e10vkza
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K/A
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 0-25092
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
86-0766246
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
1305 West Auto Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85284
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (480) 902-1001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title Of Each Class
|
|
Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01
|
|
NASDAQ |
(Title of Class) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report(s)), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
of the Registrant, based upon the closing price of the Registrants common stock as reported on The
Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 29, 2007, the last business day of the Registrants most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $1,090,737,456.
The number of issued and outstanding shares of the Registrants common stock on June 29, 2007
was 49,100,749.
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
EXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING THIS AMENDMENT
Insight Enterprises, Inc. is filing this Form 10-K/A (Amended Filing) in order
to amend our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, originally filed on
July 26, 2007 (Original Filing), to expand or correct disclosures in the Original Filing as
discussed below. In this filing, we refer to the Original Filing as
amended by this Amended Filing as this Form 10-K or
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The expanded or corrected disclosures are based on a comment letter dated August
23, 2007 from the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in conjunction with the SECs
review of our Original Filing. As disclosed in Part I, Item 1B of
this Amended Filing, none of the staff's comments remain unresolved
as of the date of this filing. The following
items were amended:
|
|
We removed the reference to third-party valuations from our disclosure of critical
accounting estimates related to valuation of long-lived assets including purchased intangible
assets and goodwill on page 47. |
|
|
|
|
|
We deleted the references to salaries and wages, employee-related expenses and contract
labor expenses excluding stock-based compensation as a percentage of net sales from our
discussion of results of operations, specifically selling and administrative expenses, on
pages 50 and 51. The disclosure of these non-GAAP financial measures in our Original Filing
was inadvertent. |
|
|
|
|
|
We modified the disclosure on page 56 of days sales outstanding in ending accounts
receivable, inventory turns and days purchases outstanding in ending accounts payable to only
disclose amounts calculable from the face of the financial statements and have disclosed the
manner in which such amounts are calculated. We also expanded the discussion of our
consolidated cash flow operating metrics to describe the impact of the acquisition of Software
Spectrum on the interrelationships between accounts receivable and net sales, inventories and
cost of sales and accounts payable and purchases. |
|
|
|
|
|
We added disclosure to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements to indicate the
amount of employee termination benefits and facility based costs incurred in the total
liability recognized with the acquisition of Software Spectrum that was disclosed in our
Original Filing. We also corrected the amounts in the table detailing changes in these
liabilities during the year because the amounts in the table in our Original Filing
inadvertently only detailed changes in the liabilities during the quarter ended December 31,
2006 instead of the activity from acquisition date through December 31, 2006, as stated in the
description of the contents of the table. |
|
|
|
|
|
We corrected the tax benefit amounts related to the exercise of employee stock options and
other employee stock programs applied to stockholders equity disclosed in Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements to agree with the amounts that were correctly disclosed in
our consolidated statements of stockholders equity in our Original Filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
We added disclosure to Note 16 to our consolidated financial statement to disclose that we
have not provided net sales amounts by product or service type for the years ended December
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, as it is impracticable for us to do so. |
|
|
|
|
|
We expanded Note 18 to our consolidated financial statement to include disclosure of the
primary reasons for the acquisition of Software Spectrum and the factors that contributed to
the recognition of goodwill, disclosure of the amount assigned to
each major intangible asset class and disclosure of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization, in total by
major intangible asset class for each period presented. |
The staffs letter did not include any comments relating to our restatement of our consolidated
financial statements as disclosed in the Original Filing, and the Amended Filing does not reflect
any changes to the disclosures related to that restatement.
There were no changes to our consolidated statements of earnings, of stockholders equity and
comprehensive income and of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, or our
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 in this Amended Filing as compared to
our consolidated financial statements included in the Original Filing.
As part of the Amended Filing, Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 32.1, containing the certifications of our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as Exhibit 23.1, containing the
consent of our independent register public accounting firm, that were filed as exhibits to the
Original Filing have been re-executed and re-filed as of the date of this Amended Filing.
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING RESTATEMENT OF OUR
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains the restatement of our consolidated statements of
earnings, of stockholders equity and comprehensive income and of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and selected
consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and for
each of the quarters in the year ended December 31, 2005 and the quarters ended March 31, and June
30, 2006.
Based on information provided by an independent committee of the Board of Directors (the
Options Subcommittee) resulting from its review of the Companys historical stock option granting
practices, we identified errors in the Companys accounting related to stock option compensation
expenses in prior periods. The Options Subcommittees review encompassed all options on Company
securities granted to directors, officers, or employees from the Companys initial public offering
in January 1995 through November 30, 2005 (the Relevant Period). During this period, the Company
made more than 28,000 individual option grants, involving options on more than 28 million
(split-adjusted) shares, on 957 separate grant dates. Additionally, the Company undertook an
analysis of the results of the Options Subcommittees review as well as all stock option activity
during the Relevant Period. We determined that corrections to our consolidated financial
statements were required to reflect additional material charges for stock-based compensation
expenses and related income tax effects.
Our consolidated retained earnings as of December 31, 2005 incorporates an aggregate of
approximately $30.9 million in incremental stock option-related compensation charges relating to
the period from January 24, 1995 through December 31, 2005. This charge is net of a $16.5 million
tax benefit related to the restatement adjustments. This additional compensation expense results
from our determination, based upon the Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis,
that for accounting purposes, the dates initially used to measure compensation expense for many
stock option grants to employees, executive officers and outside non-employee directors during the
period could not be relied upon. In particular, the Options Subcommittee identified various
categories of grants that had been made by the Company during the period under review including:
(a) discretionary grants of various types; (b) anniversary grants; (c) promotion grants; (d) new
hire grants; and (e) program grants. In general, the Options Subcommittee found: (x) a lack of
significant issues with respect to new hire grants; (y) that during a portion of the period under
review, the Company retrospectively selected dates for anniversary grants and promotion grants
based on the lowest price in a particular period; and (z) inadequate documentation surrounding
certain discretionary grants, including grants to officers that required approval by the
Compensation Committee. We determined that the revised measurement dates for accounting purposes
differed from the originally selected measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or
incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants,
including the list of individual recipients; and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise
prices.
In those cases in which the Company had previously used a measurement date that we determined
could no longer be relied upon, we undertook to identify the most supportable measurement date from
the available evidence. For the grant dates specifically reviewed by the Options Subcommittee,
management analyzed the documents identified during the review performed by the Options
Subcommittee, the information contained in the Companys stock plan administration database
application (Equity Edge), minute books, personnel files, payroll records, Securities and
Exchange Commissions (SEC) filings, electronic files on the Companys computer network and human
resources systems to determine the appropriate measurement dates. We considered the information
available for each recipient included in each of the grant dates to determine the most supportable
measurement date for each individual grant within the grant date. For the remaining grants
not specifically reviewed by the Options Subcommittee, management reviewed each grant date
and all available support contained in the Stock Plan Administration hard copy files, human
resources system data and Equity Edge information for each recipient included in each of the
individual grant dates to determine the type of grant and most supportable measurement date for
each individual grant within the grant date. The Company used the information contained in Equity
Edge to categorize the grants, if possible, into the various categories discussed above.
Individual grants categorized in Equity Edge as new hire or anniversary grants were separately
accumulated and analyzed. For more information on our restatement, see Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 and Note 2 of our Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded an adjustment for
$1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006,
which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this adjustment
was $0.4 million.
2
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
All financial information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K gives effect to the
restatements of our consolidated financial statements as described above. We have not amended, and
we do not intend to amend, our previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for each of the fiscal years and fiscal quarters of 1995 through 2005, and for the first
six months of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Financial information included in reports
previously filed or furnished by Insight Enterprises, Inc. for the periods from January 1, 1995
through June 30, 2006 should not be relied upon and are superseded by the information in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management has determined that we have a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting relating to the implementation and administration of our equity compensation
programs and the accounting for awards thereunder as of December 31, 2006. As described in more
detail in Item 9A of this Annual Report, although the Company made its last stock option grant on
November 30, 2005, based on the findings of the Options Subcommittee, the problems uncovered during
the review have caused the Company to undertake remedial measures to ensure that similar problems
cannot occur in connection with its grants of restricted stock. We have identified and are
implementing measures designed to remedy this material weakness.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of
this report, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include: projections of matters that
affect net sales, gross profit, operating expenses, earnings from continuing operations,
non-operating income and expenses or net earnings; effects of acquisitions; projections of capital
expenditures and growth; hiring plans; plans for future operations; the availability of financing
and our needs or plans relating thereto; plans relating to our products and services; the effect of
new accounting principles or changes in accounting policies; the effect of guaranty and
indemnification obligations; statements of belief; and statements of assumptions underlying any of
the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are identified by such words as believe, anticipate,
expect, estimate, intend, plan, project, will, may and variations of such words and
similar expressions, and are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be
predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set
forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements. Some of the important
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any
forward-looking statements, include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
changes in the information technology industry and/or the economic environment; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on partners for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing
incentives and competitive products to sell; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions in our information technology and voice and data networks, including the
upgrade to mySAP and the migration of Software Spectrum to our information technology and
voice and data networks; |
|
|
|
|
the integration and operation of Software Spectrum, including our ability to achieve the
expected benefits of the acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
actions of our competitors, including manufacturers/publishers of products we sell; |
|
|
|
|
the informal inquiry from the SEC and the fact that we could be subject to stockholder
litigation related to the investigation by the Options Subcommittee of our Board of
Directors into our historical stock option granting practices and the related restatement
of our consolidated financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
the recently enacted changes in securities laws and regulations, including potential
risk resulting from our evaluation of internal controls under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002; |
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with international operations; |
|
|
|
|
sales of software licenses are subject to seasonal changes in demand; |
|
|
|
|
increased debt and interest expense and lower availability on our financing facilities; |
|
|
|
|
increased exposure to currency exchange risks; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
risk that purchased goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with the terms and conditions of our public sector contracts; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with our very limited experience in outsourcing business functions to India; |
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in product standards; and |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property infringement claims. |
3
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Additionally, there may be other risks that are otherwise described from time to time in the
reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
In addition, these forward-looking statements include statements regarding the informal
inquiry commenced by the SEC and a stockholders demand to inspect our books and records pursuant
to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. There can be no assurances that
forward-looking statements will be achieved, and actual results could differ materially from those
suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially include: adjustments to the consolidated financial statements that may be
required related to the SEC informal inquiry; and risks of litigation and governmental or other
regulatory inquiry or proceedings arising out of or related to the Companys historical stock
option granting practices. Therefore, any forward-looking statements in this release should be
considered in light of various important factors, including the risks and uncertainties listed
above, as well as others.
We assume no obligation to update, and do not intend to update, any forward-looking
statements. We do not endorse any projections regarding future performance that may be made by
third parties.
4
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Insight Enterprises, Inc. (Insight or the Company) is a leading provider of
brand-name information technology (IT) hardware, software and services to large enterprises,
small- to medium-sized businesses (SMB) and public sector institutions in North America, Europe,
the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific. The Company is organized in the following three
operating segments, which are primarily defined by their related geographies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of 2006 Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
% of 2006 |
|
|
Earnings from |
|
Operating Segment* |
|
Geography |
|
Consolidated Net Sales |
|
|
Operations |
|
North America |
|
United States (U.S.) and |
|
80% |
|
|
82% |
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
19% |
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APAC |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
1% |
|
|
1% |
|
* Additional detailed segment and geographic information can be found in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 and in
Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Prior to the acquisition of Software Spectrum, Inc. (Software Spectrum) on September 7, 2006
and the divestiture of Direct Alliance Corporation (Direct Alliance) on June 30, 2006, we were
organized in three operating segments, two of which were the geographic operating segments that
provided IT products and services, Insight North America and Insight UK, and the third of which was
our discontinued operation that provided business process outsourcing, Direct Alliance.
Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, as a result of the Software Spectrum acquisition,
we operate in three geographic operating segments: North America; EMEA; and APAC. To the extent
applicable, prior period information disclosed in this report by operating segment has been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Our strategic plan over the past few years has been to transform Insight from an IT products
provider to an IT solutions provider through a combination of organic growth, driven by continuous
improvement initiatives, and targeted acquisitions. Consistent with our strategy, our acquisition
of Software Spectrum enhanced our customer (referred to within the company and this document as
clients) value proposition in many ways, such as:
|
|
|
augmenting our solution capabilities, particularly relative to software lifecycle management; |
|
|
|
|
expanding our penetration within profitable categories, most notably software and services; and |
|
|
|
|
increasing our global presence through expansion in EMEA and APAC. |
With the acquisition of Software Spectrum, our product mix changed significantly. Prior to
the acquisition of Software Spectrum, software sales represented approximately 12% of net sales.
After the acquisition of Software Spectrum, software sales represent approximately 35% to 40% of
annual net sales.
As a result of these changes, we have become a leading provider of a broad range of top
brand-name IT hardware, software and services, helping companies around the world design, enable,
manage and secure their IT environment. Insight services clients in more than 170 countries and
has the process knowledge, technical expertise and management tools necessary to ease the burden of
designing and deploying IT solutions while streamlining IT management and costs. Our clients
include large enterprises, SMB and public sector institutions. Currently, our offerings in North
America and the United Kingdom include brand-name IT hardware, software and services. Our
offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC currently only include software and
select software-related services.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1991 as the successor to an Arizona corporation that
commenced operations in 1988. We began operations in the U.S., expanded into Canada in 1997 and
into the United Kingdom in 1998. In September 2006, through our acquisition of Software Spectrum,
we penetrated deeper into global markets in EMEA and APAC, where Software Spectrum already had an
established footprint and strategic relationships. Our corporate headquarters are located in
Tempe, Arizona.
5
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Acquisitions/Dispositions History
Over the past few years, we have completed acquisitions and dispositions in each of our
operating segments.
In 2004, we sold our 95% ownership interest in Plus Net plc (PlusNet), an Internet service
provider in the United Kingdom. As a result, PlusNet is disclosed as a discontinued operation for
the year ended December 31, 2004 and all prior periods presented.
On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance, a
business process outsourcing provider in the U.S. As a result of the disposition, Direct Alliance
is disclosed as a discontinued operation for the year ended December 31, 2006 and all prior periods
presented.
Consistent with our strategic plan for growth through targeted acquisitions, on September 7,
2006 we completed our acquisition of Software Spectrum, a global technology solutions provider with
particular expertise in the selection, purchase and management of software. The purchase price was
$287.0 million plus working capital of $64.4 million, which included cash acquired of $30.3
million. The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, and the excess purchase
price over fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill related to the
Software Spectrum acquisition was $209.7 million at December 31, 2006. Software Spectrums results
of operations have been included in our consolidated results of operations subsequent to the
acquisition date.
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment. As a result of the disposition, PC Wholesale will be disclosed as a
discontinued operation beginning in the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Operating Segments
The following discussion of our operating segments should be read in conjunction with the
operating segment disclosures and information regarding geographic operations found in Note 16 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. A discussion of factors
potentially affecting our operations is discussed in Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of this
report.
North America, EMEA and APAC
North America, EMEA and APAC are reported as separate operating segments. However, they all
operate with similarly structured business models and in strategic positions as leading providers
of IT solutions. Currently, our offerings in North America and the United Kingdom include
brand-name IT hardware, software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment
and in APAC currently only include software and select software-related services. We co-branded as
Insight and Software Spectrum subsequent to the acquisition date, primarily to allow time for
an orderly transition to a common brand. We completed the conversion to the Insight brand in all
segments in the second quarter of 2007.
North America, with operations in the U.S. and Canada, is our largest operating segment,
representing 80% and 82% of consolidated net sales and earnings from operations, respectively, in
2006. This segment is the combination of Insight North America and the former Software Spectrum
North American operations acquired in September 2006. EMEA, which has operations in fourteen
countries in Europe and strategic relationships serving our clients in the Middle East and Africa,
represented 19% and 17% of consolidated net sales and earnings from operations, respectively, in
2006. EMEA is the combination of Insight UK and the former Software Spectrum EMEA operations
acquired in September 2006. APAC, with operations in Australia, China, Hong Kong, New Zealand and
Singapore, represented 1% of both consolidated net sales and earnings from operations in 2006.
APAC is the former Software Spectrum APAC operations acquired in September 2006 and the China
office we opened in October 2006.
Business Overview
Insight is a leading provider of brand-name IT hardware, software and services to large
enterprises, SMB and public sector institutions in North America, EMEA and APAC. Over the past few
years, we have been evolving our business model and branding efforts to emphasize Insights ability
to provide total technology solutions to meet our clients business-driven needs. Our value
proposition to our clients is that we serve as a trusted advisor, helping our clients enhance their
business performance through innovative technology solutions. Historically, we had primarily been
engaged in our clients acquisition cycle once they had substantially determined their IT needs.
Our role has shifted to one of a trusted advisor, where we are involved earlier in the acquisition
cycle, assisting our clients as they make technology decisions. We believe this creates stronger
relationships with our clients, allowing us to add greater value to
6
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
our clients business, to expand the range of products and services we sell to each of our
current clients and to attract new clients. We are focused on bringing more value to our clients,
employees (referred to within the Company and this document as teammates) and suppliers (referred
to within the Company and this document as partners) through the evolution of Insights value
proposition. We have transitioned from a focus on the base competencies of product selection,
price and availability to a focus on value differentiators, such as software licensing, advanced
configuration services, tailored solutions, technical expertise and e-enablement. We believe a
solution is defined not by what you sell, but how you sell it. The solution to a clients business
needs may include IT hardware, software, services or any combination of these offerings. The key
to creating an effective solution is to understand the clients business needs and assist in
determining the right IT solution to address those needs and enhance business performance.
Although we have initiatives to increase solution selling in our large enterprise client base, we
also see a significant opportunity to sell solutions to meet the needs of our current and
prospective SMB clients. IT products and services are currently sold to the SMB market in the U.S.
by a variety of national product resellers, but we believe that no national providers of IT
products and services are effectively serving this market as a true IT solutions provider. We also
believe that our expanded business model, knowledgeable sales force, targeted marketing strategies,
streamlined distribution, advanced services capabilities and commitment to total IT solutions
further differentiate us from our competitors serving the SMB market.
In 2005, we developed a five-year strategic plan and presented it to our Board of Directors
and our teammates. In 2006, we made significant progress in executing that plan. Namely, we sold
our business processing outsourcing business to focus on our core business of providing IT
solutions. We completed the acquisition of Software Spectrum, one of the worlds leading providers
of business-to-business IT solutions and services with particular expertise in the selection,
purchase and management of business software. The acquisition accelerated the expansion of our
technology solutions capabilities and our global presence. We believe that the combination of the
software expertise of Software Spectrum and Insights expertise in hardware and services solidifies
our value proposition as a trusted advisor of business solutions to our clients. With this more
robust offering, we are executing Insights global vision by penetrating deeper into global markets
where Software Spectrum already had an established footprint. Immediately upon closing the
acquisition, we began integrating the two organizations into one team and announced our leadership
team for the new organization. Since the acquisition, we have finalized our plan for integrating
the individual functions within the organization, such as Marketing, People and Development, IT and
Finance. Our integration, with the exception of IT systems, is now substantially complete, and we
are functioning as one team with a united vision. This acquisition was an integral part of our
ability to increase market share during 2006.
We have also continued our focus on driving improvements in our relationships with our
clients, teammates and partners. We made strong progress in improving each of these key
relationships.
|
|
|
Client satisfaction and loyalty, as measured in our monthly client satisfaction
surveys, increased dramatically in 2006. Further, in October 2006, H.R. Chally Group,
a third-party market research firm, awarded our North American sales force a World
Class rating after interviewing clients and prospects of IT resellers and asking them
to rate their IT providers. Insight was the only company in its industry to be rated
World Class. |
|
|
|
|
Teammate satisfaction, as measured in our annual teammate satisfaction survey,
strengthened across the world. Additionally, in December 2006, Insight was named one
of the 25 Best Service Companies to Sell For in Selling Power magazine, which ranks
the largest sales forces in America. Insight moved up from a ranking of
23rd in 2005 to 12th in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Lastly, partner satisfaction strengthened. We completed our annual partner
satisfaction survey in early January 2007, and overall satisfaction within North
America improved compared to 2005 results. |
We attribute the improvements noted above to our strengthening of the foundation of our
business through:
|
|
|
a new vision and values; |
|
|
|
|
a clear strategy; and |
|
|
|
|
a stronger team. |
Operating Strategy
The key elements of our operating strategy are:
|
|
|
Solutions-oriented business model; |
|
|
|
|
Integrated sales and marketing; |
7
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
Broad selection of brand-name IT hardware and software; |
|
|
|
|
Strong tools and expertise on software asset management; |
|
|
|
|
Services offerings; and |
|
|
|
|
Efficient technology-based operations. |
Solutions-Oriented Business Model. This model offers our business clients the benefits of
complete IT solutions that take advantage of our multiple vendor product choices, competitive
pricing, fast and efficient delivery and a vast array of customized services. We have transitioned
our business model beyond product fulfillment to include the capability to advise our clients on
business issues and develop technology solutions to address their business issues. We believe this
transition was essential to respond to changes in the way businesses plan for, implement, leverage
and manage technology. We can offer advice to help our clients find the right solution to uniquely
address their business needs due to our expertise across a broad, multi-vendor line offering. We
offer service capabilities designed to complete our solutions offerings and improve our clients
business results. We have the ability to serve as the central project manager for many
combinations of services a client may require, from the most basic, such as warranties and
financing options, to the very complex, such as custom configuration, large technology deployments,
centralized management of mobile technology, software license planning, network design and
implementation, asset tagging and asset disposal. We have what we consider to be one of the most
robust services organizations in the industry and are focused on all aspects of technology
lifecycle management. As a result, we are able to provide expert resources to design, deploy and
manage todays complex technology environments. With our acquisition of Software Spectrum, we have
a significantly enhanced portfolio of services around software solutions. We augment our sales
teams with service sales resources and technical pre-sale subject matter experts, believing that
this enables our sales team to be positioned as a trusted advisor to our clients. As a result, we
can be a one stop source for all of our clients IT needs. We deliver strategic business value to
our clients by ensuring that technology solutions drive business results and by streamlining IT
management, reporting and costs. In North America, our largest area of operation, we believe we
have a strong competitive advantage in the degree to which we can provide these products and
services across all targeted client groups.
Integrated Sales and Marketing. We market and sell IT solutions through a variety of
integrated direct sales and marketing techniques including:
|
|
|
a staff of client-dedicated account executives utilizing proactive outbound telephone-based sales; |
|
|
|
|
a client-focused, face-to-face field sales force; |
|
|
|
|
a nationally deployed dedicated service sales organization in the U.S.; |
|
|
|
|
a team of software sales specialists; |
|
|
|
|
a small group of knowledgeable account executives dedicated to taking inbound calls; |
|
|
|
|
electronic commerce (primarily the Internet and electronic data interchange (EDI)); |
|
|
|
|
targeted marketing (including print and electronic marketing and communications,
advertising, client events and specialty marketing programs); |
|
|
|
|
comprehensive product and services catalogs; and |
|
|
|
|
pre-sale technical sales support teams. |
We align our technical sales support resources and tailor our marketing model to each client
market. Our marketing programs emphasize our solutions offerings, service capabilities,
competitive pricing, efficient procurement and financing options. A large portion of our marketing
will continue to focus on increasing awareness of our service capabilities and the value of our
solutions-oriented business model, as well as driving increased demand for our IT hardware,
software and services offerings.
Components of our sales and marketing strategy include:
Focus on Large Enterprises, SMB and Public Sector Institutions. We target businesses as well
as government and educational entities. Our target client employs over 100 people who regularly
use business technology in the performance of their jobs. We believe this is the most valuable
portion of the IT hardware, software and services market because these entities demand
high-performance technology solutions, appreciate well-trained account executives, purchase
frequently, are value conscious and are knowledgeable buyers who require less technical support
than the average individual consumer. Our operating model, which allows us to tailor our offerings
to the size and complexity of our client, positions us to serve this portion of the market
effectively by combining highly qualified field and telesales account executives, advanced service
capabilities, focus on client service, competitive pricing and cost-effective distribution systems.
During 2006, virtually all of our net sales were to large enterprise, SMB and public sector
institutions, and no single client accounted for more than 3% of our consolidated net sales.
Net sales to U.S. public sector clients include federal, state and local governmental
entities, educational institutions
8
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
and non-profit organizations. Net sales from these clients are derived from: open market
sales to federal, state and local government agencies; sales made to federal agencies and
departments under the Multiple Award Schedule contract with the U.S. General Services
Administration and blanket purchase agreements from various government departments; sales made to
various state and local government agencies; and sales made to educational institutions and
non-profit organizations. Net sales to public sector clients in our EMEA segment include central
and local government entities, educational institutions, non-profit organizations and national
healthcare service organizations. Net sales from our EMEA public sector clients are derived
primarily in the United Kingdom from open market sales to individual entities and to consortium
buyers and from contracts, such as the Catalist contract, which represents a restricted procurement
channel whereby only approved vendors are permitted to bid on available opportunities. For a
discussion of risks associated with public sector contracts, see Risk Factors The failure to
comply with the terms and conditions of our public sector contracts could result in, among other
things, fines or other liabilities, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Recruit, Train and Retain a Quality Sales Force. The majority of our SMB account executives
focus on outbound telesales by contacting existing clients on a systematic basis to generate
additional sales. In addition, these account executives utilize various prospecting techniques in
order to increase our client base. To support the account executives, we maintain an extensive
database of clients and potential clients. We have established dedicated outbound sales divisions
focusing on large enterprises (generally at least 2,500 PCs), SMB (generally less than 2,500 PCs),
and the public sector entities (government, educational and not for profit institutions). Account
executives in these sales divisions interact with sophisticated IT decision makers and procurement
executives as well as various other executives of organizations to establish mutually beneficial
relationships. Once established, the one-on-one relationships between our clients and their
account executives are maintained and enhanced primarily through frequent communications by
telephone and face-to-face meetings, supplemented by marketing communications and programs. We
also enhance our telesales operations by maintaining a group of face-to-face field account
executives and service sales professionals in a number of cities throughout North America, EMEA and
APAC. These face-to-face field account executives and service sales professionals typically
service larger enterprise accounts, government accounts or SMB accounts that have advanced system
and service needs. Starting in 2006, we geographically aligned clients in the U.S. assigned to our
SMB account executives. We believe this enables us to utilize our face-to-face field account
executives to help strengthen relationships with SMB clients, as well as partner representatives,
in their geographical areas by assisting as needed the SMB account executives. Additionally, we
have a small group of knowledgeable account executives dedicated to taking inbound calls generated
by our direct marketing activities.
We believe our ability to establish and maintain long-term relationships and to encourage
repeat purchases is dependent, in part, on the quality of our account executives. Because our
clients primary contact with us is through our account executives, we focus on recruiting,
training and retaining qualified and knowledgeable sales staff. During 2006, we expanded our
training programs for new account executives. We launched improved new hire training, the Trusted
Advisor Program (TAP), in July 2005 to give our new account executives the training, development
and support they need to be successful in our competitive market. The ten-month program covers
sales, systems and solutions with the objective of preparing account executives for their role as a
trusted advisor. Through the program, teammates undergo classroom learning, call lab work and time
on a TAP sales team prior to graduating to the sales floor full time. Additionally, the TAP
program offers teammates several certifications in partner training, ranging from solutions to
in-depth product training. Since the introduction of the TAP program, we have reduced attrition
and have improved the productivity of our account executives. We continuously improve our sales
training programs to focus on enhancing existing skills or developing new skills for varying
aspects of the sales process.
With the assistance of our marketing department, each account executive is responsible for
building a client base and proactively servicing the needs of established clients. Our IT systems
allow online retrieval of relevant client information, including the clients profile, history and
product information, such as price, cost and availability, as well as up-selling and cross-selling
opportunities. This capability helps our account executives to have the type of conversations that
help to deepen client relationships, identify client needs and build our share-of-wallet with our
client base. Additionally, as part of the new mySAP Business Suite (mySAP) IT system upgrade to
be completed in mid 2007 for our U.S. hardware and services operations, we are increasing our use
of customer relationship management (CRM) tools and analytics to target the right solution or
offer to clients with the greatest propensities to have an interest in certain products. Account
executives are empowered to negotiate sales prices within established ranges, and a large part of
their compensation is based upon gross profit dollars from sales they generate. As the account
executive gains experience, we give them greater latitude to make decisions, and with greater
experience, the percentage of total compensation based on gross profit dollars generated also
increases. Compensation programs are designed to promote and reward top performers in the
organization.
With the acquisition of Software Spectrum in September 2006, we added approximately 400
software sales account executives to our sales force. Supporting our software sales efforts, our
technology assessment services engineers assist our clients in selecting the appropriate software
solutions. These engineers are trained on multiple, complex technologies and hold several
certifications for a particular software solution or category. Our software sales force and
9
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
technology assessment services engineers help our clients acquire and manage software in a
more cost-effective way with the partner licensing programs, reporting services and software asset
management tools that we offer. These software account executives are resident in the countries in
which we operate and are better situated to understand the needs of, and to communicate with, our
clients in our sales offices located in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland,
France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
the United Kingdom and the U.S. Additionally, although we do not have physical offices located in
Austria, Ireland, New Zealand and Russia, we do have software account executives resident in these
countries providing us with a local sales presence. In those regions in which we do not have a
physical presence, such as Africa and India, we serve our clients through strategic relationships.
Information regarding the number and tenure of account executives in North America, EMEA and
APAC, including former Software Spectrum account executives at December 31, 2006, with a comparison
to legacy Insight-only account executives at December 31, 2005, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
|
12/31/06 |
|
|
12/31/05 |
|
|
12/31/06 |
|
|
12/31/05 |
|
|
12/31/06 |
|
Number of account
executives |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experience: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
One to two years |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Two to three years |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
More than three years |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average tenure |
|
4.4 years |
|
3.9 years |
|
2.7 years |
|
2.3 years |
|
2.5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in tenure is important to our business as our statistics show that account executive
productivity increases with experience. The increase in average tenure for North America is due
primarily to increased retention efforts, including performance-based incentives and enhanced
training programs, and headcount reductions based on performance, which largely resulted in the
elimination of less experienced account executives. Average tenure for EMEA has increased
primarily to increased retention efforts partially offset by the loss of some of our tenured
account executives in 2005 resulting from targeted recruiting efforts by our competition.
For a discussion of risks associated with our dependence on key personnel, including sales
personnel, see Risk Factors We depend on key personnel, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Focus on Client Service. We strive to create strong, long-term relationships with our
clients, which we believe promotes client satisfaction and ultimately increases the percentage of
IT spending awarded to us. We believe that a key to building client loyalty is to provide clients
with a knowledgeable account executive backed by a strong support staff that can help clients find
the right IT solutions to solve business needs. Most business clients are assigned a trained
account executive that understands the clients business needs and proactively identifies and
provisions technology solutions that meet those needs. In addition to our account executives, we
also have technical specialists who support our sales force, creating a team approach to addressing
clients various needs within a total solutions framework. Although additional support personnel
may interact with the client, such as our solutions center or third-party service providers, the
clients dedicated account executive remains the primary contact with Insight. We believe that
solving clients unique business and technology challenges through strong one-to-one sales and
project management relationships will improve the likelihood that clients will look to us for
future product and service purchases.
We realize that fast delivery and efficient fulfillment are also important to our clients.
Client hardware orders are sent to one of our distribution centers or to one of our direct ship
partners for processing immediately after the order is released. We have integrated labeling and
tracking systems with major freight carriers into our IT system to ensure prompt and traceable
delivery. Additionally, we have integrated our IT system with our direct ship partners making
shipments from these partners virtually transparent to our clients. We ship almost all of our
orders on the day the orders are released for shipment.
We believe that effective client service is an important factor in client retention and
overall satisfaction. We will implement additional automation of our business processes as we
complete our upgrade to mySAP and believe these improvements will further increase client
satisfaction and retention.
10
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Promote Use of E-Commerce. We believe that providing the client with a seamless e-commerce
system, supported by well-trained account executives results in a highly efficient business model
that delivers high client satisfaction. Account executives encourage clients to place on-line
orders via our Web site, www.insight.com, and we offer selected businesses their own customized
landing pages, which are designed by our electronic marketing team. These pages allow businesses
to customize views based on their needs and procurement guidelines and to purchase IT hardware,
software and certain services from us at pre-negotiated, volume-based pricing. In addition, we
implement automated approval routing to help clients ensure compliance with their company policies.
We also create awareness of our products and services to clients and prospects through graphically
rich electronic newsletters, electronic postcards and other branded sales messages transmitted via
e-mail. Through the promotion of e-commerce, including EDI and our Web site, we hope to increase
sales, facilitate our clients ease of doing business with us, drive enhanced client satisfaction
and decrease administrative costs. As part of our integration of Software Spectrum,
www.softwarespectrum.com was re-branded to
www.insight.com during the first quarter of
2007.
Selectively Employ Advertising, Specialty Marketing and Catalogs. We advertise in technology
publications targeting business decision makers in North America. These advertisements focus on
the communication of our trusted advisor value proposition and are designed to create a strong
brand image for our target audience.
We continue to increase our national exposure, promote local interest and encourage visits to
our Web site through title sponsorship of the Insight Bowl, a post-season intercollegiate
football game, now in its tenth year. During the 2006 Insight Bowl, telecast live by NFL Network
on December 29, 2006, we aired television commercials highlighting our solutions capabilities as
well as commercials showcasing partners products offered by us. These 30-second spots encouraged
business decision makers in the U.S. to call us or visit our Web site. Additionally, 2006 marked
Insights first year as the title sponsor of the Insight Fiesta Bowl Block Party in Tempe, Arizona.
We also leverage more traditional merchandising vehicles targeted to specific target clients,
such as catalogs and direct mail pieces. These merchandising pieces emphasize our solutions
offerings, encourage clients and prospects to contact us for more information, and may also provide
detailed product descriptions, manufacturers specifications and pricing information.
Additionally, the Insight logo and telephone number are included from time to time in promotions by
selected manufacturers/publishers.
During 2006, we continued to expand our catalog distribution to include catalogs aimed at
specific vertical markets or industries, such as healthcare, legal and financial services. These
vertically focused catalogs provide specific vertical market solutions.
Broad Selection of Brand-Name IT Hardware and Software. We provide added convenience by
offering our clients a comprehensive selection of brand-name IT hardware products (in North America
and the United Kingdom only) and software titles. We offer products from hundreds of manufacturers
and publishers, including Hewlett-Packard (HP), Microsoft, Cisco, Lenovo, IBM, Symantec, Adobe,
Toshiba, Sony and American Power Conversion Corporation (APC). Our scale and purchasing power
combined with our efficient, high-volume and cost effective direct sales and marketing, allow us to
offer competitive prices. We believe that offering multiple vendor choices enables us to better
serve clients needs by providing a variety of product solutions to best address their specific
business needs, based on particular client preferences or other criteria, such as real-time best
pricing and availability, or compatibility with existing technology. We have developed
direct-ship programs with many of our partners through the use of EDI and extensible markup
language (XML) links allowing us to expand our product offerings without further increasing
inventory, handling costs or inventory risk exposure. Thus, we are able to offer a vast product
offering with billions of dollars in virtual inventory. Convenience and product options among
multiple brands are key competitive advantages against manufacturers/publishers direct selling
programs, which are generally limited to their own brands and may not be able to offer clients a
complete or best solution across all product categories.
We select our products based on existing and proven technology and anticipated client needs.
Our product managers and buyers evaluate the effectiveness of new and existing products and select
those products for inclusion in our offerings based on the fit in strategic solutions, market
demand, product features, quality, reliability, sales trends, price, margins and warranties.
The manufacturer warrants most of the products we market, and it is our policy to request that
clients return their defective products directly to the manufacturer for warranty service. On
selected products, and for selected client service reasons, we may accept returns directly from the
client and then either credit the client or ship a replacement product. We generally offer a
limited 15- to 30-day return policy for unopened products and certain opened products, which are
consistent with manufacturers terms; however, for some products we may charge restocking fees.
Products returned opened are quickly processed and returned to the manufacturer or partner for
repair, replacement or credit to us. We resell most unopened products returned to us. Products
that cannot be returned to the manufacturer for warranty
11
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
processing, but are in working condition, are promptly sold to inventory liquidators, to end
users as previously sold or used products or through other channels to limit our losses from
returned products.
For a discussion of risks associated with our reliance on partners, see Risk Factors We
rely on our partners for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing incentives and
competitive products to sell, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Strong Tools and Expertise on Software Asset Management. As a one-stop, global IT solutions
provider, we are also able to present our clients strong tools and expertise in software asset
management. Our tools and expertise include:
Advice, Information and Education. We advise, inform and educate our clients regarding the
wide range of procurement and licensing choices available to them. We publish newsletters, service
and product brochures and product catalogs and also provide other timely information coincident
with major product releases. We author and provide white papers and consulting advice to our
clients to allow them to realize the potential benefits associated with licensing programs. We
provide our clients with a methodology for evaluating their individual software management process
and analyzing issues in selecting and implementing the licensing programs offered by various
publishers. Our advice is designed to assist clients in selecting a software management plan,
including internal distribution services, communicating with end users, reporting and complying
with licensing agreements.
As part of our integration of Software Spectrum, we re-branded
www.softwarespectrum.com to www.insight.com during the first quarter of 2007. Our
Web site contains company news and information designed to educate clients about our services, our
software titles (including third-party reviews), the publishers we represent and the latest trends
in the industry. We conduct on-line seminars, or webinars, to train our clients on our on-line
services and host partner webinars. Additionally, we convene a global client roundtable twice a
year and schedule other roundtables as part of our publisher marketing.
Licensing Services. Our clients can acquire software applications either through licensing
agreements or by purchasing boxed products. The majority of our clients purchase their software
applications through licensing agreements, which we believe is a result of the ease of
administration they provide and their cost-effective nature. Licensing agreements, or
right-to-copy agreements, allow a client to either purchase a license for each of its users in a
single transaction or periodically report its software usage, paying a license fee for each user.
For clients, the overall cost of using one of these methods of acquiring software may be
substantially less than purchasing boxed products.
As software publishers choose different procedures for implementing licensing agreements,
businesses are faced with a significant challenge to evaluate all the alternatives and procedures
to ensure that they select the appropriate agreements, comply with the publishers licensing terms
and properly report and pay for their software licenses. A large, multinational corporation may
have over 100,000 users, increasing the complexity associated with purchasing and managing their
software assets. We work closely, either locally or globally, with our clients to understand their
requirements and educate them regarding the options available under partner licensing agreements.
Many of our clients who have elected to purchase software licenses through licensing
agreements have also purchased software maintenance, which allows clients to receive new versions,
upgrades or updates of software products released during the maintenance period in exchange for a
specified annual fee. These fees may be paid in monthly, quarterly or annual installments.
Upgrades and updates are revisions to previously published software that improve or enhance certain
features of the software and/or correct errors found in previous versions. We assist our partner
publishers and clients in tracking and renewing these agreements.
Our proprietary systems support the requirements necessary to service licensing agreements for
our clients. Our systems provide individualized client contract management data, assist clients in
complying with licensing agreements and provide clients with necessary reporting information.
In connection with certain enterprise-wide licensing agreements, publishers may choose to bill
and collect from clients directly. In these cases, we earn a referral fee directly from the
publisher.
Insight:LicenseAdvisor. Our Insight LicenseAdvisor product is a proprietary integrated
software asset management platform that is designed to enable organizations to gain better control
of their software assets, thereby saving money and helping to ensure software license compliance.
In spite of investing in software asset management tools, clients have noted that they may still
make unnecessary purchases, fall out of compliance with software licenses, are slow to distribute
software to their employees, and do not feel that they are in control of their software asset
lifecycle. Our software solution is designed to help companies close compliance gaps and manage
complex licenses by
12
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
determining who is entitled to purchase or use a software license, the right media for a
license entitlement, how to access the software, how to entitle users, groups and the enterprise to
receive the software, and how to manage entitlements going forward. The software is designed to
integrate with a companys internal processes and other asset management technology to allow the
company to purchase, deploy and manage their software assets more efficiently.
Services Offerings. Although sales of services in 2006 represented a small percentage of our
net sales (approximately 2%) and gross profit (approximately 5%), we believe our services offerings
differentiate us from our competitors. We believe these services offerings help to establish
strong, deep-rooted relationships with clients as they look to us for more than just product
fulfillment and view us as partners in creating integrated product and service solutions for their
IT needs. As sales of services increase, we expect services will likely become a greater
percentage of gross profit because sales of services are generally at a higher gross margin than
product sales. Currently, many of these service capabilities are more widely available to clients
in North America than in any other geography. Our investment in our services capabilities in North
America during 2006 resulted in year over year growth in net sales of 27% compared to 2005. We
provide our clients a wide variety of services that focus on the following areas:
|
|
|
Custom Configuration At our ISO 9001:2000 certified customer configuration lab in
the U.S., we custom configure servers, desktops, laptops and peripherals, including
services such as: |
|
|
|
asset tagging; |
|
|
|
|
basic testing; |
|
|
|
|
hardware and software configuration; and |
|
|
|
|
software imaging and installation. |
|
|
|
Advanced Integration Our ISO 9001: 2000 certified advanced integration lab in the
U.S. provides technical operations, resources and expertise to manage and implement
large-scale network rollouts, including: |
|
|
|
workstations, servers and connectivity equipment; |
|
|
|
|
individual user customization of file servers, switches, routers and racks; |
|
|
|
|
pre-built networks, including IP addressing; |
|
|
|
|
live network testing and turnkey deployment; and |
|
|
|
|
wireless activations and configurations. |
|
|
|
National Repair Center Our ISO 9001:2000 certified national repair center in the
U.S. is dedicated to maintaining our clients equipment and ensuring optimal
performance levels through a variety of services including: |
|
|
|
break fix services; |
|
|
|
|
hot swap/spare program; |
|
|
|
|
asset retrieval, refurbishment or redeployment; and |
|
|
|
|
end of lease processing. |
|
|
|
Enterprise Consulting We evaluate, design, implement and manage business
technology projects for our clients. Our enterprise consulting competencies include: |
|
|
|
infrastructure assessment and design; |
|
|
|
|
wireless LAN design and implementation; |
|
|
|
|
Microsoft assessment, design and implementation; |
|
|
|
|
IP voice and telephony solutions; and |
|
|
|
|
network security. |
|
|
|
Resource Management We offer highly skilled technical staff to augment our
clients existing IT staff in areas such as: |
|
|
|
desk side support; |
|
|
|
|
help desk support; |
|
|
|
|
installs, moves, adds and changes; |
|
|
|
|
LAN administration; and |
|
|
|
|
critical server restoration. |
|
|
|
Project Management We provide clients with experienced project managers who
coordinate the planning, design, deployment, and support of their IT projects and
ongoing service programs. This service is performed via our Project Management Office
which provides standard methodology and quality assurance. |
13
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
National Implementation Programs Together with selected highly qualified service
partners, we provide comprehensive, customized implementation services, including: |
|
|
|
national implementation and deployment projects and |
|
|
|
|
national service maintenance programs. |
A significant amount of services provided in North America are delivered through extensive
in-house capabilities, including services performed in our ISO 9001:2000 certified custom
configuration and advanced integration labs and our ISO 9001:2000 national repair center. On
certain service offerings or in certain geographies, we manage delivery of services by contracting
with highly qualified service partners. We believe this combination is a key differentiator from
direct competitors in North America. Our EMEA and APAC operating segments manage delivery of
services using in-house teammates and by contracting with highly qualified service partners.
Regardless of delivery methods or geography, the clients dedicated account executive remains the
primary contact throughout the entire implementation process, and we offer to act as the central
project manager to assure consistent quality of service across the project. This commitment to
project management is central to our value proposition for delivering total technology solutions,
and we believe it enhances the development of strong, long-term relationships with clients.
Our account executives are supported by teams of qualified experts that specialize in specific
emerging and/or complex technologies. In North America, we currently have technical sales support
teams focused on the following product and service categories:
|
|
|
Advance Network Solutions; |
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Solutions; |
|
|
|
|
Lifecycle Management; |
|
|
|
|
Mobility; |
|
|
|
|
Project Management; |
|
|
|
|
Security; |
|
|
|
|
Software License Management; |
|
|
|
|
Storage/High Performance Systems; |
|
|
|
|
Third-party Extended Warranties; |
|
|
|
|
Financial Services/Leasing; and |
|
|
|
|
Technology Disposal. |
In EMEA, we currently have teams of qualified experts focused on:
|
|
|
Connectivity (United Kingdom only); |
|
|
|
|
Helpdesk (France and United Kingdom only); |
|
|
|
|
Networking (France, Germany and United Kingdom only); |
|
|
|
|
Virtualization (France and Germany only); |
|
|
|
|
Servers (United Kingdom only); |
|
|
|
|
Storage and High Performance Systems, (UK only); |
|
|
|
|
Software Asset Management; |
|
|
|
|
Software Deployment Services; |
|
|
|
|
Software Licensing/Planning; |
|
|
|
|
Warranties and Configuration (United Kingdom only); and |
|
|
|
|
Wireless (United Kingdom only). |
In APAC, we currently have teams of qualified experts focused on Software Licensing/Planning.
Historically in the industry, advanced services were available nationally to larger enterprise
clients. However, we have the ability to provide certain of those services to our SMB clients and
view this as an opportunity for growth. Determining which services are best suited to the SMB
clients, expanding our services capabilities, creating awareness of our capabilities and increasing
sales to this client group will be a significant focus in the future. For 2006, our service
offerings to SMB clients continued to focus primarily on integration, third-party extended
warranties and leasing. However, in 2007, we plan to expand our services offerings to SMB clients
to include image loads, wireless deployment, asset disposal and managed services.
14
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
We believe that there is no other global reseller able to offer the same breadth and depth of
IT solutions that we offer across all target client groups in North America, EMEA and APAC.
Efficient Technology-Based Operations. We believe our implementation of advanced
technological systems provides a competitive advantage by increasing the productivity of our
account executives, delivering more efficient client service and reducing order processing and
inventory costs. Our technology-based operations center around our IT systems, our distribution
centers, electronic procurement and voice and data networks.
IT Systems. We are in the process of upgrading from SAP version 4.6 to mySAP. We have
reengineered our processes to prepare for the upgrade rollout and believe that the benefits will
include:
|
|
|
increased sales executive and client support productivity; |
|
|
|
|
automated service tracking and billing; |
|
|
|
|
enhanced CRM capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
streamlined opportunity management; |
|
|
|
|
improved ability to provide sales with qualified leads; |
|
|
|
|
improved service contract management and reporting; |
|
|
|
|
further automation of manual and inefficient processes; |
|
|
|
|
reduced custom programming and maintenance; and |
|
|
|
|
adoption of best practices around business processes. |
We currently plan to deploy our IT system in the U.S., including the upgrade to mySAP, to our
legacy Software Spectrum operations in the U.S. in mid 2008 and to our operations outside of the
U.S. over the next two years. Although mySAP has enhanced functionality, our current IT systems in
all geographies allow our account executives to obtain a wide range of information, including:
|
|
|
client information; |
|
|
|
|
product information; |
|
|
|
|
product pricing, gross profit and availability; |
|
|
|
|
product compatibility and alternative product offerings and accessories; and |
|
|
|
|
order status. |
We believe the information available to our account executives enables them to make better
decisions regarding solution, product and services recommendations, provide superior client service
and increase overall profitability. We also believe that our investment in IT will continue to
improve the efficiency of our operations.
Distribution Centers. Our U.S. distribution operations are conducted within a 440,000 square
foot distribution facility in Hanover Park, Illinois. Activities performed in our Illinois
distribution center include receipt and shipping of inventory and returned product processing.
Additionally, this distribution center houses our national repair center and our advanced
integration and custom configuration labs. We also have a small distribution facility in Canada,
small software-only distribution facilities in Germany and France and a 53,000 square foot
distribution facility in the United Kingdom. All of our IT systems have capabilities that
interface our sales, distribution, inventory and accounting functions. Through our IT systems, we
send orders electronically to one of our distribution centers or to a direct ship partner for
processing immediately upon order release, and the distribution center or partner automatically
prints a packing slip for order fulfillment. Products received in our distribution centers are
assigned a unique bar code and placed in designated bin locations. We use systematic checks to
ensure accurate fulfillment and to provide real-time reduction in inventories. We have implemented
a re-ordering system that calculates lead times, accepts price quotes from competing partners and,
in some instances, automatically orders from the partner with the most competitive price and
availability. We have integrated our order processing, labeling and tracking systems with major
freight carriers to ensure prompt and traceable delivery. We utilize a combined physical and
virtual distribution model, utilizing just-in-time inventory management and direct ship
relationships with partners to reduce inventory costs and increase client satisfaction. We also
purchase and hold inventory for our integration labs related to upcoming projects with large
enterprise and public sector clients. We promote the use of EDI or XML links with our partners,
which we believe helps to reduce overhead, simplify the order fulfillment cycle and reduce the use
of paper in the ordering process. Our physical distribution capabilities allow us to inventory
product as needed to take advantage of product allocations, make opportunistic purchases or meet
the service requirements of our clients. Our inventory management techniques, utilizing
15
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
our system capabilities, allow us to offer a greater range of products without increased
inventory requirements, and to reduce inventory exposure and shorten order fulfillment time.
Electronic Procurement. We participate in the electronic procurement arena in order to help
clients control costs, streamline the procurement process and improve operational efficiencies. We
do this primarily through our Web site and our Electronic Business-to-Business Partner Program
(e-B2B Partner Program):
|
|
|
Our Web Site. Our Web site, via customized landing pages, provides tools which
allow clients to restrict purchasing only to pre-approved products or allow an
administrator at a client location to give users within that organization access to the
clients on-line account, but restrict the level of their activity and the features and
options available to them. Through our Web site, we make available open-order status
and purchase activity reports formatted to meet each clients specifications. We also
maintain a suite of Internet-based tools that enable clients to manage their software
procurement. For most of our larger clients, we create customized electronic product
catalogs containing product information and pricing. These electronic catalogs are
accessed through search engine functionality, which enables clients to quickly locate
and compare products they need. |
|
|
|
|
Our e-B2B Partner Program. Under our e-B2B Partner Program, we have established
relationships with e-procurement providers, such as Ariba, Oracle, Perfect Commerce and
SAP to support clients implementations of the various e-procurement platforms in an
effort to streamline procurement processes and improve operational efficiencies. |
Voice and Data Networks. Our voice and data networks are an important part of our
technology-based operations as the majority of our sales, marketing and client service efforts are
conducted either via the telephone or over the Web. Our telephone system is programmed to route
inbound calls automatically, depending on their originating data, to specific sales groups, or to
specific account executives. Our telephone system also uses menu functions that permit the clients
to route themselves to the appropriate sales, service or support area or to their assigned account
executives. In general, our technology infrastructure and our data connectivity, in particular,
are important links in our efforts to increase the ease of transacting business with us.
For a discussion of risks associated with our IT systems and voice and data networks, see
Risk Factors Disruptions in our IT systems and voice and data networks, including the migration
of Software Spectrum to our IT voice and data networks, could affect our ability to service our
clients and cause us to incur additional expenses, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Growth Strategy
Our financial goals are focused on growing market share and net earnings at a rate that
outpaces the market. To achieve our goals, we are focused on the following areas:
|
|
|
selling additional products and services to our existing client base; |
|
|
|
|
expanding our client base; |
|
|
|
|
capitalizing on our international presence; |
|
|
|
|
increasing our gross profit; |
|
|
|
|
lowering our selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales; and |
|
|
|
|
making opportunistic strategic acquisitions. |
Selling Additional Products and Services to Our Existing Client Base. Although expanding our
client base is part of our growth strategy, we believe there is an even greater opportunity to
increase sales within our existing client base by:
|
|
|
driving incremental business by leveraging the combined strengths of our legacy
Insight and legacy Software Spectrum teammates in products, software and services and
cross-selling software offerings to legacy Insight clients and products and service
offerings to legacy Software Spectrum clients; |
|
|
|
|
increasing solution sales to drive increased share of wallet with existing clients; |
|
|
|
|
leveraging our services capabilities to enhance profitability; |
|
|
|
|
driving improvements in account executive productivity; |
|
|
|
|
aligning sales and marketing strategies; and |
16
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
leveraging e-commerce capabilities. |
Our marketing initiatives focus on demand generation, communication of our solutions
capabilities and growth of Insight brand awareness. We believe, particularly in the U.S., that the
full breadth of our solution-focused offerings is an important differentiating factor from our
competitors. Specific solutions have been and will continue to be brought to market through our
portfolio selling approach and will be supported by:
|
|
|
sales training and education; |
|
|
|
|
assessment and selling tools; |
|
|
|
|
awareness building; |
|
|
|
|
client events; |
|
|
|
|
demand generation; |
|
|
|
|
product management; |
|
|
|
|
procurement; |
|
|
|
|
services development; |
|
|
|
|
Web merchandising; and |
|
|
|
|
sales incentives. |
We believe this integrated, targeted approach will allow us to communicate our value
proposition to our clients, partners and account executives more effectively.
Expanding Our Client Base. We intend to increase our direct sales and targeted marketing
efforts in each of our client segments. We seek to acquire new account relationships through
proactive outbound telesales, face-to-face field sales, electronic commerce, targeted direct
marketing and increased advertising focused on Insight brand awareness and the differentiating
factors of our business model.
Capitalizing on Our International Presence. We seek to capitalize on our international
presence in an effort to achieve our long-term goal of becoming a global leader for IT solutions.
To that end, we plan to exploit our global footprint which was significantly expanded with the
acquisition of Software Spectrum in September 2006. A value driver in our integration planning and
execution is our plan to eventually build IT hardware and services capability in select countries
in EMEA and APAC to enhance our existing software expertise. Our expanded global presence provides
us with an increased client base, expanded product offerings and the ability to leverage our
existing infrastructure and partner relationships. We believe that our ability to service clients
globally very much differentiates us in the market. We also believe that APAC, in particular,
offers strong opportunities for growth with some of the fastest growing global economies in the
world. For a discussion of risks associated with international operations, see Risk Factors
There are risks associated with international operations that are different than those inherent in
the U.S. and our exposure to the risks of a global market could hinder our ability to maintain and
expand international operations, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Increasing Our Gross Profit. We believe that in order to meet our net earnings targets, we
need to increase our gross profit. We are focused on the following initiatives that we believe
will contribute to gross profit growth:
|
|
|
increasing attach rates for warranties, integration, leasing, accessories and
services; |
|
|
|
|
accelerating growth rates in net sales to SMB clients, which are generally conducted
at higher gross margins; |
|
|
|
|
actively managing freight margin; |
|
|
|
|
leveraging and expanding our use of automated pricing tools; and |
|
|
|
|
driving growth of higher margin categories. |
Lowering Our Selling and Administrative Expenses as a Percentage of Net Sales. In addition to
increasing gross profit, we are focused on reducing our selling and administrative expenses as a
percentage of net sales. We believe the following initiatives will help lower selling and
administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
continuing to tighten our management system and focus on expense management
throughout the organization; |
|
|
|
|
leveraging mySAP functionality to automate manual processes and adopt best practices; |
|
|
|
|
improving sales-to-support ratios; |
17
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
enhancing our alignment with our key partners to fully leverage our partners
investments in their Insight relationship; and |
|
|
|
|
achieving cost synergies from the acquisition of Software Spectrum. |
As noted in the above initiatives, key to our success is the integration of Software Spectrum
into our operations and the realization of the strategic and financial synergies we expect from the
combined business. We took a comprehensive approach to ensure the effectiveness of our
integration, which included utilization of an outside integration consultant and the development of
a disciplined project management approach. Our integration planning and execution were focused on
new sources of value including:
|
|
|
aligning sales to capture client synergies selling IT hardware and services to the
legacy Software Spectrum client base and selling software into the legacy Insight
client base to create incremental net new sales; |
|
|
|
|
retaining top talent/skills keeping and motivating key teammates from both
companies; |
|
|
|
|
leveraging our expertise in selling to SMB clients creating new markets for
software sales by exploiting expertise and existing relationships; |
|
|
|
|
capitalizing on our global footprint eventually building IT hardware and services
capabilities in select countries in EMEA and APAC; |
|
|
|
|
identifying synergies to reduce operating expenses making smart decisions that
optimize efficiency and operating margin; |
|
|
|
|
growing our services business expanding our breadth of offerings and target
service market; and |
|
|
|
|
leveraging scale in procurement and product management using our increased buying
power to improve our cost equation. |
Additionally, we anticipate that we will complete the upgrade of our SAP, version 4.6, system
to mySAP in our U.S. hardware and services business in mid 2007. We believe the mySAP upgrade,
targeted to streamline workflow within the organization, will provide us with enhanced IT tools
that will assist us in achieving our financial and operating goals.
Making Opportunistic Strategic Acquisitions. In September 2006, our strategic acquisition of
Software Spectrum broadened our client base, expanded our geographic reach, complemented our
existing operating structure, deepened our software capabilities and enhanced our product and
service offerings. It is part of our growth strategy to continue to evaluate and consider
strategic acquisition opportunities if and when they become available. For a discussion of risks
associated with strategic acquisitions, see Risk Factors The integration and operation of
Software Spectrum may disrupt our business and create additional expenses, and we may not achieve
the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Industry
Prior to late 2000, the industry experienced strong growth rates amidst a healthy economic
environment. Sales of IT products in the following years decreased worldwide due to sluggish
economic growth and a lengthening of IT replacement cycles. This slowdown in spending was evident
beginning in late 2000, and signs of an anticipated recovery were only first seen through slightly
increased activity in the latter half of 2003, which continued in 2004 through 2006. We remain
optimistic that IT spending will continue to increase in 2007 at a similar rate as that in 2006,
although we believe the motivation and demand for purchases has changed from that of the pre-2000
era, and we have repositioned ourselves to respond to these changes so that we may increase our
market share. Technology purchases are being made to address business-driven needs, and financial
officers and other senior executives are increasingly playing greater roles in the final purchasing
decisions. We believe that demand is no longer driven, for example, only by increased speed and
functionality of basic desktop computers, but by the total cost of ownership and return on
investment of IT expenditures. Therefore, direct marketers are increasing efforts to include
services among their offerings, and outbound telesales organizations are being complemented by
face-to-face field sales. We have been at the forefront of this trend since acquiring extensive
advanced service capabilities in early 2002 and enhanced software lifecycle management capabilities
with Software Spectrum in September of 2006. Other direct marketers have recently made efforts to
include varying levels of services among their offerings. We believe that we are better positioned
to take advantage of this shift in client purchasing as we began migrating from pure product
fulfillment-driven direct marketing strategies to our solutions-oriented model of providing IT
hardware, software and services much earlier than other direct marketers. We believe that in
addition to the changing motivation for purchases, the industry is evolving in other ways, too.
The market for IT hardware, software and services is served through a variety of distribution
channels, and intense competition for market share has forced manufacturers/publishers to
re-examine the psychology behind clients purchasing behaviors and to seek the most cost effective
and efficient channels to distribute their products. Clients are changing the way they plan
18
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
for, purchase and implement technology purchases, and participants in the supply chain,
including us, continue to change to keep pace with or be in front of these changes. We believe the
following trends have emerged:
|
|
|
Manufacturers and publishers are continuing their use of the direct channel, through
direct marketers and through their own internal resources, to market and sell products
directly to clients in order to grow sales and lower overall selling costs. However,
manufacturers and publishers are expecting their direct marketing partners to provide
more than just sales and products fulfillment. Manufacturers and publishers desire
partners that are knowledgeable about the differentiators of their products and can
help deploy the products in the clients IT environment. |
|
|
|
|
Consolidation has occurred over the past few years among direct marketers and
service providers, and as larger direct marketers continue to broaden their client
reach and increase the depth and breadth of product and service offerings, we believe
that larger direct marketers will continue to take market share away from smaller
resellers. |
|
|
|
|
Microsoft and other publishers have initiated sales agency licensing programs under
which resellers recognize the sales agency fee received directly from the software
publisher as net sales and not the entire sales price of the software. Additionally,
software maintenance contracts are recorded under net revenue recognition, and
therefore, only the gross profit on the transaction is recorded as net sales. The
increase in sales of licenses under sales agency licensing programs as well as sales of
software maintenance contracts makes period-to-period comparability of sales and costs
of goods sold more difficult. As a result, we believe the focus should be on gross
profit as the key measure of business performance and period-to-period trends. |
Additionally, with increased competition and an overall improved industry-wide supply chain,
IT hardware products experience continual declines in average selling prices. Therefore, in order
to increase net sales, unit sales must grow at a rate faster than the decline in average selling
prices.
We believe that we will continue to benefit from industry changes as a cost-effective provider
of a full range of IT hardware, software and services. While purchasing decisions will continue to
be influenced by product selection and availability, price and convenience, we believe that
solution offerings, knowledge of account executives and client service will become the
differentiators businesses will look for when procuring solutions that minimize their total cost of
ownership. We believe that Insight delivers strategic business value by streamlining IT management
and costs. By combining technology hardware, software and services, Insight creates
custom-tailored solutions designed to meet clients unique requirements and changing IT goals. For
a discussion of risks associated with uncertain economic conditions and actions of competitors, see
Risk Factors Changes in the IT industry and/or the economic environment may reduce demand for
the products, software and services we sell, and Risk Factors The IT hardware, software and
services industry is intensely competitive, and actions of our competitors, including manufacturers
and publishers of products we sell, can negatively affect our business, in Part I, Item 1A of this
report.
Competition
The IT hardware, software and services industry is highly competitive. We compete with a
large number and wide variety of marketers and resellers of IT hardware, software and services,
including:
|
|
|
product manufacturers, such as Dell, HP, IBM and Lenovo; |
|
|
|
|
direct marketers, such as CDW Corporation (North America) and PC World Business
(United Kingdom); |
|
|
|
|
software resellers, such as ASAP Software, SoftChoice and Softwarehouse International |
|
|
|
|
systems integrators, such as Compucom Systems, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
national and regional resellers, including value-added resellers and specialty
retailers, aggregators, distributors, national computer retailers, computer
superstores, Internet-only computer providers, consumer electronics and office supply
superstores and mass merchandisers; and |
|
|
|
|
national and global service providers, such as IBM Global Services, HP and EDS. |
Product manufacturers continue to sell directly to business clients, particularly larger
enterprise clients. Manufacturers, however, typically do not offer the breadth of multi-branded
product offerings that direct marketers such as us offer, nor do they have sufficient scale to
penetrate the SMB space cost-effectively. Additionally, most manufacturers, as well as other
direct marketers, do not provide the advanced level of services that we offer our clients. We
believe that we offer enhanced solutions capabilities, broader product selection and availability,
competitive prices, and greater purchasing convenience than traditional retail stores or
value-added resellers, and that our dedicated account executives offer the necessary support
functions (e.g., knowledge of technology solutions, credit terms and efficient return processes)
which Internet-only sellers usually do not provide.
19
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
We are not aware of any competitors with both the breadth and depth of solution offerings we
have in the U.S. or the ability to service software clients on a global level. This allows us to
differentiate ourselves with a client service strategy that spans the continuum from fast delivery
of competitively priced products, to licensing expertise and knowledgeable, industry experienced
teammates to advanced IT solutions, and a selling approach that permits us to grow with clients and
solidify those relationships.
Software publishers may intensify their efforts to sell their products directly to end users
to the exclusion of the indirect sales channel. Over the past few years, some publishers have
instituted programs for the direct sale of large order quantities of software to major corporate
accounts with only a referral fee paid to the reseller. We anticipate that these types of
transactions will continue to be used by various publishers in the future. We believe that the
total combined range of services and software titles we provide to our clients cannot be easily
substituted by individual software publishers, particularly because individual publishers do not
offer the scope of services or range of software titles required by most of our clients.
Although the barriers to entry into the industry for an Internet-only reseller are relatively
low, we believe that new entrants into the direct marketing channel must overcome a number of
significant barriers to entry including:
|
|
|
the time and resources required to build a client base of sufficient size and a
well-trained account executive sales base; |
|
|
|
|
the significant investment required to develop an IT and operating infrastructure; |
|
|
|
|
the advantages enjoyed by established larger competitors with purchasing and operating efficiencies; |
|
|
|
|
the reluctance of manufacturers and distributors to allocate product and supplier
reimbursements and establish electronic transactional relationships with additional
participants; and |
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of identifying and recruiting qualified management personnel and a
sufficient number of account executives to sell technically advanced products. |
Some of our competitors have longer operating histories and greater financial, technical,
marketing and other resources than us. In addition, some of these competitors may be able to
respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities, technologies and client requirements. Many
current and potential competitors also have greater name recognition and engage in more extensive
promotional marketing and advertising activities, offer more attractive terms to clients and adopt
more aggressive pricing policies than we do.
For a discussion of risks associated with the actions of our competitors, see Risk Factors
The IT hardware, software and services industry is intensely competitive, and actions of our
competitors, including manufacturers and publishers of products we sell, can negatively affect our
business, in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Partners
During 2006, we purchased products and software from approximately 3,700 partners.
Approximately 54% (based on dollar volume) of these purchases from partners were from distributors,
with the balance purchased directly from manufacturers or software publishers. Purchases from HP,
a manufacturer, Ingram Micro and Tech Data, both of which are distributors, accounted for
approximately 15%, 15%, and 13%, respectively, of our aggregate purchases in 2006. No other
partner accounted for more than 10% of purchases in 2006. Our top five partners as a group for
2006 were HP, Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Microsoft and SYNNEX. Approximately 58% of our total
purchases during 2006 came from this group of partners. These percentages only included Software
Spectrum purchases since September 2006, accordingly, we anticipate that our purchases from
Microsoft will increase substantially during 2007. Although brand names and individual products
are important to our business, we believe that competitive sources of supply are available in
substantially all of our product categories and many of our software offerings such that, with the
exception of Microsoft, we are not dependent on any single partner for sourcing products or
software.
We obtain supplier reimbursements from certain product manufacturers and software publishers
based typically upon the volume of sales or purchases of the manufacturers products or publishers
software. In other cases, such reimbursements may be in the form of participation in our partner
programs, discounts, advertising allowances, price protection or rebates. Manufacturers and
publishers may also provide mailing lists, contacts or leads to us. We believe that supplier
reimbursements allow us to increase our marketing reach and strengthen our relationships with
leading manufacturers and publishers. These reimbursements are important to us, and any
elimination or substantial reduction would increase our costs of goods sold or marketing expenses
and decrease our earnings from operations and net earnings. During 2006, sales of HP products and
Microsoft products accounted for approximately 26% and 15%, respectively, of our consolidated net
sales. No other manufacturers products accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales
in 2006. Sales of product from our top five manufacturers/publishers as a group (HP, Microsoft,
20
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cisco, Lenovo and IBM) accounted for approximately 61% of Insights consolidated net sales
during 2006. We believe that the majority of IT purchases by our clients are made based on the
ability of our total product and service offering to meet their IT needs more than on specific
brands.
Given the significant increase in software as a percentage of our net sales due to the
acquisition of Software Spectrum in September 2006, our reliance on Microsoft in 2007 and beyond
for both sales and vendor funding will increase. For a discussion of risks associated with our
reliance on partners, see Risk Factors We rely on our partners for product availability,
marketing funds, purchasing incentives and competitive products to sell, in Part I, Item 1A of
this report.
Teammates
We believe our teammate relations are good. Our teammates are not represented by any labor
union, and we have not experienced any work stoppages. Certain of our teammates in various
countries outside of the U.S. are subject to laws providing representation rights to teammates on
workers councils. At December 31, 2006, we had 4,568 teammates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Management, support
services and
administration |
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
Sales account executives |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
4,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have invested in our teammates future and our future through an ongoing program of
internal and external training. Training programs include new hire orientation, sales training,
general industry and computer education, technical training, specific product training and on-going
teammate and management development programs. We emphasize on-the-job training and provide our
teammates and managers with development opportunities through on-line and classroom training
relevant to their needs.
Seasonality
General economic conditions have an effect on our business and results of operations. We also
experience some seasonal trends in our sales of IT hardware, software and services. For example:
|
|
|
software sales are seasonally significantly higher in our second and fourth quarter; |
|
|
|
|
business clients, particularly larger enterprise businesses in the U.S., tend to
spend more in our fourth quarter as they utilize their remaining capital budget
authorizations, and less in the first quarter; and |
|
|
|
|
sales to the federal government in the U.S. are often stronger in our third quarter. |
These trends create overall seasonality in our consolidated results such that sales and
profitability are expected to be higher in the second and fourth quarters of the year. We expect
between 25% and 30% of our 2007 net sales and gross profit, as well as between 30% and 35% of our
2007 earnings from operations, to occur in each of the second and fourth quarters.
Backlog
Virtually all of our backlog historically has been and continues to be open cancelable
purchase orders, and we do not believe that backlog as of any particular date is indicative of
future results.
Intellectual Property
We do not maintain a traditional research and development group, but we do develop and seek to
protect a range of intellectual property, including trademarks, service marks, copyrights, domain
name rights, trade dress, trade secrets and similar intellectual property. We rely on applicable
statutes and common law rights, trade-secret protection and confidentiality and license agreements,
as applicable, with teammates, clients, vendors and others to protect our intellectual property
rights. We have registered a number of domain names, and our principal trademark is a registered
mark. We have also applied for registration of other marks, in the U.S. and in select
international jurisdictions, and from time to time, file patent applications. We may, in the
future, license certain of our proprietary intellectual property rights to third parties. It is
important for us to work closely with computer product manufacturers and other technology
developers to stay current on the latest developments in technology in order to improve our
internal operations and for
21
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
the benefit of our clients. We believe our trademarks and service marks, in particular, have
significant value and we continue to invest in the promotion of our trademarks and service marks
and in our protection of them.
Available Information
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the reports of beneficial ownership filed
pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge on our Web site at
www.insight.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file with, or furnish
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Additionally, the public may read and copy any
materials that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room is available
by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a Web site at www.sec.gov that
contains all of information we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. Please see Explanatory Note
Regarding Restatement of Our Consolidated Financial Statements above regarding our previous
reports not being amended for the restatement of our financial statements, and that the financial
information included in reports previously filed or furnished by Insight Enterprises, Inc. for
prior periods should not be relied upon, and are superseded by the information in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Changes in the IT industry and/or the economic environment may reduce demand for the IT
hardware, software and services we sell. Our results of operations are influenced by a variety of
factors, including the condition of the IT industry, general economic conditions, shifts in demand
for, or availability of, IT hardware, software, peripherals and services and industry introductions
of new products, upgrades or methods of distribution. Net sales can be dependent on demand for
specific product categories, and any change in demand for or supply of such products could have a
material adverse effect on our net sales, and/or cause us to record write-downs of obsolete
inventory, if we fail to react in a timely manner to such changes. Our operating results are also
highly dependent upon our level of gross profit as a percentage of net sales, which fluctuates due
to numerous factors, including changes in prices from partners, changes in the amount and timing of
supplier reimbursements and marketing funds that are made available, volumes of purchases, changes
in client mix, the relative mix of products sold during the period, general competitive conditions,
the availability of opportunistic purchases and opportunities to increase market share. In
addition, our expense levels, including integration related costs and the costs and salaries
incurred in connection with the hiring of account executives, are based, in part, on anticipated
net sales and the anticipated amount and timing of vendor funding. Therefore, we may not be able
to reduce spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected net sales shortfall and any
such inability could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
We rely on our partners for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing incentives and
competitive products to sell. We acquire products for resale both directly from
manufacturers/publishers and indirectly through distributors. The loss of a partner could cause a
disruption in the availability of products. Additionally, there is no assurance that as
manufacturers/publishers continue to sell directly to end users and through the distribution
channel, they will not limit or curtail the availability of their product to resellers like us.
From time to time, products we offer may become subject to manufacturer allocation, which limits
the number of units available to us. Our inability to obtain a sufficient quantity of product, or
an allocation of products from a manufacturer in a way that favors one of our competitors relative
to us, could cause us to be unable to fill clients orders in a timely manner, or at all, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, a reduction in the amount of credit granted to us by our partners could
increase our cost of working capital and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Certain manufacturers/publishers and distributors provide us with substantial incentives in
the form of rebates, supplier reimbursements and marketing funds, early payment discounts, referral
fees and price protections. Vendor funding is used to offset, among other things, inventory, costs
of goods sold, marketing costs and other operating expenses. Certain of these funds are based on
our volume of net sales or purchases, growth rate of net sales or purchases and marketing programs.
If we do not grow our net sales over prior periods or if we are not in compliance with the terms
of these programs, there could be a material negative effect on the amount of incentives offered or
paid to us by manufacturers/publishers. Additionally, partners routinely change the requirements
for, and the amount of, funds available. No assurance can be given that we will continue to
receive such incentives or that we will be able to collect outstanding amounts relating to these
incentives in a timely manner, or at all. A reduction in, the discontinuance of, a significant
delay in receiving or the inability to collect such incentives, particularly related to programs
with our largest vendors, HP and Microsoft, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
22
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Although product is generally available from multiple sources via the distribution channel as
well as directly from manufacturers/publishers, we rely on the manufacturers/publishers of products
we offer not only for product availability and vendor funding, but also for development and
marketing of products that compete effectively with products of manufacturers/publishers we do not
currently offer, particularly Dell. We do have the ability to sell, and from time to time do sell,
Dell product if it is specifically requested by our clients and approved by Dell, although we do
not currently proactively advertise or offer Dell products.
Disruptions in our IT systems and voice and data networks, including the upgrade to my SAP and
the migration of Software Spectrum to our IT systems and voice and data networks, could affect our
ability to service our clients and cause us to incur additional expenses. We believe that our
success to date has been, and future results of operations will be, dependent in large part upon
our ability to provide prompt and efficient service to our clients. Our ability to provide that
level of service is largely dependent on the accuracy, quality and utilization of the information
generated by our IT systems, which affect our ability to manage our sales, client service,
distribution, inventories and accounting systems and the reliability of our voice and data
networks. In January 2004, we completed the IT system conversion to SAP, version 4.6, across all
of Insights operations serving U.S. clients. We have been making and will continue to make
enhancements and upgrades to the system, including our current upgrade to mySAP. We currently plan
to deploy our IT system in the U.S., including the upgrade to mySAP, to our legacy Software
Spectrum operations in the U.S. in mid 2008 and to our operations outside of the U.S. over the next
two years. Additionally, certain assumed expense synergies are dependent on migrating Software
Spectrum to our IT systems. There can be no assurances that these enhancements or conversions will
not cause disruptions in our business, and any such disruption could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and financial condition. The conversion of EMEA to this software
platform will enable us to sell hardware and services to clients in that region and therefore any
delay would have an effect on future sales growth. Further, any delay in the timing could decrease
and/or delay our expense savings and any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, if we complete conversions that
shorten the life of existing technology or render it impaired, we could incur additional
depreciation expense and/or impairment charges. Although we have built redundancy into most of our
IT systems, have documented system outage policies and procedures and have comprehensive data
backup, we do not have a formal disaster recovery or business continuity plan. Substantial
interruption in our IT systems or in our telephone communication systems would have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The integration and operation of Software Spectrum may disrupt our business and create
additional expenses, and we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
Integration of an acquisition involves numerous risks, including difficulties in the conversion of
IT systems and assimilation of operations of the acquired company, the diversion of managements
attention from other business concerns, risks of entering markets in which we have had no or only
limited direct experience, assumption of unknown liabilities, the potential loss of key teammates
and/or clients, difficulties in completing strategic initiatives already underway in the acquired
and acquiring companies, and unfamiliarity with partners of the acquired company, each of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. The success of our integration of Software Spectrum assumes certain synergies and other
benefits. We cannot assure that these risks or other unforeseen factors will not offset the
intended benefits of the acquisition, in whole or in part.
The IT hardware, software and services industry is intensely competitive, and actions of our
competitors, including manufacturers and publishers of products we sell, can negatively affect our
business. Competition has been based primarily on price, product availability, speed of delivery,
credit availability and quality and breadth of product lines and, increasingly, is also based on
the ability to tailor specific solutions to client needs. We compete with
manufacturers/publishers, including manufacturers/publishers of products we sell, as well as a
large number and wide variety of marketers and resellers of IT hardware, software and services.
Product manufacturers/publishers have programs to sell directly to business clients, particularly
larger corporate clients, and are thus a competitive threat to us. In addition, the manner in
which software products are distributed and sold and the manner in which publishers compensate
channel partners like us are continually changing. Software publishers may intensify their efforts
to sell their products directly to end-users, including our current and potential clients, and may
reduce the compensation to resellers or change the requirements for earning these amounts. Other
products and methodologies for distributing software may be introduced by publishers, present
competitors or other third parties. An increase in the volume of products sold through any of these
competitive programs or distributed directly electronically to end-users or a decrease in the
amount of referral fees paid to us, or increased competition for providing services to these
clients, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
23
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Additionally, we believe our industry will see further consolidation as product resellers and
direct marketers combine operations or acquire or merge with other resellers, service providers and
direct marketers to increase efficiency, service capabilities and market share. Moreover, current
and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties to enhance their product and service offerings. Accordingly, it
is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and acquire significant
market share. Generally, pricing is very aggressive in the industry, and we expect pricing
pressures to continue. There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate prices as
favorable as those negotiated by our competitors or that we will be able to offset the effects of
price reductions with an increase in the number of clients, higher net sales, cost reductions,
greater sales of services, which are typically at higher gross margins, or otherwise. Price
reductions by our competitors that we either cannot or choose not to match could result in an
erosion of our market share and/or reduced sales or, to the extent we match such reductions, could
result in reduced operating margins, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of our competitors in each of our operating segments have longer operating histories
and greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. In addition, some of
these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or changing opportunities,
technologies and client requirements. Many current and potential competitors also have greater
name recognition and engage in more extensive promotional activities, offer more attractive terms
to clients and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we do. Additionally, some of our
competitors have higher margins and/or lower operating cost structures, allowing them to price more
aggressively. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively with current
or future competitors or that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have received an informal inquiry from the SEC and could be subject to stockholder
litigation and other regulatory proceedings related to the Options Subcommittees investigation of
our historical stock option granting practices and the related restatement of our consolidated
financial statements. As described in the Explanatory Note immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 of
this report, Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements to consolidated financial
statements and in Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in Part II, Item 7 of this report,
we identified errors in the Companys accounting related to stock option compensation expenses in
prior periods and determined that corrections to our consolidated financial statements were
required to reflect additional material charges for stock-based compensation expenses and related
income tax effects.
There is a pending informal inquiry from the SEC regarding our historical option granting
practices, and we cannot make any assurances regarding the results of that inquiry. One purported
derivative lawsuit was filed and subsequently dismissed without prejudice at the request of the
plaintiff. The Options Subcommittees investigation, our internal review and related activities
have already required the Company to incur substantial expenses for legal, accounting, tax and
other professional services and any future related investigations or litigation could require
further expenditures and harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Further, if the Company is subject to adverse findings in litigation, regulatory
proceedings or government enforcement actions, the Company could be required to pay damages or
penalties or have other remedies imposed, which could harm its business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
While the Company believes it has made appropriate judgments in determining the correct
measurement dates for its stock option grants, the SEC may disagree with the manner in which the
Company has accounted for and reported, or not reported, the financial effect. Accordingly, there
is a risk the Company may have to further restate its prior financial statements, amend prior
filings with the SEC, or take other actions not currently contemplated.
The Company has received three Nasdaq Staff Determination letters stating that, as a result of
the delayed filings, the Company was not in compliance with the filing requirements for continued
listing as set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14) and was therefore subject to delisting from
the Nasdaq Global Select Market. To date, the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel and the Nasdaq
Listing Council have granted requests for continued listing, subject to the Company filing
delinquent reports by the dates specified by Nasdaq. With the filing of this report and the filing
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company believes that it has remedied its
non-compliance with Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14). However, if the SEC disagrees with the manner in
which the Company has accounted for and reported, or not reported, the financial effect of past
stock option grants, there could be further delays in filing subsequent SEC reports that might
result in delisting of the Companys common stock from the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Evaluation of internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
will continue to affect our results. Complying with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and Nasdaqs conditions for
24
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
continued listing have imposed significant legal and financial compliance costs, and are expected
to continue to impose significant costs and management burden on us.
Additionally, we cannot be sure that we will be able to successfully remediate the currently
reported material weakness in our system of internal control over financial reporting. Our efforts
to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related regulations regarding our
required assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and our external auditors
audit of the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting continues to require the
commitment of significant financial and managerial resources.
There are risks associated with international operations that are different than those
inherent in the U.S. and our exposure to the risks of a global market could hinder our ability to
maintain and expand international operations. We have operation centers in Australia, Canada,
Germany, France, the U.S., and the United Kingdom, as well as sales offices in Australia, Belgium,
Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway,
Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the U.S., and sales presence in
Austria, Ireland, New Zealand and Russia. In the regions in which we do not currently have a
physical presence, such as Africa, Japan and India, we serve our clients through strategic
relationships. In implementing our international strategy, we may face barriers to entry and
competition from local companies and other companies that already have established global
businesses, as well as the risks generally associated with conducting business internationally.
The success and profitability of international operations are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control, such as:
|
|
|
political or economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulation; |
|
|
|
|
changes in import/export duties; |
|
|
|
|
trade restrictions; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing operations in certain foreign countries; |
|
|
|
|
work stoppages or other changes in labor conditions; |
|
|
|
|
taxes and other restrictions on repatriating foreign profits back to the U.S.; |
|
|
|
|
payment terms; and |
|
|
|
|
seasonal reductions in business activity in some parts of the world. |
In addition, until a payment history is established with clients in a new region, the
likelihood of collecting receivables generated by such operations, on a timely basis or at all,
could be less than expected. As a result, there is a greater risk that reserves established with
respect to the collection of such receivables may be inadequate. Furthermore, changes in policies
and/or laws of the U.S. or foreign governments resulting in, among other things, higher taxation,
currency conversion limitations or the expropriation of private enterprises could reduce the
anticipated benefits of their international operations. Any actions by countries in which we
conduct business to reverse policies that encourage foreign trade could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The acquisition of Software Spectrum utilized the majority of our cash balances, increased our
outstanding debt and interest expense and lowered the availability on our financing facilities, all
of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our financing facilities include a $225.0 million accounts receivable securitization financing
facility, a $75.0 million revolving line of credit and a $75.0 million five-year term loan. As of
December 31, 2006, we had $254.3 million outstanding under these facilities and approximately
$144.8 million, including $37.5 million of increased availability upon our request, was available.
The availability under the accounts receivable securitization facility is subject to formulas based
on our eligible trade accounts receivable. The accounts receivable securitization financing
facility expires in September 2009, and the revolving credit facility expires in September 2011.
Additionally, most of our financing facilities have variable interest rates, which increases our
exposure to interest rate fluctuations and may result in greater interest expense than we have
forecasted.
International operations expose us to currency exchange risk and we cannot predict the effect
of future exchange rate fluctuations on our business and operating results. International
operations are sensitive to currency exchange risks. We have currency exposure arising from both
sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in exchange rates between foreign
currencies and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our operating margins. For example, if these
foreign currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar, it will become more expensive in U.S.
dollars to pay expenses with foreign currencies. In addition, currency devaluation against the
U.S. dollar can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of that currency. We currently do not
conduct any hedging activities, and, to the extent that we continue not to do so in the future, we
may be vulnerable to the effects of currency exchange-rate fluctuations. In addition, some
currencies are subject to limitations on conversion into other currencies, which can limit the
ability to
25
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
otherwise react to rapid foreign currency devaluations. We cannot predict the effect of future
exchange-rate fluctuations on business and operating results and significant rate fluctuations
could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition.
International operations also expose us to currency fluctuations as we translate the financial
statements of our foreign operations to U. S. dollars. Although the effect of currency
fluctuations on our financial statements has not generally been material in the past, there can be
no guarantee that the effect of currency fluctuations will not be material in the future.
Sales of software licenses are subject to seasonal changes in demand and resulting sales
activities. With the acquisition of Software Spectrum, our product mix changed significantly.
Prior to the acquisition of Software Spectrum, software sales represented approximately 12% of net
sales. After the acquisition of Software Spectrum, software sales represent approximately 35% to
40% of annual net sales. Our software business is subject to seasonal change. In particular,
software sales are seasonally much higher in our second and fourth quarter. As a result, our
quarterly results will be materially affected by lower demand in the first and third quarter. A
majority of our costs are not variable and therefore a substantial reduction in sales during a
quarter could have a negative effect on operating results. In addition, periods of higher sales
activities during certain quarters may require a greater use of working capital to fund the
business. During these periods, these increased working capital requirements could temporarily
increase our leverage and liquidity needs and expose us to greater financial risk during those
periods. Due to these seasonal changes, the operating results for any three-month period will not
necessarily be indicative of the results that may be achieved for any subsequent fiscal quarter or
for a full fiscal year.
We depend on certain key personnel. Our future success will be largely dependent on the
efforts of key management personnel. The loss of one or more of these new leaders could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We cannot
offer assurance that we will be able to continue to attract or retain highly qualified executive
personnel or that any such executive personnel will be able to increase stockholder value. We also
believe that our future success will be largely dependent on our continued ability to attract and
retain highly qualified management, sales, service and technical personnel. We cannot offer
assurance that we will be able to attract and retain such personnel. Further, we make a
significant investment in the training of our sales account executives. Our inability to retain
such personnel or to train them either rapidly enough to meet our expanding needs or in an
effective manner for quickly changing market conditions could cause a decrease in the overall
quality and efficiency of our sales staff, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
If purchased goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to
record a significant charge to earnings. The purchase price allocation for the acquisition of
Software Spectrum resulted in a material amount allocated to goodwill and amortizable intangible
assets. In accordance with GAAP, we review our amortizable intangible assets for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is
required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in
circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets
may not be recoverable include a decline in stock price and market capitalization, reduced future
cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a
significant non-cash charge to earnings in our consolidated financial statements during the period
in which any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, resulting
in a negative effect on our results of operations.
The failure to comply with the terms and conditions of our public sector contracts could
result in, among other things, fines or other liabilities. Net sales to public sector clients are
derived from sales to federal, state and local governmental departments and agencies, as well as to
educational institutions, through open market sales and various contracts. Government contracting
is a highly regulated area. Noncompliance with government procurement regulations or contract
provisions could result in civil, criminal, and administrative liability, including substantial
monetary fines or damages, termination of government contracts, and suspension, debarment or
ineligibility from doing business with the government. In addition, substantially all of our
contracts in the public sector are terminable at any time for convenience of the contracting agency
or upon default. The effect of any of these possible actions by any governmental department or
agency or the adoption of new or modified procurement regulations or practices could materially
adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations.
We have very limited experience in outsourcing business functions to India. Early in 2006,
Software Spectrum entered into a business solutions partner agreement to outsource certain business
processes, such as credit and collections, accounts payable and other administrative and
back-office positions, to a third-party provider with operations in India. If we continue or
expand this outsourcing of certain business functions to India, we could be required to change
26
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
our existing operations and to adopt new policies and procedures for managing the third-party
provider. We have very limited experience in outsourcing business functions to India, and there is
no assurance that we will be successful in achieving meaningful cost reductions or greater resource
efficiency from utilizing this third-party provider. The outsourcing of business functions to
India may also cause disruption in our business that could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Rapid changes in product standards may result in substantial inventory obsolescence. The IT
industry is characterized by rapid technological change and the frequent introduction of new
products and product enhancements, both of which can decrease demand for current products or render
them obsolete. In addition, in order to satisfy client demand, protect ourselves against product
shortages, obtain greater purchasing discounts and react to changes in original equipment
manufacturers terms and conditions, we may decide to carry relatively high inventory levels of
certain products that may have limited or no return privileges. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to avoid losses related to inventory obsolescence on these products.
We may not be able to protect out intellectual property adequately, and we may be subject to
intellectual property infringement claims. To protect our intellectual property, we rely on
copyright and trademark laws, unpatented proprietary know-how, and trade secrets and patents, as
well as confidentiality, invention assignment, non-competition and non-solicitation agreements.
There can be no assurance that these measures will afford us sufficient protection of our
intellectual property, and it is possible that third parties may copy or otherwise obtain and use
our proprietary information without authorization or otherwise infringe on our intellectual
property rights. The disclosure of our trade secrets could impair our competitive position and
could have a material adverse effect on our business relationships, results of operations,
financial condition and future growth prospects. Likewise, many businesses are actively investing
in, developing and seeking protection for intellectual property in the areas of search, indexing,
e-commerce and other Web-related technologies, as well as a variety of on-line business models and
methods, all of which are in addition to traditional research and development efforts for IT
products and application software. As a result, disputes regarding the ownership of these
technologies are likely to arise in the future, and, from time to time, parties do assert various
infringement claims against us in the form of cease-and-desist letters, lawsuits and other
communications. If there is a determination that we have infringed the proprietary rights of
others, we could incur substantial monetary liability, be forced to stop selling infringing
products or providing infringing services, be required to enter into costly royalty or licensing
agreements, if available, or be prevented from using the rights, which could force us to change our
business practices in the future. As a result, these types of claims could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We issue equity-based awards, such as restricted stock units, under our long-term incentive
plans, and these issuances dilute the interests of stockholders. We have reserved shares of our
common stock for issuance under our 1998 Ling-Term Incentive Plan (the 1998 LTIP) and our 1999
Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Broad Based Plan). As approved by our
stockholders, our 1998 LTIP provides that additional shares of common stock may be reserved for
issuance based on a formula contained in that plan. The formula provides that the total number of
shares of common stock remaining for grant under the 1998 LTIP and any of our other option plans,
plus the number of shares subject to unexercised options and unvested grants of restricted stock
granted under any plan, shall not exceed 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the
time of calculation of the additional shares. Therefore, we reserve additional shares on an
ongoing basis for issuance under this plan. At December 31, 2006, we had options outstanding to
acquire 5,283,463 shares of common stock and there were 73,332 shares of restricted common stock
and 687,199 restricted common stock units unreleased. Based on the 1998 LTIP formula, we had
3,729,617 shares of common stock available for grant at December 31, 2006.
When stock options with an exercise price lower than the current market price are exercised,
the risk increases that our stockholders will experience dilution of earnings per share due to the
increased number of shares outstanding. Also, the terms upon which we will be able to obtain
equity capital may be affected, because the holders of outstanding options can be expected to
exercise them at a time when we would, in all likelihood, be able to obtain needed capital on terms
more favorable to us than those provided in outstanding options.
Some anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
stockholders rights agreement, as well as provisions of Delaware law and executive employment
contracts, could impair a takeover attempt. We have provisions in our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws which could have the effect (separately, or in combination) of rendering more difficult
or discouraging an acquisition deemed undesirable by our Board of Directors. These include
provisions:
|
|
|
authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation,
dividend and other rights superior to our common stock; |
27
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, directors and officers; |
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings; |
|
|
|
|
requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at
meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our Board of
Directors; |
|
|
|
|
controlling the procedures for conduct of Board and stockholder meetings and election
and removal of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
specifying that stockholders may take action only at a duly called annual or special
meeting of stockholders. |
These provisions, alone or together, could deter or delay hostile takeovers, proxy contests
and changes in control or management. As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions
of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some
stockholders from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of
substantially all of our outstanding common stock.
On December 14, 1998, each stockholder of record received one Preferred Share Purchase Right
(Right) for each outstanding share of common stock owned. Each Right entitles stockholders to
buy .00148 of a share of our Series A Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $88.88. The Rights
will be exercisable if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our common stock or announces a
tender offer for 15% or more of the common stock. However, should this occur, the Right will
entitle its holder to purchase, at the Rights exercise price, a number of shares of common stock
having a market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price. Rights held by the 15%
holder will become void and will not be exercisable to purchase shares at the bargain purchase
price. If we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person
acquires 15% or more of the our common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase at the
Rights then current exercise price a number of the acquiring companys common shares having a
market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price.
Additionally, we have employment agreements with certain officers and management teammates
under which severance payments would become payable in the event of specified terminations without
cause or terminations under certain circumstances after a change in control. If such persons were
terminated without cause or under certain circumstances after a change of control, and the
severance payments under the current employment agreements were to become payable, the severance
payments would generally be equal to either one or two times the persons annual salary and bonus.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or employment agreements, or
Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the
opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and also
could affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
Sales of additional common stock and securities convertible into our common stock may dilute
the voting power of current holders. We may issue equity securities in the future whose terms and
rights are superior to those of our common stock. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the
issuance of up to 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock. These are blank check preferred shares,
meaning our Board of Directors is authorized, from time to time, to issue the shares and designate
their voting, conversion and other rights, including rights superior, or preferential, to rights of
already outstanding shares, all without stockholder consent. No preferred shares are outstanding,
and we currently do not intend to issue any shares of preferred stock. Any shares of preferred
stock that may be issued in the future could be given voting and conversion rights that could
dilute the voting power and equity of existing holders of shares of common stock and have
preferences over shares of common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation rights.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our principal executive offices are located at 1305 West Auto Drive, Tempe, Arizona
85284. We conduct sales, distribution, services, and administrative activities in owned and leased
facilities, and some of our face-to-face field account executives conduct business from home
offices. We have renewal rights in most of our property leases, and we anticipate that we will be
able to extend these leases on terms satisfactory to us or, if necessary, locate substitute
facilities on acceptable terms. We believe that our facilities will be suitable and adequate for
our present purposes, and that the capacity in the majority of our facilities is not fully
utilized. In the future, we may need to purchase, build or lease additional facilities to meet the
requirements projected in our long-term business plan. If we decide to exit the current leases, we
may have to continue to make payments under the current leases or pay penalties to cancel the
leases.
28
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Information about significant sales, distribution, services and administration facilities in
use as of December 31, 2006 is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Segment |
|
Location |
|
Primary Activities |
|
Own or Lease |
Headquarters
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Executive Offices
|
|
Own |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own |
|
|
Tempe, Arizona, USA
|
|
Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Bloomingdale, Illinois, USA
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own |
|
|
Hanover Park, Illinois, USA
|
|
Services and Distribution
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Plano, Texas, USA
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Liberty Lake, Washington, USA
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own |
|
|
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
Sheffield, United Kingdom
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Own |
|
|
Sheffield, United Kingdom
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Uxbridge, United Kingdom
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Munich, Germany
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Paris, France
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Appledorn, Netherlands
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Milan, Italy
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Madrid, Spain
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Brussels, Belgium
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APAC
|
|
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
|
|
Sales and Administration
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Pudong, Shanghai, China
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Wan Chai, Hong Kong
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Sales
|
|
Lease |
In addition to those listed above, North America has leased sales offices in various cities
across the U.S., United Kingdom and Canada. For additional information on operating leases, see
Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. We own sales,
administration and distribution facilities in Tempe, Arizona that we currently lease to Direct
Alliance, our discontinued operation. These properties are not included in the table above. For
additional information on our buildings held for lease, see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. We also have leased facilities in the United Kingdom
that are no longer in use due to the integration of previous acquisitions. These properties are
also not included in the table above.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,
including asserted preference payment claims in client bankruptcy proceedings, claims of alleged
infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and claims
of alleged non-compliance with contract provisions.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (SFAS No. 5), we make a
provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly
and are adjusted to reflect the effects of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular claim. Although litigation is
inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have adequate provisions for any probable and
estimable losses. It is possible, nevertheless, that the results of our operations or cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected in any particular period by the resolution of a legal
proceeding. Legal expenses related to defense, negotiations, settlements, rulings and advice of
outside legal counsel are expensed as incurred.
29
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
In June 2006, our subsidiary, Software Spectrum, Inc. was named as a defendant in a civil
lawsuit, Allocco v. Gardner (Superior Court, County of San Diego), regarding certain software
resale transactions with Peregrine Systems, Inc. The subsidiary was named as successor to
Corporate Software & Technology, Inc. (CS&T) and alleges that during October 2000 CS&T
participated in or aided and abetted a fraudulent scheme by Peregrine to inflate Peregrines stock
price. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement by which we acquired Software Spectrum, Inc. from
Level 3 Communications, Inc. (Level 3, the former corporate parent of Software Spectrum, Inc.),
Level 3 has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless for this matter. The discovery
process is on-going, and we strongly dispute any allegations of participation in fraudulent
behavior. On our behalf, Level 3 is vigorously defending this matter.
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We have cooperated with the SEC and
will continue to do so. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Software Spectrum, as successor to CST, is party to litigation brought in the Belgian courts
regarding a dispute over the terms of a tender awarded by the Belgian Ministry of Defence (MOD)
in November 2000. In February 2001, CST brought a breach of contract suit against MOD in the Court
of First Instance in Brussels and claimed breach of contract damages in the amount of approximately
$150,000. MOD counterclaimed against CST for cost to cover in the amount of approximately
$2,700,000, and, in July 2002, CST added a Belgian subsidiary of Microsoft as a defendant. We
believe that MODs counterclaims are unfounded, and we are vigorously defending the claim.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during our 2006 fourth
quarter.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock trades under the symbol NSIT on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The
following table shows, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing price per
share for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
High Price |
|
Low Price |
Year 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
22.69 |
|
|
$ |
18.59 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
20.96 |
|
|
|
16.22 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
22.46 |
|
|
|
17.78 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
22.14 |
|
|
|
19.79 |
|
Year 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
21.60 |
|
|
$ |
18.14 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
21.19 |
|
|
|
18.20 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
20.47 |
|
|
|
17.39 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
20.36 |
|
|
|
17.23 |
|
As of June 29, 2007, we had 49,100,749 shares of common stock outstanding held by
approximately 109 stockholders of record. This figure does not include an estimate of the number
of beneficial holders whose shares are held of record by brokerage firms and clearing agencies.
We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock, and our financing facilities prohibit
the payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent. We intend to retain all of our
earnings for use in our business and currently do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future.
30
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Securities Authorized For Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options under all of our existing equity compensation plans of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance |
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
under Equity |
|
|
|
to be Issued upon |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
Exercise of |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(Excluding Securities |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
of Outstanding |
|
|
Reflected in |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Column (a)) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Plan Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
5,109,352 |
|
|
|
$19.33 |
|
|
|
3,729,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
174,111 |
(1) |
|
|
$21.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,283,463 |
|
|
|
$19.41 |
|
|
|
3,729,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted equity
compensation plans
not approved by
security holders
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,907 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of options that are outstanding under our 1999 Broad Based Plan which was not
approved by our stockholders. In September 1999, we established the 1999 Broad Based Plan for
our employees. The total number of stock options initially available for grant under the 1999
Broad Based Plan was 1,500,000; provided, however, that no more than 20% of the shares of
stock available under the 1999 Broad Based Plan may be awarded to the Officers. Stock options
available for grant under the 1999 Broad Based Plan are included in the total shares of common
stock available to grant for awards under the 1998 Plan or 1999 Broad Based Plan discussed
above. See further description of the plans in Note 3 to our Financial Statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this report. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes restricted shares available for grant under the 1998 Employee Restricted Stock Plan
and the 1998 Officer Restricted Stock Plan. See further description of the plans in Note 3 to
our Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
|
Approximate dollar value of |
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
|
shares that may yet be |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
publicly announced |
|
|
purchased under the |
|
Period |
|
purchased |
|
|
paid per share |
|
|
plans or programs |
|
|
plans or programs (1) |
|
October 1-31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
November 1-30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
December 1-31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On January 26, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase
of up to $50,000,000 of our common stock. We have made no repurchases under this program
since the inception of the program. |
31
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Stock Price Performance Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing the percentage change in the cumulative total
stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Stock Market
U.S. Companies (Market Index), the Nasdaq Retail Trade Stocks for the period starting January 1,
2002 and ending December 31, 2006. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on January 1, 2002 in
our common stock and in each of the two Nasdaq indices, and that, as to such indices, dividends
were reinvested. We have not, since our inception, paid any cash dividends on our common stock.
Historical stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future
price performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Insight
Enterprises, Inc.
Common Stock (NSIT) |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
34.17 |
|
|
|
|
77.30 |
|
|
|
|
84.38 |
|
|
|
|
80.63 |
|
|
|
|
77.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Stock Market
U.S. Companies
(Market Index) |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
68.12 |
|
|
|
|
101.85 |
|
|
|
|
110.84 |
|
|
|
|
113.20 |
|
|
|
|
124.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Retail Trade
Stocks (Peer Index) |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
85.94 |
|
|
|
|
119.66 |
|
|
|
|
151.78 |
|
|
|
|
153.22 |
|
|
|
|
167.33 |
|
|
|
32
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto in Part II, Item 8 and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of
this report. The information presented in following tables has been adjusted to reflect the
restatement of our consolidated financial results which is more fully described in the Explanatory
Note Regarding Restatement of our Consolidated Financial Statements immediately preceding Part I
of this Form 10-K and in Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements. We derived the selected consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from our
audited consolidated financial statements, and accompanying notes, included in Part II, Item 8 of
this report. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 have been restated in
connection with the restatements discussed in Note 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2003
and 2002 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been
restated below as discussed in footnote 2.
We have not amended our previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement. The financial information that has been
previously filed or otherwise reported for these periods is superseded by the information in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the financial statements and related financial information
contained in those previously filed reports should no longer be relied upon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,817,085 |
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
|
$ |
2,809,790 |
|
|
$ |
2,779,969 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
3,338,022 |
|
|
|
2,809,167 |
|
|
|
2,657,406 |
|
|
|
2,491,673 |
|
|
|
2,472,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
479,063 |
|
|
|
374,540 |
|
|
|
351,198 |
|
|
|
318,117 |
|
|
|
307,236 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
374,523 |
|
|
|
284,682 |
|
|
|
280,290 |
|
|
|
278,282 |
|
|
|
259,283 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
11,962 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous
acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
(2,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
|
103,811 |
|
|
|
78,560 |
|
|
|
72,090 |
|
|
|
38,874 |
|
|
|
(45,134 |
) |
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
6,793 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
101,607 |
|
|
|
79,186 |
|
|
|
70,476 |
|
|
|
35,021 |
|
|
|
(49,488 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
31,143 |
|
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
11,493 |
|
|
|
13,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
65,708 |
|
|
|
48,043 |
|
|
|
50,859 |
|
|
|
23,528 |
|
|
|
(63,449 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(5) |
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
29,598 |
|
|
|
11,597 |
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
76,818 |
|
|
|
54,660 |
|
|
|
80,457 |
|
|
|
35,125 |
|
|
|
(54,508 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of taxes of $330 in 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
76,818 |
|
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
|
$ |
35,125 |
|
|
$ |
(54,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net earnings (loss) per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(1.42 |
) |
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
(1.42 |
) |
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,373 |
|
|
|
48,553 |
|
|
|
48,389 |
|
|
|
46,315 |
|
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
48,564 |
|
|
|
49,057 |
|
|
|
49,220 |
|
|
|
46,581 |
|
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
As Restated |
|
As Restated |
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
407,898 |
|
|
$ |
367,184 |
|
|
$ |
370,873 |
|
|
$ |
230,193 |
|
|
$ |
181,331 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,774,151 |
|
|
|
922,340 |
|
|
|
887,641 |
|
|
|
792,124 |
|
|
|
773,731 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
66,309 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
65,004 |
|
|
|
94,592 |
|
Long-term debt portion |
|
|
224,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,146 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
690,350 |
|
|
|
569,913 |
|
|
|
565,517 |
|
|
|
448,245 |
|
|
|
385,497 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See the explanatory note in the front of this Form 10-K, Restatement of
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 7 and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. |
|
(2) |
|
The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been adjusted to reflect the restatements
described in Note 2, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. |
|
(3) |
|
Our consolidated statements of operations data above include results of
acquisitions from their respective acquisition dates. See further discussion in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. |
|
(4) |
|
Goodwill Impairment. Based on results of our 2002 annual goodwill impairment
assessment, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $91.6 million, which
represented the entire goodwill balance recorded at Insight UK. |
|
(5) |
|
Earnings from Discontinued Operations. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we
sold Direct Alliance, a business process outsourcing provider in the U.S. During the year
ended December 31, 2004, we sold our 95% ownership in PlusNet, an Internet service provider in
the United Kingdom. Accordingly, we have accounted for both entities as discontinued
operations and have reported their results of operations as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of earnings. Included in earnings from discontinued operations for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2004 are the gain on the sale of Direct Alliance of
$14.9 million, $9.0 million, net of taxes, and the gain on the sale of PlusNet of $23.7
million, $18.3 million net of taxes, respectively. |
34
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
The tables below reflect the effect of the restatement adjustments on our 2003 and 2002
Statements of Earnings (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(B) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,886,047 |
|
|
$ |
(76,257 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,809,790 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,546,586 |
|
|
|
(54,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
339,461 |
|
|
|
(21,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,117 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
279,539 |
|
|
|
(4,911 |
) |
|
|
3,654 |
(A) |
|
|
278,282 |
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses |
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in
a previous acquisition |
|
|
(2,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
58,961 |
|
|
|
(16,433 |
) |
|
|
(3,654 |
) |
|
|
38,874 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(833 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
54,714 |
|
|
|
(16,039 |
) |
|
|
(3,654 |
) |
|
|
35,021 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
18,952 |
|
|
|
(5,880 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
11,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
35,762 |
|
|
|
(10,159 |
) |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
23,528 |
|
Net earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
10,159 |
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
11,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
37,754 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,629 |
) |
|
$ |
35,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
46,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
46,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
46,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment to reclassify the operations of Direct Alliance to discontinued
operations as described in Note 11. |
35
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(B) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,875,895 |
|
|
$ |
(95,926 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,779,969 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,547,486 |
|
|
|
(74,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,472,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
328,409 |
|
|
|
(21,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,236 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
250,394 |
|
|
|
(3,928 |
) |
|
|
12,817 |
(A) |
|
|
259,283 |
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
91,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(15,072 |
) |
|
|
(17,245 |
) |
|
|
(12,817 |
) |
|
|
(45,134 |
) |
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
(19,664 |
) |
|
|
(17,007 |
) |
|
|
(12,817 |
) |
|
|
(49,488 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
24,451 |
|
|
|
(6,159 |
) |
|
|
(4,331 |
) |
|
|
13,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing
operations |
|
|
(44,115 |
) |
|
|
(10,848 |
) |
|
|
(8,486 |
) |
|
|
(63,449 |
) |
Net earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
10,848 |
|
|
|
(3,182 |
) |
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) earnings |
|
$ |
(42,840 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.42 |
) |
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.42 |
) |
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment to reclassify the operations of Direct Alliance to discontinued
operations as described in Note 11. |
36
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
The table below reflects the effect of the restatement adjustments on our 2004, 2003 and 2002
balance sheet data (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
As Restated |
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
As Restated |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
371,267 |
|
|
$ |
(394 |
)(A) |
|
$ |
370,873 |
|
|
$ |
230,294 |
|
|
$ |
(101 |
)(A) |
|
$ |
230,193 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
887,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887,641 |
|
|
|
792,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792,124 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
65,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,004 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
559,559 |
|
|
|
5,958 |
(A) |
|
|
565,517 |
|
|
|
439,369 |
|
|
|
8,876 |
(A) |
|
|
448,245 |
|
Cash dividends declared per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
As Restated |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
181,331 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
181,331 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
773,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,731 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
94,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,592 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
13,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,146 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
375,291 |
|
|
|
10,206 |
(A) |
|
|
385,497 |
|
Cash dividends declared per
common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
37
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of our
operations, which gives effect to the restatement discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto included in Item 8 of this report. Our actual results could differ materially from those
contained in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed
in Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A and elsewhere in this report.
Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Background
We announced on October 19, 2006 that the Companys Board of Directors had appointed an
Options Subcommittee, comprised of independent directors, to conduct a review of the Companys
stock options. Certain present and former directors and executive officers of the Company were
named as defendants in a derivative lawsuit related to stock option practices from 1997 to 2002,
filed in Superior Court, County of Maricopa, Arizona on September 21, 2006. The Company had been
named as a nominal defendant in that action. On December 22, 2006, we filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint based on plaintiffs failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Companys Board of
Directors. Before the opposition to the motion was due, the plaintiff voluntarily asked the Court
to dismiss the lawsuit, and, on January 19, 2007, the Court granted the plaintiffs motion to
voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. In addition, we announced on November 6, 2006
that on October 27, 2006, the Company received an informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents and information relating to the Companys stock option granting practices from January 1,
1996 to the present.
The Options Subcommittee was assisted by independent legal counsel and independent forensic
accounting consultants. At the conclusion of its review, the Options Subcommittee reported its
findings to the Companys Board of Directors and to KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm, on March 9, 2007 and March 13, 2007, respectively. Management, assisted by
its own independent legal counsel and independent forensic consultants, then undertook an analysis
of the results of the Options Subcommittees review, as well as all stock option activity during
the period after the Companys initial public offering on January 24, 1995 through November 30,
2005, the last date on which we granted stock options (the Relevant Period).
In a Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2007, we reported that based on the findings of the Options
Subcommittee and the conclusions reached to date by management in its analysis, our previously
issued financial statements would require restatement and should no longer be relied upon.
We determined, based upon the Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that
for accounting purposes, the dates initially used to measure compensation expense for various stock
option grants to employees, executive officers and outside non-employee directors during the period
could not be relied upon. The revised measurement dates identified for accounting purposes
differed from the originally selected measurement dates due primarily to (i) insufficient or
incomplete approvals, (ii) inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants,
including the list of individual recipients, and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise
prices. The restated consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
reflect the corrections resulting from our determination.
We have incurred substantial expenses related to the Options Subcommittees review and the
Companys analysis. We have incurred approximately $11.8 million in costs for legal fees, external
audit firm fees and external consulting fees through June 30, 2007 and anticipate approximately $3
million in additional fees will be incurred through August 2007 in the completion of financial
statement restatement and related matters.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded an adjustment for
$1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006,
which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this adjustment
was $0.4 million.
38
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Restatement Adjustments
Our restated consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 10-K incorporate
stock-based compensation expense, including the income tax impacts related to the restatement
adjustments. The restatement adjustments result in a $30.9 million reduction of retained earnings
as of December 31, 2006. This amount includes reductions in our consolidated net earnings of
approximately $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The total
restatement impact for the years ended December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2001, of $16.4
million, net of related tax benefits of $8.4 million, has been reflected as a prior period
adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2002.
The total unamortized pre-tax stock-based compensation was less than $0.1 million at December
31, 2006.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment
for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of
2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this
adjustment was $0.4 million.
The tables below present the decrease (increase) in net earnings resulting from the individual
restatement adjustments for each respective period presented and are explained in further detail
following the table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
|
$ |
11,716 |
|
|
$ |
4,190 |
|
|
$ |
5,830 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
8,486 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
4,834 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
6,378 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
(610 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
11,668 |
|
|
$ |
6,032 |
|
|
$ |
6,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
Total |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
29,026 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30,862 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
30,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Compensation These adjustments are from our determination, based upon the Options
Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that, for accounting purposes, the dates
initially used to measure compensation expense for numerous option grants to employees, executive
officers and outside non-employee directors during the period could not be relied upon for various
categories of option grants including: (i) discretionary grants of various types; (ii) anniversary
grants; (iii) promotion grants; (iv) new hire grants; and (v) program grants. The revised
measurement dates identified for accounting purposes differed from the originally selected
measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or
incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants, including the list of individual recipients;
and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise prices.
Specifically, for each of the categories of option grants discussed in more detail under
Accounting Considerations below, we noted the following:
Stock option grants with insufficient or incomplete approvals. The Company determined that
the original recorded grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other
evidence that indicated that not all required approvals had been obtained, including for certain
grants, Compensation Committee approval. The Company remeasured these option grants with a revised
measurement date supported by the required level of approval, as described below, and accounted for
these grants as fixed awards under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB No. 25).
40
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants. The Company determined
that for certain stock option grants, the number of shares and the exercise price were not known
with finality at the original measurement date. The Company determined that the original recorded
grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other evidence that indicated
that the Company had not finalized the number of stock options allocated to each individual
recipient and the related exercise price. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company
determined the date by which the number of stock options to be awarded to each recipient was
finalized and the other terms of the award were established and accounted for these grants as fixed
awards under APB No. 25.
The use of hindsight to select exercise prices. As noted below, the Company followed an
informal policy of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of
their employment with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions using hindsight to
select the exercise price. In many instances, little or no documentation to support dates selected
for option grants could be located by the Company. Further, instances of favorable, retrospective
date selection of discretionary grants were identified. Also, as noted below, the investigation
noted instances of inadequate documentation, or retrospective date selection, relating to the award
of grants to the Companys top three executive officers, all of which required Compensation
Committee approval. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company determined a revised
measurement date and accounted for these grants as fixed awards under APB No. 25.
Other Miscellaneous Accounting Adjustments In addition to the restatements for stock-based
compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement
expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this adjustment was $0.4 million.
Income Tax Benefit We recorded a net income tax benefit of approximately $16.5 million in
connection with the stock option-related compensation charges during the period from fiscal year
1995 to December 31, 2006. This tax benefit has resulted in an increase of our deferred tax assets
for most U.S. affected stock options prior to the exercise or forfeiture of the related options.
With the exception of UK employees exercising options after 2002, the Company recorded no tax
benefit or deferred tax asset for affected stock options granted to non-U.S. employees because we
determined that we could not receive tax benefits for these options. Further, we limited the
deferred tax assets recorded for affected stock options granted to certain highly paid officers to
reflect estimated limitations on tax deductibility under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Upon
exercise or forfeiture of the underlying options, the excess or deficiency in deferred tax assets
is written-off to paid-in capital in the period of exercise or forfeiture.
Payroll taxes, interest and penalties Management is considering possible ways to address the
impact that Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code may have as a result of the exercise price of
stock options being less than the fair market value of our common stock on the revised measurement
date. Section 409A imposes additional taxes to our employees on stock options granted with an
exercise price lower than the fair market value on the date of grant that vest after December 31,
2004. The Internal Revenue Service has issued transition rules under Section 409A that allows for
a correction, or cure, for options subject to Section 409A. We may offer the holders of
outstanding options the opportunity to affect a cure of all affected stock options. In connection
with this cure, we may make cash bonus payments in an aggregate amount of up to $200,000 in 2008 to
our non-officer employees.
Accounting Considerations Stock-Based Compensation
We originally accounted for all employee, officer and director stock option grants as fixed
grants under APB No. 25, using a measurement date of the recorded grant date. We issued all grants
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the recorded grant
date, and therefore originally recorded no stock-based compensation expense.
As a result of the findings of the Options Subcommittee, and our own further review of our
stock option granting practices, we determined that the measurement dates for certain stock option
grants differed from the recorded grant dates for such grants. Based on the analysis described
below, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to revise the measurement dates for these
grants based upon its findings. The Company calculated stock-based compensation expense under APB
No. 25 based upon the intrinsic value as of the adjusted measurement dates of stock option awards
determined to be fixed under APB No. 25 and the vesting provisions of the underlying options.
The Company calculated the intrinsic value on the adjusted measurement date as the closing price of
its common stock on such date as reported on the NASDAQ National Market, now the NASDAQ Global
Select Market, less the exercise price per share of common stock as stated in the underlying stock
option agreement, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such stock option award. The
Company recognizes these amounts as compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying
options in accordance with the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock
Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. We also determined that
variable accounting treatment was appropriate under APB No. 25 for certain stock option grants for
which evidence was obtained that the terms of the options may have been communicated to those
recipients
41
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
and that those terms were subsequently modified (stock option grants cancelled and repriced).
When variable accounting is applied to stock option grants, we remeasure, and report in our
consolidated statements of earnings, the intrinsic value of the options at the end of each
reporting period until the options are exercised, cancelled or expire unexercised.
The Company determined the most supportable measurement dates for each of the various
categories of options grants as follows:
Discretionary Grants. Discretionary grants included grants to the Companys outside
directors, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and Chief Financial Officer (the three
highest ranking executives of the Company), other Section 16 Officers, and all other Company
employees.
The Company determined that it had granted stock options to its outside directors pursuant to
the Companys stock plans or Board of Directors minutes in the majority of instances; however, in
a few instances, certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on
the approval dates specified in plan documents or signed minutes. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling less than $0.1 million associated with all grants to
outside directors during the Relevant Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company followed a practice of requiring Compensation
Committee approval of the stock option awards to the three highest ranking executives of the
Company. For some grants, the Compensation Committee minutes did not indicate approval of an
award. In other instances, the Company either did not locate minutes or the evidence was
inconclusive concerning when a specific meeting occurred. The Company determined that certain
grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates. For example, due to
inconclusive evidence regarding the date of Compensation Committee approval, because the Board had
approved the Proxy Statement in which the award was specifically listed, the Proxy Statement filing
date was selected as the best evidence of a measurement date for the award. The Company recorded a
pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $13.3 million for all grants to the three
highest ranking executives of the Company during the Relevant Period. Alternatively, for those
grants where the Proxy Statement filing date was selected, had we used the highest or lowest
closing price of our common stock between the grant date and the Proxy Statement filing date as the
revised measurement date (as a measurement date could have occurred on any date between those two
dates), the pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense would have been $3.2 million higher using
the highest price and $6.9 million lower using the lowest price.
Prior to May 16, 2003, the CEO approved stock option awards to Section 16 Officers. Evidence
of CEO approval typically consisted of an email containing the grant terms. Effective with the May
16, 2003 Compensation Committee meeting, the Compensation Committee was required to approve grants
to the Section 16 Officers. Evidence of Compensation Committee approval included Compensation
Committee minutes or a signed Unanimous Written Consent (UWC). The Company determined that
certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on the date of
approval identified in the supporting documentation. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to
compensation expense totaling $9.5 million in connection with discretionary grants to Section 16
Officers, in addition to the $13.3 million pre-tax adjustment for grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company, during the Relevant Period.
Throughout most of the Relevant Period, the Companys option plans granted discretion to the
CEO to award option grants to any Company employee, other than the top three executives. The CEO
in turn authorized a defined number of options in connection with certain discretionary grants
during the Relevant Period that were allocated by certain senior executives amongst employees
within particular business units. In certain instances, the review revealed that lists of grantees
within specified business units had not been finalized as of the grant date. Where required, the
Company identified alternative measurement dates for these discretionary grants and recorded the
required pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $7.9 million during the Relevant
Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company also granted annual performance-based options to
employees at the discretion of certain executives and managers within each business unit. Based on
the supporting documentation, the business units finalized the list of awards by person on
different dates. The Company reconciled each list to the actual awards contained in the Companys
stock plan administration database to determine the date by which each business units list was
finalized. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $6.5 million
for six grant dates during the Relevant Period that primarily related to annual performance
reviews.
Anniversary Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company followed an informal policy
of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of their employment
with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions. The number of these options was
determined by the employees level within the Company, or, in the case of promotion grants, the
level to which the employee was promoted. The majority of these grants were modest in size,
generally 500 options or less. In the case of senior management, anniversary or promotion grants
could be much larger, at
42
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
5,000 or 7,500 options. Occasionally, very senior executives, other than the top three
executives, received larger grants for anniversaries or promotions, but these were relatively few
and were generally done on a case-by-case basis.
The Options Subcommittee review indicated that the Companys anniversary related options were
granted with measurement dates determined by three general methods, depending upon the time period
in the Relevant Period. From the beginning of the Relevant Period through the end of 1998,
anniversary grants were generally granted with a measurement date on an employees actual
anniversary date. For a period of time between 1999 and 2002, the grant dates generally were
selected retrospectively based on either the low price of a month or the low price of the quarter.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company began a practice of awarding anniversary grants on the
15th day of each month for the balance of 2002, and in January 2003, the Company
essentially ceased making anniversary grants, except for minimal contractual grants to certain
United Kingdom employees which continued into 2005.
The Company used email correspondence or other documentation maintained in the Stock Plan
Administration files and information obtained from the Companys human resources system and payroll
records to determine each employees anniversary date based on the employees hire (and
corresponding anniversary) date. The general granting practice for anniversary awards in place at
the relevant point in time was used to determine the appropriate measurement date for each
employees anniversary award. For a limited number of grants, absent evidence of the employees
hire date, the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan
administration database application was used as the measurement date for the awards identified as
anniversary grants. For periods where the Company issued anniversary grants using quarterly or
monthly lows, or other low prices, alternate measurement dates were required. The Company recorded
a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $6.6 million for anniversary grants during the
Relevant Period.
Promotion Grants. Promotion grants were generally handled in the same manner as anniversary
grants. In some instances, promotion grants were awarded on the promotion effective date and other
times at the low price of the month or quarter. The Companys analysis revealed that the Company
had a general practice of granting promotion options on the employees promotion effective dates
from 1998 through 2000. The Company selected either the promotion effective date, if available, or
the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan
administration database application, if the promotion effective date was not available, as the
measurement date for the promotion grants issued from 1998 through 2000. For subsequent periods
where the Company issued promotion grants using quarterly or monthly lows, or other low prices,
alternate measurement dates were required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense
adjustment totaling $2.2 million for promotion grants during the Relevant Period.
New Hire Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company issued an option grant to each
new employee on the employees start date. The Company had a uniform practice of granting a
specific number of options depending on the incoming employees level within the Company. For
example, the lowest level employees would receive 50 options on their start date, while certain
managers might receive 2,500 options. Senior executive officers would typically receive much
larger grants upon joining the Company, and those grants were typically negotiated as part of a
total compensation package that were reflected in an employment agreement or offer letter. In
general, the Company found a lack of significant issues with respect to new hire grants.
Compensation expense was required to be recorded for administrative and error corrections and in a
small number of cases where it was determined that an employee received an award with an effective
date earlier than their actual start date, or where the amount of the grant was negotiated or
otherwise selected after the employee began working at the Company. Additionally, during certain
limited periods, due to a limited number of options being available to grant, the Company issued
certain new hire grants at a later date along with the periods anniversary grants at the low price
of the month or quarter, in which case the Company determined that alternate measurement dates were
required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $0.7 million for
new hire grants during the Relevant Period.
Program Grants. The Company had numerous routine grant programs under which options were
awarded to employees who participated on specific teams within the Company, completed certain
training programs or achieved certain goals in their jobs. These options (generally 50 to 250
options) were typically only granted to individual employees below a certain level. Although these
grants were routinely made on an annual or quarterly basis, no official written policies existed
describing the exact criteria or timing for each grant program. Not all of the grants awarded
pursuant to these programs could be identified due to incomplete or inconsistent documentation.
The Company typically determined the most supportable measurement date based on communication of
the list of recipients and the respective number of options to be granted to Stock Plan
Administration. In those instances where the review failed to reveal a specific date when lists
were received in Stock Plan Administration, the Company selected the date the employee record of
the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database application as the
measurement date. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $0.6
million for these program grants during the Relevant Period.
43
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
For some grants, the Company identified no supporting documentation to determine the timing of
the approval of the terms of the grant. In these instances, the Company selected the date the
employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database
application as the measurement date.
Related Proceedings
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We have cooperated with the SEC and
will continue to do so. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Overview
On September 7, 2006, we completed our acquisition of Software Spectrum, Inc. (Software
Spectrum) for a cash purchase price of $287.0 million plus working capital of $64.4 million, which
includes cash acquired of $30.3 million. Accordingly, the results of operations from Software
Spectrum are included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date. Prior
to the acquisition of Software Spectrum, we were organized in two segments: Insight North America;
and Insight UK. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, as a result of the acquisition, we
operate in three geographic operating segments: North America; EMEA; and APAC. To the extent
applicable, prior period information disclosed in this report by operating segment has been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Currently, our offerings in North
America and the United Kingdom include brand-name IT hardware, software and services. Our
offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC currently only include software and
select software-related services.
Founded in 1983 and headquartered in Plano, Texas, Software Spectrum is one of the worlds
leading providers of business-to-business IT solutions and services, with particular expertise in
the selection, purchase and management of software. The Software Spectrum operations deliver
value-added technology solutions across the globe through sales and operations centers in North
America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific.
This acquisition represents a significant step in Insights evolution to becoming a trusted
advisor to our clients throughout the world on technology solutions to address business needs. We
had identified expansion of software sales and services capabilities as a necessary augmentation of
Insights value proposition, and we have begun to leverage our capabilities to drive services and
solutions into the small- and medium-sized business space and to further penetrate the large
enterprise sector.
On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance
Corporation as business process outsourcing was not a core element of our growth strategy.
Accordingly, the results of operations attributable to Direct Alliance for all periods presented
are classified as a discontinued operation in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II,
Item 8. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further
discussion.
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment. Accordingly, the results of operations attributable to PC Wholesale for all
periods presented will be classified as a discontinued operation in our Consolidated Financial
Statements for the period ended March 31, 2007 and for all periods thereafter. See Note 21 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further discussion.
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 20% to $3.82 billion from $3.18
billion for the year ended December 31, 2005. Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2006
increased 42% to $76.8 million from $54.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Net earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2006 include the effect of the following items:
|
|
|
stock-based compensation expense of $13.7 million or $8.5 million, net of tax; |
|
|
|
|
severance and restructuring expenses of $729,000 or $454,000, net of tax; and |
|
|
|
|
gain on sale of discontinued operation of $14.9 million or $9.0 million, net of tax. |
Net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2005 include the
effect of the following items:
|
|
|
stock-based compensation expense of $858,000 or $512,000, net of tax; |
|
|
|
|
severance and restructuring expenses of $13.0 million or $8.5 million, net of tax; |
|
|
|
|
income from reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition of $664,000
or $306,000, net of tax; and |
44
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
cumulative effect from a change in accounting principle of $979,000 or $649,000, net
of tax. |
Although included in our consolidated financial statements, we exclude the items noted above
when internally evaluating gross profit, selling and administrative expenses, earnings from
continuing operations, tax expense, net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the Company and
when evaluating gross profit, selling and administrative expenses and earnings from operations for
our individual operating segments. We exclude these items to evaluate financial performance
against budgeted amounts, to calculate incentive compensation, to assist in forecasting future
performance and to compare our results to competitors financial results.
Overviews of each of our operating segments are discussed below and reconciliations of segment
results of operations to consolidated results of operations can be found in Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
provided in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to
assist in the understanding of our consolidated financial statements, the changes in certain key
items in those consolidated financial statements from year to year, the primary factors that
contributed to those changes, as well as how certain critical accounting estimates affect our
consolidated financial statements.
Our North America net sales increased 13% from $2.71 billion in 2005 to $3.08 billion in 2006,
due primarily to the acquisition of Software Spectrum. Our North America operations achieved a 13%
increase in earnings from operations. Overall, our North America hardware and services categories
performed well during the year, with sales from public sector clients growing faster than the
market, while sales from SMB clients were in-line with the market, and hardware sales to large
enterprise clients declined compared to last year. Increases in earnings from operations were
achieved through improvements in our gross profit as we maintained product margins, increased
vendor funding, improved attach rates for services, increased sales rep productivity, streamlined
business processes, and increased use of e-commerce tools.
Our EMEA operations, which included only the United Kingdom in 2005, recognized net sales that
were up 51% from $470.2 million in 2005 to $710.3 million in 2006 due primarily to the acquisition
of Software Spectrum. Our EMEA operations achieved a 246% increase in earnings from operations.
We were pleased with the performance of our EMEA software category as it posted seasonally strong
results in the fourth quarter of 2006. In addition, our UK hardware and services categories
performance was strong and grew faster than the market.
Our APAC segment, which was added as a result of the acquisition of Software Spectrum,
recognized net sales and earnings from operations of $30.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively,
in 2006. We were pleased with the results of our APAC segment as it achieved strong growth and
results in line with its internal budgets. Although this segment represents a small percentage of
our consolidated results, we are excited about the growth opportunities this region brings.
Critical Accounting Estimates
General
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For a summary of significant accounting policies, see
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. The preparation
of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Members of our
senior management have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with
the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Actual results, however, may differ from estimates
we have made. We believe the following critical accounting estimates reflect our significant
estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, using the modified
prospective transition method and, therefore, have not restated prior periods results. Under the
fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, we recognize stock-based compensation net of an
estimated forfeiture rate and only recognize compensation expense for those shares expected to vest
over the requisite service period of the award. We elected to not make any modifications to
existing stock options
45
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
outstanding prior to January 1, 2006, such as accelerating the vesting of previously granted
options, as we did not believe it made business sense to do so. We did, however, take the
opportunity to reevaluate our equity compensation plans, and starting in 2006, we elected to issue
service-based and performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) instead of stock options or
restricted shares. The number of RSUs ultimately awarded under the performance-based RSUs varies
based on whether we achieve certain financial results. We will record compensation expense each
period based on our estimate of the most probable number of RSUs that will be issued under the
grants of performance-based RSUs. Our expected 2007 equity compensation expense, which includes
expense attributable to RSU grants, as well as to vesting of stock options, restricted stock and
RSUs issued in prior years, is estimated to be between $13.0 million and $15.0 million. The actual
amount will likely vary based on achievement of 2007 financial results. The expense range given
assumes targeted financial results are achieved.
Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we applied the intrinsic value-based method of
accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees (APB No. 25). Under this method, compensation expense was recorded on the
measurement date only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise
price. The measurement date is the date when the number of shares and exercise price are known with
finality. For grants determined to be variable under APB No. 25, we remeasure, and report in our
statement of earnings, the intrinsic value of the options at the end of each reporting period until
the options are exercised, cancelled or expire unexercised. As a result of the application of APB
No. 25 and restatement of our consolidated financial statements, as described in Restatement of
Consolidated Financial Statements above, we have incurred pre-tax stock-based compensation expense
of $13.7 million, $858,000 and $352,000, in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. See the Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement of
our Consolidated Financial Statements immediately preceding Part I of this Form 10-K, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II,
Item 7, and note 2, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, of the notes to
consolidated financial statements.
In order to comply with the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, we determined the estimated fair value of stock options on the date of
the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton (Black-Scholes) option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes
model required us to apply highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock price
volatility, expected life of the option and the risk-free interest rate. If we decide to issue
stock options in the future, we will use an option-pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options as permitted by SFAS No. 123R. A change in one or more of the assumptions used in
the option-pricing model may result in a material change to the estimated fair value of the
stock-based compensation.
See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for
further discussion of stock-based compensation.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
Our net accounts receivable balance was $994.9 million and $480.5 million as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $23.3 million and $15.9
million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Increases in accounts receivable and
related allowance for doubtful accounts were due primarily to the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
The allowance is determined using estimated losses on accounts receivable based on historical
write-offs, evaluation of the aging of the receivables and the current economic environment.
Should our clients or vendors circumstances change or actual collections of client and vendor
receivables differ from our estimates, adjustments to the provision for losses on accounts
receivable and the related allowances for doubtful accounts would be recorded. See further
information on our allowance for doubtful accounts in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Write-Downs of Inventories
We evaluate inventories for excess, obsolescence or other factors that may render inventories
unmarketable at normal margins. Write-downs are recorded so that inventories reflect the
approximate net realizable value and take into account our contractual provisions with our partners
governing price protection, stock rotation and return privileges relating to obsolescence. Because
of the large number of transactions and the complexity of managing the process around price
protection and stock rotation, estimates are made regarding write-downs of the carrying amount of
inventories. Additionally, assumptions about future demand, market conditions and decisions by
manufacturers/publishers to discontinue certain products or product lines can affect our decision
to write down inventories. If our assumptions about future demand change or actual market
conditions are less favorable than those projected, additional write-downs of inventories may be
required. In any case, actual values could be different from those estimated.
46
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets Including Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill
We review property, plant and equipment and purchased intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Our asset impairment review assesses the fair value of the assets based on the
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net
proceeds expected from disposition of the asset (if any) and compares the fair value to the
carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for
the difference. This approach uses our estimates of future market growth, forecasted net sales and
costs, expected periods the assets will be utilized, and appropriate discount rates.
Annually, during the fourth quarter of each year, we assess whether goodwill is impaired.
Upon determining the existence of goodwill impairment, we measure that impairment based on the
amount by which the book value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The implied fair value
of goodwill is determined by deducting the fair value of a reporting units identifiable assets and
liabilities from the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole. Determining the fair value of
reporting units, as well as identifiable assets and liabilities, uses our
estimates of market capitalization allocation, future market growth, forecasted sales and costs and
appropriate discount rates. Additional impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis
if we encounter events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that, more likely than not,
the book value of goodwill has been impaired. Based on impairment tests performed, there was no
impairment of goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.
We identify potential impairment of goodwill through our strategic reviews of our reporting
units and operations performed in conjunction with restructuring actions. Deterioration of our
business in a geographic region or within a reporting unit in the future could lead to impairment
adjustments as such issues are identified.
Severance and Restructuring Activities
We have engaged, and may continue to engage, in severance and restructuring activities which
require us to utilize significant estimates related primarily to employee termination benefits,
estimated costs to terminate leases or remaining lease commitments on unused facilities, net of
estimated subleases. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, adjustments to severance
and restructuring expenses in subsequent periods would be necessary. We do not currently expect
the remaining estimates at December 31, 2006 to increase in the future; however, if we are
successful in negotiating early terminations of these leases, the remaining estimates may decrease.
A detailed description of our severance, restructuring and acquisition integration activities and
remaining accruals for these activities at December 31, 2006 can be found in Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Taxes on Earnings
Our effective tax rate includes the effect of certain undistributed foreign earnings for which
no U.S. taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be reinvested indefinitely
outside the U.S. Earnings remittance amounts are planned based on the projected cash flow needs as
well as the working capital and long-term investment requirements of our foreign subsidiaries and
our domestic operations. Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital and long-term
investment requirements could affect our effective tax rate.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more
likely than not to be realized. We consider past operating results, future market growth,
forecasted earnings, historical and projected taxable income, the mix of earnings in the
jurisdictions in which we operate, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies and statutory tax
law changes in determining the need for a valuation allowance. If we were to determine that we
would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an
adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to earnings in the period such determination
is made. Likewise, if we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax
assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. However,
the reversal of a valuation allowance established in purchase accounting upon the acquisition of
Software Spectrum would result in a reduction of goodwill as opposed to a benefit to earnings.
Additional information about the valuation allowance can be found in Note 11 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Contingencies
From time to time, we are subject to potential claims and assessments from third parties. We
are also subject to various governmental, client and vendor audits. We continually assess whether
or not such claims have merit and warrant accrual under the probable and estimable criteria of
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Where appropriate, we accrue estimates of anticipated
liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Such estimates are subject to change and may
affect our results
47
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
of operations and our cash flows. Additional information about contingencies can be found in
Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods presented certain financial data as a
percentage of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for information on our restatement. |
2006 Compared to 2005
Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 20% to $3.82 billion from
$3.18 billion for the year ended December 31, 2005. Sales contributed from the acquisition of
Software Spectrum are included from the acquisition date of September 7, 2006 and approximated 14%
of total net sales for 2006. Our net sales by operating segment for the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
3,076,826 |
|
|
$ |
2,713,468 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
710,294 |
|
|
|
470,239 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
APAC |
|
|
29,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
3,817,085 |
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 13% to $3.08 billion
from $2.71 billion for the year ended December 31, 2005, due primarily to the acquisition of
Software Spectrum. Overall, our North America hardware and services categories performed well
during the year, with sales from public sector clients growing faster than the market, while sales
from SMB clients were in-line with the market, and hardware sales to large enterprise clients
declined compared to last year. North America had 1,294 account executives at December 31, 2006,
an increase from 1,074 at December 31, 2005 due primarily to the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
Net sales per average number of account executives in North America increased to $2.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 from $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The
average tenure of our account executives in North America has increased from 3.9 years at December
31, 2005 to 4.3 years at December 31, 2006. The increase is due primarily the addition of more
tenured account executives with the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
48
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EMEAs net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 51% to $710.3 million from
$470.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Overall, our growth in EMEA was due to the
acquisition of Software Spectrum as our EMEA software category posted seasonally strong results in
the fourth quarter of 2006. EMEA had 476 account executives at December 31, 2006, an increase from
266 at December 31, 2005 due primarily to the acquisition of Software Spectrum. Net sales per
average number of account executives in EMEA increased to $1.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2006 compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The average tenure of our
account executives in EMEA has increased from 2.3 years at December 31, 2005 to 2.7 years at
December 31, 2006. The increase is due primarily to a decrease in account executive turnover and
to the addition of more tenured account executives with the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
APACs net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $30.0 million. We were pleased
with the results of our APAC segment as it achieved strong growth and results in line with its
internal budgets.
Net sales by product category for North America, EMEA and APAC were as follows for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
EMEA |
|
APAC |
|
|
Percentage of Product |
|
Percentage of Product |
|
Percentage of Product |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Sales |
|
Net Sales |
Product Categories |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Computers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notebooks and PDAs |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Desktops and Servers |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Software |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
NA |
Network and Connectivity |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Printers |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Storage Devices |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Supplies and Accessories |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Monitors and Video |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Memory and Processors |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, we continue to experience declines in average selling prices for most of our
hardware product categories, which requires us to sell more units in order to maintain or increase
the level of sales. Additionally, average selling prices for printers, monitors and notebooks have
been declining at a greater rate than the other product categories as demand and competition for
these products have increased. With the acquisition of Software Spectrum, our product mix changed
significantly. Prior to the acquisition of Software Spectrum, software sales represented
approximately 12% of net sales. After the acquisition of Software Spectrum, we expect software
sales to represent approximately 35% to 40% of consolidated net sales.
Gross Profit. The increase in sales of licenses under sales agency licensing programs as well
as sales of software maintenance contracts makes period-to-period comparability of sales and costs
of goods sold more difficult. As a result, we believe the focus should be on gross profit as the
key measure of business performance and period-to-period trends. Gross profit increased 28% to
$479.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $374.5 million for the year ended December
31, 2005. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to 12.6% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our gross profit and gross
profit as a percent of net sales by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Sales |
|
North America |
|
$ |
378,978 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
$ |
311,125 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
95,184 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
63,415 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
APAC |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
479,063 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
$ |
374,540 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2006 by 22% to $379.0
million from $311.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit increased to 12.3% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 11.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2005 due primarily to increases in agency fees for
49
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Microsoft enterprise software agreement renewals, favorable collection experience, which enabled
us to record reductions in the reserve for vendor receivables, and increases in sales of services,
which generate higher gross margins. These increases were offset partially by decreases in
freight margins and decreases in product margin, which includes vendor funding. Gross profit per
average number of account executives in North America increased to $320,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to $290,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
EMEAs gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2006 by 50% to $95.2 million
from $63.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. As a percentage of net sales, gross
profit decreased to 13.4% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 13.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The decrease in gross margin is due primarily to decreases in product margin,
which includes vendor funding, and decreases in freight margins. These decreases in gross margin
were offset partially by higher agency fees for Microsoft enterprise software agreement renewals.
Gross profit per average number of account executives in EMEA increased to $257,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2006 compared to $238,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
APAC reported a gross profit of $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. As a
percentage of net sales, gross profit was 16.4% for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Operating Expenses.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased to $374.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $284.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 and increased as a percent of net sales to 9.8% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 8.9%
for the year ended December 31, 2005. Selling and administrative expenses as a percent of net
sales by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
2006* |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
2005* |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
293,030 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
233,892 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
77,701 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
50,790 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
APAC |
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
374,523 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
$ |
284,682 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Corporate charges of $306,000 and $694,000 previously allocated to our discontinued
operation, Direct Alliance, for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, have been
reallocated to our North America operating segment. |
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. |
North Americas selling and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31,
2006 by 25% to $293.0 million from $233.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. As a
percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 9.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 8.6% for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in selling and
administrative expenses is primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages, employee-related expenses and contract labor increased approximately
$48 million due to increases in expenses related to the acquired business, increases in
stock-based compensation expense, increases in sales incentive programs and increases in
bonus expenses due to increased overall financial performance. Stock-based compensation
expense of $11.6 million and $778,000 is included in North Americas selling and
administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation increased approximately $3.9 million, primarily as a result of $2.9 million
of accelerated depreciation during 2006 related to portions of our current operating system
that will not be utilized after our upgrade to mySAP; |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets acquired with the acquisition of Software Spectrum in
September 2006 was approximately $2.3 million in 2006; |
|
|
|
|
Professional fees increased by approximately $1.6 million associated with the review of
historical stock option practices in 2006; and |
|
|
|
|
Other integration-related expenses, such as travel, legal and accounting fees, also
experienced increases in 2006. |
EMEAs selling and administrative expenses increased 53% to $77.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. As a percentage of net
sales, selling and administrative expenses
50
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
increased to 10.9% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 10.8% for the year ended December
31, 2005. The increase in selling and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages, employee-related expenses and contract labor increased approximately
$18.3 million due to increases in expenses related to the acquired business, increases in
stock-based compensation expense, increases in sales incentive programs and increases in
bonus expenses due to increased overall financial performance. Stock-based compensation
expense of $1.1 million is included in EMEAs selling and administrative expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2006. No stock-based compensation expense was recorded for EMEA in
2005; |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation increased approximately $1.2 million, primarily as a result of increases in
facility costs related to our new London office; |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets acquired with the acquisition of Software Spectrum in
September 2006 was approximately $1.3 million in 2006; and |
|
|
|
|
Other integration-related expenses, such as travel, legal and accounting fees, also
experienced increases in 2006; |
These increases were offset partially by the effect of higher net sales and a property tax
rebate of approximately $1.0 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2006.
APACs selling and administrative expenses were $3.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. Stock-based compensation expense of $12,000 is included in APACs selling and administrative
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Severance and Restructuring Expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2006, North America
and EMEA recorded severance expense of $508,000 and $221,000, respectively, associated with the
elimination of Insight positions as part of our integration and expense reduction plans. During
the year ended December 31, 2005, EMEA moved into a new facility and recorded restructuring costs
of $6.9 million for the remaining lease obligations on the previous lease and $1.0 million for
duplicate rent expense for the new facility for the last half of 2005. Also, during 2005, North
America and EMEA recorded severance and restructuring expenses of $3.7 million and $414,000,
respectively, for severance attributable to the elimination of 89 positions, primarily in support
and management. See Note 9 to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report
for further discussion of severance and restructuring activities.
Reductions in Liabilities Assumed in Previous Acquisition. During the year ended December 31,
2005, EMEA settled certain liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition for $664,000 less than the
amounts originally recorded. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item
8 of this report for further discussion.
Interest Income. Interest income of $4.4 million and $3.4 million for the year ended December
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was generated through short-term investments. The increase in
interest income is due to a generally higher level of cash available to be invested in short-term
investments and increases in interest rates earned on those investments during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $6.8 million and $1.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily relates to borrowings under our financing
facilities. The increase in interest expense is due to increased borrowings outstanding in the
year ended December 31, 2006 due to the acquisition of Software Spectrum in September 2006 and
increases in interest rates.
Net Foreign Currency Exchange Gain (Loss). Net foreign currency exchange gain was $1.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to a net foreign currency exchange loss of $72,000
for the year ended December 31, 2005. These amounts consist primarily of foreign currency
transaction gains or losses for intercompany balances that are not considered long-term in nature.
Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other income, net, was $39,000 for the year ended December 31,
2006 compared to other expense, net of $782,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. These
amounts consist primarily of bank fees associated with our financing facilities and cash management
and the amortization of deferred financing fees.
Income Tax Expense. Our effective tax rates for continuing operations for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were 35.3% and 39.3%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the year
ended December 31, 2006 was lower than for the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily due to a
benefit recognized during the year ended December 31, 2006 for the reversal of accrued income taxes
of $1.4 million resulting from the determination that a reserve previously recorded for potential
tax exposures was no longer necessary and to several tax planning initiatives as well as the change
in the percentage
51
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
of taxable income being taxed in countries with lower tax rates than the U.S. as a result of the
acquisition of Software Spectrum.
Earnings from Discontinued Operation. On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of
100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance. Accordingly, the results of operations
attributable to Direct Alliance for all periods presented have been classified as a discontinued
operation. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report
for further discussion.
2005 Compared to 2004
Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 6% to $3.18 billion
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. Our net sales by operating segment for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
2,713,468 |
|
|
$ |
2,557,402 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
470,239 |
|
|
|
451,202 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas net sales increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 by 6% to $2.7 billion
compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in net sales over the prior year was
due primarily to a stable demand environment and our initiatives to deliver technology solutions to
business clients more effectively and efficiently. During the latter half of 2005, we saw
increased growth rates in sales to SMB clients while growth rates in sales to our large enterprise
clients declined from the first half of the year. We made changes in our North America executive
management team, sales leadership, recruiting and training and have increased marketing activities,
all of which we believe helped position us to increase growth rates in our sales to SMB clients in
2006. North America had 1,074 account executives at December 31, 2005 compared with 1,106 at
December 31, 2004. The decrease in account executives was due to planned headcount reductions in
order to reduce costs and increase the productivity of the remaining account executives.
Additionally, we delayed increasing the number of account executives while we restructured the
fundamentals of our recruiting processes and our new hire training program. Net sales per average
number of account executives in North America increased 15% from $2.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, which we believe was
attributable to internal initiatives, such as training and automation, all of which were designed
to allow our account executives to work more productively. The average tenure of our account
executives in North America increased from 3.5 years at December 31, 2004 to 3.9 years at December
31, 2005. The increase was due primarily to a decrease in account executive turnover.
In 2005 and 2004, EMEA included only operations in the United Kingdom. EMEAs net sales
increased 4% to $470.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004. In British pounds sterling, net sales increased 5.0% compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004, a rate we believe was faster than the market. We believe our additions of
experienced account executives and management focused on large corporate enterprises, as well as
our various internal initiatives to drive sales growth across all client groups, contributed to our
ability to increase our market share in the United Kingdom during the year ended December 31, 2005.
EMEA had 266 account executives at December 31, 2005 compared to 298 at December 31, 2004. The
decrease was due primarily to aggressive recruiting of our more experienced account executives by
some of our competition in early 2005. Net sales per average number of account executives in EMEA
increased 17% from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 to $1.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005, which we believe was attributable to internal initiatives designed to
allow our account executives to work more productively. The average tenure of our account
executives in EMEA increased to 2.3 years compared to 2.2 years at December 31, 2004 due primarily
to a decrease in new hires during 2005.
52
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Net sales by product category for North America and EMEA were as follows for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
EMEA |
|
|
Percentage of Product |
|
Percentage of Product |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
Net Sales |
Product Categories |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Computers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notebooks and PDAs |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Desktops and Servers |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
Software |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Network and Connectivity |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Printers |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Storage Devices |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Supplies and Accessories |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Monitors and Video |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Memory and Processors |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, we experienced declines in average selling prices for most of our product
categories, which required us to sell more units than in previous periods in order to maintain or
increase the level of sales. Additionally, average selling prices for printers, monitors, desktops
and notebooks declined at a greater rate than the other product categories as demand and
competition for these products increased. The largest product category was computers, representing
33% of North America product net sales and 33% of EMEA product sales for the year ended December
31, 2005.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 7% to $374.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $351.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales, gross
profit increased to 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 11.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. Our gross profit and gross profit as a percent of net sales by operating
segment for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Sales |
|
North America |
|
$ |
311,125 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
$ |
289,604 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
63,415 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
61,594 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
374,540 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
$ |
351,198 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 by 7% to $311.1
million from $289.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit increased to 11.5% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 11.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 due primarily to increases in freight margin, increases in agency fees for
Microsoft enterprise software agreement renewals, increases in supplier reimbursements as a
percentage of net sales and increases in services. These increases were offset partially by
decreases in product margin due to the increase in the percentage of sales to large corporate
enterprise clients, which are generally transacted at lower product margins, and an increase in the
write-downs of inventories as a percentage of sales.
In 2005 and 2004, EMEA included only operations in the United Kingdom. EMEAs gross profit
increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 by 3% to $63.4 million from $61.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 13.5% for
the year ended December 31, 2005 from 13.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004 due primarily to
decreases in product margin resulting from an aggressive pricing environment as well as some
product mix shift to lower margin products and a decrease in service sales. These downward
pressures on gross profit were offset partially by decreases in the write-downs of inventories as a
percentage of sales and increases in supplier discounts.
Operating Expenses.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased 2% to
$284.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $280.3 million for the year ended December
31, 2004, but decreased as a percent of net sales to 8.9% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from
9.3% for the year ended December 31, 2004. Selling and administrative
53
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
expenses as a percent of net sales by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
233,892 |
* |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
$ |
226,782 |
* |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
50,790 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
53,508 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
284,682 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
$ |
280,290 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Corporate charges of $694,000 and $646,000 previously allocated to our discontinued
operation, Direct Alliance, for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, have been
reallocated to our North America operating segment. |
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. |
North Americas selling and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31,
2005 by 3% to $232.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net
sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 8.6% for the year ended December 31, 2005
from 8.9% for the year ended December 31, 2004. In 2005, North America benefited from increased
net sales, savings from restructuring activities and increases in operational efficiencies. These
savings were offset by increased expenses in areas we were investing in for growth, most notably
marketing, information technology and training. Additionally, selling and administrative expenses
for the year ended December 31, 2004 included $1.2 million of expenses associated with the hiring
of our chief executive officer.
In 2005 and 2004, EMEA included only operations in the United Kingdom. EMEAs selling and
administrative expenses decreased 5% to $50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared
to the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative
expenses decreased to 10.8% for the year ended December 31, 2005 from 11.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The decrease was primarily due to bonus expenses recorded in 2004 of $3.2
million, including employer taxes, related to management incentive plans with the top executives at
a discontinued operation. In 2005, EMEA also benefited from increased net sales, savings from
restructuring activities and increases in operational efficiencies. These savings were offset by
increased expenses in areas we were investing in for growth, most notably marketing, sales support
and sales compensation plans.
Severance and Restructuring Expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2005, Insight UK
moved into a new facility and recorded restructuring costs of $6.9 million for the remaining lease
obligations on the previous lease and $1.0 million for duplicate rent expense for the new facility
for the last half of 2005. Also, during 2005, North America and EMEA recorded severance and
restructuring expenses of $3.7 million and $414,000, respectively, for severance attributable to
the elimination of 89 positions, primarily in support and management. The North America amount
included the severance for the former President of Insight North America of $2.4 million. During
the year ended December 31, 2004, North America and EMEA recorded $2.0 million and $377,000,
respectively, of severance and restructuring expenses attributable to the elimination of certain
sales, support and management functions. These amounts included $1.6 million recorded for the
retirement of our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and
Secretary and our agreement to terminate his employment without cause. See Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further discussion of
severance and restructuring activities.
Reductions in Liabilities Assumed in Previous Acquisition. During the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, EMEA settled certain liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition for $664,000
and $3.6 million, respectively, less than the amounts originally recorded. See Note 10 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further discussion.
Interest Income. Interest income of $3.4 million and $1.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, was generated through short-term investments. The increase in
interest income was due to a generally higher level of cash available invested in short-term
investments and increases in interest rates earned on those investments during the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $1.9 million and $2.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily related to borrowings under our financing
facilities. The decrease in interest expense was due to a reduction in the amounts outstanding
under our interest-bearing financing facilities, offset partially by increases in interest rates
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
54
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Net Foreign Currency Exchange (Gain) Loss. Net foreign currency exchange loss decreased to
$72,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $262,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
These amounts consisted primarily of foreign currency transaction gains or losses for intercompany
balances that are not considered long-term in nature.
Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net, decreased to $782,000 for the year ended December 31,
2005 from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. These amounts consisted primarily of
bank fees associated with our financing facilities and cash management.
Income Tax Expense. Our effective tax rates for continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 were 39.3% and 28.0%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the year
ended December 31, 2005 was higher than for the year ended December 31, 2004 primarily due to a
$5.5 million tax benefit recorded during the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of a decrease
in the deferred tax valuation allowance for our United Kingdom operations. The increase in the
rate for 2005 was also due to a higher percentage of earnings that are taxable in the U.S. at
higher rates.
Earnings from Discontinued Operations. On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the
outstanding stock of Direct Alliance to TeleTech, and the results of operations attributable to
Direct Alliance for all periods presented have been classified as a discontinued operation. In
2004, we sold our entire investment in PlusNet. Accordingly, the gain on the sale of PlusNet and
the results of operations attributable to PlusNet have been classified as a discontinued operation
in 2004. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report
for further discussion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth for the periods presented certain consolidated cash flow
information for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
82,602 |
|
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
$ |
18,795 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(309,159 |
) |
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
2,706 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
242,749 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
(12,359 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued
operations |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(6,958 |
) |
|
|
(9,135 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
(5,695 |
) |
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,552 |
|
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
(3,454 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
35,145 |
|
|
|
38,443 |
|
|
$ |
41,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
54,697 |
|
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
|
$ |
38,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. |
Cash and Cash Flow
Our primary uses of cash in the past few years have been to fund our working capital
requirements, capital expenditures, repurchases of our common stock and acquisitions.
Net cash provided by operating activities. Cash flows from operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $82.6 million and $15.7 million, respectively. Cash flows from
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 resulted primarily from net earnings from
continuing operations before depreciation and amortization, and increases in accounts payable and
decreases in inventories. These increases in operating cash flows were partially offset by
increases in accounts receivable. The increased accounts payable and accounts receivable balances
can be primarily attributed to the Software Spectrum acquisition. Cash flows from operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005 resulted primarily from net earnings from continuing operations
before depreciation and amortization partially offset by increases in accounts receivable and
inventories. The increase in accounts receivable was due to increases in net sales with terms
longer than net 30 at the end of 2005 primarily related to our large enterprise and public sector
clients. The increase in inventories was due primarily to increases in opportunistic purchases and
a decision to carry additional inventories for our integration labs and upcoming projects with
large enterprise and public sector clients at the end of 2005. Cash flows from operations for the
year ended December 31, 2004 resulted primarily from net earnings before depreciation and the gain
on the sale of our investment in PlusNet, a discontinued operation, offset by an increase in
accounts receivable and inventories due primarily to increased sales compared to 2003.
55
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Our consolidated cash flow operating metrics for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Days sales outstanding in ending accounts receivable (DSOs)(a) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Inventory
turns (excluding inventories not available for sale) (b) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Days
purchases outstanding in ending accounts payable (DPOs) (c) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated as the balance of Accounts receivable, net at the
end of the year divided by daily Net sales. Daily Net sales is
calculated as Net sales divided by 360 days. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Calculated as Costs of goods sold divided by average
inventories. Average inventories is calculated as the sum of the
balances of beginning Inventories plus ending Inventories divided by
two. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Calculated as the balances of Accounts payable plus
Inventories financing facility at the end of the year divided by
daily Costs of goods sold. Daily Costs of goods sold is calculated as
Costs of goods sold divided by 360 days. |
|
The increase in DSOs and in DPOs from the year ended December 31, 2006 is due primarily to
including Software Spectrum sales from only September 7, 2006.
Increases in DSOs and in DPOs also resulted from the difference in
Software Spectrums client base. Software Spectrums
clients are predominantly larger enterprises with negotiated longer
payment terms than Insights typical historical SMB client base.
Further, expansion into differing foreign jurisdictions has impacted
these metrics due to typical business practices in the respective
countries. The increase in inventory turns is
primarily due to the fact that Software Spectrum operations require very little inventory. The
$31.1 million of inventories not available for sale at December 31, 2006 represents inventories
segregated pursuant to binding client contracts, which will be recorded as net sales when the
criteria for sales recognition are met.
Assuming sales continue to increase in the future, we expect that cash flow from operations
will be used, at least partially, to fund working capital as we typically pay our suppliers on
average terms that are shorter than the average terms granted to our clients in order to take
advantage of supplier discounts.
Net cash used in investing activities. Cash flows used in investing activities for the year
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $309.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2006, we received $46.3 million for the sale of Direct Alliance and used
$321.2 million, net of cash acquired of $30.3 million, to acquire Software Spectrum. In January
2005, we received $26.5 million owed to us by an underwriter related to the 2004 sale of our
investment in PlusNet, a discontinued operation. Capital expenditures of $35.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 primarily related to investments to upgrade our IT systems to mySAP,
including capitalized costs of software developed for internal use, IT equipment and software
licenses. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2005 of $35.0 million primarily
related to capitalized costs of software developed for internal use, the purchase of a previously
leased office facility, leasehold improvements primarily in our Illinois distribution center and in
Insight UKs London facility and computer equipment. Capital expenditures for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of $16.9 million primarily related to software, computer equipment and
capitalized costs of software developed for internal use. Capital expenditures in 2004 were offset
by proceeds from the sale of a discontinued operation and proceeds from the sale of a building.
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further
discussion about our discontinued operations. We expect total capital expenditures in 2007 to be
between $30.0 million and $35.0 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities. Cash flows provided by financing activities for
the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $242.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the acquisition of Software Spectrum was partially
financed by new term loan borrowings of $75.0 million under our amended and restated credit
facility and $173.0 million under our amended accounts receivables securitization financing
facility. During the year ended December 31, 2005, cash was provided by borrowings on our
short-term financing facility and our line of credit and by cash received from common stock
issuances as a result of stock option exercises. Cash was primarily used to make repayments on our
short-term financing facility and to repurchase shares of our common stock.
In January 2006, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that allows us to
purchase up to an additional $50.0 million of our common stock; however, no repurchases under this
program were made during the year ended December 31, 2006.
We anticipate that cash flow from operations, together with the funds available under our
financing facilities, will be adequate to support our presently anticipated cash and working
capital requirements for operations over the next twelve months. Additionally, we expect to use
any excess cash primarily to reduce outstanding debt incurred in connection with the acquisition of
Software Spectrum.
Cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to U.S. income
taxation on repatriation to the U.S. We do not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries as earnings are reinvested and, in the opinion of management, will
continue to be reinvested indefinitely outside of the U.S. The undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries that are deemed to be permanently invested outside of the U.S. were $3.5 million at
December 31, 2006.
As part of our long-term growth strategy, we intend to consider acquisition opportunities from
time to time, which may require additional debt or equity financing.
56
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a
description of our financing facilities, including terms, amounts outstanding, amounts available
and weighted average borrowings and interest rates during the year.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, which include guaranties and
indemnifications, as defined by the SECs Final Rule 67, Disclosure in Managements Discussion and
Analysis about Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations. The
guaranties and indemnifications are discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in Part II, Item 8 of this report. We believe that none of our off-balance sheet arrangements
have, or is reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial
condition, sales or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
Contractual Obligations for Continuing Operations
At December 31, 2006, our contractual obligations for continuing operations were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
Long-Term Debt (a) |
|
|
239,250 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
198,000 |
|
|
|
26,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
66,060 |
|
|
|
13,227 |
|
|
|
22,396 |
|
|
|
15,121 |
|
|
|
15,316 |
|
Severance and restructuring
obligations (b) |
|
|
17,293 |
|
|
|
9,186 |
|
|
|
8,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contractual obligations (c) |
|
|
67,932 |
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
33,486 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
10,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
390,535 |
|
|
$ |
56,314 |
|
|
$ |
261,989 |
|
|
$ |
46,271 |
|
|
$ |
25,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes our accounts receivable securitization facility that expires September 2009
and our term loan facility that is scheduled to be paid off in September 2011. |
|
(b) |
|
As a result of approved severance and restructuring plans, we expect future cash
expenditures related to employee termination benefits and facilities based costs. See
further discussion in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of
this report. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes: |
|
I. |
|
Estimated interest payments in 2007 of $27.8 million based on the average
projected balances at December 31, 2007, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009
under the asset backed securitization facility, revolving credit facility and term
loan using the December 31, 2006 weighted average interest rate of 6.4% per annum. |
|
|
II. |
|
Amounts totaling $9.7 million over the next seven years to the Valley of
the Sun Bowl Foundation for sponsorship of the Insight Bowl and $9.9 million over
the next nine years for advertising and marketing events with the Arizona Cardinals
NFL team at the University of Phoenix stadium. |
|
|
III. |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded $979,000, $649,000
net of taxes, for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the
adoption of FIN No. 47. FIN No. 47 states that companies must recognize a liability
for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform asset-retirement activities that
are conditional on a future event if the amount can be reasonably estimated. This
interpretation applies to certain provisions in our facility lease agreements in the
U.S. and the United Kingdom. Some of our leases stipulate that any leasehold
improvements performed by the tenant with landlord approval become the landlords
property upon expiration of the lease. However, some landlords further reserve the
right to make the determination as to whether the premises must be returned to their
original condition, normal wear and tear excepted, at our expense. Because of these
provisions, FIN No. 47 now requires us to record a liability for the estimated fair
value of this legal obligation to return the premises to the original condition with
the offset recorded as an increase to the cost of the leasehold improvements. We
estimate that we will owe $3.2 million in future years in connection with returning
our leased facilities to original condition. |
See further discussion in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of
this report.
Although we set purchase targets with our suppliers tied to the amount of supplier
reimbursements we receive, we have no material contractual purchase obligations.
Acquisitions
Our strategy includes the possible acquisition of other businesses to expand or complement our
operations. The magnitude, timing and nature of any future acquisitions will depend on a number of
factors, including the availability of suitable acquisition candidates, the negotiation of
acceptable terms, our financial capabilities and general economic and
57
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
business conditions. Financing of future acquisitions would result in the utilization of
cash, incurrence of additional debt, issuance of stock or a combination of any of the three.
Inflation
We have historically not been adversely affected by inflation, as technological advances and
competition within the IT industry have generally caused the prices of the products we sell to
decline and product life cycles tend to be short. This requires our growth in unit sales to exceed
the decline in prices in order to increase our net sales. We believe that most price increases
could be passed on to our clients, as prices charged by us are not set by long-term contracts;
however, as a result of competitive pressure, there can be no assurance that the full effect of any
such price increases could be passed on to our clients.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a
description of recent accounting pronouncements, including our expected dates of adoption and the
estimated effects on our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Risk
We have interest rate exposure arising from our financing facilities, which have variable
interest rates. These variable interest rates are affected by changes in short-term interest
rates. We manage interest rate exposure by maintaining a conservative debt to equity ratio.
Although the credit agreement we entered into to finance in part the acquisition of Software
Spectrum increased our exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates, we believe that the
effect of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows will not be material. Our financing facilities expose net
earnings to changes in short-term interest rates since interest rates on the underlying obligations
are variable. We had $71.3 million outstanding under our term loan, $15.0 million outstanding
under our revolving line of credit and $168.0 million outstanding under our accounts receivable
securitization financing facility at December 31, 2006. The interest rates attributable to the
term loan, the line of credit and the financing facility were 6.48%, 8.25% and 6.00%, respectively,
per annum at December 31, 2006. A change in annual net earnings from continuing operations
resulting from a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates would approximate $1.0
million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We have operation centers in Australia, Canada, Germany, France, the U.S., and the United
Kingdom, as well as sales offices in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the
United Kingdom and the U.S., and sales presence in Austria, Ireland, New Zealand and Russia. In
each of these countries, the majority of sales, expenses and capital purchasing activities are
transacted in the respective functional currencies. Therefore, we have foreign currency
translation exposure for changes in exchange rates for these currencies. Changes in exchange rates
between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our operating margins. For
example, if these foreign currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar, it will become more
expensive in terms of U.S. dollars to pay expenses with foreign currencies. Because we operate in
numerous functional currencies, we cannot predict the effect of future exchange-rate fluctuations
on business and operating results and significant rate fluctuations could have a material adverse
effect on results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, although our foreign subsidiaries have intercompany accounts that eliminate upon
consolidation, such accounts expose us to foreign currency rate movements. Exchange rate
fluctuations on short-term intercompany accounts are recorded in our consolidated statements of
earnings under Net foreign exchange (gain) loss, while exchange rate fluctuations on long-term
intercompany accounts are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets under accumulated other
comprehensive loss in stockholders equity. We also maintain cash accounts denominated in
currencies other than the local currency which expose us to foreign exchange rate movements.
We monitor our foreign currency exposure and may from time to time enter into hedging
transactions to manage this exposure. There were no hedging transactions during the quarter ended
December 31, 2006, and there were no hedging instruments outstanding at December 31, 2006.
58
INSIGHT
ENTERPRISES, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
59
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Insight Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December
31, 2005 have been restated.
As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of
accounting for stock-based compensation upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006. As discussed in note 1 to
the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB Financial Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations- an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
143, as of December 31, 2005. The net effect of the recognition of conditional asset retirement
obligations was recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission, and our report dated July 25, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements
assessment of, and an adverse opinion on the effective operation of, internal control over
financial reporting.
KPMG
LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
July 25, 2007
60
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Insight Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in Item 9A (a), Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting, that Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, because of the effect
of a material weakness identified in managements assessment, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; 2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results
in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected. The Company identified a material weakness in its
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, arising from the combined effect
of the following control deficiencies in the Companys accounting for equity based awards: (i)
inadequate policies and procedures to determine the grant date and exercise price of equity
awards; (ii) inadequate supervision and training for personnel involved in the stock option
granting process; and (iii) inadequate documentation and monitoring of the application of
accounting policies and procedures regarding equity awards. We also have audited, in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2006. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of
audit tests applied in our audit of the 2006 financial statements, and this report does not affect
our report dated July 25, 2007, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries did not
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in
our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of
the objectives of the control criteria, Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries has not
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
61
Insight Enterprises, Inc. acquired Software Spectrum, Inc. during 2006 and management excluded from
its assessment of the effectiveness of Insight Enterprises Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, Software Spectrum, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting associated with 51% of total assets (34% excluding goodwill and other identifiable
intangible assets) and 14% of net sales, respectively, included in the consolidated financial
statements of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Insight Enterprises, Inc. also
excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Software Spectrum, Inc.
KPMG
LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
July 25, 2007
62
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
54,697 |
|
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
994,892 |
|
|
|
480,458 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
97,751 |
|
|
|
121,223 |
|
Inventories not available for sale |
|
|
31,112 |
|
|
|
35,528 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
15,583 |
|
|
|
22,535 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
32,359 |
|
|
|
7,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,226,394 |
|
|
|
701,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
129,256 |
|
|
|
133,017 |
|
Buildings held for lease, net |
|
|
16,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
296,781 |
|
|
|
87,124 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
86,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
18,269 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,774,151 |
|
|
$ |
922,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
611,367 |
|
|
$ |
183,501 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
136,401 |
|
|
|
55,956 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
40,728 |
|
|
|
24,747 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
21,309 |
|
Inventories financing facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
Short-term financing facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
818,496 |
|
|
|
334,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
224,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,403 |
|
|
|
15,371 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083,801 |
|
|
|
352,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7, 8, 9, 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 3,000 shares authorized, no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 48,868 and 47,736
shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
363,308 |
|
|
|
334,404 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
297,664 |
|
|
|
220,846 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
28,889 |
|
|
|
14,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
690,350 |
|
|
|
569,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,774,151 |
|
|
$ |
922,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
63
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,817,085 |
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
3,338,022 |
|
|
|
2,809,167 |
|
|
|
2,657,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
479,063 |
|
|
|
374,540 |
|
|
|
351,198 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
374,523 |
|
|
|
284,682 |
|
|
|
280,290 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
11,962 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in a previous acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
103,811 |
|
|
|
78,560 |
|
|
|
72,090 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
6,793 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
101,607 |
|
|
|
79,186 |
|
|
|
70,476 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
31,143 |
|
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
65,708 |
|
|
|
48,043 |
|
|
|
50,859 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes of $7,153,
$4,090 and $11,646, respectively, including gains on sale in 2006
and 2004 |
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
29,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
76,818 |
|
|
|
54,660 |
|
|
|
80,457 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes of $330
in 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
76,818 |
|
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,373 |
|
|
|
48,553 |
|
|
|
48,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
48,564 |
|
|
|
49,057 |
|
|
|
49,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
64
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances at
December 31, 2003-As Reported |
|
|
47,116 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,803 |
|
|
$ |
21,744 |
|
|
$ |
150,351 |
|
|
$ |
439,369 |
|
Prior period
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,717 |
) |
|
|
8,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2003-As Restated (1) |
|
|
47,116 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,396 |
|
|
|
21,744 |
|
|
|
119,634 |
|
|
|
448,245 |
|
Issuance of common stock under employee
stock plans |
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,645 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on
stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,458 |
|
Reduction in foreign currency
translation adjustment due to sale
of investment in discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,457 |
|
|
|
80,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2004-As Restated (1) |
|
|
49,403 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,326 |
|
|
|
26,606 |
|
|
|
200,091 |
|
|
|
565,517 |
|
Issuance of common stock under employee
stock plans |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,784 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on
stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
Repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(49,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,998 |
) |
Retirement of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
49,998 |
|
|
|
(16,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,420 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,011 |
|
|
|
54,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2005-As Restated (1) |
|
|
47,736 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,404 |
|
|
|
14,186 |
|
|
|
220,846 |
|
|
|
569,913 |
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,834 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,692 |
|
Tax benefit from employee gains on
stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,818 |
|
|
|
76,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
48,868 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
363,308 |
|
|
$ |
28,889 |
|
|
$ |
297,664 |
|
|
$ |
690,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
65
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
65,708 |
|
|
$ |
48,043 |
|
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
Plus: net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
29,598 |
|
Less: cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
76,818 |
|
|
|
54,011 |
|
|
|
80,457 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,372 |
|
|
|
14,622 |
|
|
|
16,740 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
5,519 |
|
Write-downs of inventories |
|
|
8,442 |
|
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
13,731 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(14,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,725 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from employee gains on stock-based compensation |
|
|
(1,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
|
(2,615 |
) |
Tax benefit from employee gains on stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of building |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
Equity in loss of investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(290,612 |
) |
|
|
(39,374 |
) |
|
|
(55,003 |
) |
Increase in receivables from equity method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
21,287 |
|
|
|
(27,583 |
) |
|
|
(32,839 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other current assets |
|
|
10,152 |
|
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(8,370 |
) |
|
|
(1,802 |
) |
|
|
(496 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
208,499 |
|
|
|
(6,438 |
) |
|
|
439 |
|
(Decrease) increase in inventories financing facility |
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
|
|
(13,256 |
) |
|
|
11,957 |
|
Increase in deferred revenue |
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
29,230 |
|
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
5,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
82,602 |
|
|
|
15,747 |
|
|
|
18,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Software Spectrum, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(321,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(34,242 |
) |
|
|
(35,027 |
) |
|
|
(16,901 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation, net of direct expenses |
|
|
46,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,629 |
|
Cash receipt of underwriter receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of building |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
Investment in equity method investee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(309,159 |
) |
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on short-term financing facility |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
Repayments on short-term financing facility |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
Borrowings on long-term financing facility |
|
|
291,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on long-term financing facility |
|
|
(123,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on term loan |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in book overdrafts |
|
|
37,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on term loan |
|
|
(3,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments) borrowings on line of credit |
|
|
(6,309 |
) |
|
|
21,309 |
|
|
|
(10,004 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock plans |
|
|
16,462 |
|
|
|
10,784 |
|
|
|
27,645 |
|
Excess tax benefit from employee gains on stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
242,749 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
(12,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(8,909 |
) |
|
|
(3,020 |
) |
|
|
(5,486 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
(3,783 |
) |
|
|
(3,804 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,696 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(6,958 |
) |
|
|
(9,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
(5,695 |
) |
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,552 |
|
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
(3,454 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
35,145 |
|
|
|
38,443 |
|
|
|
41,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
54,697 |
|
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
|
$ |
38,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest |
|
$ |
5,814 |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for income taxes |
|
$ |
40,820 |
|
|
$ |
20,600 |
|
|
$ |
23,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvement related to conditional asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,310 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable from underwriter from sale of discontinued operation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
67
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
We are a leading provider of brand-name information technology (IT) hardware, software and
services to large enterprises, small- to medium-sized businesses (SMB) and public sector
institutions in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific. The Company is
organized in the following three operating segments, which are primarily defined by their related
geographies:
|
|
|
Operating Segment |
|
Geography |
North America
|
|
United States (U.S.) and Canada |
EMEA
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
APAC
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
Prior to the acquisition of Software Spectrum, Inc. (Software Spectrum) on September 7, 2006
and the divestiture of Direct Alliance Corporation (Direct Alliance) on June 30, 2006, we were
organized in three operating segments, two of which were the geographic operating segments that
provided IT products and services, Insight North America and Insight UK, and the third of which was
our discontinued operation that provided business process outsourcing, Direct Alliance.
Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, we operate in three geographic operating segments:
North America; EMEA; and APAC. To the extent applicable, prior period information disclosed in
this report by operating segment has been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation. Currently, our offerings in North America and the United Kingdom include brand-name
IT hardware, software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC
currently only include software and select software-related services.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
Consistent with our strategic plan for growth through targeted acquisitions, on September 7,
2006, we completed our acquisition of Software Spectrum, a global technology solutions provider
with expertise in the selection, purchase and management of software. As a result of the
acquisition, the purchase price of $287,000,000 plus working capital of $64,380,000, which included
cash acquired of $30,285,000, was allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess purchase price
over fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill related to the Software
Spectrum acquisition was $209,671,000 at December 31, 2006. Software Spectrums results of
operations have been included in our consolidated results of operations subsequent to the
acquisition date. See further information in Note 18.
On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance, a
business process outsourcing provider in the U.S., for a cash purchase price of $46,250,000,
subject to earn out and claw back provisions. Accordingly, Direct Alliances results of operations
for all periods presented are classified as a discontinued operation. See further information in
Note 19.
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment. As a result of the disposition, PC Wholesale will be disclosed as a
discontinued operation beginning in the three months ended March 31, 2007. See further information
in Note 21.
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. References to the Company, we, us, our and other similar
words refer to Insight Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context
suggests otherwise.
68
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, these estimates
and assumptions affect the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates,
including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, write-downs of inventories,
litigation-related obligations and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets.
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities at the date of purchase of three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure trade receivables are not overstated
due to uncollectibility. The allowance is determined using estimated losses on accounts receivable
based on historical write-offs, evaluation of the aging of the receivables and the current economic
environment. We write off individual accounts against the reserve when we become aware of a
clients or vendors inability to meet its financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy
filings, or deterioration in the clients or vendors operating results or financial position.
Inventories
We state inventories, principally purchased IT hardware, at the lower of weighted average cost
(which approximates cost under the first-in, first-out method) or market. We evaluate inventories
for excess, obsolescence or other factors that may render inventories unmarketable at normal
margins. Write-downs are recorded so that inventories reflect the approximate net realizable value
and take into account our contractual provisions with suppliers governing price protection, stock
rotation and return privileges relating to obsolescence.
Inventories not available for sale relate to product sales transactions in which we are
warehousing the product and will be deploying the product to clients designated locations
subsequent to period end. Additionally, we may perform services on a portion of the product prior
to shipment to our clients and will be paid a fee for doing so. Although the product contracts are
non-cancelable with customary credit terms beginning the date the inventories are segregated in our
warehouse and invoiced to the client, and the warranty periods begin on the date of invoice, these
transactions do not meet the sales recognition criteria under GAAP. Therefore, we have not
recorded sales and the inventories are classified as inventories not available for sale on our
consolidated balance sheet until the product is shipped. If clients remit payment before we ship
product to them, we record the payments received as deferred revenue on our consolidated balance
sheet until such time as the product is shipped.
Property and Equipment
We state property and equipment at cost. We capitalize major improvements and betterments,
while maintenance, repairs and minor replacements are expensed as incurred. Depreciation or
amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated economic lives
of the assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Economic Life |
Leasehold improvements |
|
Shorter of underlying lease term or asset life |
Furniture and fixtures |
|
2-7 years |
Equipment |
|
3-5 years |
Software |
|
3-10 years |
Buildings |
|
29 years |
External direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal
use computer software and payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly
associated with and who devote time to internal use computer software projects, to the extent of
the time spent directly on the project, are capitalized.
Reviews are regularly performed to determine whether facts and circumstances exist which
indicate that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or the carrying amount of assets
may not be recoverable. When an indication exists, we
69
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
assess the recoverability of our assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows
associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their
respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount
over the estimated fair value of those assets.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the estimated
fair value of net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. We perform an annual review
in the fourth quarter of every year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment
exist, to determine if the carrying value of recorded goodwill is impaired. The impairment review
process compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which goodwill resides to its carrying
value. See additional discussion of the impairment review process at Note 6.
Intangible Assets
We amortize intangible assets acquired in the acquisition of Software Spectrum using the
straight-line method over the following estimated economic lives of the intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Economic Life |
Customer relationships |
|
10 years |
Acquired technology related assets |
|
5 years |
Non-compete agreements |
|
1 year |
Trade name |
|
7 months |
Self Insurance
We are self-insured for medical insurance benefits up to certain annual stop-loss limits. Such
costs are estimated and accrued based on our maximum liability under the stop-loss limits, which
estimates both known and incurred but not reported claims.
Foreign Currencies
We use the U.S. dollar as our reporting currency. The functional currencies of our
significant foreign subsidiaries are generally the local currencies. Accordingly, assets and
liabilities of the subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at
the balance sheet dates. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rate for
each month within the year. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded directly in other
comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders equity. Net foreign currency
transaction (gains) losses, including transaction (gains) losses on intercompany balances that are
not of a long-term investment nature, are reported as a separate component of non-operating
(income) expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.
Sales Recognition
We adhere to guidelines and principles of sales recognition described in Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), issued by the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). Under SAB 104, sales are recognized when the title and risk of
loss are passed to the client, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale, delivery
has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed and determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Using these tests, the vast majority of our hardware sales
represent product sales recognized upon shipment. Usual sales terms are FOB shipping point, at
which time title and risk of loss has passed to the client and delivery has occurred. We make
provisions for estimated product returns that we expect to occur under our return policy based upon
historical return rates.
We also adhere to the guidelines and principles of software revenue recognition described in
Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2). Revenue is recognized
from software sales when clients acquire the right to use or copy software under license, but in no
case prior to the commencement of the term of the initial software license agreement, provided that
all other revenue recognition criteria have been met (i.e., evidence of the arrangement exists, the
fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility of the fee is reasonably assured).
From time to time, in the sale of hardware, software and services, we may enter into contracts
that contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. Sales of services currently
represent a small percentage of our net sales, and a significant amount of services that are
performed in conjunction with hardware and software sales are completed in our facilities prior to
shipment of the product. In these circumstances, net sales for the hardware, software and services
are
70
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
recognized upon shipment. Net sales of services that are performed at client locations are
often service-only contracts and are recorded as sales when the services are performed. If the
service is performed at a client location in conjunction with a hardware, software or other
services sale, we recognize net sales in accordance with SAB 104 and Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) 00-21 Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Accordingly, we
recognize sales for delivered items only when all of the following criteria are satisfied:
|
|
|
the delivered item(s) has value to the client on a stand-alone basis; |
|
|
|
|
there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and |
|
|
|
|
if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item,
delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially
in our control. |
We sell certain third-party service contracts and software assurance or subscription products
for which we are not the primary obligor. These sales do not meet the criteria for gross sales
recognition as defined in SAB 104 and EITF 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus
Net as an Agent (EITF 99-19), and thus are recorded on a net sales recognition basis. As we
enter into contracts with third-party service providers or vendors, we evaluate whether the
subsequent sales of such services should be recorded as gross sales or net sales in accordance with
the sales recognition criteria outlined in SAB 104 and EITF 99-19. We determine whether we act as
a principal in the transaction and assume the risks and rewards of ownership or if we are simply
acting as an agent or broker. Under gross sales recognition, the entire selling price is recorded
in sales and our cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded in costs of goods
sold. Under net sales recognition, the cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is
recorded as a reduction to sales resulting in net sales equal to the gross profit on the
transaction, and there are no costs of goods sold.
Vendor Funding
We receive payments and credits from vendors, including consideration pursuant to volume sales
incentive programs, volume purchase incentive programs and shared marketing expense programs.
Vendor funding received pursuant to volume sales incentive programs is recognized as a reduction to
costs of goods sold. Vendor funding received pursuant to volume purchase incentive programs is
allocated to inventories based on the applicable incentives from each vendor and is recorded in
cost of goods sold as the inventory is sold. Vendor funding received pursuant to shared marketing
expense programs is recorded as a reduction of the related selling and administrative expenses in
the period the program takes place only if the consideration represents a reimbursement of
specific, incremental, identifiable costs. Consideration that exceeds the specific, incremental,
identifiable costs is classified as a reduction of costs of goods sold. The amount of vendor
funding recorded as a reduction of selling and administrative expenses totaled $20,138,000,
$9,630,000 and $7,478,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
increase from 2005 to 2006 is mainly due to the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as they are incurred. Advertising expense of $23,950,000,
$18,839,000 and $15,364,000 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. These amounts were partially offset by vendor funding received pursuant to shared
marketing expense programs recorded as a reduction of selling and administrative expenses, as
discussed above.
Shipping and Handling
We record freight billed to our clients as net sales and the related freight costs as costs of
goods sold.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable earnings in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the
enactment date.
71
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations
We adopted FASB Financial Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations (FIN No. 47) during the year ended December 31, 2005. FIN No. 47 states that
companies must recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform
asset-retirement activities that are conditional on a future event if the amount can be reasonably
estimated. This interpretation applies to certain provisions in our facility lease agreements.
Some of our leases stipulate that any leasehold improvements performed by us with landlord approval
become the landlords property upon expiration of the lease. However, some of our landlords
further reserve the right to make the determination as to whether the premises must be returned to
their original condition, normal wear and tear excepted, at our expense. Because of these
provisions, we are required to record a liability for the estimated fair value of this legal
obligation to return the premises to the original condition with the offset recorded as an increase
to the cost of the leasehold improvements. As a result, during the fourth quarter of 2005, we
recorded leasehold improvements of $1,310,000 and long term liabilities of $2,289,000. Had the
obligation been recorded at January 1, 2005, the balance would have been $1,625,000. Additionally,
we recorded a non-cash cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $979,000 ($649,000
net of tax), representing cumulative amortization of the leasehold improvements and accretion of
the long term liability since the lease inception dates.
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if this
interpretation had been applied during the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Net earnings as reported |
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
Total depreciation and interest
accretion costs, net of tax |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings |
|
$ |
54,151 |
|
|
$ |
80,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Net Earnings From Continuing Operations Per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net earnings from continuing operations available to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted
EPS includes the effect of stock options assumed to be exercised using the treasury stock method.
A reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations follows (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
65,708 |
|
|
$ |
48,043 |
|
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic EPS |
|
|
48,373 |
|
|
|
48,553 |
|
|
|
48,389 |
|
Potential dilutive common shares due to dilutive stock
options |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted EPS |
|
|
48,564 |
|
|
|
49,057 |
|
|
|
49,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
72
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following weighted-average outstanding stock options during the year ended December 31,
2006 were not included in the diluted EPS calculations because the exercise prices of these options
were greater than the average market price of our common stock during the respective periods (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Weighted-average outstanding stock options having no dilutive
effect |
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
4,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified
to conform to the 2006 presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments
(SFAS No. 155), which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133) and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS No. 140). SFAS No. 155 simplifies the accounting
for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted
for as a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis.
SFAS No. 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140.
SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a
remeasurement event occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption
is permitted, provided the Company has not yet issued financial statements, including for interim
periods, for that fiscal year. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In June 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from
Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement
(That is, Gross versus Net Presentation) (EITF No. 06-3) that, for periods beginning after
December 15, 2006, entities may adopt a policy of presenting taxes in the income statement on
either a gross or net basis. Gross or net presentation may be elected for each different type of
tax, but similar taxes should be presented consistently. Taxes within the scope of EITF No. 06-3
would include taxes that are imposed concurrent with or subsequent to a revenue transaction between
a seller and a customer. EITF No. 06-3 will not affect the method that we employ to present sales
taxes in our consolidated financial statements, as we currently present sales net of taxes, and we
anticipate that we will continue to do so in the future.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 applies to all entities subject to income
taxes and covers all tax positions accounted for in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation will require that we recognize the effect of a
tax position in our consolidated financial statements if there is a greater likelihood than not of
the position being sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The
provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the
cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening
retained earnings. We have determined that there will not be a material adjustment to beginning
retained earnings as a result of the implementation of FIN 48 in the first quarter of 2007.
On May 2,
2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 48-1,
Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48,
or FSP FIN 48-1, which amends FIN 48 to provide guidance about how an enterprise should determine whether
a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing
previously unrecognized tax benefits. Under FSP FIN 48-1, a tax
position is considered to be effectively settled if the taxing
authority completed its examination, the company does not plan to
appeal, and it is remote that the taxing authority would reexamine
the tax position in the future.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which provides guidance for using fair value to measure
assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to investors requests for more information
about (1) the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, (2) the
information used to measure fair value, and (3) the effect that fair-value measurements have on
earnings. SFAS No. 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value to any
new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are in the
process of determining the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.
73
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 provides guidance
on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 establishes an approach
that requires quantification of financial statement errors based on the effects of each of a
companys balance sheets and statements of operations and the related financial statement
disclosures. SAB No. 108 permits existing public companies to record the cumulative effect of
initially applying this approach in the first year ending after November 15, 2006 by recording the
necessary correcting adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the
beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained
earnings. Additionally, the use of the cumulative effect transition method requires detailed
disclosure of the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected through the cumulative
adjustment and how and when it arose. The adoption of SAB No. 108 will not have a material effect
on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which becomes effective for fiscal periods beginning after
November 15, 2007. Under SFAS No. 159, companies may elect to measure specified financial
instruments and warranty and insurance contracts at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis,
with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each reporting period. This election, called the
fair value option, will enable some companies to reduce volatility in reported earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS
No. 159 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
(2) Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Background
We announced on October 19, 2006 that the Companys Board of Directors had appointed an
Options Subcommittee, comprised of independent directors, to conduct a review of the Companys
stock options. Certain present and former directors and executive officers of the Company were
named as defendants in a derivative lawsuit related to stock option practices from 1997 to 2002,
filed in Superior Court, County of Maricopa, Arizona on September 21, 2006. The Company had been
named as a nominal defendant in that action. On December 22, 2006, we filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint based on plaintiffs failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Companys Board of
Directors. Before the opposition to the motion was due, the plaintiff voluntarily asked the Court
to dismiss the lawsuit, and, on January 19, 2007, the Court granted the plaintiffs motion to
voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. In addition, we announced on November 6, 2006
that on October 27, 2006, the Company received an informal inquiry from the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) requesting certain documents and information relating to the Companys stock
option granting practices from January 1, 1996 to the present.
The Options Subcommittee was assisted by independent legal counsel and independent forensic
accounting consultants. At the conclusion of its review, the Options Subcommittee reported its
findings to the Companys Board of Directors and to KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm, on March 9, 2007 and March 13, 2007, respectively. Management, assisted by
its own independent legal counsel and independent forensic consultants, then undertook an analysis
of the results of the Options Subcommittees review, as well as all stock option activity during
the period after the Companys initial public offering on January 24, 1995 through November 30,
2005, the last date on which we granted stock options (the Relevant Period).
Based upon the investigation and determinations made by the Options Subcommittee of the Board
of Directors and managements undertaking of a review of historical stock option activity, the
Company identified errors in its accounting related to stock option compensation expense for each
of the fiscal years ended 1995 through 2005 and for the first quarter of the year ended December
31, 2006. In a Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2007, we reported that based on the findings of the
Options Subcommittee and the conclusions reached to date by management in its analysis, our
previously issued financial statements would require restatement and should no longer be relied
upon.
We determined, based upon the Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that
for accounting purposes, the dates initially used to measure compensation expense for various stock
option grants to employees, executive officers and outside non-employee directors during the period
could not be relied upon. The revised measurement dates identified for accounting purposes
differed from the originally selected measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or
incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants,
including the list of individual
74
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
recipients; and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise prices. These restated
consolidated financial statements reflect the corrections resulting from our determination.
Restatement Adjustments
Our restated consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 10-K incorporate
stock-based compensation expense, including the income tax impacts related to the restatement
adjustments. The restatement adjustments result in a $30.9 million reduction of retained earnings
as of December 31, 2006. This amount includes reductions in our consolidated net earnings of
approximately $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The total
restatement impact for the years ended December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2003, of $30.7
million, net of related tax benefits of $16.3 million, has been reflected as a prior period
adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2004. The Company also recorded
restatement adjustments to its selected quarterly financial information for the quarters ended
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. See Note 20 for the Companys quarterly financial
information.
The total unamortized stock-based compensation was less than $0.1 million at December 31,
2006.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment
for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of
2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this
adjustment was $0.4 million.
The following table summarizes the effect of the restatement adjustments on beginning retained
earnings as of January 1, 2004, and net earnings for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2004 |
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
54,695 |
|
|
$ |
80,528 |
|
|
$ |
150,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(47,017 |
) |
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(30,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As restated |
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
|
$ |
119,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The tables below present the decrease (increase) in net earnings resulting from the individual
restatement adjustments for each respective period presented and are explained in further detail
following the table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
|
$ |
11,716 |
|
|
$ |
4,190 |
|
|
$ |
5,830 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
8,486 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
4,834 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
6,378 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
(610 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
11,668 |
|
|
$ |
6,032 |
|
|
$ |
6,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
29,026 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30,862 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
30,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Compensation These adjustments are from our determination, based upon the Options
Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that for accounting purposes, the dates initially
used to measure compensation expense for numerous option grants to employees, executive officers
and outside non-employee directors during the period could not be relied upon for various
categories of option grants including: (i) discretionary grants of various types; (ii) anniversary
grants; (iii) promotion grants; (iv) new hire grants; and (v) program grants. The revised
measurement dates identified for accounting purposes differed from the originally selected
measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or
incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants, including the list of individual recipients;
and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise prices.
Specifically, for each of the categories of option grants discussed in more detail under
Accounting Considerations below, we noted the following:
Stock option grants with insufficient or incomplete approvals. The Company determined that
the original recorded grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other
evidence that indicated that not all required approvals had been obtained, including for certain
grants, Compensation Committee approval. The Company remeasured these option grants with a revised
measurement date supported by the required level of approval, as described below, and accounted for
these grants as fixed awards under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB No. 25).
77
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants. The Company determined
that for certain stock option grants, the number of shares and the exercise price were not known
with finality at the original measurement date. The Company determined that the original recorded
grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other evidence that indicated
that the Company had not finalized the number of stock options allocated to each individual
recipient and the related exercise price. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company
determined the date by which the number of stock options to be awarded to each recipient was
finalized and the other terms of the award were established and accounted for these grants as fixed
awards under APB No. 25.
The use of hindsight to select exercise prices. As noted below, the Company followed an
informal policy of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of
their employment with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions using hindsight to
select the exercise price. In many instances, little or no documentation to support dates selected
for option grants could be located by the Company. Further, instances of favorable, retrospective
date selection of discretionary grants were identified. Also, as noted below, the investigation
noted instances of inadequate documentation, or retrospective date selection, relating to the award
of grants to the Companys top three executive officers, all of which required Compensation
Committee approval. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company determined a revised
measurement date and accounted for these grants as fixed awards under APB No. 25.
Income Tax Benefit The Company recorded a net income tax benefit of approximately $8.1 million in
connection with the stock-based compensation related expense during the period from fiscal year
2002 to December 31, 2006, net of estimated limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).
This tax benefit resulted in an increase of the Companys deferred tax assets for most U.S.
affected stock options prior to the exercise or forfeiture of the related options. With the
exception of UK employees exercising options after 2002, the Company recorded no tax benefit or
deferred tax asset for affected stock options granted to non-U.S. employees because the Company
determined that it could not receive tax benefits for these options. Further, the Company limited
the deferred tax assets recorded for affected stock options granted to certain highly paid officers
to reflect estimated limitations on tax deductibility under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).
Upon exercise or forfeiture of the underlying options, the excess or deficiency in deferred tax
assets are written-off to paid-in capital in the period of exercise or forfeiture.
Accounting Considerations Stock-Based Compensation
We originally accounted for all employee, officer and director stock option grants as fixed
grants under APB No. 25, using a measurement date of the recorded grant date. We issued all grants
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the recorded grant
date, and therefore originally recorded no stock-based compensation expense.
As a result of the findings of the Options Subcommittee, and our own further review of our
stock option granting practices, we determined that the measurement dates for certain stock option
grants differed from the recorded grant dates for such grants. Based on the analysis described
below, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to revise the measurement dates for these
grants based upon its findings. The Company calculated stock-based compensation expense under APB
No. 25 based upon the intrinsic value as of the adjusted measurement dates of stock option awards
determined to be fixed under APB No. 25 and the vesting provisions of the underlying options.
The Company calculated the intrinsic value on the adjusted measurement date as the closing price of
its common stock on such date as reported on the NASDAQ National Market, now the NASDAQ Global
Select Market, less the exercise price per share of common stock as stated in the underlying stock
option agreement, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such stock option award. The
Company recognizes these amounts as compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying
options in accordance with the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock
Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. We also determined that
variable accounting treatment was appropriate under APB No. 25 for certain stock option grants for
which evidence was obtained that the terms of the options may have been communicated to those
recipients and that those terms were subsequently modified (stock option grants cancelled and
repriced). When variable accounting is applied to stock option grants, we remeasure, and report in
our consolidated statements of earnings, the intrinsic value of the options at the end of each
reporting period until the options are exercised, cancelled or expire unexercised.
The Company determined the most supportable measurement dates for each of the various
categories of options grants as follows:
Discretionary Grants. Discretionary grants included grants to the Companys outside
directors, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and Chief Financial Officer (the three
highest ranking executives of the Company), other Section 16 Officers, and all other Company
employees.
78
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Company determined that it had granted stock options to its outside directors pursuant to
the Companys stock plans or Board of Directors minutes in the majority of instances; however, in
a few instances, certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on
the approval dates specified in plan documents or signed minutes. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling less than $0.1 million associated with all grants to
outside directors during the Relevant Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company followed a practice of requiring Compensation
Committee approval of the stock option awards to the three highest ranking executives of the
Company. For some grants, the Compensation Committee minutes do not indicate approval of an award.
In other instances, the Company either did not locate minutes or the evidence was inconclusive
concerning when a specific meeting occurred. The Company determined that certain grants to these
individuals require alternative measurement dates. For example, due to inconclusive evidence
regarding the date of Compensation Committee approval, because the Board had approved the Proxy
Statement in which the award was specifically listed, the Proxy Statement filing date was selected
as the best evidence of a measurement date for the award. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling $13.3 million for all grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company during the Relevant Period.
Prior to May 16, 2003, the CEO approved stock option awards to Section 16 Officers. Evidence
of CEO approval typically consisted of an email containing the grant terms. Effective with the May
16, 2003 Compensation Committee meeting, the Compensation Committee was required to approve grants
to the Section 16 Officers. Evidence of Compensation Committee approval included Compensation
Committee minutes or a signed Unanimous Written Consent (UWC). The Company determined that
certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on the date of
approval identified in the supporting documentation. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to
compensation expense totaling $9.5 million in connection with discretionary grants to Section 16
Officers, in addition to the $13.3 million pre-tax adjustment for grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company, during the Relevant Period.
Throughout most of the Relevant Period, the Companys option plans granted discretion to the
CEO to award option grants to any Company employee, other than the top three executives. The CEO
in turn authorized a defined number of options in connection with certain discretionary grants
during the Relevant Period that were allocated by certain senior executives amongst employees
within particular business units. In certain instances, the review revealed that lists of grantees
within specified business units had not been finalized as of the grant date. Where required, the
Company identified alternative measurement dates for these discretionary grants and recorded the
required pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $7.9 million during the Relevant
Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company also granted annual performance-based options to
employees at the discretion of certain executives and managers within each business unit. Based on
the supporting documentation, the business units finalized the list of awards by person on
different dates. The Company reconciled each list to the actual awards contained in the Companys
stock plan administration database to determine the date by which each business units list was
finalized. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $6.5 million
for six grant dates during the Relevant Period that primarily related to annual performance
reviews.
Anniversary Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company followed an informal policy
of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of their employment
with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions. The number of these options was
determined by the employees level within the Company, or, in the case of promotion grants, the
level to which the employee was promoted. The majority of these grants were modest in size,
generally 500 options or less. In the case of senior management, anniversary or promotion grants
could be much larger, at 5,000 or 7,500 options. Occasionally, very senior executives, other than
the top three executives, received larger grants for anniversaries or promotions, but these were
relatively few and were generally done on a case-by-case basis.
The Options Subcommittee review indicated that the Companys anniversary related options were
granted with measurement dates determined by three general methods, depending upon the time period
in the Relevant Period. From the beginning of the Relevant Period through the end of 1998,
anniversary grants were generally granted with a measurement date on an employees actual
anniversary date. For a period of time between 1999 and 2002, the grant dates generally were
selected retrospectively based on either the low price of a month or the low price of the quarter.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company began a practice of awarding anniversary grants on the
15th day of each month for the balance of 2002, and in January 2003, the Company
essentially ceased making anniversary grants, except for minimal contractual grants to certain
United Kingdom employees which continued into 2005.
79
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Company used email correspondence or other documentation maintained in the Stock Plan
Administration files and information obtained from the Companys human resources system and payroll
records to determine each employees anniversary date based on the employees hire (and
corresponding anniversary) date. The general granting practice for anniversary awards in place at
the relevant point in time was used to determine the appropriate measurement date for each
employees anniversary award. For a limited number of grants, absent evidence of the employees
hire date, the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan
administration database application was used as the measurement date for the awards identified as
anniversary grants. For periods where the Company issued anniversary grants using quarterly or
monthly lows, or other low prices, alternate measurement dates were required. The Company recorded
a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $6.6 million for anniversary grants during the
Relevant Period.
Promotion Grants. Promotion grants were generally handled in the same manner as anniversary
grants. In some instances, promotion grants were awarded on the promotion effective date and other
times at the low price of the month or quarter. The Companys analysis revealed that the Company
had a general practice of granting promotion options on the employees promotion effective dates
from 1998 through 2000. The Company selected either the promotion effective date, if available, or
the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan
administration database application, if the promotion effective date was not available, as the
measurement date for the promotion grants issued from 1998 through 2000. For subsequent periods
where the Company issued promotion grants using quarterly or monthly lows, or other low prices,
alternate measurement dates were required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense
adjustment totaling $2.2 million for promotion grants during the Relevant Period.
New Hire Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company issued an option grant to each
new employee on the employees start date. The Company had a uniform practice of granting a
specific number of options depending on the incoming employees level within the Company. For
example, the lowest level employees would receive 50 options on their start date, while certain
managers might receive 2,500 options. Senior executive officers would typically receive much
larger grants upon joining the Company, and those grants were typically negotiated as part of a
total compensation package that were reflected in an employment agreement or offer letter. In
general, the Company found a lack of significant issues with respect to new hire grants.
Compensation expense was required to be recorded for administrative and error corrections and in a
small number of cases where it was determined that an employee received an award with an effective
date earlier than their actual start date, or where the amount of the grant was negotiated or
otherwise selected after the employee began working at the Company. Additionally, during certain
limited periods, due to a limited number of options being available to grant, the Company issued
certain new hire grants at a later date along with the periods anniversary grants at the low price
of the month or quarter, in which case the Company determined that alternate measurement dates were
required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $0.7 million for
new hire grants during the Relevant Period.
Program Grants. The Company had numerous routine grant programs under which options were
awarded to employees who participated on specific teams within the Company, completed certain
training programs or achieved certain goals in their jobs. These options (generally 50 to 250
options) were typically only granted to individual employees below a certain level. Although these
grants were routinely made on an annual or quarterly basis, no official written policies existed
describing the exact criteria or timing for each grant program. Not all of the grants awarded
pursuant to these programs could be identified due to incomplete or inconsistent documentation.
The Company typically determined the most supportable measurement date based on communication of
the list of recipients and the respective number of options to be granted to Stock Plan
Administration. In those instances where the review failed to reveal a specific date when lists
were received in Stock Plan Administration, the Company selected the date the employee record of
the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database application as the
measurement date. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $0.6
million for these program grants during the Relevant Period.
For some grants, the Company identified no supporting documentation to determine the timing of
the approval of the terms of the grant. In these instances, the Company selected the date the
employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database
application as the measurement date.
80
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Effect of the Restatement Adjustments on our Consolidated Financial Statements
The following tables present the effect of the financial statement restatement adjustments on
the Companys previously reported consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,261,150 |
|
|
$ |
(77,443 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,869,239 |
|
|
|
(60,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,809,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
391,911 |
|
|
|
(17,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,540 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
289,250 |
|
|
|
(5,619 |
) |
|
|
1,051 |
(A)(B) |
|
|
284,682 |
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses |
|
|
12,967 |
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,962 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in
a previous acquisition |
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
90,358 |
|
|
|
(10,747 |
) |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
78,560 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,394 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
90,985 |
|
|
|
(10,748 |
) |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
79,186 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
35,641 |
|
|
|
(4,106 |
) |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
31,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
55,344 |
|
|
|
(6,642 |
) |
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
48,043 |
|
Net earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,642 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)(A) |
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
55,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
54,660 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
54,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(684 |
) |
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.13 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.13 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
49,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
49,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment for a legal settlement expense that was recorded
in the first quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2005. |
(C) |
|
Adjustment to reclassify the operations of Direct Alliance to discontinued
operations as described in Note 11. |
81
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(B) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,082,725 |
|
|
$ |
(74,121 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,712,294 |
|
|
|
(54,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
370,431 |
|
|
|
(19,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,198 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
285,742 |
|
|
|
(5,686 |
) |
|
|
234 |
(A) |
|
|
280,290 |
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses |
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in
a previous acquisition |
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
85,871 |
|
|
|
(13,547 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
72,090 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
84,816 |
|
|
|
(14,106 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
70,476 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
24,729 |
|
|
|
(4,916 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
60,087 |
|
|
|
(9,190 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
50,859 |
|
Net earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
20,441 |
|
|
|
9,190 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
29,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
80,528 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
49,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
49,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment to reclassify the operations of Direct Alliance to discontinued
operations as described in Note 11. |
82
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement adjustments on the Companys
previously reported consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
480,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,458 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
121,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,223 |
|
Inventories not available for sale |
|
|
35,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,528 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
22,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,535 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
701,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
133,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,017 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
87,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,124 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
922,340 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
922,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
183,501 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,501 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
54,926 |
|
|
|
30 |
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
(B) |
|
|
55,956 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
24,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,747 |
|
Short-term financing facility |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
21,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,309 |
|
Inventories financing facility |
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
333,764 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
334,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
20,290 |
|
|
|
(4,919 |
)(A) |
|
|
15,371 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
356,316 |
|
|
|
(3,889 |
) |
|
|
352,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
299,043 |
|
|
|
35,361 |
(A) |
|
|
334,404 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
252,318 |
|
|
|
(31,472 |
) (A) |
|
|
220,846 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income-
foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
14,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
566,024 |
|
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
|
569,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
922,340 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
922,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment for a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first
quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. |
83
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement adjustments on the Companys
previously reported cash flow amounts for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
55,344 |
|
|
$ |
(6,642 |
) |
|
$ |
(659 |
) (A) |
|
$ |
48,043 |
|
Plus: net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,642 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) (A) |
|
|
6,617 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
54,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
54,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,204 |
|
|
|
(3,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,622 |
|
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
5,292 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
Write-downs of inventories |
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,625 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
(A) |
|
|
817 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
)(A) |
|
|
4,509 |
|
Tax benefits from employee gains on stock-
based compensation |
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(42,928 |
) |
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,374 |
) |
Increase in inventories |
|
|
(27,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,583 |
) |
Decrease in other current assets |
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,680 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(1,802 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,802 |
) |
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
|
(9,308 |
) |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,438 |
) |
Decrease in inventories financing facility |
|
|
(13,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,256 |
) |
Increase in deferred revenue |
|
|
8,555 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities |
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
636 |
(A)(B) |
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
12,726 |
|
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
15,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash receipt of underwriter receivable |
|
|
26,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,540 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(38,809 |
) |
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,269 |
) |
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on short-term financing facility |
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
Borrowings on short-term financing facility |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Net borrowings on line of credit |
|
|
21,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,309 |
|
Repayment of long-term liabilities |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(49,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,998 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of common stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
10,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
84
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash flows from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,045 |
) |
|
|
25 |
(A) |
|
|
(3,020 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,783 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
(5,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of
the
year |
|
|
38,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations (C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
60,087 |
|
|
$ |
(9,190 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
)(A) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
Plus: net earnings from discontinued operation |
|
|
20,441 |
|
|
|
9,190 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)(A) |
|
|
29,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
80,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
80,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
20,357 |
|
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,740 |
|
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,519 |
|
Write-downs of inventories |
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
(A) |
|
|
296 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225 |
)(A) |
|
|
(2,615 |
) |
Tax benefits from employee gains on stock-
based compensation |
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
Gain on sale of building |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
Gain on sale of discontinued operation |
|
|
(23,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,725 |
) |
Equity in loss of investee |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(65,666 |
) |
|
|
10,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,003 |
) |
Increase in receivable from equity method
investee |
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
Increase in inventories |
|
|
(32,842 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,839 |
) |
Increase in other current assets |
|
|
(668 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
Increase in inventories financing facility |
|
|
11,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
Increase in deferred revenue |
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
Increase in accrued expenses and other current
liabilities |
|
|
5,150 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
29 |
(A) |
|
|
5,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
13,309 |
|
|
|
5,519 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
18,795 |
|
85
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(20,705 |
) |
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,901 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation,
net of direct expenses |
|
|
18,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,629 |
|
Proceeds from sale of building |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
Investment in equity method investee |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities |
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on short-term financing facility |
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
Borrowings on short-term financing facility |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
Net repayments on line of credit |
|
|
(10,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,004 |
) |
Borrowings on long term liabilities |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of common stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
27,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(12,204 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,519 |
) |
|
|
33 |
(A) |
|
|
(5,486 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,804 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,168 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(9,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,454 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the
year |
|
|
41,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
|
$ |
38,443 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment for a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first
quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. |
|
(C) |
|
Adjustments to remove cash flows related to Direct Alliance. See further
information in Note 19. |
Related Proceedings
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
(3) Stock Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires stock-based compensation to be
measured based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant and the corresponding expense to
be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange
for the award. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based
Payments (SAB No. 107), relating to SFAS No. 123R. We have applied the provisions of SAB No. 107
in our adoption of SFAS No. 123R. Prior to January 1, 2006, we issued stock options and restricted
stock shares. For 2006, we have elected to issue service-based and performance-based restricted
stock units (RSUs) instead of stock options and restricted stock shares.
We adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method,
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R apply to all awards granted or modified after the date on which we
adopted SFAS No. 123R, and compensation expense must be recognized for any unvested stock option
awards outstanding based upon the fair value used in determining our pro forma disclosures under
FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
86
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(SFAS No. 123). We have not restated prior periods for the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. We
have recorded stock-based compensation expense in prior periods related to the amortization of the
fair value of restricted stock awards over their respective vesting period. Stock-based
compensation expense is classified in the same line item of the consolidated statements of earnings
as other payroll-related expenses for the specific employee.
Reported and pro forma net earnings and earnings per share for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Net earnings, as reported |
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value method for all awards, net of tax |
|
|
(9,261 |
) |
|
|
(8,516 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in net
earnings, net of tax |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings |
|
$ |
45,267 |
|
|
$ |
72,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements.
The restated stock-based compensation expense
included in net earnings, net of tax, was $2,629,000, $11,668,000,
$6,032,000, $6,378,000, $1,889,000, $1,596,000, $494,000, $29,000 and
$2,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
We recorded the following pre-tax amounts for stock-based compensation, by operating segment,
in our consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
North America* |
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA* |
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APAC* |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
12,714 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements.
*
- Recorded in selling and administrative expenses.
We have various long-term incentive plans, including equity-based plans in Insight
Enterprises, Inc. The purpose of the plans is to benefit and advance stockholders interests by
rewarding officers, directors and certain teammates (employees are referred to within the Company
and this document as teammates) for their contributions to our success, thereby motivating them to
continue to make such contributions in the future. The plans permit grants of incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock shares and RSUs. The stock options,
restricted stock shares and RSUs generally vest over a one to five year period from the
87
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
date of grant and the stock options expire five to ten years after the date of grant. Unexercised
options generally terminate seven business or ninety calendar days, depending on grant terms, after
an individual ceases to be an employee. Unvested restricted stock shares and RSUs terminate
immediately after an individual ceases to be an employee.
Company Plans
In October 1997, the stockholders approved the establishment of the 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the 1998 LTIP) for our officers, teammates, directors, consultants and independent
contractors. The 1998 LTIP authorizes grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted common stock and
performance-based awards. In 2000, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 1998 LTIP
increasing the number of shares eligible for awards to 6,000,000 and allowing our Board of
Directors to reserve (which they have done) additional shares such that the number of shares of
common stock available for grant under the 1998 LTIP and any of our other option plans, plus the
number of options to acquire shares of common stock granted but not yet exercised, or in the case
of restricted stock, granted but not yet vested, under the 1998 LTIP and any of our other option
plans, shall not exceed 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the time of
calculation of the additional shares. This plan has no set expiration date, but the Nasdaq
Marketplace Rules will require us to obtain new stockholder approval by 2010 if we desire to
continue granting awards under this plan after 2010. We currently plan to seek shareholder
approval of a new 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan at our next Annual Meeting. As of December 31,
2006, there were 3,729,617 total shares of common stock available to grant for awards under the
1998 LTIP and 1999 Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Broad Based Plan). For
further information on the 1999 Broad Based Plan, see below.
In September 1998, we established the 1998 Employee Restricted Stock Plan (the 1998 Employee
RSP) for our teammates. The total number of restricted common stock shares available for grant
under the 1998 Employee RSP was 562,500 and as of December 31, 2006, 434,417 shares of restricted
common stock were available for grant. There were no grants of restricted common stock under this
plan during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
In December 1998, we established the 1998 Officer Restricted Stock Plan (the 1998 Officer
RSP) for our officers. The total number of restricted common stock shares available for grant
under the 1998 Officer RSP was 56,250, and, as of December 31, 2006, 490 shares of restricted
common stock were available for grant. There were no grants of restricted common stock under this
plan during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
In September 1999, we established the 1999 Broad Based Plan for our teammates. The total
number of stock options initially available for grant under the 1999 Broad Based Plan was
1,500,000; provided, however, that no more than 20% of the shares of stock available under the 1999
Broad Based Plan may be awarded to the officers of the Company. Stock options available for grant
under the 1999 Broad Based Plan are included in the total shares of common stock available to grant
for awards under the 1998 LTIP and 1999 Broad Based Plan discussed under our description of the
1998 LTIP above.
The 1998 LTIP, 1998 Employee RSP, 1998 Officer RSP and 1999 Broad Based Plan are administered
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Except as provided below, the
Compensation Committee has the exclusive authority to administer the plans, including the power to
determine eligibility, the types of awards to be granted, the price and the timing of awards.
Through some combination of a delegation of authority from the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors and the express terms of the applicable plan, our Chief Executive Officer, was
delegated the authority to grant awards to individuals other than individuals who are subject to
the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act).
Accounting for Stock Options Prior to SFAS No. 123R Implementation
Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we applied the intrinsic value-based method of
accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees (APB No. 25) and related interpretations to account for our fixed-plan stock
options. Under this method, compensation expense was recorded on the date of grant only if the
current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. See Note 2 Restatement
of Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 123 established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. Pro forma expense was presented
in our disclosures using the accelerated vesting methodology of FASB Interpretation No. 28
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. To
determine the pro forma expense, we valued our stock options using the Black-Scholes-Merton
(Black-Scholes) option-pricing model. Our determination of fair value of stock options on the
date of grant using an option-pricing model was affected by our stock price, as well as assumptions
regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include:
|
|
|
assumptions related to the expected life of the options, which were based on evaluations
of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior; |
88
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
the risk-free interest rate, which was based on the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of
grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at the grant date; and |
|
|
|
|
the historical price volatility of our stock, which was used as the basis for the
expected volatility assumption. |
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value options granted during the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Lives |
|
|
Dividend Yield |
|
Expected Volatility |
|
Risk-Free Interest Rate |
|
(in years) |
Quarters Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
|
For the periods prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
Accounting for Stock Options After SFAS No. 123R Implementation
There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2006, and we do not currently
plan to grant any. The current period expense for all unvested options granted prior to January 1,
2006, net of estimated forfeitures, has been recognized in our consolidated statement of earnings
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Forfeitures were estimated and will be revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded in continuing operations stock-based
compensation expense related to stock options, net of forfeitures, of $8,145,000. As of December
31, 2006, total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options not yet recognized is
$4,096,000, which is expected to be recognized over the next 0.8 years on a weighted-average basis.
We used the criteria in SFAS No. 123R to calculate and establish the beginning balance of the
additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation and to determine the subsequent effect on the APIC pool and consolidated statements of
cash flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that were outstanding
upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
89
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes our stock option activity during the year ended December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(in-the-money options) |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of year |
|
|
7,122,391 |
|
|
$ |
18.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,092,870 |
) |
|
|
15.06 |
|
|
$ |
6,040,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(381,216 |
) |
|
|
19.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(364,842 |
) |
|
|
20.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of year |
|
|
5,283,463 |
|
|
|
19.41 |
|
|
$ |
4,870,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of year |
|
|
3,813,228 |
|
|
|
19.52 |
|
|
$ |
4,187,616 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest |
|
|
5,183,699 |
|
|
|
19.41 |
|
|
$ |
4,826,002 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair
value for
options granted during 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair
value for
options granted during 2005 |
|
|
8.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair
value for
options granted during 2004 |
|
|
8.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value,
based on our closing stock price of $18.87 as of December 31, 2006, which would have been received
by the option holders had all option holders exercised options and sold the underlying shares on
that date. The aggregate intrinsic value for options exercised during 2005 and 2004 was
$7,446,400 and $19,146,000, respectively.
The following table summarizes the status of outstanding stock options as of December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Number of |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise |
|
Options |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price Per |
|
Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Share |
|
$5.09 18.35 |
|
|
1,152,085 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
$ |
14.92 |
|
|
|
971,739 |
|
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
18.36 19.24 |
|
|
1,058,813 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
18.59 |
|
|
|
509,787 |
|
|
|
18.64 |
|
19.25 20.36 |
|
|
1,291,531 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
19.87 |
|
|
|
748,088 |
|
|
|
19.81 |
|
20.44 22.67 |
|
|
1,387,343 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
21.59 |
|
|
|
1,189,923 |
|
|
|
21.65 |
|
22.69 41.00 |
|
|
393,691 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
25.51 |
|
|
|
393,691 |
|
|
|
25.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,283,463 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
19.41 |
|
|
|
3,813,228 |
|
|
|
19.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Restricted Stock
We have issued shares of restricted common stock and RSUs as incentives to certain officers
and teammates and plan to grant RSUs in the future. We recognize compensation expense associated
with the issuance of such shares and RSUs over the vesting period for each respective share and
RSU. The total compensation expense associated with restricted stock represents the value based
upon the number of shares or RSUs awarded multiplied by the closing price on the date of grant.
Recipients of restricted stock shares are entitled to receive any dividends declared on our common
stock and have voting rights, regardless of whether such shares have vested. Recipients of RSUs do
not have voting or dividend rights until the vesting conditions are satisfied and shares are
released.
Starting in 2006, we have elected to issue service-based and performance-based RSUs instead of
stock options or restricted stock shares. The number of RSUs ultimately awarded under the
performance-based RSUs will vary based on whether we achieve certain financial results. We will
record compensation expense each period based on our estimate of the probable number of RSUs that
will be issued under the grants of performance-based RSUs. Additionally, the compensation expense
will be adjusted for our estimate of forfeitures.
90
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded in continuing operations
stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, related to restricted stock shares and RSUs
of $5,293,000 and $745,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2006 total compensation cost related
to nonvested restricted stock was $11,622,000, which is expected to be recognized over the next 1.2
years on a weighted-average basis.
The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity, including restricted stock
shares and RSUs, during the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at the beginning of year |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
19.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
867,529 |
|
|
|
20.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(82,873 |
) |
|
|
20.40 |
|
|
$ |
1,604,270 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(154,125 |
) |
|
|
20.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at the end of year |
|
|
760,531 |
|
|
|
20.50 |
|
|
$ |
14,351,219 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs expected to vest |
|
|
620,067 |
|
|
|
20.57 |
|
|
$ |
11,700,664 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair value of vested shares and RSUs represents the total pre-tax fair
value, based on the closing stock price on the day of vesting, which would have been received by
holders of restricted stock shares and RSUs had all such holders sold
their underlying shares on that date. The aggregate intrinsic value for awards and RSUs that
vested during 2005 and 2004
was $0 and $0, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
The aggregate fair value for the nonvested shares and the RSUs expected to vest
represents the total pre-tax fair value, based on our closing stock price of $18.87 as of December
31, 2006, which would have been received by holders of
restricted stock shares and RSUs had all such holders sold their underlying shares on that
date. |
Direct Alliance Stock Option Plan
In May 2000, we established the Direct Alliance Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
Direct Alliance Plan). We did not issue any stock options to acquire shares of common stock of
Direct Alliance after 2000. The options that were issued in 2000 were fully vested on May 5, 2005
and were exercised on May 5, 2006. As described in Note 19, Direct Alliance was sold on June 30,
2006, and $2,696,000 was paid to the holders of the 1,997,500 exercised Direct Alliance stock
options.
(4) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents are assumed to be the fair value because of
the liquidity of these instruments. The carrying amounts for accounts receivable, accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the short
maturity of these instruments. The carrying value on our variable rate long-term debt approximates
fair value because these borrowings have variable interest rate terms that approximate market
interest rates for similar debt instruments.
91
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(5) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
7,589 |
|
|
$ |
7,591 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
13,605 |
|
|
|
8,464 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
25,312 |
|
|
|
29,602 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
36,586 |
|
|
|
34,128 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
46,973 |
|
|
|
65,215 |
|
Software |
|
|
86,237 |
|
|
|
78,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,302 |
|
|
|
223,415 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(87,046 |
) |
|
|
(90,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
129,256 |
|
|
$ |
133,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, including amounts recorded in discontinued operations, was $21,561,000,
$18,204,000, and $20,357,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
On June 30, 2006, in connection with the sale of a discontinued operation, we entered into a
lease agreement where the discontinued operation will lease from us the facilities it used prior to
the sale. Accordingly, we have separately presented the land and buildings as buildings held for
lease on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. See Note 19 for further discussion.
Change in Accounting Estimate
In 2006, we accelerated the depreciation of certain software assets due to our decision to
implement a new IT system. We determined that portions of the old IT system would no longer be
used after March 31, 2007, which shortened its estimated useful life and increased the depreciation
for the year ended December 31, 2006 by approximately $2,880,000.
(6) Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2006 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
87,124 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
87,124 |
|
Software Spectrum acquisition |
|
|
130,541 |
|
|
|
60,684 |
|
|
|
16,196 |
|
|
|
207,421 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
217,469 |
|
|
$ |
62,714 |
|
|
$ |
16,598 |
|
|
$ |
296,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill of $207,421,000 represented the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair
values assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
from the purchase of Software Spectrum on September 7, 2006, as discussed in Note 18. In
accordance with current accounting standards, the goodwill is not amortized and will be tested for
impairment annually in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.
We perform an annual review in the fourth quarter of every year, or more frequently if
indicators of potential impairment exist, to determine if the carrying value of the recorded
goodwill is impaired. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition,
a loss of key personnel, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the
strategy for our overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, significant
declines in our stock price for a sustained period or significant underperformance relative to
expected historical or projected future results of operations. The impairment review process
compares the fair value of the reporting unit in which goodwill resides to its carrying value. In
testing for a potential impairment of goodwill, we first compare the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit with book value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds book
value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired and no additional steps are necessary. If,
however, the fair value of the reporting unit is less than book value, then we are required to
compare the carrying amount of the goodwill with its implied fair value. The estimate of implied
fair value of goodwill may require independent valuations of certain internally generated and
unrecognized intangible assets such as trademarks. If the carrying amount of our goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in an
92
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
amount equal to the excess. The results of the 2006, 2005 and 2004 annual assessments
indicated that goodwill was not impaired.
(7) Debt
At December 31, 2006, our long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Term loan |
|
$ |
71,250 |
|
Accounts receivable securitization financing facility |
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
239,250 |
|
Less: current portion of term loan |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
224,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
On September 7, 2006, we entered into a credit agreement with various financial institutions
that provides new credit facilities of up to $150,000,000 to finance in part the acquisition of
Software Spectrum and for general corporate purposes. The credit facilities are composed of a
five-year revolving credit facility in the amount of $75,000,000 and a five-year term loan facility
in the amount of $75,000,000. Additionally, we amended our accounts receivable securitization
financing facility to increase the maximum funding under the facility from $200,000,000 to
$225,000,000 and extend its maturity through September 7, 2009. The $71,250,000 outstanding under
the five-year term loan facility is payable in quarterly installments through September 2011.
Amounts outstanding under the term loan bear interest at a floating rate equal to the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of 0.625% to 1.375% (6.48% at December 31, 2006).
In conjunction with the acquisition, no amounts were borrowed under the revolving credit facility.
Deferred financing fees of $1,552,000 were capitalized in conjunction with the amendment to the
credit facility to finance the acquisition. Such fees are being amortized to interest expense
over the five-year term of the term loan facility using the effective interest method.
At December 31, 2006, $15,000,000 was outstanding under our $75,000,000 revolving line of
credit. Amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit bear interest, at our option, at the prime rate or
a floating rate equal to a LIBOR based rate plus a rate advance fee of 0.625% to 1.375% depending
on the level of our leverage ratio (8.25% and 6.48% per annum, respectively, at December 31, 2006).
In addition, we pay a commitment fee of 0.225% on the unused portion of the line. Because we
generally use this line for short-term borrowing needs, our borrowings are generally at the prime
rate and amounts outstanding are recorded as current liabilities. The credit facility expires on
September 7, 2009. At December 31, 2006, $60,000,000 was available under the line of credit. The
revolving line of credit also has a feature which allows us to increase the availability on the
line of credit by $37,500,000, upon request. We do not pay any fees on the increased availability
under the line until we activate the additional credit.
We have an agreement to sell receivables periodically to a special purpose accounts receivable
and financing entity (the SPE), which is exclusively engaged in purchasing receivables from us.
The SPE is a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote entity that we have included in our consolidated
financial statements. The SPE funds its purchases by selling undivided interests in up to
$225,000,000 of eligible trade accounts receivable to a multi-seller conduit administered by an
independent financial institution. The sales to the conduit do not qualify for sale treatment
under SFAS No. 140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment
of Liabilities as we maintain effective control over the receivables that are sold. Accordingly,
the receivables remain recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2006, the SPE
owned $397,123,000 of receivables recorded at fair value and included in our consolidated balance
sheet, of which $215,307,000 was eligible for funding. The financing facility expires September 7,
2009. Interest is payable monthly, and the interest rate at December 31, 2006 on borrowed funds
was 6.00% per annum, including the 0.65% commitment fee on the total $225,000,000 facility. We
also pay a 0.25% usage fee on the unused balance. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005, our weighted average interest rate per annum and weighted average borrowings under the
facility were 5.7% and $63,948,000 and 3.7% and $23,658,000, respectively. At December 31, 2006,
$168,000,000 was outstanding and $47,307,000 was available under the facility.
Our financing facilities contain various covenants, including the requirement that we comply
with leverage and minimum fixed charge ratio requirements. In addition, our credit facilities
prohibit the payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent and the requirement that we
provide annual and quarterly financial information. The annual
information is reported on by our independent
registered public accounting firm to the lenders within a certain
time period after the annual
period end. If we fail to comply with these covenants, the lenders would be able to
demand payment within a specified period of time. Because we were not current with our reporting
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act beginning on
93
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
September 30,
2006 and ending on July 26, 2007, we would have been in violation of our
financial reporting covenants had we not obtained agreements from our lenders regarding the
delivery of substitute financial information to them. The agreements with our lenders waived our
obligation to provide the filed reports and waived any events of default occurring under the
facility as a result of our failure to comply with the financial reporting covenants. We intend to
provide all late reports and current financial statements to our lenders upon becoming current in
our filings.
(8) Leases
We have several non-cancelable operating leases with third parties, primarily for
administrative and distribution center space and computer equipment. Our facilities leases
generally provide for periodic rent increases and many contain escalation clauses and renewal
options. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the length of the lease term.
Rental expense for these third-party operating leases was $9,491,000, $7,267,000 and $7,950,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is included in selling and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining
lease terms in excess of one year) as of December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
Operating Leases |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
13,227 |
|
2008 |
|
|
12,142 |
|
2009 |
|
|
10,254 |
|
2010 |
|
|
9,217 |
|
2011 |
|
|
5,904 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
15,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
66,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
(9) Restructuring and Acquisition Integration Activities
Acquisition-Related Cost Capitalized in 2006 as a Cost of Acquisition of Software Spectrum
We
recorded $9,738,000 of employee termination benefits and $1,676,000
of facility based costs in
connection with the integration of Software Spectrum. These costs were accounted for under EITF
Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with Purchase Business Combinations, and
were based on the integration plans that have been committed to by management. Accordingly, these
costs were recognized as a liability assumed in the purchase business combination and included in
the allocation of the cost to acquire Software Spectrum.
The employee termination benefits relate to severance payments for Software Spectrum teammates
in North America and EMEA who have been or will be terminated in connection with integration plans.
The facilities based costs relate to future lease payments or lease termination costs associated
with vacating Software Spectrum facilities in EMEA.
The following table details the changes in these liabilities during the year ended December
31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
$ |
1,728 |
|
|
$ |
9,686 |
|
|
$ |
11,414 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
9,528 |
|
|
$ |
10,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and Restructuring Costs Expensed in 2006
During the year ended December 31, 2006, North America and EMEA recorded severance expense of
$508,000 and $221,000, respectively, associated with the elimination of Insight positions as part
of our Software Spectrum integration plan and expense reduction plans. Of these amounts, cash
payments of $508,000 and $221,000 were made in North America and EMEA, respectively.
Severance and Restructuring Costs Expensed in 2005
During the year ended December 31, 2005, Insight UK moved into a new facility and recorded
restructuring costs of $7,458,000, of which $6,447,000 represented the present value of the
remaining lease obligations on the previous lease and
94
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
$1,011,000 represented duplicate rent expense for the new facility for the last half of 2005.
Also, during the year ended December 31, 2005, Insight North America and Insight UK recorded
employee termination benefits, related mainly to the reduction in headcount of senior management
and support staff, of $4,064,000, of which $113,000 was outstanding for North America at December
31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006, adjustments
of $237,000 and $1,155,000 were
recorded to reflect the accretion of interest for the present value of the remaining lease
obligations and fluctuations in the British pound sterling exchange rates, respectively, offset by
the release of employee termination benefit accruals in North America of $113,000. Cash payments
of $2,051,000 were made during the year ended December 31, 2006, resulting in an accrual balance of
$6,468,000 at December 31, 2006. In the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2006, $1,828,000 is expected to be paid in 2007 and is therefore included in accrued expenses and
other current liabilities, and $4,640,000 is expected to be paid after 2007 and is therefore
included in long-term liabilities.
The following table details the changes in severance and restructuring liabilities during the
year ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
7,127 |
|
|
$ |
7,240 |
|
Foreign currency
translation and other
adjustments |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,051 |
) |
|
|
(2,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,468 |
|
|
$ |
6,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Reductions in Liabilities Assumed in a Previous Acquisition
During the year ended December 31, 2005, Insight UK settled certain liabilities assumed in a
previous acquisition for $664,000 less than the amounts originally recorded. The tax expense
recorded during the year ended December 31, 2005 related to this income was $358,000.
(11) Income Taxes
The following table presents the U.S. and foreign components of earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes and the related provision for income tax expense (benefit) (in
thousands):
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
71,626 |
|
|
$ |
59,583 |
|
|
$ |
55,877 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
29,981 |
|
|
|
19,603 |
|
|
|
14,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,607 |
|
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
70,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal |
|
$ |
23,846 |
|
|
$ |
19,187 |
|
|
$ |
20,370 |
|
U.S. State and local |
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,783 |
|
|
|
28,757 |
|
|
|
22,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
U.S. State and local |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,116 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
(2,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,899 |
|
|
$ |
31,143 |
|
|
$ |
19,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements.
95
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Income tax expense (benefit) relating to a discontinued operation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
7,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,090 |
|
|
$ |
10,326 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,090 |
|
|
$ |
11,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following schedule reconciles the differences between the U.S. federal income taxes at the
U.S. statutory rate to our provision (benefit) for income taxes (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
Expected benefit at U.S. Statutory rate of 35% |
|
$ |
35,562 |
|
|
$ |
27,715 |
|
|
$ |
24,667 |
|
Change resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
Audits and adjustments, net |
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
(7,488 |
) |
Foreign income taxed at different rates |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(386 |
) |
Non-deductible/ (deductible) goodwill impairment related charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income tax expense |
|
$ |
35,899 |
|
|
$ |
31,143 |
|
|
$ |
19,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
39.3 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
(1) See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements.
For foreign entities not treated as branches for U.S. tax purposes, we do not provide for U.S.
income taxes on the undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries as earnings are reinvested and, in
the opinion of management, will continue to be reinvested indefinitely outside of the U.S. The
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are deemed to be permanently invested outside
of the U.S. were $3,477,000 at December 31, 2006. It is not practicable to determine the
unrecognized deferred tax liability on those earnings.
96
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous accruals |
|
$ |
10,968 |
|
|
$ |
10,256 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
16,967 |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
Depreciation allowance carryforwards |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns |
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
Write-downs of inventories |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
Accrued vacation and other payroll liabilities |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
4,494 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
Capital loss carryforward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Deferred tax asset relating to stock compensation |
|
|
7,433 |
|
|
|
4,915 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
53,597 |
|
|
|
41,330 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(19,830 |
) |
|
|
(8,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
33,767 |
|
|
|
33,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(37,153 |
) |
|
|
(22,853 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(37,587 |
) |
|
|
(25,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liability) asset |
|
$ |
(3,820 |
) |
|
$ |
7,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net current and non-current portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated (1) |
|
Net current deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
15,583 |
|
|
$ |
22,535 |
|
Net non-current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(19,403 |
) |
|
|
(15,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liability) asset |
|
$ |
(3,820 |
) |
|
$ |
7,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2006 we have U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) of
$384,000 that begin to expire in 2008 and will fully expire in 2026. We also have NOLs from
various non-U.S. jurisdictions of $55,351,000. While the majority of the non-U.S. NOLs have no
expiration date, $970,000 will begin to expire in 2011 and will fully expire in 2016. In addition,
we have a foreign tax credit carryforward of $4,494,000 that begins to expire in 2015 and will
fully expire in 2016.
On the basis of currently available information, we have provided valuation allowances for
certain of our deferred tax assets where we believe it is likely that the related tax benefits will
not be realized. At December 31, 2006, our valuation allowances totaled $19,830,000, representing
all of our U.S. state NOLs, a portion of our non-U.S. NOLs, depreciation allowances, and a U.S.
deferred tax asset related to Software Spectrum foreign branches. In the future, if we determine
that additional realization of these deferred tax assets is more likely than not, the reversal of
the related valuation allowance will reduce income tax expense by
$9,889,000 and will reduce
goodwill related to the Software Spectrum acquisition by $9,941,000. At December 31, 2005, our
valuation allowances totaled $8,251,000, representing all of our non-U.S. NOLs, depreciation
allowances, and all of our U.S. capital loss carryforwards.
We believe it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be
generated as a result of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, together with the tax
effects of deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover our remaining deferred tax
assets.
97
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table summarizes the change in the valuation allowance (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Valuation allowance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
8,251 |
|
|
$ |
9,084 |
|
Debited (credited) to income tax expense |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Valuation allowances on opening balance sheet of Software Spectrum |
|
|
9,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance at end of year |
|
$ |
19,830 |
|
|
$ |
8,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
benefits of $390,000, $1,161,000 and $3,956,000 in the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, related to the exercise of employee stock options and other employee
stock programs were applied to stockholders equity.
Various taxing jurisdictions are examining our tax returns for various tax years. Although
the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the ultimate
resolution of these examinations will not result in a material adverse effect to the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
(12) Benefit Plans
We have adopted a defined contribution benefit plan (the Defined Contribution Plan) which
complies with section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. We currently match 25% of the
employees pre-tax contributions up to a maximum of 6% of eligible compensation per pay period.
During the year, the termination of all Direct Alliance participants constituted a partial plan
termination in which all Direct Alliance participants were fully vested in all company match
amounts. The acquisition of Software Spectrum resulted in approximately 800 new employees that are
eligible for the Defined Contribution Plan. Contribution expense under this plan, including
amounts recorded in discontinued operations, was $2,230,000, $1,467,000 and $1,459,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(13) Stockholder Rights Agreement
On December 14, 1998, each stockholder of record received one Preferred Share Purchase Right
(Right) for each outstanding share of common stock owned. Each Right entitles stockholders to
buy .00148 of a share of our Series A Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $88.88. The Rights
will be exercisable if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our common stock or announces a
tender offer for 15% or more of the common stock. However, should this occur, the Right will
entitle its holder to purchase, at the Rights exercise price, a number of shares of common stock
having a market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price. Rights held by the 15%
holder will become void and will not be exercisable to purchase shares at the bargain purchase
price. If we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person
acquires 15% or more of the our common stock, each Right will entitle its holder to purchase at the
Rights then current exercise price a number of the acquiring companys common shares having a
market value at the time of twice the Rights exercise price.
(14) Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual
We have entered into a sponsorship agreement through 2013 with the Valley of the Sun Bowl
Foundation, d/b/a Insight Bowl, which is the not-for-profit entity that conducts the Insight Bowl
post-season intercollegiate football game. We have committed to pay an aggregate amount of
approximately $9,650,000 over the next eight years for sponsorship arrangements, ticket purchases
and miscellaneous expenses.
We have committed to pay the Arizona Cardinals an aggregate of approximately $9,900,000 over
the next ten years for advertising and marketing events at the University of Phoenix stadium, the
home of the Arizona Cardinals.
We have entered into a transition services agreement with Level 3 Communications, Inc. (Level
3) related to our acquisition of Software Spectrum. We have committed to pay an aggregate amount
of approximately $1,000,000 during 2007 as part of the physical separation of Software Spectrums
IT environment from Level 3.
In July 2007 we signed a Statement of Work with Wipro Limited to assist us in integrating our
hardware, services and software distribution operations in US, Canada, EMEA and APAC on mySAP. We
have committed to pay Wipro an
98
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
aggregate amount of approximately $17,350,000 against milestones in 2007 through 2009 as set forth
in the Statement of Work.
Employment Contracts
We have employment contracts with certain officers and management teammates under which
severance payments would become payable and accelerated vesting of stock-based compensation would
occur in the event of specified terminations without cause or terminations under certain
circumstances after a change in control. If such persons were terminated without cause or under
certain circumstances after a change of control, and the severance payments under the current
employment agreements were to become payable, the severance payments would generally be equal to
either one or two times the teammates annual salary and bonus. Additionally, we would record
additional compensation expense for the acceleration of the vesting of any stock-based
compensation.
On May 2, 2007, we announced the retirement of Stanley Laybourne, the Companys chief
financial officer, secretary and treasurer and a member of our Board of Directors. In connection
with his retirement, we have agreed to provide him payments and benefits consistent with those
required for termination without cause under his existing employment agreement, which has been
previously filed with the SEC. Accordingly, we expect to pay him a lump sum severance payment equal
to two times his base salary plus two times his 2006 bonus. The total severance amount related to
this retirement is estimated to be approximately $2,842,000, including non-cash stock-based
compensation expense for a ninety day extension of the post termination exercise period for stock
options, substantially all of which will be recorded in our financial statements in the second
quarter of 2007.
Guaranties
In the ordinary course of business, we may guarantee the indebtedness of our subsidiaries to
vendors and clients. We have not recorded specific liabilities for these guaranties in the
consolidated financial statements because we have recorded the underlying liabilities associated
with the guaranties. In the event we are required to perform under the related contracts, we
believe the cost of such performance would not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements under which we may
agree to indemnify either our client or a third-party service provider in the arrangement from any
losses incurred relating to services performed on our behalf or for losses arising from certain
defined events, which may include litigation or claims relating to past performance. These
arrangements include, but are not limited to, our indemnification of our officers and directors to
the maximum extent under the laws of the State of Delaware, the indemnification of our lessors for
certain claims arising from our use of leased facilities, and the indemnification of the lenders
that provide our credit facilities for certain claims arising from their extension of credit to us.
Such indemnification obligations may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. Management believes
that payments, if any, related to these indemnifications are not probable at December 31, 2006 and,
if incurred, would be immaterial. Accordingly, we have not accrued any liabilities related to such
indemnifications in our consolidated financial statements.
In connection with our sale of Direct Alliance in June 2006, the sale agreement contains
certain indemnification provisions pursuant to which we are required to indemnify the buyer for a
limited period of time for liabilities, losses or expenses arising out of breaches of covenants and
certain breaches of representations and warranties relating to the condition of the business prior
to and at the time of sale. Management believes that payments related to these indemnifications,
if any, are not probable at December 31, 2006 and, if incurred, would be immaterial.
In connection with our sale of PC Wholesale in March 2007, the sale agreement contains certain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which we are required to indemnify the buyer for a limited
period of time for liabilities, losses or expenses arising out of breaches of covenants and certain
breaches of representations and warranties relating to the condition of the business prior to and
at the time of sale. Management believes that payments related to these indemnifications, if any,
are not probable at March 31, 2007 and, if incurred, would not have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations.
99
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Legal Proceedings
We are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,
including asserted preference payment claims in client bankruptcy proceedings, claims of alleged
infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and claims
of alleged non-compliance with contract provisions.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (SFAS No. 5), we make a
provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly
and are adjusted to reflect the effects of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular claim. Although litigation is
inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have adequate provisions for any probable and
estimable losses. It is possible, nevertheless, that the results of our operations or cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected in any particular period by the resolution of a legal
proceeding. Legal expenses related to defense, negotiations, settlements, rulings and advice of
outside legal counsel are expensed as incurred.
In June 2006, our subsidiary, Software Spectrum, Inc. was named as a defendant in a civil
lawsuit, Allocco v. Gardner (Superior Court, County of San Diego), regarding certain software
resale transactions with Peregrine Systems, Inc. The subsidiary was named as successor to Corporate
Software & Technology, Inc. (CS&T) and alleges that during October 2000 CS&T participated in or
aided and abetted a fraudulent scheme by Peregrine to inflate Peregrines stock price. Pursuant to
the terms of the agreement by which we acquired Software Spectrum, Inc. from Level 3 (the former
corporate parent of Software Spectrum, Inc.), Level 3 has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us
harmless for this matter. The discovery process is on-going, and we strongly dispute any
allegations of participation in fraudulent behavior. On our behalf Level 3 is vigorously defending
this matter.
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We have cooperated with the SEC and
will continue to do so. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Software Spectrum, as successor to CST, is party to litigation brought in the Belgian courts
regarding a dispute over the terms of a tender awarded by the Belgian Ministry of Defence (MOD)
in November 2000. In February 2001, CST brought a breach of contract suit against MOD in the Court
of First Instance in Brussels and claimed breach of contract damages in the amount of approximately
$150,000. MOD counterclaimed against CST for cost to cover in the amount of approximately
$2,700,000, and, in July 2002, CST added a Belgian subsidiary of Microsoft as a defendant. We
believe that MODs counterclaims are unfounded, and we are vigorously defending the claim.
Contingencies Related to Third-Party Review
From time to time, we are subject to potential claims and assessments from third parties. We
are also subject to various governmental, client and vendor audits. We continually assess whether
or not such claims have merit and warrant accrual under the probable and estimable criteria of
SFAS No. 5. Where appropriate, we accrue estimates of anticipated liabilities in the consolidated
financial statements. Such estimates are subject to change and may affect our results of
operations and our cash flows.
(15) Supplemental Financial Information
A summary of additions and deductions related to the allowances for doubtful accounts
receivable and allowances for sales returns for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
End of Period |
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
15,892 |
|
|
$ |
10,238 |
* |
|
$ |
(2,919 |
) |
|
$ |
23,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
15,472 |
|
|
$ |
5,291 |
|
|
$ |
(4,871 |
) |
|
$ |
15,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
20,175 |
|
|
$ |
5,606 |
|
|
$ |
(10,309 |
) |
|
$ |
15,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
End of Period |
|
Allowance for sales returns: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
(234 |
) |
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes $7,206,000 resulting from Software Spectrum acquisition. |
(16) Segment and Geographic Information
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006, we operate in three geographic operating segments:
North America; EMEA; and APAC. To the extent applicable, prior period information disclosed in
this report by operating segment has been revised to conform to the current period presentation.
Currently, our offerings in North America and the United Kingdom include brand-name IT hardware,
software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC currently
only include software and select software-related services. We have
not disclosed net sales amounts by product or service type for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, as it is impracticable
for us to do so.
SFAS No. 131 requires disclosures of certain information regarding operating segments,
products and services, geographic areas of operation and major clients. The method for determining
what information to report under SFAS No. 131 is based upon the management approach, or the way
that management organizes the operating segments within a company, for which separate financial
information is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) in deciding how
to allocate resources. Our CODM is our Chief Executive Officer.
All intercompany transactions are eliminated upon consolidation, and there are no differences
between the accounting policies used to measure profit and loss for our segments and on a
consolidated basis. Net sales are defined as net sales to external clients. None of our clients
exceeded ten percent of consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006.
A portion of our operating segments selling and administrative expenses arise from shared
services and infrastructure that we have historically provided to them in order to realize
economies of scale and to efficiently use resources. These expenses, collectively identified as
corporate charges, include senior management expenses, legal, tax, insurance services, treasury and
other corporate infrastructure expenses. Charges are allocated to our operating segments, and the
allocations have been determined on a basis that we considered to be a reasonable reflection of the
utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the operating segments. Corporate
charges of $306,000, $694,000 and $646,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, previously allocated to our discontinued operation, Direct Alliance, have been
reallocated to our North America segment.
101
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The tables below present information about our reportable operating segments as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,076,826 |
|
|
$ |
710,294 |
|
|
$ |
29,965 |
|
|
$ |
3,817,085 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,697,848 |
|
|
|
615,110 |
|
|
|
25,064 |
|
|
|
3,338,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
378,978 |
|
|
|
95,184 |
|
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
479,063 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
293,030 |
|
|
|
77,701 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
374,523 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
$ |
85,440 |
|
|
$ |
17,262 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
103,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,051,754 |
|
|
$ |
460,359 |
|
|
$ |
39,380 |
|
|
$ |
1,774,151 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
North |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,713,468 |
|
|
$ |
470,239 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,402,343 |
|
|
|
406,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,809,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
311,125 |
|
|
|
63,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,540 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
233,892 |
|
|
|
50,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,682 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,962 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed
in a previous acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
$ |
73,583 |
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
78,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets- As Restated (1) |
|
$ |
1,114,325 |
|
|
$ |
144,583 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
922,340 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
North |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,557,402 |
|
|
$ |
451,202 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
2,267,798 |
|
|
|
389,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
289,604 |
|
|
|
61,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,198 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
226,782 |
|
|
|
53,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,290 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed
in a previous acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
$ |
60,764 |
|
|
$ |
11,326 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
72,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets- As Restated (1) |
|
$ |
895,682 |
|
|
$ |
148,308 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
887,641 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Consolidated total assets are shown net of intercompany eliminations and corporate assets of
$777,342,000, $336,568,000 and $156,349,000 at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
102
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following is a summary of our geographic continuing operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
States |
|
Foreign |
|
Total |
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,914,387 |
|
|
$ |
902,698 |
|
|
$ |
3,817,085 |
|
Total long-lived assets |
|
$ |
369,833 |
|
|
$ |
177,924 |
|
|
$ |
547,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,573,181 |
|
|
$ |
610,526 |
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
Total long-lived assets As Restated (1) |
|
$ |
180,791 |
|
|
$ |
39,571 |
|
|
$ |
220,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,439,869 |
|
|
$ |
568,735 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
Total long-lived assets As Restated (1) |
|
$ |
161,066 |
|
|
$ |
39,052 |
|
|
$ |
200,118 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Foreign net sales and total long-lived assets summarized above for 2006, 2005 and 2004 include
net sales and long-lived assets of $525,467,000 and $62,385,000; $470,239,000 and $24,020,000; and
$451,202,000 and $23,588,000, respectively, attributed to the United Kingdom. Net sales by
geographic area are presented by attributing net sales to external customers based on the domicile
of the selling location.
Although we could be affected by the international economic climate, management does not
believe material credit risk concentration existed at December 31, 2006. We monitor our clients
financial condition and do not require collateral. Historically, we have not experienced
significant losses related to accounts receivable from any individual clients or similar groups of
clients.
(17) Non-Operating (Income) Expense, Net
Non-operating (income) expense, net consists primarily of interest income, interest expense
and foreign currency exchange (gains) losses. Interest income of $4,355,000, $3,394,000 and
$1,849,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, was generated
through short-term investments. Interest expense of $6,793,000, $1,914,000 and $2,011,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily relates to borrowings under
our financing facilities. Net foreign currency exchange gain was $1.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to net foreign currency exchange losses of $72,000 and $262,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively and consist primarily of net foreign currency
transaction gains or losses for intercompany balances that are not considered long-term in nature.
Other expense, net, of $901,000, $782,000 and $1,190,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, consist primarily of bank fees associated with our financing
facilities and cash management and the amortization of deferred financing fees.
103
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(18) Acquisition
On September 7, 2006, we completed our acquisition of Software Spectrum for a cash purchase
price of $287,000,000 plus working capital of $64,380,000, which included cash acquired of
$30,285,000. Consistent with our strategy to transform Insight from
an IT products provider to an IT solutions provider, our acquisition
of Software Spectrum enhanced our clients value proposition in many
ways, such as:
|
|
|
|
augmenting our solution capabilities, particularly relative
to software lifecycle management; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
expanding our penetration within profitable categories, most
notably software and services; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
increasing our global presence through expansion in EMEA and
APAC. |
|
The following table summarizes the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price paid as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,380 |
|
Borrowings on lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,000 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,480 |
|
Fair value of net assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
284,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets see description below. |
|
|
89,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
8,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(225,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
(29,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
207,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price as shown in the table above is
allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
on their estimated fair values. The excess purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired
was recorded as goodwill. We may accrue additional charges in connection with the integration of
Software Spectrum, but the amounts cannot be reasonably estimated at present.
The estimated values of current assets and liabilities were based upon their historical costs
on the date of acquisition due to their short-term nature. Property and equipment were also
estimated based upon historical costs as they most closely approximated fair value. The estimated
value of deferred revenue was based upon the guidance in EITF 01-03, Accounting in a Business
Combination for Deferred Revenue of an Acquiree, and was calculated as the estimated cost to
fulfill the contractual obligations acquired under various customer contracts plus a fair value
profit margin. Of the total acquired deferred revenue, approximately $327,000 will result in
future cash flows as the majority of these contracts were prepaid when consummated in the
pre-acquisition period.
Identified intangible assets acquired in the acquisition of Software Spectrum totaled
$89,700,000 and consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
86,100 |
|
Acquired technology related assets |
|
|
1,700 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
200 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,700 |
|
Accumulated
amortization |
|
|
(3,811 |
) |
Foreign
currency translation adjustments |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets, net at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
86,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated
economic lives of the intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Economic Life |
Customer relationships |
|
10 years |
Acquired technology related assets |
|
5 years |
Non-compete agreements |
|
1 year |
Trade name |
|
7 months |
Amortization expense recognized for the period from the acquisition date through December 31,
2006 was $3,811,000. Future amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
Amortization Expense |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
9,838 |
|
2008 |
|
|
9,024 |
|
2009 |
|
|
9,024 |
|
2010 |
|
|
9,024 |
|
2011 |
|
|
8,938 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
40,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense |
|
$ |
85,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
104
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Goodwill of $207,421,000 represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair
value assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from
Software Spectrum. The amount of goodwill that is expected to be tax deductible is $206,986,000.
In accordance with current accounting standards, the goodwill is not amortized and will be tested
for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year or more frequently if indicators
of potential impairment exist.
We have consolidated the results of operations for Software Spectrum since its acquisition on
September 7, 2006. The following table reports pro forma information as if the acquisition of
Software Spectrum had been completed at the beginning of the earliest period presented (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
As Restated (1) |
Net sales |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
3,817,085 |
|
|
$ |
3,183,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,008,604 |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
4,984,318 |
|
|
$ |
4,242,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,406,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
65,708 |
|
|
$ |
48,043 |
|
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
58,825 |
|
|
$ |
42,341 |
|
|
$ |
54,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
76,818 |
|
|
$ |
54,011 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
69,935 |
|
|
$ |
48,269 |
|
|
$ |
83,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
(19) Discontinued Operations
Direct Alliance
On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance
for a purchase price of $46,250,000. The purchase price did not include real estate and
intercompany receivables, which had an estimated fair value of $49,400,000 (book value of
$43,237,000) and were distributed to us immediately prior to closing. In addition to payment of
the purchase price, the buyer is obligated to make a one-time bonus payment to us if Direct
Alliance achieves certain gross profit levels for the year ended December 31, 2006 (Earn Out).
Additionally, the buyer is entitled to a claw back of the purchase price of up to $5,000,000 if
certain Direct Alliance client contracts are not renewed on terms prescribed in the sale agreement.
Also, we paid $2,696,000 to the holders of 1,997,500 exercised Direct Alliance stock options.
This amount may be further adjusted for the above described Earn Out and claw back. Adjustments,
if any, for the above described Earn Out, claw back and payments to holders of exercised Direct
Alliance stock options will also adjust the gain recorded on the sale.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, we have reported the results of operations of Direct Alliance as a discontinued operation
in the consolidated statements of earnings for all periods presented. We did not allocate interest
or general corporate overhead expense to the discontinued operation.
105
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following amounts for the three years ended December 31, 2006, respectively, represent
Direct Alliances results of operations. The following amounts have been segregated from
continuing operations and reflected as a discontinued operation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
34,095 |
|
|
$ |
77,443 |
|
|
$ |
74,121 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
27,138 |
|
|
|
60,072 |
|
|
|
54,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
19,233 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
5,756 |
|
Severance and restructuring expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operation |
|
|
3,391 |
|
|
|
10,707 |
|
|
|
13,477 |
|
Non-operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
Gain on sale |
|
|
14,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operation, including
gain on sale, before income tax expense
income taxes |
|
|
18,263 |
|
|
|
10,707 |
|
|
|
14,037 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
4,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation,
including gain on sale |
|
$ |
11,110 |
|
|
$ |
6,617 |
|
|
$ |
9,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
On June 30, 2006, in connection with the sale of Direct Alliance, we entered into a lease
agreement with Direct Alliance pursuant to which Direct Alliance will lease from us the facilities
it used prior to the sale. The initial lease term is for eighteen months starting July 1, 2006.
Accordingly, we have separately presented the net book value of the buildings as buildings held
for lease on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. Lease income related to these
buildings was $870,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and is classified as net sales. Since
lease inception, depreciation expense related to the buildings is $368,000 and is classified as
costs of goods sold.
PlusNet
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we sold our 95% ownership in PlusNet, an internet
service provider in the United Kingdom which had been accounted for as a separate operating
segment. We sold 55% of our investment during PlusNets IPO and our remaining investment in
December 2004. We received net proceeds of approximately $45,478,000 and recorded a gain of
$23,725,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004. Recorded on December 31, 2004 consolidated
balance sheet was a receivable from the underwriter of $28,024,000 for the proceeds of the sale of
the remaining shares in December 2004, which was received in January 2005. Additionally, we
recorded bonus expenses of $3,229,000, including employer taxes, related to a management incentive
plan with the top executives at PlusNet. The management incentive plan compensated them, as a
group, with approximately 12.5% of the gain, after certain adjustments, related to all sales of
PlusNet shares owned by Insight Enterprises. The bonus expenses were included in selling and
administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
106
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following amounts for the year ended December 31, 2004 represent PlusNets results of
operations and have been segregated from continuing operations and reflected as a discontinued
operation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
23,161 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,269 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
4,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operation |
|
|
2,417 |
|
Non-operating income, net |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
Gain on sale |
|
|
(23,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operation, including gain on sale, before income tax
expense |
|
|
27,207 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation, including gain on sale |
|
$ |
20,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
107
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(20) Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
As required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC, the following table sets
forth selected unaudited consolidated quarterly financial information for our two most recent
years. The quarters ended March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 have been restated from previously
reported information filed in the Companys Form 10-Qs and Form 10-K, as a result of the
restatement of its financial results discussed in Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial
Statements (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,272,486 |
|
|
$ |
918,592 |
|
|
$ |
837,104 |
|
|
$ |
788,903 |
|
|
$ |
812,074 |
|
|
$ |
823,599 |
|
|
$ |
786,743 |
|
|
$ |
761,291 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
1,112,279 |
|
|
|
803,041 |
|
|
|
732,851 |
|
|
|
689,851 |
|
|
|
718,176 |
|
|
|
728,937 |
|
|
|
692,162 |
|
|
|
669,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
160,207 |
|
|
|
115,551 |
|
|
|
104,253 |
|
|
|
99,052 |
|
|
|
93,898 |
|
|
|
94,662 |
|
|
|
94,581 |
|
|
|
91,399 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
126,707 |
|
|
|
89,553 |
|
|
|
80,775 |
|
|
|
77,488 |
|
|
|
70,361 |
|
|
|
71,506 |
|
|
|
72,975 |
|
|
|
69,840 |
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,520 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
4,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions in liabilities assumed in
a previous acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
33,500 |
|
|
|
25,269 |
|
|
|
23,478 |
|
|
|
21,564 |
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
22,778 |
|
|
|
17,542 |
|
|
|
22,223 |
|
Non-operating expense (income), net |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
30,523 |
|
|
|
25,447 |
|
|
|
24,141 |
|
|
|
21,496 |
|
|
|
15,783 |
|
|
|
22,972 |
|
|
|
17,859 |
|
|
|
22,572 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
11,529 |
|
|
|
8,207 |
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
8,814 |
|
|
|
6,898 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
18,994 |
|
|
|
17,240 |
|
|
|
15,691 |
|
|
|
13,783 |
|
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
14,158 |
|
|
|
10,961 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
|
Net (loss) earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,196 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
18,867 |
|
|
|
17,240 |
|
|
|
25,887 |
|
|
|
14,824 |
|
|
|
11,081 |
|
|
|
15,382 |
|
|
|
12,685 |
|
|
|
15,512 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
18,867 |
|
|
$ |
17,240 |
|
|
$ |
25,887 |
|
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
$ |
10,432 |
|
|
$ |
15,382 |
|
|
$ |
12,685 |
|
|
$ |
15,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0. 29 |
|
|
$ |
0. 22 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net (loss) earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0. 03 |
|
|
|
0. 04 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0. 32 |
|
|
$ |
0. 26 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net (loss) earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
108
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table presents the effect of the financial statement restatement adjustments on
the Companys previously reported consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
788,903 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
788,903 |
|
|
$ |
812,074 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
812,074 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
689,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,851 |
|
|
|
718,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
99,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,052 |
|
|
|
93,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,898 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
78,488 |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
)(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,310 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
(A) |
|
|
70,361 |
|
Severance and restructuring
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
20,564 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
21,564 |
|
|
|
17,068 |
|
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
16,017 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(834 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange
(gain) loss |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
20,496 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
21,496 |
|
|
|
16,834 |
|
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
15,783 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,323 |
|
|
|
390 |
(B) |
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
7,088 |
|
|
|
(392 |
)(A)(B) |
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
13,173 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
13,783 |
|
|
|
9,746 |
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
9,087 |
|
Net earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) (A) |
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before cumulative
change in accounting principle |
|
|
14,214 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
14,824 |
|
|
|
11,765 |
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
11,081 |
|
Cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principle, net of
taxes
of $330 in 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
$ |
11,116 |
|
|
$ |
(684 |
) |
|
$ |
10,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,002 |
|
|
|
47,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
48,685 |
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
48,116 |
|
|
|
48,054 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
48,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment for a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first
quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. |
109
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table presents balance sheet information as of June 30, and March 31, 2006,
respectively, and September 30, June 30, and March 31, 2005, respectively, as restated from
previously reported information filed in the Companys Form 10-Qs, as a result of the restatement
of our financial results discussed in Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
138,252 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
138,252 |
|
|
$ |
82,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,837 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
429,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,978 |
|
|
|
419,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,431 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
91,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,549 |
|
|
|
93,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,836 |
|
Inventories not available for sale |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
|
25,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,207 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
22,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,688 |
|
|
|
22,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,822 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
8,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,601 |
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
712,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712,868 |
|
|
|
651,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
651,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
110,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,622 |
|
|
|
138,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,427 |
|
Buildings held for sale |
|
|
19,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
87,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,404 |
|
|
|
87,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,095 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
930,077 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
930,077 |
|
|
$ |
877,345 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
877,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
185,718 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
185,718 |
|
|
$ |
171,211 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171,211 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities |
|
|
71,694 |
|
|
|
419 |
(A) |
|
|
72,113 |
|
|
|
66,982 |
|
|
|
419 |
(A) |
|
|
67,401 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
23,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,887 |
|
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
281,299 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
281,718 |
|
|
|
261,934 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
262,353 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
16,499 |
|
|
|
(4,918 |
) (A) |
|
|
11,581 |
|
|
|
20,375 |
|
|
|
(4,918 |
)(A) |
|
|
15,457 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
298,125 |
|
|
|
(4,499 |
) |
|
|
293,626 |
|
|
|
282,505 |
|
|
|
(4,499 |
) |
|
|
278,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
314,301 |
|
|
|
35,361 |
(A) |
|
|
349,662 |
|
|
|
311,107 |
|
|
|
35,361 |
(A) |
|
|
346,468 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
292,414 |
|
|
|
(30,862 |
) (A) |
|
|
261,552 |
|
|
|
266,533 |
|
|
|
(30,862 |
)(A) |
|
|
235,671 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income- foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
24,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,754 |
|
|
|
16,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
631,952 |
|
|
|
4,499 |
|
|
|
636,451 |
|
|
|
594,840 |
|
|
|
4,499 |
|
|
|
599,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
930,077 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
930,077 |
|
|
$ |
877,345 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
877,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to
APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
110
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,466 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67,466 |
|
|
$ |
65,738 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,738 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
439,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,041 |
|
|
|
419,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,269 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
91,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,929 |
|
|
|
88,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,668 |
|
Inventories not available for sale |
|
|
35,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,316 |
|
|
|
39,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,330 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
|
19,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,852 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
11,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
662,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,170 |
|
|
|
644,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
127,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,272 |
|
|
|
120,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,924 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
87,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,126 |
|
|
|
86,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,784 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
876,755 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
876,755 |
|
|
$ |
852,537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
852,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
169,329 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
169,329 |
|
|
$ |
176,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
176,900 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities |
|
|
51,285 |
|
|
|
394 |
(A) |
|
|
51,679 |
|
|
|
57,117 |
|
|
|
394 |
(A) |
|
|
57,511 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
26,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,816 |
|
|
|
37,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,767 |
|
Inventories financing facility |
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
4,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,499 |
|
Short-term financing facility |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
306,949 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
307,343 |
|
|
|
276,283 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
276,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,305 |
|
|
|
(6,353 |
)(A) |
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
|
12,777 |
|
|
|
(6,353 |
) (A) |
|
|
6,424 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
320,282 |
|
|
|
(5,959 |
) |
|
|
314,323 |
|
|
|
291,622 |
|
|
|
(5,959 |
) |
|
|
285,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
294,233 |
|
|
|
36,747 |
(A) |
|
|
330,980 |
|
|
|
298,606 |
|
|
|
36,747 |
(A) |
|
|
335,353 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
241,822 |
|
|
|
(30,788 |
)(A) |
|
|
211,034 |
|
|
|
242,671 |
|
|
|
(30,788 |
)(A) |
|
|
211,883 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income- foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
19,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,943 |
|
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
556,473 |
|
|
|
5,959 |
|
|
|
562,432 |
|
|
|
560,915 |
|
|
|
5,959 |
|
|
|
566,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
876,755 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
876,755 |
|
|
$ |
852,537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
852,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
111
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
82,472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,472 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
400,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,814 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
90,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,774 |
|
Inventories not available for sale |
|
|
42,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,593 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
20,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,392 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
20,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
657,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
114,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,605 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
86,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,867 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
858,993 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
858,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
181,879 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
181,879 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities |
|
|
50,584 |
|
|
|
394 |
(A) |
|
|
50,978 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
36,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,004 |
|
Inventories financing facility |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
274,767 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
275,161 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,225 |
|
|
|
(6,352 |
) |
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
287,992 |
|
|
|
(5,958 |
) |
|
|
282,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
302,443 |
|
|
|
36,746 |
(A) |
|
|
339,189 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
243,075 |
|
|
|
(30,788 |
) (A) |
|
|
212,287 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income- foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
24,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
571,001 |
|
|
|
5,958 |
|
|
|
576,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
858,993 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
858,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation expense pursuant to APB No. 25 and the
associated income tax benefit. |
(21) Subsequent Event
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment that sells to other resellers. The transaction generated proceeds of $28.7
million including net assets sold that are subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect
to have resolution of the post-closing adjustments by the end of August 2007. Any post-closing
adjustments will adjust the gain recorded on the sale. The sale of PC Wholesale is consistent with
our strategic plan as we concluded that selling IT products to other resellers is not a core
element of our growth strategy.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), the results of operations attributable to PC Wholesale for all periods
presented will be classified as a discontinued operation in our Consolidated Financial Statements
for the period ended March 31, 2007 and for all periods thereafter.
112
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There were no disagreements with accountants on accounting or financial disclosure
matters during the periods reported herein.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) |
|
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, our management used the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards Auditing Standard No. 2 defines a material
weakness as a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in
there being a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The Company identified a material weakness
in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, arising from the combined
effect of the following control deficiencies in Companys accounting for equity based awards:
|
|
|
Inadequate policies and procedures to determine the grant date and exercise price of equity awards; |
|
|
|
|
Inadequate supervision and training for personnel involved in the stock option granting process; and |
|
|
|
|
Inadequate documentation and monitoring of the application of accounting policies
and procedures regarding equity awards. |
The material weakness resulted in errors in the accounting for equity based awards and in the
restatement of our historical consolidated financial statements. As a result of the material
weakness described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria
established in COSOs Internal Control Integrated Framework.
The Company acquired Software Spectrum, Inc. (Software Spectrum) during 2006, and management
excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, Software Spectrums internal control over financial reporting
associated with 51% of total assets (34% excluding goodwill and other identifiable intangible
assets) and 14% of net revenues, respectively, included in the consolidated financial statements of
the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on
managements assessment of internal control over financial reporting.
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2006
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, we have begun taking several steps to remediate the material
weakness described in (a) above. We have implemented or are in the process of implementing
internal control improvements in the following areas:
|
|
|
implementing new policies and procedures to ensure compliance with accounting principles
applicable to equity compensation, including restricted stock grants, and through training
and additions to the staff; |
|
|
|
|
developing an equity compensation training program for all teammates involved in the
award of and accounting for equity compensation; |
|
|
|
|
restructuring reporting responsibility for the administration of our equity compensation
programs; and |
113
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
adopting a written policy governing the award of equity compensation, including
standardizing documentation of approvals of all relevant terms of equity compensation
awards. |
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, which was newly constituted in May 2007,
has already revised some of its policies and will now only approve equity compensation grants at
meetings and not by written consent. The Compensation Committee also has improved the process for
documenting its actions and ensuring the timely reporting of its actions to the Board of Directors.
(c) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as of the end of the period covered in this report, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act) and determined that, as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial
reporting described above, as of December 31, 2006 our disclosure controls and procedures are not
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
(d) |
|
Inherent Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information Concerning Directors and Executive Officers
Our Board currently consists of nine persons, divided into three classes serving staggered
terms of three years. The terms of three Class I directors will expire at the 2007 annual meeting
(if re-elected, their new terms will expire at the 2010 annual meeting). The terms of the Class II
and Class III directors will expire at the 2008 and 2009 annual meetings, respectively. The names
of our directors and executive officers, and information about them, are set forth below.
Eric J. Crown
(Age 45)
|
|
Class I Director |
|
|
|
Chairman Emeritus |
On May 10, 2007, Mr. Crown
informed us that he has
decided not to stand for
re-election to the Board and
will retire from Board
service upon the completion
of his current term at the
2007 annual meeting of
stockholders. Mr. Crown is a
co-founder of the Company,
has served as Chairman of the
Board and will retain his
honorary title of Chairman
Emeritus. Mr. Crown has held
various officer and director
positions with us and our
predecessor corporations
since 1988, including Chief
Executive Officer. Eric J.
Crown is the brother of
Timothy A. Crown.
Timothy A. Crown
(Age 43)
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
Class III Director |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Executive Committee |
Mr. Crown, a co-founder of
the Company, stepped down
from the position of
President and Chief Executive
Officer in November 2004,
positions he had held since
January 2000 and October
2003, respectively. Mr.
Crown has been a director
since 1994 and assumed the
position of Chairman of the
Board in November 2004. Mr.
Crown had been employed by us
or one of our predecessors
since 1988. Timothy A. Crown
is the brother of Eric J.
Crown.
114
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Bennett Dorrance
(Age 61)
|
|
Class I Director |
|
|
|
Member of Compensation and
Nominating and Governance Committees |
|
|
|
Member of Options Subcommittee
(September 2006 March 2007) |
Mr. Dorrance has been a
director since 2004. He has
been a Managing Director of
DMB Associates, a real estate
service company based in
Scottsdale, Arizona since
1984. Mr. Dorrance has
served on the Board of
Directors of Campbell Soup
Company since 1989. He was
also a member of the Board of
Directors of Bank One
Corporation from 1997 to
2000.
Richard A. Fennessy
(Age 42)
|
|
Principal Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
Class II Director |
|
|
|
Member of the Executive Committee |
Mr. Fennessy was elected
President and Chief Executive
Officer effective November
2004 and was appointed
Director in September 2005.
From 1987 to 2004, Mr.
Fennessy worked for
International Business
Machines Corporation (IBM),
where he held numerous
domestic and international
executive positions. His
most recent positions
included: General Manager,
Worldwide, ibm.com; Vice
President, Worldwide
Marketing Personal
Computer Division; and
General Manager, Worldwide PC
Direct organization.
Michael M. Fisher
(Age 61)
|
|
Class I Director |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Audit Committee |
|
|
|
Member of the Executive Committee |
|
|
|
Member of Compensation and
Nominating and Governance Committees
through April 30, 2007 |
Mr. Fisher has been a
director since 2001 and is
the Audit Committees
designated financial expert.
Mr. Fisher has served as
President of Power Quality
Engineering, Inc., a
manufacturer of specialty
filters, since 1995. |
Larry A. Gunning
(Age 63)
|
|
Class II Director |
|
|
|
Member of the Nominating and
Governance Committee |
|
|
|
Chairman of Compensation Committee
through April 30, 2007 |
Mr. Gunning has been a
director since 1995. He has
been Manager and Director of
3D Petroleum LLC, a petroleum
company, since 2001. From
1988 to 2001, Mr. Gunning was
President and a Director of
Pasco Petroleum Corp., a
petroleum marketing company
that merged with 3D Petroleum
LLC in 2001. Mr. Gunning is
also a member and director of
Cobblestone AutoSpa, which
owns and operates several
full-service carwashes.
Stanley Laybourne
(Age 58)
|
|
Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
and Treasurer |
|
|
|
Class III Director |
|
|
|
Member of the Executive Committee |
On May 2, 2007, Insight
announced that Mr. Laybourne
is retiring from the Company
and its Board of Directors.
The effective date of his
retirement is expected to be
August 29, 2007. Mr.
Laybourne has been a director
since 1994. He became our
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer in 1991, served as
Executive Vice President from
2002 to 2006 and served as
Secretary from 1994 to
October 2002 and from
September 2004 to present.
Mr. Laybourne is a certified
public accountant.
115
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Robertson C. Jones
(Age 62)
|
|
Class II Director |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee |
|
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee |
|
|
|
Member of the Compensation Committee through April 30, 2007 |
Mr. Jones has been a director
since 1995. Mr. Jones was
Senior Vice President and
General Counsel of Del Webb
Corporation, a developer of
master-planned residential
communities, from 1992
through 2001.
Kathleen S. Pushor
(Age 49)
|
|
Class III Director |
|
|
|
Member of Audit Committee |
|
|
|
Member of Compensation Committee
effective May 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
Member of Options Subcommittee
(September 2006 March 2007) |
|
|
|
Member of Nominating and Governance
Committee through April 30, 2007 |
Ms. Pushor was appointed
director in September 2005.
Since January 2006, she has
served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the
Greater Phoenix Chamber of
Commerce. From 2003 to 2005,
she served as the Chief
Executive Officer of the
Arizona Lottery. From 1999
to 2002, she operated an
independent consulting
practice in the technology
distribution sector, and from
1998 to 2005, she was a
member of the Board of
Directors of Zones, Inc., a
direct marketer of IT
products.
David J. Robino
(Age 47)
|
|
Class I Director |
|
|
|
Chairman of Compensation Committee
effective May 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
Member of Nominating and Governance
Committee effective May 1, 2007 |
Mr. Robino has been a
director since May 2007. Mr.
Robino served as a
Non-Executive Director of
Memec Group Holdings Limited,
a global distributor of
specialty semiconductors,
from 2001 until the sale of
that business to Avnet, Inc.
in 2005. He served Gateway,
Inc. first as Executive Vice
President and Chief
Administrative Officer and
later as Vice Chairman from
1998 to 2001. Previously, he
held executive positions at
The Nielsen Company from 1989
to 1995 and at AT&T from 1995
to 1997.
Catherine W. Eckstein
(Age 50)
|
|
Chief Marketing Officer |
Ms. Eckstein joined Insight
Enterprises, Inc. in March
2004 and was promoted to
Chief Marketing Officer of
Insight Enterprises, Inc. in
May 2005. Before joining
Insight Enterprises, Inc.,
Ms. Eckstein served as Senior
Vice President of Marketing
and Corporate Vice President
of Worldwide Marketing at
Ingram Micro from 2000 to
2003.
Stuart A. Fenton
(Age 39)
|
|
President Insight EMEA |
Mr. Fenton joined Insight
Enterprises, Inc. in October
of 2002 and was most recently
promoted to President of our
Insight EMEA operating
segment in November 2006.
Prior to his promotion, he
held the position of Managing
Director of Insight Direct UK
Ltd. From 1995 to 2002, Mr.
Fenton held various positions
at Micro Warehouse Inc.,
serving most recently as the
General Manager of Micro
Warehouse Canada.
Mr. Glandon joined Insight
Enterprises, Inc. in February
2005 as Chief People Officer.
Prior to joining Insight,
Mr. Glandon served as Vice
President of Human Resources
for Honeywell Internationals
Aerospace division from 2003
to 2005. From 2001 to 2003,
Mr. Glandon served as Vice
President of Human Resources
for Tanox, Inc., a publicly
traded biopharmaceutical
firm.
Karen K. McGinnis
(Age 40)
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
Assistant Secretary |
Ms. McGinnis joined Insight
Enterprises, Inc. in March
2000 and was named Chief
Accounting Officer in
September 2006. She has
served as Assistant Secretary
since January 2005 and was
promoted to Senior Vice
President of Finance in April
2001. Ms. McGinnis is a
certified public accountant.
Mark T. McGrath
(Age 42)
|
|
President Insight
North America/APAC |
Mr. McGrath joined Insight
Enterprises, Inc. in May 2005
as President of Insight
Direct USA, Inc. He was
appointed the President of
our North America and APAC
business segments in
September 2006. From 1987 to
2005, Mr. McGrath worked for
IBM, most recently serving as
Vice President of IBM.com
Americas, a division of IBM
focused on leveraging the
phone and the web. Earlier
positions held at IBM
included Vice President, IBM
Direct (a division of
ibm.com), and Vice President
of Channel Sales, IBM
Personal Computing Division.
David B. Rice
(Age 54)
|
|
Chief Information Officer |
Mr. Rice joined Insight
Enterprises, Inc. in July
2000 and was named Chief
Information Officer of
Insight Enterprises, Inc. in
February 2005. Mr. Rice has
served as Chief Information
Officer of one of our
operating entities from July
2000 to January 2005. Prior
to joining Insight, he served
as Vice President, IT Mail
Order Operations at PCS
Health Systems from 1994 to
2000.
116
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Under the securities laws of the United States, our directors, executive officers, and any
persons holding more than 10% of our common stock are required to report their initial ownership of
our common stock and any subsequent changes in that ownership to the SEC. Specific due dates for
these reports have been established, and we are required to disclose any known failure to file by
these dates. Based upon a review of such reports furnished to us, or written representations that
no reports were required, we believe that these filing requirements were satisfied in a timely
manner during the year ended December 31, 2006, except for five late Form 4 reports, filed on May
3, 2006, with respect to the annual grants of 1,000 RSUs to Messrs. Dorrance, Fisher, Gunning, and
Jones and Ms. Pushor granted on April 4, 2006.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to directors and all employees, including our
Chief Executive Officer and our senior financial executives. The Code of Ethics is posted on our
website, www.insight.com, and may be found in our Investor Relations section, which can be
accessed in the drop down menu under About Insight on our welcome page. We intend to satisfy
the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendments to, or waivers
from, a provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website at the location
specified above, unless otherwise required by NASDAQ Marketplace Rules to disclose any such waiver
on Form 8-K.
Policy on Stockholder Recommendations of Director Nominees
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider Director candidates recommended by
stockholders. No changes have been made to the process by which stockholders may nominate a
person or persons to serve as a member of the Board of Directors. See further information on this
process in our Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting dated April 4, 2006.
Audit Committee
The Board has a standing Audit Committee which consists of Mr. Fisher, Chairman, Mr. Jones
and Ms. Pushor. Each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director as defined in
NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15). The Board has determined that Mr. Fisher, the Chairman of the
Audit Committee, is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Regulation S-K.
117
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The purpose of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is to provide information about each
material element of compensation that we pay or award to, or that is earned by, our named
executive officers. For 2006, our named executive officers were:
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer; |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer; |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC; |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA; and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer. |
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses and explains the numerical and related
information contained in the summary compensation tables and includes actions regarding executive
compensation that occurred after the end of 2006, including the award of discretionary bonuses
related to 2006 performance, and the adoption of any new, or the modification of any existing,
compensation programs.
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our long-term success depends on our ability to attract and retain individuals who are
committed to the Companys strategy and core values of client service, respect and integrity. Our
general philosophy of executive compensation is to offer total compensation, including base
salaries, cash incentives and equity-based incentives, but to emphasize incentive compensation
which will:
|
|
|
be competitive in the marketplace; |
|
|
|
|
permit us to attract and retain highly qualified executives; |
|
|
|
|
encourage extraordinary effort on behalf of the Company; |
|
|
|
|
reward the achievement of specific financial, strategic and tactical goals by the
Company and the individual executive which aligns the interests of management with the
interests of our stockholders; and |
|
|
|
|
be financially sound. |
Compensation Consultants and Benchmarking
The Compensation Committee utilizes internal resources, including our Chief People Officer,
to help it carry out its responsibilities and has, from time to time, engaged independent
consultants to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee has the
authority to obtain advice and assistance from, and receives appropriate funding from us for,
outside advisors as the Compensation Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties. During
2006, the Compensation Committee retained Towers Perrin, a global human resource consulting firm,
as its independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on all matters
related to executive compensation and compensation programs in general. As such, Towers Perrin
conducted a competitive analysis of the compensation for the most senior executives, including but
not limited to the named executive officers, of the Company.
The Towers Perrin analysis measured the competitiveness of the Companys compensation
relative to two groups of companies (the comparison groups). The comparison groups were chosen
by Towers Perrin and approved by the Compensation Committee based upon primary characteristics
such as similar business focus, labor market and size. Comparison Group One, which was considered
to be the primary peer group, included nineteen publicly-traded product and service competitors
and suppliers and other enterprises which may compete with the Company for executive talent.
Comparison Group Two included twenty publicly-traded technology companies, many of which were
significantly larger than Insight. Because of the large variance in size among the companies in
Comparison Group Two, Towers Perrin adjusted the compensation data for the Comparison Group Two to
reflect the revenue size of the Company. This size-adjusted data was used as a basis of
comparison of compensation between Insight and the companies in Comparison Group Two. As neither
group was limited to companies that are merely competitors or to those that are close comparisons
in terms of sales and market capitalization, the Company does not consider these groups to be peer
groups for other purposes. The specific companies included in the comparison groups are as
follows:
118
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Comparison Group One (the primary peer group)
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc.
Avnet Inc.
BearingPoint, Inc.
Bell Microproducts, Inc.
CACI International, Inc.
CDW Corp.
|
|
CGI Group, Inc.
IKON Office Solutions, Inc.
Ingram Micro, Inc.
Lexmark International, Inc.
Office Depot, Inc.
PC Connection, Inc.
Perot Systems Corp.
|
|
PetSmart, Inc.
SYNNEX Corp.
Tech Data Corp.
Tellabs, Inc.
Unisys Corp. |
Comparison Group Two
|
|
|
|
|
Apple, Inc.
Ceridian Corp.
Dell Inc.
Dendrite International, Inc.
Electronic Data Systems Corp.
EMC Corp. (Mass)
HLTH Corp.
|
|
Hewlett-Packard Co.
International Business Machines Corp.
IKON Office Solutions, Inc.
Intel Corp.
Lexmark International, Inc.
Microsoft Corp.
National Semiconductor Corp.
|
|
The Reynolds and Reynolds Co.
Sabre Holdings Corp.
Seagate Technology
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Unisys Corp.
Xerox Corp. |
The Towers Perrin study provided the Compensation Committee with compensation data for base
salary, annual cash incentives and long-term incentive compensation for each comparison group.
The study generally concluded that, with respect to total compensation, the Company is positioned
below the median of each of the comparison groups. With respect to total cash compensation, which
includes base salaries and incentive compensation, the Towers Perrin study generally concluded
that the Company is competitive based on comparison group analysis. However, this conclusion was
driven primarily by above target performance in 2006 incentive compensation, while base salaries
were noted to be below market. With respect to long-term incentive compensation, Towers Perrin
generally concluded that our equity-based incentive compensation plan, including the use of
performance-based RSUs and the target level of grants to each executive, is competitive with
market practices. The Towers Perrin report was delivered to the Compensation Committee in
December 2006, and, accordingly, the Committee used the report, in addition to other relevant
sources of information, such as past studies and existing pay levels, internal pay equity
considerations and other publicly available information about trends in executive compensation, in
setting compensation for executives for 2007. Additionally, Towers Perrin advised the
Compensation Committee and the Company regarding executive compensation programs generally and
provided advice on trends in compensation. The Committee anticipates that it will undertake
similar periodic reviews in the future and that it will use the services of outside consultants
for similar services in the future.
Compensation Programs Design
The principal components of compensation for named executive officers are:
|
|
|
base salary and benefits; |
|
|
|
|
short-term cash incentive compensation; |
|
|
|
|
long-term equity-based incentive compensation; and |
|
|
|
|
severance and change in control plans. |
A significant percentage of total compensation is allocated to incentive compensation as a result
of the executive compensation philosophy and objectives discussed above. There is no
pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash or equity or short-term or
long-term incentive compensation. Rather, the different elements of compensation are designed to
support and encourage varying behaviors, as described below:
Base Salary and Benefits
Base salary and benefits are designed to attract and retain executives by providing a fixed
compensation based on competitive market practice. This component of compensation is designed to
reward an executives core competency in the role relative to skills, experience and expected
contributions to the Company.
The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries annually and targets base pay for executive
officers at or near the median of the comparison groups and adjusts, as appropriate, for tenure,
performance and variations in actual position
119
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
responsibilities from position descriptions in the comparison groups. The Towers Perrin study
concluded that base salary levels for executive officers were generally below the median levels of
both comparison groups. As a result, on January 24, 2007, the Compensation Committee approved
certain increases in executive base salaries; although the Compensation Committee increased Mr.
Fennessys base salary by less than one percent, preferring instead to emphasize performance-based
compensation by increasing his target cash incentive compensation. The approved 2007 salaries, as
compared to 2006 salaries, include the following for named executive officers:
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer $700,000 (2006 $695,000); |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer $375,000 (2006 $350,000); |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC $375,000 (2006 $325,000); |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA $419,0001 (2006 $370,4002); and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer $255,000 (2006 $235,000). |
1 Mr. Fentons 2007 salary was translated into U.S. dollars using the British Pound Sterling
exchange rate in effect on January 24, 2007 of $1.98.
2 Mr. Fentons 2006 salary was translated into U.S. dollars using the British
Pound Sterling average exchange rates for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 of $1.75; June
30, 2006 of $1.83; September 30, 2006 of $1.87 and December 31, 2006 of $1.96.
Our named executive officers participate in employee benefit plans generally available to our
employees, including medical, health, life insurance and disability plans. Our named executive
officers are also eligible to participate in the Companys 401(k) plan, and receive Company
matching contributions, which are generally available to our employees. Mr. Fenton also receives
an automobile allowance, which is a benefit generally available to the management team in the
United Kingdom, where Mr. Fenton resides. These benefits are part of our broad-based total
compensation programs offered in the geography in which each of the executives resides.
Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee views cash incentive compensation as a means of closely tying a
significant portion of the total potential annual cash compensation for executives to the
financial performance of the Company or the portion of the Company for which the executive has
management responsibility. Our cash incentive compensation plans are designed to reward
individuals for the achievement of certain defined quarterly financial objectives of the Company,
as well as annual individual or Company financial, strategic and tactical objectives, or both.
The financial objectives and performance goals are approved by the Compensation Committee and are
set at the beginning of the year. These objectives and goals are integrated into the management
cash incentive plans throughout the organization to foster a team environment where the entire
Company is focused on the same set of objectives and goals.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews financial objectives, performance goals and
target cash incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee targets cash incentive
compensation for executive officers at or near the median of the comparison groups and adjusts, as
appropriate, for tenure, performance and variations in actual position responsibilities from
position descriptions in the comparison groups. The Towers Perrin study generally concluded that
the Companys cash incentive compensation is competitive based on comparison group analysis.
2006 Cash Incentive Plan
Under the 2006 Cash Incentive Plan, Messrs. Fennessy, Laybourne, Fenton, McGrath and Glandon
earned cash incentive compensation based on achievement of financial objectives against targeted
amounts for the Company or their respective business units, with payout varying with financial
performance levels below and above target levels (awards were discretionary over or below
specified levels). The target cash incentive amount was based on achievement of non-GAAP
quarterly operating margin percentages (non-GAAP quarterly operating margin is defined under the
plan as the quarterly operating margin modified for any adjustments which are reflected in the
tabular reconciliation of financial measures prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to non-GAAP financial measures in the quarterly press
releases of the results of operations of the Company), paid quarterly, and on achievement of
annual revenue growth, paid annually. For Mr. Glandon only, a portion was also paid quarterly and
based on performance against quarterly performance goals. Due to the over-achievement of
financial goals, the actual 2006 incentive cash compensation for the named executive officers was
paid out at amounts higher than target as follows:
120
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer $1,397,553 (target $1,203,750); |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer $900,646 (target $775,750); |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC $528,418 (target $465,985); |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA $179,8801 (target $183,3002); and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer $163,546 (target $144,450); |
1 Mr. Fentons 2006 incentive compensation was translated into U.S. dollars using
the British Pound Sterling average exchange rates for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 of $1.75; June 30, 2006
of $1.83; September 30, 2006 of $1.87 and December 31, 2006 of $1.96.
2 Mr. Fentons 2006 target incentive compensation was translated into U.S. dollars
using the British
pound sterling exchange rate in effect at January 24, 2006 of $1.78.
Additionally, on February 15, 2007, the Compensation Committee also approved the following
discretionary cash bonuses for 2006 for the named executive officers:
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer $150,000; |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer $80,000; |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC $50,000; |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA $78,3411; and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer $15,000. |
1 Mr. Fentons 2006 discretionary cash bonus was translated into U.S. dollars
using the British Pound Sterling exchange rate in effect on February 15, 2007 of $1.96.
In determining the amount of these discretionary bonuses, the Compensation Committee considered
the additional responsibilities and projects assumed by these individuals during 2006, their
performance in these roles and their overall cash compensation. In particular, their efforts in
connection with the divestiture of Direct Alliance and the acquisition and integration of Software
Spectrum, Inc. were considered. These amounts are in addition to incentives paid pursuant to the
2006 Cash Incentive Plan discussed above.
2007 Cash Incentive Plan
For 2007, the Compensation Committee retained its stance of increasing the emphasis on cash
incentive compensation relative to base salary and, accordingly, set cash incentive plans for
executive officers such that a significant portion of total compensation would be awarded through
cash incentives if performance measures were met. Annual financial performance targets were set
in conjunction with the annual budget process and were considered to be a challenge, but
potentially achievable given the tactical and strategic plans that have been developed. The
specific levels of performance have not been communicated externally and involve confidential,
commercial information disclosure of which could result in competitive harm to the Company. Based
on the Companys financial performance during 2007 to date, it appears very likely that the target
performance measures will be met or exceeded for 2007. The total target cash incentive
compensation for 2007 will be based 60% on earnings from operations of the Company or the
executives respective business units, to be determined and paid quarterly against a sliding scale
with a minimum payout of zero and a maximum payout at 145% of the earnings from operations target.
The remaining 40% of the target cash incentive compensation will be based on achievement against
annual performance goals, with the Nominating and Governance Committee measuring the performance
of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Compensation Committee determining pay based
on the results of that review and the balance of the performance measurements being determined by
the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee may also make discretionary awards
outside of the plan if performance goals are exceeded.
The Compensation Committee continued efforts in 2007 to adjust cash incentive structures to
yield cash incentive compensation and total cash compensation closer to amounts at or above the
median of both comparison groups. As such, the Compensation Committee initiated a concerted
effort to align the basis of compensation over the entire senior management team and remained
committed to providing overall compensation for the entire team of named executive officers that
is competitive with total cash compensation offered in the market assuming performance measures
are met. In determining the amount of target cash incentive compensation for 2007, the
Compensation Committee considered the results of the Towers Perrin study and the additional scope
and responsibilities assumed by these individuals during 2006, primarily as a result of the
acquisition of Software Spectrum, Inc. On January 24, 2007, the Compensation Committee
121
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
approved the 2007 target cash incentive compensation plan for named executive officers. The
approved 2007 target cash incentive compensation, as compared to 2006 target cash incentive
compensation, includes the following for named executive officers:
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer $1,400,000 (2006
target $1,203,750); |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer $800,000
(2006 target $775,750); |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC $500,000 (2006 target $465,985); |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA $241,0001 (2006 target $183,3002); and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer $155,000 (2006 target $144,450). |
1 Mr. Fentons 2007 target incentive compensation was translated into U.S. dollars
using the British
Pound Sterling exchange rate in effect on January 24, 2007 of $1.98.
2 Mr. Fentons 2006 target incentive compensation was translated into U.S. dollars
using the British pound sterling exchange rate in effect at January 24, 2006 of $1.78.
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee views long-term equity-based compensation as a critical component
of the overall executive compensation program. The principle objectives for long-term
equity-based compensation are to:
|
|
|
enhance the link among Company performance, the creation of stockholder value and
long-term incentive compensation; |
|
|
|
|
facilitate increased equity ownership by executives; |
|
|
|
|
encourage retention through use of multiple-year vesting periods; and |
|
|
|
|
provide competitive levels of total compensation to executive officers. |
Long-term equity-based incentives are currently issued in the form of service and
performance-based RSUs. We strongly favor performance-based grants and anticipate that most if
not all future RSU grants will have performance-based elements. The performance-based RSUs are
awarded for achieving threshold levels of financial performance with greater numbers of shares
awarded for higher levels of financial performance. If the Companys financial performance does
not meet or exceed a set performance threshold, no performance-based RSUs are awarded. The
performance-based RSUs are issued with a three-year vesting period and the number of RSUs issued
is based on the Companys performance against pre-defined annual key financial performance metrics
(diluted EPS for 2006 and 2007). To encourage overachievement of targets, significant upside
exists related to the number of RSUs ultimately issued. The three-year vesting period is designed
to encourage continued employment with the Company. All grants of equity-based compensation are
currently made under the Companys the 1998 LTIP.
The Compensation Committee reviews target equity-based incentive compensation annually and
targets equity-based incentive compensation for executive officers at or near the median of the
comparison groups. With respect to long-term incentive compensation, Towers Perrin generally
concluded that our equity-based incentive compensation plan, including the use of
performance-based RSUs and the target level of grants to each executive, is competitive with
market practices.
In order to link equity-based incentive compensation more closely to annual performance and
to continue to align the interests of management and stockholders and, in part, in light of
changing market expectations, the Compensation Committee adopted a practice of initiating annual
grants of equity-based incentive compensation awards to executives early in the year (as opposed
to later in the year or periodically throughout the year) in connection with the annual budgeting
process. Also, early in the year, the Compensation Committee will approve a pool of shares from
which the Chief Executive Officer may make annual RSU program grants, as well as discretionary or
new hire RSU grants throughout the year, or both, to individuals other than individuals who are
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The pool of RSUs is
based on the recommendation of management and review of the overall equity compensation expense
expected to be recorded in current and future years in the consolidated financial statements.
2006 Equity-Based Incentive Plan
For 2006, target RSUs granted to executive officers were 60% performance-based and 40%
service-based. The number of RSUs under the performance-based grants increased or decreased with
actual non- GAAP EPS (non-GAAP EPS is
122
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
defined under the plan as EPS modified for any adjustments which are reflected in the tabular
reconciliation of financial measures prepared in accordance with United States GAAP to non-GAAP
financial measures in the quarterly press releases of the results of operations of the Company),
greater or less than target EPS, with a minimum number of zero and a maximum number of 150% of the
target award. The Compensation Committee also has the ability to make discretionary awards
outside of the plan, although no discretionary awards were made to the named executive officers
during 2006 or as a result of 2006 performance. The RSUs vest in three equal annual installments
beginning February 1, 2007.
Due to the over-achievement of 2006 actual EPS, as compared to target EPS, the 2006 total
number of RSUs, which included both service-based and performance-based RSUs, granted to the named
executive officers, as compared to 2006 target awards, was as follows:
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer 44,800 (target 40,000); |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer 33,600 (target 30,000); |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC 33,600 (target 30,000); |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA 24,600 (target 22,000); and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer 16,800 (target 15,000). |
2007 Equity-Based Incentive Plan
Target RSUs granted to executive officers on February 14, 2007 were 100% performance-based.
The number of RSUs under the performance-based grants increases or decreases with actual EPS (for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, on a consolidated non-GAAP diluted basis with non-GAAP
EPS being defined under the plan as the actual 2007 EPS from continuing operations excluding any
expenses in 2007 related to the stock option review in excess of budgeted amounts) greater or less
than target EPS, with a minimum number of zero and a maximum number of 130% of the target award.
Annual financial performance targets are set in conjunction with the annual budget process and are
considered to be a challenge, but potentially achievable given the tactical and strategic plans
that have been developed. The Compensation Committee may also make discretionary awards outside
of the Plan if performance goals are exceeded. Any performance-based RSUs that are awarded will
vest in three equal installments beginning February 14, 2008.
In determining the amount of target equity-based incentive compensation for 2007, the
Compensation Committee considered the results of the Towers Perrin study and the additional scope
and responsibilities assumed by these individuals during 2006, primarily as a result of the
acquisition of Software Spectrum, Inc. The 2007 performance-based RSUs, granted on February 14,
2007, included the following target awards for named executive officers, as compared to 2006
target awards:
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy, President and Chief Executive Officer 50,000 (2006 target 40,000); |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer 37,500 (2006 target 30,000); |
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath, President, Insight North America/APAC 37,500 (2006 target 30,000); |
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton, President, Insight EMEA 27,500 (2006 target 22,000); and |
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon, Chief People Officer 18,750 (2006 target 15,000). |
Severance and Change in Control Plans
Severance and change in control plans are designed to facilitate the Companys ability to
attract and retain executives as the Company competes for talented employees in a marketplace
where such protections are commonly offered. Severance benefits provide benefits to ease an
executives transition due to an unexpected employment termination by the Company due to changes
in the Companys employment needs. Change in control benefits encourages executives to remain
focused on the Companys business in the event of rumored or actual fundamental corporate changes.
See further detail under the section entitled Employment Agreements, Severance and Change in
Control Plans.
Perquisites
We provide our executive officers with relatively limited perquisites that we believe are
reasonable and in the best interests of Insight and its stockholders. In 2006, Mr. Fenton was
provided with an automobile allowance, which is a benefit generally available to the management
team in the United Kingdom, where Mr. Fenton resides. These benefits are part of our broad-based
total compensation programs offered in the geography in which each of the executives resides. The
value of aggregate perquisites to named executive officers did not exceed $10,000 for any
individual named officer, except Mr. Fenton.
123
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
On February 15, 2007, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee,
adopted stock ownership guidelines that:
|
|
|
are designed to align the interests of key executives, Board members and stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
provide a five-year transition period to reach ownership guidelines; and |
|
|
|
|
define which ownership interests will count towards the guidelines. |
The guidelines specify that, as of each January 1, each executive and each Board member is
expected to hold Insight shares at least equal to a multiple of his or her annual base salary or
annual amount of the quarterly board retainer. For the President and Chief Executive Officer, two
times annual base salary is required, for all other Executives, one times annual base salary is
required, and for Board members, two times annual base retainer is required. Failure to meet or
to show sustained progress toward meeting the Stock Ownership Guidelines may result in a reduction
in future long term incentive grants and also may result in a requirement to retain either a
percentage of or all stock attained through Company grants of equity until the Stock Ownership
Guidelines are attained.
Role of Executives in the Compensation Setting Process.
The Compensation Committee has the overall responsibility for approving the cash based
incentive compensation for the officers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act. To facilitate this process, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief People
Officer prepare and present information and recommendations to the Committee for review,
consideration and approval.
With respect to compensation of all other teammates, the Committee functions in an oversight
role as these decisions are considered the responsibility of management. With respect to
equity-based compensation, the Committee approves the pool of available shares from which all
grants of equity-based awards are made. Similar to cash based incentive compensation, for all
officers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief People Officer prepare and present information and recommendations to
the Committee for review, consideration and approval of the equity-based awards by the
Compensation Committee. For all other teammates, management is responsible for recommending to
the Committee the persons to receive grants and the nature and size of the proposed equity-based
awards.
The Chief Executive Officer does not have the ability to call Compensation Committee meetings
and does not attend Compensation Committee meetings when his compensation is discussed. During
2006, the Chief Executive Officer did not meet with Towers Perrin outside Compensation Committee
meetings or retain any other compensation consultant.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
The Compensation Committee determines compensation for the Chief Executive Officer using the
same criteria it uses for other executives, placing relatively less emphasis on base salary and,
instead, creating greater performance-based opportunities for short-term and long-term incentive
compensation (cash and equity, respectively). The Nominating and Governance Committee meets each
year in executive session to evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, and the
Compensation Committee sets the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer following that
performance review.
2006 and Prior
Mr. Fennessy joined the Company in November 2004, and, at that time, the Compensation
Committee set a base salary for Mr. Fennessy at $695,000, the salary of Mr. Fennessys
predecessor. No change in base salary was made during 2005 or 2006. Additionally, at the time
Mr. Fennessy joined the Company, the Compensation Committee decided that it was important to
provide Mr. Fennessy with equity compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock in
order to motivate and reward him for long-term strategic management of the Company and increases
in stockholder value, and the Committee committed to making those awards in his employment
agreement. Accordingly, and pursuant to his employment agreement, upon his hire date, he received
a grant of options to acquire 500,000 shares of our common stock. In January 2005, he received a
grant of options to acquire 250,000 shares of our common stock and a grant of 75,000 shares of
restricted stock. As discussed above, Mr. Fennessy also received:
124
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
along with other executive officers, a grant of stock options to acquire 100,000
shares of our common stock in May 2005; |
|
|
|
|
grants of RSUs (16,000 target service-based RSUs and 24,000 target
performance-based RSUs based on achievement of non-GAAP EPS targets defined under
the plan as EPS modified for any adjustments which are reflected in the tabular
reconciliation of financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP to non-GAAP
financial measures in the quarterly press releases of the results of operations of
the Company) in January 2006; and |
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to receive cash incentive compensation based on non-GAAP
quarterly operating margin percentages (non-GAAP quarterly operating margin is
defined under the plan as the quarterly operating margin modified for any
adjustments which are reflected in the tabular reconciliation of financial measures
prepared in accordance with GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures in the quarterly
press releases of the results of operations of the Company), and annual net sales
growth under the 2006 Cash Incentive Plan. |
As noted above, for 2006, Mr. Fennessy earned the following cash compensation and equity
awards under the 2006 compensation programs:
|
|
|
base salary $695,000; |
|
|
|
|
cash incentive compensation $1,547,553 (includes a discretionary bonus of $150,000); and |
|
|
|
|
number of service-based and performance-based RSUs 44,800. |
2007
For 2007, the Compensation Committee approved the following target cash compensation and
target equity awards for Mr. Fennessy:
|
|
|
base salary $700,000; |
|
|
|
|
target cash incentive compensation $1,400,000; and |
|
|
|
|
target number of performance-based RSUs 50,000. |
Mr. Fennessys 2007 salary was increased from $695,000 to $700,000, the first increase in
base salary since Mr. Fennessy joined the Company in November of 2004.
As discussed above, and consistent in design with the other named executive officers, the
total 2007 target cash incentive compensation of $1,400,000 for Mr. Fennessy will be based
$840,000 (i.e., 60%) on earnings from operations, to be determined and paid quarterly against a
sliding scale with a minimum payout of zero and a maximum payout of 145% of the earnings from
operations target award. The remaining $560,000 (i.e., 40%) of the target cash incentive
compensation will be based on achievement against annual performance goals, with the Nominating
and Governance Committee measuring the performance of Mr. Fennessy and the Compensation Committee
determining pay based on the results of that review. Mr. Fennessys annual performance goals are
determined at the beginning of the year and include financial, strategic and tactical goals that
both Mr. Fennessy and the Board agree are important to drive the Companys success. As discussed
above, annual financial performance targets are set in conjunction with the annual budget process
and are considered to be challenging, but potentially achievable given the tactical and strategic
plans that have been developed. The Compensation Committee may also make discretionary awards
outside of the plan if performance goals are exceeded.
The number of RSUs under the performance-based grants increases or decreases from the target
amount of 50,000 with actual EPS (for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, on a consolidated
non-GAAP diluted basis defined under the plan as the actual 2007 EPS from continuing operations
excluding any expenses in 2007 related to the stock option review in excess of budgeted amounts)
greater or less than target EPS, with a minimum number of zero and a maximum number of 130% of the
target award. The Compensation Committee may also make discretionary awards outside of the plan if
performance goals are exceeded. The RSUs will vest in three equal annual installments beginning
February 14, 2008.
125
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)) generally prohibits a public
company from taking an income tax deduction for compensation over one million dollars paid to the
Chief Executive Officer and its four other highest paid executive officers unless certain
conditions are met. While the anticipated tax treatment of base and incentive compensation is
given some weight in making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a
policy of limiting awards of compensation to amounts that would be deductible under Section 162(m)
because the Compensation Committee believes that awards of compensation which would not comply
with the Section 162(m) requirements may at times further the long-term interests of the Company
and its stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to maximize the
corporate tax deductibility of executive compensation. Therefore, to ensure deductibility of
payments made in the future, the Company will be seeking stockholder approval of its 2007 Long
Term Incentive Plan at our next Annual Meeting.
Compensation Committee Report
Based on the Compensation Committees review of the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis
and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommends that the Board include the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry A. Gunning, Chairman
|
|
Bennett Dorrance |
Robertson C. Jones
|
|
Michael M. Fisher |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2006 or at any other time an
officer or employee of Insight, and no member had any relationship with Insight requiring
disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No executive officer of Insight has served on the
Board or Compensation Committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive
officers who served as a member of the Board or the Compensation Committee of Insight during the
2006 fiscal year.
126
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Summary Compensation Table
The table below sets forth the total compensation for services rendered to us by our
principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three other most highly
compensated executive officers. We refer to these persons as named executive officers. The
amounts shown include both amounts paid and amounts deferred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
All Other |
|
|
Name and Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
Option Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
|
Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary ($) |
|
Bonus ($)(1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
($)(5) |
|
Total ($) |
Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
695,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
807,555 |
|
|
|
2,313,872 |
|
|
|
1,397,553 |
|
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
5,368,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
223,916 |
|
|
|
445,404 |
|
|
|
900,646 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
2,003,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President
Insight North America/APAC |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
322,426 |
|
|
|
723,222 |
|
|
|
528,418 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
1,950,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President
Insight EMEA |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
370,430 |
|
|
|
78,341 |
|
|
|
163,938 |
|
|
|
360,340 |
|
|
|
179,880 |
|
|
|
55,361 |
|
|
|
1,208,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief People Officer |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
111,958 |
|
|
|
340,953 |
|
|
|
163,546 |
|
|
|
3,476 |
|
|
|
869,933 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On February 15, 2007, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary cash bonuses for 2006
for the named executive officers. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts reflect the dollar amount of compensation expense recognized for financial
statement purposes for the year ended December 31, 2006, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R of
awards pursuant to the 1998 LTIP and thus may include amounts from awards granted in and prior
to 2006. No estimate of forfeitures is included in these amounts nor were any actual
forfeitures included in these amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts reflect the dollar amount of compensation expense recognized for financial
statement purposes for the year ended December 31, 2006, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R of
awards pursuant to the 1998 LTIP and 1999 Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan (the 1999
Broad Based Plan) and thus may include amounts from awards granted prior to 2006.
Assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts are included in the footnotes to the our
audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005 which are included in Note 3 to Part II, Item 8 of this report. No estimate of
forfeitures is included in these amounts nor were any actual forfeitures included in these
amounts. |
|
(4) |
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation includes bonuses paid to executives under the 2006
cash incentive plan as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section. |
|
(5) |
|
All Other Compensation represents payments to: |
|
|
|
Mr. Fennessy for matching contributions to his 401(k) and tax gross-up related to annual
sales incentive trip of $3,300 and $1,512, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Laybourne for matching contributions to his 401(k) and tax gross-up related to
annual sales incentive trip of $3,300 and $154, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. McGrath for tax gross-up related to annual sales incentive trip of $1,512. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fenton for auto allowances, retirement plan contribution and insurance premiums of
$27,472, $26,928 and $961. The cost of the auto allowance for Mr. Fenton is considered a
perquisite and exceeds $10,000. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Glandon for matching contributions to his 401(k) and tax gross-up related to annual
sales incentive trip of $3,300 and $176, respectively |
127
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Fenton is native of the United Kingdom. He is paid in British Pounds Sterling. The
amounts above were determined by multiplying the average exchange rates applicable at March
31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006 by the compensation earned
during the quarter. |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards made during
the year ended December 31, 2006 to the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non |
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) |
|
Incentive Plan Awards (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Stock |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: Number |
|
Fair Value of |
Name and Principal |
|
Grant |
|
Approval |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
of Shares of Stock |
|
Stock Awards |
Position |
|
Date |
|
Date(3) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
or Units (#) (4) |
|
(S/Sh) |
Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/24/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,203,750 |
|
|
|
1,805,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/24/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775,750 |
|
|
|
1,163,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath |
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/24/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,985 |
|
|
|
698,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton |
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/24/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,446 |
(5) |
|
|
274,903 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon |
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/19/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
21.36 |
|
|
|
|
1/24/2006 |
|
|
|
12/14/2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,450 |
|
|
|
199,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Under the 2006 cash incentive compensation plan, Messrs. Fennessy, Laybourne, Fenton,
McGrath and Glandon, earned cash incentive compensation based on achievement of financial
objectives against targeted amounts for the Company or their respective business units, with
payout varying with financial performance levels below and above target levels (awards were
discretionary over or below specified levels). The target cash incentive amount was based on
achievement of non-GAAP quarterly operating margin percentage, paid quarterly, on achievement
of annual revenue growth, paid annually, and on the achievement of individual goals, paid
annually. For Mr. Glandon only, a portion was also paid quarterly based on performance
against quarterly performance goals. Additionally, for Mr. Fennessy only, the Nominating and
Governance Committee of the Board annually evaluates Mr. Fennessys performance for the
preceding year and, based on that review, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion,
retains the right with respect to adjust his actual cash incentive compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
Pursuant to the 2006 performance-based equity-based incentive compensation program, grants of
performance-based RSUs to Messrs. Fennessy, Laybourne, Fenton, McGrath and Glandon were also
made in January 2006, and the number of actual RSUs ultimately awarded was determined by
actual achievement of consolidated non-GAAP diluted EPS of the Company for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2006 against target consolidated non-GAAP diluted EPS. On the vest date,
the RSUs converted to service-based RSUs and one-third of the RSUs vested, with the remainder
vesting ratably over the following two years. All grants of RSUs were made under the 1998
LTIP. |
|
(3) |
|
On December 14, 2005, the Compensation Committee approved the number of RSUs to be granted to
each executive officer subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act on a date in January 2006 concurrent with the date upon which all other eligible employees
were granted RSUs. |
128
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Under a service-based equity-based incentive compensation program, Messrs. Fennessy,
Laybourne, Fenton, McGrath and Glandon received, in January 2006, varying levels of grants of
service-based RSUs which vest ratably over three years. All grants of RSUs were made under the
1998 LTIP. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Fentons cash incentive threshold, target and maximum amounts for the 2006 cash incentive
plan were translated into U.S. dollars using the average British Pound Sterling exchange rate
in effect on the grant date of January 24, 2006 ($1.78). |
Employment Agreements, Severance and Change in Control Plans
The employment agreements with executives and the incentive compensation plans reflect our
compensation philosophy. The employment agreements for Messrs. Fennessy, Laybourne, McGrath,
Fenton and Glandon provide for continually renewing terms and establish base salaries and a
mechanism for setting annual incentive bonuses. Under our 1998 LTIP, all outstanding options and
other awards become fully exercisable and all restrictions on outstanding awards shall lapse upon
a change in control. All other change in control benefits are double trigger (accelerated
vesting is triggered by two events: a change in control plus a triggering termination under the
change of control agreement), rather than single trigger (automated accelerated vesting upon a
change in control).
The material terms of the employment agreements are as follows:
Richard A. Fennessy.
|
(i) |
|
effective date as of November 15, 2004; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a two-year initial term that automatically renews for a new two-year term each
successive day after the start of the initial term; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
an annual salary of $695,000, increased to $700,000 effective January 1, 2007; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
a cash bonus of $350,000 that was paid within two weeks of the start date; |
|
|
(v) |
|
incentive compensation for years subsequent to 2005 determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
a 500,000 share grant of non-qualified stock options of the Company granted at the
start date at a price equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the start
date. The stock options vest ratably over three years and expire five years from the date
of grant. The shares will become fully vested upon termination of employment for any
reason, including cause, in the initial two year term and for the year following and will
fully vest; |
|
|
(vii) |
|
a 250,000 share grant of non-qualified stock options of the Company granted on January
3, 2005 at a price equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on January 3,
2005. The stock options vest ratably over three years and expire five years from the date
of grant, but the shares will become fully vested upon termination of employment for any
reason, including cause; |
|
|
(viii) |
|
a 75,000 share grant of restricted stock of the Company granted on January 3, 2005.
Restrictions lift ratably over three years following the date of grant but the shares will
become fully vested upon termination of employment for any reason, including cause, or upon
a change in control; |
|
|
(ix) |
|
reasonable relocation and travel fees were reimbursed, and grossed-up for income taxes,
during the period of relocation, starting at the start date and continuing for up to nine
months following start date; legal fees incurred by Mr. Fennessy of up to $25,000 for
preparation and negotiation of the employment contract were reimbursed; |
|
|
(x) |
|
a severance payment upon termination without cause or termination by executive for
good reason as those terms are defined in the agreement, payable on the date of
termination, equal to two times Mr. Fennessys annual base salary, less any amounts paid
during the notice period, and two times the higher annual bonus that
would have been awarded, based on the calculation then in effect, during the one of the
two immediately preceding fiscal years that would produce the higher award.
Additionally, Mr. Fennessy will become fully vested in the initial 500,000 share option
grant granted on his start date; |
129
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
(xi) |
|
a severance payment following a change in control of the Company if Mr. Fennessy
terminates his employment with cause or the Company terminates his employment without
cause, as those terms are defined in the agreement, prior to the expiration of 24 months
after the change in control occurs, payable within ten days of his last day of work, equal
to two times his highest annual base salary in effect during the term of the agreement and
two times the higher annual bonus that would have been awarded, based on the calculation
then in effect, during the one of the two immediately preceding fiscal years which would
produce the higher award. Mr. Fennessy will become vested in any and all stock bonus and
stock option plans and agreements of the Company in which Mr. Fennessy has an interest,
vested or contingent. Additionally, Mr. Fennessy will be eligible for benefits (life,
disability, accident, group health and dental) through the earlier of 42 months following
termination or eligibility for new benefits. All payments made following a change in
control are to be grossed-up for Mr. Fennessys excise taxes if the payment exceeds
prescribed limits; |
|
|
(xii) |
|
in the event of Mr. Fennessys death, his estate will be entitled to his annual base
salary due through the date of his death and a prorated portion of any incentive
compensation to which he would have been entitled had he not died for the year in which the
agreement terminated due to death. In addition, his estate will receive a lump sum of the
total amount of two times his annual base salary, less an amount equal to ninety days base
salary; |
|
|
(xiii) |
|
in the event of Mr. Fennessys disability, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum of
the total amount of two times his annual base salary, less an amount equal to ninety days
base salary; and |
|
|
(xiv) |
|
the agreement also provides for non-disclosure by Mr. Fennessy of our confidential
information and includes covenants by Mr. Fennessy not to compete with the Company for a
period of two years following termination of employment and not to solicit the employees,
suppliers and customers for one year following termination of employment. |
The table below outlines the potential payments to Mr. Fennessy upon the occurrence of
certain termination triggering events assuming a hypothetical effective date of termination of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Triggering Event |
|
Severance |
|
Awards(1) |
|
Benefits |
|
Total |
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
or Voluntary Termination for Good
Reason |
|
$ |
4,320,106 |
|
|
$ |
1,346,524 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,666,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Termination Change in
Control |
|
|
4,495,106 |
|
|
|
2,200,494 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
6,748,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
2,097,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,097,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death |
|
|
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This value represents the unamortized expense related to outstanding options and the
unamortized expense related to outstanding RSUs and restricted stock awards at December 31,
2006. |
Stanley Laybourne.
|
(i) |
|
effective date as of November 1, 2003; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a two-year initial term that automatically renews for a new two-year term each
successive day after the start of the initial term; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
an annual salary of $350,000, increased to $375,000 effective January 1, 2007; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
incentive compensation for years subsequent to 2005 determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board; |
130
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
(v) |
|
a severance payment upon termination without cause or termination by executive for
good reason, as those terms are defined in the agreement, payable on the date of
termination, equal to two times Mr. Laybournes annual base salary, less any amounts paid
during the notice period, and two times the higher annual bonus that would have been
awarded, based on the calculation then in effect, during the one of the two immediately
preceding fiscal years that would produce the higher award; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
a severance payment following a change in control of the Company if Mr. Laybourne
terminates his employment with cause or the Company terminates his employment without
cause, as those terms are defined in the agreement, prior to the expiration of 24 months
after the change in control occurs, payable within ten days of his last day of work, equal
to two times his highest annual base salary in effect during the term of the agreement and
two times the higher annual bonus that would have been awarded, based on the calculation
then in effect, during the one of the two immediately preceding fiscal years which would
produce the higher award. Mr. Laybourne will become vested in any and all stock bonus and
stock option plans and agreements of the Company in which Mr. Laybourne has an interest,
vested or contingent. Additionally, Mr. Laybourne will be eligible for benefits (life,
disability, accident, group health and dental) through the earlier of 42 months following
termination or eligibility for new benefits. All payments made following a change in
control are to be grossed-up for Mr. Laybournes excise taxes if the payment exceeds
prescribed limits; |
|
|
(vii) |
|
in the event of Mr. Laybournes death, his estate will be entitled to his annual base
salary due through the date of his death and a prorated portion of any incentive
compensation to which he would have been entitled had he not died for the year in which the
agreement terminated due to death. In addition, his estate will receive a lump sum of the
total amount of two times his annual base salary, less ninety days; |
|
|
(viii) |
|
in the event of Mr. Laybournes disability, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum of
the total amount of two times his annual base salary, less an amount equal to ninety days
base salary; and |
|
|
(ix) |
|
the agreement also provides for non-disclosure by Mr. Laybourne of our confidential
information and includes covenants by Mr. Laybourne not to compete with the Company for a
period of two years following termination of employment and not to solicit the employees,
suppliers and customers for one year following termination of employment. |
The table below outlines the potential payments to Mr. Laybourne upon the occurrence of
certain termination triggering events assuming a hypothetical effective date of termination of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Triggering Event |
|
Severance |
|
Awards(1) |
|
Benefits |
|
Total |
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
or Voluntary Termination for Good
Reason |
|
$ |
2,617,542 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,617,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Termination Change in
Control |
|
|
2,711,292 |
|
|
|
721,095 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
3,484,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death |
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This value represents the unamortized expense related to outstanding options and the
unamortized expense related to outstanding RSUs at December 31, 2006. |
On May 2, 2007, Insight announced that Mr. Laybourne is retiring from the Company and its
Board of Directors. The effective date of his retirement is expected to be August 29, 2007. In
connection with his retirement, the Company has agreed to provide Mr. Laybourne payments and
benefits consistent with those required for termination without cause under his existing
employment agreement. In addition, the Company has agreed to extend the exercise period for Mr.
Laybournes vested, unexercised options to 90 days following his retirement date. The calculation
of Mr. Laybournes
131
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
severance, according to the terms described under his agreement, is $2,842,000
of non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
Mark T. McGrath.
|
(i) |
|
effective as of May 23, 2005; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a two-year initial term that automatically renews for a new two-year term each
successive day after the start of the initial term; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
an annual salary of $325,000, increased to $375,000 effective January 1, 2007; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
incentive compensation for years subsequent to 2005 determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board; |
|
|
(v) |
|
a grant of 200,000 options to purchase shares of the common stock of Insight on the
date Mr. McGrath commenced employment with the exercise price set as the closing price for
the common stock of Insight on the date of grant. The options vest ratably over three
years and expire five years from the date of grant; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
a 15,000 share grant of restricted stock shares of the Company granted at the start
date. Restrictions lift ratably over three years following the date of grant; |
|
|
(vii) |
|
reasonable relocation and travel fees reimbursed and grossed-up for income taxes,
during the period of relocation, starting at the start date and continuing for up to twelve
months following start date; |
|
|
(viii) |
|
if Mr. McGraths employment is terminated without cause or if he resigns with good
reason, as those terms are defined in the agreement, he will be entitled to a lump sum
payment equal to two times his annual base salary (less any pay during the ninety day
notice period), a prorated portion of any incentive compensation earned (and not previously
paid) for the year in which termination (or resignation) takes place and one times the
higher annual bonus from the two immediately preceding fiscal years; |
|
|
(ix) |
|
following a change in control, the agreement provides that if Mr. McGraths
employment is terminated without cause or if Mr. McGrath terminates his employment for
good reason, as these terms are defined in
the agreement, prior to the expiration of 24 months following the change in control, Mr.
McGrath will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to two times his highest
annual base salary in effect during the term of the agreement and two times the higher
annual bonus from the two immediately preceding fiscal years. Additionally, Mr. McGrath
will become vested in any and all stock bonus and stock option plans and will be eligible
for benefits (life, disability, accident, group health and dental) through the earlier of
42 months following termination or eligibility for new benefits. All payments made
following a change in control are to be grossed-up for Mr. McGraths excise taxes if the
payment exceeds prescribed limits; |
|
|
(x) |
|
in the event of Mr. McGraths death, his estate will be entitled to his annual base
salary due through the date of his death and a prorated portion of any incentive
compensation to which he would have been entitled had he not died for the year in which the
agreement terminated due to death. In addition, his estate will receive a lump sum of the
total amount of two times his annual base salary, less an amount equal to ninety days base
salary; |
|
|
(xi) |
|
in the event of Mr. McGraths disability, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum of
the total amount of two times his annual base salary, less an amount equal to ninety days
base salary; and |
|
|
(xii) |
|
the agreement also provides for non-disclosure by Mr. McGrath of our confidential
information and includes covenants by Mr. McGrath not to compete with the Company for a
period of as long as two years following termination of employment and not to solicit the
employees, suppliers and customers for one year following termination of employment. |
132
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
The table below outlines the potential payments to Mr. McGrath upon the occurrence of certain
termination triggering events assuming a hypothetical effective date of termination of December
31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Triggering Event |
|
Severance |
|
Awards(1) |
|
Benefits |
|
Total |
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
or Voluntary Termination for Good
Reason |
|
$ |
1,234,668 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,234,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Termination Change in
Control |
|
|
1,906,836 |
|
|
|
1,072,309 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
3,031,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death |
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656,250 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This value represents the unamortized expense related to outstanding options and the
unamortized expense related to outstanding RSUs and restricted stock awards at December 31,
2006. |
Stuart A. Fenton.
|
(i) |
|
effective date as of September 12, 2002, amended effective as of July 1, 2004; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a term of employment that continues until terminated in accordance with the terms of
the agreement; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
an annual salary of $370,400, increased to $419,000 effective January 1, 2007 (the
amount is set in British Pounds Sterling and does not fluctuate with currency changes); |
|
|
(iv) |
|
eligibility for an incentive bonus, subject to achievement of performance criteria
established by the Compensation Committee of the Board; |
|
|
(v) |
|
a grant of 50,000 options to purchase shares of the common stock of Insight shortly
after the date Mr. Fenton commenced employment with the exercise price set as the closing
price for the common stock of Insight on the
date of grant. Half of the options vest three years from the date of grant and the other
half vests five years from the date of grant; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
upon termination of employment for reasons other than those specifically defined in the
agreement, we would be required to make a lump-sum payment in an amount equal to 165,000
GBP, less the amount paid in salary during the required statutory notice period; and |
|
|
|
(vii) |
|
the agreement also provides for non-disclosure by Mr. Fenton of our confidential
information and includes covenants by Mr. Fenton not to compete with the Company for a
period of twelve months following termination of employment and not to solicit the
employees, suppliers and customers for a period of up to eighteen months following
termination of employment. |
|
133
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
The table below outlines the potential payments to Mr. Fenton upon the occurrence of
certain termination triggering events assuming a hypothetical effective date of termination of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Triggering Event |
|
Severance |
|
Awards(1) |
|
Total |
Termination |
|
$ |
419,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
419,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Termination Change in
Control |
|
|
419,000 |
|
|
|
557,266 |
|
|
|
976,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This value represents the unamortized expense related to
outstanding options and the unamortized
expense related to RSUs at December 31, 2006. |
|
Gary M. Glandon.
|
(i) |
|
effective as of January 12, 2007; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a one-year initial term that automatically renews for a new one-year term each
successive day after the start of the initial term; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
an annual base salary that may be adjusted from time to time in accordance with the
procedures established by the Compensation Committee for salary adjustments to executives
($255,000 in 2007); |
|
|
(iv) |
|
eligibility for an annual incentive bonus, subject to achievement of performance
criteria established by the Compensation Committee of the Board; |
|
|
(v) |
|
if Mr. Glandons employment is terminated without cause, or if he resigns with good
reason, he will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to his annual base salary for the
remainder of the initial contract term or current renewal term of the contract and
incentive compensation equal to (1) with respect to any incentive compensation plan with
quarterly objectives, the sum of (i) a prorated bonus for the quarter in which the
termination takes place and (ii) four times executives bonus for the last completed
quarter, plus (2) with respect to any incentive compensation plan with annual objectives, a
prorated bonus for the year in which the termination takes place; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
following a change in control, the agreement provides that if Mr. Glandons
employment is terminated without cause or if Mr. Glandon terminates his employment for
good reason, as these terms are defined in the agreement, prior to the expiration of 12
months following the change in control, Mr. Glandon will be entitled to receive a lump sum
payment equal to his annual base salary for the remainder of the initial contract term or
current renewal term of the contract and incentive compensation equal to (1) with respect
to any incentive compensation plan with quarterly objectives, the sum of (i) a prorated
bonus for the quarter in which the termination takes place and (ii) four times executives
bonus for the last completed quarter, plus (2) with respect to any incentive compensation
plan with annual objectives, a prorated bonus for the year in which the termination takes
place; |
|
|
(vii) |
|
in the event of Mr. Glandons death, his estate will be entitled to his annual base
salary for ninety days following the date of death in addition to incentive compensation
equal to (1) with respect to any incentive compensation plan with quarterly objectives, the
sum of (i) a prorated bonus for the quarter in which the termination takes place and (ii)
the amount of incentive compensation for the last completed quarter prior to his death,
plus (2) with respect to any incentive compensation plan with annual objectives, a prorated
bonus for the year in which his death takes place; |
|
|
(viii) |
|
in the event of Mr. Glandons disability, he will be entitled to his annual base salary
for ninety days following the date of the disability in addition to incentive compensation
equal to (1) with respect to any incentive compensation plan with quarterly objectives, the
sum of (i) a prorated bonus for the quarter in which the disability takes place and (ii)
the amount of incentive compensation for the last completed quarter prior to his |
134
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
|
disability, plus (2) with respect to any incentive compensation plan with annual
objectives, a prorated bonus for the year in which his disability takes place; and |
|
|
|
(ix) |
|
the agreement also provides for non-disclosure by Mr. Glandon of our confidential
information and includes covenants by Mr. Glandon not to compete with Insight for a period
of one year following termination of employment and not to solicit the employees, suppliers
and customers for one year following termination of employment. |
The table below outlines the potential payments to Mr. Glandon upon the occurrence of certain
termination triggering events assuming a hypothetical effective date of termination of December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Triggering Event |
|
Severance |
|
Awards(1) |
|
Total |
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or
Voluntary Termination for Good Reason |
|
$ |
612,092 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
612,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Termination Change in Control |
|
|
618,348 |
|
|
|
437,526 |
|
|
|
1,055,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
385,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death |
|
|
385,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,376 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This value represents the unamortized expense related to outstanding options and the
unamortized expense related to outstanding RSUs at December 31, 2006. |
135
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards at December 31,
2006 for the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
Awards: |
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
Number of |
|
Value of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, |
|
Unearned |
|
Unearned |
|
|
of |
|
Number of |
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units or |
|
Shares, |
|
Shares, |
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Other |
|
Units or |
|
Units or |
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
Rights of |
|
Other |
|
Other |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of Stock |
|
Stock That |
|
Rights That |
|
Rights That |
|
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
That Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Vested |
|
Vested |
|
Vested |
|
Vested |
Name |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
Options (#) |
|
($) |
|
Date |
|
(#)(1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
(#)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
333,334 |
|
|
|
166,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.90 |
|
|
|
11/15/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,334 |
|
|
|
166,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.36 |
|
|
|
1/3/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,334 |
|
|
|
66,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.53 |
|
|
|
5/6/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
943,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
301,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,800 |
|
|
|
543,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.22 |
|
|
|
9/30/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.92 |
|
|
|
7/1/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,750 |
|
|
|
23,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.25 |
|
|
|
2/4/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.42 |
|
|
|
9/28/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.42 |
|
|
|
9/28/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.42 |
|
|
|
9/28/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.67 |
|
|
|
2/3/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,667 |
|
|
|
53,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.53 |
|
|
|
5/6/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.19 |
|
|
|
1/2/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
226,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,600 |
|
|
|
407,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath |
|
|
66,667 |
|
|
|
133,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.72 |
|
|
|
5/23/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
188,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
226,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,600 |
|
|
|
407,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart Fenton |
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.04 |
|
|
|
3/4/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,875 |
|
|
|
11,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.25 |
|
|
|
2/4/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.18 |
|
|
|
8/26/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.53 |
|
|
|
5/6/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
|
|
10/14/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
169,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
|
294,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary M. Glandon |
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
33,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.35 |
|
|
|
2/21/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.53 |
|
|
|
5/6/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
113,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
203,796 |
|
136
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Under various service-based equity-based incentive compensation programs, Messrs. Fennessy,
Laybourne, McGrath, Fenton, and Glandon have received varying levels of grants of
service-based RSUs and restricted stock awards that will vest ratably over three years. All
grants of RSUs were made under the 1998 Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the value based upon the number of shares awarded multiplied by the closing price
on December 31, 2006 (calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $18.87, the closing
price reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market). |
|
(3) |
|
Pursuant to the 2006 performance-based equity-based incentive compensation program, grants of
performance-based RSUs to Messrs. Fennessy, Laybourne, Fenton, McGrath and Glandon were also
made in January 2006, and the number of actual RSUs ultimately awarded was determined by
actual achievement of consolidated non-GAAP diluted EPS of the Company for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2006 against target consolidated non-GAAP diluted EPS. On the vest date,
the RSUs converted to service-based RSUs and one-third of the RSUs vested, with the remainder
vesting ratably over the following two years. All grants of RSUs were made under the 1998
Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the value based upon the number of shares awarded multiplied by the closing price
on December 31, 2006 (calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $18.87, the closing
price reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market). |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of Insight Enterprises, Inc.
common stock acquired through exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted shares and the
number of shares acquired and value realized on exercise or vesting by the named executive
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Value Realized |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Value Realized |
|
Name |
|
on Exercise (#) |
|
|
on Exercise ($) |
|
|
on Vesting (#) |
|
|
on Vesting ($) |
|
Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
494,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
340,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
338,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
(1) |
|
|
404,910 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark T. McGrath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
91,500 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance
to TeleTech and paid $2,696,000 to the holders of 1,997,500 exercised Direct Alliance stock
options. See further discussion of this transaction in the footnotes to the our audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, which are
included in Note 19 in Part II, Item 8 of this report. |
137
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Director Compensation
Employee directors do not receive any separate compensation for their Board activities. Each
non-employee director receives $15,000 per quarter for serving on the Board, an additional $2,500
per quarter for each Board Committee on which he or she serves and reimbursement for reasonable
expenses incurred in connection with service as a director. An additional $1,250 per quarter is
paid to the director serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee. In 2006, outside directors
received 2,000 RSUs upon joining the Board and 1,000 RSUs annually. Beginning in 2007, the annual
award to outside directors increased to 2,500 RSUs based on peer group comparisons reported by
Towers Perrin and will vest over three years, subject to continued Board service. For 2006, Mr.
Timothy A. Crown, Chairman of the Board, was paid a $250,000 retainer in lieu of standard
compensation for directors and based primarily on his consultative relationship with our Chief
Executive Officer, Richard A. Fennessy, and his time commitments to the Company as Chairman of the
Board. For 2007, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board for approval and the Board
has approved a $50,000 retainer for Mr. Timothy A. Crown for service as Chairman of the Board,
which is in addition to the standard fees for service as a non-employee director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
|
($)(2) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
Eric J. Crown(3) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,689 |
|
|
Timothy A. Crown |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
304,126 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
559,544 |
|
|
Bennett Dorrance |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,973 |
|
|
Michael M. Fisher |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
102,500 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,689 |
|
|
Larry A. Gunning |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,189 |
|
|
Robertson C. Jones |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,189 |
|
|
Kathleen S. Pushor |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
17,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,119 |
|
|
David J. Robino(5) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement purposes for the
year ended December 31, 2006, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R of awards pursuant to the 1998
Plan and thus may include amounts from awards granted prior to 2006. Assumptions used in the
calculations of these amounts are included in Note 3 to Part II, Item 8 of this report. An
estimate of forfeitures is not included in these amounts nor were any actual forfeitures
included in these amounts. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement purposes for the
year ended December 31, 2006, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R of awards pursuant to the 1998
Plan and 1999 Broad Based Plan and thus may include amounts from awards granted in and prior
to 2006. Assumptions used in the calculations of these amounts are included in Note 3 to Part
II, Item 8 of this report. An estimate of forfeitures is not included in these amounts nor
were any actual forfeitures included in these amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
On May 10, 2007, Mr. Crown informed us that he has decided not to stand for re-election to
the Board and will retire from Board service upon the completion of his current term at the
2007 annual meeting of stockholders. |
|
(4) |
|
This compensation expense is related to a stock option award grant that Mr. Crown received on
March 17, 2004 for 186,000 options while he was still our Chief Executive Officer. The award
vests over four years. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Robino was appointed as a Class I director on May 1, 2007 and will stand for election at
the 2007 meeting of stockholders. |
The cost of certain perquisites and other personal benefits are not included because in the
aggregate they did not exceed, in the case of any named executive officer, $10,000.
138
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The information required by this item and included under the captions Securities Authorized
for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans can be found in Part II, Item 5 of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
common stock as of June 29, 2007 (except as otherwise indicated) by (i) each person or entity known
to us own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each of our
directors, (iii) each of the named executive officers and (iv) all directors and executive officers
as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially |
|
|
Owned (1) |
Name |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Percent |
FMR Corp |
|
|
6,347,182 |
(2) |
|
|
12.93 |
% |
|
Barclays Global Investors, N.A. and affiliated entities |
|
|
4,848,282 |
(3) |
|
|
9.87 |
% |
|
Prudential Financial, Inc. |
|
|
3,175,352 |
(4) |
|
|
6.47 |
% |
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. |
|
|
3,156,658 |
(5) |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
|
Jennison Associates LLC |
|
|
3,042,904 |
(6) |
|
|
6.20 |
% |
|
Eric J. Crown |
|
|
953,406 |
(7) |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
656,602 |
(8) |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
571,784 |
(9) |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
Timothy A. Crown |
|
|
519,070 |
(10) |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
Mark T. McGrath |
|
|
159,534 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Stuart A. Fenton |
|
|
108,074 |
(12) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Gary M. Glandon |
|
|
78,934 |
(13) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Robertson C. Jones |
|
|
14,094 |
(14) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Bennett Dorrance |
|
|
14,001 |
(15) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Michael M. Fisher |
|
|
13,819 |
(16) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Larry A. Gunning |
|
|
12,094 |
(17) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Kathleen S. Pushor |
|
|
2,001 |
(18) |
|
|
* |
|
|
David J. Robino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) |
|
|
3,348,494 |
(19) |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes
voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, a person
is deemed to own beneficially any shares that such person has the right to acquire within 60
days of the date of determination of beneficial ownership. Such shares, however, are not
deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, to
our knowledge the persons or entities named in the table above have sole voting and investment
power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. |
139
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Share data based on information in an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2007
with the SEC by FMR Corp. As of December 31, 2006, the Schedule 13G indicates that FMR Corp.
had sole voting power with respect to 1,235,567 shares, shared voting power with respect to no
shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,347,182 shares and shared dispositive power
with respect to no shares. The address of FMR Corp. is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02199. |
|
(3) |
|
Share data based on information in a Schedule 13G filed on January 23, 2007 with the SEC by
Barclays Global Investors, NA (Barclays Investors), Barclays Global Fund Advisors (Barclays
Fund Advisors), Barclays Global Investors, LTD (Barclays Investors Ltd.), Barclays Global
Investors Japan Trust and Banking Company Limited (Barclays Japan Trust) and Barclays Global
Investors Japan Limited (Barclays Japan Limited). As of December 31, 2006, the Schedule 13G
indicates that Barclays Investors has sole voting power as to 3,151,201 shares and sole
dispositive power as 3,310,442 shares, Barclays Fund Advisors has sole voting power of
1,507,060 shares and sole dispositive power as to 1,507,060 shares, Barclays Investors Ltd.
has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 30,780 shares, Barclays Japan Trust and
Barclays Japan Limited both have sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 0 shares.
The address for Barclays Investors and Barclays Fund Advisors is 45 Fremont Street, San
Francisco 94105, the address for Barclays Investors Ltd. is Murray House, 1 Royal Mint Court,
London, EC3N 4HH, the address for Barclays Japan Trust and Barclays Japan Limited is Ebisu
Prime Square Tower 8th Floor, 1-1-39 Hiroo Shibuy-Ku, Tokyo 150-0012 Japan. |
|
(4) |
|
Share data based on information in an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2007
with the SEC by Prudential Financial, Inc. As of December 31, 2006, the Schedule 13G
indicates that Prudential Financial Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 575,429 shares,
shared voting power with respect to 2,599,923 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to
575,429 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,599,923 shares. The address of
Prudential Financial, Inc. is 751 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102-3777. |
|
(5) |
|
Share data based on information in an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2007
with the SEC by Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. As of December 31, 2006, the Schedule 13G
indicates that Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 3,156,658
shares, shared voting power with respect to no shares, sole dispositive power with respect to
3,156,658 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to no shares. The address of
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. is 1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor, Santa Monica, CA
90401. |
|
(6) |
|
Share data based on information in a Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2007 with the SEC by
Jennison Associates LLC. As of December 31, 2006, the Schedule 13G indicates that Jennison
Associates LLC had sole voting power with respect to 3,042,904 shares, shared voting power
with respect to no shares, sole dispositive power with respect to no shares and shared
dispositive power with respect to 3,042,904 shares. The address of Jennison Associates LLC is
466 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 700,061 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Crown is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 566,668 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Fennessy is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 560,584 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Laybourne is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 139,500 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Crown is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 133,334 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. McGrath is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 99,874 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Fenton is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 73,334 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Glandon is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 11,760 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Jones is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(15) |
|
Includes 9,167 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Dorrance is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(16) |
|
Includes 11,760 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Fisher is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(17) |
|
Includes 11,760 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Mr. Gunning is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
140
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Includes 1,667 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. The
address for Ms. Pushor is 1305 W. Auto Drive, Tempe, AZ 85284. |
|
(19) |
|
Includes 2,534,616 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of June 29, 2007. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Transactions with Related Persons and Certain Control Persons
Our practice has been that any transaction with respect to a director or executive officer who
are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act must be reviewed and
approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Any such related party transactions will only be
approved or ratified if the Audit Committee determines that such transaction will not impair the
involved persons service to, and exercise of judgment on behalf of, the company, or otherwise
create a conflict of interest that would be detrimental to the company. All of the transactions
relating to our directors and executive officers who are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act described below have been reviewed and approved or ratified by
our Audit Committee.
We sponsor the Insight Bowl, a post-season intercollegiate football game that is played
annually in Arizona. We have a multi-year sponsorship agreement with the Valley of the Sun Bowl
Foundation d/b/a Insight Bowl, the not-for-profit entity that conducts the Insight Bowl game and
related activities. During 2006, we paid the Valley of the Sun Bowl Foundation and related
entities approximately $1,196,000 for sponsorship arrangements, ticket purchases and miscellaneous
expenses. Stanley Laybourne, a member of our Board and our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer, serves as the Chief Financial Officer of these organizations and receives nominal
compensation from the organizations for that service. We believe we obtain important local and
national public relations benefits from our sponsorship and participation in these events, and we
use the Insight Bowl game and related events to entertain customers, suppliers and employees. We
also believe the terms of the sponsorship agreement are as advantageous to us as we would obtain in
an arms length transaction. The final sponsorship agreement was approved by our Board with Mr.
Laybourne abstaining from the vote.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that the following directors meet the independence
requirements of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market: Mr. Dorrance; Mr. Fisher; Mr.
Gunning; Mr. Jones; Ms. Pushor; and Mr. Robino. The independent directors hold executive sessions
without management present on a quarterly basis and more often as they determine appropriate.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Our independent registered public accounting firm during the year ended December 31, 2006
was KPMG. KPMG has audited our consolidated financial statements since 1988.
Fees and Independence
Audit Fees. KPMG billed us an aggregate of $5,026,000 and $1,560,000 for professional
services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of our
consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and statutory
audits for foreign subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees. KPMG billed us an aggregate of $0 and $0 for assurance and services
related to employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations, due diligence related to mergers
and acquisitions and additional attest services for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Tax Fees. Tax fees billed by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 of $95,000
and $123,000, respectively, include fees for services relating to tax compliance, unclaimed
property, expatriates and tax planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits.
All Other Fees. There were no other fees paid to KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of services by KPMG described in the
preceding paragraphs is compatible with maintaining KPMGs independence. All permissible non-audit
services provided by KPMG in 2006 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, no audit
engagement hours were spent by people other than KPMGs full-time, permanent employees.
141
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Pursuant to Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our Audit Committee has approved
all auditing and non-audit services performed to date and currently planned to be provided related
to the fiscal year 2006 by our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG. The services
include the annual audit, quarterly reviews, statutory audits for foreign subsidiaries, issuances
of consents related to SEC filings and certain tax compliance services.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries and the
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are filed herein as set forth under Item 8 of this report.
Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required, not
applicable, or the information is otherwise included in the consolidated financial statements or
notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits
The exhibits list in the Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page is
incorporated herein by reference as the list of exhibits required as part of this report.
142
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Tempe, State of Arizona, on this
5th day of October, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Richard A. Fennessy
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
/s/ Richard A. Fennessy
Richard A. Fennessy
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stanley Laybourne
Stanley Laybourne
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer
and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy A. Crown
Timothy A Crown
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Eric J. Crown
Eric J. Crown
|
|
Director (Chairman Emeritus)
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bennett Dorrance
Bennett Dorrance
|
|
Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael M. Fisher
Michael M. Fisher
|
|
Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
Larry A. Gunning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robertson C. Jones
Robertson C. Jones
|
|
Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kathleen S. Pushor
Kathleen S. Pushor
|
|
Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David J. Robino
David J. Robino
|
|
Director
|
|
October 5, 2007 |
143
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
Commission File No. 000-25092
(Unless otherwise noted, exhibits are filed herewith.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Certificate of
Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
of our annual report on Form 10-K filed on February 17, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 of our
Registration Statement on Form 8-A (no. 00-25092) filed on
March 17, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 33-86142) declared effective January 24,
1995). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Rights Agreement and Exhibits A and B
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed on March 17, 1999). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
* |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-110915) declared effective December 4, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
1998 Employee Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.3 of our Form S-8 (No. 333-69113)
filed on December 17, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
1998 Officer Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Form S-8 (No. 333-69113)
filed on December 17, 1998). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
1999 Broad Based Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 filed on March
30, 2000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Executive Service Agreement between Insight Direct UK
Limited and Stuart Fenton dated September 12, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
filed on March 27, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of December 31,
2002 among Insight Receivables, LLC, Insight Enterprises,
Inc., Jupiter Securitization Corporation, Bank One NA (main
office Chicago), and the entities party thereto from time
to time as financial institutions (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.38 of our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed on March
27, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement dated as
of September 3, 2003 by and among Insight Direct USA, Inc.
and Insight Public Sector, Inc. as originators, and Insight
Receivables, LLC, as buyer (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed November 13, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated
as of September 3, 2003 among Insight Receivables, LLC,
Insight Enterprises, Inc. and Jupiter Securitization
Corporation, Bank One NA (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 filed November 13, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated
as of December 23, 2003 among Insight Receivables, LLC,
Insight Enterprises, Inc. and Jupiter Securitization
Corporation, Bank One NA (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.42 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 filed March 11, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement
between Insight
Enterprises, Inc. and
Karen K. McGinnis dated as
of and effective October
15, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2
of our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004
filed November 8, 2004). |
144
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
Commission File No. 000-25092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
10.12
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement
between Insight
Enterprises, Inc. and
Richard A. Fennessy dated
as of October 24, 2004,
effective November 15,
2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1
of our current report on
Form 8-K filed October 28,
2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement
between Insight
Enterprises, Inc. and
Stanley Laybourne dated as
of November 23, 2004,
effective November 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.21 of our
annual report on Form 10-K
filed March 7, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Insight
Enterprises, Inc. and Timothy A. Crown dated as of March 4,
2005 and effective March 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference
to Items 1.01 & 1.02 of our current report on Form 8-K
filed March 10, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Enterprises, Inc.
and Gary M. Glandon dated as of February 9, 2005 and
effective February 21, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed May
9, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Grants of options and restricted stock for certain
executives (incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Amendment to Executive Service Agreement between Insight
Direct (UK) and Stuart Fenton dated as of March 1, 2005 and
effective July 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 of our annual report on Form 10-K, filed
March 7, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Insight
Enterprises, Inc. and Karen K. McGinnis dated as of April
26, 2005 and effective January 1, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our quarterly report on Form
10-Q filed May 9, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated
as of March 25, 2005 among Insight Receivables, LLC (the
Seller), Insight Enterprises, Inc. (the Servicer), JP
Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA
(Main Office Chicago)), as a Financial Institution and as
Agent (in its capacity as Agent, the Agent), and Jupiter
Securitization Corporation (Jupiter) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our quarterly report on Form
10-Q filed May 9, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Insight Direct USA, Inc. and
Mark McGrath dated as of May 15, 2005 to be effective May
23, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
current report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Summary description of 2006 incentive compensation plans
for certain executives (incorporated by reference to Item
1.01 of our current report on Form 8-K filed December 20,
2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated
as of December 19, 2005 among Insight Receivables, LLC (the
Seller), Insight Enterprises, Inc. (the Servicer), JP
Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA
(Main Office Chicago)), as a Financial Institution and as
Agent (in its capacity as Agent, the Agent), and Jupiter
Securitization Corporation (Jupiter) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current report on Form 8-K
filed December 22, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Grants of restricted stock units under 2006 incentive
compensation plan for certain executives (incorporated by
reference to Item 1.01 of our current report on Form 8-K
filed January 23, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2006, by and among
Teletech Holdings, Inc., Insight Enterprises, Inc. and Direct Alliance
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2006, by
and among Insight Enterprises, Inc., Level 3
Communications, Inc. and Technology Spectrum Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed on July 21, 2006). |
145
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
Commission File No. 000-25092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
10.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2006,
among Insight Enterprises, Inc., the European borrowers, the lenders
party thereto, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as European agent, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current report on Form 8-K filed on
September 8, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of
September 7, 2006, among Insight Receivables, LLC, Insight Enterprises,
Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA
(Main Office Chicago)), as a Financial Institution and as Agent, and
Jupiter Securitization Company LLC (formerly Jupiter Securitization
Corporation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Summary description of 2007 incentive compensation plans for certain
executives (incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed January 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Approval of discretionary cash bonuses for certain executives
(incorporated by reference to Item 5.02 of our current report on Form
8-K filed February 21, 2007). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
* |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne Retirement Termination Program - Summary of Key
Terms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities and
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities and
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Previously filed. |
|
(1) |
|
We have entered into a separate indemnification agreement with each of the
following directors and executive officers that differ only in party names and dates: Eric J.
Crown, Timothy A. Crown, Bennett Dorrance, Richard A. Fennessy, Michael M. Fisher, Larry A.
Gunning, Robertson C. Jones, Stanley Laybourne, Kathleen S. Pushor, David J. Robino and Karen
K. McGinnis. Pursuant to the instructions accompanying Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the
Registrant is filing the form of such indemnification agreement. |
|
(2) |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
146