Edgar Filing: ERIE INDEMNITY CO

Document

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018

Commission file number 0-24000



	ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



	PENNSYLVANIA		25-0466020
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)



	100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania		16530
	(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)



	(814) 870-2000
	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



	Not applicable
	(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [ ] Emerging growth company [ ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange

Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock as of the latest practicable date, with no par value and a stated value of $0.0292 per share, was 46,189,068 at October 12, 2018.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class B Common Stock as of the latest practicable date, with no par value and a stated value of $70 per share, was 2,542 at October 12, 2018.

Table of Contents



PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Statements of Operations – Three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

	Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

	Statements of Financial Position – September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017

	Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

	Notes to Financial Statements – September 30, 2018

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 6.	Exhibits


	SIGNATURES

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)



	Three months ended					Nine months ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2018		2017			2018			2017
Operating revenue
Management fee revenue - policy issuance and renewal services, net	$	451,361	$	435,214		$	1,311,911		$	1,268,591
Management fee revenue - administrative services, net	13,521		—			39,894			—
Administrative services reimbursement revenue	140,172		—			432,642			—
Service agreement revenue	7,072		7,278			21,297			21,781
Total operating revenue	612,126		442,492			1,805,744			1,290,372

Operating expenses
Cost of operations - policy issuance and renewal services	375,259		361,253			1,103,517			1,058,745
Cost of operations - administrative services	140,172		—			432,642			—
Total operating expenses	515,431		361,253			1,536,159			1,058,745
Operating income	96,695		81,239			269,585			231,627

Investment income
Net investment income	7,659		5,982			21,583			18,202
Net realized investment gains (losses)	0		899			(497		)	1,539
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	0		0			(646		)	(182		)
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	772		1,537			361			1,899
Total investment income	8,431		8,418			20,801			21,458

Interest expense, net	709		377			1,864			800
Other income (expense)	54		(415		)	156			(1,231		)
Income before income taxes	104,471		88,865			288,678			251,054
Income tax expense	24,025		30,322			62,768			86,108
Net income	$	80,446	$	58,543		$	225,910		$	164,946


Net income per share
Class A common stock – basic	$	1.73	$	1.26		$	4.85		$	3.54
Class A common stock – diluted	$	1.54	$	1.12		$	4.32		$	3.15
Class B common stock – basic	$	259	$	189		$	728		$	531
Class B common stock – diluted	$	259	$	189		$	727		$	531

Weighted average shares outstanding – Basic
Class A common stock	46,188,941		46,188,949			46,188,522			46,186,109
Class B common stock	2,542		2,542			2,542			2,542

Weighted average shares outstanding – Diluted
Class A common stock	52,317,438		52,316,876			52,313,642			52,342,450
Class B common stock	2,542		2,542			2,542			2,542

Dividends declared per share
Class A common stock	$	0.8400	$	0.7825		$	2.5200		$	2.3475
Class B common stock	$	126.000	$	117.375		$	378.000		$	352.125

See accompanying notes to Financial Statements. See Note 11, "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)", for amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into the Statements of Operations.

Table of Contents

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)



	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Net income	$	80,446		$	58,543		$	225,910		$	164,946

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
Change in unrealized holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities	(492		)	(167		)	(6,470		)	2,446

Comprehensive income	$	79,954		$	58,376		$	219,440		$	167,392

Table of Contents

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)



	September 30,			December 31,
	2018			2017
Assets	(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	244,688		$	215,721
Available-for-sale securities	105,031			71,190
Receivables from Erie Insurance Exchange and affiliates	463,620			418,328
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	44,014			34,890
Federal income taxes recoverable	0			29,900
Note receivable from Erie Family Life Insurance Company	25,000			25,000
Accrued investment income	6,504			6,853
Total current assets	888,857			801,882

Available-for-sale securities	599,164			687,523
Equity securities	12,511			—
Limited partnership investments	37,088			45,122
Fixed assets, net	121,684			83,149
Deferred income taxes, net	37,660			19,390
Other assets	62,539			28,793
Total assets	$	1,759,503		$	1,665,859

Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Commissions payable	$	257,015		$	228,124
Agent bonuses	79,308			122,528
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	113,204			104,533
Dividends payable	39,119			39,116
Contract liability	34,086			—
Deferred executive compensation	11,071			15,605
Federal income taxes payable	9,310			0
Current portion of long-term borrowings	1,395			0
Total current liabilities	544,508			509,906

Defined benefit pension plans	154,736			207,530
Employee benefit obligations	69			423
Contract liability	17,903			—
Deferred executive compensation	13,104			14,452
Long-term borrowings	98,332			74,728
Other long-term liabilities	9,828			1,476
Total liabilities	838,480			808,515

Shareholders’ equity
Class A common stock, stated value $0.0292 per share; 74,996,930 shares authorized; 68,299,200 shares issued; 46,189,068 shares outstanding	1,992			1,992
Class B common stock, convertible at a rate of 2,400 Class A shares for one Class B share, stated value $70 per share; 3,070 shares authorized; 2,542 shares issued and outstanding	178			178
Additional paid-in-capital	16,459			16,470
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(162,529		)	(156,059		)
Retained earnings	2,211,013			2,140,853
Total contributed capital and retained earnings	2,067,113			2,003,434
Treasury stock, at cost; 22,110,132 shares held	(1,157,310		)	(1,155,668		)
Deferred compensation	11,220			9,578
Total shareholders’ equity	921,023			857,344
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,759,503		$	1,665,859

See accompanying notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)



	Nine months ended
	September 30,
	2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities
Management fee received	$	1,309,769		$	1,225,966
Administrative services reimbursements received	428,071			—
Service agreement fee received	21,297			21,781
Net investment income received	26,625			23,593
Limited partnership distributions	6,008			2,993
Decrease in reimbursements collected from affiliates	—			(7,335		)
Commissions paid to agents	(639,574		)	(597,700		)
Agents bonuses paid	(130,657		)	(118,862		)
Salaries and wages paid	(136,868		)	(128,071		)
Pension contribution and employee benefits paid	(106,718		)	(62,837		)
General operating expenses paid	(144,759		)	(167,985		)
Administrative services expenses paid	(427,852		)	—
Income taxes paid	(29,208		)	(70,504		)
Interest paid	(1,820		)	(705		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	174,314			120,334

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of investments:
Available-for-sale securities	(194,773		)	(292,702		)
Equity securities	(4,087		)	—
Limited partnerships	(217		)	(330		)
Proceeds from investments:
Available-for-sale securities sales	125,913			120,418
Available-for-sale securities maturities/calls	98,922			146,434
Equity securities	4,159			—
Limited partnerships	3,046			7,986
Net purchase of fixed assets	(48,667		)	(18,036		)
Net distributions on agent loans	(37,271		)	(4,185		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(52,975		)	(40,415		)

Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid to shareholders	(117,355		)	(109,324		)
Net proceeds from long-term borrowings	24,983			24,961
Net cash used in financing activities	(92,372		)	(84,363		)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	28,967			(4,444		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	215,721			189,072
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	244,688		$	184,628

See accompanying notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Nature of Operations

Erie Indemnity Company ("Indemnity", "we", "us", "our") is a publicly held Pennsylvania business corporation that has since its incorporation in 1925 served as the attorney-in-fact for the subscribers (policyholders) at the Erie Insurance Exchange ("Exchange"). The Exchange, which also commenced business in 1925, is a Pennsylvania-domiciled reciprocal insurer that writes property and casualty insurance. We function solely as the management company and all insurance operations are performed by the Exchange.

Our primary function as attorney-in-fact is to perform policy issuance and renewal services on behalf of the subscribers at the Exchange. We also act as attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange with respect to all claims handling and investment management services, as well as the service provider for all claims handling, life insurance, and investment management services for its insurance subsidiaries, collectively referred to as "administrative services". Acting as attorney-in-fact in these two capacities is done in accordance with a subscriber's agreement (a limited power of attorney) executed individually by each subscriber (policyholder), which appoints us as their common attorney-in-fact to transact certain business on their behalf. Pursuant to the subscriber's agreement for acting as attorney-in-fact in these two capacities, we earn a management fee calculated as a percentage of the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange.

The policy issuance and renewal services we provide to the Exchange are related to the sales, underwriting and issuance of policies. The sales related services we provide include agent compensation and certain sales and advertising support services. Agent compensation includes scheduled commissions to agents based upon premiums written as well as additional commissions and bonuses to agents, which are earned by achieving targeted measures. The underwriting services we provide include underwriting and policy processing. The remaining services we provide include customer service and administrative support. We also provide information technology services that support all the functions listed above. Included in these expenses are allocations of costs for departments that support these policy issuance and renewal functions.

Our results of operations are tied to the growth and financial condition of the Exchange. If any events occurred that impaired the Exchange’s ability to grow or sustain its financial condition, including but not limited to reduced financial strength ratings, disruption in the independent agency relationships, significant catastrophe losses, or products not meeting customer demands, the Exchange could find it more difficult to retain its existing business and attract new business. A decline in the business of the Exchange almost certainly would have as a consequence a decline in the total premiums paid and a correspondingly adverse effect on the amount of the management fees we receive. We also have an exposure to a concentration of credit risk related to the unsecured receivables due from the Exchange for its management fee. See Note 12, "Concentrations of Credit Risk".

Table of Contents

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2018.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently adopted accounting standards

We adopted Accounting Standards Codification 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASC 606") on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method applied to all contracts. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 606 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at January 1, 2018. The comparative information for periods preceding January 1, 2018 has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

Under ASC 606, we determined that we have two performance obligations under the subscriber’s agreement. The first performance obligation is providing policy issuance and renewal services. The second performance obligation is acting as the attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange, as well as the service provider for its insurance subsidiaries, with respect to all administrative services. Therefore, upon adoption of ASC 606 beginning January 1, 2018, the management fee earned per the subscriber’s agreement, currently 25% of all direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange, is allocated between the two performance obligations. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, the entire management fee was allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services. Additionally, the expenses we incur and related reimbursements we receive related to the administrative services are presented gross in our Statement of Operations effective January 1, 2018. There was no significant impact to service agreement revenue upon adoption of ASC 606.

Revenue allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services continues to be recognized at the time of policy issuance or renewal because it is at the time of policy issuance or renewal when the economic benefits of the service Indemnity provides (i.e. the substantially completed policy issuance or renewal service) and the control of the promised asset (i.e. the executed insurance policy) transfers to the customer. A significant portion of the management fee is currently allocated to this performance obligation and therefore, the related revenue recognition pattern for the vast majority of our revenues remains unchanged.

The revenue allocated to the second performance obligation is recognized over several years in correlation with the costs incurred because the economic benefit of the services provided (i.e. management of the administrative services) transfers to the customer over a period of time. The amounts incurred for these services are reimbursed to Indemnity at cost in accordance with the subscriber's agreement and the service agreements. On January 1, 2018, we established a contract liability of $48.5 million representing the portion of revenue not yet earned related to the administrative services to be provided in subsequent years. We recorded a related deferred tax asset of $10.2 million and a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained earnings by $38.3 million. The adoption of ASC 606 changed the presentation of our Statement of Cash Flows, but had no net impact to our cash flows.

Table of Contents

The cumulative effect of the changes made to our Statement of Financial Position at January 1, 2018 were as follows:



(in thousands)	Balance at December 31, 2017		Adjustments due to ASC 606			Balance at January 1, 2018
Statement of Financial Position:
Assets
Deferred tax asset	$	19,390	$	10,188		$	29,578
Liabilities
Contract liability	—		48,514			48,514
Equity
Retained earnings	2,140,853		(38,326		)	2,102,527

The impact of adoption on our Statement of Financial Position at September 30, 2018 was as follows:



	September 30, 2018
(in thousands)	As Reported		Balances without ASC 606		Impact of Change Higher/(Lower)
	(Unaudited)
Statement of Financial Position:
Assets
Deferred tax asset	$	37,660	$	26,742	$	10,918
Liabilities
Contract liability	51,989		—		51,989
Equity
Retained earnings	2,211,013		2,252,084		(41,071		)

The impact of adoption on our Statement of Operations at September 30, 2018 was as follows:



	Three months ended								Nine months ended
(in thousands)	As Reported			Balances without ASC 606		Impact of Change Higher/(Lower)			As Reported			Balances without ASC 606			Impact of Change Higher/(Lower)
	(Unaudited)								(Unaudited)
Statement of Operations:
Management fee revenue allocated to policy issuance and renewal services, gross	$	451,070		$	465,982	$	(14,912	)	$	1,315,202		$	1,358,680		$	(43,478	)
Less: change in allowance for management fee returned on cancelled policies	291			300		(9		)	(3,291		)	(3,400		)	109
Management fee revenue allocated to policy issuance and renewal services, net	$	451,361		$	466,282	$	(14,921	)	$	1,311,911		$	1,355,280		$	(43,369	)


Management fee revenue allocated to administrative services, gross	$	13,538		$	—	$	13,538		$	39,939		$	—		$	39,939
Less: change in allowance for management fee returned on cancelled policies	(17		)	—		(17		)	(45		)	—			(45		)
Management fee revenue allocated to administrative services, net	13,521			—		13,521			39,894			—			39,894
Administrative services reimbursement revenue	140,172			—		140,172			432,642			—			432,642
Total revenue allocated to administrative services	$	153,693		$	—	$	153,693		$	472,536		$	—		$	472,536


Administrative services expenses	$	140,172		$	—	$	140,172		$	432,642		$	—		$	432,642

Table of Contents

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-07, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits", which requires the service cost component of net benefit costs to be reported with other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit costs are required to be presented separately from the service cost component and outside of income from operations on a retrospective basis. This amendment also allows only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization, when applicable, prospectively after the effective date. ASU 2017-07 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and have included the other components of net benefit costs in "Other income (expense)" in the Statements of Operations and conformed the prior-period presentation. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the presentation of our financial statements or related disclosures.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall". ASU 2016-01 revises the accounting related to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this guidance on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance resulted in reclassifying unrealized losses, net of tax, on equity securities from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings, which reduced retained earnings by $0.1 million at January 1, 2018. As of January 1, 2018, equity securities are presented separately in our Statement of Financial Position. Our disclosures were prepared in accordance with this guidance.

Recently issued accounting standards

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software", which align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments under ASU 2018-15 may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-15 on our financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General", which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other post retirement plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 and should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. We plan to adopt this guidance at December 31, 2018 and do not expect a material impact on our postretirement benefit disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance modifies and adds new disclosure requirements primarily related to Level 3 fair value measurements. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our fair value measurement disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses", which requires financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected through the use of a new forward-looking expected loss model and credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recognized through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 is permitted. We have evaluated the impact of this guidance on our invested assets. Our investments are not measured at amortized cost, and therefore do not require the use of a new expected loss model. Our available-for-sale debt securities will continue to be monitored for credit losses which would be reflected as an allowance for credit losses rather than a reduction of the carrying value of the asset. Other financial assets subject to this guidance include our receivables from Erie Insurance Exchange and its subsidiaries and agent loans. Given the financial strength of the Exchange, demonstrated by its strong surplus position and industry ratings, it is unlikely these receivables would have significant, if any, credit loss exposure. Accordingly, we do not expect a material impact on our financial statements or related disclosures as a result of this guidance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases", which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from operating leases on the Statements of Financial Position and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Under existing guidance, we recognize our operating lease expense in the Statements of Operations. The new lease guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, "Leases-Targeted Improvements", which permits entities to apply the existing lease guidance in comparative periods and recognize any cumulative effect adjustment in the year of adoption. We expect to apply this optional transition method. Our primary leases for which an asset and related liability will be recognized include agreements for real

Table of Contents

estate, computer equipment, vehicles, and copiers. While we expect the recognition of lease assets and liabilities to be material to our Statement of Financial Position at adoption date, we do not expect the cumulative effect adjustment to be material. The increase in assets and liabilities will be based on the actual leases in effect at the date of adoption. New disclosures will be required with the adoption of this guidance. We do not expect a material impact to our results of operations or cash flows.

Recognition of management fee revenue

We earn management fees from the Exchange under the subscriber’s agreement for services provided. Pursuant to the subscriber’s agreement, we may retain up to 25% of all direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. The management fee rate is set at least annually by our Board of Directors. The management fee revenue is calculated by multiplying the management fee rate by the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. Upon adoption of ASC 606 beginning January 1, 2018, we determined we have two performance obligations under the subscriber’s agreement. The first performance obligation is to provide policy issuance and renewal services. The second performance obligation is acting as the attorney-in-fact with respect to the administrative services. Beginning January 1, 2018, our management fee revenue is allocated to these two performance obligations. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, the entire management fee was allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services.

Management fee revenue allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services is recognized at the time of policy issuance or renewal, because it is at the time of policy issuance or renewal when the economic benefit of the service we provide (the substantially completed policy issuance or renewal service) and the control of the promised asset (the executed insurance policy) transfers to the customer.

Management fee revenue allocated to the second performance obligation relates to us acting as the attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange, as well as the service provider for its insurance subsidiaries, with respect to the administrative services and is recognized over a four-year period representing the time over which the economic benefit of the services provided (i.e. management of the administrative services) transfers to the customer.

Administrative services

By virtue of its legal structure as a reciprocal insurer, the Exchange does not have any employees or officers. Therefore, it enters into contractual relationships by and through an attorney-in-fact. Indemnity serves as the attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange with respect to its administrative services in accordance with the subscriber's agreement. The Exchange's insurance subsidiaries also utilize Indemnity for these services in accordance with the service agreements between each of the subsidiaries and Indemnity. Claims handling services include costs incurred in the claims process, including the adjustment, investigation, defense, recording and payment functions. Life insurance management services include costs incurred in the management and processing of life insurance business. Investment management services are related to investment trading activity, accounting and all other functions attributable to the investment of funds. Included in these expenses are allocations of costs for departments that support these administrative functions. Common overhead expenses and certain service department costs incurred by us on behalf of the Exchange and its insurance subsidiaries are reimbursed by the proper entity based upon appropriate utilization statistics (employee count, square footage, vehicle count, project hours, etc.) specifically measured to accomplish proportional allocations, which we believe are reasonable. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recorded the reimbursements we receive for the administrative services expenses as receivables from the Exchange and its subsidiaries with a corresponding reduction to our expenses. Upon adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the expenses we incur and related reimbursements we receive for administrative services are presented gross in our Statement of Operations. Reimbursements are settled on a monthly basis. The amounts incurred for these services are reimbursed to Indemnity at cost in accordance with the subscriber's agreement and the service agreements. State insurance regulations require that intercompany service agreements and any material amendments be approved in advance by the state insurance department.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts previously reported in the 2017 financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current period’s presentation. One of the reclassifications resulted from new accounting guidance and only affected the Statements of Operations. Most notably, "Commissions", "Salaries and employee benefits", and "All other operating expenses" have been combined within "Cost of operations - policy issuance and renewal services" in the Statements of Operations (see Note 3, "Revenue"). This reclassification had no effect on previously reported net income.

Table of Contents

Note 3. Revenue

The majority of our revenue is derived from the subscriber’s agreement between us and the subscribers (policyholders) at the Exchange. Pursuant to the subscriber’s agreement, we earn a management fee calculated as a percentage, not to exceed 25%, of all direct and assumed written premiums of the Exchange. We account for management fee revenue earned under the subscriber’s agreement in accordance with ASC 606, which we adopted on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion of the adoption, including the impact on our financial statements.

We allocate a portion of our management fee revenue, currently 25% of the direct and assumed written premiums of the Exchange, between the two performance obligations we have under the subscriber’s agreement. The first performance obligation is to provide policy issuance and renewal services to the subscribers (policyholders) at the Exchange, and the second is to act as attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange, as well as the service provider for its insurance subsidiaries, with respect to all administrative services. The transaction price, including management fee revenue and administrative service reimbursement revenue, is allocated based on the estimated standalone selling prices developed using industry information and other available information for similar services.

The first performance obligation is to provide policy issuance and renewal services that result in executed insurance policies between the Exchange or one of its insurance subsidiaries and the subscriber (policyholder). Our customer, the subscriber (policyholder), receives economic benefits when substantially all the policy issuance or renewal services are complete and an insurance policy is issued or renewed by the Exchange or one of its insurance subsidiaries. It is at the time of policy issuance or renewal that the allocated portion of revenue is recognized.

The Exchange, by virtue of its legal structure as a reciprocal insurer, does not have any employees or officers. Therefore, it enters into contractual relationships by and through an attorney-in-fact. Indemnity serves as the attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange with respect to its administrative services in accordance with the subscriber's agreement. The Exchange's insurance subsidiaries also utilize Indemnity for these services in accordance with the service agreements between each of the subsidiaries and Indemnity. Collectively, these services represent a second performance obligation under the subscriber’s agreement and the service agreements. The revenue allocated to this performance obligation is recognized over time as these services are provided. The portion of revenue not yet earned is recorded as a contract liability in the Statement of Financial Position. We recorded a contract liability of $48.5 million at January 1, 2018, upon adoption of ASC 606. The management fee revenue recognized as earned for these services for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $39.9 million. Beginning with the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the administrative services expenses we incur and the related reimbursements we receive are recorded gross in the Statement of Operations.

Indemnity records a receivable from the Exchange for management fee revenue when the premium is written or assumed by the Exchange. Indemnity collects the management fee from the Exchange when the Exchange collects the premiums from the subscribers (policyholders). As the Exchange issues policies with annual terms only, cash collections generally occur within one year.

A constraining estimate exists around the management fee received as consideration related to the potential for management fee to be returned if a policy were to be cancelled mid-term. Management fees are returned to the Exchange when policyholders cancel their insurance coverage mid-term and unearned premiums are refunded to them. We maintain an estimated allowance to reduce the management fee to its estimated net realizable value to account for the potential of mid-term policy cancellations based on historical cancellation rates. This estimated allowance has been allocated between the two performance obligations consistent with the revenue allocation proportions.

The following table disaggregates revenue by our two performance obligations:



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018		2017		2018		2017
Management fee revenue - policy issuance and renewal services	$	451,361	$	435,214	$	1,311,911	$	1,268,591

Management fee revenue - administrative services	13,521		—		39,894		—
Administrative services reimbursement revenue	140,172		—		432,642		—
Total administrative services	$	153,693	$	—	$	472,536	$	—

Table of Contents

Note 4. Earnings Per Share

Class A and Class B basic earnings per share and Class B diluted earnings per share are calculated under the two-class method. The two-class method allocates earnings to each class of stock based upon its dividend rights. Class B shares are convertible into Class A shares at a conversion ratio of 2,400 to 1. See Note 10, "Capital Stock".

Class A diluted earnings per share are calculated under the if-converted method, which reflects the conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares. Diluted earnings per share calculations include the dilutive effect of assumed issuance of stock-based awards under compensation plans that have the option to be paid in stock using the treasury stock method.

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted per-share computations is presented as follows for each class of common stock:



	Three months ended September 30,
	2018					2017
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount		Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount
Class A – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders	$	79,787	46,188,941	$	1.73	$	58,064	46,188,949	$	1.26
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards	0		27,697	—		0		27,127	—
Assumed conversion of Class B shares	659		6,100,800	—		479		6,100,800	—
Class A – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders on Class A equivalent shares	$	80,446	52,317,438	$	1.54	$	58,543	52,316,876	$	1.12
Class B – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	659	2,542	$	259	$	479	2,542	$	189
Class B – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	658	2,542	$	259	$	479	2,542	$	189



	Nine months ended September 30,
	2018					2017
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount		Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount
Class A – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders	$	224,060	46,188,522	$	4.85	$	163,596	46,186,109	$	3.54
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards	0		24,320	—		0		55,541	—
Assumed conversion of Class B shares	1,850		6,100,800	—		1,350		6,100,800	—
Class A – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders on Class A equivalent shares	$	225,910	52,313,642	$	4.32	$	164,946	52,342,450	$	3.15
Class B – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	1,850	2,542	$	728	$	1,350	2,542	$	531
Class B – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	1,849	2,542	$	727	$	1,350	2,542	$	531

Table of Contents

Note 5. Fair Value

Our available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities are recorded at fair value, which is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date.

Valuation techniques used to derive the fair value of our available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions regarding fair market value for these securities. Although virtually all of our prices are obtained from third party sources, we also perform an internal pricing review on outliers, which include securities with price changes inconsistent with current market conditions. Financial instruments are categorized based upon the following characteristics or inputs to the valuation techniques:


•	Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.


•	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.


•	Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Estimates of fair values for our investment portfolio are obtained primarily from a nationally recognized pricing service. Our Level 1 category includes those securities valued using an exchange traded price provided by the pricing service. The methodologies used by the pricing service that support a Level 2 classification of a financial instrument include multiple verifiable, observable inputs including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data. Pricing service valuations for Level 3 securities are based upon proprietary models and are used when observable inputs are not available or in illiquid markets.

In limited circumstances we adjust the price received from the pricing service when, in our judgment, a better reflection of fair value is available based upon corroborating information and our knowledge and monitoring of market conditions such as a disparity in price of comparable securities and/or non-binding broker quotes. In other circumstances, certain securities are internally priced because prices are not provided by the pricing service.

We perform continuous reviews of the prices obtained from the pricing service. This includes evaluating the methodology and inputs used by the pricing service to ensure that we determine the proper classification level of the financial instrument. Price variances, including large periodic changes, are investigated and corroborated by market data. We have reviewed the pricing methodologies of our pricing service as well as other observable inputs, such as market data, and transaction volumes and believe that the prices adequately consider market activity in determining fair value.

When a price from the pricing service is not available, values are determined by obtaining broker/dealer quotes and/or market comparables. When available, we obtain multiple quotes for the same security. The ultimate value for these securities is determined based upon our best estimate of fair value using corroborating market information. Our evaluation includes the consideration of benchmark yields, reported trades, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data.

Certain assets and liabilities are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis, including agent loans which are included in other assets (see Note 6, "Investments") and long-term borrowings (see Note 7, "Borrowing Arrangements"). Accordingly, such financial instruments are not included in the fair value hierarchy disclosure because they are not subject to re-measurement at fair value. There were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Table of Contents

The following tables present our fair value measurements on a recurring basis by asset class and level of input:



	At September 30, 2018
	Fair value measurements using:
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets Level 1		Observable inputs Level 2		Unobservable inputs Level 3
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. treasury	$	36,425	$	0	$	36,425	$	0
States & political subdivisions	256,865		0		256,865		0
Corporate debt securities	277,669		0		269,399		8,270
Residential mortgage-backed securities	2,494		0		2,494		0
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	46,860		0		46,860		0
Collateralized debt obligations	65,294		0		65,294		0
Other debt securities	18,588		0		17,683		905
Total available-for-sale securities	704,195		0		695,020		9,175
Equity securities:
Nonredeemable preferred stock - financial services sector	12,511		1,981		10,530		0
Total equity securities	12,511		1,981		10,530		0
Other limited partnership investments ⁽¹⁾	3,317		—		—		—
Total	$	720,023	$	1,981	$	705,550	$	9,175



	At December 31, 2017
	Fair value measurements using:
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets Level 1		Observable inputs Level 2		Unobservable inputs Level 3
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. treasury	$	11,734	$	0	$	11,734	$	0
States & political subdivisions	259,264		0		259,264		0
Foreign government securities	503		0		503		0
Corporate debt securities	346,523		0		338,644		7,879
Residential mortgage-backed securities	25,571		0		25,571		0
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	32,804		0		32,804		0
Collateralized debt obligations	58,034		0		55,834		2,200
Other debt securities	11,528		0		11,528		0
Total fixed maturities	745,961		0		735,882		10,079
Nonredeemable preferred stock - financial services sector	11,659		2,015		9,644		0
Nonredeemable preferred stock - utilities sector	1,093		0		1,093		0
Total available-for-sale securities	758,713		2,015		746,619		10,079
Other limited partnership investments ⁽¹⁾	4,816		—		—		—
Total	$	763,529	$	2,015	$	746,619	$	10,079

(1) Other limited partnership investments measured at fair value represent real estate funds included on the balance sheet as limited partnership investments that are reported under the fair value option using the net asset value practical expedient. These amounts are not required to be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Instead, distributions are received when liquidation of the underlying assets of the funds occur. It is estimated that the underlying assets will generally be liquidated between 5 and 10 years from the inception of the funds. The fair value of these investments is based on the net asset value (NAV) information provided by the general partner. Fair value is based on our proportionate share of the NAV based on the most recent partners' capital statements received from the general partners, which is generally one quarter prior to our balance sheet date. These values are then analyzed to determine if the NAV represents fair value at our balance sheet date, with adjustment being made where appropriate. We consider observable market data and perform a review validating the appropriateness of the NAV at each balance sheet date. It is likely that all of the investments will be redeemed at a future date for an amount different than the NAV of our ownership interest in partners' capital as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, no contributions were made and distributions totaling $1.2 million were received from these investments. During the year ended December 31, 2017, no contributions were made and distributions totaling $0.5 million were received from these investments. There were no unfunded commitments related to the investments as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

We review the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Transfers between hierarchy levels may occur due to changes in available market observable inputs. Transfers into and out of level classifications in 2017 are reported as having occurred at the beginning of the quarter in which the transfers occurred. Effective January 1, 2018, we changed our policy to recognize transfers as occurring at the end of the quarter in which the transfers occurred. This change was applied prospectively due to the immaterial impact on prior year disclosures.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Level 3 Assets – 2018 Quarterly Change:



(in thousands)	Beginning balance at June 30, 2018		Included in earnings⁽¹⁾		Included in other comprehensive income		Purchases		Sales			Transfers into Level 3⁽²⁾		Transfers out of Level 3⁽²⁾			Ending balance at September 30, 2018
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	11,120	$	3	$	71	$	1,539	$	(1,416	)	$	2,735	$	(5,782	)	$	8,270
Other debt securities	0		0		0		905		0			0		0			905
Total Level 3 available-for-sale securities	$	11,120	$	3	$	71	$	2,444	$	(1,416	)	$	2,735	$	(5,782	)	$	9,175

Level 3 Assets – 2018 Year-to-Date Change:



(in thousands)	Beginning balance at December 31, 2017		Included in earnings⁽¹⁾		Included in other comprehensive income		Purchases		Sales			Transfers into Level 3⁽²⁾		Transfers out of Level 3⁽²⁾			Ending balance at September 30, 2018
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	7,879	$	4	$	23	$	4,586	$	(2,381	)	$	10,517	$	(12,358	)	$	8,270
Collateralized debt obligations	2,200		0		7		0		0			0		(2,207		)	0
Other debt securities	0		0		0		905		0			0		0			905
Total Level 3 available-for-sale securities	$	10,079	$	4	$	30	$	5,491	$	(2,381	)	$	10,517	$	(14,565	)	$	9,175

Level 3 Assets – 2017 Quarterly Change:



(in thousands)	Beginning balance at June 30, 2017		Included in earnings⁽¹⁾		Included in other comprehensive income			Purchases		Sales			Transfers into Level 3⁽²⁾		Transfers out of Level 3⁽²⁾			Ending balance at September 30, 2017
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	9,295	$	24	$	(60	)	$	539	$	(1,240	)	$	2,633	$	(3,276	)	$	7,915
Total Level 3 available-for-sale securities	$	9,295	$	24	$	(60	)	$	539	$	(1,240	)	$	2,633	$	(3,276	)	$	7,915

Level 3 Assets – 2017 Year-to-Date Change:



(in thousands)	Beginning balance at December 31, 2016		Included in earnings⁽¹⁾		Included in other comprehensive income			Purchases		Sales			Transfers into Level 3⁽²⁾		Transfers out of Level 3⁽²⁾			Ending balance at September 30, 2017
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	9,352	$	3	$	(108	)	$	4,520	$	(4,372	)	$	8,444	$	(9,924	)	$	7,915
Total Level 3 available-for-sale securities	$	9,352	$	3	$	(108	)	$	4,520	$	(4,372	)	$	8,444	$	(9,924	)	$	7,915


(1)	These amounts are reported in the Statements of Operations as net investment income and net realized investment gains (losses) for the each of the periods presented above.


(2)	Transfers into and/or (out) of Level 3 are primarily attributable to the availability of market observable information and the re-evaluation of the observability of pricing inputs.

Table of Contents

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Unobservable Inputs

When a non-binding broker quote was the only input available, the security was classified within Level 3. Use of non-binding broker quotes totaled $9.2 million at September 30, 2018. The unobservable inputs are not reasonably available to us.

The following table presents our fair value measurements on a recurring basis by pricing source:



	At September 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available-for-sale securities priced via pricing services	$	704,195	$	0	$	695,020	$	9,175
Equity securities priced via pricing services	12,511		1,981		10,530		0
Other limited partnership investments priced via unobservable inputs ⁽¹⁾	3,317		—		—		—
Total	$	720,023	$	1,981	$	705,550	$	9,175

(1)

Other limited partnership investments measured at fair value represent real estate funds included on the Statements of Financial Position as limited partnership investments that are reported under the fair value option using the NAV practical expedient. These amounts are not required to be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these investments is based on the NAV information provided by the general partner.

Table of Contents

Note 6. Investments

Available-for-sale securities

The following tables summarize the cost and fair value of our available-for-sale securities. See also Note 5, "Fair Value" for additional fair value disclosures.



	At September 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Estimated fair value
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. treasury	$	36,799	$	0	$	374	$	36,425
States & political subdivisions	257,612		2,392		3,139		256,865
Corporate debt securities	279,814		1,031		3,176		277,669
Residential mortgage-backed securities	2,524		0		30		2,494
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	47,491		12		643		46,860
Collateralized debt obligations	65,421		80		207		65,294
Other debt securities	18,621		7		40		18,588
Total available-for-sale securities	$	708,282	$	3,522	$	7,609	$	704,195



	At December 31, 2017
(in thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Estimated fair value
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. treasury	$	11,873	$	0	$	139	$	11,734
States & political subdivisions	254,533		5,351		620		259,264
Foreign government securities	501		2		0		503
Corporate debt securities	346,759		1,688		1,924		346,523
Residential mortgage-backed securities	25,324		371		124		25,571
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	33,475		26		697		32,804
Collateralized debt obligations	57,838		237		41		58,034
Other debt securities	11,496		32		0		11,528
Total fixed maturities	741,799		7,707		3,545		745,961
Nonredeemable preferred stock - financial services sector	11,719		15		75		11,659
Nonredeemable preferred stock - utilities sector	1,118		0		25		1,093
Total available-for-sale securities	$	754,636	$	7,722	$	3,645	$	758,713

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2018, are shown below by remaining contractual term to maturity. Mortgage-backed securities are allocated based upon stated maturity dates. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	At September 30, 2018
	Amortized		Estimated
(in thousands)	cost		fair value
Due in one year or less	$	105,133	$	105,031
Due after one year through five years	230,247		230,234
Due after five years through ten years	247,101		244,336
Due after ten years	125,801		124,594
Total available-for-sale securities	$	708,282	$	704,195

Table of Contents

Available-for-sale securities in a gross unrealized loss position are as follows. Data is provided by length of time for securities in a gross unrealized loss position.



	At September 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		No. of holdings
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. treasury	$	24,910	$	31	$	11,515	$	343	$	36,425	$	374	5
States & political subdivisions	104,325		1,995		23,592		1,144		127,917		3,139		67
Corporate debt securities	145,419		2,281		39,278		895		184,697		3,176		425
Residential mortgage-backed securities	790		3		1,703		27		2,493		30		3
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	22,564		216		13,352		427		35,916		643		30
Collateralized debt obligations	43,995		207		0		0		43,995		207		33
Other debt securities	12,580		40		0		0		12,580		40		14
Total available-for-sale securities	$	354,583	$	4,773	$	89,440	$	2,836	$	444,023	$	7,609	577
Quality breakdown of available-for-sale securities:
Investment grade	$	284,054	$	3,207	$	77,869	$	2,325	$	361,923	$	5,532	213
Non-investment grade	70,529		1,566		11,571		511		82,100		2,077		364
Total available-for-sale securities	$	354,583	$	4,773	$	89,440	$	2,836	$	444,023	$	7,609	577



	At December 31, 2017
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		No. of holdings
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. treasury	$	10,237	$	110	$	1,497	$	29	$	11,734	$	139	4
States & political subdivisions	52,553		288		14,361		332		66,914		620		33
Corporate debt securities	171,154		1,585		31,113		339		202,267		1,924		331
Residential mortgage-backed securities	4,156		29		7,064		95		11,220		124		11
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	10,836		85		11,984		612		22,820		697		19
Collateralized debt obligations	21,598		41		0		0		21,598		41		12
Other debt securities	1,499		0		0		0		1,499		0		1
Total fixed maturities	272,033		2,138		66,019		1,407		338,052		3,545		411
Nonredeemable preferred stock - financial services sector	9,644		75		0		0		9,644		75		5
Nonredeemable preferred stock - utilities sector	1,093		25		0		0		1,093		25		1
Total available-for-sale securities	$	282,770	$	2,238	$	66,019	$	1,407	$	348,789	$	3,645	417
Quality breakdown of fixed maturities:
Investment grade	$	214,586	$	1,064	$	62,193	$	985	$	276,779	$	2,049	158
Non-investment grade	57,447		1,074		3,826		422		61,273		1,496		253
Total fixed maturities	$	272,033	$	2,138	$	66,019	$	1,407	$	338,052	$	3,545	411

The above securities have been evaluated and determined to be temporary impairments for which we expect to recover our entire principal plus interest. The primary components of this analysis include a general review of market conditions and financial performance of the issuer along with the extent and duration at which fair value is less than cost. Any securities that we intend to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell before recovery are included in other-than-temporary impairments, which are recognized in earnings.

Table of Contents

Net investment income

Interest and dividend income are recognized as earned and recorded to net investment income. Investment income, net of expenses, was generated from the following portfolios:



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018		2017		2018		2017
Fixed maturities ⁽¹⁾	$	6,243	$	4,234	$	18,616	$	16,358
Equity securities	203		0		487		49
Cash equivalents and other	1,484		1,936		3,518		2,852
Total investment income	7,930		6,170		22,621		19,259
Less: investment expenses	271		188		1,038		1,057
Investment income, net of expenses	$	7,659	$	5,982	$	21,583	$	18,202

(1) Includes interest earned on note receivable from Erie Family Life Insurance Company ("EFL") of $0.4 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Realized investment gains (losses)

Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized in income based upon the specific identification method. Realized gains (losses) on investments were as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018			2017			2018			2017
Available-for-sale securities:
Gross realized gains	$	525		$	1,621		$	1,100		$	2,708
Gross realized losses	(526		)	(722		)	(1,512		)	(1,261		)
Net realized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities	(1		)	899			(412		)	1,447
Equity securities	(1		)	—			(189		)	—
Miscellaneous	2			0			104			92
Net realized investment gains (losses)	$	0		$	899		$	(497	)	$	1,539

The portion of net unrealized gains and losses recognized during the reporting period, related to equity securities still held at the reporting date, is calculated as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018			2017		2018			2017
Equity securities: ⁽¹⁾
Total net realized losses	$	(1	)	$	—	$	(189	)	$	—
Less: net losses realized on securities sold	(52		)	—		(86		)	—
Net unrealized gains (losses) recognized during the period on securities held at reporting date	$	51		$	—	$	(103	)	$	—


(1)	With the adoption of ASU 2016-01, effective January 1, 2018, changes in unrealized gains and losses on equity securities are included in net realized investment gains (losses) in the Statement of Operations. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a reclassification of net unrealized losses of $0.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings at January 1, 2018.

There were no other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities recognized in earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities recognized in earnings were $0.6 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. We have the intent to sell all credit-impaired available-for-sale debt securities; therefore, the entire amount of the impairment charges were included in earnings and no non-credit impairments were recognized in other comprehensive income.

Table of Contents

Limited partnerships

The majority of our limited partnership holdings are considered investment companies where the general partners record assets at fair value. These limited partnerships are recorded using the equity method of accounting and are generally reported on a one-quarter lag; therefore, our year-to-date limited partnership results through September 30, 2018 are comprised of partnership financial results for the fourth quarter of 2017 and first two quarters of 2018. Given the lag in reporting, our limited partnership results do not reflect the market conditions of the third quarter of 2018. We also own some real estate limited partnerships that do not meet the criteria of an investment company. These partnerships prepare audited financial statements on a cost basis. We have elected to report these limited partnerships under the fair value option, which is based on the NAV from our partner's capital statement reflecting the general partner's estimate of fair value for the fund's underlying assets. Fair value provides consistency in the evaluation and financial reporting for these limited partnerships and limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method. Cash contributions made to and distributions received from the partnerships are recorded in the period in which the transaction occurs.

Amounts included in equity in earnings of limited partnerships by method of accounting are included below:



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018		2017		2018			2017
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method	$	645	$	1,305	$	624		$	1,704
Change in fair value of limited partnerships accounted for under the fair value option	127		232		(263		)	195
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	$	772	$	1,537	$	361		$	1,899

The following table summarizes limited partnership investments by sector:



(in thousands)	At September 30, 2018		At December 31, 2017
Private equity	$	29,632	$	31,663
Mezzanine debt	1,922		3,516
Real estate	2,217		5,127
Real estate - fair value option	3,317		4,816
Total limited partnership investments	$	37,088	$	45,122

See also Note 13, "Commitments and Contingencies" for investment commitments related to limited partnerships.

Agent Loans

Agent loans are issued to independent agents and are carried at unpaid principal balance. The carrying value of our agent loans at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $59.1 million and $21.8 million, respectively, and are included in other assets in the Statements of Financial Position.

Note 7. Borrowing Arrangements

Bank line of credit

As of September 30, 2018, we have access to a $100 million bank revolving line of credit with a $25 million letter of credit sublimit that expires on November 3, 2020. As of September 30, 2018, a total of $99.1 million remains available under the facility due to $0.9 million outstanding letters of credit, which reduce the availability for letters of credit to $24.1 million. We had no borrowings outstanding on our line of credit as of September 30, 2018. Bonds with a fair value of $107.5 million were pledged as collateral on the line at September 30, 2018. The securities pledged as collateral have no trading restrictions and are reported as available-for-sale securities in the Statements of Financial Position as of September 30, 2018. The banks require compliance with certain covenants, which include leverage ratios and debt restrictions, for our line of credit. We are in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2018.

Term loan credit facility

In 2016, we entered into a credit agreement for a $100 million senior secured draw term loan credit facility ("Credit Facility") for the acquisition of real property and construction of an office building that will serve as part of our principal headquarters. Under the agreement, $25 million was drawn on December 1, 2016, June 1, 2017, and December 1, 2017. The final $25 million was completed on June 1, 2018, for a total drawn amount of $100 million. During the draw period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, we will make monthly interest payments under the Credit Facility. Upon the expiration of the draw period, the Credit Facility converts to a fully-amortized term loan with monthly payments of principal and interest over a period of 28 years, commencing on January 1, 2019. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.35%. In addition, we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee of 0.08% on the unused portion of the Credit Facility during the draw period. Bonds with a fair value of $107.5 million were pledged as collateral for the facility and are reported as available-for-sale securities in the Statements of Financial Position as of September 30, 2018. The bank requires compliance with certain covenants, which include leverage ratios, debt restrictions and minimum net worth, for our Credit Facility. We are in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2018.

Amounts drawn from the Credit Facility are reported at carrying value on our Statements of Financial Position, net of unamortized loan origination and commitment fees. The estimated fair value of this borrowing at September 30, 2018 was $90.5 million. The estimated fair value was determined using estimates based upon interest rates and credit spreads and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2018.

The scheduled maturity of the $100 million Credit Facility begins on January 1, 2019 with annual principal payments of $1.9 million in 2019, $2.0 million in 2020, $2.0 million in 2021, $2.1 million in 2022, $2.2 million in 2023 and $89.8 million thereafter.

Table of Contents

Note 8. Postretirement Benefits

Pension plans

Our pension plans consist of a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees and an unfunded supplemental employee retirement plan for certain members of executive and senior management. Although we are the sponsor of these postretirement plans and record the funded status of these plans, the Exchange and its subsidiaries reimburse us for approximately 59% of the annual benefit expense of these plans, which represents pension benefits for employees performing administrative services and their allocated share of costs for employees in departments that support the administrative functions.

Accelerated contributions of $80 million were made to the defined benefit pension plan in the first half of 2018.

Prior to 2003, the employee pension plan purchased annuities from EFL for certain plan participants that were receiving benefit payments under the pension plan. These are nonparticipating annuity contracts under which EFL has unconditionally contracted to provide specified benefits to beneficiaries; however, the pension plan remains the primary obligor to the beneficiaries. A contingent liability of $18.1 million at September 30, 2018 exists in the event EFL does not honor the annuity contracts.

The cost of our pension plans are as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018			2017			2018			2017
Service cost for benefits earned	$	9,513		$	7,777		$	28,539		$	23,330
Interest cost on benefits obligation	8,845			8,569			26,536			25,706
Expected return on plan assets	(12,815		)	(10,317		)	(38,444		)	(30,950		)
Prior service cost amortization	339			218			1,015			654
Net actuarial loss amortization	3,202			2,325			9,606			6,975
Pension plan cost ⁽¹⁾	$	9,084		$	8,572		$	27,252		$	25,715


(1)	The components of pension plan costs other than the service cost component are included in the line item "Other income (expense)" in the Statements of Operations after reimbursements from the Exchange and its subsidiaries.

Note 9. Income Taxes

The effective tax rate may differ from the statutory federal tax rate primarily due to permanent differences for tax exempt interest income.

Income tax amounts are estimates based on our initial analysis and interpretation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") enacted in 2017. In the third quarter of 2018, the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance that clarifies the tax treatment for the TCJA items for which our accounting was incomplete. We are in the process of refining our analysis and determining the impact on our deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Table of Contents

Note 10. Capital Stock

Class A and B common stock

Holders of Class B shares may, at their option, convert their shares into Class A shares at the rate of 2,400 Class A shares per Class B share. There were no shares of Class B common stock converted into Class A common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017. There is no provision for conversion of Class A shares to Class B shares, and Class B shares surrendered for conversion cannot be reissued.

Stock repurchases

In 2011, our Board of Directors approved a continuation of the current stock repurchase program of $150 million, with no time limitation. There were no shares repurchased under this program during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017. We had approximately $17.8 million of repurchase authority remaining under this program at September 30, 2018.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we purchased 24,692 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $2.9 million. Of this amount, we purchased 5,830 shares for $0.7 million, or $117.39 per share, for stock-based awards in conjunction with our equity compensation plan, for which the shares were delivered to plan participants in January and May 2018. We purchased 6,938 shares for $0.8 million, or $119.52 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred stock compensation plan. The shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in March, May, and August 2018. The remaining 11,924 shares were purchased at a total cost of $1.4 million, or $119.20 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the incentive compensation deferral plan. The shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in March, May, and August 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we purchased 60,332 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $7.3 million. Of this amount, we purchased 3,785 shares for $0.4 million, or $111.55 per share, for stock-based awards in conjunction with our equity compensation plan. We purchased 9,663 shares for $1.2 million, or $121.85 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred stock compensation plan. The remaining 46,884 shares were purchased at a total cost of $5.7 million, or $122.40 per share, for stock-based awards in conjunction with our long-term incentive plan. These shares were delivered in 2017.

Table of Contents

Note 11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") (loss) by component, including amounts reclassified to other comprehensive income ("OCI") (loss) and the related line item in the Statements of Operations where net income is presented, are as follows:



	Three months ended									Three months ended
	September 30, 2018									September 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Before Tax			Income Tax ⁽¹⁾			Net			Before Tax			Income Tax ⁽¹⁾			Net
Investment securities:
AOCI (loss), beginning of period	$	(4,157	)	$	(873	)	$	(3,284	)	$	7,974		$	2,791		$	5,183
OCI (loss) before reclassifications	(624		)	(131		)	(493		)	643			225			418
Realized investment losses (gains)	1			0			1			(899		)	(314		)	(585		)
OCI (loss)	(623		)	(131		)	(492		)	(256		)	(89		)	(167		)
AOCI (loss), end of period	$	(4,780	)	$	(1,004	)	$	(3,776	)	$	7,718		$	2,702		$	5,016

Pension and other postretirement plans: ⁽²⁾
AOCI (loss), beginning of period	$	(200,954	)	$	(42,201	)	$	(158,753	)	$	(190,695	)	$	(66,744	)	$	(123,951	)
AOCI (loss), end of period	$	(200,954	)	$	(42,201	)	$	(158,753	)	$	(190,695	)	$	(66,744	)	$	(123,951	)

Total
AOCI (loss), beginning of period	$	(205,111	)	$	(43,074	)	$	(162,037	)	$	(182,721	)	$	(63,953	)	$	(118,768	)
Investment securities	(623		)	(131		)	(492		)	(256		)	(89		)	(167		)
Pension and other postretirement plans	0			0			0			0			0			0
OCI (loss)	(623		)	(131		)	(492		)	(256		)	(89		)	(167		)
AOCI (loss), end of period	$	(205,734	)	$	(43,205	)	$	(162,529	)	$	(182,977	)	$	(64,042	)	$	(118,935	)



	Nine months ended									Nine months ended
	September 30, 2018									September 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Before Tax			Income Tax ⁽¹⁾			Net			Before Tax			Income Tax ⁽¹⁾			Net
Investment securities:
AOCI, beginning of period	$	3,410		$	716		$	2,694		$	3,954		$	1,384		$	2,570
OCI (loss) before reclassifications	(9,163		)	(1,924		)	(7,239		)	5,029			1,760			3,269
Realized investment losses (gains)	412			86			326			(1,447		)	(506		)	(941		)
Impairment losses	646			136			510			182			64			118
Cumulative effect of adopting ASU 2016-01 ⁽³⁾	(85		)	(18		)	(67		)	—			—			—
OCI (loss)	(8,190		)	(1,720		)	(6,470		)	3,764			1,318			2,446
AOCI (loss), end of period	$	(4,780	)	$	(1,004	)	$	(3,776	)	$	7,718		$	2,702		$	5,016

Pension and other postretirement plans: ⁽²⁾
AOCI (loss), beginning of period	$	(200,954	)	$	(42,201	)	$	(158,753	)	$	(190,695	)	$	(66,744	)	$	(123,951	)
AOCI (loss), end of period	$	(200,954	)	$	(42,201	)	$	(158,753	)	$	(190,695	)	$	(66,744	)	$	(123,951	)

Total
AOCI (loss), beginning of period	$	(197,544	)	$	(41,485	)	$	(156,059	)	$	(186,741	)	$	(65,360	)	$	(121,381	)
Investment securities	(8,190		)	(1,720		)	(6,470		)	3,764			1,318			2,446
Pension and other postretirement plans	0			0			0			0			0			0
OCI (loss)	(8,190		)	(1,720		)	(6,470		)	3,764			1,318			2,446
AOCI (loss), end of period	$	(205,734	)	$	(43,205	)	$	(162,529	)	$	(182,977	)	$	(64,042	)	$	(118,935	)


(1)	Deferred taxes were recognized at the corporate rate of 21% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 35% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.


(2)	There are no comprehensive income items or amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to postretirement plan items during interim periods.


(3)	ASU 2016-01 required a reclassification of unrealized losses of equity securities from AOCI to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. See Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies".

Table of Contents

Note 12. Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments could potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk, including unsecured receivables from the Exchange. A large majority of our revenue and receivables are from the Exchange and its subsidiaries. See also Note 1, "Nature of Operations". Management fee amounts and other reimbursements due from the Exchange and its subsidiaries were $463.6 million and $418.3 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies

We have contractual commitments to invest up to $13.9 million related to our limited partnership investments at September 30, 2018. These commitments are split among private equity securities of $5.5 million, mezzanine debt securities of $8.1 million, and real estate activities of $0.3 million. These commitments will be funded as required by the limited partnership agreements.

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of conducting business. In accordance with current accounting standards for loss contingencies and based upon information currently known to us, we establish reserves for litigation when it is probable that a loss associated with a claim or proceeding has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. When no amount within the range of loss is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the minimum amount of the estimable loss. To the extent that such litigation against us may have an exposure to a loss in excess of the amount we have accrued, we believe that such excess would not be material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Legal fees are expensed as incurred. We believe that our accruals for legal proceedings are appropriate and, individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to be material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

We review all litigation on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions. For certain legal proceedings, we cannot reasonably estimate losses or a range of loss, if any, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development or where the plaintiffs seek indeterminate damages. Various factors, including, but not limited to, the outcome of potentially lengthy discovery and the resolution of important factual questions, may need to be determined before probability can be established or before a loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If the loss contingency in question is not both probable and reasonably estimable, we do not establish an accrual and the matter will continue to be monitored for any developments that would make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. In the event that a legal proceeding results in a substantial judgment against, or settlement by, us, there can be no assurance that any resulting liability or financial commitment would not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 14. Subsequent Events

No items were identified in this period subsequent to the financial statement date that required adjustment or additional disclosure.

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of financial condition and results of operations highlights significant factors influencing Erie Indemnity Company ("Indemnity", "we", "us", "our"). This discussion should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements" of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and with Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for the year ended December 31, 2017, as contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2018.

INDEX



	Page Number
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information	26
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards	27
Recent Accounting Standards	27
Operating Overview	27
Results of Operations	30
Financial Condition	36
Liquidity and Capital Resources	38
Critical Accounting Estimates	40

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

Statements contained herein that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements and, as such, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to differ, perhaps materially, from those discussed herein. Forward-looking statements relate to future trends, events or results and include, without limitation, statements and assumptions on which such statements are based that are related to our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions, and adequacy of resources. Examples of forward-looking statements are discussions relating to premium and investment income, expenses, operating results, and compliance with contractual and regulatory requirements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Among the risks and uncertainties, in addition to those set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that could cause actual results and future events to differ from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements include the following:


•	dependence upon our relationship with the Exchange and the management fee under the agreement with the subscribers at the Exchange;


•	dependence upon our relationship with the Exchange and the growth of the Exchange, including:


◦	general business and economic conditions;


◦	factors affecting insurance industry competition;


◦	dependence upon the independent agency system; and


◦	ability to maintain our reputation for customer service;


•	dependence upon our relationship with the Exchange and the financial condition of the Exchange, including:


◦	the Exchange's ability to maintain acceptable financial strength ratings;


◦	factors affecting the quality and liquidity of the Exchange's investment portfolio;


◦	changes in government regulation of the insurance industry;


◦	emerging claims and coverage issues in the industry; and


◦	severe weather conditions or other catastrophic losses, including terrorism;


•	costs of providing policy issuance and renewal services to the Exchange under the subscriber's agreement;


•	credit risk from the Exchange;


•	ability to attract and retain talented management and employees;


•	ability to ensure system availability and effectively manage technology initiatives;


•	difficulties with technology or data security breaches, including cyber attacks;


•	ability to maintain uninterrupted business operations;


•	factors affecting the quality and liquidity of our investment portfolio;

Table of Contents


•	our ability to meet liquidity needs and access capital; and


•	outcome of pending and potential litigation.

A forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and reflects our analysis only as of that date. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". ASC 606 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. (See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report.) We adopted ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.

Under ASC 606, we determined that we are acting as the attorney-in-fact for the subscribers at the Exchange in two capacities pursuant to the subscriber's agreement. The first is providing policy issuance and renewal services. The second is acting as the attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange, as well as the service provider for its insurance subsidiaries, with respect to all claims handling, life insurance, and investment management services, collectively referred to as "administrative services". Beginning January 1, 2018, the management fee, currently 25% of all direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange, is allocated between the two performance obligations. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, the entire management fee was allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services. Additionally, the expenses we incur and related reimbursements we receive for administrative services are presented gross in our Statement of Operations effective January 1, 2018.

A significant portion of the management fee will be allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services and recognized at a point in time, i.e. the time of policy issuance or renewal. Therefore, the related revenue recognition pattern for the vast majority of our revenues remains unchanged. The management fee allocated to the administrative services is recognized as revenue over a four-year period in correlation to costs incurred. Upon adoption at January 1, 2018, we established a contract liability related to the administrative services of $48.5 million, a deferred tax asset of $10.2 million, and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced shareholders' equity by $38.3 million. If ASC 606 had been effective in 2017, based on current estimates our revenue would have been reduced by approximately $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and reduced by approximately $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report for a discussion of other recently adopted as well as recently issued accounting standards and the impact on our financial statements if known.

OPERATING OVERVIEW

Overview

We serve as the attorney-in-fact for the subscribers (policyholders) at the Exchange, a reciprocal insurer that writes property and casualty insurance. Our primary function as attorney-in-fact is to perform policy issuance and renewal services on behalf of the subscribers at the Exchange. We also act as attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange, as well as the service provider for its insurance subsidiaries, with respect to all administrative services.

The Exchange is a reciprocal insurance exchange, which is an unincorporated association of individuals, partnerships and corporations that agree to insure one another. Each applicant for insurance to the Exchange signs a subscriber's agreement, which contains an appointment of Indemnity as their attorney-in-fact to transact the business of the Exchange on their behalf. Pursuant to the subscriber’s agreement for acting as attorney-in-fact in these two capacities, we earn a management fee calculated as a percentage of the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange.

Table of Contents

Our earnings are primarily driven by the management fee revenue generated for the services we provide to the Exchange. The policy issuance and renewal services we provide to the Exchange are related to the sales, underwriting and issuance of policies. The sales related services we provide include agent compensation and certain sales and advertising support services. Agent compensation includes scheduled commissions to agents based upon premiums written as well as additional commissions and bonuses to agents, which are earned by achieving targeted measures. Agent compensation generally comprises approximately two-thirds of our policy issuance and renewal expenses. The underwriting services we provide include underwriting and policy processing. The remaining services we provide include customer service and administrative support. We also provide information technology services that support all the functions listed above. Included in these expenses are allocations of costs for departments that support these policy issuance and renewal functions.

Our results of operations are tied to the growth and financial condition of the Exchange as the Exchange is our sole customer, and our earnings are largely generated from management fees based on the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. The Exchange generates revenue by insuring preferred and standard risks, with personal lines comprising 71% of the 2017 direct and assumed written premiums and commercial lines comprising the remaining 29%. The principal personal lines products are private passenger automobile and homeowners. The principal commercial lines products are commercial multi-peril, commercial automobile and workers compensation.

Financial Overview



	Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2018		2017			% Change			2018		2017			% Change
	(Unaudited)								(Unaudited)
Operating income	$	96,695	$	81,239		19.0		%	$	269,585	$	231,627		16.4		%
Total investment income	8,431		8,418			0.2			20,801		21,458			(3.1	)
Interest expense, net	709		377			NM			1,864		800			NM
Other income (expense)	54		(415		)	NM			156		(1,231		)	NM
Income before income taxes	104,471		88,865			17.6			288,678		251,054			15.0
Income tax expense	24,025		30,322			(20.8	)		62,768		86,108			(27.1	)
Net income	$	80,446	$	58,543		37.4		%	$	225,910	$	164,946		37.0		%
Net income per share - diluted	$	1.54	$	1.12		37.4		%	$	4.32	$	3.15		37.0		%

NM = not meaningful

Operating income increased in both the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods in 2017, as the growth in total operating revenue outpaced the growth in total operating expenses. Management fee revenue for policy issuance and renewal services increased $16.1 million in the third quarter of 2018 and $43.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods in 2017. Management fee revenue allocated to administrative services was $13.5 million in the third quarter of 2018 and $39.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. No management fee revenue was allocated to administrative services in the third quarter or nine months ended September 30, 2017. Management fee revenue is based upon the management fee rate we charge, and the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. The management fee rate was 25% for both 2018 and 2017. The direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange increased 7.1% to $1.9 billion in the third quarter of 2018 and 6.9% to $5.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods in 2017. The administrative services reimbursement revenue and corresponding cost of operations increased both total operating revenue and total operating expenses by $140.2 million for the third quarter of 2018 and $432.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, but had no net impact on operating income.

Table of Contents

Cost of operations for policy issuance and renewal services increased 3.9% and 4.2% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017, primarily due to higher commissions driven by direct written premium growth.

Total investment income remained flat in the third quarter of 2018 and decreased $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same periods in 2017. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was driven by net realized losses and impairments on investments, coupled with lower earnings generated from limited partnership investments, somewhat offset by higher net investment income.

Income before income taxes increased $15.6 million in the third quarter and $37.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, while income tax expense decreased $6.3 million in the third quarter and $23.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, due to the lower income tax rate of 21% which became effective January 1, 2018.

General Conditions and Trends Affecting Our Business

Economic conditions

Unfavorable changes in economic conditions, including declining consumer confidence, inflation, high unemployment, and the threat of recession, among others, may lead the Exchange's customers to modify coverage, not renew policies, or even cancel policies, which could adversely affect the premium revenue of the Exchange, and consequently our management fee. Further, unanticipated increased inflation costs including medical cost inflation, construction and auto repair cost inflation, and tort issues may impact the estimated loss reserves and future premium rates. If any of these items impacted the financial condition or continuing operations of the Exchange, it could have an impact on our financial results.

Financial market volatility

Our portfolio of fixed maturity, equity security, and limited partnership investments is subject to market volatility especially in periods of instability in the worldwide financial markets. Over time, net investment income could also be impacted by volatility and by the general level of interest rates, which impact reinvested cash flow from the portfolio and business operations. Depending upon market conditions, which are unpredictable and remain uncertain, considerable fluctuation could exist in the fair value of our investment portfolio and reported total investment income, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management fee revenue

On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". Upon adoption, we determined we have two performance obligations in the subscriber’s agreement, providing policy issuance and renewal services and acting as attorney-in-fact for the Exchange, as well as the service provider for its insurance subsidiaries, with respect to all administrative services. We earn management fees for acting as the attorney-in-fact for the subscribers at the Exchange in these two capacities. Upon adoption of ASC 606, we are required to allocate our revenues between our performance obligations. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, the entire management fee was allocated to the policy issuance and renewal services.

The management fee is calculated by multiplying all direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange by the management fee rate, which is determined by our Board of Directors at least annually. The management fee rate was set at 25%, the maximum rate, for both 2018 and 2017. Changes in the management fee rate can affect our revenue and net income significantly.

The following table presents the allocation and disaggregation of revenue for our two performance obligations:



	Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018			2017			% Change		2018			2017			% Change
	(Unaudited)								(Unaudited)
Policy issuance and renewal services
Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange	$	1,863,927		$	1,739,654		7.1	%	$	5,434,720		$	5,085,562		6.9	%
Management fee rate	24.2		%	25.0		%			24.2		%	25.0		%
Management fee revenue	451,070			434,914			3.7		1,315,202			1,271,391			3.4
Change in allowance for management fee returned on cancelled policies ⁽¹⁾	291			300			NM		(3,291		)	(2,800		)	NM
Management fee revenue - policy issuance and renewal services, net ⁽²⁾	$	451,361		$	435,214		3.7	%	$	1,311,911		$	1,268,591		3.4	%

Administrative services
Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange	$	1,863,927		$	—		N/A	%	$	5,434,720		$	—		N/A	%
Management fee rate	0.8		%	—					0.8		%	—
Management fee revenue	14,912			—			N/A		43,478			—			N/A
Change in contract liability ⁽³⁾	(1,374		)	N/A			N/A		(3,539		)	N/A			N/A
Change in allowance for management fee returned on cancelled policies ⁽¹⁾	(17		)	N/A			N/A		(45		)	N/A			N/A
Management fee revenue - administrative services, net	13,521			—			N/A		39,894			—			N/A
Administrative services reimbursement revenue	140,172			—			N/A		432,642			—			N/A
Total revenue from administrative services	$	153,693		$	—		N/A	%	$	472,536		$	—		N/A	%

NM = not meaningful

N/A = not applicable


(1)	Management fees are returned to the Exchange when policies are cancelled mid-term and unearned premiums are refunded. We record an estimated allowance for management fees returned on mid-term policy cancellations. This estimated allowance has been allocated between the two performance obligations consistent with the revenue allocation proportion.


(2)	The allocation of management fee revenue between the two performance obligations beginning January 1, 2018 caused the growth in management fee revenue - policy issuance and renewal services to not correspond directly with the growth in direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to same respective periods in 2017.


(3)	With the adoption of ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018, management fee revenue - administrative services is recognized over time as the services are performed. See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3, Revenue, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report.

Table of Contents

Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange

Direct and assumed premiums include premiums written directly by the Exchange and premiums assumed from its wholly owned property and casualty subsidiaries. Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange increased 7.1% to $1.9 billion in the third quarter of 2018 compared to the third quarter of 2017, driven by increases in both policies in force and average premium per policy. Year-over-year policies in force for all lines of business increased 3.5% in the third quarter of 2018 as the result of continuing strong policyholder retention, compared to 3.4% in the third quarter of 2017. The year-over-year average premium per policy for all lines of business increased 3.2% at September 30, 2018, compared to 2.6% at September 30, 2017.

Premiums generated from new business increased 3.6% to $230 million in the third quarter of 2018. While third quarter 2018 new business polices written decreased 1.9%, the year-over-year average premium per policy on new business increased 5.4% at September 30, 2018, driving this new business premium increase. Premiums generated from new business increased 14.2% to $222 million in the third quarter of 2017. Underlying this trend in new business premium was a 9.2% increase in new business policies written in the third quarter of 2017 and a year-over-year average premium per policy on new business increase of 4.6% at September 30, 2017. Premiums generated from renewal business increased 7.7% to $1.6 billion in the third quarter of 2018, compared to an increase of 4.7% to $1.5 billion in the third quarter of 2017. Underlying the trend in renewal business premiums was an increase in year-over-year average premium per policy of 2.9% at September 30, 2018 and steady policy retention ratios. Year-over-year average premium per policy increased 2.4% at September 30, 2017.

Personal lines – Total personal lines premiums written increased 6.8% to $1.4 billion in the third quarter of 2018, from $1.3 billion in the third quarter of 2017, driven by an increase of 3.6% in total personal lines policies in force and an increase of 3.2% in the total personal lines year-over-year average premium per policy.

Commercial lines – Total commercial lines premiums written increased 8.0% to $494 million in the third quarter of 2018, from $457 million in the third quarter of 2017, driven by a 2.5% increase in total commercial lines policies in force and a 3.8% increase in the total commercial lines year-over-year average premium per policy.

Future trends-premium revenue – The Exchange plans to continue its efforts to grow premiums and improve its competitive position in the marketplace. Expanding the size of its agency force through a careful agency selection process and increased market penetration in our existing operating territories is expected to contribute to future growth as existing and new agents build their books of business.

Changes in premium levels attributable to the growth in policies in force and rate changes directly affect the profitability of the Exchange and have a direct bearing on our management fee. Our continued focus on underwriting discipline and the maturing of pricing sophistication models has contributed to the Exchange's steady policy retention ratios and increased average premium per policy.

Policy issuance and renewal services



	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		% Change			2018		2017		% Change
	(Unaudited)							(Unaudited)
Management fee revenue - policy issuance and renewal services, net	$	451,361	$	435,214	3.7		%	$	1,311,911	$	1,268,591	3.4		%
Service agreement revenue	7,072		7,278		(2.8	)		21,297		21,781		(2.2	)
	458,433		442,492		3.6			1,333,208		1,290,372		3.3
Cost of policy issuance and renewal services	375,259		361,253		3.9			1,103,517		1,058,745		4.2
Operating income - policy issuance and renewal services	$	83,174	$	81,239	2.4		%	$	229,691	$	231,627	(0.8	)	%

Policy issuance and renewal services

We allocate a portion of the management fee, which currently equates to 24.2% of the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange, for providing policy issuance and renewal services. This portion of the management fee is recognized as revenue when the policy is issued or renewed because it is at that time that the services we provide are substantially complete and the executed insurance policy is transferred to the customer. The increase in management fee revenue for policy issuance and renewal services was driven by the increase in the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange discussed previously.

Table of Contents

Service agreement revenue

Service agreement revenue includes service charges we collect from subscribers/policyholders for providing extended payment terms on policies written and assumed by the Exchange, and late payment and policy reinstatement fees. The service charges are fixed dollar amounts per billed installment. The decrease in service agreement revenue reflects the continued shift to payment plans that do not incur service charges or offer a premium discount for certain payment methods. The shift to these plans is driven by the consumers' desire to avoid paying service charges and to take advantage of the discount.

Cost of policy issuance and renewal services



	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		% Change			2018		2017		% Change
	(Unaudited)							(Unaudited)
Commissions:
Total commissions	$	256,770	$	248,677	3.3		%	$	752,437	$	720,538	4.4		%
Non-commission expense:
Underwriting and policy processing	$	36,046	$	36,060	0.0		%	$	113,372	$	108,115	4.9		%
Information technology	36,720		32,688		12.3			105,569		102,850		2.6
Sales and advertising	14,725		15,722		(6.3	)		45,960		46,375		(0.9	)
Customer service	7,592		7,083		7.2			24,084		20,661		16.6
Administrative and other	23,406		21,023		11.3			62,095		60,206		3.1
Total non-commission expense	118,489		112,576		5.3			351,080		338,207		3.8
Total cost of policy issuance and renewal services	$	375,259	$	361,253	3.9		%	$	1,103,517	$	1,058,745	4.2		%

Commissions – Commissions increased $8.1 million in the third quarter of 2018 and $31.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same respective periods in 2017. The increases were driven by the growth in direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange of 7.1% for the third quarter and 6.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, slightly offset by lower agent incentive costs related to less profitable growth, compared to the same respective periods in 2017. The estimated agent incentive payout at September 30, 2018 is based on actual underwriting results for the two prior years and current year-to-date actual results and forecasted results for the remainder of 2018. Therefore, fluctuations in the current quarter underwriting results can impact the estimated incentive payout on a quarter-to-quarter basis.

Non-commission expense – Non-commission expense increased $5.9 million in the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. Information technology costs increased $4.0 million primarily due to higher professional fees. Administrative and other expenses increased $2.4 million primarily due to higher professional fees and personnel costs. Personnel costs in all expense categories were impacted by lower estimated costs for incentive plan awards related to underwriting performance.

Non-commission expense increased $12.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. Underwriting and policy processing costs increased $5.3 million primarily due to increased personnel costs and underwriting report costs. Information technology costs increased $2.7 million primarily due to increased personnel costs. Customer service costs increased $3.4 million primarily due to increased personnel costs and credit card processing fees. Personnel costs in all expense categories were higher due to additional bonuses of approximately $4.8 million awarded to all employees as a result of tax savings realized from the lower corporate income tax rate that became effective January 1, 2018 as well as increased pension and medical costs. The total increase in personnel costs was somewhat offset by lower estimated costs for incentive plan awards related to underwriting performance.

Table of Contents

Administrative services



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Management fee revenue - administrative services, net	$	13,521	$	—	N/A	%	$	39,894	$	—	N/A	%
Administrative services reimbursement revenue	140,172		—		N/A		432,642		—		N/A
Total revenue allocated to administrative services	153,693		—		N/A		472,536		—		N/A
Administrative services expenses
Claims handling services	122,205		—		N/A		377,854		—		N/A
Investment management services	7,834		—		N/A		24,607		—		N/A
Life management services	10,133		—		N/A		30,181		—		N/A
Operating income - administrative services	$	13,521	$	—	N/A	%	$	39,894	$	—	N/A	%

N/A = not applicable

Administrative services

We allocate a portion of the management fee, which currently equates to 0.8% of the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange, to the administrative services. This portion of the management fee is recognized as revenue over a four-year period representing the time over which the services are provided. We also report reimbursed costs as revenues, which are recognized monthly as services are provided. Beginning with the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the administrative services expenses we incur and the related reimbursements we receive are recorded gross in the Statement of Operations.

Cost of administrative services

Total investment income

A summary of the results of our investment operations is as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2018		2017		% Change			2018			2017			% Change
	(Unaudited)							(Unaudited)
Net investment income	$	7,659	$	5,982	28.0		%	$	21,583		$	18,202		18.6		%
Net realized investment gains (losses)	0		899		NM			(497		)	1,539			NM
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	0		0		NM			(646		)	(182		)	NM
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	772		1,537		(49.7	)		361			1,899			(81.0	)
Total investment income	$	8,431	$	8,418	0.2		%	$	20,801		$	21,458		(3.1	)	%

NM = not meaningful

Net investment income

Net investment income primarily includes interest and dividends on our fixed maturity and equity security portfolios, net of investment expenses.

Net investment income increased by $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared to the third quarter of 2017 and increased by $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in net investment income in both periods was primarily due to an increase in income from cash and cash equivalents driven by an increase in rates and an increase in bond income due to higher yields.

Table of Contents

Net realized investments gains (losses)

A breakdown of our net realized investment gains (losses) is as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018			2017		2018			2017
Securities sold:	(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Fixed maturities	$	(1	)	$	899	$	(412	)	$	1,592
Equity securities	(52		)	0		(111		)	(145		)
Equity securities change in fair value ⁽¹⁾	51			0		(78		)	0
Miscellaneous	2			0		104			92
Net realized investment gains (losses) ⁽²⁾	$	0		$	899	$	(497	)	$	1,539


(1)	The fair value of our equity portfolio is based upon exchange traded prices provided by a nationally recognized pricing service.


(2)	See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 6, Investments, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report for additional disclosures regarding net realized investment gains (losses).

The third quarter of 2018 losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities were offset by increases in fair value of equity securities and miscellaneous gains. Net realized gains during the third quarter of 2017 reflected gains from sales of fixed maturity securities. Net realized losses of $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 were primarily driven by losses from sales of securities coupled with decreases in fair value of equity securities. Net realized gains of $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were primarily driven by gains from sales of fixed maturity securities partially offset by losses from sales of equity securities.

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

There were no impairment losses in the third quarter of 2018 or 2017. Net impairment losses were $0.6 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Impairments were primarily related to securities in an unrealized loss position where we determined the loss was other-than-temporary based on credit factors. Impairments in both years also included securities in an unrealized loss position with intent to sell prior to expected recovery of our amortized cost basis.

Equity in earnings (losses) of limited partnerships

The components of equity in earnings (losses) of limited partnerships are as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2018		2017		2018			2017
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
Private equity	$	639	$	594	$	705		$	822
Mezzanine debt	125		387		230			274
Real estate	8		556		(574		)	803
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	$	772	$	1,537	$	361		$	1,899

Limited partnership earnings pertain to investments in U.S. and foreign private equity, mezzanine debt, and real estate partnerships. Valuation adjustments are recorded to reflect the changes in fair value of the underlying investments held by the limited partnerships. These adjustments are recorded as a component of equity in earnings of limited partnerships in the Statements of Operations.

Limited partnership earnings tend to be cyclical based upon market conditions, the age of the partnership, and the nature of the investments. Generally, limited partnership earnings are recorded on a quarter lag from financial statements we receive from our general partners. As a consequence, earnings from limited partnerships reported at September 30, 2018 reflect investment valuation changes resulting from the financial markets and the economy in the fourth quarter of 2017 and the first two quarters of 2018.

Limited partnership investments generated gains of $0.8 million and $0.4 million in the third quarter and year to date 2018, respectively compared to earnings of $1.5 million and $1.9 million in the third quarter and year to date periods of 2017, respectively. The real estate sector generated lower earnings in the third quarter 2018 and losses in the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Table of Contents

Financial condition of Erie Insurance Exchange

Serving in the capacity of attorney-in-fact for the Exchange, we are dependent on the growth and financial condition of the Exchange, who is our sole customer. The strength of the Exchange and its wholly owned subsidiaries is rated annually by A.M. Best Company. Higher ratings of insurance companies generally indicate financial stability and a strong ability to pay claims. The ratings are generally based upon factors relevant to policyholders and are not directed toward return to investors. The Exchange and each of its property and casualty subsidiaries are rated A+ "Superior". On June 18, 2018, the outlook for the financial strength rating was affirmed as stable. According to A.M. Best, this second highest financial strength rating category is assigned to those companies that, in A.M. Best’s opinion, have achieved superior overall performance when compared to the standards established by A.M. Best and have a superior ability to meet obligations to policyholders over the long term. As of December 31, 2017, only approximately 12% of insurance groups are rated A+ or higher, and the Exchange is included in that group.

The financial statements of the Exchange are prepared in accordance with statutory accounting principles prescribed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Financial statements prepared under statutory accounting principles focus on the solvency of the insurer and generally provide a more conservative approach than under GAAP. Statutory direct written premiums of the Exchange and its wholly owned property and casualty subsidiaries grew 6.9% to $5.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $5.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. These premiums, along with investment income, are the major sources of cash that support the operations of the Exchange. Policyholders’ surplus, determined under statutory accounting principles, was $9.1 billion at September 30, 2018, $8.8 billion at December 31, 2017, and $8.4 billion at September 30, 2017. The Exchange and its wholly owned property and casualty subsidiaries' year-over-year policy retention ratio continues to be high at 89.9% at September 30, 2018 and 89.6% at December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017.

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Investments

Our investment portfolio is managed with the objective of maximizing after-tax returns on a risk-adjusted basis.

Distribution of investments



	Carrying value at				Carrying value at
(dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2018		% to total		December 31, 2017		% to total
	(Unaudited)
Fixed maturities	$	704,195	87	%	$	745,961	90	%
Equity securities:
Preferred stock	12,511		2		12,752		2
Limited partnerships:
Private equity	29,632		4		31,663		4
Mezzanine debt	1,922		0		3,516		0
Real estate	5,534		1		9,943		1
Other investments ⁽¹⁾	59,581		6		21,985		3
Total investments	$	813,375	100	%	$	825,820	100	%


(1)	Other investments primarily include agent loans. Agent loans are included with other assets in the Statements of Financial Position.

We continually review our investment portfolio to evaluate positions that might incur other-than-temporary declines in value. We record impairment write-downs on investments in instances where the fair value of the investment is substantially below cost, and we conclude that the decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, which includes consideration for intent to sell. For all investment holdings, general economic conditions and/or conditions specifically affecting the underlying issuer or its industry, including downgrades by the major rating agencies, are considered in evaluating impairment in value. In addition to specific factors, other factors considered in our review of investment valuation are the length of time the fair value is below cost and the amount the fair value is below cost.

We individually analyze all positions with emphasis on those that have, in management’s opinion, declined significantly below cost. In compliance with impairment guidance for debt securities, we perform further analysis to determine if a credit-related impairment has occurred. Some of the factors considered in determining whether a debt security is credit impaired include potential for the default of interest and/or principal, level of subordination, collateral of the issue, compliance with financial covenants, credit ratings and industry conditions. We have the intent to sell all credit-impaired debt securities; therefore, the entire amount of the impairment charges are included in earnings and no impairments are recorded in other comprehensive income. We believe our investment valuation philosophy and accounting practices result in appropriate and timely measurement of fair value and recognition of impairment.

Fixed maturities

Under our investment strategy, we maintain a fixed maturity portfolio that is of high quality and well diversified within each market sector. This investment strategy also achieves a balanced maturity schedule. Our fixed maturity portfolio is managed with the goal of achieving reasonable returns while limiting exposure to risk. Our municipal bond portfolio accounts for $256.9 million, or 36%, of the total fixed maturity portfolio at September 30, 2018. The overall credit rating of the municipal portfolio without consideration of the underlying insurance is AA+.

Fixed maturities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred taxes, included in shareholders’ equity. Net unrealized losses on fixed maturities, net of deferred taxes, amounted to $3.2 million at September 30, 2018, compared to net unrealized gains of $3.3 million at December 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

The following table presents a breakdown of the fair value of our fixed maturity portfolio by sector and rating: ⁽¹⁾



	At September 30, 2018
(in thousands)	(Unaudited)
Industry Sector	AAA		AA		A		BBB		Non- investment grade		Fair value
Basic materials	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	16,801	$	16,801
Communications	0		1,967		0		3,486		23,592		29,045
Consumer	0		0		3,486		27,782		46,223		77,491
Diversified	0		0		0		0		957		957
Energy	0		997		0		3,644		16,179		20,820
Financial	0		3,976		23,683		28,432		17,419		73,510
Government-municipal	99,411		141,499		15,955		0		0		256,865
Healthcare	0		0		0		0		502		502
Industrial	0		0		4,920		1,013		23,942		29,875
Structured securities ⁽²⁾	90,514		30,745		7,967		4,010		0		133,236
Technology	0		999		2,003		6,489		14,405		23,896
U.S. treasury	0		36,425		0		0		0		36,425
Utilities	0		0		0		1,993		2,779		4,772
Total	$	189,925	$	216,608	$	58,014	$	76,849	$	162,799	$	704,195


(1)	Ratings are supplied by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. The table is based upon the lowest rating for each security.


(2)	Structured securities include residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and asset-backed securities.

Equity Securities

Our equity securities consist of nonredeemable preferred stock and are carried at fair value in the Statements of Financial Position with all changes in unrealized gains and losses reflected in the Statements of Operations, effective January 1, 2018 with the adoption of ASU 2016-01. Previously, changes in unrealized gains and losses were reflected in Other Comprehensive Income, net of deferred taxes.

The following table presents an analysis of the fair value of our preferred stock securities by sector:



(in thousands)
Industry Sector	At September 30, 2018		At December 31, 2017
	(Unaudited)
Financial	$	12,511	$	11,659
Utilities	0		1,093
Total	$	12,511	$	12,752

Limited partnerships

At September 30, 2018, investments in limited partnerships decreased from the investment levels at December 31, 2017. Changes in partnership values are a function of contributions and distributions, adjusted for market value changes in the underlying investments. The decrease in limited partnership investments was primarily due to net distributions received from the partnerships. We have made no new limited partnership commitments since 2006, and the balance of limited partnership investments is expected to decline over time as additional distributions are received. The results from our limited partnerships are based upon financial statements received from our general partners, which are generally received on a quarter lag. As a result, the market values and earnings recorded during 2018 reflect the partnership activity experienced in the fourth quarter of 2017 and the first two quarters of 2018.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the short- and long-term cash requirements of its business operations and growth needs. Our liquidity requirements have been met primarily by funds generated from management fee revenue and income from investments. Cash provided from these sources is used primarily to fund the costs of our management operations including commissions, salaries and wages, pension plans, share repurchases, dividends to shareholders, and the purchase and development of information technology. We expect that our operating cash needs will be met by funds generated from operations.

Volatility in the financial markets presents challenges to us as we do occasionally access our investment portfolio as a source of cash. Some of our fixed income investments, despite being publicly traded, are illiquid. Volatility in these markets could impair our ability to sell certain of our fixed income securities or cause such securities to sell at deep discounts. Additionally, our limited partnership investments are significantly less liquid. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our needs from sources other than the liquidation of securities.

Cash flow activities

The following table provides condensed cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30:



(in thousands)	2018			2017
	(Unaudited)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	174,314		$	120,334
Net cash used in investing activities	(52,975		)	(40,415		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(92,372		)	(84,363		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	28,967		$	(4,444	)

Net cash provided by operating activities was $174.3 million in the first nine months of 2018, compared to $120.3 million in the first nine months of 2017. Increased cash from operating activities for the first nine months of 2018 was primarily due to an increase in management fee revenue received driven by growth in direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange along with a decrease in income taxes paid due to the lower corporate income tax rate effective January 1, 2018, compared to the first nine months of 2017. Somewhat offsetting the increase in cash from operating activities was higher commissions and bonuses paid to agents and pension contributions, compared to the first nine months of 2017. Cash paid for agent commissions and bonuses increased $53.7 million to $770.2 million in the first nine months of 2018 due to higher scheduled commissions driven by premium growth and higher bonus award payments resulting from profitable underwriting results. Our Board approved an $80 million accelerated pension contribution, which was paid in the first half of 2018. In the first nine months of 2017, we contributed $39.0 million to our pension plan. We are reimbursed approximately 59% of the net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans from the Exchange and its subsidiaries, which includes pension benefits for employees performing administrative services and their allocated share of costs for employees in departments that support the administrative functions.

At September 30, 2018, we recorded a net deferred tax asset of $37.7 million. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. There was no deferred tax valuation allowance recorded at September 30, 2018.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $53.0 million in the first nine months of 2018, compared to $40.4 million in the first nine months of 2017. The increase in cash used for the first nine months of 2018, compared to the first nine months of 2017, was driven by less cash being generated from the maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities and increased agent loans and fixed asset purchases. These increases were somewhat offset by lower purchases of available-for-sale securities. Also impacting our future investing activities are limited partnership commitments, which totaled $13.9 million at September 30, 2018, and will be funded as required by the partnerships’ agreements. Of this amount, the total remaining commitment to fund limited partnerships that invest in private equity securities was $5.5 million, mezzanine debt securities was $8.1 million and real estate activities was $0.3 million. Additionally, we have committed to incur future costs related to the construction of the building that will serve as part of our principal headquarters, which is expected to cost $100 million and is being funded by the senior secured draw term loan credit facility of the same amount. As of September 30, 2018, $53.1 million of costs have been incurred related to this project.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $92.4 million in the first nine months of 2018, compared to $84.4 million in the first nine months of 2017. The increase in cash used was primarily due to dividends paid to shareholders. We increased both

Table of Contents

our Class A and Class B shareholder regular quarterly dividends by 7.3% for 2018, compared to 2017. There are no regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our shareholders. Financing activities in both nine month periods were also impacted by draws of $25 million in each period on the senior secured draw term loan credit facility. Future financing activities will include the principal payments due under the senior secured draw term loan credit facility, which will not commence until 2019.

There were no repurchases of our Class A nonvoting common stock in the first nine months of 2018 and 2017 in conjunction with our stock repurchase program. In 2011, our Board of Directors approved a continuation of the current stock repurchase program of $150 million with no time limitation. This repurchase authority includes, and is not in addition to, any unspent amounts remaining under the prior authorization. We had approximately $17.8 million of repurchase authority remaining under this program at September 30, 2018, based upon trade date.

In the first nine months of 2018, we purchased 24,692 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $2.9 million. Of this amount, we purchased 5,830 shares for $0.7 million, or $117.39 per share, for stock-based awards in conjunction with our equity compensation plan, for which the shares were delivered to plan participants in January and May 2018. We purchased 6,938 shares for $0.8 million, or $119.52 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred stock compensation plan. The shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in March, May and August 2018. The remaining 11,924 shares were purchased at a total cost of $1.4 million, or $119.20 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the incentive compensation deferral plan. The shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in March, May and August 2018.

In the first nine months of 2017, we purchased 58,129 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $7.0 million. Of this amount, we purchased 3,785 shares for $0.4 million, or $111.55 per share, for stock-based awards in conjunction with our equity compensation plan, for which the shares were delivered to plan participants in January 2017. We purchased 7,460 shares for $0.9 million, or $121.46 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred stock compensation plan. The shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in March, May and August 2017. The remaining 46,884 shares were purchased at a total cost of $5.7 million, or $122.40 per share, for stock-based awards in conjunction with our long-term incentive plan, for which the shares were delivered to plan participants in June 2017.

Capital Outlook

We regularly prepare forecasts evaluating the current and future cash requirements for both normal and extreme risk events. Should an extreme risk event result in a cash requirement exceeding normal cash flows, we have the ability to meet our future funding requirements through various alternatives available to us.

Outside of our normal operating and investing cash activities, future funding requirements could be met through: 1) cash and cash equivalents, which total approximately $244.7 million at September 30, 2018, 2) a $100 million bank revolving line of credit, and 3) liquidation of unpledged assets held in our investment portfolio, including preferred stock and investment grade bonds, which totaled approximately $338.8 million at September 30, 2018. Volatility in the financial markets could impair our ability to sell certain fixed income securities or cause such securities to sell at deep discounts. Additionally, we have the ability to curtail or modify discretionary cash outlays such as those related to shareholder dividends and share repurchase activities.

As of September 30, 2018, we have access to a $100 million bank revolving line of credit with a $25 million letter of credit sublimit that expires on November 3, 2020. As of September 30, 2018, a total of $99.1 million remains available under the facility due to $0.9 million outstanding letters of credit, which reduce the availability for letters of credit to $24.1 million. We had no borrowings outstanding on our line of credit as of September 30, 2018. Bonds with a fair value of $107.5 million were pledged as collateral on the line at September 30, 2018. These securities have no trading restrictions and are reported as available-for-sale securities in the Statements of Financial Position. The banks require compliance with certain covenants, which include leverage ratios and debt restrictions. We were in compliance with our bank covenants at September 30, 2018.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Off-balance sheet arrangements include those with unconsolidated entities that may have a material current or future effect on our financial condition or results of operations, including material variable interests in unconsolidated entities that conduct certain activities. We have no material off-balance sheet obligations. As of September 30, 2018, there were no material changes to our future contractual obligations as previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

Surplus Note

We hold a surplus note for $25 million from Erie Family Life Insurance Company that is payable on demand on or after December 31, 2018; however, no principal or interest payments may be made without prior approval by the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. Interest payments are scheduled to be paid semi-annually. For each of the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, we recognized interest income on the note of $1.3 million.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

We make estimates and assumptions that have a significant effect on the amounts and disclosures reported in the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to investment valuation and retirement benefit plans for employees. While management believes its estimates are appropriate, the ultimate amounts may differ from estimates provided. Our most critical accounting estimates are described in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for the year ended December 31, 2017 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2018. See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 5, Fair Value, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report for additional information on our valuation of investments.


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risk is primarily related to fluctuations in prices and interest rates. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk resulting from changes in prices, interest rates, and other risk exposures for the year ended December 31, 2017 are included in Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk", of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2018.

There have been no material changes that impact our portfolio or reshape our periodic investment reviews of asset allocations during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. For a recent discussion of conditions surrounding our investment portfolio, see the "Operating Overview", "Results of Operations", and "Financial Condition" discussions contained in Part I, Item 2. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contained within this report.


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We carried out an evaluation, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Our management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, any change in our internal control over financial reporting and determined there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Upon adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance on January 1, 2018, we implemented changes to our processes related to revenue recognition and the related control activities. There were no significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting due to the adoption of this new standard.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

State Court Lawsuit Against Erie Indemnity Company

Erie Indemnity Company (“Indemnity”) was named as a defendant in a complaint filed on August 1, 2012 by alleged subscribers of the Erie Insurance Exchange (the “Exchange”) in the Court of Common Pleas Civil Division of Fayette County, Pennsylvania captioned Erie Insurance Exchange, an unincorporated association, by Joseph S. Sullivan and Anita Sullivan, Patricia R. Beltz, and Jenna L. DeBord, trustees ad litem v. Erie Indemnity Co. (the “Sullivan” lawsuit).

As subsequently amended, the complaint alleges that, beginning on September 1, 1997, Indemnity retained “Service Charges” (installment fees) and “Added Service Charges” (late fees and policy reinstatement charges) on policies written by Exchange and its insurance subsidiaries, which allegedly should have been paid to Exchange, in the amount of approximately $308 million. In addition to their claim for monetary relief on behalf of Exchange, Plaintiffs seek an accounting of all so-called intercompany transactions between Indemnity and Exchange from 1996 to date. Plaintiffs allege that Indemnity breached its contractual, fiduciary, and equitable duties by retaining Service Charges and Added Service Charges that should have been retained by Exchange. Plaintiffs bring these same claims under three separate derivative-type theories. First, Plaintiffs purport to bring suit as members of Exchange on behalf of Exchange. Second, Plaintiffs purport to bring suit as trustees ad litem on behalf of Exchange. Third, Plaintiffs purport to bring suit on behalf of Exchange pursuant to Rule 1506 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows shareholders to bring suit derivatively on behalf of a corporation or similar entity.

Indemnity filed a motion in the state court in November 2012 seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. On December 19, 2013, the court granted Indemnity’s motion in part, holding that the Pennsylvania Insurance Holding Company Act “provides the [Pennsylvania Insurance] Department with special competence to address the subject matter of plaintiff’s claims” and referring “all issues” in the Sullivan lawsuit to the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (the “Department”) for “its views and any determination.” The court stayed all further proceedings and reserved decision on all other grounds for dismissal raised by Indemnity. Plaintiffs sought reconsideration of the court’s order, and on January 13, 2014, the court entered a revised order affirming its prior order and clarifying that the Department “shall decide any and all issues within its jurisdiction.” On January 30, 2014, Plaintiffs asked the court to certify its order to permit an immediate appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and to stay any proceedings in the Department pending completion of any appeal. On February 18, 2014, the court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion. On March 20, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a petition for review with the Superior Court, which was denied by the Superior Court on May 5, 2014.

The Sullivan matter was assigned to an Administrative Judge within the Department for determination. The parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing was not required, entered into a stipulated record, and submitted briefing to the Department. Oral argument was held before the Administrative Judge on January 6, 2015. On April 29, 2015, the Department issued a declaratory opinion and order: (1) finding that the transactions between Exchange and Indemnity in which Indemnity retained or received revenue from installment and other service charges from Exchange subscribers complied with applicable insurance laws and regulations and that Indemnity properly retained charges paid by Exchange policyholders for certain installment premium payment plans, dishonored payments, policy cancellations, and policy reinstatements; and (2) returning jurisdiction over the matter to the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas.

On May 26, 2015, Plaintiffs appealed the Department’s decision to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court. Oral argument was held before the Commonwealth Court en banc on December 9, 2015. On January 27, 2016, the Commonwealth Court issued an opinion vacating the Department’s ruling and directing the Department to return the case to the Court of Common Pleas, essentially holding that the primary jurisdiction referral of the trial court was improper at this time because the allegations of the complaint do not implicate the special competency of the Department.

On February 26, 2016, Indemnity filed a petition for allowance of appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court seeking further review of the Commonwealth Court opinion. On March 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed an answer opposing Indemnity’s petition for allowance of appeal; and, on March 28, 2016, Indemnity sought permission to file a reply brief in further support of its petition for allowance of appeal. On August 10, 2016, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied Indemnity’s petition for allowance of appeal; and the Sullivan lawsuit returned to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County.

On September 12, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a motion to stay the Sullivan lawsuit pending the outcome of the Federal Court Lawsuit they filed against Indemnity and former and current Directors of Indemnity on July 8, 2016. (See below.) Indemnity filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to stay on September 19, 2016; and filed amended preliminary objections seeking dismissal of the Sullivan lawsuit on September 20, 2016. The motion to stay and the amended preliminary objections remain pending. On June 27, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a status conference in the Sullivan lawsuit.

Table of Contents

On July 30, 2018, the Court held a status conference and thereafter lifted the stay of proceedings. On September 28, 2018, Indemnity filed a Motion to Enforce the Federal Judgment in the Beltz II lawsuit, seeking dismissal of the Sullivan lawsuit with prejudice. The Motion to Enforce the Federal Judgment remains pending.

Indemnity believes that it continues to have meritorious legal and factual defenses to the Sullivan lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations and requests for relief.

Federal Court Lawsuit Against Erie Indemnity Company and Directors

On February 6, 2013, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, captioned Erie Insurance Exchange, an unincorporated association, by members Patricia R. Beltz, Joseph S. Sullivan and Anita Sullivan, and Patricia R. Beltz, on behalf of herself and others similarly situate v. Richard L. Stover; J. Ralph Borneman, Jr.; Terrence W. Cavanaugh; Jonathan Hirt Hagen; Susan Hirt Hagen; Thomas B. Hagen; C. Scott Hartz; Claude C. Lilly, III; Lucian L. Morrison; Thomas W. Palmer; Martin P. Sheffield; Elizabeth H. Vorsheck; and Robert C. Wilburn (the “Beltz” lawsuit), by alleged policyholders of Exchange who are also the plaintiffs in the Sullivan lawsuit. The individuals named as defendants in the Beltz lawsuit were the then-current Directors of Indemnity.

As subsequently amended, the Beltz lawsuit asserts many of the same allegations and claims for monetary relief as in the Sullivan lawsuit. Plaintiffs purport to sue on behalf of all policyholders of Exchange, or, alternatively, on behalf of Exchange itself. Indemnity filed a motion to intervene as a Party Defendant in the Beltz lawsuit in July 2013, and the Directors filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in August 2013. On February 10, 2014, the court entered an order granting Indemnity’s motion to intervene and permitting Indemnity to join the Directors’ motion to dismiss; granting in part the Directors’ motion to dismiss; referring the matter to the Department to decide any and all issues within its jurisdiction; denying all other relief sought in the Directors’ motion as moot; and dismissing the case without prejudice. To avoid duplicative proceedings and expedite the Department’s review, the Parties stipulated that only the Sullivan action would proceed before the Department and any final and non-appealable determinations made by the Department in the Sullivan action will be applied to the Beltz action.

On March 7, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Indemnity filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on March 26, 2014. On November 17, 2014, the Third Circuit deferred ruling on Indemnity’s motion to dismiss the appeal and instructed the parties to address that motion, as well as the merits of Plaintiffs’ appeal, in the parties’ briefing. Briefing was completed on April 2, 2015. In light of the Department’s April 29, 2015 decision in Sullivan, the Parties then jointly requested that the Beltz appeal be voluntarily dismissed as moot on June 5, 2015. The Third Circuit did not rule on the Parties’ request for dismissal and instead held oral argument as scheduled on June 8, 2015. On July 16, 2015, the Third Circuit issued an opinion and judgment dismissing the appeal. The Third Circuit found that it lacked appellate jurisdiction over the appeal, because the District Court’s February 10, 2014 order referring the matter to the Department was not a final, appealable order.

On July 8, 2016, the Beltz plaintiffs filed a new action labeled as a “Verified Derivative And Class Action Complaint” in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The action is captioned Patricia R. Beltz, Joseph S. Sullivan, and Anita Sullivan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Company; Kaj Ahlmann; John T. Baily; Samuel P. Black, III; J. Ralph Borneman, Jr.; Terrence W. Cavanaugh; Wilson C. Cooney; LuAnn Datesh; Patricia A. Goldman; Jonathan Hirt Hagen; Thomas B. Hagen; C. Scott Hartz; Samuel P. Katz; Gwendolyn King; Claude C. Lilly, III; Martin J. Lippert; George R. Lucore; Jeffrey A. Ludrof; Edmund J. Mehl; Henry N. Nassau; Thomas W. Palmer; Martin P. Sheffield; Seth E. Schofield; Richard L. Stover; Jan R. Van Gorder; Elizabeth A. Hirt Vorsheck; Harry H. Weil; and Robert C. Wilburn (the “Beltz II” lawsuit). The individual defendants are all present or former Directors of Indemnity (the “Directors”).

The allegations of the Beltz II lawsuit arise from the same fundamental, underlying claims as the Sullivan and prior Beltz litigation, i.e., that Indemnity improperly retained Service Charges and Added Service Charges. The Beltz II lawsuit alleges that the retention of the Service Charges and Added Service Charges was improper because, for among other reasons, that retention constituted a breach of the Subscriber’s Agreement and an Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing by Indemnity, breaches of fiduciary duty by Indemnity and the other defendants, conversion by Indemnity, and unjust enrichment by defendants Jonathan Hirt Hagen, Thomas B. Hagen, and Elizabeth A. Hirt Vorsheck, at the expense of Exchange. The Beltz II lawsuit requests, among other things, that a judgment be entered against the Defendants certifying the action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; declaring Plaintiffs as representatives of the Class and Plaintiffs’ counsel as counsel for the Class; declaring the conduct alleged as unlawful, including, but not limited to, Defendants’ retention of the Service Charges and Added Service Charges; enjoining Defendants from continuing to retain the Service Charges and Added Service Charges; and awarding compensatory and punitive damages and interest.

Table of Contents

On September 23, 2016, Indemnity filed a motion to dismiss the Beltz II lawsuit. On September 30, 2016, the Directors filed their own motions to dismiss the Beltz II lawsuit. On July 17, 2017, the Court granted Indemnity’s and the Directors’ motions to dismiss the Beltz II lawsuit, dismissing the case in its entirety. The Court ruled that “the Subscriber’s Agreement does not govern the separate and additional charges at issue in the Complaint” and, therefore, dismissed the breach of contract claim against Indemnity for failure to state a claim. The Court also ruled that the remaining claims, including the claims for breach of fiduciary duty against Indemnity and the Directors, are barred by the applicable statutes of limitation or fail to state legally cognizable claims. On August 14, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

On May 10, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the Beltz II lawsuit. On May 24, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a petition seeking rehearing of their appeal before the Third Circuit. The Third Circuit denied that petition on June 14, 2018.

Federal Court Lawsuit Against Erie Indemnity Company and Directors

On December 28, 2017 a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania captioned Lynda Ritz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Company, J. Ralph Borneman, Jr., Terrence W. Cavanaugh, Eugene C. Connell, LuAnn Datesh, Jonathan Hirt Hagen, Thomas B. Hagen, C. Scott Hartz, Brian A. Hudson, Sr., Claude C. Lilly, III, George R. Lucore, Thomas W. Palmer, Martin P. Sheffield, Richard L. Stover, Elizabeth A. Hirt Vorsheck, and Robert C. Wilburn, and Erie Insurance Exchange (Nominal Defendant) (the “Ritz” lawsuit). The individual named as Plaintiff is alleged to be a policyholder (subscriber) of the Erie Insurance Exchange (the “Exchange”). With the exception of Terrence W. Cavanaugh and Robert C. Wilburn, the individuals named as Defendants comprise the current Board of Directors of Indemnity. Messrs. Cavanaugh and Wilburn are former Directors of Indemnity (the “Directors”).

The Complaint alleges that since at least 2007, Erie Indemnity Company has taken “unwarranted and excessive” management fees as compensation for its services under the Subscriber’s Agreement. Count I of the Complaint purports to allege a claim for breach of alleged fiduciary duties against Indemnity and the Directors on behalf of Plaintiff and a putative class of subscribers. Count II purports to allege a claim for breach of alleged fiduciary duties against Indemnity and the Directors on behalf of Exchange. Count III purports to allege a claim for breach of contract and an alleged implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against Indemnity on behalf of Plaintiff and a putative class. Count IV purports to allege a claim of unjust enrichment against several Directors.

The Complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages and requests the Court to enjoin Indemnity from continuing to retain excessive management fees; and order such other relief as may be appropriate.

On March 5, 2018, Indemnity filed a motion to dismiss the Ritz lawsuit. The Directors also filed their own motions to dismiss the Ritz lawsuit on March 5, 2018. Plaintiff filed her responses to both motions on April 26, 2018; and Indemnity and the Directors filed their replies in support of their motions on May 25, 2018. The motions to dismiss the Ritz lawsuit remain pending.

Indemnity believes it has meritorious legal and factual defenses and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations and requests for relief in the Ritz lawsuit. The Directors have advised Indemnity that they intend to vigorously defend against the claims in the Ritz lawsuit and have sought indemnification and advancement of expenses from the Company in connection with the Ritz lawsuit.

For additional information on contingencies, see Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, of Notes to Financial Statements".


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2018.

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In 2011, our Board of Directors approved a continuation of the current stock repurchase program, authorizing repurchases for a total of $150 million with no time limitation. This repurchase authority included, and was not in addition to, any unspent amounts remaining under the prior authorization. There were no repurchases of our Class A common stock under this program during the quarter ending September 30, 2018. We had approximately $17.8 million of repurchase authority remaining under this program at September 30, 2018.

During the quarter ending September 30, 2018, we purchased 2,445 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $0.3 million, or $127.00 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred stock compensation plan and the incentive compensation deferral plan. The shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in August 2018.

Table of Contents


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS



Exhibit
Number		Description of Exhibit

10.1		Retirement Agreement between Erie Indemnity Company and Sean J. McLaughlin dated September 26, 2018. Such exhibit is incorporated by reference to the like titled exhibit in the Registrant's Form 8-K that was filed with the Commission on September 28, 2018.

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32*		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Filed herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			Erie Indemnity Company
			(Registrant)


Date:	October 25, 2018	By:	/s/ Timothy G. NeCastro
			Timothy G. NeCastro, President & CEO

		By:	/s/ Gregory J. Gutting
			Gregory J. Gutting, Executive Vice President & CFO