Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Commission File Number: 1-32261 (BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.)
000-54089 (BioMed Realty, L.P.)
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-1142292 (BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.) |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
20-1320636 (BioMed Realty, L.P.) |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
17190 Bernardo Center Drive |
|
|
San Diego, California
|
|
92128 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(858) 485-9840
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
BioMed Realty, L.P.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
|
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
Yes þ No o |
BioMed Realty, L.P.
|
|
Yes o No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
BioMed Realty, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
|
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
Yes o No þ |
BioMed Realty, L.P.
|
|
Yes o No þ |
The number of outstanding shares of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s common stock, par value $0.01
per share, as of May 5, 2011 was 131,248,832.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and BioMed Realty, L.P., a Maryland limited
partnership of which BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. is the parent company and general partner. Unless
otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to
we, us, our or our company refer to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. together with its
consolidated subsidiaries, including BioMed Realty, L.P. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the
context requires otherwise, all references in this report to our operating partnership or the
operating partnership refer to BioMed Realty, L.P. together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. operates as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and the general
partner of BioMed Realty, L.P. As of March 31, 2011, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. owned an approximate
97.8% partnership interest and other limited partners, including some of our directors, executive
officers and their affiliates, owned the remaining 2.2% partnership interest (including long term
incentive plan units) in BioMed Realty, L.P. As the sole general partner of BioMed Realty, L.P.,
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for the operating
partnerships day-to-day management and control.
There are a few differences between our company and our operating partnership, which are
reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important to understand the
differences between our company and our operating partnership in the context of how BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P. operate as an interrelated consolidated company. BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of
BioMed Realty, L.P. As a result, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. does not conduct business itself, other
than acting as the sole general partner of BioMed Realty, L.P., issuing public equity from time to
time and guaranteeing certain debt of BioMed Realty, L.P. BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. itself does not
hold any indebtedness but guarantees some of the secured and unsecured debt of BioMed Realty, L.P.
BioMed Realty, L.P. holds substantially all the assets of the company and holds the ownership
interests in the companys joint ventures. BioMed Realty, L.P. conducts the operations of the
business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds
from public equity issuances by BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., which are generally contributed to
BioMed Realty, L.P. in exchange for partnership units, BioMed Realty, L.P. generates the capital
required by the companys business through BioMed Realty, L.P.s operations, by BioMed Realty,
L.P.s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units.
Noncontrolling interests and stockholders equity and partners capital are the main areas of
difference between the consolidated financial statements of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and those of
BioMed Realty, L.P. The operating partnership and long term incentive plan units in BioMed Realty,
L.P. that are not owned by BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. are accounted for as partners capital in
BioMed Realty, L.P.s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s financial statements. The noncontrolling interests in BioMed Realty, L.P.s financial
statements include the interests of joint venture partners. The noncontrolling interests in BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc.s financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at the BioMed
Realty, L.P. level as well as the limited partnership unitholders of BioMed Realty, L.P., not
including BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. The differences between stockholders equity and partners
capital result from the differences in the equity issued at the BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and the
BioMed Realty, L.P. levels.
We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
BioMed Realty, L.P. into this single report:
|
|
better reflects how management and the analyst community view the business as a single
operating unit, |
|
|
enhances investor understanding of our company by enabling them to view the business as a
whole and in the same manner as management, |
|
|
|
is more efficient for our company and results in savings in time, effort and expense, and |
|
|
|
is more efficient for investors by reducing duplicative disclosure and providing a single document for their review. |
2
To help investors understand the significant differences between our company and our operating
partnership, this report presents the following separate sections for each of BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P.:
|
|
consolidated financial statements, |
|
|
|
the following notes to the consolidated financial statements: |
|
|
|
Debt, |
|
|
|
|
Equity / Partners Capital, and |
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share / Unit, |
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and |
|
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
This report also includes separate Item 4. Controls and Procedures sections and separate
Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P. in
order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc. have made the requisite certifications and BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and BioMed
Realty, L.P. are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
3
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate, net |
|
$ |
3,538,560 |
|
|
$ |
3,536,114 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
56,287 |
|
|
|
57,265 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
21,467 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
|
9,971 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
7,358 |
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
Accrued straight-line rents, net |
|
|
110,981 |
|
|
|
106,905 |
|
Acquired above-market leases, net |
|
|
28,069 |
|
|
|
30,566 |
|
Deferred leasing costs, net |
|
|
121,658 |
|
|
|
125,060 |
|
Deferred loan costs, net |
|
|
13,473 |
|
|
|
11,499 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
56,656 |
|
|
|
55,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,959,080 |
|
|
$ |
3,959,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable, net |
|
$ |
629,640 |
|
|
$ |
657,922 |
|
Exchangeable senior notes, net |
|
|
199,613 |
|
|
|
199,522 |
|
Unsecured senior notes, net |
|
|
645,081 |
|
|
|
247,571 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
392,450 |
|
Security deposits |
|
|
11,585 |
|
|
|
11,749 |
|
Dividends and distributions payable |
|
|
31,086 |
|
|
|
27,029 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
88,116 |
|
|
|
98,826 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
Acquired below-market leases, net |
|
|
7,565 |
|
|
|
7,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,665,917 |
|
|
|
1,646,858 |
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares
authorized: 7.375% Series A cumulative redeemable
preferred stock, $230,000,000 liquidation preference
($25.00 per share), 9,200,000 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
222,413 |
|
|
|
222,413 |
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 131,239,482 and 131,046,509 shares issued
and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,369,922 |
|
|
|
2,371,488 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(68,908 |
) |
|
|
(70,857 |
) |
Dividends in excess of earnings |
|
|
(241,894 |
) |
|
|
(221,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,282,845 |
|
|
|
2,303,178 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
10,318 |
|
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
2,293,163 |
|
|
|
2,312,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
3,959,080 |
|
|
$ |
3,959,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental |
|
$ |
80,217 |
|
|
$ |
70,600 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
24,581 |
|
|
|
20,826 |
|
Other income |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
105,545 |
|
|
|
92,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations |
|
|
20,517 |
|
|
|
17,851 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
10,681 |
|
|
|
8,722 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,835 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
Acquisition related expenses |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
72,774 |
|
|
|
61,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
32,771 |
|
|
|
30,849 |
|
Equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(21,316 |
) |
|
|
(21,260 |
) |
(Loss)/gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
8,661 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Company |
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
8,540 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,530 |
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share available to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
129,771,733 |
|
|
|
98,229,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
132,764,842 |
|
|
|
102,577,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Dividends in |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Loss)/Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
222,413 |
|
|
|
131,046,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,371,488 |
|
|
$ |
(70,857 |
) |
|
$ |
(221,176 |
) |
|
$ |
2,303,178 |
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
2,312,896 |
|
Net issuances of unvested restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,792 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
Conversion of OP units to common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
Reallocation of equity to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,248 |
) |
|
|
(26,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,248 |
) |
OP unit distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(598 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
9,878 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
Amortization of deferred interest costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
222,413 |
|
|
|
131,239,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
|
$ |
2,369,922 |
|
|
$ |
(68,908 |
) |
|
$ |
(241,894 |
) |
|
$ |
2,282,845 |
|
|
$ |
10,318 |
|
|
$ |
2,293,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income available to common stockholders and noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
4,420 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
Amortization of deferred interest costs |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
Equity in other comprehensive income/(loss) of unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Deferred settlement payments on interest rate swaps, net |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Reclassification on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
7,630 |
|
|
|
8,336 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
7,479 |
|
|
$ |
8,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,878 |
|
|
$ |
8,661 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
821 |
|
Loss/(gain) on derivative instruments |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(865 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,835 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Revenue reduction attributable to acquired above-market leases |
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Revenue recognized related to acquired below-market leases |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
Revenue reduction attributable to lease incentives |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Compensation expense related to restricted common stock and LTIP units |
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Amortization of debt premium on mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
Amortization of debt discounts |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Loss from unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
Distributions representing a return on capital from unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
Amortization of deferred interest costs |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
|
|
1,519 |
|
Accrued straight-line rents |
|
|
(4,314 |
) |
|
|
(6,915 |
) |
Deferred leasing costs |
|
|
(2,462 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(6,174 |
) |
|
|
(11,036 |
) |
Security deposits |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
41,404 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of interests in and additions to investments in real estate and related
intangible assets |
|
|
(41,898 |
) |
|
|
(71,727 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
Funds held in escrow for acquisitions |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(42,773 |
) |
|
|
(70,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from common stock offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,797 |
|
Payment of common stock offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(371 |
) |
Payment of deferred loan costs |
|
|
(2,383 |
) |
|
|
(5,773 |
) |
Unsecured line of credit proceeds |
|
|
70,200 |
|
|
|
178,742 |
|
Unsecured line of credit payments |
|
|
(411,650 |
) |
|
|
(181,844 |
) |
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(27,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,812 |
) |
Secured term loan repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Repurchases of exchangeable senior notes due 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,311 |
) |
Proceeds from exchangeable senior notes due 2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Proceeds from unsecured senior notes |
|
|
397,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred settlement payments on interest rate swaps, net |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Distributions to operating partnership unit and LTIP unit holders |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
(429 |
) |
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
|
|
(22,280 |
) |
|
|
(13,860 |
) |
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
59,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,116 |
) |
|
|
16,878 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
21,467 |
|
|
|
19,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
19,351 |
|
|
$ |
36,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest (net of amounts capitalized of $1,494 and
$1,645, respectively) |
|
$ |
16,452 |
|
|
$ |
17,507 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for preferred stock dividends declared |
|
$ |
4,241 |
|
|
$ |
4,241 |
|
Accrual for common stock dividends declared |
|
|
26,248 |
|
|
|
14,043 |
|
Accrual for distributions declared for operating partnership unit and LTIP unit holders |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Accrued additions to real estate and related intangible assets |
|
|
21,755 |
|
|
|
10,588 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
10
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate, net |
|
$ |
3,538,560 |
|
|
$ |
3,536,114 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
56,287 |
|
|
|
57,265 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
21,467 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
|
9,971 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
7,358 |
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
Accrued straight-line rents, net |
|
|
110,981 |
|
|
|
106,905 |
|
Acquired above-market leases, net |
|
|
28,069 |
|
|
|
30,566 |
|
Deferred leasing costs, net |
|
|
121,658 |
|
|
|
125,060 |
|
Deferred loan costs, net |
|
|
13,473 |
|
|
|
11,499 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
56,656 |
|
|
|
55,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,959,080 |
|
|
$ |
3,959,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable, net |
|
$ |
629,640 |
|
|
$ |
657,922 |
|
Exchangeable senior notes, net |
|
|
199,613 |
|
|
|
199,522 |
|
Unsecured senior notes, net |
|
|
645,081 |
|
|
|
247,571 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
392,450 |
|
Security deposits |
|
|
11,585 |
|
|
|
11,749 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
31,086 |
|
|
|
27,029 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
88,116 |
|
|
|
98,826 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
Acquired below-market leases, net |
|
|
7,565 |
|
|
|
7,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,665,917 |
|
|
|
1,646,858 |
|
Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred units, 7.375% Series A cumulative redeemable
preferred units, $230,000,000 liquidation preference
($25.00 per unit), 9,200,000 units issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
222,413 |
|
|
|
222,413 |
|
Limited partners capital, 2,989,069 and 3,001,250
units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
10,536 |
|
|
|
9,918 |
|
General partners capital, 131,239,482 and 131,046,509
units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
2,127,988 |
|
|
|
2,150,314 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(67,556 |
) |
|
|
(69,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
2,293,381 |
|
|
|
2,313,096 |
|
Noncontrolling interests deficit |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
|
2,293,163 |
|
|
|
2,312,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and capital |
|
$ |
3,959,080 |
|
|
$ |
3,959,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
11
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental |
|
$ |
80,217 |
|
|
$ |
70,600 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
24,581 |
|
|
|
20,826 |
|
Other income |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
105,545 |
|
|
|
92,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations |
|
|
20,517 |
|
|
|
17,851 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
10,681 |
|
|
|
8,722 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,835 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
Acquisition related expenses |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
72,774 |
|
|
|
61,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
32,771 |
|
|
|
30,849 |
|
Equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(21,316 |
) |
|
|
(21,260 |
) |
(Loss)/gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
8,661 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Operating Partnership |
|
|
9,896 |
|
|
|
8,667 |
|
Preferred unit distributions |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to the unitholders |
|
$ |
5,655 |
|
|
$ |
4,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per unit attributable to unitholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per unit |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
132,701,731 |
|
|
|
101,135,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
132,701,731 |
|
|
|
102,577,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
12
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
(In thousands, except unit data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Series A |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
General Partners Capital |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Total Partners |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Loss)/Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interests Deficit |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
9,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
222,413 |
|
|
|
3,001,250 |
|
|
$ |
9,918 |
|
|
|
131,046,509 |
|
|
$ |
2,150,314 |
|
|
$ |
(69,549 |
) |
|
$ |
2,313,096 |
|
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
2,312,896 |
|
Net issuances of unvested restricted OP
units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,792 |
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
Conversion of OP units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,181 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
Reallocation of equity to limited
partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,087 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
9,878 |
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
Amortization of deferred interest costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivative
instruments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
9,200,000 |
|
|
$ |
222,413 |
|
|
|
2,989,069 |
|
|
$ |
10,536 |
|
|
|
131,239,482 |
|
|
$ |
2,127,988 |
|
|
$ |
(67,556 |
) |
|
$ |
2,293,381 |
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
$ |
2,293,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
13
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income available to unitholders and noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
5,637 |
|
|
$ |
4,420 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
Amortization of deferred interest costs |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
Equity in other comprehensive income/(loss) of unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Deferred settlement payments on interest rate swaps, net |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Reclassification on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
7,630 |
|
|
$ |
8,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
14
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,878 |
|
|
$ |
8,661 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
821 |
|
Loss/(gain) on derivative instruments |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(865 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,835 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Revenue reduction attributable to acquired above-market leases |
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Revenue recognized related to acquired below-market leases |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
Revenue reduction attributable to lease incentives |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Compensation expense related to share-based payments |
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Amortization of debt premium on mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
Amortization of debt discounts |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Loss from unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
Distributions representing a return on capital from unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
Amortization of deferred interest costs |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
|
|
1,519 |
|
Accrued straight-line rents |
|
|
(4,314 |
) |
|
|
(6,915 |
) |
Deferred leasing costs |
|
|
(2,462 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(6,174 |
) |
|
|
(11,036 |
) |
Security deposits |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
41,404 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of interests in and additions to investments in real estate and
related intangible assets |
|
|
(41,898 |
) |
|
|
(71,727 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
Funds held in escrow for acquisitions |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(42,773 |
) |
|
|
(70,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of OP units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,426 |
|
Payment of deferred loan costs |
|
|
(2,383 |
) |
|
|
(5,773 |
) |
Unsecured line of credit proceeds |
|
|
70,200 |
|
|
|
178,742 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured line of credit payments |
|
|
(411,650 |
) |
|
|
(181,844 |
) |
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(27,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,812 |
) |
Secured term loan repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Repurchases of exchangeable senior notes due 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,311 |
) |
Proceeds from exchangeable senior notes due 2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Proceeds from unsecured senior notes |
|
|
397,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred settlement payments on interest rate swaps, net |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Distributions paid to unitholders |
|
|
(22,789 |
) |
|
|
(14,289 |
) |
Distributions paid to preferred unitholders |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
59,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,116 |
) |
|
|
16,878 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
21,467 |
|
|
|
19,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
19,351 |
|
|
$ |
36,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest (net of amounts capitalized of $1,494
and $1,645, respectively) |
|
$ |
16,452 |
|
|
$ |
17,507 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for unit distributions declared |
|
$ |
26,846 |
|
|
$ |
14,468 |
|
Accrual for preferred unit distributions declared |
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
Accrued additions to real estate and related intangible assets |
|
|
21,755 |
|
|
|
10,588 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
16
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization of the Parent Company and Description of Business
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Parent Company), was incorporated in
Maryland on April 30, 2004. On August 11, 2004, the Parent Company commenced operations after
completing its initial public offering. The Parent Company operates as a fully integrated,
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on acquiring,
developing, owning, leasing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry
principally through its subsidiary, BioMed Realty, L.P., a Maryland limited partnership (the
Operating Partnership and together with the Parent Company referred to as the Company). The
Companys tenants primarily include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research
institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry. The
Companys properties are generally located in markets with well-established reputations as centers
for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and New York/New Jersey.
The Parent Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of March
31, 2011, owned a 97.8% percentage interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining 2.2%
percentage interest in the Operating Partnership is held by limited partners. Each partners
percentage interest in the Operating Partnership is determined based on the number of operating
partnership units and long-term incentive plan units (LTIP units and together with the operating
partnership units, the OP units) owned as compared to total OP units (and potentially issuable OP
units, as applicable) outstanding as of each period end and is used as the basis for the allocation
of net income or loss to each partner.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited, but have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all the disclosures required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for
these interim periods have been recorded. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes therein included in the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned
subsidiaries, partnerships and limited liability companies it controls, and variable interest
entities for which the Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company consolidates entities the
Company controls and records a noncontrolling interest for the portions not owned by the Company.
Control is determined, where applicable, by the sufficiency of equity invested and the rights of
the equity holders, and by the ownership of a majority of the voting interests, with consideration
given to the existence of approval or veto rights granted to the minority stockholder. If the
minority stockholder holds substantive participating rights, it overcomes the presumption of
control by the majority voting interest holder. In contrast, if the minority stockholder simply
holds protective rights (such as consent rights over certain actions), it does not overcome the
presumption of control by the majority voting interest holder.
Investments in Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
The Company evaluates its investments in limited liability companies and partnerships to
determine whether such entities may be a variable interest entity, or VIE, and, if a VIE, whether
the Company is the primary beneficiary. Generally, an entity is determined to be a VIE when either
(1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a
controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that
entitys activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors
have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the
entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting
interest. The primary beneficiary is the entity that has both (1) the power to direct matters that
most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or
the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be
significant to the VIE. The Company considers a variety of factors in identifying the entity
that holds the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the VIEs economic
performance including, but not limited to, the ability to direct financing, leasing, construction
and other operating decisions and activities. In addition, the Company considers the rights of
other investors to participate in policy making decisions, to replace or remove the manager and to
liquidate or sell the entity. The obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits
when a reporting entity is affiliated with a VIE must be based on ownership, contractual, and/or
other pecuniary interests in that VIE. The Company has determined that it is the primary
beneficiary in five VIEs, consisting of single-tenant properties in which the tenant has a
fixed-price purchase option, which are consolidated and reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
17
Selected financial data of the VIEs at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Investment in real estate, net |
|
$ |
386,297 |
|
|
$ |
375,428 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
425,360 |
|
|
|
414,993 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
159,089 |
|
|
|
161,697 |
|
If the foregoing conditions do not apply, the Company considers whether a general partner or
managing member controls a limited partnership or limited liability company. The general partner in
a limited partnership or managing member in a limited liability company is presumed to control that
limited partnership or limited liability company. The presumption may be overcome if the limited
partners or members have either (1) the substantive ability to dissolve the limited partnership or
limited liability company or otherwise remove the general partner or managing member without cause
or (2) substantive participating rights, which provide the limited partners or members with the
ability to effectively participate in significant decisions that would be expected to be made in
the ordinary course of the limited partnerships or limited liability companys business and
thereby preclude the general partner or managing member from exercising unilateral control over the
partnership or company. If these criteria are met and the Company is the general partner or the
managing member, as applicable, the consolidation of the partnership or limited liability company
is required.
Except for investments that are consolidated, the Company accounts for investments in entities
over which it exercises significant influence, but does not control, under the equity method of
accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost and subsequently adjusted for equity
in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. Under the equity method of accounting, the
Companys net equity in the investment is reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and its
share of net income or loss is included in the Companys consolidated statements of income.
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the carrying
value of the Companys investments in unconsolidated partnerships or limited liability companies
may be impaired on an other than temporary basis. An investment is impaired only if managements
estimate of the fair-value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment on
an other than temporary basis. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss is measured as the
excess of the carrying value of the investment over the fair-value of the investment. Management
does not believe that the value of any of the Companys unconsolidated investments in partnerships
or limited liability companies was impaired as of March 31, 2011.
Investments in Real Estate
Investments in real estate, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
578,753 |
|
|
$ |
578,753 |
|
Land under development |
|
|
47,920 |
|
|
|
47,920 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
3,186,329 |
|
|
|
3,160,392 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
94,218 |
|
|
|
91,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,907,220 |
|
|
|
3,878,092 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(368,660 |
) |
|
|
(341,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,538,560 |
|
|
$ |
3,536,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted
cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the long-lived assets use and
eventual disposition. These cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income,
trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If
impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a long-lived asset, an
impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair-value
of the property. The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are
impairments in the values of its investments in long-lived assets. These assessments have a direct
impact on the Companys net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate
negative adjustment to net income. The evaluation of anticipated cash flows is highly subjective
and is based in part on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital
requirements that could differ materially from actual results in future periods. Although the
Companys strategy is to hold its properties over the long-term, if the Companys strategy changes
or market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized
to reduce the property to the lower of the carrying amount or fair-value, and such loss could be
material. As of and through March 31, 2011, no assets have been identified as impaired and no such
impairment losses have been recognized.
Deferred Leasing Costs
Leasing commissions and other direct costs associated with obtaining new or renewal leases are
recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases,
with remaining terms ranging from less than one year to approximately 21 years as of March 31,
2011. Deferred leasing costs also include the net carrying value of acquired in-place leases and
acquired management agreements.
Deferred leasing costs, net at March 31, 2011 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Acquired in-place leases |
|
$ |
216,674 |
|
|
$ |
(132,269 |
) |
|
$ |
84,405 |
|
Acquired management agreements |
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
(11,514 |
) |
|
|
7,043 |
|
Deferred leasing and other direct costs |
|
|
44,191 |
|
|
|
(13,981 |
) |
|
|
30,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
279,422 |
|
|
$ |
(157,764 |
) |
|
$ |
121,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred leasing costs, net at December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Acquired in-place leases |
|
$ |
216,674 |
|
|
$ |
(126,484 |
) |
|
$ |
90,190 |
|
Acquired management agreements |
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
(11,132 |
) |
|
|
7,425 |
|
Deferred leasing and other direct costs |
|
|
40,531 |
|
|
|
(13,086 |
) |
|
|
27,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
275,762 |
|
|
$ |
(150,702 |
) |
|
$ |
125,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition
The Company commences revenue recognition on its leases based on a number of factors. In most
cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the
physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. In
determining what constitutes the leased asset, the Company evaluates whether the Company or the
lessee is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements. If the Company is the
owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the finished
space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space,
typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If the Company concludes that it is not
the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements (the lessee is the owner), then the
leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease
are treated as lease incentives, which reduce revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining non-cancelable term of the respective lease. In these circumstances, the Company begins
revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space for the lessee to
construct improvements. The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the
tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a
lease begins. The Company considers a number of different factors to evaluate whether it or the
lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include:
|
|
whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; |
|
|
whether the tenant or landlord retain legal title to the improvements; |
19
|
|
the uniqueness of the improvements; |
|
|
the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the length of the lease; |
|
|
the responsible party for construction cost overruns; and |
|
|
who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements. |
The determination of who owns the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, is subject to
significant judgment. In making that determination, the Company considers all of the above factors.
However, no one factor is determinative in reaching a conclusion.
All leases are classified as operating leases and minimum rents are recognized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts
contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases are included in accrued straight-line rents on
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and contractually due but unpaid rents are included in
accounts receivable. Existing leases at acquired properties are reviewed at the time of acquisition
to determine if contractual rents are above or below current market rents for the acquired
property. An identifiable lease intangible asset or liability is recorded based on the present
value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the
difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (2)
the Companys estimate of the fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases at
acquisition, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the leases and
any fixed rate renewal periods (based on the Companys assessment of the likelihood that the
renewal periods will be exercised). The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a
reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the
respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental
revenue on a straight-line basis over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases
and any fixed-rate renewal periods, if applicable. If a tenant vacates its space prior to the
contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any
unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off.
Acquired above-market leases, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Acquired above-market leases |
|
$ |
43,138 |
|
|
$ |
43,138 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(15,069 |
) |
|
|
(12,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,069 |
|
|
$ |
30,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired below-market leases, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Acquired below-market leases |
|
$ |
40,156 |
|
|
$ |
40,156 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(32,591 |
) |
|
|
(32,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,565 |
|
|
$ |
7,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease incentives, net, which is included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Lease incentives |
|
$ |
30,065 |
|
|
$ |
27,062 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(6,216 |
) |
|
|
(5,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,849 |
|
|
$ |
21,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations expenses, consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and common area
maintenance costs, are subject to recovery from tenants under the terms of lease agreements.
Amounts recovered are dependent on several factors, including occupancy and lease terms. Revenues
are recognized in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recorded in revenues
as tenant recoveries, and the expenses are recorded in rental operations expenses, as the Company
is generally the
primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has
discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the credit risk.
20
On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates the recoverability of tenant balances, including
rents receivable, straight-line rents receivable, tenant improvements, deferred leasing costs and
any acquisition intangibles. When it is determined that the recoverability of tenant balances is
not probable, an allowance for expected losses related to tenant receivables, including
straight-line rents receivable, utilizing the specific identification method, is recorded as a
charge to earnings. Upon the termination of a lease, the amortization of tenant improvements,
deferred leasing costs and acquisition intangible assets and liabilities is accelerated to the
expected termination date as a charge to their respective line items and tenant receivables are
written off as a reduction of the allowance in the period in which the balance is deemed to be no
longer collectible. For financial reporting purposes, a lease is treated as terminated upon a
tenant filing for bankruptcy, when a space is abandoned and a tenant ceases rent payments, or when
other circumstances indicate that termination of a tenants lease is probable (e.g., eviction).
Lease termination fees are recognized in other income when the related leases are canceled, the
amounts to be received are fixed and determinable and collectability is assured, and when the
Company has no continuing obligation to provide services to such former tenants. The effect of
lease terminations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations expense |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of lease terminations |
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
The Company, through its Operating Partnership, holds investments in equity securities in
certain publicly-traded companies and privately-held companies primarily involved in the life
science industry. The Company does not acquire investments for trading purposes and, as a result,
all of the Companys investments in publicly-traded companies are considered available-for-sale
and are recorded at fair-value. Changes in the fair-value of investments classified as
available-for-sale are recorded in other comprehensive income. The fair-value of the Companys
equity securities in publicly-traded companies is determined based upon the closing trading price
of the equity security as of the balance sheet date. Investments in equity securities of
privately-held companies are generally accounted for under the cost method, because the Company
does not influence any operating or financial policies of the companies in which it invests. The
classification of investments is determined at the time each investment is made, and such
determination is reevaluated at each balance sheet date. The cost of investments sold is determined
by the specific identification method, with net realized gains and losses included in other income.
For all investments in equity securities, if a decline in the fair-value of an investment below its
carrying value is determined to be other-than-temporary, such investment is written down to its
estimated fair-value with a non-cash charge to earnings. The factors that the Company considers in
making these assessments include, but are not limited to, market prices, market conditions,
available financing, prospects for favorable or unfavorable clinical trial results, new product
initiatives and new collaborative agreements.
21
Investments in equity securities, which are included in other assets on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Equity securities in publicly-traded companies, initial cost basis |
|
$ |
4,557 |
|
|
$ |
4,133 |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
|
(2,391 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities in publicly-traded companies, fair-value(1) |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
Equity securities in privately-held companies, initial cost basis(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities, fair-value(3) |
|
$ |
2,166 |
|
|
$ |
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Determination of fair-value is classified as Level 1 in the fair-value hierarchy based on
the use of observable market-based inputs. |
|
(2) |
|
Investments in equity securities in privately-held companies are initially recorded at
fair-value based on unobservable inputs, which are classified as Level 3 in the fair-value
hierarchy. |
|
(3) |
|
The valuation of the Companys investments in equity securities in total is classified as
Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy due to the de minimis value of the Companys investments
in equity securities of privately-held companies. |
The Companys investments in two publicly traded securities currently have a fair market value
that is less than the Companys initial cost basis in these securities due to decreases in their
respective stock prices during the three months ended March 31, 2011. However, management has the
intent and ability to retain the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for an
anticipated recovery in market value. Management will continue to periodically evaluate whether
any investments, the market value of which is less than the Companys initial cost basis, should be
considered other-than-temporarily-impaired.
The Companys remaining investments consisted of equity securities in privately-held
companies, which were determined to have a de minimis fair-value at receipt. This was the result of
substantial doubt about the ability to realize value from the sale of such investments due to an
illiquid or non-existent market for the securities and the ongoing financial difficulties of the
companies that issued the equity securities.
Share-Based Payments
All share-based payments to employees are recognized in the income statement based on their
fair-value. Through March 31, 2011, the Company had only awarded restricted stock of the Parent
Company and LTIP units of the Operating Partnership under its incentive award plan, which are
valued based on the closing market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, and
had not granted any stock options. The fair-value of all share-based payments is amortized to
general and administrative expense and rental operations expense over the relevant service period,
adjusted for anticipated forfeitures.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair-Value
The Company measures financial instruments and other items at fair-value where required under
GAAP, but has elected not to measure any additional financial instruments and other items at
fair-value as permitted under fair-value option accounting guidance.
Fair-value measurement is determined based on the assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in
fair-value measurements, there is a fair-value hierarchy that distinguishes between market
participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting
entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the
reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs
classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted
prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted
prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at
commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which
are typically based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market
activity. In instances where the determination of the fair-value measurement is based on inputs
from different levels of the fair-value hierarchy, the level in the fair-value hierarchy within
which the entire fair-value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair-value measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair-value measurement in its entirety requires judgment,
and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
22
The Company has used interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of
these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted
cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the
contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable
market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair-values of interest rate swaps are
determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash
receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The
variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates
(forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. The Company incorporates
credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the
respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair-value measurements. In adjusting the
fair-value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has
considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral
postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31,
2011, the Company has determined that the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall
valuation of its derivative positions is not significant. As a result, the Company has determined
that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair-value
hierarchy (see Note 9).
The valuation of the Companys investments in equity securities of publicly-traded companies
utilizes Level 1 inputs, based on the closing trading price of the securities as of the balance
sheet date. The valuation of the Companys investments in equity securities of private companies
utilizes Level 3 inputs (including any discounts applied to the valuations). However, as of March
31, 2011, the Companys aggregate investment in equity securities of private companies was
immaterial.
No other assets or liabilities are measured at fair-value on a recurring basis, or have been
measured at fair-value on a non-recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2011.
Derivative Instruments
The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair-value. In
determining the fair-value of its derivatives, the Company considers the credit risk of its
counterparties and the Company. These counterparties are generally larger financial institutions
engaged in providing a variety of financial services. These institutions generally face similar
risks regarding adverse changes in market and economic conditions, including, but not limited to,
fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates, equity and commodity prices and credit spreads. The
ongoing disruptions in the financial markets have heightened the risks to these institutions. While
management believes that its counterparties will meet their obligations under the derivative
contracts, it is possible that defaults may occur.
The accounting for changes in the fair-value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the
derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and
apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to
apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes
in the fair-value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk,
such as interest rate risk, are considered fair-value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying
as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of
forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as
hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge
accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the
hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair-value of the hedged asset or
liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair-value hedge or the earnings effect of
the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative
contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge
accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.
23
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the
fair-value of the derivative is initially reported in accumulated other comprehensive income
(outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings in the period in which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. If charges relating to the hedged transaction are being deferred
pursuant to redevelopment or development activities, the effective portion of changes in the
fair-value of the derivative are also deferred in other comprehensive income on the consolidated
balance sheet, and are amortized to the income statement once the deferred charges from the hedged
transaction begin again to affect earnings. The ineffective portion of changes in the fair-value of
the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each
hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument
with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction. For derivatives that
are not classified as hedges, changes in the fair-value of the derivative are recognized directly
in earnings in the period in which the change occurs.
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business
activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit
risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of
derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial
instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or
payment of future known or expected cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest
rates. The Companys derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount,
timing, and duration of the Companys known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected
cash payments principally related to the Companys investments and borrowings.
The Companys primary objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense
and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this
objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk
management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of
variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments
over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount. During the
three months ended March 31, 2011, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows
associated with the Companys unsecured line of credit. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with the Companys
unsecured line of credit and secured term loan (see Note 9). The Company formally documents the
hedging relationships for all derivative instruments, has historically accounted for its interest
rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges, and does not use derivatives for trading or speculative
purposes.
Managements Estimates
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets
and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reporting of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenue and expenses
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
Segment Information
The Companys properties share the following similar economic and operating characteristics:
(1) they have similar forecasted returns (measured by capitalization rate at acquisition), (2) they
are generally occupied almost exclusively by life science tenants that are public companies,
government agencies or their subsidiaries, (3) they are generally located near areas of high life
science concentrations with similar demographics and site characteristics, (4) the majority of
properties are designed specifically for life science tenants that require infrastructure
improvements not generally found in standard properties, and (5) the associated leases are
primarily triple-net leases, generally with a fixed rental rate and scheduled annual escalations,
that provide for a recovery of close to 100% of operating expenses. Consequently, the Companys
properties qualify for aggregation into one reporting segment.
3. Equity of the Parent Company
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Parent Company issued restricted stock
awards to the Companys employees totaling 321,044 shares of common stock (129,342 shares of common
stock were surrendered to the Company and subsequently retired in lieu of cash payments for taxes
due on the vesting of restricted stock and 10,910 shares were forfeited during the same period),
which are included in the total of common stock outstanding as of the period end (see Note 6).
24
The Parent Company also maintains a Dividend Reinvestment Program and a Cash Option Purchase
Plan (collectively, the DRIP Plan) to provide existing stockholders of the Parent Company with an
opportunity to invest automatically the cash dividends paid upon shares of the Parent Companys
common stock held by them, as well as permit existing and prospective stockholders to make
voluntary cash purchases. Participants may elect to reinvest a portion of, or the full amount of
cash dividends paid, whereas optional cash purchases are normally limited to a maximum amount of
$10,000. In addition, the Parent Company may elect to establish a discount ranging from 0% to 5%
from the market price applicable to newly issued shares of common stock purchased directly from the
Parent Company. The Parent Company may change the discount, initially set at 0%, at its discretion,
but may not change the discount more frequently than once in any three-month period. Shares
purchased under the DRIP Plan shall be, at the Parent Companys option, purchased from either (1)
authorized, but previously unissued shares of common stock, (2) shares of common stock purchased in
the open market or privately negotiated transactions, or (3) a
combination of both. As of and through March 31, 2011, all shares issued to participants in
the DRIP Plan have been acquired through purchases in the open market.
Common Stock, Operating Partnership Units and LTIP Units
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding 131,239,482 shares of the Parent Companys
common stock and 2,593,538 and 395,531 operating partnership and LTIP units, respectively. A share
of the Parent Companys common stock and the operating partnership and LTIP units have essentially
the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss and
distributions of the Operating Partnership. The operating partnership and LTIP units are further
discussed below in this Note 3.
7.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
As of March 31, 2011, the Parent Company had outstanding 9,200,000 shares of 7.375% Series A
cumulative redeemable preferred stock, or Series A preferred stock. Dividends are cumulative on the
Series A preferred stock from the date of original issuance in the amount of $1.84375 per share
each year, which is equivalent to 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share. Dividends
on the Series A preferred stock are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the 15th day of
January, April, July and October of each year. Following a change of control, if the Series A
preferred stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange or the
Nasdaq Global Market, holders will be entitled to receive (when and as authorized by the board of
directors and declared by the Parent Company) cumulative cash dividends from, but excluding, the
first date on which both the change of control and the delisting occurs at an increased rate of
8.375% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share (equivalent to an annual rate of
$2.09375 per share) for as long as the Series A preferred stock is not listed. The Series A
preferred stock does not have a stated maturity date and is not subject to any sinking fund or
mandatory redemption provisions. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series A
preferred stock will rank senior to the Parent Companys common stock with respect to the payment
of distributions and other amounts. The Parent Company is not allowed to redeem the Series A
preferred stock before January 18, 2012, except in limited circumstances to preserve its status as
a REIT. On or after January 18, 2012, the Parent Company may, at its option, redeem the Series A
preferred stock, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption
price of $25.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends on such Series A preferred stock
up to, but excluding the redemption date. Holders of the Series A preferred stock generally have no
voting rights except for limited voting rights if the Parent Company fails to pay dividends for six
or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive) and in certain other circumstances. The
Series A preferred stock is not convertible into or exchangeable for any other property or
securities of the Parent Company.
Dividends and Distributions
The following table lists the dividends and distributions declared by the Company and the
Operating Partnership during the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend and |
|
Dividend and |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Per |
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
Distribution |
|
Declaration Date |
|
Securities Class |
|
Share/Unit |
|
|
Period Covered |
|
Payable Date |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
March 14, 2011 |
|
Common stock and OP units |
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
|
$ |
26,846 |
|
March 14, 2011 |
|
Series A preferred stock/units |
|
$ |
0.46094 |
|
|
January 16, 2011 to April 15, 2011 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
|
$ |
4,241 |
|
25
Total 2011 dividends and distributions declared through March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and OP units |
|
$ |
26,846 |
|
Series A preferred stock/units |
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests on the consolidated balance sheets relate primarily to the OP units
in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Parent Company. In conjunction with the
formation of the Company, certain persons and entities
contributing interests in properties to the Operating Partnership received operating
partnership units. In addition, certain employees of the Operating Partnership received LTIP units
in connection with services rendered or to be rendered to the Operating Partnership. Limited
partners who have been issued OP units have the right to require the Operating Partnership to
redeem part or all of their OP units, which right with respect to LTIP units is subject to vesting
and the satisfaction of other conditions. The Parent Company may elect to acquire those OP units in
exchange for shares of the Parent Companys common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to
adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, issuance of stock rights, specified
extraordinary distributions and similar events, or pay cash based upon the fair market value of an
equivalent number of shares of the Parent Companys common stock at the time of redemption. With
respect to the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership, noncontrolling interests with
the redemption provisions that permit the issuer to settle in either cash or common stock at the
option of the issuer are further evaluated to determine whether temporary or permanent equity
classification on the balance sheet is appropriate. Since the OP units comprising the
noncontrolling interests contain such a provision, the Company evaluated this guidance, including
the requirement to settle in unregistered shares, and determined that the OP units meet the
requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity.
The Company evaluates individual noncontrolling interests for the ability to continue to
recognize the noncontrolling interest as permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Any
noncontrolling interest that fails to qualify as permanent equity will be reclassified as temporary
equity and adjusted to the greater of (1) the carrying amount, or (2) its redemption value as of
the end of the period in which the determination is made.
The redemption value of the OP units not owned by the Parent Company, had such units been
redeemed at March 31, 2011, was approximately $54.5 million based on the average closing price of
the Parent Companys common stock of $18.22 per share for the ten consecutive trading days
immediately preceding March 31, 2011.
The following table shows the vested ownership interests in the Operating Partnership were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Units |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Partnership Units |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
and LTIP Units |
|
|
Total |
|
|
and LTIP Units |
|
|
Total |
|
BioMed Realty Trust |
|
|
129,844,404 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
129,603,445 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
% |
Noncontrolling interest consisting of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating partnership and LTIP units held by employees
and related parties |
|
|
2,341,408 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2,268,873 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Operating partnership and LTIP units held by third parties |
|
|
588,801 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
588,801 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
132,774,613 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
132,461,119 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A charge is recorded each period in the consolidated statements of income for the
noncontrolling interests proportionate share of the Companys net income. An additional adjustment
is made each period such that the carrying value of the noncontrolling interests equals the greater
of (1) the noncontrolling interests proportionate share of equity as of the period end, or (2) the
redemption value of the noncontrolling interests as of the period end, if such interests are
classified as temporary equity. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded an
increase to the carrying value of noncontrolling interests of approximately $1.0 million (a
corresponding decrease was recorded to additional paid-in capital) due to changes in their
aggregate ownership percentage to reflect the noncontrolling interests proportionate share of
equity.
26
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had an 87.5% interest in the limited liability company that
owns the Ardenwood Venture property. This entity is consolidated in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. Equity interests in this partnership not owned by the Company are classified
as a noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2011. Subject to
certain conditions, the Company has the right to purchase the other members interest or sell its
own interest in the Ardenwood Venture limited liability company (buy-sell option). The estimated
fair-value of this option is not material and the Company believes that it will have adequate
resources to settle the option if exercised.
4. Capital of the Operating Partnership
Operating Partnership Units and LTIP Units
As of March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had outstanding 133,833,020 operating
partnership units and 395,531 LTIP units. An operating partnership unit and an LTIP unit have
essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss
and distributions of the Operating Partnership. In conjunction with the formation of the Operating
Partnership, certain persons and entities contributing interests in properties to the Operating
Partnership received operating partnership units. In addition, certain employees of the Operating
Partnership have received LTIP units in connection with services rendered or to be rendered to the
Operating Partnership. Limited partners who have been issued OP units have the right to require the
Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their OP units, which right with respect to LTIP
units is subject to vesting and the satisfaction of other conditions. The general partner of the
Operating Partnership may elect to acquire OP units upon redemption in exchange for shares of the
Parent Companys common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment in the event of stock
splits, stock dividends, issuance of stock rights, specified extraordinary distributions and
similar events, or pay cash based upon the fair-market value of an equivalent number of shares of
the Parent Companys common stock at the time of redemption. The Parent Company owned 97.8% of the
partnership interests in the Operating Partnership at March 31, 2011, is the Operating
Partnerships general partner and is responsible for the management of the Operating Partnerships
business. As the general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company effectively
controls the ability to issue common stock of the Parent Company upon a limited partners notice of
redemption. In addition, the general partner of the Operating Partnership has generally acquired OP
units upon a limited partners notice of redemption in exchange for shares of the Parent Companys
common stock. The redemption provisions of OP units owned by limited partners that permit the
issuer to settle in either cash or common stock at the option of the issuer are further evaluated
in accordance with applicable accounting guidance to determine whether temporary or permanent
equity classification on the balance sheet is appropriate. The Operating Partnership evaluated this
guidance, including the requirement to settle in unregistered shares, and determined that these OP
units meet the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity.
LTIP units represent a profits interest in the Operating Partnership for services rendered or
to be rendered by the LTIP unitholder in its capacity as a partner, or in anticipation of becoming
a partner, in the Operating Partnership. Initially, LTIP units do not have full parity with
operating partnership units of the Operating Partnership with respect to liquidating distributions,
although LTIP unitholders receive the same quarterly per unit distributions as operating
partnership units and may vote the LTIP units from the date of issuance. The LTIP units are subject
to vesting requirements, which lapse over a specified period of time (normally three to five years
from the date of issuance). In addition, the LTIP units are generally subject to a two-year lock-up
period from the date of issuance during which time the LTIP units may not be redeemed or sold by
the LTIP unitholder. Upon the occurrence of specified events, LTIP units may over time achieve full
parity with operating partnership units of the Operating Partnership for all purposes. Upon
achieving full parity, and after the expiration of any vesting and lock-up periods, LTIP units may
be redeemed for an equal number of shares of the Parent Companys common stock or cash, at the
Parent Companys election, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership.
The following table shows the vested ownership interests (excluding unvested LTIP units) in
the Operating Partnership:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Units |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
Partnership Units |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
and LTIP Units |
|
|
Total |
|
|
and LTIP Units |
|
|
Total |
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
129,844,404 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
129,603,445 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
% |
Noncontrolling interest consisting of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP units held by employees and related parties |
|
|
2,341,408 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2,268,873 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
OP units held by third parties |
|
|
588,801 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
588,801 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
132,774,613 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
132,461,119 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
An adjustment is made each period pursuant to the reallocation provisions of the Operating
Partnerships partnership agreement and the applicable accounting guidance, such that the carrying
value of the limited partners equity equals the limited partners proportionate share of total
partners equity as of the period end. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Operating
Partnership recorded an increase to the carrying value of limited partners capital of
approximately $1.1 million (a corresponding decrease was recorded to general partners capital) due
to changes in their aggregate ownership percentage to reflect the limited partners proportionate
share of equity.
The redemption value of the OP units owned by the limited partners, had such units been
redeemed at March 31, 2011, was approximately $54.5 million based on the average closing price of
the Parent Companys common stock of $18.22 per share for the ten consecutive trading days
immediately preceding March 31, 2011.
7.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units
Pursuant to the Operating Partnerships partnership agreement, the Operating Partnerships
7.375% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units, or Series A preferred units were issued to
the Parent Company in exchange for contributed proceeds of approximately $222.4 million following
the Parent Companys issuance of Series A preferred stock. The Operating Partnerships Series A
preferred units are only redeemable for cash equal to a redemption price of $25.00 per unit, plus
all accrued and unpaid distributions on such Series A preferred units up to, but excluding the
redemption date, if and when shares of the Series A preferred stock are redeemed by the Parent
Company, which may not occur before January 18, 2012, except in limited circumstances where
necessary to preserve the Parent Companys status as a REIT. On or after January 18, 2012, the
Parent Company may, at its option, redeem the Series A preferred stock, in whole or in part, at any
time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accrued and
unpaid distributions on such Series A preferred stock up to, but excluding the redemption date.
As of March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had outstanding 9,200,000 Series A preferred
units. Distributions are cumulative on the Series A preferred units from the date of original
issuance in the amount of $1.84375 per unit each year, which is equivalent to 7.375% of the $25.00
liquidation preference per unit. Distributions on the Series A preferred units are payable
quarterly in arrears on or about the 15th day of January, April, July and October of each year.
Following a change of control of the Parent Company, if the Series A preferred stock of the Parent
Company is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq
Global Market, holders of the Series A preferred stock would be entitled to receive (when and as
authorized by the board of directors of the Parent Company and declared by the Parent Company),
cumulative cash dividends from, but excluding, the first date on which both the change of control
and the delisting occurs at an increased rate of 8.375% per annum of the $25.00 liquidation
preference per share (equivalent to an annual rate of $2.09375 per share) for as long as the Series
A preferred stock is not listed. The Series A preferred stock does not have a stated maturity date
and is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption provisions. Upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, the Series A preferred units will rank senior to the OP units with
respect to the payment of distributions and other amounts. Holders of the Series A preferred stock
generally have no voting rights except for limited voting rights if the Parent Company fails to pay
dividends for six or more quarterly periods (whether or not consecutive) and in certain other
circumstances. The Series A preferred stock is not convertible into or exchangeable for any other
property or securities of the Parent Company.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries are reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. If noncontrolling interests are determined to be redeemable, they are carried at the
greater of carrying value or their redemption value as of the balance sheet date and reported as
temporary equity. Consolidated net income is reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest.
Noncontrolling interests on the consolidated balance sheets relate primarily to ownership
interests in consolidated limited liability companies or partnerships that are not owned by the
Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership evaluates individual noncontrolling interests for
the ability to continue to recognize the noncontrolling interest as permanent equity in the
consolidated balance sheets. Any noncontrolling interest that fails to qualify as permanent equity
will be reclassified as temporary equity and adjusted to the greater of (1) the carrying amount, or
(2) its redemption value as of the end of the period in which the determination is made.
28
As of March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had an 87.5% interest in the limited liability
company that owns the Ardenwood Venture property. This entity is consolidated in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. Equity interests in this entity not owned by the Operating
Partnership are classified as a noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets as of
March 31, 2011. Subject to certain conditions, the Operating Partnership has the right to purchase
the other members interest or sell its own interest in the Ardenwood Venture limited liability
company (buy-sell option). The estimated fair-value of this option is not material and the
Operating Partnership believes that it will have adequate resources to settle the option if
exercised.
5. Debt
Debt of the Parent Company
The Parent Company does not hold any indebtedness. All debt is held directly or indirectly by
the Operating Partnership; however, the Parent Company has guaranteed the Operating Partnerships
Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2026 (the Notes due 2026), Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2030 (the
Notes due 2030), Unsecured Senior Notes due 2016 (the Notes due 2016), and Unsecured Senior
Notes due 2020 (the Notes due 2020) as discussed below.
29
Debt of the Operating Partnership
A summary of the Operating Partnerships outstanding consolidated debt as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was as follows (principal balance in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Stated Fixed |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Maturity Date |
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ardentech Court (1) |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
$ |
4,205 |
|
|
$ |
4,237 |
|
|
July 1, 2012 |
Center for Life Science | Boston |
|
|
7.75 |
% |
|
|
7.75 |
% |
|
|
344,744 |
|
|
|
345,577 |
|
|
July 1, 2014 |
500 Kendall Street (Kendall D) |
|
|
6.38 |
% |
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
63,749 |
|
|
|
64,230 |
|
|
December 1, 2018 |
6828 Nancy Ridge Drive |
|
|
7.15 |
% |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
|
September 1, 2012 |
Road to the Cure (2) |
|
|
6.70 |
% |
|
|
5.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,696 |
|
|
January 31, 2014 |
10255 Science Center Drive (2) |
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
Shady Grove Road |
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
|
147,000 |
|
|
September 1, 2016 |
Sidney Street |
|
|
7.23 |
% |
|
|
5.11 |
% |
|
|
27,153 |
|
|
|
27,395 |
|
|
June 1, 2012 |
Sorrento West LLC |
|
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
2.72 |
% |
|
|
13,181 |
|
|
|
13,247 |
|
|
November 10, 2011 |
9865 Towne Centre Drive |
|
|
7.95 |
% |
|
|
7.95 |
% |
|
|
17,572 |
|
|
|
17,636 |
|
|
June 1, 2013 |
900 Uniqema Boulevard |
|
|
8.61 |
% |
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
May 1, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,025 |
|
|
|
652,317 |
|
|
|
Unamortized premiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,615 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,640 |
|
|
|
657,922 |
|
|
|
Notes due 2026 |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
6.45 |
% |
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
October 1, 2026 |
Unamortized discount (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes due 2026, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,613 |
|
|
|
19,522 |
|
|
|
Notes due 2030 |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
January 15, 2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable senior notes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,613 |
|
|
|
199,522 |
|
|
|
Notes due 2016 |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 15, 2016 |
Unamortized discount (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes due 2016, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes due 2020 |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
April 15, 2020 |
Unamortized discount (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,380 |
) |
|
|
(2,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes due 2020, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,620 |
|
|
|
247,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured senior notes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,081 |
|
|
|
247,571 |
|
|
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
392,450 |
|
|
August 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,525,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,497,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In April 2011, the Operating Partnership voluntarily prepaid in full the outstanding mortgage
note pertaining to the Ardentech Court property, in the amount of approximately $4.6 million
including a prepayment premium of $361,000, prior to its maturity date. |
|
(2) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership voluntarily prepaid
in full the outstanding mortgage notes totaling approximately $25.5 million pertaining to the
Road to the Cure and the 10255 Science Center Drive properties, prior to their respective
maturity dates. |
|
(3) |
|
The unamortized debt discount will be amortized through October 1, 2011, the first date at
which the holders of the Notes due 2026 may require the Operating Partnership to repurchase
the Notes due 2026. |
|
(4) |
|
The unamortized debt discount will be amortized through April 15, 2016, the maturity date of
the Notes due 2016. |
|
(5) |
|
The unamortized debt discount will be amortized through April 15, 2020, the maturity date of
the Notes due 2020. |
30
Mortgage Notes Payable, net
The Operating Partnerships $350.0 million mortgage loan, which is secured by the Companys
Center for Life Science | Boston property in Boston, Massachusetts, includes a financial covenant
relating to a minimum amount of net worth. Management believes that it was in compliance with this
covenant as of March 31, 2011. Other than the financial covenant related to the Center for Life
Science | Boston mortgage, no other financial covenants are required on the remaining mortgage
notes payable.
Premiums were recorded upon assumption of the mortgage notes payable at the time of the
related property acquisition to account for above-market interest rates. Amortization of these
premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective
note using a method that approximates the effective-interest method.
The Operating Partnership has the ability and intends to repay any principal and accrued
interest due in 2011 through the use of cash from operations or borrowings from its unsecured line
of credit.
Unsecured Line of Credit
The Operating Partnerships unsecured line of credit with KeyBank National Association
(KeyBank) and other lenders has a borrowing capacity of $720.0 million and a maturity date of
August 1, 2011. The unsecured line of credit bears interest at a floating rate equal to, at the
Operating Partnerships option, either (1) reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a spread which ranges from
100 to 155 basis points, depending on the Companys leverage, or (2) the higher of (a) the prime
rate then in effect plus a spread which ranges from 0 to 25 basis points, or (b) the federal funds
rate then in effect plus a spread which ranges from 50 to 75 basis points, in each case, depending
on the Companys leverage. Subject to the administrative agents reasonable discretion, the
Operating Partnership may increase the amount of the unsecured line of credit to $1.0 billion upon
satisfying certain conditions. In addition, the Operating Partnership, at its sole discretion, may
extend the maturity date of the unsecured line of credit to August 1, 2012 after satisfying certain
conditions under its control and paying an extension fee based on the then current facility
commitment. At maturity, the Operating Partnership may refinance the unsecured line of credit,
depending on market conditions and the availability of credit, or it may execute the extension
option. The Operating Partnership has deferred the loan costs associated with the subsequent
amendments to the unsecured line of credit, which are being amortized to expense with the
unamortized loan costs from the original debt facility over the remaining term. At March 31, 2011,
the Operating Partnership had $51.0 million in outstanding borrowings on its unsecured line of
credit, with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.4% (excluding the effect of interest rate
swaps). At March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had additional borrowing capacity under the
unsecured line of credit of up to approximately $661.2 million (net of outstanding letters of
credit issued by the Operating Partnership and drawable on the unsecured line of credit of
approximately $7.8 million).
The terms of the credit agreement for the unsecured line of credit includes certain
restrictions and covenants, which limit, among other things, the payment of dividends and the
incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens. The terms also require compliance with financial
ratios relating to the minimum amounts of the Companys net worth, fixed charge coverage, unsecured
debt service coverage, the maximum amount of secured, and secured recourse indebtedness, leverage
ratio and certain investment limitations. The dividend restriction referred to above provides that,
except to enable the Parent Company to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, the Parent Company will not make distributions with respect to common stock or other
equity interests in an aggregate amount for the preceding four fiscal quarters in excess of 95% of
funds from operations, as defined, for such period, subject to other adjustments. Management
believes that it was in compliance with the covenants as of March 31, 2011.
Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2026, net
On September 25, 2006, the Operating Partnership issued $175.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its Notes due 2026. The Notes due 2026 are general senior unsecured obligations of the
Operating Partnership and rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured
indebtedness of the Operating Partnership. Interest at a rate of 4.50% per annum is payable on
April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2007, until the stated maturity date of
October 1, 2026. The terms of the Notes due 2026 are governed by an indenture, dated September 25,
2006, among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, the Parent Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee. The Notes due 2026 contain an exchange settlement feature, which
provides that the Notes due 2026 may, on or after September 1, 2026 or under certain other
circumstances, be exchangeable for cash (up to the principal amount of the Notes due 2026) and,
with respect to excess exchange value, into, at the Operating Partnerships option, cash, shares of
the Parent Companys common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock at the then
applicable exchange rate. The initial exchange rate was 26.4634 shares per $1,000 principal amount
of Notes due 2026, representing an exchange price of approximately $37.79 per share. If certain
designated events occur on or prior to October 6, 2011 and a holder elects to exchange Notes due
2026 in connection with any such transaction, the Operating Partnership will increase the exchange
rate
31
by a number of additional shares of
common stock based on the date the transaction becomes
effective and the price paid per share of common stock in the transaction, as set forth in the
indenture governing the Notes due 2026. The exchange rate may also be adjusted under certain other
circumstances, including the payment of quarterly cash dividends by the Parent Company in excess of
$0.29 per share of its common stock. As a result of past increases in the Parent Companys
quarterly cash dividend, the exchange rate is currently 26.8135 shares per $1,000 principal amount
of Notes due 2026 or an exchange price of approximately $37.29 per share of the Parent Companys
common stock. The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes due 2026, in whole or in part, at any
time to preserve the Parent Companys status as a REIT or at any time on or after October 6, 2011
for cash at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The holders of the Notes
due 2026 have the right to require the Operating Partnership to repurchase the Notes due 2026, in
whole or in part, for cash on each of October 1, 2011, October 1, 2016 and October 1, 2021, or upon
the occurrence of a designated event, in each case for a repurchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes due 2026 plus accrued and unpaid interest. The terms of the indenture
for the Notes due 2026 do not require compliance with any financial covenants.
As the Operating Partnership may settle the Notes due 2026 in cash (or other assets) on
conversion, it separately accounts for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option)
components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the Operating Partnerships nonconvertible
debt borrowing rate. The equity component of the convertible debt is included in the additional
paid-in capital section of stockholders equity and the value of the equity component is treated as
original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the debt security. The
resulting debt discount is accreted as additional interest expense over the non-cancelable term of
the instrument.
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the equity component
recognized was approximately $14.0 million.
Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2030
On January 11, 2010, the Operating Partnership issued $180.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its Notes due 2030. The Notes due 2030 are general senior unsecured obligations of the
Operating Partnership and rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured
indebtedness of the Operating Partnership. Interest at a rate of 3.75% per annum is payable on
January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2010, until the stated maturity date of
January 15, 2030. The terms of the Notes due 2030 are governed by an indenture, dated January 11,
2010, among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, the Parent Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee. The Notes due 2030 contain an exchange settlement feature, which
provides that the Notes due 2030 may, at any time prior to the close of business on the second
scheduled trading day preceding the maturity date, be exchangeable for shares of the Parent
Companys common stock at the then applicable exchange rate. As the exchange feature for the Notes
due 2030 must be settled in the common stock of the Parent Company, accounting guidance applicable
to convertible debt instruments that permit the issuer to settle all or a portion of the exchange
feature in cash upon conversion does not apply. The initial exchange rate was 55.0782 shares per
$1,000 principal amount of Notes due 2030, representing an exchange price of approximately $18.16
per share of the Parent Companys common stock. If certain designated events occur on or prior to
January 15, 2015 and a holder elects to exchange Notes due 2030 in connection with any such
transaction, the Company will increase the exchange rate by a number of additional shares of the
Parent Companys common stock based on the date the transaction becomes effective and the price
paid per share of the Parent Companys common stock in the transaction, as set forth in the
indenture governing the Notes due 2030. The exchange rate may also be adjusted under certain other
circumstances, including the payment of quarterly cash dividends by the Parent Company in excess of
$0.14 per share of its common stock.
The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes due 2030, in whole or in part, at any time to
preserve the Parent Companys status as a REIT or at any time on or after January 21, 2015 for cash
at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The holders of the Notes due 2030
have the right to require the Operating Partnership to repurchase the Notes due 2030, in whole or
in part, for cash on each of January 15, 2015, January 15, 2020 and January 15, 2025, or upon the
occurrence of a designated event, in each case for a repurchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes due 2030 plus accrued and unpaid interest. The terms of the indenture
for the Notes due 2030 do not require compliance with any financial covenants.
32
Unsecured Senior Notes due 2016, net
On March 30, 2011, the Operating Partnership issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount
of its Notes due 2016. The purchase price paid by the underwriters was 99.365% of the principal
amount and the Notes due 2016 have been recorded on the consolidated balance sheet net of the
discount. The Notes due 2016 are senior unsecured obligations of the Operating Partnership and rank
equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of the Operating
Partnership. However, the Notes due 2016 are effectively subordinated to the Operating
Partnerships existing and future mortgages and other secured indebtedness (to the extent of the
value of the collateral securing such indebtedness) and to all existing and future preferred equity
and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of the Operating Partnerships subsidiaries,
including guarantees provided by the Operating Partnerships subsidiaries under the Operating
Partnerships unsecured line of credit. Interest at a rate of 3.85% per year is payable on April 15
and October 15 of each year, beginning on October 15, 2011, until the stated maturity date of April
15, 2016. The terms of the Notes due 2016 are governed by a base indenture and supplemental
indenture, each dated March 30, 2011, among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, the Parent
Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.
The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes due 2016, in whole or in part, at any time for
cash at a redemption price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes
due 2016 being redeemed; or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments
of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the
adjusted treasury rate plus 30 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest.
The terms of the indenture for the Notes due 2016 require compliance with various financial
covenants, including limits on the amount of total leverage and secured debt maintained by the
Operating Partnership and which require the Operating Partnership to maintain minimum levels of
debt service coverage. Management believes that it was in compliance with these covenants as of
March 31, 2011.
Unsecured Senior Notes due 2020, net
On April 29, 2010, the Operating Partnership issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount
of its Notes due 2020. The purchase price paid by the initial purchasers was 98.977% of the
principal amount and the Notes due 2020 have been recorded on the consolidated balance sheet net of
the discount. The Notes due 2020 are senior unsecured obligations of the Operating Partnership and
rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of the Operating
Partnership. However, the Notes due 2020 are effectively subordinated to the Operating
Partnerships existing and future mortgages and other secured indebtedness (to the extent of the
value of the collateral securing such indebtedness) and to all existing and future preferred equity
and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of the Operating Partnerships subsidiaries,
including guarantees provided by the Operating Partnerships subsidiaries under the Operating
Partnerships unsecured line of credit. Interest at a rate of 6.125% per year is payable on April
15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on October 15, 2010, until the stated maturity date of
April 15, 2020. The terms of the Notes due 2020 are governed by an indenture, dated April 29, 2010,
among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, the Parent Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee.
The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes due 2020, in whole or in part, at any time for
cash at a redemption price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes
due 2020 being redeemed; or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments
of principal and interest thereon discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the
adjusted treasury rate plus 40 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest.
The terms of the indenture for the Notes due 2020 require compliance with various financial
covenants, including limits on the amount of total leverage and secured debt maintained by the
Operating Partnership and which require the Operating Partnership to maintain minimum levels of
debt service coverage. Management believes that it was in compliance with these covenants as of
March 31, 2011.
On January 12, 2011, in accordance with the registration rights agreement entered into among
the Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and the initial purchasers of the Notes due 2020, the
Operating Partnership completed its exchange offer to exchange all of the outstanding unregistered
Notes due 2020 for an equal principal amount of a new issue of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2020
pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. A total of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of the original Notes due 2020,
representing 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the original Notes due 2020, was tendered
and received prior to the expiration of the exchange offer. The terms of the Notes due 2020 are
substantially identical to the original Notes due 2020, except for transfer restrictions and
registration rights relating to the original Notes due 2020.
33
Interest expense consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
11,377 |
|
|
$ |
11,858 |
|
Amortization of debt premium on mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
Amortization of deferred interest costs (see Note 9) |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
Derivative instruments (see Note 9) |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
Secured term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Exchangeable senior notes |
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
Unsecured senior notes |
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan fees |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
21,316 |
|
|
$ |
21,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011, principal payments due for the Operating Partnerships consolidated
indebtedness (excluding debt premiums and discounts) were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
69,968 |
|
2012 |
|
|
44,879 |
|
2013 |
|
|
25,370 |
|
2014 |
|
|
339,020 |
|
2015 |
|
|
6,253 |
|
Thereafter(1) |
|
|
1,040,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,525,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $19.8 million in principal payments of the Notes due 2026 based on a contractual
maturity date of October 1, 2026 and $180.0 million in principal payments of the Notes due
2030 based on a contractual maturity date of January 15, 2030. |
6. Earnings Per Share of the Parent Company
Instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are considered participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, are considered in computing basic earnings per share
under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method for calculating
earnings per share when a companys capital structure includes either two or more classes of common
stock or common stock and participating securities. Basic earnings per share under the two-class
method is calculated based on dividends declared on common shares and other participating
securities (distributed earnings) and the rights of participating securities in any undistributed
earnings, which represents net income remaining after deduction of dividends accruing during the
period. The undistributed earnings are allocated to all outstanding common shares and participating
securities based on the relative percentage of each security to the total number of outstanding
participating
securities. Basic earnings per share represents the summation of the distributed and
undistributed earnings per share class divided by the total number of shares.
34
Through March 31, 2011 all of the Companys participating securities (including the OP units)
received dividends/distributions at an equal dividend/distribution rate per share/unit. As a
result, the portion of net income allocable to the weighted-average restricted stock outstanding
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 has been deducted from net income available to
common stockholders to calculate basic earnings per share. The calculation of diluted earnings per
share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 includes the outstanding OP units (both vested and
unvested) in the weighted-average shares, and net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
in the Operating Partnership has been added back to net income available to common stockholders.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the restricted stock was anti-dilutive to the
calculation of diluted earnings per share and was therefore excluded. As a result, diluted earnings
per share was calculated based upon net income available to common stockholders less net income
allocable to unvested restricted stock and distributions in excess of earnings attributable to
unvested restricted stock. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 includes the outstanding OP units (both vested and unvested) and restricted stock in
the weighted-average shares, and net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the
Operating Partnership has been added to net income available to common stockholders in calculating
diluted earnings per share. No shares were issuable upon settlement of the excess exchange value
pursuant to the exchange settlement feature of the Notes due 2026 (originally issued in 2006 see
Note 5) as the common stock price at March 31, 2011 and 2010 did not exceed the exchange price then
in effect. In addition, shares issuable upon settlement of the exchange feature of the Notes due
2030 (originally issued in 2010 see Note 5) were anti-dilutive and were not included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share based on the if converted method for the three months
ended March 31, 2011. No other shares were considered anti-dilutive for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Computations of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share data) were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,530 |
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
Less: net income allocable and distributions in excess of earnings to
participating securities |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic |
|
$ |
5,232 |
|
|
$ |
4,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders basic |
|
$ |
5,232 |
|
|
$ |
4,111 |
|
Add: net income allocable and distributions in excess of earnings to dilutive
participating securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
Add: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders and participating securities |
|
$ |
5,357 |
|
|
$ |
4,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
129,771,733 |
|
|
|
98,229,996 |
|
Incremental shares from assumed conversion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289,597 |
|
Operating partnership and LTIP units |
|
|
2,993,109 |
|
|
|
3,057,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
132,764,842 |
|
|
|
102,577,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Earnings Per Unit of the Operating Partnership
Instruments granted in equity-based payment transactions are considered participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, are considered in computing basic earnings per unit
under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation method for calculating
earnings per unit when a companys capital structure includes either two or more classes of common
equity or common equity and participating securities. Basic earnings per unit under the two-class
method is calculated
based on distributions declared on the OP units and other participating securities
(distributed earnings) and the rights of participating securities in any undistributed earnings,
which represents net income remaining after deduction of distributions accruing during the period.
The undistributed earnings are allocated to all outstanding OP units and participating securities
based on the relative percentage of each security to the total number of outstanding participating
securities. Basic earnings per unit represents the summation of the distributed and undistributed
earnings per unit class divided by the total number of OP units.
35
Through March 31, 2011 all of the Operating Partnerships participating securities received
distributions at an equal distribution rate per unit. As a result, the portion of net income
allocable to the weighted-average unvested OP units outstanding for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010 has been deducted from net income available to unitholders to calculate basic
earnings per unit. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 the unvested OP units were
anti-dilutive to the calculation of earnings per unit and were therefore excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per unit, and diluted earnings per unit is calculated based upon
net income attributable to unitholders. The calculation of diluted earnings per unit for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 includes unvested OP units in the weighted-average shares, and diluted
earnings per unit is calculated based upon net income available to the unitholders. No shares of
common stock of the Parent Company were contingently issuable upon settlement of the excess
exchange value pursuant to the exchange settlement feature of the Notes due 2026 (originally issued
in 2006 see Note 5) as the common stock price at March 31, 2011 and 2010 did not exceed the
exchange price then in effect. In addition, units issuable upon settlement of the exchange feature
of the Notes due 2030 (originally issued in 2010 see Note 5) were anti-dilutive and were not
included in the calculation of diluted earnings per unit based on the if converted method for the
three months ended March 31, 2011. No other units were considered anti-dilutive for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Computations of basic and diluted earnings per unit (in thousands, except share data) were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to unitholders |
|
$ |
5,655 |
|
|
$ |
4,426 |
|
Less: net income allocable and distributions in excess of earnings
to participating securities |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to unitholders basic |
|
$ |
5,345 |
|
|
$ |
4,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to unitholders basic |
|
$ |
5,345 |
|
|
$ |
4,223 |
|
Add: net income allocable and distributions in excess of earnings
to dilutive participating securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to unitholders |
|
$ |
5,345 |
|
|
$ |
4,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
132,701,731 |
|
|
|
101,135,825 |
|
Incremental units from assumed conversion/vesting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,441,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
132,701,731 |
|
|
|
102,577,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per unit attributable to unitholders, basic and diluted: |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
8. Investment in Unconsolidated Partnerships
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include investments in two limited
liability companies with Prudential Real Estate Investors (PREI), which were formed in the second
quarter of 2007, and in 10165 McKellar Court, L.P. (McKellar Court), a limited partnership with
Quidel Corporation, the tenant which occupies the McKellar Court property. One of the PREI limited
liability companies, PREI II LLC, is a VIE; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary.
PREI will bear the majority of any losses. The other PREI limited liability company, PREI I LLC,
does not qualify as a VIE. In
addition, consolidation is not required as the Company does not control the limited liability
companies. The McKellar Court partnership is a VIE; however, the Company is not the primary
beneficiary. The limited partner at McKellar Court is the only tenant in the property and will bear
the majority of any losses. As it does not control the limited liability companies or the
partnership, the Company accounts for them under the equity method of accounting. Significant
accounting policies used by the unconsolidated partnerships that own these properties are similar
to those used by the Company. General information on the PREI limited liability companies and the
McKellar Court partnership (each referred to in this footnote individually as a partnership and
collectively as the partnerships) as of March 31, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys |
|
|
Companys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
Economic |
|
|
|
Name |
|
Partner |
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Date Acquired |
PREI I LLC(1) |
|
PREI |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
April 4, 2007 |
PREI II LLC(2) |
|
PREI |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
April 4, 2007 |
McKellar Court(3) |
|
Quidel Corporation |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
%(4) |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
PREI I LLC owns a portfolio of properties in Cambridge, Massachusetts comprised of a
stabilized laboratory/office building totaling 184,445 square feet located at 320 Bent Street,
a partially leased laboratory/office building totaling 420,000 square feet located at 301
Binney Street, a 37-unit apartment building, an operating garage facility on Rogers Street
with 503 spaces, an operating below grade garage facility at Kendall Square with approximately
1,400 spaces, and a building at 650 East Kendall Street that can support up to 280,000
rentable square feet of laboratory and office space. The 650 East Kendall Street site also
includes a below grade parking facility. |
|
|
|
Each of the PREI operating agreements includes a put/call option whereby either member can cause
the limited liability company to sell certain properties in which it holds leasehold interests
to the Company at any time after the fifth anniversary and before the seventh anniversary of the
acquisition date. However, the put/call option may be terminated prior to exercise under certain
circumstances. The put/call option purchase price is based on a predetermined return on capital
invested by PREI. If the put/call option is exercised, the Company believes that it would have
adequate resources to fund the purchase price. |
|
|
|
The PREI joint ventures $203.3 million secured acquisition and interim loan facility with
KeyBank bears interest at a rate equal to, at the option of the PREI joint ventures, either (1)
reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 350 basis points or (2) the higher of (a) the prime rate then in
effect, (b) the federal funds rate then in effect plus 50 basis points or (c) one-month LIBOR
plus 450 basis points, and requires interest only monthly payments until the maturity date,
February 10, 2012. At maturity, the PREI joint ventures may refinance the secured acquisition
and interim loan facility, depending on market conditions and the availability of credit, or
they may repay the principal balance. Pursuant to the loan facility, the Company executed
guaranty agreements in which it guaranteed the full completion of the construction and any
tenant improvements at the 301 Binney Street property if PREI I LLC was unable or unwilling to
complete the project. On March 11, 2009, the PREI joint ventures jointly entered into an
interest rate cap agreement, which was intended to have the effect of hedging variability in
future interest payments on the $203.3 million secured acquisition and interim loan facility
above a strike rate of 2.5% (excluding the applicable credit spread) through February 10, 2011.
At March 31, 2011, there were $203.3 million in outstanding borrowings on the secured
acquisition and interim loan facility, with a contractual interest rate of 3.8% (including the
applicable credit spread). |
|
|
|
On February 13, 2008, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Companys joint venture with PREI I LLC
entered into a secured construction loan facility with certain lenders to provide borrowings of
up to approximately $245.0 million in connection with the construction of 650 East Kendall
Street, a life sciences building located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. On August 3, 2010, the
maturity date of the secured construction loan facility was extended from August 13, 2010 to
February 13, 2011. On January 11, 2011, the maturity date was further extended from February
13, 2011 to August 13, 2011. In accordance with the loan agreement, Prudential Insurance
Corporation of America has guaranteed repayment of the construction loan. At maturity, the
wholly owned subsidiary may refinance the loan, depending on market conditions and the
availability of credit, or it may repay the principal balance of the construction loan. At March
31, 2011, there were $203.5 million in outstanding borrowings on the secured construction loan
facility, with a contractual interest rate of 1.8% (including the applicable credit spread). |
|
(2) |
|
As part of a larger transaction which included the acquisition by PREI I LLC of the Cambridge
portfolio described above, PREI II LLC acquired a portfolio of properties in April 2007. It
disposed of its acquired properties in 2007 at no material gain or loss. The total sale price
included approximately $4.0 million contingently payable in June 2012 pursuant to a
put/call option, exercisable on the earlier of the extinguishment or expiration of development
restrictions placed on a portion of the development rights included in the disposition. The
Companys remaining investment in PREI II LLC (maximum exposure to losses) was approximately
$814,000 at March 31, 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
The McKellar Court partnership holds a property comprised of a two-story laboratory/office
building totaling 72,863 rentable square feet located in San Diego, California. The Companys
investment in the McKellar Court partnership (maximum exposure to losses) was approximately
$12.5 million at March 31, 2011. In December 2009, the Operating Partnership provided funding
in the form of a promissory note to the McKellar Court partnership in the amount of $10.3
million, which matures at the earlier of (a) January 1, 2020, or (b) the day that the limited
partner exercises an option to purchase the Operating Partnerships ownership interest. Loan
proceeds were utilized to repay a mortgage with a third party. Interest-only payments on the
promissory note are due monthly at a fixed rate of 8.15% (the rate may adjust higher after
January 1, 2015), with the principal balance outstanding due at maturity. |
|
(4) |
|
The Companys economic interest in the McKellar Court partnership entitles it to 75% of the
extraordinary cash flows after repayment of the partners capital contributions and 22% of the
operating cash flows. |
37
The Company acts as the operating member or partner, as applicable, and day-to-day manager for
the partnerships. The Company is entitled to receive fees for providing construction and
development services (as applicable) and management services to the PREI joint ventures. The
Company earned approximately $272,000 and $527,000 in fees for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively, for services provided to the PREI joint ventures, which are reflected
in tenant recoveries and other income in the consolidated statements of income.
The condensed combined balance sheets for all of the Companys unconsolidated partnerships
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate, net |
|
$ |
616,164 |
|
|
$ |
620,430 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) |
|
|
8,238 |
|
|
|
7,914 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
11,857 |
|
|
|
12,303 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
26,098 |
|
|
|
26,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
662,357 |
|
|
$ |
667,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and members equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable and secured construction loan |
|
$ |
417,077 |
|
|
$ |
415,933 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
17,063 |
|
|
|
18,101 |
|
Members equity |
|
|
228,217 |
|
|
|
233,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
662,357 |
|
|
$ |
667,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys net investment in unconsolidated partnerships |
|
$ |
56,287 |
|
|
$ |
57,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The condensed combined statements of operations for the unconsolidated partnerships were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
9,354 |
|
|
$ |
7,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations expenses and real estate taxes |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,597 |
|
|
|
3,305 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
14,029 |
|
|
|
10,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,675 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnerships |
|
$ |
(648 |
) |
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
9. Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had two interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional
amount of $150.0 million under which at each monthly settlement date the Company either (1)
receives the difference between a fixed interest rate (the Strike Rate) and one-month LIBOR if
the Strike Rate is less than LIBOR or (2) pays such difference if the Strike Rate is greater than
LIBOR. The interest rate swaps hedge the Companys exposure to the variability on expected cash
flows attributable to changes in interest rates on the first interest payments, due on the date
that is on or closest after each swaps settlement date, associated with the amount of LIBOR-based
debt equal to each swaps notional amount. These interest rate swaps, with a notional amount of
$150.0 million (interest rate of 5.8%, including the applicable credit spread), are currently
intended to hedge interest payments associated with the Companys unsecured line of credit. No
initial investment was made to enter into the interest rate swap agreements.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had deferred interest costs of approximately $54.4 million
in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to forward starting swaps, which were settled with
the corresponding counterparties in March and April 2009 for approximately $86.5 million. The
forward starting swaps were entered into to mitigate the Companys exposure to the variability in
expected future cash flows attributable to changes in future interest rates associated with a
forecasted issuance of fixed-rate debt, with interest payments for a minimum of ten years. In June
2009 the Company closed on $368.0 million in fixed-rate mortgage loans secured by its 9865 Towne
Centre Drive and Center for Life Science | Boston properties (see Note 5). The deferred interest
costs will be amortized as additional interest expense over a remaining period of approximately
eight years.
The following is a summary of the terms of the interest rate swaps and the forward starting
swaps and their fair-values, which are included in derivative instruments on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-Value(1) |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Strike Rate |
|
|
Effective Date |
|
Expiration Date |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
|
4.673 |
% |
|
October 1, 2007 |
|
August 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
(1,707 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,928 |
) |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
4.700 |
% |
|
October 10, 2007 |
|
August 1, 2011 |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
(3,826 |
) |
Other(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,230 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fair-value of derivative instruments does not include any related accrued interest payable,
which is included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
A stock purchase warrant was received in connection with an early lease termination in
September 2009 and was recorded as a derivative instrument. Changes in the fair-value of the
stock purchase warrant are included in earnings in the period in which they occur. |
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the
fair-value of the derivative is initially reported in accumulated other comprehensive income
(outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings in the period in which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, such
derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt.
The ineffective portion of the change in fair-value of the derivatives is recognized directly in
earnings.
The Companys use of proceeds from its March 2011 unsecured debt offering to repay a portion
of the outstanding indebtedness on its unsecured line of credit caused the amount of variable-rate
indebtedness to fall below the combined notional value of the outstanding interest rate swaps on
March 30, 2011, causing the Company to be overhedged. As a result, the Company re-performed tests
to assess the effectiveness of its interest rate swaps. Although the interest rate swaps with an
aggregate notional amount of $150.0 million passed the assessment tests at March 31, 2011 and the
$115.0 million swap continued to qualify for hedge accounting, the $35.0 million swap no longer
qualifies for hedge accounting. From the date that hedge accounting was discontinued on the $35.0
million swap, changes in the fair-value associated with this interest rate swap were recorded
directly to earnings, resulting in the recognition of a gain of approximately $31,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, which is included as a component of loss on derivative instruments.
The Company accelerated the reclassification of amounts deferred in accumulated other comprehensive
loss to earnings related to the hedged forecasted transactions that became probable of not
occurring during the period in which the Company was overhedged. This resulted in a cumulative
charge to earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of approximately $1.0 million.
39
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a total loss on derivative
instruments of $1.0 million, primarily related to the reduction in the amount of the variable-rate
indebtedness relating to the remaining $150.0 million interest rate swaps (see above), hedge
ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges due to mismatches in maturity dates and interest rate reset
dates between the interest rate swaps and corresponding debt and changes in the fair-value of other
derivative instruments. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a total
gain on derivative instruments of $150,000 primarily related to changes in the fair-value of a
stock purchase warrant held by the Company, which are recorded directly to the consolidated income
statement as they occur.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivatives will be
reclassified to earnings during the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The
change in net unrealized (loss)/gain on derivative instruments includes reclassifications of net
unrealized losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss as (1) an increase to interest expense
of $3.4 million and $5.9 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
and (2) a loss on derivative instruments of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and a gain on derivative instruments of $150,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. During
the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $8.3 million will be reclassified
from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an increase to interest expense. In addition, for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately $106,000 and $288,000, respectively, of
settlement payments on interest rate swaps have been deferred in accumulated other comprehensive
loss and will be amortized over the useful lives of the related development or redevelopment
projects.
The
following is a summary of the amount of loss recognized in other comprehensive
income related to the derivative instruments for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Amount of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (effective portion): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to interest expense related to the derivative instruments for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Amount of loss
reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive loss to
income (effective portion): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps(1) |
|
$ |
(1,645 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,123 |
) |
Forward starting swaps(2) |
|
|
(1,765 |
) |
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(3,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents payments made to swap counterparties for the effective portion of interest
rate swaps that were recognized as an increase to interest expense for the periods presented
(the amount was recorded as an increase and corresponding decrease to accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the same accounting period). |
|
(2) |
|
Amount represents reclassifications of deferred interest costs from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to interest expense related to the Companys previously settled forward
starting swaps. |
40
The following is a summary of the amount of (loss)/gain recognized in income as a loss on
derivative instruments related to the ineffective portion of the derivative instruments for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Amount of (loss)/gain recognized in
income (ineffective portion and amount
excluded from effectiveness testing): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(451 |
) |
|
$ |
56 |
|
Ineffective interest rate swaps |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate swaps |
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
Other derivative instruments |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss)/gain on derivative instruments |
|
$ |
(1,011 |
) |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Fair-Value of Financial Instruments
The Company is required to disclose fair-value information about all financial instruments,
whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair-value.
The Companys disclosures of estimated fair-value of financial instruments at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 were determined using available market information and appropriate valuation
methods. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated
fair-value. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material
effect on the estimated fair-value amounts.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable,
security deposits, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate fair-value
due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The Company utilizes quoted market prices to estimate the fair-value of its fixed-rate and
variable-rate debt, when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the Company
calculates the fair-value of its mortgage notes payable and other fixed-rate debt based on a
currently available market rate assuming the loans are outstanding through maturity and considering
the collateral. In determining the current market rate for fixed-rate debt, a market credit spread
is added to the quoted yields on federal government treasury securities with similar terms to debt.
In determining the current market rate for variable-rate debt, a market credit spread is added to
the current effective interest rate. The carrying value of interest rate swaps, as well as the
underlying hedged liability, if applicable, are reflected at their fair-value (see the Assets and
Liabilities Measured at Fair-Value section under Note 2). The Company relies on quotations from a
third party to determine these fair-values.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the aggregate fair-value and the carrying value of
the Companys financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fair-Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair-Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Mortgage notes payable(1) |
|
$ |
702,351 |
|
|
$ |
629,640 |
|
|
$ |
729,561 |
|
|
$ |
657,922 |
|
Notes due 2026(2) |
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
19,613 |
|
|
|
23,244 |
|
|
|
19,522 |
|
Notes due 2030 |
|
|
214,320 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
209,128 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Notes due 2016(3) |
|
|
396,520 |
|
|
|
397,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes due 2020(4) |
|
|
264,275 |
|
|
|
247,620 |
|
|
|
262,950 |
|
|
|
247,571 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
50,873 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
388,567 |
|
|
|
392,450 |
|
Derivative instruments(5) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
(3,800 |
) |
|
|
(3,800 |
) |
Investments(6) |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Carrying value includes $4.6 million and $5.6 million of debt premium as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Carrying value includes $187,000 and $278,000 of debt discount as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Carrying value includes $2.5 million of debt discount as of March 31, 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
Carrying value includes $2.4 million of debt discount as of both March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
The Companys derivative instruments are reflected in other assets and derivative instruments
(liability account) on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on their respective
balances (see Note 9). |
|
(6) |
|
The Companys investments are included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets (see Investments section in Note 2). |
41
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
As used herein, the terms we, us, our or the Company refer to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc., a Maryland corporation, and any of our subsidiaries, including BioMed Realty, L.P., a
Maryland limited partnership of which BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. is the parent company and general
partner, which may be referred to herein as the operating partnership.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. We make statements in this report
that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital resources, portfolio performance
and results of operations contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve
numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events.
Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or
imprecise, and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and
events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). You can identify
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects,
may, will, should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, estimates or anticipates
or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify
forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. The following factors,
among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set
forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: adverse economic or real estate
developments in the life science industry or in our target markets, including the inability of our
tenants to obtain funding to run their businesses; our dependence upon significant tenants; our
failure to obtain necessary outside financing on favorable terms or at all, including the continued
availability of our unsecured line of credit; general economic conditions, including downturns in
the national and local economies; volatility in financial and securities markets; defaults on or
non-renewal of leases by tenants; our inability to compete effectively; increased interest rates
and operating costs; our inability to successfully complete real estate acquisitions, developments
and dispositions; risks and uncertainties affecting property development and construction; our
failure to successfully operate acquired properties and operations; reductions in asset valuations
and related impairment charges; the loss of services of one or more of our executive officers; our
failure to qualify or continue to qualify as a REIT; failure to maintain our investment grade
credit ratings with the rating agencies; government approvals, actions and initiatives, including
the need for compliance with environmental requirements; the effects of earthquakes and other
natural disasters; lack of or insufficient amounts of insurance; and changes in real estate, zoning
and other laws and increases in real property tax rates. We disclaim any intention or obligation to
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
The risks included here are not exhaustive, and additional factors could adversely affect our
business and financial performance, including factors and risks included in other sections of this
report. In addition, we discussed a number of material risks in our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010. Those risks continue to be relevant to our performance and
financial condition. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment.
New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such
risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our companys business or
the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and
uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a
prediction of actual results.
Overview
We operate as a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT focused on
acquiring, developing, owning, leasing and managing laboratory and office space for the life
science industry. Our tenants primarily include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies,
scientific research institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life
science industry. Our properties are generally located in markets with well-established reputations
as centers for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and New York/New Jersey.
At March 31, 2011, we owned or had interests in a portfolio of 85 properties, representing 147
buildings with an aggregate of approximately 12.2 million rentable square feet.
42
The following reflects the classification of our properties between stabilized properties
(operating properties in which more than 90% of the rentable square footage is under lease), lease
up (operating properties in which less than 90% of the rentable square footage is under lease),
long-term lease up (our Pacific Research Center property), development (properties that are
currently under development through ground up construction), redevelopment (properties that
are currently being prepared for their intended use), pre-development (development properties that
are engaged in activities related to planning, entitlement, or other preparations for future
construction) and development potential (representing managements estimates of rentable square
footage if development of these properties was undertaken) at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Portfolio |
|
|
Unconsolidated Partnership Portfolio |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
Rentable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square |
|
|
Square |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square |
|
|
Square |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square |
|
|
Square |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Feet |
|
|
Feet Leased |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Feet |
|
|
Feet Leased |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Feet |
|
|
Feet Leased |
|
Stabilized |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
6,643,542 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
72,863 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
6,716,405 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
% |
Lease up |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,899,960 |
|
|
|
67.2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
881,695 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
% |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3,781,655 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current operating portfolio |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
9,543,502 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
954,558 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
10,498,060 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
% |
Long-term lease up |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,389,517 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,389,517 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating portfolio |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
10,933,019 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
954,558 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
11,887,577 |
|
|
|
78.7 |
% |
Development |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
176,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
176,000 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Pre-development |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
152,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
152,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property portfolio |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
11,261,164 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
954,558 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
12,215,722 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,626,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,626,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,887,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,841,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factors Which May Influence Future Operations
Our long-term corporate strategy is to continue to focus on acquiring, developing, owning,
leasing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry. As of March 31,
2011, our current operating portfolio (which includes both the consolidated portfolio and
unconsolidated partnership portfolio) was 85.9% leased to 150 tenants. As of December 31, 2010, our
current operating portfolio was 84.4% leased to 154 tenants. The increase in the overall leased
percentage was due to an increase in the leased square footage during the period of approximately
184,000 square feet within the current operating portfolio.
Leases representing approximately 2.9% of our leased square footage expire during 2011 and
leases representing approximately 5.1% of our leased square footage expire during 2012. Our leasing
strategy for 2011 focuses on leasing currently vacant space, negotiating renewals for leases
scheduled to expire during the year, and identifying new tenants or existing tenants seeking
additional space to occupy the spaces for which we are unable to negotiate such renewals. We may
proceed with additional new developments and acquisitions, as real estate and capital market
conditions permit.
As a direct result of the recent economic recession, we believe that the fair-values of some
of our properties may have declined below their respective carrying values. However, to the extent
that a property has a substantial remaining estimated useful life and management does not believe
that the property will be disposed of prior to the end of its useful life, it would be unusual for
undiscounted cash flows to be insufficient to recover the propertys carrying value. We presently
have the ability and intent to continue to own and operate our existing portfolio of properties and
expected undiscounted future cash flows from the operation of the properties are expected to be
sufficient to recover the carrying value of each property. Accordingly, we do not believe that the
carrying value of any of our properties is impaired. If our ability and/or our intent with regard
to the operation of our properties otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may
be recognized to reduce the property to the lower of the carrying amount or fair-value less costs
to sell, and such loss could be material.
A discussion of additional factors which may influence future operations can be found below
under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
A complete discussion of our critical accounting policies can be found in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
43
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
The following table sets forth the basis for presenting the historical financial information
for same properties (all properties except redevelopment/development, new properties and corporate
entities), redevelopment/development properties (properties that were entirely or primarily under
redevelopment or development during either of the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010), new
properties (properties that were not owned for each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 and were not under redevelopment/development), and corporate entities (legal entities
performing general and administrative functions and fees received from our PREI joint ventures), in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment/Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Properties |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
New Properties |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Rental |
|
$ |
68,699 |
|
|
$ |
70,443 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
11,511 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Tenant recoveries |
|
|
21,380 |
|
|
|
20,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Other income |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
90,817 |
|
|
$ |
91,156 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
14,356 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Revenues. Rental revenues increased $9.6 million to $80.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 compared to $70.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
increase was primarily due to properties acquired in 2010, and the commencement of leases. Same
property rental revenues decreased $1.7 million, or 2.5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease in same property rental revenues was primarily a
result of decreases in lease rates related to lease extensions at certain properties (which had the
effect of decreasing rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis), lease expirations, and
the full amortization of below-market intangible assets in 2010, partially offset by the
commencement of new leases in 2011 and 2010, and increases in lease rates related to Consumer Price
Index adjustments and lease extensions (increasing rental revenue recognized on a straight-line
basis).
Tenant Recoveries. Revenues from tenant reimbursements increased $3.8 million to $24.6 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $20.8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to properties acquired in 2010. Same property tenant
recoveries increased $774,000, or 3.8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same period in 2010 primarily as a result of the commencement of new leases, and higher rental
operations expenses.
The percentage of recoverable expenses recovered at our properties increased to 78.8% for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 78.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
increase was primarily due to properties acquired in 2010 and the commencement of new leases.
Other Income. Other income was $747,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
$1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Other income for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 primarily comprised consideration received related to early lease terminations and
development fees earned from our PREI joint ventures. Other income for the three months ended March
31, 2010 primarily comprised realized gains from the sale of equity investments in the amount of
$865,000 and development fees earned from our PREI joint ventures. Termination payments received
for terminated leases for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 aggregated $729,000 and
$78,000, respectively.
The following table shows operating expenses for same properties, redevelopment/development
properties, new properties, and corporate entities, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment/Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Properties |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
New Properties |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Rental operations |
|
$ |
17,646 |
|
|
$ |
16,577 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
8,892 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26,512 |
|
|
|
28,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,323 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
53,050 |
|
|
$ |
54,113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,638 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Rental Operations Expense. Rental operations expense increased $2.6 million to $20.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $17.9 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to properties acquired in 2010. Same property
rental operations expense increased $1.1 million, or 6.4%, for the three months ended March 31,
2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to the commencement of new leases.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recorded bad debt expense of $324,000
and $115,000, respectively.
Real Estate Tax Expense. Real estate tax expense increased $2.0 million to $10.7 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010. The increase was primarily due to properties acquired in 2010. Same property real estate tax
expense increased $194,000, or 2.2%, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 2010.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.9
million to $33.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $28.9 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to properties acquired in
2010, partially offset by an adjustment for a cumulative understatement of depreciation expense
related to an operating property of approximately $1.0 million that was recorded during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and that we determined was not material to our previously issued
consolidated financial statements.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $1.1
million to $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $6.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to an increase in aggregate
compensation costs due to higher headcount as compared to the prior year.
Acquisition Related Expenses. Acquisition related expenses increased to $320,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $150,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in potential acquisition activities in 2011 as compared
to the prior year.
Equity in Net Loss of Unconsolidated Partnerships. Equity in net loss of unconsolidated
partnerships increased $371,000 to $648,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
$277,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increased loss primarily reflects
depreciation commencing and ceasing of capitalizing interest on a vacant property that was under
development in 2010 being placed into service.
Interest Expense. Interest cost incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled
$22.8 million compared to $22.9 million for three months ended March 31, 2010. Total interest cost
incurred decreased primarily as a result of decreases in the average interest rate on our
outstanding borrowings, partially offset by an increase in total debt outstanding. Interest expense
for both the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $21.3 million related to the decrease
in interest cost incurred offset by a decrease in capitalized interest. For a detail of interest
expense see Note 5 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
(Loss)/Gain on Derivative Instruments. The loss on derivative instruments for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 was primarily related to approximately $1.0 million of other comprehensive
loss being reclassified to the consolidated income statement due to mismatches in forecasted
transactions on interest rate swaps. The gain on derivative instruments for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was primarily related to changes in the fair-value of a stock purchase warrant,
which are recorded directly to the consolidated income statement as they occur.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we voluntarily
prepaid in full the outstanding mortgage notes totaling approximately $25.5 million pertaining to
the Road to the Cure and the 10255 Science Center Drive properties, prior to their maturity date.
The prepayments resulted in the recognition of a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$43,000 (representing a prepayment penalty and the write-off of deferred loan fees partially offset
by the write off of unamortized debt premium). During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we
repurchased $6.3 million face value of our Notes due 2026 at par. The repurchase resulted in the
recognition of a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $254,000 (representing the
write-off of deferred loan fees and unamortized debt discount) and the write-off of approximately
$567,000 of deferred loan fees related to the prepayment of $100.0 million of the outstanding
borrowings on our secured term loan.
Noncontrolling Interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased
$14,000 to $107,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $121,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in
noncontrolling interests was due to a reduction in the percentage of noncontrolling interests
due to the redemption of certain OP units for shares of our common stock and our common stock
offerings in April 2010 and September 2010.
45
Cash Flows
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
41,404 |
|
|
$ |
27,725 |
|
|
$ |
13,679 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(42,773 |
) |
|
|
(70,500 |
) |
|
|
27,727 |
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
59,653 |
|
|
|
(60,400 |
) |
Ending cash and cash equivalents balance |
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
36,800 |
|
|
|
(17,449 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $13.7 million to $41.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $27.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010. The increase was primarily due to cash flow generated by acquisitions and cash rent starts on
new leases.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $27.7 million to $42.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $70.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The decrease reflects the absence of property acquisitions during the three months ended March 31,
2011.
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $60.4 million to net cash used in
financing activities of $747,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to net cash
provided by financing activities of $59.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
decrease primarily reflects the absence of property acquisitions during the three months ended
March 31, 2011. The proceeds from the issuance of our Notes due 2016 in March 2011 were primarily
used to repay balances due under our unsecured line of credit and mortgages payable.
Funds from Operations
We present funds from operations, or FFO, available to common shares and OP units because we
consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of
REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP
historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that
the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate
values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and
amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary
items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to
operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities
and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO
in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of the National Association of
Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November
1999 and April 2002). As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents net income (computed in accordance with
GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation
and amortization (excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our computation may differ from the methodology for
calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such
other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for managements discretionary use
because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments
and uncertainties. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in
accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating
activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it
indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or
make distributions.
46
Our FFO available to common shares and OP units and a reconciliation to net income for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except share data) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income available to the common stockholders |
|
$ |
5,530 |
|
|
$ |
4,299 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in operating partnership(1) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Interest expense on Notes due 2030(2) |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
Depreciation and amortization unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
Depreciation and amortization consolidated entities |
|
|
33,835 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
Depreciation and amortization allocable to noncontrolling
interest of consolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available to common shares and units diluted |
|
$ |
42,073 |
|
|
$ |
35,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares and units outstanding diluted(2) |
|
|
144,167,342 |
|
|
|
112,491,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income allocable to noncontrolling interests in the operating partnership is included in
net income available to unitholders of the operating partnership as reflected in the
consolidated financial statements of BioMed Realty, L.P., included elsewhere herein. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects interest expense adjustment of the Notes due 2030 based on the if converted
method. The three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 include 9,914,076 shares of common
stock potentially issuable pursuant to the exchange feature of the Notes due 2030 based on the
if converted method, and the three months ended March 31, 2011 include 1,488,424 shares of
unvested restricted stock, which are considered anti-dilutive for purposes of calculating
diluted earnings per share. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
In this Liquidity and Capital Resources of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. section, the term the
Company refers only to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis, and excludes the
operating partnership and all other subsidiaries. For further discussion of the liquidity and
capital resources of the Company on a consolidated basis, see the section entitled Liquidity and
Capital Resources of BioMed Realty, L.P. below.
The Companys business is operated primarily through the operating partnership. The Company
issues public equity from time to time, but does not otherwise generate any capital itself or
conduct any business itself, other than incurring certain expenses in operating as a public company
which are fully reimbursed by the operating partnership. The Company itself does not hold any
indebtedness, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of the
operating partnership. The Companys principal funding requirement is the payment of dividends on
its common and preferred shares. The Companys principal source of funding for its dividend
payments is distributions it receives from the operating partnership.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company owned an approximate 97.8% partnership interest and other
limited partners, including some of our directors, executive officers and their affiliates, owned
the remaining 2.2% partnership interest (including LTIP units) in the operating partnership. As the
sole general partner of the operating partnership, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. has the full,
exclusive and complete responsibility for the operating partnerships day-to-day management and
control.
The liquidity of the Company is dependent on the operating partnerships ability to make
sufficient distributions to the Company. The primary cash requirement of the Company is its payment
of dividends to its stockholders. The Company also guarantees some of the operating partnerships
debt, as discussed further in Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere herein. If the operating partnership fails to fulfill certain of its debt requirements,
which trigger the Companys guarantee obligations, then the Company will be required to fulfill its
cash payment commitments under such guarantees. However, the Companys only significant asset is
its investment in the operating partnership.
47
We believe the operating partnerships sources of working capital, specifically its cash flow
from operations, and borrowings available under its unsecured line of credit, are adequate for it
to make its distribution payments to the Company and, in turn,
for the Company to make its dividend payments to its stockholders. However, we cannot assure
you that the operating partnerships sources of capital will continue to be available at all or in
amounts sufficient to meet its needs, including its ability to make distribution payments to the
Company. The unavailability of capital could adversely affect the operating partnerships ability
to pay its distributions to the Company, which would in turn, adversely affect the Companys
ability to pay cash dividends to its stockholders.
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for future dividends
expected to be paid to the Companys stockholders, operating expenses and other expenditures
directly associated with our properties, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on
outstanding indebtedness, general and administrative expenses, construction projects, capital
expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
The Company may from time to time seek to repurchase or redeem the operating partnerships
outstanding debt, the Companys shares of common stock or preferred stock or other securities in
open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or
redemptions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements,
contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
For the Company to maintain its qualification as a REIT, it must pay dividends to its
stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income. While historically
the Company has satisfied this distribution requirement by making cash distributions to its
stockholders, it may choose to satisfy this requirement by making distributions of cash or other
property, including, in limited circumstances, the Companys own stock. As a result of this
distribution requirement, the operating partnership cannot rely on retained earnings to fund its
on-going operations to the same extent that other companies whose parent companies are not REITs
can. The Company may need to continue to raise capital in the equity markets to fund the operating
partnerships working capital needs, acquisitions and developments.
The Company is a well-known seasoned issuer with an effective shelf registration statement
which was amended in November 2010 that allows the Company to register an unspecified amount of
various classes of equity securities and the operating partnership to register an unspecified
amount of various classes of debt securities. As circumstances warrant, the Company may issue
equity from time to time on an opportunistic basis, dependent upon market conditions and available
pricing. When the Company receives proceeds from preferred or common equity issuances, it is
required by the operating partnerships partnership agreement to contribute the proceeds from its
equity issuances to the operating partnership in exchange for preferred or partnership units of the
operating partnership. The operating partnership may use the proceeds to repay debt, including
borrowings under its unsecured line of credit, develop new or existing properties, acquire
properties, or for general corporate purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of BioMed Realty, L.P.
In this Liquidity and Capital Resources of BioMed Realty, L.P. section, the terms we,
our and us refer to the operating partnership together with its consolidated subsidiaries or
our operating partnership and BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. together with their consolidated
subsidiaries, as the context requires. BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., or our Parent Company, is our
sole general partner and consolidates our results of operations for financial reporting purposes.
Because we operate on a consolidated basis with our Parent Company, the section entitled Liquidity
and Capital Resources of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. should be read in conjunction with this section
to understand our liquidity and capital resources on a consolidated basis.
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for future dividends
expected to be paid to our Parent Companys stockholders, operating expenses and other expenditures
directly associated with our properties, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on
outstanding indebtedness, general and administrative expenses, construction projects, capital
expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
48
The remaining principal payments due for our consolidated and our proportionate share of
unconsolidated indebtedness (excluding debt premiums and discounts) as of March 31, 2011 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Consolidated indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate mortgages |
|
$ |
18,968 |
|
|
$ |
44,879 |
|
|
$ |
25,370 |
|
|
$ |
339,020 |
|
|
$ |
6,253 |
|
|
$ |
190,535 |
|
|
$ |
625,025 |
|
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
Notes due 2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
19,800 |
|
Notes due 2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Notes due 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Notes due 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated indebtedness |
|
|
69,968 |
|
|
|
44,879 |
|
|
|
25,370 |
|
|
|
339,020 |
|
|
|
6,253 |
|
|
|
1,040,335 |
|
|
|
1,525,825 |
|
Share of unconsolidated indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured acquisition loan facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
Secured construction loan |
|
|
40,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share of unconsolidated indebtedness |
|
|
40,709 |
|
|
|
40,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
$ |
110,677 |
|
|
$ |
85,529 |
|
|
$ |
25,370 |
|
|
$ |
339,020 |
|
|
$ |
6,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,040,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,607,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2011, we voluntarily prepaid in full the outstanding mortgage note pertaining to
the Ardentech Court property, in the amount of approximately $4.6 million including a prepayment
penalty of $361,000, prior to its maturity date. Additional consolidated mortgage note maturities
through 2012 include mortgages on our 6828 Nancy Ridge Drive, Sidney Street and Sorrento West
properties, with outstanding balances of $6.5 million, $27.2 million and $13.2 million,
respectively, as of March 31, 2011.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for scheduled debt
maturities, construction obligations, renovations, expansions, capital commitments and other
non-recurring capital expenditures that need to be made periodically, and the costs associated with
acquisitions of properties that we pursue. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we entered
into construction contracts and lease agreements, with a remaining commitment totaling
approximately $72.2 million related to tenant improvements, leasing commissions and
construction-related capital expenditures.
We expect to satisfy our short-term liquidity requirements through our existing working
capital and cash provided by our operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, the
issuance of additional equity or debt securities and the use of net proceeds from the disposition
of non-strategic assets. Our rental revenues, provided by our leases, generally provide cash
inflows to meet our debt service obligations, pay general and administrative expenses, and fund
regular distributions. We expect to satisfy our long-term liquidity requirements through our
existing working capital, cash provided by operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness
and the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. We also expect to use funds available
under our unsecured line of credit to finance acquisition and development activities and capital
expenditures on an interim basis. Our unsecured line of credit has a maturity date of August 1,
2011, which may be extended to August 1, 2012 at our sole discretion, after satisfying certain
conditions and paying an extension fee based on the then current facility commitment. The secured
acquisition and interim loan facility has a maturity date of February 10, 2012. The secured
construction loan has a maturity date of August 13, 2011. In accordance with the loan agreement,
Prudential Insurance Corporation of America has guaranteed repayment of the secured construction
loan. At maturity, we may refinance the loan, depending on market conditions and the availability
of credit, or we may repay the principal balance of the secured construction loan. In addition, we
earned an investment grade rating which we believe will provide us with continued access to the
unsecured debt markets, providing us with an additional source of long term financing.
On March 30, 2011, we issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of our Notes due 2016.
The net proceeds from the issuance were utilized to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness
on our unsecured line of credit and for other general corporate and working capital purposes. The
terms of the base indenture and supplemental indenture for the Notes due 2016 requires compliance
with various financial covenants including limits on the amount of total leverage and secured debt
maintained by us and requires us to maintain minimum levels of debt service coverage.
49
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s total capitalization at March 31, 2011 was approximately $4.3
billion and comprised the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares/Units at |
|
|
Amount or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
Percent of Total |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Equivalent |
|
|
Capitalization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
625,025 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Notes due 2026(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Notes due 2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Notes due 2016(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Notes due 2020(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Unsecured line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,525,825 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
% |
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, operating partnership and LTIP units outstanding(5) |
|
|
134,228,551 |
|
|
|
2,553,027 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
% |
7.375% Series A Preferred shares outstanding(6) |
|
|
9,200,000 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,783,027 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,308,852 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount excludes debt premiums of $4.6 million recorded upon the assumption of the outstanding
indebtedness in connection with our purchase of the corresponding properties. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount excludes a debt discount of $187,000. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount excludes a debt discount of $2.5 million. |
|
(4) |
|
Amount excludes a debt discount of $2.4 million. |
|
(5) |
|
Aggregate principal amount based on the market closing price of the common stock of our
Parent Company of $19.02 per share on the last trading day of the quarter (March 31, 2011).
Limited partners who have been issued OP units have the right to require the operating
partnership to redeem part or all of their OP units, which right with respect to LTIP units is
subject to vesting and the satisfaction of other conditions. We may elect to acquire those OP
units in exchange for shares of our Parent Companys common stock on a one-for-one basis,
subject to adjustment. At March 31, 2011, 131,239,482 of the outstanding OP units had been
issued to our Parent Company upon receipt of the net proceeds from the issuance of an equal
number of shares of our Parent Companys common stock. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on the liquidation preference of $25.00 per share of our Parent Companys 7.375% Series
A preferred stock (we have issued a corresponding number of 7.375% Series A preferred units). |
Although our organizational documents do not limit the amount of indebtedness that we may
incur, our Parent Companys board of directors has adopted a policy of targeting our indebtedness
at approximately 50% of our total asset book value. At March 31, 2011, the ratio of debt to total
asset book value was approximately 38.5%. However, our Parent Companys board of directors may from
time to time modify our debt policy in light of current economic or market conditions including,
but not limited to, the relative costs of debt and equity capital, market conditions for debt and
equity securities and fluctuations in the market price of our Parent Companys common stock.
Accordingly, we may increase or decrease our debt to total asset book value ratio beyond the limit
described above. In addition, the terms of the indentures governing our Notes due 2016 and Notes
due 2020 require compliance with various financial covenants including limits on the amount of
total leverage and secured debt maintained by us and require us to maintain minimum levels of debt
service coverage. The terms of the credit agreement governing our unsecured line of credit also
require compliance with financial ratios relating to the Companys fixed charge coverage, unsecured
debt service coverage, the maximum amount of secured and secured recourse indebtedness and leverage
ratio. For more detail regarding the terms governing our indebtedness, see Note 5 in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
50
We may from time to time seek to repurchase or redeem our outstanding debt, OP units or
preferred units (subject to the repurchase or redemption of an equivalent number of shares of
common stock or preferred stock by our Parent Company) or other securities, and our Parent Company
may seek to repurchase or redeem its outstanding shares of common stock or preferred stock or other
securities, in each case in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.
Such repurchases or redemptions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity
requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011, we had investments in the following unconsolidated partnerships: (1)
McKellar Court limited partnership, which owns a single tenant occupied property located in San
Diego; and (2) two limited liability companies with PREI, which own a portfolio of properties
primarily located in Cambridge, Massachusetts (see Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere herein for more information).
The McKellar Court partnership is a VIE; however, we are not the primary beneficiary. The
limited partner at McKellar Court is the only tenant in the property and will bear a
disproportionate amount of any losses. We, as the general partner, will receive 22% of the
operating cash flows and 75% of the gains upon sale of the property. We account for our general
partner interest using the equity method. The assets of the McKellar Court partnership were $14.7
million and the liabilities were $10.5 million at both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Our
equity in net income of the McKellar Court partnership was $225,000 and $282,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In December 2009, we provided funding in the
form of a promissory note to the McKellar Court partnership in the amount of $10.3 million, which
matures at the earlier of (1) January 1, 2020, or (2) the day that the limited partner exercises an
option to purchase our ownership interest. Interest-only payments on the promissory note are due
monthly at a fixed rate of 8.15% (the rate may adjust higher after January 1, 2015), with the
principal balance outstanding due at maturity.
PREI II LLC is a VIE; however, we are not the primary beneficiary. PREI will bear the majority
of any losses incurred. PREI I LLC does not qualify as a VIE. In addition, consolidation is not
required as we do not control the limited liability companies. In connection with the formation of
the PREI joint ventures in April 2007, we contributed 20% of the initial capital. However, the
amount of cash flow distributions that we receive may be more or less based on the nature of the
circumstances underlying the cash distributions due to provisions in the operating agreements
governing the distribution of funds to each member and the occurrence of extraordinary cash flow
events. We account for our member interests using the equity method for both limited liability
companies. The assets of the PREI joint ventures were $647.7 million and $652.3 million at March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and the liabilities were $423.6 million at both March
31, 2011 and December 2010. Our equity in net loss of the PREI joint ventures was $873,000 and
$559,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We have been the primary beneficiary in five other VIEs, consisting of single-tenant
properties in which the tenant has a fixed-price purchase option, which are consolidated and
reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Our proportionate share of outstanding debt related to our unconsolidated partnerships is
summarized below (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Name |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Interest Rate(2) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Maturity Date |
PREI I LLC and PREI II LLC(3) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
$ |
40,650 |
|
|
$ |
40,650 |
|
|
February 10, 2012 |
PREI I LLC(4) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
40,709 |
|
|
|
40,481 |
|
|
August 13, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,359 |
|
|
$ |
81,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents our proportionate share of the total outstanding indebtedness for each of
the unconsolidated partnerships. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective or weighted-average interest rate of the outstanding indebtedness as of March 31,
2011, including the effect of an interest rate cap. |
51
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amount represents our proportionate share of the total draws outstanding under a secured
acquisition and interim loan facility, which bears interest at a rate equal to, at the option
of our PREI joint ventures, either (a) reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 350 basis points or (b) the
higher of (i) the prime rate then in effect, (ii) the federal funds rate then in effect plus
50 basis points or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 450 basis points, and requires interest only
monthly payments until the maturity date. |
|
(4) |
|
Amount represents our proportionate share of a secured construction loan, which bears
interest at a LIBOR-indexed variable rate. The secured construction loan was executed by a
wholly owned subsidiary of PREI I LLC in connection with the construction of the 650 East
Kendall Street property (initial borrowings of $84.0 million on February 13, 2008 were used in
part to repay a portion of the secured acquisition and interim loan facility). The remaining
balance is being utilized to fund construction costs at the property. At maturity, we may
refinance the loan, depending on market conditions and the availability of credit, or we may
repay the principal balance of the secured construction loan. In accordance with the loan
agreement, Prudential Insurance Corporation of America has guaranteed repayment of the secured
construction loan. |
Cash Distribution Policy
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the
Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet
a number of organizational and operational requirements, including the requirement that we
distribute currently at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our stockholders. It is our
intention to comply with these requirements and maintain our REIT status. As a REIT, we generally
will not be subject to corporate federal, state or local income taxes on taxable income we
distribute currently (in accordance with the Code and applicable regulations) to our stockholders.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal, state and local
income taxes at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for subsequent tax
years. Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to certain
state and local taxes on our income and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed
taxable income, i.e., taxable income not distributed in the amounts and in the time frames
prescribed by the Code and applicable regulations thereunder.
In April 2009, in an effort to maintain financial flexibility in light of the current capital
markets environment, we reset our annual dividend rate on shares of our common stock to $0.44 per
share, starting in the second quarter of 2009. We subsequently increased our annual dividend rate
on shares of our common stock to $0.56 per share, starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, to $0.60
per share, starting in the second quarter of 2010, to $0.68 per share, starting in the third
quarter of 2010, and again to $0.80 per share, starting in the first quarter of 2011. While the
change to our dividend level in the first quarter of 2011 represents our current expectation, the
actual dividend payable in the future will be determined by our board of directors based upon the
circumstances at the time of declaration and, as a result, the actual dividend payable in the
future may vary from the current rate. The decision to declare and pay dividends on shares of our
common stock in the future, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future
dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors in light of conditions then
existing, including our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, debt maturities, the
availability of debt and equity capital, applicable REIT and legal restrictions and the general
overall economic conditions and other factors.
The following table provides historical dividend information for our common and preferred
stock for the prior two fiscal years and the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
Dividend |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Date Declared |
|
Date Paid |
|
per Common Share |
|
|
per Preferred Share |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 16, 2009 |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
$ |
0.33500 |
|
|
$ |
0.46094 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 15, 2009 |
|
July 15, 2009 |
|
|
0.11000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 15, 2009 |
|
October 15, 2009 |
|
|
0.11000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
December 15, 2009 |
|
January 15, 2010 |
|
|
0.14000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 15, 2010 |
|
April 15, 2010 |
|
|
0.14000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 15, 2010 |
|
July 15, 2010 |
|
|
0.15000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 15, 2010 |
|
October 15, 2010 |
|
|
0.17000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
December 15, 2010 |
|
January 17, 2011 |
|
|
0.17000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 14, 2011 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
|
|
0.20000 |
|
|
|
0.46094 |
|
52
Inflation
Some of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation.
These provisions generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases either at fixed
rates or indexed escalations (based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures). We may be
adversely impacted by inflation on the leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. In
addition, most of our leases require the tenant to pay an allocable share of operating expenses,
including common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance. This may reduce our
exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation, assuming our
properties remain leased and tenants fulfill their obligations to reimburse us for such expenses.
Portions of our unsecured line of credit bear interest at a variable rate, which will be
influenced by changes in short-term interest rates, and will be sensitive to inflation.
53
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our future income, cash flows and fair-values relevant to financial instruments depend upon
prevailing market interest rates. Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The primary
market risk to which we believe we are exposed is interest rate risk. Many factors, including
governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political
considerations and other factors that are beyond our control contribute to interest rate risk.
As of March 31, 2011, our consolidated debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Rate at |
|
|
|
Principal Balance(1) |
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Fixed interest rate(2) |
|
$ |
1,474,334 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
% |
|
|
5.59 |
% |
Variable interest rate(3) |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/weighted-average effective interest rate |
|
$ |
1,525,334 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Principal balance includes only consolidated indebtedness. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes nine mortgage notes payable secured by certain of our properties (including $4.6
million of unamortized premium), our Notes due 2026 (including $187,000 of unamortized debt
discount), our Notes due 2030, our Notes due 2020 (including $2.5 million of unamortized debt
discount), and our Notes due 2016 (including $2.4 million of unamortized debt discount). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes our unsecured line of credit, which bears interest based on a LIBOR-indexed variable
interest rate, plus a credit spread. The stated effective rate for the variable interest debt
excludes the impact of any interest rate swap agreements. We have entered into two interest
rate swaps, which are intended to have the effect of initially fixing the interest rates on
$150.0 million of our variable rate debt at weighted average interest rates of approximately
4.7% (excluding applicable credit spreads for the underlying debt). |
To determine the fair-value of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness, we utilize quoted
market prices to estimate the fair-value, when available. If quoted market prices are not
available, we calculate the fair-value of our mortgage notes payable and other fixed-rate debt
based on an estimate of current lending rates, assuming the debt is outstanding through maturity
and considering the notes collateral. In determining the current market rate for fixed-rate debt,
a market credit spread is added to the quoted yields on federal government treasury securities with
similar terms to the debt. In determining the current market rate for variable-rate debt, a market
credit spread is added to the current effective interest rate. At March 31, 2011, the fair-value of
the fixed-rate debt was estimated to be $1.6 billion compared to the net carrying value of $1.5
billion (includes $4.6 million of unamortized debt premium, $187,000 of unamortized debt discount
associated with our Notes due 2026, $2.5 million of unamortized debt discount associated with our
Notes due 2020, and $2.4 million of unamortized debt discount associated with our Notes due 2016).
At March 31, 2011, the fair-value of the variable-rate debt was estimated to be $50.9 million
compared to the net carrying value of $51.0 million. We do not believe that the interest rate risk
represented by our fixed-rate debt or the risk of changes in the credit spread related to our
variable-rate debt was material as of March 31, 2011 in relation to total assets of $4.0 million
and equity market capitalization of $2.8 billion of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s common stock and
preferred stock, and BioMed Realty, L.P.s OP units.
Based on the outstanding unhedged balances of our consolidated indebtedness at March 31, 2011,
a 1% change in interest rates would not change our interest cost as all of our consolidated
indebtedness is effectively fixed rate debt. Based on the outstanding unhedged balances of our
proportionate share of the outstanding balance for the PREI joint ventures secured loan and
secured construction loan at March 31, 2011, a 1% change in interest rates would change our
interest costs included in our equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnerships by approximately
$814,000 per year. This amount was determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest
rates on our financial instruments. This analysis does not consider the effect of any change in
overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change
of the magnitude discussed above, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the
change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their
possible effects, this analysis assumes no changes in our financial structure.
54
In order to modify and manage the interest rate characteristics of our outstanding debt and to
limit the effects of interest rate risks on our operations, we may utilize a variety of financial
instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate our
interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. The use of these types of instruments to
hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates carries additional risks, including counterparty
credit risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that unanticipated and
significant changes in interest rates will cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. To
limit counterparty credit risk we will seek to enter into such agreements with major financial
institutions with high credit ratings. There can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately
protect against the foregoing risks and will ultimately realize an economic benefit that exceeds
the related amounts incurred in connection with engaging in such hedging activities. We do not
enter into such contracts for speculative or trading purposes.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Controls and Procedures (BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.)
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its
management, including BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing
and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. has investments in unconsolidated entities. As BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. manages these
entities, its disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are essentially
consistent with those it maintains with respect to its consolidated entities.
As required by Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act,
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of its management, including BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on the foregoing, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
There has been no change in BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting.
Controls and Procedures (BioMed Realty, L.P.)
BioMed Realty, L.P. maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in its reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and
management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures. Also, BioMed Realty, L.P. has investments in unconsolidated
entities. As BioMed Realty, L.P. manages these entities, its disclosure controls and procedures
with respect to such entities are essentially consistent with those it maintains with respect to
its consolidated entities.
As required by Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act,
BioMed Realty, L.P. carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
its management, including BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of BioMed Realty, L.P.s disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing,
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
BioMed Realty, L.P.s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance
level.
55
There has been no change in BioMed Realty, L.P.s internal control over financial reporting
during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, BioMed Realty, L.P.s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Although we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, we
are not currently a party to any legal proceedings nor is any legal proceeding threatened against
us that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
There are no material changes to the risk factors described under Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Please refer to
that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, our Parent Company issued, net of forfeitures,
an aggregate of 180,792 shares of its common stock in connection with restricted stock awards under
its incentive award plan for no cash consideration, in reliance on the exemption from registration
provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For each share of common stock
issued by our Parent Company in connection with such an award, the operating partnership issued a
restricted operating partnership unit to our Parent Company. During the three months ended March
31, 2011, the operating partnership issued, net of forfeitures, an aggregate of 180,792 restricted
operating partnership units to our Parent Company, as required by the operating partnerships
partnership agreement.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
56
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2011, by and among BioMed Realty, L.P., BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.(1) |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated March 30, 2011, by and among BioMed Realty, L.P., BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, including the form of 3.85% Senior
Notes due 2016 and guarantee thereof.(1) |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not
filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of
the Securities Act, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act,
and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s and BioMed Realty,
L.P.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 30, 2011. |
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly
caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
|
|
BIOMED REALTY, L.P. |
|
|
By: BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
Its general partner |
|
|
|
/s/ ALAN D. GOLD
|
|
/s/ ALAN D. GOLD |
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
Alan D. Gold |
Chairman of the Board and
|
|
Chairman of the Board and |
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ GREG N. LUBUSHKIN
|
|
/s/ GREG N. LUBUSHKIN |
|
|
|
Greg N. Lubushkin
|
|
Greg N. Lubushkin |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
Dated: May 5, 2011
|
|
Dated: May 5, 2011 |
58
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2011, by and among BioMed Realty, L.P., BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.(1) |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated March 30, 2011, by and among BioMed Realty, L.P., BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, including the form of 3.85% Senior
Notes due 2016 and guarantee thereof.(1) |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not
filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of
the Securities Act, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act,
and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.s and BioMed Realty,
L.P.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 30, 2011. |
59