e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Commission File
No. 1-11182
BIO-IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
(Exact name of
Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
11-2872047
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
826 Newtown-Yardley Road,
Newtown, Pennsylvania
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
18940-1721
(Zip Code)
|
(267) 757-3000
(Registrants Telephone
Number, Including Area Code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock $0.00025 par
value per share
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act:
None
Check if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes: o No: þ
Check if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes: o No: þ
Check whether the Registrant: (1) filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes: þ
No: o
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response
to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Check if the Registrant is a larger accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
accelerated filer and larger accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act of 1934.
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Check whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). Yes: o No: þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $27,391,181
on June 30, 2006, the last business day of the
Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
based on the average bid and asked prices on that date.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
Registrants classes of common equity, as of
February 28, 2007:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Common Stock, $.00025 par
value
|
|
11,473,470
|
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the
Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement for
its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this Report.
PART I
General
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc., referred to herein as
we, us and our, is a global
pharmaceutical contract service organization, providing services
that support the product development process of the
pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. We
specialize in assisting our clients in the design and management
of the medical imaging component of clinical trials for all
modalities, which consist of computerized tomography (CT),
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), x-rays, dual energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DXA/DEXA), positron emission tomography (PET),
single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT),
quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), cardiac MRI and CT,
intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), peripheral quantitative
angiography (QVA) and ultrasound.
We utilize proprietary processes and software applications in
providing our services to pharmaceutical companies conducting
clinical studies in which medical imaging modalities are used to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, biologics
or medical devices. Our digital image processing and computer
analysis techniques enable technologists or radiologists to make
highly precise measurements and biostatistical inferences about
drug or device effects. The resulting data enables our clients
and regulatory reviewers, primarily the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and comparable European agencies, to evaluate
product efficacy and safety. In addition, we have developed
specialized computer services and software applications that
enable independent radiologists and other medical specialists
involved in clinical trials to review medical image data in an
entirely digital format. Our services also include the
regulatory submission of medical images, quantitative data and
text.
We are directing our marketing and sales efforts towards those
clinical development areas that use medical imaging. These areas
include oncology, musculoskeletal, central nervous system,
neurovascular and cardiovascular, among others.
We have a European facility in Leiden, the Netherlands that
provides centralized image processing services for our European
clients. We manage our services for European-based clinical
trials from this facility. Our European facility has similar
processing and analysis capabilities as our United States
headquarters.
In February 2007, we acquired 100% of the stock of Theralys
S.A., referred to as Theralys, a privately held company located
in Lyon, France. Theralys is an imaging core lab providing
centralized blinded read services and customized image analysis
services primarily in the field of central nervous system
disorders and neurovascular diseases. Theralys proprietary
image processing software enables the introduction of
quantitative imaging markers in the design of clinical trials
for Neurovascular and CNS disorders, which include stroke,
secondary prevention drugs, multiple sclerosis and dementia,
including Alzheimers disease. Theralys proprietary
and validated software for clinical trials includes applications
that enable the automated quantitation of various imaging
parameters such as brain, white matter lesion and hippocampal
volumes and MRI diffusion and perfusion.
In December 2004, we acquired 100% of the stock of Heart Core
B.V., referred to as Heart Core, a privately held company
located in Leiden, the Netherlands. Heart Core is a global
provider of centralized imaging analysis services in the field
of cardiovascular, pulmonary and orthopedic clinical research.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1987 under the name Wise
Ventures, Inc. Our name was changed to Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. in 1991. The address of our principal executive offices is
826 Newtown-Yardley Road, Newtown, Pennsylvania, 18940, and our
telephone number is
267-757-3000.
Our Internet website is www.bioimaging.com. We also utilize the
Internet website www.capmed.com for the CapMed division of our
business. We make available on our Internet website all of our
public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC. However, nothing on our Internet website is intended to be
incorporated by reference into this
Form 10-K
or any other filing made by us with the SEC. The public may read
or copy any filings Bio-Imaging, Technologies, Inc. files with
the SEC at the SEC Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public can also
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
1
Business
Services
Core
Laboratory Services
We are a leading provider of medical imaging management services
for clinical development purposes. Our imaging core laboratory
facilities in the United States and Europe provide centralized
image data collection, processing, analysis and archival
services for clinical trials conducted worldwide. The facilities
are designed for high-volume efficient processing of film and
digital image data in a secure environment that complies with
regulatory guidelines for clinical data management.
Medical image data are received by us from clinical trial sites,
located throughout the world. We have developed procedures for
data tracking and quality control that we believe to be of
significant value to our clients. Our facilities contain
specialized hardware and software for the digitization of films
and translation of digital data, enabling data to be
standardized, regardless of its source. We believe our ability
to handle most commercially available image file formats is a
valuable technical asset and an important competitive advantage
in gaining new business from large global multi-center clinical
trials.
We perform image analyses on client data using internally
developed or specially configured software. We measure key
indicators of drug efficacy in different organs and disease
states. The results from image analysis derived in our
facilities are transferred to databases that can be transmitted
electronically to our clients or integrated directly into our
Bio/ImageBasetm
package for regulatory submission on our clients behalf.
Information
Management Services
Our information management services focus on providing
specialized solutions for improving the quality, speed and
flexibility of image data management for clinical trials. We
believe that our Computer Assisted Masked Reading systems, or
CAMRtm
systems, offer numerous advantages over conventional film-based
medical image reading scenarios, including increased reading
speed, greater standardization of image reading, and reduced
error in the capture of reader interpretations.
Using our
CAMRtm
systems, independent medical specialists can review medical
image data from clinical trials in a digital format. The
CAMRtm
systems display all modalities of medical image data, regardless
of source equipment. In addition, the systems display either
translated digital data or digitized films. Such image reviews
are often required during clinical trials to evaluate
patients responses to therapy or to determine if patients
qualify for studies. By using the
CAMRtm
systems to read and evaluate image data, medical specialists
achieve greater reading speed than is possible with film and
perform evaluations in a more objective, reproducible manner.
We have also developed
remote CAMRtm
systems, or
rCAMRtm
systems, that are located on the premises, either home or
office, of the individual medical specialists who are engaged by
the sponsor to perform the analysis of the medical image data.
Historically, the
CAMRtm
systems have been utilized to determine efficacy of the
compounds being studied. More recently, clients are requesting
us to provide rapid turn-around reads for inclusion/exclusion
criteria. We believe that the
rCAMRtm
system is the optimal tool for this work because it allows us,
at our clients discretion, to provide the images to an
expert in the field to facilitate the review of the images from
the experts office or home.
We have developed an image database software application,
Bio/ImageBasetm,
that enables our clients to submit their medical images and
related clinical data to the FDA in a digital format. Using data
stored on CD-ROM or DVD disks,
Bio/ImageBasetm
allows clients and FDA medical reviewers to review medical
images and related clinical data. We believe that
Bio/ImageBasetm
offers the potential to decrease review time, resulting in
faster regulatory approvals and reduced
time-to-market
for new drugs, biologics and medical devices.
Our
Bio/ImageBasetm
software has been installed at client sites and on two
off-the-shelf
image reading and review computer systems at the FDA. We have
been using our
Bio/ImageBasetm
software to submit medical images and related data to the FDA
since mid-1993. In March 1996,
Bio/ImageBasetm
was cited in the FDAs 1996 Computer-Assisted Product
License Application Guidance Manual as an acceptable database
for submission of imaging data.
2
CapMed
Division
Our CapMed division includes the Personal Health Record
software, or PHR, which is a software application that enables
users to manage and store personal health information, including
their medical images, on the privacy of their desktop computer,
while linking directly to sponsor-directed resources such as
drug information, patient education or disease guidelines.
CapMed also includes the Personal
HealthKeytm
that plugs into a computers USB port, allowing doctors and
patients easy access to the patients medical record
without the need for additional hardware or software, and it is
password protected.
Other
Services
We provide technical consulting in the evaluation of the sites
that may participate in clinical trials. We also consult with
clients regarding regulatory issues involved in the design,
execution, analysis and submission of medical image data in
clinical trials.
Target
Markets
Our primary target market is comprised of pharmaceutical,
biotechnology and medical device companies whose clinical
development pipelines include drugs, biologics or devices that
are typically evaluated by medical imaging methods. This global
target market includes leading international pharmaceutical
companies and biotechnology companies with products currently in
the clinical development pipeline.
We focus our marketing on the following stages of clinical
development:
Phase II
Clinical Trials
Phase II clinical trials are generally conducted over six
months to two years and involve basic efficacy, safety and
dose-range testing in approximately 50 to 400 patients
suffering from the disease or condition under study. Such trials
help determine the best effective dose, confirm that the drug
works as expected and provide initial safety data.
Phase III
Clinical Trials
Phase III clinical trials are generally conducted over one
to four years and involve efficacy and safety studies in broader
populations of hundreds or thousands of patients and many
investigational sites, such as hospitals and clinics. These
trials are sometimes referred to as pivotal studies for
submission to the regulatory agencies. Generally, Phase III
studies are intended to provide additional information on drug
safety and efficacy, and the evaluation of the risk-benefit of
the drug and information for the adequate labeling of the
product.
Phase IV
Post Approval Studies
Phase IV studies are studies conducted after a
pharmaceutical drug or device has been approved for use. These
studies are generally conducted over a two to four year period
and involve either a continuation of a Phase III patient
population or the recruitment of a new patient population. As
there continues to be pressure to expedite approval of
pharmaceuticals and medical devices, there is an increase in the
number of conditional approvals based on the conduct of
additional Phase IV studies.
In addition, our experience spans a wide range of therapeutic
areas with a concentration in the following:
Cancer
Therapeutics
Many pharmaceutical companies are currently developing new
therapies for the treatment of cancer. For solid tumor studies,
medical imaging modalities are used to determine the response of
treated and untreated tumors. These medical images are evaluated
by medical specialists during the course of oncology clinical
trials to determine the extent of disease and changes in tumor
size over time.
The FDAs guidelines aimed at accelerating access to new
drugs for the review and approval of new cancer therapies place
greater emphasis on shrinkage of tumors as an early indicator of
anti-tumor efficacy. We believe that these FDA guidelines may
have a favorable impact on our business as pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies
3
may have an increased need for regulatory compliant medical
imaging services to conduct their oncology clinical trials.
Musculoskeletal
Therapeutics
Anti-inflammatory clinical trials, such as those focused on
arthritis, include radiologic evaluation of the bones and joints
to determine drug efficacy. We believe that demand among
pharmaceutical companies for our services will increase as new
classes of biotechnology-derived drugs enter and progress
through the clinical development pipeline.
Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by thinning bones, which
leads to fractures in the elderly. The FDA guidance document for
developing treatments for this disease recognized DEXA as one of
the primary efficacy and safety measurement tools available.
Furthermore, all data needs to go through a quality assurance
laboratory. This is now standard practice in all studies using
DEXA instruments whether for osteoporosis, oncology or
anti-obesity, or muscle wasting assessment.
Central
Nervous System and Neurovascular Therapeutics
Many pharmaceutical companies are developing drugs for treatment
of neurovascular diseases and conditions of the central nervous
system, referred to as CNS, such as multiple sclerosis,
infectious diseases that target the CNS, stroke and
Alzheimers disease. For many of these diseases, the
diagnosis is largely dependent upon imaging, particularly MRI.
We believe that the central nervous system clinical trials
business may increase as more therapies progress through the
research pipeline and as baby boomers continue to age, driving
the demand for these products.
Cardiovascular
Therapeutics
We provide our services to clients developing drugs and medical
devices for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular
diseases and conditions that are evaluated with the aid of
medical imaging. We offer various cardiovascular, quantitative,
image-analysis services including: quantitative coronary
angiography (QCA), cardiac MRI and CT, ultrasound, intravascular
ultrasound (IVUS) and peripheral quantitative angiography (QVA).
We have participated in numerous multinational trials for
leading pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device
companies throughout the world. In addition, as research
continues to advance, our collective knowledge base of the
underlying pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease will grow
as well as the need for advanced imaging technology to be used
in cardiovascular trials. For example, CT may be used to
identify coronary calcifications, which are considered to be a
predictor of cardiovascular risk. It follows that clinical
trials involving therapeutic interventions targeting coronary
calcifications will require imaging as an endpoint of efficacy.
Diagnostic
Imaging Agents
We provide our services to clients developing diagnostic imaging
agents that are designed to diagnose disease conditions more
quickly and accurately in their development in order to
facilitate earlier and more accurate treatment.
Market
Trends
We believe that a variety of favorable regulatory, technological
and market trends may positively impact the demand for medical
imaging management services, including:
|
|
|
|
|
FDA initiatives to streamline the regulatory submission and
review process that are being implemented continue to have a
beneficial impact on us. The FDA is investing in new information
technology and is continuing the process of formulating and
disseminating guidelines for standardizing the submission of
electronic data, including medical images. We expect submission
of image data to continue to be a requirement in key therapeutic
and diagnostic areas for evaluating the effectiveness of a drug
or imaging agent.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation, restructuring and downsizing in the
pharmaceutical industry in response to downward pressure on
certain pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies drug
prices has resulted in increased outsourcing of certain research
and development activities.
|
|
|
|
Overall, growth in pharmaceutical and biotechnology research and
development spending is increasing. As a result, we believe that
the outsourcing of development activities should like-wise
increase.
|
|
|
|
New classes of drugs to treat conditions traditionally evaluated
by imaging are entering or progressing through the clinical
development pipeline, leading to increased demand for medical
imaging-related services. In addition, we believe that digital
technologies for data acquisition and management are penetrating
the radiology community.
|
|
|
|
We believe that as pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
increasingly attempt to expand the market for new drugs by
conducting clinical trials and pursuing regulatory approval in
multiple countries simultaneously, contract service
organizations with a global presence and expertise will continue
to benefit.
|
Due to several factors, including, without limitation,
competition from commercial competitors and academic research
centers, the risk of project cancellations, slowing of patient
enrollment in on-going studies or delay of future project
awards, among others, we cannot assure you that demand for our
services and technologies will grow, sustain growth, or that
additional revenue generating opportunities will be realized by
us.
Intellectual
Property
Proprietary protection for our computer-imaging programs,
processes and know-how is important to our business. We have
developed certain technically derived procedures and computer
software applications that are intended to increase the
effectiveness and quality of our services. We rely upon patents,
trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how and continuing
technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive
position. We have claimed trademark protection for
Bio/ImageBasetm,
CAMRtm,
rCAMRtm,
Intelligent
Imagingtm
and Personal Health
Keytm.
We hold patents for the two DEXA phantoms, titled Spine and
Variable Composition Phantoms, which we sell to trial sites. We
have a patent pending on our Personal Health
Keytm.
We have registered our Stylized Man Design with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We cannot assure you that
we can limit unauthorized or wrongful disclosures of trade
secrets or otherwise confidential information. In addition, to
the extent we rely on trade secrets and know-how to maintain our
competitive technological position, we cannot assure you that
others may not develop independently the same, similar or
superior techniques. Although our intellectual property rights
are important to the results of our operations, we believe that
other factors, such as our independence, process knowledge,
technical expertise and experience are more important, and that,
overall, these technological capabilities offer significant
benefits to our clients.
Government
Regulation
The research and development, manufacture and marketing of drugs
and medical devices are subject to stringent regulation by the
FDA in the United States and by similar authorities in other
countries. In addition, regulations imposed by other federal
agencies, as well as state and local authorities, may impact
such research and development, manufacturing and marketing.
The FDA has established mandatory procedures and safety
standards that apply to the clinical testing, manufacturing and
marketing of drugs and medical devices. These procedures and
safety standards include, among other things, the completion of
adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish
the safety and efficacy of the drug or device for its
recommended conditions or use. We advise our clients in the
execution of clinical trials and other drug and device
development tasks. We do not administer drugs to or utilize
medical devices on patients.
The success of our business is dependent upon continued
acceptance by the FDA and other regulatory authorities of the
data and analyses generated by our services in connection with
the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of new drugs and
devices. The FDA has formal guidelines that encourage the use of
surrogate measures, through submission of digital image data,
for evaluation of drugs to treat life- threatening or
debilitating conditions. We cannot assure you that the FDA or
other regulatory authorities will accept the data or analyses
generated by us in
5
the future and, even assuming acceptance, we cannot assure you
that the FDA or other regulatory authorities will require the
application of imaging techniques to numbers of patients and
over time periods substantially similar to those required of
traditional safety and efficacy techniques.
Changes in the FDAs policy for the evaluation of
therapeutic oncology agents may have a positive impact on the
time to market of such therapeutics. According to FDA
guidelines, approval times for new cancer therapies can be
shortened if evidence of tumor shrinkage is verifiable and
demonstrable through the use of objective measurement
techniques. These guidelines place greater reliance on the use
of medical image data to demonstrate objective tumor shrinkage.
In addition, the FDA has implemented guidelines aimed at
accelerating other therapeutic categories through the use of
imaging markers as surrogate endpoints for measuring therapeutic
effectiveness. We believe the FDAs initiatives to
streamline and accelerate the submission and review process of
therapeutic agents has had a favorable impact on our business.
We believe that our ability to achieve continued and sustainable
growth will be materially dependent upon, among other factors,
the continued stringent enforcement of the comprehensive
regulatory framework by various government agencies. Any
significant change in these regulatory requirements or the
enforcement thereof, especially relaxation of standards, could
adversely affect our prospects.
The current European market regulation is more fragmented than
in the United States. However, we believe that our expertise in
working with the standards of the FDA provides us with
experience when working with the various European regulatory
agencies.
Competition
We continue to experience competition from commercial
competitors and academic research centers. The biopharmaceutical
services industry is highly competitive, and we face numerous
potential competitors in our business, including hundreds of
contract research organizations. We primarily compete against
specialty contract research organizations, or CROs, and to a
lesser extent, universities and teaching hospitals. Certain of
these competitors are owned by or are divisions of larger
organizations, some of which have substantially greater
resources than we do. As competition increases, we will look to
provide value-added services and undertake marketing and sales
programs to differentiate our services based on our expertise
and experience in specific therapeutic and diagnostic areas, our
technical expertise, our regulatory and clinical development
experience, our quality performance and our international
capabilities. Our competitive position also depends upon our
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and develop
and preserve proprietary technology, processes and know-how.
Competition in our industry has resulted in additional pressure
being placed on price, service and quality. Although we believe
that we are well positioned against our competitors due to our
experience in clinical trials and regulatory compliance along
with our international presence, we cannot assure you that our
competitors or clients will not provide or develop services
similar or superior to those provided by us. This competition
could have a material adverse impact on us.
Marketing
and Sales
We provide and market our services on an international basis
primarily to pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device
companies. Our sales and marketing activities are directed by a
Senior Vice President of Medical Affairs and a Vice President of
Global Business Development, supported by in-house staff and
field business development personnel.
Our selling efforts are focused on North America and Western
Europe. Our marketing activities include exhibiting at major
trade shows, advertising in trade journals and the sponsoring of
industry associations.
Significant
Clients
During fiscal 2006, contracts with one client, Novartis
Pharmaceutical, Inc., which encompassed 14 projects, represented
10.9% of our service revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2006, while for the year ended
December 31, 2005, no one client accounted for 10% or more
of our service revenues. These contracts are
6
terminable by our client at any time and for any reason. The
loss of this client, or a reduction in services provided to this
client, would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we had 283 employees, four of whom
are executive officers.
Of our employees, as of December 31, 2006, 26 were engaged
in sales and marketing, 227 were engaged in client related
projects and 30 were engaged in administration and management. A
significant number of our management and professional employees
have prior industry experience. We believe that we have been
successful in attracting skilled and experienced personnel,
however, it remains a competitive market for recruiting such
personnel. Although all of our employees are covered by
confidentiality and non-competition agreements, we cannot assure
you that such agreements will be enforceable. As of
February 28, 2007, we have employment agreements with two
of our executive officers. See Item 11. Executive
Compensation. We consider relations with our employees to
be good.
The more prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our
business are described below. However, additional risks and
uncertainties may also impair our business operations. If any of
the following risks actually occur, our business, financial
condition or results of operations may suffer. Investing in our
common stock involves a high degree of risk. Any of the
following factors could harm our business and future results of
operations and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Company and Business
We may
incur financial losses because contracts may be delayed or
terminated or reduced in scope for reasons beyond our
control.
Our clients may terminate or delay their contracts for a variety
of reasons, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
unexpected or undesired clinical results;
|
|
|
|
the clients decision to terminate the development of a
particular product or to end a particular study;
|
|
|
|
insufficient patient enrollment in a study;
|
|
|
|
insufficient investigator recruitment;
|
|
|
|
failure to perform our obligations under the contract; or
|
|
|
|
the failure of products to satisfy safety requirements.
|
In addition, we believe that FDA-regulated companies may proceed
with fewer clinical trials or conduct them without assistance of
contract service organizations if they are trying to reduce
costs as a result of cost containment pressures associated with
healthcare reform, budgetary limits or changing priorities.
These factors may cause such companies to cancel contracts with
contract service organizations.
We cannot assure you that our clients will continue to use our
services or that we will be able to replace, in a timely or
effective manner, departing clients with new clients that
generate comparable revenues. Further, we cannot assure you that
our clients will continue to generate consistent amounts of
revenues over time.
The loss, reduction in scope or delay of a large contract or the
loss or delay of multiple contracts could materially adversely
affect our business, although our contracts entitle us to
receive all fees earned up to the time of termination. The loss
of business from our client, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Inc.,
would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
7
We
depend on a small number of industries and clients for all of
our business, and the loss of one such significant client could
cause revenues to drop quickly and unexpectedly.
We depend on research and development expenditures by
pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies to
sustain our business. Our operations could be materially and
adversely affected if:
|
|
|
|
|
clients businesses experience financial problems or are
affected by a general economic downturn;
|
|
|
|
consolidation in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology or medical
device industries leads to a smaller client base for us; or
|
|
|
|
clients reduce their research and development expenditures.
|
During fiscal 2006, contracts with one client, Novartis
Pharmaceutical, Inc., which encompassed 14 projects, represented
10.9% of our service revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2006, while for the comparable period last
year, no one client accounted for 10% or more of our service
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005. The loss of
business from a significant client or our failure to continue to
obtain new business to replace completed or canceled projects
would have a material adverse effect on our business and
revenues.
Our
contracted/committed backlog may not be indicative of future
results.
Our reported contracted/committed backlog of $75.2 million
at December 31, 2006 is based on anticipated service
revenue from uncompleted projects with clients. Backlog is the
expected service revenue that remains to be earned and
recognized on signed and verbally agreed to contracts. Contracts
included in backlog are subject to termination by our clients at
any time. In the event that a client cancels a contract, we
would be entitled to receive payment for all services performed
up to the cancellation date and subsequent client authorized
services related to the cancellation of the project. The
duration of the projects included in our backlog range from less
than three months to seven years. We cannot assure that this
backlog will be indicative of future results. A number of
factors may affect backlog, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the variable size and duration of the projects (some are
performed over several years);
|
|
|
|
the loss or delay of projects;
|
|
|
|
the change in the scope of work during the course of a
project; and
|
|
|
|
the cancellation of such contracts by our clients.
|
Also, if clients delay projects, the projects will remain in
backlog, but will not generate revenue at the rate originally
expected. Accordingly, the historical relationship of backlog to
revenues may not be indicative of future results.
We
have experienced substantial expansion in the past, and if we
fail to properly manage that expansion, our business may
suffer.
Our business has expanded substantially in the past. Our
continuing sales and marketing efforts have increased the number
of projects under management from 270 in fiscal 2005 to 284 in
fiscal 2006. In addition, we acquired Theralys in February 2007,
HeartCore in December 2004 and CapMed in November 2003.
Rapid expansion, internally or through acquisitions, could
strain our operational, human and financial resources. If we
fail to properly manage this expansion, our results of
operations and financial condition might be adversely affected.
In order to manage our expansion, we must:
|
|
|
|
|
effectively market our services to pharmaceutical, biotechnology
and medical device companies;
|
|
|
|
continue to improve operating, administrative and information
systems;
|
|
|
|
accurately predict future personnel and resource needs to meet
client contract commitments;
|
|
|
|
successfully integrate our acquired companies and businesses;
|
|
|
|
track the progress of on-going client projects; and
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
attract and retain qualified management, sales, professional and
technical operating personnel.
|
We will face additional risks in expanding foreign operations.
Specifically, we might find it difficult to:
|
|
|
|
|
assimilate differences in foreign business practices and
regulations;
|
|
|
|
hire and retain qualified personnel; and
|
|
|
|
overcome language and cultural barriers.
|
We may
engage in future acquisitions, which may be expensive and time
consuming and from which we may not realize anticipated
benefits.
We may acquire additional businesses, technologies and products
if we determine that these additional businesses, technologies
and products complement our existing business or otherwise serve
our strategic goals. If we do undertake transactions of this
sort, the process of integrating an acquired business,
technology or product may result in operating difficulties and
expenditures and may absorb significant management attention
that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our
business. Moreover, we may never realize the anticipated
benefits of any acquisition. Future acquisitions could result in
potentially dilutive issuances of our securities, the incurrence
of debt and contingent liabilities and amortization expenses
related to intangible assets, which could adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
On February 6, 2007, we acquired 100% of the outstanding
securities of Theralys, a privately held company headquartered
in Lyon, France. The aggregate purchase price was 2,731,257
Euros ($3,556,097 as determined by an agreed upon exchange
rate), of which 2,375,484 Euros ($3,092,881) was paid in cash
and 355,773 Euros ($463,216) was paid in 57,408 shares of
our common stock. In addition to the aggregate purchase price,
certain stockholders of Theralys received an aggregate of
36,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of
$8.06885 per share.
Loss
of key personnel, or failure to attract and retain additional
personnel, may cause the success and growth of our business to
suffer.
Future success depends on the personal efforts and abilities of
the principal members of our senior management to provide
strategic direction, develop business, manage operations and
maintain a cohesive and stable environment. Specifically, we are
dependent upon Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive
Officer, David A. Pitler, Senior Vice President Operations,
Colin G. Miller, Ph.D., Senior Vice President Medical
Affairs and Ted I. Kaminer, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Although we have employment agreements with
Mr. Weinstein and Mr. Kaminer, this does not
necessarily mean that they will remain with us. Although we have
executive retention agreements with our officers, we do not have
employment agreements with any other key personnel. Furthermore,
our performance also depends on our ability to attract and
retain management and qualified professional and technical
operating staff. Competition for these skilled personnel is
intense. The loss of services of any key executive, or inability
to continue to attract and retain qualified staff, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. We do not maintain any key employee
insurance on any of our executives.
Our
revenues, earnings and operating costs are exposed to exchange
rate fluctuations.
In fiscal 2006, a portion of our service revenues were
denominated in foreign currency. Our financial statements are
denominated in United States dollars. In the event a greater
portion of our service revenues are denominated in a foreign
currency changes in foreign currency exchange rates could affect
our results of operations and financial condition. Fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates could materially impact the
operating costs of our European facility in Leiden, the
Netherlands which are primarily Euro denominated.
9
Risks
Related to Our Industry
Our
failure to compete effectively in our industry could cause our
revenues to decline.
Significant factors in determining whether we will be able to
compete successfully include:
|
|
|
|
|
consultative and clinical trials design capabilities;
|
|
|
|
reputation for on-time quality performance;
|
|
|
|
expertise and experience in specific therapeutic areas;
|
|
|
|
the scope of service offerings;
|
|
|
|
strength in various geographic markets;
|
|
|
|
the price of services;
|
|
|
|
ability to acquire, process, analyze and report data in a
time-saving and accurate manner;
|
|
|
|
ability to manage large-scale clinical trials both domestically
and internationally;
|
|
|
|
our size; and
|
|
|
|
the service and product offerings of our competitors.
|
If our services are not competitive based on these or other
factors, our business, financial condition and results of
operations will be materially harmed.
The biopharmaceutical services industry is highly competitive,
and we face numerous competitors in our business, including
hundreds of contract research organizations. If we fail to
compete effectively, we will lose clients, which would cause our
business to suffer. We primarily compete against in-house
departments of pharmaceutical companies, full service contract
research organizations, or CROs, small specialty CROs, and to a
lesser extent, universities and teaching hospitals. Some of
these competitors have substantially greater capital, technical
and other resources than we do. In addition, certain of our
competitors that are smaller specialized companies may compete
effectively against us because of their concentrated size and
focus.
Changes
in outsourcing trends in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
industries could adversely affect our operating results and
growth rate.
Service revenues depend greatly on the expenditures made by the
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries in research and
development. Accordingly, economic factors and industry trends
that affect our clients in these industries also affect our
business. For example, the practice of many companies in these
industries has been to hire outside organizations like us to
conduct clinical research projects. This practice has grown
significantly in the last decade, and we have benefited from
this trend. However, if this trend were to change and companies
in these industries were to reduce the number of research and
development projects they outsource, our business could be
materially adversely affected.
Additionally, numerous governments have undertaken efforts to
control growing healthcare costs through legislation, regulation
and voluntary agreements with medical care providers and
pharmaceutical companies. If future regulatory cost containment
efforts limit the profits that can be derived on new drugs, our
clients might reduce their research and development spending,
which could reduce our business.
Failure
to comply with existing regulations could result in increased
costs to complete clinical trials.
Our business is subject to numerous governmental regulations,
primarily relating to pharmaceutical product development and the
conduct of clinical trials. In particular, we are subject to
21 CFR Part 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations that
provides the criteria for acceptance by the FDA of electronic
records. If we fail to comply with these governmental
regulations, it could result in the termination of ongoing
clinical research or the disqualification of data for submission
to regulatory authorities. We also could be barred from
providing clinical trial services in the
10
future or be subjected to fines. Any of these consequences would
harm our reputation, our prospects for future work and our
operating results.
Our
CapMed division may not reach profitability.
Our CapMed division had a loss from operations of $1,554,564 in
fiscal 2006. If our CapMed division continues to incur such
losses, our businesses, results of operations and financial
condition will be materially adversely affected.
Changes
in governmental regulation could decrease the need for the
services we provide, which would negatively affect our future
business opportunities.
In recent years, the United States Congress and state
legislatures have considered various types of healthcare reform
in order to control growing healthcare costs. The United States
Congress and state legislatures may again address healthcare
reform in the future. We are unable to predict what legislative
proposals will be adopted in the future, if any. Similar reform
movements have occurred in Europe and Asia.
Implementation of healthcare reform legislation that results in
additional costs could limit the profits that can be made by
clients from the development of new products. This could
adversely affect our clients research and development
expenditures, which could, in turn, decrease the business
opportunities available to us both in the United States and
abroad. In addition, new laws or regulations may create a risk
of liability, increase costs or limit service offerings. We
cannot predict the likelihood of any of these events.
In addition to healthcare reform proposals, the expansion of
managed care organizations in the healthcare market may result
in reduced spending on research and development. Managed care
organizations efforts to cut costs by limiting
expenditures on pharmaceuticals and medical devices could result
in pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies
spending less on research and development. If this were to
occur, we would have fewer business opportunities and our
revenues could decrease, possibly materially.
Governmental agencies throughout the world, but particularly in
the United States, strictly regulate the drug
development/approval process. Our business involves helping
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies navigate the
regulatory drug approval process. Changes in regulation, such as
relaxation in regulatory requirements or the introduction of
simplified drug approval procedures or an increase in regulatory
requirements that we may have difficulty satisfying could
eliminate or substantially reduce the need for our services. If
these changes in regulations were to occur, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected. These and other changes in
regulation could have a material adverse impact on our available
business opportunities.
If
governmental agencies do not accept the data and analyses
generated by our services, the need for our services would be
eliminated or substantially reduced.
The success of our business is dependent upon continued
acceptance by the FDA and other regulatory authorities of the
data and analyses generated by our services in connection with
the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of new drugs and
devices. The FDA has formal guidelines that encourage the use of
surrogate measures through submission of digital
image data, for evaluation of drugs to treat life-threatening or
debilitating conditions. We cannot assure you that the FDA or
other regulatory authorities will accept the data or analyses
generated by us in the future and, even assuming acceptance, the
FDA or other regulatory authorities may not require the
application of imaging techniques to numbers of patients and
over time periods substantially similar to those required of
traditional safety and efficacy techniques. If the governmental
agencies do not accept data and analyses generated by our
services in connection with the evaluation of new drugs and
devices, the need for our services would be eliminated or
substantially reduced, and, as a result, our business, results
of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
11
We may
be exposed to liability claims as a result of our involvement in
clinical trials.
We may be exposed to liability claims as a result of our
involvement in clinical trials. We cannot assure you that
liability claims will not be asserted against us as a result of
work performed for our clients. We maintain liability insurance
coverage in amounts that we believe are sufficient for the
pharmaceutical services industry. Furthermore, we cannot assure
you that our clients will agree to indemnify us, or that we will
have sufficient insurance to satisfy any such liability claims.
If a claim is brought against us and the outcome is unfavorable
to us, such outcome could have a material adverse impact on us.
Risks
related to our common stock
Your
percentage ownership and voting power and the price of our
common stock may decrease as a result of events that increase
the number of our outstanding shares.
As of December 31, 2006, we had the following capital
structure:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding
|
|
|
11,309,550
|
|
Common stock issuable upon:
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options which are
outstanding
|
|
|
1,870,662
|
|
Exercise of options which have not
been granted
|
|
|
714,216
|
|
Total common stock outstanding
assuming exercise or conversion of all of the above
|
|
|
13,894,428
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, we had outstanding options to
purchase 1,870,662 shares of common stock at exercise
prices ranging from $0.63 to $7.03 per share (exercisable
at a weighted average of $2.61 per share), of which
1,690,362 options were then exercisable. Exercise of our
outstanding options into shares of our common stock may
significantly and negatively affect the market price for our
common stock as well as decrease your percentage ownership and
voting power. In addition, we may conduct future offerings of
our common stock or other securities with rights to convert the
securities into shares of our common stock. As a result of these
and other events, such as future acquisitions, that increase the
number of our outstanding shares, your percentage ownership and
voting power and the price of our common stock may decrease.
Shares
of our common stock eligible for public sale may have a negative
impact on its market price.
Future sales of shares of our common stock by existing holders
of our common stock or by holders of outstanding options, upon
the exercise thereof, could have a negative impact on the market
price of our common stock. As of December 31, 2006, we had
11,309,550 shares of our common stock issued and
outstanding, all of which are currently freely tradable. On
March 1, 2006, in connection with his employment agreement
dated March 28, 2005, we issued 14,850 shares of
restricted stock to our President and Chief Executive Officer,
this was net of 10,150 shares withheld for withholding
taxes associated with the issuance of the shares.
We are unable to estimate the number of shares that may be sold
because this will depend on the market price for our common
stock, the personal circumstances of the sellers and other
factors. Any sale of substantial amounts of our common stock or
other securities in the open market may adversely affect the
market price of the securities offered hereby and may adversely
affect our ability to obtain future financing in the capital
markets as well as create a potential market overhang.
There
are a limited number of shareholders who have significant
control over our common stock, allowing them to have significant
influence over the outcome of all matters submitted to our
stockholders for approval, which influence may conflict with our
interests and the interests of our other
stockholders.
Our directors, officers and principal stockholders (stockholders
owning 10% or more of our common stock), including Covance Inc.,
beneficially owned 34% of the outstanding shares of common stock
and stock options that could have been converted to common stock
at December 31, 2006, and such stockholders will have
significant influence over the outcome of all matters submitted
to our stockholders for approval, including the election of our
directors and other corporate actions. In addition, such
influence by these affiliates could have the effect of
12
discouraging others from attempting to take us over, thereby
increasing the likelihood that the market price of the common
stock will not reflect a premium for control.
Because
we do not intend to pay dividends, stockholders will benefit
from an investment in our common stock only if it appreciates in
value.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if
any, to finance further research and development and do not
expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a
result, the success of an investment in our common stock will
depend upon any future appreciation in its value. There is no
guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value or even
maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their
shares.
Trading
in our common stock may be volatile, which may result in
substantial declines in its market price.
The market price of our common stock has experienced historical
volatility and might continue to experience volatility in the
future in response to
quarter-to-quarter
variations in:
|
|
|
|
|
operating results;
|
|
|
|
analysts reports;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations; and
|
|
|
|
changes in general conditions in the economy or the financial
markets.
|
The overall market (including the market for our common stock)
has also experienced significant decreases in value in the past.
This volatility and potential market decline could affect the
market prices of securities issued by many companies, often for
reasons unrelated to their operating performance, and may
adversely affect the price of our common stock. Between
January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006, our common
stock has traded at a low of $3.11 per share and a high of
$8.10 per share. Between January 1, 2007 and
February 28, 2007, our common stock has traded at a low of
$6.78 per share and a high of $9.40 per share.
Our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Global Market,
formerly called the NASDAQ National Market, on December 18,
2003 and has a limited trading market. We cannot assure that an
active trading market will develop or, if developed, will be
maintained. As a result, our stockholders may find it difficult
to dispose of shares of our common stock and, as a result, may
suffer a loss of all or a substantial portion of their
investment.
Certain
provisions of our charter and Delaware law could make a takeover
difficult and may prevent or frustrate attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our management
team.
We have an authorized class of 3,000,000 shares of
undesignated preferred stock, of which 1,250,000 shares
were previously issued, and the remaining 1,750,000 shares
may be issued by our board of directors, on such terms and with
such rights, preferences and designation as the Board may
determine. Issuance of such preferred stock, depending upon the
rights, preferences and designations thereof, may have the
effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control
of our company. In addition, we are subject to provisions of
Delaware corporate law which, subject to certain exceptions,
will prohibit us from engaging in any business
combination with a person who, together with affiliates
and associates, owns 15% or more of our common stock for a
period of three years following the date that the person came to
own 15% or more of our common stock unless the business
combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
These provisions of our certificate of incorporation, and of
Delaware law may have the effect of delaying, deterring or
preventing a change in control of our company, may discourage
bids for our common stock at a premium over market price and may
adversely affect the market price, and the voting and other
rights of the holders, of our common stock. In addition, these
provisions make it more difficult to replace or remove our
current
13
management team in the event our stockholders believe this would
be in the best interest of our company and our stockholders.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
We lease 54,400 square feet of office space located in
Newtown, Pennsylvania. This lease expires June 2010 and provides
for a fixed base rent of $93,000 per month with an annual
inflation increase. We lease 7,447 square feet of
additional office space located in Newtown, Pennsylvania for
$6,100 per month in base rent expiring November 2008. In
addition, we lease 15,500 square feet of office space in
Leiden, the Netherlands. This lease, denominated in Euro,
expires in May 2008 and provides for a base rent of
$30,500 per month, based upon the conversion rate as of
December 31, 2006, with an annual inflation increase. We
believe that these facilities will be adequate for our needs for
the foreseeable future.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
In the normal course of business, we may be a party to legal
proceedings. We are not currently a party to any material legal
proceedings.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Global Market,
formerly called the NASDAQ National Market, on December 18,
2003 under the symbol BITI. Prior to listing on the NASDAQ
Global Market, our common stock was traded on the American Stock
Exchange under the symbol BIT from February 25, 2003. Our
common stock was quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board
under the symbol BITI prior to being listed on the American
Stock Exchange.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid quotations
for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for
each of the quarters from the quarter ended March 31, 2005
through December 31, 2006. Such quotations reflect
interdealer prices, without retail
mark-up,
mark-down or commission and may not represent actual
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
4.73
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
14
As of February 28, 2007, the number of holders of record of
our common stock was 93 and the approximate number of beneficial
holders of our common stock was 1,700.
On February 6, 2007, we acquired 100% of the outstanding
securities of Theralys, a privately held company headquartered
in Lyon, France. The aggregate purchase price was 2,731,257
Euros ($3,556,097 as determined by an agreed upon exchange
rate), of which 2,375,484 Euros ($3,092,881) was paid in cash
and 355,773 Euros ($463,216) was paid in 57,408 shares of
our common stock. In addition to the aggregate purchase price,
certain stockholders of Theralys received an aggregate of
36,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of
$8.06885 per share.
On March 1, 2006, in connection with his employment
agreement dated March 28, 2005, we issued
14,850 shares of restricted stock to our President and
Chief Executive Officer, which was net of 10,150 shares
withheld for withholding taxes associated with the issuance of
the shares.
We believe that the issuance of the foregoing securities was
exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions not
involving a public offering. Each of the recipients were
sophisticated or accredited investors, acquired the securities
for investment purposes only and not with a view to distribution
and had adequate information about our company.
We have neither paid nor declared dividends on our common stock
since our inception and do not plan to pay dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. We expect that any
earnings which we may realize will be retained to finance our
growth.
On November 9, 2005, our Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors recommended, and our Board of Directors
approved, the acceleration of vesting of all
out-of-the-money
unvested options to purchase shares of our common stock with an
exercise price greater than $7.00 held by our current employees
and executive officers (but excluding any options granted to
members of our Board of Directors). These options were
previously awarded to our employees on February 4, 2004,
pursuant to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, and would still have
been unvested at January 1, 2006. Options to purchase
107,691 shares of common stock are subject to this
acceleration. The exercise price per share for these options was
$7.03, while the closing price per share on November 9,
2005 was $2.20.
The following table summarizes the options subject to
acceleration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issuable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Accelerated
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
per Share
|
|
Date of Grant
|
|
Employees as a group (other than
executive officers)
|
|
|
69,722
|
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
February 4, 2004
|
|
Executive officers as a group
|
|
|
37,969
|
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
February 4, 2004
|
|
The acceleration of vesting of these
out-of-the
money options is being undertaken primarily to eliminate any
future compensation expense our company would otherwise
recognize in its income statement with respect to these options
with the implementation of the Financial Accounting Standard
Board (FASB) statement Share-Based Payment
(FAS 123R) effective for our company on January 1,
2006. We estimate this compensation expense, before tax, would
be approximately $402,763 in aggregate future expenses based on
calculations using the Black-Scholes methodology.
15
STOCK
PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Our common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol BITI. The Stock Price
Performance Graph set forth below compares the cumulative total
stockholder return on the our common stock for the period from
December 31, 2001 through December 31, 2006, with the
cumulative total return of the NASDAQ U.S. Stock Index and
the NASDAQ Health Services Index over the same period. The
comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2001
in our common stock, in the NASDAQ U.S. Stock Index and in
the NASDAQ Health Services Index and assumes reinvestment of
dividends, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc.
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
169.23
|
|
|
|
$
|
479.23
|
|
|
|
$
|
421.54
|
|
|
|
$
|
248.46
|
|
|
|
$
|
620.00
|
|
NASDAQ U.S. Stock Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
69.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
103.37
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.49
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.88
|
|
|
|
$
|
126.23
|
|
NASDAQ Health Services
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
86.16
|
|
|
|
$
|
131.76
|
|
|
|
$
|
166.06
|
|
|
|
$
|
228.23
|
|
|
|
$
|
227.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foregoing Stock Price Performance Graph and related
information shall not be deemed soliciting material
or to be filed with the SEC, nor shall such
information be incorporated by reference into any future filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of
1934, each as amended, except to the extent that we specifically
incorporate if by reference into such filing.
16
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The following table presents selected consolidated financial
data. This data is derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and related footnotes included in this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended,
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data and number of
employees)
|
|
|
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
$
|
31,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,712
|
|
|
$
|
25,069
|
|
|
$
|
21,748
|
|
|
$
|
17,190
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
40,519
|
|
|
$
|
30,486
|
|
|
$
|
29,691
|
|
|
$
|
25,211
|
|
|
$
|
20,879
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
(4,335
|
)
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,166
|
|
|
$
|
10,554
|
|
|
$
|
9,650
|
|
|
$
|
13,289
|
|
|
$
|
2,563
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
10,219
|
|
|
|
8,055
|
|
|
|
13,121
|
|
|
|
12,966
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
34,108
|
|
|
|
28,791
|
|
|
|
28,374
|
|
|
|
25,907
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
18,842
|
|
|
|
17,197
|
|
|
|
19,518
|
|
|
|
17,426
|
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
OTHER DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
$
|
2,232
|
|
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
Number of employees (not audited)
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Weighted average shares used in
computing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
|
|
|
10,812
|
|
|
|
9,276
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
12,364
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
|
|
|
12,229
|
|
|
|
10,849
|
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Overview
Pharmaceutical
Contract Services
We are a global pharmaceutical contract service organization,
providing services that support the product development process
of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device
industries. We specialize in assisting our clients in the design
and management of the medical imaging component of clinical
trials for all modalities, which consist of computerized
tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), x-rays, dual
energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA/DEXA), positron emission
tomography (PET), single photon emission computerized tomography
(SPECT), quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), cardiac MRI
and CT, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), peripheral quantitative
angiography (QVA) and ultrasound. We provide services that
include the processing and analysis of medical images and the
data-basing and regulatory submission of medical images,
quantitative data and text.
Our sales cycle, referring to the period from the presentation
by us to a potential client to the engagement of us by such
client, has historically ranged from three to twelve months. In
addition, the contracts under which we perform services
typically cover a period of 12 to 60 months and the volume
and type of services performed by us generally vary during the
course of a project. We cannot assure you that our service
revenues will remain at levels
17
sufficient to maintain profitability. Service revenues were
generated from 128 clients encompassing 284 distinct projects
for fiscal 2006. This compares to 115 clients encompassing 270
distinct projects for fiscal 2005.
Our contracted/committed backlog, referred to as backlog, is the
expected service revenue that remains to be earned and
recognized on both signed and verbally agreed to contracts. Our
backlog was $75.2 million as of December 31, 2006.
This compares to $58.4 million as of December 31,
2005, an increase of 28.8%. This increase is primarily due to
our sales and marketing efforts for fiscal 2006 and an overall
market growth for medical-imaging related services for clinical
trials. Contracts included in backlog are subject to termination
by our clients at any time. In the event that a contract is
cancelled by the client, we would be entitled to receive payment
for all services performed up to the cancellation date. The
duration of the projects included in our backlog range from less
than three months to seven years. We believe that our backlog
assists our management as an indicator of our long-term
business. However, we do not believe that backlog is a reliable
predictor of near-term results because service revenues may be
incurred in a given period on contracts that were not included
in the previous reporting periods backlog
and/or
contract cancellations or project delays may occur in a given
period on contracts that were included in the previous reporting
periods backlog.
We believe that demand for our services and technologies will
continue to grow as the use of digital technologies for data
acquisition and management increases in the radiology and drug
development communities. We also believe that there is a growing
recognition within the bio-pharmaceutical industry of the
advantages in using an independent centralized core laboratory
for analysis of medical-imaging data and compliance with the
regulatory demands for the submission of such data and this may
lead to a growth in our market share for these services. The FDA
is also requiring more robust studies and additional data for
clinical trials. In addition, the FDA continues to develop
sophisticated guidelines for computerized submission of clinical
trial data, including medical images. Furthermore, we believe
that the increased use of digital medical images in clinical
trials, especially for important drug classes such as
anti-inflammatory, neurologic and oncologic therapeutics and
diagnostic image agents, generate large amounts of image data
from a large number of imaging sources. These studies require
processing, analysis, data management and submission services
best handled by vendors with scalable logistical capabilities
and extensive experience working with research facilities
worldwide. However, due to several factors, including, without
limitation, competition from commercial competitors and academic
research centers and the risk of project cancellations, slowing
of patient enrollment in on-going studies or delay of future
project awards, among others, we cannot assure you that demand
for our services and technologies will grow, sustain growth, or
that additional revenue generating opportunities will be
realized by us.
CapMed
Division
Our CapMed division offers the Personal Health Record software,
referred to as PHR, and the patent-pending Personal
HealthKeytm
technology. The PHR is a software application that enables users
to manage and store personal health information, including their
medical images, on the privacy of their desktop computer, while
linking directly to sponsor-directed resources such as drug
information, patient education, or disease guidelines. The
Personal
HealthKeytm
plugs into a computers USB port, allowing doctors and
patients easy access to the patients medical record
without the need for additional hardware or software, and it is
password protected.
We intend to expand our CapMed division through partnerships and
marketing efforts devoted to the PHR and Personal
HealthKeytm
products. We believe that continued emphasis on improving
patient care and reducing cost will contribute to the growth of
the personal electronic medical records market. CapMed continues
to progress towards the completion of its
dot-net
conversion and development of its web portal strategy, which
includes a web-based PHR. Once completed, our customers will
have the choice of managing their health through an on-line PHR,
from their desktop PC or from our patent-pending USB Healthkey,
which we believe will further enhance value in the marketplace
and reduce the lengthy sales cycle typical in this space. We
continue to be encouraged by the long-term prospects for this
division although the adoption rate has been slower than
anticipated.
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed in this
Form 10-K
are forward-looking statements intended to qualify
for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking
18
statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of
forward-looking terminology such as believes,
expects, may, will,
should or anticipates or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology,
or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and
uncertainties. In particular, our statements regarding: our
projected financial results; growth potential for our CapMed
division; the demand for our services and technologies; growing
recognition for the use of independent centralized core
laboratories; trends toward the outsourcing of imaging services
in clinical trials; realized return from our marketing efforts;
increased use of digital medical images in clinical trials;
integration of our acquired companies and businesses; expansion
into new business segments; the success of any potential
acquisitions and the integration of current acquisitions; and
the level of our backlog are examples of such forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements include risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the timing of
revenues due to the variability in size, scope and duration of
projects, estimates made by management with respect to our
critical accounting policies, regulatory delays, clinical study
results which lead to reductions or cancellations of projects,
and other factors, including general economic conditions and
regulatory developments, not within our control. The factors
discussed in this
Form 10-K
and expressed from time to time in our filings with the SEC, as
well as the risk factors set forth in this
Form 10-K,
could cause actual results and developments to be materially
different from those expressed in or implied by such statements.
The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of
this filing, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update
such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or
circumstances.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Estimates and Risks
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including
the recoverability of tangible and intangible assets, disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reported period.
On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates. The most
significant estimates relate to the recognition of revenue and
profits based on the proportional performance method of
accounting for fixed service contracts, allowance for doubtful
accounts and income taxes.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation
of our Consolidated Financial Statements:
Revenue Recognition. Service revenues are
recognized over the contractual term of our customer contracts
using the proportional performance method, which is based on
hours incurred as a percentage of total estimated hours. Service
revenues are not recognized until we have a signed contract from
a customer which: (i) contains fixed or determinable fees;
and (ii) collectability of such fees is reasonably assured.
Any change to recognized service revenue as a result of
revisions to estimated total hours are recognized in the period
the estimate changes. Our revenue recognition policy entails a
number of estimates including an estimate of the total hours
that are expected to be incurred on a project, which is used as
the basis for determining the portion of our revenue to be
recognized for each period. The revenue recognized in any period
might have been materially affected if different assumptions or
conditions prevailed. The timing of our recognition of revenue
would be revised if there were changes in the total estimated
hours (other than scope changes in a project which typically
result in a revision to the contract). We review our total
estimated hours monthly. Provisions for losses expected to be
incurred on contracts, based on our monthly estimates, are
recognized in full in the period in which it is determined that
a loss will result from performance of the contractual
arrangement.
We enter into contracts that contain fixed or determinable
fees. The fees in the contracts are based on the
scope of work we are contracted to perform. There are unitized
fees per service and fixed fees with a total estimated for the
contract based upon the estimated unitized service expected to
be performed, as well as the service to be delivered under the
fixed fee component of the contract. The units are estimated
based on the information provided by the customer, and we bill
the customer for actual units completed in accordance with
19
the terms of the contract. In the event that a contract is
cancelled by the client, we would be entitled to receive payment
for all services performed up to the cancellation date.
Long-lived Assets, Intangibles and
Goodwill. Management annually evaluates the net
realizable value of long-lived assets, including property and
equipment, intangibles and goodwill relying on a number of
factors including operating results, business plans, economic
projections and anticipated future cash flows. If these factors
indicate that the carrying value of a long lived asset exceeds
the net realizable value, the Company will record an impairment
and reduce the carrying value of the asset to the net realizable
value.
Capitalized Software Development. We
capitalize development costs for a software project once the
preliminary project stage is completed, we have committed to
fund the project and it is probable that the project will be
completed and the software will be used to perform the function
intended. We cease capitalization at such time as the computer
software project is substantially complete and ready for its
intended use. The determination that a software project is
eligible for capitalization and the ongoing assessment of
recoverability of capitalized software development costs require
considerable judgment by us with respect to certain external
factors including, but not limited to, anticipated future
revenue, estimated economic life and changes in software and
hardware technologies.
Income Taxes. We evaluate the need to record a
valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing
the need for the valuation allowance, we consider our future
taxable income and on-going prudent and feasible tax planning
strategies. In the event that we were to determine that, in the
future, we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in
excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred
tax asset would be made, thereby increasing net income in the
period such determination was made. Likewise, should we
determine that it is more likely than not that we will be unable
to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the
future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be
charged, thereby decreasing net income in the period such
determination was made. We recognize contingent liabilities for
any tax related exposures when those exposures are both probable
and estimable.
Derivatives. We use derivative financial
instruments to reduce the risk caused by interest rate
fluctuations. The derivative instruments are not held for
trading purposes. Derivatives are accounted for in accordance
with FAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. We recognize
derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in our
balance sheet and measure them at fair value. If designated as a
cash flow hedge, the corresponding changes in fair value are
recorded in stockholders equity (as a component of comprehensive
income/expense).
Stock-based compensation costs. Effective
January 1, 2006, we account for stock-based compensation
costs in accordance with SFAS 123R, which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based payment awards made to our employees and directors.
Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R,
stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date
based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense
over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of the
stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable
judgment. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating
the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be
forfeited. If the actual experience differs significantly from
the assumptions used to compute our stock-based compensation
cost, or if different assumptions had been used, we may have
recorded too much or too little stock-based compensation cost.
Foreign
Currency Risks
Our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could materially
increase the operating costs of our facility in the Netherlands,
which are primarily Euro denominated. At December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005, a 10% increase or decrease in the
Euro to U.S. dollar spot exchange rate would result in a
change of $41,600 and $60,000 to our net asset position,
respectively. In addition, certain of our contracts are
denominated in foreign currency. We believe that any adverse
fluctuation in the foreign currency markets relating to these
contracts will not result in any material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations. In the event we
derive a greater portion of our service revenues from
international operations, factors associated with international
operations, including changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, could affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
20
We do hedge our foreign currency exposure. Our foreign currency
financial instruments primarily consist of cash, trade
receivables, prepaid expenses, fixed assets, trade payables and
accrued expenses and were in a net asset position at
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. An increase
in the exchange rate would result in less net assets when
converted to U.S. dollars. Conversely, if we were in a net
liability position, a decrease in the exchange rate would result
in more net liabilities when converted to U.S. dollars.
Results
of Operations
The results of operations for our CapMed segment is not material
to the trend of the our financials and therefore, the results of
operations discussed below includes both our Pharmaceutical
Contract Services and CapMed segments.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
$
|
31,856,558
|
|
|
|
78.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,712,141
|
|
|
|
77.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,144,417
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
Reimbursement revenues
|
|
|
8,662,235
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
6,773,500
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,888,735
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
40,518,793
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
30,485,641
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,033,152
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
28,156,579
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
%
|
|
|
25,087,575
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
|
|
3,069,004
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,507,518
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,960,378
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
547,140
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
5,739,303
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
4,772,223
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
967,080
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and
expenses
|
|
|
39,403,400
|
|
|
|
97.2
|
%
|
|
|
34,820,176
|
|
|
|
114.2
|
%
|
|
|
4,583,224
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
operations
|
|
|
1,115,393
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
(4,334,535
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
|
|
5,449,928
|
|
|
|
(125.7
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
559,816
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
189,609
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
370,207
|
|
|
|
195.2
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(56,338
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(106,287
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
49,949
|
|
|
|
(47.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income
tax
|
|
|
1,618,871
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
(4,251,213
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
|
5,870,084
|
|
|
|
(138.1
|
)%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
614,772
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
(1,705,841
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
|
2,320,613
|
|
|
|
(136.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
3,549,471
|
|
|
|
(139.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues were $31,856,558 for fiscal 2006 and
$23,712,141 for fiscal 2005, an increase of $8,144,417, or
34.3%. The increase in service revenues was due to an increase
in work performed from our increased contract signings in fiscal
2005 and 2006. Our backlog at December 31, 2006 increased
to $75.2 million from $58.4 million at
December 31, 2005, an increase of 28.8%. We believe this
increase in backlog is an indicator that the overall market
growth for medical-imaging related services for clinical trials
continues to be positive, subject to project cancellations,
slowing of patient enrollment in on-going studies and delays of
future project awards. Service revenues were generated from 128
clients encompassing 284 distinct projects for fiscal 2006. This
compares to 115 clients encompassing 270 distinct projects for
fiscal 2005. Contracts with one client, Novartis Pharmaceutical,
Inc., which encompassed 14 projects, represented 10.9% of our
service revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006,
while no one client accounted for 10% or more of our service
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005. Service
revenues generated from our client base, while still
concentrated as measured by the number of clients, has continued
to become more dispersed over time, and we believe more
diversification is evident when revenue concentration is
measured by the number of individual projects. Our primary scope
of work in both periods included medical-imaging core laboratory
services and image-based information management services.
21
Reimbursement revenues consist of payments received from the
customer for reimbursable costs. Reimbursement revenues
fluctuate significantly over the course of any given project and
quarter to quarter variations are a reflection of this project
timing. Therefore, our management believes that reimbursement
revenues are not a significant indicator of our overall
performance trends. At the request of our clients, we may
directly pay the independent radiologists who review our
clients imaging data. In such cases, per contractual
arrangement, these costs are billed to our clients and are
included in Reimbursement Revenue and Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues was $28,156,579 for fiscal 2006 and $25,087,575
for fiscal 2005, an increase of $3,069,004, or 12.2%. Cost of
revenues for fiscal 2006 and 2005 was comprised of professional
salaries and benefits, allocated overhead and pass-through
costs. The increase in cost of revenues is primarily due to the
increase in reimbursement costs for fiscal 2006 and consulting
costs associated with project related revenues. The decrease in
cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues to 69.5% for
fiscal 2006 from 82.3% for fiscal 2005 is primarily attributable
to the reduced revenue in 2005 as a result of the contract
cancellations in 2004 and process improvement efforts during
fiscal 2006. The cost of revenues as a percentage of total
revenues also fluctuates due to work-flow variations in the
utilization of staff and the mix of services provided by us in
any given period. We expect that our cost of revenues will
continue to increase in fiscal 2007 as reimbursement revenues
and service revenues increase.
General and administrative expenses were $5,507,518 for fiscal
2006 and $4,960,378 for fiscal 2005, an increase of $547,140, or
11.0%. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2006 and
2005 consisted primarily of salaries and benefits, depreciation
and amortization, professional and consulting services, office
rent and corporate insurance. The increase is primarily due to
an increase in professional and consulting services. We expect
that our general and administrative expense will increase in
2007 due to anticipated additional expenditures for compliance
with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The decrease in general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues to
13.6% for fiscal 2006 from 16.3% for fiscal 2005 is primarily
due to a greater increase in our total revenues for fiscal 2006.
Sales and marketing expenses were $5,739,303 for fiscal 2006 and
$4,772,223 for fiscal 2005, an increase of $967,080, or 20.3%.
Sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2006 and 2005 were
comprised of direct sales and marketing costs, salaries and
benefits and allocated overhead. The increase is due to an
increase associated with our CapMed division of $349,000,
$135,000 in expenses associated with tradeshow appearances and
$479,000 in personnel costs and sales commissions due to the
increase in contract signings for fiscal 2006 as compared to
fiscal 2005. We expect that sales and marketing expenses will
increase in fiscal 2007 as we continue to expand our market
presence in the United States and Europe. The decrease in sales
and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues to
14.2% for fiscal 2006 from 15.7% for fiscal 2005 is primarily
due to a greater increase in our total revenues for fiscal 2006.
Net interest income was $503,478 for fiscal 2006 and net
interest income was $83,322 for fiscal 2005, an increase of
$420,156, or 504.3%. This increase is primarily due to a higher
investable cash balances and higher interest rates on short term
investments. Also, interest expense has decreased as our capital
leases are maturing. Net interest income and expense for 2006
and 2005 is comprised of interest income earned on our cash
balance and interest expense incurred on equipment lease
obligations. Interest income may decrease in fiscal 2007 if we
utilize cash for acquisitions.
Income before income taxes was $1,618,871 for fiscal 2006, and
we had a loss before income tax of $4,251,213 for fiscal 2005,
an increase of $5,870,084 or 138.1%. The increase was due to the
reduction of $5,449,928 of operating loss from the prior year
from greater service revenue while expenses increased at a
slower rate due to our process improvement efforts during fiscal
2006.
Our income tax provision for fiscal 2006 was $614,772 versus an
income tax benefit for fiscal 2005 of $1,705,841. The income tax
benefit in fiscal 2005 resulted from recording a deferred tax
benefit for the future tax savings anticipated from using the
net operating loss carryforwards available at December 31,
2005. Our effective tax rate is approximately 37.4% for fiscal
2006 and 40% for fiscal 2005. The decrease in the effective tax
rate is due to the mix of pre-tax income in the U.S. versus
the Netherlands, which has a lower corporate income tax rate.
22
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
$
|
23,712,141
|
|
|
|
77.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,068,670
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1,356,529
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
Reimbursement revenues
|
|
|
6,773,500
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
4,622,105
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
2,151,395
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
30,485,641
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
29,690,775
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
794,866
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
25,087,575
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
|
|
20,451,633
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
%
|
|
|
4,635,942
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,960,378
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
4,452,535
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
507,843
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
4,772,223
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
3,182,125
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,590,098
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and
expenses
|
|
|
34,820,176
|
|
|
|
114.2
|
%
|
|
|
28,086,293
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
%
|
|
|
6,733,883
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
operations
|
|
|
(4,334,535
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)%
|
|
|
1,604,482
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
(5,939,017
|
)
|
|
|
(370.2
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
189,609
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
132,273
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
57,336
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(106,287
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(129,409
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
23,122
|
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income
tax
|
|
|
(4,251,213
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
|
1,607,346
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
(5,858,559
|
)
|
|
|
(364.5
|
)%
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(1,705,841
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
|
658,434
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
(2,364,275
|
)
|
|
|
(359.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
948,912
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
(3,494,284
|
)
|
|
|
(368.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues were $23,712,141 for fiscal 2005 and
$25,068,670 for fiscal 2004, a decrease of $1,356,529, or 5.4%.
The decrease in service revenues was due to a significantly
higher than historical norm cancellation rate in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2004, which resulted in a loss of revenue from
anticipated projects for fiscal 2005. The cancellations were the
result of sponsors halting studies for clinical or strategic
considerations. Our backlog at December 31, 2005 increased
to $58.4 million from $38.5 million at
December 31, 2004, an increase of 52%. Service revenues
were generated from 115 clients encompassing 270 distinct
projects for fiscal 2005. This compares to 84 clients
encompassing 224 distinct projects for fiscal 2004. No one
client accounted for 10% or more of our service revenues for
fiscal 2005, while for the comparable period last year, one
client, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., encompassing 18 distinct
projects represented 10.4% of our service revenues. No other
client accounted for more than 10% of service revenues in fiscal
year 2004.
Cost of revenues was $25,087,575 for fiscal 2005 and $20,451,633
for fiscal 2004, an increase of $4,635,942, or 22.7%. Cost of
revenues for fiscal 2005 and 2004 was comprised of salaries and
benefits, allocated overhead and pass-through costs. The
increase in cost of revenues is primarily due to the increase in
reimbursement revenues for fiscal 2005 of $2,151,395 and an
increase of $1,900,000 attributable to the expansion of our
European facility to expand our global capabilities and further
develop our therapeutic expertise in the cardiovascular area,
including the additional personnel and costs from the Heart Core
acquisition, which occurred on December 10, 2004. The
increase in cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues
to 82.2% for fiscal 2005 from 68.9% for fiscal 2004 is primarily
attributable to the increase in reimbursement revenue, lower
service revenues for fiscal 2005 due to cancellations from the
fourth quarter of 2004 and the increase in cost from the
expansion of our European facility.
General and administrative expenses were $4,960,378 for fiscal
2005 and $4,452,535 for fiscal 2004, an increase of $507,843, or
11.4%. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2005 and
2004 consisted primarily of salaries and benefits, depreciation
and amortization, professional and consulting services, office
rent and corporate insurance. The increase is primarily due to
an increase in professional and consulting services.
The increase in general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of total revenues to 16.3% for fiscal 2005 from 15.0%
for fiscal 2004 is primarily due to an increase in professional
and consulting services.
23
Sales and marketing expenses were $4,772,223 for fiscal 2005 and
$3,182,125 for fiscal 2004, an increase of $1,590,098, or 50.0%.
Sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2005 and 2004 were
comprised of direct sales and marketing costs, salaries and
benefits and allocated overhead. The increase is due to an
increase associated with our CapMed division of $610,000,
$207,000 in fees and expenses associated with our Scientific
Advisory Board and $765,000 of other sales and marketing
expenses, including an increase of $322,000 in personnel costs
and sales commissions due to the increase in contract signings
for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004.
The increase in sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of
total revenues to 15.7% for fiscal 2005 from 10.7% for fiscal
2004 is primarily due to increased expenses associated with our
CapMed division and Scientific Advisory Board and an increase in
personnel.
Net interest income was $83,322 for fiscal 2005 and net interest
income was $2,864 for fiscal 2004, an increase of $80,458, or
2,809.3%. This increase is primarily due to the payment of the
promissory note issued by us to Quintiles, Inc., referred to as
the Quintiles Note, in November 2004, and, therefore, we did not
incur this interest expense for fiscal 2005. Net interest income
and expense for 2005 and 2004 is comprised of interest income
earned on our cash balance and interest expense incurred on
equipment lease obligations. Net interest income and expense for
fiscal 2004 also included interest expense incurred on the
Quintiles Note.
The loss before income taxes was $4,251,213 for fiscal 2005, and
we had income before income tax of $1,607,346 for fiscal 2004, a
decrease of $5,858,559, or 364.5%. This decrease is due to the
loss in anticipated service revenues from contracts cancelled in
the fourth quarter of 2004 resulting from a cancellation rate
during that quarter that was significantly higher than
historical norms. The cancellations were the result of sponsors
halting studies for clinical or strategic considerations. The
convergence of cancellation rates higher than historical norms,
an overall slowing of patient enrollment in ongoing studies and
the delay of several anticipated projects combined with the
operating expense increases described above resulted in our
unfavorable fiscal 2005 results.
Our income tax benefit for fiscal 2005 was $1,705,841 versus an
income tax provision for fiscal 2004 of $658,434. The income tax
benefit in fiscal 2005 resulted from recording a deferred tax
benefit for the future tax savings anticipated from using the
net operating loss carryforwards available at December 31,
2005. As a result, our effective income tax rate was 40% for
fiscal 2005.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
8,528,685
|
|
|
$
|
3,118,144
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
$
|
(2,232,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,870,978
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
$
|
(683,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
(343,638
|
)
|
At December 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$16,166,264. Working capital at December 31, 2006 was
$10,218,505 as compared to working capital at December 31,
2005 of $8,055,374.
Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2006 was
$8,528,685 as compared to net cash provided by operating
activities of $3,118,144 for fiscal 2005. This increase is
primarily due to the net collection of our accounts receivable
of $1,050,597 during fiscal 2006 and from the increase in our
deferred revenue of $3,196,192 at December 31, 2006 from
December 31, 2005 due to advance deposits received from our
clients for new contract signings. In addition, we had a net
income of $1,004,099 for fiscal 2006.
Net cash used in investing activities primarily represents our
investment in capital and leasehold improvements of $2,232,461.
We currently anticipate that capital expenditures for fiscal
2007 will be approximately $2.5 million. These expenditures
primarily represent additional upgrades in our networking, data
storage and core laboratory capabilities for both the United
States and European operations as well as capitalization of
software costs.
Net cash used in financing activities is primarily attributable
to payments on capital leases of $874,267.
24
The following table lists our cash contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
731,113
|
|
|
$
|
634,077
|
|
|
$
|
97,036
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Facility rent operating leases
|
|
$
|
4,538,640
|
|
|
$
|
1,425,461
|
|
|
$
|
2,501,098
|
|
|
$
|
612,081
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Employment agreements
|
|
$
|
678,833
|
|
|
$
|
323,000
|
|
|
$
|
355,833
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
5,948,586
|
|
|
$
|
2,382,538
|
|
|
$
|
2,953,967
|
|
|
$
|
612,081
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 17, 2005, we renewed and amended our agreement with
Wachovia Bank, N.A. The renewed and amended agreement was for an
unsecured committed line of credit of $5,000,000. Interest was
payable at the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 2.0%. The agreement
required us, among other things, to maintain certain financial
covenants. The committed line of credit matured June 30,
2006 and because of our cash balance at that time, we decided
not to incur the expense associated with renewing the line, and
therefore, did not renew the credit line.
On February 6, 2007, we acquired 100% of the outstanding
securities of Theralys, SA, referred to as Theralys, a privately
held company headquartered in Lyon, France. The aggregate
purchase price was 2,731,257 Euros ($3,556,097 as determined by
an agreed upon exchange rate), of which 2,375,484 Euros
($3,092,881) was paid in cash and 355,773 Euros ($463,216) was
paid in 57,408 shares of our common stock. In addition to
the aggregate purchase price, certain stockholders of Theralys
received an aggregate of 36,000 shares of our common stock
at an average price of $8.06885 per share.
We have neither paid nor declared dividends on our common stock
since our inception and do not plan to pay dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future.
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet transactions,
arrangements or other relationships with unconsolidated entities
or other persons.
We anticipate that our existing capital resources together with
cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our
foreseeable cash needs. However, we cannot assure you that our
operating results will continue to achieve profitability on an
annual basis in the future. The inherent operational risks
associated with:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to gain new client contracts;
|
|
|
|
project cancellations;
|
|
|
|
the variability of the timing of payments on existing client
contracts; and
|
|
|
|
other changes in our operating assets and liabilities
|
may have a material adverse affect on our future liquidity.
We may seek to raise additional capital from equity or debt
sources in order to take advantage of unanticipated
opportunities, such as more rapid expansion, acquisitions of
complementary businesses or the development of new services. We
cannot assure you that additional financing will be available,
if at all, on terms acceptable to us.
Our fiscal year 2007 operating plan contains assumptions
regarding revenue and expenses. The achievement of our operating
plan depends heavily on the timing of work performed by us on
existing projects and our ability to gain and perform work on
new projects. Project cancellations or delays in the timing of
work performed by us on existing projects or our inability to
gain and perform work on new projects could have an adverse
impact on our ability to execute our operating plan and maintain
adequate cash flow. In the event actual results do not meet the
operating plan, our management believes it could execute
contingency plans to mitigate these effects. Considering the
cash on hand and based on the achievement of the operating plan
and managements actions taken to date, management believes
it has the ability to continue to generate sufficient cash to
satisfy our operating requirements in the normal course of
business for at least the next 12 months and the
foreseeable future.
25
Recently
Issued Accounting Statements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. This statement clarifies the definition of
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
impact of its adoption on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
more likely than not threshold for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to taken in a tax return. This interpretation also
provides guidance on other topics related to accounting for
income tax assets and liabilities, interest and penalties
associated with tax positions and income taxes in interim
periods as well as income tax disclosures. This interpretation
is effective as of January 1, 2007. We are currently
evaluating FIN 48 and the related impact on our financial
position and results of operations.
Existing
Contracts
As of December 31, 2006, we had entered into agreements
with 79 companies, encompassing 179 projects, to provide
services in the aggregate amount of $134.7 million through
April 2013, of which services valued at $75.2 million
remain to be completed. Such contracts are subject to
termination by us or our clients at any time or for any reason.
In addition, clients clinical trials or other projects are
subject to timing and scope changes. Therefore, total service
revenue generated by us during the life of these contracts may
be less than initial contract values.
Item 7a. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest
Rate Risk
We invest in high-quality financial instruments, primarily money
market funds, federal agency notes, asset backed securities,
corporate debt securities and United States treasury notes, with
an effective duration of the portfolio of less than nine months
and no security with an effective duration in excess of two
years, which we believe are subject to limited credit risk. We
currently do not hedge our interest rate exposure. Due to the
short-term nature of our investments, we do not believe that we
have any material exposure to interest rate risk arising from
our investments.
Foreign
Currency Risk
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Foreign Currency
Risks for a more detailed discussion of our foreign
currency risks and exposures.
26
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
27
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
And Stockholders of
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income, of shareholders equity and of cash flows, present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for share-based compensation in 2006.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 29, 2007
28
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,166,264
|
|
|
$
|
10,553,668
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,000 and $3,295,
respectively
|
|
|
5,564,748
|
|
|
|
6,631,477
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
1,237,405
|
|
|
|
991,840
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,210,800
|
|
|
|
715,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
25,179,217
|
|
|
|
18,892,202
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
5,908,281
|
|
|
|
5,108,693
|
|
Intangibles and goodwill
|
|
|
2,227,438
|
|
|
|
2,518,812
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
272,954
|
|
|
|
1,844,171
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
519,821
|
|
|
|
427,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
34,107,711
|
|
|
$
|
28,790,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,720,481
|
|
|
$
|
1,680,922
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
3,334,554
|
|
|
|
2,026,612
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
9,451,219
|
|
|
|
6,255,027
|
|
Current maturities of capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
454,458
|
|
|
|
874,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
14,960,712
|
|
|
|
10,836,828
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
|
|
97,036
|
|
|
|
551,494
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
208,208
|
|
|
|
205,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
15,265,956
|
|
|
|
11,594,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
$.00025 par value; authorized 3,000,000 shares, 0
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
$.00025 par value; authorized 18,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 11,309,550 and 11,167,737 shares at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
22,864,390
|
|
|
|
22,302,328
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(4,042,619
|
)
|
|
|
(5,046,718
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
gain (loss)
|
|
|
17,157
|
|
|
|
(61,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
equity
|
|
|
18,841,755
|
|
|
|
17,196,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
34,107,711
|
|
|
$
|
28,790,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
$
|
31,856,558
|
|
|
$
|
23,712,141
|
|
|
$
|
25,068,670
|
|
Reimbursement revenues
|
|
|
8,662,235
|
|
|
|
6,773,500
|
|
|
|
4,622,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
40,518,793
|
|
|
|
30,485,641
|
|
|
|
29,690,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
28,156,579
|
|
|
|
25,087,575
|
|
|
|
20,451,633
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,507,518
|
|
|
|
4,960,378
|
|
|
|
4,452,535
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
5,739,303
|
|
|
|
4,772,223
|
|
|
|
3,182,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and
expenses
|
|
|
39,403,400
|
|
|
|
34,820,176
|
|
|
|
28,086,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
operations
|
|
|
1,115,393
|
|
|
|
(4,334,535
|
)
|
|
|
1,604,482
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
559,816
|
|
|
|
189,609
|
|
|
|
132,273
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(56,338
|
)
|
|
|
(106,287
|
)
|
|
|
(129,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income
tax
|
|
|
1,618,871
|
|
|
|
(4,251,213
|
)
|
|
|
1,607,346
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
614,772
|
|
|
|
(1,705,841
|
)
|
|
|
658,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
$
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
948,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares
|
|
|
11,219,283
|
|
|
|
11,114,483
|
|
|
|
10,812,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
dilutive common equivalent shares
|
|
|
12,364,041
|
|
|
|
11,114,483
|
|
|
|
12,228,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
10,710,481
|
|
|
$
|
2,678
|
|
|
$
|
20,873,968
|
|
|
$
|
(3,450,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,426,388
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
140,986
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
129,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,660
|
|
Shares issued for acquisition
|
|
|
175,853
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
847,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847,875
|
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,807
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
948,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
948,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
11,027,320
|
|
|
|
2,757
|
|
|
|
22,016,231
|
|
|
|
(2,501,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,517,642
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
110,417
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
93,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,293
|
|
Restricted shares issued
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
42,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,252
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,587
|
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign
currency options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,578
|
)
|
|
|
(61,578
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
11,167,737
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
22,302,328
|
|
|
|
(5,046,718
|
)
|
|
|
(61,578
|
)
|
|
|
17,196,824
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
126,963
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
153,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,286
|
|
Restricted shares issued
|
|
|
14,850
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(5,132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,129
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,510
|
|
Tax benefit on exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,430
|
|
Unrealized gain on foreign
currency options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,735
|
|
|
|
78,735
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
11,309,550
|
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
22,864,390
|
|
|
$
|
(4,042,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,157
|
|
|
$
|
18,841,755
|
|
31
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
$
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
948,912
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash provided by Operating activities, net
of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,035,096
|
|
|
|
2,311,853
|
|
|
|
1,759,789
|
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
24,203
|
|
|
|
(1,817,041
|
)
|
|
|
364,648
|
|
Sales leaseback deferred gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,518
|
|
|
|
34,018
|
|
Bad debt benefit (provision)
|
|
|
16,132
|
|
|
|
(10,872
|
)
|
|
|
(12,654
|
)
|
Non-cash stock based compensation
expense
|
|
|
357,381
|
|
|
|
71,729
|
|
|
|
13,704
|
|
Loss on foreign currency options
|
|
|
81,513
|
|
|
|
29,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts
receivable
|
|
|
1,050,597
|
|
|
|
1,337,131
|
|
|
|
(3,155,821
|
)
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and
other current assets
|
|
|
(234,266
|
)
|
|
|
(91,796
|
)
|
|
|
(334,663
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(92,766
|
)
|
|
|
(108,835
|
)
|
|
|
82,034
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts
payable
|
|
|
(271,290
|
)
|
|
|
411,067
|
|
|
|
284,857
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,359,373
|
|
|
|
262,159
|
|
|
|
(297,372
|
)
|
Increase in deferred revenue
|
|
|
3,196,192
|
|
|
|
3,178,397
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
74,106
|
|
|
|
23,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
8,528,685
|
|
|
|
3,118,144
|
|
|
|
(282,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,232,461
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870,978
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848,927
|
)
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,213,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(2,232,461
|
)
|
|
|
(1,870,978
|
)
|
|
|
(3,062,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under equipment lease
obligations
|
|
|
(874,267
|
)
|
|
|
(825,778
|
)
|
|
|
(659,513
|
)
|
Payments under promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(666,666
|
)
|
Premiums paid for foreign currency
options
|
|
|
(14,077
|
)
|
|
|
(118,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
153,286
|
|
|
|
93,300
|
|
|
|
129,660
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to
stock options
|
|
|
51,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales leaseback
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,872
|
|
|
|
902,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(683,628
|
)
|
|
|
(343,638
|
)
|
|
|
(294,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,612,596
|
|
|
|
903,528
|
|
|
|
(3,639,313
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
10,553,668
|
|
|
|
9,650,140
|
|
|
|
13,289,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period
|
|
$
|
16,166,264
|
|
|
$
|
10,553,668
|
|
|
$
|
9,650,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
interest
|
|
$
|
56,338
|
|
|
$
|
106,287
|
|
|
$
|
129,409
|
|
Cash paid during the period for
income taxes
|
|
$
|
97,625
|
|
|
$
|
228,169
|
|
|
$
|
270,225
|
|
Supplemental schedule of
noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment purchases under capital
lease obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
622,531
|
|
|
$
|
902,486
|
|
32
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Description
of Business
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Bio-Imaging or the Company) is a
pharmaceutical contract services organization, operating in two
business segments, the pharmaceutical services division and the
CapMed division. The pharmaceutical services division provides
services that support the product development process of the
pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. The
Company specializes in assisting its clients in the design and
management of the medical-imaging component of clinical trials
for all modalities which consist of computerized tomography
(CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
x-rays, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA),
positron emission tomography (PET), single photon
emission computerized tomography (SPECT),
quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), cardiac MRI
and CT, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), peripheral
quantitative angiography (QVA) and ultrasound. The
Company provides services which include the processing and
analysis of medical images and the data-basing and regulatory
submission of medical images, quantitative data and text. The
Companys CapMed division includes the Personal Health
Record (PHR) software and the patent-pending
Personal
HealthKeytm
technology. The PHR is a software application that enables users
to manage and store personal health information, including their
medical images, on the privacy of their desktop computer, while
linking directly to sponsor-directed resources such as drug
information, patient education, or disease guidelines. The
Personal
HealthKeytm
plugs into a computers USB port, allowing doctors and
patients easy access to the patients medical record
without the need for additional hardware or software, and it is
password protected.
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Oxford Bio-Imaging Research, Inc. and Bio-Imaging Technologies
Holding B.V. All intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of the Companys financial instruments,
which include cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and other accrued expenses approximate their fair values
due to their short maturities. Based on borrowing rates
currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms,
the carrying value of capital lease obligations approximate fair
value.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company maintains cash in excess of FDIC insurance limits in
certain financial institutions. The Company considers cash
equivalents to be highly liquid investments with a maturity at
the time of purchase of three months or less.
The Company has a standby letter of credit which approximated
$166,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005. This letter of
credit represents an irrevocable guarantee to fulfill the office
facilities operating lease obligation.
33
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue
Recognition
Service revenues are recognized over the contractual term of the
Companys customer contracts using the proportional
performance method, which is based on hours incurred as a
percentage of total estimated hours. Service revenues are first
recognized when the Company has a signed contract from a
customer which: (i) contains fixed or determinable fees;
and (ii) collectability of such fees is reasonably assured.
Any change to recognized service revenue as a result of
revisions to estimated total hours are recognized in the period
the estimate changes.
The Company enters into contracts that contain fixed or
determinable fees. The fees in the contracts are based on the
scope of work we are contracted to perform; there are unitized
fees per service and fixed fees with a total estimated for the
contract based upon the estimated unitized service expected to
be performed, as well as the service to be delivered under the
fixed fee component of the contract. The units are estimated
based on the information provided by the customer, and the
Company bills the customer for actual units completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract. In the event that a
contract is cancelled by the client, we would be entitled to
receive payment for all services performed up to the
cancellation date.
The Companys revenue recognition policy entails a number
of estimates including an estimate of the total hours that are
expected to be incurred on a project, which is used as the basis
for determining the portion of the Companys revenue to be
recognized for each period. The revenue recognized in any period
might have been materially affected if different assumptions or
conditions prevailed. The timing of the Companys
recognition of revenue would be revised if there were changes in
the total estimated hours (other than scope changes in a project
which typically result in a revision to the contract). The
Company reviews its total estimated hours monthly. Provisions
for losses expected to be incurred on contracts are recognized
in full in the period in which it is determined that a loss will
result from performance of the contractual arrangement.
The Company also incurs direct costs at the outset of a customer
service arrangement prior to receiving a final signed contract.
Accordingly, the Company defers these costs and delays the
recording of any revenue until the contract is executed. If a
customer does not execute the contract, the Company immediately
expenses the deferred costs, offset by any deferred service
revenue associated with these costs.
Unbilled services represent revenue recognized which pursuant to
contractual terms have not yet been billed to the client. In
general, amounts become billable pursuant to contractual
milestones or in accordance with predetermined payment
schedules. Unbilled services are generally billable within one
year from the respective balance sheet date. Deferred revenue is
recorded for cash received from clients for services that have
not yet been earned at the respective balance sheet date.
34
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Allowance
For Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts on a
specific identification method for estimated losses resulting
from the inability of its customers to make required payments.
If the financial condition of its customers were to deteriorate,
resulting in an impairment of the customers ability to make
payments, additional allowances may be required. The Company
does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to
its customers and the trade accounts receivable does not bear
interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Billed trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
4,781,682
|
|
|
$
|
5,030,642
|
|
Unbilled trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
771,818
|
|
|
|
1,600,155
|
|
Employee receivables
|
|
|
11,248
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
5,564,748
|
|
|
$
|
6,634,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance Rollforward:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
10,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
(21,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
(3,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at historical cost and
depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the respective
assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided for
over the lesser of the related lease term, or the useful lives
of the related assets. The cost and related accumulated
depreciation of assets fully depreciated, sold, retired or
otherwise disposed of are removed from the respective accounts
and any resulting gains or losses are included in the statements
of income.
Management annually evaluates the net realizable value of
long-lived assets, including property and equipment, relying on
a number of factors including operating results, business plans,
economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. If these
factors indicate that the carrying value of a long lived asset
exceeds the net realizable value, the Company will record an
impairment and reduce the carrying value of the asset to the net
realizable value.
Capitalized
Software Development
The Company capitalizes development costs for a software project
once the preliminary project stage is completed, management
commits to funding the project and it is probable that the
project will be completed and the software will be used to
perform the function intended. The Company ceases capitalization
at such time as the computer software project is substantially
complete and ready for its intended use. The determination that
a software project is eligible for capitalization and the
ongoing assessment of recoverability of capitalized software
development costs require considerable judgment by management
with respect to certain external factors including, but not
limited to, anticipated future revenue, estimated economic life
and changes in software and hardware technologies. The Company
capitalized software development costs of $1,518,684 and
$849,044 for the year ended December 31, 2006, and 2005
respectively. Amortization expense related to capitalized
computer software costs
35
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
amounted to $357,281, $311,458, and $196,257 at
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively. Capitalized
software development costs are included as a component of
property and equipment.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
which utilizes the liability method. Deferred taxes are
determined based on the estimated future tax effects of
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities at currently enacted tax laws and rates.
A valuation allowance is provided against the carrying value of
deferred tax assets when management believes it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
Company recognizes contingent liabilities for any tax related
exposures when those exposures are both probable and estimable.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The United States Dollar is the functional currency for the
Companys foreign subsidiaries.
Earnings
Per Share
SFAS No. 128 Earnings per Share requires
the presentation of basic earnings per share and diluted
earnings per share. Basic earnings per common share are
calculated by dividing the net income available to Common
Stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common
share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, adjusted
for the effect of potentially dilutive securities using the
treasury stock method.
The computation of basic earnings per common share and diluted
earnings per common share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic
|
|
$
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
$
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
948,912
|
|
Interest expense on convertible
note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
diluted
|
|
|
1,004,099
|
|
|
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
|
976,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares
|
|
|
11,219,283
|
|
|
|
11,114,483
|
|
|
|
10,812,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares
|
|
|
11,219,283
|
|
|
|
11,114,483
|
|
|
|
10,812,185
|
|
Common share equivalents of
outstanding stock options
|
|
|
967,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,284,894
|
|
Common share equivalents of
unrecognized compensation expense
|
|
|
176,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share equivalents related
to the convertible promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
dilutive common equivalent shares
|
|
|
12,364,041
|
|
|
|
11,114,483
|
|
|
|
12,228,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2005, options to purchase
1,360,358 shares of the Companys Common Stock have
been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per
common share as they were antidilutive.
36
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Also, we excluded options to purchase 412,450 and
205,900 shares of our common stock for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006 and 2004, respectively, since they
were
out-of-the-money
and antidilutive.
Derivatives
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to reduce the
risk caused by interest rate fluctuations. The derivative
instruments are not held for trading purposes. Derivatives are
accounted for in accordance with FAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. The Company recognizes derivative instruments
as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and
measures them at fair value. If designated as a cash flow hedge,
the corresponding changes in fair value are recorded in
stockholders equity (as a component of comprehensive
income/expense).
Recently
Issued Accounting Statements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. This statement clarifies the definition of
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of its adoption on its consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a
more likely than not threshold for financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to taken in a tax return. This interpretation also
provides guidance on other topics related to accounting for
income tax assets and liabilities, interest and penalties
associated with tax positions and income taxes in interim
periods as well as income tax disclosures. This interpretation
is effective as of January 1, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating FIN 48 and the related impact on its
financial position and results of operations.
On December 10, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the
stock of Heart Core B.V. (Heart Core), a privately
held company located in Leiden, the Netherlands. Heart Core
provides centralized imaging analysis services in the field of
cardiovascular, pulmonary and orthopedic clinical research. In
connection with the Heart Core acquisition, the Company paid
total consideration of $2,258,025, consisting of $1,410,150 and
175,853 shares of the Companys common stock.
$1,269,135 and 158,268 shares of common stock were issued
directly to the sellers, and $141,015 and 17,585 shares of
common stock were issued to an escrow agent pursuant to the
terms of the acquisition. The escrow is being held as security
for the payment of any unknown claims and will be released in
December 2007. The Company also incurred acquisition costs of
$275,319.
The following unaudited consolidated pro forma information has
been prepared assuming Heart Core was acquired as of
January 1, 2004, with pro forma adjustments for interest
expense and income taxes. The pro forma information is presented
for informational purposes only and is not indicative of what
would have occurred if the Heart Core acquisition had been made
on January 1, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
30,715,877
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,051,519
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
37
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment, at cost, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
$
|
5,412,801
|
|
|
$
|
4,772,557
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Equipment under capital leases
|
|
|
4,332,486
|
|
|
|
4,332,486
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
744,501
|
|
|
|
710,434
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
708,826
|
|
|
|
557,939
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Computer software costs
|
|
|
4,317,828
|
|
|
|
2,600,954
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,516,442
|
|
|
|
12,974,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(9,608,161
|
)
|
|
|
(7,865,677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
5,908,281
|
|
|
$
|
5,108,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation related to equipment acquired under
capital leases amounted to $3,056,588, $2,389,076, and
$1,677,758 at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Accumulated amortization related to capitalized
computer software costs amounted to $904,984, $547,704, and
$236,246 at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 were $1,742,484, $1,963,242, and $1,552,000,
respectively.
Included in other assets, the following is the acquired
intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
$
|
406,502
|
|
|
$
|
406,502
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
372,130
|
|
|
|
372,130
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Customer backlog
|
|
|
165,900
|
|
|
|
165,900
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
175,190
|
|
|
|
175,190
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
76,953
|
|
|
|
76,953
|
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,196,675
|
|
|
|
1,196,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(842,943
|
)
|
|
|
(550,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
353,732
|
|
|
$
|
646,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,872,467
|
|
|
$
|
1,872,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has evaluated the goodwill and has determined that
there is no impairment of the values at December 31, 2006.
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 were $292,612, $332,343 and $201,802, respectively.
38
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future amortization of the intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
210,983
|
|
2008
|
|
|
142,749
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
353,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
1,825,330
|
|
|
$
|
1,538,192
|
|
Accrued consulting fees
|
|
|
75,932
|
|
|
|
63,025
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
435,576
|
|
|
|
125,214
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
997,716
|
|
|
|
300,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,334,554
|
|
|
$
|
2,026,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Capital
Lease Obligations
|
Capital lease obligations consist of equipment lease obligations
at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The equipment lease
obligations are payable in monthly installments ranging from
$400 to $15,614 for 2006 and from $400 to $24,957 for 2005. I
Interest rates range from 5.35% to 7.50%, through August 2008,
and are collateralized by the related equipment.
On May 17, 2005, the Company renewed and amended its
agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association. The renewed
and amended agreement is for an unsecured committed line of
credit of $5,000,000. Interest is payable at the LIBOR Market
Index Rate plus 2.0%. The agreement requires the Company, among
other things, to maintain certain financial covenants. The
committed line of credit matured June 30, 2006 and the
Company decided not to renew the credit line.
In June 2004, the Company entered into a $339,567 sale-leaseback
transaction whereby the Company sold and leased back computer
equipment and furniture. The resulting lease is being accounted
for as a capital lease. There was no gain or loss recorded on
the sale. The lease term is 3 years with an interest rate
of 5.35%.
In September 2004, the Company entered into a $332,536
sale-leaseback transaction whereby the Company sold and leased
back computer equipment and furniture. The resulting lease is
being accounted for as a capital lease. There was a gain
recorded on the sale in the amount of $20,964 which is being
deferred over the life of the lease. The lease term is for
3 years with an interest rate of 5.87%.
In December 2004, the Company entered into a $230,384
sale-leaseback transaction whereby the Company sold and leased
back computer equipment and furniture. The resulting lease is
being accounted for as a capital lease. There was a gain
recorded on the sale in the amount of $13,054 which is being
deferred over the life of the lease. The lease term is for
3 years with an interest rate of 6.44%.
39
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In May 2005, the Company entered into a $506,872 sale-leaseback
transaction whereby the Company sold and leased back computer
equipment, software, and furniture. The resulting lease is being
accounted for as a capital lease. There was a gain recorded on
the sale in the amount of $16,518 which is being deferred over
the life of the lease. The lease term is for 3 years with
an interest rate of 6.10%
In August 2005, the Company entered into a $115,659 transaction
whereby the Company leased media equipment. The resulting lease
is being accounted for as a capital lease. The lease term is for
3 years with an interest rate of 7.50%
The following is a schedule, by year, of the future minimum
payments under capital leases, together with the present value
of the net minimum payments as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
454,458
|
|
2008
|
|
|
97,036
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum capital lease
payments
|
|
|
551,494
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
(21,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total present value of minimum
payment
|
|
|
529,898
|
|
Less current portion of such
obligations
|
|
|
(435,213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
|
|
94,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Stock
Based Compensation
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R),
which establishes the financial accounting and reporting
standards for stock-based compensation plans. SFAS 123R
requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense
for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors. The
stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date,
based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is
recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the entire award. This period is
generally the vesting period of the corresponding award. We have
adopted the forfeiture rate on stock option grants issued after
January 1, 2006 and the application of the forfeiture rate
on unvested stock options at January 1, 2006 was immaterial
to our financial statement and therefore, no cumulative gain was
recognized.
At December 31, 2006, the Company has one stock-based
employee compensation plan. The compensation cost that has been
recorded to income under the plan for the year ended
December 31, 2006 was $357,381, of which $167,079 is a
result of the expensing of stock options pursuant to
FAS 123R.
On November 9, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company recommended, and the
Companys Board of Directors approved, the acceleration of
vesting of all
out-of-the-money
unvested options to purchase shares of common stock of the
Company with an exercise price greater than $7.00 held by
current employees and executive officers of the Company (but
excluding any options granted to members of the Companys
Board of Directors). These options were previously awarded to
employees of the Company on February 4, 2004, pursuant to
the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, and would still have been
unvested at January 1, 2006. Options to purchase
107,691 shares of common stock were subject to this
acceleration. The exercise price per share for these options was
$7.03, while the closing price per share on November 9,
2005 was $2.20.
40
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the options subject to
acceleration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issuable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Accelerated
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
per Share
|
|
Date of Grant
|
|
Employees as a group (other than
executive officers)
|
|
|
69,722
|
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
February 4, 2004
|
|
Executive officers as a group
|
|
|
37,969
|
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
February 4, 2004
|
|
The acceleration of vesting of these
out-of-the
money options is being undertaken primarily to eliminate any
future compensation expense the Company would otherwise
recognize in its income statement with respect to these options
with the implementation of the Financial Accounting Standard
Board (FASB) statement Share-Based Payment
(FAS 123R) effective for the Company on January 1,
2006. We estimate this compensation expense, before tax, would
be approximately $402,763 in aggregate future expenses based on
calculations using the Black-Scholes methodology.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based
employee compensation plan under the recognition and measurement
principles of APB Opinion No. 25. No stock based employee
compensation cost was reflected in net income, as all options
granted under this plan had an exercise price equal to or
greater than the fair market value of the underlying common
stock on the date of grant. The following table sets forth the
computation of basic and diluted loss per share for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and illustrates the effect
on net loss and loss per share as if we had applied the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R to its stock
plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net (loss) income, as reported
|
|
$
|
(2,545,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
948,912
|
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense included in reported net (loss) income, net
of related tax effects
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
8,222
|
|
Deduct: Stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under SFAS 123R, net of
related tax effects
|
|
|
(421,407
|
)
|
|
|
(744,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(2,966,090
|
)
|
|
$
|
213,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
The following table presents the total stock-based compensation
expense resulting from stock options and restricted stock unit
awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
255,374
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
49,952
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
52,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
357,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate (range)
|
|
|
4.61 - 4.94
|
%
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
58.00
|
%
|
|
|
56.00
|
%
|
|
|
67.00
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Expected Volatility. Expected volatility is
calculated on a weekly basis over the expected term of the
option using the companys common stock close price.
Expected Term. The expected term is based on
historical observations of employee exercise patterns during our
history.
Risk-Free Interest Rate. The interest rate
used in valuing awards is based on the yield at the time of
grant of a U.S. Treasury security with an equivalent
remaining term.
Dividend Yield. The Company has never paid
cash dividends, and does not currently intend to pay cash
dividends, and thus has assumed a 0% dividend yield.
Pre-Vesting Forfeitures. Estimates of
pre-vesting option forfeitures are based on our experience. We
used a 10% forfeiture rate assumption. We will adjust our
estimate of forfeitures over the requisite service period based
on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are
expected to differ, from such estimates. The cumulative effect
resulting from initially applying the provisions of
SFAS 123R to nonvested equity awards was not significant.
Stock
Options
Fiscal
Year 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
1,831,308
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
$
|
1,629,864
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
198,100
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
$
|
792,886
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
126,963
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
870,036
|
|
Forfeited or Expired
|
|
|
31,783
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
1,870,662
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
$
|
10,192,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
180,300
|
|
|
$
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
$
|
723,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
1,690,362
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
|
$
|
9,469,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$4.06, $1.06 and $3.40, respectively. Cash received from option
exercises for the years ended 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $153,285,
$93,300, and $129,636, respectively.
As of December 31, 2006, there was $201,597 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock
options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of
4.17 years.
In the first quarter of 2002, the Companys Board of
Directors and stockholders approved the adoption of the 2002
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan and authorized
the issuance of 950,000 shares of the Companys Common
Stock under the plan. In May 2005, the Companys Board of
Directors and stockholders
42
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
approved an amendment to the 2002 Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
Stock Option Plan and authorized the issuance of an additional
750,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock under the
plan.
Each option is exercisable into one share of Common Stock.
Options granted pursuant to the plan may be qualified incentive
stock options, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, or
nonqualified options. The exercise price of qualified incentive
stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the
Companys Common Stock at the date of grant. The term of
such stock options granted under the plan shall not exceed ten
years and the vesting schedule of such stock option grants
varies from immediate vesting on date of grant to vesting over a
period of up to five years.
The following table summarizes the transactions pursuant to the
Companys stock option plan for the year ended
December 31, 2006.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Option Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Underlying Options
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
77,750
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
198,100
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(95,550
|
)
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
Non-vested at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
180,300
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
1,690,362, 1,753,558 and 1,613,000 options are exercisable at
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, at a
weighted average exercise price of $2.46, $2.30 and $1.51,
respectively.
The intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively, were
$470,731, $242,476 and $708,176.
At December 31, 2006, by range of exercise prices, the
number of shares represented by outstanding options with their
weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining
contractual life, in years, and the number of shares represented
by exercisable options with their weighted average exercise
price are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$
|
0.63-$0.88
|
|
|
|
629,687
|
|
|
2.77 years
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
629,687
|
|
|
2.77 years
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
$
|
1.00-$1.16
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
4.95 years
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
4.95 years
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
$
|
1.25-$1.31
|
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
1.72 years
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
1.72 years
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
$
|
1.85-$2.80
|
|
|
|
86,375
|
|
|
6.10 years
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
86,375
|
|
|
6.10 years
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
$
|
3.05-$5.10
|
|
|
|
571,800
|
|
|
6.96 years
|
|
$
|
4.19
|
|
|
|
391,500
|
|
|
6.96 years
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
190,800
|
|
|
7.12 years
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
190,800
|
|
|
7.12 years
|
|
$
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.63-$7.03
|
|
|
|
1,870,662
|
|
|
4.78 years
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1,690,362
|
|
|
4.55 years
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units: On March 1, 2006,
we entered into an employment agreement with our President and
Chief Executive Officer that expires on February 28, 2009.
This agreement amended and restated the prior agreement that
originally expired January 31, 2007 and extended the term
of service through February 28, 2009. Pursuant to this
employment agreement our President and Chief Executive Officer
can potentially receive up to 25,000 restricted shares of the
companys common stock for fiscal 2006. Based on
managements assumptions, we recognized the related
proportionate expense of $201,500 for 25,000 shares of
these restricted stock units for fiscal 2006 based on a fair
value of $8.06 at December 31, 2006. These restricted
shares are service and performance-based and the value is
determined by its fair value (as if underlying shares were
vested and issued).
43
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 10, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the
stock of Heart Core.
In connection with the Heart Core acquisition, the Company
issued 158,268 shares of common stock directly to the
sellers and 17,585 shares of common stock were issued to an
escrow agent pursuant to the terms of the acquisition. The
market value of the Companys common stock was $4.82 at the
time of issuance.
The Company has entered into non-cancelable operating leases for
office facilities which expire through June 2010.
Future minimum aggregate rental payments on the noncancelable
portion of the lease are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,425,462
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,293,717
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,207,381
|
|
2010
|
|
|
612,080
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,538,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense charged to operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $1,649,766, $1,590,759
and $1,364,000, respectively.
On March 1, 2006, the Company entered into an employment
agreement with its President and Chief Executive Officer that
expires on February 28, 2009. This agreement amended and
restated the prior agreement that originally expired
January 31, 2007. In addition, the Company has an
employment agreement with its Chief Financial Officer that
expires February 5, 2008. The aggregate amount due from
January 1, 2006 through the expiration under these
agreements was $1,176,317. At December 31, 2006, the
Company has recorded compensation of $201,500, which we believe
will be paid in stock, to its President and Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to his employment agreement.
|
|
10.
|
Employee
Benefit Plan
|
The Company sponsors the Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
Employees Savings Plan (the 401(k) Plan), a
defined contribution plan with a cash or deferred arrangement.
Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, eligible employees may elect
to reduce their annual compensation up to the annual limit
prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company may make
discretionary matching contributions in cash, subject to plan
limits. The Company made contributions of $54,450, $43,062 and
$40,942 for the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
During fiscal 2006, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Inc., encompassing
14 projects represented 10.9% of our service revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2006, while for the comparable
period last year, no one client accounted for 10% or more of our
service revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005. No
other customers accounted for more than 10% of service revenues
in fiscal year 2006.
44
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
No customer accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable
at December 31, 2006 and one customer accounted for 12% of
accounts receivable at December 31, 2005. No other
customers accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable.
The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
121,411
|
|
|
$
|
50,414
|
|
|
$
|
18,451
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
207,228
|
|
|
|
9,862
|
|
|
|
135,937
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
210,500
|
|
|
|
50,924
|
|
|
|
139,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
539,139
|
|
|
$
|
111,200
|
|
|
$
|
293,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
268,717
|
|
|
|
(1,373,792
|
)
|
|
|
344,082
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(129,084
|
)
|
|
|
(443,249
|
)
|
|
|
20,566
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,633
|
|
|
|
(1,817,041
|
)
|
|
|
364,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
614,772
|
|
|
$
|
(1,705,841
|
)
|
|
$
|
658,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys reconciliation of the expected federal
provision (benefit) rate to the effective income tax rate is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Tax provision at statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
State and local income taxes, net
of federal benefit
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Foreign rate difference
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
|
|
(40.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys domestic and foreign income (loss) before
income tax is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Domestic income (loss) before
income tax
|
|
$
|
1,187,448
|
|
|
$
|
(4,651,156
|
)
|
Foreign income before income tax
|
|
|
431,423
|
|
|
|
399,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) before income
tax
|
|
|
1,618,871
|
|
|
|
(4,251,213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net deferred tax assets consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
28,936
|
|
|
$
|
29,318
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
AMT credit
|
|
|
145,376
|
|
|
|
12,847
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,381,677
|
|
|
|
998,905
|
|
Federal net operating loss
carryforwards
|
|
|
943,760
|
|
|
|
2,761,007
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
81,796
|
|
|
|
16,686
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
67,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,649,368
|
|
|
|
3,820,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of tax over book
depreciation
|
|
|
(323,025
|
)
|
|
|
(514,096
|
)
|
Amortization of acquisition costs
|
|
|
(85,159
|
)
|
|
|
(7,586
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(349,430
|
)
|
|
|
(331,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(757,614
|
)
|
|
|
(852,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(408,000
|
)
|
|
|
(408,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
2,483,754
|
|
|
$
|
2,559,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred
tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. In assessing the need for the valuation allowance, the
Company considers future taxable income and on-going prudent and
feasible tax planning strategies. In the event that the Company
was to determine that, in the future, they would be able to
realize the deferred tax assets in excess of its net recorded
amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be made,
thereby increasing net income in the period such determination
was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it is more
likely than not that it will be unable to realize all or part of
the net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the
deferred tax asset would be charged, thereby decreasing net
income in the period such determination was made.
The Company has accumulated tax losses, which include allowable
deductions related to exercised employee stock options,
generating federal and state net operating loss (NOL) credit
carryforwards of $2.8 million as of December 31, 2006
and $7.4 million as of December 31, 2005. These losses
will expire, if unused, in the years 2009 through 2022. Under
limitations imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 382,
certain potential changes in ownership of the Company, which may
be outside the Companys knowledge or control, may restrict
future utilization of these carryforwards. Due to such ownership
changes that have occurred in prior years, the Company has
estimated that $1.1 million of the current federal net
operating loss will likely expire unused due to Internal Revenue
Code Section 382 limitations. The current and long-term
deferred tax assets are comprised of the NOL carryforwards with
a tax effected value of $1.1 as of December 31, 2006.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that the
Company establish a valuation allowance for any portion of its
deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more
likely than not the Company will be unable to utilize the asset
to offset future taxes. The Company will continue to evaluate
the potential use of its deferred tax assets and the need for a
valuation allowance by considering future taxable income and
on-going prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
Subsequent revisions to the estimated realizable value of the
deferred tax assets could cause the provision for income taxes
to vary significantly from period to period, although the cash
tax payments would remain unaffected until the NOL credit
carryforward is fully utilized or has expired. At
December 31, 2006, management has
46
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determined that there is sufficient future taxable income to
more likely than not utilize the unlimited net operating loss
carryforward at December 31, 2006.
The Company recognizes contingent liabilities for any tax
related exposures when those exposures are both probable and
estimable.
The tax benefit of the stock option deductions have been
recorded to additional paid in capital in the amount of $51,430
and $80,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The Company has not provided for U.S. federal income and
foreign withholding taxes on approximately $1.4 million of
undistributed earnings from its
non-U.S. operations
as of December 31, 2006 because such earnings are intended
to be reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States.
The Company, in the normal course of conducting business,
maintains certain tax positions that may be subject to review by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Company has not recorded any
contingent liabilities for these tax exposures at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, since they are not believed to
be probable of occurring.
All derivatives are recognized in our Consolidated Statement of
Operations and in other comprehensive income on the Balance
Sheet at fair value and are reported in prepaid expenses and
other current assets on the Balance Sheet. To qualify for hedge
accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138,
Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain
Hedging Activities, (SFAS No. 133), we require
that the instruments are effective in reducing the risk exposure
that they are designated to hedge. For instruments that are
associated with the hedge of cash flows, hedge effectiveness
criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying
transaction will occur. Instruments that meet established
accounting criteria are formally designated as hedges at the
inception of the contract. These criteria demonstrate that the
derivative is expected to be highly effective at offsetting
changes in fair value or cash flows of the underlying exposure
both at inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing
basis. The assessment for effectiveness is formally documented
at hedge inception and reviewed at least quarterly throughout
the designated hedge period.
In accordance with our current foreign exchange rate risk
management policy, since inception, we have purchased twenty
monthly Euro call options. Nineteen monthly call options are in
the amount of 250,000 Euros each and one call option is for
200,000 Euros for anticipated additional costs in May, 2006. The
first expiration was on July 27, 2005 and the last
expiration is in March 2007 with a strike price ranging from
$1.26 to $1.27. These options are to hedge against the exposure
to variability in our cash flows due to the Euro denominated
costs for our Netherlands subsidiary. We paid a total premium of
$132,109 for the options and at December 31, 2006 have
recorded an Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain of $17,157 in
the stockholders equity section of the Balance Sheet due
to changes in the value of this derivative.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, we
exercised seven of the thirteen options. A loss of $10,784 was
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations on the
exercised options during fiscal 2006. During the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005, no options were exercised.
Upon expiration or ineffectiveness of the derivative, we will
record a gain or loss from the derivative that is deferred in
stockholders equity to cost of revenues and general and
administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations based on the nature of the underlying cash flow
hedged.
Foreign customers accounted for 28% and 24% of service revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
47
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information, requires companies
to provide certain information about their operating segments.
In November 2003, the Company acquired the intellectual property
of CapMed Corporation. Accordingly, the Company now has two
reportable segments: pharmaceutical contract services and the
CapMed division. The pharmaceutical contract service segment
provides services that support the product development process
of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device
industries. The CapMed segment offers a software application
that enables users to manage and store personal health
information, including their medical images, on the privacy of
their desktop computer, while linking directly to
sponsor-directed resources such as drug information, patient
education, or disease guidelines. The operating segments are
managed separately because each offers different services and
applications to different markets. Management evaluates the
performance of each segment based upon operating earnings or
losses before interest and income taxes.
Summarized financial information concerning the Companys
reportable segments is shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|
|
CapMed
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Contract Services
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
40,256,454
|
|
|
|
262,339
|
|
|
|
40,518,793
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
|
37,586,497
|
|
|
|
1,816,903
|
|
|
|
39,403,400
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,669,957
|
|
|
|
(1,554,564
|
)
|
|
|
1,115,393
|
|
Total assets at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
32,418,588
|
|
|
|
1,689,123
|
|
|
|
34,107,711
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
30,125,893
|
|
|
$
|
359,748
|
|
|
$
|
30,485,641
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
$
|
33,352,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,467,598
|
|
|
$
|
34,820,176
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(3,226,685
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,107,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,334,535
|
)
|
Total assets at December 31,
2005
|
|
$
|
27,605,712
|
|
|
$
|
1,185,221
|
|
|
$
|
28,790,933
|
|
Fiscal 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
29,579,645
|
|
|
$
|
111,130
|
|
|
$
|
29,690,775
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
$
|
27,145,793
|
|
|
$
|
940,500
|
|
|
$
|
28,086,293
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
2,433,852
|
|
|
$
|
(829,370
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,604,482
|
|
Total assets at December 31,
2004
|
|
$
|
27,377,774
|
|
|
$
|
996,040
|
|
|
$
|
28,373,814
|
|
The Company maintains offices in Newtown, Pennsylvania and
Leiden, the Netherlands. Total assets located in Newtown,
Pennsylvania were $31,059,973 and $27,643,632 at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net fixed assets
located in Leiden, the Netherlands were $1,358,615 and $725,716
at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
48
BIO-IMAGING
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
At December 31, 2006, Covance, Inc. owned 20.8% of the
Companys outstanding Common Shares. The Company and
Covance, Inc. have entered into various services agreements, for
Covances clients that sponsor clinical trials, in the
ordinary course of business. The Companys service revenues
include $820,955, $307,016 and $804,509 for the year ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the amounts due from Covance,
Inc. were $212,323 and $97,834, respectively.
On February 6, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding securities of Theralys, SA (Theralys), a
privately held company headquartered in Lyon, France. The
aggregate purchase price was 2,731,257 Euros ($3,556,097 as
determined by an agreed upon exchange rate), of which 2,375,484
Euros ($3,092,881) was paid in cash and 355,773 Euros ($463,216)
was paid in 57,408 shares of the Companys common
stock, $0.00025 par value per share (the Common
Stock). In addition to the aggregate purchase price,
certain stockholders of Theralys received an aggregate of
36,000 shares of Common Stock at an average price of
$8.06885 per share.
49
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on their evaluation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-14(c)
and
15d-14(c)
under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, or the Exchange
Act) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting
and financial officer) have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms and are operating in an effective manner for the
period covered by this report.
Changes in internal controls. There were no
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting in the
fourth quarter of 2006 that has materially affect, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
The information relating to our directors, nominees for election
as directors and executive officers under the headings
Election of Directors and Executive
Officers in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by
reference to such proxy statement.
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics
that applies to our principal executive officer and principal
financial and accounting officer, or persons performing similar
functions. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers
from, our code of business conduct and ethics that are required
to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the SEC and the
NASDAQ Global Market by filing such amendment or waiver with the
SEC.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
The discussion under the heading Executive
Compensation in our definitive proxy statement for the
2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by
reference to such proxy statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
The discussion under the heading Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in our definitive
proxy statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
The discussion under the headings Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions and Election of
Directors in our definitive proxy statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by
reference to such proxy statement.
50
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services.
|
The discussion under the heading Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm Fees and Other Matters in our
definitive proxy statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy
statement.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a)(1) Financial Statements. The financial
statements filed as part of this report are listed on the Index
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)(2) Financial Statement
Schedules. Schedules are omitted because they are
not applicable or the required information is shown in the
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits. Reference is made to the
Exhibit Index on page 53. The exhibits are included,
or incorporated by reference, in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized this 29th day of March, 2007.
BIO-IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Mark
L. Weinstein
|
Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Mark
L. Weinstein
Mark
L. Weinstein
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ted
I. Kaminer
Ted
I. Kaminer
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial
and accounting officer)
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
H. Berg, Ph.D.
Jeffrey
H. Berg, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
F. Cimino
Richard
F. Cimino
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ E.
Martin Davidoff, Esq.,
CPA
E.
Martin Davidoff, Esq., CPA
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
E. Nowicki, D.M.D.
David
E. Nowicki, D.M.D.
|
|
Chairman of the
Board and Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
Stack
David
Stack
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
A. Taylor, Ph.D.
James
A. Taylor, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paula
B. Stafford
Paula
B. Stafford
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29th, 2007
|
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated
October 25, 2001, by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. and Quintiles, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 25, 2001.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
Number 33-47471),
which became effective on June 18, 1992. Amendments
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 1993 and to
Exhibit 3.1 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended March 31, 1995.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
Number 33-47471),
which became effective on June 18, 1992.
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Registration Agreement dated
October 13, 1994, between Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
and Corning Pharmaceuticals Services Inc., now Covance Inc.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 13, 1994.
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated as of October 25, 2001, by and between Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. and Quintiles, Inc. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2 of our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
dated October 25, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
2002 Stock Incentive Plan, adopted
by the stockholders of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. on
February 27, 2002, as amended and restated on
April 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 of our Registration Statement on
Form S-8
dated December 21, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
401(k) Plan. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 of our Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
Number 33-47471),
which became effective on June 18, 1992.
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Employees Invention
Assignment, Confidential Information and Non-Competition
Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1992.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated
October 13, 1994, between Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
and Covance Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of our Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated October 13, 1994.
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
Invention Assignment and
Confidential Information Agreement dated January 20, 2000,
by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. and Mark L.
Weinstein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended December 31, 1999.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated March 1, 2006, by and between Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. and Mark L. Weinstein. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
First Modification of Office Space
Lease between 826 Newtown Associates, LP and Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. dated January 11, 2002. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Office Space Lease dated
September 22, 1999, between Yardley Road Associates, L.P.
and Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Office Space Lease dated
September 11, 2000, between Angelo Investment Company and
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000.
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
February 6, 2003, by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. and Ted I. Kaminer. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB/A
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement
dated September 15, 2003, by and between Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. and certain institutional investors.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 15, 2003.
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
dated September 15, 2003, by and between Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. and certain institutional investors.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 15, 2003.
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Form of Amended Executive
Retention Agreement by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. and certain executive officers. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated
November 20, 2003, by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. and CapMed, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
December 10, 2004, by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. and Heart Core B.V. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Fourth Modification of Office
Space Lease between 826 Newtown Associates, LP and Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. dated September 29, 2004. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
February 6, 2007, by and between Bio-Imaging Technologies,
Inc. and Theralys, S.A. Incorporated herewith.
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Development and Supply Agreement
dated June 20, 2005 between CapMed, a division of
Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc., and Medic Alert Foundation
United States, Inc. (Portions of this exhibit have been omitted
and have been filed separately pursuant to an application for
confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 15, 2005). Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of
Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of principal
executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of principal
financial and accounting officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of principal
executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of principal
financial and accounting officer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 13(a)
of
Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
Included herewith. |
|
|
|
Included herewith, revised confidential treatment. |
54