Form 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34850
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
30-0278688 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
104 Cambridge Plaza Drive, Winston-Salem, NC 27104
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (336) 331-4000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
$0.001 Par Value Common Stock
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by checkmark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
(Check One):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o
No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates,
computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold on the NASDAQ Global
Market on March 25, 2011 was $158.6 million. The Registrant has provided this information as of
March 25, 2011 because its common equity was not publicly-traded as of the last business day of its
most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants $0.001 par value Common Stock, its only
outstanding class of Common Stock, as of March 21, 2011, was 19,431,101 shares.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 18, 2011
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Note: Items 10-14 are incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement.
PART I
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements about our
estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, and the assumptions
underlying such statements. We use the words anticipates, believes, estimates, expects,
intends, forecasts, may, will, should, and similar expressions to identify our
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or our present expectations.
Factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth
under Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which
reflect the expectations of management only as of the time such statements are made. Except as
required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Company Background
Primo Water Corporation (Primo) is a rapidly growing provider of multi-gallon purified
bottled water, self-serve filtered drinking water, and water dispensers sold through major
retailers in the United States and Canada. Primos products provide an environmentally friendly,
economical, convenient and healthy solution for consuming purified and filtered water. Primo is a
Delaware corporation that was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina. On November 10, 2010, in connection with Primos initial public offering (IPO), Primo
purchased certain assets from Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan of Canada, Ltd. related to
their business of providing reverse osmosis water filtration systems that generate filtered water
for refill vending machines and store-use water services in the United States and Canada. This
business also sells empty reusable water bottles for use at refill vending machines (such
businesses are together referred to as the Refill Business). References to Primo, the
Company, we, us or our refer to Primos business as a whole and include the Refill Business
unless the context requires otherwise.
Our business is designed to generate recurring demand for our bottled water through the sale
of innovative water dispensers. This business strategy is commonly referred to as
razor-razorblade because the initial sale of a product creates a base of users who frequently
purchase complementary consumable products. We believe dispenser owners consume an average of 35
multi-gallon bottles of water annually. Once our bottled water is consumed using a water
dispenser, empty bottles are either exchanged at our recycling center displays, which provide a
recycling ticket that offers a discount toward the purchase of a new bottle of Primo purified water
(exchange) or they can be refilled at a self-serve filtered drinking water vending location
(refill). Each of our three-and five-gallon water bottles can be sanitized and reused up to 40
times before being taken out of use, crushed and recycled, substantially reducing landfill waste
compared to consumption of equivalent volumes of single-serve bottled water. As of December 31,
2010, our exchange and refill services were offered in each of the contiguous United States and in
Canada at approximately a combined 12,600 retail locations, including Lowes Home Improvement,
Walmart, Kroger, Safeway, Albertsons and Walgreens.
We provide major retailers throughout the United States and Canada with single-vendor
solutions for water bottle exchange services and refill vending services, addressing a market
demand that we believe was previously unmet. Our solutions are easy for retailers to implement,
require minimal management supervision and store-based labor and provide centralized billing and
detailed performance reports. Our exchange solution offers retailers attractive financial margins
and the ability to optimize typically unused retail space with our displays. Our refill solution
provides filtered water through the installation and servicing of reverse osmosis water filtration
systems in the back room of the retailers store location, which minimizes the usage of the
customers retail space. Only the refill vending machine, which is typically accompanied by a
sales display containing empty reusable bottles, is
located within the retailer customers floor space. Additionally, due to the recurring nature
of water consumption, retailers benefit from year-round customer traffic and highly predictable
revenue.
1
Recent Developments
Purchase of Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Culligan of Canada, Ltd.
(the Seller) and Culligan International Company, pursuant to which we purchased certain of the
Sellers assets related to its bulk water exchange business currently conducted in Canada (the
Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business). The purchase price for the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange
Business was approximately $5,331,000, which consisted of a cash payment of approximately
$1,575,000 and the issuance of 307,217 shares of our common stock having a value of approximately
$3,816,000 (based upon a price per share equal to the average of the closing price of our common
stock on The NASDAQ Global Market for the 20 trading days prior to the closing date), and the
assumption of certain specified liabilities (the Culligan Bulk Water Transaction). The Culligan
Bulk Water Exchange Business provides refill and delivery of water in 18-liter containers to
commercial retailers in Canada for resale to consumers.
Agreement to Purchase Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
On March 8, 2011, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the Omnifrio Purchase
Agreement) with Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC (Omnifrio) and certain of its members. The
Omnifrio Purchase Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions therein,
our subsidiary, Primo Products, LLC, will purchase certain of Omnifrios intellectual property and
other assets (the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business) for a purchase price of up to
$13,150,000, which will consist of:
|
|
|
a cash payment at closing of $2,000,000; |
|
|
|
the issuance at closing of 501,080 shares of our common stock having a value of $6,150,000
(based upon a price per share equal to the average of the closing price of our common stock
on The NASDAQ Global Select Market for the 20 trading days prior to the date of the Omnifrio
Purchase Agreement); |
|
|
|
a cash payment of $2,000,000 on the 15-month anniversary of the closing date (subject to
our setoff rights in the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement); |
|
|
|
up to $3,000,000 in cash milestone payments; and |
|
|
|
the assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the Omnifrio Single-Serve
Beverage Business. |
The Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business primarily consists of technology related to
single-serve cold carbonated beverage appliances and consumable flavor cups, or S-cups, and
CO2 cylinders used with the appliances to make a variety of cold beverages. We expect
to close this transaction in the second quarter of 2011.
Industry Overview
We believe there are several trends that support consumer demand for our water bottle exchange
service, refill vending service and water dispensers including the following:
Emphasis on Health and Wellness. As part of a desire to live a healthier lifestyle, we
believe consumers are increasingly focused on drinking greater quantities of water.
Concerns Regarding Quality of Municipal Tap Water. Many consumers purchase bottled water
because of concerns regarding municipal tap water quality. Municipal water is typically surface
water that is treated centrally and pumped to homes, which can allow contaminants to dissolve into
the water through municipal or household pipes impacting taste and quality.
Growing Preference for Bottled Water. We believe consumer preference toward bottled water
relative to tap water continues to grow as bottled water has become accepted on a mainstream basis.
According to an April 2010
report by independent market analyst Datamonitor, Bottled Water in the United States, the U.S.
bottled water market generated revenues of $17.1 billion in 2009.
2
Increasing Demand for Products with Lower Environmental Impact. We believe that consumers are
increasingly favoring products with a lower environmental impact with a reuse, recycle, reduce
mindset becoming a common driver of consumer behavior. Most single-serve polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) water bottles are produced using fossil fuels and contribute to landfill
waste given that only 28% of PET bottles are recycled according to a November 2010 Environmental
Protection Agency report. Governmental legislation also reflects these concerns with the passage
of bottle bills in many jurisdictions that tax the purchase of plastic water bottles, require
deposits with the purchase of certain plastic bottles, prohibit the use of government funds to
purchase plastic water bottles and ban certain plastic bottles from landfills.
Availability of an Economical Water Bottle Exchange Service, Refill Vending Service and
Innovative Water Dispensers. Based on estimates derived from industry data, we believe the current
household penetration rate of multi-gallon water dispensers is approximately 4% in the United
States, with the vast majority of these households utilizing traditional home delivery services.
We believe the lack of innovation, design enhancement and functionality and the retail pricing
structure of our competitors dispenser models have prevented greater household adoption.
Compounding these issues, we believe there previously was no economical water bottle exchange and
refill vending service with major retailer relationships throughout the United States and Canada to
promote dispenser usage beyond the traditional home delivery model. We believe our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services provide this alternative and we believe we are currently the
only provider delivering a solution to retailers throughout United States and Canada. We believe
there are over 200,000 major retail locations throughout the United States and Canada that we can
target to sell our dispensers or offer our bottled water services.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that Primos competitive strengths include the following:
Appeal to Consumer Preferences
|
|
|
Environmental Awareness. Both our water bottle exchange and refill vending services
incorporate the reuse of existing bottles, recycle water bottles when their lifecycle is
complete and reduce landfill waste and fossil fuel usage compared to alternative methods of
bottled water consumption. |
|
|
|
Value. We provide consumers the opportunity for cost savings when consuming our bottled
water compared to both single-serve bottled water and typical home and office delivery
services. Our water dispensers are sold at attractive retail prices in order to enhance
consumer awareness and adoption of our water bottle exchange and refill vending services,
increase household penetration and drive sales of our purified and filtered water. |
|
|
|
Convenience. Our water bottle exchange and refill vending services and water dispensers
are available at major retail locations in the United States and Canada. In addition, our
water bottle exchange and refill vending services provide consumers the convenience of either
exchanging empty bottles and purchasing full bottles or refilling the empty bottles at any
participating retailer. |
|
|
|
Taste. We have dedicated significant time and effort to develop our water purification
process and formulate the proprietary blend of mineral ingredients included in our Primo
purified water offered through our water bottle exchange service. We believe that Primo
purified water has a silky smooth taste profile. |
|
|
|
Health and Wellness. As part of a desire to live a healthier lifestyle, we believe that
consumers are increasingly focused on drinking more water relative to consumption of other
beverages. As we raise our brand awareness, we believe consumers will recognize that our
water bottle exchange and refill vending services are an effective option for their water
consumption needs. |
3
Key Retail Relationships Served by a Single-Vendor Solution. We believe we are the only
provider of water bottle exchange and refill vending services with a single-vendor solution for
retailers in the United States and Canada. Our direct sales force actively pursues
headquarters-based retail relationships to better serve our retail customers and to minimize layers
of approval and decision-making with regard to the addition of new retail locations. Our bottlers
and distributors utilize our MIS tools and processes to optimize their production and distribution
assets while servicing our retail customers. We believe the combination of our major retail
relationships, unique single-vendor solution for retail customers, bottling and distribution
network and our MIS tools is difficult to replicate. We anticipate these factors will facilitate
our introduction of new water-related products in the future.
Ability to Attract and Retain Consumers. We offer razor-razorblade products designed to
generate recurring demand for Primo bottled water (the razorblade) through the initial sale of our
innovative water dispensers (the razor), which include a coupon for a free three- or five-gallon
bottle of Primo purified water. We acquire new consumers and enhance recycling efforts by
accepting most dispenser-compatible water bottles in exchange for a recycle ticket discount toward
the purchase of a full bottle of Primo purified water. In addition, we believe our offering
high-quality water dispensers enhances consumer awareness and adoption of our water bottle exchange
and refill vending services, increases household penetration and drives sales of our water.
Efficient Business Model. Our business model allows us to efficiently offer our solutions to
our retail partners and centrally manage our bottling and distribution network without a
substantial capital investment. We believe our business processes and MIS tools enable us to
manage the bottling and distribution of our water, servicing of our refill locations, our product
quality, retailer inventory levels and the return of used bottles on a centralized basis,
leveraging our invested capital and personnel.
Benefit from Managements Proven Track Record. We benefit greatly from management experience
gained over the last 15 years in exchange businesses to implement and refine best practices and
develop and maintain key business relationships. In addition to our Chief Executive Officer, our
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Operations, Vice President, Products and Vice
President of National Accounts all held comparable positions within the Blue Rhino organization
during its rapid sales and location growth.
Growth Strategy
We seek to increase our market share and drive further growth in our business by pursuing the
following strategies:
Increase Penetration with Existing Retail Relationships and Develop New Retail Relationships.
We believe we have significant opportunities to increase store penetration with our existing retail
relationships. As of December 31, 2010, our water bottle exchange service and our refill vending
service were offered at a combined total of 9,300 of our top ten retailers locations. If we
were to offer both our water bottle exchange service and our refill vending service at each of our
top ten retailers approximate 19,400 individual locations, these top ten retailers would provide us
with a combined total of approximately 38,800 locations to provide our services. As a result, these top ten
retailers present us an opportunity to add either our water bottle exchange service or our refill
vending service at a combined total of approximately 29,500 additional locations. There is minimal overlap where our
water bottle exchange and refill vending services are both currently offered. We intend to further
penetrate our other existing retail customers with our supplementary hydration solutions, which
collectively provide us the opportunity to be present in more than a combined total 50,000
additional water bottle exchange or refill vending locations.
Our long-term strategy includes increasing our locations to 40,000 to 50,000 retail store
locations (which includes new locations with our existing retail customers) within our primary
retail categories of home centers, hardware stores, mass merchants, membership warehouses, grocery
stores, drug stores and discount general merchandise stores for our water bottle exchange service
or our refill vending service. We believe that the introduction of additional hydration solutions
to our product portfolio will allow us to cross-sell products to our existing and newly-acquired
retail customers.
Drive Consumer Adoption Through Innovative Water Dispenser Models. We intend to continue to
develop and sell innovative water dispensers at attractive retail prices, which we believe is
critical to increasing consumer awareness and driving consumer adoption of our water services. We
believe the current household penetration rate of multi-gallon water dispensers is approximately 4%
in the United States. Our long term strategy is to provide multiple water-based beverages from a
single Primo water dispenser, which we believe will lead to greater
household penetration, with consistent promotion of our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services to supply the water. In addition, the acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve
Beverage Business will enhance our ability to add innovative beverage and hydration solutions to
our line of water dispensers. At December 31, 2010, we offered our water dispensers at
approximately 5,500 locations in the United States, including Walmart, Target, Kmart, Sams Club,
Costco, and Lowes Home Improvement.
4
Increase Same Store Sales. We sell our water dispensers at minimal margin and provide a
coupon for a free three- or five-gallon bottle of water with the sale of various water dispensers
at certain retailers to drive consumer demand for our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services. We believe increasing unit sales of Primo water is dependent on generating greater
consumer awareness of the environmentally friendly and economical aspects of and the convenience
associated with our water bottle exchange and refill vending services. We expect that our
branding, cross-promotion marketing and sales efforts will result in greater usage of our water
bottle exchange and refill vending services.
Develop and Install Other Hydration Solutions. We believe we have significant opportunities
to leverage our bottling and distribution network and our systems and processes to offer other
environmentally friendly, economical, convenient and healthy hydration solutions to our retail
partners without significant increases in our centralized costs.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions to Augment Geographic and Retail Relationships. In addition to
our recent acquisition of the Refill Business and the transactions described in the Recent
Developments section, we believe opportunities exist to expand through selective acquisitions,
including smaller water bottle exchange businesses with established retail accounts, other
on-premises self-service water refill vending machine networks and retail accounts, ice dispenser
machine networks and retail accounts and water dispenser or other beverage-related appliance
companies.
Product Overview
Water. We have dedicated significant time and effort in developing our water purification
process and formulating the proprietary blend of mineral ingredients included in the purified
bottled water offered through our water bottle exchange service. Our proprietary blend of mineral
ingredients was developed with the assistance of consultants and several months of lab work and
taste tests and has what we believe to be a silky smooth taste. To ensure that our safety
standards are met and FDA and industry standards are met or exceeded, each production lot of our
purified water undergoes chemical and microbiological testing by the bottler and all facilities
bottling Primo purified water undergo regular hygiene audits by a third party hired by us. Our
refill vending service consists of a reverse osmosis water filtration system that provides filtered
drinking water, which is periodically tested for quality. All state or industry standards related
to our purified or filtered water are met or exceeded.
Water Bottles. We currently source three- and five-gallon water bottles from multiple
independent vendors for use in our exchange service. Each of our Primo water bottles includes a
handle designed for easy transportation and lifting when installing the bottle onto or into one of
our water dispensers. Our bottles also include a specially designed cap that prevents spills when
carrying or installing. We source the empty reusable one-, three- and five-gallon bottles that
typically accompany our refill vending machines from several manufacturers.
5
Water Dispensers. We currently source and market four lines of water dispensers comprised of
22 models. Our dispensers are designed to dispense Primo and other dispenser-compatible bottled
water. Our dispensers have manufacturer suggested retail prices that range from $199.99 for our
top-of-the-line bottom-loading model with a stainless steel finish to $9.99 for a simple pump that
can be installed on a bottle and operated by hand. Currently, more than 95% of our dispenser sales
are attributable to our bottom- and top-loading products. Consistent with our environmental focus,
our electric dispensers are Energy Star® rated, and, we believe, utilize less energy
than competing water dispensers without this industry rating.
Currently, all of our water dispensers are manufactured by independent suppliers in China.
Our dispensers are shipped directly to our retailer partners and we do not use distributors in
connection with our water dispensers.
Primo Water Marketing
Our marketing efforts focus primarily on developing and maintaining a brand identity
synonymous with an environmentally friendly, economical, convenient and healthy solution for
bottled water consumption. We direct our marketing efforts as close as possible to the point of
sale to strengthen our brand and promote consumer awareness of our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services. We believe our water bottle exchange service promotes consumer loyalty through
the use of our recycling tickets, while our refill vending service promotes consumer loyalty
through preferred pricing. Our marketing efforts include the following initiatives: (i) prominent
display of our Primo logo and distinctive four-bubble design on water bottles, sales and recycling
displays and water dispensers; (ii) highly visible sales and recycling center displays; and (iii)
regular cross marketing promotions.
The Primo Supply Chain
Water Purification and Bottling for Our Water Bottle Exchange Service
For our water bottle exchange service, our independent bottlers are responsible for the water
purification and bottling process and use their own equipment to complete this process. Our
bottling process begins with either spring water or water from a public source that is processed
through a pre-filtration stage to remove large particles. The water is then passed through
polishing filters to catch smaller particles followed by a carbon filtration process that removes
odors, tastes, sanitization by-products and pharmaceutical chemicals. A microfiltration process
then removes microbes before the water is passed through a softener to increase the purification
efficiency. The water next passes through the last phase of reverse osmosis or distillation,
completing the purification process. After the purification process is complete, our proprietary
blend of mineral ingredients is injected into the water followed by the final ozonation process to
sanitize the water. Each of our production lots is placed on a 48-hour hold to allow for testing
by the bottler and to ensure successful compliance with chemical and microbiological standards. We
have the ability to trace each bottle of Primo purified water to its bottling and distributor
sources, and we regularly perform recall tests to ensure our ability to react to a contamination
event should it occur.
Our distributors are responsible for collecting empty Primo bottles and other
dispenser-compatible bottles that are deposited into our recycling center displays. At the
completion of the delivery cycle, a distributor inspects the exchanged bottles for reusability and
coordinates the recycling efforts with our operations personnel to ensure that reuse of each water
bottle we receive in the exchange process is being optimized. Our water bottles can be sanitized
and reused up to 40 times before being taken out of use, crushed and recycled, substantially
reducing landfill waste compared to consumption of similar amounts of single-serve PET bottled
water. Bottles that pass a distributors initial inspection are subject to three washing cycles to
remove particles. Bottles are then passed through two sanitization stages before a final rinse
with hyper-ozonated water to kill or inactivate any microbes that remain at that point in the
sanitization process. The water bottles are then ready to be filled with our purified water.
Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration Systems for Our Refill Vending Service
The reverse osmosis water filtration systems used in our refill vending service are placed under
services agreements with retail customers who pay fees based on the number of gallons of water used
or dispensed by the system. Under this program we own the water filtration system and contract
with our distributors for the provision of all required service and maintenance. Water meters are
generally read monthly by our distributors and an invoice is subsequently delivered to the
retailer.
6
The reverse osmosis water filtration system is comprised of two components: reverse osmosis
water filtration equipment and a refill vending machine. The water filtration equipment is
typically installed in the back room of a retail location and all such equipment generally has the
same component filters and parts. A water line is installed from the water filtration equipment to
the refill vending machine. The retail customer specifies the location of the refill vending
machine, which is typically in the water aisle or back wall of the store. The retail customer is
responsible for the plumbing, electrical and drainage requirements of an installation.
The regular maintenance completed by our distributors generally includes a monthly
sanitization of the reverse osmosis water filtration system, a monthly system component check and
any necessary preventative maintenance resulting from such component check and may include a water
test for regulatory purposes. The various jurisdictions in which we operate have specific
bimonthly, monthly, quarterly or annual water testing reporting requirements with which our
distributors must comply, although they perform water tests on each reverse osmosis water
filtration system at least quarterly.
We employ an operations team which assembles, refurbishes and repairs the refill vending
machines. This team routinely refurbishes equipment that has been in service for several years or
when a customer requests a refreshed system. The operations team also procures new filtration
system component parts and assembles the units and ships them to locations for installation by our
distributors. The component parts are generally sourced from multiple suppliers.
Distribution Network
We rely on our bottling and distribution network to deliver our solutions to retailers. Our
water bottle exchange process begins when a distributor is directed through our proprietary MIS
tool, PrimoLink, to stock or replenish a water bottle exchange retail location. PrimoLink enables
our distributors to review delivery quantities and tentative scheduling requirements in their
territory. Our systems provide anticipated demand based on historical sales and, to the extent
available, retailer point of sale (POS) data. Each distributor is provided information to enable
the distributor to load a truck with the appropriate inventory to stock or restock the water bottle
exchange sales displays on its route, including a tailored amount of excess bottles as safety
stock. Upon arrival at each retail location, the driver first visits the recycling center display
to collect empty Primo and other dispenser-compatible bottles. The driver enters data related to
empty bottles on a handheld device to collect exchange efficiency information and potential
customer conversion data and then loads empty bottles onto the truck. The driver next checks the
in-store sales display to compare the number of remaining bottles of water with the anticipated
demand report generated by our MIS tools. After entering current stock levels, the driver is
instructed by our MIS tools through the handheld device and based on proprietary algorithms, to
replenish the sales display with an appropriate quantity of bottles.
At the completion of the delivery cycle and after inspection of the bottles, our distributors
typically are responsible for coordinating the sanitization and bottling process with our bottlers.
In addition, distributors must run end-of-day reports on their handheld devices which transmit
crucial data points into our databases and validate daily activity. Our handheld devices also
capture electronic signatures, significantly reducing paper exchange. This greatly improves our
verification procedures and enhances our environmental efforts. We have the ability to test and
refine procedures through our Company-operated distribution system before implementing them with
our independent distributors nationwide. In addition, we regularly solicit feedback from our
independent distributors to improve processes.
Our refill vending process begins when a distributor is directed through a proprietary
dispatching MIS tool to schedule meter readings, quality testing, preventative maintenance and
repairs. Our systems allow the distributor to see the previous meter read or previously performed
preventative maintenance. The distributors are responsible for the initial installation of the
reverse osmosis water filtration systems, the regular maintenance of the systems, any necessary
repairs, routine water testing and monthly meter reading to determine retail customer water usage.
Flow of Payments and Capital Requirements
We control the flow of payments with our retail customers and with our bottlers
and distributors through electronic data interchange. Depending on the retailer, our distributors
either present the store manager with
an invoice for the bottles delivered or meter reading or our systems electronically bill the
retailer. We believe our exchange service provides five-gallon bottles of purified water that
typically cost a consumer between $5.99 and $6.99, after giving effect to the discount provided by
our recycling ticket, while our refill vending service typically costs a consumer between $0.25 and
$0.50 per gallon, depending upon the location and the retailers overall pricing strategy.
7
We compensate our distributors with a fixed payment per delivered water bottle or a commission
based upon a percentage of total revenues at the locations for which the distributor is
responsible, subject to minimum and maximum amounts. Payments are typically made between the tenth
and fifteenth day of the month following the delivery or service activity. Our fixed payment for
deliveries in our water bottle exchange service is a gross amount from which the distributor must
typically pay the bottler. Due to the high degree of automation during our billing and inventory
management procedures, we are able to leverage our centralized personnel and believe we will be
able to significantly expand our business with minimal increases in variable costs.
We focus our capital expenditures on developing new retail relationships, installing new store
locations, raising brand awareness, research and development for new products and maintaining our
MIS tools. We are also responsible for the centralized operations and personnel, sales and
recycling displays, bottles, transportation racks, mineral packets and mineral injectors, reverse
osmosis equipment and parts, vending displays and handheld devices. Our bottling and distribution
network typically has made the capital investment required to operate our services, including a
majority of the capital expenditures related to the bottling, sanitization and refill process and
the distribution assets such as delivery trucks and warehouse storage. Participation in our water
bottle exchange or refill vending service does not typically require the independent bottlers and
distributors to make substantial new investments because they often are able to augment their
current production capacity and leverage their existing bottling and distribution assets. In
addition, many of our major retail customers have invested their capital to expand store locations
and generate customer traffic.
Retailer Relationships
We target major retailers with either a national footprint or a significant regional
concentration. Our relationships are diversified among the following retail categories and major
accounts:
|
|
|
Retail Category |
|
Major Accounts |
|
|
|
Home Centers / Hardware Stores
|
|
Lowes Home Improvement, Ace Hardware, True Value |
Mass Merchants
|
|
Walmart, Target, Kmart |
Grocery Stores
|
|
Kroger, Albertsons, Food Lion, Safeway, Sobeys |
Membership Warehouses
|
|
Sams Club, Costco |
Drug Stores
|
|
Walgreens, CVS |
Office Retail
|
|
Office Depot, Staples |
Retailer Opportunity. We offer retailers a single-vendor solution. Our services provide
retailers with a year-round consumer product and an opportunity to increase sales and profits with
minimal labor and financial investment. Through our bottling and distribution network, we are able
to service major retailers nationwide and in Canada. Retailers benefit from our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services that offer high margin and generate productivity from often
underutilized interior and exterior retail space. In addition, these services have the potential
to increase retailers sales of ancillary products through increased traffic from repeat water
consumers, who we believe purchase an average of 35 multi-gallon water bottles annually.
Account Set-Up. We actively pursue headquarters-based retail relationships to better serve
our retail partners and minimize layers of approval and decision-making with regard to the roll-out
of our water services to multiple locations. Upon confirmation of new retail locations, we
coordinate with the retailer and distributor to schedule openings in a timely manner. We actively
assist retailers in developing site plans for the setup of our sales and recycling center displays
and reverse osmosis water filtration systems. While retailer setup preferences may vary, retailers
often like to locate the recycling center display prominently on the exterior of their store to
ease the transaction process, showcase their recycling and environmental efforts and conserve
inside floor space while at the same time promoting the Primo brand.
8
Account Service. Our water bottle exchange and refill vending services are turn-key programs
for retailers in which we and our distributors actively service each retail account. After the
retail location is established, our distributors complete on-site training and have an economic
interest in supporting and growing the business relationship to increase product throughput.
Sales Support. While distributors service our retail accounts, the customer relationship is
owned and maintained by our experienced retail sales organization, which allows us to develop
strong brand affinity and maintain key headquarters-based relationships to secure and maintain our
retail network. Our retail relationships are divided into regions and managed by our sales
personnel. In addition, we leverage our independent distributors who typically employ their own
sales representatives. This combined team is responsible for selling and supporting our water
bottle exchange and refill vending services to targeted retailers.
Significant Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Lowes Home Improvement and
Walmart represented approximately 37% and 21% of our consolidated net sales, respectively.
Bottler and Distributor Network
Bottler and Distributor Opportunity. We provide independent bottlers and distributors with an
attractive business expansion opportunity, complementing many of their existing operations. We
continually pursue new relationships and additional locations with existing retail partners to
increase the production at each bottlers manufacturing facility and the retail customer density
within each distributors territory.
Water Bottle Exchange Service Bottler and Distributor Standards. We work closely with our
bottling and distribution network to ensure their production, storage and service standards meet or
exceed the requirements of the United States Food and Drug Administration and other industry
regulations. As we seek to promote our brand, we believe it is critical to provide bottled water
that has consistent taste and is produced in a manner that exceeds current industry requirements.
We regularly monitor, test and arrange for third-party hygiene audits of each bottling facility.
In addition, we regularly monitor our distributors performance to ensure a high level of
account service. Distributors of our water bottle exchange service are generally required to
develop an infrastructure sufficient to:
|
|
|
complete customer installations within 30 days of the notification of a newly established
account; |
|
|
|
monitor and maintain inventory levels with assigned retail accounts; and |
|
|
|
resolve water bottle stock-outs within 36 hours. |
Bottler and Distributor Selection Process. We have selectively identified and pursued high
quality independent bottlers and distributors that can support our major retailers nationwide and in
Canada. We screen independent bottler and distributor candidates by reviewing credit reports,
safety records and manufacturing compliance reports, and conducting management reference checks.
As a result of this thorough selection process, we have established what we believe to be highly
dependable relationships with our independent bottlers and distributors. We believe we have a
positive relationship with each of these parties and our senior executives have maintained a
business relationship with many of our key distributors since they were managing operations at Blue
Rhino Corporation.
Bottler and Distributor Services. We currently employ raw material procurement and supply
chain personnel who perform periodic inventory audits and month-end review procedures. In addition
we have operations personnel who manage our independent bottler and distributor relationships,
including training and monitoring personnel. We also employ customer service personnel who handle
bottler, distributor, retailer and end-user phone calls.
Company Owned Distribution Operations. We currently own and operate two distribution
operations that have distribution responsibilities for certain regions that are relatively near our
primary facilities. We distribute our bottled water for our exchange service to major retailers in
portions of North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida and Virginia. We believe distributing our
bottled water in these areas is an important way for us to better understand the
bottled water exchange process and provides us the necessary feedback to enhance our
independent bottler and distributor relationships. In addition, distributing our bottled water in
these areas should assist us in validating the economic arrangements we offer our bottlers and
distributors and developing industry knowledge that we can deploy throughout our system.
9
Independent Bottler and Distributor Agreements. With respect to our water bottle exchange
service we have entered into bottler and distributor agreements with each of our independent
bottlers and distributors on substantially similar terms. While individual agreements contain
variances and exceptions, the material terms of such agreements are described generally below. No
individual bottler or distributor is material to our overall financial condition or results of
operations.
Independent Bottler Agreement. In our independent bottler agreement for the water bottle
exchange service, we appoint a bottler as a non-exclusive supplier of our purified drinking water.
The bottler is restricted from competing with us during the term of the agreement and for a
specified period after the term in a specified geography.
The bottler is required to bottle and deliver product in conformance with our specifications,
including our proprietary mineral formula. The bottler must ensure that our bottled water products
comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations (including those of the FDA), industry standards
(including those of the International Bottled Water Association) and our quality requirements. The
agreement also imposes requirements on the bottler with respect to the maintenance of its
facilities and equipment that are intended to ensure the quality of our products.
We provide the necessary bottles, caps, labels, transportation racks, mineral injectors and
formula minerals at no charge to the bottler to support the bottling and supply of our bottled
water products. The bottler is required to maintain inventory levels necessary to satisfy our
production requirements. Product may not be released for shipment until the bottler meets all
applicable quality requirements.
Pricing is set forth in the agreement, and we have the right to modify pricing on thirty days
notice to the bottler. The agreements generally have a three-year term, and if not otherwise
terminated, automatically renew for successive one-year periods after the initial term. Either
party may terminate the agreement in the event of an uncured material breach by the other party.
Water Bottle Exchange Distribution Agreement. In our independent distributor agreement for
the water bottle exchange service, we grant a distributor the right to serve as our exclusive
delivery and service agent and representative with respect to our bottled water exchange service
for a specified term in a specified geographic territory. Many of our independent distributors are
also responsible for performing or outsourcing the performance of the bottling function in their
specified geographic territory. The distributor is restricted from competing with us during the
term of the agreement and for a specified period after the term in the specified geography. We
have the right, at any time, to purchase a distributors rights under the agreement, along with
related distribution equipment, for an amount based on the distributors revenues under the
agreement for the prior twelve-month period and the fair market value of the equipment being
purchased.
The distributor must perform its services under the agreement in conformance with our
distributor manual and all applicable laws and regulations, including those of the FDA.
We compensate a distributor for its services while maintaining a direct relationship with and
collecting payments from our retailer customers within the distributors service territory.
Pricing is set forth in the agreement, and we have the right to modify pricing and payment terms on
thirty days notice to the distributor.
The agreements generally have a ten-year term, and if not otherwise terminated, automatically
renew for successive one-year terms after the initial ten-year term. Either party may terminate
the agreement for, among other reasons, an uncured material breach by the other party.
Refill Standards. We work closely with distributors of our refill vending services to ensure
operation and sanitation standards meet or exceed the requirements of state regulations, NAMA
standards and other industry standards. As we seek to promote our brand, we believe it is critical
to provide filtered drinking water that is
produced in a manner that exceeds current industry requirements. We regularly monitor, test
and arrange for third-party hygiene testing of production and dispenser units.
10
In addition, we regularly monitor our distributors performance to ensure a high level of
account service. Our distributors are generally required to develop an infrastructure sufficient
to:
|
|
|
complete customer installations within 30 days of the notification of a newly established
account; |
|
|
|
monitor and maintain production and dispenser operation and quality; and |
|
|
|
resolve production unit and dispenser failures within 36 hours. |
Refill Vending Services Agreements. Our distributors of refill vending services are
responsible for the initial installation of the reverse osmosis water filtration systems, the
regular maintenance of the systems, any necessary repairs, routine water testing and monthly meter
reading to determine retail customer water usage. The distributors are comprised of Culligan
International Company franchised dealers, distributors owned by subsidiaries of Culligan
International Company and third-party distributors.
Management Information Systems
We have made a substantial investment in MIS tools which enhance our ability to process
orders, manage inventory and accounts receivable, maintain distributor and customer information,
maintain cost-efficient operations and assist distributors in delivering products and services on a
timely basis. Our technology utilizes highly integrated, scalable software applications that
cost-effectively support our growing retail network. Our MIS tools also allow us to analyze
historical trends and data to further enhance the execution, service and identification of new
markets and marketing opportunities. The primary components of our systems include the following:
Sales and Marketing Support Systems. We operate a single customer relationship management
database that integrates all financial and transaction-based data with respect to each retail
account. Our MIS tools provide our account managers and customer service representatives access to
crucial data to effectively manage each bottler, distributor and retail relationship.
Bottler and Distributor Level Technology. Our distribution process is highly automated and
scalable. Our technology allows bottlers and distributors timely access to information for
customer support needs and provides access to real-time data to enhance decisions. In addition,
each distributor is electronically linked to our systems with our proprietary PrimoLink software.
PrimoLink enables distributors to review delivery quantities and tentative scheduling requirements
across our entire bottling and distribution network. In addition, our MIS tools allow drivers to
update delivery, inventory and invoicing information through handheld devices. This technology
provides retailers with accurate and timely inventory and invoices and assists each distributor in
managing its responsibilities.
Financial Integration. We utilize Microsofts Dynamics GP software as our core platform which
interfaces with all of our systems. Each handheld device is based on Microsofts operating system
and ensures integration within our reporting and financial databases. All delivery transactions
are validated and data is imported into our database tables and mapped to corresponding accounting
ledgers. We anticipate completing the integration of the Refill Business into our financial
systems in the second quarter of 2011.
Manufacturing and Sourcing
Our manufacturing strategy is to utilize independent manufacturers to produce empty water
bottles, sales displays and recycle centers and water dispensers at a reasonable cost. We believe
that using independent manufacturers has several advantages over our manufacturing these items
directly, including (i) decreased capital investment in manufacturing plants and equipment and
working capital, (ii) the ability to leverage independent manufacturers purchasing relationships
for lower materials costs, (iii) minimal fixed costs of maintaining unused manufacturing capacity
and (iv) the ability to utilize our suppliers broad technical and process expertise.
11
Currently, the majority of our water dispensers are assembled by independent manufacturers in
China. These manufacturers utilize several sub-suppliers to provide components and subassemblies. Each unit is
inspected and tested for quality prior to shipment and any units returned by consumers or retailers
are sent directly to the manufacturer for a credit, replacement or refund issued by the
manufacturer. Our units generally are shipped directly from Hong Kong to the retailer.
We employ an operations team which assembles, refurbishes and repairs the refill vending
machines. This team is located at our Eagan, Minnesota facility, where it routinely refurbishes
equipment that has been in service for several years or when a customer requests a refreshed
system. The operations team also procures new filtration systems component parts and assembles the
units and ships them to locations for installation by distributors. The component parts are
generally sourced from multiple suppliers.
Our water bottles and caps are produced by multiple independent vendors throughout the United
States. We select suppliers based on price, quality and geographic proximity to our bottlers. We
only purchase water bottles with handles as a convenience feature for consumers.
Our sales displays and recycle centers are made to our design. We frequently request bids
from multiple independent manufacturers to achieve optimal pricing.
Product Design and Development
A primary focus of our product research and development efforts is developing innovative water
dispensers as part of our strategy to enhance consumer awareness and adoption of our bottled water
services, increase household penetration and drive sales of our bottled water. We continually work
to improve water dispenser features, seek to lower manufacturing costs so that our innovative
products are more affordable and introduce new models. Innovative improvements developed in
cooperation with our manufacturing partners include bottom-loading dispensers, adjustable hot and
cold temperature controls and faster water dispensing capabilities. Our water dispenser models are
designed to appeal to consumers of diverse demographic audiences.
We introduced a new water dispenser product line in the fourth quarter of 2010. In the third
quarter of 2011, we plan to ship the first model in our 3rd dimension line, which will
include a 12-cup drip coffee maker. With our purchase of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage
Business, we expect to introduce an appliance that dispenses single-serve cold carbonated beverages
is the fourth quarter of 2011. In addition, we are developing a water dispenser product that
provides consumers the ability to dispense multiple purified water-based beverages, including
traditional coffee and single-serve cold carbonated beverages.
Competition
We participate in the highly competitive bottled water segment of the nonalcoholic beverage
industry. While the industry is dominated by large and well-known international companies,
numerous smaller firms are also seeking to establish market niches. We believe we have a unique
business model in the bottled water market in the United States in that we not only offer
multi-gallon bottled water on a nationwide basis but also provide consumers the ability to exchange
their used containers as part of our water bottle exchange service or refill their used containers
as part of our refill vending service. We believe that we are one of the first companies to provide
a national water bottle exchange service at retail. While we are aware of a few direct competitors
that operate similar exchange networks, we believe they operate on a much smaller scale than we do
and do not have equivalent MIS tools or bottler and distributor capabilities to effectively support
major retailers nationwide. Competitive factors with respect to our business include pricing,
taste, advertising, sales promotion programs, product innovation, efficient production and
distribution techniques, introduction of new packaging, and brand and trademark development and
protection.
Our primary competitors in our bottled water business include Nestlé, The Coca-Cola Company,
PepsiCo, Dr Pepper Snapple Group and DS Waters of America. While none of these companies currently
offers a nationwide water bottle exchange service at retail, Nestlé and DS Waters of America offer
this service on a regional basis. However, many of these competitors are leading consumer products
companies, have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do, have established a
strong brand presence with consumers and have established
relationships with retailers, manufacturers, bottlers and distributors necessary to start an
exchange business at retail locations nationwide should they decide to do so.
12
Our business model for the refill vending service is differentiated from most of the
participants in the North American nonalcoholic beverage industry in that it offers self-service
refill of drinking water. There are a few direct competitors that offer similar refill vending
services, but with the exception of Glacier Water Services, Inc., we believe these direct
competitors generally operate on a smaller geographical and operational scale than our refill
vending service. Our refill vending service faces two levels of competition: (i) competition at
the retail customer level to secure placement of its reverse osmosis water filtration systems in
the store; and (ii) competition at an end-user level to convince consumers to purchase its water
versus other options. Competitive factors with respect to our refill vending service include
pricing, taste, advertising, sales promotion programs, retail placement, introduction of new
packaging and branding. In addition to competition between firms within the bottled water
industry, the industry itself faces significant competition from other non-alcoholic beverages,
including carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks and waters, juices, sport and energy drinks,
coffees, teas and spring and tap water.
We also compete directly and indirectly in the water dispenser marketplace. This marketplace
is diverse and faces competition from other methods of purified water consumption such as
countertop filtration systems, faucet mounted filtration systems, in-line whole-house filtration
systems, water filtration dispensing products such as pitchers and jugs, standard and advanced
feature water coolers and refrigerator-dispensed filtered and unfiltered water.
Intellectual Property and Trademarks
We believe that our intellectual property provides a competitive advantage and we have
invested substantial time, effort and capital in establishing and protecting our intellectual
property rights. We have filed certain patent applications and trademark registration applications
and intend to seek additional patents, to develop additional trademarks and seek federal
registrations for such trademarks and to develop other intellectual property. We consider our
Primo name and related trademarks and our other intellectual property to be valuable to our
business and the establishment of a national branded bottled water exchange service. We rely on a
combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and other arrangements to protect
our proprietary rights. We own ten United States federal trademark registrations, including
registrations for our Primo® and Taste Perfection® trademarks, our
Primo® logo and our distinctive four bubble design. U.S. federal trademark
registrations generally have a perpetual duration if they are properly maintained and renewed. We
also own a pending application to register our Zero Waste. Perfect Tastetm
trademark in the United States and Canada for use in association with drinking water dispensers,
bottled drinking water and a variety of other non-alcoholic beverages. In addition, the design of
our recycling center displays is protected by four United States design patents and two Canadian
industrial design registrations. The United States design patents expire between May 2021 and
April 2022 and, assuming that certain required fees are paid, the Canadian industrial design
registrations expire in May 2017.
In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets and other non-patented
proprietary information relating to our product development, business processes and operating
activities. We regard portions of our proprietary MIS tools, various algorithms used in our
business and the composition of our mineral formula to be valuable trade secrets of the Company.
We seek to protect this information through appropriate efforts to maintain its secrecy, including
confidentiality agreements.
Governmental Regulation
The conduct of our businesses and the production, distribution, advertising, promotion,
labeling, safety, transportation, sale and use of our products are subject to various laws and
regulations administered by federal, state, provincial and local governmental agencies in the
United States and Canada. It is our policy to abide by the laws and regulations that apply to us,
and we require our bottling, manufacturing, and distributing partners to comply with all laws and
regulations applicable to them.
13
We are required to comply with:
|
|
|
federal laws, such as the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Occupational Safety
and Health Act; |
|
|
|
customs and foreign trade laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
state consumer protection laws; |
|
|
|
federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws; |
|
|
|
laws governing equal employment opportunity and workplace activities; and |
|
|
|
various other federal, state and local statutes and regulations. |
We maintain environmental, health and safety policies and a quality, environmental, health and
safety program designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (the FDA) regulates bottled water as a food
under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Our bottled water must meet FDA requirements of
safety for human consumption, identity, quality and labeling. Further, the sale and marketing of
our products is subject to FDAs advertising and promotion requirements and restrictions. In
addition, FDA has established current good manufacturing practice regulations, which govern the
facilities, methods, practices and controls used for the processing, bottling and distribution of
bottled drinking water. We and our third-party supply, bottling and distribution partners are
subject to these requirements. We also must comply with overlapping and sometimes inconsistent
state regulations in various jurisdictions. As a result, we must expend resources to continuously
monitor state legislative and regulatory activities for purposes of identifying and ensuring
compliance with the laws and regulations that apply to our bottled water business in each state in
which we operate. While we must meet the government-mandated standards, we believe that our
self-imposed standards meet or exceed those set by federal, state and local regulations.
Additionally, the manufacture, sale and use of resins used to make water bottles is subject to
regulation by the FDA. Those regulations are concerned with substances used in food packaging
materials, not with specific finished food packaging products. We believe our beverage containers
are in compliance with FDA regulations. Additionally, the use of polycarbonates in food containers
used by children under three years of age is subject to certain state and local restrictions.
Measures have been enacted in various localities and states that require a deposit or tax to
be charged for certain non-refillable beverage containers. The precise requirements imposed by
these measures vary. Other deposit, recycling or product stewardship proposals have been
introduced in various jurisdictions. We anticipate that similar legislation or regulations may be
proposed in the future at the local, state and federal levels.
The refill vending machines used in our reverse osmosis water filtration systems are certified
by the National Automatic Merchandising Association (NAMA). NAMA maintains a vending machine
certification program which evaluates food and beverage vending machines against current
requirements of the U.S. Public Health Service Ordinance and Code. The manufacturing facility used
in connection with our refill vending service is required to be registered with the EPA under the
provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act because certain components
used in connection with the reverse osmosis water filtration systems are deemed to be pesticidal
devices. The Eagan, Minnesota facility has been registered as required. Additionally, certain
states have permit requirements for the operation of the refill vending machines.
14
Segments
At December 31, 2010, we had four operating segments and three reportable segments: Primo
Bottled Water Exchange (Exchange), Primo Refill (Refill) and Primo Products (Products).
However, with the acquisition of the Refill Business, we manage and view our business as Primo
Water (Water) related and Products related. Our Water operations consist of our Exchange, Refill
and an Other operating segment that does not meet quantitative thresholds for segment reporting.
As we further integrate the various Water operations we anticipate that we will have two reportable
segments in the future. See Note 11 Segments in Item 8 of this report for further details,
including additional financial information regarding our principal products and services.
Seasonality
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our sales
and operating income. Our sales have been highest in the spring and summer,
and lowest in the fall and winter. Our water bottle exchange and refill vending services, which
generally enjoy higher margins than our water dispensers, experience higher sales in the spring and
summer. We have historically experienced higher sales in spring and summer with respect to our
water dispensers, however, we believe dispenser sales are more dependent on
retailer inventory management and purchasing cycles and have little correlation to weather.
Sustained periods of poor weather, particularly in the spring and summer, can negatively impact our
sales with respect to our higher margin water bottle exchange and refill vending services.
Accordingly, our results of operations in any quarter will not necessarily be indicative of the
results that we may achieve for a fiscal year or any future quarter.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we had 126 employees. We believe that our continued success will
depend on our ability to continue to attract and retain skilled personnel. We have never had a work
stoppage and none of our employees are represented by a labor union. We believe our relationship
with our employees is good.
Exchange Act Reports
We make available free of charge through our Internet website, www.primowater.com, our annual
report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments
to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed
with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC maintains an Internet
website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other
information filed electronically with the SEC. Any materials that the we file with the SEC may also
be read and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington,
D. C. 20549. Information on the operations of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The information provided on our website is not part of this report and is
not incorporated herein by reference.
15
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur operating losses in the future.
We have incurred operating losses in the past and expect to incur operating losses in the
future. As of December 31, 2010, our accumulated deficit was approximately $113.7 million. Our
losses from continuing operations were $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, $8.2
million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $12.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2010. We have not been profitable since our inception, and we may not become profitable in the
future. Our losses may continue as we incur additional costs and expenses related to acquired
businesses, branding and marketing, expansion of operations, product development and development of
relationships with strategic business partners. If our operating expenses exceed our expectations,
our financial performance will be adversely affected. If our sales do not grow to offset these
increased expenses, we may not become profitable. If we do not achieve sustained profitability, we
may be unable to continue operations.
We depend on a small number of large retailers for most of our consumer sales. Our arrangements
with these retailers for our bottled water exchange services and sales of our water dispensers are
nonexclusive and may be terminated at will.
Certain retailers make up a significant percentage of our retail sales volume, such that if
one or more of these retailers were to materially reduce or terminate its business with us, our
sales would suffer. For 2010, Lowes Home Improvement and Walmart represented approximately 37%
and 21% of our consolidated net sales, respectively. While we sell a small percentage of our
dispensers directly to consumers through our online store, the vast majority of our sales are made
through our retail partners.
While we have arrangements with certain retailers for our products and services, we cannot
provide any assurance of any future sales. None of our significant retail accounts are
contractually bound to offer our water dispensers or water bottle exchange service. As a result,
retailers can discontinue our dispenser products or water bottle exchange services at any time and
offer a competitors products or services, or none at all. Additionally, the contractual
commitments of the Refill Business with its retail customers are not long-term in nature.
Continued positive relations with a retailer depend upon various factors, including price, customer
service, consumer demand and competition. Certain of our retailers have multiple vendor policies
and may seek to offer a competitors products or services at new or existing locations. If any
significant retailer materially reduces, terminates or is unwilling to expand its relationship with
us, or requires price reductions or other adverse modifications in our selling terms, our sales
would suffer.
Additionally, most major retailers continually evaluate and often modify their in-store retail
strategies, including product placement, store set-up and design and demographic targets. Our
business could suffer significant setbacks in net sales and operating income if one or more of our
major retail customers modified its current retail strategy resulting in a termination or reduction
of its business relationship with us, a reduction in store penetration or an unfavorable product
placement within such retailers stores, any or all of which could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may experience difficulties in integrating the Refill Business, the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange
Business and the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business with our current business and may not be
able to fully realize all of the anticipated synergies from these acquisitions.
We may not be able to fully realize all of the anticipated synergies from the acquisition of
the Refill Business and the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business or from the proposed acquisition
of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business. The ability to realize the anticipated benefits of
these acquisitions will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to successfully integrate these
businesses with our water bottle exchange and dispenser businesses. The integration of independent
businesses is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. In addition, we are integrating
multilple businesses that are different from our water bottle exchange and dispenser business in
several respects, including with respect to the types of products and services offered, the manner
in which such
16
products
and services are provided to retail customers and pricing dynamics. As a result, we are devoting
significant management attention and resources to integrating our business practices and operations
with these newly acquired businesses. This integration process may disrupt the Refill Business,
the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business, the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business or our water
bottle exchange and dispenser business and, if implemented ineffectively, would preclude
realization of the full benefits we expect to realize. The failure to meet the challenges involved
in integrating successfully the operations of these new businesses with ours or otherwise to
realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition transactions could cause an interruption of, or
a loss of momentum in, our business activities or those of the newly acquired businesses, and could
seriously harm our results of operations. In addition, the overall integration may result in
unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, loss of customer and supplier
relationships, and diversion of managements attention. The challenges we face in integrating the
operations of the newly acquired businesses with ours include, among others:
|
|
|
maintaining employee morale and retaining and hiring key personnel; |
|
|
|
consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and eliminating duplicative
operations; |
|
|
|
minimizing the diversion of managements attention from ongoing business concerns; |
|
|
|
coordinating geographically dispersed organizations; |
|
|
|
addressing unanticipated issues in integrating information technology, communications and
other systems; and |
|
|
|
managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating operations. |
In addition, even if we successfully integrate these new businesses with our water bottle
exchange and dispenser business, we may not realize the full benefits of the acquisition
transactions, including synergies, cost savings or sales or growth opportunities. These benefits
may not be achieved within the anticipated timeframe, or at all.
The success of our business depends on retailer and consumer acceptance of our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services and water dispensers.
We are a consumer products and services company operating in the highly-competitive bottled
water market and rely on continued consumer demand or preference for our products and services. To
generate sales and profits, we must sell products that appeal to retailers and to consumers. Our
future success depends on consumer acceptance, particularly at the household level, of our bottled
water products, water bottle exchange and refill vending services and water dispensers. There is
no guarantee that there will be significant market acceptance of our water bottle exchange or
refill vending services or that we will be successful in selling our water dispensers on a scale
necessary to achieve sustained profitability.
The market for bottled water related products and services is evolving rapidly and we may not
be able to accurately assess the size of the market or trends that may emerge and affect our
business. Consumer preference can change due to a variety of factors, including social trends,
negative publicity and economic changes. If we are unable to convince current and potential retail
customers and individual consumers of the advantages of our products and services, our ability to
sell our bottled water products and water dispensers will be limited. Consumer acceptance also
will affect, and be affected by, our existing retail partners and potential new retail partners
decision to sell our products and services and their perception of the likelihood of consumers
purchasing our products and services. Even if retail customers purchase our products or services,
there is no guarantee that they will be successful in selling our products or services to consumers
on a scale necessary for us to achieve sustained profitability. Any significant changes in
consumer preferences for purified bottled water could result in reduced demand for our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services and our water dispensers and erosion of our competitive and
financial position.
17
If we lose key personnel or are unable to recruit qualified personnel, our ability to
implement our business strategies could be delayed or hindered. In addition, we may not be able to
attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our planned growth.
We are highly dependent upon the services of our senior management because of their
experience, industry relationships and knowledge of the business. We are particularly dependent on
the services of Billy D. Prim, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. We do not have
a formal succession plan in place for Mr. Prim. While our employment agreements with members of
our senior management include customary confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation
covenants, there can be no assurance that such provisions will be enforceable or adequately protect
us.
The loss of one or more of our key employees could seriously harm our business and we may not
be able to attract and retain individuals with the same or similar level of experience or
expertise. We face competition for qualified employees from numerous sources and there can be no
assurance that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel on acceptable terms. Our
ability to recruit and retain such personnel will depend upon a number of factors, such as our
results of operations, prospects and the level of competition then prevailing in the market for
qualified personnel. Failure to recruit and retain such personnel could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In our bottled water business, we depend on independent bottlers, distributors and suppliers for
our business to operate.
We are and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, substantially dependent on
independent bottlers, distributors and suppliers to bottle and deliver our bottled water products
and provide our water bottle exchange service to our retail customers. We do not have our own
manufacturing facilities to produce bottled water products. We are and will continue to be for the
foreseeable future, entirely dependent on third parties to supply the bottle pre-forms, bottles,
water and other materials necessary to operate our bottled water business. We rely on third-party
supply companies to manufacture our three- and five-gallon water bottles and deliver them to our
bottlers. In turn, we rely on bottlers to properly purify the water, include our mineral
enhancements and bottle the finished product without contamination and pursuant to our quality
standards and preparation procedures. Finally, we rely upon our distributors to deliver bottled
water to our retail partners in a timely manner, accurately enter information regarding the
delivery of the bottles into our management information system, manage our recycling center
displays and return used bottles to the bottlers to be sanitized or crushed and recycled.
We can make no assurance that we will be able to maintain these third-party relationships or
establish additional relationships as necessary to support growth and profitability of our business
on economically viable terms. As independent companies, these bottlers, distributors and suppliers
make their own business decisions. Suppliers may choose not to do business with us for a variety
of reasons, including competition, brand identity, product standards and concerns regarding our
economic viability. They may have the right to determine whether, and to what extent, they produce
and distribute our products, our competitors products and their own products. Some of the
business for these bottlers, distributors and suppliers comes from producing or selling our
competitors products. These bottlers, distributors and suppliers may devote more resources to
other products or take other actions detrimental to our brands. In addition, their financial
condition could also be adversely affected by conditions beyond our control and our business could
suffer. In addition, we will face risks associated with any bottlers or distributors failure to
adhere to quality control and service guidelines we establish or failure to ensure an adequate and
timely supply of product and services at retail locations. Any of these factors could negatively
affect our business and financial performance. If we are unable to obtain and maintain a source of
supply for bottles, water and other materials, our business will be materially and adversely
affected.
In our bottled water business, if our distributors do not perform to our retailers expectations,
if we encounter difficulties in managing our distributor operations or if we or our distributors
are not able to manage growth effectively, our retail relationships may be adversely impacted and
business may suffer.
We rely on our distributors to deliver our three- and five-gallon bottled water and provide
our water bottle exchange service to retailers. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to
manage our retail relationships through the performance of our distributor partners. The majority
of our current distributors are independent and we
exercise only limited influence over the resources they devote to delivery and exchange of our
three- and five-gallon water bottles. Our success depends on our ability to establish and maintain
distributor relationships and on the distributors ability to operate viable businesses. We can
provide no assurance that we will be able to maintain such relationships or establish additional
relationships as necessary to support growth and profitability of our business on economically
viable terms. Our retailers impose demanding service requirements on us and we could suffer a loss
of consumer or retailer goodwill if our distributors do not adhere to our quality control and
service guidelines or fail to ensure an adequate and timely supply of bottled water at retail
locations. The poor performance of a single distributor to a major retailer could jeopardize our
entire relationship with that retailer and cause our bottled water sales and exchange service to
suffer. In addition, the number of retail locations offering our water bottle exchange service and
our corresponding sales have grown significantly over the past several years along with our
national distributor network. Accordingly, our distributors must be able to adequately service an
increasing number of retail accounts. If we or our distributors fail to manage our growth
effectively, our bottled water sales and exchange service may suffer.
18
We are dependent on the network of distributors of the Refill Business and we may be unable to
maintain these relationships or achieve the cost savings we anticipate creating with the
post-acquisition consolidation of this network.
The Refill Business is dependent on its network of primarily independent distributors to
provide a number of services with respect to its reverse osmosis water systems. We are party to a
dealer services agreement with Culligan International Company pursuant to which we have access to
this network of distributors through December 2011. There can be no assurance that the
distributors will continue to provide these services after the termination of the dealer services
agreement.
Additionally, we are in the process of consolidating the current network of approximately 500
distributors in order to achieve cost savings. There can be no assurance that we can successfully
consolidate the current network of distributors or that we will be able to achieve any cost savings
if we are able to consolidate the network. If we are unable to rely on the service provider
network of the Refill Business to continue providing the services currently provided or we are
unable to achieve cost savings through a consolidation of this network, we may not realize the full
benefits of the acquisition of the Refill Business and our business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows could suffer.
If the distributors of the Refill Business do not perform to retailer expectations, its retail
relationships may be adversely impacted and business may suffer.
The Refill Business primarily relies on third-party distributors to install, maintain and
repair the reverse osmosis water systems at its retail customers locations. These third-party
distributors are also responsible for providing retail customer training with respect to the
reverse osmosis water systems, submitting water for testing and conducting monthly meter readings
to determine water usage for billing purposes. Accordingly, the success of the Refill Business
depends on its ability to manage its retail relationships through the performance of these
distributors. The significant majority of these distributors are independent dealers and the
Refill Business exercises only limited influence over the resources they devote to their
responsibilities with respect to its retail customers. The success of the Refill Business
currently depends on its ability to establish and maintain relationships with these third-party
distributors and on the distributors ability to operate viable businesses. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to continue to maintain such relationships. Retail customers of the
Refill Business impose demanding service requirements and we could suffer a loss of retailer or
consumer goodwill if these distributors do not perform to the retail customers expectations. The
poor performance of a single service provider to a major retailer could jeopardize our entire
relationship with that retailer potentially preventing future installations at additional retail
locations and causing sales to suffer.
We operate in a highly competitive industry, face competition from companies with far greater
resources than we have and could encounter significant competition from these companies in our
niche market of water bottle exchange services and related products and refill vending services.
We participate in the highly competitive bottled water segment of the nonalcoholic beverage
industry. While the industry is dominated by large and well-known international companies,
numerous smaller firms are also seeking to
establish market niches. In our business model, we not only offer multi-gallon bottled water
but also provide consumers the ability to exchange their used containers as part of our exchange
service or refill their used containers as part of our refill vending service. While we are aware
of a few direct competitors that operate water bottle exchange networks at retail, we believe they
operate on a much smaller scale than we do and we believe they do not have equivalent MIS tools or
bottling and distribution capabilities to effectively support major retailers nationwide.
Competitive factors with respect to our business include pricing, taste, advertising, sales
promotion programs, product innovation, increased efficiency in production and distribution
techniques, the introduction of new packaging and brand and trademark development and protection.
19
Our primary competitors in our bottled water business include Nestlé, The Coca-Cola Company,
PepsiCo, Dr Pepper Snapple Group and DS Waters of America. While none of these companies currently
offers a nationwide water bottle exchange service at retail, Nestlé and DS Waters of America offer
this service on a regional basis. Many of these competitors are leading consumer products
companies, have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do, have established a
strong brand presence with consumers and have established relationships with retailers,
manufacturers, bottlers and distributors necessary to start an exchange at retail locations
nationwide should they decide to do so. The Refill Business faces direct competition in its
industry and for its retail customers from Glacier Water Services, Inc., which has a strong brand
presence and greater financial and other resources than we have. In addition to competition
between companies within the bottled water industry, the industry itself faces significant
competition from other non-alcoholic beverages, including carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks
and waters, juices, sport and energy drinks, coffees, teas and spring and tap water.
We also compete directly and indirectly in the water dispenser marketplace. While we have had
recent success in our sales of water dispensers to retailers, there are many large consumer
products companies with substantially greater financial and other resources than we do, a larger
brand presence with consumers and established relationships with retailers that could decide to
enter the marketplace. Should any of these consumer products companies so decide to enter the
water dispenser marketplace, sales of our water dispensers could be materially and adversely
impacted, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our sales of bottled water.
Finally, our bottled water business faces competition from other methods of purified water
consumption such as countertop filtration systems, faucet mounted filtration systems, in-line
whole-house filtration systems, water filtration dispensing products such as pitchers and jugs,
standard and advanced feature water coolers and refrigerator-dispensed filtered and unfiltered
water.
In our water dispenser business, because all of our dispensers are manufactured in China, a
significant disruption in the operations of these manufacturers or political unrest in China could
materially adversely affect us.
We have only three manufacturers of water dispensers. Any disruption in production or
inability of our manufacturers to produce quantities of water dispensers adequate to meet our needs
could significantly impair our ability to operate our water dispenser business on a day-to-day
basis. Our manufacturers are located in China, which exposes us to the possibility of product
supply disruption and increased costs in the event of changes in the policies of the Chinese
government, political unrest or unstable economic conditions in China or developments in the U.S.
that are adverse to trade, including enactment of protectionist legislation. In addition, our
dispensers are shipped directly from the manufacturer to our retail partners. Although we
routinely inspect and monitor our manufacturing partners activities and products, we rely heavily
upon their quality controls when producing and delivering the dispensers to our retail partners.
Any of these matters could materially adversely affect our water dispenser business and, as a
result, our profitability.
If the water we sell became contaminated, our business could be seriously harmed.
We have adopted various quality, environmental, health and safety standards. However, our
products may still not meet these standards or could otherwise become contaminated. A failure to
meet these standards or contamination could occur in our operations or those of our bottlers,
distributors or suppliers. Such a failure or contamination could result in expensive production
interruptions, recalls and liability claims. Moreover, negative publicity could be generated even
from false, unfounded or nominal liability claims or limited recalls. Any of these failures or
occurrences could negatively affect our business and financial performance.
20
Interruption or disruption of our supply chain, distribution channels or bottling and distribution
network could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability and that of our business partners, including suppliers, bottlers, distributors and
retailers, to manufacture, sell and deliver products and services is critical to our success.
Interruption or disruption of our supply chain, distribution channels or service network due to
unforeseen events, including war, terrorism and other international conflicts, public health
issues, natural disasters such as earthquakes, fires, hurricanes or other adverse weather and
climate conditions, strikes and other labor disputes, whether occurring in the United States or
abroad, could impair our ability to manufacture, sell or deliver our products and services.
The consolidation of retail customers may adversely impact our operating margins and profitability.
Our customers, such as mass merchants, supermarkets, warehouse clubs, food distributors and
drug and pharmacy stores, have consolidated in recent years and consolidation may continue. As a
result of these consolidations, our large retail customers may seek lower pricing or increased
promotions from us. If we fail to respond to these trends in our industry, our volume growth could
slow or we may need to lower prices or increase trade promotions and consumer marketing for our
products and services, both of which would adversely affect our financial results. These retailers
may use floor or shelf space currently used for our products and services for their own private
label products and services. In addition, retailers are increasingly carrying fewer brands in any
one category and our results of operations will suffer if we are not selected by our significant
customers to remain a vendor. In the event of consolidation involving our current retailers, we
may lose key business if the surviving entities do not continue to purchase products or services
from us.
While many members of our senior management have experience as executives of a products and
exchange services business, there can be no assurances that this experience and past success will
result in our business becoming profitable.
Many members of our senior management have had experience as senior managers of a company
engaged in the supply, distribution and exchange of propane gas cylinders. While the business
model for that company and the model for our business are similar, the propane gas industry and the
bottled water industry are very different. For example, there are no assurances that consumer
demand will exist for our bottled water products, water bottle exchange or refill vending services
or water dispensers sufficient to enable us to be profitable. While we believe our business model
will be successful, any similarity between our business model and that of our senior managements
predecessor employer should not be viewed as an indication that we will be profitable.
We depend on key management information systems.
We depend on our management information systems (MIS) to process orders, manage inventory and
accounts receivable, maintain distributor and customer information, maintain cost-efficient
operations and assist distributors in delivering products and services on a timely basis. Any
disruption in the operation of our MIS tools, the loss of employees knowledgeable about such
systems, the termination of our relationships with third-party MIS partners or our failure to
continue to effectively modify such systems as business expands could require us to expend
significant additional resources or to invest additional capital to continue to manage our business
effectively, and could even affect our compliance with public reporting requirements.
Additionally, our MIS tools are vulnerable to interruptions or other failures resulting from, among
other things, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, software, equipment or telecommunications
failures, processing errors, computer viruses, hackers, other security issues or supplier defaults.
Security, backup and disaster recovery measures may not be adequate or implemented properly to
avoid such disruptions or failures. Any disruption or failure of these systems or services could
cause substantial errors, processing inefficiencies, security breaches, inability to use the
systems or process transactions, loss of customers or other business disruptions, all of which
could negatively affect our business and financial performance.
21
Our results of operations could be adversely affected as a result of the impairment of goodwill or
other intangibles.
When we acquire a business, we record an asset called goodwill equal to the excess amount we
pay for the business, including liabilities assumed, over the fair value of the tangible and
intangible assets of the business we acquire. In accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), we must identify and value intangible assets
that we acquire in business combinations, such as customer arrangements, customer relationships and
non-compete agreements, that arise from contractual or other legal rights or that are capable of
being separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or
exchanged. The fair value of identified intangible assets is based upon an estimate of the future
economic benefits expected to result from ownership, which represents the amount at which the
assets could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a
forced or liquidation sale.
GAAP provides that goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not
be amortized, but instead must be tested at least annually for impairment, and intangible assets
that have finite useful lives should continue to be amortized over their useful lives. GAAP also
provides specific guidance for testing goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets for
impairment. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions to allocate
goodwill to reporting units and to determine the fair value of reporting unit net assets and
liabilities, including, among other things, an assessment of market conditions, projected cash
flows, investment rates, cost of capital and growth rates, which could significantly impact the
reported value of goodwill and other intangible assets. Fair value is determined using a
combination of the discounted cash flow, market multiple and market capitalization valuation
approaches. Absent any impairment indicators, we perform our impairment tests annually during the
fourth quarter.
We review our intangible assets with definite lives for impairment when events or changes in
business conditions indicate the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable, as required
by GAAP. An impairment of intangible assets with definite lives exists if the sum of the
undiscounted estimated future cash flows expected is less than the carrying value of the assets.
If this measurement indicates a possible impairment, we compare the estimated fair value of the
asset to the net book value to measure the impairment charge, if any.
We cannot predict the occurrence of certain future events that might adversely affect the
reported value of goodwill and other intangible assets that totaled $88.5 million at December 31,
2010. Such events include strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive
conditions, the impact of the economic environment on our customer base, material negative changes
in our relationships with material customers and other parties breaching their contractual
obligations under non-compete agreements. Future impairments, if any, will be recognized as
operating expenses.
If we are unable to build and maintain our brand image and corporate reputation, our business may
suffer.
We are a relatively new company, having been formed in late 2004 and commenced operations in
June 2005. Our success depends on our ability to build and maintain the brand image for our
existing products and services and effectively build the brand image for any new products. We
cannot assure you, however, that any additional expenditures on advertising and marketing will have
the desired impact on our products brand image and on consumer preferences. Actual or perceived
product quality issues or allegations of product contamination, even if false or unfounded, could
tarnish the image of our brand and may cause consumers to choose other products. Allegations of
product defects or product contamination, even if untrue, may require us from time to time to
recall a product from all of the markets in which the affected product was distributed. Product
recalls would negatively affect our profitability and brand image. Also, adverse publicity
surrounding water usage and any campaigns by activists attempting to connect our system to
environmental issues, water shortages or workplace or human rights violations in certain developing
countries in which we or our business partners operate, could negatively affect our overall
reputation and our products acceptance by consumers.
Adverse weather conditions could negatively impact our business.
Unseasonable or unusual weather may negatively impact demand for our products. The sales of
our bottled water products, water dispensers and refill vending services are influenced to some
extent by weather conditions in the
markets in which we operate. Unusually cool or rainy weather may reduce temporarily the
demand for our products and contribute to lower sales, which would have an adverse effect on our
results of operations for such periods.
22
We may not be able to consummate the acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business.
We have entered into an asset purchase agreement with Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC
(Omnifrio) and certain of its members to acquire the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business. The
closing of this acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. Either
Omnifrio or we may terminate the purchase agreement if certain closing conditions have not been
satisfied or waived by April 29, 2011. If certain conditions to Omnifrios obligation to close are
not satisfied by April 29, 2011, or if we fail to obtain necessary consents, Omnifrio may terminate
the purchase agreement and we would be required to pay Omnifrio $250,000. We cannot assure you
that we will consummate the acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve
Beverage Business on favorable terms, or at all.
We may be required to make substantial capital expenditures in connection with our recent
acquisition transactions and the proposed Omnifrio transaction.
Maintenance of refill equipment located at the stores of current and future retail customers
of the Refill Business may be substantially costlier than we currently anticipate and there may be
unanticipated capital expenditures in connection with our continued operations the Refill Business
and the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business. Additionally, the development of a market-ready
Omnifrio single-serve cold carbonated beverage appliance may be substantially costlier than we
currently anticipate.
We may incur substantial capital expenditures in growing each of these new businesses. If we
are required to make greater than anticipated capital expenditures in connection with continued
operations or growth of any of these businesses, our business, financial condition and cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected.
We are required to rebrand the Refill Business under our Primo or another new brand and the
rebranding may be more costly than anticipated or may fail to achieve its intended result.
We are required to rebrand the Refill Business to eliminate all ties to Culligan International
Company before November 10, 2011. Our rebranding efforts may not achieve their intended results,
which include increasing our retail business. Our rebranding efforts could turn out to be
substantially more expensive than we currently anticipate, which would materially adversely affect
our results of operations. Additionally, the rebranding of the Refill Business could result in the
loss of current Refill Business retail customers and consumers, which would prevent us from
realizing the full benefits of the Refill Acquisition and would negatively affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Refill Business and the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business have substantial Canadian
operations and are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and political uncertainties.
The Refill Business and the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business have substantial Canadian
operations, and as a result, we are subject to risks associated with doing business
internationally. Risks inherent to operating internationally include:
|
|
|
changes in a countrys economic or political conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and |
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements. |
To the extent the United States dollar strengthens against the Canadian dollar, our foreign
revenues and profits will be reduced when translated into United States dollars.
23
Water scarcity and poor quality could negatively impact our long-term profitability.
Water is a limited resource facing unprecedented challenges from overexploitation, population
growth, increasing pollution, poor management and climate change. As demand for water continues to
increase and as water becomes scarcer and the quality of available water deteriorates, our business
may incur increasing costs or face capacity constraints which could adversely affect our
profitability or net sales in the long run.
We may pursue acquisitions and investments in new product lines, businesses or technologies that
involve numerous risks, which could disrupt our business or adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
In addition to our recent acquisitions of the Refill Business and the Culligan Bulk Water
Exchange Business and the proposed acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business, we
may in the future acquire or invest in new product lines, businesses
or related technologies to expand our
current bottled water products and services. Acquisitions or
investments in new product lines, businesses or related technologies present a number of potential risks and
challenges that could disrupt our business operations, increase our operating costs or capital
expenditure requirements and reduce the value of the acquired product
line, business or related technology.
For example, if we identify an acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate
or finance the acquisition on favorable terms or at all. The process of negotiating acquisitions
and integrating acquired products, services, technologies, personnel or businesses might result in
significant transaction costs, operating difficulties or unexpected expenditures and might require
significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our
business. If we are successful in consummating an acquisition, we may not be able to integrate the
acquired product line, business or technology into our existing business and products and we may
not achieve the anticipated benefits of any acquisition. Furthermore, potential acquisitions and
investments may divert our managements attention, require considerable cash outlays and require
substantial additional expenses that could harm our existing operations and adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition. To complete future acquisitions, we may issue
equity securities, incur debt, assume contingent liabilities or incur amortization expenses and
write-downs of acquired assets, any of which could dilute the interests of our stockholders or
adversely affect our profitability or cash flow.
Changes in taxation requirements could affect our financial results.
We are subject to income tax in the numerous jurisdictions in which we generate net sales. In
addition, our water dispensers are subject to certain import duties and sales taxes in certain
jurisdictions in which we operate. Increases in income tax rates could reduce our after-tax income
from affected jurisdictions, while increases in indirect taxes could affect our products and
services affordability and therefore reduce demand for our products and services.
Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards in the United States may be limited.
As of December 31, 2010, we had net operating losses of approximately $66 million for federal
income tax purposes, which expire at various dates through 2030. To the extent available and not
otherwise utilized, we intend to use any net operating loss carryforwards to reduce the U.S.
corporate income tax liability associated with our operations. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating
loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone
certain changes in stock ownership. Our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards may be
limited, under this section or otherwise, by the issuance of common stock in our IPO. To the
extent our use of net operating loss carryforwards is significantly limited, our income could be
subject to U.S. corporate income tax earlier than it would if we were able to use net operating
loss carryforwards, which could result in lower profits.
24
Our financial results may be negatively impacted by the recent global financial events.
The recent global financial events have resulted in the consolidation, failure or near failure
of a number of institutions in the banking, insurance and investment banking industries and have
substantially reduced the ability of companies to obtain financing. Additionally, geopolitical
tensions in the Middle East and other foreign regions have caused great uncertainty in the
financial markets and led to escalating fuel prices. These events could have a number of different
effects on our business, including:
|
|
|
a reduction in consumer spending, which could result in a reduction in our sales volume; |
|
|
|
a shift in the purchasing habits of our target consumers; |
|
|
|
a negative impact on the ability of our retail customers to timely pay their obligations
to us, thus reducing our cash flow; |
|
|
|
increased costs related to our distribution channels; |
|
|
|
a negative impact on the ability of our vendors to timely supply materials; and |
|
|
|
an increased likelihood that our lender may be unable to honor its commitments under our
new senior revolving credit facility. |
Other events or conditions may arise directly or indirectly from the global financial events
that could negatively impact our business.
Risks Relating to Regulatory and Legal Issues
Our inability to protect our intellectual property, or our involvement in damaging and disruptive
intellectual property litigation, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition or result in the loss of use of products or services.
We have filed certain patent applications and trademark registration applications and intend
to seek additional patents, to develop additional trademarks and seek federal registrations for
such trademarks and to develop other intellectual property. We consider our Primo name and related
trademarks and our other intellectual property to be valuable to our business and the establishment
of a national branded bottled water exchange program. We rely on a combination of patent,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and other arrangements to protect our proprietary rights
and could incur substantial expense to enforce our rights under such laws. A number of other
companies, however, use trademarks similar or identical to the Primo® mark to identify
their products, and we may not be able to stop these other companies from using such trademarks.
The requirement to change any of our trademarks, service marks or trade names could entail
significant expense and result in the loss of any goodwill associated with that trademark, service
mark or trade name. While we have filed, and intend to file in the future, patent applications,
where appropriate, and to pursue such applications with the patent authorities, we cannot be sure
that patents will be issued on such applications or that any issued patents will not be
successfully contested by third parties. Also, since issuance of a patent does not prevent other
companies from using alternative, non-infringing technology or designs, we cannot be sure that any
issued patents, or patents that may be issued to others and licensed to us, will provide
significant or any commercial protection, especially as new competitors enter the market.
In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets and other non-patented
proprietary information relating to our product development, business processes and operating
activities. We seek to protect this information through appropriate efforts to maintain its
secrecy, including confidentiality agreements. We cannot be sure that these efforts will be
successful or that confidentiality agreements will not be breached. We also cannot be sure that we
would have adequate remedies for any breach of such agreements or other misappropriation of our
trade secrets, or that our trade secrets and proprietary know-how will not otherwise become known
or be independently discovered by others.
Where necessary, we may initiate litigation to enforce our patent or other intellectual
property rights. Any such litigation may require us to spend a substantial amount of time and
money and could distract management from its day-to-day operations. Moreover, there is no
assurance that we will be successful in any such litigation or that such litigation will not result
in successful counterclaims or challenges to the validity of our intellectual property rights. Our
failure to successfully develop intellectual property, or to successfully obtain, maintain and
enforce patents, trademarks and other intellectual property, could affect our ability to
distinguish our products and services from those of our competitors and could cause our sales to
suffer.
25
Our business and our ability to provide products and services may be impaired by claims that
we infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Vigorous protection and pursuit of
intellectual property rights characterize the consumer products industry. These traits can result
in significant, protracted and materially expensive litigation. In addition, parties making
infringement and other claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief that could
effectively block our ability to provide our products, services or utilize our business methods and
could cause us to pay substantial damages. In the event of a successful claim of infringement, we
may need to obtain one or more licenses from third parties, which may not be available at a
reasonable cost, or at all. It is possible that our intellectual property rights may not be valid
or that we may infringe existing or future proprietary rights of others. Any successful
infringement claims could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses on
unfavorable terms, prevent us from manufacturing or selling products, providing services and
utilizing business methods and require us to redesign or, in the case of trademark claims, re-brand
our Company, products or services, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition.
In January 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an updated report regarding bisphenol
A, or BPA, a chemical used in food and beverage packaging and other products that can possibly have
adverse health effects on consumers, particularly on young children. The three- and five- gallon
polycarbonate plastic bottles that we use to bottle our water contain BPA. Any significant change
in perception by our customers or government regulation of polycarbonate plastic in food and
beverage products could adversely affect our operations and financial results.
In January 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an updated report regarding its
current perspective on the safety of BPA in food packaging materials, asserting the need for
additional studies on BPA and issuing its interim public health recommendations. BPA is an
industrial chemical used to make hard, clear plastic known as polycarbonate, which is currently
used in our three- and five-gallon water bottles. BPA is regulated by the FDA as an indirect food
additive. While the FDA notes that studies employing standardized toxicity tests support the
safety of human exposure to BPA at the low levels currently experienced by consumers, the FDAs
report additionally acknowledges the results of certain recent studies which suggest some concern
regarding potential developmental and behavioral effects of BPA exposure, particularly on infants
and young children.
The FDA is continuing to evaluate these low dose toxicity studies, as well as other recent
peer-reviewed studies related to BPA, and has solicited public comment and inter-agency scientific
input in connection with updating its formal assessment of the safety of BPA for use in food
contact applications. In the interim, the FDAs public health recommendations include taking
reasonable steps to reduce exposure of infants to BPA in the food supply and working with industry
to support and evaluate manufacturing practices and alternative substances that could reduce
exposure in other populations. Further, the FDA indicates that it plans to review its existing
authority to shift to a more robust regulatory framework for oversight of BPA.
Consistent with the findings of numerous international regulatory bodies, we believe that the
scientific evidence suggests that polycarbonate plastic made with BPA is a safe packing material
for all consumers. Nonetheless, media reports and the FDA report have prompted concern in our
marketplace among existing and potential customers. It is possible that developments surrounding
this issue could lead to adverse effects on our business. Such developments could include:
|
|
|
increased publicity that changes public or regulatory perception regarding packaging that
uses BPA, so that significant numbers of consumers stop purchasing products that are packaged
in polycarbonate plastic; |
|
|
|
the emergence of new scientific evidence that suggests that the low doses of BPA to which
consumers may be exposed when using polycarbonate plastic is unsafe; |
|
|
|
interpretations of existing evidence by the FDA or other regulatory agencies that lead to
prohibitions on the use of polycarbonate plastic as packaging for consumable products; |
|
|
|
|
the listing of BPA by Californias Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment on the
states Proposition 65 list, which would require us to label our products with information
about BPA content and could obligate us to evaluate the levels of exposure to BPA associated
with the use of our products; and |
|
|
|
the inability of sellers of consumable products to find an adequate supply of alternative
packaging if polycarbonate plastic containing BPA becomes an undesirable or prohibited
packaging material.
|
26
In addition, federal, state and local governmental authorities have and continue to introduce,
and in certain states enact, proposals intended to restrict or ban the use of BPA in food and
beverage packaging materials. Additionally, a food safety bill is currently pending in the U.S.
Senate which may be amended to include a provision that would override the FDAs ongoing assessment
of BPA, ban the use of BPA in certain food and beverage containers and change the way in which BPA
is regulated. At this juncture, we cannot predict with certainty whether or when any such
proposals may be enacted or what impact they may have on our business.
If any of these events were to occur, our sales and operating results could be materially
adversely affected.
Our products and services are heavily regulated in the United States and Canada. If we are unable
to continue to comply with applicable regulations and standards in any jurisdiction, we might not
be able to sell our products in that jurisdiction or they could be recalled, and our business could
be seriously harmed.
The production, distribution and sale of our products in the United States and Canada are
subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; the Occupational Safety and Health Act; the
Lanham Act; various environmental statutes; Canadian permitting requirements; and various other
federal, state, provincial and local statutes and regulations applicable to the production,
transportation, sale, safety, advertising, promotion, labeling and ingredients of such products.
For example, measures have been enacted in various localities and states that require a deposit to
be charged for certain non-refillable beverage containers. The precise requirements imposed by
these measures vary. Other deposit, recycling or product stewardship proposals have been
introduced in various jurisdictions. We anticipate that similar legislation or regulations may be
proposed in the future at the local, state and federal levels.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the FDA) regulates bottled water as a food under the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Our bottled water must meet FDA requirements of safety for
human consumption, identity, quality and labeling. Further, any claims we make in marketing our
products, such as claims related to the beneficial health effects of drinking water, are subject to
FDAs advertising and promotion requirements and restrictions. In addition, the FDA has
established current good manufacturing practices, regulations which govern the facilities, methods,
practices and controls used for the processing, bottling and distribution of bottled drinking
water. We and our third-party bottling and distribution partners are subject to these
requirements. In addition, all public drinking water must meet Environmental Protection Agency
standards established under the Safe Drinking Water Act for mineral and chemical concentration and
drinking water quality and treatment. We also must comply with overlapping and, in some cases,
inconsistent state regulations in a variety of areas. These state-level regulations, among other
things, set standards for approved water sources and the information that must be provided and the
basis on which any therapeutic claims for water may be made. We must expend resources to
continuously monitor state legislative and regulatory activities in order to identify and ensure
compliance with laws and regulations that apply to our bottled water business in each state in
which we operate.
Additionally, the manufacture, sale and use of resins used to make water bottles are subject
to regulation by the FDA. These regulations relate to substances used in food packaging materials,
not with specific finished food packaging products. Our beverage containers are deemed to be in
compliance with FDA regulations if the components used in the containers: (i) are approved by the
FDA as indirect food additives for their intended uses and comply with the applicable FDA indirect
food additive regulations; or (ii) are generally recognized as safe for their intended uses and are
of suitable purity for those intended uses.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission, FDA or other applicable regulatory bodies may require
the recall, repair or replacement of our products if those products are found not to be in
compliance with applicable standards or regulations. The failure of our third party manufacturers
or bottlers to produce merchandise that adheres to our quality control standards could damage our
reputation and lead to customer litigation against us. If our manufacturers or distributors are
unable or unwilling to recall products failing to meet our quality standards, we may
be required to remove merchandise or recall those products at a substantial cost to us. We
may be unable to recover costs related to product recalls.
27
We believe that our self-imposed standards meet or exceed those set by federal, state and
local regulations. Nevertheless, our failure or the failure of our suppliers, bottlers,
distributors or third-party services providers to comply with federal, state, provincial or local
laws, rules or regulations could subject us to potential governmental enforcement action for
violation of such regulations, which could result in warning letters, fines, product recalls or
seizures, civil or criminal penalties and/or temporary or permanent injunctions, each of which
could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition,
our failure, or even our perceived failure, to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations
could cause retailers and others to determine not to do business with us or reduce the amount of
business they do with us.
Legislative and executive action in state and local governments enacting local taxes on bottled
water to include multi-gallon bottled water could adversely affect our business and financial
results.
Regulations have been enacted or proposed in some localities where we operate to enact local
taxes on bottled water. These actions are purportedly designed to discourage the use of bottled
water due in large part to concerns about the environmental effects of producing and discarding
large numbers of plastic bottles. While we have not to date directly experienced any adverse
effects from these concerns, and we believe that our products are sufficiently different from those
affected by recent enactments, there is no assurance that our products will not be subject to
future legislative and executive action by state and local governments, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities, including product
liability claims, and damage our reputation.
We are from time to time party to various litigation claims and legal proceedings. We
evaluate these claims and proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and
estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. If our products are not properly
manufactured or designed, personal injuries or property damage could result, which could subject us
to claims for damages. The costs associated with defending product liability and other claims, and
the payment of damages, could be substantial. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by
such claims, whether or not successful.
We may establish a reserve as appropriate based upon assessments and estimates in accordance
with our accounting policies. We base our assessments, estimates and disclosures on the
information available to us at the time and rely on legal and management judgment. Actual outcomes
or losses may differ materially from assessments and estimates. Actual settlements, judgments or
resolutions of these claims or proceedings may negatively affect our business and financial
performance. A successful claim against us that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our
available insurance limits could require us to make significant payments of damages and could
materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
The value of our common stock could be volatile.
The overall market and the price of our common stock may fluctuate greatly. The trading price
of our common stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including:
|
|
|
quarterly fluctuations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
changes in investors and analysts perception of the business risks and conditions of our
business; |
|
|
|
our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial
analysts or investors; |
|
|
|
|
unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity research analysts; |
|
|
|
termination of lock-up agreements or other restrictions on the ability of our existing
stockholders to sell their shares; and |
|
|
|
general economic or political conditions.
|
28
Future sales of our common stock, or the perception in the public markets that these sales may
occur, may depress our stock price.
Sales of a large number of our shares of common stock in the public market, or the perception
that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could
impair our ability to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem
appropriate. We had 19,431,101 shares of common stock outstanding at March 25, 2011, which
includes unvested restricted stock awards. The shares of common stock are freely tradable without
restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), except for any
shares of our common stock that may be held or acquired by our directors, executive officers and
other affiliates, as that term is defined in the Securities Act, which will be restricted
securities under the Securities Act. Restricted securities may not be sold in the public market
unless the sale is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is
available.
We, our executive officers, directors and certain stockholders (including Culligan
International Company) have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, with the underwriters in our
initial public offering not to offer, sell, contract to sell or otherwise dispose of any common
stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock through May 3, 2011
(subject to extension in certain circumstances). These shares represent approximately 49.9% of our
common stock (including shares issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants). Shares
representing an additional 3.6% of our common stock (including shares issuable upon the exercise of
options and warrants) are subject to comparable lock-up arrangements with the Company. As
restrictions on resale end, the market price of our common stock could decline if the holders of
the restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated may, in its sole discretion, release any of these shares from
these restrictions at any time without notice.
We have agreed with Culligan International Company to use our commercially reasonable efforts
to register for resale by May 4, 2011 all shares of our common stock we issued to Culligan
International Company in payment of a portion of the purchase price for the Refill Business and the
Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business.
We may issue additional shares of our capital stock to raise capital or complete acquisitions, which could be
dilutive to our stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 70,000,000 shares of common stock,
par value $0.001 per share. As of March 25, 2011, we had 19,431,101 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. If (i) our cash flows are less than we anticipate or we have less than expected availability under our
senior revolving credit facility, (ii) we choose to accelerate our rate of organic growth beyond its currently
anticipated level or (iii) we pursue additional strategic acquisitions, we may issue a substantial number of
additional shares of our common stock to raise capital or to fund such acquisitions. The issuance of additional
shares of our common stock may result in significant dilution to our existing stockholders and adversely affect
the prevailing market price for our common stock.
Concentration of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors and their affiliates
may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.
As of March 25, 2011, our executive officers, directors and their affiliates beneficially own,
in the aggregate, approximately 22.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock. In particular,
Billy D. Prim, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, beneficially owns approximately
12.7% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of March 25, 2011. In addition, Culligan
International Company owns approximately 14.9% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of
March 25, 2011. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise a significant level of
control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors,
amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions.
This control could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our Company or
changes in management and will make the approval of certain transactions difficult or impossible
without the support of these stockholders.
29
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable
research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that
securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We currently have research
coverage by a limited number securities and industry analysts. If one or more of the analysts who covers us
downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock
price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to
publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock
price and trading volume to decline.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay
acquisition attempts for us that you might consider favorable.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain
provisions that may make the acquisition of our Company more difficult without the approval of our
Board of Directors. These provisions:
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be
established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may
include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to
the rights of the holders of common stock; |
|
|
|
eliminate the ability of our stockholders to act by written consent in most circumstances; |
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of
Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder
meetings; |
|
|
|
provide that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our
amended and restated bylaws; and |
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors the members of which will serve staggered
three-year terms. |
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some stockholders holding more
than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without
approval of the holders of substantially all of our outstanding common stock.
These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay
or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our Company, including actions that our
stockholders may deem advantageous, or negatively affect the trading price of our common stock.
These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other
stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions
you desire.
If we do not timely satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
trading price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
As a company with publicly-traded securities, we are subject to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This law requires us to document and test the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting in accordance with an established internal control
framework and to report on our conclusion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. The cost to comply with this law will affect our net income adversely. Any
delays or difficulty in satisfying the requirements of Section 404 could, among other things, cause
investors to
lose confidence in, or otherwise be unable to rely on, the accuracy of our reported financial
information, which could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In addition,
failure to comply with Section 404 could result in The Nasdaq Stock Market imposing sanctions on
us, which could include the delisting of our common stock.
30
Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness
Restrictive covenants in our senior revolving credit facility restrict or prohibit our ability to
engage in or enter into a variety of transactions, which could adversely restrict our financial and
operating flexibility and subject us to other risks.
Our senior revolving credit facility contains various restrictive covenants that limit our and
our subsidiaries ability to take certain actions. In particular, these agreements limit our and
our subsidiaries ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
make restricted payments (including paying dividends on, redeeming or repurchasing capital
stock); |
|
|
|
make certain investments or acquisitions; |
|
|
|
create liens on our assets to secure debt; |
|
|
|
engage in certain types of transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
engage in sale-and-leaseback or similar transactions; and |
|
|
|
transfer or sell assets, merge, liquidate or wind-up. |
Any or all of these covenants could have a material adverse effect on our business by limiting
our ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition or other corporate opportunities
and to fund our operations. Our ability to close the acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve
Beverage Business is dependent on our receipt of the consent of our lenders under our senior
revolving credit facility. Any future debt could also contain financial and other covenants more
restrictive than those to be imposed under our senior revolving credit facility.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in any debt instrument governing our current or
future indebtedness could result in a default under that instrument and, due to customary
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could result in a default under any other debt
instrument that we may have. If the lenders under our indebtedness were to so accelerate the
payment of the indebtedness, we cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient
to repay in full our outstanding indebtedness, in which event we likely would seek reorganization
or protection under bankruptcy or other, similar laws.
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations. In addition, our
inability to generate sufficient cash flows to support operations and other activities without debt
financing could prevent future growth and success.
Our ability to generate cash, make scheduled payments or refinance our obligations depends on
our successful financial and operating performance. Our financial and operating performance, cash
flow and capital resources depend upon prevailing economic conditions and various financial,
business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our cash flow and capital
resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or
delay capital expenditures, sell material assets or operations, obtain additional capital or
restructure our debt, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that we would be
able to take any of these actions on terms acceptable to us, or at all, that these actions would
enable us to continue to satisfy our capital requirements or that these actions would be permitted
under the terms of our various debt agreements.
31
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows to support capital expansion, business
acquisition plans and general operating activities, and are unable obtain the necessary funding for
these items through debt financing, our business could be negatively affected and we may be unable
to expand into existing and new markets. Our ability to
generate cash flows is dependent in part upon obtaining necessary financing at favorable
interest rates. Interest rate fluctuations and other capital market conditions may prevent us from
doing so.
Global capital and credit market issues could negatively affect our liquidity, increase our costs
of borrowing and disrupt the operations of our suppliers, bottlers, distributors and customers.
The global capital and credit markets have experienced increased volatility and disruption in
recent years, making it more difficult for companies to access those markets. There can be no
assurance that continued or increased volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets
will not impair our liquidity or increase our costs of borrowing. Our business could also be
negatively impacted if our suppliers, bottlers, distributors or retail customers experience
disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy.
32
|
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, sales,
technical support and research and development facilities, are located in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina where we lease approximately 14,200 square feet under an agreement that expires on May 31,
2011. We also lease approximately 20,250 square feet of office and warehouse space in Eagan,
Minnesota under an agreement that expires in October 2014.
In addition we lease warehouse space in Winston-Salem and Wilmington, North Carolina;
Lakeland, Florida; and Petersburg, Virginia to support our Company-owned operations in these
regions. These facilities have lease expirations that vary from May 2011 to February 2013.
We believe that our current facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current needs,
and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate
expansion of our operations.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we are a party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings
arising from our normal business activities. We have not had, and we do not believe that we have
currently, any proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved) |
Not applicable.
33
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities |
We completed the initial public offering of our common stock on November 10, 2010. The
principal United States market on which the Companys common stock is listed and traded is the
Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol PRMW.
The table below presents the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as
reported on the Nasdaq Global Market for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter (Beginning November 5) |
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
11.53 |
|
We have never paid or declared cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to
retain any future earnings to finance the growth, development and expansion of our business.
Accordingly, we do not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our
Board of Directors and will depend upon various factors, including our results of operations,
financial condition, capital requirements, investment opportunities and other factors that our
Board of Directors deems relevant.
As of March 24, 2011, there were approximately 87 shareholders of record.
34
Performance Graph
The graph set forth below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock
between November 5, 2010 (the date our common stock began trading on The Nasdaq Global Market) and
December 31, 2010, with the cumulative total return of (i) the S&P smallcap 600 Index and (ii) the
S&P Foods and Packaging Index, over the same period. This graph assumes the investment of $100 on November 5,
2010 in each of our common stock at the closing price of $12.95 on such date, rather than the
initial public offering price of $12.00 per share, the S&P smallcap 600 Index and the S&P Foods and Packaging
Index and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any.
The comparisons shown in the graph below are based on historical data. We caution that the
stock price performance presented in the graph below is not necessarily indicative of, or is it
intended to forecast, the potential future performance of our common stock. Information used in the
graph was obtained from the Nasdaq Stock Market website, but we do not assume responsibility for
any errors or omissions in such information.
35
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Selected Financial Data |
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto contained in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
6,589 |
|
|
$ |
13,453 |
|
|
$ |
34,647 |
|
|
$ |
46,981 |
|
|
$ |
44,607 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
6,141 |
|
|
|
11,969 |
|
|
|
30,776 |
|
|
|
38,771 |
|
|
|
34,213 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
10,353 |
|
|
|
13,791 |
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
12,621 |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,681 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
4,205 |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
25,688 |
|
|
|
48,185 |
|
|
|
52,898 |
|
|
|
54,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(10,724 |
) |
|
|
(12,235 |
) |
|
|
(13,538 |
) |
|
|
(5,917 |
) |
|
|
(9,477 |
) |
Interest and other (expense) income, net |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(2,257 |
) |
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(10,608 |
) |
|
|
(12,170 |
) |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(10,608 |
) |
|
|
(12,170 |
) |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,904 |
) |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(10,608 |
) |
|
|
(14,074 |
) |
|
|
(19,346 |
) |
|
|
(11,824 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant modification charges |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(2,147 |
) |
|
|
(19,875 |
) |
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
|
|
(9,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(11,459 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(7.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.88 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.72 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.81 |
) |
Loss from
discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.32 |
) |
|
|
(3.96 |
) |
|
|
(2.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(7.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
7,638 |
|
|
$ |
5,776 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
20,904 |
|
|
|
21,909 |
|
|
|
30,570 |
|
|
|
22,368 |
|
|
|
139,611 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14,403 |
|
|
|
17,945 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
36
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion of the Companys financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
elsewhere in this report.
Overview
Primo Water Corporation is a rapidly growing provider of multi-gallon purified bottled water,
self-serve filtered drinking water, and water dispensers sold through major retailers in the United
States and Canada. Our business is designed to generate recurring demand for Primo purified bottled
water through the sale of our innovative water dispensers. Once our bottled water is consumed using
a water dispenser, empty bottles are either exchanged at our recycling center displays, which
provide a recycling ticket that offers a discount toward the purchase of a new bottle of Primo
purified water (exchange services) or they can be refilled at a self-serve filtered drinking water
vending location (refill services). We have created a nationwide single-vendor water bottle
exchange and self-serve filtered drinking water service for our retail customers that requires
minimal customer management supervision and store-based labor and provides centralized billing and
detailed performance reports. We deliver this service utilizing our current relationships with our
independent bottlers and independent distributors and our two Company-owned distribution operations
covering portions of four states, which we refer to collectively as our network. As of December
31, 2010, our Exchange and Refill services were offered in each of the contiguous United States and
in Canada at approximately 12,600 combined retail locations. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, we generated
net sales of $34.6 million, $47.0 million and $44.6 million, respectively.
On November 10, 2010, the Company completed the initial public offering (IPO) of 8.3 million
shares of its common stock at a price of $12.00 per share. In addition on November 18, 2010, the
Company issued an additional 1.3 million shares upon the exercise of the over-allotment option by
the underwriters of its IPO. The net proceeds of the IPO after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions were approximately $106.9 million.
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan
of Canada, Ltd. (the Refill Business or Refill Acquisition) pursuant to an Asset Purchase
Agreement dated June 1, 2010 for a purchase price of approximately $109.1 million. The purchase
price was paid by $74.5 million in proceeds from the IPO and the issuance of approximately 2.6
million shares of our common stock with a value of approximately $34.6 million based upon the
$13.38 average price of our common stock on November 10, 2010.
In addition to the acquisition of the Refill Business, we used the proceeds of our IPO along
with $15.0 million in borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility to: (i) repay the
outstanding borrowings under our prior senior loan agreement of approximately $7.9 million; (ii)
repay subordinated debt and accrued interest of approximately $18.7 million; (iii) redeem 50% of
the outstanding Series B preferred stock along with all unpaid and accrued dividends totaling
approximately $15.8 million; and (iv) to pay fees and expenses of approximately $5.0 million in
connection with all of the foregoing items.
Business Segments
At December 31, 2010, we had four operating segments and three reportable segments: Primo
Bottled Water Exchange (Exchange), Primo Refill (Refill) and Primo Products (Products).
However, with the acquisition of the Refill Business, we manage and view our business as Primo
Water (Water) related and Products related. Our Water operations consist of our Exchange, Refill
and an Other operating segment that does not meet quantitative thresholds for segment reporting.
As we further integrate the various Water operations we anticipate that we will have two reportable
segments in the future.
Our Exchange segment consists of our Primo exchange business, which sells three- and
five-gallon purified bottled water through retailers in each of the contiguous United States. Our
water bottle exchange service is offered through point of purchase display racks and recycling
centers that are prominently located at major retailers in space that is often underutilized.
37
Our Refill segment consists of our Refill Business, which provides a self-serve filtered
drinking water service, through retailers in the contiguous United States and Canada. Our refill
vending service provides filtered water through the installation and servicing of reverse osmosis
water filtration systems in the back room of the retailers store location. The refill vending
machine, which is typically accompanied by a sales display containing empty reusable bottles, is
located within the retailer customers floor space.
We service the Exchange and Refill retail locations through our network of primarily
independent bottlers and distributors. As of December 31, 2010, we offered our Exchange and Refill
services at approximately 12,600 combined locations.
Our Products segment sells water dispensers that are designed to dispense Primo and other
dispenser-compatible bottled water. Our Products sales are primarily generated through major U.S.
retailers. Our water dispensers are sold primarily through a direct-import model, where we
recognize revenues for the sale of the water dispensers when title is transferred to our retailer
customers. We support retail sell-through with limited domestic inventory.
We evaluate the financial results of these segments focusing primarily on segment net sales
and segment income (loss) from operations before depreciation and amortization (segment income
(loss) from operations). We utilize segment net sales and segment income (loss) from operations
because we believe they provide useful information for effectively allocating our resources between
business segments, evaluating the health of our business segments based on metrics that management
can actively influence and gauging our investments and our ability to service, incur or pay down
debt.
Cost of sales consists of costs for bottling and related packaging materials and distribution
costs for our bottled water for our Exchange services and servicing and material costs for our
Refill services. Cost of sales for Products consists of contract manufacturing, freight, duties and
warehousing costs of our water dispensers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for all segments consist primarily of personnel
costs for sales, marketing, operations support and customer service, as well as other supporting
costs for operating each segment.
Expenses not specifically related to operating segments are shown separately as Corporate.
Corporate expenses are comprised mainly of compensation and other related expenses for corporate
support, information systems, and human resources and administration. Corporate expenses also
include certain professional fees and expenses and compensation of our Board of Directors.
In this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
when we refer to same store sales, we are comparing retail locations at which our Exchange or
Refill service had been available for at least 12 months at the beginning of the relevant period.
In December 2009, we completed the divestiture of our former subsidiary, Prima Bottled Water,
Inc. (Prima), by distributing the stock in Prima to our existing stockholders on a pro rata basis
based upon each such stockholders proportionate ownership of our common stock, Series A preferred
stock and Series C preferred stock on an as-converted basis. The assets, liabilities and results of
operations of Prima are accounted for as discontinued operations. For 2008 and 2009, we recognized
losses from discontinued operations of $5.7 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
38
Recent Transactions
On March 8, 2011, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary Primo Refill Canada Corporation (Primo
Canada) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Culligan of Canada, Ltd. (the Seller) and
Culligan International Company (Culligan International and together with the Seller, the
Culligan Parties), pursuant to which Primo Canada purchased certain of the Sellers assets
related to its bulk water exchange business currently conducted in Canada (the Culligan Bulk Water
Exchange Business). The purchase price for the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business was
approximately $5.4 million, which consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1.6 million and the
issuance of 307,217 shares of the Companys common stock having a value of approximately $3.8
million (based upon a price per share equal to the average of the closing price of the Companys
common stock for the 20 trading days prior to the closing date), and the assumption of certain
specified liabilities (the Culligan Bulk Water Transaction). The Culligan Bulk Water Transaction
was intended to be effective from an economic standpoint as of December 31, 2010 and, as a result,
the cash portion of the purchase price was reduced by approximately $60,000 which the parties
mutually agreed represented a reasonable approximation of the net earnings of the Culligan Bulk
Water Exchange Business between January 1, 2011 and March 8, 2011. The Culligan Bulk Water Exchange
Business provides refill and delivery of water in 18-liter containers to commercial retailers in
Canada for resale to consumers.
On March 8, 2011, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary Primo Products, LLC (Primo Products)
entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC (Omnifrio). The
Omnifrio Asset Purchase Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
therein, Primo Products will purchase certain of Omnifrios intellectual property and other assets
(the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business) for a purchase price of up to $13.2 million, which
consists of:
|
|
|
a cash payment at closing of $2.0 million; |
|
|
|
|
the issuance at closing of 501,080 shares of the Companys common stock having a
value of approximately $6.2 million (based upon a price per share equal to the average
of the closing price of the Companys common stock for the 20 trading days prior to the
date of the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
a cash payment of $2.0 million on the 15-month anniversary of the closing date
(subject to the Companys setoff rights in the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
up to $3.0 million in cash milestone payments; and |
|
|
|
|
the assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business. |
The acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business is subject to conditions to
closing, including the Companys receipt of certain consents, and is expected to close in the
second quarter of 2011.
39
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
34,647 |
|
|
$ |
46,981 |
|
|
$ |
44,607 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
30,776 |
|
|
|
38,771 |
|
|
|
34,213 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,791 |
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
12,621 |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
4,205 |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
48,185 |
|
|
|
52,898 |
|
|
|
54,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(13,538 |
) |
|
|
(5,917 |
) |
|
|
(9,477 |
) |
Interest expense and other, net |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(2,257 |
) |
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(19,346 |
) |
|
|
(11,824 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant modification charges |
|
|
(19,875 |
) |
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
|
|
(9,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(39,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth our results of operations expressed as a percentage of net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Consolidated statements of operations data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
139.1 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(39.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
Interest expense and other, net |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(55.8 |
)% |
|
|
(25.2 |
)% |
|
|
(29.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
The following table sets forth our segment net sales and segment income (loss) from
operations presented on a segment basis and reconciled to our consolidated loss from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Segment net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
$ |
19,237 |
|
|
$ |
22,638 |
|
|
$ |
24,900 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,347 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,111 |
|
|
|
24,249 |
|
|
|
29,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
13,758 |
|
|
|
22,824 |
|
|
|
14,741 |
|
Inter-company elimination |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
34,647 |
|
|
$ |
46,981 |
|
|
$ |
44,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
$ |
(1,267 |
) |
|
$ |
3,374 |
|
|
$ |
3,183 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
Other |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
Inter-company elimination |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
(7,077 |
) |
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
|
|
(8,922 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(3,618 |
) |
|
|
(4,205 |
) |
|
|
(4,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
$ |
(13,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for 2010 decreased $2.4 million or 5.1% to $44.6 million from $47.0
million for 2009. The decrease in sales for 2010 resulted primarily from a 35.4% decrease in
Products sales offset by a 23.2% increase in Water operations sales, which included the Refill
Business for the period from November 10, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Water. Water net sales increased $5.6 million or 23.2% to $29.9 million, representing
67.0% of our total net sales for 2010. The increase for 2010 compared to the same period in 2009
was the result of a $2.3 million increase in Exchange net sales as well as the addition of the
Refill Business, which accounted for $3.3 million of the increase.
Exchange. The increase in Exchange net sales was the result of an approximately 11%
increase in water bottle units sold to approximately 4.3 million. The increase in units sold
was driven by an approximately 14% increase in exchange selling locations to approximately
8,000 at December 31, 2010 as well as an increase in same store units of approximately 5%
for 2010. The increase was offset slightly by a decrease in the average price per unit of
approximately 1.1% for 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease in average price per unit is the
result of a shift in mix of transactions to 73.6% exchange transactions and 26.4%
non-exchange transactions for 2010 compared to 70.9% exchange transactions and 29.1%
non-exchange transactions for 2009. The shift in the mix of transactions is due to the
increase in the overall
number of repeat consumers utilizing our three- and five-gallon water bottle exchange
service. We recognize approximately twice as much revenue on non-exchange transactions as we
do on exchange transactions as a result of the discount provided to consumers for the return
of an empty three- or five-gallon bottle in exchange for the purchase of a new three- or
five-gallon bottle of purified water. Adding new locations at which our water bottle
exchange service is offered is important to our strategy of penetrating more homes with our
water dispensers as expanded locations and increased water bottle availability enhance the
convenience of our service to consumers.
41
Refill. The acquisition of the Refill Business on November 10, 2010 provided us with an
established platform to expand into the self-serve filtered drinking water refill business.
The refill vending services are highly complementary to our water bottle exchange services
from both a product and operational perspective. For the period from the acquisition date
through December 31, 2010, the refill vending business generated $3.3 million in net sales
from approximately 4,600 locations.
Products. Products net sales decreased $8.1 million or 35.4% to $14.7 million,
representing 33.0% of our total net sales for 2010. The decrease is a result of a decrease in
the number of dispenser units sold by approximately 30.9% for 2010. We believe the decrease in
sales and units is primarily the result of retailers continuing to manage their inventory levels
in anticipation of a new product line, which began shipping in the fourth quarter of 2010. Sales
in the fourth quarter 2010 increased approximately 38% compared to the fourth quarter of 2009.
We believe sales at retail to end consumers increased 14% in 2010 compared to 2009. We
anticipate this overall trend of decreases in Product sales to reverse and expect to begin
increasing sales going forward as more customers begin to replenish their inventories with the
new product line.
Gross Margin. Our overall gross margin, defined as net sales less cost of sales, as a
percentage of net sales increased to 23.3% for 2010 from 17.5% for 2009.
Water. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales in Water increased to 32.2% for 2010 from
28.4% for 2009.
Exchange. This increase is partially due to Exchange continuing to see benefits from
supply chain improvements that increased the gross margin to 27.3% for 2010 from 26.6% for
2009. Gross margins continued to see improvements as we realized a full years worth of
benefits from these improvements.
Refill. The acquisition of the Refill Business provided gross margin of 54.0% during
the period from November 10, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Gross margins for both Exchange and Refill could be impacted in 2011 if fuel prices
continue to increase and effect freight and distribution costs negatively.
Products. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales in our Products segment decreased to
5.3% for 2010 from 5.6% for 2009. This decrease is due primarily to the mix of dispensers sold
during 2010 as compared to 2009. Our strategy is to sell our water dispensers at minimal
operating profit in order to increase home penetration, which we believe will lead to increased
recurring revenue, higher margin Water operations sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $2.7 million or 27.2% to $12.6 million for 2010. As a percentage of net sales, selling,
general and administrative expenses increased to 28.3% for 2010 from 21.1% for 2009.
Water. Selling, general and administrative expenses of Water increased $1.3 million or
34.8% to $4.8 million for 2010. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased to 16.2% for 2010 from 14.8% for 2009.
42
Exchange. The increase is primarily related to an increase in Exchange resulting from
an increase in marketing and sales efforts related to the addition of new locations in 2010.
Refill. In addition, the Refill Business added $0.4 million in additional selling,
general and administrative expenses during 2010.
As we integrate the operations of Exchange and Refill we anticipate selling, general and
administrative expenses to decrease as a percentage of revenues in the future.
Products. Selling, general and administrative expenses of our Products segment decreased
$0.2 million or 12.6% to $1.4 million for 2010. This decrease is primarily the result of reduced
advertising and marketing expenses in 2010 as compared to 2009. Selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of Products segment net sales increased to 9.2% for 2010
from 6.8% for 2009. The increase as a percentage of Products segment net sales is a result of
the 35.4% decrease in Product net sales.
Corporate. Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses, increased $1.6 million
or 34.3% to $6.4 million for 2010. Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of consolidated net sales increased to 14.4% for 2010 from 10.2% for 2009. The
increase resulted primarily from an increase in salaries and related payroll costs associated
with the additional employees hired in preparation for our IPO. Also, non-cash stock
compensation increased $0.4 million primarily as a result of the immediate vesting of all
unvested stock options upon the completion of the IPO. We expect to incur additional costs related to compliance, reporting and insurance in 2011, our first full year operating as a public company.
Acquisition Related Costs. Acquisition related costs totaled $2.5 million in 2010 and are
associated with the acquisition of our Refill Business. The acquisition related costs consist
primarily of a transaction fee of $1.5 million along with professional and other expenses of
approximately $0.6 million and severance costs of $0.4 million. We expect to incur acquisition
related costs in 2011 related to the integration of the Refill Business and the acquisitions
described in the Recent Transactions section above in the range of $1.0 to $2.0 million
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased 13.2% to $4.8 million
for 2010. The increase is primarily due to approximately $0.4 million in depreciation and
amortization related to the acquisition of the Refill Business, which included approximately $18.5
million in property and equipment and approximately $10.3 million in identifiable intangible
assets. We expect depreciation to increase in 2011 as a result of the impact of a full year of
depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition of the Refill Business as well as for
increases in capital expenditures related to the addition of new locations.
Interest (Expense) and Other Income, Net. Net interest expense increased to $3.4 million for
2010 from $2.3 million for 2009. The increase is a result of an increase in the use of debt to fund
business operations prior to our IPO in November 2010. In addition, the subordinated notes entered
into in December 2009 and September 2010, were at a higher interest then our previous debt. In
November 2010, in connection with the completion of our IPO, the subordinated notes were paid in
full and retired. We expect interest expense to decrease significantly for 2011 as a result of
lower debt levels and lower interest rates.
Preferred Dividends, Beneficial Conversion and Warrant Modification Charges. Preferred
dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant modification charges increased by $6.8 million in 2010
to $9.9 million. Dividends on our Series B preferred stock decreased $1.0 million to $2.0 million
for 2010. In January 2009, we offered holders of our Series B preferred stock the option to suspend
their current cash dividend payment of 10% in exchange for a dividend accrual of 15% for 2009. In
January 2010, the dividend accrual was reduced to 10% with no cash dividend until the Series B
preferred stock was converted or redeemed. In November 2010, in connection with the completion of
our IPO, 50% of Series B preferred stock was redeemed along with all unpaid and accrued dividends.
The remaining 50% of the Series B preferred stock was converted into shares of common stock.
The Company also incurred non-cash beneficial conversion charges of $2.9 million associated
with its Series B preferred stock and $2.4 million associated with its Series C preferred stock
upon the completion of its IPO in November 2010. In addition, for 2010, we incurred a $2.3 million
charge related to the modification to the terms of
warrants issued to the holders of Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock to
remove a provision that accelerated the termination of the warrants exercise period upon the
consummation of an IPO. The warrants will now expire on the date such warrants would have otherwise
expired absent an IPO. We do not expect to incur charges for dividends or beneficial conversion
charges in the future.
43
Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for 2009 increased $12.3 million or 35.6% to $47.0 million from $34.6
million in 2008. The increase in sales resulted primarily from a 65.9% increase in Products sales
and a 17.7% increase in Exchange sales.
Exchange. Exchange net sales increased $3.4 million or 17.7% to $22.6 million in 2009,
representing 48.2% of our total net sales in 2009. The increase was due to an increase in water
bottle units sold of approximately 0.6 million units or 19.8% to 3.9 million units sold in 2009.
The increase in units sold was driven by a same store sales increase of 7.9% as well as an 8.3%
increase in selling locations to approximately 7,000 at December 31, 2009. We believe the
increase in same store sales is primarily a result of two factors: first, the increase in water
dispenser sales results in an increasing number of consumers of three- and five-gallon bottled
water and second, as more consumers become aware of and participate in our exchange program at a
particular selling location, the number of water bottle units sold at that location typically
increases over comparable prior periods. During 2009, we added approximately 600 selling
locations as a result of both adding new retail customers and increased penetration with our
existing retail customers. The average price per unit decreased 1.7% in 2009 compared to 2008 as
a result of a shift in mix of transactions to 70.9% exchange and 29.1% non-exchange transactions
in 2009 compared to 63.2% exchange and 36.8% non-exchange transactions in 2008. The shift in the
mix of transactions is due to the increase in the overall number of repeat consumers utilizing
our three- and five-gallon bottled water exchange service compared to the number of consumers
that are new to our service. We recognize approximately twice as much revenue on non-exchange
transactions as we do on exchange transactions as a result of the discount provided to consumers
for the return of an empty three- or five-gallon bottle in exchange for the purchase of a new
three- or five-gallon bottle of purified water.
Products. Products net sales increased $9.1 million or 65.9% to $22.8 million in 2009,
representing 48.6% of our total net sales in 2009. Dispenser sales increased 95,000 units or 53%
to approximately 272,000 units in 2009. The increase in sales and units in 2009 is primarily a
result of a greater than 100% increase in the number of retail locations offering our dispensers
to approximately 5,500 at December 31, 2009. The difference in growth rates in net sales
compared to the number of retail locations at which our water dispensers are offered is the
result of retail locations being added during the course of the year which did not sell our
water dispensers during the entire twelve-month period. As a result, during a period in which we
experience rapid growth in the number of retail locations at which our water dispensers are
offered, there is a delay before the full effect of these additional retail locations is
reflected in our net sales. In addition, we successfully launched several new water dispenser
models which accounted for approximately 48% of the total units sold in 2009.
Gross Margin. Our overall gross margin, defined as net sales less cost of sales, as a
percentage of net sales increased to 17.5% for 2009 from 11.2% for 2008.
Exchange. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales in our Exchange segment increased to
26.6% for 2009 from 15.2% in 2008 due primarily to decreased freight costs as a result of the
addition of bottling and distribution capabilities during 2008 for which we received a full-year
benefit in 2009. With these additions we believe we have sufficient bottling and distribution
capabilities to service our continued growth.
Products. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales in our Products segment improved to
5.6% for 2009 from 0.5% in 2008 due primarily to improved pricing from retailers. Our strategy
is to sell our water dispensers at minimal operating profit in order to increase home
penetration, which we believe will lead to increased recurring-revenue, higher margin Exchange
sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for
2009 decreased $3.9 million or 28.1% to $9.9 million from $13.8 million and, as a percentage of net
sales, decreased to 21.1% for 2009 from 39.8% for 2008.
44
Exchange. Selling, general and administrative expenses of our Exchange segment decreased
$1.5 million or 36.8% to $2.6 million from $4.2 million and as a percentage of Exchange segment
net sales decreased to 11.7% in 2009 from 21.8% in 2008. The decrease is due to lower
employee-related costs as a result of a reduction in headcount of seven employees as well as
reduced levels of consulting fees and related travel and benefit costs resulting in
approximately $1.0 million of the overall reduction of selling, general and administrative
expenses. The additional personnel resources were related to our efforts in 2008 to expand our
supply chain with more bottling and distribution capacity. During 2009 we were able to reduce
these personnel resources when our supply chain reached what we believe to be an appropriate
size. We were able to significantly grow our Exchange segment net sales and gross margins in
2009 despite the reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Products. Selling, general and administrative expenses of our Products segment decreased as
a percentage of Products segment net sales to 6.8% in 2009 from 11.1% in 2008. Our Products
segment was able to significantly increase sales without the need for additional headcount or
selling, general and administrative costs.
Corporate. Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses for 2009, decreased $2.3
million or 32.3% to $4.8 million from $7.1 million, and as a percent of consolidated net sales
decreased to 10.2% for 2009 from 20.4% in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to lower
employee-related costs as a result of a reduction in headcount of nine employees as well as
reduced levels of consulting fees and related travel and benefit costs resulting in about $1.6
million of the overall reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses. The additional
resources were related to our efforts in 2008 to expand our information system and financial
infrastructure as well as our efforts to establish new business segments.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.6 million or 16.2%
to $4.2 million in 2009 from $3.6 million in 2008. The increase is the result of a full year of
depreciation on the $8.3 million of capital expenditures in 2008.
Interest (Expense) and Other Income, Net. Net interest expense for 2009 increased to $2.3
million from $70,000 in 2008 as a result of increased use of debt to fund business operations.
Preferred Dividends and Beneficial Conversion Charge. Dividends on our Series B preferred
stock increased $0.7 million to $3.0 million in 2009 from $2.3 million in 2008. In January 2009, we
offered holders of our Series B preferred stock the option to suspend their current cash dividend
payment of 10% in exchange for a dividend accrual of 15% for 2009. Cash dividends paid on our
Series B preferred stock during 2009 and 2008 were $1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008 the accrued and unpaid dividends on our Series B preferred stock were
$2.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, which is included in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. Our Series C preferred stock was convertible
into common stock at a ratio of 1:0.184, which was based upon a formula taking into account sales
for 2008, compared to the original conversion ratio of 1:0.096. The change in the conversion
resulted in a $17.6 million beneficial conversion or deemed dividend on the Series C preferred
stock for 2008, which is included in the $19.9 million preferred dividends and beneficial
conversion charge in 2008.
45
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table shows the components of our cash flows for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(11,832 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,972 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,871 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
(9,628 |
) |
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
(80,967 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
24,361 |
|
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
89,277 |
|
Since our inception we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of stock,
the issuance of debt and borrowings under credit facilities. On November 10, 2010, we completed an
IPO of 8.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $12.00 per share. In addition, on
November 18, 2010, we issued an additional 1.3 million shares upon the exercise of the
over-allotment option by the underwriters of our IPO. The net proceeds of the IPO after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions were approximately $106.9 million.
At December 31, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity were accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts, of $6.6 million, cash of $0.4 million and borrowing availability
under our senior revolving credit facility of $10.0 million. During 2009, the primary source of
capital was proceeds from the issuance of long term debt and, as of December 31, 2009, we had an
outstanding debt balance of $14.8 million, net of a $0.6 million discount. During 2008, our primary
source of capital was the proceeds of preferred stock issuances of $19.6 million. Additionally,
during 2008 we made borrowings under our current senior revolving credit facility, which had a
balance of $7.0 million at December 31, 2008.
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
During 2010, we used $7.9 million in operations primarily as a result of a $12.9 million loss
from continuing operations and a $1.6 million increase in working capital components, offset by
non-cash depreciation and amortization of $4.8 million, non-cash interest expense of $1.2 million
and stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million.
Net cash used in operating activities was $2.0 million for 2009 and $11.8 million for 2008.
For 2009, net cash used in operations was primarily the result of an $8.2 million loss from
continuing operations, partially offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization of $4.2 million,
non-cash interest expense of $0.7 million related to our long term debt issuances and reduction in
working capital components of $0.8 million. For 2008, net cash used in operations was primarily the
result of a $13.6 million loss from continuing operations, partially offset by depreciation and
amortization of $3.6 million. Additional working capital for accounts receivable and inventory due
to revenue growth resulted in a use of cash of $1.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and was
partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $1.1 million.
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During 2010, cash used in investing activities was $81.0 million primarily as a result of our
acquisition of the Refill Business. On November 10, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the
Refill Business for a total purchase price of $109.1 million, which was paid by $74.5 million in
proceeds from our IPO and the issuance of approximately 2.6 million common shares. Other investing
activities included capital expenditures for property, equipment and bottles of $6.4 million. Our
capital expenditures are primarily for the installation of our recycle centers and display racks at
new locations that offer our water bottle exchange service as well as related transportation racks
and bottles. We also invest in technology infrastructure to manage our distribution network.
During 2009 and 2008 cash flows from investing activities were primarily a result of capital
expenditures for property and equipment and bottles of $2.4 million, $9.4 million, respectively.
46
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During 2010, cash provided by financing activities was primarily from our issuance of common
stock in connection with our IPO. The proceeds from the IPO, net of underwriting discounts,
commissions and issuance costs were $104.2 million. On November 10, 2010, we used the proceeds of
our IPO along with $15.0 million in borrowings under our new senior revolving credit facility to:
(i) repay outstanding borrowings under our prior senior loan agreement of approximately $7.9
million; (ii) repay subordinated debt and accrued interest of approximately $18.7 million; (iii)
redeem 50% of the outstanding Series B preferred stock along with all unpaid and accrued dividends
totaling approximately $15.8 million; and (iv) pay fees and expenses of approximately $5.0 million
in connection with all of the foregoing items.
Prior to our IPO we had net borrowings under our prior senior loan agreement of approximately
$6.5 million and had borrowings from subordinated debt of $3.4 million. We also paid dividends of
approximately $0.2 million prior to our IPO. Subsequent to our IPO we had borrowings of $15.3
million and payments of $13.3 million under our new senior revolving credit facility. We also
incurred $1.5 million in costs associated with our new senior revolving credit facility.
For 2009, financing activities were primarily the issuance of long term debt of $20.4 million
that was partially offset by payments of $6.6 million on our prior senior loan agreement, payments
of $5.4 million related to other long term debt, Series B preferred stock dividend payments of $1.3
million and payment of debt issuance costs of $0.6 million. The cash component of our Series B
preferred stock dividends was partially reduced in 2009 and accrued as opposed to paid currently.
For 2008, financing activities were primarily the issuance of preferred stock of $19.6 million
and borrowings of $7.0 million on our prior senior loan agreement that were partially offset by
payments of $2.3 million of Series B preferred stock dividends.
Senior Revolving Credit Facility
On November 10, 2010, we closed our IPO and entered into a $40.0 million senior revolving
credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and Branch
Banking & Trust Company (Senior Revolving Credit Facility) that replaced our Senior Loan
Agreement. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility has a three-year term and is secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Company.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility is payable
at our option at either a floating base rate plus an interest rate spread or a floating rate of
LIBOR plus an interest rate spread. Both the interest rate spreads and the commitment fee rate are
determined from a pricing grid based on our total leverage ratio. The Senior Revolving Credit
Facility also provides for letters of credit issued to our vendors, which reduce the amount
available for cash borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee on the unused amounts of the
commitments under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility. At December 31, 2010, the base rate and
floating LIBOR borrowings outstanding were $2.9 million and $15.0 million, respectively, at
interest rates of 5.25% and 3.27%, respectively. At December 31, 2010, there were no outstanding
letters of credit under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility. The availability under the Senior
Revolving Credit Facility was approximately $10.0 million, based upon the maximum leverage ratio
allowed at December 31, 2010.
The Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains various restrictive covenants and the following
financial covenants: (i) a maximum total leverage ratio that is initially set at 3.5 to 1.0 and
step downs to 2.5 to 1.0 for the quarter ending December 31, 2011; (ii) a minimum EBITDA threshold
initially set at $6.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 and increasing for the two
quarters thereafter; (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 beginning with the
quarter ended September 30, 2011; and (iv) a maximum amount of capital expenditures of $6.0 million
for the period from closing to December 31, 2010 and increasing to $25.0 million for the year
ending
December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2010, the Company is in compliance with all the terms and
conditions of the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
47
Prior Senior Loan Agreement
In June 2005, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement that was subsequently amended (the
Prior Senior Loan Agreement). The facility provided for an up to $10.0 million revolving loan
commitment (the Revolver). The Revolver was subject to certain borrowing base restrictions based
on eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory less reserves, and the aggregate face amount of
undrawn trade letters of credit of which the Company was the beneficiary. The Revolver also
provided for letters of credit issued to our vendors, which reduced the amount available for cash
borrowings. The Seventh Amendment to the Senior Loan Agreement extended the term of the agreement
to January 30, 2011, allowed for up to a $3.0 million over-advance (Overadvance Line), which was
guaranteed by our CEO, and amended the agreements financial covenants. At December 31, 2009,
there were outstanding letters of credit under the Revolver totaling approximately $371,000. In
connection with the completion of our IPO, the Prior Senior Loan Agreement was paid in full and
replaced with the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Revolver were payable quarterly at the option
of the Company at (i) the LIBOR Market Index Rate (LMIR) plus the applicable margin or (ii) the
greater of (a) the federal funds rate plus .50% or (b) the banks prime rate plus in either case
the applicable margin. At December 31, 2009, the interest rate on the outstanding balance on the
Revolver was based on the banks prime rate plus 2.50% (5.75% at December 31, 2009).
The Overadvance Line was personally guaranteed by Billy Prim, our Chief Executive Officer. As
an inducement to Mr. Prim to guarantee the $3.0 million Overadvance Line, the Company issued Mr.
Prim $150,000 of restricted stock (12,500 shares) with the per share value equal to the initial
public offering price of $12.00 per share. The restricted stock was issued in November 2010 and
vested in full on January 2, 2011. The award of restricted stock was approved by the independent
members of the board of directors and the amount of the award was based upon 5% of the guaranteed
obligations (which the board members believed was an appropriate amount in light of their
experience with similar transactions and representative of a 2.5% commitment fee and a 2.5%
draw-down fee).
14% Subordinated Convertible Notes due March 31, 2011
In December 2009 and October 2010, we issued our 14% subordinated convertible notes due March
31, 2011 (Notes) to 34 investors, including existing stockholders, affiliates of existing
stockholders and senior management. The Notes had a total face value of $18.4 million and were
subordinated to the Prior Senior Loan Agreement. The Notes paid quarterly interest at 14% and were
paid in full in November 2010 using the proceeds from our IPO and closing of the Senior Revolving
Credit Facility.
Warrants to purchase 130,747 shares of our common stock were issued in connection with the
Notes. The initial fair value of the warrants was approximately $0.7 million and resulted in an
original issue discount on the Notes that was amortized into interest expense over the term of the
Notes with the unamortized balance being expensed when the Notes were paid in full in November
2010. The fair value of the warrants was initially included in other long-term liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet based upon estimated fair value as adjusted periodically until such time
that the exercise price became fixed at the IPO date, at which time the then fair value was
reclassified as a component of stockholders equity (deficit). In connection with our IPO the
exercise price per share of the warrants was fixed at $9.60, or 80% of the initial public offering
price per share of our common stock.
48
Adequacy of Capital Resources
Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now anticipated and will depend
on many factors, including acquisitions of other businesses, the rate of growth in new locations
and related display and rack costs, cost to develop new water dispensers, sales and marketing
resources needed to further penetrate our markets, the expansion of our operations in the United
States and Canada as well as the response of competitors to our solutions and products.
Historically, we have experienced increases in our capital expenditures consistent with the growth
in our operations and personnel, and we anticipate that our expenditures will continue to increase
as we grow our business.
While we had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2010, we do
anticipate incurring between $17.0 million and $20.0 million of capital expenditures related to our
anticipated growth in locations and new water dispenser lines for 2011. In addition, in connection
with the acquisition of the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business and the anticipated acquisition
of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business, both described herein, we expect to make cash
payments of approximately $6.6 million in 2011.
We anticipate having between $5.0 million and $10.0 million in availability under our Senior
Revolving Credit Facility during 2011. We believe our cash, funds available under our Senior
Revolving Credit Facility and future cash flows from our operations will be sufficient to meet our
currently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next
twelve months.
During the last three years, trends and conditions in the retail environment and credit
markets, inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on our business and we do not
expect that these trends and conditions, inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or
undisclosed borrowings or debt. Additionally, we are not a party to any derivative contracts or
synthetic leases.
Contractual and Commercial Commitment Summary
Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2010 are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
1 3 |
|
|
4 5 |
|
|
Than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
17,912 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,912 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payment obligations (1) |
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,808 |
|
|
$ |
1,361 |
|
|
$ |
20,118 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents estimated interest payments to be made on our long term debt, capital leases
and notes payable. All interest payments assume that principal payments are made as
originally scheduled. Interest rates utilized to determine interest payments for our
variable rate long-term debt are based upon our outstanding balances and their current
interest rates. |
49
Inflation
During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on
our business and we do not expect that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
Seasonality
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our sales
and operating income. Our sales and operating income have been highest in the spring and summer,
and lowest in the fall and winter. Our Water operations, which generally enjoys higher margins than
our Products segment, experiences higher sales and operating income in the spring and summer. Our
Products segment had historically experienced higher sales and operating income in spring and
summer, however, we believe the seasonality of this segment will be more dependent on retailer
inventory management and purchasing cycles and not correlated to weather. Sustained periods of poor
weather, particularly in the spring and summer, can negatively impact our sales in our higher
margin Water segment. Accordingly, our results of operations in any quarter will not necessarily be
indicative of the results that we may achieve for a fiscal year or any future quarter.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our consolidated financial statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make certain
estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used
to determine certain amounts that affect the financial statements are reasonable, based on
information available at the time they are made. To the extent there are material differences
between these estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual results, our consolidated financial
statements may be affected. Some of the more significant estimates include allowances for doubtful
accounts, valuation of inventories, depreciation, valuation of intangible assets and goodwill,
valuation of deferred taxes and allowance for sales returns.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized for the sale of three- and five-gallon purified
bottled water upon either the delivery of inventory to the retail stores or the purchase by the
consumer. Revenue is either recognized as an exchange transaction (where a discount is provided on
the purchase of a three- or five-gallon bottle of purified water for the return of an empty three-
or five-gallon bottle) or a non-exchange transaction. Revenues on exchange transactions are
recognized net of the exchange discount. Self-serve filtered water revenue is recognized at the
time the water is filtered which is measured by the water dispensing equipment meter. Our water
dispensers are sold primarily through a direct-import model, where we recognize revenue when title
is transferred to our retail customers. We have no contractual obligation to accept returns of
water dispensers nor do we guarantee water dispenser sales. However, we will at times accept
returns or issue credits for water dispensers that have manufacturer defects or that were damaged
in transit. Revenues of water dispensers are recognized net of an estimated allowance for returns
using an average return rate based upon historical experience. In addition, we offer certain
incentives such as coupons and rebates that are netted against and reduce net sales in the
consolidated statements of operations. Historically, these incentives have not been material to the
overall consolidated results of operations. With the purchase of certain of our water dispensers we
include a coupon for a free three- or five-gallon bottle of water. No revenue is recognized with
respect to the redemption of the coupon for a free three- and five-gallon bottle of water and the
estimated cost of the three- and five-gallon bottle of water is included in cost of sales.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from our retail customers inability to pay us. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is based on a review of specifically identified accounts in addition to an overall aging
analysis. Judgments are made with respect to the collectability of accounts receivable based on
historical experience and current economic trends. Actual losses could differ from those estimates.
50
Long-Lived Assets. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is not
recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the
use and eventual disposition of the asset at the date it is tested for recoverability, whether in
use or under development. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount
of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. We recorded an impairment charge in 2008 of $98,000,
related to display racks no longer in use and to be disposed.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We classify intangible assets into three categories: (1)
intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization, (2) intangible assets with
indefinite lives not subject to amortization and (3) goodwill. We determine the useful lives of our
identifiable intangible assets after considering the specific facts and circumstances related to
each intangible asset. Factors we consider when determining useful lives include the contractual
term of any agreement related to the asset, the historical performance of the asset, the Companys
long-term strategy for using the asset, any laws or other local regulations which could impact the
useful life of the asset, and other economic factors, including competition and specific market
conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized, primarily on a
straight-line basis, over their useful lives.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives, including trademarks and
goodwill, for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that
assets might be impaired. Our Company performs these annual impairment reviews as of the first day
of our fourth quarter. The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary.
The first step involves a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value.
The fair value is estimated based on a number of factors including operating results, business
plans and future cash flows. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
the second step of the process is performed which compares the implied value of the reporting unit
goodwill with the carrying value of the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of
the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. No impairment charge was considered necessary
at December 31, 2010. For indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that
excess. Intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment on an annual basis
or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax
bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to
the extent that utilization is not presently more likely than not.
As required by Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740-10, we recognize the financial
statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would
more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the
more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest
benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement
with the relevant tax authority.
Stock-Based Compensation. We account for our stock-based employee and director compensation
plans in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires recognition of
the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the
financial statements over the period the employee is required to perform the services in exchange
for the award (presumptively the vesting period).
In 2008, 2009 and 2010 compensation expense related to stock options was approximately
$215,000, $298,000 and $387,000 and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses
from continuing operations, respectively, and approximately $61,000, $80,000 and $0 is included in
discontinued operations, respectively.
51
We measure the fair value of each stock option grant at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average fair value per share of the options
granted during 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $8.66, $5.11, and $6.16, respectively. The following
assumptions were used in arriving at the fair value of options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Expected life of options in years |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of our stock
options. The estimated pre-vesting forfeiture rate is based on our historical experience. The
expected term of the options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee
exercise behavior. As a non-public entity, historic volatility is not available for our shares. As
a result, we estimated volatility based on a peer group of companies, which we believe collectively
provide a reasonable basis for estimating volatility. We intend to continue to consistently use the
same group of publicly traded peer companies to determine volatility in the future until sufficient
information regarding volatility of our share price becomes available or the selected companies are
no longer suitable for this purpose. We do not expect to declare dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future. As of each stock option grant date, we considered the fair value of the
underlying common stock, determined as described below, in order to establish the option exercise
price.
During 2009, a total of 13,608 common stock options were granted, all on one date during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, at an exercise price of $13.04 per share. The estimated fair value of
our common stock on the issuance date was $13.04 per share. During 2010, a total of 31,145 common
stock options were granted, all in the first quarter of 2010, at an exercise price of $12.84 per
share. The estimated fair value of our common stock on the issuance date was $12.84 per share.
In April 2010, the Board of Directors approved the 100% vesting of all unvested stock option
awards upon the successful completion of an IPO of the Companys common stock. The IPO was
completed in November 2010 and all unrecognized compensation cost related to the stock option
awards that became 100% vested was expensed in the fourth quarter. At December 31, 2010, we had
approximately 304,000 stock options outstanding, all of which were vested with an intrinsic value
of approximately $653,000.
In addition, we granted 105,636 shares of restricted stock that generally cliff-vest over a
three-year period and we recognized compensation expense of approximately $298,000 related to these
awards, which is included in selling, general, and administrative expenses from continuing
operations. In addition, in connection with the guarantee of the $3.0 million over-advance line of
our Prior Senior Loan Agreement by our CEO, we granted a restricted stock award, in the fourth
quarter of 2010, which vests in January 2011. The value of the restricted stock was $150,000,
based upon our IPO price of $12.00 per share, and was expensed in 2010 as part of the issuance cost
of the Prior Senior Loan Agreement.
Significant Factors Used in Determining Fair Value of Our Common Stock. The fair value of the
shares of common stock that underlie the stock options we have granted has historically been
determined by our board of directors based upon information available to it at the time of grant.
Because, prior to our IPO, there was no public market for our common stock, our board of directors
has determined the fair value of our common stock by utilizing, among other things, recent or
contemporaneous valuation information from negotiated equity transactions with third parties or
third party valuations. The valuation information included reviews of our business and general
economic, market and other conditions that could be reasonably evaluated at that time, including
our financial results, business agreements, intellectual property and capital structure. These
valuation approaches are based on a number of assumptions, including our future sales and industry,
general economic, market and other conditions that could reasonably be evaluated at the time of the
valuation.
52
For the 13,607 stock options granted on one date in the first quarter of 2009, the fair value
of our common stock was determined by the board of directors to be $13.04 per share. The fair value
was based in part upon the finalization of the conversion ratio of the Series C Preferred Stock on
December 31, 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock was issued in an arms-length transaction primarily
to unrelated third parties in 2008 with an initial conversion to common stock ratio of 1:0.096 or
$25.04 per share. However, the Series C Preferred Stock contained a beneficial conversion feature
that was negotiated with the primarily unrelated third parties that adjusted and was finalized
based upon the consolidated net sales for the year ending December 31, 2008. The adjusted
conversion ratio was 1:0.184 or $13.04 per share. In addition, the board of directors considered
the Companys most recent independent valuation and then current expectations of the Companys
future performance in determining that $13.04 per share was a reasonable fair valuation of common
stock at December 31, 2008 and that there were not any significant changes in the business or
results of operations from December 31, 2008 to the date in the first quarter of 2009 the stock
options were issued that would change that estimated fair value.
For the 31,146 stock options and 105,636 restricted stock awards granted during the first
quarter of 2010, the fair value of our common stock was determined by the board of directors to be
$12.84 per share. The fair value was based upon a valuation obtained by the Company from an
unrelated party in December 2009 that determined the fair value of the Companys common stock to be
$12.84 per share. The fair value method utilized by the unrelated party was the income approach.
The income approach recognizes that the current value is premised upon the expected receipt of
future economic benefits or cash flows. The fair value is developed utilizing managements
estimates of expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present value utilizing a
discount rate of 20.0%. In addition, there were not any significant changes in the business,
results of operations or expected future cash flows from the valuation date in December 2009 to the
dates in the first quarter of 2010 the stock options and restricted stock awards were granted that
would change the estimated fair value.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-28 When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This update provides amendments to ASC
Topic 350 Intangibles, Goodwill and Other that requires an entity to perform Step 2 impairment
test even if a reporting unit has zero or negative carrying amount. The first step is to identify
potential impairments by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying
value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair
value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step is
to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit s goodwill, measured in the same manner
as goodwill is recognized in a business combination, and compare that amount with the carrying
amount of the goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
ASU No. 2010-28 is effective beginning January 1, 2011. As a result of this standard, goodwill
impairments may be reported sooner than under current practice. We do not expect ASU No. 2010-28 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which contains updated accounting guidance to
clarify the acquisition date that should be used for reporting pro forma financial information when
comparative financial statements are issued. This update requires that a company should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred
during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting
period only. This update also requires disclosure of the nature and amount of material,
nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. The provisions of this update, which are to be applied
prospectively, are effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010,
with early adoption permitted. The impact of this update on the Company s consolidated financial
statements will depend on the size and nature of future business combinations.
53
|
|
|
Item 7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Sensitivity Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates on borrowings under our
Senior Revolving Credit Facility. Our Senior Revolving Credit Facility bears interest based on
LIBOR or the prime rate plus in each case an applicable margin. To quantify our exposure to
interest rate risk, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have increased interest
expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010 by approximately $29,000, $132,000
and $204,000, respectively. Actual changes in interest rates may differ materially from the
hypothetical assumptions used in computing this exposure.
Diesel Fuel Price Fluctuation Risk
We are impacted by fluctuations in diesel fuel prices with our company-owned operations and
distribution network. To quantify our exposure to diesel fuel prices, a $0.42 increase in diesel
prices would have an approximate 1.0% impact on our Exchange gross margin.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our results of operations and cash flows are not materially affected by fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates.
54
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements
55
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
6,605 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
12,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottles, net |
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
14,321 |
|
|
|
34,890 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
11,039 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,415 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,368 |
|
|
$ |
139,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,547 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
2,923 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
7,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
14,403 |
|
|
|
17,945 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
22,777 |
|
|
|
26,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value -70,000 shares authorized,
1,453 and 19,021 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value - 65,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock, 18,755 and 0 shares issued and
outstanding
at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, 23,280 and 0 shares issued and
outstanding
at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Series C preferred stock, 12,520 and 0 shares issued and
outstanding
at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
86,737 |
|
|
|
220,125 |
|
Common stock warrants |
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(90,999 |
) |
|
|
(113,723 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
113,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
$ |
22,368 |
|
|
$ |
139,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
56
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
34,647 |
|
|
$ |
46,981 |
|
|
$ |
44,607 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
30,776 |
|
|
|
38,771 |
|
|
|
34,213 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,791 |
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
12,621 |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
4,205 |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
48,185 |
|
|
|
52,898 |
|
|
|
54,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(13,538 |
) |
|
|
(5,917 |
) |
|
|
(9,477 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
|
|
(3,431 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(19,346 |
) |
|
|
(11,824 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant
modification charges |
|
|
(19,875 |
) |
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
|
|
(9,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(39,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(23.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.72 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.81 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
|
(3.96 |
) |
|
|
(2.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(27.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
57
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Series A |
|
|
Series B |
|
|
Series C |
|
|
Subscriptions |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
23,280 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
4,515 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
|
$ |
49,786 |
|
|
$ |
3,433 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(34,862 |
) |
|
$ |
17,916 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock, Series C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,005 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
18,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,232 |
|
Warrants attached to Series C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
Warrants issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense,
net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
Beneficial conversion feature of
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,346 |
) |
|
|
(19,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
23,280 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,357 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,083 |
) |
|
|
16,127 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense,
net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
Dividend of subsidiary stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,050 |
) |
|
|
(2,050 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,824 |
) |
|
|
(11,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
23,280 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,737 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,999 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense,
net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685 |
|
Restricted stock vesting |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
9,583 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,089 |
|
Issuance of common stock in connection
with the acquisition |
|
|
2,588 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,621 |
|
Beneficial conversion feature of
Series B Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature of
Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(18,755 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,520 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Series B Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640 |
) |
Warrant modification charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722 |
|
Warrant expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
|
|
(2,003 |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
19,021 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,125 |
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(113,723 |
) |
|
|
113,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
58
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(19,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,893 |
) |
Less: Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(13,608 |
) |
|
|
(8,174 |
) |
|
|
(12,893 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
4,205 |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Other |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(1,277 |
) |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(11,832 |
) |
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
|
|
(7,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(8,331 |
) |
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
(4,938 |
) |
Purchases of bottles, net of disposals |
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Refill Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,474 |
) |
Additions to and acquisitions of intangible assets |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(9,628 |
) |
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
(80,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings from (payments on) revolving line of credit |
|
|
7,004 |
|
|
|
(6,580 |
) |
|
|
489 |
|
Issuance of long term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,350 |
|
|
|
33,668 |
|
Long term debt payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,668 |
) |
Note payable and capital lease payments |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(5,353 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
Net change in book overdraft |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,194 |
|
Prepaid equity issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Redemption of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
19,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
(4,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
24,361 |
|
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
89,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash from continuing operations |
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
Cash, beginning of period |
|
|
5,776 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Cash used in discontinued operations from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
(6,764 |
) |
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
(8,161 |
) |
|
|
(2,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period |
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
59
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Primo Water Corporation (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, Primo, we, our,
the Company) is a rapidly growing provider of three- and five-gallon purified bottled water,
self-serve filtered drinking water and water dispensers sold through major retailers in the United
States and Canada.
Initial Public Offering and Acquisition
On November 10, 2010, the Company completed the initial public offering (IPO) of 8,333
shares of its common stock at a price of $12.00 per share. In addition on November 18, 2010, the
Company issued an additional 1,250 shares upon the exercise of the over-allotment option by the
underwriters of its IPO. The net proceeds of the IPO after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions were approximately $106,900.
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan
of Canada, Ltd. (the Refill Business or Refill Acquisition) pursuant to an Asset Purchase
Agreement dated June 1, 2010 (the Asset Purchase Agreement). The total purchase price for the
Refill Business was approximately $109,095 (including the working capital adjustment), which was
paid with $74,474 in proceeds from the IPO and $34,621 from the issuance of approximately 2,588
common shares at an average price of $13.38 per share on November 10, 2010.
In addition to the acquisition of the Refill Business, we used the proceeds of our IPO along
with $15,000 in borrowings under our new senior revolving credit facility to: (i) repay the
outstanding borrowings under our prior senior loan agreement of approximately $7,900; (ii) repay
subordinated debt and accrued interest of approximately $18,700; (iii) redeem 50% of the
outstanding Series B preferred stock along with all unpaid and accrued dividends totaling
approximately $15,800; and (iv) to pay fees and expenses of approximately $5,000 in connection with
all of the foregoing items.
Principles of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Our consolidated statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States (GAAP).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make
certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and
assumptions used to determine certain amounts that affect the financial statements are reasonable,
based on information available at the time they are made.
To the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our
consolidated financial statements may be affected. Some of the more significant estimates include
allowances for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventories, depreciation, valuation of intangible
assets, valuation of deferred taxes and allowance for sales returns.
60
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized for the sale of three- and five-gallon purified bottled water upon
either the delivery of inventory to the retail store or the purchase by the consumer. Revenue is
either recognized as an exchange transaction (where a discount is provided on the purchase of a
three- or five-gallon bottle of purified water for the return of an empty three- or five-gallon
bottle) or a non-exchange transaction. Revenues on exchange transactions are recognized net of the
exchange discount. Self-serve filtered water revenue is recognized at the time the water is
filtered which is measured by the water dispensing equipment meter.
Our water dispensers are sold primarily through a direct-import model, where we recognize
revenue when title is transferred to our retail customers. We have no contractual obligation to
accept returns of water dispensers nor do we guarantee water dispenser sales. However, we will at
times accept returns or issue credits for water dispensers that have manufacturer defects or that
were damaged in transit. Revenues of water dispensers are recognized net of an estimated allowance
for returns using an average return rate based upon historical experience.
In addition, we offer certain incentives such as coupons and rebates that are netted against
and reduce net sales in the consolidated statements of operations. With the purchase of certain of
our water dispensers we include a coupon for a free three- or five-gallon bottle of water. No
revenue is recognized with respect to the redemption of the coupon for a free three- and
five-gallon bottle of water and the estimated cost of the three- and five-gallon bottle of water is
included in cost of sales.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of
purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable
All trade accounts receivable are due from customers located within the United States and
Canada. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of our customers to make required payments. Accounts receivable, net includes allowances
for doubtful accounts of approximately $112 and $244 at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of specifically identified accounts in
addition to an overall aging analysis. Judgments are made with respect to the collectability of
accounts receivable based on historical experience and current economic trends. Actual losses could
differ from those estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Charged |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
to Revenues, Costs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
or Expense |
|
|
Accounts (a) |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes adjustments related to our acquisition of the Refill Business. |
Prepaid and other current assets
Prepaid and other current assets consist primarily of amounts due from one of our
international water dispenser manufacturers. The amounts due are related to costs and charges for
returns on defective water dispensers that the manufacturer guaranteed under the terms our
agreement.
Inventories
Our inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are valued at the lower of cost or
realizable value, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Miscellaneous
selling supplies such as labels are expensed when incurred.
61
Bottles
Bottles consist of three- and five- gallon refillable polycarbonate bottles used in our
exchange business and are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of three years.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. For
internally developed software, certain costs during the application development stage and related
to upgrades and enhancements that provide additional functionality are capitalized and amortized
over the estimated useful life of the software. The vending equipment is depreciated using an
estimated salvage value of 25%. Depreciation and amortization is generally calculated using
straight-line methods over estimated useful lives that range from two to 10 years.
The Company incurs maintenance costs on its major equipment. Maintenance, repair and minor
refurbishment costs are charged to expense as incurred, while additions, renewals, and improvements
are capitalized.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We classify intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives
subject to amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization
and (3) goodwill. We determine the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after
considering the specific facts and circumstances related to each intangible asset. Factors we
consider when determining useful lives include the contractual term of any agreement related to the
asset, the historical performance of the asset, the Companys long-term strategy for using the
asset, any laws or other local regulations which could impact the useful life of the asset, and
other economic factors, including competition and specific market conditions. Intangible assets
that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized, primarily on a straight-line basis, over
their useful lives.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives, including trademarks and
goodwill, for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that
assets might be impaired. Our Company performs these annual impairment reviews as of the first day
of our fourth quarter. The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary.
The first step involves a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value.
The fair value is estimated based on a number of factors including operating results, business
plans and future cash flows. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
the second step of the process is performed which compares the implied value of the reporting unit
goodwill with the carrying value of the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of
the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. No impairment charge was considered necessary
at December 31, 2010. For indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that
excess.
Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset
is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the
use and eventual disposition of the asset at the date it is tested for recoverability, whether in
use or under development. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount
of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. We recorded an impairment charge in 2008 of $98
reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations, related
to display racks no longer in use and to be disposed.
Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures, for financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
62
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820
also describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2 observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available,
which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
The following is a reconciliation of the common stock warrants, which were measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
600 |
|
Total (gains) losses recognized |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Initial Fair Value |
|
|
137 |
|
Fair Value transferred to stockholders equity |
|
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the warrants was initially included in other long-term liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet based upon estimated fair value as adjusted periodically until such time
that the exercise price became fixed at the IPO date, at which time the then fair value was
reclassified as a component of stockholders equity (deficit). In connection with our IPO the
exercise price per share of the warrants was fixed at $9.60, or 80% of the IPO price per share of
our common stock.
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial instruments, which include cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued expenses, approximate their
fair values due to their short maturities. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the
Company for loans with similar terms, the carrying value of long-term debt, capital leases and
notes payable approximates fair value.
Advertising Costs
Costs incurred for producing and distributing advertising and advertising materials are
expensed when incurred. Advertising costs totaled approximately $717, $270 and $296 for 2008, 2009
and 2010, respectively, and are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Beneficial Conversion Charges
Our Series C Preferred Stock (Series C) was convertible into common stock and was issued
with an adjustable conversion feature, which was based upon consolidated revenue for the year
ending December 31, 2008 with a conversion price ranging from $13.04 to $25.04 per common
equivalent share. A beneficial conversion charge is measured as the difference between the initial
price of $25.04 per share and the conversion price at December 31, 2008 of $13.04 per share. At
December 31, 2008 we recorded a beneficial conversion charge (also referred to as a deemed
dividend) of approximately $17,500 related to the adjustment in the conversion price of the Series
C convertible preferred stock, based upon consolidated revenues for the year ending December 31,
2008. The beneficial conversion charge for equity instruments is recorded to additional paid in
capital with no effect on total stockholders equity or the consolidated statement of operations.
63
In 2010, the conversion ratio of Series C was amended thus creating a contingent beneficial
conversion that was measured and recorded at the time the contingency was removed, or at the time
the IPO price per share was known and less than $13.04 per share. With the IPO per share price of
$12.00, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion charge related to the Series C of $2,404. The
charge was recorded to additional paid in capital with no effect on total stockholders equity or
the consolidated statement of operations.
In 2010, our Series B Preferred Stock (Series B) was amended to provide for the mandatory
conversion of at least 50% of Series B into common stock at a conversion ratio calculated by
dividing the liquidation preference of
Series B by 90% of the greater of the IPO price and $10.44. This amendment also created a
contingent beneficial conversion that was measured at the time of the IPO. The Company recorded a
beneficial conversion charge related to the Series B of $2,933. The charge was recorded to
additional paid in capital with no effect on total stockholders equity or the consolidated
statement of operations.
Concentrations of Risk
Our principal financial instruments subject to potential concentration of credit risk are cash
and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses. We invest our funds
in a highly rated institution and believe the financial risks associated with cash and cash
equivalents are minimal. At December 31, 2009 and 2010, approximately $0 and $441, respectively, of
our cash on deposit exceeded the insured limits.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers financial condition and maintain
allowances for doubtful accounts that we believe are sufficient to provide for losses that may be
sustained on realization of accounts receivable. We had two customers that accounted for
approximately 42% and 21% in 2008; three customers that accounted for approximately 33%, 19% and
15% of sales in 2009; and two customers that accounted for approximately 37% and 21% of sales in
2010. We had one customer with a balance that accounted for approximately 21% of total trade
receivables at December 31, 2009 and two customers that accounted for approximately 35% and 12% of
total trade receivables at December 31, 2010.
Basic and Diluted Net loss Per Share
Net loss per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during each period. Diluted amounts per share include the dilutive impact, if
any, of the Companys outstanding potential common shares, such as options and warrants and
convertible preferred stock. Potential common shares that are anti-dilutive are excluded from the
calculation of diluted net loss per common share.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, stock options, unvested shares of
restricted stock and warrants with respect to an aggregate of 142, 139 and 430 shares, as well as
3,626, 4,101 and 3,700 shares of convertible preferred stock, have been excluded from the
computation of the number of shares used in the diluted earnings per share, respectively. These
shares have been excluded because the Company incurred a net loss for each of these periods and
their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires recognition
of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have
been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected
to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that utilization
is not presently more likely than not.
As required by ASC 740-10, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only
after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position
following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount
recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.
Cumulative Translation Adjustment and Foreign Currency Transactions
The local currency of our operation in Canada is considered to be the functional currency.
Assets and liabilities of the Canada subsidiary are translated into U. S. dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Results of operations are translated using the
average exchange rate prevailing throughout the period. The effects of
unrealized exchange rate fluctuations on translating foreign currency assets and liabilities
into U. S. dollars are accumulated as the cumulative translation adjustment included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in members equity. Realized gains and losses on foreign currency
transactions are included in the statement of operations.
64
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-28 When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This update provides amendments to ASC
Topic 350 Intangibles, Goodwill and Other that requires an entity to perform Step 2 impairment
test even if a reporting unit has zero or negative carrying amount. The first step is to identify
potential impairments by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying
value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair
value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step is
to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit s goodwill, measured in the same manner
as goodwill is recognized in a business combination, and compare that amount with the carrying
amount of the goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
ASU No. 2010-28 is effective beginning January 1, 2011. As a result of this standard, goodwill
impairments may be reported sooner than under current practice. We do not expect ASU No. 2010-28 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, which contains updated accounting guidance to
clarify the acquisition date that should be used for reporting pro forma financial information when
comparative financial statements are issued. This update requires that a company should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred
during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting
period only. This update also requires disclosure of the nature and amount of material,
nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. The provisions of this update, which are to be applied
prospectively, are effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010,
with early adoption permitted. The impact of this update on the Company s consolidated financial
statements will depend on the size and nature of future business combinations.
2. Bottles
Bottles are summarized as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
$ |
2,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,997 |
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for bottles was approximately $853, $907 and $971 in 2008, 2009 and
2010, respectively.
65
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is summarized as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
Vending equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,169 |
|
Racks and display panels |
|
|
12,389 |
|
|
|
15,816 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Software and computer equipment |
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
Transportation racks |
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,128 |
|
|
|
47,057 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(8,807 |
) |
|
|
(12,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,321 |
|
|
$ |
34,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was approximately $2,223, $2,897 and
$3,371 in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
Acquisition of Refill Business |
|
|
77,382 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
77,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill relates to the acquisition of the Refill Business and represents the excess of
acquisition cost over the fair value of net assets acquired.
Intangible assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
2,985 |
|
|
$ |
(2,089 |
) |
|
$ |
13,289 |
|
|
$ |
(2,484 |
) |
Patent costs |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
13,410 |
|
|
|
(2,542 |
) |
Unamortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,202 |
|
|
$ |
(2,125 |
) |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
|
$ |
(2,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, patents, and trademarks. Patent
costs are amortized using a straight-line basis over estimated lives of three years, while customer
relationships are amortized on an either an accelerated or straight-line basis over an estimated
useful life ranging from 10 to 15 years. In 2010, we acquired customer relationships related to
the Refill Business totaling $10,300 that have a useful life of 15 years.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $542, $401 and $417,
respectively, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible
assets, which is an estimate for each future year and subject to change, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
910 |
|
2012 |
|
|
859 |
|
2013 |
|
|
807 |
|
2014 |
|
|
764 |
|
2015 |
|
|
743 |
|
2016 and thereafter |
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable |
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued payroll and related items |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
Accrued severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
Accrued professional and other expenses |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Accrued sales tax payable |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Accrued advertising |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued receipts not invoiced |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Other |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
6. Long-Term Debt, Capital Leases and Notes
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable are summarized as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,912 |
|
Senior loan agreement |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated convertible notes payable,
net of original issue discount |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and capital leases |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,829 |
|
|
|
17,956 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, notes payable and
capital leases, net of current portion |
|
$ |
14,403 |
|
|
$ |
17,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 10, 2010, we closed our IPO and entered into a $40,000 senior revolving
credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and Branch
Banking & Trust Company (Senior Revolving Credit Facility) that replaced our Senior Loan
Agreement (as defined below). The Senior Revolving Credit Facility has a three-year term and is
secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility is payable
at our option at either a floating base rate plus an interest rate spread or a floating rate of
LIBOR plus an interest rate spread. Both the interest rate spreads and the commitment fee rate are
determined from a pricing grid based on our total leverage ratio. The Senior Revolving Credit
Facility also provides for letters of credit issued to our vendors, which reduce the amount
available for cash borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee on the unused amounts of the
commitments under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility. At December 31, 2010, the base rate and
floating LIBOR borrowings outstanding were $2,912 and $15,000, respectively, at interest rates of
5.25% and 3.27%, respectively. At December 31, 2010, there were no outstanding letters of credit
under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility. The availability under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility was approximately $10,000, based upon the maximum leverage ratio allowed at December 31,
2010.
The Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains various restrictive covenants and the following
financial covenants: (i) a maximum total leverage ratio that is initially set at 3.5 to 1.0 and
step downs to 2.5 to 1.0 for the quarter ending December 31, 2011; (ii) a minimum EBITDA threshold
initially set at $6,500 for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 and increasing for the two quarters
thereafter; (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ended
September 30, 2011; and (iv) a maximum amount of capital expenditures of $6.0 million for the
period from closing to December 31, 2010 and increasing to $25.0 million for the year ending
December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2010, the Company is in compliance with all the terms and
conditions of the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
In June 2005, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement that was amended in April 2006,
April 2007, June 2008, January 2009, December 2009 and June 2010 (the Senior Loan Agreement)
pursuant to which the bank originally provided a $25,000 revolving loan commitment (the
Revolver). In June 2008, the Revolver commitment was reduced to $20,000 and it was subsequently
reduced further to $10,000 in January 2009. The Revolver was subject to certain borrowing base
restrictions based on eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory less reserves, and the
aggregate face amount of undrawn trade letters of credit of which the Company is the beneficiary.
The Revolver also provided for letters of credit issued to our vendors, which reduced the amount
available for cash borrowings. The Seventh Amendment to the Senior Loan Agreement extended the
term of the agreement to January 30, 2011, allowed for up to a $3,000 over-advance, which was
guaranteed by our CEO, and amended the agreements financial covenants. At December 31, 2009,
there were outstanding letters of credit under the Revolver totaling approximately $371.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Revolver was payable quarterly at the option
of the Company at (i) the LIBOR Market Index Rate (LMIR) plus the applicable margin or (ii) the
greater of (a) the federal funds rate plus .50% or (b) the banks prime rate plus in either case
the applicable margin. At December 31, 2009, the interest rate on the outstanding balance on the
Revolver was based on the banks prime rate plus 2.50% (5.75% at December 31, 2009).
68
In December 2009 and September 2010, we issued Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes
(Notes) that had a total face value of $15,000 and $3,418, respectively, and were subordinated to
borrowings under the Senior Loan Agreement. The September 2010 Notes related to borrowings
outstanding at September 30, 2010 were closed in October 2010. The Notes paid quarterly interest
at 14% and were paid in full in November 2010 using the proceeds from our IPO and closing of the
Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
The Notes were accompanied by detachable warrants with a value at issuance equal to 4% of the
face amount of the corresponding Notes. The total number of shares of common stock issuable under
the warrants is 131. The initial fair value of the warrants was $737, of which $137 is
attributable to the Notes issued in the third quarter of 2010, and resulted in an original issue
discount on the Notes that was amortized into interest expense over the term of the Notes with the
unamortized balance being expensed when the Notes were paid in full in November 2010. The fair
value of the warrants was initially included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet based upon estimated fair value as adjusted periodically until such time that the
exercise price became fixed at the IPO date, at which time the then fair value was reclassified as
a component of stockholders equity (deficit). In connection with our IPO the exercise price per
share of the warrants was fixed at $9.60, or 80% of the initial public offering price per share of
our common stock.
In January 2009, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with our primary bank that was
subordinated to the Senior Loan Agreement (the Prior Subordinated Loan Agreement), pursuant to
which a $10,000 term loan was provided (the Prior Subordinated Loan). The bank acted as
syndication agent and provided $4,100 of the facility. Twelve existing investors in the Company
(including our CEO and CFO) funded the $5,900 balance of the facility. The proceeds of the Prior
Subordinated Loan Agreement were used to repay the then outstanding balance on the Revolver and for
working capital purposes. Interest on the Prior Subordinated Loan was at the banks prime rate
plus 10.0%, payable monthly. The Prior Subordinated Loan had an original maturity of January 6,
2010; however, the balance was paid in full in December 2009. In connection with the Prior
Subordinated Loan the Company paid fees totaling approximately $575, which were deferred and
amortized as a component of interest expense.
In June 2010, we entered into two notes for the purchase of delivery vehicles in our Company
operations totaling $46. The notes bear interest at 4.90% and are payable in 60 monthly
installments of approximately $0.9.
The aggregate future maturities of long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable as of
December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
2012 |
|
|
9 |
|
2013 |
|
|
17,921 |
|
2014 |
|
|
10 |
|
2015 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,956 |
|
Less: amounts representing interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
69
7. Stockholders Equity
The Board of Directors and stockholders approved the Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (Revised Charter) that effected a 1-for-10.435 reverse stock split of all the
outstanding shares of common stock and a proportional adjustment to the existing conversion ratios
for each series of preferred stock and provides that the authorized capital stock consists of (1)
70,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and (2) 65,000 shares of preferred stock,
$0.001 par value per share. Accordingly, all common share and per common share amounts for all
periods presented in these consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, have been adjusted
retroactively, where applicable, to reflect this reverse stock split and adjustment of the
preferred stock conversion ratios.
The Revised Charter became effective in connection with the closing of our IPO. The Revised
Charter resulted in the following in connection with the IPO: (i) the mandatory conversion of the
Series A preferred stock (Series A) into common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately
1:0.0960, (ii) the mandatory conversion of the Series C preferred stock (Series C) into shares of
common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.2000 based upon the IPO price per share of
$12.00, (iii) the mandatory conversion of at least 50% of the Series B preferred stock (Series B)
into common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.0926, calculated by dividing the
liquidation preference of the Series B by 90% of IPO price of $12.00, (iv) the repurchase of the
balance of the outstanding shares of the Series B within 30 days following the IPO for $1.00 per
share, and (v) payment of accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series B within 30 days following the
IPO.
Preferred Stock
Upon closing of our IPO 18,755 shares of the Series A were converted into shares of common
stock at a conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.0960.
Upon the closing of the IPO, 50% of the then outstanding 23,280 shares of the Series B were
converted into common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.0926, calculated by dividing
the liquidation preference of the Series B by 90% of IPO price of $12.00, with the remaining 50% of
the Series B being repurchased for $1.00 per share. The conversion of the Series B at 90% of the
IPO price created a beneficial conversion charge of approximately $2,900 at the time of the IPO.
The beneficial conversion charge or deemed dividend was recorded to additional paid in capital with
no effect on total stockholders equity, but increased the net loss attributable to common
stockholders in the fourth quarter of 2010.
In December 2009, all payment of dividends on the Series B was suspended and in January 2010
the dividends began to accrue at 10%. Series B dividends paid during the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2010, were $1,257 and $4,370, respectively. At December 31, 2009, the accrued and unpaid
dividends were $2,367. Upon the closing of the IPO all accrued and unpaid dividends were paid.
Upon the closing of the IPO the then outstanding 12,520 shares of the Series C were converted
into shares of common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.2000 based upon the IPO
price per share of $12.00. With the Revised Charter the conversion ratio for the Series C was
adjusted from the original amount based upon $13.04 per share to an amount based upon the greater
of $10.44 or the IPO price. This adjustment created a contingent beneficial conversion upon the
closing of our IPO and conversion of the Series C. The beneficial conversion charge related to the
conversion of the Series C preferred stock at the IPO price of $12.00 per share was approximately
$2,400. The beneficial conversion charge or deemed dividend was recorded to additional paid in
capital with no effect on total stockholders equity, but increased the net loss attributable to
common stockholders in the fourth quarter of 2010.
In connection with the amendments to the Revised Charter, we also modified the terms of common
stock warrants for the aggregate purchase of 716 shares of common stock, originally issued to the
purchasers of the Series B and Series C, to remove a provision that accelerated the termination of
the warrants exercise period upon the consummation of an IPO. The warrants will now expire on the
date such warrants would have otherwise expired absent the IPO. At the time of the modification, a
charge of approximately $2,300, the change in the estimated fair value immediately before and after
the modification, as determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model, was recorded to accumulated
deficit with no effect on total stockholders equity, but increased the net loss attributable to
common stockholders for 2010.
70
In addition, in October 2010, we reduced the exercise price of the warrants issued to the
holders of the Series C from $20.66 to $13.04. At the time of the modification a charge of
approximately $175 was recorded to additional paid in capital with no effect on total stockholders
equity, but increased the net loss attributable to common stockholders in the fourth quarter of
2010.
8. Stock-Based Compensation
2004 Stock Plan
In 2004, our Board of Directors adopted the Primo Water Corporation 2004 Stock Plan (the 2004
Plan) for employees, including officers, non-employee directors and non-employee consultants. The
Plan provides for the issue of incentive or nonqualified stock options and restricted common stock.
The Company has reserved 431 shares of common stock for issuance under the Plan. The Company does
not intend to issue any additional awards under the 2004 Plan; however, all outstanding awards will
remain in effect and will continue to be governed by their existing terms.
2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
In April 2010, our stockholders adopted the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2010
Plan). The 2010 Plan is limited to employees, officers, non-employee directors, consultants and
advisors. The 2010 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive or nonqualified stock options,
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, cash- or stock-based
performance awards and other stock-based awards. The Company has reserved 719 shares of common
stock for issuance under the 2010 Plan.
Stock Option Activity
We measure the fair value of each stock option grant at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average fair value per share of the options
granted during 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $8.66, $5.11, and $6.16, respectively. The following
assumptions were used in arriving at the fair value of options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Expected life of options in years |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate for the expected life of the
options at the time of grant. As a newly-public entity, historic volatility is not available for
our shares. As a result, we estimated volatility based on a peer group of companies, which
collectively provide a reasonable basis for estimating volatility. We intend to continue to
consistently use the same group of publicly traded peer companies to determine volatility in the
future until sufficient information regarding volatility of our share price becomes available or
the selected companies are no longer suitable for this purpose. The expected life is based on the
estimated average life of the options, and forfeitures are estimated on the date of grant based on
certain historical data and management estimates.
71
In 2008, 2009 and 2010, compensation expense related to stock options was approximately $215,
$298 and $387 and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses from continuing
operations, respectively, and approximately $61, $80 and $0 is included in discontinued operations,
respectively. A summary of awards under the Plan at December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, and changes
during the years then ended is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
20.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
13.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
18.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
13.15 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
$ |
10.85 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
$ |
13.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
12.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
13.15 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
211 |
|
|
$ |
12.63 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
280 |
|
|
$ |
13.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
12.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
11.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
17.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
13.14 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
304 |
|
|
$ |
13.14 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, a total of 31 common stock options were granted under the 2004 Plan, all in
the first quarter of 2010, at an exercise price of $12.84 per share. The estimated fair value of
the common stock on the issuance date was $12.84 per share. The Company obtained a valuation from
an unrelated party in December 2009 that determined the fair value of the Companys common stock to
be $12.84 per share.
During 2009, a total of 14 common stock options were granted, all issued on one date during
the first quarter, at an exercise price of $13.04 per share. The estimated fair value of the common
stock on the issuance date was $13.04 per share. The fair value determination was based in part
upon the finalization of the conversion ratio of the Series C Preferred Stock on December 31, 2008.
The board of directors also considered the Companys most recent independent valuation and then
current expectations of the Companys future performance in determining the fair value.
The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during 2008, 2009 and 2010 was
approximately $8, $0 and $8, respectively, with proceeds to the Company of $13, $2 and $65,
respectively. In April 2010, the Board of Directors approved the 100% vesting of all unvested
stock options awards upon the successful completion of an IPO of the Companys common stock. The
IPO was completed in November 2010 and all unrecognized compensation cost related to the stock
option awards that became 100% vested was expensed in the fourth quarter.
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value per
share of the common stock on the date of grant. The options generally vest over a period of one to
four years, based on graded vesting, and expire ten years from the date of grant. The terms and
conditions of the awards made under the Plans vary but, in general, are at the discretion of the
board of directors or its appointed committee.
72
Restricted Stock Activity
In 2010, we granted restricted stock awards under the 2004 Plan, all in the first quarter of
2010, that generally cliff-vest annually over a three-year period and we recognized compensation
expense of $298 related to these awards, which is included in selling, general, and administrative
expenses from continuing operations. In addition, in connection with the guarantee of the $3,000
over-advance line of the Senior Loan Agreement by our CEO, the Company granted a restricted stock
award under the 2010 Plan, in the fourth quarter of 2010, which vested in January 2011. The value
of the restricted stock was $150 and was expensed in 2010 as part of the issuance cost of the
guarantee on the Senior Loan Agreement.
A reconciliation of restricted stock activity and related information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
12.75 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
12.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
116 |
|
|
$ |
12.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately $897 of total unrecognized compensation cost,
net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock awards. That cost is expected
to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In April 2010, our stockholders approved the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2010
ESPP) which was effective upon the consummation of the Companys IPO. The 2010 ESPP provides for
the purchase of common stock and is generally available to all employees. The Company has reserved
24 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2010 ESPP. Effective January 1, 2011, employees
were able to participate in the 2010 ESPP.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company leases office space and vehicles under various lease arrangements. Total rental
expense from continuing operations for 2008, 2009 and 2010 was approximately $1,496, $1,101 and
$1,288, respectively. The rental expense includes $325 in 2008 paid to PWC Leasing, LLC, which is
an entity with common ownership. On June 30, 2008, we purchased the leased assets of PWC Leasing,
LLC at the fair value of $3,500 and terminated the related lease agreement. At December 31, 2010,
future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
705 |
|
2012 |
|
|
548 |
|
2013 |
|
|
405 |
|
2014 |
|
|
231 |
|
2015 |
|
|
83 |
|
2016 and thereafter |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
73
Sales Tax
We routinely purchase equipment for use in operations from various vendors. These purchases
are subject to sales tax depending on the equipment type and local sales tax regulations, however,
certain vendors have not assessed the appropriate sales tax. For purchases that are subject to
sales tax in which the vendor did not assess the appropriate amount, we accrue an estimate of the
sales tax liability we ultimately expect to pay.
Other Contingencies
In the normal course of business the Company may be involved in various claims and legal
actions. Management believes that the outcome of such legal actions will not have a significant
adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
10. Income Taxes
There is no income tax provision (benefit) for federal or state income taxes as the Company
has incurred operating losses since inception.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate and effective tax rates is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Federal statutory taxes |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Foreign taxes less than the domestic rate |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
Permanent differences |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(37.7 |
%) |
|
|
(37.9 |
%) |
|
|
(38.2 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes are recorded based upon differences between the financial reporting and
income tax basis of assets and liabilities. The following deferred income taxes are recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal net operating loss carryforward |
|
$ |
18,802 |
|
|
$ |
22,590 |
|
State loss carryforward |
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
Allowance for bad debts |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Other |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
23,442 |
|
|
|
28,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(23,375 |
) |
|
|
(28,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, available taxes in the carryback periods, projected
future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Accordingly, the
Company has provided valuation allowances to fully offset the net deferred tax assets at December
31, 2009 and 2010. The $4,476 and $4,755 net increase in the valuation allowance for 2009 and 2010,
respectively, primarily reflects the net increase in the federal and state loss carryfoward
deferred tax assets.
The Company has approximately $66,441 in federal net operating loss carryforwards that expire
between 2025 through 2030 and approximately $54,068 in state loss carryforwards that begin to
expire in 2011. Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code imposes an annual limitation on the
amount of net operating loss carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a
corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership. The Company believes that an
annual limit will be imposed by Section 382, however the Company expects to fully utilize its net
operating loss carryforwards during their respective carryforward periods.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits recorded from the January 1, 2007 adoption of ASC
740-10 through the year ended December 31, 2010, and there are no uncertain tax positions for which
it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly
increase within the next 12 months.
11. Segments
At December 31, 2010, we had four operating segments and three reportable segments: Primo
Bottled Water Exchange (Exchange), Primo Refill (Refill) and Primo Products (Products).
However, with the acquisition of the Refill Business, we manage and view our business as Primo
Water (Water) related and Products related. Our Water operations consist of our Exchange, Refill
and an Other operating segment that does not meet quantitative thresholds for segment reporting.
As we further integrate the various Water operations we anticipate that we will have two reportable
segments in the future.
We manage our Primo Water business primarily through two reporting segments: Exchange and
Refill. Our Exchange segment consists of our Primo exchange business, which sells three- and
five-gallon purified bottled water through retailers in each of the contiguous United States. Our
exchange service is offered through point of purchase display racks and recycling centers that are
prominently located at major retailers in space that is often underutilized.
Our Refill segment consists of the Refill Business, which provides a self-serve filtered
drinking water service, both through retailers in each of the contiguous United States and Canada.
Our refill service provides filtered water through the installation and servicing of reverse
osmosis water filtration systems in the back room of the retailers store location. The refill
vending machine, which is typically accompanied by a sales display containing empty reusable
bottles, is located within the retailer customers floor space.
As of December 31, 2010, we offered our water Exchange and Refill services at approximately
12,600 combined locations.
Our Products segment sells water dispensers that are designed to dispense Primo and other
dispenser-compatible bottled water. Our Products sales are primarily generated through major U.S.
retailers. Our water dispensers are sold primarily through a direct-import model, where we
recognize revenues for the sale of the water dispensers when title is transferred to our retailer
customers. We support retail sell-through with limited domestic inventory. We design, market and
arrange for certification and inspection of our products.
75
We evaluate the financial results of these segments focusing primarily on segment net sales
and segment income (loss) from operations before depreciation and amortization (segment income
(loss) from operations). We utilize segment net sales and segment income (loss) from operations
because we believe they provide useful information for effectively allocating our resources between
business segments, evaluating the health of our business segments based on metrics that management
can actively influence and gauging our investments and our ability to service, incur or pay down
debt.
Cost of sales for Water consists of costs for bottling and related packaging materials and
distribution costs for our bottled water for our exchange services and servicing and material costs
for our refill services. Cost of sales for Products consists of contract manufacturing, freight,
duties and warehousing costs of our water dispensers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for all segments consist primarily of personnel
costs for sales, marketing, operations support and customer service, as well as other supporting
costs for operating each segment.
Expenses not specifically related to operating segments are shown separately as Corporate.
Corporate expenses are comprised mainly of compensation and other related expenses for corporate
support, information systems, and human resources and administration. Corporate expenses also
include certain professional fees and expenses and compensation of our Board of Directors.
76
The following table presents segment information for each of the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Segment Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
$ |
19,237 |
|
|
$ |
22,638 |
|
|
$ |
24,900 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,347 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,111 |
|
|
|
24,249 |
|
|
|
29,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
13,758 |
|
|
|
22,824 |
|
|
|
14,741 |
|
Inter-company elimination |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
34,647 |
|
|
$ |
46,981 |
|
|
$ |
44,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
$ |
(1,267 |
) |
|
$ |
3,374 |
|
|
$ |
3,183 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
Other |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
Inter-company elimination |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
(7,077 |
) |
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
|
|
(8,922 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(3,618 |
) |
|
|
(4,205 |
) |
|
|
(4,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
$ |
(13,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
|
$ |
3,124 |
|
|
$ |
3,341 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
Other |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
4,205 |
|
|
$ |
4,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
$ |
8,174 |
|
|
$ |
1,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,046 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
Other |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,412 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
5,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,420 |
|
|
$ |
2,424 |
|
|
$ |
6,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,685 |
|
|
$ |
19,309 |
|
Refill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,933 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,286 |
|
|
|
131,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
5,642 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,368 |
|
|
$ |
139,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
12. Refill Acquisition
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of the Refill Business pursuant to an Asset
Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2010. The Refill Business provided us with an established platform
to expand into the self-serve water refill business. The self-serve water refill business is
complementary to our exchange business from both a product and operational perspective. The total
purchase price for the Refill Business was approximately $109,095 (including the working capital
adjustment), which was paid with $74,474 in proceeds from the IPO and $34,621 from the issuance of
approximately 2,588 of our common shares valued at $13.38 per share. The Refill Acquisition has
been accounted for as a business combination in accordance with the acquisition method.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination are recorded at fair value
in accordance with ASC 805 based upon appraisals obtained from an unrelated third party valuation
specialist. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired resulting in
goodwill of approximately $77,382. The identifiable intangible assets consist primarily of customer
lists and will be amortized over 15 years. Operations of the acquired entity are included in the
consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date. Fees and expenses associated with
the acquisition of the Refill Business were approximately $2,101. This amount was included in
selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets and liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
$ |
74,474 |
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
34,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
$ |
109,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price allocation: |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
Net current assets |
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
19,054 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
10,300 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
77,382 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price |
|
$ |
109,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts of net sales and earnings of the Refill Business included in the Companys
consolidated income statement from the acquisition date to the year ending December 31, 2010, are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
3,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma revenue and earnings for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010
presented below is based upon the purchase price allocation and does not reflect any anticipated
operating efficiencies or cost savings from the integration of the Refill Business into our
business. Pro forma adjustments have been made as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1
of the period presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
72,988 |
|
|
$ |
67,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,417 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
19,003 |
|
|
|
19,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
These amounts have been calculated after applying the Companys accounting policies and
adjusting the results of the Refill Business to reflect the additional depreciation and
amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to property and
equipment and intangible assets had been as of January 1 of the period presented.
13. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
1,535 |
|
|
$ |
2,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired under capital lease or seller notes payable |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with the Refill Acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Conversion of Series B preferred stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Conversion of Series C preferred stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant modification charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends accrued not paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Discontinued Operations
In July, 2008, the Company and its Board of Directors made the decision to divest the
operations of its subsidiary, Prima Bottled Water, Inc. (Prima) formerly Primo To Go, LLC. As a
result, the related assets, liabilities and results of the operations of Prima are accounted for as
discontinued operations. In December 2009, the Company completed the divesture by distributing the
stock in Prima to existing shareholders of the Company. Each shareholder received a number of
shares in Prima based upon such shareholders proportionate ownership of our Series A, Series C and
common stock on an as converted basis as of the date of distribution. This transaction is reflected
as a dividend of subsidiary stock in the statement of stockholders equity (deficit) in the amount
of $2,050, the book value of the net assets of Prima as of the distribution date.
Net sales and operating results classified as discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
4,456 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(2,568 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of assets held for sale |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(5,672 |
) |
|
|
(3,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, before income taxes |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(5,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,650 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
15. Employee Retirement Savings Plan
The Company has the Primo Water Corporation 401(k) Plan & Trust retirement plan covering
substantially all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of age and who have completed at
least two months of service. Plan participants may make before tax elective contributions up to the
maximum percentage of compensation and dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. Plan
participants are 100% vested in their elective contributions at all times and are vested 25% per
year of service for four years in the Companys discretionary contributions. A year of service for
vesting purposes is 1,000 hours of service in a Plan year. The Company did not make any matching
contributions during 2008 or 2009, as the Companys matching contributions to the plan were
discretionary and determined with respect to each plan year. In 2010, our Board of Directors
established a Company match of up to 50% of the employee contributions up to 6% of their salaries,
with 50% of the matching amount being contingent upon our achievement of certain specified
objectives to be determined by our Board of Directors. Contribution expense for the plan was
approximately $31 in 2010.
16. Subsequent Events
On March 8, 2011, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Primo Refill Canada Corporation
(Primo Canada) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Culligan of Canada, Ltd. (the
Seller) and Culligan International Company (Culligan International and together with the
Seller, the Culligan Parties), pursuant to which Primo Canada purchased certain of the Sellers
assets related to its bulk water exchange business currently conducted in Canada (the Culligan
Bulk Water Exchange Business). The purchase price for the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business
was approximately $5,391, which consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1,575 and the
issuance of 307 shares of the Companys common stock having a value of approximately $3,816 (based
upon a price per share equal to the average of the closing price of the Companys common stock for
the 20 most recent trading days prior to the closing date), and the assumption of certain specified
liabilities (the Culligan Bulk Water Transaction). The Culligan Bulk Water Transaction was
intended to be effective from an economic standpoint as of December 31, 2010 and, as a result, the
cash portion of the purchase price was reduced by approximately $60, which the parties mutually
agreed represented a reasonable approximation of the net earnings of the Culligan Bulk Water
Exchange Business between January 1, 2011 and March 8, 2011. The Culligan Bulk Water Exchange
Business provides refill and delivery of water in 18-liter containers to commercial retailers in
Canada for resale to consumers.
On March 8, 2011, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Primo Products, LLC (Primo
Products) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC
(Omnifrio). The Omnifrio Asset Purchase Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to
the conditions therein, Primo Products will purchase certain of Omnifrios intellectual property
and other assets (the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business) for a purchase price of up to
$13,150, which consists of:
|
|
|
a cash payment at closing of $2,000; |
|
|
|
|
the issuance at closing of 501 shares of the Companys common stock having a value
of $6,150 (based upon a price per share equal to the average of the closing price of
the Companys common stock for the 20 most recent trading days prior to the date of the
Omnifrio Purchase Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
a cash payment of $2,000 on the 15-month anniversary of the closing date (subject to
the Companys setoff rights in the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement); |
|
|
|
|
up to $3,000 in cash milestone payments; and |
|
|
|
|
the assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business. |
80
17. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following tables set forth a summary of our quarterly financial information for each of
the four quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
8,829 |
|
|
$ |
12,173 |
|
|
$ |
10,899 |
|
|
$ |
12,706 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
8,591 |
|
|
|
8,950 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
Acquisition-related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2,184 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
13,845 |
|
|
|
12,986 |
|
|
|
16,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
(2,087 |
) |
|
|
(3,897 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(936 |
) |
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(2,990 |
) |
|
|
(4,946 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(2,990 |
) |
|
|
(4,946 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(2,990 |
) |
|
|
(4,946 |
) |
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant modification charges |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(2,896 |
) |
|
|
(5,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,123 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,998 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(2.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(2.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
9,567 |
|
|
$ |
14,933 |
|
|
$ |
14,595 |
|
|
$ |
7,886 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
12,716 |
|
|
|
12,279 |
|
|
|
6,124 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
2,516 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
11,291 |
|
|
|
16,196 |
|
|
|
15,707 |
|
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,724 |
) |
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
(1,818 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
(1,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(2,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(2,687 |
) |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
|
(2,063 |
) |
|
|
(5,380 |
) |
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant modification charges |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,448 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(2.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.22 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
(2.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(2.37 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.69 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Primo Water Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Primo Water Corporation and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Primo Water Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 30, 2011
82
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None
|
|
|
Item 9A. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer
(CEO), and chief financial officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based on that
evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective for the purpose of providing reasonable assurance that the information
required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms
and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred
during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of
the Registered Accounting Firm
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include a report of managements assessment regarding
internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Companys registered
public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public
companies.
|
|
|
Item 9B. |
|
Other Information |
None
83
PART III
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
For information with respect to the executive officers of the Company, see the Executive Officers
section of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated
herein by reference. For information with respect to the Directors of the Company, see the
Proposal 1: Election of Directors section of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to Section
16 reports, see the Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance section of the Proxy
Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
For information with respect to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, see the Corporate
Governance Board Committees section of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is intended to qualify as a
code of ethics within the meaning of Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. This code
applies to all of the directors, officers and employees of Primo and its subsidiaries. A copy of
our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our corporate website (www.primowater.com).
We expect that any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed
on our website.
|
|
|
Item 11. |
|
Executive Compensation |
For information with respect to executive officer and director compensation, see the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, Executive Compensation Tables, Additional Information About Directors
and Executive Officers Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,
Compensation Committee Report, Director Compensation and Corporate Governance The Boards
Role in Risk Oversight sections of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
For information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management, see
the Principal Stockholders section of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see the Equity Compensation Plan
Information section of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
For information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions, see the Related
Persons Transactions section of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
which is incorporated herein by reference. For certain information with respect to director
independence, see the disclosures in the Corporate Governance section of the Proxy Statement for
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders regarding director independence, which are incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 14. |
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
For information with respect to principal accountant fees and services, see Proposal 5:
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm section of the Proxy
Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
84
PART IV
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
a) |
|
List of documents filed as part of this report. |
|
(1) |
|
Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Financial Statement Schedule: No financial statement schedules are required. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits: See (b) below. |
b) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
See Exhibit Index on page 86. |
85
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Primo Water Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.4 to Amendment No. 9 to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed November 3,
2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Primo Water Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Form
8-K filed November 16, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Specimen Certificate representing shares of common stock of
Primo Water Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Amendment No. 5 to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed August 11,
2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Form of 14% Subordinated Convertible Note, dated as of December
30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Subordinated Convertible Debt Common Stock Purchase
Warrant, dated as of December 30, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-165452) filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Form of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Subscription
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Form of Series C Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-165452)filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Form of First Amendment to Series C Common Stock Purchase
Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Form of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Subscription
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Form of Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 1
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
2004 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2010 Omnibus Plan)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 1
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Form of Option Agreement under 2010 Omnibus Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2010 Omnibus
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Amendment
No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April
26, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (filed herewith)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between the
Company and Billy D. Prim (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.22 to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed June
4, 2010)* |
86
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between the
Company and Mark Castaneda (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed June
4, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between the
Company and Michael S. Gunter (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed June
4, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, between the
Company, P1 Sub, LLC, P2 Sub, LLC, Culligan Store Solutions,
LLC, Culligan of Canada, Ltd. and Culligan International
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed June 4, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, between Culligan
Store Solutions, LLC, Culligan International Company, Thomas
Weisel Partners, LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Amendment No. 2
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed June 4, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated October 5, 2010 to Lock-up Agreement
dated as of June 1, 2010 between Culligan Store Solutions, LLC,
Culligan International Company, Thomas Weisel Partners LLC and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.40 to Amendment No. 7 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed
October 6, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
Form of 14% Convertible Subordinated Note, dated as of October
5, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to
Amendment No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
Form of Consent of the Holders of the Subordinated Convertible
Promissory Notes Issued in December 2009 and October 2010
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to Amendment No. 7
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Series B Common Stock Purchase
Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to
Amendment No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Series C Common Stock Purchase
Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to
Amendment No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated November 10, 2010 between
the Company and Culligan International Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
November 16, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
Credit Agreement dated November 10, 2010 among the Company,
certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent for
the lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed November 16, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 8, 2011 by and among the
Company, Primo Refill Canada Corporation, Culligan of Canada,
Ltd. and Culligan International Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed March
9, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement Amendment dated March 8, 2011
between the Company and Culligan International Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 8, 2011 by and among the
Company, Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC and the other parties
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2010 Omnibus Plan (filed herewith)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Primo Water Corporation (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14a and pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
87
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14a and pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
88
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 30, 2011
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Billy D. Prim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Billy D. Prim
Billy D. Prim
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer) and
President
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Castaneda
Mark Castaneda
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial
Officer)
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David J. Mills
David J. Mills
|
|
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard A. Brenner
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Malcom McQuilkin
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David L. Warnock
David L. Warnock
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David W. Dupree
David W. Dupree
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2011 |
89