e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2008
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number:
000-51863
VANDA PHARMACEUTICALS
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
03-0491827
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
|
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
Incorporation or
Organization)
|
|
|
Identification No.
|
)
|
9605 Medical Center Drive, Suite 300
|
|
|
20850
|
|
Rockville, Maryland
|
|
|
(Zip Code
|
)
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
|
|
|
(240) 599-4500
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 9, 2008, there were 26,652,728 shares of the
registrants Common Stock issued and outstanding.
Vanda
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Form 10-Q
Index
For the
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
|
|
Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period
from March 13, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2008
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Stockholders Equity for the three months ended
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period
from March 13, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2008
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
48
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
49
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
EX-31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EX-31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EX-32.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Part I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited).
|
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
56,015,493
|
|
|
$
|
41,929,533
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
15,028,210
|
|
|
|
43,243,960
|
|
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
1,176,179
|
|
|
|
1,781,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
72,219,882
|
|
|
|
86,955,374
|
|
Marketable securities, long-term
|
|
|
5,994,202
|
|
|
|
7,979,331
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,602,025
|
|
|
|
1,345,845
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
430,230
|
|
|
|
430,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
80,396,339
|
|
|
$
|
96,860,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,825,933
|
|
|
$
|
2,988,069
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
8,491,785
|
|
|
|
9,789,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
10,317,718
|
|
|
|
12,777,807
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
422,407
|
|
|
|
354,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
10,740,125
|
|
|
|
13,131,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized and none issued and outstanding at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares
authorized as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007;
and 26,652,728 shares issued and outstanding as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
26,653
|
|
|
|
26,653
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
262,706,082
|
|
|
|
257,600,368
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
29,874
|
|
|
|
12,176
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
(193,106,395
|
)
|
|
|
(173,910,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
69,656,214
|
|
|
|
83,728,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
80,396,339
|
|
|
$
|
96,860,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues from services
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11,102,665
|
|
|
|
10,592,059
|
|
|
|
136,752,438
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,959,214
|
|
|
|
6,233,549
|
|
|
|
65,968,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
20,061,879
|
|
|
|
16,825,608
|
|
|
|
202,720,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(20,061,879
|
)
|
|
|
(16,825,608
|
)
|
|
|
(202,639,370
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
865,750
|
|
|
|
1,433,654
|
|
|
|
9,564,539
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,485
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
865,750
|
|
|
|
1,433,654
|
|
|
|
9,556,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax provision
|
|
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
|
(15,391,954
|
)
|
|
|
(193,083,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
23,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
|
(15,392,760
|
)
|
|
|
(193,106,395
|
)
|
Beneficial conversion feature deemed dividend to
preferred stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,486,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,392,760
|
)
|
|
$
|
(226,593,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculation of basic and diluted net loss per
share attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
26,648,344
|
|
|
|
25,340,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
During the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stage
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
26,652,728
|
|
|
$
|
26,653
|
|
|
$
|
257,600,368
|
|
|
$
|
12,176
|
|
|
$
|
(173,910,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,728,931
|
|
Employee stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,118,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,118,537
|
|
Non-employee stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,823
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,178,431
|
)
|
|
|
(19,178,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
26,652,728
|
|
|
$
|
26,653
|
|
|
$
|
262,706,082
|
|
|
$
|
29,874
|
|
|
$
|
(193,106,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,656,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,392,760
|
)
|
|
$
|
(193,106,395
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
122,629
|
|
|
|
148,671
|
|
|
|
2,091,484
|
|
Employee and non-employee stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,105,714
|
|
|
|
4,107,972
|
|
|
|
36,041,237
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,241
|
|
Accretion of discount on investments
|
|
|
(162,519
|
)
|
|
|
(230,268
|
)
|
|
|
(2,154,674
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
606,421
|
|
|
|
109,921
|
|
|
|
(1,176,179
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,355,101
|
)
|
|
|
(767,846
|
)
|
|
|
1,632,978
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,299,209
|
)
|
|
|
(1,419,185
|
)
|
|
|
8,491,785
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
68,365
|
|
|
|
38,361
|
|
|
|
422,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(16,109,219
|
)
|
|
|
(13,405,134
|
)
|
|
|
(147,849,116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(186,442
|
)
|
|
|
(118,678
|
)
|
|
|
(3,624,175
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,179
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(1,485,150
|
)
|
|
|
(65,477,330
|
)
|
|
|
(254,517,812
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
2,790,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,505,774
|
|
Maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
29,060,000
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
147,175,000
|
|
Investment in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
30,178,434
|
|
|
|
(64,646,008
|
)
|
|
|
(22,691,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings on note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,147
|
|
Principal payments on obligations under capital lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,797
|
)
|
Principal payments on note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(515,147
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,795,187
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,516
|
|
|
|
307,510
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,291,219
|
|
|
|
164,588,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,347,735
|
|
|
|
226,599,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
16,745
|
|
|
|
(4,150
|
)
|
|
|
(43,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14,085,960
|
|
|
|
33,292,443
|
|
|
|
56,015,493
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
41,929,533
|
|
|
|
30,928,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
56,015,493
|
|
|
$
|
64,221,338
|
|
|
$
|
56,015,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
6
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
1.
|
Business
Organization and Presentation
|
Business
organization
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Vanda or the Company) is a
biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and
commercialization of small molecule therapeutics, with exclusive
worldwide commercial rights to three product candidates in
clinical development for various central nervous system
disorders. Vanda commenced its operations in 2003. The
Companys lead product candidate,
Fanaptatm
(iloperidone, also previously referred to by the Company as
Fiapta), is a compound for the treatment of schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder. The Company submitted a New Drug Application
(NDA) for
Fanaptatm
in schizophrenia to the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) on September 27, 2007. On
November 27, 2007, the FDA accepted the NDA for
Fanaptatm
in schizophrenia. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) of 1992, Vanda expects a PDUFA action on or about
July 27, 2008. The Companys second product candidate,
tasimelteon (VEC-162), is a compound for the treatment of sleep
and mood disorders. In November 2006 Vanda announced positive
top-line results from the Phase III trial of tasimelteon in
transient insomnia. In November 2007 the Company initiated and
in February 2008 completed an enrollment in a Phase III
trial of tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia. Vanda expects
to report top-line results in June 2008. Tasimelteon is also
ready for Phase II trials for the treatment of depression.
The third product candidate, VSF-173, is a compound for the
treatment of excessive sleepiness in the Phase II program.
Capital
resources
Since its inception, the Company has devoted substantially all
of its efforts to business planning, research and development,
market research, recruiting management and technical staff,
acquiring operating assets and raising capital. Accordingly, the
Company is considered to be in the development stage as defined
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage
Enterprises.
The Companys activities will necessitate significant uses
of working capital throughout 2008 and beyond. Additionally, the
Companys capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including the success of the Companys research and
development efforts, payments received under contractual
agreements with other parties, if any, and the status of
competitive products. The Company plans to continue financing
its operations with cash received from financing activities.
Based on its current operating plans, the Company believes that
its existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
will be sufficient to meet the Companys anticipated
operating needs into the fourth quarter of 2008. If
Fanaptatm
is approved by the FDA on the expected Prescription Drug User
Fee Act (PDUFA) action date of or about July 27, 2008, the
Company intends to pursue additional financing, in part to fund
additional marketing and product launch costs. The Company
believes that it would be able to raise sufficient capital to
fund the product launch and operations into 2009. However, if
the Company cannot obtain additional financing, management has
the ability and intent to implement a reduced spending plan to
fund operations at least through the first quarter of 2009. In
budgeting for its activities, the Company has relied on a number
of assumptions, including assumptions that the Company will
continue to expend funds in preparation of a commercial launch
of
Fanaptatm,
that it will complete its Phase III clinical trial of
tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia in accordance with the
Companys expectations, that it will not engage in further
in-licensing activities, that it will not receive any proceeds
from potential partnerships, that it will not expend funds on
the bipolar indication for
Fanaptatm,
that it will not conduct additional trials for the injectable
formulation for
Fanaptatm,
that it will not conduct additional trials for VSF-173, that it
will continue to evaluate clinical and pre-clinical compounds
for potential development, that it will be able to continue the
manufacturing of its product candidates at commercially
reasonable prices, that it will be able to retain its key
personnel, and that it will not incur any significant contingent
liabilities.
7
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The Company may need to raise additional funds more quickly if
one or more of its assumptions proves to be incorrect or if it
chooses to expand its product development efforts more rapidly
than presently anticipated or seek to acquire additional product
candidates, and the Company may decide to raise additional funds
even before they are needed if the conditions for raising
capital are favorable. However, the Company may not be able to
raise additional funds on acceptable terms, or at all. If the
Company is unable to secure sufficient capital to fund its
research and development activities, the Company may not be able
to continue operations, or the Company may have to enter into
collaboration agreements that could require the Company to share
commercial rights to its products to a greater extent or at
earlier stages in the drug development process than is currently
intended. These collaborations, if consummated prior to
proof-of-efficacy
or safety of a given product candidate, could impair the
Companys ability to realize value from that product
candidate.
Basis of
presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP) and the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim
financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the
Companys consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2007 included in the Companys
annual report on the
Form 10-K.
The financial information as of March 31, 2008 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the
period from March 13, 2003 (inception) to March 31,
2008, is unaudited, but in the opinion of management all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals,
considered necessary for a fair statement of the results of
these interim periods have been included. The condensed
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 was
derived from audited financial statements but does not include
all disclosures required by GAAP.
The results of the Companys operations for any interim
period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for any other interim period or for a full fiscal year.
The financial information included herein should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
in the Companys annual report incorporated by reference in
the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly-owned Singapore subsidiary that ceased
operations during 2007. All inter-company balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Cash
and cash equivalents
For purposes of the condensed consolidated balance sheets and
condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, cash
equivalents represent highly-liquid investments with a maturity
of three months or less at the date of purchase.
8
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Marketable
securities
The Company classifies all of its marketable securities as
available-for-sale
securities. The Companys investment policy requires the
selection of high-quality issuers, with bond ratings of AAA to
A1+/P1.
Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains
and losses reported as a component of stockholders equity
in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss. Interest and
dividend income is recorded when earned and included in interest
income. Premiums and discounts on marketable securities are
amortized or accreted, respectively, to maturity and included in
interest income. The Company uses the specific identification
method in computing realized gains and losses on the sale of
investments, which would be included in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations when generated. Marketable
securities with a maturity of more than one year as of the
balance sheet date are classified as long-term securities.
Concentrations
of credit risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company
places its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities with
highly-rated financial institutions and does not hold any
investment securities as of March 31, 2008 that have been
affected by the recent credit crisis. At March 31, 2008,
the Company maintained all of its cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities in three financial institutions. Deposits
held with these institutions may exceed the amount of insurance
provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be
redeemed upon demand, and the Company believes there is minimal
risk of losses on such balances.
Employee
stock-based compensation
The Company accounts for the stock-based compensation expenses
in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) revised SFAS No. 123, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)) adopted on January 1, 2006.
Accordingly, compensation costs for all stock-based awards to
employees and directors are measured based on the grant date
fair value of those awards and recognized over the period during
which the employee or director is required to perform service in
exchange for the award. The Company generally recognizes the
expense over the awards vesting period.
For stock awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006,
expenses are amortized under the accelerated attribution method.
For stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, expenses
are amortized under the accelerated attribution method for
options that were modified after the original grant date and
under the straight-line attribution method for all other
options. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be
estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Pre-vesting forfeitures on the options granted
subsequent to 2006 were estimated to be approximately 2% based
on the Companys historical experience.
9
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period
from March 13, 2003 (inception) to March 31, 2008 was
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13,
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
1,155,393
|
|
|
$
|
1,003,370
|
|
|
$
|
6,947,718
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,963,144
|
|
|
|
2,995,676
|
|
|
|
28,930,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
5,118,537
|
|
|
$
|
3,999,046
|
|
|
$
|
35,878,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense per basic and diluted share of
common stock
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculation of stock-based compensation expense
per share
|
|
|
26,648,344
|
|
|
|
25,340,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, approximately $23.3 million of
total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested
awards are expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.5 years.
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had two equity incentive
plans, the Second Amended and Restated Management Equity Plan
(the 2004 Plan) and the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006
Plan) that were adopted in December 2004 and April 2006,
respectively. An aggregate of 1,164,351 shares were subject
to outstanding options granted under the 2004 Plan as of
March 31, 2008, and no additional options will be granted
under this plan. As of March 31, 2008 there are
3,451,250 shares of the Companys common stock
reserved under the 2006 Plan of which 2,694,979 shares were
subject to outstanding options to employees and non-employees.
Options are subject to terms and conditions established by the
compensation committee of the board of directors. None of the
stock-based awards are classified as a liability as of
March 31, 2008. Option awards have
10-year
contractual terms and all options granted prior to
December 31, 2006 and options granted to new employees vest
and become exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant
date with respect to 25% of the option awards. The remaining 75%
of the option awards vest and become exercisable monthly in
equal installments thereafter over three years. Option awards
granted to existing employees after December 31, 2006 vest
and become exercisable monthly in equal installments over four
years. The initial stock options granted to directors upon their
election vest and become exercisable in equal monthly
installments over a period of four years, while the subsequent
annual stock option grants to directors vest and become
exercisable in equal monthly installments over a period of one
year. Certain option awards to executives and directors provide
for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control of the
Company.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model that
uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected
volatility rates are based on historical volatility of the
common stock of comparable entities and other factors due to the
lack of historic information of the Companys publicly
traded common stock. The expected term of options granted is
based on the transition approach provided by Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 as the options meet the
plain vanilla criteria required by this guidance.
The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury
yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the
option in effect at the time of the grant. The
10
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Company has not paid dividends to its stockholders since its
inception and does not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future.
Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing
model for employee and director stock options granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average expected volatility
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
Weighted average expected term (years)
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Weighted average risk-free rate
|
|
|
3.14
|
%
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
A summary of option activity for the 2004 Plan is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Remaining Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
at Grant Date
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,169,975
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(5,288
|
)
|
|
|
4.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,164,351
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
2,820,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
676,373
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
$
|
1,686,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of option activity for the 2006 Plan is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Remaining Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
at Grant Date
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,768,635
|
|
|
$
|
26.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
966,000
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,507
|
)
|
|
|
30.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(38,149
|
)
|
|
|
17.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,694,979
|
|
|
|
18.90
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
550,559
|
|
|
|
24.91
|
|
|
|
8.89
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted
during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $3.70 per
share. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
the Company received a total of $0 and $56,516, respectively, in
cash from options exercised under the stock-based arrangements.
Accrued
expenses
Management is required to estimate accrued expenses as part of
the process of preparing financial statements. The estimation of
accrued expenses involves identifying services that have been
performed on the Companys behalf, and then estimating the
level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for
such services as of each balance sheet date in the financial
statements. Accrued expenses include professional service fees,
such as lawyers and accountants, contract service fees, such as
those under contracts with clinical
11
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
monitors, data management organizations and investigators in
conjunction with clinical trials, fees to contract manufacturers
in conjunction with the production of clinical materials, and
fees for marketing and other commercialization activities.
Pursuant to managements assessment of the services that
have been performed on clinical trials and other contracts, the
Company recognizes these expenses as the services are provided.
Such management assessments include, but are not limited to:
(1) an evaluation by the project manager of the work that
has been completed during the period, (2) measurement of
progress prepared internally
and/or
provided by the third-party service provider, (3) analyses
of data that justify the progress, and
(4) managements judgment.
Research
and development expenses
The Companys research and development expenses consist
primarily of fees for services provided by third parties in
connection with the clinical trials, costs of contract
manufacturing services, milestone license fees, costs of
materials used in clinical trials and research and development,
depreciation of capital resources used to develop products, all
related facilities costs, and salaries, other employee related
costs and stock-based compensation for the research and
development personnel. The Company expenses research and
development costs as they are incurred, including payments made
to date under the license agreements. Manufacturing-related
costs are also included in research and development expenses as
the Company does not yet have FDA approval for any of its
product candidates. Costs related to the acquisitions of
intellectual property have been expensed as incurred since the
underlying technology associated with these acquisitions were
made in connection with the Companys research and
development efforts and have no alternative future use.
Milestone payments are accrued in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, when
it is deemed probable that the milestone event will be achieved.
General
and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries, other employee related costs and stock-based
compensation for personnel serving executive, business
development, marketing, finance, accounting, information
technology and human resource functions, facility costs not
otherwise included in research and development expenses,
insurance costs and professional fees for legal, accounting and
other professional services. General and administrative costs
also include third party expenses incurred to support business
development, marketing and other business activities related to
our product candidate
Fanaptatm,
in anticipation of its commercial launch.
Income
taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), which
requires companies to account for deferred income taxes using
the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability
method, current income tax expense or benefit is the amount of
income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the
current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is
recognized for future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and tax credits and loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Tax rate
changes are reflected in income during the period such changes
are enacted. Changes in ownership may limit the amount of net
operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized in the future
to offset taxable income.
12
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Segment
information
Management has determined that the Company operates in one
business segment which is the development and commercialization
of pharmaceutical products.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or
Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities
(EITF 07-3),
which provides guidance to research and development companies on
how to account for the nonrefundable portion of an advance
payment made for research and development activities. The
Company adopted
EITF 07-3
on January 1, 2008 and this pronouncement has not had an
impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007) (SFAS 141R), Business Combinations
and SFAS No. 160 (SFAS 160),
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51. SFAS 141R will change how
business acquisitions are accounted for and will impact
financial statements both on the acquisition date and in
subsequent periods. SFAS 160 will change the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized
as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of
equity. SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 will be applied to
acquisitions that close in years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. These
pronouncements are not expected to have significant impact on
the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements
(EITF 07-1).
The consensus prohibits the equity method of accounting for
collaborative arrangements under APB 18, The Equity Method of
Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, unless a legal
entity exists. Payments between the collaborative partners will
be evaluated and reported in the income statement based on
applicable GAAP. Absent specific GAAP, the participants to the
arrangement will apply other existing GAAP by analogy or apply a
reasonable and rational accounting policy consistently. The
guidance in
EITF 07-1
is effective for periods that begin after December 15, 2008
and will apply to arrangements in existence as of the effective
date. The effect of the new consensus will be accounted for as a
change in accounting principle through retrospective
application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
EITF 07-1
on its results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB No. 110,
Share-Based Payment, or SAB 110, which
expresses the views of the SEC regarding the use of a simplified
method, as discussed in SAB 107, in developing an estimate
of the expected term of plain vanilla share options in
accordance with SFAS 123R. In SAB 110, the SEC stated
that it understood that the detailed information necessary to
calculate an expected term for plain vanilla options may not be
widely available by December 31, 2007, as previously
discussed within SAB 107. Accordingly, the SEC will
continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the
simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. As allowed
under SAB 110, the Company has continued to use the
simplified method in estimating the expected term of its stock
options until such time as more relevant detailed information
becomes available.
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per share is
calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share and SAB No. 98. Basic
earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing the net
income or loss attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding,
reduced by the weighted average unvested shares of common stock
subject to repurchase.
13
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the net income or loss
attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of other potential common stock outstanding for the
period. Other potential common stock includes stock options and
warrants to purchase common stock, but only to the extent that
their inclusion is dilutive. The Company incurred a net loss in
all periods presented, causing inclusion of any potentially
dilutive securities to have an anti-dilutive effect, resulting
in dilutive loss per share attributable to common stockholders
and basic loss per share attributable to common stockholders
being equivalent. The Company did not have any common shares
issued for nominal consideration as defined under the terms of
SAB No. 98, which would be included in EPS
calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,196,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,392,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
26,652,728
|
|
|
|
25,365,415
|
|
Weighted average unvested shares of common stock subject to
repurchase
|
|
|
(4,384
|
)
|
|
|
(24,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
26,648,344
|
|
|
|
25,340,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share applicable to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive securities not included in diluted net loss per
share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,859,330
|
|
|
|
2,769,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys
available-for-sale marketable securities as of March 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Short-term :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
$
|
2,000,344
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(346
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,999,998
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
9,367,503
|
|
|
|
23,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,391,473
|
|
U.S. asset-based securities
|
|
|
3,632,633
|
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,636,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000,480
|
|
|
$
|
28,076
|
|
|
$
|
(346
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,028,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
$
|
1,990,739
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,966,560
|
|
U.S. asset-based securities
|
|
|
4,001,319
|
|
|
|
26,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,027,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,992,058
|
|
|
$
|
26,323
|
|
|
$
|
(24,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,994,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following is a summary of the Companys
available-for-sale marketable securities as of December 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Short-term :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
$
|
3,980,732
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(897
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,979,835
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
33,301,950
|
|
|
|
48,247
|
|
|
|
(11,417
|
)
|
|
|
33,338,780
|
|
U.S. asset-based securities
|
|
|
5,920,992
|
|
|
|
4,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,925,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,203,674
|
|
|
$
|
52,600
|
|
|
$
|
(12,314
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,243,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
$
|
1,999,104
|
|
|
$
|
2,844
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,001,948
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
1,988,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,597
|
)
|
|
|
1,970,040
|
|
U.S. asset-based securities
|
|
|
4,003,480
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,991,221
|
|
|
$
|
6,707
|
|
|
$
|
(18,597
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,979,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Prepaid
Expenses, Deposits and Other Current Assets
|
The following is a summary of the Companys prepaid
expenses, deposits and other current assets, as of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current deposits with vendors
|
|
$
|
455,000
|
|
|
$
|
455,000
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
125,893
|
|
|
|
395,203
|
|
Prepaid research and development expenses
|
|
|
138,733
|
|
|
|
175,955
|
|
Accrued interest income
|
|
|
126,087
|
|
|
|
603,556
|
|
Other prepaid expenses
|
|
|
250,070
|
|
|
|
146,771
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
80,396
|
|
|
|
5,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,176,179
|
|
|
$
|
1,781,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
The following is a summary of the Companys property and
equipment at cost, as of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Laboratory equipment
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,281,877
|
|
|
$
|
1,281,877
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
756,424
|
|
|
|
758,776
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
283,231
|
|
|
|
187,317
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
468,923
|
|
|
|
505,684
|
|
Construction in Progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110,699
|
|
|
|
2,733,654
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,508,674
|
)
|
|
|
(1,387,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,602,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,345,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 were $122,629 and $148,671,
respectively, and for the period from March 13, 2003
(inception) to March 31, 2008 was $2,091,484.
The following is a summary of accrued liabilities, as of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accrued research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
6,835,482
|
|
|
$
|
7,151,360
|
|
Bonus accrual
|
|
|
272,211
|
|
|
|
957,035
|
|
Accrued consulting and other professional fees
|
|
|
1,121,321
|
|
|
|
1,307,650
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
171,540
|
|
|
|
168,275
|
|
Lease abandonment
|
|
|
43,247
|
|
|
|
84,617
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
47,984
|
|
|
|
120,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,491,785
|
|
|
$
|
9,789,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
leases
The Company has commitments totaling approximately
$6.2 million under operating real estate leases for its
current and former headquarters located in Rockville, Maryland,
expiring in 2016 and 2008. In September 2007, the Company
entered into an agreement to sublease its former headquarters
for the remainder of the lease for approximately $52,000, of
which $36,000 has been received as of March 31, 2008.
Guarantees
and indemnifications
The Company has entered into a number of standard intellectual
property indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
its business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company has
agreed to indemnify, hold harmless, and to reimburse the
indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the
indemnified party,
16
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
generally the Companys business partners or customers, in
connection with any U.S. patent or any copyright or other
intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with
respect to the Companys products. The term of these
indemnification agreements is generally perpetual from the date
of execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of
future payments the Company could be required to make under
these indemnification agreements is unlimited. Since inception,
the Company has not incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle
claims related to these indemnification agreements. The Company
also agreed to indemnify its officers and directors for certain
events or occurrences, subject to certain limits. The Company
believes that the fair value of the indemnification agreements
is minimal, and accordingly the Company has not recognized any
liabilities relating to these agreements as of March 31,
2008.
License
agreements
The Companys rights to develop and commercialize the
clinical-stage product candidates are subject to the terms and
conditions of licenses granted to the Company by other
pharmaceutical companies.
Fanaptatm. The
Company acquired exclusive worldwide rights to patents for
Fanaptatm
through a sublicense agreement with Novartis. A predecessor
company of sanofi-aventis, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (HMRI),
discovered iloperidone and completed early clinical work on the
compound. In 1996, following a review of its product portfolio,
HMRI licensed its rights to the iloperidone patents to Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on an exclusive basis. In 1997, soon after
it had acquired its rights, Titan sublicensed its rights to
iloperidone on an exclusive basis to Novartis. In June 2004, the
Company acquired exclusive worldwide rights to these patents to
develop and commercialize iloperidone through a sublicense
agreement with Novartis. In partial consideration for this
sublicense, the Company paid Novartis an initial license fee of
$500,000 and is obligated to make future milestone payments to
Novartis of less than $100 million in the aggregate (the
majority of which are tied to sales milestones), as well as
royalty payments to Novartis at a rate which, as a percentage of
net sales, is in the mid-twenties. In November 2007, the Company
met a milestone under this license agreement relating to the
acceptance of its filing of the NDA for
Fanaptatm
for the treatment of schizophrenia and made a license payment of
$5 million to Novartis.
The rights with respect to the patents to develop and
commercialize
Fanaptatm
may terminate, in whole or in part, if the Company fails to meet
certain development or commercialization milestones relating to
the time it takes for the Company to launch
Fanaptatm
commercially following regulatory approval, and the time it
takes for the Company to receive regulatory approval following
the submission of an NDA or equivalent foreign filing.
Additionally, the Companys rights may terminate in whole
or in part if the Company does not meet certain other
obligations under the sublicense agreement to make royalty and
milestone payments, if the Company fails to comply with
requirements in the sublicense agreement regarding its financial
condition, or if the Company does not abide by certain
restrictions in the sublicense agreement regarding other
development activities.
Tasimelteon. In February 2004, the Company
entered into a license agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS)
under which the Company received an exclusive worldwide license
under certain patents and patent applications, and other
licenses to intellectual property, to develop and commercialize
tasimelteon. In partial consideration for the license, the
Company paid BMS an initial license fee of $500,000 and is
obligated to make future milestone payments to BMS of less than
$40 million in the aggregate (the majority of which are
tied to sales milestones) as well as royalty payments based on
the net sales of tasimelteon at a rate which, as a percentage of
net sales, is in the low teens. The Company is also obligated
under this agreement to pay BMS a percentage of any sublicense
fees, upfront payments and milestone and other payments
(excluding royalties) that the Company receives from a third
party in connection with any sublicensing arrangement, at a rate
which is in the mid-twenties. The Company has agreed with BMS in
the license agreement for tasimelteon to use commercially
reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize tasimelteon and
to meet certain
17
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
milestones in initiating and completing certain clinical work.
During March 2006, the Company met its first milestone relating
to the initiation of the Phase III clinical trial for
tasimelteon and recorded a license fee expense of $1,000,000.
BMS holds certain rights with respect to tasimelteon in the
license agreement. If the Company has not agreed to one or more
partnering arrangements to develop and commercialize tasimelteon
in certain significant markets with one or more third parties
after the completion of the Phase III program, BMS has the
option to exclusively develop and commercialize tasimelteon on
its own on pre-determined financial terms, including milestone
and royalty payments. If the Company seeks a co-promotion
agreement for tasimelteon, BMS has a right of first negotiation
to enter into such an agreement with the Company.
Either party may terminate the tasimelteon license agreement
under certain circumstances, including a material breach of the
agreement by the other. In the event that BMS has not exercised
its option to reacquire the rights to tasimelteon and the
Company terminates the license, or if BMS terminates the license
due to the Companys breach, all rights licensed and
developed by the Company under this agreement will revert or
otherwise be licensed back to BMS on an exclusive basis.
VSF-173. In June 2004, the Company entered
into a license agreement with Novartis under which the Company
received an exclusive worldwide license to develop and
commercialize VSF-173. In consideration for the license, the
Company paid Novartis an initial license fee of $500,000. The
Company is also obligated to make future milestone payments to
Novartis of less than $50 million in the aggregate (the
majority of which are tied to sales milestones) and royalty
payments at rates which, as a percentage of net sales, range
from the low-to-mid teens. In March 2007, the Company met its
first milestone under this license agreement relating to the
initiation of the Phase II clinical trial for VSF-173, and
recorded a license fee expense of $1,000,000.
Novartis has the right to co-develop and exclusively
commercialize VSF-173 on its own after the completion of
Phase II and Phase III programs in exchange for
certain milestones and royalty payments. In the event that
Novartis chooses not to exercise either of these options and the
Company decides to enter into a partnering arrangement to
commercialize VSF-173, Novartis has a right of first refusal to
negotiate such an agreement with the Company, as well as a right
to submit a last matching counteroffer regarding such an
agreement. In addition, the rights with respect to VSF-173 may
terminate, in whole or in part, if the Company fails to meet
certain development and commercialization milestones described
in the license agreement relating to the time it takes the
Company to complete the development work on VSF-173. These
rights may also terminate in whole or in part if the Company
fails to make royalty or milestone payments or if the Company
does not comply with requirements in the license agreement
regarding its financial condition. In the event of an early
termination of the license agreement, all rights licensed and
developed by the Company under this agreement may revert back to
Novartis.
Future license payments. No amounts were
recorded as liabilities nor were any contractual obligations
relating to the license agreements included in the condensed
consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2008,
since the amounts, timing and likelihood of these future
payments are unknown and will depend on the successful outcome
of future clinical trials, regulatory filings, favorable FDA
regulatory approvals, growth in product sales and other factors.
Research
and development and marketing agreements
The Company entered into agreements with several organizations
to provide services relating to clinical development, clinical
manufacturing activities and marketing services under fee
service arrangements. The Companys current agreements for
these services may be terminated on no more than 60 days
notice without incurring additional charges, other than charges
for work completed but not paid for through the effective date
18
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
of termination and other costs incurred by the Companys
contractors in closing out work in progress as of the effective
date of termination.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
(FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes. The adoption of FIN No. 48 did not
have a material effect on the Companys financial position
or results of operations. In addition, there are no uncertain
tax positions whose resolution in the next twelve months is
expected to materially affect operating results. The Company
accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method.
Deferred income taxes are recognized by applying enacted
statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if
necessary, by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits for
which future realization is uncertain.
The Company has not recorded any tax provision or benefit for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 or 2007, except for
an estimated tax expense resulting from the research and
development agreement with the Companys subsidiary in
Singapore for the three month period ended March 31, 2007.
The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the full
amount of its net deferred tax assets since realization of any
future benefit from deductible temporary differences and net
operating loss cannot be sufficiently assured at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007. Under the Tax Reform Act of
1986, the amounts of and benefits from the operating loss
carryforwards may be impaired in certain circumstances. Events
which cause limitations in the amount of net operating losses
that the Company may utilize in any one year include, but are
not limited to, a cumulative ownership change of more than 50%,
as defined, over a three year period.
|
|
10.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the
FASB agreed to delay the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Company has adopted the provisions
of SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, for financial
instruments. Although the adoption of SFAS 157 did not
materially impact its financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flow, the Company is now required to provide
additional disclosures as part of its financial statements.
Under FAS No. 159, entities are permitted to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The Company did not elect the fair value measurement
option under FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
including an amendment to FAS 115 (SFAS 159),
for any of its financial assets or liabilities.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These
tiers include:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 defined as observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets
|
|
|
|
Level 2 defined as inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable
|
|
|
|
Level 3 defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions
|
19
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
As of March 31, 2008, the Company held certain assets that
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The Company makes use of observable market based inputs to
calculate fair value, in which case the measurements are
classified within Level 2. The Company currently does not
have non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Description :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Various statements in this report are forward-looking
statements under the securities laws. Words such as, but
not limited to, believe, expect,
anticipate, estimate,
intend, plan, targets,
likely, will, would, and
could, and similar expressions or words, identify
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based
upon current expectations that involve risks, changes in
circumstances, assumptions and uncertainties. Vanda
Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Vanda or the Company) is at an early stage
of development and may not ever have any products that generate
significant revenue. Important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those reflected in our
forward-looking statements include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
delays in the completion of our clinical trials;
|
|
|
|
a failure of our product candidates to be demonstrably safe and
effective;
|
|
|
|
our failure to obtain regulatory approval for our products or to
comply with ongoing regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
a lack of acceptance of our product candidates in the
marketplace, or a failure to become or remain profitable;
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain the capital necessary to fund our
research and development activities;
|
|
|
|
our failure to identify or obtain rights to new product
candidates;
|
|
|
|
our failure to develop or obtain sales, marketing and
distribution resources and expertise or to otherwise manage our
growth;
|
|
|
|
a loss of any of our key scientists or management personnel;
|
|
|
|
losses incurred from product liability claims made against
us; and
|
|
|
|
a loss of rights to develop and commercialize our products under
our license and sublicense agreements.
|
All written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable
to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified
in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or
referred to in this section. We caution investors not to rely
too heavily on the forward-looking statements we make or that
are made on our behalf. We undertake no obligation, and
specifically decline any obligation, to update or revise
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
We encourage you to read the discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and our condensed consolidated financial
statements contained in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
We also encourage you to read Item 1A Risk
Factors of Part II of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q,
which contains a more complete discussion of the risks and
uncertainties associated with our business. In addition to the
risks described above and in Item 1A of this report, other
unknown or unpredictable factors also could affect our results.
There can be no assurance that the actual results or
developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if
substantially realized, that they will have the expected
consequences to, or effects on, us. Therefore, no assurance can
be given that the outcomes stated in such forward-looking
statements and estimates will be achieved.
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development
and commercialization of clinical-stage product candidates for
central nervous system disorders, with exclusive worldwide
commercial rights to three product candidates in clinical
development. Our lead product candidate,
Fanaptatm
(iloperidone, also previously referred to as Fiapta), is a
compound for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar
disorder. On November 27, 2007 the United States Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) accepted our New Drug Application
(NDA) for
Fanaptatm
in schizophrenia. Our second product candidate, tasimelteon
(VEC-162) is a compound for the treatment of sleep and mood
disorders. In November 2006 we announced positive top-line
results from our Phase III trial of tasimelteon in
transient insomnia. In November 2007 we initiated, and in
February 2008 we
21
completed, an enrollment in a Phase III trial of
tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia. Vanda expects to to
report top-line results in June 2008. Tasimelteon is also ready
for Phase II trials for the treatment of depression. Our
third product candidate, VSF-173, is a compound for the
treatment of excessive sleepiness and is currently in a
Phase II program.
We expect a decision from the FDA on the NDA for
Fanaptatm
in schizophrenia on or about July 27, 2008, its PDUFA
action date, although the FDA may not meet, or may extend, the
PDUFA action date. We will have to conduct additional
Phase III trials for tasimelteon in chronic sleep disorders
prior to our filing of an NDA for tasimelteon. We will have to
conduct additional Phase II trials for VSF-173 in order to
further its development. Assuming successful outcomes of our
clinical trials and approval by the FDA, we expect to
commercialize
FanaptaTM
and VSF-173 with our own sales force in the U.S. and
through a partnership in
non-U.S. markets,
and expect to commercialize tasimelteon through a partnership
with a global pharmaceutical company, although we have not yet
identified such a global partner.
We are a development stage enterprise and have accumulated net
losses of approximately $193.1 million since the inception
of our operations through March 31, 2008. We have no
product revenues to date and have no approved products for sale.
Since we began our operations in March 2003, we have devoted
substantially all of our resources to the in-licensing and
clinical development of our product candidates. Our future
operating results will depend largely on our ability to
successfully develop and commercialize our lead product
candidate,
FanaptaTM,
and on the progress of other product candidates currently in our
research and development pipeline. The results of our operations
will vary significantly from year-to-year and quarter-to-quarter
and depend on a number of factors, including risks related to
our business, risks related to our industry, and other risks
which are detailed in Item 1A Risk Factors of
Part II of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Based on our current operating plans, we believe that our
existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, will
be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating needs into the
fourth quarter of 2008. If
Fanaptatm
is approved by the FDA on the expected PDUFA action date of or
about July 27, 2008, the Company intends to pursue
additional financing, in part to fund additional marketing and
product launch costs. The Company believes that it would be able
to raise sufficient capital to fund the product launch and
operations into 2009. However, if the Company cannot obtain
additional financing, management has the ability and intent to
implement a reduced spending plan to fund operations at least
through the first quarter of 2009. In budgeting for our
activities, we have relied on a number of assumptions, including
assumptions that we will continue to expend funds in preparation
of a commercial launch of
Fanaptatm,
that we will complete our Phase III clinical trial of
tasimelteon for the treatment of chronic primary insomnia in
accordance with our expectations, that we will not engage in
further in-licensing activities, that we will not receive any
proceeds from potential partnerships, that we will not expend
funds on the bipolar indication for
Fanaptatm,
that we will not conduct additional trials for the injectable
formulation for
Fanaptatm,
that we will not conduct additional trials for VSF-173, that we
will continue to evaluate clinical and pre-clinical compounds
for potential development, that we will be able to continue the
manufacturing of our product candidates at commercially
reasonable prices, that we will be able to retain our key
personnel, and that we will not incur any significant contingent
liabilities. We may need to raise additional funds more quickly
if one or more of our assumptions proves to be incorrect, if we
choose to expand our product development efforts more rapidly
than presently anticipated, or if we seek to acquire additional
product candidates. We may also decide to raise additional funds
even before they are needed if the conditions for raising
capital are favorable.
In our capital-raising efforts, we may seek to sell additional
equity or debt securities or obtain a bank credit facility. The
sale of additional equity or debt securities, if convertible,
could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of
indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and
could also result in covenants that would restrict our
operations.
We cannot assure you that additional capital will be available
when we need it on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
The unavailability of financing may require us to delay, scale
back or eliminate expenditures for our research, development and
marketing activities necessary to commercialize our potential
biopharmaceutical products. If we are unable to secure
sufficient capital to fund our research and development
activities, we may not be able to continue operations or we may
have to enter into collaboration agreements
22
that could require us to share commercial rights to our products
to a greater extent or at earlier stages in the drug development
process than we currently intend. Collaborations that are
consummated by us prior to proof-of-efficacy and safety of a
product candidate could impair our ability to realize value from
that product candidate. In the absence of our ability to raise
additional capital resources, we are prepared and have the
ability to curtail the existing operating needs and commitments
to have the operating funds through the first quarter of 2009.
Fanaptatm. Fanaptatm
is our product candidate under development to treat
schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. We submitted an NDA for
Fanaptatm
for the treatment of schizophrenia to the FDA on
September 27, 2007 and on November 27, 2007 the FDA
accepted our NDA. We continue to work closely with the FDA
throughout their review process and anticipate a decision on our
NDA on its PDUFA action date of or about July 27, 2008,
although the FDA may not meet, or may extend, the PDUFA action
date. The application includes data from 35 clinical trials and
more than 3,000 patients treated with
Fanaptatm
and also contains pharmacogenetic data aimed to further improve
the benefit/risk profile of
Fanaptatm
in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.
From inception to March 31, 2008 we incurred approximately
$68.4 million in research and development costs directly
attributable to our development of
Fanaptatm,
including a $5.0 million milestone license fee paid to
Novartis in 2007 upon the acceptance of our NDA.
We expect to increase our pre-launch commercial activities
relating to
Fanaptatm,
and we expect to start marketing
Fanaptatm
commercially in early 2009. However, the time it takes to
receive cash inflows from the sale of
Fanaptatm
is highly dependent on facts and circumstances that we may not
be able to control and are subject to a number of risks. For
example, delays in the approval process and subsequent
commercial launch of
Fanaptatm
following our filing may occur if the FDA fails to attend to our
filing in a timely manner or requires further data to approve
Fanaptatm.
Please see Item 1A Risk Factors of Part II
of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for a more detailed discussion of these and other risks.
We are also developing a 4-week injectable formulation for
Fanaptatm,
for which we already have early Phase II data from a study
previously conducted by Novartis. We have completed essential
manufacturing activities and intend to conduct additional
clinical trials following FDA approval of the oral dose
formulation for
Fanaptatm.
Tasimelteon. Tasimelteon is our product
candidate under development to treat sleep and mood disorders.
Tasimelteon is a melatonin receptor agonist that works by
adjusting the human body clock of circadian rhythm.
Tasimelteon has successfully completed a Phase III trial
for the treatment of transient insomnia in November 2006. In
November 2007 we initiated and in February 2008 completed an
enrollment in a Phase III trial of tasimelteon to evaluate
the safety and efficacy of tasimelteon in chronic primary
insomnia. The trial is a randomized, double-blind, and
placebo-controlled study with 324 patients. The trial
measures time to fall asleep and sleep maintenance, as well as
next-day
performance. We expect to complete the study and to report its
top-line results in June 2008. We will have to conduct
additional trials prior to our filing of an NDA for tasimelteon
to treat sleep disorders. Tasimelteon is also ready for
Phase II trials for the treatment of depression.
From inception to March 31, 2008, we incurred approximately
$47.6 million in direct research and development costs
directly attributable to our development of tasimelteon,
including a $1.0 million milestone license fee paid to BMS
in 2006 upon the initiation of our Phase III program.
VSF-173. VSF-173 is an oral compound that has
demonstrated effects on animal sleep/wake patterns and gene
expression suggestive of a stimulant effect. In a recently
completed Phase II trial of VSF-173 in excessive
sleepiness, the compound demonstrated improvement compared to
placebo on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), though not
statistically significant, and dose-dependent, statistically
significant improvements versus placebo on a number of secondary
endpoints taken in the recovery sleep period after dosing,
including number of awakenings, and sleep efficiency and wake
after sleep onset in the first third of the recovery sleep
period. VSF-173 was also demonstrated to be safe and
well-tolerated. We will have to conduct additional Phase II
trials of VSF-173 in order to further its development.
23
Excessive sleepiness is a common symptom that can significantly
impair a persons ability to function. The effects of
excessive sleepiness range from mild sleepiness to unrecognized
episodes of microsleeps and uncontrollable sleep
attacks. Excessive sleepiness is a symptom of many disorders,
including obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy, shift worker
sleep disorder, Parkinsons disease and Alzheimers
disease.
From inception to March 31, 2008, we incurred approximately
$6.3 million in research and development costs directly
attributable to our development of VSF-173, including a
milestone license fee of $1.0 million paid to Novartis upon
the initiation of our first Phase II clinical trial in
March of 2007.
Research
and development expenses
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of fees
paid to third-party professional service providers in connection
with the services they provide for our clinical trials, costs of
contract manufacturing services, costs of materials used in
clinical trials and research and development, depreciation of
capital resources used to develop our products, all related
facilities costs, and salaries, benefits and stock-based
compensation expenses related to our research and development
personnel. We expense research and development costs as
incurred, including payments made to date under our license
agreements. We believe that significant investment in product
development is a competitive necessity and plan to continue
these investments in order to realize the potential of our
product candidates and pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics
expertise. From inception through March, 31, 2008 we incurred
research and development expenses in the aggregate of
approximately $136.8 million, including stock-based
compensation expenses of approximately $6.9 million. We
expect our research and development expenses to increase as we
continue to develop our product candidates. We also expect to
incur licensing costs in the future that could be substantial,
as we continue our efforts to develop our product candidates and
to evaluate potential in-license product candidates.
The following table summarizes our product development
initiatives for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007 and for the period from March 13, 2003 (inception) to
March 31, 2008. Included in this table are the research and
development expenses recognized in connection with our product
candidates in clinical development. Included in Other
product candidates are the costs directly related to
research initiatives for all other product candidates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) to
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Direct project costs(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fanaptatm
(iloperidone)
|
|
$
|
2,326,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,322,000
|
|
|
$
|
68,370,000
|
|
Tasimelteon (VEC-162)
|
|
|
7,586,000
|
|
|
|
2,796,000
|
|
|
|
47,552,000
|
|
VSF-173
|
|
|
277,000
|
|
|
|
1,484,000
|
|
|
|
6,250,000
|
|
Other product candidates
|
|
|
459,000
|
|
|
|
459,000
|
|
|
|
5,588,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct product costs
|
|
|
10,648,000
|
|
|
|
10,061,000
|
|
|
|
127,760,000
|
|
Indirect project costs(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
148,000
|
|
|
|
131,000
|
|
|
|
1,727,000
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
1,775,000
|
|
Other indirect overhead
|
|
|
218,000
|
|
|
|
290,000
|
|
|
|
5,490,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indirect expenses
|
|
|
455,000
|
|
|
|
531,000
|
|
|
|
8,992,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
11,103,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,592,000
|
|
|
$
|
136,752,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Many of our research and development costs are not attributable
to any individual project because we share resources across
several development projects. We record direct costs, including
personnel costs and related benefits and stock-based
compensation, on a
project-by-project
basis. We record indirect costs that support a number of our
research and development activities in the aggregate. |
24
General
and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and other related costs for personnel, including
stock-based compensation, serving executive, finance,
accounting, information technology, marketing and human resource
functions. Other costs include facility costs not otherwise
included in research and development expenses and fees for
legal, accounting and other professional services. We expect
that our general and administrative expenses will continue to
increase as we support our discovery and research development
efforts, for our commercial development activities and fulfill
our reporting and other regulatory obligations applicable to
public companies. From inception through March 31, 2008, we
incurred general and administrative expenses in the aggregate of
approximately $66.0 million, including stock-based
compensation expenses of approximately $28.9 million.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
our financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and
expenses during the reported periods. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other factors that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
value of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes
to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2007 included in our annual report on
Form 10-K.
However, we believe that the following critical accounting
policies relating to accrued expenses and stock-based
compensation expense are important to understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results, and we have
accordingly included them in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Accrued
expenses
As part of the process of preparing financial statements we are
required to estimate accrued expenses. The estimation of accrued
expenses involves identifying services that have been performed
on our behalf, and then estimating the level of service
performed and the associated cost incurred for such services as
of each balance sheet date in the financial statements. Accrued
expenses include professional service fees, such as those for
lawyers and accountants, contract service fees, such as those
under contracts with clinical monitors, data management
organizations and investigators in conjunction with clinical
trials, fees to contract manufacturers in conjunction with the
production of clinical materials, and fees for marketing and
other commercialization activities. Pursuant to our assessment
of the services that have been performed on clinical trials and
other contracts, we recognize these expenses as the services are
provided. Our assessments include, but are not limited to:
(1) an evaluation by the project manager of the work that
has been completed during the period, (2) measurement of
progress prepared internally
and/or
provided by the third-party service provider, (3) analyses
of data that justify the progress, and
(4) managements judgment. In the event that we do not
identify certain costs that have begun to be incurred or we
under- or over-estimate the level of services performed or the
costs of such services, our reported expenses for such period
would be too low or too high.
Stock-based
compensation
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share Based Payment , (SFAS 123(R))
on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective
transition method of implementation and adopted the accelerated
attribution method. Prior to January 1, 2006 we followed
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations, in
accounting for our stock-based compensation plans, rather than
the alternative fair value accounting method provided for under
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation .
We currently use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model
to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination
of the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using an
option pricing
25
model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These
variables include the expected stock price volatility over the
expected term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock
option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected
dividends. Expected volatility rates are based on historical
volatility of the common stock of comparable entities and other
factors due to the lack of historic information of the
Companys publicly traded common stock. The expected term
of options granted is based on the transition approach provided
by Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 as
the options meet the plain vanilla criteria required
by this method. The risk-free interest rates are based on the
U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the
expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant.
We have not paid dividends to our stockholders since the
inception and do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future. The stock-based compensation expense for a period is
also affected by expected forfeiture rate for the respective
option grants. If our estimates of the fair value of these
equity instruments or expected forfeitures are too high or too
low, it would have the effect of overstating or understating
expenses.
Total employee stock-based compensation expense recognized
during the three months ending March 31, 2008 and 2007 was
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
1,156,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,003,000
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,963,000
|
|
|
|
2,996,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
5,119,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,999,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF
No. 07-3,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or
Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities
(EITF 07-3),
which provides guidance to research and development companies on
how to account for the nonrefundable portion of an advance
payment made for research and development activities. We adopted
EITF 07-3
on January 1, 2008 and this pronouncement has not had an
impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007) (SFAS 141R), Business Combinations
and SFAS No. 160 (SFAS 160),
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51. SFAS 141R will change how
business acquisitions are accounted for and will impact
financial statements both on the acquisition date and in
subsequent periods. SFAS 160 will change the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized
as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of
equity. SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 will be applied to
acquisitions that close in years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted. These
pronouncements are not expected to have significant impact on
our results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements
(EITF 07-1).
The consensus prohibits the equity method of accounting for
collaborative arrangements under APB 18, The Equity Method of
Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, unless a legal
entity exists. Payments between the collaborative partners will
be evaluated and reported in the income statement based on
applicable GAAP. Absent specific GAAP, the participants to the
arrangement will apply other existing GAAP by analogy or apply a
reasonable and rational accounting policy consistently. The
guidance in Issue
EITF 07-1
is effective for periods that begin after December 15, 2008
and will apply to arrangements in existence as of the effective
date. The effect of the new consensus will be accounted for as a
change in accounting principle through retrospective
application. We are currently evaluating the impact of
EITF 07-1
on our results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the SEC issued SAB No. 110,
Share-Based Payment, or SAB 110, which
expresses the views of the SEC regarding the use of a simplified
method, as discussed in SAB 107, in developing an
26
estimate of the expected term of plain vanilla share options in
accordance with SFAS 123R. In SAB 110, the SEC stated
that it understood that the detailed information necessary to
calculate an expected term for plain vanilla options may not be
widely available by December 31, 2007, as previously
discussed within SAB 107. Accordingly, the SEC will
continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the
simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. As allowed
under SAB 110, we will continue to use the simplified
method in estimating the expected term of our stock options
until such time as more relevant detailed information becomes
available.
Results
of Operations
We have a limited history of operations. We anticipate that our
quarterly results of operations will fluctuate for the
foreseeable future due to several factors, including any
possible payments made or received pursuant to licensing or
collaboration agreements, progress of our research and
development efforts, and the timing and outcome of clinical
trials and related possible regulatory approvals. Our limited
operating history makes predictions of future operations
difficult or impossible. Since our inception, we have incurred
significant losses. As of March 31, 2008, we had a deficit
accumulated during the development stage of approximately
$193.1 million. We anticipate incurring additional losses
for the foreseeable future and these losses may be incurred at
increasing rates.
Three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to three months ended
March 31, 2007
Research and development expenses. Research
and development expenses increased by approximately
$0.5 million, or 4.8%, to approximately $11.1 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to
approximately $10.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007.
The following table discloses the components of research and
development expenses reflecting all of our project expenses for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Direct project costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical trials
|
|
$
|
6,164,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,762,000
|
|
Contract research and development, consulting, materials and
other direct costs
|
|
|
2,218,000
|
|
|
|
4,242,000
|
|
Milestone license fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs
|
|
|
1,111,000
|
|
|
|
1,054,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,155,000
|
|
|
|
1,003,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct costs
|
|
|
10,648,000
|
|
|
|
10,061,000
|
|
Indirect project costs
|
|
|
455,000
|
|
|
|
531,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,103,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,592,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs increased approximately $0.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007 as a result of the clinical
trial expenses relating to our Phase III trial of
tasimelteon in chronic primary insomnia that we initiated during
the fourth quarter of 2007 and offset by lower other expenses
relating to our NDA for
Fanaptatm.
Clinical trials expense increased approximately
$3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 primarily
due to the cost incurred during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 in our Phase III clinical trial of
tasimelteon that we initiated during the fourth quarter of 2007.
Contract research and development, consulting, materials and
other direct costs decreased approximately $2.0 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 relative to the three
months ended March 31, 2007, primarily as a result of
decreased
Fanaptatm
NDA related expenses. Salaries, benefits and related costs
increased approximately $57,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 relative to the three months ended
March 31, 2007 due to cost of living
27
adjustments. Stock-based compensation expense increased by
approximately $152,000 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2007 as a result of options granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2008.
We expect to continue to incur substantial research and
development expenses due to our ongoing research and development
efforts as our existing and future product candidates advance
through clinical trials.
General and administrative expenses. General
and administrative expenses increased by approximately
$2.7 million, or 43.7%, to approximately $9.0 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from
approximately $6.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007.
The following table discloses the components of our general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs
|
|
$
|
990,000
|
|
|
$
|
785,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,963,000
|
|
|
|
2,996,000
|
|
Marketing and related consulting services
|
|
|
2,330,000
|
|
|
|
1,017,000
|
|
Legal, accounting and other professional expenses
|
|
|
888,000
|
|
|
|
701,000
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
788,000
|
|
|
|
735,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,959,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,234,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, benefits and related costs increased by approximately
$205,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2007 due to an increase
in personnel as we continued to build our marketing capabilities
in anticipation of the commercial launch of
Fanaptatm.
Stock-based compensation expense increased by approximately
$967,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007, as a
result of options granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. Marketing and related consulting services
expenses increased by approximately $1.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, relative to the three
months ended March 31, 2007, due to the increase in
marketing activity related to our anticipated commercial launch
of
Fanaptatm.
These increased expenses include market research, branding,
medical community cultivation and publication planning costs.
Legal, accounting and other professional costs increased by
approximately $187,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 due
primarily to a higher level of patent and trademark costs and
business development consulting activity. Other expenses
increased by approximately $53,000 primarily due to increased
insurance costs.
We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase
substantially, primarily to support our commercial development
activities.
Other income, net. Interest and other income
in the three months ended March 31, 2008 was approximately
$866,000 compared to approximately $1.4 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2007. Interest income was
lower for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2007, due to lower
average cash balances and lower short-term interest rates for
the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Our interest income for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007 are disclosed on the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
866,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,434,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We have funded our operations through March 31, 2008
principally with the net proceeds from private preferred stock
offerings of approximately $62.0 million, with net proceeds
from our April 2006 initial public offering of approximately
$53.3 million and with net proceeds from our January 2007
follow-on offering of approximately $111.3 million.
As of March 31, 2008, our total cash and cash equivalents
and marketable securities were approximately $77.0 million
compared to approximately $93.2 million at
December 31, 2007. Our cash and cash equivalents are
deposits in operating accounts and highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of 90 days or less at date of
purchase and consist of time deposits, investments in money
market funds with commercial banks and financial institutions,
and commercial paper of high-quality corporate issuers. As of
March 31, 2008 the Company also held a non-current deposit
of $430,000 that is used to collateralize a letter of credit
issued for its current office lease expiring in 2016.
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our
liquidity resources are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
56,015,000
|
|
|
$
|
41,930,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,980,000
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
9,391,000
|
|
|
|
33,339,000
|
|
U.S. asset-backed securities
|
|
|
3,637,000
|
|
|
|
5,925,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, short-term
|
|
|
15,028,000
|
|
|
|
43,244,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,002,000
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
|
|
|
1,966,000
|
|
|
|
1,970,000
|
|
U.S. asset-backed securities
|
|
|
4,028,000
|
|
|
|
4,007,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, long-term
|
|
|
5,994,000
|
|
|
|
7,979,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
77,037,000
|
|
|
$
|
93,153,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
$
|
430,000
|
|
|
$
|
430,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, we maintained all of our cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities in three financial
institutions. Deposits held with these institutions may exceed
the amount of insurance provided on such deposits, but we do not
anticipate any losses with respect to such deposits.
Our activities will necessitate significant uses of working
capital throughout 2008 and beyond. Based on our current
operating plans, we believe that our existing cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated operating needs into the fourth quarter of 2008.
If
Fanaptatm
is approved by the FDA on the expected PDUFA action date of or
about July 27, 2008, the Company intends to pursue
additional financing, in part to fund additional marketing and
product launch costs. We believe that we would be able to raise
sufficient capital to fund the product launch and operations
into 2009. However, if we cannot obtain additional financing,
management has the ability and intent to implement a reduced
spending plan to fund operations at least through the first
quarter of 2009. In budgeting for our activities, we have relied
on a number of assumptions, including assumptions that we will
continue to expend funds in preparation of a commercial launch
of
Fanaptatm,
that we will complete our tasimelteon Phase III trial in
chronic primary insomnia in accordance with our expectations,
that we will not engage in further in-licensing activities, that
we will not receive any proceeds from potential partnerships,
that we will not expend funds on the bipolar indication for
Fanaptatm,
that we will not conduct additional trials for the injectable
formulation for
Fanaptatm,
that we will not conduct additional trials for VSF-173, that we
will continue to evaluate clinical and pre-clinical compounds
for potential development, that we will be able to continue the
manufacturing of our product candidates at commercially
reasonable prices, that we will be able to retain our key
personnel, and that we will not incur any significant contingent
liabilities. We may need to raise additional funds more
29
quickly if one or more of our assumptions proves to be incorrect
or if we choose to expand our product development efforts more
rapidly than presently anticipated or seek to acquire additional
product candidates, and we may also decide to raise additional
funds even before they are needed if the conditions for raising
capital are favorable.
We may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or
obtain a bank credit facility. The sale of additional equity or
debt securities, if convertible, could result in dilution to our
stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in
increased fixed obligations and could also result in covenants
that would restrict our operations.
We cannot assure you that additional funds will be available
when we need them on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
The unavailability of financing may require us to delay, scale
back or eliminate expenditures for our research, development and
marketing activities necessary to commercialize our potential
biopharmaceutical products. If we are unable to secure
sufficient capital to fund our research and development
activities, we may not be able to continue operations or we may
have to enter into collaboration agreements that could require
us to share commercial rights to our products to a greater
extent or at earlier stages in the drug development process than
we currently intend. Collaborations that are consummated by us
prior to proof-of-efficacy and safety of a product candidate
could impair our ability to realize value from that product
candidate.
Cash
Flow
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, and March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(16,109,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,405,000
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
30,178,000
|
|
|
|
(64,646,000
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,348,000
|
|
Exchange rate effect on cash and equivalents
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
14,086,000
|
|
|
$
|
33,292,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operations was approximately $16.1 million
and approximately $13.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net loss for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 of approximately
$19.2 million was offset primarily by non-cash charges for
stock-based compensation of approximately $5.1 million, by
depreciation and amortization of approximately $123,000, by an
increase in prepaid expenses of approximately $606,000, by a
decrease in accrued expenses and accounts payable of
approximately $2.7 million, and other net changes in
working capital. Net cash provided by investing activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 was approximately
$30.2 million and consisted primarily of net proceeds of
marketable securities of approximately $30.4 million offset
by $200,000 of capital expenditures. There was no cash provided
by financing activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual cash
obligations as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
April to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2012
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$
|
6,154,000
|
|
|
$
|
481,000
|
|
|
$
|
685,000
|
|
|
$
|
706,000
|
|
|
$
|
727,000
|
|
|
$
|
749,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,806,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Operating
leases
Our commitments under operating leases shown above consist of
payments relating to our real estate leases for our current and
former headquarters located in Rockville, Maryland, expiring in
2016 and 2008, respectively. We vacated our previous
headquarters in January 2006.
Clinical
research organization contracts and other
contracts
We have entered into agreements with clinical research
organizations responsible for conducting and monitoring our
clinical trials for
Fanaptatm
and tasimelteon, and have also entered into agreements with
clinical supply manufacturing organizations and other outside
contractors who will be responsible for additional services
supporting our ongoing clinical development processes. These
contractual obligations are not reflected in the table above
because we may terminate them on no more than 60 days
notice without incurring additional charges (other than charges
for work completed but not paid for through the effective date
of termination and other costs incurred by our contractors in
closing out work in progress as of the effective date of
termination).
License
agreements
In February 2004 and June 2004, we entered into separate
licensing agreements with Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis,
respectively, for the exclusive rights to develop and
commercialize our three compounds in clinical development. We
are obligated to make payments under the conditions in the
agreements upon the achievement of specified clinical,
regulatory and commercial milestones. If the products are
successfully commercialized we will be required to pay certain
royalties based on net sales for each of the licensed products.
Please see the notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements included with this report for a more detailed
description of these license agreements.
As a result of the successful commencement of the Phase III
clinical study of tasimelteon in March 2006, we met the first
milestone specified in our licensing agreement with
Bristol-Myers Squibb and made an associated milestone payment of
$1.0 million. During March 2007, we met our first milestone
under the license agreement with Novartis for VSF-173 relating
to the initiation of the Phase II clinical trial and made
an associated milestone payment of $1.0 million. In
November 2007, the Company met a milestone under this license
agreement with Novartis relating to the acceptance of the NDA
for
Fanaptatm
in schizophrenia and made a license payment of $5.0 million
to Novartis. No other amounts were recorded as liabilities nor
were any other contractual obligations relating to the license
agreements included in the condensed consolidated financial
statements as of March 31, 2008, since the amounts, timing
and likelihood of these payments are unknown and will depend on
the successful outcome of future clinical trials, regulatory
filings, favorable FDA regulatory approvals, growth in product
sales and other factors. For a more detailed description of the
risks associated with the outcome of such clinical trials,
regulatory filings, FDA approvals and product sales, please see
the section Risk Factors of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.
Fair
Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company has
adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of January 1,
2008, for financial instruments. Although the adoption of
SFAS 157 did not materially impact its financial condition,
results of operations, or cash flow, the Company is now required
to provide additional disclosures as part of its financial
statements. Under FAS No. 159, entities are permitted
to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value. The Company did not elect the fair
value measurement option under FAS No. 159 for any of
its financial assets or liabilities.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These
tiers include:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 defined as observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 defined as inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable
|
|
|
|
Level 3 defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions
|
As of March 31, 2008, the Company held certain assets that
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The Company makes use of observable market based inputs to
calculate fair value, in which case the measurements are
classified within Level 2. The Company currently does not
have non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Description :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,022,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
Foreign
Exchange
We currently incur a portion of our operating expenses in
currencies other than U.S. dollars, the reporting currency
for our consolidated financial statements, and we have
determined that such operating expenses have not been
significant to date. As a result, we have not been impacted
materially by changes in exchange rates and do not expect to be
impacted materially for the foreseeable future. However, if our
operating expenses incurred outside of the United States
increase, our results of operations could be adversely impacted
by changes in exchange rates. We do not currently hedge foreign
currency exposure and do not intend to do so in the foreseeable
future.
Interest
Rates
Our exposure to market risk is currently confined to our cash
and cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash.
We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. We have not
used derivative financial instruments for speculation or trading
purposes. Because of the short-term maturities of our cash and
cash equivalents and marketable securities, we do not believe
that a change in market rates would have any significant impact
on the realized value of our investments.
Effects
of Inflation
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities. Because of their liquidity, these assets
are not directly affected by inflation. We also believe that we
have intangible assets in the value of our intellectual
property. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, we have not capitalized the value of this
intellectual property on our balance sheet. Due to the nature of
this intellectual property, we believe that these intangible
assets are not affected by inflation. Because we intend to
retain and continue to use our equipment, furniture and fixtures
and leasehold improvements, we believe that the incremental
inflation related to replacement costs of such items will not
materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation
affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation
and contract services, which could increase our level of
expenses and the rate at which we use our resources.
32
Marketable
securities
We deposit our cash with financial institutions that we consider
to be of high credit quality and purchase marketable securities
which are generally investment grade, liquid, short-term fixed
income securities and money-market instruments denominated in
U.S. dollars.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in
Item 303(a)(4) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions
Regulation S-K.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the
Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2008. Based upon
that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of
March 31, 2008, the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report, to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f) of
the Exchange Act) during the first quarter of 2008 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
33
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties
described below, together with all of the other information in
this report, including the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes contained in this quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q,
with respect to any investment in shares of our common stock. If
any of the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and future prospects
would likely be materially and adversely affected. In that
event, the market price of our common stock could decline and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
related to our business and industry
Our
success is dependent on the success of our three product
candidates in clinical development:
Fanaptatm,
tasimelteon and VSF-173. If any of these product candidates are
determined to be unsafe or ineffective in humans, whether in
clinical trials or commercially, our business will be materially
harmed.
Despite the positive results of our completed trials, we are
uncertain whether any of our current product candidates in
clinical development will ultimately prove to be effective and
safe in humans. Frequently, product candidates that have shown
promising results in clinical trials have suffered significant
setbacks in later clinical trials or even after they are
approved for commercial sale. Future uses of any of our product
candidates, whether in clinical trials or commercially, may
reveal that the product candidate is ineffective, unacceptably
toxic, has other undesirable side effects or is otherwise not
fit for further use. If we are unable to discover and develop
products that are safe and effective, our business will be
materially harmed.
Any
failure or delay in completing clinical trials for our product
candidates could severely harm our business.
Pre-clinical studies and clinical trials required to demonstrate
the safety and efficacy of our product candidates are
time-consuming and expensive and together take several years to
complete. The completion of clinical trials for our product
candidates may be delayed by many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to manufacture or obtain from third parties
materials sufficient for use in pre-clinical studies and
clinical trials
|
|
|
|
delays in patient enrollment and variability in the number and
types of patients available for clinical trials
|
|
|
|
difficulty in maintaining contact with patients after treatment,
resulting in incomplete data
|
|
|
|
poor effectiveness of product candidates during clinical trials
|
|
|
|
unforeseen safety issues or side effects
|
|
|
|
governmental or regulatory delays and changes in regulatory
requirements and guidelines
|
If we fail to complete successfully one or more clinical trials
for any of our product candidates, we may not receive the
regulatory approvals needed to market that product candidate.
Therefore, any failure or delay in commencing or completing
these clinical trials would harm our business materially.
We
face heavy government regulation, and FDA regulatory approval of
our products is uncertain.
The research, testing, manufacturing and marketing of drug
products such as those that we are developing are subject to
extensive regulation by federal, state and local government
authorities, including the FDA. To obtain regulatory approval of
a product, we must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
applicable regulatory agency that, among other things, the
product is safe and effective for its intended use. In addition,
we must
34
show that the manufacturing facilities used to produce the
products are in compliance with current Good Manufacturing
Practices regulations or cGMP.
The process of obtaining FDA and other required regulatory
approvals and clearances will require us to expend substantial
time and capital. Despite the time and expense expended,
regulatory approval is never guaranteed. The number of
pre-clinical and clinical tests that will be required for FDA
approval varies depending on the drug candidate, the disease or
condition that the drug candidate is in development for, and the
regulations applicable to that particular drug candidate. The
FDA can delay, limit or deny approval of a drug candidate for
many reasons, including that:
|
|
|
|
|
a drug candidate may not be safe or effective
|
|
|
|
the FDA may interpret data from pre-clinical and clinical
testing in different ways than we do
|
|
|
|
the FDA may not approve our manufacturing process
|
|
|
|
the FDA may change their approval policies or adopt new
regulations
|
|
|
|
the FDA may not meet, or may extend, the PDUFA date with respect
to a particular NDA
|
For example, if certain of our methods for analyzing our trial
data are not approved by the FDA, we may fail to obtain
regulatory approval for our product candidates.
Moreover, if and when our products do obtain such approval or
clearances, the marketing, distribution and manufacture of such
products would remain subject to extensive ongoing regulatory
requirements. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory
requirements could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
warning letters
|
|
|
|
fines
|
|
|
|
civil penalties
|
|
|
|
injunctions
|
|
|
|
recall or seizure of products
|
|
|
|
total or partial suspension of production
|
|
|
|
refusal of the government to grant approvals
|
|
|
|
withdrawal of approvals
|
|
|
|
criminal prosecution
|
Any delay or failure by us to obtain regulatory approvals for
our product candidates could diminish competitive advantages
that we may attain and would adversely affect the marketing of
our products. We have not received regulatory approval to market
any of our product candidates in any jurisdiction.
Even if we do receive regulatory approval for our drug
candidates, the FDA may impose limitations on the indicated uses
for which our products may be marketed, subsequently withdraw
approval or take other actions against us or our products that
are adverse to our business. The FDA generally approves products
for particular indications. An approval for a more limited
indication reduces the size of the potential market for the
product. Product approvals, once granted, may be withdrawn if
problems occur after initial marketing.
We also are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws,
regulations and recommendations relating to safe working
conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the
environment and the use and disposal of hazardous substances
used in connection with our discovery, research and development
work. In addition, we cannot predict the extent of government
regulations or the impact of new governmental regulations that
might significantly harm the discovery, development, production
and marketing of our products. We may be required to incur
significant costs to comply with current or future laws or
regulations, and we may be adversely affected by the cost of
such compliance.
35
We
intend to seek regulatory approvals for our products in foreign
jurisdictions, but we may not obtain any such
approvals.
We intend to market our products outside the United States with
one or more commercial partners. In order to market our products
in foreign jurisdictions, we may be required to obtain separate
regulatory approvals and to comply with numerous and varying
regulatory requirements. The approval procedure varies among
countries and jurisdictions and can involve additional testing,
and the time required to obtain approval may differ from that
required to obtain FDA approval. We have no experience with
obtaining any such foreign approvals. Additionally, the foreign
regulatory approval process may include all of the risks
associated with obtaining FDA approval. For all of these
reasons, we may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a
timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure
approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or
jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority
does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other
foreign countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We may not be
able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive
necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.
The failure to obtain these approvals could harm our business
materially.
Our
product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have
other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory
approval or limit their marketability.
Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could
interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in the
denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory
authorities for any or all targeted indications, and in turn
prevent us from commercializing our product candidates and
generating revenues from their sale. For example, like many
other drugs in its class,
Fanaptatm
is associated with a prolongation of the hearts QTc
interval, which is a measurement of specific electrical activity
in the heart as captured on an electrocardiogram, corrected for
heart rate. A QTc interval that is significantly prolonged may
result in an abnormal heart rhythm with adverse consequences
including fainting, dizziness, loss of consciousness and death.
No patient in the controlled portion of any of
Fanaptatms
clinical trials was observed to have an interval that exceeded a
500-millisecond threshold of particular concern to the FDA. Two
patients experienced a prolongation of 500 milliseconds or more
during the open-label extension of one trial. We will continue
to assess the side effect profile of
Fanaptatm
and our other product candidates in our ongoing clinical
development program.
In addition, if any of our product candidates receive marketing
approval and we or others later identify undesirable side
effects caused by the product, we could face one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling
statements, such as a black box warning or a
contraindication
|
|
|
|
regulatory authorities may withdraw their approval of the product
|
|
|
|
we may be required to change the way the product is
administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change the
labeling of the product
|
|
|
|
our reputation may suffer
|
Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or
maintaining market acceptance of the affected product or could
substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing
the product candidate, which in turn could delay or prevent us
from generating significant revenues from its sale.
Our
product candidates may never achieve market acceptance even if
we obtain regulatory approvals.
Even if we receive regulatory approvals for the sale of our
product candidates, the commercial success of these products
will depend, among other things, on their acceptance by
physicians, patients, third-party payors and other members of
the medical community as a therapeutic and cost-effective
alternative to competing products and treatments. The degree of
market acceptance of any of our product candidates will depend
on a number of factors, including the demonstration of its
safety and efficacy, its cost-effectiveness, its potential
advantages over other therapies, the reimbursement policies of
government and third-party payors with respect
36
to the product candidate, and the effectiveness of our marketing
and distribution capabilities. If our product candidates fail to
gain market acceptance, we may be unable to earn sufficient
revenue to continue our business. If our product candidates do
not become widely accepted by physicians, patients, third-party
payors and other members of the medical community, it is
unlikely that we will ever become profitable.
If we
fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund our research and
development activities, we may be unable to continue operations
or we may be forced to share our rights to commercialize our
product candidates with third parties on terms that may not be
attractive to us.
Based on our current operating plans, we believe that our
existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, will
be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating needs into the
fourth quarter of 2008, and after that time we will require
additional capital. In budgeting for our activities, we have
relied on a number of assumptions, including assumptions that we
will continue to expend funds in preparation of a commercial
launch of
Fanaptatm,
that we will complete our Phase III clinical trial of
tasimelteon for the treatment of chronic primary insomnia in
accordance with our expectations, that we will not engage in
further in-licensing activities, that we will not receive any
proceeds from potential partnerships, that we will not expend
funds on the bipolar indication for
Fanaptatm,
that we will not conduct additional trials for the injectable
formulation for
Fanaptatm,
that we will not conduct additional trials for VSF-173, that we
will continue to evaluate pre-clinical compounds for potential
development, that we will be able to continue the manufacturing
of our product candidates at commercially reasonable prices,
that we will be able to retain our key personnel, and that we
will not incur any significant contingent liabilities. We may
need to raise additional funds more quickly if one or more of
our assumptions proves to be incorrect, if we choose to expand
our product development efforts more rapidly than presently
anticipated, or if we seek to acquire additional product
candidates. We may also decide to raise additional funds even
before they are needed if the conditions for raising capital are
favorable.
In our capital-raising efforts, we may seek to sell additional
equity or debt securities or obtain a bank credit facility. The
sale of additional equity or debt securities, if convertible,
could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of
indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and
could also result in covenants that would restrict our
operations.
We cannot assure you that additional capital will be available
when we need it on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
The unavailability of financing may require us to delay, scale
back or eliminate expenditures for our research, development and
marketing activities necessary to commercialize our potential
biopharmaceutical products. If we are unable to secure
sufficient capital to fund our research and development
activities, we may not be able to continue operations or we may
have to enter into collaboration agreements that could require
us to share commercial rights to our products to a greater
extent or at earlier stages in the drug development process than
we currently intend. Collaborations that are consummated by us
prior to
proof-of-efficacy
and safety of a product candidate could impair our ability to
realize value from that product candidate.
We
have incurred operating losses in each year since our inception
and expect to continue to incur substantial and increasing
losses for the foreseeable future.
We have a limited operating history. We have not generated any
revenue from product sales to date and we cannot estimate with
precision the extent of our future losses. We do not currently
have any products that have been approved for commercial sale
and we may never generate revenue from selling products or
achieve profitability. We expect to continue to incur
substantial and increasing losses for the foreseeable future,
particularly as we increase our research, clinical development
and administrative activities. As a result, we are uncertain
when or if we will achieve profitability and, if so, whether we
will be able to sustain it. We have been engaged in identifying
and developing compounds and product candidates since March
2003. As of March 31, 2008, we have accumulated net losses
of approximately $193.1 million. Our ability to achieve
revenue and profitability is dependent on our ability to
complete the development of our product candidates, obtain
necessary regulatory approvals, and have our products
manufactured and marketed. We cannot assure you that we will be
profitable even if we successfully commercialize our products.
Failure to become and
37
remain profitable may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue
operations.
If our
contract research organizations do not successfully carry out
their duties or if we lose our relationships with contract
research organizations, our drug development efforts could be
delayed.
We are dependent on contract research organizations, third-party
vendors and investigators for pre-clinical testing and clinical
trials related to our drug discovery and development efforts and
we will likely continue to depend on them to assist in our
future discovery and development efforts. These parties are not
our employees and we cannot control the amount or timing of
resources that they devote to our programs. If they fail to
devote sufficient time and resources to our drug development
programs or if their performance is substandard, it will delay
the development and commercialization of our product candidates.
The parties with which we contract for execution of our clinical
trials play a significant role in the conduct of the trials and
the subsequent collection and analysis of data. Their failure to
meet their obligations could adversely affect clinical
development of our product candidates. Moreover, these parties
may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some
of which may compete with us. If they assist our competitors, it
could harm our competitive position.
If we lose our relationship with any one or more of these
parties, we could experience a significant delay in both
identifying another comparable provider and then contracting for
its services. We may be unable to retain an alternative provider
on reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we locate an alternative
provider, it is likely that this provider may need additional
time to respond to our needs and may not provide the same type
or level of service as the original provider. In addition, any
provider that we retain will be subject to current Good
Laboratory Practices or cGLP, and similar foreign standards and
we do not have control over compliance with these regulations by
these providers. Consequently, if these practices and standards
are not adhered to by these providers, the development and
commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed.
We
rely on a limited number of manufacturers for our product
candidates and our business will be seriously harmed if these
manufacturers are not able to satisfy our demand and alternative
sources are not available.
We do not have an in-house manufacturing capability and depend
completely on a small number of third-party manufacturers and
active pharmaceutical ingredient formulators for the manufacture
of our product candidates. We do not have long-term agreements
with any of these third parties, and if they are unable or
unwilling to perform for any reason, we may not be able to
locate alternative acceptable manufacturers or formulators or
enter into favorable agreements with them. Any inability to
acquire sufficient quantities of our product candidates in a
timely manner from these third parties could delay clinical
trials and prevent us from developing our product candidates in
a cost-effective manner or on a timely basis. In addition,
manufacturers of our product candidates are subject to cGMP and
similar foreign standards and we do not have control over
compliance with these regulations by our manufacturers. If one
of our contract manufacturers fails to maintain compliance, the
production of our product candidates could be interrupted,
resulting in delays and additional costs. In addition, if the
facilities of such manufacturers do not pass a pre-approval
plant inspection, the FDA will not grant pre-market approval of
our products.
Our manufacturing strategy presents the following additional
risks:
|
|
|
|
|
the manufacturing process for VSF-173 has not been tested in
quantities needed for continued clinical trials or commercial
sales, and delays in
scale-up to
commercial quantities of tasimelteon and VSF-173 could delay
clinical trials, regulatory submissions and commercialization of
these product candidates
|
|
|
|
because most of our third-party manufacturers and formulators
are located outside of the United States, there may be
difficulties in importing our compounds or their components into
the United States as a result of, among other things, FDA import
inspections, incomplete or inaccurate import documentation or
defective packaging
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
because of the complex nature of our compounds, our
manufacturers may not be able to successfully manufacture our
compounds in a cost-effective
and/or
timely manner
|
Materials
necessary to manufacture our product candidates may not be
available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, which may
delay the development, regulatory approval and commercialization
of our product candidates.
We rely on our manufacturers to purchase from third-party
suppliers the materials necessary to produce our product
candidates for our clinical trials. Suppliers may not sell these
materials to our manufacturers at the times we need them or on
commercially reasonable terms. We do not have any control over
the process or timing of the acquisition of these materials by
our manufacturers. Moreover, we currently do not have any
agreements for the commercial production of these materials. If
our manufacturers are unable to obtain these materials for our
clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory
approval of our product candidates could be delayed,
significantly affecting our ability to develop our product
candidates. If we or our manufacturers are unable to purchase
these materials after regulatory approval has been obtained for
our product candidates, the commercial launch of our product
candidates would be delayed or there would be a shortage in
supply, which would materially affect our ability to generate
revenues from the sale of our product candidates.
We
face substantial competition which may result in others
developing or commercializing products before or more
successfully than we do.
Our future success will depend on our ability to demonstrate and
maintain a competitive advantage with respect to our product
candidates and our ability to identify and develop additional
product candidates through the application of our
pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise. Large, fully
integrated pharmaceutical companies, either alone or together
with collaborative partners, have substantially greater
financial resources and have significantly greater experience
than we do in:
|
|
|
|
|
developing products
|
|
|
|
undertaking pre-clinical testing and clinical trials
|
|
|
|
obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of products
|
|
|
|
manufacturing and marketing products
|
These companies may invest heavily and quickly to discover and
develop novel products that could make our product candidates
obsolete. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining
patent protection, receiving FDA approval or commercializing
superior products or other competing products before we do.
We believe the primary competitors for each of our product
candidates are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
Fanaptatm
in the treatment of schizophrenia, the atypical antipsychotics
Risperdal®
(risperidone), including the depot formulation
Risperdal®
Consta®,
and
Invega®
(paliperidone), each by Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.,
Zyprexa®
(olanzapine) by Eli Lilly and Company,
Seroquel®
(quetiapine) by AstraZeneca PLC,
Abilify®
(aripiprazole) by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company/Otsuka
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,
Geodon®
(ziprasidone) by Pfizer Inc., and generic clozapine, as well as
the typical antipsychotics haloperidol, chlorpromazine,
thioridazine, and sulpiride (all of which are generic). In
addition to the approved products, compounds in Phase III
trials (or for which an NDA has been recently filed) for the
treatment of schizophrenia include bifeprunox (Solvay
S.A./Lundbeck A/S), and asenapine (Schering-Plough Corporation)
and pimavanserin (Acadia Pharmaceuticals).
|
|
|
|
For tasimelteon in the treatment of insomnia,
Rozeremtm
(ramelteon) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, hypnotics
such as
Ambien®
(zolpidem) by sanofi-aventis (including Ambien
CR®),
Lunesta®
(eszopiclone) by Sepracor Inc. and
Sonata®
(zaleplon) by King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., generic compounds such
as trazodone and doxepin, and over-the-counter remedies such as
Benadryl®
and Tylenol
PM®.
In addition to the approved products, compounds in
Phase III trials for insomnia (or for
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
which an NDA has been recently filed) include indiplon
(Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.) and low-dose doxepin
(Silenortm)
by Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For tasimelteon in the treatment of depression, antidepressants
such as
Paxil®
(paroxetine) by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK),
Zoloft®
(sertraline) by Pfizer,
Prozac®
(fluoxetine) by Eli Lilly, Lexapro (escitalopram) by Lundbeck
A/S /Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc., and
Effexor®
(venlafaxine) by Wyeth as well as other compounds such as
Wellbutrin®
(buproprion) by GSK and
Cymbalta®
(duloxetine) by Eli Lilly. In addition to the approved products,
compounds in Phase III trials for depression include
agomelatine (Novartis and Les Laboratories Servier).
|
|
|
|
For VSF-173 in the treatment of excessive sleepiness,
Provigil®
(modafinil) and
Nuvigil®
(armodafinil) by Cephalon Inc., and
Xyrem®
(sodium oxybate) by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
Additionally, our ability to compete may be affected because
insurers and other third-party payors in some cases seek to
encourage the use of cheaper, generic products, which could make
our products less attractive.
We
have no experience selling, marketing or distributing products
and no internal capability to do so.
At present, we have limited marketing and no sales personnel. In
order for us to commercialize any of our product candidates, we
must either acquire or internally develop sales, marketing and
distribution capabilities, or enter into collaborations with
partners to perform these services for us. We may not be able to
establish sales and distribution partnerships on acceptable
terms or at all, and if we do enter into a distribution
arrangement, our success will be dependent upon the performance
of our partner. In the event that we attempt to acquire or
develop our own in-house sales, marketing and distribution
capabilities, factors that may inhibit our efforts to
commercialize our products without partners or licensees include:
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of
effective sales and marketing personnel
|
|
|
|
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to or persuade
adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our product
|
|
|
|
the lack of complementary products to be offered by our sales
personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage
against companies with broader product lines
|
|
|
|
unforeseen costs associated with creating our own sales and
marketing team or with entering into a partnering agreement with
an independent sales and marketing organization
|
We
will need to increase the size of our organization, and we may
experience difficulties in managing our growth.
As of March 31, 2008, we had 49 full-time employees.
We will need to expand our managerial, operational, financial
and other resources in order for us to manage and fund our
operations, continue our development activities and
commercialize our product candidates. Our current personnel,
systems and facilities are not adequate to support this future
growth. To manage our growth, we must:
|
|
|
|
|
manage our clinical trials effectively
|
|
|
|
manage our internal development efforts effectively
|
|
|
|
improve our operational, financial, accounting and management
controls, reporting systems and procedures
|
|
|
|
build marketing and sales organizations in order to
commercialize
Fanaptatm
|
|
|
|
attract and retain sufficient numbers of talented employees
|
We may be unable to successfully implement these tasks on a
larger scale and, accordingly, may not achieve our development
and commercialization goals.
40
If we
cannot identify, or enter into licensing arrangements for, new
product candidates, our ability to develop a diverse product
portfolio may be limited.
A component of our business strategy is acquiring rights to
develop and commercialize compounds discovered or developed by
other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for which we
may find effective uses and markets through our unique
pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics expertise. Competition for
the acquisition of these compounds is intense. If we are not
able to identify opportunities to acquire rights to
commercialize additional products, we may not be able to develop
a diverse portfolio of products and our business may be harmed.
Additionally, it may take substantial human and financial
resources to secure commercial rights to promising product
candidates. Moreover, if other firms develop pharmacogenetics
and pharmacogenomics capabilities, we may face increased
competition in identifying and acquiring additional product
candidates.
If we
lose key scientists or management personnel, or if we fail to
recruit additional highly skilled personnel, it will impair our
ability to identify, develop and commercialize product
candidates.
We are highly dependent on principal members of our management
team and scientific staff, including our Chief Executive
Officer, Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D. These executives
each have significant pharmaceutical industry experience. The
loss of any such executives, including Dr. Polymeropoulos,
or any other principal member of our management team or
scientific staff, would impair our ability to identify, develop
and market new products.
Product
liability lawsuits could divert our resources, result in
substantial liabilities and reduce the commercial potential of
our products.
The risk that we may be sued on product liability claims is
inherent in the development of pharmaceutical products. For
example, we face a risk of product liability exposure related to
the testing of our product candidates in clinical trials and
will face even greater risks upon any commercialization by us of
our product candidates. We believe that we may be at a greater
risk of product liability claims relative to other
pharmaceutical companies because our compounds are intended to
treat behavioral disorders, and it is possible that we may be
held liable for the behavior and actions of patients who use our
compounds. These lawsuits may divert our management from
pursuing our business strategy and may be costly to defend. In
addition, if we are held liable in any of these lawsuits, we may
incur substantial liabilities and may be forced to limit or
forego further commercialization of one or more of our products.
Although we maintain general liability and product liability
insurance, our aggregate coverage limit under this insurance is
$10,000,000, and while we believe this amount of insurance is
sufficient to cover our product liability exposure, these limits
may not be high enough to fully cover potential liabilities. In
addition, product liability insurance is becoming increasingly
expensive, and we may not be able to obtain or maintain
sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost or otherwise
to protect against potential product liability claims, which
could prevent or inhibit the commercial production and sale of
our products.
Legislative
or regulatory reform of the healthcare system in the U.S. and
foreign jurisdictions may affect our ability to sell our
products profitably.
The continuing efforts of the U.S. and foreign governments,
insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors
of health care services to contain or reduce health care costs
may adversely affect our ability to set prices for our products
which we believe are fair, and our ability to generate revenues
and achieve and maintain profitability.
Specifically, in both the United States and some foreign
jurisdictions there have been a number of legislative and
regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways
that could affect our ability to sell our products profitably.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement
and Modernization Act of 2003 reforms the way Medicare will
cover and reimburse for pharmaceutical products. This
legislation could decrease the coverage and price that we may
receive for our products. Other third-party payors are
increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products
and services. It will be time-
41
consuming and expensive for us to go through the process of
seeking reimbursement from Medicare and private payors. Our
products may not be considered cost effective, and coverage and
reimbursement may not be available or sufficient to allow us to
sell our products on a competitive and profitable basis. Further
federal and state proposals and healthcare reforms are likely
which could limit the prices that can be charged for the drugs
we develop and may further limit our commercial opportunity. Our
results of operations could be materially adversely affected by
the Medicare prescription drug coverage legislation, by the
possible effect of this legislation on amounts that private
insurers will pay and by other healthcare reforms that may be
enacted or adopted in the future.
In some foreign countries, including major markets in the
European Union and Japan, the pricing of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these
countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities
can take nine to twelve months or longer after the receipt of
regulatory marketing approval for a product. To obtain
reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be
required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the
cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available
therapies. Our business could be materially harmed if
reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope
or amount or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels.
Recently
enacted legislation may make it more difficult and costly for us
to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates and to
produce, to market and to distribute our existing
products.
On September 27, 2007, President Bush signed into law the
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 or the
FDAAA. The FDAAA grants a variety of new powers to the FDA, many
of which are aimed at assuring drug safety and monitoring the
safety of drug products after approval. The recently enacted
amendments would among other things, require some new drug
applicants to submit risk evaluation and minimization plans to
monitor and address potential safety issues for products upon
approval, grant the FDA the authority to impose risk management
measures for marketed products and to mandate labeling changes
in certain circumstances, and establish new requirements for
disclosing the results of clinical trials. Companies that
violate the new law are subject to substantial civil monetary
penalties. Additional measures have also been enacted to address
the perceived shortcomings in the FDAs handling of drug
safety issues, and to limit pharmaceutical company sales and
promotional practices. While we expect the FDAAA to have a
substantial effect on the pharmaceutical industry, the extent of
that effect is not yet known. As the FDA issues regulations,
guidance and interpretations relating to the new legislation,
the impact on the industry as well as our business will become
clearer. The new requirements and other changes that the FDAAA
imposes may make it more difficult, and likely more costly, to
obtain approval of new pharmaceutical products and to produce,
market and distribute existing products. Our ability to
commercialize approved products successfully may be hindered,
and our business may be harmed as a result.
Our
quarterly operating results may fluctuate
significantly.
Our operating results will continue to be subject to quarterly
fluctuations. The revenues we generate, if any, and our
operating results will be affected by numerous factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
our addition or termination of development programs
|
|
|
|
variations in the level of expenses related to our existing
three product candidates or future development programs
|
|
|
|
our execution of collaborative, licensing or other arrangements,
and the timing of payments we may make or receive under these
arrangements
|
|
|
|
any intellectual property infringement lawsuit in which we may
become involved
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments affecting our product candidates or
those of our competitors
|
If our quarterly operating results fall below the expectations
of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common
stock could decline substantially. Furthermore, any quarterly
fluctuations in our operating results may, in turn, cause the
price of our stock to fluctuate substantially. We believe that
quarterly
42
comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily
meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of our
future performance.
Risks
related to intellectual property and other legal
matters
Our
rights to develop and commercialize our product candidates are
subject in part to the terms and conditions of licenses or
sublicenses granted to us by other pharmaceutical companies.
With respect to tasimelteon and VSF-173, these terms and
conditions include options in favor of these pharmaceutical
companies to reacquire rights to commercialize and develop these
product candidates in certain circumstances.
Fanaptatm
(iloperidone) is based in part on patents and other intellectual
property owned by sanofi-aventis and Novartis. Titan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Titan) holds an exclusive license from
sanofi-aventis to the intellectual property owned by
sanofi-aventis, and Titan has sublicensed its rights under such
license on an exclusive basis to Novartis. We have acquired
exclusive rights to this and other intellectual property through
a further sublicense from Novartis. Our rights with respect to
the intellectual property to develop and commercialize
Fanaptatm
may terminate, in whole or in part, if we fail to meet certain
milestones contained in our sublicense agreement with Novartis
relating to the time it takes for us to launch
Fanaptatm
commercially following regulatory approval, and the time it
takes for us to receive regulatory approval following our
submission of an NDA or equivalent foreign filing. We may also
lose our rights to develop and commercialize
Fanaptatm
if we fail to pay royalties to Novartis, if we fail to comply
with certain requirements in the sublicense agreement regarding
our financial condition, or if we fail to comply with certain
restrictions regarding our other development activities.
Finally, our rights to develop and commercialize
Fanaptatm
may be impaired if we do not cure breaches by Novartis and Titan
of similar obligations contained in these sublicense and license
agreements, although we are not aware of any such breach by
Titan or Novartis. In the event of an early termination of our
sublicense agreement, all rights licensed and developed by us
under this agreement may be extinguished, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Tasimelteon (VEC-162) is based in part on patents that we have
licensed on an exclusive basis and other intellectual property
licensed from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS). BMS holds
certain rights with respect to tasimelteon in the license
agreement. If we have not agreed to one or more partnering
arrangements to develop and commercialize tasimelteon in certain
significant markets with one or more third parties after the
completion of the Phase III program, BMS has the option to
exclusively develop and commercialize tasimelteon on its own on
pre-determined financial terms, including milestone and royalty
payments. If we seek a co-promotion agreement for tasimelteon,
BMS has a right of first negotiation to enter into such an
agreement with us. BMS may terminate our license if we fail to
meet certain milestones or if we otherwise breach our royalty or
other obligations in the agreement. In the event that we
terminate our license, or if BMS terminates our license due to
our breach, all of our rights to tasimelteon (including any
intellectual property we develop with respect to tasimelteon)
will revert back to BMS or otherwise be licensed back to BMS on
an exclusive basis. Any termination or reversion of our rights
to develop or commercialize tasimelteon, including any
reacquisition by BMS of our rights, may have a material adverse
effect on our business.
VSF-173 is based in part on patents and other intellectual
property that we have licensed on an exclusive basis from
Novartis. Novartis has the option to reacquire rights to
co-develop and exclusively commercialize VSF-173 following the
completion of the Phase II trials, and an additional option
to reacquire co-development rights and exclusive
commercialization rights following the completion of the
Phase III clinical trials, subject in each case to
Novartis payment of pre-determined royalties and other
payments to us. In the event that Novartis chooses not to
exercise either of these options and we decide to enter into a
partnering arrangement to help us commercialize VSF-173,
Novartis has a right of first refusal to negotiate such an
agreement with us, as well as a right to submit a last matching
counteroffer regarding such an agreement. In addition, our
rights with respect to VSF-173 may terminate, in whole or in
part, if we fail to meet certain development and
commercialization milestones described in our license agreement
relating to the time it takes us to complete our development
work on VSF-173. These rights may also terminate in whole or in
part if we fail to make royalty or milestone payments or if we
do not comply with requirements in our license agreement
regarding our financial condition. In the event of an early
termination of our license agreement, all rights licensed and
43
developed by us under this agreement may revert back to
Novartis. Any termination or reversion of our rights to develop
or commercialize VSF-173, including any reacquisition by
Novartis of our rights, may have a material adverse effect on
our business.
If our
efforts to protect the proprietary nature of the intellectual
property related to our products are not adequate, we may not be
able to compete effectively in our markets.
In addition to the rights we have licensed from Novartis and BMS
relating to our product candidates, we rely upon intellectual
property we own relating to our products, including patents,
patent applications and trade secrets. As of March 31, 2008
we had fourteen pending provisional patent applications in the
United States, two U.S. national stage applications under
U.S.C. 371 and eight pending Patent Cooperation Treaty
applications, which permit the pursuit of patents outside of the
U.S., relating to our product candidates in clinical
development. Our patent applications may be challenged or fail
to result in issued patents and our existing or future patents
may be too narrow to prevent third parties from developing or
designing around these patents. In addition, we rely on trade
secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect
certain proprietary know-how that is not patentable, for
processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and for any
other elements of our drug development processes that involve
proprietary know-how, information and technology that is not
covered by patent applications. While we require all of our
employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have
access to our proprietary know-how, information and technology
to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot be certain
that this know-how, information and technology will not be
disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to
our trade secrets or independently develop substantially
equivalent information and techniques. Further, the laws of some
foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same
extent as the laws of the United States. As a result, we may
encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our
intellectual property both in the United States and abroad. If
we are unable to protect or defend the intellectual property
related to our technologies, we will not be able to establish or
maintain a competitive advantage in our market.
If we
do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Act and similar
foreign legislation to extend our patents and to obtain market
exclusivity for our product candidates, our business will be
materially harmed.
The United States Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984, more commonly known as the
Hatch-Waxman Act, provides for an extension of
patent protection for drug compounds for a period of up to five
years to compensate for time spent in development. Assuming we
gain a five-year extension for each of our current product
candidates in clinical development, and that we continue to have
rights under our sublicense and license agreements with respect
to these product candidates, we would have exclusive rights to
Fanaptatms
United States new chemical entity patent (the
primary patent covering the compound as a new composition of
matter) until 2016, to tasimelteons United States new
chemical entity patent until 2022 and to VSF-173s United
States new chemical entity patent until 2019. In Europe, similar
legislative enactments allow patent protection in the European
Union to be extended for up to five years through the grant of a
Supplementary Protection Certificate. Assuming we gain such a
five-year extension for each of our current product candidates
in clinical development, and that we continue to have rights
under our sublicense and license agreements with respect to
these product candidates, we would have exclusive rights to
Fanaptatms
European new chemical entity patents until 2015, to
tasimelteons European new chemical entity patents until
2022 and to VSF-173s European new chemical entity patents
until 2017. Additionally, a directive in the European Union
provides that companies who receive regulatory approval for a
new compound will have a
10-year
period of market exclusivity for that compound (with the
possibility of a further one-year extension) in most countries
in Europe, beginning on the date of such European regulatory
approval, regardless of when the European new chemical entity
patent covering such compound expires. A generic version of the
approved drug may not be marketed or sold during such market
exclusivity period. This directive may be of particular
importance with respect to
Fanaptatm,
since the European new chemical entity patent for
Fanaptatm
will likely expire prior to the end of this
10-year
period of market exclusivity. However, there is no assurance
that we will receive the extensions of our patents or other
exclusive rights available under the Hatch-Waxman Act or similar
foreign legislation. If we fail to receive such extensions and
exclusive rights, our ability to
44
prevent competitors from manufacturing, marketing and selling
generic versions of our products will be materially harmed.
Litigation
or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement
could require us to divert resources and may prevent or delay
our drug discovery and development efforts.
Our commercial success depends in part on our not infringing the
patents and proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties
may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology
without authorization. In addition, third parties may obtain
patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies
infringes upon these patents. Furthermore, parties making claims
against us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief,
which could effectively block our ability to develop and
commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Defense of
these claims, regardless of their merit, would divert
substantial financial and employee resources from our business.
In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us,
we may have to pay substantial damages, obtain one or more
licenses from third parties or pay royalties. In addition, even
in the absence of litigation, we may need to obtain additional
licenses from third parties to advance our research or allow
commercialization of our product candidates. We may fail to
obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on
reasonable terms, if at all. In that event, we would be unable
to develop and commercialize further one or more of our product
candidates.
In addition, in the future we could be required to initiate
litigation to enforce our proprietary rights against
infringement by third parties. Prosecution of these claims to
enforce our rights against others could divert substantial
financial and employee resources from our business. If we fail
to enforce our proprietary rights against others, our business
will be harmed.
If we
use hazardous and biological materials in a manner that causes
injury or violates applicable law, we may be liable for
damages.
Our research and development activities involve the controlled
use of potentially hazardous substances, including toxic
chemical and biological materials. We could be held liable for
any contamination, injury or other damages resulting from these
hazardous substances. In addition, our operations produce
hazardous waste products. While third parties are responsible
for disposal of our hazardous waste, we could be liable under
environmental laws for any required cleanup of sites at which
our waste is disposed. Federal, state, foreign and local laws
and regulations govern the use, manufacture, storage, handling
and disposal of these hazardous materials. If we fail to comply
with these laws and regulations at any time, or if they change,
we may be subject to criminal sanctions and substantial civil
liabilities, which may adversely affect our business.
Even if we continue to comply with all applicable laws and
regulations regarding hazardous materials, we cannot eliminate
the risk of accidental contamination or discharge and our
resultant liability for any injuries or other damages caused by
these accidents. Although we maintain pollution liability
insurance, our coverage limit under this insurance is
$2,000,000, and while we believe this amount and type of
insurance is sufficient to cover risks typically associated with
our handling of materials, the insurance may not cover all
environmental liabilities, and these limits may not be high
enough to cover potential liabilities for these damages fully.
The amount of uninsured liabilities may exceed our financial
resources and materially harm our business.
Risks
related to our common stock
Our
stock price has been volatile and may be volatile in the future,
and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial
losses.
The stock market has from time to time experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations, and the market prices of the
securities of life sciences companies without product revenues,
such as ours, have historically been highly volatile. Between
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008, the high and low
sale prices of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global
Market varied between $24.31 and $2.70. The
45
following factors, in addition to the other risk factors
described in this section, may also have a significant impact on
the market price of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
publicity regarding actual or potential testing or trial results
or the outcome of regulatory review relating to products under
development by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States and foreign
countries
|
|
|
|
developments concerning any collaboration or other strategic
transaction we may undertake
|
|
|
|
announcements of patent issuances or denials, technological
innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results
|
|
|
|
changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations
by securities analysts
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel or members of our board
of directors
|
|
|
|
publicity regarding actual or potential transactions involving
the Company
|
|
|
|
economic and other external factors beyond our control
|
As a result of these factors, holders of our common stock might
be unable to sell their shares at or above the price they paid
for such shares.
If
there are substantial sales of our common stock, our stock price
could decline.
A small number of early investors in our company who held our
stock prior to the sale of shares in our initial public offering
continue to hold a substantial number of shares of our common
stock. Additionally, a small number of institutional investors
and private equity funds continue to hold a significant number
of shares of our common stock. Sales by these stockholders of a
substantial number of shares, or the expectation of such sales,
could cause a significant reduction in the market price of our
common stock. Additionally, the holders of a substantial number
of shares of our common stock have rights, subject to certain
conditions, to require us to file registration statements to
permit the resale of these shares in the public market or to
include their shares in registration statements that we may file
for ourselves or other stockholders.
In addition to our outstanding common stock, as of
March 31, 2008 there were a total of 3,859,330 shares
of common stock that we have registered and that we are
obligated to issue upon the exercise of currently outstanding
options granted under our Second Amended and Restated Management
Equity Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Upon the exercise of
these options in accordance with their respective terms, these
shares may be resold freely, subject to restrictions imposed on
our affiliates under Rule 144. If significant sales of
these shares occur in short periods of time, these sales could
reduce the market price of our common stock. Any reduction in
the trading price of our common stock could impede our ability
to raise capital on attractive terms.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
reports or publish unfavorable research about our business, our
stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on
the research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts
who covers the Company downgrades our stock, our stock price
would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to
cover us or fails to publish regular reports on us, interest in
the purchase of our stock could decrease, which could cause our
stock price or trading volume to decline.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter and bylaws, and in Delaware law, could
prevent or delay a change in control of our
company.
We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions
of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may
discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting
us from engaging in a
46
business combination with an interested stockholder for a period
of three years after the person becomes an interested
stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to
our existing stockholders. In addition, our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or
prevent a change in our management or control over us that
stockholders may consider favorable. Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of blank check preferred
stock that could be issued by our board of directors to thwart a
takeover attempt
|
|
|
|
do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of
directors, which would allow holders of less than a majority of
the stock to elect some directors
|
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which
the successors to the directors whose terms have expired will be
elected to serve from the time of election and qualification
until the third annual meeting following their election
|
|
|
|
require that directors only be removed from office for cause
|
|
|
|
provide that vacancies on the board of directors, including
newly-created directorships, may be filled only by a majority
vote of directors then in office
|
|
|
|
limit who may call special meetings of stockholders
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all
actions to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders
|
|
|
|
Establish Advance Notice Requirements For Nominating Candidates
For Election To The Board Of Directors Or For Proposing Matters
That Can Be Acted Upon By Stockholders At Stockholder Meetings
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
We registered shares of our common stock in connection with our
follow-on offering under the Securities Act. Our Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(Reg.
No. 333-139485
and
No. 333-140081)
in connection with our follow-on offering was declared effective
by the SEC on January 18, 2007. The offering was
consummated on January 24, 2007 with respect to all
4,370,000 shares of our common stock that were offered,
including 570,000 of such shares that were offered pursuant to
the exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
The managing underwriters of the offering were J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated,
Banc of America Securities LLC and Natexis Bleichroeder Inc.
All 4,370,000 shares of our common stock sold in the
follow-on offering were sold to the public at the offering price
of $27.29 per share. The aggregate price of the offering was
approximately $119.3 million. The net offering proceeds to
us after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, as
well as estimated offering expenses, were approximately
$111.3 million. We incurred total expenses in connection
with the offering of approximately $8.0 million which
consisted of approximate direct payments of:
(i) $772,000 in legal, accounting and printing fees
(ii) $7,155,000 in underwriters discounts, fees and
commissions and
(iii) $75,000 in miscellaneous expenses
We have used a portion of, and intend to continue to use, the
proceeds of our initial public offering and our follow-on
offering for general corporate and research and development
expenses, including for our clinical trials for
Fanaptatm,
tasimelteon and VSF-173, the generation and submission of an NDA
for iloperidone, the initiation and implementation of our
commercialization strategy of iloperidone, and clinical
manufacturing and other expenses relating to the development of
our lead product candidates. The unused net proceeds from the
initial public and follow-on offerings are invested in
investment grade securities. This use of proceeds is not
materially different from the use of proceeds described in the
final prospectuses for our initial public offering and follow-on
offering.
47
The amount and timing of our actual expenditures may vary
significantly depending on numerous factors, such as the
progress of our product development and commercialization
efforts and the amount of cash used by our operations.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
The certification attached as Exhibit 32 that accompanies
this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mihael
H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.
|
Mihael H. Polymeropoulos, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)
May 9, 2008
Steven A. Shallcross
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal financial and accounting officer)
May 9, 2008
49
VANDA
PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
The certification attached as Exhibit 32 that accompanies
this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
50