,
located in Denver, Colorado. From 1992 to 1994 Mr. Cooper served with AIG, an
insurance group.

Karl F. Arleth has been our president and Chief Executive Officer and Corporate
Secretary since May 2003 and our director since 2002. From 2002 to 2003, Mr.
Arleth was the Chief Operating Officer and a Board member of Sefton Resources,
Inc. Between 1999 and 2001, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Eurogas, Inc. Ending in 1999, Mr. Arleth spent 21 years with Amoco and BP-Amoco.
In 1998 he chaired the Shareholder Board of the Azerbaijan International
Operating Company (AIOC) for BP-Amoco in Baku, Azerbaijan. Concurrently in 1998,
he was also President of Amoco Caspian Sea Petroleum Ltd. in Azerbaijan. In
1997, he served as Director of Strategic Planning for Amoco Corporations
Worldwide Exploration and Production Sector in Chicago. From 1992 to 1996 Mr.
Arleth was President of Amoco Poland Ltd. in Warsaw, Poland.

Igor Effimoff has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
since 2002. Between 1996 and 2001, he was President of Pennzoil Caspian
Corporation, managing the Company's interests in the Caspian Region. Between
1994 and 1996 he was the Chief Executive Officer of Larmag Energy, NV, a
privately held Dutch oil and gas production company with its primary assets in
the Caspian Sea.

John Mahar has been our Executive Vice President of Finance since 2004 and
served as our interim Chief Financial Officer from April 2003 until February
2004. Since 1991, he has been a Managing Director of Gladstone Capital, LLC, an
oil-and-gas financial advisory firm based in New York he co-founded. Between
1983 and 1991, Mr. Mahar was first Vice President at Schroder Capital Management
International, Inc. where he was responsible for the firm's domestic U.S.
investment operations.

Patrick A. Quinn, CPA, CVA has been our Chief Financial Officer since February
2004, a position he occupies on a part-time basis. Since 1986, Mr. Quinn has
been the CEO of Quinn & Associates, P.C. (Q&A). Q&A provides accounting, tax and
auditing services primarily to the oil and gas industry. Q&A has provided
accounting and tax services to the Company since its inception. Mr. Quinn has
extensive experience in international oil and gas operations including serving
as the Controller of Hamilton Oil Corporation, which was the first company to
produce oil in the U.K. sector of the North Sea.

Ilia Gurevich has been our Senior Controller for Russia since 2003, having
previously held the position of Controller since 2002. Between 1998 and 2002, he
was a financial analyst for TeleInvest, an investment firm in Denver, Colorado.
From 1997 to 1998, he was a Research Analyst for the firm of MIG-2000, in Los
Angeles. From 1993 to 1997, he was Vice President, Finance, for an oil joint
venture affiliated with Sidanco.

Gordon Phair has been our U.S. Controller since November 2003. Between 1999 and
November 2003, Mr. Phair was an independent contractor providing accounting and
financial services primarily to mining companies. From 1998 to 1999 Mr. Phair
was the director of accounting for Caleel-Hayden, a cosmetics distributor. Mr.
Phair is a certified public accountant.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information about the total compensation for
services in all capacities to the Company or its subsidiary for the Chief
Executive Officer and the other most highly compensated executive officers of
the Company whose total annual salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 (collectively,
the "named executive officers"). See the Compensation Committee Report beginning
on page 16 for an explanation of our compensation philosophy.

Long-Term
Compensation
Awards
Other Annual (Securities)
Compensation Underlying
Name and Positions Year Salary($) Bonus($) ($) Options)
==============================================================================

H. Howard Cooper 2003 160,000 - - 603,289
2002 160,000 50,000 - -
2001 210,000 - - -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Karl F. Arleth(1) 2003 85,000 - - 410,338
2002 - - - -
2001 - - - -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Igor Effimoff 2003 108,000 - - 89,815
2002 - - - -
2001 - - - -

(1) Reflects compensation as Chief Executive Officer for the period beginning
May 1, 2003 through the end of 2003.

Options/SARs Grants During Last Fiscal Year

The following table provides information related to options granted to our
Directors and named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003.

Number of % of Total
Securities Options Exercise
Underlying Granted in Price
Options Fiscal Per Expiration
Name Granted 2003 (1) Share Date
---- ------- ------- ----- ----

H. Howard Cooper 603,289 38.2% $3.48 04/08/13

Karl F. Arleth 410,338 26.0% $3.48 04/08/13

James J. 210,148 13.3% $3.48 04/08/13
Woodcock

John T. Connor, 100,000 6.3% $3.40 08/03/13
Jr.

Igor Effimoff 89,815 5.7% $3.71 04/08/13

John J. Mahar 83,333 5.3% $3.48 04/08/13

Thomas F. Conroy 28,658 1.8% $3.48 04/08/13

(1) The exercise price of the stock options was based on the fair market value
of the stock on the day of the grant.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Value

No options were exercised in the last fiscal year.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires that the Company's Directors and certain
of its officers file reports of ownership and changes of ownership of the
Company common stock with the SEC and AMEX. Based solely on copies of such
reports provided to the Company, the Company believes that all Directors and
officers filed on a timely basis all such reports required of them with respect
to stock ownership and changes in ownership during 2003 except that Mr. John
Mahar and Mr. John Connor were late in filing Form 3s reporting becoming
respectively, an executive officer and a director and Messrs. Arleth, Conroy,
Cooper, and Woodcock were late in reporting the grant of stock options under the
2003 Employee Stock Option Plan.

Executive Employment Agreements

The Company and Mr. Cooper, our Chairman, entered into an employment agreement,
effective May 1, 2002. The employment agreement is for a three-year term. After
the third year, the agreement is automatically renewed from year to year, unless
it is terminated as provided below. Mr. Cooper's initial salary under the
agreement is $13,333 per month, which was increased to $16,667 per month
beginning in January 2004. In the Board's discretion, he may receive additional
bonus compensation. Mr. Cooper's employment is terminated immediately upon his
death or permanent disability. The Company may also terminate Mr. Cooper's
employment immediately for cause, as defined in the agreement. Mr. Cooper may
terminate his employment immediately for good reason, as defined in the
agreement. Additionally, either the Company or Mr. Cooper may terminate Mr.
Cooper's employment upon 60 days prior written notice to the other. Upon
termination of Mr. Cooper's employment without cause by the Company or for good
reason by Mr. Cooper, Mr. Cooper is entitled to severance pay. The severance pay
is equal to Mr. Cooper's salary for the preceding 24 months. Such severance may
be paid in monthly installments over 24 months from the date of termination. The
Company may discontinue the severance payments if Mr. Cooper violates the
confidentiality, noncompetition, or nonsolicitation provisions of his employment
agreement.

Ms. Anya Cooper, secretary, signed an employment agreement with the Company on
May 1, 2002. The agreement is for a three-year term, whereby Ms. Cooper's salary
is $6,500 per month. Under the terms of the agreement, Ms. Cooper is entitled to
12 months of severance pay, payable in monthly installments over 12 months from
the date of termination. The Company may discontinue the severance payments if
Ms. Cooper violates the confidentiality provision of her employment agreement.
Ms. Cooper is the wife of Mr. Cooper, the Chairman and Founder of the Company.

Mr. Arleth, President and Chief Executive Officer, signed an employment
agreement on May 1, 2003. The agreement is for a three-year term, with an
initial salary of $10,000 per month that was increased to $15,000 per month
beginning in January 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Arleth is
entitled to 24 months severance pay in the event of a change of position or
control of the Company.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following Report of the Audit Committee (the "Audit Report") does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by
reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically
incorporates this Audit Report by reference therein.

Role of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee's primary responsibilities fall into three broad categories:

First, the Committee is charged with monitoring the preparation of quarterly and
annual financial reports by the Company's management, including discussions with
management and the Company's outside auditors about draft annual financial
statements and key accounting and reporting matters;

Second, the Committee is responsible for matters concerning the relationship
between the Company and its outside auditors, including recommending their
appointment or removal; reviewing the scope of their audit services and related
fees, as well as any other services being provided to the Company; and
determining whether the outside auditors are independent (based in part on the
annual letter provided to the Company pursuant to Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1); and

Third, the Committee reviews financial reporting, policies, procedures, and
internal controls of the Company.

The Committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of
each fiscal year it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate
to each of the matters assigned to it under the Committee's charter. In
overseeing the preparation of the Company's financial statements, the Committee
met with management and the Company's outside auditors, including meetings with
the Company's outside auditors without management present, to review and discuss
all financial statements prior to their issuance and to discuss significant
accounting issues. Management advised the Committee that all financial
statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and the Committee discussed the statements with both management and
the outside auditors. The Committee's review included discussion with the
outside auditors of matters required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication With Audit Committees) as well as
matters previously disclosed in Item 8-A of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.

With respect to the Company's outside auditors, the Committee, among other
things, discussed with Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC matters relating to
its independence, including the disclosures made to the Committee as required by
the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with
Audit Committees).

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to the Company by Ehrhardt
Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC as of or for the two fiscal years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002 are set forth below:

2003 2002
---- ----
Audit Fees $ 141,917 $ 142,296
Audit-Related 51,047 33,778
Fees
Tax Fees 6,500 12,805
----- ------
Total $ 199,464 $ 188,879

Audit Fees. Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Ehrhardt Keefe
Steiner & Hottman PC in connection with its audit of our consolidated financial
statements included in Forms 10-KSB and the quarterly reviews of our financial
statements included in Forms 10-QSB for the fiscal years 2003 and 2002.

Audit-Related Fees. These were primarily related to SB-2 and SB-2/A filings for
the registration of our stock, assistance with the AMEX application process, and
reviews and discussions regarding accounting treatment of debt and equity
transactions.

Tax Fees. These were related to tax compliance and related tax services.

Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC rendered no professional services to us in
connection with the design and implementation of financial information systems
in fiscal year 2003 or 2002.

Recommendations of the Audit Committee. In reliance on the reviews and
discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board that the
Board approve the inclusion of the Company's audited financial statements in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003, for filing with the SEC.

John T. Connor, Jr.
James J. Woodcock

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following performance graph reflects the share price performance of Teton
Petroleum Company since its shares commenced trading in the United States on the
OTC Bulletin Board in November 2001. (Teton shares have been traded on the
American Stock Exchange since May 2003). The total return of Teton's shares is
compared to 1) the Russell 2000(R)Index, an index measuring the performance of
2000 companies with small market capitalizations, and to 2) a peer group of 26
companies with SIC code 1311 (Crude Oil and Natural Gas Producers) with market
capitalizations of less than $100 million. All cumulative returns are calculated
on a fiscal year basis ending on December 31 of each year and have been weighted
by market capitalization.

The Companies included in the peer group are:

Abraxas Pete Corp Equity Oil Co Parallel Pete Corp Del

Arena Resources Inc Exploration Co Primeenergy Corp

Beta Oil & Gas Inc Georesources Inc Pyr Energy Corp

Blue Dolphin Energy Co Gmx Res Inc Quest Resource Corp

Castle Energy Corp Gulfwest Energy Inc New Tengasco Inc

Chaparral Res Inc Isramco Inc Toreador Res Corp

Contango Oil & Gas Co Kestrel Energy Inc Tri Vy Corp

Daugherty Res Inc Magellan Pete Corp Vaalco Energy Inc

Double Eagle Pete Co Mexco Energy Corp

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act,
and in accordance therewith files reports, proxy statements, and other
information with the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information
may be inspected without charge at the principal office of the SEC, 450 Fifth
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the regional offices of the SEC
located at 233 Broadway, New York, New York 10279 and 175 W. Jackson Blvd.,
Suite 900, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and copies of all or any part thereof may be
obtained at prescribed rates from the SEC's Public Reference Section at such
addresses. Also, the SEC maintains a World Wide Web site on the Internet at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.
Such reports, proxy and information statements and other information also can be
inspected at the office of the American Stock Exchange, Inc., 86 Trinity Place
New York, NY 10006.

The Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 (which is not part of the Company's proxy soliciting materials) has
been mailed to the Company's stockholders with or prior to this proxy statement.
A copy of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, without exhibits, will be
furnished without charge to stockholders upon request to:

Ms. Gillian Kane
Vice President, Investor Relations
Tel. (970) 870-1417
Teton Petroleum Company
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

PROPOSAL NO. 2

Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC has served as the Company's independent
auditors since December 1999 and has been appointed by the Board to continue as
the Company's independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004.
In the event that ratification of this selection of auditors is not approved by
a majority of the shares of Common Stock voting at the Annual Meeting in person
or by proxy, the Board will reconsider its selection of auditors. Ehrhardt Keefe
Steiner & Hottman PC has no interest, financial or otherwise, in the Company.

A representative of Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC is expected to be
present at the Annual Meeting. The auditors will have the opportunity to make a
statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to
appropriate questions.

The proxy holders intend to vote the shares represented by proxies to ratify the
Board's selection of Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC as the Company's
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit
Services of Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by
the independent auditors prior to the engagement of the independent auditors
with respect to such services. The Chairman of the Audit Committee has been
delegated the authority by the Committee to pre-approve interim services by the
independent auditors other than the annual audit. The Chairman must report all
such pre-approvals to the entire Audit Committee at the next Committee meeting.

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the
shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF EHRHARDT
KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004.

SALE OF GOLOIL

PROPOSAL NO. 3

TO APPROVE THE SALE OF THE COMPANY'S INDIRECT EQUITY INTEREST IN GOLOIL, WHICH
CONSTITUTES THE SALE OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE COMPANY'S ASSETS WITHIN THE
MEANING OF SECTION 271 OF DELAWARE GENERALL CORPORATION LAW, TO RUSSNEFT, THE
OWNER OF THE REMAINING INTERESTS IN GOLOIL; ALL AS SET FORTH IN THE SHARE SALE
AND PURCHASE CONTRACT DATED APRIL 20, 2004, BETWEEN GOLTECH PETROLEUM LLC, OUR
WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY AND 35.30% OWNER OF GOLOIL, AND RUSSNEFT.

Business of Goloil

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Goltech owns a 35.30% equity
interest in Goloil. Goltech's principal executive office is located at 1600
Broadway, Suite 4200, Denver, Colorado 80202 and its telephone number is (303)
542-1878. RussNeft owns the remaining 64.70% of Goloil through two subsidiaries,
McGrady and InvestPetrol. McGrady holds 35.29% and InvestPetrol holds 29.41% of
the equity interests in Goloil. However, until Goltech and McGrady receive the
return of 100% of their capital investment in Goloil, they are each entitled to
a 50% economic interest in Goloil. Goloil is managed by a seven person
management board on which we have two representatives. Pursuant to the existing
agreements among Goloil's shareholders, Goltech and McGrady share equally in
capital expenditures, gross revenues, costs and expenses, until they receive
100% return of their investments in Goloil. Limited Liability Company
EnergoSoyuz-A ("EUA"), a wholly owned subsidiary of RussNeft, is the lessor of
certain oil field facilities to Goloil pursuant to Lease Agreement No. EST
160/000630 (the "EUA Lease Agreement") among EUA as lessor and Goloil as lessee
dated as June 2000. EUA is also the recipient of a production payment
("Production Payment") consisting of 50% of Goloil's production (or at EUA's
option, cash in lieu of such production). Since October 2003 EUA has taken cash
instead of oil under the Production Payment in the amount of approximately
$650,000 per month. In addition, Goloil has been selling its oil at a fixed
price of 2,400 Rubles or $11.50 per barrel. It is possible that a significant
portion of such sales have been made to or through one or more affiliates of
RussNeft.

RussNeft, which was founded in the fall of 2002, is one of Russia's largest
independent oil producers. The address of RussNeft's principal executive office
is 15 Zubarev Per., Building No. 1, Moscow 129164, Russia and its telephone
number is 011-7095-411-6335. In September 2003, RussNeft acquired a 64.70%
equity interest in Goloil in a private transaction in which it purchased all of
the shareholders of Goloil (other than Goltech), i.e., McGrady and InvestPetrol.
At that time, RussNeft also acquired EUA, the lessor of various wells and
facilities to Goloil under the EUA Lease Agreement and recipient of the
Production Payment described above. In acquiring such interests, RussNeft became
entitled to appoint a majority of the management board of Goloil and effectively
took control of its operations.

Goloil holds a twenty-five year renewable license to produce oil and gas in a
portion of Western Siberia. The license was issued by the Russian Federation and
expires in 2022, but may be extended if Goloil complies with certain specified
conditions and undertakes additional operations at the end of the term of the
license. The Goloil license encompasses 187 square kilometers (116 square miles)
in the south central portion of the west Siberian basin. The license area is
located approximately 50 miles north of Nizhnevartovsk in western Siberia. Three
oil producing fields are located within the license area: Golevaya, Eguryak, and
South Eguryak.

The following chart shows the current ownership structure of Goloil.

Description of Arrangements with Goloil and RussNeft

The most recent estimate of Teton's share of the oil reserves owned by Goloil
was prepared for inclusion in our Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2003 that we filed with the SEC. The analysis was prepared by the independent
oil and gas reservoir engineering firm, Gustavson Associates which is located in
Boulder, Colorado.

The price of oil used for this analysis was 2,400 rubles per ton ($11.50 per
barrel at March 31, 2004 exchange rates), net of transportation, marketing and
export duties, which is the price Goloil has realized from October 1, 2003 to
the present time under the pricing arrangement set by RussNeft. The analysis
took into account other factors including the costs to operate and maintain
Goloil's wells, important taxes such the Mineral Extraction Tax, the Russian
profits tax, Value Added Tax (VAT), and required capital expenses.

In addition to the economic and tax parameters discussed above, the Gustavson
analysis also took into account the somewhat complex ownership and financing
structure of Teton's ownership in Goloil.

As noted above, Teton owns 35.30% of the shares of Goloil. But Teton has always
been entitled to 50% of the net profits from Goloil because InvestPetrol, the
owner of 29.41% of Goloil's shares has never invested in the development of the
license and consequently is not entitled to any profits until Teton and McGrady
fully recover their investment. Based on the Gustavson analysis, this would not
occur until 2011 or 2012, at which time Teton's interest in the profits of
Goloil would be reduced from 50% to 35.30%.

Gustavson's analysis also takes into account the Production Payment. Since 2001
Goloil has paid EUA a fee payable in oil production (i.e. physical barrels of
oil), or cash, at an amount equivalent to 50% of Goloil's oil production. Since
RussNeft (which now owns EUA) became the majority owner of Goloil in October
2003, the production payment has been paid as a flat monthly fee of 19 million
rubles (approximately $650,000) and Gustavson applied this amount through June
2007, when the production payment is due to expire.

Based on the above, Gustavson estimated that the share of Goloil's proved
reserves attributable to Teton was approximately 8,262,000 barrels of oil.
Teton's share of the future cash flow from the production of these reserves was
estimated at $12,225,000 and its present value, using a 10% discount rate, was
estimated at $5,993,000. These numbers are after Russian profits tax, but do not
take into account any U.S. federal income taxes.

In order to realize these cash flows, Gustavson estimated that Teton would be
required to invest approximately $14.6 million in capital expenditures for
drilling and infrastructure over the next three years, before Goloil would begin
to generate positive cash flow to Teton's interest.

As required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the standardized
measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by applying year-end
prices, costs and legislated tax rates and a discount factor of 10% to net
proved reserves. The standardized measure includes costs for future
dismantlement, abandonment and rehabilitation obligations. The Company believes
the standardized measure does not provide a reliable estimate of the Company's
expected future cash flows to be obtained from the development and production of
its oil and gas properties or the value of its proved oil and gas reserves. The
standardized measure is prepared on the basis of certain prescribed assumptions
including year-end prices, which represent a single point in time and therefore
may cause significant variability in cash flows from year to year as prices
change.

Revenues/Assets

Our oil revenues from the Goloil license were $6,923,320 in 2002, $11,437,802 in
2003 and $2,962,500 in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In each period the
Goloil revenues accounted for 100% of our revenues and our interest in Goloil
constitutes our only operating asset. Consequently, this sale constitutes a sale
of substantially all of our assets for purposes of Delaware law. Accordingly,
the sale is being submitted to stockholders for approval pursuant to Section 271
of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Background of the Negotiations

The Company's acquired an initial interest in Goloil in September 1996. Between
1996 and 1998, the Company's added to its interest in Goloil ultimately owning
70.6% of the shareholding in Goloil, with the balance being owned by a number of
minority shareholders whose interests were ultimately purchased by InvestPetrol.
Initially, Goltech was to provide 100% of the capital required for investment
and would be entitled to 100% of the revenue until such time as Goltech recouped
its investment and interest on that investment. Goltech was also the operator of
Goloil. However, the Company lacked the necessary capital to drill wells and
lacked the ability to transport its oil through the Russian State Pipeline
Company ("TransNeft") since the field was not connected to the TransNeft
pipeline system.

In order to comply with the terms and work program obligations for its license
and commence drilling by the time required by its license, the Company sold
one-half of its 70.6% interest in Goloil to a Russian partner, Mediterranean
Overseas Trust, a trust organized under the Republic of Malta ("MOT"). Pursuant
to a Master Agreement ("the Master Agreement") dated June 19, 2000 among MOT,
Goltech and Teton. Also in June 2000, the Company and MOT entered into the EUA
Lease Agreement with EUA, an affiliate of MOT, pursuant to which EUA drilled and
completed five wells on the Eguryak license, completed construction of a 24 mile
long pipeline connection to the TransNeft pipeline system and constructed a
separation and oil processing unit. EUA leased these facilities to Goloil
pursuant to the EUA Lease Agreement in exchange for the Production Payment that
consists of 50% of Goloil's production through 2007 subject to minimum delivery
requirements (all of which could be taken in oil to be sold domestically within
Russia or in cash). The Master Agreement, among other things, provided that MOT
would buy a 50% interest in Goltech. In addition to taking its 50% interest in
Goltech, MOT became entitled to appoint a majority of the management board of
Goloil and assumed operating control of Goloil. The Production Payment and the
investment plan were memorialized in an oilfield development agreement and the
EUA Lease Agreement, which were entered into between the parties on June 30,
2000.

The description of the Agreements between MOT, Goltech and Teton are
incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 under the caption "Item 1. Description of Business
- MOT Agreements." Except as modified by the 10/2003 MOU (as defined below), it
has been Teton's view that these agreements with RussNeft's subsidiaries are
still in effect. However, as a practical matter it may be difficult to enforce
these agreements against those subsidiaries for the reasons set forth under
"Risk Factors - Risks if Asset Sale is Not Approved."

By allowing MOT to take domestic (Russian) oil as payment, the Company ensured
that it would be able to sell most of its own allocation of the field's
production into the non-Russian markets for hard currency where it could receive
a substantially higher price per barrel than was provided by the Russian
domestic market. At the time the June 2000 agreements were signed, the average
price received by Goloil for Russian domestic oil was approximately $10 per
barrel and the average price received by Goloil for export oil was approximately
$23 per barrel. More importantly, the transaction served a vital immediate
purpose by facilitating the Company's ability to raise the capital necessary to
continue to meet the license's work requirements as specified by the Russian
government. The Company proceeded with the transaction because it believed that:

o MOT was capable of quickly establishing production and generating cash flow
at Goloil;

o these assets were undervalued due to poor infrastructure as well as due to
Russia's status as an emerging market with a nascent political system and
an embryonic legal system; and

o if Teton had not secured the financing for the drilling program, separation
and oil processing unit and connecting pipeline, the Goloil license could
have been revoked by the Russian Government for failure to meet the
license's requirements.

Notwithstanding the clear need the Company had to consummate the transaction
with MOT and its affiliate EUA, as the Company matured, it became increasingly
evident that the transaction did not provide an ideal platform for the Company
because of:

o our lack of operating control of Goloil once RussNeft purchased its
majority interest;

o the lack of operating discipline from its Russian Partner resulting in
operating revenues that covered operating costs but not capital expenses.

Goltech, Teton and MOT entered into a new arrangement known as the Restructuring
and Funding Agreement (the "Restructuring Agreement") dated October 19, 2001.
The Restructuring Agreement allowed MOT ultimately to transfer its interest in
Goloil from Goltech to McGrady, an MOT subsidiary, thus making McGrady a direct
stockholder in Goloil along with InvestPetrol and our Goltech subsidiary. The
Restructuring Agreement also provided for the Company and MOT to share equally
in funding responsibility for Goloil.

In or around April 2002, the Company believes that MOT and its affiliates began
to change the payment terms under the Restructuring Agreement and the Master
Agreement by, among other things, paying to EUA 50% of Goloil's cash oil sales
revenue, rather than taking oil in-kind under the Production Payment to EUA.

On November 12, 2002, Mr. Cooper sent a letter to MOT that, among other things,
indicated the Company's interest in redefining the relationship to more
accurately reflect the original operating concept, including the Production
Payment. On November 26, 2002, the parties signed a memorandum of understanding
(the "11/2002 MOU") that, among other things, defined agreements to control the
relationship between McGrady, and the Company going forward. As a result of the
11/2002 MOU, an amendment to the EUA Lease Agreement dated March 25, 2002 was
signed that clearly defined the Production Payment as 50% of production to be
sold into the domestic (Russian) market. The MOU also allowed MOT to complete
its withdrawal from Goltech and transfer its interest to McGrady as a direct
stockholder in Goloil. The 11/2002 MOU also provided for joint approval of
capital expenditures by Goltech and MOT.

After the 11/2002 MOU was executed, and from April to September of 2003, the
Company began a series of discussions with InvestPetrol, McGrady, and EUA, with
respect to a potential buyout of their interests in Goloil. These discussions
ultimately did not lead to any agreement due to an inability to agree on price.

On September 14, 2003, MOT informed the Company of RussNeft's purchase of
McGrady, InvestPetrol and EUA.

On September 29, 2003, Messrs. Arleth, Cooper and Effimoff met with
representatives of RussNeft in Moscow to discuss entering into a new memorandum
of understanding.

At subsequent meetings, RussNeft indicated that it wanted to sell Goloil's
production at a fixed price based on the average price Goloil had received for
its oil (both domestic and export) for the previous year. That price of 2,400
rubles per ton (or $11.50 per barrel) became the price at which Goloil sold its
oil commencing in October 2003. On October 2, 2003, Teton signed a new
memorandum of understanding dated October 2, 2003 with RussNeft, Teton, McGrady
InvestPetrol, Goltech and Goloil (the "10/2003 MOU") which, among other things,
recognized certain of the existing arrangements and provided the parties would
seek a more general basis of cooperation to be negotiated in the future but
suspend for further discussion RussNeft's stated intention to have Goloil sell
its production at 2,400 rubles per ton.

Between mid-October 2003 and November 2003, Messrs. Effimoff (Chief Operating
Officer)and Gurevich (the Company's Senior Controller) met with representatives
of RussNeft in an effort to agree on the outstanding issues not addressed in the
10/2003 MOU. During this time, Goloil began selling its oil at $11.50 per barrel
and making payments to EUA at a flat rate of 19 million rubles per month
(approximately $650,000) in lieu of the production payment.

On November 3, 2003, Mr. Gurevich met with Mr. Sergei Bakhir, Vice President for
Operations of RussNeft, and other RussNeft executives in Moscow to discuss the
various issues between the parties. During the course of that meeting,
representatives of RussNeft first indicated an interest in purchasing Teton's
share of Goloil.

In November and December 2003, representatives of the Company continued to
explore with RussNeft whether a common ground could be found for proceeding with
the relationship. On December 15, 2003, the Company received RussNeft's proposed
budget for Goloil for 2004. Among other things, the budget provided for an
accelerated drilling program and capital expenditures that were beyond the
Company's means and which might never be recovered under the RussNeft pricing
policy of selling all of Goloil's production for 2,400 rubles per ton. On
December 22, 2003, the proposed 2004 Goloil budget was approved by the Goloil
board. The Company representatives on Goloil's board opposed the proposed 2004
budget.

On January 18 and 19, Messrs. Cooper, Effimoff and Arleth met at the Company's
Colorado office to consider the status of the relationship with RussNeft and the
possibility of recommending a sale of the Company's interest in Goloil to the
Company's Board.

In late January 2004 through February 12, 2004, Messrs. Effimoff and Gurevich
traveled to Moscow to, discuss with RussNeft the terms of a possible sale of the
Company's interest in Goloil.

On January 20, 2004, the Company hired an affiliate of Troika Dialog, a
Moscow-based investment bank ("Troika"), with a mandate to assist it in
negotiating the sale of its interest in Goloil.

On February 10, 2004, the Company received a letter from Mr. Gutseriev through
Troika. Among other things, the letter offered the Company $4.5 million for its
share in Goloil, which included payment of debt and equity for the Company.

During February 2004, representatives of Troika, acting on behalf of the
Company, met with Mr. Gutseriev on several occasions to discuss a revised offer
for the Company's interest in Goloil.

On March 2, 2004, following a Goloil Board meeting, Messrs. Cooper and Arleth,
accompanied by representatives of Troika, met with Mr. Gutseriev in Moscow to
negotiate the proposed sale of Teton's stake in Goloil.

On March 26, 2004, during a telephonic Board meeting, Mr. Arleth discussed with
the other Board members the plan to sell Goltech's interest in Goloil to
RussNeft if a fair and reasonable transaction could be structured under the
circumstances. The Board endorsed management's assessment and recommendation.

On March 31, 2004, we signed an agreement with RussNeft regarding the sale of
its interest in Goloil.

On April 5, 2004, we announced an agreement to acquire a majority interest in a
producing field in Russia (later disclosed to be the Samson transaction).

On April 6, 2004, the Company's Board unanimously approved the proposed terms of
the Goloil sale and authorized the execution of a definitive agreement.

On April 12, 2004, we announced the sale of Goloil. The press release stated in
relevant part:

"Teton will sell its 35% stake in the Goloil license to a private Russian
independent. In addition, the sale price will include all outstanding loans
and accrued interest owed to Teton. The closing of the Goloil transaction
is subject to approval by Teton's shareholders."

On April 20, 2004, a revised definitive Share Purchase and Sale Contract (the
"Share Purchase and Sale Contract") between the Company and RussNeft for the
sale of the Company's interest in Goloil was executed.

On May 13, 2004, we announced, among other things, further information on the
Goloil sale, that Vitol had exercised its first purchase right with respect to
the Samson transaction and that our $3.85 million deposit on this proposed
purchase had therefore been fully refunded.

The aggregate consideration of US$15,000,000 was ultimately arrived at through a
variety of factors:

o The amount of the loans, including accrued interest, due Goltech had
previously been established at US$6,039,771 at March 31, 2004; and

o The balance or US$8,960,229 was based in part on the parties' agreement on
the value of the reserves.

Summary of Material Terms of the Share Purchase and Sale Contract

On April 6 and April 13, 2004, our Board unanimously approved and on May 11,
2004, it unanimously ratified the Share Purchase and Sale Contract between our
wholly owned subsidiary Goltech Petroleum LLC and RussNeft, pursuant to which
Goltech agreed to sell our indirect 35.30% interest in Goloil to RussNeft. The
definitive Share Purchase and Sale Contract was executed by both parties on
April 20, 2004. Under Delaware law, completion of the Goloil sale requires the
approval of our stockholders since the Goloil sale constitutes the sale of
substantially all of our assets.

The material terms of the Share Purchase and Sale Contract are summarized below.

Parties

The parties to the Share Purchase and Sale Contract are Goltech Petroleum LLC, a
Texas limited liability company and our wholly owned subsidiary, and RussNeft.

The Assets

The asset to be sold is Goltech's 35.30% ownership stake in Goloil. Goloil's
significant asset is a license that encompasses 187 square kilometers (116
square miles) in the south central portion of the west Siberian basin. It is
located approximately 10 miles to the north and west of Samotlor, Russia's
largest oil field. Three producing fields are located within the license area:
Golevaya, Eguryak, and South Eguryak. The Goloil license expires in 2022, but
may be extended upon compliance with a specified program of operations and an
undertaking of additional investment after the end of the term. The Goloil
license may be terminated prior to its term if Goloil fails to comply with the
requirements of the license. The Assets to be sold constitute substantially all
of our operating assets.

The Purchase Price

The purchase price for our 35.30% interest in Goloil is $8,960,229 in cash. As
is described below, Goloil will also repay advances made by the Company to
Goloil totaling $6,039,771, of which $3,569,051 of the principal and $131,452 of
the accrued interest had been repaid as of April 2, 2004. The gross proceeds of
the two transactions to the Company will be $15,000,000. The advances were made
to Goloil by the Company to finance our 50% share of Goloil's capital
expenditures and currently bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum.

Closing

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the closing date for the Goloil sale is
expected to take place shortly after shareholder approval of the Goloil sale is
obtained and all other conditions of the Goloil sale are met.

Representations and Warranties

The agreement contains various customary representations and warranties made by
each of the parties to the agreement. Such representations and warranties relate
to, among other things, the enforceability of the agreement, the parties'
organization, the parties' authority to enter into the agreement, and the title
to the shares of Goloil being transferred.

Conditions to Completion of the Goloil Sale

In addition to stockholder approval of the transaction, the completion of the
sale of our assets is subject to the repayment of $6,039,771 in loans made by
the Company to Goloil, $3,569,051 of the principal and $131,452 of the accrued
interest of which had been repaid as of April 2, 2004.

Termination of the Share Purchase and Sale Contract

The contract may be terminated and the Goloil sale abandoned for various
reasons, including:

o by mutual consent of the parties;

o if we have not sent a notice to RussNeft by August 1, 2004, stating that
our stockholders have approved the Goloil sale;

o if RussNeft has not issued certain letters of credit to support payment of
the Purchase Price and the repayment of advances as required by the
agreement by August 16, 2004; and

o if Goloil has not repaid all debts, including the principal and interest
under all of its loan agreements with the Company, pursuant to the loan
repayment agreement described below.

Regulatory Approvals

The sale is subject to Russian Anti-Monopoly Commission approval.

Repayment of Loan Advances

In connection with the Goloil sale, the Company also entered into a separate
agreement with Goloil for the repayment of all of the outstanding loans and
advances owed to the Company by Goloil. At the date of the loan repayment
agreement, the amount of advances by the Company to Goloil, including interest
totaled $6,039,771. As of April 2, 2004, $3,569,051 of the principal and
$131,452 of the accrued interest had been repaid. As noted above, the repayment
of the loans is a condition to the closing of the Share Purchase and Sale
Contract.

Expenses of the Goloil Sale

Whether or not the Goloil sale is completed, each party is required to bear its
own costs and expense including fees of attorneys, accountants and financial
advisors. We currently estimate our legal and accounting costs in connection
with the sale to be approximately $250,000. Additionally, if the Goloil sale is
completed, we will owe an investment banking fee of $750,000 to Troika in
connection with its arrangement of the Goloil sale.

Absence of Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal

Under the applicable provisions of Delaware General Corporation Law, the
Company's stockholders will have no appraisal rights in connection with the
Proposed Transaction to seek appraisal for the fair value of the shares of
Common Stock. Currently there are provisions made by the Company to grant any
unaffiliated security holders access to the corporate files of the Company or to
obtain counsel or appraisal services at the expense of the Company.

No Opinion of Financial Advisor - Fairness of the Goloil Sale

The Board believes that in light of all the circumstances, including those set
forth under "Risk Factors" below, that the proposed Goloil sale is in the best
interests of and is fair and reasonable to the stockholders of the Company and
unanimously recommends that our stockholders approve the sale of Goloil.

Our Board has considered a number of factors in reaching this conclusion,
including, in particular, the following:

o The Company expects to realize a significant gain on the Goloil sale
currently estimated at approximately $12.6 million;

o The fact that RussNeft is the most likely purchaser for Goloil since it is
already the majority owner of Goloil;

o The fact that there is a limited universe of alternate buyers for a
minority interest in a Russian oil and gas company;

o The expected long term recovery of profits by our Company based on the
current structure of Goloil's ownership and the positions RussNeft has
taken under the agreements and, in particular, the fact that we would have
had to invest approximately $14.6 million in Goloil over the next three
years to fund RussNeft's accelerated capital expenditure programs, in order
to receive approximately $13.3 million in cash flow from reserves, rather
than receiving $15 million of cash in the Goloil sale now.

o Our minority position in Goloil does not allow us to maximize our return on
investment since RussNeft as majority owner is able to make decisions for
the benefit of RussNeft;

o RussNeft has caused Goloil to sell its production at a fixed price which
does not allow the Company to maximize the value of its investment in
Goloil;

o The inability of the Company to effectively prevent the discounted sales of
Goloil production;

o The difficulties the Company would face in continuing its relationship with
RussNeft;

o The fact that legal remedies for minority stockholders in Russia are
significantly more limited than in the United States and the potential
costs and effectiveness of seeking redress in Russian courts against a
Russian party;

o The fact that the Company pays the Russian mineral extraction tax and the
lifting costs on the 50% of Goloil's production that is paid to EUA as a
production payment and will do so through 2007;

o The fact that InvestPetrol has a 29.41% reversionary interest in Goloil's
profits from and after the time at which Teton receives its original
investment back which would reduce Teton's profit interest after payout of
its investment;

o Reductions in Goloil's revenues and projected future net revenues from
proved reserves as a result of the sales by Goloil at a fixed price and in
2002 as a result of various other factors previously reported by the
Company;

o The Company's desire to own a controlling interest in its operating
business;

o The potential availability of other potential oil fields for sale in Russia
at attractive prices comparable to the price the Company would receive in
the sale of Goloil; and

o The potential availability of the proceeds from the sale of Goloil for use
in pursuing other opportunities with the potential to improve the Company's
economic position.

Teton believes that the Goloil sale is fair to unaffiliated security holders in
light of all the circumstances. The transaction is not structured so that
approval of a majority of unaffiliated stockholders is required and the
non-employee directors did not retain an unaffiliated representative to act
solely on behalf of unaffiliated security holders for purposes of negotiating
the terms of the Goloil sale or preparing a report concerning the fairness of
the Goloil sale. However, the Company did retain an investment banking firm to
negotiate the best price for the Goloil sale and all non-employee directors
unanimously approved the sale. Given the price and the limited alternatives
available to a sale to RussNeft, the Company believes the sale to be fair and
reasonable under the circumstances.

Countervailing Considerations

The Board also identified and considered a number of potentially negative
factors in its deliberations concerning the Goloil sale, including, but not
limited to:

o The risk that if the Company cannot complete an acquisition within a
reasonable time after closing Goloil that its Common Stock could be
delisted from the AMEX;

o The risk that the Company cannot promptly reinvest the proceeds from the
Goloil sale it risks dissipating those proceeds in payment of operating
expenses; and

o The potential for a negative perception being created in the market by
reason of our not having a completed acquisition to replace our operating
business before exiting from our existing business.

Procedural Safeguards

The Board believes that sufficient procedural safeguards are present to ensure
the fairness of the Goloil sale. The belief is based upon the following factors:

o Approval of the Share Purchase and Sale Contract requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company;

o The Goloil sale was unanimously approved by the Directors of the Company,
including the independent members of the Board; and

o The Company retained an investment banking firm to negotiate the sale price
of the Goloil sale with RussNeft.

Accounting Treatment of Proposed Transaction

Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
upon consummation of the Proposed Transaction, we expect to reflect the results
of operations of Goloil as discontinued operations, including the related gain
on the sale, net of any applicable taxes commencing in the third quarter of
2004. For further information see the Pro Forma financial information included
as Appendix A-3.

SUMMARY PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Attached as Appendix A-3 is the Company's unaudited pro forma condensed
financial information, which gives effect to the sale of Goloil. As discussed in
Appendix A-3, and summarized below, the operations of Goloil have been
reclassified to discontinued operations and a gain of $12.6 million has been
recorded on the sale. The pro forma condensed financial information does not
purport to represent what the results of operations and financial position of
the Company would actually have been nor do they purport to project the results
of operations or financial position of the Company for any future period or as
of any date. The summary pro forma information set forth below is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the pro forma information set forth in Appendix A-3
including the notes thereto.

The following table summarizes key financial items as historically provided by
the Company and then on a pro forma basis, assuming the sale occurred on March
31, 2004:

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
SUMMARY PRO FORMA INFORMATION
GIVING EFFECT TO THE SALE OF GOLOIL

December 31, 2003 March 31, 2004
----------------- --------------
Historical Pro Forma Historical Pro Forma
Amounts, as After Amounts, After
Statement of Operations Data: Reported Goloil Sale as Reported Goloil Sale
---------------------------- -----------------------------

Sales $ 11,437,802 $ - $ 2,962,500 $ -

Net loss from continuing
operations applicable to
common shares: (8,415,537) (6,816,857) (3,075,083) (2,639,787)

Net income (loss) from
discontinued operations
applicable to common shares: - (1,598,680) - 12,177,001

Net (loss) income applicable to
common shares: (8,415,537) (8,415,537) (3,075,083) 9,537,214

Net loss from continuing
operations per common share: (1.23) (1.00) (0.35) (0.30)

Net income (loss) from
discontinued operations
per common share: - (0.23) - 1.39

Weighted average common shares
outstanding 6,840,303 6,840,303 8,747,165 8,747,165

Net (loss) income from per common
share $ (1.23) (1.23) $ (0.35) $ 1.09

Balance Sheet Data:

Current assets 10,325,326 20,696,760

Total assets 21,132,672 20,723,128

Current liabilities 13,011,002 732,261

Total liabilities 13,140,502 732,261

Total stockholders' equity 7,992,170 19,990,867

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table contains selected consolidated Financial Data and Operating
Information of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2003 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the unaudited financial statements of the Company for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2004 and the audited financial
statements for the three years ended December 31, 2003 set forth in Appendix A.
The results for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 are not indicative of results
for the full year 2004.

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA AND OPERATING INFORMATION
(In $000's, except as noted)

For the Quarter
Ended
March 31, For the Years Ended December 31,
------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
Financial
---------
Operating Revenues $ 2,963 $ 3,409 $ 11,438 $ 6,923 $ 1,625 $ 1,675 $ 1,518

Net loss (2,522) (781) (5,635) (10,974) (1,658) (3,066) (1,025)

Comprehensive loss (3,360) (695) (8,247) (11,115) (1,742) (2,957) (325)

Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities (1,563) 192 (3,011) (5,169) (1,553) (1,069) (903)

Total assets 21,133 10,995 20,718 10,012 2,211 2,317 1,789

Oil and gas properties,
net (successful efforts) 8,564 7,479 9,340 4,896 1,169 1,490 1,482

Notes payable 0 0 0 0 844 1,425 577

Proportionate share of
notes payable 8,220 2,845 7,419 2,948 770 395 0

Working capital (deficit) (2,686) (2,865) (1,160) 176 (1,430) (982) (246)

Stockholders' equity
(deficit) 7,992 5,154 10,205 4,879 (382) 58 (1,212)

Weighted average Common
shares outstanding -
basic and diluted 8,747 6,321 6,840 3,105 2,244 1,470 1,096

Basic and diluted loss per
common share (0.35) (0.12) (1.23) (3.53) (0.72) (2.04) (0.96)

Cash dividends declared
per common share 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Operating
---------
Net productive wells(1) 10.5 7.5 10.5 6.5 3.5 1.5 1.0

Net oil production -
barrels 167 151 632 471 95 143 134

Oil and gas property and
equipment expenditures 190 2,887 5,392 3,222 322 2,002 257

Proved reserves -
barrels(2, 3) 8,095 13,113 8,262 13,264 40,174 8,500 19,375

Proved developed reserves
- barrels(2, 3) 3,649 4,416 3,816 4,567 15,493 1,300 2,300

(1) Net well count is based on Teton's effective net interest as of the end of
each year. Prior to August 2000, Teton owned 100% of the interests in
Goltech. Subsequent to August 2000 our interest was reduced to 50%. In
November, 2002, it again became 100%.

(2) Teton revised its estimated proved and proved developed reserves downward
at the end of 2002. The reserve estimates were decreased at the end of 2002
based on additional data derived from production and other data from both
new and older wells producing in 2002. These had been revised upwards in
the previous year following the preparation of a waterflood feasibility
study that indicated the existence of substantial reserves from secondary
recovery. The decline in reserves from 1999 to 2000, reflected the sale of
50% of Teton's shares in Goloil to MOT.

(3) Teton again reduced its estimated proved reserves at the end of 2003. In
particular, the performance of several of the Company's Jurassic formation
wells led its engineers to reduce the anticipated primary (before
waterflood) recovery of reserves and revise their opinion concerning the
necessity of waterflooding. While the Company anticipates Goloil will
eventually recover most of the reduction in reserves through waterflooding,
SEC regulations do not permit the inclusion of such reserves in the proven
category in the absence of either a pilot program or formal written
commitment by the operator and non-operators in a project to commence the
waterflood project. The Company also removed several Jurassic locations
from the proved category, either because they were deemed uneconomic for
primary production alone, based on the performance of offsetting Jurassic
producing wells or in two cases because the operator and Company have not
yet formally agreed to drill them. The Company would expect to restore the
reserves from the two wells to the proven category when they are drilled.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed herein are
forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward looking
statements include, but are not limited to statements concerning anticipated
trends in revenues. Our actual results could differ materially from the results
discussed in such forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that we
will achieve the results expressed or implied in forward-looking statements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

Teton Petroleum Company is an independent oil and gas exploration and production
company whose primary focus is the Russian Federation and former Commonwealth of
Independent States ("CIS"). The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary,
Goltech owns a 35.30% equity interest in Goloil. RussNeft owns the remaining
64.70% of Goloil through two subsidiaries, McGrady and InvestPetrol. McGrady
holds 35.29% and InvestPetrol holds 29.41% of the equity interests in Goloil.
However, until Goltech and McGrady receive the return of 100% of their capital
investment in Goloil, they are each entitled to a 50% net profit in Goloil.
Goloil is managed by a seven person management board on which we have two
representatives. Pursuant to the existing agreements among Goloil's
shareholders, Goltech and McGrady share equally in capital expenditures, gross
revenues, costs and expenses, until they receive 100% return of their
investments in Goloil. Limited Liability Company EnergoSoyuz-A ("EUA"), a wholly
owned subsidiary of RussNeft, is the lessor of certain oil field facilities to
Goloil pursuant to a Lease Agreement No. EST 160/000630 (the "EUA Lease
Agreement") among EUA as lessor and Goloil as lessee dated as June 2000. EUA is
also the recipient of a production payment ("Production Payment") consisting of
50% of Goloil's production (or at EUA's option, cash in lieu of such
production). Since October 2003 EUA has taken cash instead of oil under the
Production Payment in the amount of approximately $650,000 per month. In
addition, Goloil has been selling its oil at a fixed price of 2,400 rubles or
$11.50 per barrel. It is possible that a significant portion of such sales have
been made to or through one or more affiliates of RussNeft.

RussNeft, which was founded in the fall of 2002, is one of Russia's largest
independent oil producers. In September 2003, RussNeft acquired a 64.70% equity
interest in Goloil in a private transaction in which it purchased all of the
shareholders of Goloil (other than Goltech) consisting of McGrady and
InvestPetrol. At that time, RussNeft also acquired EUA, the lessor of various
wells and facilities to Goloil under the EUA Lease Agreement. In acquiring such
interest, RussNeft became entitled to appoint a majority of the management board
of Goloil and acceded to EUA's interest in the production payment and McGrady's
and InvestPetrol's reversionary interests in Goloil.

Goloil holds a twenty-five year renewable license to produce oil and gas in a
portion of Western Siberia. The license was issued by the Russian Federation and
expires in 2022, but may be extended if Goloil complies with certain specified
conditions and undertakes additional operations at the end of the term of the
license. The Goloil license encompasses 187 square kilometers (78 square miles)
in the south central portion of the west Siberian basin. The license area is
located approximately 50 miles north of Nizhnevartovsk in western Siberia. Three
oil producing fields are located within the license area: Golevaya, Eguryak, and
South Eguryak.

Highlights from the year ended December 31, 2003 include:

o Annual sales increased by 42.5% from 443,268 to 631,626 barrels, net to
Teton.

o Seven new wells (gross) were drilled on the Company's Goloil license
bringing the total to 21 wells, 16 of which were in production at year-end.
Of the 21 wells, one is awaiting completion, and four are off-line pending
upgrades to the gathering system.

o Revenues increased 65.2%, from $6,923,320 to $11,437,802.

o The Company's net loss for the year narrowed from $10,973,923 to
$5,634,844.

o In April 2003, Teton's Board of Directors made several changes to the
management of the Company the most important of which was the appointment
of a new President and Chief Executive Officer, Karl Arleth, who assumed
responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Company. Other
management changes made at the time included the appointment of a
Controller and an interim full-time Chief Financial Officer.

o Also in April 2003, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters from
Steamboat Springs, CO to Denver, CO and over the next several months hired
several administrative and accounting personnel to support the Company's
plans for growth. The Company also took steps to tighten its internal
controls, enhance its ability to evaluate potential acquisitions, and
improve its information systems.

o In May 2003, the Company effected a 1:12 reverse share split and listed its
shares on the American Stock Exchange.

o Also in May 2003, the Company announced the signing of a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire the 50% ownership interest in LLC Chernogorskoye held
by Anderman Smith, which if completed would have added approximately 4,000
BOPD to the Company's net oil production. However, the Company was unable
to close this transaction due to differences with the seller over closing
price adjustments the Company believed necessary following due diligence.
Although discussions continued on this possible acquisition until spring of
2004, such discussions were terminated in May 2004.

o In November 2003, the Company successfully concluded the private placement
of $9.8 million (with an additional $500,000 issued in January of 2004) of
8% Convertible Preferred Stock to be used primarily for working capital in
the Goloil license and for general corporate purposes.

o The Company opened a Moscow Representative Office in December to better
monitor its operations in Russia as well as to establish a higher profile
in the Russian oil industry and facilitate greater deal-flow as it pursues
acquisition opportunities there and in other FSU states.

Financial highlights from the quarter ended March 31, 2004 include the
following:

o Teton's share of production from Goloil increased by 10.5% to 167,162
barrels year over year in the first quarter.

o First quarter production revenues declined year over year by 13.1% to
$2,962,500 primarily as a consequence of the low oil prices received
related to new product marketing arrangements put in place for Goloil by
RussNeft starting in the fourth quarter of 2003.

o Teton's net loss for the first quarter widened from $781,085 to $2,522,113
from the same period in 2003.

During 2004 Teton's activities have been focused in three areas:

1) Discussions with its partner RussNeft over the management of its Goloil
subsidiary;

2) Negotiating the proposed sale of Goloil to RussNeft; and

3) Acquiring other producing oil properties in Russia and the CIS.

Sale of Goloil Interest to RussNeft

In September 2003, RussNeft, a newly formed Russian independent oil producer
acquired the 64.70% of Goloil shares held by Mediterranean Overseas
Trust/McGrady and InvestPetrol and assumed responsibility for operating Goloil's
Eguryak License.

Commencing October 1, RussNeft began selling Goloil's production to an entity
believed by the Company to be an affiliate of RussNeft for a fixed price of
2,400 rubles per ton ($11.50 per barrel), a price substantially below the
blended market price Goloil formerly received selling its production into the
export, near abroad and domestic markets and significantly below current market
prices. As a consequence, the Company estimates its revenues after taxes for the
quarter were reduced by approximately $1.44 million in fourth quarter of 2003
and by $2.02 million in the first quarter of 2004 from what it would have
received under its previous arrangements. Moreover, since this pricing
arrangement prevailed through the end of the fourth quarter and beyond, the
Company had to significantly reduce the present value of its reserves effective
January 1, 2004, as detailed in its Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December
31, 2003.

Efforts to resolve these and other issues with RussNeft culminated in a series
of meetings in Russia starting in November 2003 between Teton executives and
representatives of RussNeft, which failed to yield an acceptable resolution.
Shortly thereafter, the Company and RussNeft began to discuss the terms of an
exit via a sale of Teton's interest in Goloil to RussNeft.

The proposed sale of the Company's interest was announced on April 11, 2004 and
on May 12, 2004 the Company provided additional detail in a press release
including the sales price. The purchase price for our 35.30% interest in Goloil
is $8,960,229 in cash. As is described below, Goloil will also repay advances
made by the Company to Goloil totaling $6,039,771, of which $3,569,051 of the
principal and $131,452 of the accrued interest had been repaid as of April 2,
2004. The gross proceeds of the two transactions to the Company will be
$15,000,000. The advances were made to Goloil by the Company to finance our 50%
share of Goloil's capital expenditures and currently bear interest at the rate
of 8% per annum. On May 12, 2004, the Company also disclosed that the Goloil
sale would result in a gain of approximately $12 million.

The sale is subject to Russian Anti-Monopoly Commission approval.

2004 Operational and Financial Objectives

With the Company's agreement to sell Goloil, subject to shareholder approval,
the Company is now focusing its efforts on seeking to acquire oil and gas
properties as described below.

The Company plans to use the proceeds from this transaction to acquire other oil
and gas properties. The Company is primarily focused on acquisition
opportunities in Russia and the former CIS states with the characteristics
described below. However, the Company may consider other opportunities outside
its area of geographic focus, as described below. The Company has been actively
seeking acquisitions of properties for approximately one year. Specifically, the
Company has been targeting small to medium-sized oil fields with existing
production ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 barrels of oil per day with proven
reserves that provide immediate cash flow, production, and an opportunity for
additional upside potential from developmental drilling and other exploitation
opportunities. The Company has been focusing its efforts in the West Siberian
Basin and in the Komi Region of Russia but could consider opportunities either
inside or outside of Russia and the former CIS states where:

o It can achieve operating control over the acquired asset;

o There is sufficient operating infrastructure, including gathering systems,
pipeline connections, electricity generation, and oil processing
facilities;

o The acquisition cost is between US$1.50 - US$3.00 per barrel of proved
reserves (for Russian and CIS properties); and

o The investment has the potential to produce an internal rate of return in
excess of 15%.

The Company has engaged in preliminary negotiations regarding several properties
in Russia during the past year, and is continuing to seek acquisition
opportunities, but has not, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, entered into
any agreements with any party except as described below with respect to Samson
International Resources.

Teton's plans to pursue such acquisitions means that it will incur increased due
diligence and legal expenses, that will be reflected in its G&A expenses. The
Company is now devoting significant internal resources to evaluating
acquisitions while also utilizing the services of outside technical, legal and
accounting consultants.

Samson International Transaction

On April 5, 2004, the Company announced that it had signed a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire a majority (52%) interest in a producing field in Russia
subject to many conditions and further due diligence. A cash deposit of $3.85
million was paid by the Company to Samson International Resources ("Samson") in
connection with the proposed sale. The closing of the acquisition was subject to
several conditions, including a right of first purchase held by Samson's
partner, Vitol, to acquire Samson's interest in the field on the same terms
offered by the Company. Vitol elected to exercise this right in May and Samson
subsequently refunded the Company's deposit on May 11, 2004, though the contract
between Samson and the Company technically remains in effect. In the event that
Vitol does not purchase Samson's 52% interest, the Company and Samson could
determine to proceed with the transaction subject to the Company's due diligence
and assuming that all other conditions to the sale are met. However, the Company
believes, in light of the exercise of the first purchase right by Vitol, that
this transaction is unlikely to occur.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2003

The table below summarizes some of the most important components of our
revenues, operating costs and net loss during in 2003. Please note that since
Teton absorbs its share of the cost of producing the oil paid under the
production payment (included in the cost amounts), per barrel costs are
effectively doubled.

Operating Highlights for the Year ended December 31
(in U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise noted)

2003 2002 Change($) Change(%)
---------------------------------------------------

Sales, Barrels 631,626 443,268 188,358 42.5%
Average Daily Sales,
Barrels 1,730 1,214 516 42.5%
Average Selling Price,
$/barrel $ 18.11 $ 15.62 $ 2.49 15.9%
Revenues $11,437,802 $ 6,923,320 $ 4,514,482 65.2%

Costs of Sales and
Expenses, excl. DD&A
Production Costs 2,020,447 1,218,411 802,036 65.8%
Transportation &
Marketing 807,266 611,956 195,310 31.9%
Taxes other than Income
taxes 5,864,920 3,537,990 2,326,930 65.8%
Export Duties 1,492,999 910,936 582,063 63.9%
----------- ----------- ----------- -------
10,185,632 6,279,293 3,906,339 62.2%

Results from Goloil
Operations, before DD&A 1,252,170 644,027 608,143 94.4%
Less General &
Administrative Expense,
Goloil 837,134 588,774 248,360 42.2%
----------- ----------- ----------- -------
Goloil operating (loss)
income before DD&A 415,036 55,253 359,783 -

Depreciation, Depletion
& Amortization, Goloil 1,582,513 451,930 1,130,583 250.2%
----------- ----------- ----------- -------

Operating loss, Goloil (1,167,477) (396,677) (770,800) -

General & Administrative
Expense, Teton 3,919,746 4,744,952 (825,206) -17.4%
----------- ----------- ----------- -------

Operating Loss, Teton $(5,087,223) $(5,141,629) $ 54,406 -
=========== =========== =========== =======

Costs and Expenses Per Barrel during the Year ended December 31
(in U.S. Dollars)

Change
Controllable Costs 2003 2002 ($) % Change
-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Production Costs $ 3.20 $ 2.75 $0.45 16.4%
G&A - Goloil 1.33 1.33 (0.00) -0.0%
G&A - Teton 6.21 10.70 (4.49) -42.0%
----- ----- ------ ------
10.74 14.78 (4.04) -27.4%

Non-Controllable Costs
Transportation &
Marketing 1.28 1.38 (0.10) -7.2%
Taxes other than
Income Taxes 9.29 7.98 1.31 16.4%
Export Duties 2.36 2.06 0.30 14.6%
----- ----- ----- -----
$12.93 $11.42 $1.51 13.2%

In 2003, Teton's net loss narrowed from $10,973,923 to $5,634,844, or $8,415,537
after giving effect to the imputed preferred stock dividends for inducements and
beneficial conversion charges associated with the Company's 8% convertible
preferred stock offering and subsequent conversion. In terms of earnings per
share, Teton's loss narrowed from $3.53 to $1.23 per share. The decrease in
losses was largely attributable to improved operating results at Goloil and a
significant decline in non-cash charges related to financing, offset by
increased salaries and other expenses related to the Company's increased
staffing levels.

Oil revenues increased from $6,923,320 to $11,437,802 from 2002 to 2003. The
increase was due to both a 42.5% increase in barrels sold and a 15.9% increase
in the average price per barrel sold from $15.62 to $18.11 per barrel.
Historically, Teton has not hedged its sales and this remained the case in 2003.
However, as discussed above revenues were less than expected during the fourth
quarter of 2004 by $1.44 million due to the fixed price paid by an affiliate of
RussNeft when compared to blended market price Goloil received previously. The
Company anticipates that a similar reduction in revenues and operating earnings
for each 2004 quarter in which the Company retains an interest in Goloil.

Teton's share of Goloil's costs of sales and expenses (before depreciation,
depletion and amortization expenses or "DD&A") increased 62.2%, which was
slightly less than the increase in revenues. As seen from the table above, taxes
other than income taxes and export tariffs are both important contributors to
these costs and expenses accounting for more than 70% of the total costs in both
2002 and 2003. Both are tied directly to revenues, and in the case of the export
tariff, to the price of oil as well. Export tariffs would have been higher had
not Goloil effectively stopped exporting oil at the end of the third quarter,
instead selling all of its production domestically for a flat fee of 2,400
rubles per barrel.

Teton's share of Goloil's operating income before DD&A increased from $55,253 to
$415,036 from 2002 to 2003, but after Goloil's DD&A its share of operating
losses rose from $396,677 to $1,167,477. DD&A itself increased by 250.1%, from
$451,930 to $1,582,513, reflecting the capital expenditures incurred by Goloil
as it has developed its license.

General and administrative expense ("G&A") at Teton decreased from $4,774,952 to
$3,919,746 or 17.4% from 2002 to 2003. The decrease was largely attributable to
a $1,562,575 decline in fees paid to consultants for capital raising activities
offset by increases in compensation to officers and employees ($323,951),
professional fees ($109,146), travel and entertainment ($193,773), and expenses
relating to marketing, advertising, and investor relations ($167,987). In
addition to the increase in compensation relating to additional staffing to meet
Company goals and objectives, most of the other G&A increases were the result of
activities such as Teton's preferred stock offering, its listing on the AMEX,
the filing of its registration statement with the SEC, and due diligence with
respect to the proposed acquisition of LLC Chernogorskoye.

Results of Operations for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2004

The table below summarizes some of the most important components of our
revenues, operating costs and net loss in the first quarter of this year. It is
important to note that since Teton absorbs 50% of the cost of producing the oil
paid under the Goloil production payment (included in the cost amounts), Teton's
per barrel production costs are effectively doubled.

Operating Highlights for the Quarter ended March 31
(in U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise noted)

2004 2003 Change % Change

Sales, Barrels 167,162 151,304 15,858 10.5%
Average Daily Sales, Barrels 1,837 1,663 174 10.5%
Average Selling Price, $/barrel 17.72 22.53 (4.81) -21.3%
Revenues 2,962,500 3,408,718 (446,218) -13.1%

Costs of Sales and Expenses, excl. DD&A
Production Costs 622,277 326,305 295,972 90.7%
Transportation & Marketing - 280,965 (280,965) -100.0%
Taxes other than Income taxes 1,973,275 1,427,572 545,703 38.2%
Exploration cost (Geology & Geophysics) 154,776 93,148 61,628 66.2%
Export Duties - 559,240 (559,240) -100.0%
--------- --------- --------- ------
2,750,328 2,687,230 63,098 2.3%

Results from Goloil Operations, before
DD&A 212,172 721,488 (509,315) -
Less General & Administrative Expense,
Goloil 184,086 219,557 (35,471) -16.2%
--------- --------- --------- ------
28,086 501,931 (473,844) -

Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization,
Goloil 390,386 332,738 57,648 17.3%

Operating Income (Loss), Goloil (362,300) 169,193 (531,493) -

General & Administrative Expense, Teton 2,102,638 772,899 1,329,739 172.0%
Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization,
Teton 19,284 - - -

Operating Income (Loss), Teton (2,484,222) (603,706) (1,880,516) -

Costs and Expenses during the Quarter ended March 31
(in U.S. $ per barrel)

2004 2003 Change % Change
Controllable Costs
Production Costs 3.72 2.16 1.57 72.7%
G&A - Goloil 1.10 1.45 (0.35) -24.1%
G&A - Teton 12.58 5.11 7.47 146.2%
-------- ------ ----- ------
17.40 8.72 8.69 99.5%

Non-Controllable Costs
Transportation & Marketing - 1.86 (1.86) -100.0%
Taxes other than Income Taxes 11.80 9.44 2.37 25.1%
Export Duties - 3.70 (3.70) -100.0%
----- ------ ------ ------
11.80 14.99 (3.18) -21.2%

During the first quarter, Teton's net loss, applicable to Common stock, widened
from $781,085 in the first quarter of 2003 to $3,075,083 or $2,293,998 after
taking into account non-cash inducement charges of $521,482 for beneficial
conversion of the preferred stock and preferred dividends of $31,488 in the
first quarter of 2004. On a per share basis, Teton's loss widened from $0.12 per
share to $0.35. The increased loss was largely due to a shift in its share of
Goloil's operating income from a gain of $169,193 in the first quarter of 2003
to a loss of $362,300 in the first quarter of 2004, along with an increase in
Teton domestic general and administrative ("G&A") expenses from $772,899 to
$2,102,638 during the same periods, both of which are discussed in the
paragraphs below.

Teton's share of Goloil revenues fell year over year from $3,408,718 to
$2,962,500 in the first quarter. The decrease reflected a 21.3% decrease in
average selling price from $22.53 to $17.72 per barrel, partially offset by a
10.5% increase in production volume from 151,304 to 167,162 barrels. Production
costs increased by $295,972, or 90.7%, while taxes other than income taxes
increased by $545,703 or 38.2%. The increase in production costs was tied to
increased workover activity and higher diesel fuel expenditures. Taxes other
than income taxes include the Russian Minerals Extraction Tax and Value Added
Tax (VAT) and represent significant expenses for all Russian oil producers. The
Mineral Extraction Tax is a tax on revenues tied to the price of Urals blend
crude, a benchmark for exports. Goloil no longer incurs export tariffs or
transportation charges under the marketing arrangement now in place; all sales
take place at the wellhead. Teton's share of Goloil's depreciation, depletion,
and amortization expenses increased by $57,648.

First quarter domestic G&A expense at Teton increased from $772,899 to
$2,102,638 year over year, an increase of 172.0%. The key factors contributing
to this increase were an increase in compensation costs of $522,723 including
management bonuses paid in January, as well as increases in advertising and
public relations expenses of $307,262, legal and accounting expenses of
$150,248, franchise taxes of $128,000, consulting fees of $97,467, and
geological and engineering expenses of $73,922. In addition to the increase in
compensation relating to additional staffing to meet Company goals and
objectives, many of the other increases in G&A expenses were the result of
Teton's due diligence and financing costs incurred in connection with
preliminary negotiations to acquire and develop new oil and gas properties in
Russia.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company had a cash balance of $7,856,899 on March 31, 2004 and a working
capital deficit of $2,685,676. Excluding the pro rata consolidation of Goloil's
working capital deficit, Teton has a working capital surplus of $7,011,577.

Assuming shareholder approval is obtained and the sale of Goloil closes in the
latter half of July, the Company anticipates it will have approximately $20
million in cash at the end of July 2004. In addition, its $9.9 million share of
Goloil's net liabilities will be extinguished leaving it with a working capital
position essentially equal to its cash.

Sources and Uses of Funds

Historically, Teton's primary source of liquidity has been cash provided by
equity offerings. Such offerings will continue to play an important role in
financing Teton's business and the Company anticipates seeking approval to raise
additional equity capital from its shareholders at its annual meeting. In
addition, the Company is working to establish a borrowing facility with one or
more international banks, most likely in the form of a revolving line of credit
that will be used primarily for the acquisition of producing properties and for
developmental drilling and other capital expenditures. There can be no
assurances however, as to whether and on what terms such financing would be
available.

The Company's cash flow is dependent on its ability to obtain dividends and loan
repayments from Goloil through its Goltech subsidiary. As a minority
shareholder, the Company lacks power to compel Goloil to put dividends to
Goltech. Teton will continue in the position of minority stockholder in which
under Russian law, its rights and remedies are limited compared to Western
standards. As majority owner, RussNeft could cause the Company not to receive
any cash flow or profit from its investment in Goloil.

The Company also currently lacks funding to finance its share of RussNeft's
accelerated drilling plans for Goloil. The Company has disagreed with RussNeft
over the pace of a drilling at Goloil. RussNeft has proposed plans to
significantly accelerate Goloil's drilling program. The Company's budgeted share
of Goloil capital expenditures is approximately $14.6 million over the next
three years. The Company would have to seek external financing to pay its share
of this program and believes that such investment would not result in adequate
returns to its shareholders given the current economics of its Goloil
investment. If the sale of Goloil were completed these uncertainties would be
removed.

Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures

Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was
$1,563,180 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $191,787 for the
three months ended March 31, 2003. As described above the Company's net loss
increased to $2,522,113 from $781,085 at March 31, 2003.

RussNeft, the operator of Goloil continues to proceed in the development of
Goloil's oil and gas resulting in the Company investing $190,444 in the Goloil
oil and gas properties in the first quarter. Resulting from the Company's first
quarter negotiations with RussNeft, the company received $1,065,000 from Goloil
as repayment of advances made to Goloil prior to December 31, 2003. The Company
received an additional $3,658,252 as of April 2, 2004.

During the first quarter of 2004, the Company received $449,997 from the sale of
Preferred stock. The increase in proceeds from advances represents amounts
advanced by RussNeft to Goloil. As discussed above, such advances will be
eliminated upon completion of the Company's proposed sale of its interest in
Goloil.

The following table shows Teton's contractual obligations, including its pro
rata share of Goloil's liabilities and planned future capital expenditures by
expected maturity.

Contractual Obligations Payments due by period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Less than 1-3 3-5 More than
1 year years years 5 years
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proportionate Share of $8,219,652 $8,219,652 0 0 0
Goloil Debt (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share of Goloil Capital $14,600,000 0 $14,600,000 0 0
Expenditure Budget (2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset Retirement Obligation $129,500 0 0 0 $129,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Contractual $22,949,152 $8,219,652 $14,600,000 0 $129,500
Obligations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Represents Teton's pro rata share of Goloil's debts. Teton is not liable
for Goloil's debts.

(2) Based on current capital expenditure plans, including the accelerated
drilling budget approved by the Goloil Board of Directors on December 22,
2003.

Income Taxes, Net Operating Losses and Tax Credits

Currently, Goloil pays a profits tax in Russia equal to 24% of net profits as
defined by Russian income tax law. As discussed in our 10-KSB the taxation
system in Russia is evolving as the central government transforms itself from a
command to a market-oriented economy. Based on current tax law and the U.S.
Russian Income Tax Treaty the profits tax paid to Russia will be a creditable
tax when determining the Company's U.S. income taxes payable, if any. At March
31, 2004 the Company has a U.S. net operating loss tax carry forward of
approximately $20,000,000, utilization of which is limited under IRC section
382.

While Teton expects to realize a profit of approximately $12.6 million from the
sale of Goloil, Teton's tax advisors anticipate that it will incur only a
relatively small Alternative Minimum Tax liability of approximately $180,000.

Critical Accounting Policies

In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and
assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial
condition in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results
could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and
conditions. We believe that the following discussion addresses our most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of
our financial condition and results of operations and require our most
difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to
make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Reserve Estimates: The information regarding the Company's share of oil and gas
reserves, the changes thereto and the resulting net cash flows are all dependent
upon assumptions used in preparing the Company's annual reserve study. A
qualified independent petroleum engineer, in accordance with standards of
applicable regulatory agencies and the Securities and Exchange Commission
definitions, prepares the Company's reserve study. Estimates of economically
recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and future net cash flows necessarily
depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as historical
production from the area compared with production from other producing areas,
the assumed effects of regulations by governmental agencies and assumptions
governing future oil and natural gas prices, the exchange rate between the
Russian ruble and the U.S. dollar, future operating costs, severance, ad
valorem, export, excise and other taxes, development costs and workover and
remedial costs, all of which may, in fact, vary considerably from actual
results. For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities
of oil and natural gas attributable to any particular group of properties,
classifications of such reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the
future net cash flows expected there from may vary substantially. Any
significant variance in the assumptions could materially affect the estimated
quantity and value of the reserves, which could affect the carrying value of the
Company's oil and gas properties and the rate of depletion of the oil and gas
properties. Management believes that the current assumptions used in preparation
of the reserve study are reasonable. The Company's revised downward its estimate
of oil and gas reserves by 4.4 million barrels in the fourth quarter of 2003
primarily due to the reclassification of certain waterflood reserves and
reserves associated with undrilled locations to probable. Only reserves
associated with two wells planned and budgeted for 2004 have been classified as
proved undeveloped. The Company's estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2003
and 2002 were prepared by independent petroleum engineering consultants
Gustavson and Associates.

Property, Equipment and Depreciation: The Company follows the successful efforts
method of accounting for oil and gas properties. As of March 31, 2004 all of the
Company's oil and gas assets are held in one cost center located in Siberia,
Russia. As the Company makes additional acquisitions it will have additional
cost centers. Under the successful efforts method of accounting the costs of
development wells are capitalized, but exploratory wells are capitalized only if
they are successful. The Company plans to increase its oil and gas reserves by
acquisition and the development of reserves in place. Accordingly, acquisition
and drilling costs on successful wells will be capitalized. Capitalized costs
will be depleted and depreciated using the units of production method based on
estimated proved oil reserves as determined by independent engineers, currently
Gustavson and Associates. If the estimates of oil and gas reserves are changed
materially then the amount of depreciation and depletion recorded by the Company
could increase or decrease materially. In addition the carrying costs of the oil
and gas properties are subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 144, "Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." The Company is required to
impair the net book value for a cost center when such net book value is greater
than the estimated future cash flows for such cost center. At March 31, 2004 the
Company's estimated cash flow for its Siberian cost center, using the domestic
Russian price of 2,400 rubles per ton ($11.50 per barrel) exceed the carrying
value.

Pro Rata Consolidation: The Company currently pro rata consolidates its 50%
interest in Goloil, because, as of March 31, 2004, Management believes that to
be the most meaningful presentation. If the Company completes the proposed sale
of its interest in Goloil then the assets and liabilities of Goloil will be
eliminated in recording the gain on sale.

Production Payment: During June, 2000 the Company entered into a Master
Agreement that requires, among other things, a seven year production payment to
EUA equal to 50% of the oil produced from new and existing Goloil wells in
exchange for wells and facilities constructed by EUA. Because the production
payment was for a specified amount of production and not for a fixed and
determinable dollar amount, the Company did not record such transaction as a
loan. Currently, Goloil is paying EUA a flat amount of 19,000,000 rubles per
month (approximately $650,000 per month), which, at current prices, is less than
50% of the oil produced. If the Company is not successful in its efforts to sell
Goloil to RussNeft, we would continue our interest in Goloil reserves, which
would continue to be subject to a production payment through June 2007, which
may cause future impairment of our investment in such properties.

Asset Retirement Obligation: During the fourth quarter of 2004 the Company
applied the provisions of SFAS 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations"
and recorded the estimated December 31, 2003 liability for the retirement of its
Russian oil and gas assets along with a corresponding increase in the carrying
value of the related oil and gas properties. The liability was estimated based
on the estimated, discounted future cost to plug the oil and gas wells existing
at December 31, 2003 plus the costs of clean up based on the Company's current
understanding of the standards that will be applied at the time of retirement.
The Company recorded an increase in the asset retirement obligation during the
first quarter of 2004 solely due to the accretion of the discount. If the
Company does not sell Goloil, the Company will continually review the
assumptions it used in making such estimate and revise the liability as
required.

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION

The Proposed Transaction should not result in the recognition of income or gain
to the Company's stockholders, as none of the sales proceeds will be distributed
as a dividend or otherwise with respect to the Company's shares. The Proposed
Transaction should be a "taxable" transaction to the Company for U.S. income tax
purposes. However, the Company expects to recognize gain from the Proposed
Transaction in an amount that is less than the amount of its available net
operating loss carry-forwards. Accordingly, the Proposed Transaction should
result in relatively modest amounts due for U.S. federal income tax, consisting
entirely of "alternative minimum tax" estimated at approximately $181,000.

TETON WILL NOT SEEK AN OPINION OF COUNSEL WITH RESPECT TO THE ANTICIPATED TAX
CONSEQUENCES. THE FOREGOING SUMMARY OF CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
IS INCLUDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE TO
ANY STOCKHOLDER. TETON RECOMMENDS THAT EACH STOCKHOLDER CONSULT HIS OR HER OWN
TAX ADVISER REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION.

No U.S. regulatory requirements must be complied with or approvals obtained
prior to the completion of the sale, other than stockholder approval.

CERTAIN RUSSIAN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION

Neither the Company nor Goltech will be liable for any taxes imposed by the
Russian Federation or any constituent entity thereof arising out of the Proposed
Transaction. Under the Tax Code of the Russian Federation, a nonresident foreign
entity is not subject to tax on income from the sale of shares of a Russian
company unless more than fifty percent (50%) of the assets of the Russian
company, as measured by book value, are immovable property. The double tax
treaty between the U.S. and the Russian Federation contains an essentially
identical exemption. Goloil has undertaken to provide a certified statement that
less than 50% of its assets are immovable property.

USE OF PROCEEDS

o It can achieve operating control over the acquired asset;

o There is sufficient operating infrastructure, including gathering systems,
pipeline connections, electricity generation, and oil processing
facilities;

o The acquisition cost is between US$1.50 - US$3.00 per barrel of proved
reserves (for Russian and CIS properties); and

o The investment has the potential to produce an internal rate of return in
excess of 15%.

SAMSON INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION

RISK FACTORS

The proposed Goloil sale poses a high degree of risk for our stockholders.
Before deciding how to vote on this proposal, stockholders should carefully
consider the following risks.

Risks of Doing Business in Russia

Weaknesses relating to the Russian legal system and Russian legislation create
an uncertain environment for investment and for business activity.

Russia is still developing the legal framework required by a market economy.
Several fundamental Russian laws have only recently become effective. The recent
nature of much of Russian legislation and the rapid evolution of the Russian
legal system place the enforceability and underlying constitutionality of laws
in doubt and result in ambiguities, inconsistencies and anomalies. In addition,
Russian legislation often leaves substantial gaps in the regulatory
infrastructure. Among the risks of the current Russian legal system are:

o since 1991, Soviet law has been largely, but not entirely, replaced by a
new legal regime as established by the 1993 Federal Constitution, the 1995
Civil Code and by other federal laws, and by decrees, orders and
regulations issued by the president, the government and federal ministries,
which are, in turn, complemented by regional and local rules and
regulations. These legal norms, at times, overlap or contradict one
another;

o limited judicial and administrative guidance on interpreting Russian
legislation;

o the relative inexperience of judges in interpreting Russian legislation;

o a high degree of discretion on the part of governmental authorities; and

o bankruptcy procedures that are not well developed and are subject to abuse.

All of these weaknesses could affect our ability to enforce our rights under
contracts, or to defend ourselves against claims by others.

Lack of independence and inexperience of certain members of the judiciary and
the difficulty of enforcing court decisions and governmental discretion in
instigating, joining and enforcing claims could prevent us or you from obtaining
effective redress in a court proceeding, including enforcing our rights as a
stockholder of a Russian company or in respect of expropriation or
nationalization.

The independence of the judicial system and its immunity from economic,
political and nationalistic influences in Russia remains largely untested. The
court system is understaffed and underfunded. Judges and courts are generally
inexperienced in the area of business and corporate law. Russia is a civil law
jurisdiction and, as such, judicial precedents have no binding effect on
subsequent decisions. In addition, most court decisions are not readily
available to the public. Enforcement of court judgments can in practice be very
difficult in Russia. All of these factors make judicial decisions in Russia
difficult to predict and effective redress uncertain. Additionally, court claims
are often used in furtherance of political aims. We may be subject to such
claims and as a foreign party may not be able to receive a fair hearing.
Additionally, court judgments are not always enforced or followed by law
enforcement agencies.

These uncertainties also extend to property rights. During Russia's
transformation from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, legislation
has been enacted to protect private property against expropriation and
nationalization. However, it is possible that due to the lack of experience in
enforcing these provisions and due to political changes, these protections would
not be enforced in the event of an attempted expropriation or nationalization.

Unlawful or arbitrary government action may have an adverse effect on our
business.

Government authorities have a high degree of discretion in Russia and at times
exercise their discretion arbitrarily, without hearing or private notice, and
sometimes in a manner that is contrary to law. Moreover, the government also has
the power in certain circumstances, by regulation or government act, to
interfere with the performance of, nullify or terminate contracts. Unlawful or
arbitrary governmental actions have included withdrawal of licenses, sudden and
unexpected tax audits, criminal prosecutions and civil actions. Federal and
local government entities have also used common defects in matters surrounding
share issuances and registration as pretexts for court claims and other demands
to invalidate such issuances and registrations and/or to void transactions.
Unlawful or arbitrary government action, if directed at us, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.

Risks if Goloil Sale is Not Approved

The Company would need to seek external financing to fund Goloil's accelerated capital
expenditure program.

The Company currently lacks funding to finance its share of RussNeft's
accelerated drilling plans for Goloil. The Company has disagreed with RussNeft
over the pace of a drilling at Goloil. RussNeft has proposed plans to
significantly accelerate Goloil's drilling program. The Company's budgeted share
of Goloil capital expenditures is approximately $14.6 million over the next
three years. The Company would have to seek external financing to pay its share
of this program and believes that such investment would not result in adequate
returns to its shareholders given the current economics of its Goloil
investment.

The Company's cash flow is dependent on its ability to obtain dividends from
Goloil.

It may be difficult to sell our investment in Goloil to another buyer if the
Goloil sale to RussNeft is not approved.

The Company's minority status and lack of control over Goloil's operations makes
it an illiquid investment. If the Goloil sale to RussNeft is not approved, it is
likely to be extremely difficult for the Company to find another buyer willing
to purchase our interests in Goloil on equivalent terms given our minority
status and RussNeft's control over the operations of Goloil.

Any continuing relationship with RussNeft involves numerous risks and
difficulties.

RussNeft has effective control of Goloil as its majority owner. If the Goloil
sale is not completed, the Company may face substantial difficulties in its
continuing relationship with RussNeft and in realizing further value from
Goloil. For example, we would be required to fund our shared substantial capital
expenditures of Goloil for which we would need to obtain external financing.
Also, RussNeft's decision to sell Goloil's production at a fixed price has
adversely affected the economics of our investment. The Company therefore
believes that if the Goloil sale is not consummated it will be increasingly
difficult for the Company to realize value from Goloil. Given the difficulties
of enforcing minority stockholder rights in Russia as explained below,
litigation may not be an effective option for the Company.

Goloil has a substantial amount of indebtedness, which could limit its financing
options and consume a substantial portion of its operating cash flow.

Goloil, the entity in which we have an equity interest, has a substantial amount
of indebtedness. As of March 31, 2004, Goloil had total indebtedness of
approximately $16,440,000; all of which is owed to other equity interest holders
in Goloil. The level of indebtedness could have important consequences to the
holders of our securities.

For example, it:

o may limit Goloil's ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures or general corporate purposes;

o will require Goloil to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from
operation to the payment or principal and interest on its debt, reducing
the funds available for distribution to us or for other purposes including
expansion through acquisitions, capital expenditures, marketing spending
and expansion of our product offerings; and

o may limit our flexibility to adjust to changing business and market
conditions and make us more vulnerable to a downturn in general economic
conditions as compared to our competitors.

Goloil's ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance its obligations with
respect to its indebtedness will depend on its financial and operating
performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to
financial, business and other factors beyond its control.

In addition, the debt is secured by substantially all of Goloil's assets and
there are no guarantees on the loan. Although the debt is current and in
compliance, the noteholders may foreclose in the event of a default.

There is little effective protection of minority stockholders in Russia.

In general, minority stockholder protection under Russian law derives from
supermajority other special stockholder approval requirements for certain
corporate action (including "interested party" transactions discussed in more
detail below), as well as from the ability of a stockholder to demand that the
Company purchase the shares held by that stockholder if that stockholder voted
against or abstained from voting on certain types of action. While these
protections are similar to the types of protections available to minority
stockholders in the U.S., in practice corporate governance standards for many
Russian companies have proven to be poor, and minority stockholders in Russian
companies have suffered losses due to abusive share dilutions, asset transfers
and transfer-pricing practices. Stockholder meetings have been irregularly
conducted, and stockholder resolutions have not always been respected by
management.

In addition, where they apply, the supermajority stockholder approval
requirement is met by a vote of 75% of all voting shares that are present at a
stockholders' meeting. Thus, controlling stockholders owning slightly less than
75% of outstanding shares of the Company may have a 75% or more voting power if
certain minority stockholders are not present at the meeting. In situations
where controlling stockholders effectively have 75% or more of the voting power
at a stockholders' meeting, they are in a position to approve amendments to the
charter of the Company, which could be prejudicial to the interests of minority
stockholders.

Disclosure and reporting requirements and anti-fraud legislation have been
enacted in Russia only recently. Most Russian companies and managers are not
accustomed to restrictions on their activities arising from these requirements.
The concept of fiduciary duties of management or Directors' duties to their
companies or stockholders is also relatively new and is not well developed.
Violations of disclosure and reporting requirements or breaches of fiduciary
duties to us could materially adversely affect the value of our Common Stock.

While the Russian Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies provides that
stockholders owning not less than 1% of the Company's ordinary shares may bring
an action for damages on behalf of the Company, Russian courts do not to date
have significant experience with such suits. Russian corporate law does not
contemplate class action litigation. Accordingly, a foreign investor's practical
ability to pursue legal redress against RussNeft may be limited. Our minority
status in Goloil is therefore subject to significant risks under the laws of
Russia.

Risks if Goloil Sale is Approved

Even if approved by our stockholders, the Goloil sale may not be completed.

The completion of the Goloil sale is subject to several conditions. Even if our
stockholders approve the Goloil sale, there can be no assurance that the other
conditions to closing will be met and that the Goloil sale will be completed. If
the Goloil sale is not completed, we will have spent a substantial amount of
time and financial resources in connection with the transaction without
realizing any gain and will be subject to all of the risks described above if
the Goloil sale is not approved.

If the Goloil sale is completed, we will have no remaining operating business
and no source of continuing revenue.

If the Goloil sale is completed, we will transfer to RussNeft all of our
currently productive assets and have no operating assets. Further revenues and
profits of the Company will therefore be completely dependent on completing an
acquisition of producing properties. The Company is currently seeking
acquisition opportunities, primarily focused on Russia and the former CIS
states. While we have from time to time been engaged in preliminary negotiations
with respect to such opportunities, no agreements have been signed (other than
with respect to the Samson transaction). As was the case with the Samson
transaction, even signed agreements to purchase oil properties in Russia are
often subject to rights of first refusal, which can supersede such agreements
and cause them not to close. Therefore, we can give no assurance that any such
acquisition can be completed on reasonable terms or in a reasonable time frame.

There is no plan to distribute any of the proceeds of the Goloil sale to our
stockholders.

We do not intend to distribute any portion of the proceeds from the Goloil sale
to our stockholders. Our intention is to use the net proceeds of the Goloil sale
to acquire interests in other companies engaged in Russian oil production.
Pending such uses, the net proceeds will be invested in short term money market
instruments, bank deposits or other liquid instruments. While we have been
engaged in preliminary negotiations regarding potential acquisitions and expect
to continue to seek acquisition opportunities, there can be no assurance that we
will be successful in consummating or reaching an agreement for a transaction.
If we are not successful in acquiring an interest in another business in the
near future, we could end up spending a significant portion of the net proceeds
of the Goloil sale on overhead and operating expenses.

Any new business opportunity will likely involve significant risks.

Potential business opportunities of the Company may involve significant risks.
Our acquisition of or participation in new business opportunities in the Russian
oil and gas industry may be illiquid and could result in a total loss to the
Company and our stockholders if the business or opportunity proves to be
unsuccessful. In addition, any such acquisition would be subject to all of the
risks of doing business in Russia describe above.

We may be unable to acquire or may be delayed in acquiring interests in other
Russian oil industry companies due to factors beyond our control, including
regulatory requirements and changes in economic conditions. For example, the
Company believes that prices for Russian oil properties are rising rapidly due
to record high oil prices now being experienced in the market place. If these
trends continue and the Company is not able to complete a purchase transaction
in the near future, the Company may not be able to acquire new producing assets
on favorable terms.

Although we are in preliminary discussions regarding other acquisitions, we may
be unable to acquire or may be delayed in acquiring such interests.

Risks of Proposed Samson Transaction

If Vitol does not complete its purchase of the Samson assets, the Company could
become obligated to complete the transaction if all other conditions to the sale
are met. However, not only has Vitol exercised its first refusal right but it
has publicly announced that it has agreed to resell the Samson assets to a third
party. Based on the foregoing, we do not believe that the Company will be
required to complete the Samson transaction. However, in the event that the
Company enters into another acquisition agreement and is also required to
complete the Samson transaction, it could be in the position of having to find
new external financing for both transactions. While the Company believes that
such financing would be obtainable, there can be no assurance that this would be
the case on attractive terms.

Possible Need to Obtain Further Debt and Equity Financing

If the Company enters into an agreement to purchase a producing field for a
price greater than its cash on hand and the proceeds of the sale of Goloil, then
it may need to seek additional debt or equity financing to complete such
purchase. The Company is seeking approval to issue Common Stock or securities
convertible into Common Stock for this purpose under Proposal No. 4. However,
there can be no assurance as to the terms on which such financing would be
available, if at all. The Company has been working to develop a relationship
with a group of commercial banks in the event it determines to seek debt
financing for a portion of any acquisition. However, there can be no assurance
that any such bank financing would be available on acceptable terms for any
particular acquisition.

If We Are Classified as an Investment Company, We Could Be Subject to
Restrictive and Costly Regulation.

If the Goloil sale is completed, the cash proceeds received from the sale will
represent a significant portion of our assets. It is possible that we could be
classified as an "investment company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940
("1940 Act") if more than a specified percentage of our assets are held in
investment securities as defined in the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated under the act are extremely restrictive. Compliance with
the 1940 Act would be very costly, and it would be difficult or impossible for
us to execute our business plan. We do not believe that we will be an
"investment company" after the Goloil sale, and we intend to conduct our
activities and invest the proceeds of the Goloil sale so as to avoid being
classified as such.

Potential for Delisting from AMEX if an Acquisition of Operating Asset Cannot be
Closed

Under Section 1002 of the AMEX Company Guide, the Exchange may seek delisting of
the Company's shares if it has sold or otherwise disposed of its principal
operating assets, or has ceased to be an operating company for any reason
whatsoever. As a result, unless the Company is able to promptly acquire
additional operating assets following the Goloil sale, it is possible that AMEX
could commence delisting proceedings which the result that the Company's Common
Stock could ultimately be delisted from the Exchange. However, the Company is
currently seeking to acquire other operating assets.

Once the AMEX staff identifies a Company as being below the continued listing
criteria, the Exchange staff will notify the Company by letter of its status
within 10 business days. This letter will also provide the Company with an
opportunity to provide the Exchange staff with a plan (the "Plan") advising the
Exchange staff of action the Company has taken, or will take, that would bring
it into compliance with the continued listing standards within 18 months of
receipt of the letter. However, the Exchange staff may establish a time period
of less than 18 months for a Company to regain compliance.

Within 5 business days after receipt of the letter, the Company must contact the
Exchange staff to confirm receipt of the notification, discuss any possible
financial data of which the Exchange staff may be unaware, and indicate whether
or not it plans to present a Plan; otherwise, delisting proceedings will
commence.

The Company has 30 days from the receipt of the letter to submit its Plan to the
Exchange staff for review. However, the Exchange staff may require submission of
a Company's Plan within less than 30 days (but in no event less than seven days)
if the Exchange staff has established a time period of 90 days or less for the
Company to regain compliance. If it does not submit a Plan within the specified
time period, delisting procedures will commence.

The Plan must include specific milestones, quarterly financial projections, and
details related to any strategic initiatives the Company plans to complete.
Exchange staff will evaluate the Plan and make a determination as to whether the
Company has made reasonable demonstration in the Plan of an ability to regain
compliance within the time period decided.

If the Exchange staff does not accept the Plan, the Exchange staff will promptly
initiate delisting proceedings. The Company may appeal the Exchange staff's
determination not to accept the Plan, and request a review thereof, in
accordance with specific procedures.

If the Exchange staff accepts the Plan, the Company must make a public
announcement, within five business days from receipt of the notification
thereof, disclosing the fact that it has fallen below the continued listing
standards of the Exchange and that its listing is being continued pursuant to an
extension. The Exchange staff will review the Company on a quarterly basis for
compliance with the Plan. If the Company does not show progress consistent with
the Plan, the Exchange staff will review the circumstances and variance, and
determine whether such variance warrants the commencement of delisting
procedures. Should the Exchange staff determine to proceed with delisting
procedures, it may do so regardless of the Company's continued listing status at
that time.

If, prior to the end of the extension period, the Company is able to demonstrate
compliance with the continued listing standards for a period of two consecutive
quarters, the Exchange staff will deem the Plan period over. If the Company does
not meet continued listing standards at the end of the extension period, the
Exchange staff will promptly initiate delisting procedures. The Company may
appeal an Exchange staff determination to initiate delisting procedures, and
request a review thereof, in accordance with specific procedures.

In the event the Company's Common Stock is delisted from AMEX, trading, if any,
in the Company's Common Stock would thereafter be conducted in the
over-the-counter market. As a result of such delisting, the market price of the
Company's Common Stock could be materially adversely affected and an investor
could find it more difficult to dispose, or to obtain accurate quotations as to
the market value, of the Common Stock.

Because we are currently seeking to acquire other oil and gas properties as
described herein, we do not believe that there is a substantial likelihood that
our Common Stock will be delisted, although there can be no assurance that an
acquisition can be completed within the timeframe described above.

PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Certain pro forma financial information is included in Appendix A-3.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TETON BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION IS IN THE
BEST INTERESTS OF, AND IS FAIR AND REASONABLE TO, TETON AND ITS STOCKHOLDERS.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
TRANSACTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.

ISSUANCE OF SECURITIES

PROPOSAL NO. 4

TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK OR SECURITIES CONVERTIBLE INTO OR
EXERCISABLE FOR COMMON STOCK (WHICH MAY BE ISSUABLE, EXERCISABLE OR CONVERTIBLE
BELOW THE THEN CURRENT MARKET VALUE OF THE COMMON STOCK) WHICH COULD RESULT IN
AN INCREASE IN OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF 20% OR MORE

We are seeking your approval pursuant to the AMEX Company Guide Section 713
where there is a sale or issue of Common Stock or securities convertible into
Common Stock equal to 20% of more of the presently issued outstanding Common
Stock for less than the greater of book or market value of the Common Stock.

Following the completion of the sale of Goloil, the Company will continue to
seek to negotiate the purchase of additional oil and gas properties primarily
focused on Russia and the former CIS states. For example, we announced the
signing of a Purchase -Sale Agreement to acquire a 52% interest in Samson. We
believe that the Samson transaction is not likely to be completed due to the
exercise by, another shareholder, Vitol of its right of first purchase to
purchase the Samson properties. Vitol has also publicly announced its intention
to resell the Samson properties acquired from Samson pursuant to the right of
first purchase.

The Company intends to seek other transactions involving the purchase of
controlling interests in other oil and gas properties primarily focused on
Russia and the former CIS states. We may also consider opportunities outside our
primary geographic focus. The Company has determined to target small to
medium-sized oil fields with existing production typically ranging from 1,000 to
5,000 barrels per day. We intend to finance the purchase of any such transaction
or transaction, from the net proceeds of the sale of Goloil, from cash on hand
(estimated at $7.86 million at March 31, 2004) and, if necessary, from debt and
equity financing. Debt financing could include borrowings from commercial banks
or other financial institutions, which borrowings may be secured. The equity
portion of any such financing is expected to be in the form of one or more of
the following:

o common stock;
o preferred stock;
o convertible debentures; and/or
o warrants entitling the holders to purchase common stock or preferred stock.

It is not currently possible to estimate the amount of any Common Stock or the
terms or amount of any convertible securities or warrants since the Company has
not entered into any agreements for the purchase of additional assets or
properties. The purpose of the authorization of the securities is to allow the
Board to authorize the issuance of the securities without seeking further
approval from stockholders if an acquisition transaction is consummated. The
Board does not currently intend to seek further authorization for the issuance
of the securities by a vote of security holders. The securities are expected to
be issued in one or more private placements exempt from registration under the
Securities Act of 1933.

The issuance price, conversion price or exercise price for any Common Stock,
convertible securities or warrants could be below current market value and or
book value of the Common Stock at the time of issuance of such securities
depending on market conditions at the time of issuance. Therefore, existing
stockholders may be diluted by such issuances.

Description of Common Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 250,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value
$.001. As of March 31, 2004, there were 9,101,830 shares of Common Stock
outstanding. Holders of the Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on
all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders and have no preemptive,
subscription, redemption or conversion rights.

Description of Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. At March
31, 2004, there were outstanding 269,970 shares of Series A 8% Convertible
Preferred Stock (the "Series A Preferred"). The Series A Preferred is entitled
to quarterly dividends at the annual rate of 8.0%. The Series A Preferred is
currently convertible at any time into shares of the Company's Common Stock on a
one for one basis. The Series A Preferred carries a liquidation preference of
$4.35 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, in the event of the
winding-up or liquidation of the Company, and may not be redeemed by the Company
until one year following the issuance date. On and after such date, the Series A
Preferred is redeemable at a redemption price of $4.35 per share. As at March
31, 2004, the aggregate liquidation preference amount of the Series A Preferred
was $1,197,839, including accrued and unpaid dividends. The rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions of any preferred stock of any series that may be
issued in the future will be fixed by the certificate of designation relating to
that series.

The Company's Board may issue additional authorized shares of preferred stock in
one or more series and may, subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law:

o Fix its rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions;
o Fix the number of shares and designations of any series; and
o Increase or decrease the number of shares of any series if not adjusting to
a level below the number of then outstanding shares.

The Board may issue preferred stock with voting, liquidation, dividend,
conversion and such other rights which could negatively affect the voting power
or other rights of the common stockholders without the approval of the Company's
common stockholders. Any issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company.

Description of Warrants

We may issue separately, or together with any Common Stock, preferred stock or
convertible debentures, warrants for the purchase of other shares of Common
Stock or preferred stock ("Warrants"). The Warrants may be issued under warrant
agreements to be entered into between us and a bank or trust company, as warrant
agent, or may be represented by certificates evidencing the Warrants. The terms
of such Warrants, including the exercise price and exercise period will be
determined by our Board prior to the issuance thereof.

At March 31, 2004, we had outstanding Warrants to purchase 7,932,553 shares of
our Common Stock exercisable at prices ranging from $2.72 to $12.

Section 713 of the AMEX Company Guide

Section 713 of the AMEX Company Guide requires that certain transactions be
approved by the Company's stockholders. Specifically, stockholder approval is
required under Section 713 for a transaction, other than a public offering,
involving the sale, issuance, or potential issuance by the Company of Common
Stock (or securities convertible into Common Stock) equal to 20% or more of
presently outstanding stock for less than the greater of book or market value of
the stock.

Because the possible issuances described in this proposal involve the potential
issuance by the Company of Common Stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for Common Stock for less than the greater of book or market value
of the stock that could, depending on the size of the issuance, potentially
amount to greater than 20% of its presently outstanding Common Stock, this
proposal is subject to Section 713 and, therefore, requires your approval.

AMEX has the authority to delist the securities of any issuer that fails to
comply with its listing criteria, including the stockholder voting provisions of
Section 713. Therefore, if we do not obtain your approval and we nonetheless
issue such shares, the Company's Common Stock could be delisted from AMEX.

Under Delaware General Corporation Law, stockholders are not entitled to
dissenters' rights of appraisal with respect to this proposal.

Accounting Treatment of Below Market Issuances of Preferred Shares Convertible
into Common Shares

If we issue preferred shares of stock, which are convertible into our common
shares at below market prices of our Common Stock at issuance, we will be
required to record a non-cash accounting charge for the beneficial conversion
feature. The non-cash charges will be treated as a preferred stock dividend and
will increase our loss per common share or reduce any future earnings per share.
These charges may be significant. We recorded similar charges for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 and the year-ended December 31, 2003 of approximately
$119,000 and $1,064,000, respectively.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF COMMON
STOCK OR SECURITIES CONVERTIBLE INTO OR EXERCISABLE FOR COMMON STOCK WHICH COULD
RESULT IN AN INCREASE IN OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF 20% OR MORE

APPROVAL OF THE 2004 NON EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN

PROPOSAL NO. 5

At the Annual Meeting, the Company's stockholders are being asked to approve the
2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan ("2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan"). The
Board has unanimously approved the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan and has
directed that it be submitted for the approval of the stockholders at the annual
meeting. The 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan will become effective on the
date of stockholder approval (the "Effective Date").

The following description of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan is only a
summary of the important provisions of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan
and does not contain all of the terms and conditions of the 2004 Non Employee
Compensation Plan. The full text of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan is
attached as Appendix B.

What is the Purpose of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan?

The purpose of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan is to help us retain
consultants, professionals, and service providers who provide services to the
Company in connection with, among other things, the Company's obligations as a
publicly held reporting company. In addition, we expect to benefit from the
added interest that the awardees will have in our welfare as a result of their
ownership or increased ownership of our Common Stock.

Over the last two years, we have been able to engage consultants, professionals,
and service providers by compensating them through the issuance of shares of our
Common Stock. In the first three months of 2004 and the year ended December 31,
2003, the Company issued 7,500 shares and 7,402 shares to such consultants,
primarily for investor relations' services. This afforded us the ability to
preserve our cash. In addition, Section 711 of the AMEX Company Guide, which was
amended in October 2003, now requires that such compensation arrangements be
approved by the Company's stockholders. For the foregoing reasons, the Board has
unanimously approved the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan, as a separate and
distinct plan from the Company's existing 2003 Employee Stock Option Plan, and
has directed that such plan be submitted for the approval of the stockholders at
the annual meeting.

What Types of Awards Can Be Granted Under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation
Plan?

Awards authorized under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan shall consist of
shares of our Common Stock. Such awards may be subject to forfeiture in the
event of premature termination of engagement, failure to meet certain
performance objectives, or other conditions, as may be determined by the Board.

Each award described above is sometimes referred to in this Proxy Statement as
an "Award," and all such awards are sometime collectively referred to in this
Proxy Statement as "Awards" and individuals receiving Awards are sometimes
referred to as "Awardees."

How Will the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan Be Administered?

The 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan will be administered by the Board
(provided however, that the Board may delegate such administration to the
Compensation Committee).

Subject to the express terms and conditions of the 2004 Non Employee
Compensation Plan, the Board will have full power to make Awards, to construe or
interpret the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan, to prescribe, amend and
rescind rules and regulations relating to it and to make all other
determinations necessary or advisable for its administration. Except as
otherwise provided in the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan, the Board may
also determine which persons shall be granted Awards, the nature of the Awards
granted, the number of shares subject to Awards and the time at which Awards
shall be made. Such determinations will be final and binding.

How Much Stock Will Be Available Under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan?

The only class of stock subject to an Award is Common Stock. The maximum number
of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted is
1,000,000 shares; however, this number is subject to adjustment in the event of
a recapitalization, reorganization or similar event. The maximum number of
shares of Common Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted to any
participant in any year under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan is 500,000
shares. Shares shall consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued
shares or treasury shares. Any shares represented by Awards that are cancelled,
forfeited, terminated or expired will again be available for grants and issuance
under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan.

Who Is Eligible to Participate in the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan?

Persons eligible for Awards under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan will
be limited to consultants, professionals and service providers of the Company
and our subsidiaries ("Eligible Persons"). The Board will select who will
receive Awards and the amount and nature of such Awards. Board members and
officers and employees of the Company are not eligible to receive Awards.

What Happens If the Number of Outstanding Shares Changes Because of a Merger,
Consolidation, Recapitalization or Reorganization?

In the event that our outstanding shares of Common Stock are increased,
decreased or changed or converted into other securities by reason of merger,
reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, extraordinary
cash dividend or other change in our corporate structure affecting the stock,
the number of shares that may be delivered under the 2004 Non Employee
Compensation Plan and the number and/or the purchase price of shares subject to
outstanding Awards under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan may be adjusted
at the sole discretion of the Board to the extent that the Board determines to
be appropriate, provided, however, that the number of shares subject to any
Awards will always be a whole number.

When Will the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan Terminate?

The 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan will expire on the tenth anniversary
from the date of stockholder approval, but the Board may terminate the 2004 Non
Employee Compensation Plan at any time prior to that date and Awards granted
prior to such termination may extend beyond such date. Termination of the 2004
Non Employee Compensation Plan will not alter or impair, without the consent of
the Awardee, any of the rights or obligations of any Award made under the 2004
Non Employee Compensation Plan.

What Changes Can the Board Make to the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan?

The Board may from time to time alter, amend, suspend or discontinue the 2004
Non Employee Compensation Plan. However, no such action of the Board may alter
the provisions of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan so as to alter any
outstanding Awards to the detriment of the Awardee or participant without such
participant's or Awardees consent, and no amendment to the 2004 Non Employee
Compensation Plan may be made without stockholder approval if such amendment
would materially increase the benefits to the Awardees or the participants in
the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan, materially increase the number of
shares issuable under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan, extend the terms
of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan or the period during which Awards may
be granted or exercised or materially modify requirements as to eligibility to
participate in the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan.

What Are the Important Provisions of the Plan With Respect to Each Type of
Award?

The Board may, at its discretion, award shares of Common Stock to a recipient
(the "Stock Awards"). The Stock Awards will be issued pursuant to an agreement
between the Company and the Awardee. Each recipient of a Stock Award will be a
stockholder and have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such
shares, including the right to vote and receive all dividends or other
distributions made or paid with respect to such shares.

If the recipient of an Award ceases to be a consultant, professional or service
provider for any reason, then the Award may be subject to forfeiture, as
provided in the particular agreement, unless such forfeiture is waived by the
Board when it, in its discretion, determines that such waiver is in our best
interests.

In the event of a participant's retirement, permanent disability or death, or in
cases of special circumstances, the Board may waive any or all of the remaining
restrictions and limitations imposed under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation
Plan with respect to any Awards.

What are the Restrictions on Transferability?

These Shares of stock may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged,
hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of until such time as any stated
restrictions lapse. The Board, in its absolute discretion, may impose such
restrictions on the transferability of the Awards granted in this 2004 Non
Employee Compensation Plan as it deems appropriate. Any such restrictions shall
be set forth in the Agreement with respect to such Awards and may be referred to
on the certificates evidencing shares issued pursuant to any such Award. Shares
of restricted stock will be evidenced by a certificate that bears a restrictive
legend.

What are the U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the 2004 Non Employee
Compensation Plan?

The following discussion is a summary of the U.S. Federal income tax
consequences to recipients of Awards and to us with respect to Awards granted
under the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan. The 2004 Non Employee
Compensation Plan is not qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code.

Stock awarded to an Awardee may be subject to any number of restrictions
(including deferred vesting, limitations on transfer, and forfeitability)
imposed by the Board. In general, the receipt of stock with restrictions will
not result in the recognition of income by an Awardee until such time as the
shares are either not forfeitable or are freely transferable. Upon the lapse of
such restrictions, the Awardee will be required to include as ordinary income
the difference between the amounts paid for the stock, if any, and the fair
market value of such stock on the date the restrictions lapse and we will be
entitled to a corresponding deduction. In addition, any dividends paid with
respect to the stock prior to the lapse of the restrictions will be treated as
compensation income by the Awardee and will be deductible by the Company.
Awardees receiving Stock Awards may elect to include the value of such stock
(less any amounts paid for such stock) as ordinary income at the time the Award
is made. Awardees making this election would treat any gain or loss realized on
a sale of the stock as capital gain or loss, but would not be entitled to any
loss deduction if they forfeited the stock pursuant to the restrictions imposed
by the Board.

In view of the complexity of the tax aspects of transactions involving the grant
and exercise Awards, and because the impact of taxes will vary depending on
individual circumstances, each Awardee receiving an Award under the 2004 Non
Employee Compensation Plan should consult their own tax advisor to determine the
tax consequences in such Awardee's particular circumstances.

Registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission

We intend to file a Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering the 2004 Non
Employee Compensation Plan if the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan is
approved by the stockholders.

Required Vote

Approval of the 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan requires the receipt of the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of the Company's Common Stock
present in person or by proxy and voting at the Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF
THE 2004 NON-EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Other Business

The Board is not aware of any other business that will come before the Meeting,
but if any such matters are properly presented, the proxies solicited hereby
will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the persons holding the
proxies. All shares represented by duly executed proxies will be voted at the
Meeting.

Stockholder Proposals

In order for stockholders proposals to be included in Teton's proxy statement
for the 2005 Annual Meeting, they must be received by Teton at its principal
executive office, 1600 Broadway, Suite 2400, Denver, Colorado 80202 by January
18, 2004. All other stockholder proposals, including nominations for Directors,
must be received by Teton not less than 60 days or more than 90 days prior to
such Meeting, which is tentatively scheduled for May 13, 2005.

Availability of Certain Documents Referred to Herein

This Proxy Statement refers to certain documents of the Company that are not
presented herein or delivered herewith. Such documents are available to any
person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this Proxy Statement is
delivered, upon oral or written request, without charge, directed to Gillian
Kane, Vice President, Investor Relations, Teton Petroleum Company, P.O. Box
774327, Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477, telephone number (970) 870-1417.

It is important that the proxies be returned promptly and that your shares be
represented. Stockholders are urged to mark, date, execute and promptly return
the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

------------------------------
H. Howard Cooper, Chairman

Denver, Colorado
June 18, 2004

APPENDIX A

FINANCIAL SECTION

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Appendix A - Index to Financial Statements
------------------------------------------

Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2004

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements

Independent Auditors' Report

Consolidated Balance Sheet

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Information as of March 31, 2004

Pro Forma Balance Sheet

Pro Forma Statements of Operations

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations

APPENDIX A-1

UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2004

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2004

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Assets March 31, December 31,
2004 2003
------------ ------------
(Unaudited) (Audited)
Current assets
Cash................................................... $ 7,856,899 $ 7,588,439
Proportionate share of Goloil accounts receivable ..... 16,538 15,739
Proportionate share of Goloil VAT and other accounts
receivable............................................... 1,756,637 1,078,369
Proportionate share of Goloil inventory................ 622,981 448,812
Prepaid expenses and other assets...................... 72,271 95,693
---------- -----------
Total current assets............................... 10,325,326 9,227,052
---------- -----------

Non-current assets.......................................
Oil and gas properties, net (successful efforts)....... 8,564,084 9,339,786
Cogeneration plant construction in- progress........... 1,758,620 1,700,696
Fixed assets, net...................................... 484,642 450,841
---------- -----------
Total non-current assets........................... 10,807,346 11,491,323
---------- -----------
Total assets............................................. $21,132,672 $20,718,375
========== ===========

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities............... $732,261 $ 376,429
Proportionate share of accounts payable and accrued
liabilities........................................... 4,059,089 2,590,901
Current portion of proportionate share of notes payable
owed to affiliate (Note 2)............................ 8,219,652 7,419,409
---------- -----------
Total current liabilities.......................... 13,011,002 10,386,739
---------- -----------

Non-current liabilities
Asset retirement obligation............................ 129,500 126,500
---------- -----------
Total non-current liabilities 129,500 126,500
---------- -----------
Total liabilities 13,140,502 10,513,239
---------- -----------

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity
Series A convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value,
25,000,000 shares authorized, 269,970 and 618,231
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2004 and December
31, 2004. Liquidation preference at March 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 of $1,197,839 and $2,689,305........ 270 618
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 and
100,000,000 shares authorized, 9,101,830 and 8,584,068
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2004 and 9,101
December 31, 2003..................................... 8,584
Additional paid-in capital............................. 37,548,890 37,073,366
Unamortized preferred stock dividends.................. -- (118,610)
Accumulated deficit.................................... (30,179,691) (27,657,578)
Foreign currency translation adjustment................ 613,600 898,756
---------- -----------
Total stockholders' equity......................... 7,992,170 10,205,136
---------- -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............... $21,132,672 $20,718,375
========== ===========

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------

Sales.................................................... $ 2,962,500 $ 3,408,718
Cost of sales and expenses
Oil and gas production................................. 622,277 326,305
Transportation and marketing........................... -- 280,965
Taxes other than income taxes.......................... 1,973,275 1,427,572
Export duties.......................................... -- 559,240
Exploration............................................ 154,776 93,148
General and administrative - Goloil.................... 184,086 219,557
General and administrative - Teton Petroleum........... 2,102,638 772,899
Depreciation, depletion and amortization............... 409,670 332,738
------------ ------------
Total cost of sales and expenses................... 5,446,722 4,012,424
------------ ------------

Loss from operations..................................... (2,484,222) (603,706)
------------ ------------

Other income (expense)
Other income........................................... 17,640 21,688
Interest expense....................................... (55,531) (94,225)
-------------- -------------
Total other income (expense)....................... (37,891) (72,537)
------------ ------------

Net loss before taxes.................................... (2,522,113) (676,243)
-------------- --------------

Foreign income tax....................................... -- (104,842)

Net loss................................................. (2,522,113) (781,085)
Imputed preferred stock dividends for inducements and
beneficial conversion charges........................... (521,582) --

Preferred stock dividend................................. (31,488) --

Net loss applicable to common stock...................... (3,075,083) (781,085)

Other comprehensive (loss), net of tax
Effect of exchange rates.............................. (285,156) 86,000
------------- ------------

Other comprehensive (loss) income.................. (285,156) $ 86,000
-------------- -------------

Comprehensive loss....................................... $ (3,360,239) $ (695,085)
============= ==============

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding............................................. 8,747,165 6,321,218
============ ============

Basic and diluted (loss) income per common share......... $ (.35) $ (.12)
============ ============

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended
March 31,
---------------------------
2004 2003
------------ -----------
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss............................................... $(2,522,113) $ (781,085)
------------ -----------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization............. 409,670 332,738
Stock and warrants issued for services and interest... 117,094 --
Debentures issued for services........................ -- --
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable................................. (679,067) (488,956)
Prepaid expenses and other assets................... 23,422 75,446
Inventory........................................... (174,169) 19,104
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities............ 1,261,983 1,034,540
----------- -----------
958,933 972,872
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (1,563,180) 191,787
------------ -----------

Cash flow from investing activities
Repayment of loans from Goloil 1,065,000 --
Oil and gas properties and equipment expenditures...... (190,444) (2,886,831)
------------- -------------

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 874,556 (2,886,831)
------------ -------------

Cash flows from financing activities
Net (repayments) proceeds from advances under notes
payable from affiliate 800,243 (103,714)
Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of issue costs of
$50,000 and $98,100 449,997 2,406,510
Payments of dividends (8,000) --
------------- ------------

Net cash provided by financing activities.......... 1,242,240 2,302,796
----------- -----------

Effect of exchange rates................................. (285,156) 86,000
------------ -----------

Net (decrease) increase in cash.......................... 268,460 (306,248)

Cash - beginning of year................................. 7,588,429 712,013
----------- -----------

Cash - end of period..................................... $ 7,856,899 $ 405,765
=========== ===========

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:

During the first quarter of 2004, the Company had the following transactions:

100,000 warrants were issued to a consultant for services valued at $102,094.

13,750 shares of common stock were issued for the settlement of accrued
liabilities valued at $58,700.

The Company issued (i) 1,306,669 non-qualified options to officers and Directors
valued at $3,243,406; and (ii) 108,331 incentive stock options valued at
$268,899 with no expense being recorded for accounting purposes.

The Company issued 3,750 shares of common stock for services valued at $15,000.

The Company has accrued a liability for (i) $52,362 related to the obligation to
issue 50,000 warrants to consultants; (ii) $32,329 related to the obligation to
issue 7,876 common shares to consultants; and (iii) $28,500 related to the
obligation to issue 5,955 shares for services rendered by the outside Directors.

Approximately $2,383,000 of capital expenditures for oil and gas properties was
included in accounts payable at March 31, 2004 and approximately $1,786,000 of
capital expenditures was in accounts payable at December 31, 2003 for an
increase during the three months ended March 31, 2004 of $597,000.

Conversion of 463,207 shares of preferred stock, plus dividends of 37,057 shares
converted into 500,264 shares of common stock.

We issued 50,000 warrants valued at $22,863 in settlement of accrued liabilities
at December 31, 2003.

During the first quarter of 2003, the Company had the following transactions:

7,408 shares of stock were issued to a consultant for services valued at $20,000
provided in 2001 and accrued in payables.

73,422 shares of stock and 66,667 warrants exercisable at $6.00 were issued to a
consultant for services provided in 2002 valued at $200,000 and accrued in
accounts payable.

$25,000 of stock subscriptions receivable outstanding at March 31, 2003 were
collected in April 2003.

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

The March 31, 2004 financial statements are unaudited and reflect all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the
opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
position and operating results for the interim periods. The unaudited financial
statements as of March 31, 2004, as is customary in the oil and gas industry,
reflect a pro-rata consolidation of the Company's 50% interest in ZAO Goloil, a
Russian closed joint-stock company. However, see note 5 regarding the sale of
Goloil. The unaudited financial statements contained herein should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the
Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, as reported
in the Company's Form 10-KSB filed March 30, 2004. The results of operations for
the period ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results
for the entire fiscal year.

Certain amounts for March 31, 2003 have been adjusted to include adjustments to
exploration expenses and depreciation, depletion and amortization made during
the fourth quarter of 2003.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

The conversion of the functional currency of Goloil (a Russian Company) in
rubles to the reporting currency of U.S. dollars is based upon the exchange
rates in effect. The exchange rates in effect at March 31, 2004 and 2003 were
28.48 and 31.67 rubles to the U.S. dollar, respectively. The average rates in
effect during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 was 29.00 and 31.67
rubles to the U.S. dollar, respectively.

Earnings Per Share

At the March 19, 2003 meeting, the Company's shareholders approved a reverse 1
for 12 stock split. All share amounts and earnings per share have been adjusted
to reflect the split.

All potential dilutive securities have an antidilutive effect on earnings (loss)
per share and accordingly, basic and dilutive weighted average shares are the
same.

The following table reflects the effects of dilutive securities as of March 31,
2003, which could dilute future earnings:

Dilutive effects of stock options 2,993,037
Dilutive effects of warrants 7,932,553
Dilutive effects of convertible preferred shares 526,441
-------
11,452,031
==========

Note 2 - Proportionate Share of Liabilities

The proportionate share of accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$4,059,089 at March 31, 2004, are obligations of Goloil and not Teton Petroleum
nor have they been guaranteed by Teton Petroleum.

The Company's 50% pro-rata share of notes payable advances made which are
advances to Goloil by an affiliate are also obligations of Goloil at March 31,
2004 and not Teton Petroleum nor have they been guaranteed by Teton Petroleum.
However, see note 5 regarding the proposed sale of Goloil.

The Company's pro-rata share of Goloil notes payable owed to an affiliate
totaled $8,219,652 at March 31, 2004. The proceeds were used to pay certain
operating expenses and capital expenditures of Goloil. These notes provide for
interest rates of 8%, with quarterly interest payments, maturing through June
2004. These notes are secured by substantially all Goloil assets. The notes
payable will be repaid from cash flow from ZAO Goloil as available, or extended
to future periods. However, see note 5 regarding the proposed sale of Goloil.

Note 3 - Stockholder's Equity

In March 2003, the stockholders approved an increase in the amount of authorized
common shares from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000 and also approved 25,000,000 of
preferred stock authorized for future issuances.

Private Placements of Common Stock

17,500 common shares valued at $73,700 were issued for (i) the settlement of
accrued liabilities of $58,700; and (ii) services provided by consultants of
$15,000.

Private Placements of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

During the period ending March 31, 2004 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed preferred stock at a price of
$4.35 per share.

Proceeds of $450,000 (net of cash costs of $50,000) from the issuance of 114,942
shares of 8% convertible preferred stock.

The preferred shares carry an 8% dividend, payable quarterly commencing January
1, 2004 and are convertible into common stock at a price of $4.35 per share. The
preferred stock is entitled to vote on all matters presented to the Company's
common stockholders, with the number of votes being equal to the number of
underlying common shares. The preferred stock also contains a liquidation
preference of $4.35 per share plus accrued unpaid dividends. The preferred
shares can be redeemed by the Company after one year for $4.35 per share upon
proper notice of redemption being provided by the Company.

In connection with the preferred share private placements, certain placements
were entered into when the underlying price of the common stock to which the
preferred shares are convertible into, exceeded $4.35 the stated conversion
rate. As a result of the underlying shares being in-the-money, the Company was
required to compute a beneficial conversion charge, which is calculated as the
difference between the conversion price of $4.35 and the closing stock price on
the effective date each offering, multiplied by the total of the related common
shares to be issued upon conversion of the preferred stock. These charges are
reflected as a dividend to the preferred shareholders and are recognized over
the period in which the preferred stock first becomes convertible. For the
Tranche 1 shares the charge was immediately recognized as the shares were
immediately convertible into common. For Tranche 2 the shares could not be
converted until a shareholder vote on January 27, 2004 took place approving the
issuance of additional common shares. The calculated beneficial conversion
feature on Tranche 2 was therefore amortized from the effective date of each
issuance through January 27, 2004. This resulted in total beneficial conversion
charges of $1,182,452, of which $1,063,842 was recorded during the fourth
quarter of 2003, and $118,610 was amortized and recorded as preferred dividends
in January 2004.

In order to induce convertible preferred shareholders to convert to Common
shares, the Company agreed to issue Common share dividends of 8% for a full
year, totaling $140,815, and agreed to issue, 402,990 warrants, valued at
$262,057, resulting in a total inducement charge of $402,872 to be recognized as
a preferred dividend in the first quarter for those investors which accepted the
inducement offer. As a result, shareholders converted 463,207 of 8% convertible
preferred shares to common stock at a price of $4.35 per share during the first
quarter of 2004. The warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model using the following assumptions: volatility of 55.2%, a risk-free
rate of 1.59%, zero dividend payments, and a life of two years.

Note 4 - Stock Options

During the first quarter of 2004, the Company issued 1,306,669 non-qualified
options to employees, officers and Directors valued at $3,243,406 using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility of
55.2%, a risk-free rate of 4%, zero dividend payments, and a life of ten years.
The Company also issued 108,331 incentive options to employees, officers and
Directors valued at $268,899 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model under
the same assumptions described above.

The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."
Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for stock options issued
to employees, officers and Directors under the stock option plan. Had
compensation cost for the Company's options issued to employees, officers and
Directors been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards
consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the
Company's net loss and basic loss per common share would have been changed to
the pro forma amounts indicated below:

For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
-------------------------------
2004 2003
------------- -------------

Net loss - as reported.......................... $(3,075,083) $ (781,085)
------------- -------------

Add fair value of employee compensation expense. (3,512,304) --
------------- ------------

Net loss per common share - pro forma........... $(6,587,387) $ (781,085)
============= =============

Basic loss per common share - as reported....... $ 0.35 $ 0.12
============ ============

Basic loss per common share - pro forma......... $ 0.75 $ 0.12
============ ============

Note 5-Proposed Sale of Goloil Shares

During April 2004 the Company entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement (the
"Agreement") with RussNeft, an Open Joint-Stock Company organized under the laws
of the Russian Federation. RussNeft is the current operator of Goloil. Pursuant
to the terms of the Agreement, RussNeft will pay $8,960,000 for all of the
Company's shares held in Goloil. In connection with the Agreement, the Company
entered into a separate agreement with Goloil for repayment of all of the
outstanding advances owed to the Company. At the date the parties reached
agreement, the Company had advances totaling $6,040,000, of which $1,065,000 and
$3,600,000 had been received as of March 31, 2004 and May 11, 2004,
respectively. The Company will pay an investment banking fee of $750,000 related
to the sale and estimates its expenses in connection with the negotiation of the
agreement to be $135,000.

The Company had recorded the advances as investments in Goloil and accordingly
such amount had been included in the carrying value of oil and gas properties.

The transaction is subject to the customary conditions and is subject to the
approval of the shareholders of the Company.

If approved, the gross proceeds from the two transactions, totaling $15,000,000
less the estimated $885,000 in costs combined with the elimination of
approximately $9,900,000 in liabilities, net of current assets, will result in
the Company recording an estimated gain of $12,601,000 during 2004. The
following unaudited pro forma condensed balance sheet gives effect to the sale
of shares assuming the sale of Goloil shares occurred on March 31, 2004:

Current assets $ 20,685,000
Non-current assets 26,000
------------
Total assets $ 20,711,000
============

Current liabilities $ 710,000
Stockholders' equity 20,001,000
------------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $ 20,711,000
============

The condensed pro forma balance sheet reflects the historical balance sheet
included in this Form 10-Q adjusted for the following:

a. The proceeds of $8,960,000 from the sale of Goloil shares plus the
remaining $4,975,000 advances to be received, subsequent to March 31, 2004,
less estimated expenses of $885,000 and alternative minimum taxes of
$181,000.

b. Elimination of Goloil's assets and liabilities, which have been
historically consolidated on a pro rata basis.

c. Recording a gain from the disposition of a discontinued operation, net of
tax, of approximately $12,601,000.

Assuming the sale occurred on January 1, 2004 Teton would have had, on a pro
forma basis, an estimated net loss from operations applicable to common shares
of $2,462,000 and as a result of the sale, net income of approximately
$9,703,000. On a pro forma basis, the loss per share from continuing operations
would be $.28 per common share and net income per common share would be $1.11.

Note 6-Proposed Acquisition

On April 5, 2004 the Company entered into an agreement with Samson International
Resources ("Samson") for the purchase of Samson's 52% interest in ZAO
Pechoraneftegas ("PNG") in the Komi region of Siberia. Teton paid Samson a $3.85
million deposit. Since then, Samson's partner in PNG, Vitol Cypress ("Vitol"),
has exercised its preferential right to acquire Samson's interest in the
property. Teton's deposit has been fully refunded, but the contract remains in
effect. In the event that Vitol does not close on Samson's 52% interest, Teton
and Samson may continue with the transaction with closing subject to Teton's due
diligence and other customary conditions.

Teton continues to negotiate the acquisition of new fields in Russia, although
currently no definitive agreements have been reached. We will provide further
information on the above transactions, as well as others, through additional
press releases and the soon-to-be released proxy statement.

APPENDIX A-2

AUDITED ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Teton Petroleum Company
Denver, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Teton Petroleum
Company as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders' (deficit) equity and
cash flows, for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes assessing the
accounting principals used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Teton Petroleum
Company and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.

/s/Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
--------------------------------------
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

March 29, 2004
Denver, Colorado

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2003

Assets
Current assets
Cash.................................................. $ 7,588,439
Proportionate share of accounts receivable ........... 15,739
Proportionate share of VAT receivable................. 1,078,369
Proportionate share of inventory...................... 448,812
Prepaid expenses and other assets..................... 95,693
-----------
Total current assets.............................. 9,227,052
-----------

Non-current assets
Oil and gas properties, net (successful efforts)...... 9,339,786
Cogeneration plant construction in- progress.......... 1,700,696
Other property and equipment, net..................... 450,841
-----------
Total non-current assets.......................... 11,491,323
-----------

Total assets............................................ $20,718,375
===========

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.............. $ 376,429
Proportionate share of accounts payable and accrued
liabilities............................................. 2,590,901
Proportionate share of notes payable owed to affiliate 7,419,409
-----------
Total current liabilities......................... 10,386,739
-----------

Non-current liabilities
Asset retirement obligation........................... 126,500
-----------
Total non-current liabilities..................... 126,500
-----------
Total liabilities................................. 10,513,239
-----------

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity
Series A convertible preferred stock, $.001 par
value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 618,231 issued
and outstanding. Liquidation preference at December
31, 2003 of $2,689,305............................... 618
Common stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares
authorized, 8,584,068 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2003................................. 8,584
Additional paid-in capital............................ 37,073,366
Unamortized preferred stock dividends................. (118,610)
Accumulated deficit................................... (27,657,578)
Foreign currency translation adjustment............... 898,756
-----------
Total stockholders' equity........................ 10,205,136
-----------

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.............. $20,718,375
===========

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

For the Years Ended
December 31,
----------------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------

Sales................................................... $ 11,437,802 $ 6,923,320
Cost of sales and expenses..............................
Oil and gas production................................ 2,020,447 1,218,411
Transportation and marketing.......................... 807,266 611,956
Taxes other than income taxes......................... 5,864,920 3,537,990
Export duties......................................... 1,492,999 910,936
General and administrative - Goloil................... 837,134 588,774
General and administrative - Teton.................... 3,919,746 4,744,952
Depreciation, depletion and amortization.............. 1,582,513 451,930
------------ ------------
Total cost of sales and expenses.................. 16,525,025 12,064,949
------------ ------------

Loss from operations.................................... (5,087,223) (5,141,629)
------------ ------------

Other income (expense)
Other income.......................................... 17,445 51,751
Interest expense...................................... (347,740) (385,939)
Financing charges..................................... (132,818) (5,498,106)
------------ ------------
Total other income (expense)...................... (463,113) (5,832,294)
------------ ------------

Net loss before tax..................................... (5,550,336) (10,973,923)
Foreign income tax...................................... (84,508) -
------------ -----------

Net loss................................................ (5,634,844) (10,973,923)
Imputed preferred stock dividends for inducements and
beneficial conversion charges.......................... (2,780,693) -
------------- -----------
Net loss applicable to common shares.............. (8,415,537) (10,973,923)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Effect of exchange rates.............................. 168,256 (140,773)
------------ ------------

Comprehensive loss ..................................... $ (8,247,281) $(11,114,696)
============ ============

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding............................................ 6,840,303 3,105,235
============ ============

Basic and diluted loss per common share................. $ (1.23) $ (3.53)
=========== ============

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Unamortized Foreign
Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Preferred Currency
------------------- ------------------- Paid-in Stock Translation Accumulated Stockholders'
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Dividends Adjustment Deficit Equity
--------- ------ --------- ------ ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------

Balance - December 31, 2001.......... - - 2,374,046 2,374 $9,792,722 - $ 871,273 (11,048,811) (382,442)

Common stock issued for cash......... - - 1,223,737 1,224 3,332,236 - - - 3,333,460

Common stock subscriptions paid in
2003................................. - - 712,045 712 1,938,898 - - - 1,939,610

Common stock and warrants issued for
services............................. - - 221,198 221 836,905 - - - 837,126

Common stock issued for conversion
of convertible debentures............ - - 1,758,49 1,758 5,353,231 - - - 5,354,989

Warrants issued and in-the-money
conversion feature on convertible
debentures........................... - - - - 4,557,845 - - - 4,557,845

Warrants issued with notes payable... - - - - 150,016 - - - 150,016

Warrants issued in connection with
extensions on notes payable - - - - 203,362 - - - 203,362

Net loss............................. - - - - - - - (10,973,923) (10,973,923)

Foreign currency translation
adjustment........................... - - - - - - (140,773) - (140,773)

Balance - December 31, 2002 ......... - - 6,289,520 6,289 26,165,215 - 730,500 (22,022,734) 4,879,270

Common stock issued for cash - net
of commissions of $98,100............ - - 437,012 437 1,091,463 - - - 1,091,900

Common stock issued for settlement
of accounts payable and accrued
liabilities.......................... - - 79,793 80 219,920 - - - 220,000

Options issued to advisory board and
common stock issued for services..... - - 1,035 1 97,901 - - - 97,902

Warrants issued with notes payable... - - - - 110,170 - - - 110,170

Preferred stock issued for cash, net
of commissions of $473,838 (cash)
and $99,168 (non-cash)............... 2,226,680 2,226 - - 9,110,830 - - - 9,113,056

Preferred stock converted to common
stock (1,645,099) (1,645) 1,776,708 1,776 (131) - - - -

Preferred stock issued in exchange
for notes payable and accrued
interest of $9,426................... 36,650 37 - - 159,389 - - - 159,426

In-the-money conversion feature
charges to be amortized.............. - - - - 1,182,452 (1,182,452) - - -

Amortization of in-the-money
conversion feature charges........... - - - - (1,063,842) 1,063,842 - - -

Net loss............................. - - - - - - - (5,634,844) (5,634,844)

Foreign currency translation
adjustment........................... - - - - - - 168,256 - 168,256

Balance - December 31, 2003.......... 618,231 618 8,584,068 $8,584 $37,073,366 $ (118,610) $ 898,756 $(27,657,578) $10,205,136

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- ------------
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss.............................................. $(5,634,844) $(10,973,923)
----------- ------------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization............ 1,582,513 451,930
Stock based compensation for variable plan warrants.. - -
Stock and stock options issued for services and
interest............................................ 107,128 -
Warrants issued for notes payable extensions......... 110,170 46,582
Stock and warrants issued for services............... - 837,126
Debentures issued for services....................... - 267,500
Amortization of debenture and note payable discounts. - 5,331,412
Changes in assets and liabilities....................
Accounts receivable................................ 462,000 (1,048,608)
Prepaid expenses and other assets.................. (4,247) (57,446)
Inventory.......................................... 54,177 (313,489)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities........... 311,901 290,131
----------- -----------
2,623,642 5,805,138
----------- -----------
Net cash used in operating activities............. (3,011,202) (5,168,785)
----------- -----------

Cash flows from investing activities
Oil and gas properties and equipment expenditures..... (5,392,450) (3,222,349)
Construction in progress.............................. (1,700,696) -
----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities............. (7,093,146) (3,222,349)
----------- -----------

Cash flows from financing activities
Net proceeds from advances under notes payable owed
to affiliates........................................ 4,470,984 2,178,525
Proceeds from stock subscription...................... 1,939,610 -
Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of $473,838
commissions.......................................... 10,251,924 -
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures...... - 4,143,643
Proceeds from notes payable........................... 628,750 300,000
Payments on notes payable............................. (478,750) (894,210)
Issuance of common stock.............................. - 3,333,460
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities......... 16,812,518 9,061,418
----------- -----------

Effect of exchange rates................................ 168,256 (140,773)
----------- -----------

Net increase in cash.................................... 6,876,426 529,511

Cash - beginning of year................................ 712,013 182,502
----------- -----------

Cash - end of year...................................... $ 7,588,439 $ 712,013
=========== ===========

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid for: Interest

2003 $ 18,202
2002 $ 120,008

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company had the following
transactions:

128,700 warrants issued with debt and valued at $110,170 were
initially recorded as a discount on the note payable. At December 31,
2003, the full amount of the discount had been amortized as financing
costs.

79,793 shares of common stock were issued for settlement of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities valued at $220,000.

The Company issued 30,000 non-qualified options to advisory board
members valued at $94,702.

The Company issued 1,035 shares of common stock for services valued at
$3,201.

The Company has accrued a liability for $46,968 related to the
obligation to issue 57,420 warrants to a consultant for capital
raising services.

12,000 preferred shares were issued to consultants for services valued
at $52,200 related to capital raising.

Approximately $1,785,000 of capital expenditures for oil and gas
properties was included in accounts payable at December 31, 2003.

During 2002, the Company had the following transactions:

In exchange for the extension of principal payments on four notes
payable, the Company modified expiration dates of certain warrants
previously held by the note holders and issued an additional 10,416
such warrants. The fair value of the modification of the warrants
totaled $46,582 and has been recorded as financing costs.

A note payable of $250,000 was converted into a convertible debenture
with 83,333 warrants also being issued under the same terms of the
Company's private placement offering of convertible debentures.

1,647,881 warrants were issued with convertible debentures valued at
$811,559 were initially recorded as a discount on the debentures. At
December 31, 2002, the full amount of the discount had been amortized
as financing costs.

In-the-money conversion features on convertible debt valued at
$3,746,285 were recognized as financing costs.

The Company issued 143,678 warrants in connection with related party
notes payable of $450,000 and $50,000. The warrants were valued at
$156,781 and recorded as financing costs.

$267,500 of convertible debentures with 89,167 warrants valued at
$14,250 for a total amount of $281,750 was issued for consulting
services.

41,667 warrants issued with a note payable valued at $150,016 were
initially recorded as a discount on the note payable. At December 31,
2002 the full discount had been amortized and recorded as financing
costs.

$4,661,143 of debentures and accrued interest of $227,075 were
converted into 1,758,494 shares of stock with $466,771 being paid as a
premium at conversion and recorded as financing costs.

221,198 shares of stock were issued to consultants for services valued
at $607,790.

133,333 warrants were issued to consultants for services valued at
$215,086.

Approximately $1,142,000 of capital expenditures for oil and gas
properties was included in accounts payable at December 31, 2002.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company received $1,939,610 of
stock subscriptions receivable for 712,045 shares of stock. The cash
for these subscriptions was paid during the first quarter of 2003.

Note 1 - Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Teton Petroleum Company (the Company) is an oil and gas exploration and
production company whose current focus is the Russian Federation. Since the
Company's operations are exclusively in the Russian Federation it is subject to
certain risks not typically associated with companies in North America,
including, but not limited to, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the
imposition of exchange control regulations, the possibility of expropriation
decree, undeveloped business practices and laws, and less liquid capital
markets.

The exploration and development of oil and gas reserves involves significant
financial risks. The ability of the Company to meet its obligations and
commitments under the terms and conditions of its licensing agreements and carry
out its planned exploration activities is dependent upon continued financial
support from its stockholders, the ability to develop economically recoverable
reserves, and its ability to obtain necessary financing to complete development
of the reserves.

Should the Company's licenses be revoked as a result of changes in legislation,
title disputes or failure to comply with license agreements, there would be a
material write-down of the oil and gas properties. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that may be required due to
these uncertainties.

The United States dollar is the principal currency of the Company's business
and, accordingly, these consolidated financial statements are expressed in
United States dollars.

Principles of Consolidation
---------------------------

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Teton
Petroleum Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Goltech Petroleum, LLC
("Goltech"). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.

During 2002, the Company owned a 50% interest in Goltech, which had a 70.59%
interest in ZAO Goloil. Accordingly ZAO Goloil was consolidated into Goltech and
the Company reflected its 50% share of Goltech. As of December 31, 2002, the
other 50% member of Goltech relinquished their ownership interest in exchange
for a 35.295% direct ownership interest in ZAO Goloil. The audited financial
statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, as is customary in the oil and gas
industry, reflect a pro-rata consolidation of the Company's interest in ZAO
Goloil (a Russian Company) through its wholly owned subsidiary Goltech.
Management believes this to be the most meaningful presentation as the Company's
only significant asset is its investment in Goltech Petroleum, LLC. The Company
is required to provide 50% of the capital expenditure requirements and is
entitled to a 50% operating interest until repayment of its investment occurs
("Payout"). Under the pro-rata consolidation method the Company includes its
pro-rata share of the assets (50%), liabilities (50%), revenues (50%) and
expenses (50%) of the accounts of Goloil until repayment (payout) of our current
and any future loans to Goloil occurs. The intercompany balances of Goltech and
Teton do not fully eliminate under the pro-rata consolidation method, and the
remaining receivable on Teton's accounts has been included as a component of oil
and gas properties, as this balance will only be repaid through net cash flow
generated from oil and gas properties.

In September OAO NK RussNeft acquired the shares held by Mediterranean Overseas
Trust and InvestPetrol in Goloil and assumed responsibility for operating the
License. During the transition, the Company subsequently learned in November,
Goloil sold substantially less than its export quota into export markets where
prices are substantially higher, instead selling the production into the
domestic market.

Commencing October 1, RussNeft began selling Goloil's production to a related
party for a fixed price of 2,400 rubles per ton (roughly $11 per barrel), a
price substantially below the blended market price Goloil formerly received
selling its production into the export, near abroad and domestic markets. As a
consequence, the Company estimates its revenues after taxes for the quarter were
reduced by approximately $1.44 million. Moreover, since this pricing arrangement
prevailed through the end of the fourth quarter and beyond, the Company has had
to significantly reduce the present value of its reserves effective January 1,
2004. In addition, RussNeft has adjusted the amount of production payment to be
paid to EnergoSoyuz-A ("EUA") to a fixed amount per month which is less than the
50% of oil produced previously agreed to, based on the current price.

Teton has strenuously objected to RussNeft's actions and is continuing to engage
its management in discussions over the issue, while retaining counsel with the
intention of vigorously pursuing it rights under previous agreements and as a
significant minority shareholder in Goloil. While counsel has advised the
Company that its position has merit, the outcome of this dispute cannot be
predicted at the current time.

Use of Estimates
----------------

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
-------------------------

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company continually
monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial
institutions it invests with. As of the balance sheet date, the Company had no
cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition
-------------------

The Company recognizes oil sales revenue at the point in time oil quantities
have been delivered to purchasers.

Comprehensive Income
--------------------

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period from
transactions and other events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income is
the total of net income or loss and other comprehensive income or loss. The
effect of foreign currency exchange rates currently is the Company's only item,
which constitutes comprehensive income or loss.

Oil and Gas Properties
----------------------

The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas
producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas
properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves, and
to drill and equip development wells are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory
wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and geophysical costs, and
costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed. The Company
also evaluates costs capitalized for exploratory wells, and if proved reserves
cannot be determined within one year from drilling exploration wells, those
costs are written-off and recorded as an expense.

Unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are
periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the
time of impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Other unproved
properties are amortized based on the Company's experience of successful
drilling and average holding period. Currently the Company holds no unproved
properties.

Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering
estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs and estimated salvage values, are
depreciated and depleted by the unit-of-production method. Significant
development projects are excluded from the depletion calculation prior to
assessment of the existence of proven reserves that are ready for commercial
production. The Company had a cogeneration plant under construction at December
31, 2003, the Company's share of which totaled $1,700,696, which has been
excluded from properties subject to depletion until its completion. The Company
did not have any significant development projects, which have been excluded from
depletion at December 31, 2003. Support equipment and other property and
equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

On the sale or retirement of a complete unit of a proved property, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization are eliminated
from the property accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. On the
retirement or sale of a partial unit of proved property, the cost is charged to
accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization with a resulting gain or
loss recognized in income based on the amount of proceeds.

On the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property for cash or cash
equivalent, gain or loss on the sale is recognized, taking into consideration
the amount of any recorded impairment if the property had been assessed
individually. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, the amount
received is treated as a reduction of the cost of the interest retained.

All of the Company's oil and gas assets are held in one cost center located in
Siberia, Russia. The Russian Federation (RF) has performed substantial
exploration efforts on properties on which the Company has received successful
tenders for future exploration and development. As a result, those areas
accepted under tender by the RF are known to contain proved reserves and the
Company's efforts are focused on further development of such reserves.

The net carrying value of the Company's oil and gas properties is limited to an
estimated net recoverable amount. The net recoverable amount is based on
undiscounted future net revenues and is determined by applying factors based on
historical experience and other data such as primary lease terms of properties
and average holding periods. If it is determined that the net recoverable value
is less than the net carrying value of the oil and gas properties, any
impairment is charged to operations.

Inventories
-----------

Inventory includes extracted oil physically in the pipeline prior to delivery
for sale and oil held by third parties valued at the cost of development.
Inventory also includes various supplies and spare parts and is valued at cost
using the weighted average method.

Property and Equipment
----------------------

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives for owned assets, ranging
from 3 to 27 years.

Feasibility Study TDA Grants
----------------------------

Grants that are received for use on oil and gas properties are recorded as an
offset to expenditures incurred under the grants.

One such study was completed in 2001. In the event that the project is
implemented and a substantial economic benefit is reaped, funds previously
advanced by the TDA may be required to be reimbursed. Goloil may be required to
reimburse the TDA in the form of a success fee if certain events occur by
December 31, 2004, which include: taking an equity position in the project,
financing development of the license area, or obtaining external financing for
development of the license area.

The Company has also received a $300,000 grant from the TDA for a feasibility
study for field development and pipeline construction. As of March 25, 2004 the
Company has completed and submitted to TDA its feasibility study of the Eguryak
license area. The Company has received $255,000 as of December 31, 2003 under
the grant. In the event that the project is implemented and a substantial
economic benefit is reaped, funds previously advanced by the TDA may be required
to be reimbursed. The Company may be required to reimburse the TDA in the form
of a success fee if certain events occur based substantially on the results of
the study by December 31, 2005, which include: taking an equity position in the
project, financing development of the license area or obtaining external
financing for development of the license area.

For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company received $0 under
TDA grants, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
-------------------------------

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with
the provisions established under Statement of SFAS no. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable.
An impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on
an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the related assets.
An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the discounted estimated
future cash flows. Changes in significant assumptions underlying future cash
flow estimates or fair values of assets may have a material effect on the
Company's financial position and results of operations.

Asset Retirement Obligations
----------------------------

During 2003 the Company applied the provisions of SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations." The Company recorded $126,500 as the fair value
of the Company's estimated liability for the retirement of its Russian oil and
gas assets along with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the
related oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2003, as the effect of
adopting SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 was not material. Had the Company
adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 the net loss to common shareholders
would have been increased by $13,000.

Stock-Based Compensation
------------------------

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation- Transition and Disclosure." This statement amends SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" to provide alternative methods of
transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 amends the
disclosure provision of SFAS 123 to require more prominent disclosure about the
effects of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based
employee compensation on reported results of operations. The Company has adopted
the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation
cost has been recognized for stock options issued to employees, officers and
Directors under the stock option plan. Had compensation cost for the Company's
options issued to employees, officers and Directors been determined based on the
fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS
No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 124, the Company's net loss and basic loss per
common share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

For the Years Ended
December 31,
----------------------------
2003 2002
----------- ------------

Net loss applicable to common shareholders - as reported $ (8,415,537) $(10,973,923)
Net loss applicable to common shareholders - pro forma $(13,389,678) $(11,945,964)
Basic loss per common share - as reported $ (1.23) $ (3.53)
Basic loss per common share - pro forma $ (1.96) $ (3.84)

The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used:

For the Years Ended
December 31,
----------------------------
2003 2002
----------- ------------

Approximate risk free rate 4.00% 4.50%
Average expected life 10 years 2 years
Dividend yield -% -%
Volatility 100% 87.20%
Estimated fair value of total options granted $4,974,141 $972,041

Foreign Currency Translation
----------------------------

All assets and liabilities of the Company's subsidiary are translated into U.S.
dollars using the prevailing exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Income
and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the
period. Stockholders' investments are translated at the historical exchange
rates prevailing at the time of such investments. Any gains or losses from
foreign currency translation are included as a separate component of
stockholders' equity. The prevailing exchange rates at December 31, 2003 and
2002 were approximately 1 U.S. dollar to 29.45 and 31.78, Russian rubles,
respectively. For the years ended 2003 and 2002, the average exchange rate for 1
U.S. dollar was 30.66 and 31.39, Russian rubles, respectively.

Basic Loss Per Share
--------------------

The Company applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" (FAS 128). All dilutive potential common shares
have an antidilutive effect on diluted per share amounts and therefore have been
excluded in determining net loss per share. The Company's basic and diluted loss
per share is equivalent and accordingly only basic loss per share has been
presented.

The following table reflects the effects of dilutive securities as of December
31, 2003.

Dilutive effects of stock options $ 1,578,037
Dilutive effects of warrants 7,389,981
Dilutive effects of convertible preferred shares 2,381,351
-----------

$11,349,369
===========

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
-----------------------------------

The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash, accounts
receivable, sundry receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, notes
payable and convertible debentures approximated fair value as of December 31,
2003 because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

The carrying amounts of notes payable and debt issued approximate fair value as
of December 31, 2003 because interest rates on these instruments approximate
market interest rates. The Company has no derivative financial instruments.

The Company is exposed to foreign currency risks to the extent that transactions
and balances are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.
This risk could be significant for those transactions and balances denominated
in rubles, as the ruble has experienced significant devaluation in the past.

Reclassifications
-----------------

Certain amounts in the 2002 consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
-----------------------------------------

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150
establishes standards for how an issuer measures certain financial instruments
with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and requires that an issuer
classify a financial instrument within its scope as a liability (or asset in
some circumstances). SFAS No. 150 was effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective and
adopted by the Company on July 1, 2003. As the Company has no such instruments,
the adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.

During December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46R, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"), which requires the consolidation of
certain entities that are determined to be variable interest entities ("VIE's").
An entity is considered to be a VIE when either (i) the entity lacks sufficient
equity to carry on its principal operations, (ii) the equity owners of the
entity cannot make decisions about the entity's activities or (iii) the entity's
equity neither absorbs losses or benefits from gains. Teton Petroleum owns no
interests in variable interest entities, and therefore this new interpretation
will not affect the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 - Investments in Goltech Petroleum, LLC
----------------------------------------------

Effective in August 2000, the Company entered into a transaction agreement
selling a 50% equity interest in Goltech in exchange for $1,000,000 cash and a
$5.6 million investment in the license area for drilling additional wells on the
license area, completion of a pipeline and the construction of a processing
facility (the oilfield development program). The $1,000,000 received was also
invested in the license area to complete the oilfield development program. The
party to the agreement obtained the right to name 50% of the board of managers
and became the general manager of Goltech. No gain or loss was recognized on the
transaction as the proceeds were immediately reinvested into the field
development and pipeline completion project. ZAO Goloil was also required to
make a production payment to compensate the other party for its investment in
the license area. The production payment requires ZAO Goloil to deliver 50% of
the production from existing and future wells through July 2007. The other party
is obligated under an agreement to only sell their share of the production in
the Russian domestic market. Effective December 31, 2002, the other party
withdrew as a member of Goltech and in exchange for relinquishment of 50% of its
membership interests in Goltech, it received 35.295% of the ZAO Goloil shares
and the return of its $1,000,000 initial contribution. ZAO Goloil is still
obligated under the production payment.

The other membership holder (the "affiliate") to Goltech Petroleum, LLC
(Goltech) had invested approximately $7,000,000 under the oilfield development
agreement outside of Goltech and Goloil as of December 31, 2003. These costs are
reflected in the accounts of another entity controlled by the affiliate and are
not reflected anywhere in the financial statements of the Company. These
expenditures were used to drill and complete four additional wells and complete
a pipeline on the Company's license area that provides the ability to transport
oil directly through this pipeline year-round to other larger pipelines for
ultimate sale. The Company has compensated the affiliate in the form of a
production payment of approximately 2,262,343 barrels of oil through December
31, 2003. The Company also has the obligation to compensate the affiliate for a
minimum of 4,088,000 barrels of oil (1,825,657 barrels remaining at December 31,
2003) over a seven-year period for its investments under the oilfield
development agreement. See Note 10 for a discussion of the changes made to the
production payment being proposed by OAO NK RussNeft, a newly formed Russian
independent oil producer ("RussNeft").

Additionally, the affiliate has net direct loans to Goloil of approximately
$14,839,000, which have been used to help fund capital expenditures for
completion of a processing facility and to help fund other related expenses. The
Company has reflected a 50% of these loans in its financial statements under the
pro-rata consolidation method (Note 6).

Note 3 - Property and Equipment
-------------------------------

Property and equipment consist of the following at December 31, 2003:

Building $ 123,942
Vehicles 178,598
Computers and equipment 30,053
Other equipment 175,707
Furniture and fixtures 27,689
-----------
535,989
Less: Accumulated depreciation (85,148)
-----------

$ 450,841
===========

Note 4 - Oil and Gas Properties
-------------------------------

Goloil License
--------------

The Company holds an interest in the license for the Eguryak license area for
exploration and production of oil and gas through its investment in Goloil
(which is held through its 100% owned subsidiary, Goltech). This license grants
Goloil the exclusive right to explore and develop an area in Siberia covering
186.8 square kilometers and includes the Eguriakhskoe, South Eguriakhskoe and
Golevoye oil fields situated in the Nizhnevartovsk Region. The license expires
on May 21, 2022, subject to additional extensions as approved by applicable
bodies of the Russian Federation. The license may also be canceled by the
Company with a 90-day written notice.

The license requires Goloil to drill a minimum of five wells over four years,
conduct an additional seismic survey aggregating 30 square kilometers, and
evaluate geological data from the 186.8 square kilometers of the license. Goloil
was also required to conduct production tests on six wells between 1997 and
2000. In addition to performing its duties under the license, Goloil must comply
with Russian environmental and archeological laws. Currently, the Company has
fulfilled its requirements under the license. Management is continuing to pursue
completion of future required performance criteria and believes that there will
be no adverse effects on the Company's license for failure to comply with any
past license requirements.

The license requires Goloil to pay all taxes including mining tax, property tax
and certain ecological taxes. All geological information obtained at Goloil's
expense is the property of Goloil, while all geological information obtained at
the expense of the Russian government may be used by Goloil. Oil and gas
produced from the licensed property, subject to certain royalty payments, is the
property of Goloil.

During 2003, Goloil began the construction of a gas-powered electrical
generating plant, which will be operational in the first quarter of 2004.

See Note 10 for a discussion of a dispute with RussNeft, the operator of Goloil.

Note 5 - Notes Payable
----------------------

During 2003:

The Company received proceeds of $628,750 from the issuance of promissory notes
to three shareholders. In connection with these notes, 128,700 warrants valued
at $110,170 were issued. At December 31, 2003, the full amount of the discount
had been amortized and recorded as a non-cash financing charge. The Company has
recorded the value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model using the following assumptions: volatility of 73%, a risk-free rate of
3.5%, zero dividend payments, and a life of one year.

The Company paid $478,750 of the promissory notes issued during the year. The
remaining $150,000 along with accrued interest of $9,426 was exchanged for
Teton's 8% convertible preferred shares.

During 2002:

The scheduled March 1, 2002 principal payments on two notes payable totaling
$250,000 to stockholders were extended to April 15, 2002. In exchange for this
extension, the holders were issued 10,417 stock purchase warrants, with an
exercise price of $6.00 that expired February 2004, which had been valued at
$14,469 using the Black Scholes option pricing model with assumptions of
volatility of 100%, risk free rate of 5.5% and no dividend yield. These
extensions were recorded in the first quarter of 2002 as financing costs. These
notes were fully paid off in 2002.

The Company issued 143,678 warrants in connection with related party notes
payable of $450,000 and $50,000. The warrants were valued at $156,781 and
recorded as financing costs. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2002, the due
dates of the two notes payable totaling $500,000 was extended by the holders to
April 15, 2002. As consideration for this extension the Company agreed to modify
the expiration dates of certain warrants previously held by the note holders
from October 31, 2002 to January 31, 2003. These extensions were valued based
upon the incremental fair value of the warrants on the date of modification,
which totaled approximately $32,000. The values were calculated using the Black
Scholes option-pricing model under the assumptions described in the previous
paragraph, and were recorded in the first quarter of 2002, the quarter the
modifications occurred.

During 2002, the Company paid $200,000 of a $450,000 note payable outstanding at
December 31, 2001. The remaining $250,000 was converted into a convertible
debenture with 83,333 warrants also being issued in connection with the
Company's private placement offering of convertible debentures.

The Company also paid off a $50,000 note payable to a stockholder and the
$94,210 note payable to an officer during 2002, which were outstanding at
December 31, 2001.

During 2002, the Company received proceeds of $300,000 on a note payable from a
stockholder. In connection with the note, 41,667 warrants valued at $150,016
were issued and recorded as financing charges. The Company paid off this note in
November 2002. The Company has recorded the value of these warrants using the
Black Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions: volatility
of 138%, a risk-free rate of 4.5%, zero dividend payments, and a life of 2
years.

Total expense recorded associated with the above warrant issuances and
modifications totaled $353,379 and have been recorded as non-cash financing
charges during the year ended December 31, 2002.

Note 6 - Proportionate Share of Liabilities
-------------------------------------------

The proportionate share of accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$2,590,901 at December 31, 2003 are obligations of Goloil and not Teton
Petroleum nor have they been guaranteed by Teton Petroleum.

The following notes reflect the Company's 50% pro-rata share of notes payable
advances made by and owed to Goloil owed to an affiliate. These advances are
obligations of Goloil at December 31, 2003 and not Teton Petroleum nor have they
been guaranteed by Teton Petroleum.

Pro-rata share of Goloil notes payable owed to an affiliate. The
proceeds were used to pay certain operating expenses and capital
expenditures of Goloil. These notes provide for interest rates of
8%, with interest payable either quarterly or on maturity, maturing
through December 2004. These notes are secured by substantially
all Goloil assets. The notes payable will be repaid from cash flow
from ZAO Goloil as available, or extended to future periods. $ 7,419,409
-----------
Less: current portion (7,419,409)
-----------

$ -
===========

Note 7 - Stockholders' Equity
-----------------------------

Changes in Stockholders' Equity during 2003
-------------------------------------------

On March 19, 2003, the stockholders authorized an increase in the Company's
common shares from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000 and authorized 25,000,000 shares
of preferred stock for future issuance.

Private Placements of Common Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed common stock:

$1,091,900 (net of costs of $98,100) from the issuance of 437,012 shares of
common stock. In connection with the private placement, the Company also issued
a warrant for each $3.00 stock investment. The warrants have a term of two years
and an exercise price of $6.00,

$1,939,610 during the year ended December 31, 2003 related to outstanding stock
subscriptions receivable at December 31, 2002,

80,828 common shares valued at $317,902 were issued for (i) settlement of
accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $220,000; and (ii) services provided
by the advisory board of $97,902.

Private Placements of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
----------------------------------------------------------

During the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed preferred stock issued at an
offering price of $4.35 per share.

Proceeds of $9,145,450 (net of cash costs of $473,888 and net of $46,968 related
to the obligation to issue warrants for capital raising) from the issuance of
2,266,680 shares of 8% convertible preferred stock.

$14,574 from the issuance of 40,000 preferred shares in exchange for a $150,000
note payable outstanding and accrued interest of $9,426.

We also issued 12,000 preferred shares to a consultant for capital raising
services valued at $52,200.

In connection with the preferred share private placement for Tranches 1 and 2,
certain placements were entered into when the underlying price of the common
stock to which the preferred shares are convertible into, exceeded $4.35, the
stated conversion rate. As a result of the underlying shares being in-the-money,
the Company was required to compute a beneficial conversion charge, which is
calculated as the difference between the conversion price of $4.35 and the
closing stock price on the effective date of each offering, multiplied by the
total of the related common shares to be issued upon conversion of the preferred
stock. These charges are reflected as a dividend to the preferred shareholders
and are recognized over the period in which the preferred stock first becomes
convertible. For the Tranche 1 shares the charge was immediately recognized as
the shares were immediately convertible into common. For Tranche 2 the shares
could not be converted until a shareholder vote on January 27, 2004 took place
approving the issuance of additional common shares. The calculated beneficial
conversion feature on Tranche 2 was therefore amortized from the effective date
of each issuance through January 27, 2004. This resulted in total beneficial
conversion charges of $ 1,182,452, of which $1,063,842 were recorded during the
fourth quarter of 2003, and $118,610 will be amortized and recorded as preferred
dividends in January of 2004.

The Company also sent each preferred shareholder an inducement offer to convert
their shares of preferred into common shares. If converted within 60 days of
closing, the investors will be entitled to receive (i) dividends payable in
common stock equivalent to one years worth of dividends; and (ii) 2 Class B
Warrants for each $10 invested, exercisable at $6.00 per share.

In connection with the preferred share private placement for Tranche 1,
shareholders converted 1,645,099 of 8% convertible preferred shares to common
stock at a price of $4.35 per share. Common share dividends of 8% for a full
year were paid totaling $546,173 and 1,431,237 warrants were issued valued at
$1,170,678, for a total inducement charge of $1,716,851 recognized as a
preferred dividend during the fourth quarter for those investors which accepted
the inducement offer. The warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model using the following assumptions: volatility of 55%, a
risk-free rate of 1.875%, zero dividend payments, and a life of two years.

In connection with the preferred share private placement for Tranche 2, a common
share dividend of 8% for a full year was paid totaling $157,601 and warrants
were issued valued at $337,805, for a total inducement charge of $495,406 which
will be recognized as a preferred dividend in the first quarter of 2004,
associated with the preferred stock inducement offer ending on March 27, 2004.
The warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
using the following assumptions: volatility of 55%, a risk-free rate of 1.875%,
zero dividend payments, and a life of two years.

Warrants to Purchase Common Shares
----------------------------------

During 2003, the Company issued 440,140 warrants to entities for their services
directly related to raising capital under private placements. The Company also
issued 128,700 warrants in conjunction with debt valued at $110,170.

During 2003, the Company issued 1,019,883 warrants in connection with common
stock private placement offerings, with an exercise price of $6.00 that expire
December 30, 2004.

Changes in Stockholder Equity During 2002
-----------------------------------------

Private Placements of Common Stock
----------------------------------

During the year ended December 31, 2002 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed common stock:

$3,333,460 from the issuance of 1,223,737 shares of common stock. In connection
with the private placement offerings, the Company also issued a warrant for each
$3.00 stock investment. The warrants have a term of two years and an exercise
price of $6.00.

$605,136 from the issuance of 221,198 common shares issued for consulting
services.

$23,200 from the issuance of 7,407 common shares for services provided in 2001.
The Company accrued a liability for this amount at December 31, 2002.

Convertible Debentures
----------------------

During 2002, the Company received proceeds of $4,163,143 from the private
placement of convertible debentures. The debentures had a term of three years
from April 1, 2002 and provided for interest at 10% per annum payable annually.
The debentures provided that the holder may convert the debenture and accrued
interest into shares of common stock at a $3 conversion rate.

The debentures also included warrants to purchase common stock and have an
exercise price of $6 and a term of two years. Each debenture holder received one
warrant for each $.25 (pre-split) of investment made in debentures.

On September 1, 2002, the Company redeemed all debentures outstanding for shares
of its common stock. The debentures were redeemed at 110% of their face value by
issuing one share of common stock for each $3 of redemption value, which also
incorporates any accrued interest through September 1, 2002. Financing charges
were recorded for the difference between the cumulative 10% contractual interest
accrued through September 1, 2002 and the 10% premium paid upon redemption,
which totaled $466,771.

As a result of the warrants issued with the debentures and in-the-money
conversion features present at issuance, non-cash financing charges of
$4,714,625 were expensed. While the stock to which the conversion rights and
warrants apply is restricted stock, the valuation with respect to this stock in
calculating the discount was "as if" the stock was immediately salable. The
effect of this is to make the amount of discount and its related amortization
higher than it would otherwise have been. Management believes these costs are
non-recurring and will manage future capital raising programs to minimize or
eliminate these costs.

Warrants to Purchase Common Shares

During 2002, the Company issued 133,333 warrants to consultants for services
valued at $215,086. The Company also issued 616,793 to employees and Directors
for services performed.

The following table presents the activity for warrants outstanding:

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Shares Price
------------ ------------

Outstanding - December 31, 2001 544,098 $ 5.28
Granted 4,068,682 5.52
Forfeited/canceled (25,000) 2.04
------------ ------------

Outstanding - December 31, 2002 4,587,780 5.52
Granted 3,210,249 2.49
Forfeited/canceled (408,048) 0.30
------------ ------------

Outstanding - December 31, 2003 7,389,981 $ 5.63
============ ============

The following table presents the composition of warrants outstanding and exercisable:

Shares Outstanding
-----------------------------
Range of Exercise Prices Number Price* Life*
------------------------ ----------- ------------- -------------

$2.72 - $4.80 997,800 $ 0.41 0.27
$6.00 - $12.00 6,392,181 5.22 0.93
----------- ------------- -------------

Total - December 31, 2003 7,389,981 $ 5.63 1.20
============ ============= =============

*Price and Life reflect the weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining
contractual life, respectively.

Note 8 - Stock Options
----------------------

At the annual meeting on March 19, 2003, the Company's shareholders approved an
employee stock option plan and authorized 2,083,333 shares of Common Stock for
issuance thereunder. Under the plan, incentive and non-qualified options may be
granted. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company issued 30,000
non-qualified options to outside advisory board members which has been recorded
as compensation expense during the three-months ended June 30, 2003 valued at
$94,701, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions: volatility of 100%, a risk-free rate of 4%, zero dividend payments,
and a life of ten years. The Company also issued 1,448,037 incentive options to
employees, officers and Directors valued at $4,571,026 using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model under the same assumptions described above. In the third
quarter, 100,000 options valued at $308,414 were issued to a director under the
Company Plan.

As of December 31, 2003, 1,478,037 options with an exercise price of $3.48 were
outstanding as well as 100,000 options with an exercise price of $3.71. The
weighted average price and contractual life of both issues were $3.26 and $3.71
and 8.59 and .61 years, respectively.

The following table presents the activity for stock options outstanding:

Shares Outstanding
-----------------------------
Range of Exercise Prices Number Price* Life*
------------------------ ----------- ------------- -------------

Outstanding - December 31, 2002 - $ - -
Issued 1,578,037 3.49 9.20
----------- ------------- -------------

Outstanding - December 31, 2003 1,578,037 $ 3.49 9.20
============ ============= =============

*Price and Life reflect the weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining
contractual life, respectively.

Note 9 - Income and Other Taxes
-------------------------------

The Company has incurred losses since inception and, as a result of uncertainty
surrounding the use of those net operating loss carry-forwards, no provision for
income taxes has been recorded.

The Company has net operating loss carry-forwards for U.S. tax purposes of
approximately $18,500,000, which expire between 2012 and 2023, if unused, and
have been fully reserved by a valuation allowance.

Taxes payable are tax liabilities of its Russian subsidiary, Goloil (held
through its wholly owned subsidiary Goltech). Tax payments made by Goloil to the
Russian government include profits taxes, value-added taxes ("VAT"), unified
social taxes, transport taxes and property taxes.

The Company had no income tax liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2003.
ZAO Goloil has net operating loss carry-forwards, which are available to offset
future taxable income, which will expire in 2013. The foreign income tax
carry-forwards for Russian tax purposes are limited to a maximum of 30% of
taxable income in any year. As of December 31, 2003, Goloil had $210,662 in
deferred tax assets ($105,331 net to Teton) and $34,906 ($17,453 net to Teton)
in deferred tax liabilities. These amounts can be applied against future income
taxes.

Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies
---------------------------------------

Contingencies
-------------

Dispute with Current Operator of Goloil

In September, RussNeft acquired the shares held by Mediterranean Overseas Trust
and InvestPetrol in Goloil and assumed responsibility for operating the License.
During the fourth quarter, the Company subsequently learned, Goloil sold
substantially less than its export quota into export markets where prices are
substantially higher, instead selling the production into the domestic market.

Commencing October 1, RussNeft began selling Goloil's production to a related
party of RussNeft (RussTrade) for a fixed price of 2,400 rubles per ton (roughly
$11 per barrel), a price substantially below the blended market price Goloil
formerly received selling its production into the export, near abroad and
domestic markets. As a consequence, the Company estimates its revenues after
taxes for the quarter were reduced by approximately $1.44 million. Moreover,
since this pricing arrangement prevailed through the end of the fourth quarter
and beyond, the Company has had to significantly reduce the present value of its
reserves effective January 1, 2004. In addition, RussNeft has adjusted the
amount of production payment to be paid to EnergoSoyuz-A ("EUA") to a fixed
amount per month which is less than the 50% of oil produced previously agreed
to, based on the current price.

Taxation

The taxation system in Russia is evolving as the central government transforms
itself from a command to a market-oriented economy. There were many new Russian
Federation and Republic taxes and royalty laws and related regulations
introduced over the last few years. Many of these were not clearly written and
their application is subject to the interpretation of the local tax inspectors,
Central Bank officials and the Ministry of Finance. Instances of inconsistent
interpretation between local, regional and federal tax authorities and between
the Central Bank and Ministry of Finance are not unusual. The current regime of
penalties and interest related to reported and discovered violations of Russian
laws, decrees and related regulations are severe. Penalties include confiscation
of the amounts at issue (for tax law violations), as well as fines of up to 40%
of the unpaid taxes. Interest is assessable at rates of up to 0.1% per day. As a
result, penalties and interest can result in amounts that are multiples of any
unreported taxes.

The Company's policy is to accrue contingencies in the accounting period in
which a loss is deemed probable and the amount is reasonably determinable. In
this regard, because of the uncertainties associated with the Russian tax and
legal systems, the ultimate taxes as well as penalties and interest, if any,
assessed may be in excess of the amounts paid to date as of December 31, 2003.

Management believes based upon its best estimates that the Company has paid or
accrued all taxes that are applicable for the current and prior years, and
compiled with all essential provisions of laws and regulations of the Russian
Federation.

Environmental

The Company may be subject to loss contingencies pursuant to Russian national
and regional environmental claims that may arise for the past operations of the
related fields, which it operates. As Russian laws and regulations evolve
concerning environmental assessments and cleanups, the Company may incur future
costs, the amount of which is currently indeterminable due to such factors as
the current state of the Russian regulatory process, the ultimate determination
of responsible parties associated with these costs and the Russian government's
assessment of respective parties' ability to pay for those costs related to
environmental reclamation.

Political

The Company's operations and financial position will continue to be affected by
Russian political developments including the application of existing and future
legislation, regulations and claims pertaining to production, imports, exports,
oil and gas regulations and tax regulations. The likelihood of such occurrences
and their effect on the Company could have a significant impact on the Company's
current activity and its overall ability to continue operations. Management does
not believe that these contingencies, as related to its operations, are any more
significant than those of similar enterprises in Russia.

Commitments

Mr. Howard Cooper, Chairman, signed an agreement on May 1, 2002. The employment
agreement is for a three-year term, whereby Mr. Cooper's salary is $13,333 per
month. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Cooper is entitled to 24 months of
severance pay, payable in monthly installments over 24 months, from the date of
termination. The Company may discontinue the severance payments if Mr. Cooper
violates the confidentiality, noncompetition, or nonsolicitation provisions of
his employment agreement.

Mr. Karl Arleth, President and Chief Executive Officer, signed an agreement on
May 1, 2003. The employment agreement is for a three-year term, with a salary of
$10,000 per month. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Arleth is entitled to
24 months severance pay in the event of change of position or control of the
company.

Ms. Anya Cooper, Secretary, signed an agreement on May 1, 2002. The employment
agreement is for a three-year term, whereby Ms. Cooper's salary is $6,500 per
month. Under the terms of the agreement, Ms. Cooper is entitled to 12 months of
severance pay, payable in monthly installments over 12 months from the date of
termination. The Company may discontinue the severance payments if Ms. Cooper
violates the confidentiality provision of her employment agreement.

Note 11 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures
----------------------------------------------

The following is a summary of costs incurred in oil and gas producing
activities:

Included below is the Company's investment and activity in oil and gas producing
activities, which includes a proportionate share of ZAO Goloil's oil and gas
properties, revenues, and costs.

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- -----------

Property acquisition costs $ - $ -
Construction in progress 1,700,696 -
Development costs 5,207,931 4,150,742
----------- -----------

Total $ 6,908,627 $ 4,150,742
=========== ===========

The following reflects the Company's capitalized costs associated with oil and gas
producing activities:

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- -----------

Property acquisition costs $ 595,558 $ 595,558
Construction in progress 1,700,696 -
Development costs 10,808,813 4,830,421
----------- -----------
13,105,067 5,425,979
Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and
valuation allowances (2,064,585) (529,671)
----------- -----------

Net capitalized costs $11,040,482 $ 4,896,308
=========== ===========

Results of Operations from Oil and Gas Producing Activities
-----------------------------------------------------------

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities (excluding general
and administrative expense, and interest expense) are presented as follows:

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- -----------

Oil and gas sales $11,437,802 $ 6,923,320
Oil and gas production (2,020,447) (1,218,411)
Transportation and marketing (807,266) (611,956)
Export duties (1,492,999) (910,936)
Taxes other than income taxes (5,864,920) (3,537,990)
Depletion, depreciation and amortization (1,534,914) (451,930)
----------- -----------

Results of operations from oil and gas producing
activities $ (282,744) $ 192,097
=========== ===========

Reserves (Unaudited) - Base Case
--------------------------------

Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural
gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate
with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known
reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved development
oil and gas reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered through
existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. The reserve data
is based on studies prepared by an independent engineer. All proved reserves of
oil and gas are located in Russia.

See Note 10 to the financial statements for a full discussion of the dispute
with RussNeft. As the outcome of this dispute cannot be predicted at this time,
the Company has prepared two separate proved oil reserve cases: the "Base Case
SEC reserves and Cash Flow Projections" and the "Alternate Case". The Base Case
assumes that the Company is not successful in it's dispute with RussNeft,
accordingly, the price received for oil is set at 2,400 rubles per ton ($11 per
barrel) and the production payment is deducted assuming 19 million rubles per
month ($645,000 per month less VAT). The Alternate Case assumes that the Company
is successful in the dispute and that RussNeft and Goloil would honor all
pre-existing agreements. In the Base Case, future cash flows are substantially
less than in the Alternate Case, however oil reserves quantities are greater as
a result of payout being delayed and how the production payment is being
calculated. Management has elected to report the lower, alternate case reserves
as its oil reserves.

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- -----------

Proved reserves (bbls), beginning of period 13,264,000 40,174,000
Production (632,000) (471,000)
Extension of reservoir - 2,000,000
Revisions of previous estimates (4,370,000) (28,439,000)
----------- -----------

Proved reserves (bbls), end of period 8,262,000 13,264,000
=========== ===========

Proved developed reserves (bbls), beginning of period 4,567,000 5,493,000
=========== ===========

Proved developed reserves (bbls), end of period 3,816,000 4,567,000
=========== ===========

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows (Unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

SFAS No. 69 prescribes guidelines for computing a standardized measure of future
net cash flows and changes therein relating to estimated proved reserves. The
Company has followed these guidelines, which are briefly discussed below.

Future cash inflows and future production and development costs are determined
by applying year-end prices and costs to the estimated quantities of oil and gas
to be produced. Estimated future income taxes are computed using current
statutory income tax rates for those countries where production occurs. The
resulting future net cash flows are reduced to present value amounts by applying
a 10% annual discount factor.

The assumptions used to compute the standardized measure are those prescribed by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board and, as such, do not necessarily
reflect the Company's expectations for actual revenues to be derived from those
reserves nor their present worth. The limitations inherent in the reserve
quantity estimation process, as discussed previously, are equally applicable to
the standardized measure computations since these estimates are the basis for
the valuation process.

The following summarizes the Base Case standardized measure and sets forth the
Company's future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves based on
the standardized measure prescribed in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 69 assuming the Company is not successful in it's dispute with
RussNeft.

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- -----------

Future cash inflows $ 114,992,000 $ 230,581,000
Future production costs (80,812,000) (151,167,000)
Future development costs (14,595,000) (18,556,000)
Future income tax expense (7,360,000) (16,365,000)
------------- -------------
Future net cash flows (undiscounted) 12,225,000 44,493,000
Annual discount of 10% for estimated timing of cash
flows (6,232,000) (19,069,000)
------------- -------------

Standardized measure of future net discounted cash flows $ 5,993,000 $ 25,424,000
============= =============

Changes in Standardized Measure Base Case (Unaudited)
-----------------------------------------------------

The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows:

For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
----------- -----------

Standardized measure, beginning of period, $ 25,424,000 $ 40,362,000
Net changes in prices and production costs (11,483,000) 189,975,000
Future development costs (3,098,000) 22,344,000
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (11,806,000) (274,605,000)
Extension of reservoir - 19,867,000
Accretion of discount 2,542,000 4,036,000
Changes in income taxes, net 4,414,000 23,445,000
------------- -------------

Standardized measure, end of period, 2003 and 2002 $ 5,993,000 $ 25,424,000
============= =============

Reserves (Unaudited) - Alternate Case

The following summary sets forth the Company's future net cash flows relating to
proved oil and gas reserves based on the standardized measure prescribed in
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69 and assuming that the Company
is successful in resolving its dispute with RussNeft, the Alternate Case.

For the Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------
2003 2002
------------- -------------

Future cash inflows $ 175,631,000 $ 230,581,000
Future production costs (104,257,000) (151,167,000)
Future development costs (14,595,000) (18,556,000)
Future income tax expense (15,567,000) (16,365,000)
------------- -------------
Future net cash flows (undiscounted) 41,212,000 44,493,000
Annual discount of 10% for estimated timing of cash
flows (17,560,000) (19,069,000)
------------- -------------

Standardized measure of future net discounted cash flows $ 23,652,000 $ 25,424,000
============= =============

Changes in Standardized Measure (Unaudited)
-------------------------------------------

The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows:

For the Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------
2003 2002
------------- -------------

Standardized measure, beginning of period, $ 25,424,000 $ 40,362,000
Net changes in prices and production costs 50,949,000 189,975,000
Future development costs (3,098,000) 22,344,000
Revisions of previous quantity estimates (52,623,000) (274,605,000)
Extension of reservoir - 19,867,000
Accretion of discount 2,542,000 4,036,000
Changes in income taxes, net 458,000 23,445,000
------------- -------------

Standardized measure, end of period, 2003 and 2002 $ 23,652,000 $ 25,424,000
============= =============

Note 12 - Fourth Quarter Adjustments
------------------------------------

The following significant adjustments were recorded by the Company during the
fourth quarter of 2003:

Depletion, amortization and amortization $ 919,744
Exploration expenses 275,416
Imputed preferred stock dividends for inducements and
beneficial conversion charges 2,762,137
-----------

Total impact on loss applicable to common stockholders $ 3,957,297
===========

As described in Note 10 to these financial statements, the operations of Goloil
have had some significant management changes that have affected the operating
results of Goloil during the fourth quarter. The effects of these changes can be
seen in the accompanying table reflecting the fourth quarter results of
operations.

Fourth
Quarter
2003
-----------
Sales, Barrels 150,938
Average Daily Sales, Barrels 1,654
Average Selling Price, $/barrel $ 15.45

Revenues $ 2,332,464

Costs of Sales and Expenses, excl. DD&A
Production Costs 563,590
Transportation & Marketing 6,061
Taxes other than Income taxes 1,700,920
Export Duties -
------------

Results from Goloil Operations, before DD&A 61,889
Less General & Administrative Expense, Goloil 188,229
-----------
Goloil operating (loss) income before DD&A (126,340)

Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization, Goloil 919,744
-----------

Operating loss, Goloil (1,046,084)

General & Administrative Expense, Teton 1,244,063
-----------

Operating Loss, Teton $(2,290,147)
===========

APPENDIX A-3

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AS OF
MARCH 31, 2004

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Information as of March 31, 2004

Introduction

The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial information gives effect
to the sale of Teton Petroleum Company's (the "Company") entire interest (35.30%
of the outstanding ordinary shares of stock) in the Siberian-Texan Closed Joint
Stock Company Goloil ("Goloil"). These pro forma statements are presented for
illustrative purposes only. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable.

The unaudited pro forma condensed balance sheet as of March 31, 2004 was
prepared by using the historical cost consolidated balance sheet for the
Company, giving effect to the repayment of all loans outstanding and the related
sale of our entire equity interest of Goloil (35.30% of the outstanding shares)
as if closing had occurred on March 31, 2004.

The unaudited pro forma condensed statement of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003 were prepared by
using the historical consolidated statement of operations for the Company and
then reclassifying the operations of Goloil as discontinued operations and then
recording the gain on sale assuming the sale had occurred on March 31, 2004 as a
component of discontinued operations.

These pro forma condensed financial statements do not purport to represent what
the results of operations or financial position of the Company would actually
have been if the repayment of outstanding loans and the related sale of the
Company's interest in Goloil had occurred on the dates referred to above nor do
they purport to project the results of operations or financial position of the
Company for any future period or as of any date, respectively.

Teton Petroleum Company
Pro Forma Balance Sheet
As of March 31, 2004

Historical Pro forma adjustments Pro forma
----------------------
Amounts Loan Sale of After Sale
Repayment investment
(1) (2) (3)
------------------------------------------------
Assets
Current assets:
Cash $ 7,856,899 $ 5,101,422 $ 7,664,640 $20,622,961
Proportionate share of Goloil
accounts receivable 16,538 - (16,538) -
Proportionate share of Goloil
VAT receivable and
other receivables 1,756,637 - (1,755,109) 1,528
Proportionate share of Goloil
inventory 622,981 - (622,981) -

Prepaid expenses and other assets 72,271 - - 72,271
------------------------------------------------------

Total current assets 10,325,326 5,101,422 5,270,012 20,696,760
------------------------------------------------------

Non-current assets:
Oil and gas properties, net
(successful efforts) 8,564,084 (5,101,422) (3,462,662) -
Co-generation plant construction
in progress 1,758,620 - (1,758,620) -
Fixed assets, net 484,642 - (458,274) 26,368
------------------------------------------------------
Total non-current assets 10,807,346 (5,101,422) (5,679,556) 26,368
------------------------------------------------------

Total assets $21,132,672 $ - (409,544) $20,723,128
======================================================

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities $ 732,261 $ - $ - $ 732,261
Proportionate share of Goloil
accounts payable and
accrued liabilities 4,059,089 - (4,059,089) -
Current portion of proportionate
share of notes payable owed
to affiliate 8,219,652 - (8,219,652) -
------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 13,011,002 - (12,278,741) 732,261

Non-current liabilities
Asset retirement obligation 129,500 - (129,500) -
------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 13,140,502 - (12,408,241) 732,261
------------------------------------------------------

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Series A convertible preferred
stock 270 - - 270
Common stock 9,101 - - 9,101
Additional paid-in capital 37,548,890 - - 37,548,890
Unamortized preferred stock
dividends - - - -
Accumulated deficit (30,179,691) - 12,612,297 (17,567,394)
Foreign currency translation
adjustment 613,600 - (613,600) -
------------------------------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 7,992,170 - 11,998,697 19,990,867
------------------------------------------------------

Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $21,132,672 $ - (409,544) $20,723,128
======================================================

Teton Petroleum Company
Pro Forma Statements of Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2004

Historical Pro forma adjustments Pro Forma
-------------------------
Amounts (1) Eliminate Record After Sale
Goloil (4) Gain (3)
-------------------------------------------------------

Sales $ 2,962,500 $(2,962,500) $ - $ -
-------------------------------------------------------
Cost of sales and expenses:
Oil and gas production 622,277 (622,277) - -
Transportation and marketing - - - -
Taxes other than income taxes 1,973,275 (1,973,275) - -
Exploration 154,776 (154,776) - -
General and
administrative-Goloil 184,086 (184,086) - -
General and administrative-Teton 2,102,638 - - 2,102,638
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization 409,670 (407,851) - 1,819
-------------------------------------------------------
Total cost of sales
and expenses 5,446,722 (3,342,265) - 2,104,457
-------------------------------------------------------

Income (loss) from operations
(2,484,222) 379,765 - (2,104,457)
-------------------------------------------------------

Other income (expense)
Other income 17,640 - - 17,640
Gain on sale of ZAO Goloil - - - -
Interest expense (55,531) 55,531 - -
Financing charges - - -
-------------------------------------------------------
Total other income
(expense) (37,891) 55,531 - 17,640
-------------------------------------------------------

Net income (loss) from continuing
operations, before taxes (2,522,113) 435,296 - (2,086,817)

Foreign income tax - - - -
-------------------------------------------------------

Income (loss) from continuing
operations (2,522,113) 435,296 - (2,086,817)

Imputed preferred stock dividends
for inducements and
beneficial conversion charges (521,482) (521,482)

Preferred stock dividend (31,488) - - (31,488)
-------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations
applicable to common stock (3,075,083) 435,296 - (2,639,787)

Discontinued operations, net of
tax - (435,296) 12,612,297 12,177,001

Net income (loss) applicable to
common stock (3,075,083) - 12,612,297 9,537,214

Other comprehensive income, net
of tax effect of exchange rates (285,156) - (613,600) (898,756)
-------------------------------------------------------

Comprehensive income (loss) $(3,360,239) $ - $11,998,697 $ 8,638,458
=======================================================

Basic and diluted weighted
average common shares outstanding 8,747,165 $ - - 8,747,165
=======================================================

Basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share
for continuing operations (0.35) (0.30)
============= ===========

Basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share
for discontinued operations - 1.39
============= ===========

Basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share $ (0.35) 1.09
============= ===========

Teton Petroleum Company
Pro Forma Statements of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2003

----------------
Historical Eliminate Pro Forma
Amounts(1) Goloil(4) After Sale
----------------------------------------

Sales $11,437,802 $(11,437,802) $ -
----------------------------------------
Cost of sales and expenses
Oil and gas production 2,020,447 (2,020,447) -
Transportation and marketing 807,266 (807,266) -
Taxes other than income taxes 5,864,920 (5,864,920) -
Export duties 1,492,999 (1,492,999) -
General and
administrative-Goloil 837,134 (837,134) -
General and
administrative-Teton 3,919,746 - 3,919,746
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization 1,582,513 (1,581,468) 1,045
----------------------------------------
Total cost of sales
and expenses 16,525,025 (12,604,234) 3,920,791
----------------------------------------

Income (loss) from operations
(5,087,223) 1,166,432 (3,920,791)
----------------------------------------

Other income (expense)
Other income 17,445 - 17,445
Interest expense (347,740) 347,740 -
Financing charges (132,818) (132,818)
----------------------------------------
Total other income
(expense) (463,113) 347,740 (115,373)
----------------------------------------

Net income (loss) from
continuing operations, before
taxes (5,550,336) 1,514,172 (4,036,164)

Foreign income tax (84,508) 84,508 -
----------------------------------------

Income (loss) from continuing
operations (5,634,844) 1,598,680 (4,036,164)

Imputed preferred stock
dividends for inducements and
beneficial conversion charges (2,780,693) - (2,780,693)
----------------------------------------

Net income (loss) from
continuing operations
applicable to common shares (8,415,537) 1,598,680 (6,816,857)

Discontinued operations, net of
tax - (1,598,680) (1,598,680)

Net income (loss) applicable to
common shares (8,415,537) - (8,415,537)

Other comprehensive income, net
of tax
Effect of exchange rates 168,256 - 168,256
----------------------------------------

Comprehensive income (loss) $(8,247,281) $ - $(8,247,281)
========================================

Basic and diluted weighted
average common
shares outstanding 6,840,303 6,840,303 6,840,303
========================================

Basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share
for continuing operations $ (1.23) $ (1.00)
=========== ==========

Basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share
for discontinued operations $ - $ (0.23)
=========== ==========

Basic and diluted income (loss)
per common share $ (1.23) $ (1.23)
=========== ==========

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations

1. Reflects the historical financial statement balances, as of March 31, 2004
and for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed by the Company on Forms 10-Q and 10-KSB.

2. To reflect the repayment of all outstanding loans and accrued interest as
of March 31, 2004.

Because these loans are reflected as part of the Company's investment and
will only be repaid through the future production or sale of the Company's
oil and gas properties, the repayment has been reflected as a reduction of
the carrying value of oil and gas properties.

3. To record the disposal of Goloil assuming the sale occurred on March 31,
2004 reflecting the elimination of all assets and liabilities of Goloil,
the proceeds received from the sale of the Company's equity interest in
Goloil and to record the related gain from disposal.

The proceeds and gain from disposal are determined as follows:

Sale price for Goloil shares $8,960,229
Less direct transaction expenses:
Commission (750,000)
Legal and accounting (250,000)
---------
Net proceeds before taxes 7,960,229

Estimated alternative minimum taxes (181,000)
due

Net proceeds after taxes $7,779,229

Investment in net assets of Goloil:
Net assets before loan repayment $ 881,954
Repayment of outstanding loans (5,101,422)
-----------
Net assets (deficit) of Goloil (4,219,468)

Gain on disposal of subsidiary $ 11,998,697
Plus reclassifications of translation 613,600
-------
gain on disposal
Gain on disposal net of taxes $ 12,612,297

Net proceeds after taxes $7,779,229
Elimination of Goloil cash at March (114,589)
31, 2004
Net pro forma adjustment to cash
balances at March 31, 2004 $7,664,640
==========

4. To reclassify the results of Goloil as discontinued operations for the year
ended December 31, 2003.

APPENDIX B

2004 NON-EMPLOYEE STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

1. PURPOSE

The purpose of the Teton Petroleum Company 2004 Non-Employee Stock Compensation
Plan (the "Plan") is to promote the interests of Teton Petroleum Company (the
"Company") and its stockholders by allowing the Company to attract and retain
consultants, professionals, and service providers who provide services to the
Company ("Eligible Persons") in connection with, among other things, the
Company's obligations as a publicly held reporting company. The Plan is expected
to contribute to the attainment of these objectives by increasing the
proprietary interest of the Eligible Persons in the growth and performance of
the Company through the grant to such persons of shares of Common Stock, par
value $0.001 per share ("Shares"), of the Company, the grant to such Eligible
Persons of Shares which are restricted as provided in Section 5 of this Plan
("Restricted Shares").

2. ADMINISTRATION

The Plan shall be administered by the Company's Board of Directors or the
Compensation Committee (collectively referred to as the "Board"). Subject to the
provisions of the Plan, the Board shall be authorized to interpret the Plan; to
establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the Plan; and
to make all determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the
Plan. The determinations of the Board in the administration of the Plan, as
described herein, shall be final and conclusive. Each of the Chief Executive
Officer or the Chief Financial Officer and the Secretary of the Company shall be
authorized to implement the Plan in accordance with its terms and to take such
actions of a ministerial nature as shall be necessary to effectuate the intent
and purposes of the Plan. The validity, construction and effect of the Plan and
any rules and regulations relating to the Plan shall be determined in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware.

3. ELIGIBILITY

The class of individuals eligible to receive Restricted Shares (the "Awards")
under the Plan, shall be persons who are not employees, affiliates, Directors,
officers, or associates of the Company or any of its affiliates ("Eligible
Persons"). Any holder of an Award granted under the Plan shall hereinafter be
referred to as a "Participant," an "Awardee," or collectively as "Participants"
or "Awardees."

4. SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 6, the maximum number of
Shares that may be delivered to Participants under the Plan shall be 1,000,000
Shares; provided, however, that the maximum number of Shares of Common Stock
with respect to which Awards may be granted to any participant in any year is
500,000 Shares. The Shares to be delivered under the Plan may consist of either
Shares authorized and reserved for the Plan or Shares subsequently acquired by
the Company as treasury Shares, including Shares purchased in the open market or
in private transactions.

(b) In the event that prior to the date the Plan shall terminate in
accordance with Section 10, any Award granted under the Plan expires unexercised
or unvested or is terminated, surrendered or cancelled without the delivery of
Shares, or any Restricted Shares are forfeited back to the Company, then the
Shares subject to such Award may be made available for subsequent Awards under
the terms of the Plan.

5. GRANT, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED SHARES

(a) The Board may from time to time grant Restricted Shares under the Plan
to Eligible Persons, subject to such restrictions, conditions and other terms as
the Board may determine. At the time a grant of Restricted Shares is made, the
Board shall determine the duration of the period (the "Restricted Period")
during which, and the conditions under which, the Restricted Shares shall vest
and no longer be subject to forfeiture to the Company. The Board may, in its
discretion, at the time a grant of Restricted Shares is made, prescribe
restrictions in addition to or other than the expiration of the Restricted
Period.

(b) The Restricted Shares granted under this Plan shall have the following
terms and conditions:

(i) Nontransferability of Restricted Shares. Restricted Shares may not
be assigned, alienated, pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred,
encumbered or disposed of during the applicable Restricted Period or prior
to the satisfaction of any other restrictions prescribed by the Board with
respect to such Restricted Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Restricted Shares may be transferred pursuant to a qualified domestic
relations order, as defined in Section 414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, or any successor provision.

(ii) Termination of Service as Eligible Person. Any Restricted Shares
granted to a Participant pursuant to this Plan shall be forfeited if the
Participant terminates service as a consultant to the Company for any
reason other than death or total disability prior to the expiration or
termination of the applicable Restricted Period and the satisfaction of any
other conditions applicable to such Restricted Shares. Upon such
forfeiture, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or the
Secretary of the Company shall cause the Restricted Shares that are
forfeited to the Company to be either cancelled or retained as treasury
Shares. If a Participant shall die while serving as a consultant or if a
Participant's service as a consultant to the Company ceases as a result of
the Participant's becoming totally disabled, all restrictions and
conditions applicable to the Restricted Shares held by the Participant
shall immediately lapse.

(iii) Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control,
all restrictions and conditions applicable to the Restricted Shares held by
Participants shall immediately lapse. "Change in Control" shall mean a
merger or consolidation in which securities possessing more than fifty
percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company's
outstanding securities are transferred to a person or persons different
from the persons holding those securities immediately prior to such
transaction, or the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the Company's assets to a non-Affiliate of the Company
(other than a sale to the Open-Joint Stock Oil and Gas Company RussNeft).

(iv) Award Agreement. Each grant of Restricted Shares under this Plan
shall be evidenced by an agreement with the Company, which shall contain
the terms and conditions of the Restricted Shares and shall otherwise be
consistent with the provisions of this Plan.

(c) If the Board deems it necessary or appropriate, the Company may issue,
in the name of each Participant to whom Restricted Shares have been granted, one
or more stock certificates representing the total number of Restricted Shares
granted to the Participant; provided that such stock certificates bear an
appropriate legend or other restriction on transfer. The Chief Executive
Officer, the Chief Financial Officer or the Secretary of the Company shall hold
such stock certificates, properly endorsed for transfer, for the Participant's
benefit until such time as the Restricted Shares are forfeited to the Company,
or the applicable Restricted Period expires and any other conditions applicable
to the Restricted Shares are satisfied.

(d) Holders of Restricted Shares shall not have the right to vote such
Restricted Shares or the right to receive any dividends with respect to such
Restricted Shares. All distributions, if any, received by a Participant with
respect to Restricted Shares as a result of any split-up, distribution,
combination of shares, or other similar transaction affecting the Shares, shall
be subject to the restrictions of this Section 5.

(e) Upon the expiration or termination of the applicable Restricted Period
and the satisfaction of any other conditions prescribed by the Board, the
restrictions applicable to the Restricted Shares shall lapse and a stock
certificate for or other appropriate documentation evidencing the number of
Restricted Shares with respect to which the restrictions have lapsed shall be
delivered, free of all such restrictions, to the Eligible Person or the Eligible
Person's beneficiary or estate, as the case may be.

6. ADJUSTMENT AND CHANGES IN SHARES

If, after the Effective Date, there is a Share dividend or Share split,
recapitalization (including payment of an extraordinary dividend), merger,
consolidation, combination, spin-off, distribution of assets to stockholders,
exchange of shares, or other similar corporate change affecting the Shares, the
Board shall appropriately adjust the aggregate number of Shares available for
Awards under the Plan or subject to outstanding Awards, and any other factors,
limits or terms affecting any outstanding or subsequently issuable Awards as may
be appropriate.

7. PLAN AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

The Plan shall automatically terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Plan's
Effective Date. The Board may terminate, suspend or amend the Plan at any time
without stockholder approval except to the extent that stockholder approval is
required to satisfy applicable requirements imposed by (a) Rule 16b-3 under the
Exchange Act, or any successor rule or regulation; or (b) the rules of any
exchange on or through which the Shares are then listed or traded. If the Plan
is terminated, the terms of the Plan, notwithstanding such termination, shall
continue to apply to Awards granted prior to such termination.

8. APPLICABLE LAW AND REGISTRATION

The grant of Awards and the issuance of Shares shall be subject to all
applicable laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals of any
governmental agencies or exchanges as may be required. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no Shares shall be issued under the Plan unless the Company is
satisfied that such issuance will be in compliance with applicable federal and
state securities laws. Shares issued under the Plan may be subject to such stop
transfer orders and other restrictions as the Board may deem advisable under the
rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, any exchange on or through which the Shares are then listed or
traded, or any applicable federal or state securities law. The Board may cause a
legend or legends to be placed on any certificates issued under the Plan to make
appropriate reference to restrictions within the scope of this Section 8 or
other provisions of the Plan.

9. TAX CONSEQUENCES

The 2004 Non Employee Compensation Plan is not qualified under Section 401(a) of
the Code.

10. EFFECTIVE DATE AND DURATION OF PLAN

The Plan shall become effective on the date of the adoption of the Plan by the
Board and the Shareholders ("Effective Date"). Subject to the provisions of
Section 7, the Plan shall continue until the tenth anniversary of the Effective
Date unless the Plan is terminated by exhaustion of the Shares available for
issuance under the Plan.

APPENDIX C

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Organization

This charter governs the operations of the audit committee. The committee shall
review and reassess the charter at least annually and obtain the approval of the
Board. The committee shall be appointed by the Board and shall comprise at least
two Directors, each of whom is independent of management and the Company.
Members of the committee shall be considered independent if they have no
relationship that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from
management and the Company. All committee members shall be financially literate,
or shall become financially literate within a reasonable period of time after
appointment to the committee and at least one member shall have accounting or
related financial management expertise.

Statement of Policy

The audit committee shall provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling their
oversight responsibility to the stockholders, potential stockholders, the
investment community, and others relating to the Company's financial statements
and the financial reporting process, the systems of internal accounting and
financial controls, the annual independent audit of the Company's financial
statements, and the legal compliance and ethics programs as established by
management and the board. In so doing, it is the responsibility of the committee
to maintain free and open communication between the committee, independent
auditors and management of the Company. In discharging its oversight role, the
committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention with
full access to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the Company and
the power to retain outside counsel, or other experts for this purpose.

Responsibilities and Processes

The primary responsibility of the audit committee is to oversee the Company's
financial reporting process on behalf of the board and report the results of
their activities to the board. Management is responsible for preparing the
Company's financial statements, and the independent auditors are responsible for
auditing those financial statements. The committee in carrying out its
responsibilities believes its policies and procedures should remain flexible, in
order to best react to changing conditions and circumstances. The committee
should take the appropriate actions to set the overall corporate "tone" for
quality financial reporting, sound business risk practices, and ethical
behavior.

The following shall be the principal recurring processes of the audit committee
in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The processes are set forth as a
guide with the understanding that the committee may supplement them as
appropriate.

o The committee shall have a clear understanding with management and the
independent auditors that the independent auditors are ultimately
accountable to the board and the audit committee, as representatives of the
Company's stockholders. The committee shall have the ultimate authority and
responsibility to evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the independent
auditors. The committee shall discuss with the auditors their independence
from management and the Company and the matters included in the written
disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board. Annually, the
committee shall review and recommend to the board the selection of the
Company's independent auditors, subject to stockholders' approval.

o The committee shall discuss with the independent auditors the overall scope
and plans for their respective audits including the adequacy of staffing
and compensation. Also, the committee shall discuss with management and the
independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and
financial controls, including the Company's system to monitor and manage
business risk, and legal and ethical compliance programs. Further, the
committee shall meet separately with the independent auditors, with and
without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations.

o The committee shall review the interim financial statements with management
and the independent auditors prior to the filing of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Also, the committee shall discuss the results of the
quarterly review and any other matters required to be communicated to the
committee by the independent auditors under generally accepted auditing
standards. The chair of the committee may represent the entire committee
for the purposes of this review.

o The committee shall review with management and the independent auditors the
financial statements to be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K (or the annual report to stockholders if distributed prior to the
filing of Form 10-K), including their judgment about the quality, not just
acceptability, of accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant
judgments, and the clarity of the disclosures in the financial statements.
Also, the committee shall discuss the results of the annual audit and any
other matters required to be communicated to the committee by the
independent auditors under generally accepted auditing standards.

APPENDIX D

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

1. PURPOSE

The Executive Compensation Committee ("Committee") shall assist the Board of
Directors in the discharge of its responsibilities with respect to the
compensation of the Corporation's outside Directors, executive officers, and
other key employees, and for such purpose shall review compensation arrangements
for the Corporation's executive officers and administer all employee benefit
plans, including any equity incentive plan adopted by the Corporation.

The Committee is authorized to approve the compensation payable to the
Corporation's executive officers and other key employees, approve all
perquisites, equity incentive awards, and special cash payments made or paid to
the Corporation's executive officers and other key employees, and approve
severance packages with cash and/or equity components for the Corporation's
executive officers and other key employees.

2. COMPOSITION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Committee shall consist of not less than two Directors each of whom shall be
an independent director under American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") listing
standards, a "nonemployee director" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 issued the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and an "outside director" within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Each
appointed Committee member shall be subject to annual reconfirmation and may be
removed by the Board at any time.

3. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES

In carrying out the purpose and authorities set forth in Section 1 above, the
Committee shall:

A. Executive Officer Compensation. Review and approve the corporate goals and
objectives relevant to the compensation of the Corporation's Chief
Executive Officer ("CEO") and other executive officers, evaluate the
officers' performance in light of those goals and objectives, and set the
officers' compensation level based on this evaluation;

B. Significant Officer Contracts. Review and approve significant employment
agreements, arrangements, or transactions with executive officers,
including any arrangements having any compensatory effect or purpose;

C. Director Compensation. Review and recommend to the Board appropriate
director compensation programs for service as Directors, committee
chairmanships, and committee members, consistent with any applicable
requirements of the listing standards for independent Directors;

D. Compensation Policies and Performance Review. Periodically assess the
Corporation's policies applicable to the Corporation's executive officers
and Directors, including the relationship of corporate performance to
executive compensation;

E. Equity Plan Awards. Approve stock option grants and other equity-based or
incentive awards under any stock option or equity incentive compensation
plans adopted by the Corporation, and otherwise assist the Board in
administering awards under these plans;

F. Evaluate Stock and Incentive Plans. Evaluate and make recommendations to
the Board concerning any stock option or equity incentive compensation
plans proposed for or adopted by the Corporation and make recommendations
to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based
plans;

G. Retention of Compensation Consultants and Other Professionals. Have full
authority to hire independent compensation consultants and other
professionals to assist in the design, formulation, analysis and
implementation of compensation programs for the Corporation's executive
officers and other key employees;

H. Committee Report in Proxy Statement. Assist in the preparation of and
approve a report of the Committee for inclusion in the Corporation's proxy
statement for each annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the
rules of the SEC and any requirements of the AMEX;

I. Review. Periodically review the operation of all of the Corporation's
employee benefit plans, though day-to-day administration of such plans,
including the preparation and filing of all government reports and the
preparation and delivery of all required employee materials and
communications, shall be performed by Corporation management;

J. Access to Executives. Have full access to the Corporation's executives as
necessary to carry out its responsibilities;

K. Other Activities. Perform any other activities consistent wit h this
Charter, the Corporation's By-laws and governing law as the Committee or
the Board deems necessary or appropriate;

L. Review Charter. Review the Committee Charter from time to time for adequacy
and recommend any changes to the Board; and

M. Report to Board. Report to the Board of Directors on the major items
covered at each Committee meeting.

4. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEETINGS

The Committee shall meet with the CEO at or near the start of each fiscal year
to discuss the goals and incentive compensation programs to be in effect for
such fiscal year and the performance targets triggering payout under those
programs. The Committee shall, by duly authorized resolution, establish the
incentive compensation programs to be in effect for the fiscal year for the
Corporation's executive officers and other participants, including the financial
objectives to be attained and the procedures for determining the individual
awards payable under those programs. At or near the end of each fiscal year, the
Committee shall meet to review performance under those programs and award
bonuses thereunder. At that time the Committee shall also adjust base salary
levels in effect for the Corporation's executive officers and review the overall
performance of the Corporation's employee benefit plans.

The Committee shall also meet as and when necessary to act upon any other
matters within its jurisdiction under this Charter. A majority of the total
number of members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum at all Committee
meetings. A majority of the members of the Committee acting shall be empowered
to act on behalf of the Committee.

Minutes shall be kept of each meeting of the Committee.

APPENDIX E

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

Treat in an Ethical Manner Those to Whom Teton Petroleum Company has an Obligation

The officers, Directors and employees of Teton Petroleum Company (the "Company")
are committed to honesty, just management, fairness, providing a safe and
healthy environment free from the fear of retribution, and respecting the
dignity due everyone. For the communities in which we live and work we are
committed to observe sound environmental business practices and to act as
concerned and responsible neighbors, reflecting all aspects of good citizenship.

For our stockholders we are committed to pursuing sound growth and earnings
objectives and to exercising prudence in the use of our assets and resources.

For our suppliers and partners we are committed to fair competition and the
sense of responsibility required of a good customer and teammate.

Promote a Positive Work Environment

All employees want and deserve a workplace where they feel respected, satisfied,
and appreciated. We respect cultural diversity and will not tolerate harassment
or discrimination of any kind -- especially involving race, color, religion,
gender, age, national origin, disability, and veteran or marital status.

Providing an environment that supports honesty, integrity, respect, trust,
responsibility, and citizenship permits us the opportunity to achieve excellence
in our workplace. While everyone who works for the Company must contribute to
the creation and maintenance of such an environment, our executives and
management personnel assume special responsibility for fostering a work
environment that is free from the fear of retribution and will bring out the
best in all of us.

Supervisors must be careful in words and conduct to avoid placing, or seeming to
place, pressure on subordinates that could cause them to deviate from acceptable
ethical behavior.

Protect Yourself, Your Fellow Employees, and the World We Live In

We are committed to providing a drug-free, safe and healthy work environment,
and to observing environmentally sound business practices. We will strive, at a
minimum, to do no harm and where possible, to make the communities in which we
work a better place to live. Each of us is responsible for compliance with
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.

Keep Accurate and Complete Records

We must maintain accurate and complete Company records. Transactions between the
Company and outside individuals and organizations must be promptly and
accurately entered in our books in accordance with generally accepted accounting
practices and principles. No one should rationalize or even consider
misrepresenting facts or falsifying records. It will not be tolerated and will
result in disciplinary action.

Obey the Law

We will conduct our business in accordance with all applicable laws and
regulations. Compliance with the law does not comprise our entire ethical
responsibility. Rather, it is a minimum, absolutely essential condition for
performance of our duties. In conducting business, we shall:

A. STRICTLY ADHERE TO ALL ANTITRUST LAWS

Officer, Directors and employees must strictly adhere to all antitrust
laws. Such laws exist in the United States and in many other countries
where the Company may conduct business. These laws prohibit practices
in restraint of trade such as price fixing and boycotting suppliers or
customers. They also bar pricing intended to run a competitor out of
business; disparaging, misrepresenting, or harassing a competitor;
stealing trade secrets; bribery; and kickbacks.

B. STRICTLY COMPLY WITH ALL SECURITIES LAWS

In our role as a publicly owned company, we must always be alert to
and comply with the security laws and regulations of the United States
and other countries.

Do Not Engage In Speculative or Insider Trading

Federal law and Company policy prohibits officers, Directors and employees,
directly or indirectly through their families or others, from purchasing or
selling company stock while in the possession of material, non-public
information concerning the Company. This same prohibition applies to trading in
the stock of other publicly held companies on the basis of material, non-public
information. To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, Company policy also
prohibits officers, Directors and employees from trading options on the open
market in Company stock under any circumstances.

Material, non-public information is any information that could reasonably be
expected to affect the price of a stock. If an officer, director or employee is
considering buying or selling a stock because of inside information they
possess, they should assume that such information is material. It is also
important for the officer, director or employee to keep in mind that if any
trade they make becomes the subject of an investigation by the government, the
trade will be viewed after-the-fact with the benefit of hindsight.

Consequently, officers, Directors and employees should always carefully consider
how their trades would look from this perspective.

Two simple rules can help protect you in this area: (1) Do not use non-public
information for personal gain. (2) Do not pass along such information to someone
else who has no need to know.

This guidance also applies to the securities of other companies for which you
receive information in the course of your employment at the Company.

Be Timely and Accurate in All Public Reports

As a public company, the Company must be fair and accurate in all reports filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, Directors
and management of the Company are responsible for ensuring that all reports are
filed in a timely manner and that they fairly present the financial condition
and operating results of the Company.

Securities laws are vigorously enforced. Violations may result in severe
penalties including forced sales of parts of the business and significant fines
against the Company. There may also be sanctions against individual employees
including substantial fines and prison sentences.

The principal executive officer and principal financial Officer will certify to
the accuracy of reports filed with the SEC in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. Officers and Directors who knowingly or willingly make false
certifications may be subject to criminal penalties or sanctions including fines
and imprisonment.

Avoid Conflicts of Interest

Our officers, Directors and employees have an obligation to give their complete
loyalty to the best interests of the Company. They should avoid any action that
may involve, or may appear to involve, a conflict of interest with the Company.
Officers, Directors and employees should not have any financial or other
business relationships with suppliers, customers or competitors that might
impair, or even appear to impair, the independence of any judgment they may need
to make on behalf of the Company.

Here are Some Ways a Conflict of Interest Could Arise:

o Employment by a competitor, or potential competitor, regardless of the
nature of the employment, while employed by the Company.

o Acceptance of gifts, payment, or services from those seeking to do business
with the Company.

o Placement of business with a firm owned or controlled by an officer,
director or employee or his/her family.

o Ownership of, or substantial interest in, a company that is a competitor,
client or supplier.

o Acting as a consultant to the Company, customer, client or supplier.

o Seeking the services or advice of an accountant or attorney who has
provided services to the Company.

Officers, Directors and employees are under a continuing obligation to disclose
any situation that presents the possibility of a conflict or disparity of
interest between the officer, director or employee and the Company. Disclosure
of any potential conflict is the key to remaining in full compliance with this
policy.

Compete Ethically and Fairly for Business Opportunities

We must comply with the laws and regulations that pertain to the acquisition of
goods and services. We will compete fairly and ethically for all business
opportunities. In circumstances where there is reason to believe that the
release or receipt of non-public information is unauthorized, do not attempt to
obtain and do not accept such information from any source.

If you are involved in Company transactions, you must be certain that all
statements, communications, and representations are accurate and truthful.

Avoid Illegal and Questionable Gifts or Favors

The sale and marketing of our products and services should always be free from
even the perception that favorable treatment was sought, received, or given in
exchange for the furnishing or receipt of business courtesies. Officers,
Directors and employees of the Company will neither give nor accept business
courtesies that constitute, or could be reasonably perceived as constituting,
unfair business inducements or that would violate law, regulation or policies of
the Company, or could cause embarrassment to or reflect negatively on the
Company's reputation.

Maintain the Integrity of Consultants, Agents, and Representatives

Business integrity is a key standard for the selection and retention of those
who represent the Company. Agents, representatives and consultants must certify
their willingness to comply with the Company's policies and procedures and must
never be retained to circumvent our values and principles. Paying bribes or
kickbacks, engaging in industrial espionage, obtaining the proprietary data of a
third party without authority, or gaining inside information or influence are
just a few examples of what could give us an unfair competitive advantage and
could result in violations of law.

Protect Proprietary Information

Proprietary Company information may not be disclosed to anyone without proper
authorization. Keep proprietary documents protected and secure. In the course of
normal business activities, suppliers, customers and competitors may sometimes
divulge to you information that is proprietary to their business. Respect these
confidences.

Obtain and Use Company Assets Wisely

Personal use of Company property must always be in accordance with corporate
policy. Proper use of Company property, information resources, material,
facilities and equipment is your responsibility. Use and maintain these assets
with the utmost care and respect, guarding against waste and abuse, and never
borrow or remove Company property without management's permission.

Follow the Law and Use Common Sense in Political Contributions and Activities

The Company encourages its employees to become involved in civic affairs and to
participate in the political process. Employees must understand, however, that
their involvement and participation must be on an individual basis, on their own
time and at their own expense. In the United States, federal law prohibits
corporations from donating corporate funds, goods, or services, directly or
indirectly, to candidates for federal offices -- this includes employees' work
time. Local and state laws also govern political contributions and activities as
they apply to their respective jurisdictions.

Board Committees

The Company shall establish an Audit Committee empowered to enforce this Code of
Ethics. The Audit Committee will report to the Board at least once each year
regarding the general effectiveness of the Company's Code of Ethics, the
Company's controls and reporting procedures and the Company's business conduct.

Disciplinary Measures

The Company shall consistently enforce its Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
through appropriate means of discipline. Violations of the Code shall be
promptly reported to the Audit Committee. Pursuant to procedures adopted by it,
the Audit Committee shall determine whether violations of the Code have occurred
and, if so, shall determine the disciplinary measures to be taken against any
employee or agent of the Company who has so violated the Code.

The disciplinary measures, which may be invoked at the discretion of the Audit
Committee, include, but are not limited to, counseling, oral or written
reprimands, warnings, probation or suspension without pay, demotions, reductions
in salary, termination of employment and restitution.

Persons subject to disciplinary measures shall include, in addition to the
violator, others involved in the wrongdoing such as (i) persons who fail to use
reasonable care to detect a violation, (ii) persons who if requested to divulge
information withhold material information regarding a violation, and (iii)
supervisors who approve or condone the violations or attempt to retaliate
against employees or agents for reporting violations or violators.

APPENDIX F

GOVERNANCE & NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONING

There shall be a committee of the Board to be known as the Governance and
Nominating Committee (the "Committee").

1. Composition, Meetings, and Quorum
------------------------------------

The Committee shall be comprised of at least two Directors who shall be
appointed initially by the Board and thereafter by the Board after considering
the recommendation of the Committee. The Committee shall only include Directors
who satisfy the independence requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and AMEX. The Board shall designate one member of the Committee as
its Chairman. Members of the Committee shall serve until their resignation,
retirement, removal by the Board or until their successors are appointed.

The Committee shall meet at least two times per each year with authority to
convene additional meetings as circumstances require. The meetings may be held
by teleconference with the same authority as in-person meetings. A majority of
the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum of the Committee. A
majority of the members in attendance shall decide any question brought before
any meeting of the Committee. Voting or approval of matters may occur either in
person, or via teleconference, facsimile, or electronic mail.

2. Reporting
------------

The Secretary shall keep minutes of its proceedings. The minutes of a meeting
shall be approved by the Committee at its next meeting, shall be available for
review by the entire Board, and shall be filed as permanent records with the
Secretary of the Company.

At each meeting of the Board following a meeting of the Committee, the Chairman
of the Committee shall report to the full Board on the matters considered at the
last meeting of the Committee.

The Committee shall prepare and, through its Chair, submit periodic reports of
the Committee's work and findings to the Board; the Committee shall include
recommendations for Board actions when appropriate.

3. Authority
------------

The Committee shall have the authority to retain special legal, accounting or
other consultants to advise the Committee. The Committee may request any officer
or employee of the Company or any outside counsel or consultants to meet with
any members of the Committee.

4. Staff
--------

The Corporate Secretary, Assistant Secretary, or his or her assistant shall
provide the Committee such staff support as it may require.

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

The Committee's goal is to provide guidance to and oversight of the
Corporation's governance and to assure that the composition, practices, and
operation of the Board contribute to value creation and effective representation
of Teton Corporation's stockholders.

SPECIFIC DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Committee has the following specific duties, in addition to any additional
similar matters which may be referred to the Committee from time to time by the
full Board or the Chairman or which the Committee raises on its own initiative:

1. Recommend Nominees for Election as Directors
-----------------------------------------------

The Committee shall recommend to the Board the Director nominees for the next
annual meeting of stockholders and persons to fill vacancies in the Board that
occur between meetings of stockholders. In carrying out this responsibility, the
Committee shall:

(a) Establish qualifications, desired background, and selection criteria for
members of the Board in accordance with relevant law and AMEX rules.

(b) Consider nominees submitted to the Board by stockholders; and

(c) Prior to recommending a nominee for election, determine that the election
of the nominee as a Director would effectively further the policies set
forth in the Governance Guidelines.

The Committee shall have the sole authority to retain and terminate any search
firm used to identify director candidates and shall have sole authority to
approve such search firm's fees and other retention terms. The Committee shall
also have authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external
legal, accounting or other advisors.

2. Recommend Appointments to Board Committees
---------------------------------------------

The Committee shall annually evaluate and make recommendations to the full Board
concerning the number and accountability of Board Committees, and Committee
assignments to the Board the Directors. The Committee shall consider the desired
qualifications for membership on each Committee, the availability of the
Director to meet the time commitment required for membership on the particular
committee and the extent to which there should be a policy of periodic rotation
of Committee members.

3. Monitor and Evaluate Governance Guidelines and Committee Charter
-------------------------------------------------------------------

The Committee shall review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually
and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval. The Committee
shall annually review the Governance Guidelines for the purposes of: Determining
whether the Guidelines are being effectively adhered to and implemented; Ensure
that the Guidelines are appropriate for the Company and comply with applicable
laws, regulations and listing standards; and Recommending any desirable changes
in the Guidelines to the Board. The Committee shall monitor and evaluate
annually how effectively the Board and the Company have implemented the policies
and principles of the governance guidelines. In addition, the Committee shall
consider any other corporate governance issues that may arise, from time to
time, and develop appropriate recommendations to the Board.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Guidelines for Selection of Director Nominees

To discharge its duties in identifying and evaluating Directors for selection to
the Board and its committees, the Committee shall evaluate the overall
composition of the Board as well as the qualifications of each candidate. In its
evaluation process, the Committee shall take into account the following
guidelines:

Criteria:
--------

1. Decisions for nominating candidates shall be based on merit, qualifications,
performance, competency, and the corporation's business needs and shall comply
with the corporation's anti-discrimination policies and federal, state and local
laws.

2. A majority of the entire Board shall be composed of independent Directors, as
defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission and AMEX.

3. The composition of the entire Board shall be taken into account when
evaluating individual Directors, including: the diversity of experience and
background represented on the Board; the need for financial, business, academic,
public and other expertise on the Board and its committees; and the desire for
Directors working cooperatively to represent the best interests of the
corporation, its stockholders and employees.

4. Candidates shall be individuals of the highest professional and personal
ethics and values and who possess significant experience or skills that will
benefit the corporation and assist in discharging their duties as Directors.

5. Candidates shall be free of conflicts of interest that would interfere with
their ability to discharge their duties as a director or would violate any
applicable law or regulation.

6. Candidates shall be willing and able to devote sufficient time to effectively
carry out their duties; their service on other boards of public companies should
be limited to a reasonable number.

7. Candidates shall have the desire to represent and evaluate the interests of
the corporation as a whole.

8. In conducting this assessment, the Committee considers diversity, age, skill,
and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the current needs of the
Board and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience, and
capability.

9. Any other criteria as determined by the Committee.

PROXY PROXY

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 16, 2004
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints H. Howard Cooper, as proxy, with the power to
appoint his substitute, to represent and to vote all the shares of Common Stock
of Teton Petroleum Company (the "Company"), which the undersigned would be
entitled to vote, at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
July 16, 2004 and at any adjournments thereof, subject to the directions
indicated on the reverse side hereof.

In their discretion, the proxy is authorized to vote upon any other matter that
may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE, BUT IF NO
CHOICES ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES
AND FOR THE PROPOSALS LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.

IMPORTANT--This proxy must be signed and dated on the reverse side.

THIS IS YOUR PROXY
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

Dear Stockholder:

We cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Teton
Petroleum Company to be held at The Pinnacle Club, located at 555 17th St.,
Suite 3700, Denver, Colorado 80202 on July 16, 2004 at 9:30 AM (local time).

Please read the Proxy Statement, which describes the proposals and presents
other important information, and complete, sign and return your proxy promptly
in the enclosed envelope.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL

1. Election of Directors -- For Withhold
Nominees:
---------------

H. Howard Cooper [_] [_]
Thomas F. Conroy [_] [_]
Karl F. Arleth [_] [_]
James F. Woodcock [_] [_]
John T. Connor, Jr. [_] [_]

(Except nominee(s) written above)

For Against Abstain
2. To consider and act upon a proposal [_] [_] [_]
to ratify the Board's selection of Ehrhardt
Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC as the
Company's independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004

3. To approve the sale of the Company's [_] [_] [_]
indirect equity interest in the Siberian-Texan Joint
Stock Company Goloil ("Goloil"), which
constitutes substantially all of the Company's
assets within the meaning of Section 271 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law,
to the Open-Joint Stock Oil and Gas
Company RussNeft ("RussNeft"), the owner
of the remaining interests in Goloil;
all as set forth in the Share Sale and Purchase Contract
dated April 20, 2004, between Goltech Petroleum LLC,
our wholly owned subsidiary and 35.30% owner of
Goloil, and RussNeft

4. To approve the issuance of common stock [_] [_] [_]
or securities convertible into or exercisable for
common stock (which may be issuable, exercisable
or convertible below the then current market value
of the common stock) which could result in an increase
in outstanding shares of common stock of 20% or more

5. To approve the 2004 Non-Employee Stock [_] [_] [_]
Compensation Plan

6. To transact such other business [_] [_] [_]
as may properly come before the Annual Meeting
and any adjournment or postponement thereof

Dated:________________, 2004

Signature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name (printed)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Title
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Important: Please sign exactly as name appears on this proxy. When signing as
attorney, executor, trustee, guardian, corporate officer, etc., please indicate
full title.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE

VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET
QUICK *** EASY *** IMMEDIATE

TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY

o You can now vote your shares electronically through the Internet or the
telephone.
o This eliminates the need to return the proxy card.
o Your electronic vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in
the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy
card.

TO VOTE YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET
www.computershare.com/us/proxy

Have your proxy card in hand when you access the above website. You will be
prompted to enter the company number, proxy number and account number to create
an electronic ballot. Follow the prompts to vote your shares.

TO VOTE YOUR PROXY BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card above, detach it and return it in the
postage-paid envelope provided.

TO VOTE YOUR PROXY BY PHONE
1-800-728-8841

Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand
when you call. You will be prompted to enter the company number, proxy number
and account number. Follow the voting instructions to vote your shares.

PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THE ABOVE CARD IF VOTING ELECTRONICALLY