UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. __ )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
| ¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ¨ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| x | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ¨ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Microsoft Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| x | No fee required. |
| ¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| (5) | Total fee paid: |
| ¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| ¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| (3) | Filing Party: |
| (4) | Date Filed: |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not
required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Microsoft’s Board Adopts New “Say-on-Pay” Policy
Posted by Brad Smith
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
and John Seethoff
Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
We’ve blogged in the past about Microsoft’s commitment to strong corporate governance, and our belief in the need for transparent policies that enhance public and investor trust in large companies like our own.
Today, our Board of Directors put Microsoft’s philosophy into practice by adopting a new “Say-on-Pay” policy that enables our shareholders to weigh-in on our executive compensation practices.
Under the policy adopted by the Board today, Microsoft shareholders will be able to cast a non-binding, advisory vote every three years on the compensation programs for our senior executive officers. The first vote will take place at our annual shareholders’ meeting later this year on November 19.
As we mentioned in May, we’ve been studying the evolution of Say-on-Pay over the last year. Variations of the concept have been circulating via proposed legislation, shareholder proposals and management initiatives, and our Board has carefully studied the alternatives to determine the approach that would best serve our company and our shareholders.
Indeed, the decision to go with a triennial approach to Say-on-Pay grew out of an open and constructive dialogue with our shareholders. Earlier this year, we received two shareholder proposals asking our Board to implement Say-on-Pay votes. We considered the merits of each proposal and met with Walden Asset Management and Calvert Investments, co-sponsors of one of the proposals, and the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, sponsor of the other, to understand their goals and motivations. We also sought input from several of our largest institutional shareholders, governance advocates and other companies.
Our discussions led us to the conclusion that a three-year cycle is optimal for Say-on-Pay votes at Microsoft. Although we acknowledge that some constituencies support an annual say-on-pay vote, a number of considerations led us to our conclusion. Among them:
| • | Our compensation program is designed to induce and reward performance over a multi-year period. Say-on-Pay votes should occur over a similar timeframe. |
| • | A three-year cycle will provide investors sufficient time to evaluate the effectiveness of our short- and long-term compensation strategies and related business outcomes. |
| • | Many large shareholders rely on proxy advisory firms, which evaluate the compensation programs of over 12,000 U.S. public companies, for vote recommendations. We believe holding Say-on-Pay votes every three years, rather than annually, helps proxy advisory firms provide more detailed and thorough analyses and recommendations. |
| • | Most compensation programs can’t be changed overnight. Triennial votes give the Board and the Compensation Committee sufficient time to thoughtfully respond to shareholders’ sentiments and implement any necessary policy changes. |
| • | Pre-existing Board requirements to seek shareholder approval of employee stock plans and other compensation-related matters give our shareholders an opportunity to provide feedback even in years when Say-on-Pay votes do not occur. |
Our Board has taken today’s action on its own initiative, but we recognize that Say-on-Pay proposals are under consideration on Capitol Hill. Microsoft will of course comply with any requirements that emerge either through federal legislation or regulatory changes adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We will also continue to look at additional ways to engage with our shareholders on executive compensation. Just as Microsoft believes in constant innovation in our products and services, we believe there is considerable room for innovation in shareholder dialogue.
Microsoft shareholders can communicate directly with our Board, any committee of the Board or any individual directors by e-mailing us at askboard@microsoft.com.
For additional information about corporate governance at Microsoft, please click here, and feel free to leave a comment on this blog below.