10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File number 001-32959
AIRCASTLE LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
98-0444035 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
c/o Aircastle Advisor LLC |
|
|
300 First Stamford Place, 5th Floor, |
|
|
Stamford, CT
|
|
06902 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (203) 504-1020
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting companyo |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
As of May 1, 2009, there were 79,234,863 outstanding shares of the registrants common shares,
par value $0.01 per share.
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
80,947 |
|
|
$ |
102,399 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,332 |
|
Debt investments |
|
|
14,349 |
|
|
|
12,626 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
182,623 |
|
|
|
177,537 |
|
Flight equipment held for lease, net of accumulated depreciation of
$371,591 and $422,820 |
|
|
3,837,543 |
|
|
|
3,798,709 |
|
Aircraft purchase deposits and progress payments |
|
|
68,923 |
|
|
|
75,476 |
|
Leasehold improvements, furnishings and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $1,999 and $2,119 |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
62,852 |
|
|
|
80,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,251,572 |
|
|
$ |
4,251,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings from securitizations and term debt financings |
|
$ |
2,476,296 |
|
|
$ |
2,446,165 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
60,789 |
|
|
|
63,574 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
Lease rentals received in advance |
|
|
28,463 |
|
|
|
26,789 |
|
Security deposits |
|
|
65,307 |
|
|
|
71,531 |
|
Maintenance payments |
|
|
224,288 |
|
|
|
232,975 |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
276,401 |
|
|
|
261,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,139,406 |
|
|
|
3,110,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference shares, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
78,620,320 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008; and
79,234,863 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,474,455 |
|
|
|
1,474,804 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
10,075 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(362,602 |
) |
|
|
(344,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,112,166 |
|
|
|
1,140,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
4,251,572 |
|
|
$ |
4,251,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease rental revenue |
|
$ |
130,981 |
|
|
$ |
125,994 |
|
Amortization of net lease discounts and lease incentives |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
Maintenance revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease rentals |
|
|
133,627 |
|
|
|
131,480 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
Other revenue |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
134,956 |
|
|
|
132,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
48,215 |
|
|
|
51,561 |
|
Interest, net |
|
|
41,011 |
|
|
|
43,411 |
|
Selling, general and administrative (including non-cash share based payment expense
of $1,598, and $1,658, respectively) |
|
|
11,489 |
|
|
|
11,095 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
5,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
101,360 |
|
|
|
111,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
33,351 |
|
|
|
20,387 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
48,162 |
|
|
|
51,561 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
Amortization of net lease discounts and lease incentives |
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
1,117 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
Accretion of purchase discounts on debt investments |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Non-cash share based payment expense |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
Cash flow hedges reclassified into earnings |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Security deposits and maintenance payments included in earnings |
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
(3,451 |
) |
Loss on sale of investments |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
Changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(17,972 |
) |
|
|
5,086 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(1,548 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
(9,951 |
) |
Payable to affiliates |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Lease rentals received in advance |
|
|
(4,347 |
) |
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
58,765 |
|
|
|
69,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and improvement of flight equipment and lease incentives |
|
|
(117,027 |
) |
|
|
(17,268 |
) |
Aircraft purchase deposits and progress payments, net of returned deposits |
|
|
(5,312 |
) |
|
|
(7,906 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of debt investments |
|
|
65,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments on debt investments |
|
|
11,224 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Collateral call payments on derivatives and repurchase agreements |
|
|
(198,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Collateral call receipts on derivatives and repurchase agreements |
|
|
158,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements, furnishings and equipment |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(86,608 |
) |
|
|
(24,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares from directors and employees |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
Securitization and term debt financing repayments |
|
|
(15,692 |
) |
|
|
(30,131 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(2,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Credit facility borrowings |
|
|
325,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility repayments |
|
|
(142,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments on repurchase agreements |
|
|
(65,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Security deposits and maintenance payments received |
|
|
26,977 |
|
|
|
22,534 |
|
Security deposits and maintenance payments returned |
|
|
(6,452 |
) |
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
Payments for terminated cash flow hedges |
|
|
(32,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(55,004 |
) |
|
|
(7,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
31,648 |
|
|
|
(23,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
|
21,452 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
13,546 |
|
|
|
80,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17,351 |
|
|
$ |
102,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
38,637 |
|
|
$ |
36,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Aircastle Limited (Aircastle, the Company, we, us or our) is a Bermuda exempted
company that was incorporated on October 29, 2004 by Fortress Investment Group LLC and certain of
its affiliates (together, the Fortress Shareholders or Fortress) under the provisions of
Section 14 of the Companies Act of 1981 of Bermuda. Aircastles business is investing in aviation
assets, including leasing, managing and selling commercial jet aircraft to airlines throughout the
world and investing in aircraft related debt investments.
Basis of Presentation
Aircastle is a holding company that conducts its business through subsidiaries. Aircastle
directly or indirectly owns all of the outstanding common shares of its subsidiaries. The
consolidated financial statements presented are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). We operate in a single segment.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) for
interim financial reporting and, in our opinion, reflect all adjustments, including normal
recurring items, which are necessary to present fairly the results for interim periods. Operating
results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the entire year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the SEC; however, we believe that the disclosures are adequate to
make information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting
about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable
investors to better understand their effects on an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. See Note 10 Derivatives.
Also effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities (FSP No. EITF 03-6-1). FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether unvested
share-based payment awards with rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents should be
considered participating securities for the purposes of applying the two-class method of
calculating earnings per share (EPS) under SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. The FASB staff
concluded that unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and thus
should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. The adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1
requires us to present EPS using the two-class method for our current period EPS computations and
to retrospectively revise our comparative prior period EPS computations using the two-class method.
The adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 did not have a material effect on EPS. See Note 6 Earnings
Per Share.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aircastle and all of its
subsidiaries. Aircastle consolidates three Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) of which
Aircastle is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
6
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April, 2009, the FASB issued three final FSPs intended to provide additional application
guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities.
FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides
guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in FASB
Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, enhances consistency in financial reporting by
increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, provides additional guidance designed to create
greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities.
The FSPs are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, but entities may
early adopt the FSPs for the interim and annual periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company
plans to adopt these FSPs during the second quarter of 2009. Additional disclosures on a quarterly
basis will be required.
Note 2. Fair Value Measurements
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, requires the use of valuation techniques to measure
fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize use of unobservable inputs.
These inputs are prioritized as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable,
either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or
market corroborated inputs. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which
require us to develop our own assumptions about how market participants price the asset or
liability. |
The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
|
|
|
Market approach Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Income approach Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single
present amount based on current market expectation about those future amounts. |
|
|
|
|
Cost approach Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the
service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). |
The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2009 that
we measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy. As
required by SFAS No. 157, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their
entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement.
7
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Using Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Technique |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
102,399 |
|
|
$ |
102,399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Market |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
177,537 |
|
|
|
177,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
Debt investments |
|
|
12,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,626 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
292,562 |
|
|
$ |
279,936 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
261,977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
199,650 |
|
|
$ |
62,327 |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our cash and cash equivalents, along with our restricted cash and cash equivalents balances,
consists largely of money market securities that are considered to be highly liquid and easily
tradable. These securities are valued using inputs observable in active markets for identical
securities and are therefore classified as level 1 within our fair value hierarchy. Our interest
rate derivatives included in level 2 consist of United States dollar denominated interest rate
swaps, and their fair values are determined by applying standard modeling techniques under the
income approach to relevant market interest rates (cash rates, futures rates, swap rates) in effect
at the period close to determine appropriate reset and discount rates.
Our debt investments included in Level 3 consist of available-for-sale United States corporate
obligations consisting of interests in pools of loans which are collateralized by interests in
commercial aircraft. The fair value of our debt investments included within Level 3 is valued by
using discounted cash flow methodologies, where the inputs to those models are based on
unobservable market inputs. The Company used two sources of unobservable inputs; we obtained broker
quotes which provided an indication of the market value and we obtained market values from a
pricing service. We used the broker quotes and/or the pricing service market values to validate the
discount rate used for our cash flow model for these debt investments in accordance with
SFAS 157-3.
Our interest rate derivatives included in Level 3 consist of United States dollar denominated
interest rate swaps with a guaranteed notional balance. The guaranteed notional balance has an
upper notional band that matches the hedged debt and a lower notional band. The notional balance is
guaranteed to match the hedged debt balance if the debt balances decreases within the upper and
lower notional band. The fair value of the interest rate derivative is determined based on the
upper notional band using cash flows discounted at the relevant market interest rates in effect at
the period close. The range of the guaranteed notional between the upper and lower band represents
an option that may not be exercised independently of the debt notional and is therefore valued
based on unobservable market inputs.
The following tables reflect the activity for the major classes of our assets and liabilities
measured at fair value using level 3 inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Derivative |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Investments |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
14,349 |
|
|
$ |
(66,321 |
) |
Transfers in (out) in first quarter 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total gains/(losses), net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in interest income |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
Included in interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
4,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
12,626 |
|
|
$ |
(62,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
8
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
Note 3. Lease Rental Revenues and Flight Equipment Held for Lease
The contracted minimum future lease rental payments to be received under our existing
operating leases at March 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
375,477 |
|
2010 |
|
|
455,110 |
|
2011 |
|
|
403,761 |
|
2012 |
|
|
347,794 |
|
2013 |
|
|
250,876 |
|
2014 |
|
|
186,460 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
403,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,423,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic concentration of lease rental revenue earned from flight equipment held for lease
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
Region |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
Europe |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Asia |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
North America |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Middle East and Africa |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The classification of regions in the tables above and the table and discussion below is
determined based on the principal location of the lessee of each aircraft.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, one customer accounted for 8% of lease rental
revenue and three additional customers accounted for a combined 15% of lease rental revenue. No
other customer accounted for more than 4% of lease rental revenue. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, one customer accounted for 9% of lease rental revenue and two additional customers
accounted for a combined 13% of lease rental revenue. No other customer accounted for more than 4%
of lease rental revenue.
Geographic concentration of net book value of flight equipment held for lease was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
of |
|
Net Book |
|
of |
|
Net Book |
Region |
|
Aircraft |
|
Value % |
|
Aircraft |
|
Value % |
Europe |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Asia |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
31 |
(1) |
|
|
22 |
% |
North America |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Middle East and Africa |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Off-lease |
|
|
8 |
(2) |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
(3) |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes two Boeing Model 737-400 aircraft currently being converted
to freighter configuration for which we have executed leases with a
carrier in Asia post-conversion. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes one Boeing Model 737-300 aircraft which we delivered on lease
to a carrier in the Middle East in the first quarter of 2009, three
Boeing Model 737-700 aircraft which we delivered on lease to a carrier
in Europe in the first quarter of 2009, two Boeing Model 737-700
aircraft which are committed for lease to a carrier in Africa, one
Boeing Model 737-700 aircraft which is committed for lease to a
carrier in Latin America and one Boeing Model 737-700 aircraft which
is committed for lease to a carrier in Europe. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes four Boeing Model 737-700 aircraft, one of which is subject
to a lease commitment with a carrier in Latin America, two of
which |
9
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
are subject to a lease commitment with a carrier in Africa and one of
which is subject to a lease commitment with a carrier in Europe. We
expect to deliver these four aircraft in the second quarter of 2009. |
At December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, lease acquisition costs included in other assets on
the consolidated balance sheets were $293 and $417, respectively. Prepaid lease incentive costs
included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets were $5,127 and $12,708 at December 31,
2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
Note 4. Securitizations and Term Debt Financings
The outstanding amounts of our securitizations, term debt financings and borrowings under our
credit facilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
At March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Stated |
|
Debt Obligation |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Interest Rate(1) |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Securitizations and Term Debt Financings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization No. 1 |
|
$ |
472,048 |
|
|
$ |
466,718 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
6/20/31 |
|
Securitization No. 2 |
|
|
1,097,913 |
|
|
|
1,092,771 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
6/14/37 |
|
Term Financing No. 1 |
|
|
757,610 |
|
|
|
745,385 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
5/02/15 |
|
Term Financing No. 2 |
|
|
148,725 |
|
|
|
141,291 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
9/23/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,476,296 |
|
|
$ |
2,446,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects floating rate in effect at the applicable reset date. |
Note 5. Dividends
On December 11, 2007, our board of directors declared a fourth quarter dividend of $0.70 per
common share or an aggregate of $55,004, for the three months ended December 31, 2007, which was
paid on January 15, 2008 to shareholders of record on December 31, 2007. On March 24, 2008, our
board of directors declared a first quarter dividend of $0.25 per common share, or an aggregate of
$19,640, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, which was paid on April 15, 2008 to
shareholders of record on March 31, 2008.
On December 22, 2008, our board of directors declared a fourth quarter dividend of $0.10 per
common share or an aggregate of $7,862, for the three months ended December 31, 2008, which was
paid on January 15, 2009 to shareholders of record on December 31, 2008. On March 13, 2009, our
board of directors declared a first quarter dividend of $0.10 per common share, or an aggregate of
$7,923, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, which was paid on April 15, 2009 to shareholders
of record on March 31, 2009.
Note 6. Earnings Per Share
As described in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, on January 1, 2009 we
adopted FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities, which required us to include all common shares which
granted under our incentive compensation plan which remain unvested (restricted common shares)
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid
(participating securities), in the number of shares outstanding in our basic and diluted EPS
calculations using the two-class method. All of our restricted common shares are currently
participating securities.
Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of
distributed earnings allocated to common shareholders and undistributed earnings allocated to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In
applying the two-class method, distributed and
10
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and restricted common shares based
on the total weighted average shares outstanding during the period as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
77,719,986 |
|
|
|
77,941,201 |
|
Restricted common shares |
|
|
913,912 |
|
|
|
1,282,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average shares |
|
|
78,633,898 |
|
|
|
79,223,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
98.8 |
% |
|
|
98.4 |
% |
Restricted common shares |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculations of both basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Earnings
per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
Less: Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to restricted common shares (a) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to common shareholders Basic |
|
$ |
31,269 |
|
|
$ |
18,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
77,719,986 |
|
|
|
77,941,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
Less: Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to restricted common shares |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to common shareholders Diluted |
|
$ |
31,269 |
|
|
$ |
18,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
77,719,986 |
|
|
|
77,941,201 |
|
Effect of dilutive shares |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
77,719,986 |
|
|
|
77,941,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, distributed and
undistributed earnings to restricted shares is 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively, of
net income. |
|
(b) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, we have no dilutive shares. |
Note 7. Income Taxes
Income taxes have been provided for based upon the tax laws and rates in countries in which
our operations are conducted and income is earned. The Company received an assurance from the
Bermuda Minister of Finance that it would be exempted from local income, withholding and capital
gains taxes until March 2016. Consequently, the provision for income taxes recorded relates to
income earned by certain subsidiaries of the Company which are located in, or earn income in,
jurisdictions that impose income taxes, primarily the United States and Ireland.
11
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
The sources of income from continuing operations before income taxes for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
U.S. operations |
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
Non-U.S. operations |
|
|
32,716 |
|
|
|
19,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,351 |
|
|
$ |
20,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of our aircraft-owning subsidiaries that are recognized as corporations for U.S. tax
purposes are non-U.S. corporations. These non-U.S. subsidiaries generally earn income from sources
outside the United States and typically are not subject to U.S. federal, state or local income
taxes unless they operate within the U.S., in which case they may be subject to federal, state and
local income taxes. We also have a U.S-based subsidiary which provides management services to our
non-U.S. subsidiaries and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes.
Differences between statutory income tax rates and our effective income tax rates applied to
pre-tax income consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Notional U.S. federal income tax expense at the statutory rate |
|
$ |
11,672 |
|
|
$ |
7,135 |
|
U.S. state and local income tax, net |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Non-U.S. operations |
|
|
(9,984 |
) |
|
|
(5,268 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses in the U.S. |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) includes net income, the changes in the fair value and the
reclassification into earnings of amounts previously deferred relating to our derivative financial
instruments which qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and the change in unrealized fair value of debt
securities classified as available-for-sale. Total comprehensive income (loss) for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
Net change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax
benefit of $1,264 and tax expense of $231,
respectively |
|
|
(123,371 |
) |
|
|
13,972 |
|
Derivative (gain) loss reclassified into earnings |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
Net change in unrealized fair value of debt investments |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(92,292 |
) |
|
$ |
36,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
The following table sets forth the components of accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax where applicable, at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(365,138 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
2,536 |
|
|
$ |
(362,602 |
) |
Net change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax expense of $231 |
|
|
13,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,972 |
|
Derivative gain reclassified into earnings |
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
Net change in unrealized fair value of debt investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(346,217 |
) |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
(344,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of tax benefit of $4,530 at December 31, 2008. |
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
We have an acquisition agreement, which we refer to as the Airbus A330 Agreement, with Airbus
S.A.S, or Airbus, under which we agreed to acquire from Airbus twelve new A330-200 aircraft, or the
New A330 Aircraft. In February 2009, we amended the Airbus A330 Agreement to defer the scheduled
delivery of an aircraft from the fourth quarter of 2010 to the first half of 2012. As of March 31,
2009, we had paid $60,300 in Airbus deposits and pre-delivery payments and recorded $4,697 in
capitalized interest. Under certain circumstances, we have the right to change the delivery
positions to alternative A330 aircraft models. Three of the New A330 Aircraft are scheduled to be
delivered in 2010, six are scheduled to be delivered in 2011 and the remaining three are scheduled
to be delivered in 2012.
Committed amounts to acquire, convert and modify aircraft including, where applicable, our
estimate of adjustments for configuration changes, engine acquisition costs, contractual price
escalations and other adjustments, net of amounts already paid, are approximately $110,217 in 2009,
$289,823 in 2010, $380,067 in 2011 and $156,323 in 2012.
Note 10. Derivatives
As described in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities on January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging
activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects
on an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
In the normal course of business we utilize interest rate derivatives to manage our exposure
to interest rate risks. Specifically, our interest rate derivatives are hedging variable rate
interest payments on our various debt facilities. We account for our interest rate derivatives in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended and interpreted, or SFAS No. 133. Under SFAS No. 133, if certain conditions are met, an
interest rate derivative may be specifically designated as a cash flow hedge. All of our
designated interest rate derivatives are cash flow hedges. We have one interest rate derivative
that is not designated under SFAS No. 133.
On the date that we enter into an interest rate derivative, we formally document the intended
use of the interest rate derivative and its designation as a cash flow hedge, if applicable. We
also assess (both at inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the interest rate derivative has
been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the variable rate interest
payments on our debt and whether the interest rate derivative is expected to remain highly
13
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
effective in future periods. If it were to be determined that the interest rate derivative
is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a cash flow hedge, we would discontinue SFAS No.
133 accounting prospectively.
At inception of an interest rate derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, we establish the
method we will use to assess effectiveness and the method we will use to measure any
ineffectiveness. Historically, we have elected to use the change in variable cash flows method
for both. This method, involves a comparison of the present value of the cumulative change in the
expected future cash flows on the variable leg of the interest rate derivative against the present
value of the cumulative change in the expected future interest cash flows on the variable-rate
debt. When the change in the interest rate derivatives variable leg exceeds the change in the
debts variable-rate interest cash flows, the calculated ineffectiveness is recorded in interest
expense on our consolidated statement of income. Effectiveness is assessed by dividing the change
in the interest rate derivative variable leg by the change in the debts variable-rate interest
cash flows.
We use the hypothetical trade method for interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges subsequent to inception that did not qualify for the change in variable cash flow method
under SFAS No. 133. The calculation involves a comparison of the change in the fair value of the
interest rate derivative to the change in the fair value of a hypothetical interest rate derivative
with critical terms that reflect the hedged variable-rate debt. The effectiveness of these
relationships is assessed by regressing historical changes in the interest rate derivative against
historical changes in the hypothetical interest rate derivative. When the change in the interest
rate derivative exceeds the change in the hypothetical interest rate derivative, the calculated
ineffectiveness is recorded in interest expense on our consolidated statement of income.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 157, all interest rate derivatives are recognized
on the balance sheet at their fair value. We determine fair value for our United States dollar
denominated interest rate derivatives by calculating reset rates and discounting cash flows based
on cash rates, futures rates and swap rates in effect at the period close. We determine the fair
value of our United States dollar denominated guaranteed notional balance interest rate derivatives
based on the upper notional band using cash flows discounted at relevant market interest rates in
effect at the period close. See Note 2 Fair Value Measurements for more information.
For our interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, the
effective portion of the interest rate derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a
component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the
interest payments on the debt are recorded in earnings. The ineffective portion of the interest
rate derivative is calculated and recorded in interest expense on our consolidated statement of
income at each quarter end. For any interest rate derivative not designated as a cash flow hedge
under SFAS No. 133, the gain or loss is recognized in other income (expense) on our consolidated
statement of income.
We may choose to terminate certain interest rate derivatives prior to their contracted
maturities. Any related net gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date
of termination are not reclassified into earnings if it remains probable that the interest payments
on the debt will occur. The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income are reclassified into
earnings as the interest payments on the debt affect earnings. Terminated interest rate derivatives
are reviewed periodically to determine if the forecasted transactions remain probable of occurring.
To the extent that the occurrence of the interest payments on the debt are deemed remote, the
related portion of the accumulated other comprehensive income balance is reclassified into earnings
immediately.
Our interest rate derivatives involve counterparty credit risk. As of March 31, 2009, all of
our interest rate derivatives are held with counterparties or guarantors of these counterparties
who are considered highly rated (senior unsecured ratings of A3 or above by Moodys Investors Service). As a
result, we do not anticipate that any of these counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.
14
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
We held the following interest rate derivatives as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Effective |
|
Maturity |
|
Notional |
|
|
Floating |
|
Fixed |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
Hedged Item |
|
Amount |
|
|
Date |
|
Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
Rate |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Interest rate derivatives designated
as cash flow hedges under
Statement
133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization No. 1 |
|
$ |
498,341 |
|
|
Jun-06 |
|
Jun-16 |
|
$ |
498,341 |
|
|
1M LIBOR + 0.27% |
|
5.78% |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
77,898 |
|
Securitization No. 2 |
|
|
1,084,180 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
Jun-12 |
|
|
1,084,180 |
|
|
1M LIBOR |
|
5.25% to 5.36% |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
117,413 |
|
Term Financing No. 1(1) |
|
|
676,761 |
|
|
Jun-08 |
|
May-13 |
|
|
676,761 |
|
|
1M LIBOR |
|
4.04% |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
50,371 |
|
Term Financing No. 1(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
May-13 |
|
May-15 |
|
|
491,718 |
|
|
1M LIBOR |
|
5.31% |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
11,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges
under Statement 133 |
|
|
2,259,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,751,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives not
designated as cash flow hedges under
Statement 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Financing No. 2 (2) |
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
Oct-08 |
|
Sep-13 |
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
3M LIBOR |
|
3.17% |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate derivatives
not designated as cash flow
hedges under
Statement 133 |
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate derivatives |
|
$ |
2,385,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,877,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest payments related to Term Financing No. 1 are being hedged
by two consecutive interest rate derivatives. When the first matures
in May 2013, the next becomes effective. |
|
(2) |
|
Although we entered into this interest rate derivative to hedge the
variable rate interest payments in connection with Term Financing No.
2, it has not been designated as a hedge for accounting purposes. |
In addition to the derivative liability above, another component of the fair value of our
interest rate derivatives is accrued interest. As of March 31, 2009, accrued interest payable
included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities on our consolidated balance
sheet was $5,814 related to interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and $61 for
interest rate derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges.
The amount of loss expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI into interest expense over
the next 12 months consists of net interest settlements on active interest rate derivatives,
disclosed above, in the amount of $89,096 and the amortization of deferred net losses in the amount
of $7,949. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the amount of loss reclassified from
accumulated OCI into interest expense consisted of net interest settlements on active interest rate
derivatives in the amount of $24,169 and the amortization of deferred net losses in the amount of
$2,074, as disclosed below.
15
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
Following is the effect of interest rate derivatives on the statement of financial performance
for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
Amount of |
Derivatives in |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Location of |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
Statement 133 |
|
Recognized in |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Location of |
|
Recognized in |
Cash Flow |
|
OCI on |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Income on |
Hedging |
|
Derivative |
|
Accumulated |
|
OCI into Income |
|
Recognized in |
|
Derivative |
Relationships |
|
(a) |
|
OCI into Income |
|
(b) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
(c) |
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
$(10,197)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$(26,243)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$(279)(1) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This represents the change in fair market value of our interest rate derivatives since
year end, net of taxes, offset by the amount of actual cash paid related to the net
settlements of the interest rate derivatives for each month of the quarter. |
|
(b) |
|
This represents the amount of actual cash paid related to the net settlements of the
interest rate derivatives for each month of the quarter plus any effective amortization
of net deferred interest rate derivative losses. |
|
(c) |
|
This represents both realized and unrealized ineffectiveness incurred during the quarter. |
|
(1) |
|
Excludes a loss of $2,875 which was charged to interest expense during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 as a result of changes in projected future debt related to the New
A330 Aircraft. See Accelerated amortization of deferred losses in table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not |
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
Designated as |
|
or (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
Hedging Instruments |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
Recognized in Income |
under Statement 133 |
|
On Derivative |
|
on Derivative |
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
$92 |
Generally, our interest rate derivatives are hedging current interest payments on debt and
future interest payments on long-term debt. In the past, we have entered into forward-starting
interest rate derivatives to hedge the anticipated interest payment on long-term financings. These
interest rate derivatives were terminated and new, specifically tailored interest rate derivatives
were entered into upon closing of the relevant long-term financing. We have also early terminated
interest rate derivatives in an attempt to manage our exposure to collateral calls. We have no
active interest rate derivatives in effect in relation to the anticipated interest payments on
long-term financings required for our New A330 Aircraft.
16
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
The following table summarizes the deferred (gains) and losses for our terminated interest
rate derivatives and the related amortization into interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) or Loss |
|
|
(Gain) or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized (including |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
Accelerated |
|
|
expected to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Amortization) into |
|
|
be |
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
(Gain) or |
|
|
Interest Expense for |
|
|
amortized |
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) or |
|
|
Loss at |
|
|
the Three Months |
|
|
over the |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Loss Upon |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
next twelve |
|
Hedged Item |
|
Amount |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
% |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
months |
|
Securitization No. 1 |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
Dec-05 |
|
Aug-10 |
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
Jun-06 |
|
$ |
(13,397 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,136 |
) |
|
$ |
(819 |
) |
|
$ |
(783 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,037 |
) |
Securitization No. 1 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
Dec-05 |
|
Dec-10 |
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
Jun-06 |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
Securitization No. 2 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
Mar-06 |
|
Mar-11 |
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
|
(2,687 |
) |
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
Securitization No. 2 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
Jan-07 |
|
Aug-12 |
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
Securitization No. 2 |
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
Feb-07 |
|
Apr-17 |
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
|
(3,119 |
) |
|
|
(2,307 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
Repurchase Agreement |
|
|
74,000 |
|
|
Feb-06 |
|
Jul-10 |
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
Feb-08 |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreement |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Dec-05 |
|
Sep-09 |
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
Mar-08 |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Financing No. 1 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
Jul-07 |
|
Dec-17 |
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
Mar-08 |
|
|
15,281 |
|
|
|
12,929 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Term Financing No. 1 |
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
Feb-13 |
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
Partial Mar-08 |
|
|
26,281 |
|
|
|
20,381 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
5,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Jun-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Financing No. 1 |
|
|
248,000 |
|
|
Aug-07 |
|
May-13 |
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
Jun-08 |
|
|
9,888 |
|
|
|
8,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
Repurchase Agreement |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
Jun-05 |
|
Mar-13 |
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
Jun-08 |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Financing No. 2 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
May-08 |
|
Mar-14 |
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
Jun-08 |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Financing No. 2 |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
Jan-08 |
|
Feb-19 |
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
Partial Jun-08 |
|
|
23,077 |
|
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Oct-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future debt
and securitization |
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
Apr-10 |
|
Oct-15 |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
Partial Jun-08 |
|
|
15,310 |
|
|
|
13,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Dec-08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future debt and
securitization |
|
|
203,000 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
Jan-12 |
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
Dec-08 |
|
|
2,728 |
(1) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Future debt and
securitization |
|
|
238,000 |
|
|
Jan-11 |
|
Apr-16 |
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
Dec-08 |
|
|
19,430 |
|
|
|
18,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
Future debt and
securitization |
|
|
238,000 |
|
|
Jul-11 |
|
Sep-16 |
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
Dec-08 |
|
|
17,254 |
|
|
|
16,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,038 |
|
|
$ |
94,660 |
|
|
$ |
(139 |
) |
|
$ |
4,949 |
|
|
$ |
7,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The deferred loss for this interest rate derivative is related to the
period prior to de-designation. |
17
Aircastle Limited and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
The following table summarizes amounts charged directly to the consolidated statement of
income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, related to our interest
rate derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness (gains) losses (unrealized) |
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated amortization of deferred losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
Amortization of deferred (gains) losses |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
2,074 |
|
Losses on termination of interest rate derivatives |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amortization |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charged to interest expense |
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
4,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark to market gains (losses) on undesignated interest rate derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charged to other income (expense) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average interest pay rates of these derivatives at December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009 were 4.90% and 4.91%, respectively.
As of March 31, 2009, we did not have any cash collateral pledged under our interest rate
derivatives, nor do we have any existing agreements that require cash collateral postings.
Note 11. Interest, Net
The following table shows the components of interest, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest on borrowings and other liabilities |
|
$ |
41,879 |
|
|
$ |
36,770 |
|
Hedge ineffectiveness (gains) losses (unrealized) |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Amortization of interest rate derivative contracts related to deferred (gains) losses |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
Losses on termination of interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
46,322 |
|
|
|
44,123 |
|
Less interest income |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
Less capitalized interest |
|
|
(3,580 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
$ |
41,011 |
|
|
$ |
43,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Shareholders Equity and Share Based Payment
In January 2009, the Company granted restricted common shares to employees with a total fair
value of $2,846. The 597,350 restricted common shares granted had grant prices which ranged between
$4.42 and $5.36 per share. Of these restricted common shares, 347,350 vest over three years. The
remaining 250,000 restricted common shares vest over five years. In February 2009, the Company
granted 125,000 restricted common shares to certain directors with a total fair value of $351. The
shares vest on January 1, 2010. The fair value of the restricted common shares granted is
determined based upon the market price of the common shares at grant date.
18
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
This managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should
read the following discussion in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements
and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. The results of operations for the periods
reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods,
and our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those described under ''Risk Factors
and included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Our consolidated financial statements are prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. All
references to dollars and $ in this report are to, and all monetary amounts in this report are
presented in, U.S. dollars.
Certain items in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this report), and other information we
provide from time to time, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, but not necessarily limited to,
statements relating to our ability to acquire, sell and lease aircraft, raise capital, pay
dividends, and increase revenues, earnings and EBITDA and the global aviation industry and aircraft
leasing sector. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, projects, believes,
may, will, would, could, should, seeks, estimates and variations on these words and
similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are
based on managements current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of factors that
could lead to actual results materially different from those described in the forward-looking
statements; Aircastle Limited can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained.
Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in
this report. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future
prospects or that could cause actual results to differ materially from Aircastle Limiteds
expectations include, but are not limited to, prolonged capital markets disruption and volatility,
which may adversely affect our continued ability to obtain additional capital to finance our
working capital needs, our pre-delivery payment obligations and other aircraft acquisition
commitments, our ability to extend or replace our existing financings, and the demand for and value
of aircraft; our exposure to increased bank and counterparty risk caused by credit and capital
markets disruptions; general economic conditions and business conditions affecting demand for
aircraft and lease rates; our continued ability to obtain favorable tax treatment in Bermuda,
Ireland and other jurisdictions; our ability to pay dividends; high or volatile fuel prices, lack
of access to capital, reduced load factors and yields and other factors affecting the
creditworthiness of our airline customers and their ability to continue to perform their
obligations under our leases; termination payments on our interest rate hedges; and other risks
detailed from time to time in Aircastle Limiteds filings with the SEC, including Risk Factors as
previously disclosed in Aircastles 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and elsewhere in this report.
In addition, new risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for
Aircastle to predict or assess the impact of every factor that may cause its actual results to
differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date of this report. Aircastle Limited expressly disclaims any obligation to
release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to
reflect any change in its expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any statement is based.
WEBSITE AND ACCESS TO COMPANYS REPORTS
The Companys Internet website can be found at www.aircastle.com. Our annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of
charge through our website under Investors SEC Filings as soon as reasonably practicable after
they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
The information on the Companys website is not part of, or incorporated by reference, into
this report, or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
19
OVERVIEW
We are a global company that acquires, leases and sells high-utility commercial jet aircraft
to passenger and cargo airlines throughout the world. High-utility aircraft are generally modern,
operationally efficient jets with a large operator base and long useful lives. As of March 31,
2009, our aircraft portfolio consisted of 130 aircraft and we had 58 lessees located in 32
countries. At March 31, 2009, the average age of the aircraft in our portfolio was 10.7 years and
the average remaining lease term was 5.1 years, in each case weighted by net book value. Our
revenues and income from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were
$132.1 million and $20.4 million, respectively.
Although current market conditions have significantly reduced the availability of equity and
debt capital, we plan to grow our business and profits over the long term by continuing to employ
our fundamental business strategy which includes:
|
(1) |
|
Selectively investing in additional commercial jet aircraft and other aviation assets
when attractively priced opportunities and cost effective financing are available; |
|
|
(2) |
|
Maintaining an efficient capital structure by using varying long-term debt structures to
obtain cost effective financing and leveraging the efficient operating platform we have
established; and |
|
|
(3) |
|
Reinvesting a portion of the cash flows generated by our business and from selective
asset dispositions in additional aviation assets and/or our own debt and equity securities. |
We believe our teams capabilities in the global aircraft leasing market place us in a
favorable position to explore new income-generating activities when capital becomes available for
such activities. However, the financial markets are under severe distress and the disruption has
reached unprecedented levels. It is not clear when credit will become readily available in
sufficient volume to satisfy the financing and refinancing needs in the aviation industry. If
current levels of financial market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no
assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our ability to
access capital, on our cost of capital or on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
In addition to the current financial markets turmoil, the global economic slowdown has reduced
both passenger and cargo air traffic, as evidenced by the sharp drop in traffic levels during the
past few months. The International Air Transport Association reported year on year declines in
international passenger traffic for the first three months in 2009 of more than 9% and declines in
international freight traffic in excess of 20%. This has translated into increased financial
pressures on airlines as well as reduced demand for aircraft. With an average remaining lease term
of 5.1 years and relatively modest scheduled releasing requirements over the next year, we believe
our portfolio is well positioned. Our management team has significant experience in the leasing
and technical management of aviation assets, and extensive experience managing lease restructuring
and aircraft repossessions, which we believe is critical to mitigate our customer default exposure.
However, we expect the business environment in 2009 will continue to be very challenging for the
aircraft leasing industry.
We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to our shareholders. On March 13, 2009, our board
of directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.10 per common share, or an aggregate of
$7.9 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, which was paid on April 15, 2009 to
holders of record on March 31, 2009. This dividend may not be indicative of the amount of any
future dividends.
Revenues
Our revenues are comprised primarily of operating lease rentals on flight equipment held for
lease. In addition, we recognize revenue from retained maintenance payments related to lease
expirations. We also earn interest income from our debt investments.
Typically, our aircraft are subject to net operating leases whereby the lessee pays lease
rentals and is generally responsible for maintaining the aircraft and paying operational,
maintenance and insurance costs, although in a majority of cases we are obligated to pay a portion
of specified maintenance or modification costs. Our aircraft lease agreements generally provide for
the periodic payment of a fixed amount of rent over the life of the lease and the amount of the
20
contracted rent will depend upon the type, age, specification and condition of the aircraft, and
market conditions at the time the lease is committed. The amount of rent we receive will depend on
a number of factors, including the credit-worthiness of our lessees and the occurrence of
delinquencies, restructurings and defaults. Our lease rental revenues are also affected by the
extent to which aircraft are off-lease and our ability to remarket aircraft that are nearing the
end of their leases in order to minimize their off-lease time. Our success in re-leasing aircraft
is affected by market conditions relating to our aircraft and by general industry conditions and
trends. An increase in the percentage of off-lease aircraft or a reduction in lease rates upon
remarketing would negatively impact our revenues.
2009 Lease Expirations and Lease Placements
|
|
|
Scheduled lease expirations placements. For our 20 owned aircraft originally having
lease expirations in 2009, we executed leases and lease renewals, or commitments to lease
or renew, with respect to 17 aircraft, including one aircraft we have taken back earlier
than originally scheduled in 2009 on a consensual basis from a lessee. We are actively
marketing the remaining three aircraft. We estimate that for the 20 aircraft, the weighted
average lease term for the new leases or renewals will be approximately six years with
monthly lease rates that are approximately six percent higher than the previous rentals. |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft acquisitions placements. We currently have no commitment to acquire any
aircraft in 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Repossessions placements. In 2009, we delivered on lease or executed lease
commitments for all of the 12 aircraft we repossessed in 2008. In addition to the early transition mentioned in
Scheduled lease expiration placements above, we completed a consensual early lease
termination for one aircraft and placed it with a new lessee in the first quarter of 2009.
We expect to complete another consensual early lease termination for a second aircraft in
the second quarter of 2009 and have a commitment to lease the aircraft to another lessee. |
2010 Lease Expirations and Lease Placements
|
|
|
Scheduled lease expirations placements. For our 19 owned aircraft originally
having lease expirations in 2010, we have executed lease renewals with respect to four
aircraft, we have signed sale agreements to sell two aircraft and we are actively
remarketing the remaining aircraft. |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft acquisitions placements. We are scheduled to take delivery of three of the
new A330-200 aircraft, all in the second half of 2010. We have executed lease agreements
for all three aircraft with a carrier in Asia. We currently have no other commitment to
acquire aircraft in 2010. |
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses are comprised of depreciation of flight equipment held for lease, interest
expense, selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, and other expenses. Because our
operating lease terms generally require the lessee to pay for operating, maintenance and insurance
costs, our portion of other expenses relating to aircraft reflected in our statement of income has
been nominal; however, to the extent our customers fail to pay operating, maintenance, insurance or
transition costs, our portion of these expenses reflected in our income statement would increase.
Income Tax Provision
We have obtained an assurance from the Minister of Finance of Bermuda under the Exempted
Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966 that, in the event that any legislation is enacted in Bermuda
imposing any tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or
appreciation or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, such tax shall not, until
March 28, 2016, be applicable to us or to any of our operations or to our shares, debentures or
other obligations except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or
to any taxes payable by us in respect of real property owned or leased by us in Bermuda.
Consequently, the provision for income taxes
21
recorded relates to income earned by certain subsidiaries of the Company which are located in, or
earn income in, jurisdictions that impose income taxes, primarily Ireland and the United States.
All of our aircraft-owning subsidiaries that are recognized as corporations for U.S. tax
purposes are non-U.S. corporations. These non-U.S. subsidiaries generally earn income from sources
outside the United States and typically are not subject to U.S. federal, state or local income
taxes unless they operate within the U.S., in which case they may be subject to federal, state and
local income taxes. We also have a U.S-based subsidiary which provides management services to our
non-U.S. subsidiaries and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
We have an acquisition agreement, or the Airbus A330 Agreement, with Airbus S.A.S, or Airbus,
under which we agreed to acquire from Airbus twelve new A330-200 aircraft, or the New A330
Aircraft. In February 2009, we amended the Airbus A330 Agreement to defer the scheduled delivery of
an aircraft from the fourth quarter of 2010 to the first half of 2012. Three of the New A330
Aircraft are scheduled to be delivered in 2010, six are scheduled to be delivered in 2011 and the
remaining three are scheduled to be delivered in 2012.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the aircraft owned by us as
of March 31, 2009:
AIRCASTLE AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Aircraft as of |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
March 31, 2009(1) |
Flight Equipment Held for Lease |
|
$ |
3,799 |
|
Number of Aircraft |
|
|
130 |
|
Number of Lessees |
|
|
58 |
|
Number of Countries |
|
|
32 |
|
Weighted Average Age Passenger (years)(2)(5) |
|
|
11.2 |
|
Weighted Average Age Freighter (years)(2)(5) |
|
|
9.7 |
|
Weighted Average Age Combined (years)(2)(5) |
|
|
10.7 |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Passenger Lease Term (years)(3)(5) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Cargo Lease Term (years)(3)(5) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Combined Lease Term (years)(3)(5) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
Weighted Average Fleet Utilization during First Quarter 2009(4) |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated using net book value as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Weighted average age (years) by net book value. |
|
(3) |
|
Weighted average remaining lease term (years) by net book value. |
|
(4) |
|
Aircraft on-lease days as a percent of total days in period weighted by net book value, excluding aircraft in freighter conversion. |
|
(5) |
|
Two Boeing Model 737-400 aircraft currently being converted to freighter configuration are included as Freighter aircraft; the
remaining lease terms for these aircraft, for which we have executed leases post-conversion, are measured based on the ten-year
terms of the post-conversion leases. |
22
PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Aircraft as of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
Aircraft |
|
|
Book Value |
|
Aircraft Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrowbody |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Midbody |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Widebody |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Passenger |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Freighter(1) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
Airbus |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Diversification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
Asia(1) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
North America |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Middle East and Africa |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Off-lease (2) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes two Boeing Model 737-400 aircraft currently being converted
to freighter configuration as Freighter aircraft for which we have
executed leases with a carrier in Asia post-conversion. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes four Boeing Model 737-700 aircraft, one of which is subject
to a lease commitment with a carrier in Latin America, two of which
are subject to a lease commitment with a carrier in Africa and one of
which is subject to a lease commitment with a carrier in Europe. We
expect to deliver these four aircraft in the second quarter of 2009. |
Our largest customer represents less than 8% of the net book value of flight equipment held
for lease at March 31, 2009. Our top 15 customers for aircraft we owned at March 31, 2009,
representing 58 aircraft and 60% of the net book value of flight equipment held for lease, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
Percent of Net Book Value |
|
Customer |
|
Country |
|
Aircraft |
Greater than 6% per customer
|
|
Martinair
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Emirates
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
US Airways
|
|
USA
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3% to 6% per customer
|
|
Iberia Airlines
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
GOL Transportes Aereos(1)
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
Airbridge Cargo(2)
|
|
Russia
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
World Airways
|
|
USA
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Jet Airways
|
|
India
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
Icelandair(3)
|
|
Iceland
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Swiss International Air Lines
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 3% per customer
|
|
China Eastern Airlines
|
|
China
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Korean Air
|
|
South Korea
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Malaysia Airlines
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Hainan Airlines
|
|
China
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
VRG Linhas Aereas and GOL Transportes Aereos are shown combined in the above table. |
|
(2) |
|
Guaranteed by Volga-Dnepr. |
|
(3) |
|
Icelandair and SmartLynx are shown combined in the above table. |
23
Our owned aircraft portfolio as of March 31, 2009 is listed in Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
Approximately 87% of the total aircraft and 90% of the freighters we owned as of March 31, 2009 are
what we consider to be the most current technology for the relevant airframe and engine type and
airframe size, as listed under the headings Latest Generation Narrowbody Aircraft, Latest
Generation Midbody Aircraft, Latest Generation Widebody Aircraft and Latest Generation Widebody
Freighter Aircraft in Exhibit 99.1 to this report.
Finance
We have typically financed the initial purchase of aircraft using short-term credit
arrangements and cash on hand. We then refinanced these short-term credit facilities on a long-term
basis with the net proceeds from subsequent securitizations, bank debt and equity offerings. Our
debt financing arrangements have been secured by the acquired aircraft and related leases, and the
financing parties have limited recourse to Aircastle Limited. While such financing has historically
been available on reasonable terms given the loan to value profile we have used, the current
financial markets turmoil has significantly reduced the availability of both debt and equity
capital and the terms on which any such capital may be made available to us would not be as
favorable to us. Though we expect the financing market to improve in time, we are presently taking a cautious
approach to incremental financing and with respect to refinancing risk.
To the extent that we acquire additional aircraft directly, we intend to fund such investments
through medium to longer-term financings and cash on hand. We may repay all or a portion of such
borrowings from time to time with the net proceeds from subsequent long-term debt financings,
additional equity offerings or cash generated from operations and asset sales. Therefore, our
ability to execute our business strategy, particularly the acquisition of additional commercial jet
aircraft or other aviation assets, depends to a significant degree on our ability to obtain
additional debt and equity capital on terms we deem attractive.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2008 to the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease rental revenue |
|
$ |
130,981 |
|
|
$ |
125,994 |
|
Amortization of net lease discounts and lease incentives |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
Maintenance revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease rentals |
|
|
133,627 |
|
|
|
131,480 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
Other revenue |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
134,956 |
|
|
|
132,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
48,215 |
|
|
|
51,561 |
|
Interest, net |
|
|
41,011 |
|
|
|
43,411 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
11,489 |
|
|
|
11,095 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
5,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
101,360 |
|
|
|
111,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
33,351 |
|
|
|
20,387 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Revenues:
Total revenues decreased by 2.1% or $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008, primarily as a result of the following:
Lease rental revenue. The decrease in lease rental revenue of $5.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily the result of
decreases of:
|
|
|
$7.7 million of revenue downtime in connection with aircraft in transition and freighter
conversions; and |
|
|
|
|
$1.6 million due to lower floating rate lease rentals. |
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$3.4 million of additional revenue as a result of the impact of 2008 aircraft
acquisitions net of dispositions; and |
|
|
|
|
$0.9 million in lease rate changes. |
Amortization of net lease discounts and lease incentives. The decrease in amortization of net
lease discounts and lease incentives of $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as
compared to the same period in 2008 is primarily the result of the decrease in amortization of net
lease discounts of $1.2 million and lease incentives of $2.6 million for aircraft transitions.
Maintenance revenue. The increase in maintenance revenue of $6.6 million is primarily the
result of three aircraft that were returned from lessees.
Interest Income. The decrease in interest income of $0.7 million was primarily due to the
sale of two of our debt investments in February 2008.
Operating Expenses:
Total operating expenses increased by 10.3% or $10.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily as a result of the
following:
Depreciation expense increased by $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 over
the same period in 2008 as a result of an increase in the aircraft book value due to the aircraft
acquired in 2008, partially offset by the reduction in depreciation expense as a result of the
sales of owned aircraft in 2008.
Interest, net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest on borrowings and other liabilities |
|
$ |
41,879 |
|
|
$ |
36,770 |
|
Hedge ineffectiveness (gains) losses (unrealized) |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Amortization of interest rate derivative contracts related to deferred (gains) losses |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
Losses on termination of interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
46,322 |
|
|
|
44,123 |
|
Less interest income |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
Less capitalized interest |
|
|
(3,580 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
$ |
41,011 |
|
|
$ |
43,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Interest, net increased by $2.4 million, or 5.9%, over the three months ended March 31, 2008.
The net increase is primarily a result of increases due to:
|
|
|
a $6.1 million increase in amortization of deferred losses principally due to the
termination of several interest rate derivative contracts during 2008; |
|
|
|
|
a $3.3 million decrease in capitalized interest reflecting the delivery of aircraft from
the manufacturer or from its freighter conversion process in 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.3 million decrease in interest income on our cash and cash equivalents resulting
from significantly lower interest rates during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as compared
to the same period in 2008. |
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $5.1 million decrease in interest expense on our borrowings due primarily to a lower
average debt balance; |
|
|
|
|
a $2.1 million decrease in losses due to hedge ineffectiveness; and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.1 million decrease resulting from the loss on the termination of an interest rate
swap that occurred in the first quarter of 2008. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, for the three months ended March 31,
2009 decreased by $0.4 million, or 3.4% over the same period in 2008. This decrease was due mainly
to a decrease in professional fees of $0.3 million. Non-cash share based expense was $1.6 million
in 2008 and $1.7 million in 2009, respectively. SG&A as a percentage of total assets was 0.3% for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 0.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Other expense increased $5.1 million primarily as a result of transition expenses for eight
aircraft returned from bankrupt lessees.
Other income (expense):
Total other income (expense) represented income of $0.1 million for mark-to-market adjustments
on our undesignated interest rate derivatives during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
expense of $0.2 million representing a loss on the sale of our debt investments during the three
months ended March 31, 2008.
Income Tax Provision
Our provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009 was $1.7
million and $1.9 million, respectively. Income taxes have been provided based on the applicable tax
laws and rates of those countries in which operations are conducted and income is earned, primarily
Ireland and the United States. The increase in our income tax provision of approximately $0.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008 was
primarily attributable to the increase in our operating income subject to tax in Ireland and the
United States.
All of our aircraft-owning subsidiaries that are recognized as corporations for U.S. tax
purposes are non-U.S. corporations. These non-U.S. subsidiaries generally earn income from sources
outside the United States and typically are not subject to U.S. federal, state or local income
taxes, unless they operate within the U.S., in which case they may be subject to federal, state and
local income taxes. We also have a U.S-based subsidiary which provides management services to our
non-U.S. subsidiaries and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes.
The Company received an assurance from the Bermuda Minister of Finance that it would be
exempted from local income, withholding and capital gains taxes until March 2016. Consequently, the
provision for income taxes recorded relates to income earned by certain subsidiaries of the Company
which are located in, or earn income in, jurisdictions that impose income taxes, primarily the
United States and Ireland.
26
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, or SFAS No. 161. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting
about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable
investors to better understand their effects on an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows.
Also effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF
03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities, or FSP No. EITF 03-6-1. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether unvested
share-based payment awards with rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents should be
considered participating securities for the purposes of applying the two-class method of
calculating earnings per share (EPS) under SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. The FASB staff
concluded that unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and thus,
should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. The adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1
requires us to present EPS using the two-class method for our current period EPS computations and
to retrospectively revise our comparative prior period EPS computations using the two-class method.
The adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 did not have a material effect on EPS.
In April, 2009, the FASB issued three final FSPs intended to provide additional application
guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities.
FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides
guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in FASB
Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, enhances consistency in financial reporting by
increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, provides additional guidance designed to create
greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities.
The FSPs are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, but entities may
early adopt the FSPs for the interim and annual periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company
plans to adopt these FSPs during the second quarter of 2009 and believes this guidance will have no
material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Additional disclosures on a quarterly
basis will be required.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have been able to meet our liquidity and capital resource requirements by utilizing several
sources, including:
|
|
|
lines of credit, our securitizations, term financings, and other secured borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
our public offerings of common shares; |
|
|
|
|
prior to our initial public offering, equity contributions from funds managed by
affiliates of Fortress; |
|
|
|
|
aircraft lease revenues and maintenance payments; |
|
|
|
|
principal and interest payments from our debt investments; and |
|
|
|
|
asset sales. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we made capital improvements (including lease incentives) to our aircraft
portfolio totaling $17.3 million. We expect to fund approximately $116.9 million of purchase
obligations for aircraft pre-delivery and
conversion payments during the next twelve months. In addition, at March 31, 2009, we expect
capital expenditures and lessee maintenance payment draws on our owned and committed aircraft
portfolio to be approximately $105 million to $115 million, excluding freighter conversion payments
(see Purchase Obligations in Contractual
27
Obligations below), and we expect maintenance payment collections from lessees on our owned
aircraft portfolio of approximately equal to the expected expenditures and draws over the next
twelve months. There can be no assurance that the capital expenditures, our contributions to
maintenance events and lessee maintenance payment draws described above will not be greater than
expected or that our expected maintenance payment collections or disbursements will equal our
current estimates.
We believe that cash on hand and funds generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy
our liquidity needs, including our pre-delivery payments, required debt amortization, expected
capital expenditures and lessor contributions over the next twelve months. In addition, potential
asset sales and an anticipated future financing facility to fund a portion of the Airbus
pre-delivery payments may provide additional sources of liquidity over that time frame.
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Net cash flow provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
58,765 |
|
|
$ |
69,374 |
|
Net cash flow used in investing activities |
|
|
(86,608 |
) |
|
|
(24,449 |
) |
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
31,648 |
|
|
|
(23,473 |
) |
Operating activities provided net cash flow of $58.8 million and $69.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Cash from operations increased $10.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 versus the same period in 2008 primarily as a
result of $16.8 million increased cash flow from working capital (changes in certain assets and
liabilities), offset by a decrease of lease rental revenues of $5.0 million.
Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased by $62.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 versus the same period in 2008 primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
a $99.8 million net decrease in aircraft acquisitions and capital expenditures (no
aircraft acquired in 2009 as compared to three aircraft acquired in 2008); and |
|
|
|
|
a $40.6 million decrease in net collateral posted with our derivative counterparties
(no net payments in 2009). |
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$65.3 million of proceeds from the sale of debt investments in the first quarter of
2008; and |
|
|
|
|
a $10.4 million decrease in principal repayments on our debt investments versus the
same period in 2008. |
Net cash flow provided by financing activities totaled $31.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and net cash used in financing activities totaled $23.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009. The net decrease in cash flow provided by financing activities of
$55.1 million versus the same period in 2008 was a result of:
|
|
|
$183.4 million of lower borrowings (net of repayments) on our credit facilities; and |
|
|
|
|
a $14.4 million increase in principal repayments on our securitizations and term
financings. |
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
$65.5 million of lower principal repayments on our repurchase agreements; |
|
|
|
|
$47.1 million of lower dividend payments; and |
|
|
|
|
$32.7 million of lower payments of terminated cash flow hedges. |
28
Debt Obligations
The following table provides a summary of our credit facilities at March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Stated |
|
Debt Obligation |
|
Collateral |
|
Borrowing(1) |
|
|
Aircraft |
|
|
Rate(2) |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
Securitization No. 1 |
|
Interests in aircraft leases, beneficial interests in aircraft owning entities and related interests |
|
$ |
466,718 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
6/20/31 |
|
Securitization No. 2 |
|
Interests in aircraft leases, beneficial interests in aircraft owning entities and related interests |
|
|
1,092,771 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
6/14/37 |
|
Term Financing No. 1 |
|
Interests in aircraft leases, beneficial interests in aircraft owning entities and related interests |
|
|
745,385 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
5/02/15 |
|
Term Financing No. 2 |
|
Interests in aircraft leases, beneficial interests in aircraft owning entities and related interests |
|
|
141,291 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
9/23/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
2,446,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Outstanding borrowing amount equals committed borrowing amount at March 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects floating rate in effect at the most recent applicable reset date. |
Our debt obligations contain various customary non-financial loan covenants. Such covenants do
not, in managements opinion, materially restrict our investment strategy or our ability to raise
capital. We are in compliance with all of our loan covenants as of March 31, 2009.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations consist of principal and interest payments on variable rate
liabilities, obligations under the Airbus A330 Agreement, obligations under our freighter
conversion contracts and rent payments pursuant to our office leases. Total contractual obligations
decreased from $3.75 billion at December 31, 2008 to approximately $3.56 billion at March 31, 2009
due primarily to principal payments under our securitizations and term financings.
The following table presents our actual contractual obligations and their payment due dates
as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period as of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
2-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands) |
|
Securitization No. 1(1) |
|
$ |
482,746 |
|
|
$ |
25,792 |
|
|
$ |
108,676 |
|
|
$ |
195,669 |
|
|
$ |
152,609 |
|
Securitization No. 2(2) |
|
|
1,141,575 |
|
|
|
48,677 |
|
|
|
127,699 |
|
|
|
296,185 |
|
|
|
669,014 |
|
Term Financing No. 1(3) |
|
|
829,030 |
|
|
|
65,738 |
|
|
|
128,143 |
|
|
|
173,999 |
|
|
|
461,150 |
|
Term Financing No. 2(4) |
|
|
162,128 |
|
|
|
37,671 |
|
|
|
74,422 |
|
|
|
50,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
Office leases(5) |
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Purchase obligations(6) |
|
|
936,430 |
|
|
|
116,918 |
|
|
|
663,653 |
|
|
|
155,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,556,293 |
|
|
$ |
295,862 |
|
|
$ |
1,104,538 |
|
|
$ |
872,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,283,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes interest on variable rate, LIBOR-based instruments at the March 31, 2009 rate and principal payments based on
amortization schedules through October 2015 that require the securitization cash flows be applied to the outstanding
principal balance of the indebtedness so that the loan to assumed aircraft values are held constant until the
securitizations fifth anniversary, after which all excess cash flow is required to reduce the principal balances of the
indebtedness. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes interest on variable rate, LIBOR-based instruments at the March 31, 2009 rate and principal payments based on
amortization schedules through February 2018 that require the securitization cash flows be applied to the outstanding
principal balance of the indebtedness so that the loan to assumed aircraft values are held constant until the
securitizations fifth anniversary, after which all excess cash flow is required to reduce the principal balances of the
indebtedness. The 2-3 year commitment includes repayments of $23.6 million related to contracted sales for two aircraft
in 2010 and one aircraft in 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes interest on variable rate, LIBOR-based instruments at the March 31, 2009 rate and scheduled principal payments
through May 2013, after which all excess cash flow is required to reduce the principal balances of the indebtedness
until maturity in May 2015. |
29
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes interest on variable rate, LIBOR-based instruments at the March 31, 2009 rate and principal payments equal to
85% of the cash flow remaining after the payment of expenses, fees, interest and amounts owing to interest rate hedge
providers. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents contractual payment obligations for our office leases in Stamford, Connecticut; Dublin, Ireland and Singapore. |
|
(6) |
|
At March 31, 2009, we had aircraft purchase agreements and freighter conversion agreements, including the acquisition of
12 New A330 Aircraft from Airbus. |
Capital Expenditures
We make capital expenditures from time to time in connection with improvements made to our
aircraft. These expenditures include the cost of major overhauls necessary to place an aircraft in
service and modifications made at the request of lessees. For the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2009, we incurred a total of $6.1 million and $17.3 million, respectively, of capital
expenditures (including lease incentives) related to the acquisition and improvement of aircraft.
As of March 31, 2009, the weighted average age (by net book value) of our aircraft was
approximately 10.7 years. In general, the costs of operating an aircraft, including maintenance
expenditures, increase with the age of the aircraft. Under our leases, the lessee is primarily
responsible for maintaining the aircraft. We may incur additional maintenance and modification
costs in the future in the event we are required to remarket an aircraft or a lessee fails to meet
its maintenance obligations under the lease agreement. At March 31, 2009, we had $233.0 million of
maintenance reserves as a liability on our balance sheet. These maintenance reserves are paid by
the lessee to provide for future maintenance events. Provided a lessee performs scheduled
maintenance of the aircraft, we are required to reimburse the lessee for scheduled maintenance
payments. In certain cases, we are also required to make lessor contributions, in excess of amounts
a lessee may have paid, towards the costs of maintenance events performed by or on behalf of the
lessee.
Actual maintenance payments to us by lessees in the future may be less than projected as a
result of a number of factors, including defaults by the lessees. Maintenance reserves may not
cover the entire amount of actual maintenance expenses incurred and, where these expenses are not
otherwise covered by the lessees, there can be no assurance that our operational cash flow and
maintenance reserves will be sufficient to fund maintenance requirements, particularly as our
aircraft age.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2009.
Foreign Currency Risk and Foreign Operations
At March 31, 2009, all of our leases are payable to us in U.S. dollars. However, we incur Euro
and Singapore dollar-denominated expenses in connection with our subsidiary in Ireland and branch
office in Singapore. As of March 31, 2009, 11 of our 76 employees were based in Ireland and four
employees were based in Singapore. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, expenses, such as
payroll and office costs, denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar aggregated
approximately $1.9 million in U.S. dollar equivalents and represented approximately 17% of total
selling, general and administrative expenses. Our international operations are a significant
component of our business strategy and permit us to more effectively source new aircraft, service
the aircraft we own and maintain contact with our lessees. Therefore, it is likely that our
international operations and our exposure to foreign currency risk will increase over time.
Although we have not yet entered into foreign currency hedges because our exposure to date has not
been significant, if our foreign currency exposure increases we may enter into hedging transactions
in the future to mitigate this risk. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, we
incurred insignificant net gains and losses on foreign currency transactions.
Hedging
In the normal course of business we utilize interest rate derivatives to manage our exposure
to interest rate risks. Specifically, our interest rate derivatives are hedging variable rate
interest payments on our various debt facilities. We
30
account for our interest rate derivatives in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, or SFAS, No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended and interpreted, or SFAS No. 133. Under SFAS No. 133, if certain conditions are met, an
interest rate derivative may be specifically designated as a cash flow hedge. All of our
designated interest rate derivatives are cash flow hedges. We have one interest rate derivative
that is not designated under SFAS No. 133.
We held the following derivative contracts as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Floating |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
Hedged Item |
|
Amount |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under
Statement 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization No. 1 |
|
$ |
498,341 |
|
|
Jun-06 |
|
Jun-16 |
|
$ |
498,341 |
|
|
1M LIBOR + 0.27% |
|
|
5.78% |
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
77,898 |
|
Securitization No. 2 |
|
|
1,084,180 |
|
|
Jun-07 |
|
Jun-12 |
|
|
1,084,180 |
|
|
1M LIBOR |
|
5.25% to 5.36% |
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
117,413 |
|
Term Financing No. 1(1) |
|
|
676,761 |
|
|
Jun-08 |
|
May-13 |
|
|
676,761 |
|
|
1M LIBOR |
|
|
4.04% |
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
50,371 |
|
Term Financing No. 1(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
May-13 |
|
May-15 |
|
|
491,718 |
|
|
1M LIBOR |
|
|
5.31% |
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
11,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under Statement 133 |
|
|
2,259,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,751,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges under
Statement 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Financing No. 2 (2) |
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
Oct-08 |
|
Sep-13 |
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
3M LIBOR |
|
|
3.17% |
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges under
Statement 133 |
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate derivatives |
|
$ |
2,385,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,877,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest payments related to Term Financing No. 1 are being hedged
by two consecutive interest rate derivatives. When the first matures
in May 2013, the next becomes effective. |
|
(2) |
|
Although we entered into this interest rate derivative to hedge the
variable rate interest payments in connection with Term Financing No.
2, it has not been designated as a hedge for accounting purposes. |
As of March 31, 2009, accrued interest payable included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses,
and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet was $5,814 related to interest rate
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and $61 for interest rate derivatives not designated as
cash flow hedges.
The amount of loss expected to be reclassified from accumulated OCI into interest expense over
the next 12 months consists of net interest settlements on active interest rate derivatives,
disclosed above, in the amount of $89,096 and the amortization of deferred net losses in the amount
of $7,949. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the amount of loss reclassified from
accumulated OCI into interest expense consisted of net interest settlements on active interest rate
derivatives in the amount of $24,169 and the amortization of deferred net losses in the amount of
$2,074, as disclosed below.
31
The following table summarizes amounts charged directly to the consolidated statement of
income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, related to our interest
rate derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness (gains) losses (unrealized) |
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated amortization of deferred losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
Amortization of deferred (gains) losses |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
2,074 |
|
Losses on termination of interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amortization |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charged to interest expense |
|
$ |
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
4,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark to market gains (losses) on undesignated hedges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charged to other income (expense) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average interest pay rates of these derivatives at December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009 were 4.90% and 4.91%, respectively.
As of March 31, 2009, we did not have any cash collateral pledged under our interest rate
derivatives, nor do we have any existing agreements that require cash collateral postings.
Managements Use of EBITDA
We define EBITDA as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, interest
expense, and depreciation and amortization. We use EBITDA to assess our consolidated financial and
operating performance, and we believe this non-GAAP measure is helpful in identifying trends in our
performance.
This measure provides an assessment of controllable expenses and affords management the
ability to make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial goals as well
as achieving optimal financial performance. It provides an indicator for management to determine if
adjustments to current spending decisions are needed.
EBITDA provides us with a measure of operating performance because it assists us in comparing
our operating performance on a consistent basis as it removes the impact of our capital structure
(primarily interest charges on our outstanding debt) and asset base (primarily depreciation and
amortization) from our operating results. Accordingly, this metric measures our financial
performance based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the
cost structure or expenses of the organization. EBITDA is one of the metrics used by senior
management and the board of directors to review the consolidated financial performance of our
business.
Limitations of EBITDA
EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool. It should not be viewed in isolation or as a
substitute for GAAP measures of earnings. Material limitations in making the adjustments to our
earnings to calculate EBITDA, and using this non-GAAP financial measure as compared to GAAP net
income (loss), include:
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization, though not directly affecting our current cash position,
represent the wear and tear and/or reduction in value of our aircraft, which affects the
aircrafts availability for use and may be indicative of future needs for capital
expenditures; and |
|
|
|
|
the cash portion of income tax (benefit) provision generally represents charges (gains),
which may significantly affect our financial results. |
32
An investor or potential investor may find this item important in evaluating our performance,
results of operations and financial position. We use non-GAAP financial measures to supplement our
GAAP results in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting
our business.
EBITDA is not an alternative to net income, income from operations or cash flows provided by
or used in operations as calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. You should not rely on
EBITDA as a substitute for any such GAAP financial measure. We strongly urge you to review the
reconciliation of EBITDA to GAAP net income (loss), along with our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report. We also strongly urge you to not rely on
any single financial measure to evaluate our business. In addition, because EBITDA is not a measure
of financial performance under GAAP and is susceptible to varying calculations, the EBITDA measure,
as presented in this quarterly report, may differ from, and may not be comparable to, similarly
titled measures used by other companies. The table below shows the reconciliation of net income
(loss) to EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,471 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
48,215 |
|
|
|
51,561 |
|
Amortization of net lease discounts and lease incentives |
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
1,117 |
|
Interest, net |
|
|
41,011 |
|
|
|
43,411 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
1,714 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
119,931 |
|
|
$ |
116,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in the level of interest
rates and the spread between different interest rates. These risks are highly sensitive to many
factors, including U.S. monetary and tax policies, U.S. and international economic factors and
other factors beyond our control. We are exposed to changes in the level of interest rates and to
changes in the relationship or spread between interest rates. Our primary interest rate exposures
relate to our lease agreements, debt investments, floating rate debt obligations and interest rate
derivatives. Rent payments under our aircraft lease agreements typically do not vary during the
term of the lease according to changes in interest rates. Similarly, our debt investments are
predominately collateralized by fixed rate aircraft leases, and provide for a fixed coupon interest
rate. However, our borrowing agreements generally require payments based on a variable interest
rate index, such as LIBOR. Therefore, to the extent our borrowing costs are not fixed, increases in
interest rates may reduce our net income by increasing the cost of our debt without any
corresponding increase in rents or cash flow from our securities.
Changes in interest rates may also impact our net book value as our interest rate derivatives
and debt investments are periodically marked-to-market through stockholders equity. Generally, we
are exposed to loss on our fixed pay interest rate derivatives to the extent interest rates
decrease below their contractual fixed rate. Also, as interest rates increase, the value of our
fixed rate debt investments generally decreases. The magnitude of the decrease is a function of the
difference between the coupon rate and the current market rate of interest, the average life of the
securities and the face amount of the securities.
The relationship between spreads on debt investments and derivative instruments may vary from
time to time, resulting in a net aggregate book value increase or decrease. Changes in the general
level of interest rates can also affect our ability to acquire new investments and our ability to
realize gains from the settlement of such assets.
33
Sensitivity Analysis
The following discussion about the potential effects of changes in interest rates is based on
a sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of hypothetical interest rate shifts on our
financial condition and results of operations. We changed our interest rate risk disclosure to an
alternative that provides a more meaningful analysis of our interest rate risk. Although we believe
a sensitivity analysis provides the most meaningful analysis permitted by the rules and regulations
of the SEC, it is constrained by several factors, including the necessity to conduct the analysis
based on a single point in time and by the inability to include the extraordinarily complex market
reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled. Although the following results
of a sensitivity analysis for changes in interest rates may have some limited use as a benchmark,
they should not be viewed as a forecast. This forward-looking disclosure also is selective in
nature and addresses only the potential minimum contracted rental and interest expense impacts on
our financial instruments and our 11 variable rate leases and, in particular, does not address the
mark-to-market impact on our interest rate derivatives. It also does not include a variety of other
potential factors that could affect our business as a result of changes in interest rates.
A hypothetical 100-basis point increase/decrease in our variable interest rates would
increase/decrease the minimum contracted rentals on our portfolio as of March 31, 2009 by
$1.6 million over the next twelve months. As of March 31, 2009, a hypothetical 100-basis point
increase/decrease in our variable interest rate on our borrowings would result in an interest
expense increase/decrease of $0.6 million, net of amounts received
from our interest rate derivatives, over the next twelve months.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. This term refers to the controls and
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the SEC. An evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive
Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the Companys
management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is not a party to any material legal or adverse regulatory proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the disclosure related to the risk factors described in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1
|
|
Memorandum of Association |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bye-laws |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Share Certificate |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement among Aircastle
Limited and Fortress Investment Fund III LP, Fortress
Investment Fund III (Fund B) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III
(Fund C) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III (Fund D) L.P.,
Fortress Investment Fund III (Fund E) LP, Fortress Investment
Fund III (Coinvestment Fund A) LP, Fortress Investment Fund
III (Coinvestment Fund B) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III
(Coinvestment Fund C) LP, Fortress Investment Fund III
(Coinvestment Fund D) L.P., Drawbridge Special Opportunities
Fund LP, Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund Ltd. and
Drawbridge Global Macro Master Fund Ltd. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Owned Aircraft Portfolio at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Companys registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006, as amended on July 10, 2006,
July 25, 2006 and August 2, 2006. |
35
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: May 7, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIRCASTLE LIMITED
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Aaron Dahlke
|
|
|
|
Aaron Dahlke |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and Authorized Officer |
|
|
36