form10-q.htm
 



 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549


FORM 10-Q

x
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
     
Or
     
o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
For the transition period from to
     
Commission file number 0-26083


INSWEB CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
 
94-3220749
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
     
11290 Pyrites Way, Suite 200 Gold River, California 95670
(Address of principal executive offices)
     
(916) 853-3300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
     
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
   

The aggregate market value of registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the common stock as of the last business day of registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2009), as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market, was approximately $6,945,000. Registrant is a smaller reporting company as defined in Regulation S-K. Shares of common stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x

The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, on July 31, 2009 were 4,802,566 shares.
 





FORM 10-Q
INSWEB CORPORATION
INDEX

 
 
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
ITEM 2:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14
ITEM 3:
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
21
ITEM 4:
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
21
ITEM 4T:
Controls and Procedures
21
     
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
21
ITEM 1:
Legal Proceedings  
21
ITEM 1A:
Risk Factors
21
ITEM 6:
Exhibits
21
     
Signature
 
22
Certifications
   

2
 



PART I:
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.                      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INSWEB CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)
(unaudited)

   
June 30,
2009
 
December 31, 2008
 
Assets
         
Current assets:
         
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
5,772
 
$
9,238
 
Accounts receivable, net
 
1,977
 
1,450
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
453
 
711
 
Restricted cash
 
2,105
 
 
Total current assets
 
10,307
 
11,399
 
Related party receivables
 
307
 
304
 
Property and equipment, net
 
179
 
249
 
Other assets
 
269
 
329
 
Total assets
 
$
11,062
 
$
12,281
 
           
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
         
Current liabilities:
         
Accounts payable
 
$
2,064
 
$
2,138
 
Accrued expenses
 
769
 
1,014
 
Deferred revenue
 
465
 
437
 
Total current liabilities
 
3,298
 
3,589
 
           
Commitments and contingencies
         
           
Stockholders’ equity:
         
Common stock
 
8
 
8
 
Paid-in capital
 
206,889
 
206,719
 
Treasury stock
 
(6,334
)
(6,334
)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
 
 
1
 
Accumulated deficit
 
(192,799
)
(191,702
)
Total stockholders’ equity
 
7,764
 
8,692
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 
$
11,062
 
$
12,281
 

See accompanying notes.

3
 


INSWEB CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

 
Three Months 
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months 
Ended June 30,
   
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
   
Revenues:
                 
Transaction fees
$
7,941
 
$
8,751
 
$
17,425
 
$
21,722
   
Other
42
 
58
 
84
 
119
   
Total revenues
7,983
 
8,809
 
17,509
 
21,841
   
                   
Operating expenses:
                 
Direct marketing
5,334
 
6,238
 
11,879
 
15,543
   
Sales and marketing
1,671
 
1,433
 
3,441
 
2,728
   
Technology
901
 
811
 
1,859
 
1,627
   
General and administrative
643
 
1,373
 
1,446
 
2,399
   
Total operating expenses
8,549
 
9,855
 
18,625
 
22,297
   
Income from operations
(566
)
(1,046
)
(1,116
(456
)
 
Interest income
6
 
60
 
20
 
149
   
                   
Loss before income taxes
(560
)
(986
)
(1,096
(307
)
 
                   
Income tax provision (benefit)
35
 
(9
)
 
   
                   
Net loss
$
(595
)
$
(977
)
$
(1,096
$
(307
 
                   
Net income (loss) per share:
                 
Basic
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.23
$
(0.07
 
Diluted
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.23
$
(0.07
 
                   
Weighted-average shares used in computing per share amounts
                 
Basic and diluted
4,791
 
4,689
 
4,789
 
4,665
   

See accompanying notes.

4
 



INSWEB CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)
(unaudited)

   
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
 
   
2009
 
2008
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
         
Net loss
 
$
(1,096
$
(307
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
         
Share-based compensation
 
148
 
412
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
95
 
74
 
Related party receivables
 
(3
 
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:
         
Accounts receivable
 
(527
)
69
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
258
 
126
 
Other assets
 
35
 
 
Accounts payable
 
(74
170
 
Accrued expenses
 
(245
168
 
Deferred revenue
 
28
 
(7
)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
 
(1,381
705
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
         
Change in restricted cash
 
(2,105
)
 
Purchases of intangible assets
 
 
(225
)
Purchases of property and equipment
 
(3
)
(80
)
Net cash used in investing activities
 
(2,108
)
(305
)
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
         
Settlement of equity awards
 
 
(850
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through stock plans
 
23
 
347
 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
 
23
 
(503
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 
(3,466
(103
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
 
9,238
 
10,777
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
5,772
 
$
10,674
 

See accompanying notes.

5
 



INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Business of InsWeb

InsWeb operates an online insurance marketplace that electronically matches consumers and providers of automobile, homeowners and term life insurance. InsWeb has combined knowledge of the insurance industry, technological expertise and close relationships with insurance companies, agents and other providers to develop an integrated online marketplace. InsWeb’s marketplace enables consumers to research insurance-related topics, search for, analyze and compare insurance products, and apply for and receive quotes for coverage for automobile, homeowners and term life insurance. Management believes that InsWeb provides insurance providers with pre-qualified consumers at attractive acquisition costs, with the scalable, cost-efficient distribution capabilities of InsWeb’s Internet-based model.

For the automobile and homeowners insurance products, InsWeb’s principal source of revenues is transaction fees from participating insurance providers. While quotes obtained through InsWeb’s online insurance marketplace are provided to consumers free of charge, InsWeb earns revenues when a qualified lead is delivered to a participating insurance provider or local agent. In certain instances, consumers are provided the opportunity to link directly to a third party insurance provider’s website. In these situations, InsWeb will be paid a fee for that consumer link or click-through.

For term life insurance, the majority of InsWeb’s revenues prior to April 2007 consisted of commissions earned by InsWeb’s insurance agency subsidiary, InsWeb Insurance Services, Inc., upon the sale of a term life insurance policy. InsWeb discontinued the term life agency operation in April 2007 but continued to earn commissions throughout 2007 (in decreasing amounts) on a limited number of policies written prior to the discontinuation of the agency operations. Beginning in 2008, substantially all of InsWeb’s term life insurance revenues were being generated by the sale of leads to third parties and to local agents.

Beginning in 2008, InsWeb began generating both subscription and display advertising revenues from sales of advertising on its Agent Directory pages. These pages display listings of insurance companies and local agents for the consumer to contact.

Beginning in 2009, InsWeb’s health and small business insurance revenues were being generated by the sale of leads to third parties or agents.

InsWeb is subject to all of the risks inherent in the electronic commerce industry and special risks related to the online insurance industry. These risks include, but are not limited to, uncertain economic conditions which could result in lower growth rates, the changing nature of the electronic commerce industry, variations in the availability and cost of acquiring consumer traffic, unpredictability of future revenues, reliance on key customers —insurance carriers, agents and other providers – who are themselves subject to volatility in their operating cycles, and reliance on a third party intermediaries who provide leads to local insurance agents on InsWeb’s behalf. These risks and uncertainties, among others, could cause InsWeb’s actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently anticipated. In light of InsWeb’s ongoing modifications to its business model to better capitalize on its position as a leading insurance portal, InsWeb believes that period-to-period comparisons of its operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Moreover, there is no assurance that InsWeb will be able to attain or sustain profitability.

2. Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of InsWeb Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, InsWeb Insurance Services, Inc. and Goldrush Insurance Services, Inc. (“InsWeb” or the “Company”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

6
 



INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly InsWeb’s financial position as of June 30, 2009 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The financial data and other information disclosed in these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements related to these periods are unaudited. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in InsWeb’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and other information as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company believes the disclosures in its notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. InsWeb has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing these financial statements on August 11, 2009.

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“Statement 141(R)”). Statement 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. Statement 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. InsWeb adopted Statement 141(R) at the beginning of 2009, with no material impact to InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
 
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“Statement 160”). Statement 160 amends FASB Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the on controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Statement 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. InsWeb adopted Statement 160 at the beginning of 2009, with no material impact to InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

             In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of U.S. GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. We will begin to use the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in the third quarter of 2009. As the Codification does not change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
7
 

 

INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)


3. Share-Based Payments

InsWeb maintains a stock option plan and an employee stock purchase plan. The following table sets forth the total share-based compensation expense relating to these plans included in InsWeb’s operating expenses in its condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
 
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
 
                 
Technology
$
1
 
$
1
 
$
7
 
$
55
 
Sales and marketing
17
 
37
 
45
 
131
 
General and administrative
28
 
40
 
96
 
226
 
 
$
46
 
$
78
 
$
148
 
$
412
 

4. Concentration of Risk — Significant Customers

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, three customers each accounted for 10% of total revenues, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2009, one customer accounted for 10% of total revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, three customers accounted for 16%, 13% and 11%; and 17%, 15%, and 11% of total revenues, respectively.  At June 30, 2009, four customers accounted for 15%, 11%, 11%, and 10% of accounts receivable, respectively. At December 31, 2008, one customer accounted for 17% of accounts receivable.

5.  Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“Statement 157”) for its financial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2008, and has adopted Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009. The two-step adoption is in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, (“FSP FAS 157-2), which allows for the delay of the effective date of Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. There was no impact relating to the adoption of Statement 157 and FSP FAS 157-2 to InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements.

Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value:

 
 
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
       
 
 
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
       
 
 
Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.


 
8
 


INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
 
                                 
   
Jun 30,
                   
   
2009
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Assets:
                               
Cash equivalents
 
$
2,129
   
$
2,129
   
$
   
$
 
Restricted cash
   
2,105
     
2,105
                 
Total
 
$
4,234
   
$
4,234
   
$
   
$
 
 
Cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash include U.S. treasury bills, money market funds and commercial paper from corporations whose credit ratings are P-1 by Moody’s or A-1 by Standard & Poor’s. For these securities, the Company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine their fair value, thus they are considered to be Level 1 instruments.

6. Related Party Receivables

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, related party receivables relate to promissory notes totaling $300,000 from three non-officer employees of InsWeb in exchange for cash and the related interest accrued on these notes.  These notes are unsecured loans with a per annum rate of 2.42%.  Principal and interest are payable in full on or before July, 2011.

7. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30,
2009
 
December 31,
2008
 
         
Prepaid software licenses
$
93
 
$
293
 
Tax related assets
 
30
   
120
 
Prepaid insurance
137
 
124
 
Prepaid rent and current portion of lease deposits
94
 
93
 
Other prepaid  and current assets
99
 
81
 
 
$
453
 
$
711
 
 
8. Restricted Cash

As of June 30, 2009, restricted cash consists of $2.1 million in short-term investments used as collateral to obtain a commercial credit line. Pursuant to the agreement the collateral value of the securities account should be no less than $2.0 million, based upon the net margin percentage of the investment portfolio holdings. The collateral value may become unrestricted, upon notification from InsWeb to the issuing bank.



 9
 


INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

9. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
 
   
June 30,
2009
 
December 31,
2008
 
           
Amounts due to fee sharing partners
 
$
16
 
$
271
 
Deferred rent
 
206
 
262
 
Accrued employee compensation
 
540
 
481
 
Other
   
7
   
 
   
$
769
 
$
1,014
 
 
10. Comprehensive Loss
 
 
Three months ended 
June 30,
 
Six months ended 
June 30,
 
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
 
                 
Net loss
$
(595)
 
$
(977)
 
$
(1,096)
 
$
(307)
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) - change in unrealized gain or loss on investments
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive loss
$
(595)
 
$
(977)
 
$
(1,096)
 
$
(307)
 

11. Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted loss per share is a measure of the potential dilution that would occur if stock options had been exercised. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator used to calculate basic and diluted net income per share of common stock:
 
 
Three months ended
 June 30,
 
Six months ended
 June 30,
 
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
 
                 
Numerator for basic and diluted net loss per share:
               
Net loss available to common stockholders
$
(595
)
$
(977
)
$
(1,096
$
(307
)
                 
Denominator for net loss per share:
               
Basic—weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
4,791
 
4,689
 
4,789
 
4,665
 
Dilutive effect of employee stock options
 
 
 
 
Diluted
4,791
 
4,689
 
4,789
 
4,665
 
                 
Net loss per share:
               
Basic and diluted —as reported
$
(0.12
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.23
$
(0.07
)

10
 



INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)
 
As a result of our net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, certain stock awards have been excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Had InsWeb reported net income for this period, an additional 108,000 shares and 81,000 shares of common stock would have been included in the number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
 
Options to purchase 2.0 million shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the weighted-average exercise price of these shares was $5.19 per share.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

InsWeb has a non-cancelable 10-year operating lease agreement through April 2011 for office space in the Sacramento area which houses its corporate headquarters. InsWeb has an option to extend the lease at the end of the lease term, and has the right of first refusal on other office space in the complex.

Securities Class Action

A securities class action lawsuit was filed on December 5, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, (the “Court”) purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock from July 22, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The complaint named as defendants InsWeb, certain current and former officers and directors, and three investment banking firms that served as underwriters for InsWeb’s initial public offering in July 1999. The complaint, as subsequently amended, alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the prospectuses incorporated in the registration statements for the offering failed to disclose, among other things, that (i) the underwriters had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the shares of our stock sold in the offerings and (ii) the underwriters had entered into agreements with customers whereby the underwriters agreed to allocated shares of the stock sold in the offering to those customers in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional shares of InsWeb stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. No specific damages are claimed. Similar allegations have been made in lawsuits relating to more than 300 other initial public offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000, all of which have been consolidated for pretrial purposes. In October 2002, all claims against the individual defendants were dismissed without prejudice. In February 2003, the Court dismissed the claims in the InsWeb action alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but allowed the plaintiffs to proceed with the remaining claims. In June 2003, the plaintiffs in all of the cases presented a settlement proposal to all of the issuer defendants. Under the proposed settlement, the plaintiffs would dismiss and release all claims against participating defendants in exchange for a contingent payment guaranty by the insurance companies collectively responsible for insuring the issuers in all the related cases, and the assignment or surrender to the plaintiffs of certain claims the issuer defendants may have against the underwriters. InsWeb and most of the other issuer defendants have accepted the settlement proposal. While the District Court was considering final approval of the settlement, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the class certification of plaintiffs’ claims against the underwriters in six cases designated as focus or test cases. On December 14, 2006, the District Court ordered a stay of all proceedings in all of the lawsuits pending the outcome of plaintiffs’ petition to the Second Circuit for rehearing en banc and resolution of the class certification issue. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing, but clarified that the plaintiffs may seek to certify a more limited class in the District Court. Because of the significant technical barriers presented by the Court’s decision, the parties withdrew the proposed settlement and the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In September 2008, representatives of all of the parties to the IPO litigation agreed in principle to a revised settlement, subject to preparation of formal documentation. As
 
11
 



INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

12. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

with the earlier settlement proposal, the revised settlement proposal does not require InsWeb to contribute any cash. There is no assurance that the new settlement will be finalized, and then approved. If the settlement is not finalized and subsequently approved, InsWeb intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. The litigation and settlement process is inherently uncertain and management cannot predict the outcome, though, if unfavorable, it could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Section 16(b) Lawsuit

On October 12, 2007, Vanessa Simmonds, a purported stockholder of InsWeb, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, against InsWeb and two investment banking firms that served as underwriters for the initial public offering of our common stock in July 1999. The complaint alleges that:  (i) the defendants, other underwriters of the offering, and unspecified officers, directors and principal stockholders of InsWeb constituted a “group” that owned in excess of 10% of InsWeb’s outstanding common stock between July 23, 1999 and July 20, 2000; (ii) the defendants were therefore subject to the “short swing” prohibitions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Actgroup of 1934; and (iii) the defendants engaged in purchases and sales, or sales and purchases, of InsWeb’s common stock within periods of less than six months in violation of the provisions of Section 16(b). The complaint seeks disgorgement of all profits allegedly received by the defendants, with interest and attorneys fees, for transactions in violation of Section 16(b). InsWeb, as the statutory beneficiary of any potential Section 16(b) recovery, is named as a nominal defendant in the complaint. A number of similar lawsuits against underwriters of other public offerings have recently been filed by the same plaintiff and law firm. On February 11, 2008, the court approved a stipulated order that InsWeb need not answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. On February 28, 2008, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, and InsWeb was again excused from filing an answer. On March 12, 2009 the court issued an order dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice, but the plaintiff has appealed this order.  If the lawsuit is reinstated on appeal, InsWeb intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. The litigation and settlement process is inherently uncertain and management cannot predict the outcome, though, if unfavorable, it could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Patent Litigation Settlements

On November 30, 2007, Autobytel, Inc.filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against InsWeb and three other defendants (“Autobytel Patent Litigation”). The complaint alleged that InsWeb and the other defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,282,517 (the “ ‘517 patent”), which appears to disclose a method and apparatus to allow a potential automobile purchaser to create and submit a purchase request for a new or used automobile over a computer network. The complaint contained generic allegations that InsWeb infringed the ‘517 patent by making, using, offering to sell and selling systems and/or methods that embody the invention claimed in the ‘517 patent and/or actively inducing and/or contributing to others’ infringement of such inventions. The complaint sought unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief.

On March 11, 2008, InsWeb filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against Autobytel, Inc., Autobytel I Corporation (formerly known as AVV, Inc.) and Dominion Enterprises (“InsWeb Patent Litigation”). InsWeb filed an amended complaint on July 3, 2008 adding OneCommand, Inc. as a defendant.The amended complaint alleged that the defendants infringed InsWeb’s U.S. Patent No. 6,898,597, which relates to an event logging system that monitors for the occurrence of predefined website usage events. Defendant Autobytel, through its wholly-owned subsidiary AVV, marketed and sold a product known as WebControl that embodies the invention claimed in the ‘597 patent. In January 2008, Autobytel sold AVV, including the WebControl product, to Dominion Enterprises. Autobytel also owned an asset named Retention Performance Marketing (RPM) that embodied the invention claimed in InsWeb’s patent. Autobytel sold the RPM asset to OneCommand in July 2007. The amended complaint also added Internet Brands, Inc., Leadpoint, Inc., and Auto Internet Marketing, Inc. as co-plaintiffs with InsWeb following InsWeb’s assignment of a partial interest in the ‘597 patent to these companies.


12
 




INSWEB CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

12. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)


Patent Litigation Settlements

On April 23, 2009 InsWeb announced that it entered into a settlement agreement with Autobytel settling and dismissing with prejudice the Autobytel Patent Litigation and the InsWeb Patent Litigation. Under the settlement terms, Autobytel granted to Insweb, Internet Brands and Leadpoint, and Insweb, Internet Brands and Leadpoint each granted to Autobytel, a non-exclusive perpetual license to their respective patents, as well as long-term covenants not to sue any of the parties for infringement of current or future patents, and mutual releases of claims. In addition, InsWeb and Autobytel entered into a Content License Agreement pursuant to which Autobytel will receive specific auto insurance editorial content, data and interactive tools from InsWeb. The content and tools will contain links to one of InsWeb’s insurance websites, and Autobytel and InsWeb will share the revenue associated with consumer activity generated by the links. All claims against Dominion, OneCommand and RPM were also dismissed with prejudice, with Internet Brands, Leadpoint, and InsWeb each providing Dominion, OneCommand and RPM covenants not to sue for infringement of the InsWeb ‘597 Patent, and Dominion, OneCommand and RPM each granting to InsWeb, Internet Brands and Leadpoint, and InsWeb, Internet Brands and Leadpoint each granting to Dominion, OneCommand and RPM long-term mutual releases of claims.


 
13
 


ITEM 2.                      MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains “forward-looking statements” with respect to InsWeb’s future financial performance. The words or phrases “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and InsWeb cautions you that any forward-looking information provided by, or on behalf of, InsWeb is not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond InsWeb’s control, including, but not limited to, uncertain economic conditions which could result in lower growth rates, fluctuations in revenues, anticipated and unanticipated losses, the unpredictability of consumer shopping and/or buying behavior, especially on the internet, potential increases in advertising and marketing costs on the internet, the rate of participation by insurance companies and agents, reliance on key customers, who are themselves subject to volatility in their operating cycles, reliance on  third party lead aggregators who provide leads to their networks of insurance providers on InsWeb’s behalf, competition, risks associated with system development and operation risks, management of potential growth and risks of new business areas, business combinations, litigation in which InsWeb is a party, and strategic alliances. These risks and uncertainties, as well as other risks and uncertainties, which are described in greater detail in InsWeb’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could cause InsWeb’s actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently anticipated. All forward-looking statements are based on information available to InsWeb on the date hereof, and InsWeb assumes no obligation to update such statements.

Overview

InsWeb (the “Company,” “InsWeb,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) operates an online insurance marketplace that electronically matches consumers and providers of automobile, homeowners and term life insurance. InsWeb has combined extensive knowledge of the insurance industry, technological expertise and close relationships with a significant number of insurance companies, agents and insurance providers to develop an integrated online marketplace.

For the automobile and homeowners insurance products, our principal source of revenues is transaction fees from participating insurance providers. While quotes obtained through our online insurance marketplace are provided to consumers free of charge, we earn revenues when a qualified lead is delivered to a participating insurance provider or local agent. In certain instances, consumers are provided the opportunity to link directly to a third party insurance provider’s website. In these situations, we will be paid a fee for that consumer link or click-through.

For term life insurance, the majority of our revenues prior to April 2007 consisted of commissions earned by our insurance agency subsidiary, InsWeb Insurance Services, Inc., upon the sale of a term life insurance policy. We discontinued the term life agency operation in April 2007 but continued to earn commissions throughout 2007 (in decreasing amounts) on a limited number of policies written prior to the discontinuation of the agency operations. Beginning in 2008, substantially all of our term life insurance revenues were being generated by the sale of leads to third parties and to local agents.

Beginning in 2008, InsWeb began generating both subscription and display advertising revenues from sales of advertising on its Agent Directory pages. These pages display listings of several insurance companies and not more than eight local agents for the consumer to contact.

Beginning in 2009, our health and small business insurance revenues were being generated by the sale of leads to third parties and to local agents.

We have focused our efforts on automobile insurance, which accounted for approximately 84% of our transaction revenues in 2008 and 2007. For the six month period ending June 30, 2009 automobile insurance accounted for 83% of our transaction revenues.  For the comparable six month period in 2008, automobile insurance accounted for approximately 85% of transaction revenues.  We anticipate that automobile insurance will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future.

14
 


Results of Operations

The following financial highlights and key metrics are provided as a resource for our investors

 
Three months Ended
 
Six months Ended
 
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
 
Revenues (in thousands):
               
Auto
$
6,554
 
$
7,266
 
$
14,540
 
$
18,462
 
Property
860
 
1,015
   
1,755
   
1,947
 
Term life
359
 
360
   
808
   
845
 
Agent directory
123
 
105
   
234
   
456
 
All other
45
 
5
   
88
   
12
 
Total transaction fees
$
7,941
 
$
8,751
 
$
17,425
 
$
21,722
 
                 
Direct marketing costs (in thousands):
$
5,334
 
$
6,238
 
$
11,879
 
$
15,543
 
                         
Direct marketing costs as a percent of revenues:
67
%
71
%
68
%
71
%
                 
Cash, cash equivalents, short term investments, and restricted cash (in thousands):
 
$
7,877
 
 
$
10,674
 
$
7,877
 
$
10,674
 
Account receivable (in thousands):
$
1,977
 
$
2,360
 
$
1,977
 
$
2,360
 
Day sales outstanding (DSO):
31
 
31
 
31
 
31
 
Staffing:
87
 
84
 
87
 
84
 
 
Transaction Fees. Automobile insurance transaction fees (consisting of lead fees and click through fees) decreased to $6.6 million and $14.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from $7.3 million and $18.5 million for the comparable periods in 2008. Revenue per consumer was $2.76 and $2.73 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease from $3.57 and $3.77 for the comparable periods in 2008. The decrease in revenue per consumer is a direct result of more consumers being acquired through other lead aggregators.  Consumers acquired through other aggregators generate less revenue since we are only able to sell these leads to insurance companies that the consumer has not already seen from the other aggregators.

Property insurance transaction fees (consisting primarily of lead fees) decreased to $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the comparable periods in 2008.

Term life insurance transaction fees (consisting primarily of lead fees) remained level at $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009.

Auto, property and term life transaction fees are expected to remain at current levels for the third quarter, but they are expected to decrease during our traditionally slower fourth quarter.

Agent directory revenues (consisting of subscription revenue and advertising revenues) remained level at $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and decreased to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $0.5 million for the comparable period in 2008.  This decrease was due primarily to lower advertising revenues generated by selling banner ads on the directory site. Agent directory revenues are expected to remain at current levels for the remainder of 2009.

15
 



Operating Expenses
 
   
Three months ended
June 30,
   
Percentage 
change from
   
(in thousands, except percentages)
 
2009
   
2008
   
prior period
   
                     
Operating expenses:
                   
Direct marketing
  $ 5,334     $ 6,238       (14 ) %
Sales and marketing
    1,671       1,433       17   %
Technology
    901       811       11   %
General and administrative
    643       1,373       (53 ) %


   
Six months ended
June 30,
   
Percentage 
change from
   
(in thousands, except percentages)
 
2009
   
2008
   
prior period
   
                     
Operating expenses:
                   
Direct marketing
  $ 11,879     $ 15,543       (24 ) %
Sales and marketing
    3,441       2,728       26   %
Technology
    1,859       1,627       14   %
General and administrative
    1,446       2,399       (40 ) %

       Direct Marketing. Direct marketing expenses consist of advertising, promotions and fees incurred to drive consumer traffic to the InsWeb online marketplace. Our marketing strategy is designed to increase consumer traffic to our website and to drive awareness of our insurance products and services. We employ various means of advertising, which consist primarily of online advertising, sponsored search, portal advertising, e-mail campaigns and strategic partnerships with high-profile online companies and other online lead generators that use our network to complement their network of providers. Fees related to our online marketing are expensed in the period in which the consumer clicks through from a partner’s website to InsWeb’s website, or in some cases, when the consumer’s activity on the InsWeb website generates a lead to an insurance provider.

Direct marketing expenses for the three and six months ending June 30, 2009 decreased to $5.3 million and $11.9 million from $6.2 million and $15.5 million in the comparable periods in 2008. Direct marketing expense as a percent of total revenues was 67% and 68% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 71% for both comparable periods in 2008. Direct marketing expenses per consumer was $1.12 and $1.34 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease from $2.28 and $2.39 for the comparable periods in 2008. There has also been a significant increase in consumers being acquired through the agent directory program, with minimal costs associated with the acquisition. Excluding agent directory consumers, more consumers were acquired from other aggregators with whom we have revenue sharing arrangements. As a result, direct marketing expense per consumer fell to $1.92 and $1.97 for the three and six months ending June 30, 2009 from $2.71 and $2.82 for the comparable periods in 2008.  As mentioned earlier, consumers acquired through other aggregators generate less revenue per consumer. Direct marketing expenses are expected to remain at current levels for the third quarter, but  are expected to be lower during the traditionally slower fourth quarter.  Marketing costs per consumer are expected to remain at current levels for the remainder of 2009.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, including employee benefits, facility costs, telecommunications and systems costs, for our sales and marketing personnel. Sales and marketing expenses increased to $1.7 million and $3.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from $1.4 million and $2.7 million for the comparable periods in 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase in headcount related and consulting expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the remainder of 2009 are expected to remain consistent with current spending levels.
 
16
 


Technology. Technology expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, including employee benefits, facility and systems costs, for product and site development personnel involved with our technology initiatives. Technology expenses increased to $0.9 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from $0.8 million and $1.6 million for the comparable periods in 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase in headcount related expenses and software licenses. Technology expenses for the remainder of 2009 are expected to remain consistent with current spending levels.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, including employee benefits, facility costs, telecommunications and systems costs, for our general management, administrative and accounting personnel, as well as other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased to $0.6 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, from $1.4 million and $2.4 million for the comparable periods in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in legal costs associated with the patent litigation settlement in April 2009, a decrease in share-based compensation expense and recognition of severance related costs associated to the departure of the chief operating officer in June 2008. General and administrative expenses are expected to remain consistent with current spending levels for the remainder of 2009.

Income Taxes.

The provision for income taxes was $35,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to a benefit from income taxes of $9,000 for the comparable period in 2008. No provision or benefit was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and for the comparable period in 2008.

Interest Income

Interest income was $6,000 and $20,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease from $60,000 and $149,000 for the comparable periods in 2008 relating to the decrease in InsWeb’s cash and investment balances and decrease in yield on InsWeb’s investment securities. Interest income represents interest earned on InsWeb’s investment securities.

 
17
 


Critical Accounting Policies

InsWeb’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based on InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires InsWeb to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. InsWeb bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. InsWeb believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. InsWeb’s principal source of revenues is transaction fees from participating insurance providers, either directly from an insurance company or from a local insurance agent. While quotes and other information obtained through InsWeb’s online insurance marketplace are provided to consumers free of charge, InsWeb earns revenues from participating insurance companies or agents based on the delivery of qualified leads. In certain instances, consumers are provided the opportunity to link directly to a third-party insurance provider’s website (“Sponsored Web Link” program). In these situations, the consumer will complete the third-party company’s online application, and InsWeb will be paid a fee for that consumer link or “click-through.” InsWeb recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement between InsWeb and the customer exists, (ii) delivery of the product to the customer has occurred or service has been provided to the customer, (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured.

Contingencies. As discussed in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements — Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies.”Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report, InsWeb is a defendant in: i) a class action lawsuit that alleges InsWeb violated certain federal securities laws at the time of its initial public offering; and ii) a securities lawsuit alleging certain officers and directors and significant shareholders violated the short swing trading prohibition of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.  InsWeb cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters at this time and therefore, cannot estimate the range of probable loss, if any, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation. InsWeb believes it has meritorious defenses; however InsWeb cannot assure that it will prevail in any of these actions. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Share-Based Compensation. InsWeb accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Under the provisions of Statement 123(R), share-based compensation cost is generally estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected option life, volatility, and forfeiture rates. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. Generally, compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period. However, to the extent performance conditions affect the vesting of an award; compensation cost will be recognized only if the performance condition is satisfied. Compensation cost will not be recognized, and any previously recognized compensation cost will be reversed, if the performance condition is not satisfied.

 
18
 




Critical Accounting Policies (continued)

Income Taxes.  InsWeb accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The deferred tax assets and/or liabilities are determined by multiplying the differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting bases for assets and liabilities by the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such differences are recovered or settled.

InsWeb has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $0.3 million (none of which, if recognized, would favorably affect InsWeb’s effective tax rate). InsWeb does not believe there will be material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next twelve months.

As of December 31, 2008, InsWeb had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $190 million for federal income tax purposes and $76 million for state income tax purposes, respectively. The federal net operating loss carry forwards will begin to expire in the year 2011 and state net operating loss carry forwards will begin to expire in 2012. InsWeb’s ability to utilize a portion of its net operating loss carry forwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to restrictions attributable to equity transactions that result in changes in ownership as defined in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. These restrictions may limit, on an annual basis, InsWeb’s future use of its net operating loss carry forwards.

The carrying value of our deferred tax assets, which was approximately $70 million at December 31, 2008, is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. We have established a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets to reflect the uncertainty of realizing the deferred tax benefits, given historical losses. A valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. This assessment requires a review and consideration of all available positive and negative evidence, including our past and future performance, the market environment in which we operate, the utilization of tax attributes in the past, and the length of carryforward periods and evaluation of potential tax planning strategies. We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation allowance until an appropriate level of profitability is sustained or we are able to develop tax strategies that would enable us to conclude that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets would be realizable.

 
19
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summarized cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):

   
Six months ended 
June 30,
 
   
2009
 
2008
 
Cash provided (used) by operating activities
 
$
(1,381
$
705
 
Cash used in investing activities
 
(2,108
)
(305
)
Cash provided (used) by financing activities
 
23
 
(503
)

At June 30, 2009, InsWeb’s principal source of liquidity was $5.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of preferred and common stock.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash used by operating activities was $1.4 million, primarily consisting of our net loss adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation and depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and intangible assets of $0.9 million.  An increase in accounts receivable of $0.5 million and a decrease in accrued expenses and accounts payable of $0.3 million decreased cash provided by operations, but was partially offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.3 million and an increase in deferred revenue of $28,000.  For the comparable six month period ended June 30, 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was $0.7 million, primarily due to our net loss of $0.3 million as adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation of $0.4 million, depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and intangible assets of $74,000, a decrease in accounts receivable of $69,000, a decrease in prepaid expenses of $126,000, an increase in accounts payable of $170,000, and an increase in accrued expenses of $168,000.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $2.1 million relating to cash restricted for the use as collateral to obtain a commercial credit line.  InsWeb uses this commercial credit line for many of its larger, recurring accounts payable and will earn a cash rebate of approximately 50-95 basis points, dependent upon the purchase volume during the 2009 calendar year.  For the comparable six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $305,000, representing purchases of property, equipment and intangible assets.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $23,000, and was primarily attributable to proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan. For the comparable six month period ended June 30, 2008, net cash used by financing activities was $0.5 million, consisting of $0.9 million used for a cash settlement of equity awards in connection with the departure of the president and COO in June, 2008, offset by proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock issued from our employee stock purchase plan of $0.4 million.

We have a non-cancelable 10-year operating lease agreement through April 2011 for office space in the Sacramento area which currently houses our corporate headquarters. We have options to extend the lease at the end of the lease term, and have the right of first refusal on other office space in the complex.

Aggregate contractual cash obligations, net of contractual sublease income, as of June 30, 2009 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
   
Gross lease 
commitments
 
Sublease 
income
 
Net lease 
commitment
 
Six months ending December 31, 2009
 
$
539
 
$
(30)
 
$
509
 
Year ending December 31, 2010
 
1,078
 
(17)
 
1,061
 
Year ending December 31, 2011
 
359
 
 
359
 
Thereafter
 
 
 
 
   
$
1,976
 
$
(47)
 
$
1,929
 

We currently anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. Although we do not anticipate the need for additional financing, we nevertheless may require additional funds to meet operating needs, or to expand our business internally or through acquisition. We cannot be certain that additional financing will be available when required, on favorable terms or at all. If we are not successful in raising additional capital as required, our business could be materially harmed. If additional funds were raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our then-current stockholders would be reduced.

20
 


ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes to our disclosures related to certain market risks as reported under Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 4.                                SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 4T.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 
(a)
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

 
(b)
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II:
OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
ITEM 1.                      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements — Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies.”

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS.

Our future business, operating results and financial condition are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. There have been no material changes to the risk factors as so disclosed.

ITEM 6.                      EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
 
Description of Document
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
     
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
     
32
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

21
 


SIGNATURE

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: August 11, 2009
INSWEB CORPORATION
 
(Registrant)
   
 
/s/ STEVEN J. YASUDA
 
Steven J. Yasuda
 
Chief Accounting Officer

 
22
 


EXHIBIT 31.1

INSWEB CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Hussein A. Enan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of InsWeb Corporation, certify that:

 
(1)
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

 
(2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
(3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
(4)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:

 
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
(5)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


 
/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN
Dated: August11, 2009
Hussein A. Enan
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 

 

 
 
EXHIBIT 31.2

INSWEB CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kiran Rasaretnam, Chief Financial Officer of InsWeb Corporation, certify that:

 
(1)
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

 
(2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
(3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
(4)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:

 
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
 (5)
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


 
/s/ KIRAN RASARETNAM
Dated: August 11, 2009
Kiran Rasaretnam
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 

 

EXHIBIT 32

INSWEB CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN
 
Hussein A. Enan
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
Dated: August 11, 2009
 
   
   
/s/ KIRAN RASARETNAM
 
Kiran Rasaretnam
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
Dated : August 11, 2009