e424b5
The information in
this prospectus supplement is not complete and may be changed.
This prospectus supplement is not an offer to sell these
securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED DECEMBER 8, 2008
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
To Prospectus Dated December 2, 2008
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)
Registration
No. 333-155300
3,806,657 Shares
Common Stock
We are offering 15,000 shares of our common stock and the
selling stockholders identified in this prospectus supplement
are offering 3,791,657 shares of our common stock. We will
not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares by
the selling stockholders.
The common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol APEI. The last reported sale price of the
common stock on December 5, 2008 was $42.20 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
See Risk Factors beginning on page S-8 of this
prospectus supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus supplement. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to the Company (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to the selling stockholders (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters an option
for a period of 30 days from the date of this prospectus
supplement to purchase up to 421,295 additional shares of
common stock on the same terms and conditions set forth above to
cover over-allotments, if any.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on
or
about ,
2008.
|
|
William
Blair & Company |
Piper Jaffray |
Stifel Nicolaus
|
First Analysis Securities
|
The date of this prospectus supplement is
December , 2008
Table of
Contents
Prospectus
Supplement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
|
|
S-9
|
|
|
|
|
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
S-11
|
|
|
|
|
S-12
|
|
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
Prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Prospectus Summary
|
|
|
1
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
3
|
|
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
19
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
19
|
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
20
|
|
Regulation of Our Business
|
|
|
21
|
|
Selling Stockholders
|
|
|
36
|
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
37
|
|
Experts
|
|
|
37
|
|
Where You Can Find Additional Information
|
|
|
38
|
|
Incorporation by Reference
|
|
|
39
|
|
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus or to which we have referred you. We and
the selling stockholders have not authorized anyone to provide
you with information that is different. This prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus may only be used
where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in
this document may only be accurate on the date of this
prospectus supplement.
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained or incorporated
by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus. Before deciding to invest in shares of our common
stock, you should read the entire prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus carefully, including the documents
incorporated by reference, especially the matters discussed
under Risk Factors beginning on page S-8 and the
financial statements and related notes included in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus by
reference. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms
we, us and our refer to
American Public Education, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary,
American Public University System, Inc.
We are a provider of exclusively online postsecondary education
directed at the needs of the military and public service
communities. We operate through two universities, American
Military University, or AMU, and American Public University, or
APU, which together constitute the American Public University
System. Our universities share a common faculty and curriculum
that includes 73 degree programs and 49 certificate programs in
disciplines related to national security, military studies,
intelligence, homeland security, criminal justice, technology,
business administration, liberal arts and education. We
currently serve over 41,000 students living in all
50 states and more than 130 foreign countries. Our
university system is regionally and nationally accredited.
From 2003 to 2007, our total revenue increased from
$17.8 million to $69.1 million, a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 40%, while our total revenue increased 58%
to $75.6 million for the first nine months of 2008 from
$47.9 million for the corresponding period in 2007. We
believe the recent acceleration in our growth is attributable
to: (i) high student satisfaction and referral rates;
(ii) achieving regional accreditation in May 2006;
(iii) increasing acceptance of distance learning within our
targeted markets; and (iv) achieving certification to
participate in federal student aid programs under Title IV
of the Higher Education Act of 1965, or Title IV programs,
beginning with classes starting in November 2006. Net income
attributable to common stockholders improved to
$11.1 million for the first nine months of 2008 from
$5.8 million for the corresponding period in 2007 and
improved to $8.8 million in 2007 from a loss of $217,000 in
2003.
Over 80% of our students currently serve in the United States
military on active duty, in the reserves, or in the National
Guard or are veterans. Most of our other students are public
service professionals including federal, national and local law
enforcement personnel or other first responders. Our programs
are designed to help these working adult students advance in
their current professions or prepare for their next career. Our
online method of instruction is well-suited to these students,
many of whom serve in positions requiring extended and irregular
schedules, are on-call for rapid response missions, participate
in extended deployments and exercises, travel or relocate
frequently and have limited financial resources. Our satisfied
students have been a significant source of referrals for us,
reducing our marketing costs per new student. Over 50% of our
new students in 2007 who responded to our surveys tell us they
inquired about enrolling in either AMU or APU as the result of a
personal referral.
As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately
137 full-time and over 661 adjunct faculty, virtually all
of whom have advanced degrees and many of whom are former or
current leading practitioners in their fields. Our adjunct
faculty also includes professors who teach at leading national
and state universities. We believe quality faculty members are
attracted to us because of the high percentage of military and
public service professionals in our student body who can
immediately apply lessons learned in our classroom to their
daily work. In addition, our faculty members are attracted to
the flexible nature of teaching online, the numerous support
services we provide them, and our per student pay structure for
our adjunct faculty.
We have invested significant amounts of capital and resources on
developing proprietary information systems and processes to
support what we refer to as Partnership At a Distance, or PAD.
PAD is our approach to how we interact with our students, and at
its center is the PAD system. The PAD system allows prospective
and current students to interact with us exclusively online, on
their schedule. The PAD system also allows us to manage on an
automated and cost-effective basis the complex administrative
tasks resulting from offering monthly semester starts for over
1,100 classes in over 700 unique courses to our over 41,000
students taught by over 790 faculty members. Our systems and
processes also help us measure and manage the activities of our
faculty, student support personnel, and prospective and active
students, allowing us to continuously
S-1
improve our academic quality, student support services and
marketing efficiency. We believe these proprietary systems and
processes will support a much larger institution and provide us
important competitive and cost advantages.
Our university system achieved regional accreditation in May
2006 with The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central
Association of Colleges and Schools, or The Higher Learning
Commission. Our university system has been nationally accredited
by the Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and
Training Council, or DETC, since 1995. In September 2007, we
received approval from The Higher Learning Commission and DETC
to offer seven new degree programs in Education and Information
Technology. In May 2008, we also became fully certified to
participate in Title IV programs after a provisional
certification period that had begun in 2006. In August 2008, as
a result of a partial distribution of shares by the selling
stockholders, we underwent a change in ownership and control
under Department of Education regulations. Because of that
change in ownership and control, we were required to submit a
change in ownership application to the Department of Education.
After review of that application, the Department of Education
determined that we remain eligible to participate in
Title IV programs and provisionally certified us.
Provisional certification will allow us to continue to
participate in Title IV programs but with certain
limitations. We do not believe that these limitations will have
an adverse effect on our current operations or growth plans. See
Recent Developments below and see
Regulation of Our Business in the accompanying
prospectus for additional information regarding our provisional
certification.
Market
Overview
Within the postsecondary education market, we believe that there
is significant opportunity for growth in online programs. We
believe that increasing requirements for workers to have job
mobility, combined with the growing acceptance of online
learning from employers, and the flexibility associated with
online learning should attract more students, both traditional
and adult, to distance learning.
There are more than 2.1 million active and reserve military
professionals in the United States Armed Forces. Each year,
approximately 300,000 new service members are enlisted or
commissioned to replace retiring and separating members. We
believe that the unpredictable and demanding work schedules of
military personnel and their geographic distribution make online
learning and asynchronous teaching particularly attractive to
them. Military leaders and policies promote voluntary education
programs as a means for service members to gain the knowledge
and skills that will improve their military performance as well
as prepare them for a career following their military service.
Academic achievement can also result in increased rank and pay
for service members. The United States Armed Forces recognize
academic achievement through awarding promotion points for
academic credits, specifying education level eligibility
requirements for assignments, promotions, and service schools,
and entering remarks on performance appraisals.
Active duty and reserve component military personnel are
eligible for tuition assistance through the Uniform Tuition
Assistance Program of the Department of Defense, or DoD. DoD
policy allows for payment of 100% of a military students
tuition costs, up to $250 per semester credit hour and a maximum
benefit of $4,500 per fiscal year. Our undergraduate tuition per
course is designed so that the tuition assistance paid by the
service branches covers the cost of our courses for service
members up to the annual maximum benefit. Military students who
are eligible for the Department of Veterans Affairs GI
Bill Entitlement Program may apply those funds to pay for
tuition costs above the DoD limits through the GI Bills
Top-Up
feature. Most military veterans are also eligible to use their
Montgomery GI Bill entitlement in continuing their education
after retirement or separation.
We believe that national security, homeland security, and public
safety professionals also represent a large and growing market
for online education. As with their military counterparts, these
individuals have unique program requirements as well as
unpredictable and demanding work schedules that often prevent
them from attending traditional universities.
Competitive
Strengths
We believe that we have the following competitive strengths:
Exclusively Online Education We have designed
our courses and programs specifically for online delivery, and
we recruit and train faculty exclusively for online instruction.
Because our students are located around the globe, we focus our
instruction on asynchronous, interactive instruction that
provides students the
S-2
flexibility to study and interact during the hours of the day or
days of the week that suit their terms and schedules.
Emphasis on Military and Public Services
Communities Since our founding, our culture has
reflected our devotion to our mission of Educating Those Who
Serve. We have designed our academic programs,
policies, marketing strategies and tuition specifically to meet
the needs of the military and public service communities. These
communities tend to be tightly knit, which greatly facilitates
personal testimonials from active to prospective students.
Affordable Tuition Our tuition is generally
consistent with less expensive in-state tuition at state
universities and is designed so that DoD tuition assistance
programs fully cover the cost of undergraduate courses and over
90% of the cost of graduate courses. We have not increased our
undergraduate tuition of $250 per credit hour since 2000 and
have no current intention to do so.
Commitment to Academic Excellence Our
academic programs are overseen by our Board of Trustees, which
counts as members two former college presidents, four active
accreditation peer evaluators, a former Commandant of the Marine
Corps, and a former Department of the Army Inspector General. We
are committed to continuously improving our academic programs
and services, as evidenced by the level of attention and
resources we apply to Instruction and Educational support.
Proprietary Information Systems and Processes
Through the PAD system, students may access our services online
24/7, such as admission, orientation, course registrations,
tuition payments, book requests, grades, transcripts and degree
progress, and various other inquiries. We also have created
management tools based on the data from the PAD system that help
us to improve continuously our academic quality, student support
services and marketing efficiency. A key benefit to our
proprietary systems and processes is that they allow us to
manage the complexities involved in starting over 1,100 classes
in over 700 unique courses monthly. We believe our proprietary
systems and processes will support a much larger student body
and provide us important competitive and cost advantages.
Highly Scalable and Profitable Business Model
We believe our exclusively online education model, our
proprietary management information systems, our relatively low
student acquisition costs, and our variable faculty cost model
have enabled us to expand our operating margins. Our operating
margins grew to 23.1% for the first nine months of 2008 from
20.0% for the corresponding period in 2007, on revenue that
increased to $75.6 million from $47.9 million over the
same period.
Experienced and Accomplished Management Team
Our management team represents a diverse blend of higher
education, military, public service and business professionals.
Our CEO, Wallace E. Boston, Jr., was previously a senior
executive officer of several publicly-traded companies. Our
Provost, Dr. Frank B. McCluskey, led successful distance
learning programs at Mercy College in New York and has more than
18 years of higher education distance learning experience.
Our CFO, Harry T. Wilkins, served previously as the chief
financial officer for Strayer Education, Inc. from 1992 until
2001, leading Strayer through its IPO in 1996. Two members of
our senior management are retired military officers who served
in the U.S. Army for a combined period of over
50 years.
Growth
Strategies
We believe our growth in student enrollment and revenue has
consistently been driven by high student satisfaction and
referral rates and increasing acceptance of distance learning
within our targeted markets. Between 2002 and 2005, we grew our
revenue at a CAGR of 38% from $10.7 million to
$28.2 million. We believe achieving regional accreditation
in May 2006 and gaining access to Title IV programs
beginning with classes that started in November 2006 have been
additional factors driving our recent acceleration in growth.
Our revenues increased by 73% to $69.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $40.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. We plan to grow our business
by employing the following primary strategies:
Expand in Our Core Military Market We have
focused on the needs of the military community since our
founding and this community has been responsible for the vast
majority of our growth to date. The combination of our online
model, focused curriculum and outreach to the military has
enabled us to gain share from more established schools that have
served this market for longer periods, many of which are
traditional brick and mortar schools.
S-3
Capitalize on Title IV Availability to Penetrate the
Public Service and Civilian Markets We believe
our curriculum is directly relevant to federal, state and local
law enforcement and other first responders, but historically
this market was limited to us because, outside the federal
government, only a few agencies or departments have the tuition
reimbursement plans critical to fund continuing adult education.
Now that our students can obtain grants or low cost student
loans through Title IV programs, we have begun to increase
our focus on these markets.
Focus on Improving Student Retention Through
December 31, 2007, over 80% of the students who have
completed three classes with us remain as active students or
have graduated from our university system. However, because our
academics are rigorous, and because we are an open enrollment
university system, accepting into our undergraduate programs all
applicants with a high school diploma or equivalent, many of our
new students have difficulty continuing with our program and
drop after only one or two courses.
Add New Degree Programs We plan to continue
to expand our degree offerings to meet our students needs.
For example, we recently received approval from The Higher
Learning Commission and DETC to offer seven new degree programs
in Education and Information Technology, as well as expanded the
number of our Associate Degree offerings.
Recent
Developments
We gained full acceptance into the Navy College Program Distance
Learning Partnership in March 2008. The program allows us
to join a select number of schools offering degree programs in
support of the Servicemembers Opportunity Colleges Degree
Network System for the Marine Corps (SOCMAR), the Coast Guard
(SOCCOAST) and the Navy (SOCNAV). Participation in this program
offers us greater access to Navy bases and increased visibility
on some Navy education websites.
In August 2008, funds affiliated with ABS Capital Partners
reduced their beneficial ownership interest from approximately
26% to approximately 24% of our outstanding common stock by
distributing to their limited partners and general partners
400,000 shares of our stock. As a result of this
distribution of shares, we were deemed to have undergone a
change in ownership and control requiring review by the
Department of Education in order to reestablish our eligibility
and continue participation in Title IV programs. In
connection with that review, we were required to submit to the
Department of Education a change in ownership application. On
October 2, 2008 the Department of Education concluded its
review of our change in ownership application, determined that
we are eligible and may continue to participate in Title IV
programs, and provisionally certified us until
September 30, 2010. In addition to the review by the
Department of Education, we also consulted with state regulators
and our accreditors. After its review of the distribution, The
Higher Learning Commission informed us that it considered the
distribution to be a change in ownership under its policies and
it approved the change in ownership. The Higher Learning
Commission also informed us that it plans to conduct a focused
evaluation in Spring 2009 as its policies require it to do when
a change of ownership occurs. See Regulation of Our
Business in the accompanying prospectus for additional
information regarding our provisional certification and
accreditation.
In the third quarter of 2008, net course registrations from new
students were 10,400 and total net course registrations were
38,900, compared to 6,700 net course registrations from new
students and 25,300 total net course registrations in the third
quarter of 2007. Total revenue for the third quarter of 2008 was
$27.4 million, compared to total revenue of
$17.6 million in the third quarter of 2007. Our net income
for the third quarter of 2008, including stock-based
compensation expense, was $3.8 million compared to
$2.2 million in the third quarter of 2007. The weighted
average number of diluted shares outstanding in the third
quarter of 2008 was 18.9 million, resulting in diluted
earnings per share of $0.20, compared to $0.18 per diluted share
in the third quarter of 2007.
We anticipate that for the year ending December 31, 2008,
net course registrations from new students will be approximately
36,300 and total net course registrations will be 145,700 or
more. We anticipate that our total revenue for the year ending
December 31, 2008 will be between $105.2 million and
$106.6 million, and that our net income, including
stock-based compensation expense, for the same period will be
between $15.2 million and $15.4 million, or between
$0.81 and $0.82 per diluted share. The weighted average number
of diluted shares outstanding is expected to be approximately
18.8 million shares for the year ending December 31,
2008. Our revenue, net income and net course registration
anticipated results are based upon our preliminary analysis of
estimated and anticipated results and actual results may be
significantly different. See Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements below for a discussion
cautioning against reliance on forward-looking information.
S-4
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
15,000 Shares |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
3,791,657 Shares |
|
Common stock outstanding after the offering |
|
17,955,439 Shares |
|
NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
APEI |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that our proceeds from this offering will be
approximately $603,000 after deducting the estimated
underwriting discount. We will use proceeds primarily to pay the
estimated offering expenses payable by us. Any remaining
proceeds will be used for working capital and other general
corporate purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the shares sold by the
selling stockholders. |
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors and other information included in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for a
discussion of factors you should carefully consider before
deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock |
The share information above is based on 17,940,439 shares
of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and
excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
1,380,700 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of options outstanding as of September 30, 2008 at a
weighted average exercise price of $6.57;
|
|
|
|
751,692 shares of common stock reserved under our 2007
Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
100,000 shares of common stock reserved under our Employee
Stock Purchase Plan;
|
but includes 70,803 shares of restricted stock that are
subject to forfeiture as of September 30, 2008.
Unless we indicate otherwise, the information in this prospectus
supplement assumes that the underwriters will not exercise their
over-allotment
option to purchase up to 421,295 additional shares of
common stock from the selling stockholders.
S-5
Summary
Consolidated Financial and Operating Data
The following table shows our summary consolidated statement of
operations data and other financial and operating data for each
of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 and our
summary balance sheet data as of September 30, 2008. The
summary consolidated statement of operations data and the other
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, which are incorporated
herein by reference. The summary statement of operations data
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 and
the summary consolidated balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2008 have been derived from our unaudited
financial statements, which are incorporated herein by reference
and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of such data. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of our results for any future period.
This information should be read in conjunction with our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, and our quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, including the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and our financial
statements and related notes appearing in each of those reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
28,178
|
|
|
$
|
40,045
|
|
|
$
|
69,095
|
|
|
$
|
47,873
|
|
|
$
|
75,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instructional costs and services
|
|
|
13,247
|
|
|
|
17,959
|
|
|
|
29,479
|
|
|
|
20,697
|
|
|
|
31,334
|
|
Selling and promotional
|
|
|
4,043
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
|
|
6,765
|
|
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
|
8,390
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,364
|
|
|
|
9,150
|
|
|
|
15,335
|
|
|
|
10,769
|
|
|
|
15,461
|
|
Write-off of software development project(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
25,954
|
|
|
|
37,105
|
|
|
|
54,404
|
|
|
|
38,307
|
|
|
|
58,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before interest income and
income taxes
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
14,691
|
|
|
|
9,566
|
|
|
|
17,416
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
15,579
|
|
|
|
10,161
|
|
|
|
18,035
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
6,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
|
|
5,793
|
|
|
|
11,146
|
|
Preferred stock accretion, including a $12,300 charge in 2005
attributable to the exchange of preferred stock
|
|
|
(12,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
|
(11,597
|
)
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
|
|
5,793
|
|
|
|
11,146
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(11,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,798
|
|
|
$
|
8,750
|
|
|
$
|
5,793
|
|
|
$
|
11,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
8,055,300
|
|
|
|
11,741,191
|
|
|
|
12,758,833
|
|
|
|
11,990,375
|
|
|
|
17,796,305
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
8,055,300
|
|
|
|
12,177,693
|
|
|
|
13,600,607
|
|
|
|
12,530,269
|
|
|
|
18,805,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
OTHER DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
3,971
|
|
|
$
|
9,011
|
|
|
$
|
17,517
|
|
|
$
|
14,483
|
|
|
$
|
19,784
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
4,613
|
|
|
$
|
4,475
|
|
|
$
|
6,827
|
|
|
$
|
3,489
|
|
|
$
|
6,547
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense(2)
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
754
|
|
|
$
|
1,242
|
|
Net course registrations (unaudited)(3)
|
|
|
37,506
|
|
|
|
54,828
|
|
|
|
94,846
|
|
|
|
67,012
|
|
|
|
105,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As
Adjusted(5)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
41,350
|
|
|
$
|
41,413
|
|
Working capital(4)
|
|
$
|
32,655
|
|
|
$
|
32,718
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
71,036
|
|
|
$
|
71,099
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
47,535
|
|
|
$
|
47,598
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2006, $3.1 million of capitalized software
development costs were written off when management determined
that the asset related to these costs was impaired because we
were no longer pursuing the related project. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R)-Share-Based
Payment, or SFAS 123R, which requires companies to expense
share-based compensation based on fair value. Prior to
January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based payment in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25-Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and provided the disclosure
required in SFAS
123-Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No.
148-Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-An
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. Stock-based
compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2005
resulted from the repurchase of shares of common stock acquired
upon exercise of employee stock options. |
|
(3) |
|
Net course registrations represent the total number of course
registrations for students that have attended a portion of a
course. |
|
(4) |
|
Working capital is calculated by subtracting total current
liabilities from total current assets. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to our sale of common stock in this
offering at an assumed offering price of $42.20, which is the
last reported stock price of our common stock on The NASDAQ
Global Market on December 5, 2008, after deducting the
estimated underwriting discount and other estimated offering
expenses. |
S-7
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock has a high degree of risk.
Before making an investment in our common stock, you should
carefully consider the risks set forth under heading Risk
Factors on page 3 of the accompanying prospectus, as well as the
other information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Please
see Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements below and Incorporation by
Reference in the accompanying prospectus.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement, including the information
incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements.
We may, in some cases, use words such as project,
believe, anticipate, plan,
expect, estimate, intend,
should, would, could,
potentially, will, or may,
or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or
outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this prospectus supplement,
including the forward-looking statements that are incorporated
by reference, include statements about:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with the extensive regulatory framework
applicable to our industry, including Title IV of the
Higher Education Act and the regulations thereunder, state laws
and regulatory requirements, and accrediting agency requirements;
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding provisional certification;
|
|
|
|
the pace of growth of our enrollment;
|
|
|
|
our conversion of prospective students to enrolled students and
our retention of active students;
|
|
|
|
our ability to update and expand the content of existing
programs and the development of new programs in a cost-effective
manner or on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our maintenance and expansion of our relationships with the
United States Armed Forces and various organizations and the
development of new relationships;
|
|
|
|
the competitive environment in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
our cash needs and expectations regarding cash flow from
operations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage and grow our business and execution of our
business and growth strategies;
|
|
|
|
our anticipated results for the year ending December 31,
2008; and
|
|
|
|
our financial performance generally.
|
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements. There are a number of important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the results
anticipated by these forward-looking statements, which apply
only as of the date of this prospectus. These important factors
include those that we discuss in the accompanying prospectus
under the caption Risk Factors and elsewhere. You
should read these factors and the other cautionary statements
made in this prospectus supplement as being applicable to all
related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this
prospectus supplement. If one or more of these factors
materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
our actual results, performance or achievements may vary
materially from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We
undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statements after the date of this prospectus supplement, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise,
except as required by law.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that our proceeds from our sale of shares of common
stock in this offering will be approximately $603,000, at an
assumed offering price of $42.20 per share (the last reported
sale price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on
December 5, 2008) and after deducting the estimated
underwriting discount. We will use the proceeds primarily to
pay offering expenses payable by us. Any remaining proceeds
will be used for working capital and other general corporate
purposes.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock by the selling stockholders.
S-8
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock has traded on The NASDAQ Global Market under
the symbol APEI since it began trading on
November 9, 2007. Our initial public offering was priced at
$20.00 per share on November 8, 2007. The following table
sets forth, for the time periods indicated, the high and low
sales prices of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ
Global Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2007 (beginning November 9, 2007)
|
|
$
|
29.23
|
|
|
$
|
46.98
|
|
Year Ending December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2008
|
|
$
|
27.56
|
|
|
$
|
44.94
|
|
Second Quarter 2008
|
|
$
|
29.51
|
|
|
$
|
41.36
|
|
Third Quarter 2008
|
|
$
|
34.53
|
|
|
$
|
53.24
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2008 (through December 5, 2008)
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
49.96
|
|
On December 5, 2008 the last reported sale price of our
common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market was $42.20. As of
October 31, 2008, there were approximately 377 holders
of record of our common stock.
S-9
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows our capitalization as of
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to reflect the sale of
15,000 shares of common stock in this offering by us at an
assumed offering price of $42.20 per share (the last reported
sales price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on
December 5, 2008), after deducting the estimated
underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses.
|
You should read this table in conjunction with the section of
this prospectus supplement entitled Use of Proceeds
and in conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 and our quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, including the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and our financial
statements and related notes appearing in each of those reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
41,350
|
|
|
$
|
41,413
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized actual and
as adjusted, and no shares issued and outstanding, actual and as
adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000,000 shares authorized actual and as adjusted,
17,869,636 shares issued and outstanding actual, and
17,884,636 issued and outstanding as adjusted
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
130,885
|
|
|
|
130,948
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
83,529
|
|
|
|
83,529
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
47,535
|
|
|
|
47,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
47,535
|
|
|
$
|
47,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding share information as of September 30, 2008
shown in the table above excludes 1,380,700 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
outstanding as of that date at a weighted average exercise price
of $6.57, 751,692 shares of common stock reserved under our
2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, 100,000 shares of common stock
reserved under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
70,803 shares of restricted stock that were subject to
forfeiture as of that date.
S-10
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
The following information supplements the information set forth
under the caption Selling Stockholders in the
accompanying prospectus to reflect the shares actually being
offered by selling stockholders in this offering and the grant
by the selling stockholders to the underwriters of an option for
a period of 30 days from the date of this prospectus
supplement to purchase up to 421,295 additional shares of common
stock to cover over-allotments, if any. The information is based
on information provided by the selling stockholders to us and is
as of the date of this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Owned
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
Assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Assuming Full
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Being
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming No
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
of Over-
|
|
|
of Over-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
Being
|
|
|
in Over-
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
Name of Selling Stockholder
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with ABS Capital Partners(1)
|
|
|
4,212,952
|
|
|
|
3,791,657
|
|
|
|
421,295
|
|
|
|
421,295
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
3,728,057 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV, L.P.; |
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
124,825 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV-A, L.P.; |
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
214,103 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV Offshore, L.P.; and |
|
|
|
(iv) |
|
145,967 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV Special Offshore, L.P. (together with
ABS Capital Partners IV, L.P., ABS Capital Partners IV-A, L.P.
and ABS Capital Partners IV Offshore, L.P., the ABS
Entities). |
ABS Partners IV, L.L.C. is the general partner of the ABS
Entities and has voting and dispositive power over these shares,
which is shared by Phillip A. Clough and Timothy
Weglicki (the Managers) as two of the managing
members of ABS Partners IV, L.L.C. Each of the Managers, who
both serve on our board of directors, disclaims beneficial
ownership of these shares except to the extent of his respective
pecuniary interests. The address for these entities is 400 East
Pratt Street, Suite 910, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.
S-11
UNDERWRITING
The underwriters named below have severally agreed, subject to
the terms and conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement
by and among the underwriters, the selling stockholders and us,
to purchase from us and the selling stockholders the respective
number of shares of common stock set forth opposite each
underwriters name in the table below. William
Blair & Company, L.L.C. is acting as Sole Book-Running
Manager, Piper Jaffray & Co. is acting as Co-Lead
Manager and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated,
BMO Capital Markets Corp., Signal Hill Capital Group LLC,
ThinkPanmure, LLC, Barrington Research Associates, Inc. and
First Analysis Securities Corporation are acting as Co-Managers
for this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
BMO Capital Markets Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
Signal Hill Capital Group LLC
|
|
|
|
|
ThinkPanmure, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Barrington Research Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
First Analysis Securities Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,806,657
|
|
This offering will be underwritten on a firm commitment basis.
In the underwriting agreement, the underwriters have agreed,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, to
purchase the shares of common stock being sold pursuant to this
prospectus supplement at a price per share equal to the public
offering price less the underwriting discount specified on the
cover page of this prospectus supplement. According to the terms
of the underwriting agreement, the underwriters either will
purchase all of the shares or none of them. In the event of
default by any underwriter, in certain circumstances, the
purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.
The representative of the underwriters has advised us that the
underwriters propose to offer the common stock to the public
initially at the public offering price set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus supplement and to selected dealers at
such price less a concession of not more than
$ per share. The underwriters may
allow, and such dealers may re-allow, a concession not in excess
of $ per share to certain other
dealers. The underwriters will offer the shares subject to prior
sale and subject to receipt and acceptance of the shares by the
underwriters. The underwriters may reject any order to purchase
shares in whole or in part. The underwriters expect that we and
the selling stockholders will deliver the shares to the
underwriters through the facilities of The Depository
Trust Company in New York, New York on or
about ,
2008. At that time, the underwriters will pay us and the selling
stockholders for the shares in immediately available funds.
After commencement of the public offering, the representative
may change the public offering price and other selling terms.
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters an
option, exercisable within 30 days after the date of this
prospectus supplement, to purchase up to an aggregate of 421,295
additional shares of common stock at the same price per share to
be paid by the underwriters for the other shares offered hereby
solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. If
the underwriters purchase any such additional shares pursuant to
this option, each of the underwriters will be committed to
purchase such additional shares in approximately the same
proportion as set forth in the table above. The underwriters may
exercise the option only for the purpose of covering excess
sales, if any, made in connection with the distribution of the
shares of common stock offered hereby. The underwriters will
offer any additional shares that they purchase on the terms
described in the preceding paragraph.
S-12
The following table summarizes the compensation to be paid by us
and the selling stockholders to the underwriters. This
information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the
underwriters of their over-allotment option:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount paid by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount paid by selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We will pay the offering expenses of the selling stockholders,
except for the underwriting discount. We estimate that the total
expenses for this offering, excluding the underwriting discount,
will be approximately $541,000.
We have agreed, subject to limited exceptions described below,
for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus
supplement, not to, without the prior written consent of William
Blair & Company, L.L.C.:
|
|
|
|
|
directly or indirectly, offer, sell (including short
selling), assign, transfer, encumber, pledge, contract to sell,
grant an option to purchase, establish an open put
equivalent position within the meaning of
Rule 16a-1(h)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise dispose
of any shares of common stock or securities convertible or
exchangeable into, or exercisable for, common stock held of
record or beneficially owned (within the meaning of
Rule 13d-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934); or
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers all or a
portion of the economic consequences associated with the
ownership of any common stock.
|
Our agreement does not apply to any securities issued by us:
(i) under our existing stock incentive plan,
(ii) under our existing employee stock purchase plan,
(iii) upon conversion of currently outstanding convertible
securities, or (iv) in connection with mergers,
acquisitions or similar transactions, provided that issuances in
such transactions are conditional upon an agreement of the
recipients to be bound by a similar restriction. The
90-day
lock-up
period will be extended if (1) we release earnings results
or material news or a material event relating to our company
occurs during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, or (2) prior to the expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period. In either case, the
lock-up
period will be extended for 18 days after the date of the
release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the
material news or material event. This extension will not apply
if the publication of research reports by the underwriters
during the period around the expiration of this lock-up period
is no longer restricted by applicable law or regulation.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters and their controlling persons against certain
liabilities for misstatements in the registration statement of
which this prospectus supplement forms a part, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, or to contribute
to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect
thereof.
The representative has informed us that the underwriters will
not confirm, without client authorization, sales to their client
accounts as to which they have discretionary authority. The
representative has also informed us that the underwriters intend
to deliver all copies of this prospectus supplement via
electronic means, via hand delivery or through mail or courier
services.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters and other
persons participating in this offering may engage in
transactions which affect the market price of the common stock.
These may include stabilizing and over-allotment transactions
and purchases to cover syndicate short positions. Stabilizing
transactions consist of bids or purchases for the purpose of
pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of the common stock. An
over-allotment involves selling more shares of common stock in
this offering than are specified on the cover page of this
prospectus supplement, which results in a syndicate short
position. The underwriters may cover this short position by
purchasing common stock in the open market or by exercising all
or part of their over-allotment option. In addition, the
representative may impose a penalty bid. This allows the
representative to reclaim the selling concession allowed to an
underwriter or selling group member if shares of common stock
sold by such underwriter or selling group member in this
offering are repurchased by the representative in
S-13
stabilizing or syndicate short covering transactions. These
transactions, which may be effected on The NASDAQ Global Market
or otherwise, may stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
market price of the common stock and could cause the price to be
higher than it would be without these transactions. The
underwriters and other participants in this offering are not
required to engage in any of these activities and may
discontinue any of these activities at any time without notice.
We and the underwriters make no representation or prediction as
to whether the underwriters will engage in such transactions or
choose to discontinue any transactions engaged in or as to the
direction or magnitude of any effect that these transactions may
have on the price of the common stock.
One or more of the underwriters currently act as a market maker
for our common stock and may engage in passive market
making in such securities on The NASDAQ Global Market in
accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the
Securities Exchange Act. Rule 103 permits, upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions, underwriters participating
in a distribution that are also NASDAQ market makers in the
security being distributed to engage in limited market making
transactions during the period when Regulation M would
otherwise prohibit such activity. Rule 103 prohibits
underwriters engaged in passive market making generally from
entering a bid or effecting a purchase price that exceeds the
highest bid for those securities displayed on The NASDAQ Global
Market by a market maker that is not participating in the
distribution. Under Rule 103, each underwriter engaged in
passive market making is subject to a daily net purchase
limitation equal to the greater of (i) 30% of such
entitys average daily trading volume during the two full
calendar months immediately preceding, or any 60 consecutive
calendar days ending within the ten calendar days preceding, the
date of the filing of the registration statement under the
Securities Act pertaining to the security to be distributed or
(ii) 200 shares of common stock.
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol APEI.
In the ordinary course of business, some of the underwriters and
their affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide,
investment banking, commercial banking and other services to us
for which they may receive customary fees or other compensation.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The legal validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement will be passed upon for us by
Hogan & Hartson LLP, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hogan & Hartson LLP in the past provided, and may
continue to provide, legal services to ABS Capital Partners and
its respective affiliates. Hogan & Hartson LLP owns a
limited partnership interest of less than 1% in ABS Capital
Partners IV, L.P.
Legal matters in connection with the offering will be passed
upon for the underwriters by Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago,
Illinois.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of American Public
Education, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006
and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, incorporated by reference from our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, have been included
herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the
report of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, also incorporated by
reference from our annual report on Form 10-K, and upon the
authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
S-14
PROSPECTUS
4,227,952
Shares
Common Stock
We are offering 15,000 shares of our common stock and the
selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are offering
4,212,952 shares of our common stock. The selling stockholders
intend to sell the shares of our common stock held by them in a
single transaction, or a set of simultaneous transactions, at a
time that is determined based on their assessment of market
conditions. Any sales of shares of common stock by us would only
be done at the same time as sales by the selling stockholders.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares
by the selling stockholders. Subject to any agreement that we
may in the future reach in connection with the offer and sale of
shares pursuant to this prospectus, we will bear all expenses of
this offering, except that the selling stockholders will pay all
transfer taxes and any underwriting discounts or commissions or
equivalent expenses applicable to the sale of their shares.
We are registering the offer and sale of shares by the selling
stockholders pursuant to a registration rights agreement with
the selling stockholders. The shares offered under this
prospectus by the selling stockholders are being registered to
permit the selling stockholders to sell the shares in the public
market at a time that they determine based on their assessment
of market conditions. We and the selling stockholders may sell
the shares offered under this prospectus through an underwritten
offering or through any other means described in the section
titled Plan of Distribution.
The common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol APEI. The last reported sale price of the
common stock on December 1, 2008 was $36.96 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 3 of this
prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is December 2, 2008
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus, or any prospectus supplement to which we have
referred you. We and the selling stockholders have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This prospectus may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this prospectus.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained or incorporated
by reference in this prospectus. Before deciding to invest in
shares of our common stock, you should read the entire
prospectus carefully, including the documents incorporated by
reference in this prospectus, especially the matters discussed
under Risk Factors beginning on page 3 and the
financial statements and related notes included in this
prospectus by reference. Unless the context otherwise requires,
the terms we, us and our
refer to American Public Education, Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiary, American Public University System, Inc.
We are a provider of exclusively online postsecondary education
directed at the needs of the military and public service
communities. We operate through two universities, American
Military University, or AMU, and American Public University, or
APU, which together constitute the American Public University
System. Our universities share a common faculty and curriculum
that includes 73 degree programs and 49 certificate programs in
disciplines related to national security, military studies,
intelligence, homeland security, criminal justice, technology,
business administration, liberal arts and education. We
currently serve over 41,000 students living in all
50 states and more than 130 foreign countries. Our
university system is regionally and nationally accredited.
Corporate
Information
We were organized as a Virginia corporation in 1991, and we
reorganized in Delaware in 2002 into our current holding company
structure. As part of our 2002 reorganization, our corporate
name was changed from American Military University, Inc. to
American Public Education, Inc. We completed our initial public
offering in November 2007. Our principal executive offices are
located at 111 W. Congress Street, Charles Town, West
Virginia 25414, and our main telephone number at that address is
(304) 724-3700.
The website of the American Public University System is
www.apus.edu. Our corporate website address is
www.AmericanPublicEducation.com. The contents of these websites
are not a part of this prospectus.
1
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
15,000 Shares |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
4,212,952 Shares |
|
Common stock outstanding after the offering |
|
17,955,439 Shares |
|
NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
APEI |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will use proceeds primarily to pay offering expenses payable
by us. Any remaining proceeds will be used for working capital
and other general corporate purposes. We will not receive any
proceeds from the shares sold by the selling stockholders. |
|
Plan of Distribution |
|
The selling stockholders plan to sell up to all of the shares
being offered by them in this offering in a single transaction
or a set of simultaneous transactions at a time determined by
our and their assessment of market conditions. Any sales of
shares of common stock by us would only occur at the same time
as sales by the selling stockholders. See Plan of
Distribution for additional information. |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors and other information included in
this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully
consider before deciding whether to invest in shares of our
common stock |
The share information above is based on 17,940,439 shares
of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and
excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
1,380,700 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of options outstanding as of September 30, 2008 at a
weighted average exercise price of $6.57;
|
|
|
|
751,692 shares of common stock reserved under our 2007
Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
100,000 shares of common stock reserved under our Employee
Stock Purchase Plan;
|
but includes 70,803 shares of restricted stock that are
subject to forfeiture as of September 30, 2008.
2
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock has a high degree of risk.
Before making an investment in our common stock, you should
carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other
information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus, as well as any modification or addition to the risks
described below contained in one or more supplements to this
prospectus. The risks described below are those that we believe
are the material risks we face. Any of the risk factors
described below could significantly and adversely affect our
business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. As a result, the trading price of our common stock
could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Please see Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Incorporation by Reference.
Risks
Related to Our Business
If we are unable to continue our recent revenue and
earnings growth, our stock price may decline and we may not have
adequate financial resources to execute our business
plan.
Our revenue increased 73% from $23.1 million in 2004 to
$40.0 million in 2006, and it increased 73% from
$40.0 million in 2006 to $69.1 million in 2007,
primarily due to strong referrals from current students, new
student marketing, and the receipt of regional accreditation in
May 2006. These same factors also contributed to our net income
attributable to common stockholders improving to
$8.8 million in 2007 from $1.8 million in 2006. We may
not be able to achieve similar growth rates in future periods.
You should not rely on the results of any prior periods as an
indication of our future operating performance. If we are unable
to maintain adequate revenue and earnings growth, our stock
price may decline, and we may not have adequate financial
resources to execute our business plan.
Our growth may place a strain on our resources that could
adversely affect our systems, controls and operating
efficiency.
The growth that we have experienced in the past, as well as any
future growth that we experience, may place a significant strain
on our resources and increase demands on our management
information and reporting systems and financial management
controls. We do not have experience scheduling courses and
administering programs for more students than our current
enrollment, and if growth negatively impacts our ability to do
so, the learning experience for our students could be adversely
affected, resulting in a higher rate of student attrition and
fewer student referrals. We also have limited experience adding
to our courses, programs and operations through acquisitions.
Future growth will also require continued improvement of our
internal controls and systems, particularly those related to
complying with federal regulations under the Higher Education
Act of 1965, or the Higher Education Act, as administered by the
U.S. Department of Education, including as a result of our
participation in federal student financial aid programs under
Title IV of the Higher Education Act, which we refer to in
this prospectus as Title IV programs. We have described
some of the most significant regulatory risks that apply to us,
including those related to Title IV programs, under the
heading Risks Related to the Regulation of our
Industry below. If we are unable to manage our growth or
successfully carry out and integrate acquisitions, we may also
experience operating inefficiencies that could increase our
costs and adversely affect our profitability and results of
operations.
Tuition assistance programs offered to United States Armed
Forces personnel constituted 66% of our revenues for 2007, and
our revenues and number of students would decrease if we are no
longer able to receive funds under these tuition assistance
programs or tuition assistance is reduced or eliminated.
Service members of the United States Armed Forces are eligible
to receive tuition assistance from their branch of the armed
forces that they may use to pursue postsecondary degrees.
Service members of the United States Armed Forces can use
tuition assistance at postsecondary schools that are accredited
by accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Secretary of
Education. Our tuition is currently structured so that tuition
assistance payments for service members fully cover the service
members per course tuition cost of our undergraduate
courses and cover more than 90% of the per course tuition cost
of our graduate courses. If we are no longer able to receive
tuition assistance payments or federal funds for the tuition
assistance program are reduced or eliminated, our enrollments
and revenues would be significantly reduced resulting in a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
3
Strong competition in the postsecondary education market,
especially in the online education market, could decrease our
market share and increase our cost of acquiring students.
Postsecondary education is highly fragmented and competitive. We
compete with traditional public and private two-year and
four-year colleges as well as other for-profit schools,
particularly those that offer online learning programs. Public
and private colleges and universities, as well as other
for-profit schools, offer programs similar to those we offer.
Public institutions receive substantial government subsidies,
and public and private institutions have access to government
and foundation grants, tax-deductible contributions and other
financial resources generally not available to for-profit
schools. Accordingly, public and private institutions may have
instructional and support resources that are superior to those
in the for-profit sector. Recent legislation, effective
August 1, 2009, provides education assistance benefits for
veterans in an amount up to the highest rate of tuition and fees
charged undergraduate students at a public institution in the
state in which the veteran is enrolled and a monthly housing
stipend during the veterans program of education where
such program of education is not offered through distance
learning. Such legislation may hinder our ability to compete
against present or future competitors in other states or who
offer programs through formats other than or in addition to
distance learning. In addition, some of our competitors,
including both traditional colleges and universities and other
for-profit schools, have substantially greater name recognition
and financial and other resources than we have, which may enable
them to compete more effectively for potential students,
particularly in the non-military sector of the market. We also
expect to face increased competition as a result of new entrants
to the online education market, including established colleges
and universities that have not previously offered online
education programs.
We may not be able to compete successfully against current or
future competitors and may face competitive pressures that could
adversely affect our business or results of operations. We may
also face increased competition if our competitors pursue
relationships with the military and governmental educational
programs with which we already have relationships. These
competitive factors could cause our enrollments, revenues and
profitability to decrease significantly.
If we are unable to update and expand the content of
existing programs and develop new programs and specializations
on a timely basis and in a cost-effective manner, our future
growth may be impaired.
The updates and expansions of our existing programs and the
development of new programs and specializations may not be
accepted by existing or prospective students or employers. If we
cannot respond to changes in market requirements, our business
may be adversely affected. Even if we are able to develop
acceptable new programs, we may not be able to introduce these
new programs as quickly as students require or as quickly as our
competitors introduce competing programs. To offer a new
academic program, we may be required to obtain appropriate
federal, state and accrediting agency approvals, which may be
conditioned or delayed in a manner that could significantly
affect our growth plans. In addition, because we are
provisionally certified after the recent change in ownership and
control, the Department of Education may more closely monitor or
may limit our ability to add new academic programs. If we are
unable to respond adequately to changes in market requirements
due to financial constraints, regulatory limitations or other
factors, our ability to attract and retain students could be
impaired and our financial results could suffer.
Establishing new academic programs or modifying existing
programs requires us to make investments in management, incur
marketing expenses and reallocate other resources. We may have
limited experience with the courses in new areas and may need to
modify our systems and strategy or enter into arrangements with
other institutions to provide new programs effectively and
profitably. If we are unable to increase the number of students,
or offer new programs in a cost-effective manner, or are
otherwise unable to manage effectively the operations of newly
established academic programs, our results of operations and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
If we do not have adequate continued personal referrals
and marketing and advertising programs that are effective in
developing awareness among, attracting and retaining new
students, our financial performance in the future would
suffer.
Building awareness of AMU and APU and the programs we offer
among potential students is critical to our ability to attract
new students. In order to maintain and increase our revenues and
profits, we must continue to attract new students in a
cost-effective manner and these students must remain active in
our programs. During 2007, we increased the amounts spent on
marketing and advertising, and we anticipate this
4
trend to continue, particularly as a result of our attempts to
attract and retain students from non-military market sectors. We
use marketing tools such as the Internet, exhibits at
conferences, and print media advertising to promote our schools
and programs. Additionally, we rely on the general reputation of
AMU and APU and referrals from current students, alumni and
educational service officers in the United States Armed Forces
as a source of new students. Some of the factors that could
prevent us from successfully advertising and marketing our
programs and from successfully enrolling and retaining students
in our programs include:
|
|
|
|
|
the emergence of more successful competitors;
|
|
|
|
factors related to our marketing, including the costs of
Internet advertising and broad-based branding campaigns;
|
|
|
|
performance problems with our online systems;
|
|
|
|
failure to maintain accreditation;
|
|
|
|
student dissatisfaction with our services and programs;
|
|
|
|
failure to develop a message or image that resonates well within
non-military sectors of the market;
|
|
|
|
failure to maintain eligibility and certification to participate
in Title IV programs, or limitations on participation in
Title IV programs;
|
|
|
|
adverse publicity regarding us, our competitors or online or
for-profit education generally;
|
|
|
|
adverse developments in our relationship with military
educational service officers;
|
|
|
|
a decline in the acceptance of online education; and
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the perceived or actual economic benefits that
students derive from our programs.
|
If we are unable to continue to develop awareness of AMU and APU
and the programs we offer, and to enroll and retain students in
both military and non-military market sectors, our enrollments
would suffer and our ability to increase revenues and maintain
profitability would be significantly impaired.
System disruptions and security breaches to our online
computer networks could negatively impact our ability to
generate revenue and damage our reputation, limiting our ability
to attract and retain students.
The performance and reliability of our technology infrastructure
is critical to our reputation and ability to attract and retain
students. Any system error or failure, or a sudden and
significant increase in bandwidth usage, could result in the
unavailability of our online classroom, damaging our ability to
generate revenue. Our technology infrastructure could be
vulnerable to interruption or malfunction due to events beyond
our control, including natural disasters, terrorist activities
and telecommunications failures.
Our systems, particularly those related to our
Partnership-At-a-Distance,
or PAD, system have been predominantly developed in-house, with
limited support from outside vendors. We are continuously
working on upgrades to the PAD system, and our employees
continue to devote substantial time to its development. To the
extent that we face problems with the PAD system, we may not
have the capacity to address the problems with our internal
capability, and we may not be able to identify outside
contractors with expertise relevant to our custom system.
Any failure of our online classroom system could also prevent
students from accessing their courses. Any interruption to our
technology infrastructure could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to attract and retain students and could require
us to incur additional expenses to correct or mitigate the
interruption.
Our computer networks may also be vulnerable to unauthorized
access, computer hackers, computer viruses and other security
problems. A user who circumvents security measures could
misappropriate proprietary information, personal information
about our students or cause interruptions or malfunctions in
operations. As a result, we may be required to expend
significant resources to protect against the threat of these
security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these
breaches. We engage multiple security assessment providers on a
periodic basis to review and assess our security. We utilize
this information to audit ourselves to ensure that we are
continually monitoring the security of our technology
infrastructure. However, we cannot assure you that these
security assessments and audits will protect our computer
networks against the threat of security breaches.
5
We use third party software for our online classroom, and
if the provider of that software were to cease to do business or
was acquired by a competitor, we may have difficulty maintaining
the software required for our online classroom or updating it
for future technological changes, which could adversely affect
our performance.
Our online classroom employs the
Educatortm
learning management system pursuant to a license from
Ucompass.com, Inc. The Educator system is a web-based portal
that stores and delivers course content, provides interactive
communication between students and faculty, and supplies online
evaluation tools. We rely on Ucompass for ongoing support and
customization and integration of the Educator system with the
rest of our technology infrastructure. If Ucompass ceased to
operate or was unable or unwilling to continue to provide us
with service, we may have difficulty maintaining the software
required for our online classroom or updating it for future
technological changes. Any failure to maintain our online
classroom would have an adverse impact on our operations, damage
our reputation and limit our ability to attract and retain
students.
Future growth or increased technology demands will require
continued investment of capital, time and resources to develop
and update our technology and if we are unable to increase the
capacity of our resources appropriately, our ability to handle
growth, our ability to attract or retain students and our
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We believe that continued growth will require us to increase the
capacity and capabilities of our technology infrastructure,
including our PAD system. Increasing the capacity and
capabilities of our technology infrastructure will require us to
invest capital, time and resources, and there is no assurance
that even with sufficient investment our systems will be
scalable to accommodate future growth. We may also need to
invest capital, time and resources to update our technology in
response to competitive pressures in the marketplace. If we are
unable to increase the capacity of our resources or update our
resources appropriately, our ability to handle growth, our
ability to attract or retain students, and our financial
condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The loss of any key member of our management team may
impair our ability to operate effectively and may harm our
business.
Our success depends largely upon the continued services of our
executive officers and other key management and technical
personnel. The loss of one or more members of our management
team could harm our business. Except for the employment
agreements we have with Mr. Boston, Dr. McCluskey and
Mr. Wilkins, we do not have employment agreements with any
of our other executive officers or key personnel. We do not
maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our
employees.
If we are unable to attract and retain faculty,
administrators, management and skilled personnel, our business
and growth prospects could be severely harmed.
To execute our growth strategy, we must attract and retain
highly qualified faculty, administrators, management and skilled
personnel. Competition for hiring these individuals is intense,
especially with regard to faculty in specialized areas. If we
fail to attract new skilled personnel or faculty or fail to
retain and motivate our existing faculty, administrators,
management and skilled personnel, our business and growth
prospects could be severely harmed.
The protection of our operations through exclusive
proprietary rights and intellectual property is limited, and we
encounter disputes from time to time relating to our use of
intellectual property of third parties, any of which could harm
our operations and prospects.
In the ordinary course of our business, we develop intellectual
property of many kinds that is or will be the subject of
copyright, trademark, service mark, patent, trade secret or
other protections. This intellectual property includes but is
not limited to courseware materials and business know-how and
internal processes and procedures developed to respond to the
requirements of operating and various education regulatory
agencies. We rely on a combination of copyrights, trademarks,
service marks, trade secrets, domain names, agreements and
registrations to protect our intellectual property. We rely on
service mark and trademark protection in the United States and
select foreign jurisdictions to protect our rights to the marks
AMERICAN MILITARY UNIVERSITY, AMERICAN PUBLIC
UNIVERSITY, AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
and EDUCATING THOSE WHO SERVE, as well as
distinctive logos and other marks associated with our services.
We rely on agreements under which we obtain rights to use course
content developed by faculty
6
members and other third party content experts. We cannot assure
you that the measures that we take will be adequate or that we
have secured, or will be able to secure, appropriate protections
for all of our proprietary rights in the United States or select
foreign jurisdictions, or that third parties will not infringe
upon or violate our proprietary rights. Despite our efforts to
protect these rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to
duplicate or copy the proprietary aspects of our curricula,
online resource material and other content, and offer competing
programs to ours.
In particular, third parties may attempt to develop competing
programs or duplicate or copy aspects of our curriculum, online
resource material, quality management and other proprietary
content. Any such attempt, if successful, could adversely affect
our business. Protecting these types of intellectual property
rights can be difficult, particularly as it relates to the
development by our competitors of competing courses and programs.
We may encounter disputes from time to time over rights and
obligations concerning intellectual property, and we may not
prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise a claim
against us alleging an infringement or violation of the
intellectual property of that third party. In July 2006, we
settled a dispute with another institution regarding the use of
certain marks that allowed us to continue to use the marks at
issue, but we may not be able to favorably resolve future
disputes. Some third party intellectual property rights may be
extremely broad, and it may not be possible for us to conduct
our operations in such a way as to avoid those intellectual
property rights. Any such intellectual property claim could
subject us to costly litigation and impose a significant strain
on our financial resources and management personnel regardless
of whether such claim has merit. Our general liability and cyber
liability insurance may not cover potential claims of this type
adequately or at all, and we may be required to alter the
content of our classes or pay monetary damages, which may be
significant.
We may incur liability for the unauthorized duplication or
distribution of class materials posted online for class
discussions.
In some instances, our faculty members or our students may post
various articles or other third party content on class
discussion boards. We may incur liability for the unauthorized
duplication or distribution of this material posted online for
class discussions. Third parties may raise claims against us for
the unauthorized duplication of this material. Any such claims
could subject us to costly litigation and impose a significant
strain on our financial resources and management personnel
regardless of whether the claims have merit. Our faculty members
or students could also post classified material on class
discussion boards, which could expose us to civil and criminal
liability and harm our reputation and relationships with members
of the military and government. Our general liability insurance
may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at
all, and we may be required to alter the content of our courses
or pay monetary damages.
Because we are an exclusively online provider of
education, we are entirely dependent on continued growth and
acceptance of exclusively online education and, if the
recognition by students and employers of the value of online
education does not continue to grow, our ability to grow our
business could be adversely impacted.
We believe that continued growth in online education will be
largely dependent on additional students and employers
recognizing the value of degrees from online institutions. If
students and employers are not convinced that online schools are
an acceptable alternative to traditional schools or that an
online education provides value, or if growth in the market
penetration of exclusively online education slows, growth in the
industry and our business could be adversely affected. Because
our business model is based on online education, if the
acceptance of online education does not grow, our ability to
continue to grow our business and our financial condition and
results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
If we do not maintain continued strong relationships with
various military bases and educational service officers, and if
we are unable to expand our use of articulation agreements, our
future growth may be impaired.
We have non-exclusive articulation agreements or memoranda of
understanding with various educational institutions of the
United States Armed Forces and other governmental education
programs. Articulation agreements and memoranda of understanding
are agreements pursuant to which we agree to award academic
credits toward our degrees for learning in educational programs
offered by others. Additionally, we rely on relationships with
educational service officers on military bases and base
education counselors to distribute our information to interested
service members. If our relationships with educational service
offices or base
7
education counselors deteriorate or end, our efforts to recruit
students from that base will be impaired. If our articulation
agreements and memoranda of understanding are eliminated, or if
our relationships with educational service officers or base
education counselors deteriorate, this could materially and
adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
The United States Armed Forces has in the past and may in the
future approve programs and initiatives to provide additional
educational opportunities to service members, and these programs
and initiatives may not include participation by us. We cannot
predict the impact of these announcements, programs or
initiatives on us, but given our dependence on students from the
armed forces, our net course registrations and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected by such
announcements, programs and initiatives.
Government regulations relating to the Internet could
increase our cost of doing business, affect our ability to grow
or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our
business.
The increasing popularity and use of the Internet and other
online services have led and may lead to the adoption of new
laws and regulatory practices in the United States or foreign
countries and to new interpretations of existing laws and
regulations. These new laws and interpretations may relate to
issues such as online privacy, copyrights, trademarks and
service marks, sales taxes, fair business practices and the
requirement that online education institutions qualify to do
business as foreign corporations or be licensed in one or more
jurisdictions where they have no physical location or other
presence. New laws, regulations or interpretations related to
doing business over the Internet could increase our costs and
materially and adversely affect our enrollments, revenues and
results of operations.
Risks
Related to the Regulation of Our Industry
The Department of Education has placed us on provisional
certification as a result of our recent change in ownership and
control, and the terms of our provisional certification could
limit our potential for growth outside the military sector and
adversely affect our enrollment, revenues and results of
operations.
In August 2008, funds affiliated with ABS Capital Partners
reduced their beneficial ownership interest from approximately
26% to approximately 24% of our outstanding common stock by
distributing to their limited partners and general partners
400,000 shares of our stock. As a result of this
distribution of shares, we were deemed to have undergone a
change in ownership and control requiring review by the
Department of Education in order to reestablish our eligibility
and continue participation in Title IV programs. As
required under Department of Education regulations, we timely
notified the Department of Education of our change in ownership
and control. In connection with the Department of
Educations review of the change, we submitted to the
Department of Education a change in ownership application that
included the submission of required documentation, including a
letter from our regional accrediting agency, The Higher Learning
Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and
Schools indicating that it had approved the change. On
October 2, 2008, we received a letter from the Department
of Education approving the change in ownership and control and
granting us provisional certification until September 30,
2010.
During a period of provisional certification, we must comply
with any additional conditions included in our program
participation agreement, which include, among other things,
limitations on our operations. Our program participation
agreement provides that as a provisionally certified
institution, we must apply for and receive approval by the
Secretary for any substantial change. Under our program
participation agreement, substantial changes include but are not
limited to establishment of additional locations, an increase in
the level of academic offering, and addition of any non-degree
or short-term training program. The Department of Education may
also more closely review us while we are provisionally
certified. The conditions to provisional certification or closer
review by the Department of Education could impact, among other
things, our ability to add educational programs, acquire other
schools or make other significant changes. In addition, while we
are provisionally certified if the Department of Education
determines that we are unable to meet our responsibilities, it
may seek to revoke our certification to participate in
Title IV programs with fewer due process protections than
if we were fully certified. Limitations on our operations could,
and the loss of our certification to participate in
Title IV programs would, adversely affect our ability to
grow our presence outside the military sector in addition to
having adverse effects on our enrollment, revenues and results
of operations.
8
If we fail to comply with the extensive regulatory
requirements for our business, we could face penalties and
significant restrictions on our operations, including loss of
access to federal tuition assistance programs for members of the
United States Armed Forces and federal loans and grants for our
students.
We are subject to extensive regulation by (1) the federal
government through the U.S. Department of Education and
under the Higher Education Act, (2) state regulatory bodies
and (3) accrediting agencies recognized by the
U.S. Secretary of Education. The regulations, standards and
policies of these agencies cover the vast majority of our
operations, including our educational programs, facilities,
instructional and administrative staff, administrative
procedures, marketing, recruiting, financial operations and
financial condition. These regulatory requirements can also
affect our ability to add new or expand existing educational
programs and to change our corporate structure and ownership.
Institutions of higher education that grant degrees, diplomas or
certificates must be authorized by an appropriate state
education agency or agencies. In addition, in certain states as
a condition of continued authorization to grant degrees and in
order to participate in various federal programs, including
tuition assistance programs of the United States Armed Forces, a
school must be accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by
the Secretary of Education. Accreditation is a non-governmental
process through which an institution submits to qualitative
review by an organization of peer institutions, based on the
standards of the accrediting agency and the stated aims and
purposes of the institution. The Higher Education Act requires
accrediting agencies recognized by the Department of Education
to review and monitor many aspects of an institutions
operations and to take appropriate action when the institution
fails to comply with the accrediting agencys standards.
Our operations are also subject to regulation due to our
participation in Title IV programs. Title IV programs,
which are administered by the Department of Education, include
educational loans with below-market interest rates that are
guaranteed by the federal government in the event of default.
Title IV programs also include several grant programs for
students with economic need as determined in accordance with the
Higher Education Act and Department of Education regulations. To
participate in Title IV programs, a school must receive and
maintain authorization by the appropriate state education
agencies, be accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by
the Secretary of Education and be certified as an eligible
institution by the Department of Education. Our growth strategy
is partly dependent on enrolling more students who are attracted
to us because of our continued participation in these programs.
The regulations, standards and policies of the Department of
Education, state education agencies and our accrediting agencies
change frequently, and changes in, or new interpretations of,
applicable laws, regulations, standards or policies, or our
noncompliance with any applicable laws, regulations, standards
or policies, could have a material adverse effect on our
accreditation, authorization to operate in various states,
activities, receipt of funds under tuition assistance programs
of the United States Armed Forces, our ability to participate in
Title IV programs, or costs of doing business. Furthermore,
findings of noncompliance with these laws, regulations,
standards and policies also could result in our being required
to pay monetary damages, or being subjected to fines, penalties,
injunctions, limitations on our operations, termination of our
ability to grant degrees, revocation of our accreditation,
restrictions on our access to Title IV program funds or
other censure that could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
If we fail to maintain our institutional accreditation, we
would lose our ability to participate in the tuition assistance
programs of the United States Armed Forces and also to
participate in Title IV programs.
American Public University System is accredited by The Higher
Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges
and Schools, one of six regional accrediting agencies recognized
by the Secretary of Education, and by the Accrediting Commission
of the Distance Education and Training Council, or DETC, which
is a national accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary of
Education. Accreditation by an accrediting agency that is
recognized by the Secretary of Education is required for
participation in the tuition assistance programs of the United
States Armed Forces. In 2007, we derived approximately 66% of
our revenues from these tuition assistance programs.
Accreditation by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the
Secretary of Education for Title IV purposes is also
required for an institution to become and remain eligible to
participate in Title IV programs. American Public
University System achieved regional accreditation from The
Higher Learning Commission in 2006 and has had national
accreditation from the Distance Education and Training Council
since 1995. We have identified The Higher Learning Commission as
our primary accreditor for Title IV purposes. Either The
Higher Learning Commission or DETC may impose restrictions on
our accreditation or may terminate our
9
accreditation. To remain accredited American Public University
System must continuously meet certain criteria and standards
relating to, among other things, performance, governance,
institutional integrity, educational quality, faculty,
administrative capability, resources and financial stability.
Failure to meet any of these criteria or standards could result
in the loss of accreditation at the discretion of the
accrediting agencies. Furthermore, many prospective students may
view accreditation by a regional accrediting agency to be more
prestigious than accreditation by a national accrediting agency,
and we believe that loss of regional accreditation may reduce
the marketability of American Public University System even if
national accreditation were maintained. The complete loss of
accreditation would, among other things, render our students and
us ineligible to participate in the tuition assistance programs
of the United States Armed Forces or Title IV programs and
have a material adverse effect on our enrollments, revenues and
results of operations.
We have only recently begun to participate in
Title IV programs, and our failure to comply with the
complex regulations associated with Title IV programs would
have a significant adverse effect on our operations and
prospects for growth.
We first became certified to participate in Title IV
programs for classes beginning in November 2006. We expect a
significant portion of our growth in enrollments and revenues to
come from students who are utilizing funds from Title IV
programs. However, compliance with the requirements of the
Higher Education Act and Title IV programs is highly
complex and imposes significant additional regulatory
requirements on our operations, which require additional staff,
contractual arrangements, systems and regulatory costs. We have
limited to no demonstrated history of compliance with these
additional regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with
any of these additional regulatory requirements, the Department
of Education could, among other things, impose monetary
penalties, place limitations on our operations,
and/or
condition or terminate our eligibility to receive Title IV
program funds, which would limit our potential for growth
outside the military sector and adversely affect our enrollment,
revenues and results of operations.
If American Public University System does not maintain its
authorization in West Virginia, our operations would be
curtailed and we may not grant degrees.
A school that grants degrees, diplomas or certificates must be
authorized by the relevant education agency of the state or
states in which it is located. State authorization is also
required for an institution to be eligible to participate in
Title IV programs. American Public University System is
headquartered in the State of West Virginia and is authorized by
the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission. If we
maintain our regional accreditation, we will likely remain in
good standing with the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission. However, the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission may also take disciplinary action or revoke
authorization if an institutions bond is cancelled, if the
institution fails to take corrective action to bring it into
compliance with West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission
policies, or if the owner is convicted for a felony or crime
involving institution administration of Title IV programs.
If we do not maintain regional accreditation, our state
authorization may be continued based on our national accrediting
agency, DETC, if the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission finds that it is an acceptable alternative
accrediting agency. If we lose accreditation from both
accrediting agencies, or accreditation by DETC is not an
acceptable alternative accrediting agency in case of loss of
Higher Learning Commission accreditation, the West Virginia
Higher Education Policy Commission may suspend, withdraw, or
revoke our authorization. In addition, in order to maintain our
eligibility for accreditation by The Higher Learning Commission,
we must remain headquartered in one of the states in its region,
which includes West Virginia. If we were to lose our
authorization from the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission we would be unable to provide educational services,
and we would lose our regional accreditation.
Our failure to comply with regulations of various states
could have a material adverse effect on our enrollments,
revenues and results of operations.
Various states impose regulatory requirements on educational
institutions operating within their boundaries. Several states
have sought to assert jurisdiction over online educational
institutions that have no physical location or other presence in
the state but offer educational services to students who reside
in the state, or that advertise to or recruit prospective
students in the state. State regulatory requirements for online
education are inconsistent among states and not well developed
in many jurisdictions. As such, these requirements change
frequently and, in some instances, are not clear or are left to
the discretion of state
10
regulators. Our changing business and the constantly changing
regulatory environment require us to evaluate continually our
state regulatory compliance activities. In the event we are
found not to be in compliance, and a state seeks to restrict one
or more of our business activities within its boundaries, we may
not be able to recruit students from that state and may have to
cease providing service to students in that state.
American Public University System has a physical presence in the
Commonwealth of Virginia based on administrative offices in that
state, and it is authorized by the State Council of Higher
Education for Virginia. We are currently reviewing the licensure
requirements of other states to determine whether our activities
in these states constitute a presence or otherwise require
licensure or authorization by the respective state educational
agencies, and we have received, and are in the process of
seeking, licensure or authorization in additional states. State
laws typically establish standards for instruction,
qualifications of faculty, administrative procedures, marketing,
recruiting, financial operations and other operational matters.
To the extent that we have obtained, or obtain in the future,
additional authorizations or licensure, state laws and
regulations may limit our ability to offer educational programs
and award degrees. Some states may also prescribe financial
regulations that are different from those of the Department of
Education, the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission,
The Higher Learning Commission or DETC. If we fail to comply
with state licensing or authorization requirements, we may be
subject to the loss of state licensure or authorization. If we
fail to comply with state requirements to obtain licensure or
authorization, we may be the subject of injunctive actions or
penalties. Although we believe that the only state licensure or
authorization that is necessary for American Public University
System to participate in the tuition assistance programs for the
United States Armed Forces and in Title IV programs is our
authorization from the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission, loss of licensure or authorization in other states
or the failure to obtain required licensures or authorizations
could prohibit us from recruiting or enrolling students in those
states, reduce significantly our enrollments and revenues and
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We must periodically seek recertification to participate
in Title IV programs, and may, in certain circumstances, be
subject to review by the Department of Education prior to
seeking recertification, and our future success may be adversely
affected if we are unable to successfully maintain certification
or obtain recertification.
An institution generally must seek recertification from the
Department of Education at least every six years and possibly
more frequently depending on various factors, such as whether it
is provisionally certified. The Department of Education may also
review an institutions continued eligibility and
certification to participate in Title IV programs, or scope
of eligibility and certification, in the event the institution
undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change of control
or expands its activities in certain ways, such as the addition
of certain types of new programs, or, in certain cases, changes
to the academic credentials that it offers. In certain
circumstances, the Department of Education must provisionally
certify an institution, such as when it is an initial
participant in Title IV programs or has undergone a change
in ownership and control. In 2006 we applied to participate in
Title IV programs for the first time and were provisionally
certified for a period through June 30, 2007. We timely
submitted our application for recertification, and the
Department of Education granted us provisional certification
through June 30, 2008. In May 2008, we were fully
recertified to participate in Title IV programs. In August
2008, we were deemed to have undergone a change in ownership and
control requiring review by the Department of Education in order
to reestablish our eligibility and continue participation in
Title IV programs. As required under Department of
Education regulations, we timely notified the Department of
Education of our change in ownership and control. In connection
with the Department of Educations review of the change, we
submitted to the Department of Education a change in ownership
application that included the submission of required
documentation, including a letter from The Higher Learning
Commission indicating that it had approved the change. On
October 2, 2008, we received a letter from the Department
of Education approving the change in ownership and control and
granting us provisional certification until September 30,
2010. A provisionally certified institution must apply for and
receive Department of Education approval of substantial changes
and must comply with any additional conditions included in its
program participation agreement. If the Department of Education
determines that a provisionally certified institution is unable
to meet its responsibilities under its program participation
agreement, it may seek to revoke the institutions
certification to participate in Title IV programs with
fewer
11
due process protections for the institution than if it were
fully certified. The Department of Education may withdraw our
certification if it determines that we are not fulfilling
material requirements for continued participation in
Title IV programs. If the Department of Education does not
renew or withdraws our certification to participate in
Title IV programs, our students would no longer be able to
receive Title IV program funds, which would have a material
adverse effect on our enrollments, revenues and results of
operations. In addition, regulatory restraints related to the
addition of new programs could impair our ability to attract and
retain students and could negatively affect our financial
results.
If regulators do not approve or delay their approval of
transactions involving a change of control of our company, our
ability to operate could be impaired.
If we or American Public University System experience a change
of control under the standards of applicable state education
agencies, the Department of Education, DETC, The Higher Learning
Commission, or other regulators, we must notify or seek the
approval of each relevant regulatory agency. A change of control
occurred in August 2008 and we have completed the required
notification and approval processes. As a result of its review
and approval of the change, The Higher Learning Commission
informed us that it plans to conduct a focused evaluation in
Spring 2009 as its policies require it to do as a result of a
change of the type we experienced in August 2008. Transactions
or events that constitute a change of control include
significant acquisitions or dispositions of an
institutions common stock and significant changes in the
composition of an institutions board of directors. Some of
these transactions or events may be beyond our control. Our
failure to obtain, or a delay in receiving, approval of any
change of control from the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission, the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia,
the Department of Education, DETC or The Higher Learning
Commission could have a material adverse effect on our business
and financial condition. Our failure to obtain, or a delay in
receiving, approval of any change of control from other states
in which we are currently licensed or authorized could require
us to suspend our activities in that state or otherwise impair
our operations. The potential adverse effects of a change of
control could influence future decisions by us and our
stockholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance or
redemption of our stock. In addition, the regulatory burdens and
risks associated with a change of control also could have an
adverse effect on the market price of your shares.
Government and regulatory agencies and third parties may
conduct compliance reviews, bring claims or initiate litigation
against us, any of which could disrupt our operations and
adversely affect our performance.
Because we operate in a highly regulated industry, we are
subject to compliance reviews and claims of non-compliance and
lawsuits by government agencies, regulatory agencies and third
parties, including claims brought by third parties on behalf of
the federal government. For example, the Department of Education
regularly conducts program reviews of educational institutions
that are participating in Title IV programs and the Office
of Inspector General of the Department of Education regularly
conducts audits and investigations of such institutions. If the
results of compliance reviews or other proceedings are
unfavorable to us, or if we are unable to defend successfully
against lawsuits or claims, we may be required to pay monetary
damages or be subject to fines, limitations, loss of
Title IV funding, injunctions or other penalties, including
the requirement to make refunds. Even if we adequately address
issues raised by an agency review or successfully defend a
lawsuit or claim, we may have to divert significant financial
and management resources from our ongoing business operations to
address issues raised by those reviews or to defend against
those lawsuits or claims. Claims and lawsuits brought against us
may damage our reputation, even if such claims and lawsuits are
without merit.
Our regulatory environment and our reputation may be
negatively influenced by the actions of other for-profit
institutions.
We are one of a number of for-profit institutions serving the
postsecondary education market. In recent years, regulatory
investigations and civil litigation have been commenced against
several companies that own for-profit educational institutions.
These investigations and lawsuits have alleged, among other
things, deceptive trade practices and non-compliance with
Department of Education regulations. These allegations have
attracted adverse media coverage and have been the subject of
federal and state legislative hearings. Although the media,
regulatory and legislative focus has been primarily on the
allegations made against these specific companies, broader
allegations against the overall for-profit school sector may
negatively affect public perceptions of other for-profit
educational institutions, including American Public University
System. In addition, recent reports on student lending practices
of various lending institutions and schools, including
for-profit schools, and investigations by a
12
number of state attorneys general, Congress and governmental
agencies have led to adverse media coverage of postsecondary
education. Adverse media coverage regarding other companies in
the for-profit school sector or regarding us directly could
damage our reputation, could result in lower enrollments,
revenues and operating profit, and could have a negative impact
on our stock price. Such allegations could also result in
increased scrutiny and regulation by the Department of
Education, Congress, accrediting bodies, state legislatures or
other governmental authorities with respect to all for-profit
institutions, including us.
Congress may change the law or reduce funding for
Title IV programs, which could reduce our student
population, revenues and profit margin.
The Higher Education Act comes up for reauthorization by
Congress approximately every five to six years. When Congress
does not act on complete reauthorization, there are typically
amendments and extensions of authorization. On August 14,
2008, President Bush signed into law the Higher Education
Opportunity Act, or HEOA, which reauthorizes the Higher
Education Act. Additionally, Congress reviews and determines
appropriations for Title IV programs on an annual basis
through the budget and appropriations process. We cannot predict
with certainty the effect HEOA will have on our business.
Further, many of the provisions of HEOA are effective upon
enactment, even though the Department of Education has not yet
promulgated regulations related to such provisions. If our
efforts to comply with the provisions of HEOA are inconsistent
with how the Department of Education interprets those provisions
in final regulations or otherwise, we may be found to be in
noncompliance with such provisions and the Department of
Education could impose monetary penalties, place limitations on
our operations,
and/or
condition or terminate our eligibility to receive Title IV
program funds. In addition, there is no assurance that Congress
will not in the future enact changes that decrease Title IV
program funds available to students, including students who
attend our institution. Any action by Congress that
significantly reduces funding for Title IV programs or the
ability of our school or students to participate in these
programs, would require us to arrange for other sources of
financial aid and would materially decrease our enrollment. Such
a decrease in enrollment would have a material adverse effect on
our revenues and results of operations. Congressional action,
including HEOA, may also require us to modify our practices in
ways that could result in increased administrative and
regulatory costs and decreased profit margin. Further, since
2005, President Bush has signed three major laws that amend the
Higher Education Act. Among other measures, those laws
reauthorize the federal student loan programs, reduce interest
rates on certain federal student loans, reduce government
subsidies to lenders that participate in federal student loan
programs, and seek to facilitate student loan availability in
light of current market conditions. We are not in a position to
predict with certainty whether any legislation will be passed by
Congress or signed into law in the future. The reallocation of
funding among Title IV programs, material changes in the
requirements for participation in such programs, or the
substitution of materially different Title IV programs
could reduce the ability of certain students to finance their
education at our institution and adversely affect our revenues
and results of operations.
Investigations by state attorneys general, Congress and
governmental agencies regarding relationships between loan
providers and educational institutions and their financial aid
officers may result in increased regulatory burdens and
costs.
In recent years, the student lending practices of postsecondary
educational institutions, financial aid officers and student
loan providers have been subjected to several investigations by
state attorneys general, Congress and governmental agencies.
These investigations concern, among other things, possible
deceptive practices in the marketing of private student loans
and loans provided by lenders pursuant to Title IV
programs. HEOA contains new requirements pertinent to
relationships between lenders and institutions. In particular,
HEOA requires institutions to have a code of conduct, with
certain specified provisions, pertinent to interactions with
lenders of student loans, prohibits certain activities by
lenders and guaranty agencies with respect to institutions, and
establishes substantive and disclosure requirements for lists of
recommended or suggested lenders of federal and private student
loans. In addition, HEOA imposes substantive and disclosure
obligations on institutions that make available a list of
recommended lenders for potential borrowers. The Department of
Education promulgated regulations, generally effective
July 1, 2008, that in part address institutions
student loan activity. In particular, the Department of
Educations regulations clarify and expand rules pertinent
to relationships between institutions and lenders and establish
new rules applicable to institutions that make available a list
of recommended or suggested lenders for use by potential
borrowers. State legislators have also passed or may be
considering legislation related to relationships between lenders
13
and institutions. Because of the evolving nature of these
legislative efforts and various inquiries and developments, we
can neither know nor predict with certainty their outcome or
effects, or the potential remedial actions that might result
from these or other potential inquiries. Governmental action may
impose increased administrative and regulatory costs and
decreased profit margins.
We are subject to sanctions that could be material to our
results and damage our reputation if we fail to calculate
correctly and return timely Title IV program funds for
students who withdraw before completing their educational
program.
A school participating in Title IV programs must correctly
calculate the amount of unearned Title IV program funds
that have been disbursed to students who withdraw from their
educational programs before completion and must return those
unearned funds in a timely manner, generally within 45 days
after the date the school determines that the student has
withdrawn. Because we began to participate in Title IV
programs in 2006, we have limited experience complying with
these provisions. Under Department of Education regulations,
late returns of Title IV program funds for 5% or more of
students sampled in connection with the institutions
annual compliance audit constitutes material non-compliance. If
unearned funds are not properly calculated and timely returned,
we may have to repay Title IV funds, post a letter of
credit in favor of the Department of Education or otherwise be
sanctioned by the Department of Education, which could increase
our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our
results of operations.
A failure to demonstrate financial
responsibility may result in the loss of eligibility by
American Public University System to participate in
Title IV programs or require the posting of a letter of
credit in order to maintain eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs.
To participate in Title IV programs, an eligible
institution must satisfy specific measures of financial
responsibility prescribed by the Department of Education, or
post a letter of credit in favor of the Department of Education
and possibly accept other conditions, such as provisional
certification, additional reporting requirements or regulatory
oversight, on its participation in Title IV programs. The
Department of Education may also apply such measures of
financial responsibility to the operating company and ownership
entities of an eligible institution and, if such measures are
not satisfied by the operating company or ownership entities,
require the institution to post a letter of credit in favor of
the Department of Education and possibly accept other conditions
on its participation in Title IV programs. Any obligation
to post a letter of credit could increase our costs of
regulatory compliance. If we were unable to secure a letter of
credit, we would lose our eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs. In addition to the obligation to post a
letter of credit under certain circumstances, an institution
that is determined by the Department of Education not to be
financially responsible may be transferred from the
advance system of payment of Title IV funds,
which allows the institution to obtain Title IV program
funds from the Department of Education prior to making
disbursements to students, to cash monitoring status or to the
reimbursement system of payment, which requires the
institution to make Title IV disbursements to students and
seek reimbursement from the Department of Education. A change in
our system of payment could increase our costs of regulatory
compliance. If we fail to demonstrate financial responsibility
and thus lose our eligibility to participate in Title IV
programs, our students would lose access to Title IV
program funds for use in our institution, which would limit our
potential for growth outside the military community and
adversely affect our enrollment, revenues and results of
operations.
A failure to demonstrate administrative
capability may result in the loss of American Public
University Systems eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs.
Department of Education regulations specify extensive criteria
an institution must satisfy to establish that it has the
requisite administrative capability to participate
in Title IV programs. See Regulation of our
Business in this prospectus for more information on the
Department of Educations regulations on administrative
capability.
If an institution fails to satisfy any of these criteria or
comply with any other Department of Education regulations, the
Department of Education may require the repayment of
Title IV funds, transfer the institution from the
advance system of payment of Title IV funds to
cash monitoring status or to the reimbursement
system of payment, place the institution on provisional
certification status, or commence a proceeding to impose a fine
or to limit, suspend or terminate the participation of the
institution in Title IV programs. If we
14
are found not to have satisfied the Department of
Educations administrative capability
requirements we could be limited in our access to, or lose,
Title IV program funding, which would limit our potential
for growth outside the military sector and adversely affect our
enrollment, revenues and results of operations.
We rely on a third party to administer our participation
in Title IV programs and its failure to comply with
applicable regulations could cause us to lose our eligibility to
participate in Title IV programs.
We only recently became eligible to participate in Title IV
programs, and we have not developed the internal capacity to
handle without third-party assistance the complex administration
of participation in Title IV programs. Global Financial Aid
Services, Inc. assists us with administration of our
participation in Title IV programs, and if it does not
comply with applicable regulations, we may be liable for its
actions and we could lose our eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs. In addition, if it is no longer able to
provide the services to us, we may not be able to replace it in
a timely or cost-efficient manner, or at all, and we could lose
our ability to comply with the requirements of Title IV
programs, which would limit our potential for growth and
adversely affect our enrollment, revenues and results of
operation.
We are subject to sanctions if we pay impermissible
commissions, bonuses or other incentive payments to individuals
involved in recruiting, admissions or financial aid
activities.
A school participating in Title IV programs may not provide
any commission, bonus or other incentive payment based directly
or indirectly on success in enrolling students or securing
financial aid to any person involved in student recruiting or
admission activities or in making decisions regarding the
awarding of Title IV program funds. The law and regulations
governing this requirement do not establish clear criteria for
compliance in all circumstances. If we violate this law, we
could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by the Department of
Education, or we could face litigation brought under the
whistleblower provisions of the Federal False Claims Act. Any
such fines or sanctions could harm our reputation, impose
significant costs on us, and have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations.
We may lose eligibility to participate in Title IV
programs if our student loan default rates are too high, and if
we lose that eligibility our future growth could be
impaired.
An educational institution may lose its eligibility to
participate in some or all Title IV programs if, for three
consecutive federal fiscal years, 25% or more of its students
who were required to begin repaying their student loans in the
relevant fiscal year default on their payment by the end of the
next federal fiscal year. In addition, an institution may lose
its eligibility to participate in some or all Title IV
programs if its default rate exceeds 40% in the most recent
federal fiscal year for which default rates have been calculated
by the Department of Education. HEOA modifies the Higher
Education Acts default rate provisions. Beginning with
default rate calculations for federal fiscal year 2009, the
cohort default rate will be calculated by determining the rate
at which borrowers who become subject to their repayment
obligation in the relevant federal fiscal year default by the
end of the second federal fiscal year. The current method of
calculating rates will remain in effect and will be used to
determine institutional eligibility until three consecutive
years of cohort default rates calculated under the new formula
are available. In addition, effective as of federal fiscal year
2012, the cohort default rate threshold of 25% will be increased
to 30%. HEOA also requires certain default prevention action by
an institution with a default rate of 30% or more. Because we
have just begun to enroll students who are participating in the
federal student loan programs, we have no historical cohort
default rates. Relatively few students are expected to enter the
repayment phase in the near term, which could result in defaults
by a few students having a relatively large impact on our cohort
default rate. If American Public University System loses its
eligibility to participate in Title IV programs because of
high student loan default rates, our students would no longer be
eligible to use Title IV program funds in our institution,
which would significantly reduce our enrollments and revenues
and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
15
Risks
Related to This Offering
A significant portion of our outstanding common stock is
not subject to restrictions on resale and may be sold in the
public market. Future sales of shares by existing stockholders
could cause our stock price to decline.
If following this offering our existing stockholders,
particularly our directors, funds affiliated with ABS Capital
Partners and funds affiliated with Camden Partners and our
executive officers, sell substantial amounts of our common stock
in the public market, or are perceived by the public market as
intending to sell, the trading price of our common stock could
decline significantly. As of October 31, 2008, we had
18,022,402 shares of common stock outstanding, including
70,563 shares of restricted stock that were subject to
forfeiture as of that date and not including the 15,000 shares
of common stock that we are offering in this offering. These
shares are freely tradable in the public market, except for
shares of common stock held by directors, executive officers and
our other affiliates that will be subject to volume limitations
under Rule 144 of the Securities Act and, in certain cases,
various vesting arrangements.
As of October 31, 2008, funds affiliated with Camden
Partners have contractual demand or piggyback rights to require
us to register with the SEC up to 311,706 shares assuming
the sale of all of the shares being offered in this offering. If
we register these shares of common stock, the stockholders would
be able to sell those shares freely in the public market, which
sales could cause the trading price of our common stock to
decline.
The price of our common stock may be volatile, and as a
result returns on an investment in our common stock may be
volatile.
We completed our initial public offering in November 2007.
Trading in our common stock since that time has also been
limited and, at times, volatile. An active trading market for
our common stock may not be sustained, and the trading price of
our common stock may fluctuate substantially.
The price of the common stock may fluctuate as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from
time to time;
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
comparable companies;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our earnings, enrollments or
net course registrations, or fluctuations in our operating
results or in the expectations of securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and trends;
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events;
|
|
|
|
sales of large blocks of our stock; or
|
|
|
|
recruitment or departure of key personnel.
|
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price
of a companys securities, securities class action
litigation has often been brought against that company. Because
of the potential volatility of our stock price, we may become
the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities
litigation could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources from our business.
We are incurring significant costs as a result of
operating as a public company that we have not previously
incurred, and our management and key employees are, and will
continue to be, required to devote substantial time to
compliance initiatives.
We have operated as a public company only since November 8,
2007. As a public company, we incur significant legal,
accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private
company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules
subsequently implemented by the SEC and The NASDAQ Stock Market
have imposed various new requirements on public companies,
including with respect to public disclosure, internal control,
corporate governance practices and other matters. Our management
and other personnel are devoting substantial amounts of time to
these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and
regulations have significantly increased our legal and financial
compliance costs and have made some
16
activities more time-consuming and costly. In addition, we have
and will continue to incur additional costs associated with our
public company reporting requirements. We will incur significant
costs to remediate any material weaknesses we identify through
these efforts. These rules and regulations have made it more
difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and
officer liability insurance. We currently are evaluating and
monitoring developments with respect to these rules, and we
cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may
incur or the timing of such costs. If our profitability is
adversely affected because of these additional costs, it could
have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Seasonal and other fluctuations in our results of
operations could adversely affect the trading price of our
common stock.
Our results in any quarter may not indicate the results we may
achieve in any subsequent quarter or for the full year. Our
revenues and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of
seasonal variations in our business, principally due to changes
in enrollment. Student population varies as a result of new
enrollments, graduations and student attrition. While our number
of enrolled students has grown in each sequential quarter over
the past three years, the number of enrolled students has been
proportionally greatest in the fourth quarter of each respective
year. A significant portion of our general and administrative
expenses do not vary proportionately with fluctuations in
revenues. We expect quarterly fluctuations in operating results
to continue as a result of seasonal enrollment patterns. Such
patterns may change, however, as a result of new program
introductions and increased enrollments of students. These
fluctuations may result in volatility in our results of
operations
and/or have
an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
If we fail to maintain proper and effective disclosure
controls and procedures and internal controls over financial
reporting, our ability to produce accurate financial statements
could be impaired, which could adversely affect our stock price,
our ability to operate our business and investors views of
us.
Ensuring that we have adequate disclosure controls and
procedures, including internal controls over financial
reporting, in place so that we can produce accurate financial
statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming
effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. We are
continuing the process of documenting, reviewing and, if
appropriate, improving our internal controls and procedures
following our becoming a public company and eventually being
subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which will require annual management
assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting and a report by our independent auditors
addressing these assessments. We will be required to comply with
the internal controls evaluation and certification requirements
of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by no later than
the end of our 2008 fiscal year.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports
about our business or if they downgrade their evaluations of our
stock, the price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the
research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish
about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts
covering us downgrade their estimates or evaluations of our
stock, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of
these analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose
visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could
cause our stock price to decline.
Provisions in our organizational documents and in the
Delaware General Corporation Law may prevent takeover attempts
that could be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions in our charter and bylaws and in the Delaware General
Corporation Law may make it difficult and expensive for a third
party to pursue a takeover attempt we oppose even if a change in
control of our company would be beneficial to the interests of
our stockholders. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to issue up to
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series
and to fix the powers, preferences and rights of each series
without stockholder approval, which may discourage unsolicited
acquisition proposals or make it more difficult for a third
party to gain control of our company;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that stockholders provide advance notice of their
intention to nominate a director or to propose any other
business at an annual meeting of stockholders;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
a prohibition against stockholder action by means of written
consent unless otherwise approved by our board of directors in
advance; and
|
|
|
|
the application of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which generally prohibits us from engaging in
mergers and other business combinations with stockholders that
beneficially own 15% or more of our voting stock, or with their
affiliates, unless our directors or stockholders approve the
business combination in the prescribed manner. However, because
funds affiliated with ABS Capital Partners acquired their shares
prior to our initial public offering, Section 203 is
currently inapplicable to any business combination or
transaction with it or its affiliates.
|
An individual has made claims that he is entitled to
shares that we do not treat as being outstanding, and this could
result in our outstanding shares being understated and subject
us to claims for damages.
In November 2007, an individual presented a stock certificate of
our predecessor company that he asserts represents his ownership
of 57,965 outstanding shares of our common stock. Our records
and other evidence available to us indicate that these shares
were repurchased from him before 2003, notwithstanding the fact
that the stock certificate he has presented was not marked
canceled. If he is successful in asserting that these shares are
in fact outstanding, then our outstanding capital stock as
presented in this prospectus is understated by
57,965 shares of common stock, which represents less than
half of one percent of our outstanding common stock and for
which the amount of the special distribution made in connection
with our initial public offering would have been $442,273. In
addition, if he successfully asserts ownership to these shares,
we may be subject to claims from stockholders who have purchased
stock from us prior to our initial public offering in respect of
the representations and warranties related to our outstanding
capitalization that were made at the time those stockholders
invested in our company. We are not able to predict with
certainty the amount of any liability we may ultimately have
with respect to this matter.
18
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus and any supplement to this prospectus, including
information incorporated by reference in this prospectus or any
supplement to this prospectus, contain forward-looking
statements. We may, in some cases, use words such as
project, believe,
anticipate, plan, expect,
estimate, intend, should,
would, could, potentially,
will, or may, or other words that convey
uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this
prospectus, and any supplement to this prospectus, including the
forward-looking statements that are incorporated by reference,
include statements about:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with the extensive regulatory framework
applicable to our industry, including Title IV of the
Higher Education Act and the regulations thereunder, state laws
and regulatory requirements, and accrediting agency requirements;
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding provisional certification;
|
|
|
|
the pace of growth of our enrollment;
|
|
|
|
our conversion of prospective students to enrolled students and
our retention of active students;
|
|
|
|
our ability to update and expand the content of existing
programs and the development of new programs in a cost-effective
manner or on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our maintenance and expansion of our relationships with the
United States Armed Forces and various organizations and the
development of new relationships;
|
|
|
|
the competitive environment in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
our cash needs and expectations regarding cash flow from
operations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage and grow our business and execution of our
business and growth strategies; and
|
|
|
|
our financial performance generally.
|
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements. There are a number of important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the results
anticipated by these forward-looking statements, which apply
only as of the date of this prospectus. These important factors
include those that we discuss in this prospectus under the
caption Risk Factors and elsewhere. You should read
these factors and the other cautionary statements made in this
prospectus as being applicable to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this prospectus. If one or
more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or
achievements may vary materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update any forward-looking statements after the date of
this prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by law.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We will use the proceeds primarily to pay offering expenses
payable by us. Any remaining proceeds will be used for working
capital and other general corporate purposes. We will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock
by the selling stockholders.
19
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
The selling stockholders intend to sell, transfer or otherwise
dispose of up to all of the shares of common stock being offered
by them in this offering in either a single transaction or a set
of simultaneous transactions at a time to be determined based on
their assessment of market conditions. These dispositions may be
at a fixed price, at a prevailing market price at the time of
sale, at a price related to the prevailing market price, or at a
negotiated price. Any sales of shares of common stock by us
would only be done at the same time as sales by the selling
stockholders.
We and the selling stockholders may use any one or more of the
following methods when selling the shares:
|
|
|
|
|
an underwritten offering on a firm commitment or best efforts
basis;
|
|
|
|
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the
shares as agent, but may position and resell a portion of the
block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
|
|
|
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the
broker-dealer for its account;
|
|
|
|
privately negotiated transactions;
|
|
|
|
a combination of any such methods of sale; and
|
|
|
|
any other manner permitted pursuant to applicable law.
|
The aggregate proceeds to us and the selling stockholders, as
applicable, from the sale of the common stock offered by us and
them will be the purchase price of the common stock less
discounts or commissions, if any. We and each of the selling
stockholders reserve the right to accept and, together with our
and their agents from time to time, to reject, in whole or in
part, any proposed purchase of common stock to be made directly
or through agents. We will not receive any of the proceeds from
the shares sold by the selling stockholders.
The selling stockholders and any underwriters, broker-dealers or
agents that participate in the sale of the common stock or
interests therein may be underwriters within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. Any
discounts, commissions, concessions or profit they earn on any
resale of the shares may be underwriting discounts and
commissions under the Securities Act. Selling stockholders who
are underwriters within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act will be subject to the
prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.
To the extent required, the shares of our common stock to be
sold, the respective purchase prices and public offering prices,
the names of any agents, dealer or underwriter, any applicable
commissions or discounts with respect to a particular offer will
be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement or, if
appropriate, a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement that includes this prospectus.
In order to comply with the securities laws of some states, if
applicable, the common stock may be sold in these jurisdictions
through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition,
in some states the common stock may not be sold unless it has
been registered or qualified for sale or an exemption from
registration or qualification requirements is available and is
complied with.
Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act,
any person engaged in the distribution of the resale shares may
not simultaneously engage in market activities with respect to
the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as
defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the
distribution. In addition, the selling stockholders will be
subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M,
which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of
the common stock by the selling stockholders or any other
person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the
selling stockholders and have informed them of the need to
deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior
to the time of the sale (including by compliance with
Rule 172 under the Securities Act).
Members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or
FINRA, may participate in distributions of the offered
securities. In compliance with the guidelines of FINRA, as of
the date of this prospectus, the maximum discount or commission
to be received by any FINRA member or independent broker-dealer
may not exceed 8.0% of the offering proceeds.
Subject to any agreements that we reach in connection with any
disposition, we will bear all expenses of the offering of common
stock. We have agreed to indemnify in certain circumstances the
selling stockholders and any brokers, dealers and agents who may
be deemed to be underwriters, if any, of the securities covered
by the registration statement, against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933.
20
REGULATION OF
OUR BUSINESS
The following discussion of the regulation of our business
reflects updates to and supercedes the discussion under the
heading Regulation of Our Business contained in
Item 1 of Part I of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
resulting from, among other things, recent changes to our
certification status under Title IV programs and recent
changes under applicable federal law.
We are subject to extensive regulation by (1) state
regulatory bodies, (2) accrediting agencies recognized by
the U.S. Secretary of Education and (3) the federal
government through the U.S. Department of Education and
under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or the
Higher Education Act. The regulations, standards and policies of
these agencies cover the vast majority of our operations,
including our educational programs, facilities, instructional
and administrative staff, administrative procedures, marketing,
recruiting, financial operations and financial condition.
As an institution of higher education that grants degrees,
diplomas and certificates, we are required to be authorized by
appropriate state education authorities. In addition, in certain
states as a condition of continued authorization to grant
degrees and in order to participate in various federal programs,
including tuition assistance programs of the United States Armed
Forces, a school must be accredited by an accrediting agency
recognized by the Secretary of Education. Accreditation is a
non-governmental process through which an institution submits to
qualitative review by an organization of peer institutions,
based on the standards of the accrediting agency and the stated
aims and purposes of the institution. The Higher Education Act
requires accrediting agencies recognized by the Secretary of
Education to review and monitor many aspects of an
institutions operations and to take appropriate action
when the institution fails to comply with the accrediting
agencys standards.
Our operations are also subject to regulation due to our
participation in federal student financial aid programs under
Title IV of the Higher Education Act, which we refer to in
this prospectus as Title IV programs. Title IV
programs, which are administered by the Department of Education,
include educational loans with below-market interest rates that
are guaranteed by the federal government in the event of
default. Title IV programs also include several grant
programs for students with the greatest economic need as
determined in accordance with the Higher Education Act and
Department of Education regulations. To participate in
Title IV programs, a school must receive and maintain
authorization by the appropriate state education agencies, be
accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary
of Education, and be certified as an eligible institution by the
Department of Education.
State
Education Licensure
We are authorized to offer our programs by the West Virginia
Higher Education Policy Commission, the regulatory agency
governing postsecondary education in the State of West Virginia,
where we are headquartered.
We are also authorized to operate as an out-of-state institution
by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia. We are
authorized in Virginia because we have administrative offices
there, which requires state authorization under Virginia laws.
We are currently reviewing the licensure requirements of other
states to determine whether our activities in these states
constitute a presence or otherwise require licensure or
authorization by the respective state educational agencies, and
we have received, and are in the process of seeking, licensure
or authorization in additional states. Because we enroll
students from each of the 50 states, as well as the
District of Columbia, and because we may undertake activities in
other states that constitute a presence or otherwise subject us
to the jurisdiction of the respective state educational agency,
from time to time we will need to seek licensure or
authorization in additional states.
The increasing popularity and use of the Internet and other
online services for the delivery of education has led and may
lead to the adoption of new laws and regulatory practices in the
United States or foreign countries and to new interpretations of
existing laws and regulations. These new laws, regulations and
interpretations may relate to issues such as the requirement
that online education institutions be licensed in one or more
jurisdictions where they have no physical location or other
presence. For instance, in some states we are or may be required
to seek licensure or authorization because our recruiters meet
with prospective students in the state. In other states, the
state educational agency requires, or may require, licensure or
authorization because, for example, we enroll students or employ
faculty who reside in the state. New laws,
21
regulations or interpretations related to doing business over
the Internet could increase our cost of doing business and
affect our ability to recruit students in particular states,
which could, in turn, negatively affect enrollments and revenues
and have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to extensive regulations by the states in which
we are authorized or licensed to operate. State laws typically
establish standards for instruction, qualifications of faculty,
administrative procedures, marketing, recruiting, financial
operations and other operational matters. State laws and
regulations may limit our ability to offer educational programs
and to award degrees. Some states may also prescribe financial
regulations that are different from those of the Department of
Education, and may require the posting of surety bonds. If we
fail to comply with state licensing requirements, we may lose
our state licensure or authorizations. Although we believe that
the only state authorization or licensure necessary for us to
participate in the tuition assistance programs for the United
States Armed Forces and in Title IV programs is our
authorization from the West Virginia Higher Education Policy
Commission, failure to comply with authorization or licensure
requirements in other states could restrict our ability to
recruit or enroll students in those states. Failure to comply
with the requirements of the West Virginia Higher Education
Policy Commission could result in our losing authorization from
the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission,
eligibility to participate in Title IV programs, or ability
to offer certain programs, any of which may force us to cease
operations.
Accreditation
We received institutional accreditation in 2006 from The Higher
Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges
and Schools, a regional accrediting agency recognized by the
Secretary of Education. Our next comprehensive evaluation will
be in 2010 2011, as part of a regularly scheduled
evaluation process. The Higher Learning Commission plans to
conduct a focused evaluation in Spring 2009 due to the August
2008 change in ownership under The Higher Learning
Commissions standards. Accreditation is a non-governmental
system for recognizing educational institutions and their
programs for student performance, governance, integrity,
educational quality, faculty, physical resources, administrative
capability and resources, and financial stability. In the United
States, this recognition comes primarily through private
voluntary associations that accredit institutions or programs of
higher education. To be recognized by the Secretary of
Education, accrediting agencies must adopt specific standards
and procedures for their review of educational institutions or
programs. Accrediting agencies establish criteria for
accreditation, conduct peer-review evaluations of institutions
and programs, and publicly designate those institutions that
meet their criteria. Accredited schools are subject to periodic
review by accrediting agencies to determine whether such schools
maintain the performance, integrity, and quality required for
accreditation.
The Higher Learning Commission is the same accrediting agency
that accredits such universities as The University of Chicago,
Northwestern University, West Virginia University, and other
degree-granting public and private colleges and universities in
its region (including Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Iowa,
Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North
Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, New Mexico, South Dakota, West
Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming).
Accreditation by The Higher Learning Commission is an important
attribute of ours. Colleges and universities depend, in part, on
accreditation in evaluating transfers of credit and applications
to graduate schools. Employers rely on the accredited status of
institutions when evaluating a candidates credentials, and
students and corporate and government sponsors under tuition
reimbursement programs look to accreditation for assurance that
an institution maintains quality educational standards.
Moreover, institutional accreditation by an accrediting agency
recognized by the Secretary of Education is necessary for
eligibility to participate in tuition assistance programs of the
United States Armed Forces and Title IV programs.
In addition to regional accreditation, we have been accredited
by the Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and
Training Council, or DETC, since 1995. DETC is a national
accrediting agency that is recognized by the Secretary of
Education. The Higher Learning Commission, and not DETC, is our
designated primary accreditor for Title IV program purposes.
We believe many prospective students, employers, state licensing
authorities and higher education organizations may view
accreditation by a regional accrediting agency to be more
prestigious than accreditation by a national accrediting agency,
and loss of our regional accreditation would reduce the
marketability of American Public University System even if we
were to maintain our national accreditation.
22
We also believe that military personnel are counseled that
regional accreditation is an important consideration when
selecting a postsecondary institution and that there are further
opportunities to leverage regional accreditation to service
members, such as joining degree networks previously closed to us
like the Servicemember Opportunity Colleges Degree Network
System, a DoD program that promotes its member institutions to
military professionals.
Nature of
Federal, State and Private Financial Support for Postsecondary
Education
Our students finance their education through a combination of
individual resources, tuition assistance programs of the United
States Armed Forces, private loans, corporate reimbursement
programs, and Title IV programs. Participation in these
programs adds to the regulation of our operations.
Service members of the United States Armed Forces are eligible
to receive tuition assistance from their branch of service
through the Uniform Tuition Assistance Program of the Department
of Defense, or DoD. Service members may use this tuition
assistance to pursue postsecondary degrees at postsecondary
schools that are accredited by accrediting agencies that are
recognized by the Secretary of Education. For our undergraduate
programs we have established tuition per course that can be 100%
covered by DoD tuition assistance funds, resulting in no
out-of-pocket costs to undergraduate military students to attend
our institution. Each branch of the armed forces has established
its own rules for the tuition assistance programs of DoD.
Pursuant to these rules, in order for service members to use
their tuition assistance funds at American Public University
System, we need to maintain our state licensure and either our
regional or national accreditation and the service member must
maintain satisfactory academic progress and must also progress
in a timely manner toward completion of their degree.
To the extent that tuition assistance programs do not cover the
full cost of tuition for service members, service members may
also use their benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill
administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or
VA, through the GI Bills
Top-Up
feature. If we lost our eligibility to receive tuition
assistance from the United States Armed Forces, or if the amount
of tuition assistance per service member is reduced, military
service members would need to seek alternative funds. While they
may be able to use their education benefits under the Montgomery
GI Bill in lieu of DoD tuition assistance funds, we do not know
if that option would be as attractive to these students. As a
result, the inability to participate in DoD tuition assistance
programs, and any reduction in the funding for DoD tuition
assistance programs, could have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
The federal government provides a substantial part of its
support for postsecondary education through Title IV
programs, in the form of grants and loans to students who can
use those funds at any institution that has been certified by
the Department of Education to participate in Title IV
programs. Aid under Title IV programs is primarily awarded
on the basis of financial need, generally defined as the
difference between the cost of attending the institution and the
amount a student can reasonably contribute to that cost. All
recipients of Title IV program funds must maintain
satisfactory academic progress and must also progress in a
timely manner toward completion of their program of study. In
addition, each school must ensure that Title IV program
funds are properly accounted for and disbursed in the correct
amounts to eligible students.
We were first certified to participate in Title IV programs
in September 2006. The Department of Education has approved us
to participate in the following Title IV programs
(described below): (1) the Federal Family Education Loan
Program (the FFEL program), (2) William D. Ford
Federal Direct Loan Program (the Direct Loan
Program), (3) the Federal Pell Grant program (the
Pell program) and (4) campus-based programs.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
FFEL Program. Under the FFEL program, banks
and other lending institutions make loans to students and
parents of dependent students. The FFEL program includes the
Federal Stafford Loan Program, the Federal PLUS Program (which
beginning on July 1, 2006 provides for making loans to
graduate and professional students as well as to parents of
dependent undergraduate students), and the Federal Consolidation
Loan Program. If a student defaults on a loan, payment is
guaranteed by a federally recognized guaranty agency, which is
then reimbursed by the Department of Education. Students who
demonstrate financial need may qualify for a subsidized Stafford
loan. With a subsidized Stafford loan, the federal government
will pay the interest on the loan while the student is in school
and during any approved periods of deferment, until the
students obligation to repay the
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
loan begins. Unsubsidized Stafford loans are available to
students who do not qualify for a subsidized Stafford loan or,
in some cases, in addition to a subsidized Stafford loan.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Direct Loan Program. Under the Direct Loan
Program, the Department of Education makes loans directly to
students rather than guaranteeing loans made by lending
institutions. To date, we have not originated any loans under
this program but are taking steps to enable us to do so if we
decide to participate actively in the program.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Federal Pell Grants. Grants under the Federal
Pell Grant program are available to eligible students based on
financial need and other factors.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Campus-Based Programs. The
campus-based Title IV programs include the
Federal Supplemental Education Opportunity Grant program, the
Federal Work-Study program and the Federal Perkins Loan program.
|
In addition to the programs stated above, eligible students may
participate in several other financial aid programs or receive
support from other governmental and private sources. For
example, some of our students who are veterans use their
benefits under the GI Bill to cover their tuition. Certain of
our students are also eligible to receive funds from other
educational assistance programs administered by the VA. Pursuant
to federal law providing benefits for veterans and reservists,
we are approved for education of veterans and members of the
selective reserve and their dependents by the state approving
agencies in Virginia and West Virginia. We offer institutional
financial aid to eligible students, such as members of the
National Sheriffs Association. In certain circumstances,
our students may access alternative loan programs. Alternative
loans are intended to cover the difference between what the
student receives from all financial aid sources and the full
cost of the students education. Students can apply to a
number of different lenders for this funding at current market
interest rates. Finally, some of our students finance their own
education or receive full or partial tuition reimbursement from
their employers.
On June 30, 2008, President Bush signed the Post-9/11
Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008. The legislation,
sometimes referred to as the New GI Bill, expands
educational benefits for veterans who have served on active duty
since September 11, 2001, including reservists and members
of the National Guard. Under the New GI Bill, eligible veterans
may receive benefits for tuition purposes up to the cost of
in-state tuition at the most expensive public institution of
higher education in the state where the veteran is enrolled. In
addition, veterans who are not enrolled in distance education
programs may receive monthly housing stipends. Veterans may also
receive up to $1,000 per academic year for books and other
educational costs. The provisions regarding benefits for
post-9/11 veterans are effective August 1, 2009. The
legislation also increases the amount of educational benefits
available to eligible veterans under pre-existing law, namely
the Montgomery GI Bill, effective August 1, 2008. The
legislation also authorizes expansion of servicemembers
ability to transfer veterans education benefits to family
members. We cannot predict with certainty whether and how the
New GI Bill, including the tuition benefit formula and the
housing stipend provisions distance education exclusion,
might affect our operations.
Regulation
of Title IV Financial Aid Programs
To be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, an
institution must comply with specific standards and procedures
set forth in the Higher Education Act and the regulations issued
thereunder by the Department of Education. An institution must,
among other things, be licensed or authorized to offer its
educational programs by the state within which it is physically
located (in our case, West Virginia) and maintain institutional
accreditation by a recognized accrediting agency. In May 2008,
we were fully recertified to participate in Title IV
programs after having completed an initial period of
participation during which we were provisionally certified. In
August 2008, we were deemed to have undergone a change in
ownership and control requiring review by the Department of
Education in order to reestablish our eligibility and continue
participation in Title IV programs. In connection with this
review, we submitted to the Department of Education a change in
ownership application that included the submission of required
documentation, including a letter from The Higher Learning
Commission indicating that it had approved the change. On
October 2, 2008, we received a letter from the Department
of Education approving the change in ownership and control and
granting us provisional certification until September 30,
2010. See Regulatory Actions and Restrictions
on Operations below for more information.
24
The substantial amount of federal funds disbursed through
Title IV programs, the large number of students and
institutions participating in these programs, and allegations of
fraud and abuse by certain for-profit institutions have caused
Congress to require the Department of Education to exercise
considerable regulatory oversight over for-profit institutions
of higher learning. Accrediting agencies and state education
agencies also have responsibilities for overseeing compliance of
institutions with Title IV program requirements. As a
result, our institution is subject to extensive oversight and
review. Because the Department of Education periodically revises
its regulations and changes its interpretations of existing laws
and regulations, and because Congress recently enacted
legislation that imposes new obligations on institutions, we
cannot predict with certainty how the Title IV program
requirements will be applied in all circumstances.
Significant factors relating to Title IV programs that
could adversely affect us include the following:
Congressional Action. Congress reauthorizes
the Higher Education Act approximately every five to six years.
On July 31, 2008, Congress completed the reauthorization
process by passing the Higher Education Opportunity Act or HEOA.
President Bush signed the bill into law on August 14, 2008.
HEOA provisions are effective upon enactment, unless otherwise
specified in the law. Selected HEOA provisions are described in
relevant parts of this prospectus. Although Congress took many
years to complete reauthorization, three laws to amend and
reauthorize aspects of the Higher Education Act have been
enacted in the meantime. In February 2006, President Bush signed
the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which includes the Higher
Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 or HERA. Among other
measures, HERA reauthorized the Higher Education Act with
respect to the federal guaranteed student loan programs. In
September 2007, President Bush signed the College Cost Reduction
and Access Act, which increased benefits to students under the
Title IV programs and reduced payments to and raised costs
for lenders that participate in the federal student loan
programs. In May 2008, President Bush signed the Ensuring
Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008, which was
designed to facilitate student loan availability and to increase
student access to federal financial aid in light of current
market conditions. HEOA includes numerous new and revised
requirements for higher education institutions and thus
increases substantially regulatory burdens imposed on such
institutions under the Higher Education Act. We cannot predict
with certainty the effect HEOAs provisions will have on
our business. In addition, we cannot predict with certainty
whether or when Congress might act to amend further the Higher
Education Act. The elimination of certain Title IV
programs, material changes in the requirements for participation
in such programs, or the substitution of materially different
programs could increase our costs of compliance and could reduce
the ability of certain students to finance their education at
our institution.
The Department of Education has stated that affected parties are
responsible for taking steps to comply by the effective dates
established in HEOA, even though the Department of Education has
yet to issue regulations to implement HEOAs provisions.
The Department of Education started the negotiated rulemaking
process for certain parts of HEOA by holding a series of public
meetings. The Higher Education Act requires negotiated
rulemaking for the development of all regulations implementing
statutory changes to Title IV of the Higher Education Act,
which contains the federal student financial assistance
programs. The Department of Education anticipates that it will
establish negotiated rulemaking committees and begin
negotiations by February 2009. The Department of Education has
also explained that where negotiated rulemaking is not required,
HEOAs provisions will be implemented either through the
usual notice and comment process or, where regulations will
merely reflect the changes to the Higher Education Act and not
expand upon those changes, as technical changes. We cannot
predict how the Department of Education will interpret
HEOAs provisions through rulemaking or otherwise. If our
efforts to comply with HEOAs provisions are inconsistent
with how the Department of Education interprets those provisions
in final regulations or otherwise, we may be found to be in
noncompliance with such provisions and the Department of
Education could impose monetary penalties, place limitations on
our operations,
and/or
condition or terminate our eligibility to receive Title IV
program funds.
In addition, Congress reviews and determines appropriations for
Title IV programs on an annual basis through the budget and
appropriations process. A reduction in federal funding levels of
such programs could reduce the ability of certain students to
finance their education. These changes, in turn, could lead to
lower enrollments, require us to increase our reliance upon
alternative sources of student financial aid and impact our
growth plans. The loss of or a significant reduction in
Title IV program funds available to our students
25
could reduce our enrollment and revenue and possibly have a
material adverse effect on our business and plans for growth. In
addition, the legislation and implementing regulations
applicable to our operations have been subject to frequent
revisions, many of which have increased the level of scrutiny to
which for-profit postsecondary educational institutions are
subjected and have raised applicable standards. If we were not
to continue to comply with legislation and implementing
regulations applicable to our operations, such non-compliance
might impair our ability to participate in Title IV
programs, offer educational programs or continue to operate.
Certain of the statutory and regulatory requirements applicable
to us are described below.
Eligibility and Certification Procedures. Each
institution must apply periodically to the Department of
Education for continued certification to participate in
Title IV programs. Such recertification generally is
required every six years, but may be required earlier, including
when an institution undergoes a change of control. An
institution may come under the Department of Educations
review when it expands its activities in certain ways, such as
opening an additional location or, in certain cases, when it
modifies academic credentials that it offers. The Department of
Education may place an institution on provisional certification
status if it finds that the institution does not fully satisfy
all of the eligibility and certification standards and in
certain other circumstances, such as when an institution is
certified for the first time or undergoes a change in ownership
resulting in a change in control. During the period of
provisional certification, the institution must comply with any
additional conditions included in its program participation
agreement. In addition, the Department of Education may more
closely review an institution that is provisionally certified if
it applies for approval to open a new location, add an
educational program, acquire another school or make any other
significant change. If the Department of Education determines
that a provisionally certified institution is unable to meet its
responsibilities under its program participation agreement, it
may seek to revoke the institutions certification to
participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process
protections for the institution than if it were fully certified.
Students attending provisionally certified institutions remain
eligible to receive Title IV program funds. We are
currently provisionally certified because we have recently
undergone a change in ownership and control.
In August 2008, we were deemed to have undergone a change in
ownership and control requiring review by the Department of
Education in order to reestablish our eligibility and continue
participation in Title IV programs. In connection with this
review, we submitted to the Department of Education a change in
ownership application that included the submission of required
documentation, including a letter from The Higher Learning
Commission indicating that it had approved the change. On
October 2, 2008, we received a letter from the Department
of Education approving the change in ownership and control and
granting us provisional certification until September 30,
2010. See Regulatory Actions and Restrictions
on Operations for more information.
Distance Learning and Repeal of the 50%
Rules. We offer all of our existing degree,
diploma and certificate programs via Internet-based
telecommunications from our headquarters in Charles Town, West
Virginia.
Prior to passage of HERA as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, the Higher Education Act generally excluded from
Title IV programs institutions at which (1) more than
50% of the institutions courses were offered via
correspondence methods, which included online courses under
certain circumstances, or (2) 50% or more of the
institutions students were enrolled in courses delivered
via correspondence methods, which included online courses under
certain circumstances (i.e., the 50% Rules).
Because 100% of our courses are online courses, the 50% Rule
regarding online courses previously disqualified us from
participation in Title IV programs.
As part of the 1998 amendments to the Higher Education Act, the
Department of Education was authorized to waive specific
statutory and regulatory requirements in order to assess the
viability of online educational offerings. Under the Distance
Education Demonstration Program, or Demonstration Program,
institutions were allowed to seek waivers of certain regulatory
provisions that inhibited the offering of distance education
programs, including the 50% Rules. Participation in the
Demonstration Program included regular submissions of data to
the Department of Education. Only institutions that were
accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by the Secretary
of Education for purposes of participation in Title IV
programs were allowed to participate in the Demonstration
Program. We were not eligible to participate in the
Demonstration Program, because at the time the Department of
Education was accepting applicants we were accredited
26
exclusively by the Distance Education and Training Council,
whose accrediting authority at that time did not extend to
Title IV programs.
Effective July 1, 2006, the 50% Rules were repealed for
telecommunications courses (which include online courses) as
part of HERA, but remain in place for traditional correspondence
courses. Accordingly, online institutions such as us, which
offer their courses exclusively through telecommunications, are
no longer subject to the 50% Rules. Following passage of HERA,
the Department of Education also terminated the Demonstration
Program effective as of June 30, 2006.
Under HEOA, an accreditor that evaluates institutions offering
distance education must require such institutions to have
processes through which the institution establishes that a
student who registers for a distance education program is the
same student who participates in and receives credit for the
program. At this time we cannot predict with certainty how our
accreditors will interpret this provision for purposes of their
own requirements and whether such interpretation will impact our
operations.
Administrative Capability. Department of
Education regulations specify extensive criteria by which an
institution must establish that it has the requisite
administrative capability to participate in
Title IV programs. Failure to satisfy any of the standards
may lead the Department of Education to find the institution
ineligible to participate in Title IV programs or to place
the institution on provisional certification as a condition of
its participation. To meet the administrative capability
standards, an institution must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
comply with all applicable Title IV program regulations;
|
|
|
|
have capable and sufficient personnel to administer
Title IV programs;
|
|
|
|
have acceptable methods of defining and measuring the
satisfactory academic progress of its students;
|
|
|
|
not have cohort default rates above specified levels;
|
|
|
|
have various procedures in place for safeguarding federal funds;
|
|
|
|
not be, and not have any principal or affiliate who is, debarred
or suspended from federal contracting or engaging in activity
that is cause for debarment or suspension;
|
|
|
|
provide financial aid counseling to its students;
|
|
|
|
refer to the Department of Educations Office of Inspector
General any credible information indicating that any applicant,
student, employee or agent of the institution has been engaged
in any fraud or other illegal conduct involving Title IV
programs;
|
|
|
|
submit in a timely manner all reports and financial statements
required by the regulations; and
|
|
|
|
not otherwise appear to lack administrative capability.
|
If an institution fails to satisfy any of these criteria or any
other Department of Education regulation, the Department of
Education may:
|
|
|
|
|
require the repayment of Title IV funds;
|
|
|
|
transfer the institution from the advance system of
payment of Title IV funds to cash monitoring status or to
the reimbursement system of payment;
|
|
|
|
place the institution on provisional certification
status; or
|
|
|
|
commence a proceeding to impose a fine or to limit, suspend or
terminate the participation of the institution in Title IV
programs.
|
If we are found not to have satisfied the Department of
Educations administrative capability
requirements, we could lose, or be limited in our access to,
Title IV program funding.
Third Party Servicers. Department of Education
regulations permit an institution to enter into a written
contract with a third-party servicer for the administration of
any aspect of the institutions participation in
Title IV programs. The third-party servicer must, among
other obligations, comply with Title IV requirements and be
jointly and severally liable with the institution to the
Secretary of Education for any violation by the servicer of any
Title IV provision. An institution must report to the
Department of Education new contracts with or any significant
modifications to contracts with third-party servicers as well as
other matters related to third-party servicers. We contract with
the third-party servicer Global Financial Aid Services, Inc.,
which performs activities related to our participation in
Title IV programs. If Global Financial Aid Services, Inc.
27
does not comply with applicable statute and regulations
including the Higher Education Act, we may be liable for their
actions and we could lose our eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs.
Financial Responsibility. The Higher Education
Act and Department of Education regulations establish extensive
standards of financial responsibility that institutions such as
us must satisfy in order to participate in Title IV
programs. These standards generally require that an institution
provide the resources necessary to comply with Title IV
program requirements and meet all of its financial obligations,
including required refunds and any repayments to the Department
of Education for liabilities incurred in programs administered
by the Department of Education.
The Department of Education evaluates institutions on an annual
basis for compliance with specified financial responsibility
standards. Generally, the standards require an institution to
receive an unqualified opinion from its accountants on its
audited financial statements, maintain sufficient cash reserves
to satisfy refund requirements, meet all of its financial
obligations and remain current on its debt payments. The
financial responsibility standards include a complex formula
that uses line items from the institutions audited
financial statements. The formula focuses on three financial
ratios: (1) equity ratio (which measures the
institutions capital resources, financial viability and
ability to borrow); (2) primary reserve ratio (which
measures the institutions viability and liquidity); and
(3) net income ratio (which measures the institutions
profitability or ability to operate within its means). An
institutions financial ratios must yield a composite score
of at least 1.5 for the institution to be deemed financially
responsible without the need for further federal oversight. The
Department of Education may also apply such measures of
financial responsibility to the operating company and ownership
entities of an eligible institution. At the request of the
Department of Education, we supply our consolidated financial
statements to the Department of Education for purposes of
calculating the composite score. We have applied the financial
responsibility standards to our consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007,
and calculated a composite score of 3.0 out of a maximum score
of 3.0. We therefore believe that we meet the Department of
Educations composite score standards. If the Department of
Education were to determine that we did not meet the financial
responsibility standards due to a failure to meet the composite
score or other factors, we may be able to establish financial
responsibility on an alternative basis by, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
posting a letter of credit in an amount equal to at least 50% of
the total Title IV program funds received by us during our
most recently completed fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
posting a letter of credit in an amount equal to at least 10% of
such prior years Title IV program funds received by
us, accepting provisional certification, complying with
additional Department of Education monitoring requirements and
agreeing to receive Title IV program funds under an
arrangement other than the Department of Educations
standard advance payment arrangement such as the
reimbursement system of payment or cash
monitoring; or
|
|
|
|
complying with additional Department of Education monitoring
requirements and agreeing to receive Title IV program funds
under an arrangement other than the Department of
Educations standard advance payment arrangement such as
the reimbursement system of payment or cash
monitoring.
|
Failure to meet the Department of Educations
financial responsibility requirements, because we do
not meet the Department of Educations minimum composite
score to establish financial responsibility or are unable to
establish financial responsibility on an alternative basis or
fail to meet other financial responsibility requirements, would
cause us to lose access to Title IV program funding.
Title IV Return of Funds. Under the
Department of Educations return of funds regulations, an
institution must return unearned funds to the Department of
Education in a timely manner. An institution must first
determine the amount of Title IV program funds that a
student earned. If the student withdraws during the
first 60% of any period of enrollment or payment period, the
amount of Title IV program funds that the student earned is
equal to a pro rata portion of the funds for which the student
would otherwise be eligible. If the student withdraws after the
60% threshold, then the student has earned 100% of the
Title IV program funds. The institution must return to the
appropriate Title IV programs, in a specified order, the
lesser of (i) the unearned Title IV program funds or
(ii) the institutional charges incurred by the student for
the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned
Title IV program funds. An institution must return the
funds no later than 45 days after the date of the
institutions determination that a student withdrew. If
such payments are not timely made, an institution may be subject
to adverse action, including being required to submit a letter
of
28
credit equal to 25% of the refunds the institution should have
made in its most recently completed fiscal year. Under
Department of Education regulations, late returns of
Title IV program funds for 5% or more of students sampled
in the institutions annual compliance audit constitutes
material non-compliance.
The 90/10 Rule. A requirement of the Higher
Education Act, commonly referred to as the 90/10
Rule, applies only to proprietary institutions of
higher education, which includes us. Under the Higher
Education Act, a proprietary institution is prohibited from
deriving, on a cash accounting basis, more than 90% of its
revenues for any fiscal year from Title IV funds. Prior to
the adoption of HEOA, an institution that violated the rule
became ineligible to participate in Title IV programs as of
the first day of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in
which it exceeded 90%, and it was unable to apply to regain its
eligibility until the next fiscal year.
HEOA changed the 90/10 Rule from an eligibility requirement to a
compliance obligation that is part of an institutions
program participation agreement with the Department of
Education. Accordingly, HEOA generally lessens the severity of
noncompliance with the 90/10 Rule, although repeated
noncompliance will result in loss of eligibility to participate
in Title IV programs. Under the terms of HEOA, a
proprietary institution of higher education that violates the
90/10 Rule for any fiscal year will be placed on provisional
status for two fiscal years. Proprietary institutions of higher
education that violate the 90/10 Rule for two consecutive fiscal
years will become ineligible to participate in Title IV
programs for at least two fiscal years and will be required to
demonstrate compliance with Title IV eligibility and
certification requirements for at least two fiscal years prior
to resuming Title IV program participation. HEOA generally
codifies the formula for 90/10 Rule calculations as set forth in
current Department of Education regulations, but also expands on
the Department of Educations formula in certain respects,
including by broadening the categories of funds that may be
counted as revenue for 90/10 Rule purposes. HEOAs changes
to the 90/10 Rule are effective upon enactment, which occurred
on August 14, 2008.
Student Loan Defaults. Under the Higher
Education Act, an educational institution may lose its
eligibility to participate in some or all of the Title IV
programs if defaults on the repayment of FFEL program or Direct
Loan Program loans by its students exceed certain levels. For
each federal fiscal year, a rate of student defaults (known as a
cohort default rate) is calculated for each
institution with 30 or more borrowers entering repayment in a
given federal fiscal year by determining the rate at which
borrowers who become subject to their repayment obligation in
that federal fiscal year default by the end of the next federal
fiscal year. For such institutions, the Department of Education
calculates a single cohort default rate for each federal fiscal
year that includes in the cohort all current or former student
borrowers at the institution who entered repayment on any FFEL
program or Direct Loan Program loan during that year.
If the Department of Education notifies an institution that its
cohort default rates for each of the three most recent federal
fiscal years are 25% or greater, the institutions
participation in the FFEL program, Direct Loan Program and Pell
program ends 30 days after the notification, unless the
institution appeals in a timely manner that determination on
specified grounds and according to specified procedures. In
addition, an institutions participation in the FFEL
program and Direct Loan Program ends 30 days after
notification that its most recent cohort default rate is greater
than 40%, unless the institution timely appeals that
determination on specified grounds and according to specified
procedures. An institution whose participation ends under these
provisions may not participate in the relevant programs for the
remainder of the fiscal year in which the institution receives
the notification, as well as for the next two fiscal years.
If an institutions cohort default rate equals or exceeds
25% in any single year, the institution may be placed on
provisional certification status. Provisional certification does
not limit an institutions access to Title IV program
funds; however, an institution with provisional status is
subject to closer review by the Department of Education and may
be subject to summary adverse action if it violates
Title IV program requirements. Because we have just begun
to enroll students who are participating in the federal student
loan programs, we have no historical cohort default rate.
Relatively few students are expected to enter the repayment
phase in the near term, which could result in defaults by a few
students having a relatively large impact on our cohort default
rate.
HEOA modified the Higher Education Acts cohort default
rate provisions related to FFEL program and Direct Loan Program
loans. Beginning with cohort default rate calculations for
federal fiscal year 2009, the cohort default rate will be
calculated by determining the rate at which borrowers who become
subject to their repayment obligation in the relevant federal
fiscal year default by the end of the second federal fiscal
year.
29
The current method of calculating rates will remain in effect
and will be used to determine institutional eligibility until
three consecutive years of cohort default rates calculated under
the new formula are available. In addition, effective as of
federal fiscal year 2012, the cohort default rate threshold of
25% will be increased to 30%. An institution whose cohort
default rate is equal to or greater than 30% for each of the
three most recent federal fiscal years for which data are
available will be ineligible to participate in the Title IV
programs. If an institutions cohort default rate is 30% or
more in a given fiscal year, the institution will be required to
assemble a default prevention task force and submit
to the Department of Education a default improvement plan.
Institutions that exceed 30% for two consecutive years will be
required to review, revise and resubmit their default
improvement plans, and the Department of Education may direct
that such plan be amended to include actions, with measurable
objectives, that it determines will promote loan repayment. An
institution whose cohort default rate is 30% or more for any two
consecutive federal fiscal years may file an appeal to
demonstrate exceptional mitigating circumstances and, if the
Secretary of Education determines that the institution
demonstrated such circumstances, the Secretary may not subject
the institution to provisional certification based solely on the
institutions cohort default rate. At this time, we cannot
predict the effect that this change may have on our ability to
meet cohort default rate standards.
Incentive Compensation Rules. As part of an
institutions program participation agreement with the
Department of Education and in accordance with the Higher
Education Act, an institution may not provide any commission,
bonus or other incentive payment to any person or entity engaged
in any student recruitment, admissions or financial aid awarding
activity based directly or indirectly on success in securing
enrollments or financial aid. Certain Department of Education
regulations clarify the incentive payment rule. The regulations
set forth 12 safe harbors, which describe payments
or arrangements that do not violate the incentive payment rule.
Failure to comply with the incentive compensation rule could
result in loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV
programs, limitations on participation in Title IV
programs, or financial penalties.
Although there can be no assurance that the Department of
Education would not find deficiencies in our present or former
employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements,
we believe that our employee compensation and third-party
contractual arrangements comply with the incentive compensation
provisions of the Higher Education Act and Department of
Education regulations thereunder.
Code of Conduct Related to Student Loans. HEOA
adds a new requirement, as part of an institutions program
participation agreement with the Department of Education, that
institutions that participate in Title IV programs adopt a
code of conduct pertinent to student loans. For financial aid
office or other employees who have responsibility related to
education loans, the code must forbid, with limited exceptions,
gifts, consulting arrangements with lenders, and advisory board
compensation other than reasonable expense reimbursement. The
code also must ban revenue-sharing arrangements,
opportunity pools that lenders offer in exchange for
certain promises and staffing assistance from lenders. The
institution must post the code prominently on its website and
ensure that its officers, employees, and agents who have
financial aid responsibilities are informed annually of the
codes provisions. In addition to the code of conduct
requirements that apply to institutions, HEOA contains
provisions that apply to federal and private lenders,
prohibiting such lenders from engaging in certain activities as
they interact with institutions. Failure to comply with the code
of conduct provision could result in loss of eligibility to
participate in Title IV programs, limitations on
participation in Title IV programs, or financial penalties.
Preferred Lender Lists. The Department of
Education recently published regulations, effective July 1,
2008, that in part address institutions student loan
activity. In particular, the Department of Educations
regulations establish new rules applicable to institutions that
make available a list of recommended or suggested lenders for
use by potential borrowers. For example, an institution must
include at least three unaffiliated lenders on a list, must
disclose the method and criteria used to select lenders, must
provide comparative information about benefits offered by listed
lenders, must include a prominent statement that
borrowers may select a lender not on the list, and must update
the list and accompanying information at least annually.
Under HEOA, institutions that receive any federal funding and
enter into preferred lender arrangements must comply with
certain requirements related to development and disclosure of
preferred lender list. Such institutions must submit annual
reports to the Department of Education that explain, among other
matters, why the institution has a preferred lending
arrangement. Such institution also must publish a code of
conduct with certain specified provisions. If the institution
participates in Title IV programs, the institutions
preferred lender list must satisfy certain requirements, many of
which are included in current Department of Education
30
regulations. In addition, HEOA requires an institution to
exercise a duty of care and a duty of loyalty to compile a
preferred lender list without prejudice and for the sole benefit
of students at the institution and their families. The list must
cover the institutions preferred lender arrangements
related to federal and private loans. Institutions with
preferred lenders also must make certain disclosures
based on information provided annually by the lender to the
institution for each type of loan offered under a
preferred lender arrangement. Failure to comply with preferred
lender list rules under the Higher Education Act or the
Department of Educations regulations could result in loss
of eligibility to participate in federal student financial aid
programs, limitations on participation in federal student
financial aid programs, or financial penalties.
College Affordability and Transparency
Lists. Under HEOA, beginning July 1, 2011,
the Department of Education will publish on its website lists of
the top five percent of institutions, in each of nine
categories, with (1) the highest tuition and fees for the
most recent academic year, (2) the highest net
price for the most recent academic year, (3) the
largest percentage increase in tuition and fees for the most
recent three academic years, and (4) the largest percentage
increase in net price for the most recent three academic years.
An institution that is placed on a list for high percentage
increases in either tuition and fees or in net price must submit
a report to the Department of Education explaining the increases
and the steps that it intends to take to reduce costs. The
Department of Education will report annually to Congress on
these institutions and will publish their reports on its web
site. The Department of Education also will post lists of the
top 10% of institutions in each of the nine categories with
lowest tuition and fees or the lowest net price for the most
recent academic year. Under HEOA, net price means average yearly
price actually charged to first-time, full-time undergraduate
students who receive student aid at a higher education
institution after such aid is deducted. We cannot predict with
certainty the effect such lists will have on our operations.
Lobbying. HEOA forbids postsecondary education
institutions to use Higher Education Act funds to compensate any
person for influencing or attempting to influence certain
government officials or employees with regard to certain federal
actions, including, for example, the awarding of federal
contracts. In addition, under HEOA, no Title IV program
funds may be used to hire a registered lobbyist or to pay any
person or entity for securing an earmark. An institution must
certify annually that it has abided by these HEOA provisions.
HEOA grants the Secretary of Education authority to take such
actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions are
implemented and enforced.
Compliance Reviews. We are subject to
announced and unannounced compliance reviews and audits by
various external agencies, including the Department of
Education, its Office of Inspector General (OIG),
state licensing agencies, agencies that guarantee FFEL program
loans, the Department of Veterans Affairs and accrediting
agencies. As part of the Department of Educations ongoing
monitoring of institutions administration of Title IV
programs, the Higher Education Act and Department of Education
regulations also require institutions to submit annually a
compliance audit conducted by an independent certified public
accountant in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and
applicable audit standards of the Department of Education. In
addition, to enable the Secretary of Education to make a
determination of financial responsibility, institutions must
annually submit audited financial statements prepared in
accordance with Department of Education regulations.
Privacy. The Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974, or FERPA, and the Department of
Educations FERPA regulations require institutions to allow
students to review and request changes to such students
education records maintained by the institution, notify students
at least annually of this inspection right, and maintain records
in each students file listing requests for access to and
disclosures of personally identifiable information and the
interest of such party in the students personally
identifiable information. FERPA also limits the disclosure of a
students personally identifiable information by an
institution without such students prior written consent.
If an institution fails to comply with FERPA or the Department
of Educations FERPA regulations, the Department of
Education may require corrective actions by the institution,
withhold further payments under any applicable Title IV
program or terminate an institutions eligibility to
participate in Title IV programs. In addition, an
institution participating in any Title IV program is
obligated to safeguard customer information pursuant to
applicable provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, or GLBA,
and Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, regulations. GLBA and the
GLBA regulations require an institution to develop and maintain
a comprehensive information security program to protect
personally identifiable financial information of students,
parents or other individuals with whom an institution has a
31
customer relationship. If an institution fails to comply with
GLBA or GLBA regulations, it may be required to take corrective
actions, be subject to FTC monitoring and oversight, and be
subject to fines or penalties imposed by the FTC.
Potential Effect of Regulatory Violations. If
we fail to comply with the regulatory standards governing
Title IV programs, the Department of Education could impose
one or more sanctions, including transferring us to the
reimbursement or cash monitoring system of payment, seeking to
require repayment of certain Title IV program funds,
requiring us to post a letter of credit in favor of the
Department of Education as a condition for continued
Title IV certification, taking emergency action against us,
referring the matter for criminal prosecution or initiating
proceedings to impose a fine or to limit, condition, suspend or
terminate our participation in Title IV programs. In
addition, the agencies that guarantee FFEL loans for our
students could initiate proceedings to limit, suspend or
terminate our eligibility to provide guaranteed student loans in
the event of certain regulatory violations. If such sanctions or
proceedings were imposed against us and resulted in a
substantial curtailment, or termination, of our participation in
Title IV programs, our enrollments, revenues and results of
operations would be materially and adversely affected.
If we lost our eligibility to participate in Title IV
programs, or if Congress reduced the amount of available federal
student financial aid, we would seek to arrange or provide
alternative sources of revenue or financial aid for students.
Although we believe that one or more private organizations would
be willing to provide financial assistance to students attending
our universities, there is no assurance that this would be the
case, and the interest rate and other terms of such financial
aid might not be as favorable as those for Title IV program
funds. We may be required to guarantee all or part of such
alternative assistance or might incur other additional costs in
connection with securing alternative sources of financial aid.
Accordingly, the loss of our eligibility to participate in
Title IV programs, or a reduction in the amount of
available federal student financial aid, would be expected to
have a material adverse effect on our growth plans and results
of operations even if we could arrange or provide alternative
sources of revenue or student financial aid.
In addition to the actions that may be brought against us as a
result of our participation in Title IV, we also may be
subject, from time to time, to complaints and lawsuits relating
to regulatory compliance brought not only by our regulatory
agencies, but also by other government agencies and third
parties, such as present or former students or employees and
other members of the public.
Regulatory
Actions and Restrictions on Operations
Many actions that we may wish to take in connection with our
operations are also subject to regulation from a variety of
agencies.
Restrictions on Adding Educational
Programs. State requirements and accrediting
agency standards may, in certain instances, limit our ability to
establish additional programs. Many states require approval
before institutions can add new programs under specified
conditions. The Higher Learning Commission, DETC, and the West
Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission require institutions
to notify them in advance of implementing new programs, and upon
notification may undertake a review of the institutions
licensure, authorization or accreditation.
Under the Higher Education Act and Department of Education
regulations, a proprietary institution of higher education must
have been in existence for at least two years in order to be
eligible to participate in Title IV programs. The
Department of Education considers an institution to have been in
existence for two years if it was legally authorized to give
(and continuously was giving) the same postsecondary instruction
for at least two consecutive years. Thus, when a for-profit
institution applies to participate in Title IV programs for
the first time, it must show that it is in compliance with the
so-called two-year rule. An institution subject to the two-year
rule may not award Title IV funds to a student in a program
that is not included in the institutions approval
documents. For institutions that are subject to the two-year
rule, during the institutions initial period of
participation in the Title IV programs, the Department of
Education will not approve additional programs that would expand
the scope of the institutions eligibility. The Department
of Education may provide an exception to such limitation if the
institution demonstrates that the program has been legally
authorized and continuously provided for at least two years
prior to the date of the request. In addition, when an
institution is certified for the first time, its certification
is provisional until the Department of Education has reviewed a
compliance audit that covers a complete fiscal year of
Title IV program participation and has decided to certify
fully the institution.
32
In the first quarter of 2008, we timely filed a recertification
application because our initial period of certification was
scheduled to end on June 30, 2008. As part of that
recertification process, the Department of Education fully
certified us and it no longer considers us to be in our initial
period of certification. However, in August 2008, we were deemed
to have undergone a change in ownership and control requiring
review by the Department of Education in order to reestablish
our eligibility and continue participation in Title IV
programs. As required under Department of Education regulations,
we timely notified the Department of Education of our change in
ownership and control. In connection with the Department of
Educations review of the change, we submitted to the
Department of Education a change in ownership application that
included the submission of required documentation, including a
letter from The Higher Learning Commission indicating that it
had approved the change. On October 2, 2008 the Department
of Education approved our change in ownership application and
granted us provisional certification for a two-year period
ending September 30, 2010. Our program participation
agreement provides that as a provisionally certified
institution, we must apply for and receive approval by the
Secretary for any substantial change. Under our program
participation agreement, substantial changes include but are not
limited to establishment of additional locations, an increase in
the level of academic offering, and addition of any non-degree
or short-term training program.
The Department of Education has advised us that an institution
that is provisionally certified based on a change in ownership
and control that resulted from a reduction of ownership interest
is able to add new degree programs under the same conditions
that apply to a fully certified institution. Generally, if an
institution that is not subject to the two-year rule or is not
in its initial period of certification adds an educational
program after it has been designated as an eligible institution,
the institution must apply to the Department of Education to
have the additional program designated as eligible. However, a
fully certified degree-granting institution is not obligated to
obtain the Department of Educations approval of additional
programs that lead to an associate, bachelors,
professional or graduate degree at the same degree level(s)
previously approved by the Department of Education. In the event
that an institution that is required to obtain the Department of
Educations express approval for the addition of a new
program fails to do so, and erroneously determines that the new
educational program is eligible for Title IV program funds,
the institution may be liable for repayment of Title IV
program funds received by the institution or students in
connection with that program.
Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change of
Control. Many states and accrediting agencies
require institutions of higher education to report or obtain
approval of certain changes in ownership or other aspects of
institutional status, but the types of and triggers for such
reporting or approval vary among states and accrediting
agencies. In addition, our accrediting agencies, The Higher
Learning Commission and the Distance Education and Training
Council, require institutions that they accredit to inform them
in advance of any substantive change, including a change that
significantly alters the ownership or control of the
institution. Examples of substantive changes requiring advance
notice to The Higher Learning Commission and to the Distance
Education and Training Council include changes in the legal
status, ownership, or form of control of the institution, such
as the sale of a proprietary institution. The Higher Learning
Commission must approve a substantive change in advance in order
to include the change in the institutions accreditation
status. The Higher Learning Commission also requires an
on-site
evaluation within six months to confirm the appropriateness of
the approval. The Distance Education and Training Council
requires advance notification and an
on-site
evaluation within six months for the purpose of reaffirming the
institutions accreditation.
The Higher Education Act provides that an institution that
undergoes a change in ownership resulting in a change in control
loses its eligibility to participate in the Title IV
programs and must apply to the Department of Education in order
to reestablish such eligibility. An institution is ineligible to
receive Title IV program funds during the period prior to
recertification. The Higher Education Act provides that the
Department of Education may temporarily provisionally certify an
institution seeking approval of a change in ownership and
control based on preliminary review by the Department of
Education of a materially complete application received by the
Department of Education within 10 business days after the
transaction. The Department of Education may continue such
temporary, provisional certification on a month-to-month basis
until it has rendered a final decision on the institutions
application. If the Department of Education determines to
approve the application after a change in ownership and control,
it issues a provisional certification, which extends for a
period expiring not later than the end of the third complete
award year following the date of provisional
33
certification. Department of Education regulations describe some
transactions that constitute a change of control, including the
transfer of a controlling interest in the voting stock of an
institution or the institutions parent corporation.
Department of Education regulations provide that a change of
control of a publicly traded corporation occurs in one of two
ways: (i) if there is an event that would obligate the
corporation to file a Current Report on
Form 8-K
with the SEC disclosing a change of control or (ii) if the
corporation has a stockholder that owns at least 25% of the
total outstanding voting stock of the corporation and is the
largest stockholder of the corporation, and that stockholder
ceases to own at least 25% of such stock or ceases to be the
largest stockholder. A significant purchase or disposition of
our voting stock could be determined by the Department of
Education to be a change in ownership and control under this
standard.
When a change of ownership resulting in a change of control
occurs, the Department of Education applies a different set of
financial tests to determine the financial responsibility of the
institution in conjunction with its review and approval of the
change of ownership. The institution generally is required to
submit a
same-day
audited balance sheet reflecting the financial condition of the
institution immediately following the change in ownership. The
institutions
same-day
balance sheet must demonstrate an acid test ratio of at least
1:1, which is calculated by adding cash and cash equivalents to
current accounts receivable and dividing the sum by total
current liabilities (and excluding all unsecured or
uncollateralized related party receivables). The
same-day
balance sheet must demonstrate positive tangible net worth. When
a publicly traded company undergoes a change in ownership and
control due to a reduction in ownership interest, as occurred
when funds affiliated with ABS Capital Partners recently
distributed approximately 400,000 shares of our stock to
its general and limited partners, the institution may submit its
most recent quarterly financial statement as filed with the SEC,
along with copies of all other SEC filings made after the close
of the fiscal year for which a compliance audit has been
submitted to the Department of Education, instead of the
same day balance sheet. In addition, when a change
in ownership and control occurs and there is a new owner, the
institution must submit to the Department of Education audited
financial statements of the institutions new owners
two most recently completed fiscal years that are prepared and
audited in accordance with Department of Education requirements.
The Department may determine whether the financial statements
meet financial responsibility standards with respect to the
composite score formula. If the institution does not satisfy
these requirements, the Department of Education may condition
its approval of the change of ownership on the
institutions agreeing to letters of credit, provisional
certification,
and/or
additional monitoring requirements, as described in the above
section on Financial Responsibility. If the new owner does not
have the required audited financial statements, the Department
of Education may impose certain restrictions on the institution,
including with respect to adding locations and programs.
In August 2008, funds affiliated with ABS Capital Partners
reduced their beneficial ownership interest from approximately
26% to approximately 24% of our outstanding common stock by
distributing to their limited partners and general partners
400,000 shares of our stock. As a result of such
distribution, we were deemed to have undergone a change in
ownership and control requiring review by the Department of
Education in order to reestablish our eligibility and continue
participation in Title IV programs. As required under
Department of Education regulations, we timely notified the
Department of Education of our change in ownership and control.
In connection with the Department of Educations review of
the change, we submitted to the Department of Education a change
in ownership application that included the submission of
required documentation, including a letter from The Higher
Learning Commission indicating that it had approved the change.
On October 2, 2008, we received a letter from the
Department of Education approving the change in ownership and
control and granting us provisional certification until
September 30, 2010.
Many states include the sale of a controlling interest of common
stock in the definition of a change of control requiring
approval. A change of control under the definitions of an agency
that regulates us might require us to obtain approval of the
change in ownership and control in order to maintain our
regulatory approval. Under certain circumstances, the West
Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission and the State
Council of Higher Education for Virginia might require us to
seek approval of changes in ownership and control in order to
maintain our state authorization or licensure. With respect to
the ABS Funds distribution of 400,000 shares of our
stock to their limited and general partners, the State Council
of Higher Education for Virginia did not consider the
distribution to be a change in ownership under its regulations
and the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission
approved the change.
34
The Department of Education, The Higher Learning Commission,
DETC, the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia and the
West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission have all
informed us that the transactions contemplated by this offering
do not constitute a change in ownership and control requiring
approval.
Pursuant to federal law providing benefits for veterans and
reservists, we are approved for education of veterans and
members of the selective reserve and their dependents by the
state approving agencies in West Virginia and Virginia. In
certain circumstances, state approving agencies may require an
institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and
control.
A change of control could occur as a result of future
transactions in which we were involved. Some corporate
reorganizations and some changes in the board of directors are
examples of such transactions. Moreover, as a publicly traded
company, the potential adverse effects of a change of control
could influence future decisions by us and our stockholders
regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance or redemption
of our stock. In addition, the regulatory burdens and risks
associated with a change of control also could discourage bids
for your shares of common stock and could have an adverse effect
on the market price of your shares.
35
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the following information with
respect to each selling stockholder: (i) the name of the selling
stockholder; (ii) the number of shares of our common stock
beneficially owned by the selling stockholder before this
offering; (iii) the maximum number of shares of our common stock
the selling stockholder is offering; and (iv) the number of
shares of our common stock, and the percentage of our total
outstanding stock that the selling stockholder will beneficially
own after the selling stockholder sells all of the shares it is
offering. Except as set forth in footnotes to the table below or
in the information incorporated herein by reference, none of the
selling stockholders has had a material relationship with us.
The information is based on information provided by the selling
stockholders to us and is as of the date of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
Shares Being
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
After
|
|
Name of Selling Stockholder
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with ABS Capital Partners(1)
|
|
|
4,212,952
|
|
|
|
4,212,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
3,728,057 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV, L.P.; |
|
(ii) |
|
124,825 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV-A, L.P.; |
|
(iii) |
|
214,103 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV Offshore, L.P.; and |
|
(iv) |
|
145,967 shares of common stock held of record by ABS
Capital Partners IV Special Offshore, L.P. (together with
ABS Capital Partners IV, L.P., ABS Capital Partners IV-A, L.P.
and ABS Capital Partners IV Offshore, L.P., the ABS
Entities). |
|
|
|
|
|
ABS Partners IV, L.L.C. is the general partner of the ABS
Entities and has voting and dispositive power over these shares,
which is shared by Messrs. Clough and Weglicki (the
Managers) as two of the managing members of ABS
Partners IV, L.L.C. Each of the Managers, who both serve on our
board of directors, disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares except to the extent of their respective pecuniary
interests. The address for these entities is 400 East Pratt
Street, Suite 910, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. |
36
LEGAL
MATTERS
The legal validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for us by Hogan &
Hartson LLP, Baltimore, Maryland. Hogan & Hartson LLP
in the past provided, and may continue to provide, legal
services to ABS Capital Partners and Camden Partners and their
respective affiliates. Hogan & Hartson LLP owns a
limited partnership interest of less than 1% in ABS Capital
Partners IV, L.P.
Legal matters in connection with the offering will be passed
upon for any underwriters or agents named in a supplement to
this prospectus by Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of American Public
Education, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006
and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, incorporated by reference from our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, have been included
herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the
report of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, also incorporated by
reference from our annual report on Form 10-K, and upon the
authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
37
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-3,
including exhibits, schedules and amendments filed with the
registration statement, under the Securities Act with respect to
the common stock to be sold in the offering. This prospectus
does not contain all of the information contained in the
registration statement. For further information about us and our
common stock, we refer you to the registration statement. For
additional information, you should refer to the exhibits and
schedules that have been filed with our registration statement
on
Form S-3.
Statements in this prospectus concerning the contents of any
contract or any other document are not necessarily complete. If
a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement, we refer you to that exhibit. Each
statement in this prospectus relating to a contract or document
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement is qualified
by the filed exhibit.
We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act and, as a result, we are required to
file periodic and current reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy, at prescribed
rates, all or any portion of the registration statement or any
other information that we file with the SEC at the SECs
public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information
concerning the operation of the SECs public reference room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Our SEC filings, including the registration statement, will also
be available to the public on the SECs Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
38
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference in
this prospectus certain information we file with the SEC, which
means that we may disclose important information in this
prospectus by referring you to the document that contains the
information. The information incorporated by reference is
considered to be a part of this prospectus, and the information
we file later with the SEC will automatically update and
supersede the information filed earlier. We incorporate by
reference into this prospectus the documents listed below (and
any amendments thereto):
|
|
|
|
|
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on
March 28, 2008, which incorporates by reference certain
sections from our proxy statement filed with the SEC on
April 8, 2008, which we also incorporate by reference into
this prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008
and September 30, 2008.
|
In addition, we also incorporate by reference into this
prospectus all documents we subsequently file with the SEC under
Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
until the offering of the shares covered by this prospectus is
completed; provided, however, that we are not
incorporating by reference any future documents or information,
including parts of documents that we file with the SEC, that are
deemed to be furnished and not filed with the SEC unless we
specifically state otherwise.
We will provide to each person, including any beneficial owner,
to whom a prospectus is delivered, a copy of the reports and
documents that have been incorporated by reference in this
prospectus, at no cost. Any such request may be made by writing
or telephoning us at the following address or phone number:
American Public Education, Inc.
111 West Congress Street
Charles Town, WV 25414
Attention: Corporate Secretary
(703) 334-3880
These documents can also be requested through, and are or will
be available in, the Investor Relations section of our website,
which is located at www.americanpubliceducation.com, or as
described under Where You Can Find Additional
Information above. The information and other content
contained on or linked from our internet website are not part of
this prospectus.
39
3,806,657 Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT
December , 2008
|
|
William
Blair & Company |
Piper Jaffray |
Stifel Nicolaus
|
First Analysis Securities
|