e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File Number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(412) 394-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At October 26, 2010, the registrant had outstanding 98,584,640 shares of its Common Stock.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
SEC FORM 10-Q
Quarter Ended September 30, 2010
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Current period unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
443.3 |
|
|
$ |
708.8 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for
doubtful accounts of $6.3 and $6.5 at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
623.0 |
|
|
|
392.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,012.0 |
|
|
|
825.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,160.7 |
|
|
|
1,997.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,939.9 |
|
|
|
1,907.9 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
208.1 |
|
|
|
207.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
181.0 |
|
|
|
169.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,489.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,346.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
412.1 |
|
|
$ |
308.6 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
276.4 |
|
|
|
258.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Short term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
710.4 |
|
|
|
624.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,039.2 |
|
|
|
1,037.6 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
409.1 |
|
|
|
424.3 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
111.2 |
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,357.0 |
|
|
|
2,256.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-
50,000,000 shares; issued-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at September 30,
2010 and
December 31, 2009; outstanding-98,579,115 shares at
September 30, 2010 and 98,070,474 shares at
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
647.2 |
|
|
|
653.6 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,228.4 |
|
|
|
2,230.5 |
|
Treasury stock: 3,825,141 shares at September 30, 2010 and
4,333,782 shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(183.7 |
) |
|
|
(208.6 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(653.9 |
) |
|
|
(673.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,048.2 |
|
|
|
2,012.2 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
2,132.7 |
|
|
|
2,089.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
4,489.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,346.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
1
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,058.8 |
|
|
$ |
697.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,010.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,239.2 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
969.0 |
|
|
|
603.5 |
|
|
|
2,647.2 |
|
|
|
1,989.2 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
216.1 |
|
|
|
228.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other income
and income taxes |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
146.9 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
55.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
2
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
61.3 |
|
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
106.0 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
Changes in operating asset and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(186.5 |
) |
|
|
150.2 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(231.0 |
) |
|
|
114.7 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
103.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(289.8 |
) |
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
149.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(133.2 |
) |
|
|
(308.1 |
) |
Asset disposals and other |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(132.4 |
) |
|
|
(302.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
752.5 |
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(194.5 |
) |
Net borrowings under credit facilities |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Taxes on share-based compensation |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on share-based compensation |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(69.2 |
) |
|
|
509.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(265.5 |
) |
|
|
356.4 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
708.8 |
|
|
|
469.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
443.3 |
|
|
$ |
826.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Statements of Changes in Consolidated Equity
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
controlling |
|
Total |
|
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Interests |
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
651.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,286.7 |
|
|
$ |
(244.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(746.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,029.0 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
$ |
158.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
162.6 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock
($0.54 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.9 |
) |
Cash dividends paid to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
647.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,210.8 |
|
|
$ |
(208.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(581.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,153.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
653.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,230.5 |
|
|
$ |
(208.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(673.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,089.6 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Unrealized losses on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
75.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
|
Cash dividends on common stock
($0.54 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
Employee stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
647.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,228.4 |
|
|
$ |
(183.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(653.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,132.7 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
Note 1. Accounting Policies
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless the context requires otherwise, Allegheny
Technologies, ATI and the Company refer to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its
subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for any future period. The December 31, 2009 financial information has been
derived from the Companys audited financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In January 2010, the FASB issued changes to disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements, including the amount of transfers between Level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy,
the reasons for transfers in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and activity for
recurring Level 3 measures. In addition, the changes clarify certain disclosure requirements
related to the level at which fair value disclosures should be disaggregated with separate
disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, and the requirement to provide
disclosures about valuation techniques and inputs used in determining the fair value of assets or
liabilities classified as Levels 2 or 3. The Company adopted the disclosure changes effective
January 1, 2010, except for the disaggregated Level 3 rollforward disclosures, which will be
effective for fiscal year 2011.
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
191.7 |
|
|
$ |
158.3 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
843.7 |
|
|
|
673.9 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
121.5 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at current cost |
|
|
1,156.9 |
|
|
|
928.3 |
|
Less allowances to reduce current cost values to LIFO basis |
|
|
(143.5 |
) |
|
|
(102.8 |
) |
Progress payments |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
1,012.0 |
|
|
$ |
825.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out
(FIFO), and average cost methods) or market, less progress payments. Most of the Companys
inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of the Companys non-U.S.
operations is valued using average cost or FIFO methods. The effect of using the LIFO methodology
to value inventory, rather than FIFO, increased cost of sales by $40.7 million for the first nine
months of 2010 compared to a decrease to cost of sales of $59.0 million for the first nine months
of 2009.
5
Note 3. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
628.7 |
|
|
|
590.6 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,687.1 |
|
|
|
2,607.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,340.6 |
|
|
|
3,223.2 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,400.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,315.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,939.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,907.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Debt
Debt at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Allegheny Technologies 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
402.5 |
|
|
$ |
402.5 |
|
Allegheny Technologies 9.375% Notes due 2019 |
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
Allegheny Technologies 8.375% Notes due 2011, net (a) |
|
|
117.5 |
|
|
|
117.9 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Domestic Bank Group $400 million unsecured credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
Foreign credit facilities |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020, and other |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term debt |
|
|
1,061.1 |
|
|
|
1,071.1 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,039.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,037.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $1.2
million at September 30, 2010 and $1.8 million at December 31, 2009. |
The Company did not borrow funds under its $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit facility
during the first nine months of 2010, although approximately $7 million has been utilized to
support the issuance of letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires the Company to maintain
a leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness net of cash on hand in excess of $50 million,
divided by consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and
non-cash pension expense) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an interest coverage ratio
(consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, and non-cash pension expense divided by interest
expense) of not less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2010, the leverage ratio
was 1.67, and the interest coverage ratio was 4.85.
The Company has an additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of September 30, 2010, $32 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, has a 205 million renminbi (approximately $31 million at September 30, 2010 exchange
rates) revolving credit facility with a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely
by STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture partners. As of
September 30, 2010, there were no borrowings under this credit facility.
6
Note 5. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
As part of its risk management strategy, the Company, from time-to-time, utilizes derivative
financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in raw material prices, energy costs,
foreign currencies, and interest rates. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the
Company accounts for most of these contracts as hedges. In general, hedge effectiveness is
determined by examining the relationship between offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows
attributable to the item being hedged, and the financial instrument being used for the hedge.
Effectiveness is measured utilizing regression analysis and other techniques to determine whether
the change in the fair market value or cash flows of the derivative exceeds the change in fair
value or cash flow of the hedged item. Calculated ineffectiveness, if any, is immediately
recognized on the statement of income.
The Company sometimes uses futures and swap contracts to manage exposure to changes in prices
for forecasted purchases of raw materials, such as nickel and natural gas. Under these contracts,
which are generally accounted for as cash flow hedges, the price of the item being hedged is fixed
at the time that the contract is entered into and the Company is obligated to make or receive a
payment equal to the net change between this fixed price and the market price at the date the
contract matures.
The majority of ATIs products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index
mechanisms. However, as of September 30, 2010, the Company had entered into financial hedging
arrangements primarily at the request of its customers, related to firm orders, representing
approximately 4% of its annual nickel usage, primarily with settlements in 2010. A minor amount of
nickel hedges extend into 2014.
At September 30, 2010, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge the Companys
exposure to energy cost volatility included natural gas cost hedges for approximately 75% of its
annual forecasted domestic requirements through 2011 and approximately 15% for 2012, and
electricity hedges for Western Pennsylvania operations of approximately 45% of its forecasted
on-peak and off-peak requirements for 2011 and approximately 30% for 2012.
While the majority of the Companys direct export sales are transacted in U.S. dollars,
foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit transactional exposure to
changes in currency exchange rates for those transactions denominated in a non-U.S. currency. The
Company sometimes purchases foreign currency forward contracts that permit it to sell specified
amounts of foreign currencies expected to be received from its export sales for pre-established
U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates. The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign
currencies in which export sales are denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the
variability in cash flows of a portion of the forecasted future export sales transactions which
otherwise would expose the Company to foreign currency risk. The Company may also enter into
foreign currency forward contracts that are not designated as hedges, which are denominated in the
same foreign currency in which export sales are denominated. At September 30, 2010, the
outstanding financial derivatives, including both hedges and undesignated derivatives, that are
used to manage the Companys exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros, represented
approximately 15% of its forecasted total international sales through 2011. In addition, the
Company may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies as hedges of forecasted foreign
currency transactions.
The Company may enter into derivative interest rate contracts to maintain a reasonable balance
between fixed- and floating-rate debt. There were no unsettled derivative financial instruments
related to debt balances for the periods presented, although previously settled contracts remain a
component of the recorded value of debt. See Note 4. Debt, for further information.
The fair values of the Companys derivative financial instruments are presented below. All
fair values for these derivatives were measured using Level 2 information as defined by the
accounting standard hierarchy, which includes quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions): |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Asset derivatives |
|
Balance sheet location |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as
hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
not designated as
hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives |
|
Balance sheet location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated
as hedging
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Electricity contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
For derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged item affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing
either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness
are recognized in current period results. The Company did not use fair value or net
investment hedges for the periods presented. The effects of derivative instruments in the
tables below are presented net of related income taxes.
8
Activity with regard to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
on Derivatives (Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) (a) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) (b) |
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Nickel and other raw
material contracts |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity contracts |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
on Derivatives (Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) (a) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) (b) |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Nickel and other
raw material contracts |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
(12.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas contracts |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity contracts |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
(20.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income related to the
effective portion of the derivatives are presented in cost of sales. |
|
(b) |
|
The gains recognized in income on derivatives related to the ineffective portion and
the amount excluded from effectiveness testing are presented in selling and administrative
expenses. |
Assuming market prices remain constant with those at September 30, 2010, a loss of $6.6
million is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months.
The disclosures of gains or losses presented above for nickel and other raw material contracts
and foreign currency contracts do not take into account the anticipated underlying transactions.
Since these derivative contracts represent hedges, the net effect of any gain or loss on results of
operations may be fully or partially offset.
9
Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
as Hedging Instruments |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of foreign exchange contract derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments are recorded in cost of sales.
There are no credit risk-related contingent features in the Companys derivative contracts,
and the contracts contained no provisions under which the Company has posted, or would be required
to post, collateral. The counterparties to the Companys derivative contracts were substantial and
creditworthy commercial banks that are recognized market makers. The Company controls its credit
exposure by diversifying across multiple counterparties and by monitoring credit ratings and credit
default swap spreads of its counterparties. The Company also enters into master netting agreements
with counterparties when possible.
Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at September 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Active Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
443.3 |
|
|
$ |
443.3 |
|
|
$ |
262.1 |
|
|
$ |
181.2 |
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
Debt (a) |
|
|
1,061.1 |
|
|
|
1,288.3 |
|
|
|
1,246.4 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
The estimated fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Active Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
(In millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
708.8 |
|
|
$ |
708.8 |
|
|
$ |
245.1 |
|
|
$ |
463.7 |
|
Derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Debt (a) |
|
|
1,071.1 |
|
|
|
1,285.5 |
|
|
|
1,234.8 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $1.2 million at
September 30, 2010, and $1.8 million at December 31, 2009. |
In accordance with accounting standards, fair value is defined as the exchange price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Accounting standards established three levels of a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities
to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three
levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
10
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs. |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of
its financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: Cash fair value was determined using Level 1 information. Cash
equivalent fair value was determined using Level 2 information.
Derivative financial instruments: Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items. The fair value was determined using Level 2
information, including consideration of counterparty risk and the Companys credit risk.
Short-term and long-term debt: The fair values of the Companys publicly traded debt were
based on Level 1 information. The fair values of the other short-term and long-term debt were
determined using Level 2 information.
Note 7. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans covering
substantially all employees. Benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are generally based
on years of service and/or final average pay. The Company funds the U.S. pension plans in
accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Company also sponsors several postretirement plans covering certain salaried and hourly
employees. The plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. In
most plans, Company contributions towards premiums are capped based on the cost as of a certain
date, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans, the
Company maintains the right to amend or terminate the plans at its discretion.
For the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the components of pension
(income) expense and components of other postretirement benefit expense for the Companys defined
benefit plans included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(45.4 |
) |
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the components of pension (income)
expense and components of other postretirement benefit expense for the Companys defined benefit
plans included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
22.7 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(136.2 |
) |
|
|
(114.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
$ |
78.9 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement benefit costs for a defined contribution plan were $0.5 million and $1.5
million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Note 8. Income Taxes
Third quarter 2010 results included a provision for income taxes of $6.2 million, compared to
an income tax benefit of $1.4 million for the comparable 2009 period. The third quarter 2010
included a tax charge of $3.9 million primarily due to the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act,
which allows businesses of all sizes to immediately deduct from taxable income 50% of the cost of
depreciable property placed into service during 2010. Excluding the tax charge, the third quarter
2010 effective tax rate was 36.8% of income before tax. The third quarter 2009 tax provision was
reduced by an income tax benefit of $2.4 million for adjustment of taxes paid in a prior year.
For the first nine months of 2010, the provision for income taxes was $41.8 million, compared
to $5.3 million for the first nine months of 2009. The first nine months 2010 included a
non-recurring tax charge of $5.3 million associated with the impact of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and the $3.9 million third quarter tax charge for the Small Business Jobs and
Credit Act discussed above. These tax charges were partially offset by discrete net tax benefits
of $5.3 million associated with adjustment of taxes paid in prior years, the settlement of
uncertain income tax positions, and other changes. As a result of the settlements of uncertain
income tax positions, the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits was reduced by $15.9
million, including $4.2 million related to interest and penalties, and deferred taxes increased
$11.7 million. The provision for income taxes for the first nine months of 2009 included a
non-recurring tax charge of $11.5 million, primarily associated with the tax consequences of the
June 2009 $350 million voluntary contribution to the pension plan, partially offset by net discrete
income tax benefit adjustments of $7.3 million associated with prior years taxes.
12
Note 9. Business Segments
Following is certain financial information with respect to the Companys business segments for the
periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
362.3 |
|
|
$ |
292.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,035.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,036.5 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
626.3 |
|
|
|
369.2 |
|
|
|
1,767.6 |
|
|
|
1,098.3 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
104.9 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
|
|
|
300.9 |
|
|
|
195.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093.5 |
|
|
|
721.9 |
|
|
|
3,104.3 |
|
|
|
2,330.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
91.2 |
|
Sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
344.4 |
|
|
|
279.2 |
|
|
|
988.5 |
|
|
|
987.6 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
619.2 |
|
|
|
364.2 |
|
|
|
1,751.1 |
|
|
|
1,077.6 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
270.6 |
|
|
|
174.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,058.8 |
|
|
$ |
697.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,010.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,239.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
72.0 |
|
|
$ |
51.3 |
|
|
$ |
194.3 |
|
|
$ |
146.6 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
268.5 |
|
|
|
163.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
(40.7 |
) |
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Retirement benefit expense |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
(67.4 |
) |
|
|
(96.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
103.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit expense represents defined benefit plan pension expense, and other
postretirement benefit expense for both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Operating
profit with respect to the Companys business segments excludes any retirement benefit expense.
Corporate expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $13.4 million, compared
to $15.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This change is due primarily to
decreased expenses in 2010 associated with cash incentive compensation programs.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented
primarily in selling and administrative expenses and in other expense in the statement of
operations. These items resulted in net charges of $1.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease
was primarily related to lower expenses at closed operations and foreign currency remeasurement
gains.
13
Note 10. Per Share Information
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share
(in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
55.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25% Convertible Notes due 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to ATI after assumed
conversions |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
55.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per
common share-weighted average shares |
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.25% Convertible Notes due 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per
common share adjusted weighted average shares
assuming conversions |
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) attributable to ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to ATI per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock that would be issuable upon the assumed conversion of the 2014 Convertible Notes
and other option equivalents and contingently issuable shares were excluded from the computation of
contingently issuable shares, and therefore, from the denominator for diluted earnings per share,
as the effect of inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Excluded shares for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 were 9.6 million for both periods. Excluded shares for the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 were 9.6 million and 5.1 million,
respectively.
Note 11. Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
The payment obligations under the $150 million 6.95% debentures due 2025 issued by Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation (the Subsidiary) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated (the Guarantor Parent). In accordance with positions established by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the following financial information sets forth separately
financial information with respect to the Subsidiary, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the
Guarantor Parent. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
certain intercompany balances and transactions. Investments in subsidiaries, which are eliminated
in consolidation, are included in other assets on the balance sheets.
Allegheny Technologies is the plan sponsor for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
(the Plan) which covers certain current and former employees of the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries. As a result, the balance sheets presented for the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries do not include any Plan assets or liabilities, or the related deferred
taxes. The Plan assets, liabilities and related deferred taxes and pension income or expense are
recognized by the Guarantor Parent. Management and royalty fees charged to the Subsidiary and to
the non-guarantor subsidiaries by the Guarantor Parent have been excluded solely for purposes of
this presentation.
Cash flows related to intercompany activity between the Guarantor Parent, the Subsidiary, and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented as financing activities on the condensed statements of
cash flows.
14
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
$ |
158.1 |
|
|
$ |
277.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
443.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
325.1 |
|
|
|
297.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
228.5 |
|
|
|
783.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,012.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
724.1 |
|
|
|
1,393.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
435.9 |
|
|
|
1,501.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939.9 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.1 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and
other assets |
|
|
4,153.2 |
|
|
|
1,531.1 |
|
|
|
984.8 |
|
|
|
(6,488.1 |
) |
|
|
181.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,199.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,803.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,975.2 |
|
|
$ |
(6,488.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4,489.7 |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
207.0 |
|
|
$ |
201.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
412.1 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,101.3 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
711.9 |
|
|
|
(1,601.0 |
) |
|
|
276.4 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,104.6 |
|
|
|
281.7 |
|
|
|
925.1 |
|
|
|
(1,601.0 |
) |
|
|
710.4 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
870.0 |
|
|
|
350.8 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
1,039.2 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241.4 |
|
|
|
167.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409.1 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,066.6 |
|
|
|
898.6 |
|
|
|
1,192.8 |
|
|
|
(1,801.0 |
) |
|
|
2,357.0 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,132.7 |
|
|
|
1,904.7 |
|
|
|
2,782.4 |
|
|
|
(4,687.1 |
) |
|
|
2,132.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,199.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,803.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,975.2 |
|
|
$ |
(6,488.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4,489.7 |
|
|
|
|
15
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,549.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,460.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,010.2 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
1,492.0 |
|
|
|
1,128.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,647.2 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
119.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216.1 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before interest, other
income and income taxes |
|
|
(102.0 |
) |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
213.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.9 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(38.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
Other income including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
243.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(250.5 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
216.2 |
|
|
|
(250.5 |
) |
|
|
103.1 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
(95.4 |
) |
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
(155.1 |
) |
|
|
61.3 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
55.6 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
126.6 |
|
|
$ |
(149.4 |
) |
|
$ |
55.6 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(227.6 |
) |
|
$ |
191.4 |
|
|
$ |
(25.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
|
|
(96.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(50.3 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
(69.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(314.1 |
) |
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(265.5 |
) |
|
|
|
16
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
472.2 |
|
|
$ |
229.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
708.8 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
156.1 |
|
|
|
235.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159.9 |
|
|
|
665.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825.5 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
795.8 |
|
|
|
1,178.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,997.6 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
429.7 |
|
|
|
1,474.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,907.9 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and
other assets |
|
|
3,969.0 |
|
|
|
1,422.5 |
|
|
|
999.5 |
|
|
|
(6,221.4 |
) |
|
|
169.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,059.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,760.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,748.1 |
|
|
$ |
(6,221.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,346.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
|
$ |
168.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
308.6 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,013.4 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
696.6 |
|
|
|
(1,505.7 |
) |
|
|
258.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion
of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,041.6 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
888.3 |
|
|
|
(1,505.7 |
) |
|
|
624.6 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
870.4 |
|
|
|
361.3 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
1,037.6 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
257.6 |
|
|
|
166.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424.3 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,969.6 |
|
|
|
846.9 |
|
|
|
1,145.6 |
|
|
|
(1,705.7 |
) |
|
|
2,256.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,089.6 |
|
|
|
1,913.2 |
|
|
|
2,602.5 |
|
|
|
(4,515.7 |
) |
|
|
2,089.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,059.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,760.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,748.1 |
|
|
$ |
(6,221.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4,346.0 |
|
|
|
|
17
Note 11. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Operations
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
984.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,255.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,239.2 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
925.0 |
|
|
|
1,012.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,989.2 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228.9 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before interest, other
income and income taxes |
|
|
(141.9 |
) |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Other income including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
156.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(161.8 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
(161.8 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
(71.6 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
|
|
(90.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to ATI |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
|
$ |
(86.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
77.0 |
|
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
(23.2 |
) |
|
$ |
149.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(132.8 |
) |
|
|
(55.3 |
) |
|
|
(248.9 |
) |
|
|
134.4 |
|
|
|
(302.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by
financing activities |
|
|
113.2 |
|
|
|
303.1 |
|
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
(111.2 |
) |
|
|
509.6 |
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
324.8 |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
356.4 |
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and
regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and disposal of wastes, and which may require
that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites
associated with past and present operations. The Company could incur substantial cleanup costs,
fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims as a
result of violations or liabilities under these laws or noncompliance with environmental permits
required at its facilities. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation
of a number of its current and former sites, as well as third party sites.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs
are reasonably estimable. In many cases, however, the Company is not able to determine whether it
is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. Estimates
of the Companys liability remain subject to
18
additional uncertainties, including the nature and extent of site contamination, available
remediation alternatives, the extent of corrective actions that may be required, and the number,
participation, and financial condition of other potentially responsible parties (PRPs). The
Company expects that it will adjust its accruals to reflect new information as appropriate. Future
adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations in a given
period, but the Company cannot reliably predict the amounts of such future adjustments.
Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that there is a
reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the sites with
which the Company is currently associated (either individually or in the aggregate) will be an
amount that would be material to a decision to buy or sell the Companys securities. Future
developments, administrative actions or liabilities relating to environmental matters, however,
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
At September 30, 2010, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations
totaled approximately $17 million, of which $8 million was included in other current liabilities.
The reserve includes estimated probable future costs of $6 million for federal Superfund and
comparable state-managed sites; $7 million for formerly owned or operated sites for which the
Company has remediation or indemnification obligations; $3 million for owned or controlled sites at
which Company operations have been discontinued; and $1 million for sites utilized by the Company
in its ongoing operations. The Company continues to evaluate whether it may be able to recover a
portion of future costs for environmental liabilities from third parties.
The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site. The Company
expects that it will expend present accruals over many years and that remediation of all sites with
which it has been identified will be completed within thirty years.
See Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies to the Companys consolidated financial statements
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 for a
discussion of legal proceedings affecting the Company.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company relating to the conduct of its currently and formerly owned businesses, including those
pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial, government contract work,
employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental, health and safety, occupational disease, and
stockholder matters. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some
of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management
does not believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any
reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations for that period.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers
in the world. We use innovative technologies to offer global markets a wide range of specialty
metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
superalloys, zirconium, hafnium, and niobium, advanced powder alloys, stainless and specialty steel
alloys, grain-oriented electrical steel, tungsten-based materials and cutting tools, carbon alloy
impression die forgings, and large grey and ductile iron castings. Our specialty metals are
produced in a wide range of alloys and product forms and are selected for use in applications that
demand metals having exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or
abrasion, or a combination of these characteristics.
Results of Operations
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products, and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009:
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Profit (Loss) |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(15 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for the third quarter 2010 increased 52% to $1.06 billion, compared to the third quarter
2009, primarily as a result of higher shipments across all our business segments, and higher
transactional selling prices in our Flat-Rolled Products segment. Compared to the third quarter
2009, sales increased 23% in the High Performance Metals segment, 70% in the Flat-Rolled Products
segment and 75% in the Engineered Products segment.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, sales were $3.01 billion, an increase of 34%
compared to the same period of 2009. Sales for the first nine months of 2010 increased 63% in the
Flat-Rolled Products segment and 55% in the Engineered Products segment compared to the 2009
period, and sales in the High Performance Metals segment sales were at a similar level to the prior
year.
Demand from the global aerospace and defense, electrical energy, oil and gas, chemical process
industry, and medical markets accounted for approximately 68% of our sales for the first nine
months of 2010. Aerospace and defense represented 25% of our sales for the first nine months of
2010, with the oil and gas and chemical process industry markets representing 20% of total sales,
and sales to the electrical energy market representing 17%. During the 2010 first nine months,
demand from these markets continued to improve, particularly for air frames and jet engines,
compared to 2009.
For the first nine months of 2010, direct international sales increased $267.1 million, or
39%, to $958.4 million, or 31.8% of total sales. Sales of our high-value products (titanium and
titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and specialty alloys, exotic alloys, grain-oriented electrical
steel, precision and engineered strip, and tungsten materials) represented 70% of total sales.
Titanium product shipments, including ATI-produced products for our Uniti titanium joint venture,
were over 29 million pounds in the first nine months of 2010, which represented 14% of total sales,
and compares to 27.1 million pounds in the comparable 2009 period.
Segment operating profit for the third quarter 2010 increased to $63.0 million, or 6.0% of
sales, compared to $54.0 million, or 7.7% of sales, in the third quarter 2009. For the first nine
months of 2010, segment operating profit increased to $268.5 million, or 8.9% of sales, compared to
$163.8 million, or 7.3%, in the comparable period 2009. Third quarter 2010 total segment operating
profit included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $35.2 million, which included
approximately $33 million of cumulative adjustments due to changes in our estimates of year-end
LIFO inventory cost, primarily as a result of the recent significant and unexpected increase in the
cost of nickel. Third quarter 2009 results included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of
$4.5 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the LIFO inventory valuation reserve
charge was $40.7 million, compared to a benefit of $59.0 million for the prior year period.
Although demand improved across all three business segments compared to the prior year, operating
results for the 2010 third quarter and first nine months were adversely affected by idle facility,
start-up costs and additional equipment maintenance costs of $27.0 million and $47.0 million,
respectively, primarily impacting our High Performance Metals segment. The start-up costs relate
mostly to our Rowley, UT premium-titanium sponge facility. The facility is operational and
producing sponge, as we work on standardizing the process and improving yields as part of the
orderly production ramp up. Idle facility costs relate mostly to our Albany, OR titanium sponge
facility, which is positioned to be back in production when warranted by market conditions. The
third quarter 2010 results benefited from gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation,
of $30.1 million, bringing gross cost reductions for the 2010 first nine months to $102.4 million.
Compared to the second quarter 2010, sales were largely unchanged across all segments. Segment
operating profit sequentially declined 46%, primarily due to LIFO inventory valuation reserve
charges in the Flat-Rolled Products segment, and higher than normal equipment maintenance expenses.
The selling prices for many of our products include surcharges or indices by which we attempt
to match changes in raw material costs, and in some cases energy costs, with shipments. The first
nine months of 2009 results were adversely impacted by approximately $83 million in out-of-phase
raw material surcharges and indices due primarily to the rapid decrease in the cost of raw
materials in late 2008. This was partially offset by a LIFO
20
inventory valuation reserve benefit of $59.0 million in the first nine months 2009 as a result
of a decline in raw material costs in 2009.
Segment operating profit (loss) as a percentage of sales for the three month and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
(15.9 |
%) |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
(13.9 |
%) |
Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and results
of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest income or
expense, retirement benefit expense, and other costs net of gains on asset sales. We believe
segment operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of controllable operating
results at the business segment level.
In June 2009, we completed several proactive liability management actions including the
issuance $350 million of 9.375% 10-year Senior Notes and $402.5 million of 4.25% 5-year Convertible
Senior Notes. The net proceeds of the debt issuances were used to retire $183.3 million of 8.375%
Notes due in 2011, and to make a $350 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. defined
benefit pension plan to significantly improve the plans funded position, with the balance of the
proceeds being used for general corporate purposes. As a result of these actions, results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 include a charge of $9.2 million pre-tax, or $5.5 million
after-tax, for debt retirement expense and a discrete tax charge of $11.5 million, primarily
associated with the tax consequences of the $350 million voluntary pension contribution.
Income before tax for the 2010 third quarter and first nine months benefited from decreased
retirement benefit expenses of $3.0 million and $28.8 million, respectively, due to higher than
expected returns on pension plan assets in 2009 and the benefits resulting from our voluntary
pension contributions over the past several years. However, interest expense, net of interest
income, increased $8.3 million and $37.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively, primarily due to the debt issuances in the second quarter 2009 and lower
interest expense capitalized on strategic projects due to project completions.
Income before tax for the third quarter 2010 was $9.5 million compared to $2.6 million for the
third quarter 2009. For the first nine months 2010, income before tax was $103.1 million compared
to $2.9 million for the comparable period of 2009.
Net income attributable to ATI for the third quarter 2010 was $1.0 million, or $0.01 per
share, compared to $1.4 million, or $0.01 per share for the third quarter 2009. In the third
quarter 2010, we recorded a one-time tax charge of $3.9 million, or $0.04 per share, primarily due
to the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act. While this charge had a 2010 third quarter negative
impact on ATIs tax provision, we expect to receive a cash refund in the first first half 2011 of
approximately $30 million. Excluding this tax charge, net income attributable to ATI was $4.9
million, or $0.05 per share.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net income attributable to ATI, including
special charges, was $55.6 million, or $0.56 per share. Results included a 2010 first quarter
non-recurring tax charge of $5.3 million related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
and the third quarter tax charge of $3.9 million discussed above. Excluding these non-recurring
tax charges, net income attributable to ATI was $64.8 million, or $0.66 per share. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, net loss attributable to ATI, including special charges, was $6.1
million, or $0.06 per share. Excluding special charges related to liability management actions
described above, results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were net income attributable
to ATI of $10.9 million, or $0.11 per share.
We continued to maintain our solid balance sheet. At September 30, 2010, we had cash on hand
of $443.3 million, representing an increase of $64.6 million in the 2010 third quarter. Cash flow
used in operations for the
21
first nine months 2010 was $63.9 million as investment in managed working capital of $345.2
million, due to improving business activity and higher raw material costs, offset increased
profitability. Net debt to total capitalization was 23.2% and total debt to total capitalization
was 34.1% at September 30, 2010.
Our key markets are performing well. We see increasing opportunities in 2011 to supply large
projects in the oil and gas market and chemical processing industry in Asia and the Middle East.
Also, we are cautiously optimistic that demand for our standard sheet and plate products will
continue to recover. However, this demand is being driven by modest U.S. and European GDP growth
expectations, and operating results are subject to being impacted by volatile raw material costs.
We recently announced price increases for some of our high-value products. These range from
4% to 7% for certain nickel-based alloys and specialty alloys in long and flat-rolled product
forms. In addition, Uniti LLC, our industrial titanium joint venture, announced that it is
increasing prices by 6% to 9% for CP titanium products. Due to lead times that extend into the
first quarter 2011, these announced price increases are expected to impact 2011 performance.
Our focus remains on execution as we continue to position ATI for the expected strong growth
trends over the next several years in our key global markets. We expect 2011 to be much improved
as demand recovers and we grow faster than our key markets as a result of new customers and
long-term agreements, the growing use of our innovative new products, our new technically advanced
manufacturing capabilities, and a global focus on our key markets.
High Performance Metals Segment
Third quarter 2010 sales increased 23% to $344.4 million compared to the same 2009 period.
Shipments increased 19% for titanium and titanium alloys and 36% for
nickel-based and specialty
alloys, primarily due to improved demand from the commercial aerospace jet engine market.
Shipments of exotic alloys increased 14% primarily due to increased demand from the medical and
energy markets. Average selling prices declined 2% for titanium and titanium alloys due to a more
competitive pricing environment, but increased 1% for nickel-based and specialty alloys primarily
as a result of higher raw material surcharges. Average selling prices for exotic alloys decreased
6% due to product mix.
Segment operating profit in the 2010 third quarter increased to $72.0 million, or 20.9% of
sales, compared to $51.3 million, or 18.4% of sales, for the third quarter 2009. The increase in
operating profit primarily resulted from higher shipments and the benefits of gross cost
reductions. In addition, third quarter 2010 operating profit was adversely affected by
approximately $12 million of start-up and idle facility costs associated with our titanium sponge
operations and by approximately $7 million related to a two-week shutdown at our zirconium
facilities. Third quarter results included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $4.9
million for the 2010 period compared to a $10.0 million benefit for the 2009 period. Segment
results benefited from $14.8 million of gross cost reductions in the third quarter 2010.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
6,511 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
19.71 |
|
|
$ |
20.08 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
|
$ |
14.87 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
58.18 |
|
|
$ |
61.61 |
|
|
|
(6 |
%) |
22
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, segment sales increased 33% to $988.5 million.
Shipments increased 7% for titanium and titanium alloys and 9% for nickel-based and specialty
alloys as demand from the commercial aerospace market began to recover from the trough in the 2009
second half. Shipments of exotic alloys decreased 10% primarily due to the timing of projects for
the chemical process industry. Average selling prices declined 11% for titanium and titanium
alloys and 2% for nickel-based and specialty alloys primarily due to a more competitive pricing
environment. Average selling prices for exotic alloys increased 2% due to a favorable product mix.
Segment operating profit for the first nine months 2010 increased to $194.3 million, or 19.7%
of sales, compared to $146.6 million, or 14.8% of sales, for the comparable 2009 period. The
increase in operating profit primarily resulted from a better matching of surcharges and raw
material costs, and the benefits of $50.6 million in gross cost reductions which offset lower
average selling prices for most products, and lower shipments of exotic alloys. Operating profit
for the first nine months of 2010 was adversely affected by approximately $37.4 million of idle
facility and start-up costs. Operating profit for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009 included
$2.8 million and $9.5 million, respectively, of LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefits. In
addition, operating profit for the 2009 first nine months was adversely affected by approximately
$24 million from the impact of higher cost raw materials, primarily nickel and titanium, purchased
in prior periods flowing through cost of sales and not being in phase with the raw material indices
included in our selling prices during the first half of the year. This was due primarily to the
rapid decrease in raw material costs in late 2008 and the long manufacturing times of some of our
products.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
18,386 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
26,819 |
|
|
|
24,652 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
(10 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
$ |
21.38 |
|
|
|
(11 |
%) |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
13.96 |
|
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
59.78 |
|
|
$ |
58.85 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
Third quarter 2010 sales increased to $619.2 million, 70% higher than the third quarter 2009,
primarily due to increased shipments, higher raw material surcharges, and improved base-selling
prices for stainless products. Shipments of standard stainless products (sheet and plate)
increased 31% and high-value products shipments increased 26%. Average transaction prices for all
products, which include surcharges, were 33% higher due to increased raw material surcharges and
improved base prices for stainless products.
A segment operating loss of $11.8 million for the third quarter 2010 was primarily due to a
LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $38.9 million, primarily as a result of the recent
significant and unexpected increase in the cost of nickel, and $5 million of higher than normal
major maintenance expenses. Segment operating profit was $11.3 million for the third quarter 2009,
and included a $6.8 million LIFO inventory valuation reserve
charge. Segment results for the 2010 period benefited from
$10.4 million in gross cost reductions.
23
Comparative information on the segments products for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
113,738 |
|
|
|
90,602 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
166,293 |
|
|
|
126,911 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
280,031 |
|
|
|
217,513 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Standard |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, sales increased to $1.75 billion, 58% higher
than the 2009 period, primarily due to higher shipments and raw material surcharges, and improved
base-selling prices for stainless products. Shipments of standard stainless products (sheet and
plate) increased 44% and high-value products shipments increased 25%. Average transaction prices
for all products, which include surcharges, were 22% higher due to increased raw material
surcharges and improved base prices for stainless products.
Segment operating profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 improved to $61.7
million, or 3.5% of sales, compared to $41.3 million, or 3.8% of sales, for the 2009 period due
primarily to increased shipments and higher base prices for stainless products plus a better
matching of surcharges with raw material costs. Results for the first nine months of 2010 include
a $40.5 million LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge, compared to a LIFO inventory valuation
reserve benefit of $45.5 million in the 2009 period. Additionally, operating profit for the 2009
first half was adversely affected by $59 million of higher cost raw materials purchased in 2008
flowing through cost of sales and not being in phase with raw material surcharges included in
selling prices. This was due primarily to the rapid decrease in raw material costs in the second
half of the fourth quarter 2008 and the long manufacturing times of some of our products. Results
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 benefitted from $37.0 million of gross cost
reductions.
Comparative information on the segments products for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
337,212 |
|
|
|
268,720 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
500,683 |
|
|
|
346,696 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
837,895 |
|
|
|
615,416 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Standard |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Engineered Products Segment
Sales for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 were $95.2 million and $270.6
million, respectively, which were 75% and 55% higher than the same periods of 2009. Demand
continued to improve from the oil and gas, transportation, aerospace, electrical energy, and
automotive markets. Segment operating profit for the 2010 third quarter and first nine months was
$2.8 million and $12.5 million, respectively, compared to losses of $8.6 million and $24.1 million
in the comparable 2009 periods. The improvement in operating profit was primarily due to
significantly increased demand and the improvement in operating costs resulting from better
operating rates compared to 2009. Operating profit for the 2010 third quarter and first nine
months was adversely affected by a
24
LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $1.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Segment
results benefited from a $1.3 million decrease in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve for the 2009
third quarter and a $4.0 million decrease for the 2009 first nine months.
Results for 2010 also benefited from $4.9 million of gross cost reductions in the third
quarter 2010, bringing year to date 2010 gross cost reductions to $14.8 million.
Corporate Items
Corporate expenses decreased to $13.4 million for the third quarter of 2010, compared to $15.7
million in the year-ago period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, corporate expenses
increased to $40.7 million compared to $38.7 million in the prior year-to-date period. These
changes were primarily due to expenses associated with annual and long-term performance-based cash
incentive compensation programs.
Interest expense, net of interest income, in the third quarter 2010 was $16.4 million,
compared to interest expense of $8.1 million in the third quarter 2009. For the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, net interest expense was $46.4 million compared to $9.3 million in the prior
year-to-date period. The increases in interest expense were primarily due to debt issuances in the
second quarter 2009 and lower capitalized interest on strategic projects due to project
completions. Interest expense benefited from the capitalization of interest costs on strategic
capital projects of $10.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 and by $30.2 million in the
first nine months of 2009.
In June 2009, we completed a tender offer resulting in the retirement of $183.3 million of the
Companys 8.375% notes due in December 2011, which left $116.7 million in face value of the 2011
Notes outstanding at the end of June 2010. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a
pre-tax charge of $9.2 million in the 2009 second quarter for the costs of the debt retirement.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, primarily includes charges incurred in connection
with closed operations and other assets, and other non-operating income or expense. These items
are presented primarily in selling and administration expenses, and in other income (expense) in
the statement of operations and resulted in other expense of $1.2 million for the third quarter
2010 and $2.1 million for the third quarter 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
other expense, net of gains on asset sales, was $10.9 million, compared to $7.5 million for the
comparable 2009 period. The changes in expenses primarily related to the recognition of foreign
currency gains and losses, and legal expenses.
Retirement benefit expense, which includes pension expense and other postretirement expense,
decreased to $22.5 million in the third quarter 2010, compared to $25.5 million in the third
quarter 2009. For the third quarter 2010, retirement benefit expense of $16.1 million was included
in cost of sales and $6.4 million was included in selling and administrative expenses. For the
third quarter 2009, the amount of retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $15.9
million, and the amount included in selling and administrative expenses was $9.6 million.
Retirement benefit expense decreased to $67.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to $96.2 million in the third quarter 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
retirement benefit expense of $48.1 million was included in cost of sales and $19.3 million was
included in selling and administrative expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
amount of retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $67.2 million, and the amount
included in selling and administrative expenses was $29.0 million. The decreases in retirement
benefit expense for the 2010 three and nine month periods, compared to the prior year periods, were
primarily due to higher than expected returns on pension plan assets in 2009 and the benefits
resulting from our voluntary pension contributions made over the last several years.
Income Taxes
Third quarter 2010 results included a provision for income taxes of $6.2 million, compared to
an income tax benefit of $1.4 million for the comparable 2009 period. The third quarter 2010
included a tax charge of $3.9 million primarily due to the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act,
signed into law on September 27, 2010, which allows businesses of all sizes to immediately
write-off 50% of the cost of depreciable property placed into service during 2010. Although the
tax law change has a one-time negative income tax provision impact, it will have a favorable cash
flow impact to ATI in the first half of 2011. Excluding the tax charge, the third quarter 2010
effective tax rate was 36.8%. The third quarter 2009 tax provision was reduced by an income tax
benefit of $2.4 million for adjustment of taxes paid in a prior year.
25
For the first nine months of 2010, the provision for income taxes was $41.8 million, compared
to $5.3 million for the comparable 2009 period. The first nine months of 2010 included a
non-recurring tax charge of $5.3 million associated with the impact of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, and the third quarter tax charge for the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act
discussed above. The provision for income taxes for the first nine months of 2009 included a
non-recurring tax charge of $11.5 million, primarily associated with the tax consequences of the
June 2009 $350 million voluntary contribution to the pension plan, partially offset by net discrete
income tax benefit adjustments of $7.3 million associated with prior years taxes.
Primarily as a result of the $350 million voluntary pension contribution in June 2009 which
was designated to pertain to the 2009 tax year, the Company received a U.S. Federal income tax
refund of $108.5 million in the 2009 second quarter.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings
under existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a
substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years, and scheduled debt
maturities. We did not borrow funds under our domestic senior unsecured credit facility during the
first nine months of 2010. However, as of September 30, 2010, approximately $7 million of this
facility was utilized to support letters of credit.
If we needed to obtain additional financing using the credit markets, the cost and the terms
and conditions of such borrowings may be influenced by our credit rating. Changes in our credit
rating do not impact our access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash used in operating activities was $63.9
million as an investment of $345.2 million in managed working capital, primarily due to improving
business activity and higher raw material costs, offset increased profitability. Cash used in
investing activities was $132.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 and consisted primarily of
capital expenditures. Cash used in financing activities was $69.2 million in the first nine months
of 2010 due primarily to dividend payments of $53.0 million. At September 30, 2010, cash and cash
equivalents on hand totaled $443.3 million, a decrease of $265.5 million from year end 2009, and a
sequential increase of $64.6 million during the 2010 third quarter.
As part of managing the liquidity of our business, we focus on controlling managed working
capital, which is defined as gross accounts receivable and gross inventories, less accounts
payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working capital, we exclude the
effects of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete inventory reserves, and reserves
for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature, are managed separately. At
September 30, 2010, managed working capital was 32.3% of annualized sales, compared to 34.5% of
annualized sales at December 31, 2009. During the first nine months of 2010, managed working
capital increased by $345.2 million, to $1.4 billion. The increase in managed working capital from
December 31, 2009 was due to increased accounts receivable of $230.0 million and increased
inventory of $220.6 million, partially offset by increased accounts payable of $105.4 million.
While accounts receivable balances increased during 2010, days sales outstanding, which measures
actual collection timing for accounts receivable, remained comparable to year end 2009. Gross
inventory turns, which excludes the effect of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, improved 16%
compared to year end 2009.
26
The Components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
623.0 |
|
|
$ |
392.0 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,012.0 |
|
|
|
825.5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(412.1 |
) |
|
|
(308.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,222.9 |
|
|
|
908.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
LIFO reserve |
|
|
143.5 |
|
|
|
102.8 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital |
|
|
1,406.4 |
|
|
|
1,061.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior 2 months sales |
|
$ |
4,351.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,076.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a % of annualized sales |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in managed working capital from December
31, 2009 |
|
$ |
345.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
We have significantly expanded, and continue to expand, our manufacturing capabilities to meet
expected intermediate and long-term increased demand from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and
defense, chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially
for titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and
exotic alloys. We currently expect capital expenditures for 2010 to be approximately $250 million,
of which $133.2 million was expended in the first nine months of 2010. These self-funded on-going
strategic capital investments include:
|
|
|
A new advanced specialty metals hot-rolling and processing facility at our existing
Brackenridge, PA site. The project is estimated to cost approximately $1.16 billion and
take at least four years to complete. Engineering, permitting and site preparation are
nearly completed for the facility. Our new advanced hot-rolling and processing facility is
designed to be the most powerful mill in the world for production of specialty metals. It
is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at reduced
cost with shorter lead times, and require lower working capital requirements. When
completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot-rolling and processing
facility will provide unsurpassed manufacturing capability and versatility in the
production of a wide range of flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect improved
productivity, lower costs, and higher quality for our diversified product mix of
flat-rolled specialty metals, including nickel-based and specialty alloys, titanium and
titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision Rolled Strip® products, and stainless sheet
and coiled plate products. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality hot bands
of up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide. |
|
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot-rolling and processing
facility, in the third quarter 2010, we completed the integration of our Natrona, PA
grain-oriented electrical steel melt shop into ATIs Brackenridge, PA melt shop. This
consolidation is expected to improve the overall productivity of ATIs flat-rolled
grain-oriented electrical steel and other stainless and specialty alloys, and reduce the
cost of producing slabs and ingots. We expect to see annual cost savings of approximately
$30 million from this consolidation beginning in 2011. |
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through capital expansions
of zirconium sponge production and VAR melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting
capacity better positions ATI for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the
nuclear electrical energy and chemical process industry markets. We believe that ATI is
now the worlds largest producer of critical reactor grade zirconium sponge for the nuclear
energy market. |
27
Debt
At September 30, 2010, we had $1,061.1 million in total outstanding debt, compared to $1,071.1
million at December 31, 2009, a decrease of $10.0 million. The decrease in debt was primarily due
to scheduled debt maturity payments.
During the 2009 second quarter, we issued $350 million of 9.375% unsecured Senior Notes and
$402.5 million of 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes. The net proceeds of the debt issuances were used
to retire $183.3 million of 8.375% Notes due in 2011 and to make a $350 million voluntary cash
contribution to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan, with the balance used for general corporate
purposes.
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt
to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Net debt as a percentage of total capitalization was
23.2% at September 30, 2010, compared to 15.3% at December 31, 2009. The net debt to total
capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,061.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,071.1 |
|
Less: Cash |
|
|
(443.3 |
) |
|
|
(708.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
617.8 |
|
|
$ |
362.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
617.8 |
|
|
$ |
362.3 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,048.2 |
|
|
|
2,012.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net ATI total capital |
|
$ |
2,666.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,374.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt to ATI total capital |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capitalization decreased to 34.1% at September 30, 2010 from
34.7% December 31, 2009.
Total debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,061.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,071.1 |
|
Total ATI stockholders equity |
|
|
2,048.2 |
|
|
|
2,012.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital |
|
$ |
3,109.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,083.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total ATI capital |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not borrow funds under our $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit facility
during the first nine months of 2010, although approximately $7 million has been utilized to
support the issuance of letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires us to maintain a
leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness net of cash on hand in excess of $50 million,
divided by consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and
non-cash pension expense) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an interest coverage ratio
(consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, and non-cash pension expense divided by interest
expense) of not less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2010, our leverage ratio
was 1.67, and our interest coverage ratio was 4.85.
We have an additional, separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of
September 30, 2010, $32 million in letters of credit was outstanding under this facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, has a 205 million renminbi (approximately $31 million at September 30, 2010 exchange
rates) revolving credit facility with a
28
group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial capability
without any guarantees from the joint venture partners. As of September 30, 2010, there were no
borrowings under this credit facility.
Retirement Benefits
At December 31, 2009, the measurement date for ERISA funding, our U.S. qualified pension
defined benefit pension plan was essentially fully-funded. Based upon current regulations and
actuarial studies, we are not required to make a cash contribution for 2010. However, we may
elect, depending upon investment performance of the pension plan assets and other factors, to make
additional voluntary cash contributions to this plan in the future.
Dividends
A regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock was declared on September 2,
2010, payable on September 27, 2010 to stockholders of record at the close of business on September
16, 2010. The payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends upon matters deemed
relevant by our Board of Directors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash
requirements, future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit agreements or senior
securities, and other factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Critical Accounting Policies
Inventory
At September 30, 2010, we had net inventory of $1,012 million. Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or
market, less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable
manufacturing and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued
utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using
average cost or FIFO methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw
materials and production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even
though these material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due
to the length of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have
been extremely volatile during the past four years. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing
the LIFO inventory costing methodology, a rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our
operating results, while, conversely, a fall in material costs results in a benefit to operating
results. For example, in 2009, 2008 and 2007, the effect of falling raw material costs on our LIFO
inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $102.8 million, $169.0 million and
$92.1 million, respectively, lower than would have been recognized had we utilized the FIFO
methodology to value our inventory. However, in 2006 the effect of increases in raw material costs
on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $197.0 million higher
than would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. In a
period of rising prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is generally higher than the
cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a period of declining raw
material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to
acquire the inventory sold.
Since the LIFO inventory valuation methodology is designed for annual determination, interim
estimates of the annual LIFO valuation are required. We recognize the effects of the LIFO
inventory valuation method on an interim basis by projecting the expected annual LIFO cost and
allocating that projection to the interim quarters equally. These projections of annual LIFO
inventory valuation reserve changes are updated quarterly and are evaluated based upon material,
labor and overhead costs and projections for such costs at the end of the year plus projections
regarding year-end inventory levels. Operating results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 included LIFO inventory valuation reserve charges of $35.2 million and $40.7
million, respectively, primarily as a result of the recent and unexpected increase in the cost of
nickel.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be comparable
to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to the
differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory valuation
methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as an
expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At September 30, 2010, no
significant reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down to scrap value any
inventory that is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has not moved in
29
more than twelve months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months due to the
longer manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
Other Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of other significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding
uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of
uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for
derivatives, retirement plans, income taxes, environmental and other contingencies as well as asset
impairment, inventory valuation and collectibility of accounts receivable. We use historical and
other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However,
actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our
financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In January 2010, the FASB issued changes to disclosure requirements for fair value
measurements, including the amount of transfers between Level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy,
the reasons for transfers in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and activity for
recurring Level 3 measures. In addition, the changes clarify certain disclosure requirements
related to the level at which fair value disclosures should be disaggregated with separate
disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, and the requirement to provide
disclosures about valuation techniques and inputs used in determining the fair value of assets or
liabilities classified as Levels 2 or 3. We adopted the disclosure changes effective January 1,
2010, except for the disaggregated Level 3 rollforward disclosures, which will be effective for
fiscal year 2011.
Forward-Looking and Other Statements
From time to time, we have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in this
report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which we are unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements include: (a) material adverse changes in economic or
industry conditions generally, and global supply and demand conditions and prices for our specialty
metals; (b) material adverse changes in the markets we serve, including the aerospace and defense,
electrical energy, chemical process industry, oil and gas, medical, automotive, construction and
mining and other markets; (c) our inability to achieve the level of cost savings, productivity
improvements, synergies, growth or other benefits anticipated by management, including those
anticipated from strategic investments, whether due to significant increases in energy, raw
materials or employee benefits costs, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated
costs and expenses, or other factors; (d) volatility of prices and availability of supply of the
raw materials that are critical to the manufacture of our products; (e) declines in the value of
our defined benefit pension plan assets or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern
pension plan funding; (f) significant legal proceedings or investigations adverse to us; and (g)
other risk factors summarized in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no duty to
update our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from
time to time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, energy prices, foreign
currencies, and interest rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our
counterparty to these financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among
counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Fair values for
30
derivatives were measured using exchange-traded prices for the hedged items including consideration
of counterparty risk and the Companys credit risk.
Interest Rate Risk. We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At September 30, 2010, we had approximately $34
million of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately
1.3%. Approximately $10 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate.
Since the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest,
we are exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1% increase in the
rate of interest on the $24 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap
would result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.2 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices. Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these uncertainties
cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We use approximately 8 to 10
million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business conditions, in the manufacture of
our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a
hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas would result in increased annual
energy costs of approximately $8 to $10 million. We use several approaches to minimize any material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations from volatile energy prices.
These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge on many of our products and using
financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price volatility.
At September 30, 2010, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to
energy cost volatility included both natural gas and electricity hedges. For natural gas,
approximately 75% of our forecasted domestic requirements are hedged through 2011, and about 15% of
our domestic requirements are hedged for 2012. The net mark-to-market valuation of these
outstanding natural gas hedges at September 30, 2010 was an unrealized pre-tax loss of $23.1
million, of which $18.7 million was presented in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet, $4.5
million presented in other long-term liabilities, and $0.1 million as assets. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, the effects of natural gas hedging activity increased cost of sales by
$12.2 million. For electricity usage in our Western Pennsylvania operations, we have hedged
approximately 45% of our on-peak and off-peak forecasted requirements for 2011 and approximately
30% for 2012. The net mark-to-market valuation of the electricity hedges was an unrealized pre-tax
loss of $3.0 million, of which $1.6 million is presented in accrued liabilities on the balance
sheet and $1.4 is million presented in other long-term liabilities. The effects of the hedging
activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices. We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2009 we used approximately 60 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $60 million. In
addition, in 2009 we also used approximately 600 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the production
of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in increased
costs of approximately $6 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts from
time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain that
our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of September 30, 2010, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements primarily at
the request of our customers related to firm orders for approximately 4% of our total annual nickel
requirements, primarily with settlements in 2010. A minor amount of nickel hedges extend into
2014. Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included in cost of sales.
At September 30, 2010, the net mark-to-market valuation of our outstanding raw material hedges was
an unrealized pre-tax gain of $9.3 million, comprised of $8.7 million included in prepaid expenses
and other current assets, $0.7 million in other long-term assets, and $0.1 million in accrued
liabilities on the balance sheet.
31
Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. We may also enter into foreign currency forward contracts that are not
designated as hedges, which are denominated in the same foreign currency in which export sales are
denominated. At September 30, 2010, the outstanding financial derivatives, including both hedges
and undesignated derivatives, that are used to manage our exposure to foreign currency, primarily
euros, represented approximately 15% of our forecasted total international sales through 2011. In
addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies as hedges of forecasted
foreign currency transactions. At September 30, 2010, the net mark-to-market valuation of the
outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was a net asset of $1.9 million, of which $5.8
million is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, $2.3 million in other long-term
assets, $2.8 million in accrued liabilities, and $3.4 million in other long-term liabilities on the
balance sheet.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2010, and they concluded that
these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of
September 30, 2010, conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company
relating to the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contract work, employment, employee benefits, taxes,
environmental, health and safety, occupational disease, and stockholder matters. Certain of such
lawsuits, claims and proceedings are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and addressed in Note 12 to the unaudited interim financial statements included
herein. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these
lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not
believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting
period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations for that period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
32
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Dale G. Reid
|
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Principal Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 3, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Karl D. Schwartz
|
|
|
|
Karl D. Schwartz |
|
|
|
Controller and
Principal Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
34
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |