e20vf
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
|
|
|
o |
|
Registration statement pursuant to section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
|
|
|
o |
|
Shell Company Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-16139
WIPRO LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
Karnataka, India
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Doddakannelli
Sarjapur Road
Bangalore, Karnataka 560035, India
+91-80-2844-0011
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
None
|
|
Not applicable |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
American Depositary Shares,
each represented by one Equity Share, par value Rs. 2 per share.
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
Not Applicable
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report: 1,458,999,650 Equity Shares.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, 1934
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 þ
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (As
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Yes o No þ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Currency of Presentation and Certain Defined Terms
In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, references to U.S., or United States are to the United
States of America, its territories and its possessions. References to India are to the Republic
of India. References to U.K. are to United Kingdom. Reference to $ or US$ or dollars or U.S.
dollars are to the legal currency of the United States, references to £ or Pound Sterling are
to the legal currency of United Kingdom and references to Rs. or Rupees or Indian rupees are
to the legal currency of India. All amounts are in Rs. unless otherwise stated. Our financial
statements are presented in Indian rupees and translated into U.S. dollars solely for the
convenience of the readers and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). References to Indian GAAP are to Indian Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. References to a particular fiscal year are to our fiscal year ended March
31 of such year.
All references to we, us, our, Wipro or the Company shall mean Wipro Limited and, unless
specifically indicated otherwise or the context indicates otherwise, our consolidated subsidiaries.
Wipro is a registered trademark of Wipro in the United States and India. All other trademarks or
trade names used in this Annual Report on Form 20-F are the property of the respective owners.
Except as otherwise stated in this Annual Report, all translations from Indian rupees to U.S.
dollars are based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York on March 30, 2007, for cable
transfers in Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York which was Rs. 43.10 per $1.00. No representation is made that the Indian rupee amounts have
been, could have been or could be converted into United States dollars at such a rate or any other
rate. Any discrepancies in any table between totals and sums of the amounts listed are due to
rounding. Information contained in our website, www.wipro.com, is not part of this Annual Report.
Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate
IN ADDITION TO HISTORICAL INFORMATION, THIS ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINS CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE
SECURITIES ACT), AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (THE
EXCHANGE ACT). THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE REFLECTED IN THE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT MIGHT CAUSE SUCH A DIFFERENCE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED
TO, THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE SECTIONS ENTITLED RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATION AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. READERS ARE
CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH REFLECT
MANAGEMENTS ANALYSIS ONLY AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. IN ADDITION, READERS SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THE
OTHER INFORMATION IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT AND IN THE COMPANYS PERIODIC REPORTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) FROM TIME TO TIME.
This Annual Report includes statistical data about the IT industry that comes from information
published by sources including International Data Corporation (IDC), Gartner Inc. (Gartner),
National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM), and Dataquest India (Dataquest).
This type of data represents only the estimates of IDC, Gartner, NASSCOM, Dataquest and other
sources of industry data. In addition, although we believe that data from these companies is
generally reliable, this type of data is inherently imprecise. We caution you not to place undue
reliance on this data.
2
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable
3
Item 3. Key Information
Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements, the related notes and operating and financial review and prospects which are
included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated statements of income data for
the five years ended March 31, 2007 and selected consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31,
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 in Indian rupees have been derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes except for cash dividend per equity share, which have been
prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(In millions, except per equity share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
Consolidated statements of income data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
Rs. |
28,623 |
|
|
Rs. |
39,102 |
|
|
Rs. |
54,280 |
|
|
Rs. |
73,061 |
|
|
Rs. |
101,509 |
|
|
$ |
2,355 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
7,664 |
|
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
4,709 |
|
|
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
8,369 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Products |
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
6,305 |
|
|
|
8,694 |
|
|
|
10,380 |
|
|
|
15,519 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
|
|
7,558 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
7,063 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
42,849 |
|
|
|
58,433 |
|
|
|
81,353 |
|
|
|
106,107 |
|
|
|
149,431 |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
|
16,763 |
|
|
|
25,047 |
|
|
|
33,780 |
|
|
|
46,986 |
|
|
|
66,818 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
|
|
4,740 |
|
|
|
5,810 |
|
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Products |
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
5,643 |
|
|
|
7,815 |
|
|
|
9,286 |
|
|
|
13,943 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
3,556 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
5,749 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
27,176 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
53,855 |
|
|
|
71,647 |
|
|
|
102,200 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
15,673 |
|
|
|
19,433 |
|
|
|
27,498 |
|
|
|
34,460 |
|
|
|
47,231 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(2,916 |
) |
|
|
(5,278 |
) |
|
|
(5,466 |
) |
|
|
(6,764 |
) |
|
|
(9,173 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(3,277 |
) |
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
(3,744 |
) |
|
|
(5,239 |
) |
|
|
(7,639 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other operating income/ (expenses) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9,486 |
|
|
|
10,901 |
|
|
|
17,857 |
|
|
|
21,972 |
|
|
|
29,868 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
Gain/ (loss) on sale of stock by
affiliates, including direct issue of
stock by affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/ (expense), (net) |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
1276 |
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of changes in
accounting policy |
|
|
9,849 |
|
|
|
11,659 |
|
|
|
18,608 |
|
|
|
23,536 |
|
|
|
32,853 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
(2,694 |
) |
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Minority interest (1) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
9,992 |
|
|
|
15,833 |
|
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
|
29,130 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
Rs. |
8,099 |
|
|
Rs. |
9,992 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,833 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,270 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,169 |
|
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
20.42 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Net income |
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
20.45 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
11.29 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
20.17 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Net income |
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
11.29 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
20.20 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
Cash dividend per equity share |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Additional data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
Rs. |
28,949 |
|
|
Rs. |
39,412 |
|
|
Rs. |
54,256 |
|
|
Rs. |
72,888 |
|
|
Rs. |
101,353 |
|
|
$ |
2,351 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
9,389 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
Rs. |
30,593 |
|
|
Rs. |
43,775 |
|
|
Rs. |
60,689 |
|
|
Rs. |
80,514 |
|
|
Rs. |
110,742 |
|
|
$ |
2,569 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products |
|
|
8,046 |
|
|
|
9,445 |
|
|
|
13,395 |
|
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
3,493 |
|
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
42,849 |
|
|
Rs. |
58,433 |
|
|
Rs. |
81,353 |
|
|
Rs. |
106,107 |
|
|
Rs. |
149,431 |
|
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income by segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
Rs. |
8,034 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,505 |
|
|
Rs. |
14,817 |
|
|
Rs. |
18,398 |
|
|
Rs. |
24,399 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
Rs. |
8,281 |
|
|
Rs. |
9,300 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,825 |
|
|
Rs. |
19,409 |
|
|
Rs. |
26,528 |
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Others |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Reconciling items |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
9,486 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,901 |
|
|
Rs. |
17,857 |
|
|
Rs. |
21,972 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,868 |
|
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
Rs. |
6,283 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,297 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,671 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,858 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,412 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,238 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Investments in liquid and short-term
mutual funds |
|
|
7,813 |
|
|
|
18,479 |
|
|
|
22,958 |
|
|
|
30,315 |
|
|
|
32,410 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Working capital (2) |
|
|
21,473 |
|
|
|
30,649 |
|
|
|
36,449 |
|
|
|
50,691 |
|
|
|
58,575 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
42,781 |
|
|
|
57,738 |
|
|
|
72,075 |
|
|
|
102,827 |
|
|
|
146,102 |
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
35,431 |
|
|
|
46,364 |
|
|
|
56,729 |
|
|
|
78,764 |
|
|
|
101,468 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
1. |
|
Minority interest represents the share of minority in the profits of Wipro BPO
Solutions Limited (formerly Wipro Spectramind Services Limited) and Wipro Healthcare IT
Limited. The minority interest in Wipro Healthcare IT Limited was acquired in the year
ended March 31, 2003. The minority interest in Wipro BPO was acquired in the year ended
March 31, 2006. |
|
2. |
|
Working capital equals current assets less current liabilities. |
5
Exchange Rates
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Indian rupee and the U.S. dollar will affect the
U.S. dollar equivalent of the Indian rupee price of our equity shares on the Indian stock exchanges
and, as a result, will likely affect the market price of our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs,
listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and vice versa. Such fluctuations will also affect the U.S.
dollar conversion by our depository for the ADSs, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, or
Depositary, of any cash dividends paid in Indian rupees on our equity shares represented by the
ADSs.
The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, information concerning the
number of Indian rupees for which one U.S. dollar could be exchanged based on the average of the
noon buying rate in the City of New York on the last business day of each month during the period
for cable transfers in Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York. The column titled Average in the table below is the average of the daily noon
buying rate on the last business day of each month during the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, |
|
Period End |
|
Average |
|
High |
|
Low |
2007 |
|
Rs. |
43.10 |
|
|
Rs. |
45.06 |
|
|
Rs. |
46.83 |
|
|
Rs. |
42.78 |
|
2006 |
|
|
44.48 |
|
|
|
44.21 |
|
|
|
46.26 |
|
|
|
43.05 |
|
2005 |
|
|
43.62 |
|
|
|
44.87 |
|
|
|
46.45 |
|
|
|
43.27 |
|
2004 |
|
|
43.40 |
|
|
|
45.78 |
|
|
|
47.46 |
|
|
|
43.40 |
|
2003 |
|
|
47.53 |
|
|
|
48.36 |
|
|
|
49.07 |
|
|
|
47.53 |
|
On
May 29, 2007, the noon buying in the City of New York as certified for customs purposes by
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was Rs. 40.19.
The following table sets forth the high and low exchange rates for the previous six months and
are based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York on each business day during the period
for cable transfers in Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
High |
|
Low |
April 2007 |
|
|
43.05 |
|
|
|
40.56 |
|
March 2007 |
|
|
44.43 |
|
|
|
42.78 |
|
February 2007 |
|
|
44.21 |
|
|
|
43.87 |
|
January 2007 |
|
|
44.49 |
|
|
|
44.07 |
|
December 2006 |
|
|
44.70 |
|
|
|
44.11 |
|
November 2006 |
|
|
45.26 |
|
|
|
44.46 |
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
6
RISK FACTORS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in the following risk factors
and elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following risk factors should be considered carefully in
evaluating us and our business.
Risks Related to our Company and our Industry
Our revenues and expenses are difficult to predict because they can fluctuate significantly
given the nature of the markets in which we operate. This increases the likelihood that our
results could fall below the expectation of market analysts, which could cause the price of our
equity shares and ADSs to decline.
Our revenue historically has fluctuated and may fluctuate in the future depending on a number
of factors, including:
|
|
|
the size, complexity, timing, pricing terms and profitability of significant projects or product orders; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
the proportion of services we perform at our clients sites rather than at our offshore facilities; |
|
|
|
|
seasonal changes that affect the mix of services we provide to our clients or the
relative proportion of services and product revenue; |
|
|
|
|
seasonal changes that affect purchasing patterns among our consumers of desktops,
notebooks, servers, communication devices, consumer care and other products; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated cancellations, contract terminations or deferral of projects or those
occurring as a result of our clients reorganizing their operations; |
|
|
|
|
the duration of tax holidays or exemptions and the availability of other Government
of India incentives; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of seasonal hiring patterns and the time we require to train and
productively utilize our new employees; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated variations in the duration, size and scope of our projects, as well as
changes in the corporate decision-making process of our clients; |
|
|
|
|
currency exchange fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
|
other economic and political factors. |
Approximately 53% of our total operating expenses in our IT Services and Products business,
particularly personnel and facilities, are fixed in advance of any particular quarter. As a result,
unanticipated variations in the number and timing of our projects or employee utilization rates may
cause significant variations in operating results in any particular quarter. Therefore, we believe
that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and
should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. Thus, it is possible that in the
future some of our periodic results of operations may be below the expectations of public market
analysts and investors, and the market price of our equity shares and ADSs could decline.
Our net income increased 44% in the year ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended
March 31, 2006. We continue to face increasing competition, pricing pressures for our products and
services and wage pressures for our work force in India primarily due to large U.S. multinational
corporations establishing offshore operations in India. We are also investing in developing
capabilities in new technology areas and deepening our domain expertise. While we believe that our
global delivery model allows us to manage costs efficiently, as the proportion of our services
delivered at client sites increases, we may not be able to keep our operating costs as low in the
future. In our Business Process Outsourcing, or BPO, business, we are diversifying our service
offerings to include process transformation services. High attrition levels and higher proportion
of revenues from customer interaction services could adversely impact our operating margins. As a
result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sustain our historic levels of
profitability.
7
If we do not continue to improve our administrative, operational and financial personnel and
systems to manage our growth, the value of our shareholders investment may be harmed.
We have experienced significant growth in all our businesses. We expect our growth to continue
to place significant demands on our management and other resources. This will require us to
continue to develop and improve our operational, financial and other internal controls, both in
India and elsewhere. In particular, our continued growth will increase the challenges involved in:
|
|
|
recruiting and retaining sufficiently skilled technical, marketing and management personnel; |
|
|
|
|
adhering to our high quality standards; |
|
|
|
|
maintaining high levels of client satisfaction; |
|
|
|
|
developing and improving our internal administrative infrastructure,
particularly our financial, operational, communications and other internal systems;
and |
|
|
|
|
preserving our culture, values and entrepreneurial environment. |
If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, the quality of our services and products
may decline, and our ability to attract clients and skilled personnel may be negatively affected.
These factors in turn could negatively affect the growth of our Global IT Services and Products
business and harm the value of our shareholders investment.
Intense competition in the market for IT services could adversely affect our cost advantages,
and, as a result, decrease our revenues.
The market for IT services is highly competitive. Our competitors include software companies,
IT companies, systems consulting and integration firms, other technology companies and client
in-house information services departments. We may also face competition from IT companies operating
from China and the Philippines. Many of our competitors command significantly greater financial,
technical and marketing resources and generate greater revenue than we do. We cannot be reasonably
certain that we will be able to compete successfully against such competitors or that we will not
lose our key employees or clients to such competitors. Additionally, we believe that our ability to
compete also depends in part on factors outside our control, such as the availability of skilled
resources, the price at which our competitors offer comparable services, and the extent of our
competitors responsiveness to their clients needs.
We may face difficulties in providing end-to-end business solutions for our clients that could
cause clients to discontinue their work with us, which in turn could harm our business.
We have been expanding the nature and scope of our engagements and have added new service
offerings, such as IT consulting, business process management, systems integration and outsourcing
of entire portions of IT infrastructure. The success of these service offerings is dependent, in
part, upon continued demand for such services by our existing and new clients and our ability to
meet this demand in a cost-competitive and effective manner. In addition, our ability to
effectively offer a wider breadth of end-to-end business solutions depends on our ability to
attract existing or new clients to these service offerings. To obtain engagements for such
end-to-end solutions, we also are more likely to compete with large, well-established international
consulting firms, resulting in increased compensation and marketing costs. Accordingly, we cannot
be certain that our new service offerings will effectively meet client needs or that we will be
able to attract existing and new clients to these service offerings.
The increased breadth of our service offerings may result in larger and more complex projects
with our clients. This will require us to establish closer relationships with our clients and a
thorough understanding of their operations. Our ability to establish such relationships will depend
on a number of factors, including the proficiency of our IT professionals and our management
personnel. Our failure to understand our client requirements or our failure to deliver services
which meet the requirements specified by our clients could result in termination of client
contracts, and we could be liable to our clients for significant penalties or damages.
Larger projects may involve multiple engagements or stages, and there is a risk that a client
may choose not to retain us for additional stages or may cancel or delay additional planned
engagements. These terminations, cancellations or delays may result from the business or financial
condition of our clients or the economy generally, as opposed to factors related to the quality of
our services. Such cancellations or delays make it difficult to plan for project resource
requirements, and inaccuracies in such resource planning may have a negative impact on our
profitability.
8
Our success depends in large part upon our management team and other highly skilled
professionals. If we fail to retain and attract these personnel, our business may be unable to
grow and our revenue could decline, which may decrease the value of our shareholders investment.
We are highly dependent on the senior members of our management team, including the continued
efforts of our Chairman and Managing Director. Our ability to execute project engagements and to
obtain new clients depends in large part on our ability to attract, train, motivate and retain
highly skilled professionals, especially project managers, software engineers and other senior
technical personnel. If we cannot hire and retain additional qualified personnel, our ability to
bid on and obtain new projects and to continue to expand our business will be impaired and our
revenue could decline. We believe that there is significant competition for professionals with the
skills necessary to perform the services we offer. We may not be able to hire and retain enough
skilled and experienced employees to replace those who leave. Additionally, we may not be able to
re-deploy and retain our employees to keep pace with continuing changes in technology, evolving
standards and changing client preferences. We are experiencing high employee attrition rates, in
line with industry, in our BPO services business. Continued employee attrition rates in this
business may adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
The Central Government in India is considering introducing legislation mandating employers to
give preferential hiring treatment to under-represented groups. State Governments in India may also
introduce such legislation. The quality of our work force is critical to our business. The
legislation may affect our ability to hire the most qualified and competent technology and other
professionals.
Changes in government policies also affect our ability to hire, attract and retain personnel.
For instance, the Finance Bill, 2007 seeks to impose a fringe benefit tax (FBT) on companies in
respect of specified securities or equity shares allotted or transferred, directly or indirectly,
by the company free of cost or at a concessional rate to its employees. The FBT could act as
deterrent on our ability to use stock option grants to attract, hire and retain qualified
personnel.
Appreciation of Indian Rupee against major currencies of the world could negatively impact our
revenue and operating results.
Approximately 73% of our revenues are earned in major currencies of the world while a
significant portion of our costs are in Indian rupees. The exchange rate between the rupee and
major currencies of the world has fluctuated significantly in recent years and may continue to
fluctuate in the future. Appreciation of the rupee against the major currencies of the world can
adversely affect our revenues and competitive positioning, and can adversely impact our gross
margins. We enter into forward exchange contracts to minimize the impact of currency fluctuations
on our revenues. However, volatility in exchange rate movement and/or sustained rupee appreciation
will negatively impact our revenue and operating results.
An economic slowdown, terrorist attacks in the United States, and other acts of violence or
war could delay or reduce the number of new purchase orders we receive and disrupt our operations
in the United States, thereby negatively affecting our financial results and prospects.
Approximately 66% of our Global IT Services and Products revenue is from the United States.
During an economic slowdown our clients may delay or reduce their IT spending significantly, which
may in turn lower the demand for our services and affect our financial results. Further, terrorist
attacks in the United States could cause clients in the U.S. to delay their decisions on IT
spending, which could affect our financial results. Any significant decrease in the IT industry, or
significant consolidation in that industry or decrease in growth or consolidation in other industry
segments on which we focus, may reduce the demand for our services and negatively affect our
revenues and profitability. Although we continue to believe that we have a strong competitive
position in the United States, we have increased our efforts to geographically diversify our
clients and revenue.
Our Global IT Services and Products service revenue depends to a large extent on a small
number of clients, and our revenue could decline if we lose a major client.
We currently derive, and believe we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our
Global IT Services and Products service revenue from a limited number of corporate clients. The
loss of a major client or a significant reduction in the service performed for a major client could
result in a reduction of our revenue. Our largest client for the years ended March 31, 2005, March
31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, accounted for 4%, 3% and 3% of our Global IT Services and Products
revenue, respectively. For the same periods, our ten largest clients accounted for 27%, 27% and 25%
of our Global IT Services and Products revenue. The volume of work we perform for specific clients
may vary from year to year, particularly since we typically are not the only outside service
provider for our clients. Thus, a major client in one year may not provide the same level of
revenue in a subsequent year.
9
There are a number of factors, other than our performance, that could cause the loss of a
client and that may not be predictable. In certain cases, clients have reduced their spending on IT
services due to challenging economic environment and consequently have reduced the volume of
business with us. If we were to lose one of our major clients or have significantly lower volume of
business with them, our revenue and profitability could be reduced. We continually strive to reduce
our dependence on revenue from services rendered to any one client.
Restrictions on immigration may affect our ability to compete for and provide services to
clients in the United States, which could hamper our growth and cause our revenue to decline.
If U.S. immigration laws change and make it more difficult for us to obtain H-1B and L-1 visas
for our employees, our ability to compete for and provide services to clients in the United States
could be impaired. In response to recent terrorist attacks in the United States, the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services has increased the level of scrutiny in granting visas and has
decreased the number of its grants. These restrictions and any other changes in turn could hamper
our growth and cause our revenue to decline. Our employees who work on site at client facilities or
at our facilities in the United States on temporary and extended assignments typically must obtain
visas.
A majority of our personnel in the United States hold H-1B visas or L-1 visas. An H-1B visa is
a temporary work visa, which allows the employee to remain in the United States while he or she
remains an employee of the sponsoring firm, and the L-1 visa is an intra-company transfer visa,
which only allows the employee to remain in the United States temporarily. Although there is no
limit to new L-1 petitions, there is a limit to the aggregate number of new H-1B petitions that the
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may approve in any government fiscal year. The
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services have limited the number of H-1B visas that may be granted
as of the 2005 fiscal year to 65,000 per year, from 195,000 in each of the three years prior to
2004. Although the U.S. government has approved the grant of approximately 20,000 additional H-1B
visas, these visas are only available to skilled workers who possess a Masters or higher degree
from educational institutions in the United States.
The L-1 and H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004 further proposes to preclude foreign companies from
obtaining L-1 visas for employees with specialized knowledge: (1) if such employees will be
stationed primarily at the worksite of another company in the U.S. and the employee will not be
controlled and supervised by his employer, or (2) if the placement is essentially an arrangement to
provide labor for hire rather than in connection with the employees specialized knowledge. The L1
Reforms Act provisions became effective in June 2005.
The USCIS announced on April 3, 2007, the second day that the window was open for receipt of
H-1 B visa petitions, for fiscal 2008, that it had received enough H-1 B visa petitions
(approximately 150,000) to meet the congressionally mandated cap for fiscal 2008. For all petitions
received on April 2, 2007 and April 3, 2007, USCIS will use a random computer-generated selection
process to select the applications. In this random selection process we may not obtain adequate
H1-B visas and this could hamper our growth.
Immigration laws in the United States may also require us to meet certain levels of
compensation, and to comply with other legal requirements, including labor certifications, as a
condition to obtaining or maintaining work visas for our technology professionals working in the
United States.
Immigration laws in the United States and in other countries are subject to legislative
change, as well as to variations in standards of application and enforcement due to political
forces and economic conditions. It is difficult to predict the political and economic events that
could affect immigration laws, or the restrictive impact they could have on obtaining or monitoring
work visas for our technology professionals.
Although we currently have sufficient personnel with valid H-1B visas, we cannot assure you
that we will continue to be able to obtain any or a sufficient number of H-1B visas on the same
time schedule as we have previously obtained, or at all.
We focus on high-growth industries, such as networking and communications. Any decrease in
demand for technology in such industries may significantly decrease the demand for our services,
which may impair our growth and cause our revenue to decline.
Approximately 35% of our IT Services and Products business is derived from clients in high
growth industries who use our IT services for networking and communications equipment. These
industries have experienced periods of above normal growth and periods of contraction. Any
significant decrease in the growth of these industries will decrease the demand for our services
and could reduce our revenue.
Our failure to complete fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts on budget and on time may
negatively affect our profitability, which could decrease the value of our shareholders
investment.
10
We offer a portion of our services on a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe basis, rather than on a
time-and-materials basis. Although we use specified software engineering processes and our past
project experience to reduce the risks associated with estimating, planning and performing
fixed-price, fixed-timeframe projects, we bear the risk of cost overruns, completion delays and
wage inflation in connection with these projects. If we fail to accurately estimate the resources
and time required for a project, future rates of wage inflation and currency exchange rates, or if
we fail to complete our contractual obligations within the contracted timeframe, our profitability
may suffer.
Disruptions in telecommunications could harm our service model, which could result in a
reduction of our revenue.
A significant element of our business strategy is to continue to leverage and expand our
software development centers in Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad and Pune, India, as well as overseas.
We believe that the use of a strategically located network of software development centers will
provide us with cost advantages, the ability to attract highly skilled personnel in various regions
of the country and the world, the ability to service clients on a regional and global basis and the
ability to provide services to our clients 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Part of our service
model is to maintain active voice and data communications between our main offices in Bangalore,
our clients offices, and our other software development and support facilities. Although we
maintain redundancy facilities and satellite communications links, any significant loss in our
ability to transmit voice and data through satellite and telephone communications could result in a
disruption in business, thereby hindering our performance or our ability to complete client
projects on time. This, in turn, could lead to a reduction of our revenue.
The markets in which we operate are subject to the risk of earthquakes, floods and other
natural disasters.
Some of the regions that we operate in are prone to earthquakes, flooding and other
natural disasters. In the event that any of our business centers are affected by any such
disasters, we may sustain damage to our operations and properties, suffer significant financial
losses and be unable to complete our client engagements in a timely manner, if at all. Further, we
may also incur costs in redeploying personnel and property. In addition, if there is a major
earthquake, flood or other natural disaster in any of the locations in which our significant
customers are located, we face the risk that our customers may incur losses, or sustained business
interruption and/or loss which may materially impair their ability to continue their purchase of
products or services from us. A major earthquake, flood or other natural disaster in the markets in
which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
We may be liable to our clients for damages caused by disclosure of confidential
information or system failures.
We often have access to or are required to collect and store confidential client and customer
data. Many of our client agreements do not limit our potential liability for breaches of
confidentiality. If any person, including any of our employees, penetrates our network security or
misappropriates sensitive data, we could be subject to significant liability from our clients or
from our clients customers for breaching contractual confidentiality provisions or privacy laws.
Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client and customer data, whether through
breach of our computer systems, systems failure or otherwise, could damage our reputation and cause
us to lose clients.
We are investing substantial cash assets in new facilities and physical infrastructure, and
our profitability could be reduced if our business does not grow proportionately.
As of March 31, 2007, we had contractual commitments of approximately Rs. 3,432 million ($ 80
million) related to capital expenditures on construction or expansion of our software development
facilities. We may encounter cost overruns or project delays in connection with new facilities.
These expansions may increase our fixed costs. If we are unable to grow our business and revenues
proportionately, our profitability will be reduced.
Our international operations subject us to risks inherent in doing business on an
international level that could harm our operating results.
Currently, we have software development facilities in eight countries around the world. The
majority of our software development facilities are located in India. We intend to establish new
development facilities in Southeast Asia and Europe. We have not yet made substantial contractual
commitments to establish any new facilities and we cannot assure you that we will not significantly
alter or reduce our proposed expansion plans. Because of our limited experience with facilities
outside of India, we are subject to additional risks related to our international expansion
strategy, including risks related to complying with a wide variety of national and local laws,
restrictions on the import and export of certain technologies and multiple and possibly overlapping
tax structures. In addition, we may face competition in other countries from companies that may
have more experience with operations in such countries or with
11
international operations generally. We may also face difficulties integrating new facilities
in different countries into our existing operations, as well as integrating employees that we hire
in different countries into our existing corporate culture. Our international expansion plans may
not be successful and we may not be able to compete effectively in other countries.
Our business will suffer if we fail to anticipate and develop new services and enhance
existing services in order to keep pace with rapid changes in technology and the industries on
which we focus.
The IT services market is characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry
standards, changing client preferences and new product and service introductions. Our future
success will depend on our ability to anticipate these advances and develop new product and service
offerings to meet client needs. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these
advances on a timely basis, or, if we do respond, the services or technologies we develop may not
be successful in the marketplace. Further, products, services or technologies that are developed by
our competitors may render our services non-competitive or obsolete.
Most of our client contracts can typically be terminated without cause and with little or no
notice or penalty, which could negatively impact our revenue and profitability.
Our clients typically retain us on a non-exclusive, project-by-project basis. Most of our
client contracts, including those that are on a fixed-price, fixed-timeframe basis, can be
terminated with or without cause, with between zero and ninety days notice and without
termination-related penalties. Additionally, most of our contracts with clients are typically
limited to discrete projects without any commitment to a specific volume of business or future
work. Our business is dependent on the decisions and actions of our clients, and there are a number
of factors relating to our clients that are outside our control that might result in the
termination of a project or the loss of a client, including:
|
|
|
financial difficulties for a client; |
|
|
|
|
a change in strategic priorities, resulting in a reduced level of IT spending; |
|
|
|
|
a demand for price reductions; and |
|
|
|
|
a change in outsourcing strategy by moving more work to client in-house IT
departments or to our competitors. |
We may engage in future acquisitions, investments, strategic partnerships or other ventures
that may harm our performance, dilute our shareholders ownership and cause us to incur debt or
assume contingent liabilities.
We have acquired and in the future may acquire or make investments in complementary
businesses, technologies, services or products, or enter into strategic partnerships with parties
who can provide access to those assets. For example, in November 2006, we acquired 100% of the
equity of Hydrauto Group AB (Hydrauto), a company engaged in the production, marketing and
development of customized hydraulic cylinders solutions for mobile applications such as mobile
cranes, excavator, dumpers and trucks. Also in November 2006, we acquired 100% of the India, Middle
East and SAARC operations of 3D Networks and Planet PSG. 3D Networks provides business
communication solutions that include consulting, voice, data and converged solutions, and managed
services. In the future, we may not identify suitable acquisition, investment or strategic
partnership candidates, or if we do identify suitable candidates, we may not complete those
transactions on terms commercially acceptable to us or at all. We could have difficulty in
assimilating the personnel, operations, technology and software of the acquired companies. In
addition, the key personnel of an acquired company may decide not to work for us. If we make other
types of acquisitions, we could have difficulty in integrating the acquired products, services or
technologies into our operations. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract
our management and employees and increase our expenses. Changes in competition laws in India and
abroad could also impact our acquisition plans.
Our revenues could be significantly affected if the governments, in geographies we operate in,
restrict companies from outsourcing work to foreign corporations
In the United States, despite economic recovery, unemployment levels have not declined
significantly from pre-economic recovery levels. There has been concern among the legislators about
the impact of outsourcing on unemployment levels in the United States. Legislation has been
proposed to prohibit federal and state governments from outsourcing IT and IT enabled services to
foreign corporations. Legislators have also proposed to introduce economic deterrents for U.S.
companies outsourcing work to foreign corporations.
12
Independent research agencies have conducted research and concluded that outsourcing benefits
the U.S. economy. Several U.S. companies have also supported outsourcing as a competitive
advantage. However, if the proposed laws come into effect it would adversely affect our revenues
and profitability.
Our BPO services revenue depend to a large extent on a small number of clients, and our
revenue could decline if a major client reduces the volume of services obtained from us.
We currently derive, and believe we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our BPO
services revenue from a limited number of corporate clients. The reduction in volume of work done
to a major client could result in a reduction of our revenue. Since we recruit and train employees
in anticipation of continued growth in volume, reduction in the volume of work from these major
clients would adversely impact our gross margins.
There are a number of factors that could cause the loss of a client and such factors are not
predictable. We could fail to achieve performance standards due to a lack of clarity between us and
the client on the performance standards or due to deficiencies in processes. In certain cases, a
client could reduce their spending on such services due to a challenging economic environment and
consequently reduce the volume and profitability of business with us. In other cases, a client
could reduce its spending on such services with us and form internal competing operations in the
U.S., India or other price competitive geographies.
Some of our long-term client contracts contain benchmarking provisions which, if triggered
could result in lower contractual revenues and profitability in the future.
As the size and complexity of our client engagements increase, our clients may require further
benchmarking provisions in our client contracts. Benchmarking provisions allow a customer in
certain circumstances to request a benchmark study prepared by an agreed upon third-party comparing
our pricing, performance and efficiency gains for delivered contract services to that of an agreed
upon list of other service providers for comparable services. Based on the results of the benchmark
study and depending on the reasons for any unfavorable variance, we may be required to reduce the
pricing for future services to be performed under the balance of the contract, which could have an
adverse impact on our revenues and profitability.
We may be liable to our clients for damages caused by system failures, which could damage our
reputation and cause us to lose customers.
Many of our contracts involve projects that are critical to the operations of our clients
businesses and provide benefits that may be difficult to quantify. Any failure in a clients
system could result in a claim for substantial damages against us, regardless of our responsibility
for such failure. Although we attempt to limit our contractual liability for consequential damages
in rendering our services, we cannot be assured that the limitations on liability we provide for in
our service contracts will be enforceable in all cases, or that they will otherwise protect us from
liability for damages. A successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds
our available insurance coverage or changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases
or the imposition of a large deductible or co-insurance requirement, could adversely affect our
operating results.
Compliance with new and changing corporate governance and public disclosure requirements adds
uncertainty to our compliance policies and increases our costs of compliance.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to accounting, corporate governance and
public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations, NYSE rules,
Securities and Exchange Board of India rules and Indian stock market listing regulations, are
creating uncertainty for companies like ours. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards
may lack specificity and are subject to varying interpretations. Their application in practice may
evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result
in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs of compliance as a result
of ongoing revisions to such governance standards.
In particular, continuing compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal controls over financial
reporting requires the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. With respect
to our Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007, our management has performed an assessment of
the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. We have determined that the
internal controls are effective.
We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure,
and our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards in this regard have
resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses
and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance
activities. In addition, the new laws, regulations and standards regarding corporate governance
may make it more difficult for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.
13
Further, our board members, chief executive officer and chief financial officer could face an
increased risk of personal liability in connection with their performance of duties. As a result,
we may face difficulties attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive officers,
which could harm our business. If we fail to comply with new or changed laws or regulations and
standards differ, our business and reputation may be harmed.
Risks Related to Investments in Indian Companies and International Operations generally.
We are incorporated in India, and substantially all of our assets and our employees are
located in India. Consequently, our financial performance and the market price of our ADSs will be
affected by political, social and economic developments affecting India, Government of India
policies, including taxation and foreign investment policies, Government currency exchange control,
as well as changes in exchange rates and interest rates.
Wages in India have historically been lower than wages in the United States and Europe, which
has been one of our competitive advantages. Wage increases in India may prevent us from sustaining
this competitive advantage and may reduce our profit margins.
Our wage costs in India have historically been significantly lower than wage costs in the
United States and Europe for comparably skilled professionals, and this has been one of our
competitive advantages. However, wage increases in India may prevent us from sustaining this
competitive advantage and may negatively affect our profit margins. We may need to increase the
levels of our employee compensation more rapidly than in the past to retain talent. Unless we are
able to continue to increase the efficiency and productivity of our employees, increase in
proportion of employees with lower experience or source talent from other low cost locations, like
Eastern Europe, China or South-East Asia, wage increases in the long term may reduce our profit
margins.
We would realize lower tax benefits if the special tax holiday scheme for units set up in
special economic zones is substantially modified
The Government of India introduced a separate tax holiday scheme for units set up in special
economic zones. Under this scheme, units in designated special economic zones which began providing
services on or after April 1, 2005 will be eligible for a deduction of 100 percent of profits or
gains derived from the export of services for the first five years from commencement of provision
of services and 50 percent of such profits or gains for a further five years.
Recently there have been demands by legislators and various political parties in India that
the Government of India should actively regulate the development of special economic zones by
private entities. There have been demands to impose strict conditions which need to be complied
with before an economic zone developed by a private entity is designated as special economic zone.
If such regulations or conditions are imposed it would adversely impact our ability to set up new
units in such designated special economic zones and avail ourselves of tax benefits.
Our net income would decrease if the Government of India imposes additional taxes or withdraws
or reduces tax benefits or other incentives
Currently, we benefit from certain tax incentives under Indian tax laws. As a result of these
incentives, our operations have not been subject to significant Indian tax liabilities. These tax
incentives currently include a tax holiday from payment of Indian corporate income taxes for our
Global IT Services and Products business operated from specially designated Software Technology
Parks and Special Economic Zones in India and an income tax deduction of 100% for profits
derived from exporting information technology services. As a result, a substantial portion of our
pre-tax income has not been subject to significant tax in recent years.
The Finance Bill, 2007 has proposed to include income eligible for deductions under sections
10A and 10B of the Indian Income Tax Act in the computation of book profits for the levy of a
Minimum Alternative Tax, or MAT. The rate of MAT, effective April 1, 2007, would be 11.33%
(including a surcharge and education cess) on our book profits determined after including income
eligible for deductions under Sections 10A and 10B of the Indian Income Tax Act. The Income Tax Act
provides that the MAT paid by us can be adjusted against our tax liability over the next five
years. Although MAT paid by us can be set off against our future income tax liability, our cash
flows could be adversely affected.
Regional conflicts in South Asia could adversely affect the Indian economy, disrupt our
operations and cause our business to suffer.
South Asia has from time to time experienced instances of civil unrest and hostilities among
neighboring countries, including between India and Pakistan. In recent years there have been
military confrontations between India and Pakistan that have occurred in the region of Kashmir and
along the India-Pakistan border. The potential for hostilities between the two countries are high
due to terrorist incidents in India and the aggravated geopolitical situation
14
in the region. Both countries have initiated active measures to reduce hostilities. Military
activity or terrorist attacks in the future could influence the Indian economy by disrupting
communications and making travel more difficult and such political tensions could create a greater
perception that investments in Indian companies involve higher degrees of risk. This, in turn,
could have a material adverse effect on the market for securities of Indian companies, including
our equity shares and our ADSs, and on the market for our services.
Political instability in the Indian Government could delay the liberalization of the Indian
economy and adversely affect economic conditions in India generally, which could impact our
financial results and prospects.
Since 1991, successive Indian Governments have pursued policies of economic liberalization,
including significantly relaxing restrictions on the private sector. Nevertheless, the role of the
Indian Central and State Governments in the Indian economy as producers, consumers and regulators
has remained significant. The last general elections were held in May 2004. The ruling coalition
Government, which has over the last several years pushed significant economic reforms, was voted
out of power and a new coalition Government has come to the helm. The current Government has
announced policies and taken initiatives that support the continued economic liberalization
policies that had been pursued by the previous Government. Although we believe that the process of
economic liberalization will continue, the rate of economic liberalization could change, and
specific laws and policies affecting technology companies, foreign investment, currency exchange
and other matters affecting investment in our securities could change as well. A significant
change in Indias economic liberalization and deregulation policies could adversely affect business
and economic conditions in India generally and our business in particular.
The incumbent Government is a coalition of several parties and withdrawal of one or more of
these parties could result in political instability. Such instability could delay the reform of the
Indian economy and could have a material adverse effect on the market for securities of Indian
companies, including our equity shares and our ADSs, and on the market for our services.
Indian law limits our ability to raise capital outside India and may limit the ability of
others to acquire us, which could prevent us from operating our business or entering into a
transaction that is in the best interests of our shareholders.
Indian law constrains our ability to raise capital outside India through the issuance of
equity or convertible debt securities. Generally, any foreign investment in, or an acquisition of,
an Indian company requires approval from relevant Government authorities in India, including the
Reserve Bank of India. However, subject to certain exceptions, the Government of India currently
does not require prior approvals for IT companies like us. If we are required to seek the approval
of the Government of India and the Government of India does not approve the investment or
implements a limit on the foreign equity ownership of IT companies, our ability to seek and obtain
additional equity investment by foreign investors will be limited. In addition, these
restrictions, if applied to us, may prevent us from entering into a transaction, such as an
acquisition by a non-Indian company, which would otherwise be beneficial for our company and the
holders of our equity shares and ADSs.
Our ability to acquire companies organized outside India depends on the approval of the
Government of India. Our failure to obtain approval from the Government of India for acquisition of
companies organized outside India may restrict our international growth, which could negatively
affect our revenue.
The Ministry of Finance of the Government of India and/or the Reserve Bank of India must
approve our acquisition of any company organized outside of India or grant general or special
permission for such acquisition. The regulatory authority has recently issued a policy statement
permitting the acquisition of companies organized outside India for a transaction value not
exceeding 300% of the net worth of the acquiring company and:
|
|
|
if the transaction consideration is paid in cash with proceeds of ADS, up to
100% of the proceeds from an ADS offering; and |
|
|
|
|
if the transaction consideration is paid in stock (i.e., by issue of
ADRs/GDRs), up to ten times the acquiring companys previous fiscal years
export earnings. |
We cannot assure you that any required approval from the Reserve Bank of India and or the
Ministry of Finance or any other Government agency can be obtained. Our failure to obtain approval
from the Government of India for acquisitions of companies organized outside India may restrict our
international growth, which could negatively affect our revenue.
It may be difficult for you to enforce any judgment obtained in the United States against us,
the selling shareholders or our affiliates.
15
We are incorporated under the laws of India and many of our directors and executive officers,
reside outside the United States. Virtually all of our assets and the assets of many of these
persons are located outside the United States. As a result, you may be unable to effect service of
process upon us outside India or upon such persons outside their jurisdiction of residence. In
addition, you may be unable to enforce against us in courts outside of India, or against these
persons outside the jurisdiction of their residence, judgments obtained in courts of the United
States, including judgments predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United
States.
We have been advised by our Indian counsel that the United States and India do not currently
have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than
arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of
money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States on civil liability, whether or
not predicated solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States, would not be
enforceable in India. However, the party in whose favor such final judgment is rendered may bring a
new suit in a competent court in India based on a final judgment that has been obtained in the
United States. The suit must be brought in India within three years from the date of the judgment
in the same manner as any other suit filed to enforce a civil liability in India. It is unlikely
that a court in India would award damages on the same basis as a foreign court if an action is
brought in India. Furthermore, it is unlikely that an Indian court would enforce foreign judgments
if it viewed the amount of damages awarded as excessive or inconsistent with Indian practice. A
party seeking to enforce a foreign judgment in India is required to obtain approval from the
Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, to execute such a judgment
or to repatriate any amount recovered.
The laws of India do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as those of
the United States, and we may be unsuccessful in protecting our intellectual property rights.
Unauthorized use of our intellectual property may result in development of technology, products or
services which compete with our products. We may also be subject to third-party claims of
intellectual property infringement.
Our intellectual property rights are important to our business. We rely on a combination of
copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions
to protect our intellectual property. However, the laws of India do not protect proprietary rights
to the same extent as laws in the United States. Therefore, our efforts to protect our
intellectual property may not be adequate. Our competitors may independently develop similar
technology or duplicate our products or services. Unauthorized parties may infringe upon or
misappropriate our products, services or proprietary information.
The misappropriation or duplication of our intellectual property could disrupt our ongoing
business, distract our management and employees, reduce our revenue and increase our expenses. We
may need to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and
scope of the proprietary rights of others. Any such litigation could be time-consuming and costly.
As the number of patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights in our industry
increases, and as the coverage of these rights increases, we believe that companies in our industry
will face more frequent infringement claims. Defending against these claims, even if not
meritorious, could be expensive and divert our attention and resources from operating our company.
Although we believe that our intellectual property rights do not infringe on the intellectual
property rights of any other party, infringement claims may be asserted against us in the future.
If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be
required to pay a substantial damage award and be forced to develop non-infringing technology,
obtain a license or cease selling the applications or products that contain the infringing
technology. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain a license on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
Risks Related to the ADSs
Sales of our equity shares may adversely affect the prices of our equity shares and the
ADSs.
Sales of substantial amounts of our equity shares, including sales by insiders, in the public
market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market
price of our equity shares or our ADSs or our ability to raise capital through an offering of our
securities. In the future, we may also sponsor the sale of shares currently held by some of our
shareholders, or issue new shares. We can make no prediction as to the timing of any such sales or
the effect, if any, that future sales of our equity shares, or the availability of our equity
shares for future sale, will have on the market price of our equity shares or ADSs prevailing from
time to time.
An active or liquid trading market for our ADSs is not assured.
An active, liquid trading market for our ADSs may not be maintained in the long term. Loss of
liquidity could increase the price volatility of our ADSs.
16
Indian law imposes foreign investment restrictions that limit a holders ability to convert
equity shares into ADSs, which may cause our ADSs to trade at a premium or discount to the market
price of our equity shares.
Under certain circumstances, the Reserve Bank of India must approve the sale of equity shares
underlying ADSs by a non-resident of India to a resident of India. The Reserve Bank of India has
given general permission to effect sales of existing shares or convertible debentures of an Indian
company by a resident to a non-resident, subject to certain conditions, including the price at
which the shares may be sold. Additionally, except under certain limited circumstances, if an
investor seeks to convert the rupee proceeds from a sale of equity shares in India into foreign
currency and then repatriate that foreign currency from India, he or she will have to obtain an
additional Reserve Bank of India approval for each transaction. Required approval from the Reserve
Bank of India or any other Government agency may not be obtained on terms favorable to a
non-resident investor or at all.
Investors who exchange ADSs for the underlying equity shares and are not holders of record
will be required to declare to us details of the holder of record, and the holder of record will be
required to disclose the details of the beneficial owner. Any investor who fails to comply with
this requirement may be liable for a fine of up to Rs. 1,000 for each day such failure continues.
Such restrictions on foreign ownership of the underlying equity shares may cause our ADSs to trade
at a premium or discount to the equity shares.
An investor in our ADSs may not be able to exercise preemptive rights for additional shares
and may thereby suffer dilution of his or her equity interest in us.
Under the Indian Companies Act, a company incorporated in India must offer its holders of
equity shares preemptive rights to subscribe and pay for a proportionate number of shares to
maintain their existing ownership percentages prior to the issuance of any new equity shares,
unless such preemptive rights have been waived by three-fourths of the shares voting on the
resolution to waive such rights. Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights for
equity shares underlying ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective
with respect to such rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act is available. We are not obligated to prepare and file such a registration statement and our
decision to do so will depend on the costs and potential liabilities associated with any such
registration statement, as well as the perceived benefits of enabling the holders of ADSs to
exercise their preemptive rights, and any other factors we consider appropriate at the time. No
assurance can be given that we would file a registration statement under these circumstances. If we
issue any such securities in the future, such securities may be issued to the Depositary, which may
sell such securities for the benefit of the holders of the ADSs. There can be no assurance as to
the value, if any, the Depositary would receive upon the sale of such securities. To the extent
that holders of ADSs are unable to exercise preemptive rights granted in respect of the equity
shares represented by their ADSs, their proportional interests in us would be reduced.
ADS holders may be restricted in their ability to exercise voting rights.
At our request, the Depositary will mail to you any notice of shareholders meeting received
from us together with information explaining how to instruct the Depositary to exercise the voting
rights of the securities represented by ADSs. If the Depositary receives voting instructions from
you in time, relating to matters that have been forwarded to you, it will endeavor to vote the
securities represented by your ADSs in accordance with such voting instructions. However, the
ability of the Depositary to carry out voting instructions may be limited by practical and legal
limitations and the terms of the securities on deposit. We cannot assure that you will receive
voting materials in time to enable you to return voting instructions to the Depositary in a timely
manner. Securities for which no voting instructions have been received will not be voted. There may
be other communications, notices or offerings that we only make to holders of our equity shares,
which will not be forwarded to holders of ADSs. Accordingly, you may not be able to participate in
all offerings, transactions or votes that are made available to holders of our equity shares.
Item 4. Information on the Company
History and Development of the Company
Wipro Limited was incorporated in 1945 as Western India Vegetable Products Limited under the
Indian Companies Act, VII of 1913, which is now superseded by the Companies Act, 1956. We are
deemed to be registered under the Companies Act, 1956, or the Companies Act. We are registered
with the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, Bangalore, India as Company No. 20800. Our registered
office is located at Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore 560 035, and the telephone number of
our registered office is +91-80-2844-0011. In October 2000, we raised gross aggregate proceeds of
approximately $ 131 million in our initial U.S. public offering of our ADSs on the New York Stock
Exchange. The name and address of our registered agent in the United States is CT Corporation,
located at 1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 100, Walnut Creek, California 94596.
17
Wipro Limited was initially engaged in the manufacture of hydrogenated vegetable oil. Over the
years, we have diversified into the areas of Information Technology, or IT, services, IT products
and Consumer Care and Lighting Products. We are headquartered in Bangalore, India and have
operations in North America, Europe and Asia. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, 89% of our
operating income was generated from our Global IT Services and Products. For the same period, IT
Services and Products represented 82% of our operating income, BPO Services represented 7% of our
operating income, India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products represented 7% of our operating income
and Consumer Care and Lighting and Others represented 4% of our operating income.
We incurred capital expenditure of Rs. 6,613 million, Rs. 7,486 million and Rs. 11,392 million
during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. These capital
expenditures were primarily incurred on new software development facilities in India for our IT
Services and Products business segment. As of March 31, 2007, we had contractual commitments of
Rs. 3,432 million ($ 80 million) related to capital expenditures on construction or expansion of
software development facilities. We currently intend to finance our planned construction and
expansion entirely through our cash and cash equivalents and investments in liquid and short term
mutual funds as of March 31, 2007.
Industry Overview
IT Services and Products
The role of IT in transforming businesses and economies has been widely recognized. Changing
economic and business conditions, rapid technological innovation, proliferation of the Internet and
increasing globalization are creating an increasingly competitive market environment that is
driving corporations to transform the manner in which they operate. Customers are increasingly
demanding improved products and services with accelerated delivery times and at lower prices. To
adequately address these needs, corporations are focusing on their core competencies and are using
outsourced technology service providers to help improve productivity, develop new products, conduct
research and development activities, reduce business risk and manage operations more effectively.
The IT and information technology-enabled service or IT-ITES, sector has been experiencing
growth in India, with multinational companies building a global presence through cross-border
acquisitions and organic growth in other low cost locations. This is complemented by major global
players continuing to significantly develop their offshore delivery capabilities, predominantly in
India, validating the success of the global delivery model and highlighting Indias increasing role
in outsourcing.
The shift in the role of IT from merely supporting business to transforming business, which is
driving productivity gains and creating new business models, has increased the importance of IT to
the success of companies worldwide. The ability to design, develop, implement, and maintain
advanced technology platforms and solutions to address business and customer needs has become a
competitive advantage and a priority for corporations worldwide. We have found that companies are
now focused on moving data residing in disparate IT systems to the decision makers within the
company real-time and in a seamless manner. Companies have recognized the transformational
capabilities of real-time data and have started integrating IT processes with core business
activities, with their clients and with their suppliers. Concurrently, the prevalence of multiple
technology platforms and a greater emphasis on network security and redundancy have increased the
complexity and cost of IT systems, and have resulted in greater technology-related risks. The need
for more dynamic technology solutions and the increased complexity, cost and risk associated with
these technology platforms has created a growing need for specialists with experience in leveraging
technology to help drive business strategy.
To serve these companies, there is an increasing need for highly skilled technology
professionals in the markets in which we operate. IT service providers need cross functional teams
of domain experts with deep industry knowledge and process and implementation specialists with
technical expertise and application development skills. The cross functional teams should have the
ability to integrate solutions across disparate IT systems.
The focus for companies is on objective factors such as:
|
|
|
providing decision makers with real-time data from disparate IT systems to enhance
the effectiveness of the decision making process; |
|
|
|
|
realizing measurable cost efficiencies; |
|
|
|
|
realizing a defined return on investment on their IT spending; |
|
|
|
|
reducing the cycle time of introducing new software applications, commonly known as
time-to- application advantage; |
18
|
|
|
reducing the time it takes to develop new technologies, commonly known as
time-to-market advantage; and |
|
|
|
|
increasing the focus on core activities by outsourcing IT infrastructure to
integrated IT service providers; and |
|
|
|
|
strengthening individual portfolio and expanding geographic footprints through
cross-border mergers and acquisitions. |
According to the Worldwide Services Spending Forecast, a report published by International
Data Corporation, or IDC, in May 2005, the global IT services market is estimated to grow from
approximately $ 383 billion in 2003 to approximately $512 billion by 2008, reflecting a compound
annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 6%.
According to NASSCOM Strategic Review Report 2007, the Indian IT-BPO sector (including
domestic and export segment) is growing at approximately 28%. IT-BPO exports are expected by the
report to reach US $60 billion by 2010.
Companies are increasingly using external professional services as an effective tool to meet
their IT requirements. Outsourcing IT requirements enable companies to acquire high quality and
cost competitive services. We believe that effective outsourcing provides various benefits,
including lower total cost of ownership of IT infrastructure, better productivity from IT,
converting a portion of fixed costs into variable costs and quick access to the latest technology.
By deploying high-speed communications equipment, companies can access skilled IT services from
remote locations to meet their complex IT requirements in a cost-effective manner.
Increasing Trend Towards Offshore Technology Services. Companies are increasingly turning to
offshore technology service providers to meet their need for high quality, cost competitive
technology solutions. Technology companies have been outsourcing software research and development
and related support functions to offshore technology service providers to reduce cycle time for
introducing new products and services. These companies are now outsourcing a larger portion of
their IT activities, including core software research and development activities, to offshore
locations to access skilled resources at lower costs.
According to the Gartner Forecast titled IT Outsourcing, Worldwide 2004-2009 Update -
Worldwide IT, outsourcing spending will rise from $193 billion in 2004 to $260 billion by 2009. The
Gartner Dataquest report, 2006 indicates that the Business Process Outsourcing market is expected
to grow from $111 billion to $172 billion during the same period
According to NASSCOMM Strategic Review Report 2006, IDC forecasts a cumulative annual growth
rate (CAGR) of over 7% in worldwide IT-ITeS spends, and a CAGR of over 15% in offshore IT spending,
for the period 2005-09.
Pure play IT services are becoming a high-volume commoditized service offering. Indian IT
service providers have traditionally addressed the application development and maintenance markets.
The Indian IT service providers are now acquiring or developing consulting skills to effectively
compete against leading global IT services companies as integrated service providers. Indian IT
service providers are also benefiting from the growing trend of companies breaking up large IT
services contracts into smaller components. The companies can diversify their vendor base, realize
cost savings by off-shoring certain components and retain flexibility to ramp up or scale down IT
operations lockstep with changing business requirements. Indian IT service providers can now
compete more effectively against established IT services companies like Accenture, EDS and IBM.
The India Advantage. We believe that India is a premiere destination for offshoring IT
services. According to the June 2004 Gartner Strategic Analysis Report, titled India Maintains Its
Offshore Leading Position, India will remain the dominant offshore service provider through 2008.
According to the report, no other nation will have a double-digit share of global offshore service
revenue.
According to NASSCOMs Strategic Review Report 2007, the total combined Indian IT services and
IT-enabled services export market in fiscal 2007 was nearly $ 31 billion, growth of approximately
33%. Also according to this report, the Indian IT-BPO sector is on track to achieve a target of USD
60 billion in export revenues by FY 2010. Key factors supporting this projection are the growing
impact of technology led innovation, the increasing demand for global sourcing and gradually
evolving socio-political attitudes.
19
We believe that there are several key factors contributing to the growth of India-based IT
services:
|
|
|
India based sourcing offers significant cost advantages in terms of accessing highly
skilled talent at lower wage costs and productivity gains that can be derived from
having a very competent employee base. According to NASSCOMs Strategic Review 2007,
the cost advantage achievable from outsourcing to India is unlikely to go away due to
an absolute cost advantage vis-à-vis other key markets and the prospect of further
reductions in infrastructure and overhead costs. |
|
|
|
|
India-based IT companies have proven their ability to deliver IT services that
satisfy the requirements of international clients who expect the highest quality
standards. According to NASSCOMs Strategic Review Report 2007, India based centers
(both Indian firms as well as MNC owned captives) constitute the largest number of
quality certifications achieved by any single country. As of December 2006, over 440
Indian companies had acquired quality certifications with 90 companies certified at SEI
CMM level 5. |
|
|
|
|
India has a large, highly skilled English-speaking labor pool that is available at a
relatively low labor cost. According to NASSCOM Strategic Review Report 2007, the
Indian IT industry employed nearly 1,080,000 software professionals as of 2006-07,
making it one of the largest employers in the IT services industry. According to the
same report, India has the largest pool of suitable off-shore talent accounting for
28% of the suitable pool available across all offshore destinations. |
|
|
|
|
With the time differential between India and its largest market, the United States,
Indian companies are able to provide a combination of onsite and offshore services on a
24-hour basis on specific projects. |
|
|
|
|
The Indian IT industry has been the primary beneficiary of the rapid transformation
of the telecom sector since it was deregulated to allow private participation, with the
cost of international connectivity declining rapidly and service level quality
improving significantly. This cost advantage is likely to continue due to lower
penetration levels and a growing consumer base. |
The traditional model for most large companies has been to manage most functions internally.
However, current global macroeconomic conditions and intense competitive pressures have forced
companies to pursue new business models. Companies are focusing on their core activities and
outsourcing critical but non-core activities to companies that specialize in such non-core
functions. Outsourcing enables companies to reduce their operating costs, realize benefits of scale
and flexible cost structures and achieve significant process improvements.
BPO Services
India is a leading destination for BPO services. The proven track record and client
relationships of established Indian IT services companies, favorable wage differentials,
availability of a large, high quality, English speaking talent pool and a regulatory environment
more friendly to investment are facilitating Indias emergence as a global outsourcing hub.
According to the March 2005 report published by IDC, titled Worldwide and US Business Process
Outsourcing (BPO) 2004-2008 forecast, the worldwide spending on BPO services is expected to grow
from $ 448 billion in 2004 to approximately $ 682 billion by 2008, a CAGR of 11%. According to
NASSCOM Strategic Review Report 2007, the worldwide spending on ITeS-BPO services is expected to
grow at a CAGR of around 10% for the period 2005-2009.
India and Asia Pac IT Services and Products
According to IDC, the domestic IT market in India grew by 22.4% in 2006. The estimated
year-on-year growth in 2007 is estimated to be 21.5% in 2007 making it the fastest growing market
in the Asia-Pacific region. The domestic Indian IT industry is primarily composed of hardware,
packaged software and IT services.
The domestic IT packaged software market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 20.9% during the period
of 2006-2010. Application software will continue to account for the largest portion of the packaged
software market. The hardware market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 17.5% during the same period.
Within hardware market, the PC market has grown to 5.5 million units in 2006. Desktops constitute
the largest component of the market, followed by laptops and servers, in unit and value terms. In
unit terms, the PC market in India is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 19.9% over the next 5 years.
Domestic IT services Market in India has witnessed good growth in the last one year. According
to IDC estimates, the domestic IT services market for the year 2006 is estimated at US$ 3.5
Billion. The market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 16.6% over the next 5 years. According to an
IDC study, the retail vertical is expected to witness the maximum growth, followed by utility and
healthcare. The key verticals to date BFSI, Manufacturing, telecom, government are expected to
maintain their positions as good IT spenders.
20
Consumer Care and Lighting
The consumer care market that we address includes soaps, toiletries and infant care products. A
large portion of our revenues in these markets are derived from the sale of soaps. The market for
soaps in India is dominated by established players like Hindustan Unilever (a subsidiary of
Unilever). We have a strong brand presence in a niche segment and have significant market share in
select regional geographies. We expect to increase our market share organically in our identified
geographies. In addition we continue to look at acquiring established brands which complement our
brand presence and distribution strengths. In lighting, we operate in the domestic market for
household lamps as well as the institutional market for luminaries and lamps. The market for
lighting is led by Philips India (subsidiary of Philips NV). We have a strong brand presence in
select regional geographies for domestic lighting, as well as an established institutional presence
in offering lighting solutions to select segments including retail, pharma and software development
centers. Our business to business (B2B) portfolio has been strengthened, to offer existing
customers, office modular furniture and modular light switches.
Business Overview
We are a leading global IT services company. We also provide outsourced research and development,
infrastructure outsourcing and business consulting services. We have been acknowledged among
leading offshore providers of technology services by Gartner, Forrester and other leading research
and advisory firms. We are the only Indian company to be ranked among the Top 10 Global
Outsourcing Providers in the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals Fortune
Global 100 listings. We are also a winner of NASSCOMs Technology Innovation Award 2005.
We provide a comprehensive range of IT services, software solutions, IT consulting, business
process outsourcing, or BPO, services and research and development services in the areas of
hardware and software design to leading companies worldwide. We combine the business knowledge and
industry expertise of our domain specialists and the technical knowledge and implementation skills
of our delivery team in our development centers located in India and around the world, to develop
and integrate solutions which enable our clients to leverage IT for achieving their business
objectives. We use our quality processes and global talent pool for delivering time to development
advantage, cost savings and productivity improvements.
Our objective is to be a world leader in providing a comprehensive range of IT services to our
clients. The markets we address are undergoing rapid change due to the pace of developments in
technology, changes in business models and changes in the sourcing strategies of clients. We
believe that these trends provide us with significant growth opportunities.
Our overall business strategy
Aggressively build awareness of the Wipro brand name
We plan to continue aggressively building awareness among clients and consumers both
domestically and internationally of the Wipro brand name. We believe we can leverage the strength
of an international brand name across all of our businesses by ensuring that our brand name is
associated with Wipros position as a market leader that is committed to high quality standards. To
achieve this objective, we intend to expand our marketing efforts with advertising campaigns and
promotional efforts that are targeted at specific groups.
Pursue selective acquisition of IT companies
We continue to pursue selective acquisitions of IT service companies that will allow us to
expand our service portfolio and acquire additional skills that are valued by our clients. We
believe this will strengthen our relationships with clients and allow us to realize higher revenues
from them. In pursuing acquisitions, we focus on companies where we can leverage domain expertise
and specific skill sets, and where a significant portion of the work can be moved offshore to India
to leverage our low cost offshore delivery model and realize higher margins.
We have made the following acquisitions:
|
|
|
mPower Software Services Inc. and subsidiaries (mPower) in December 2005 |
|
|
|
|
BVPENTE Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH and subsidiaries (New Logic) in December 2005 |
|
|
|
|
cMango Inc. and subsidiaries (cMango) in April 2006 |
|
|
|
|
RetailBox BV and subsidiaries (Enabler) in June 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Saraware Oy (Saraware) in June 2006 |
21
|
|
|
Quantech Global Services LLC and Quantech Global Services Ltd (Quantech) in July 2006 |
Sustain growth in operating income and cash flow of our traditional businesses
We have been in the consumer care business since 1945 and the lighting business since 1992.
The consumer care business has historically generated surplus cash for us to be able to grow our
other businesses. Our strategy is to maintain a steady growth in operating income for these
businesses through efficient capital utilization, strong brand name recognition and expanding our
nationwide distribution network. We have invested in brands which complement our brand and
distribution strengths.
Applied innovation
Through applied innovation, we infuse newer ideas and newer ways of doing things into all
parts of the organisation. This approach covers process, delivery, business and technology
innovation and enables us to work collaboratively with the client. It improves the business
outcome, often without major disruptive change.
Continue development of our deep industry knowledge
We continue to build specialized industry expertise in the IT service industry. We combine
deep industry knowledge with an understanding of our clients needs and technologies to provide
high value, quality services. Our industry expertise can be leveraged to assist other clients in
the same industries, thereby improving quality and reducing the cost of services to our clients. We
will continue to build on our extensive industry expertise and enter into new industries.
Segment overview
Global IT Services and Products
Our Global IT Services and Products segment provides IT services to customers in the Americas,
Europe and Japan. The range of our services includes IT consulting, custom application design,
development, re-engineering and maintenance, systems integration, package implementation,
technology infrastructure outsourcing, BPO services and research and development services in the
areas of hardware and software design. Our service offerings in BPO services include customer
interaction services, finance and accounting services and process improvement services for
repetitive processes.
Business lines with similar economic characteristics and which comply with segment aggregation
criteria specified in U.S. GAAP have been combined to form our reportable segments. Consequently,
IT Services and Products and BPO Services qualify as separate reportable segments.
The operations of mPower, New Logic, cMango, Enabler, Saraware and Quantech Global Service,
which were acquired through 2005 and 2006 are part of IT Services and Products, are currently
reviewed by our Chief Operating Decision Maker, or CODM, separately, and have accordingly been
reported separately under Acquisitions in the segment information.
Our Global IT Services and Products segment accounted for 74% of our revenues and 89% of our
operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007. Of these percentages, our IT Services and
Products segment accounted for 68% of our revenue and 82% of our operating income for the year
ended March 31, 2007, and our BPO Services segment accounted for 6% of our revenue and 7% of our
operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Our strategy
Significantly expand our IT Services and Products business and our BPO Services Business
We expect to continue to grow each of our IT Services and Products business and our BPO
Services business and the percentage of our total revenues and profits contributed by these
businesses over the next few years. We believe that we can achieve this objective through the
following means:
|
|
|
Identify and develop service offerings in emerging growth areas as separate business
opportunities. Currently we are focusing on areas such as business intelligence
services, package implementation, niche consulting, data warehousing and network
storage; |
|
|
|
|
Increase our share of the total IT spending by our large customers through focused
account management and more effective selling of all service lines to our existing
customers; |
|
|
|
|
Develop industry specific point solutions and use them as entry strategies by
demonstrating industry knowledge and understanding of customer businesses and the
benefits of outsourcing; |
|
|
|
|
Offer new pricing models, sharing the risks and rewards of the impact of IT
solutions on business, productivity improvements and timeliness of delivery; |
22
|
|
|
Use efficient global sourcing models to source IT services from various geographies
and develop methodologies to develop and integrate solutions from around the globe. |
|
|
|
|
Leverage our experience in providing IT infrastructure management services in the
Indian market and our access to existing clients outside India to provide technology
infrastructure support services; |
|
|
|
|
Grow our research and development services by focusing on high growth markets such
as telecommunications, mobile communications and the Internet, and high growth
technologies such as embedded software; |
|
|
|
|
Expand our market presence by providing enterprise application integration and
system integration services; and |
|
|
|
|
Expand our service line by investing on eBusiness solutions around information security, business
intelligence and information system, service oriented architecture and web based applications.
|
|
|
|
|
Expand our business consulting services and position consulting services as
strategic differentiator over other competing entities. |
Increase the number of clients and penetration with such clients of our IT Services and Products
and our BPO Services
We intend to increase the number of our clients through a dedicated sales team focused on new
client acquisition and increasing our presence in Europe and Asia. Our goal is to make new client
accounts generate at least $ 1 million in annual revenues within twelve months of opening each
account. We intend to increase our share of business with existing clients by expanding our range
of IT solutions and by increasing our knowledge of industry segments and individual client
businesses to allow us to better understand client needs and requirements. We intend to grow our
BPO Services business by leveraging our existing client relationships to offer BPO Services to
clients of our IT Services and Products segment. We intend to expand our range of service
offerings, migrate from providing solely rules-based processing activities to offering an entire
set of enhanced processes, provide value-added services and partner with clients in business
transformation initiatives.
Service offering
IT Services and Products
Our IT Services and Products business segment, which we call Wipro Technologies, is a leader
in providing IT services to international companies. We provide our clients customized IT solutions
to improve their business competitiveness. Our IT services are focused on the following areas:
|
|
|
enterprise IT services; |
|
|
|
|
technology infrastructure support services; and |
|
|
|
|
research and development services; |
In our IT service offerings, we typically assume primary project management responsibility. We
offer these services globally through a team of over 50,350 professionals.
Enterprise Solutions Business
We provide a comprehensive range of enterprise solutions primarily to Fortune 1000 and Global
500 companies to meet their business needs. Our services extend from Enterprise Application
Services (CRM, ERP, e-Procurement and SCM), to e-Business solutions. We combine the business
knowledge and industry expertise of our domain specialists and the technical knowledge and
implementation skills of our delivery team to create customized solutions for delivering time to
development advantage, cost savings and productivity enhancements. Our delivery capabilities are
supplemented by a holistic quality approach that integrates quality processes like Six Sigma, SEI
CMM Level 5 and CMM to eliminate deficiencies in execution.
Our enterprise solutions have served clients from a range of industries including Energy and
Utilities, Finance, Telecom, and Media and Entertainment. Our enterprise solutions division
accounted for 63%, 63% and 65% of our IT Services and Products revenues for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively.
23
Our services include:
Customised applications. We enable our clients to leverage IT to achieve business goals and
to align their IT systems with their business strategy by creating customized solutions, selecting
appropriate technologies, implementing systems on a fast-track basis, and ensuring overall quality.
|
|
|
Development. We offer well-defined and mature application development processes
over a broad spectrum of technology areas that include client or server applications,
object-oriented software, Internet or intranet applications and mainframe applications.
For example, a leading electronics company in the United States used to sell products
of a particular division online. We helped the client to develop online sales
capability at other divisions by building an oracle application interface with EDI
systems, third-party software and third-party suppliers. Through this process, the
client now obtains online information about inventory levels of various products,
reconciles sales returns, credits and charge backs and generates automated invoices. |
|
|
|
|
Re-engineering. We study a clients business processes and existing systems and
convert or redevelop them to improve efficiency and reduce costs. For example, we
assisted one of the worlds largest water companies in a strategic re-engineering
initiative to streamline its IT operations to ensure better service delivery, improved
customer relationship and closer links with business. Over a two year period, through a
series of strategic initiatives, we enabled the client to realize significant cost
savings and improvements in the quality of the IT applications. We followed a cycle of
define, perform, review and refine for each of the IT applications assigned to us. We
realized savings in the IT application support budget by consolidating IT applications
to derive economies of scale and redistributing IT applications among third party
vendors for optimum cost savings. |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance. To meet the needs of a changing business environment with limited
internal resource utilization, we maintain legacy software applications that require
frequent upgrades. Our maintenance services also support a distributed delivery
environment wherein work responsibilities can be effectively divided between the
various organizations depending on the criticality of the requests. For example, we
have assisted a leading owner, operator and developer of gas transportation systems in
adopting an offshore development center model for maintaining and supporting its
shipper services systems as well as other parts of its diverse business application
portfolio. We gradually transitioned the clients applications and have taken over the
maintenance and support for the majority of the clients applications. The shipper
services systems are now characterized by well defined roles and responsibilities,
clear processes and closely coordinated on-site and offshore delivery. |
Enterprise application integration services. We implement packaged enterprise applications
that integrate information in an organization with key business processes to improve the efficiency
and effectiveness of our clients. Through strategic alliances with other vendors, we assist our
clients in implementing services in the areas of enterprise resource planning, supply chain
management and customer relationship management.
Business intelligence and data warehousing. We develop strategies and implement solutions for
our clients to manage multiple sources of data for use in their decision-making processes. For
example, a large auto maker that was working on a Supply Chain Information Visibility project,
wanted to streamline its inventory requirements, improve its supplier visualization for its long
term requirements, all in order to avoid short supply or surplus inventory situations. We deployed
an EAI tool known as e*Gate from See Beyond, that helped the client to send its part requirements,
supplier schedule, details of advance shipment notices (ASNs), receipts, alarms and inventory
status.
Package implementation. We use our expertise in package software to architect, implement and
maintain client specific solutions. For example, we partnered with a leading global manufacturer of
digital cameras and consumer products in to help it roll out a standardized, automated and
integrated SAP module to replace its existing manual accounting process. We carried out an
extensive business process study across functional areas and engineered substantial process
re-engineering to ensure optimal deployment of the ERP application.
Consulting. We leverage our domain expertise and knowledge base in specific areas to provide
consulting services. For example, we worked with one of the largest foreign exchange and travel
companies to design the architecture of a global, online commercial foreign exchange system. The
system was intended to facilitate end-to-end automatic foreign exchange transactions with minimal
manual intervention and delays. The system also included customer relationship management
functionality and provided value added services to members. We defined a multi-tiered,
multi-layered architecture to meet these requirements. The architecture was comprised of disparate
software technologies such as J2EE, XML, CORBA, VB and COM-Java/EJB bridging.
24
Testing Services. We are one of the largest Offshore Testing Services providers in the world
with annual revenues aggregating to approximately $ 270 million. We have 6,000 dedicated employees
and 220 customers across the globe, including engagements with many Fortune 500 companies. We have
been operating our Independent Testing Services division since 1997. Our service portfolio in
testing covers many user needs from product concept to deployment, and across the stages of the
product/ application life cycle.
Technology Infrastructure Support Services
Our service offerings include help desk management, systems management and migration, network
management and messaging services. We are able to provide our IT Services and Products clients
with high quality, 24-hour, seven-day-a-week support services by leveraging our expertise in
managing IT infrastructures for our clients in India. Our offerings are powered by the skills of
over 6,500 technical specialists and state-of-the-art BS 15000 certified infrastructure for
operations support. For example for a leading global Electronic trading and securities firm, we
manage the IT infrastructure through a dedicated help desk. We have deployed sophisticated software
to offer a single point of contact for all IT requirements installation, configuration,
troubleshooting and procurement of IT assets. We have been able to significantly reduce the
response and resolution time and improve the user satisfaction score.
We formed this division at the end of 1998 and it accounted for 7%, 8%, 11% of our IT Services
and Products revenues for the year ended March 31, 2005, March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007,
respectively. We anticipate that this division of our Global IT Services business will continue to
grow over the next few years.
Research and Development Services
We provide product development services for both hardware and software systems that are
implemented in computers and communications equipment. We acquired these skill sets from earlier
research and development efforts in the design of computer hardware products for the Indian market
when the Government of India did not allow these products to be imported. We have leveraged our
research and development skills to become an outsourcing resource for companies that seek highly
skilled product development services for some of their core technologies. We are able to assume
complete responsibility for all phases of the development, beginning with the requirements analysis
to the transfer of technology and information to the client.
Our research and development services division accounted for 37%, 37% and 35% of our IT
Services and Products revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Our
services include:
Hardware design and development. We design and develop various types of integrated electronic
circuits, or ICs, including application specific integrated circuits, or ASICs and field
programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs. We offer our services over a broad spectrum of technology
areas, and are able to provide our clients complete subsystems or entire products.
Software system design and development. We develop software applications, including computer
operating system software applications commonly known as middleware, electronics communication
protocols and software that helps computers manage networks and control peripheral devices such as
printers and monitors. We focus on embedded software technologies that involve the design and
development of software solutions that are embedded in the hardware of a particular device.
IT Professionals. We have approximately 14,000 IT professionals trained in a broad array of
computing platforms and communication technologies. By focusing on selected markets and
technologies we are able to leverage our expertise and create greater efficiencies as well as
faster delivery times. Our research and development services are organized into three areas of
focus, which are described below with illustrative examples of projects we have completed for our
clients:
Telecommunications and inter-networking. We provide software and hardware design, development
and implementation services in areas such as fiber optics communication networks, wireless
networks, data networks, voice switching networks and networking protocols. For example, one of
our clients, a European leader in telematics products, wanted to develop a fully integrated
infotainment system featuring a global navigation system, GSM phone, audio, emergency services,
internet access, voice activation and climate control. We designed a software application
interface, using Object Oriented Design methodology, integrating multiple functionalities,
comprised of human machine interface, functional modules (API layers), resource schedulers and
graphics library.
Embedded systems and Internet access devices. The software solutions we provide are
programmed into the hardware IC or ASIC to eliminate the need for running the software through an
external source. The technology is particularly important to portable computers, hand held
devices, consumer electronics, computer peripherals,
25
automotive electronics and mobile phones, as well as other machines such as process-controlled
equipment. For example, we helped one of our customers in Japan by providing mobile printing
solution for business travelers. We created an extensive architecture, used device simulators for
development and testing and managed the seamless migration of the solution to a real-time
environment. The solution interfaces with laptops and multiple other mobile devices to cater to
needs of anywhere printing solutions for an estimated 45 million business travelers across the
globe every year.
Telecommunications and service providers. We provide software application integration,
network integration and maintenance services to telecommunications service providers, Internet
service providers, application service providers and Internet data centers.
Semiconductor IP. We offer an industry leading portfolio of Semiconductor Intellectual
Property (IP) cores for complex wireless and wireline applications; these include Wireless LAN,
Bluetooth, Ultra wideband, Wireless USB and Firewire. Our portfolio of IP cores also contains
software, silicon proven Wireless LAN, multiband radio module and analog / mixed-signal / digital
blocks such as AFEs, synthesizers, PLLs and LVDS driver / receiver.
Our Global Delivery Model
In our IT service offerings, we typically assume primary project management responsibility for
all stages of implementation of a project. Typically, a project team consists of a small number of
IT professionals based at the clients location who define the scope of the project, track changes
to specifications and requirements during project implementation, assist in installing the software
or system at the clients site and ensure its continued operation. The large proportion of the
development work on a project is performed at one of our dedicated offshore development centers, or
ODCs, located in India. Our project management techniques, risk management processes and quality
control measures enable us to complete projects on time and seamlessly across multiple locations
with a high level of quality.
The Offshore Development Center. We were one of the first Indian IT services companies to
implement the offshore development model as a method for delivering high-quality services at a
relatively low cost to our international clients. Our ODC is a virtual extension of the clients
working environment with a dedicated facility and dedicated hardware and software infrastructure
that replicates the clients facilities. Certain clients have had ODCs with us over thirteen
years. This is further enhanced by a dedicated high-speed telecommunication link with the clients
onsite facilities and a secure working environment. In all our projects, we endeavor to increase
the proportion of work performed at the ODCs in order to be able to take advantage of the various
benefits associated with this approach, including higher gross margins and increased process
control. Due to the level of investment required by our clients in an ODC and the quality of
services we provide, the ODC model has provided us a high percentage of repeat business and a
stable revenue stream.
The Nearshore Development Center. Based on specific client needs, we have established
dedicated development centers in close proximity to our clients business locations, which we call
nearshore development centers. These nearshore development centers have employees with specialized
functional expertise and provide on-call support to our customers. We currently have nearshore
development centers in Reading, in the U.K., Windsor, Ontario in Canada, Kiel in Germany, Tampere
in Finland, Shanghai in China and Yokohama in Japan. In addition to providing software development
services, these centers, with their significant local talent, also provide a local customer
interface.
Our Clients
We provide IT software solutions to clients from a broad array of industry sectors. Several
of our clients purchase our services across several of our business divisions. We seek to expand
the level of business with our existing clients by increasing the type and range of services we
provide to them. The table below illustrates the size of our client project engagement size as
measured by revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of clients in |
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Per client revenue($) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
1-3 million |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of clients in |
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Per client revenue($) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
3-5 million |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
>5 million |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, the largest client of our IT Services and
Products segment accounted for 3% and 3% of the revenues of IT Services and Products and the
largest client of our BPO Services segment accounted for 24% and 19% of the revenues of BPO
Services. For the same periods, the five largest clients of our IT Services and Products segment
accounted for 15% of IT Services and Products revenues.
Sales and Marketing
Our headquarters are located in Bangalore, India. We sell and market our IT Services
primarily through our direct sales force, with locations worldwide, including in the United States,
France, Germany, Holland, Japan, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Our sales teams are organized in
three ways:
|
|
|
by the vertical market segment of the clients business; |
|
|
|
|
by the geographic region in which the client is located; and |
|
|
|
|
by the specific practice specialization or skill set that the client requires. |
We use an integrated team sales approach that allows our sales teams to pass a client over to
an execution team once the sale is completed. Our sales personnel work together with the
appropriate software professionals and technical managers in analyzing potential projects and
selling our expertise to potential clients. Global IT Services and Products also gets support from
our corporate marketing team to assist in brand building and other corporate level marketing
efforts. Our sales and marketing team in IT Services and Products has increased from 213 to 340
personnel from March 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007. We intend to expand our global marketing efforts
through increased presence in targeted geographical regions.
Competition
The market for IT services is highly competitive and rapidly changing. Our competitors in
this market include consulting firms, big four accounting firms, global IT services companies, such
as Accenture, EDS, IBM Global Services and India based IT services companies such as Cognizant,
Infosys, Satyam and Tata Consultancy Services.
These competitors are located internationally as well as in India. We expect that further
competition will increase and potentially include companies from other countries that have lower
personnel costs than those currently in India. A significant part of our competitive advantage has
historically been a wage cost advantage relative to companies in the United States and Europe.
Because wage costs in India are presently increasing at a faster rate than those in the United
States our ability to compete effectively will increasingly become dependent on our ability to
provide high quality, on-time, complex deliverables that depend on increased expertise in certain
technical areas. We also believe that our ability to compete will depend on a number of factors
not within our control, including:
|
|
|
the ability of our competitors to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled IT
services professionals; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which our international competitors expand their operations in India
and benefit from the favorable wage differential; |
|
|
|
|
the price at which our competitors offer their services; and |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which our competitors can respond to a clients needs. |
We believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors and believe our success
has been driven by quality leadership, our ability to create client loyalty and our expertise in
targeted select markets.
27
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) Services
Wipro BPO is one of Indias leading offshore BPO providers. Wipro BPO enables clients to
improve their quality of processes, reduce costs and realize benefits of scale. Wipro BPO is
uniquely positioned to service customer requirements by leveraging its quality and innovation,
talented employees, self sustaining process framework and domain knowledge. We offer customized
service offerings; that translates into flexible and cost effective services of the highest quality
for our customers.
Our service offerings include:
customer interaction services, such as IT-enabled customer services, marketing
services, technical support services and IT helpdesks;
finance and accounting services, such as accounts payable and accounts receivable
processing; and
process improvement services that provide benefits of scale for repetitive processes
like claims processing, mortgage processing and document management.
In BPO Services, we primarily compete against the in-house business process outsourcing units
of international companies, other Indian IT service providers, global competitors and competitors
from other offshore locations like the Philippines and Ireland. In many large outsourcing deals,
BPO services are an integral part of the total services outsourced. Integrating BPO services into
our portfolio of service offerings has provided us with a strong competitive advantage over other
IT services providers.
For BPO projects, we have a defined framework to manage the complete BPO process migration and
transition. The process has been developed based on the experience of our senior management team
over the past ten years in migrating remote business processes to India. This defined framework is
designed to ensure process integrity and minimize inherent migration risks. The framework includes
a proprietary transition toolkit, which ensures that there is a documented methodology with
formats, tools, guidelines and a repository of past experiences to aid the transition team during
the transition phase.
For example, we have been providing outsourced technical support services for one of the large
broadband service providers in the United States. We now have 24x7 customer support facilities,
whereas previously it took 8-9 hours to start attending customer requirements. Call volume has
increased by a 30 times multiple from the pilot stage and there is an overall increase in customer
satisfaction.
We have over 17,400 employees in our BPO Services segment as of March 31, 2007. Our revenues
from our BPO Services segment have grown from Rs. 1,644 million for the year ended March 31, 2003
to Rs. 9,413 million for the year ended March 31, 2007.
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
Our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products segment is a leader in the Indian IT market and
focuses primarily on meeting the IT products and services requirements of companies in India,
Asia-Pacific and the Middle East region. This business segment accounted for 16% of our revenue
and 7% of our operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Our strategy
Focus on services-led growth in India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products segment
We plan to grow in the IT market in India and AsiaPac by focusing on IT services. We believe
that by offering clients a full service technology solution, including IT consulting, systems
integration, support services, software and networking solutions along with branded hardware
products, we can enhance our profitability significantly.
Service offering
Our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products business segment, which we call Wipro Infotech,
is focused on the Indian, Asia-Pacific and Middle-East markets and provides enterprise clients with
comprehensive IT solutions. We offer our clients a full array of IT lifecycle services. From
technology optimization to mitigating risks, there is a constant demand to evaluate, deploy and
manage flexible, responsive and economical solutions.
28
Our suite of services and products consists of the following:
|
|
|
technology products; |
|
|
|
|
technology integration, IT management and infrastructure outsourcing services; |
|
|
|
|
custom application development, application integration, package implementation and
maintenance; and |
|
|
|
|
consulting. |
Additionally, we provide our domestic customers with access to our full range of global IT
services, including enterprise solutions and research and development services.
Services and Products
Technology Products. We manufacture our own brand of personal desktop computers, servers and
notebooks, and offer in India a portfolio of international brands in desktops, servers, notebooks,
storage products, networking solutions and packaged software to meet our clients requirements. We
source components from domestic and international companies for manufacturing our own brand of
computers, servers and notebooks.
Technology integration and management services and outsourcing services. We enable our
customers to leverage our IT skill and expertise to maximize returns on their technology
investments. We have over 25 years of experience and currently support approximately 415,000
systems with over 8,700 contracts, with approximately 6,900 IT professionals, including outsourced
professionals. Our offerings include:
|
|
|
Availability Services. Includes hardware and software maintenance, and network
availability services. We provide these services through an annual service or
maintenance contract with the client which provides for both preventive and breakdown
maintenance services. |
|
|
|
|
System Integration. We are one of the largest system integrators in India and our
services include integration of computing platforms, networks, storage, data center and
enterprise management software. These services are typically bundled with sales of our
technology products. |
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure Management and Total Outsourcing. Includes management and operations
of customers IT infrastructure on a day-to-day basis. Our Total Outsourcing practice
encompasses process, function or activity of the IT department in a clients
organization that can be outsourced to us by the client, through a long term
contractual agreement. Our total outsourcing proposition delivers improved business
benefit by effectively managing the Information Technology life cycle of the
organization and achieving maximum value by providing end-to-end best of breed IT
practices for the clients business. Through our acknowledged quality processes and
program governance frameworks, we help our clients achieve and sustain business
momentum. |
|
|
|
|
Managed Services. We manage, monitor and support our clients technology
infrastructure. Our managed services portfolio includes IT Service Desk, End User
Services, Data Centre Services, Contact Centre Technology Management Services,
Application Management and Business Service Management. |
We supplement our in-house resources with approximately 128 franchisees, which we train, and
provide support to allow them to provide both Availability and Managed IT services. This allows us
to grow our business substantially without corresponding increases in our personnel.
Custom application development, application integration, package implementation and
maintenance. We design, develop and implement enterprise applications for corporate customers. Our
solutions include custom application development, package implementation, sustenance of enterprise
applications, including industry-specific applications, and enterprise application integration.
Consulting. We provide consulting services in the areas of business continuity and risk
management, technology, process and strategy. We help our clients achieve business momentum in the
light of challenges arising from globalization, competition and the dynamics of customer loyalty.
The various consulting practices enable our client to achieve strategic cost reduction, business
process improvements, execution excellence, cost leadership and business agility through IT,
resulting in sustainable business leadership in your industry.
Clients
29
We provide products and services to clients in a variety of areas such as manufacturing,
banking, financial services and insurance, Government, IT and IT-enabled services,
telecommunications and education. Our clients also include channel partners, who are value-added
resellers of our services and products. As of March 31, 2007, we had close to 163 channel partners
throughout India. We have a diverse range of clients, none of whom account for more than 5% of our
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products business segment revenues.
Sales and Marketing
We sell and market our products and services to major corporate clients through our direct
sales force, and to smaller clients and retail clients through an extensive network of channel
partners. Sales teams are organized based on vertical segments, geographies, client size or product
or service segment. Compensation of our sales teams is comprised of salary and additional
compensation linked to achievement of revenue or profit targets and collections that a particular
sales team produces. Sales efforts are supplemented through a corporate wide web based ordering
system and a marketing team that assists in brand building, and other corporate level marketing
efforts. As of March 31, 2007, we had 500 sales and marketing staff.
Competition
The market for our services and products is highly competitive and rapidly changing. Our
competitors include global players like IBM, Hewlett Packard, EDS, Dell and Indian companies such
as TCS, HCL Infosystems and Infosys. We anticipate that Lenovo, which has acquired the PC business
of IBM, will be a significant player in Indian IT products market. Global players like IBM and
Hewlett Packard and to some extent Sun Microsystems have been increasingly focusing on increasing
their presence in the Indian markets. Some of these competitors have secured large IT services
contracts in India. We anticipate this competition to continue to grow as the demand for these
services increases and we also expect additional companies to enter the Indian market.
30
Consumer Care and Lighting
We leverage our brand name and distribution strengths to sustain a profitable presence in
niche markets in the areas of soaps, toiletries and lighting products for the Indian market. This
business segment accounted for 5% of our revenue and 4% of our operating income for the year ended
March 31, 2007.
Our consumer care and lighting business segment focuses on niche profitable market segments
and has historically generated cash to support the growth of our other business segments. We began
with the hydrogenated oil business in 1946, and have continued to expand our business, currently
offering a mix of consumer products including hydrogenated cooking oil, soaps and toiletries,
wellness products, light bulbs and fluorescent tubes, and lighting accessories.
Products
Soaps and toiletries. Our product lines include soaps and toiletries, as well as baby
products, using ethnic ingredients. Our umbrella brands include Santoor, Chandrika and Wipro
Active. The Wipro Baby Soft line of infant and child care products, which includes soap, talcum
powder, oil, diapers and feeding bottles and Wipro Sanjeevani line of wellness products.
Lighting. Our product line includes incandescent light bulbs, compact fluorescent lamps and
luminaries. We operate both in commercial and retail markets. We have also developed commercial
lighting solutions for pharmaceutical production centers, retail stores, software development
centers and other industries.
Hydrogenated cooking oils. Our product line consists of hydrogenated cooking oils, a cooking
medium used in homes, and bulk consumption points like bakeries and restaurants. We sell this
product under our brand name Wipro Sunflower, which was launched in the 1950s and has been a
leading brand in western and southern India.
Sales and Marketing
We sell and market our consumer care products primarily through our distribution network in
India, which has access to 2.4 million retail outlets throughout the country. We sell our lighting
products to major industrial and commercial customers through our direct sales force, from 31 sales
offices located throughout India. We also have access to over 250,000 retail outlets for our
lighting products.
We leverage our brand recognition by successfully incorporating the Wipro identity with our
consumer brands. We intend to expand our marketing efforts with advertising campaigns and
promotional efforts targeted to specific regions of India.
Competition
Our competitors in consumer care and lighting are located primarily in India, and include
multinational and Indian companies such as Hindustan Unilever for soaps, toiletries and General
Electric and Philips for lighting. Certain competitors have recently focused sales strategies on
increasing volumes through lower prices. Sustained price pressures by competitors may require us to
respond with similar or different pricing strategies. We cannot be reasonably certain that we will
be able to compete successfully against such competitors or that continued competition may not
adversely affect our gross and operating profits.
Raw Materials and Manufacturing
The primary raw materials for many of our soap and hydrogenated oil products are agricultural
commodities, such as vegetable oils. We normally purchase these raw materials domestically and
internationally through various suppliers contracts. Prices of vegetable oils, agricultural
commodities tend to fluctuate due to seasonal, climatic and economic factors, which generally also
affect our competitors.
Our lighting products are manufactured from glass and industrialized parts. We purchase these
parts from various domestic and foreign distributors and manufacturers, pursuant to a combination
of requirement and other supply contracts.
We have six manufacturing facilities located across India.
31
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following are our principal competitive strengths:
Comprehensive range of IT services
We provide a comprehensive and integrated suite of IT solutions, ranging from consulting to
application development and maintenance and take end-to-end responsibility for project execution
and delivery. We have over 16 years of experience in software development, re-engineering and
maintenance for our corporate customers and provide managed IT support services at the clients
site through our offshore development centers in India and several near shore development centers
located in countries closer to our clients offices. We believe that this integrated approach
positions us to take advantage of key growth areas in enterprise solutions, including IT services
data warehousing, implementation of enterprise package application software such as enterprise
resource planning, or ERP, supply chain management or SCM and customer relationship management or
CRM. In many large outsourcing deals, BPO services are an integral part of the total services
outsourced. Integrating BPO services into our portfolio of service offerings has provided us with a
strong competitive advantage over other IT services providers.
World-class quality as measured by SEI-CMM and Six Sigma initiatives
One of the crucial factors in our success has been our commitment to pursue the highest
quality standards in all aspects of our business. We were assessed at SEI-CMM Level 5, the highest
level of quality certification, in January 1999, making us the first IT services provider in the
world to achieve this standard. SEI-CMM is widely accepted in the software industry as a standard
to measure the maturity and effectiveness of software processes. Our SEI-CMM Level 5 rating is
supported by our Six Sigma initiative, which is an internationally recognized program focusing on
defect reduction and cycle time reduction. Our Six Sigma program was launched in 1998. Six Sigma
represents a quality standard of less than 3.4 defects per million opportunities in which a defect
may arise. In our continuous quest of doing more with less, we pioneered the application of LEAN
thinking in software services and support transactions. We believe that LEAN is a proven
manufacturing philosophy that has been sustained over several decades. The focus is on streamlining
activities solely from the customers viewpoint, eliminating waste, and a collaborative way of
working. We have found that this enhances productivity. We believe that our approach of continuous
enrichment through effective experimentation has proven fruitful.
Service offerings in emerging growth areas
We focus on identifying emerging growth areas and developing service offerings in these areas.
For example, we identified technology infrastructure outsourcing as an emerging growth area in
1998. We developed service offerings in this area and familiarized customers with the concept of
remote network management. Today this comprises 11% of our revenues from IT Services and Products.
We have established centers of excellence in emerging growth areas. These centers focus on
understanding technology and developing customized business solutions for our customers.
Broad range of research and development services
Our strengths in research and development services position us to take advantage of a recovery
in global research and development spending. We are one of a few major IT services companies in
the world capable of providing an entire range of research and development services from concept to
product realization. According to NASSCOMs Strategic Review Report 2005, Indian Research and
Development services and software products exports are expected to grow from $ 2.3 billion in 2004
to grow to $ 8 billion by 2008, a CAGR of 37%. This is higher than the 28% CAGR projected for IT /
ITeS Services by NASSCOM in the same strategic review report. The recurring nature of revenues from
research and development services helps in mitigating the cyclic nature of IT services. We provide
IT services for designing, enhancing and maintaining platform technologies including servers and
operating systems, communication subsystems, local area and wide area network protocols, optical
networking systems, Internet protocol based switches, routers and embedded software, including
software used in mobile phones, home or office appliances, industrial automation and automobiles.
We acquired these skill sets through our earlier research and development efforts in the design of
computer hardware products for the Indian market when the Government of India did not allow these
products to be imported.
Global delivery model
One of our strengths is our global delivery model, which includes our offshore development
centers, or ODCs, and our near shore development centers. We were among the first India-based IT
services companies to implement the
32
offshore development model as a method for delivering high-quality services at a relatively
low cost to international clients. Our global delivery model has many features that are attractive
to our clients, including:
|
|
|
a time difference between the client site and the ODC which allows a 24-hour work
schedule for specific projects; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to quickly increase the scale of development operations; |
|
|
|
|
increased access to our large pool of highly skilled IT professionals located in India; and |
|
|
|
|
physical and operational separation from all other client projects, providing
enhanced security for a clients intellectual property. |
Established track record with premier international customer base
As of March 31, 2007, our IT Services and Products segment had over 600 active clients and our
BPO Services had over 35 active customers and around 123 processes. 70% of our revenues from IT
Services and products segment was derived from Fortune 1000 and Global 500 clients. We have
approximately 100 clients that each represents at least $5.0 million in revenues in the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2007. We believe that having an established base of high quality, high technology
clients provides us with the following competitive advantages:
|
|
|
the type of clients we target are likely to maintain or increase their IT
outsourcing budgets; |
|
|
|
|
our ODCs support critical IT applications of our large clients, so the clients are
therefore likely to provide a high level of repeat business; and |
|
|
|
|
our IT professionals are consistently exposed to the latest technologies that we are
then able to leverage to procure business from other clients. |
Ability to access, attract and retain skilled IT professionals
We have continued to develop innovative methods of accessing and attracting skilled IT
professionals. We partnered with a leading Indian university to establish a program for on the job
training and a Masters degree in software engineering. We have also sought to open facilities in
various cities in India to better access local professionals. We believe that our ability to
retain highly skilled personnel is enhanced by our leadership position, opportunities to work with
leading edge technologies and focus on training and compensation. In February 2007, we were
awarded Dale Carnegie Global Leadership Award in recognition of our emphasis on development of
human resources, innovation and organizational creativity. As of March 31, 2007, in our IT Services
and Products business segment we had over 50,350 employees. We expect to grow these numbers in
the foreseeable future. One of the keys to attracting and retaining qualified personnel is our
variable and performance linked compensation programs. We have had an employee stock purchase
program since 1984 and employee stock option plan and a productivity bonus plan since October 1999.
Robust systems and processes to support growth in business
We have proactively invested in systems, processes and infrastructure to support growth in our
business. We have developed systems and processes to ensure that we have adequate infrastructure,
robust recruitment systems and processes to maintain our culture of ethical behavior, openness and
transparency. Our employee base in our IT Services and Products segment grew from approximately
9,900 employees as of March 31, 2001 to approximately 50,350 employees as of March 31, 2007 and our
employee base in BPO Services stands at approximately 17,450 employees as of March 31, 2007.
During the same period, our revenues from our IT Services and Products segment have grown from Rs.
17,816 million to Rs. 101,353 million. Our revenues from BPO Services have grown from Rs. 1,644
million for the year ending March 31, 2003 to Rs. 9,389 million for the year ending March 31, 2007.
Broad distribution network and strong sales force in India
We have a large and growing distribution network for our domestic businesses. For our Indian
IT Services and Products business segment, our direct sales force targets large corporate clients
and over 190 channel partners throughout India, and focuses on medium and small enterprises. For
our consumer care and lighting products, we have access to more than 2.4 million retail outlets.
This distribution reach provides us with a significant competitive advantage and allows us to grow
our business with minimal increases in personnel.
33
Strong brand recognition in the Indian market
We believe that our brands are some of the most well recognized brands in the Indian market.
We have been operating in the Indian market for over 60 years and believe that customers equate our
brand with high quality standards and a commitment to customer service. We enhance the value of
our brands through aggressive and selective advertising and promotions.
Wipro Infrastructure Engineering Limited
Our fluid power business was started in 1975, as a result of our strategy to enter new
emerging markets with profitable business and high margins. We focus on the hydraulics market,
especially the mobile construction equipment business and believe the growth of this business is
linked to the growth of infrastructure spending in India. We manufacture and sell cylinders and
truck hydraulics, and we also distribute hydraulic steering equipment and pumps, motors and valves
for international companies. The initiatives by the Government of India in improving physical
infrastructure have increased the demand for our products. We anticipate that this demand will
continue to remain strong. Our main competitors include Hitachi Ltd., Hyundai Motor Company, UT
Limited (India) and overseas suppliers such as the Danfoss Group and Komatsu Ltd.
During the year ended March 31, 2007 we completed the acquisition of Hydrauto Group AB
(Hydrauto). Hydrauto is engaged in the production, marketing and development of customized
hydraulic cylinders solution for mobile applications such as mobile cranes, excavator, dumpers and
trucks. The consideration (including direct acquisition cost) included cash payment of Rs. 1,412
million. Through this acquisition we aim to gain an entry into Europe, access to a customer base
built over decades and complementing engineering skills.
Markets and Sales Revenue
Our revenues for the last three fiscal years by geographic areas are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
India |
|
Rs. 19,350 |
|
|
Rs. 21,804 |
|
|
Rs. 30,650 |
|
United States |
|
|
41,812 |
|
|
|
53,481 |
|
|
|
72,846 |
|
Europe |
|
|
16,602 |
|
|
|
24,310 |
|
|
|
36,972 |
|
Rest of the world |
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. 81,353 |
|
|
Rs. 106,107 |
|
|
Rs. 149,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wipro GE Medical Systems Private Limited
In 1990, we formed a joint venture with General Electric called Wipro GE Medical Systems
Private Limited to learn new technologies and management processes from world class companies like
General Electric and to enter new markets. General Electric currently holds 51% of the equity in
the joint venture and we hold 49%. The joint venture partners have equal representation on the
board of directors and the chairman of the joint venture is the chairman of Wipro Limited. The
joint venture provides customers in South Asian markets after sales services for all GE Medical
Systems products sold to them. Products offered in this market consist of GE Medical Systems
products manufactured world wide and portable ultrasound equipment manufactured in India by this
joint venture for the global markets. This venture also leverages our strength in software
development to develop embedded software for medical equipment designed and developed by General
Electric for their global product portfolio. The main competitors of Wipro GE Medical Systems
Private Limited include Siemens and Philips.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property rights are important to our business. We rely on a combination of
patent, copyright, trademark and design laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and
contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property. We require employees, independent
contractors and, whenever possible, vendors to enter into confidentiality agreements upon the
commencement of their relationships with us. These agreements generally provide that any
confidential or proprietary information being developed by us or on our behalf be kept
confidential. These agreements also provide that any confidential or proprietary information
disclosed to third parties in the course of our business be kept confidential by such third
parties. However, our clients usually own the intellectual property in the software we develop for
them.
34
Our efforts to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate. Our competitors may
independently develop similar technology or duplicate our products and/or services. Unauthorized
parties may infringe upon or misappropriate our products, services or proprietary information. In
addition, India has now complied with all World Trade Organization, or WTO, requirements, which
means, that India meets the international mandatory and statutory requirements regarding the
protection of intellectual property rights.
We could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our
competitors grows and our product or service offerings overlap with competitive offerings. In
addition, we may become subject to such claims since we may not always be able to verify the
intellectual property rights of third parties from which we license a variety of technologies.
Defending against these claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive and divert our
attention from operating our company. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their
intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay substantial damage awards and be forced
to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the applications that
contain the infringing technology. The loss of some of our existing licenses could delay the
introduction of software enhancements, interactive tools and other new products and services until
equivalent technology could be licensed or developed. We may be unable to develop non-infringing
technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
As of March 31, 2007, Wipro Limited and its subsidiaries (Wipro) hold more than 450 trademarks
in India, including Wipro, Santoor and Wipro Babysoft. Wipro holds four registered trademarks in
Japan, five registered trademarks in the United States and five registered community trademarks.
Wipro has more than 400 trademark applications pending in India, two trade marks applications
pending in the United States, one trademark application pending registration in Nepal, twelve
trademark applications in Sri Lanka and four community trademark applications pending in Europe.
Wipro have one registered patent for hydraulic tipping valve, two registered patents in
Germany for Electric compensation circuit and Monolithically integrated transformer and one
registered patent in France for Radar Detector and Radar detecting method for WLAN Systems
according to 802.11 Standards. Wipro have three patent applications that are currently pending in
India, twenty six patent applications that are currently pending in the US and sixteen of them in
Germany.
Wipro have twenty three registered copyrights and five pending copyright registrations in
India. Wipro also have ten designs registered in India.
We cannot guarantee that we will obtain registration for trademarks including service marks,
patent, design and copyright registration for any of our pending applications.
Effect of Government Regulation on our Business
Regulation of our business by the Indian Government affects our business in several ways. We
benefit from certain tax incentives promulgated by the Government of India, including a ten-year
tax holiday from Indian corporate income taxes for the operation of most of our Indian facilities
and a partial taxable income deduction for profits derived from exported IT services under Indian
tax laws and tax holiday for operations in notified economic zones.. As a result of these
incentives, our operations have been subject to relatively insignificant Indian tax liabilities. We
have also benefited from the liberalization and deregulation of the Indian economy by the
successive Indian Governments since 1991, including the current Indian Government. Further, there
are restrictive parts of Indian law that affect our business, including the fact that we are
generally required to obtain approval under the Factories Act and the Shops and Establishment Act,
from the Reserve Bank of India and/or the Ministry of Finance of the Government of India to acquire
companies organized outside India, and we are generally required, subject to some exceptions, to
obtain approval from relevant Government authorities in India in order to raise capital outside
India. The conversion of our equity shares into ADSs is governed by guidelines issued by the
Reserve Bank of India.
Finally, we are subject to several legislative provisions relating to the Prevention of Food
Adulteration, Weights and Measures, Drugs and Cosmetics, Storage of Explosives, Environmental
Protection, Pollution Control, Essential Commodities and operation of manufacturing facilities.
Non-compliance with these provisions may lead to civil and criminal liability. We are and generally
have been in compliance with these provisions.
Please see the section titled Risk Factors in Item 3, Key Information, as well as the
section titled Additional Information in Item 10, for more information on the effects of
Governmental regulation of our business.
35
Organizational Structure
Our subsidiaries are provided in the table below as at March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of |
Direct Subsidiaries |
|
Step subsidiaries |
|
Incorporation |
Wipro Infrastructure Engineering Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
Wipro Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA |
|
|
Enthink Inc.
|
|
|
|
USA |
|
|
mPower Software Services
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
(India) Private Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPact Technologies Services
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
Private Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
cMango Inc.
|
|
|
|
USA |
|
|
|
|
cMango India Private Limited
|
|
India |
|
|
Quantech Global Services LLC
|
|
|
|
USA |
cMango Pte Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore |
Wipro Japan KK
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
Wipro Shanghai Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
Wipro Trademarks Holding Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
Cygnus Negri Investments
|
|
|
|
India |
|
|
Private Limited |
|
|
|
|
Wipro Travel Services Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
Wipro HealthCare IT Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
Wipro Consumer Care Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
Wipro Chandrika Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
Wipro Holdings (Mauritius) Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mauritius |
|
|
Wipro Holdings UK Limited
|
|
|
|
UK |
|
|
|
|
Wipro Technologies UK
|
|
UK |
|
|
|
|
Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BVPENTE
|
|
Austria |
|
|
|
|
Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Logic Technologies GmbH
|
|
Austria |
|
|
|
|
NewLogic Technologies SARL
|
|
France |
|
|
|
|
NewLogic Technologies S.A.
|
|
Switzerland |
|
|
|
|
3D Networks FZ-LLC
|
|
Dubai |
|
|
|
|
3D Networks (UK) Limited
|
|
UK |
Wipro Cyprus Private Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cyprus |
|
|
RetailBox BV
|
|
|
|
Netherlands |
|
|
|
|
Enabler Informatica SA
|
|
Portugal |
|
|
|
|
Enabler France SAS
|
|
France |
|
|
|
|
Enabler UK Ltd
|
|
UK |
|
|
|
|
Enabler Brasil Ltd
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
Enabler & Retail Consult
GmbH
|
|
Germany |
|
|
Saraware Oy
|
|
|
|
Finland |
|
|
Hydrauto Group AB
|
|
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Medium cylinders
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Skelleftteas AB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Engineering AB
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Light Cylinders
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Bispgarden AB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Light Cylinders
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Ostersund AB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Big Cylinders
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Ljungby AB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Logistics AB
|
|
Sweden |
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Oy Ab Pernion
|
|
Finland |
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Celka Hidrolic San
|
|
Turkey |
|
|
|
|
ve Tic a.s |
|
|
|
|
Wipro Technologies SRL
|
|
|
|
Romania |
Quantech Global Services Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
India |
Wipro Australia Pty Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
3D Networks Pte Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore |
Planet PSG Pte Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore |
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of |
Direct Subsidiaries |
|
Step subsidiaries |
|
Incorporation |
|
|
Planet PSG Pte Limited
|
|
|
|
Malaysia |
Spectramind Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA |
All the above direct subsidiaries are 100% held by the Company except that we hold 90% in
Wipro Chandrika Limited.
As at March 31, 2007 we also held 49% in Wipro GE Medical Systems Private Limited and 80.1% in WM
Net Serv Limited, both of which are accounted for as equity method investments.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Our headquarters and corporate offices are located at Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore,
India. The offices are approximately 300,000 square feet. We have purchased approximately 2 million
square feet of land adjoining our corporate offices for future expansion plans. In addition we have
approximately 11 million square feet of land and approximately 6 million square feet of owned
software development facilities in India and approximately 1 million square feet of leased software
development premises in India. We have 80,000 square feet of leased software development facilities
in 7 countries outside India.
We have one sales and marketing office located in each of the following countries: Canada,
France, Germany, Japan, Sweden, Italy, Switzerland, Finland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom,
China and Japan. In addition, we have eleven sales and marketing offices in the United States.
We operate ten manufacturing sites, aggregating approximately 1.3 million square feet and
approximately 4 million square feet of land. We own seven of these facilities, located in Amalner,
Tumkur, Bangalore, Mysore, Hindupur, Chennai and Pondicherry, India. We have leased on a long-term
basis two facilities located in Waluj and Baddi, India.
Our software development and manufacturing facilities are equipped with a world class
technology infrastructure that includes networked workstations, servers, data communication links,
captive power generators and other plants and machinery.
We believe that our facilities are optimally utilized and that appropriate expansion plans are
being planned and undertaken to meet our future growth.
37
Material Plans to Construct, Expand and Improve Facilities
As of March 31, 2007, we have capital commitments of Rs. 3,432 million ($ 80 million) related
to the construction or expansion of our software development
facilities. We currently intend to finance our additional expansion plans entirely through our cash and cash
equivalents and investments in liquid and short term mutual funds as of March 31, 2007.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we may from time to time become involved in certain legal
proceedings. Except as otherwise described herein, Wipro Limited, our directors, executive
officers and subsidiaries are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. Please see
the description of our tax proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner of Income, Tax, Bangalore,
India, under the section titled Income Taxes under Item 5 of this Annual Report.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Readers are cautioned that this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. When used in this discussion, the words anticipate, believe,
estimate, intend ,could, may, plan, predict, should, would, will and expect
and other similar expressions as they relate to the company or our business are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. These forwardlooking statements speak only as of the
date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Actual results, performances or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include those described under the heading Risk Factors, as well as the other factors
discussed in this report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with our financial statements included herein and the notes thereto.
Overview
We are a leading global information technology, or IT, services company founded in 1945, and
headquartered in Bangalore, India. We provide a comprehensive range of IT services, software
solutions and research and development services in the areas of hardware and software design to
leading companies worldwide. We use our development centers located in India and around the world,
quality processes and global resource pool to provide cost effective IT solutions and deliver
time-to-market and time-to-development advantages to our clients. We also provide business process
outsourcing, or BPO, services.
Our revenue and net income for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 are provided
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wipro Limited and subsidiaries |
|
|
|
Years ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions except earnings per share data) |
|
Revenue |
|
Rs. 81,353 |
|
|
Rs. 106,107 |
|
|
|
149,431 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
(53,895 |
) |
|
|
(71,647 |
) |
|
|
(102,200 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
27,458 |
|
|
|
34,460 |
|
|
|
47,231 |
|
Gross margins |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
17,857 |
|
|
|
21,972 |
|
|
|
29,868 |
|
Loss on direct issue of
stock by
subsidiary |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
15,833 |
|
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
|
29,169 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
20.45 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
11.29 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
20.20 |
|
38
Our revenue and operating income by business segment expressed in terms of percentages are
provided below for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Others |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Others |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
§ |
|
Total revenues increased by 41% from Rs. 106,107
million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 149,431 million for the year ended March 31, 2007.
This was driven primarily by a 39%, 23%, 45%, 34%
and 115% increase in revenue from our IT Services
and Products, BPO Services, India and AsiaPac IT
Services and Products, Consumer Care and Lighting
and Others business segments, respectively. |
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of total revenue, gross profit
declined marginally by 1% from 33% for the year
ended March 31, 2006 to 32% for the year ended
March 31, 2007. This was primarily on account of a
decline in gross profit as a percentage of revenue
from our IT Services and Products segment from 36%
for the year ended March 31, 2006 to 34% for the
year ended March 31, 2007 and Others from 25% for
the year ended March 31, 2006 to 19% for the year
ended March 31, 2007 which was partially offset by
an increase in gross profit as a percentage of
revenue from our BPO services from 24% for the
year ended March 31, 2006 to 34% for the year
ended March 31, 2007. Gross profit as a percentage
of total revenue for Consumer Care and Lighting
segment declined by 2% from 37% for the year ended
March 31, 2006 to 35% for the year ended March 31,
2007. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues
from our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products remained constant at 22% for the years
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006. |
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses increased by 44%
from Rs. 6,764 million for the year ended March
31, 2006 to Rs. 9,173 million for the year ended
March 31, 2007. This increase was primarily on
account of an increase in selling and marketing
expenses in our IT Services business by Rs. 1,107
million, an increase in selling and marketing
expenses in our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products business by Rs. 676 million, an increase
in the selling and marketing expenses in our
Consumer Care and Lighting business by Rs. 322
million and an increase in selling and marketing
expenses in Others including reconciling items by
Rs. 253 million. |
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses increased by
46% from Rs. 5,239 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006 to Rs. 7,639 million for the year
ended March 31, 2007. This increase was primarily
on account of an increase in general and
administrative expenses of our IT Services and
Products business by Rs. 1,350 million, an
increase in BPO Services by Rs. 231 million, an
increase in general and administrative expenses of
our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business by Rs. 357 million, and an increase in
general and administrative expenses of Others
including reconciling items by Rs. 444 million. |
39
§ |
|
As a result of the foregoing factors, operating
income increased by 36% from Rs. 21,972 million
for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 29,868
million for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
|
§ |
|
Other income, net, increased from Rs. 1,276
million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs.
2,667 million for the year ended March 31, 2007.
The increase in other income was primarily due to
an increase in the average quantum of investments
and an increase in the average yield during the
year ended March 31, 2007. |
|
§ |
|
Income taxes increased by 14% from Rs. 3,265
million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs.
3,723 million for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Our effective tax rate decreased from 13.9% for
the year ended March 31, 2006 to 11.3% for the
year ended March 31, 2007. This decrease was
primarily attributable to reversal of income taxes
in respect of prior years and an increase in the
share of income which is exempt from tax. |
|
§ |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates for the year
ended March 31, 2006 and 2007 was Rs. 288 million
and Rs. 318 million respectively. Equity in
earnings of affiliates of Rs. 318 million for the
year ended March 31, 2007 comprises equity in
earnings of Wipro GE of Rs. 302 million, net gain
on sale of a portion of the interest in WeP
Peripherals of Rs. 40 million and equity in loss
of WM Net Serv of Rs. 24 million. Equity in
earnings of affiliates of Rs. 288 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006 comprises equity in
earnings of Wipro GE of Rs. 259 million and equity
in earnings of WeP Peripherals of Rs. 29 million. |
|
§ |
|
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income
increased by 44% from Rs. 20,270 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 29,169 million
for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
§ |
|
Our total revenues increased by 30% from Rs.
81,353 million for the year ended March 31, 2005
to Rs. 106,107 million for the year ended March
31, 2006. This was driven primarily by a 34%, 19%,
23%, 23% and 23% increase in revenue from our IT
Services and Products, BPO Services, India and
AsiaPac IT Services and Products, Consumer Care
and Lighting and Others business segments,
respectively. |
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of total revenue, gross profit
declined marginally by 1% from 34% for the year
ended March 31, 2005 to 33% for the year ended
March 31, 2006. This was primarily on account of a
decline in gross profit as a percentage of revenue
from our IT Services and Products segment from 38%
for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 36% for the
year ended March 31, 2006 and BPO Services from
26% for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 24% for
the year ended March 31, 2006 which was partially
offset by an increase in gross profit as a
percentage of revenue from our Consumer Care and
Lighting segment by 1% from 36% for the year ended
March 31, 2005 to 37% for the year ended March 31,
2006. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues
from our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products remained constant at 22% for the years
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006. |
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses increased by 24%
from Rs. 5,466 million for the year ended March
31, 2005 to Rs. 6,764 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily on
account of an increase in selling and marketing
expenses in our IT Services business by Rs. 771
million, a decrease in BPO Services by Rs. 52
million, an increase in selling and marketing
expenses in our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products business by Rs. 241 million and increase
in the selling and marketing expenses in our
Consumer Care and Lighting business by Rs. 284
million and an increase in selling and marketing
expenses in Others including reconciling items by
Rs. 54 million. |
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses increased 40%
from Rs. 3,744 million for the year ended March
31, 2005 to Rs. 5,238 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily on
account of an increase in general and
administrative expenses of our IT Services and
Products business by Rs. 1,167 million, an
increase in BPO Services by Rs. 238 million, an
increase in general and administrative expenses of
our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business by Rs. 53 million, an increase in general
and administrative expenses of our Consumer Care
and Lighting business by Rs. 20 million and an
increase in general and administrative expenses of
Others including reconciling items by Rs. 16
million. |
|
§ |
|
As a result of the foregoing factors, operating
income increased by 23% from Rs. 17,857 million
for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 21,972
million for the year ended March 31, 2006. |
|
§ |
|
Other income, net, increased from Rs. 799 million
for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 1,276
million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The
increase in other income is primarily due to an
increase in the average quantum of investments and
an increase in the average yield during the year
ended March 31, 2006. |
40
§ |
|
Income taxes increased by 21% from Rs. 2,694
million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.
3,265 million for the year ended March 31, 2006.
Our effective tax rate decreased from 14.5% for
the year ended March 31, 2005 to 13.9% for the
year ended March 31, 2006. Income taxes for the
year ended March 31, 2006 include reversal of
provision of Rs. 175 million in respect of prior
years due to a favorable tax order. Excluding
this, our effective tax rate increased from 14.5%
for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 14.9% for the
year ended March 31, 2006. The increase in
effective tax rate is primarily on account of an
increase in the proportion of income being subject
to tax. |
|
§ |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates for the year
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 was Rs. 158 million
and Rs. 288 million respectively. Equity in
earnings of affiliates of Rs. 288 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006 comprises equity in
earnings of Wipro GE of Rs. 259 million and equity
in earnings of WeP Peripherals of Rs. 29 million.
Equity in earnings of affiliates of Rs. 158
million for the year ended March 31, 2005
comprises equity in earnings of Wipro GE of Rs.
126 million and equity in earnings of WeP
Peripherals of Rs. 32 million. |
|
§ |
|
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income
increased by 28% from Rs. 15,832 million for the
year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 20,270 million
for the year ended March 31, 2006. |
Segment analysis
Reorganization of segments:
Until June 30, 2005, we reported Global IT Services and Products as an integrated business
segment. Effective July 1, 2005, we reorganized the management structure of our Global IT Services
and Products segment. Pursuant to this reorganization, we have reorganized our business into new
operating segments. Business lines with similar economic characteristics and which comply with
segment aggregation criteria specified in U.S. GAAP have been combined to form our reportable
segments. Consequently, IT Services and Products, and BPO Services qualify as reportable segments
and are reported separately. Segment data for fiscal 2005 have been reclassified to conform to the
fiscal 2006 and 2007 presentation.
Global IT Services and Products
Our Global IT Services and Products segment provides IT services to customers in the Americas,
Europe and Japan and BPO Services to clients in North America, Europe, Australia and other markets.
The range of IT services we provide includes IT consulting, custom application design, development,
re-engineering and maintenance, systems integration, package implementation, technology
infrastructure outsourcing, testing services and research and development services in the areas of
hardware and software design. Our services offerings in BPO Services include customer interaction
services, finance and accounting services and process improvement services for repetitive
processes.
The operations of most of the companies acquired through 2005 and 2006 consisting of mPower,
New Logic, cMango, Enabler, Saraware and Quantech Global Service which are part of our IT Services
and Products, are currently reviewed by our Chief Operating Decision Maker, or CODM, separately,
and have accordingly been reported separately under Acquisitions in the Notes to our Financial
Statements.
Our Global IT Services and Products segment accounted for 74% of our revenue and 89% of our
operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007. Of these percentages, our IT Services and
Products segment accounted for 68% of our revenue and 82% of our operating income for the year
ended March 31, 2007 and our BPO Services segment accounted for 6% of our revenue and 7% of our
operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Global IT Services and Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
Rs. 54,256 |
|
|
Rs. 72,887 |
|
|
|
101,353 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
9,389 |
|
Total |
|
|
60,689 |
|
|
|
80,513 |
|
|
|
110,742 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services and Products |
|
|
20,476 |
|
|
|
25,901 |
|
|
|
34,536 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
Total |
|
|
22,169 |
|
|
|
27,718 |
|
|
|
37,752 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(3,223 |
) |
|
|
(3,942 |
) |
|
|
(5,100 |
) |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
|
|
(4,144 |
) |
|
|
(5,725 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
15,825 |
|
|
|
19,409 |
|
|
|
26,528 |
|
Revenue growth rate over prior period |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
Revenue from our Global IT Services and Products segment consists of revenue from our IT
Services and Products and BPO Services business operating segments.
IT Services and Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services |
|
Acquisitions |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
|
54,256 |
|
|
|
72,419 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
72,887 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
20,476 |
|
|
|
25,813 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
25,901 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(3,122 |
) |
|
|
(3864 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(3,893 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
|
|
(3345 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(3,392 |
) |
Research and Development expenses |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
14,817 |
|
|
|
18,401 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
18,398 |
|
Revenue growth rate over prior
period |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
IT Services |
|
Acquisitions |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
|
96,548 |
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
101,353 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
33,877 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
34,536 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(4,883 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(4,230 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(4,742 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
24,509 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
24,400 |
|
Revenue growth rate over prior
period |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
24 |
% |
The revenue and profits for any period of our IT services is significantly affected by the
proportion of work performed at our facilities in India and at client sites overseas and by the
utilization rates of our IT professionals. The higher rates we charge for performing work at
client sites overseas do not completely offset the higher costs of performing such overseas work,
and therefore, services performed in India generally yield better profit margins. For this reason,
we seek to move a project as early as possible from overseas locations to our Indian development
centers. As of March 31, 2007, 77% of our professionals engaged in providing IT services were
located in India. For the year ended March 31, 2007, 45% of the revenues of our IT services were
generated from work performed at our facilities in India.
42
In our segment reporting only, management has included the impact of exchange rate
fluctuations in revenue. Excluding the impact of exchange rate fluctuations, revenue, as reported
in our statements of income, is Rs. 54,236 million, Rs. 73,061 million and Rs. 101,509 million for
the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively.
BPO Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Revenue |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
7,626 |
|
|
|
9,389 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(983 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
Revenue growth rate over prior period |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
In our segment reporting only, management has included the impact of exchange rate
fluctuations in revenue. Excluding the impact of exchange rate fluctuations, revenue, as reported
in our statements of income, is Rs. 6,477 million, Rs. 7,664 million and Rs. 9,413 million for the
years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively.
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
§ |
|
Global IT Services and Products revenue increased
by 37% from Rs. 80,726 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006 to Rs. 110,921 million for the year
ended March 31, 2007. IT Services and Products
revenue increased by 39% from Rs. 73,061 million
for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 101,509
million for the year ended March 31, 2007. The
increase in revenues from IT Services and Products
is attributable primarily to two factors. First,
we integrated the acquisitions of mPower, New
logic, cMango, Saraware, Enabler and Quantech.
Second, the increase in revenue from this business
segment comprises a 41% increase in revenue from
enterprise services and a 30% increase in revenue
from technology services. The increase in revenue
from enterprise services was primarily driven by
increased revenue from services provided to
customers in the financial services, healthcare
and retail sectors. The increase in revenue from
technology services was primarily driven by
increased revenue from services provided to
customers in the telecom sector and from the
design and development of embedded software
solutions for customers in the consumer
electronics sector. In our IT Services and
Products business segment, we added 194 new
clients during the year ended March 31, 2007. The
total number of clients that individually
accounted for over $1 million run rate in revenue
increased from 195 as of March 31, 2006 to 233 as
of March 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
BPO Services revenue increased by 23% from Rs. 7,626 million for the year ended March 31, 2006
to Rs. 9,389 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. This increase in revenue from our BPO
Services business segment was primarily due to an increase in the number of clients and an
increase in the scope and volume of services provided to existing clients. In our BPO Services
business segment, we added 2 new clients during the year ended March 31, 2007. The total number
of clients that individually accounted for over $ 1 million run rate in revenue increased from
17 as of March 31, 2006 to 22 as of March 31, 2007. |
|
§ |
|
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues of our Global IT Services and Products has
decreased marginally from 35% of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2006 to 34% of revenue
for the year ended March 31 2007 primarily on account of: |
|
|
|
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues of our IT services and products declined by 2% from
36% for the year ended March 31, 2006 to 34% for the year ended March 31, 2007. The decrease was
primarily due to an increase in compensation costs for offshore and onsite employees, as a part
of our compensation review in January 2006, September 2006, November 2006 and January 2007,
compensation costs arising from the grant of additional stock options, lower utilization rates
of our IT professionals, and changes in the onsite-offshore mix during the year as compared to
the same period last year. Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues was also impacted by
acquisitions which have lower gross profit margins. |
|
|
|
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues of our BPO services increased from 24% for the year
ended March 31, 2006 to 34% for the year ended March 31, 2007. The increase in gross profit
percentage as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the rationalization of low-margin
projects, higher billing rates and the result of our cost containment initiatives. |
43
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for our Global IT Services and
Products business segment increased by 29% from Rs. 3,942 million
for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 5,100 million for the
year ended March 31, 2007. This increase was primarily driven by a
28% increase in the selling and marketing expenses in our IT
Services and Products business from Rs. 3,893 million for the year
ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 5,000 million for the year ended March
31, 2007. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the
number of our sales and marketing personnel from 213 as of March
31, 2006 to 340 as of March 31, 2007, an increase in compensation
costs as part of our compensation review in January 2006 and
January 2007, the impact of an increase in our sales promotional
activities and the impact of additional stock options granted in
July 2006 and November 2006. |
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses for our Global IT Services and
Products business segment increased by 38% from Rs. 4,144 million
for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 5,725 million for the
year ended March 31, 2007. This increase was primarily due to an
increase of Rs. 1,350 in general and administrative expenses of
our IT Services and Products business. General and administrative
expenses of our BPO Services business increased by Rs. 231
million. The increase in the general and administrative expenses
in our IT Services and Products business was primarily due to an
increase in compensation costs due to our compensation review in
September 2006, November 2006 and January 2007 and additional
stock options granted during the period, an increase in the number
of support staff and an increase in the volume of operations
during the year. The increase in general and administrative
expenses in our BPO Services business was primarily due to an
increase in compensation costs as part of our compensation review
and an increase in support staff consistent with the increase in
business volumes. |
|
§ |
|
As a result of the above, operating income of our IT Services and
Products business increased by 33% from Rs. 18,399 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 24,400 million for the year ended
March 31, 2007. Operating income of our BPO services increased
from Rs. 1,011 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs.
2,128 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
§ |
|
Global IT Services and Products revenue increased by 33% from Rs. 60,713 million for the
year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 80,726 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. IT
Services and Products revenue increased by 34% from Rs. 54,256 million for the year ended
March 31, 2005 to Rs. 73,061 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. This increase was
attributable primarily to two factors. First, we acquired mPower and New Logic in December
2005. Second, the increase in revenues from IT Services comprises of a 36% increase in
revenues from enterprise services and a 36% increase in revenue from technology services.
The increase in revenue from enterprise services was primarily driven by increased revenue
from services provided to customers in the financial services, energy and utilities and
healthcare and other sectors. The increase in revenue from technology services was
primarily driven by increased revenue from the design and development of embedded software
solutions for customers in the consumer electronics sector. In our IT Services and Products
business segment, we added 166 new clients during the year ended March 31, 2006. The total
number of clients that individually accounted for over $ 1 million run rate in revenue
increased from 144 as of March 31, 2005 to 195 as of March 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
BPO Services revenue increased by 19% from Rs. 6,433 million for the year ended March 31,
2005 to Rs. 7,626 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. This increase in revenue from
our BPO Services business segment was primarily due to an increase in the number of clients
and an increase in the scope and volume of services provided to existing clients. In our
BPO Services business segment, we added 5 new clients during the year ended March 31, 2006.
The total number of clients that individually accounted for over $ 1 million run rate in
revenue increased from 13 as of March 31, 2005 to 17 as of March 31, 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues of our Global IT Services and Products has
decreased by 2% from 37% of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 35% of revenue for
the year ended March 31 2006 primarily on account of: |
|
|
|
|
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues of our IT services and products declined by 2%
from 38% for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 36% for the year ended March 31, 2006. The
decrease was primarily due to an increase in compensation costs for offshore and onsite
employees, as a part of our compensation review in November 2005 and January 2006
respectively, an increase in amortization of deferred compensation costs and impact of
fringe benefit taxes. Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues was also impacted by the
new acquisitions which have a lower gross profit margin. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross profit as a percentage of revenues of our BPO services declined by 2% from 26% for
the year ended March 31, 2005 to 24% for the year ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was
primarily due to increase in compensation costs as part of our compensation review in
October 2005, an increase in amortization of deferred compensation costs and the impact of
fringe benefit taxes. |
44
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for our Global IT Services and Products business segment
increased by 22% from Rs. 3,223 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 3,942
million for the year ended March 31, 2006. This was primarily due to a 25% increase in the
selling and marketing expenses in our IT Services and Products business from Rs. 3,122
million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 3,893 million for the year ended March 31,
2006, partially offset by a decline of 52% in the selling and marketing expenses in BPO
Services, from Rs. 102 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 49 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006. The increase of Rs. 771 million in selling and marketing
expenses in our IT Services and Products business was primarily due to an increase in the
number of our sales and marketing personnel from 173 as of March 31, 2005 to 213 as of
March 31, 2006, an increase in compensation costs as part of our compensation review in
January 2006, and an increase in the amortization of deferred compensation costs. The
decline of Rs. 52 million in the selling and marketing expenses in our BPO Services
business is primarily on account of a rationalization of the sales force. |
|
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses for our Global IT Services and Products business
segment increased by 51% from Rs. 2,739 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.
4,144 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase of Rs. 1,405 million in
general and administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in general and
administrative expenses of our IT Services and Products business by Rs. 1,167 million and
an increase in general and administrative expenses of our BPO Services business by Rs. 238
million. The increase of Rs. 1,167 million in the general and administrative expenses in
our IT Services and Products business was primarily due to an increase in compensation
costs as part of our compensation review from November 2005 at offshore and January 2006 at
onsite, an increase in provision for doubtful receivables and an increase in recruitment
expenditure due to increase in the number of hires. The increase of Rs. 238 million in the
general and administrative expenses in our BPO Services business is primarily due to an
increase in compensation costs as part of our compensation review effective October 2005,
higher occupancy costs and increase in expenditure on recruiting employees. |
|
|
§ |
|
Operating income of our IT Services and Products business increased by 24% from Rs.
14,817 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 18,399 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006. Operating income of our BPO services increased from Rs. 1,008 million for
the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 1,011 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. |
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products.
Our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products segment is a leader in the Indian IT market and
focuses primarily on meeting the requirements for IT products and services of companies in India,
AsiaPacific and the Middle East region. Our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products segment
accounted for 16% of our revenue and 7% of our operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007.
The operations of 3D Networks are currently reviewed by our Chief Operating Decision Maker, or
CODM, as a integral part of India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products segment, and have
accordingly been reported under this segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
Rs. 4,709 |
|
|
Rs. 6,097 |
|
|
Rs. 8,369 |
|
Products |
|
|
8,686 |
|
|
|
10,378 |
|
|
|
15,494 |
|
Total |
|
|
13,395 |
|
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
23,863 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
Products |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
1092 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
Total |
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
5,308 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1404 |
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
Revenue growth rate over prior period |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
45
In our segment reporting only, management has included the impact of exchange rate
fluctuations in revenue. Excluding the impact of exchange rate fluctuations, revenue, as reported
in our statements of income, is Rs. 13,403 million, Rs.16,477 million and Rs. 23,888 for the years
ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively.
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
§ |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products revenue increased by 45% from Rs. 16,477
million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 23,888 million for the year ended March
31, 2007. Revenue from the products component of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products business segment increased by 50% from Rs. 10,380 million for the year ended March
31, 2006 to Rs. 15,520 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. The increase is
attributable to an increase in revenue from traded products by 42% and in manufactured
products by 35%. |
|
|
|
|
Revenue from the services component of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment grew by 37% from Rs. 6,097 million in the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs.
8,369 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in revenue from service lines including consulting services, system integration
services and total outsourcing services, and growth in our core business of hardware and
software support and maintenance services. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products revenue, gross profit
remained constant at 22% for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007. Our gross profit as a
percentage of revenues of our services segment of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products improved by 3% from 42% for the year ended March 31, 2006 to 45% for the year
ended March 31, 2007. This improvement was primarily due to higher realization rates and
better utilization of the personnel. |
|
|
|
|
This decline was offset by a marginal decline in gross profit as a percentage of revenues of
our products segment of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products from 11% for the year
ended March 31, 2006 to 10% for the year ended March 31, 2007. Our gross margin for Products
has declined due to an increase in the proportion of revenues from products with lower gross
margins. |
|
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment increased by 49% from Rs. 1,392 million for the year ended March 31, 2006
to Rs. 2,068 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. This was primarily due to an
increase in compensation costs due to an increase in the number of sales and marketing
personnel for this business segment, an increase in compensation costs as part of our
compensation review in October 2006, an increase in dealer commission consequent to an
increase in proportion of sales initiated through distribution channels and an increase in
a marketing activities which is in line with the increase in the business volumes. |
|
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses for our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment increased by 42% from Rs. 841 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to
Rs. 1,198 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. This was primarily due to an increase
in compensation costs as part of our compensation review in October 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a result of the above, operating income of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products increased by 46% from Rs. 1,404 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs.
2,039 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
§ |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products revenue increased by 23% from Rs. 13,403
million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 16,477 million for the year ended March
31, 2006. Revenue from the products component of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products business segment increased by 19% from Rs. 8,694 million for the year ended March
31, 2005 to Rs. 10,380 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase was
attributable to an increase in revenue from traded products by 22% and in manufactured
products by 11%. |
|
|
|
|
Revenue from the services component of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment grew by 29% from Rs. 4,709 million in the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.
6,097 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in revenue from service lines like consulting |
46
|
|
|
services and system integration
services and growth in our core service business of hardware and software support and
maintenance services. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products revenue, gross profit
remained constant at 22% for the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006. Our gross profit as a
percentage of revenues of our services segment of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products declined by 1% from 43% for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 42% for the year
ended March 31, 2006. This decline was offset by an increase in the gross profit as a
percentage of revenues of our products segment of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products by 1% from 10% for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 11% for the year ended March
31, 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment increased by 21% from Rs. 1150 million for the year ended March 31, 2005
to Rs. 1,392 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. This was primarily due to two
factors. First, an increase in compensation costs due to an increase in the number of sales
and marketing personnel for this business segment and an increase in compensation costs as
part of our compensation review in November 2005. Second, an increase in shipping and
handling costs from Singapore to customer locations on account of an increase in proportion
of revenues from our overseas manufacturing facilities. |
|
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses for our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment increased by 7% from Rs. 788 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to
Rs. 841 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. This was primarily due to an increase in
compensation costs as part of our compensation review in November 2005. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a result of the above, operating income of our India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products increased by 45% from Rs. 970 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.
1,404 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. |
Consumer Care and Lighting
We leverage our brand name and distribution strengths to sustain a profitable presence in
niche markets in the areas of soaps, toiletries, lighting products and hydrogenated cooking oils
for the Indian market. Our Consumer Care and Lighting segment accounted for 5% of our revenue and
4% of our operating income for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Consumer Care and Lighting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
Rs. 4,555 |
|
|
Rs. 5,625 |
|
|
Rs. 7,563 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
(1,483 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Revenue growth rate over prior period |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
We have been in the Consumer Care business since 1945 and the lighting business since 1992.
The Consumer Care business has historically generated surplus cash. Our strategy is to sustain
operating margins, continue generating positive operating cash flows and increase the proportion of
revenues from high margin products.
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
§ |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting revenue increased by 34% from Rs. 5,625 million for the year
ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 7,563 million for the year March 31, 2007. The increase in
revenue is attributable to an increase in the volume of our soap, lighting and furniture
products, an increase in the prices of certain products and the integration of sales from
our acquisition of Northwest. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of Consumer Care and Lighting revenue, gross profit decreased by 2% from
37% for the year ended March 31, 2006 to 35% for the year ended March 31, 2007. This was
primarily due to an increase in the |
47
|
|
|
proportion of revenue from furniture and lighting
products, which typically have lower gross margins as compared to soap products. |
|
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for our Consumer Care and Lighting business increased by
28% from Rs. 1,160 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 1,483 million for the
year ended March 31, 2007. This was primarily due an increase in sales promotion expenses
for building brands and expanding market share in select geographies in this business
segment and increase in sales personnel and increase in compensation costs. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a result of the above, operating income of our Consumer Care and Lighting
business increased by 34% from Rs. 799 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs.
1,069 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. |
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
§ |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting revenue increased by 23% from Rs. 4,555 million for the year
ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 5,625 million for the year March 31, 2006. This was primarily
due to increased efforts on expanding market presence in select geographies which resulted
in higher sales of soap products, lighting (luminous and compact fluorescent lamp). |
|
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of Consumer Care and Lighting revenue, gross profit increased by 1% from
36% for the year ended March 31, 2005 to 37% for the year ended March 31, 2006. This was
due to an increase in the proportion of revenues from soap products which typically have
higher margins than lighting products. |
|
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for our Consumer Care and Lighting business increased by
32% from Rs. 877 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 1,160 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006. This was primarily due an increase in sales promotion expenses
for building brands and expanding market share in select geographies in this business
segment and an increase in sales personnel and an increase in compensation costs. |
|
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses for Consumer Care and Lighting increased by 24% from
Rs. 82 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 102 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation costs as part
of our compensation review which is effective from November 2005. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a result of the above, operating income of our Consumer Care and Lighting increased
by 19% from Rs. 671 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 798 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006. |
Others, including reconciling items
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
§ |
|
Revenue from Others increased from Rs. 3,279 million for the year ended March 31, 2006
to Rs. 7,063 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. This was primarily due to
integration of the revenues arising from our acquisition of Hydrauto Group of Rs. 2,756
million and an increase in revenue from the sale of hydraulic cylinders and tipping gear
systems. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a percentage of revenue, gross profit declined from 25% of revenue for the year ended
March 31, 2006 to 19% of revenue for the year ended March 31, 2007. This was primarily due
to integration of our acquisition of Hydrauto Group, which reported a gross profit of 13%
during the year ended March 31, 2007. |
|
|
§ |
|
Selling and marketing expenses for Others, including reconciling items, have increased
from Rs. 270 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 523 million for the year
ended March 31, 2007. This increase is attributable to an increase in use of premium
distribution channel for deliveries and due to integration of Hydrauto Group during the
year ended March 31, 2007. |
|
|
§ |
|
General and administrative expenses for Others, including reconciling items, have
increased from Rs. 151 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 596 million for the
year ended March 31, 2007. This was primarily due to integration of our acquisition of
Hydrauto Group during the year ended March 31, 2007. |
|
|
§ |
|
As a result of the above, operating income of Others, including reconciling items,
declined from Rs. 360 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 231 million for the
year ended March 31, 2007. |
48
Analysis of year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
Revenue from Others increased by 22% from Rs. 2,681 million for the year ended March 31,
2005 to Rs. 3,279 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. This was primarily due to a
37% increase in the revenues from the sale of hydraulic cylinders and tipping gear systems
in our Wipro Infrastructure Engineering business. |
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses for Others, including reconciling items, increased by 25%
from Rs. 216 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 270 million for the year
ended March 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses for Others, including reconciling items, increased
by 12% from Rs. 135 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs. 151 million for the
year ended March 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
As a result of the above, operating income of Others, including reconciling items,
declined by Rs. 31 million from Rs. 391 million for the year ended March 31, 2005 to Rs.
360 million for the year ended March 31, 2006. |
Acquisitions
Acquisition of Ownership Interest in a Subsidiary
As of March 31, 2005, we held approximately 93% of the outstanding equity shares of Wipro BPO
Solutions Limited which we refer to as Wipro BPO. The remaining shares were held by employee
shareholders.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, we acquired the 7% balance from the employee
shareholders at fair value for an aggregate consideration of Rs. 852 million. This step-acquisition
resulted in goodwill and intangibles of Rs. 304 million and Rs. 15 million respectively. As a
result of this transaction, Wipro BPO became our wholly owned subsidiary.
We completed the following acquisitions during the year ended March 31, 2006.
mPower Software Services Inc. and subsidiaries
In December 2005, we acquired 100% of the equity of mPower Software Services Inc. and
subsidiaries (mPower) including the minority shareholding held by MasterCard International in mPact
India, a joint venture between MasterCard International and mPower Inc, for an aggregate cash
consideration of Rs. 1,275 million. mPower Software Services Inc. is a US based Company engaged in
providing IT services in the payments service sector.
As a part of this acquisition, we plan to provide MasterCard a wide range of services
including application development and maintenance, infrastructure services, package implementation,
BPO and testing. We believe that through this acquisition, we will be able to expand domain
expertise in the payment service sector and increase the addressable market for IT services.
The total purchase price has been allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
185 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
513 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(177 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
BVPENTE Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH and subsidiaries
In December 2005, we acquired 100% of the equity of BVPENTE Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH and
subsidiaries (New Logic). New Logic is a European system-on-chip design company. The consideration
included an upfront consideration of Rs. 1,156 million, subject to working capital adjustments, and
an earn-out of Euro 27 million to be determined and paid in the future based on financial targets
being achieved over a 3 year period. During the year ended March 31, 2007, we paid an additional
consideration of Rs. 69 million towards the working capital adjustment. We have determined that a
portion of the earn-out, up to a maximum of Euro 2 million is linked to the continuing employment
of one of the selling shareholders. The balance earn-out will be recorded as additional purchase
price when the contingency is resolved.
49
We believe that through this acquisition, we have acquired strong domain expertise in
semiconductor Intellectual Property (IP) cores and complete system-on-chip solutions with digital,
analog mixed signal and Radio Frequency (RF) design services. The acquisition also enables us to
access over 20 customers in the product engineering space.
The purchase price has been allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
307 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
117 |
|
Technology-related intangibles |
|
|
96 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
We completed the following acquisitions during the year ended March 31, 2007.
cMango Inc. and subsidiaries
In April 2006, we acquired 100% of the equity of cMango Inc. and subsidiaries (cMango). cMango
is a provider of Business Service Management (BSM) solutions. The consideration (including direct
acquisition costs) included a cash payment of Rs. 884 million and an earn-out of USD 12 million to
be determined and paid in the future based on specific financial targets being achieved over a two
year period. The earn-out will be recorded as additional purchase price when the contingency is
resolved.
We believe that through this acquisition we will expand our operations in the Business
Management Services sector. This acquisition also enables us to access over 20 customers in the
Business Management services sector.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
(23 |
) |
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
132 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
884 |
|
|
|
|
|
RetailBox BV and subsidiaries
In June 2006, we acquired 100% of the equity of RetailBox BV and subsidiaries (Enabler).
Enabler is in the business of providing comprehensive IT solutions and services. The consideration
(including direct acquisition costs) included a cash payment of Rs. 2,442 million and an earn-out
of Euro 11 million to be determined and paid in the future based on specific financial targets
being achieved over a two year period. The earn-out will be recorded as additional purchase price
when the contingency is resolved.
Through this acquisition we aim to provide a wide range of services including Oracle retail
implementation, digital supply chain, business optimization and integration. Further, through this
acquisition, we aim to expand domain expertise both in the retail and technology sectors and obtain
a presence in five different geographical locations.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
389 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
298 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(104 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
2,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Switchgear Limited
In May 2006, we acquired a substantial portion of the business of North-west Switchgear
Limited a manufacturer and distributor of switches, sockets and miniature circuit breakers
(collectively the products) under the
trademark/ brand name North-West. The consideration (including direct acquisition costs)
included a cash payment of
50
Rs 1,132 million and an earn-out of Rs. 200 million to be determined and
paid in the future based on achievement of a specified revenue levels over a period of four years.
Further, we have entered into a non-compete and manufacturing agreement with the sellers. Under the
manufacturing agreement, the seller will manufacture the products for us using certain assets and
employees retained by the seller. The manufacturing agreement is for a period of five years.
Amounts paid by us for such manufacturing services will be recorded through the income statement.
The earn-outs which are not linked to any post-acquisition services by the seller will be recorded
as additional purchase consideration when the contingency is resolved.
Based on the guidance in EITF Issue No. 98-3, Determining Whether a Non-monetary Transaction
Involves Receipt of Productive Assets of a Business, we have accounted for this transaction as an
acquisition of a business. A significant portion of the consideration has been allocated to the
trademark/brand name North-West.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
34 |
|
Marketing-related intangibles |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
Saraware Oy
In June 2006, we acquired 100% of the equity of Saraware Oy (Saraware) a Company involved in
providing design and engineering services to telecom companies. We acquired Saraware for an
aggregate consideration of Rs. 947 million and an earn-out of Euro 7 million to be determined and
paid in future based on financial targets being achieved over a period of 18 months. In addition,
amounts collected against certain specific reward/ incentive assets at the acquisition date are
payable to the sellers. We have paid Rs. 149 million against specific reward/ incentives collected
and Rs. 19 million as earn-out against targets achieved during the period ended March 31, 2007. The
earn-out and the additional payments are recorded as additional purchase price when the related
contingencies are resolved.
Through this acquisition we aim to expand our presence in the engineering services space in
Finland and the Nordic region.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
187 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
254 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quantech Global Services
In July 2006, we acquired 100% of the equity of Quantech Global Services LLC and Quantech
Global Services Ltd (Quantech). Quantech provides computer aided design and engineering services.
The consideration includes upfront cash payment of Rs. 142 million, a deferred cash payment of USD
3 million and an earn-out to be determined and paid in the future based on specific financial
targets being achieved over a period of 36 months.
Through this acquisition, we aim to strengthen our presence in the mechanical engineering
design and analysis services sector.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
(230 |
) |
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
45 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Group
51
In November 2006, we acquired 100% of the equity of Hydrauto Group AB (Hydrauto). Hydrauto is
engaged in the production, marketing and development of customized hydraulic cylinders solution for
mobile applications such as mobile cranes, excavator, dumpers and trucks. The consideration
(including direct acquisition cost) included cash payment of Rs. 1,412 million. Through this
acquisition we aim to gain an entry into Europe, access to a customer base built over the past few
decades and complementary engineering skills.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
202 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
74 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
3D Networks
In November 2006, we acquired 100% of the equity of the India, Middle East and South Asian
operations of 3D Networks and Planet PSG. 3D Networks provides business communication solutions
that include consulting, voice, data and converged solutions and managed services. These
specialized solutions are deployed in the ITES/IT, Telecom, Banking and Finance, Government and
Service verticals. Planet PSG provides professional services on voice and speech platforms in the
Asia Pacific region. The consideration (including direct acquisition cost) included upfront cash
payment of Rs. 904 million and a maximum earn-out of USD 44 million to be determined and paid in
the future based on achieving certain agreed financial targets over a 24 months period. We believe
that this acquisition is a strategic fit as it complements Wipros existing practice capabilities
and differentiates Wipro as the most comprehensive IT Solutions provider across segments.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
508 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
136 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
904 |
|
|
|
|
|
For all the above acquisitions except New Logic and mPower, the purchase consideration
has been allocated on a preliminary basis based on managements estimates. We are in the process of
making a final determination of the carrying value of assets and liabilities, which may result in
changes in the carrying value of net assets recorded. Finalization of the purchase price
allocation, which is expected to be completed during the period ending June 30, 2007 may result in
certain adjustments to the above allocations.
Stock compensation expense
Effective April 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS
No. 123 (R)), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based payment awards based on the grant-date fair value of those awards. Previously, we used
the intrinsic value based method, permitted by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock issued to Employees, to account for its employee stock-based compensation
plans and had adopted the pro-forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation.
We have adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method. Under this
approach we have recognized compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to,
but not yet vested as of April 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. Pursuant to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we have recognized
additional compensation expense of Rs. 165.00 million for the year ended March 31, 2007.
As of March 31, 2007, there were 7,499,980 options outstanding under our WRSUP 2004 plan and
1,551,330 options outstanding under our WARSUP 2004 plan. The compensation cost arising from such
grants is being amortized over the vesting period of five years.
52
As a result of the above, we have amortized stock compensation expenses of Rs. 354 million,
Rs. 652 million and Rs. 1,336 million for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
respectively.
The stock compensation charge has been allocated to cost of revenue and selling and marketing
expenses and general and administrative expenses in line with the nature of the service rendered by
the employee who received the benefit.
The allocation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
Rs. |
238 |
|
|
Rs. |
437 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,045 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
354 |
|
|
Rs. |
652 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the
economic benefits consumed in each period. We have amortized intangible assets of Rs. 140 million,
Rs. 94 million and Rs. 379 million for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively.
Foreign Exchange Gains/(Losses), net
Foreign exchange gains, net, comprise:
|
|
|
exchange differences arising from the translation or settlement of transactions
in foreign currency; and |
|
|
|
|
The changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging derivatives
and ineffective portion of the hedging instruments. For forward foreign exchange
contracts which are designated and effective as accounting hedges, the marked to
market gains and losses are deferred and reported as a component of other
comprehensive income in stockholders equity and subsequently recorded in the
income statement when the hedged transaction occurs along with the hedged item. |
Others, net
Others, net, include net gains on the sale of property, plant, equipment, and other operating
income.
Loss on Direct Issue of Stock by Subsidiary
As of March 31, 2004, Wipro BPO had 4,745,731 employee stock options outstanding under the
Wipro BPO option plan. During the year ended March 31, 2005, 4,637,375 options vested and were
exercised at a price of Rs. 57 per share.
As the exercise price per option was less than our carrying value per share, the decline in
the carrying value of our ownership interest of Rs. 207 million has been included in the statement
of income for the year ended March 31, 2005 as a loss on the direct issue of stock by a subsidiary.
The shares issued as a result of the option exercises are covered by a share repurchase
feature that entitles us to repurchase these shares at the then fair value and also gives the
employee the right to sell the shares back to us at the then fair value. Both we and the employee
can exercise this repurchase right after six months from the date of option exercise. During the
year ended March 31, 2005, we acquired 4,147,561 shares from the employees of Wipro BPO for an
aggregate consideration of Rs. 618 million, pursuant to the repurchase right. The excess of
consideration paid over the value of minority interest acquired amounting to Rs. 189 million has
been recorded as goodwill.
Other Income, net
Our other income includes interest income on short-term investments, net of interest expense
on short-term and long-term debt, dividend income and realized gains/losses on the sale of
investment securities.
Equity in Earnings/Losses of Affiliates
Wipro GE Medical Systems Private Limited. (Wipro GE). We hold a 49% equity interest in Wipro
GE Medical Systems Private Limited, a venture where General Electric, USA holds the balance of 51%.
53
WeP Peripherals (WeP). We held a 36.9% interest as of March 31, 2006 in WeP Peripherals. In
December 2006, we sold a portion of our interest in WeP Peripherals subsequent to which, our
ownership interest in WeP Peripherals reduced to 15% and we do not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over the operating and financial policies of WeP Peripherals. Accordingly, we
now account for our investment under the cost method.
W M Netserv. We record our 80.1% ownership interest in WM Netserv by the equity method as the
minority shareholder in the investee has substantive participative rights as specified in EITF
Issue No. 96-16, Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the
Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Right.
Income Taxes
Our net income earned from providing services at client premises outside India is subject to
tax in the country where we perform the work. Most of our tax paid in countries other than India
can be applied as a credit against our Indian tax liability to the extent that the same income is
liable to tax in India.
Currently, we benefit from certain tax incentives under Indian tax laws. As a result of these
incentives, our operations have not been subject to significant Indian tax liabilities. These tax
incentives currently include a tax holiday from payment of Indian corporate income taxes for our
Global IT Services and Products business operated from specially designated Software Technology
Parks and Special Economic Zones in India and an income tax deduction of 100% for profits
derived from exporting information technology services. As a result, a substantial portion of our
pre-tax income has not been subject to significant tax in recent years. For the years ended March
31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 our tax benefits were Rs. 4,591 million, Rs. 4,721 million and Rs. 6,464
million respectively, from such tax incentives. We are currently also eligible for exemptions from
other taxes, including customs duties.
In the Finance Act, 2005, the Government of India introduced a separate tax holiday scheme for
units set up under designated special economic zones engaged in manufacture of articles or in
provision of services. Under this scheme, units in designated special economic zones which begin
providing services on or after April 1, 2005 will be eligible for a deduction of 100 percent of
profits or gains derived from the export of services for the first five years from commencement of
provision of services and 50 percent of such profits or gains for a further five years. Certain tax
benefits are also available for a further five years subject to the unit meeting defined
conditions. When our tax holiday and income tax deduction exemptions expire or terminate, our costs
will increase. Additionally, the Government of India could enact similar laws in the future, which
could further impair our other tax incentives. When our tax holiday and income tax deduction
exemptions expire or terminate, our costs will increase.
We have received tax demands from the Indian income tax authorities for the financial years
ended March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 aggregating to Rs. 8,100 million (including interest of Rs. 750
million). The tax demands were primarily on account of denial of deduction claimed by us under
Section 10A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (Act), in respect of profits earned by our undertakings in
Software Technology Park at Bangalore. We had appealed against these demands. In March 2006, the
first appellate authority vacated the tax demands for the years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002. The
income tax authorities have filed an appeal.
In March 2007, the first Income tax appellate authority upheld the deductions claimed by us
under Section 10A of the Act, which vacates a substantial portion of the demand for the year ended
March 31, 2003.
In December 2006, we received an additional tax demand of Rs. 3,027 million (including
interest of Rs. 753 million) for the financial year ended March 31, 2004 on similar grounds as
earlier years. We have filed an appeal against this demand. Considering the facts and nature of
disallowance and the order of the appellate authority upholding our claims for earlier years, we
believe that the final outcome of the above dispute should be in our favor and there will not be
any material impact on our financial statements. The range of loss relating to these contingencies
is between zero and the amount of the demand raised.
Although we currently believe we will ultimately prevail in our appeals, the results of such
appeals, and any subsequent appeals, cannot be predicted with certainty. Should we fail to prevail
in our appeals, or any subsequent appeals, in any reporting period, the operating results of such
reporting period could be materially adversely affected.
The Indian Finance Act, 2005 imposes an additional income tax on companies called a Fringe
Benefits Tax, or FBT. Pursuant to this Act, companies are deemed to have provided fringe benefits
to their employees if certain defined expenses are incurred. A portion of these expenses is deemed
to be a fringe benefit to the employees and subjects a company to tax at a rate of 30%, exclusive
of applicable surcharge and cess. The Fringe Benefits Tax and other similar taxes enacted in the
future by the Government of India could adversely affect our profitability.
54
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically financed our working capital and capital expenditure significantly
through our operating cash flows. As of March 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of Rs.
12,418 million, investments in liquid and short-term mutual funds of Rs. 32,410 million and unused
lines of credit of approximately Rs. 3,204 million, US$ 25 million and GBP 6 million from our
bankers for working capital requirements. To utilize this line of credit we need to comply with
certain financial covenants. As of March 31, 2007 we were in compliance with such financial
covenants.
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2007 was Rs. 30,162 million
against Rs. 20,192 million in the year ended March 31, 2006. This increase of 49% was primarily
driven by a 44% increase in net income from Rs. 20,270 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to
Rs. 29,169 million for the year ended March 31, 2007. Depreciation and amortization increased from
Rs. 3,195 million for the year ended March 31, 2006 to Rs. 4,309 million for the year ended March
31, 2007. Similarly stock based compensation increased from Rs. 662 million for the year ended
March 31, 2006 to Rs. 1,336 million for the year ended
March 31, 2007. This increase is primarily due to new stock options
granted during the year. The increase in individual
line under operating asset and liability was generally consistent with the increase in business
volumes during the year.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2007 was Rs. 21,377 million
against Rs. 17,299 million in the year ended March 31, 2006. During the year ended March 31, 2007,
Rs. 7,800 million was utilized for acquisitions against Rs. 2,777 million utilized during the year
ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily driven by our business growth strategies. We
expect to continue fund acquisitions through cash generated from operations. During the year ended
March 31, 2007, we utilized Rs. 11,392 million for acquiring property, plant and equipment which
was consistent with an increase in operations and business volumes. The remaining amounts were
invested in liquid and short-term mutual funds.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2007 was Rs. 5,180 million
against Rs. 305 million of cash provided by financing activities during the year ended March 31,
2006. This increase was primarily due to dividends paid amounting to Rs. 16,111 million which is
offset by cash receipts on issuance of equity shares amounting to Rs. 8,894 million and short-term
borrowings amounting to Rs. 1,825 million.
We have proposed to pay a cash dividend of Re. 1 per share on our equity shares and ADRs. This
proposal is subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company. We expect a dividend payout
(excluding corporate dividend tax) of approximately Rs. 1,459 million.
As of March 31, 2007 we had contractual commitments of Rs. 3,432 million ($ 80 million)
related to capital expenditures on construction or expansion of software development facilities,
non-cancelable operating lease obligations and other purchase obligations. Plans to construct or
expand our software development facilities are dictated by business requirements.
In our acquisitions, a portion of the purchase consideration is payable upon achievement of
specified earnings targets in future. Details are given below. We currently intend to finance our
planned construction and expansion entirely through our cash and cash equivalents and investments
in liquid and short term mutual funds as of March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Earn-out payable |
|
Acquired entity |
|
Earn-out Period |
|
RetailBox BV and subsidiaries (Enabler) |
|
Euro 11 Million |
|
|
2 years |
BVPENTE Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH and its |
|
Euro 27 Million |
subsidiaries (New Logic) |
|
3 years |
North-West Switchgear Limited |
|
Rs. 200 Million |
|
|
4 years |
India, Middle East and SAARC operations of 3D |
|
USD 44 million |
Networks and Planet PSG |
|
2 years |
Saraware Oy |
|
Euro 7 Million |
|
|
1.5 years |
cMango Inc and subsidiaries (cMango) |
|
USD 12 Million |
|
|
2 years |
Quantech
Global Services (Quantech) |
|
To be determined |
|
|
3 years |
55
In the normal course of business, we transfer accounts receivables and employee advances
(financial assets). These transfers can be with or without recourse. As at March 31, 2007, we had
transferred financial assets of Rs. 480 million.
Our liquidity and capital requirements are affected by many factors, some of which are based
on the normal ongoing operations of our businesses and some of which arise from uncertainties
related to global economies and the markets that we target for our services. In addition, we
routinely review potential acquisitions. In the future, we may require or choose to obtain
additional debt or equity financing. We cannot be certain that additional financing, if needed,
will be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by SEC Final Rule 67
(FR-67), Disclosure in Managements Discussion and Analysis about Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
and Aggregate Contractual Obligations.
Contractual obligations
The table of future payments due under contractual commitments as of March 31, 2007,
aggregated by type of contractual obligation, is given below:
In Rs. million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Payments due in |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-13 |
|
|
payment |
|
2007-08 |
|
2008-10 |
|
2010-12 |
|
onwards |
Long-term debt |
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cancelable
operating lease
obligation |
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
Capital Commitments |
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities(1) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations include all commitments to purchase goods or services of either a fixed
or minimum quantity that meet any of the following criteria: (1) they are non-cancelable, or (2) we
would incur a penalty if the agreement was terminated. If the obligation to purchase goods or
services is non-cancelable, the entire value of the contract was included in the above table. If
the obligation is cancelable, but we would incur a penalty if cancelled, the amount of the penalty
is included as a purchase obligation.
(1) In accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions,
and SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, as
amended by SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), the total
accrued benefit liability for defined benefit and contribution plans recognized as of March 31,
2007, was Rs. 492 million. This accrued liability is included under other long-term liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheet. This amount is impacted by, among other items, pension expense
funding levels, change in plan demographics and assumptions, return on plan assets etc. Because the
accrued liability does not represent expected liquidity needs, we did not include this amount in
the contractual obligation table. This was completely funded in April 2007.
Research and Development
Research and Development investments in IT Services and Products business is directed towards
developing solutions that have broad applications across various industry segments and developing
expertise in emerging technologies. Over a period of two to three years Research and Development
efforts in identified areas are focused on developing in-depth solutions, frameworks and
applications.
Research and Development initiatives are executed through Centers of Excellence or CoE and
Innovation Initiative.
CoEs are designed to enable growth of existing practice and/or create a new practice. CoEs
focus on creating competencies in specific existing and emerging technologies and domains. CoEs
create thought leadership by publishing white papers and participating in industry forums.
Currently, we have CoEs focusing on Wireless and
56
Broadband Communication, Computing Platforms like Grid Computing, e-Biz technologies like Web
services, Retail Supply chain management and other similar areas.
Innovation initiative is directed towards creating new solutions and intellectual property
which potentially expand our service offerings.
Innovation initiative covers the entire cycle of Idea Generation, Incubation and Successful
Execution. We focus on Process Innovations, Delivery Innovations, Technology Innovations, Product
Innovations and Business Innovations. We were awarded the NASSCOMs IT Innovation Award 2005 for
our pioneering work in next generation managed services platform.
Research and development expenditures for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were
Rs. 274 million, Rs. 202 million and Rs. 268 million, respectively.
Trend Information
IT Services and Products. We believe that the increased competition among IT companies,
commoditization of services and high volume transactions in IT services limits our ability to
increase our prices and improve our profits. We continually strive to differentiate ourselves from
the competition, innovate service delivery models, adopt new pricing strategies and demonstrate our
value proposition to the client to sustain prices and profits. We have also acquired businesses to
augment our existing services and capabilities. Our acquisitions have also allowed us to sustain
and in certain circumstances improve our prices and profits.
Gross profit as a percentage of revenues in our IT Services and Products business decreased
from 36% in the year ended March 31, 2006 to 34% in the year ended March 31, 2007. We anticipate
difficulty in sustaining or improving our profits due to:
|
|
|
pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
|
increases in proportion of services performed at client location some of our newer
service offerings, such as consulting and package implementation, require a higher
proportion of services to be performed at the clients premises; |
|
|
|
|
increases in wages for our IT professionals; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of amortization of stock compensation cost; and |
|
|
|
|
the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our rupee realizations; |
We expect these trends to continue for the foreseeable future. In response to the pressure on
gross margins and the increased competition from other IT services companies, we are focusing on
offering services with higher margins, strengthening our delivery model, increasing employee
productivity, investing in emerging technology areas, managing our cost structure, aligning our
resources to expected demand and increasing the utilization of our IT professionals.
To remain competitive, we believe that we need to innovate, identify and position ourselves in
emerging technology areas and increase our understanding of industry, business and impact of IT on
the business.
Our IT Services and Products business segment is also subject to fluctuations primarily
resulting from factors such as:
|
|
|
the effect of seasonal hiring which occurs in the quarter ended September 30; |
|
|
|
|
the time required to train and productively use new employees; |
|
|
|
|
the proportion of services we perform at client sites for a particular project; |
|
|
|
|
exchange rate fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
|
the size, timing and profitability of new projects. |
BPO Services. Although we believe that the increasing acceptance of outsourcing and offshoring
as an economic necessity has contributed to continued growth in our revenue, we have experienced
pricing pressures in our BPO Services business due to increased competition among IT companies.
Gross profit as a percentage of revenues in BPO Services increased from 24% in the year ended March
31, 2006 to 34% in the year ended March 31, 2007. We anticipate difficulty in sustaining or
improving our profits due to, among other things, the impact of the high percentage on fixed costs,
attrition rates and composition of voice based services in our revenues from BPO services. Our BPO
Services business segment is also subject to seasonal fluctuations.
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products. In our India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products
business segment we have experienced pricing pressures due to increased competition among IT
companies. Large multinational
57
corporations like IBM and HP have identified India as a key focus area. The gross margins in
the products component of this business segment decreased by 1% from 11% for the year ended March
31, 2006 to 10% for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Consumer Care and Lighting. Our Consumer Care and Lighting business segment is also subject to
seasonal fluctuations. Our revenues in this segment are also subject to commodity price
fluctuations.
Our quarterly revenue, operating income and net income have varied significantly in the past
and we expect that they are likely to vary in the future. You should not rely on our quarterly
operating results as an indication of future performance. Such quarterly fluctuations may have an
impact on the price of our equity shares and ADSs.
Dividends. Final dividends on common stock are recorded as a liability on the date of
declaration by the stockholders and the interim dividends are recorded as a liability on the date
of declaration by the board of directors.
Recent accounting pronouncements
FASB Interpretation No. 48. . In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 applies to all tax positions within the scope of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, and clarifies when and how to recognize tax benefits in the financial
statements with a two-step approach of recognition and measurement. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006, and, as a result, is effective for the Company commencing
April 1, 2007. FIN 48 also requires the enterprise to make explicit disclosures about uncertainties
in their income tax positions, including a detailed roll-forward of tax benefits taken that do not
qualify for financial statement recognition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN
48 on the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 157. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance on determination of fair value and lays down the
fair value hierarchy to classify the source of information used in fair value measurement. We are
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements and will adopt the
provisions of SFAS No. 157 for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 159. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). This statement permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility
in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having
to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the fiscal year
beginning April 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical accounting policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that in our view are most important to the
portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results and that place the most significant
demands on managements judgment. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other
accounting policies, please refer to Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenues primarily from two sources: (i) product revenue and (ii) service revenue.
Product Revenue
Product revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product
has been delivered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably
assured. The product is considered delivered to the customer once it has been shipped, and title
and risk of loss has been transferred.
We generally consider a binding purchase order or a signed contract as persuasive evidence of
an arrangement. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement may take different forms depending upon the
customary practices of a specific class of customers.
58
Service Revenue
Service revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of a contract, the sales price
is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Time-and-materials service
contract revenue is recognized as the services are rendered. Revenue from fixed-price,
fixed-timeframe contracts that involve significant production, modification or customization of the
software is accounted for in conformity with ARB No. 45, using the guidance in Statement of
Position (SOP) 81-1, and the Accounting Standards Executive Committees conclusion in paragraph 95
of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. Fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts, which are
similar to contracts to design, develop, manufacture, or modify complex aerospace or electronic
equipment to a buyers specification or to provide services related to the performance of such
contracts and contracts for services performed by architects, engineers, or architectural or
engineering design firms as laid out in paragraph 13 of SOP 81-1, are also accounted for in
conformity with SOP 81-1. In these Fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts revenue is recognized
using the percentage-of-completion method.
We use the input (cost expended) method to measure progress towards completion. Percentage of
completion method accounting relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. We
follow this method when reasonably dependable estimates of the revenues and costs applicable to
various elements of the contract can be made. Key factors we review to estimate the future costs to
complete include estimates of future labor costs and productivity efficiencies. Because the
financial reporting of these contracts depends on estimates that are assessed continually during
the term of these contracts, recognized revenue and profit are subject to revisions as the contract
progresses to completion. When estimates indicate that a loss will be incurred, the loss is
provided for in the period in which the loss becomes evident. To date, we have not had any
fixed-price, fixed-timeframe contracts that resulted in a material loss.
We evaluate change orders to determine whether such change orders are normal element and form
part of the original scope of the contract. If the change orders are part of the original scope of
the contract, no changes are made to the contract price. For other change orders, contract revenue
and costs are adjusted only after the approval of the changes to the scope and price by us and the
client. Costs that are incurred for a specific anticipated contract and that will result in no
future benefits unless the contract is obtained are not included in contract costs before the
receipt of the contract. However, such costs are deferred only if the cost can be directly
associated with specific anticipated contract and the recoverability from that contract is deemed
to be probable.
Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Revenue from
customer training, support and other services is recognized as the related services are performed.
Revenues from BPO Services are derived from both time-based and unit-priced contracts. Revenue
is recognized as services are performed under the specific terms of the contracts with the
customers.
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
Based on the guidance in EITF Issue No. 00-21, we recognize revenues on the delivered products
or services only if:
|
|
The revenue recognition criteria applicable to the unit of accounting is met; |
|
|
|
The delivered element has value to the customer on a standalone basis. The delivered unit will have value on a
standalone basis if it is being sold separately by other vendors or the customer could resell the deliverable on a
standalone basis; |
|
|
|
There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and |
|
|
|
If the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the
undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. |
The arrangement consideration is allocated to the units of accounting based on their fair
values. The revenue recognized for the delivered items is limited to the amount that is not
contingent upon the delivery or performance of the undelivered items. In certain cases, the
application of the contingent revenue provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-21 could result in
recognizing a loss on the delivered element. In such cases, the cost recognized is limited to the
amount of non-contingent revenues recognized and the balance of costs are recorded as an asset and
are reviewed for impairment based on the estimated net cash flows to be received for future
deliverables under the contract. These costs are subsequently recognized on recognition of the
revenue allocable to the balance of deliverables.
Assessments about whether the delivered units have a value to the customer on a standalone
basis, impact of forfeiture and similar contractual provisions, and determination of fair value of
each unit would affect the timing of revenue recognition and would impact our results of
operations.
59
Volume discount.
We account for volume discounts and pricing incentives to customers using the guidance in EITF
Issue 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of
the Vendors Products). The discount terms in our arrangements with customers generally entitle the
customer to discounts, if the customer completes a specified level of revenue transactions. In some
arrangements, the level of discount varies with increases in the levels of revenue transactions. We
recognize discount obligations as a reduction of revenue based on the ratable allocation of the
discount to each of the underlying revenue transactions that result in progress by the customer
toward earning the discount. We recognize the liability based on its estimate of the customers
future purchases. If we cannot reasonably estimate the customers future purchases, then the
liability is recorded based on the maximum potential level of discount. We recognize changes in the
estimated amount of obligations for discounts using a cumulative catch-up adjustment.
Accounting Estimates
While preparing financial statements we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amount of assets, liabilities, disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of
financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses for the reporting period.
Specifically, we make estimates of the uncollectability of our accounts receivable by analyzing
historical payment patterns, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness and current
economic trends. If the financial condition of a customer deteriorates, additional allowances may
be required.
Our estimate of liability relating to pending litigation is based on currently available facts
and our assessment of the probability of an unfavorable outcome. Considering the uncertainties
about the ultimate outcome and the amount of losses, we re-assess our estimates as additional
information becomes available. Such revisions in our estimates could materially impact our results
of operations and our financial position.
We provide for inventory obsolescence, excess inventory and inventories with carrying values
in excess of market values based on our assessment of the future demands, market conditions and our
specific inventory management initiatives. If market conditions and actual demands are less
favorable than our estimates, additional inventory write-downs may be required. In all cases
inventory is carried at the lower of historical cost or market value.
Accounting for Income taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to
estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We are subject to tax
assessments in each of these jurisdictions. A tax assessment can involve complex issues, which can
only be resolved over extended time periods. Though we have considered all these issues in
estimating our income taxes, there could be an unfavorable resolution of such issues that may
affect results of our operations.
We also assess the temporary differences resulting from differential treatment of certain
items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and
liabilities, which are recognized in our consolidated financial statements. We assess our deferred
tax assets on an ongoing basis by assessing our valuation allowance and adjusting the valuation
allowance appropriately. In calculating our valuation allowance we consider the future taxable
incomes and the feasibility of tax planning initiatives. If we estimate that the deferred tax asset
cannot be realized at the recorded value, a valuation allowance is created with a charge to the
statement of income in the period in which such assessment is made. We have not created a deferred
tax liability in respect of the basis difference in the carrying value of investments in domestic
subsidiaries, since we expect to realize this in a tax-free manner and the current tax laws in
India provide means by which we can realize our investment in a tax-free manner.
We are subject to a 15% branch profit tax in the United States to the extent the net profit
attributable to our U.S. branch for the fiscal year is greater than the increase in the net assets
of the U.S. branch for the fiscal year, as computed in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code.
As of March 31, 2007, the U.S. branchs net assets amounted to approximately $ 155 million. We
have not triggered the branch profit tax and, consistent with our business plan, we intend to
maintain the current level of our net assets in the United States. Accordingly, we did not record
a provision for branch profit tax as of March 31, 2007.
Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we have assigned all
the assets and liabilities, including goodwill, to the reporting units. We review goodwill for
impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of
goodwill may not be recoverable. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step impairment
test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit
to its carrying value. We determine the fair value of our reporting units using the income
approach.
60
Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on
measurement techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. If the fair value of the reporting
unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired
and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform
the second step in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill and
compare it to the carrying value of the reporting units goodwill. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business
combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit
had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the
purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. If the carrying value of a reporting units
goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we must record an impairment loss equal to the
difference.
To assist in the process of determining goodwill impairment, we obtain appraisals from
independent valuation firms. In addition we perform internal valuation analyses and consider other
market information that is publicly available. The discounted cash flow approach and the income
approach, which we use to estimate the fair value of our reporting units, are dependent on a number
of factors including estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs,
appropriate discount rates and other variables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future
results may differ from those estimates.
Derivatives and Hedge Accounting, and Exchange Rate Risk
Although our functional currency is the Indian rupee, we transact a major portion of our
business in foreign currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar. The exchange rate between the rupee
and the dollar has changed substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in the
future. Consequently, the results of our operations are adversely affected as the rupee appreciates
against the U.S. dollar. Our exchange rate risk primarily arises from our foreign currency
revenues, receivables and payables. We enter into forward foreign exchange contracts (derivatives)
to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates on accounts receivables and forecasted
cash flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. The derivatives also include short term
forward foreign exchange contracts pursuant to a roll-over hedging strategy which are replaced with
successive new contracts up to the period in which the forecasted transactions are expected to
occur. We also designate zero-cost collars, which qualify as net purchased options, to hedge the
exposure to variability in expected future foreign currency cash inflows due to exchange rate
movements beyond a defined range. The range comprises an upper and lower strike price. At maturity,
if the exchange rate remains within the range the cash inflows are realized at the spot rate,
otherwise the cash inflows are realized at the upper or lower strike price.
We designate the derivatives in respect of forecasted transactions, which meet the hedging
criteria, as cash flow hedges. Changes in the derivative fair values that are designated, effective
and qualify as cash flow hedges, under SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, are deferred and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income until the hedged transactions occur and are then recognized in the consolidated statements
of income. With respect to derivatives acquired pursuant to the roll-over hedging strategy, the
changes in the fair value of discount or forward premium points are recognized in consolidated
statements of income of each period.
Gains and losses upon roll-over of derivatives acquired pursuant to the roll-over hedging
strategy are deferred and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until
the hedged transactions occur and are then recognized in the consolidated statements of income.
Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging derivatives and ineffective
portion of the hedging instruments are recognized in consolidated statements of income of each
period. We assess the hedge effectiveness at the end of each reporting period.
Hedge ineffectiveness could result from forecasted transactions not happening in the same
amounts or in the same periods as forecasted or changes in the counterparty credit rating.
Further, change in the basis of designating derivatives as hedges of forecasted transactions could
alter the proportion of derivatives which are ineffective as hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness
increases volatility of the consolidated statements of income since the changes in fair value of an
ineffective portion of derivatives is immediately recognized in the consolidated statements of
income.
We may not purchase adequate instruments to insulate ourselves from foreign exchange currency
risks. The policies of the Reserve Bank of India may change from time to time which may limit our
ability to hedge our foreign currency exposures adequately. In addition, any such instruments may
not perform adequately as a hedging mechanism. We may, in the future, adopt more active hedging
policies, and have done so in the past.
As of March 31, 2007 there were no significant gains or losses on derivative transactions or
portions thereof that have become ineffective as hedges, or associated with an underlying exposure
that did not occur.
61
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
Directors and Senior Management
Our directors and executive officers, their respective ages and positions as of March 31, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Azim H. Premji
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
Managing Director (designated as Chairman) |
Dr. Ashok S Ganguly
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Director |
B.C. Prabhakar
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
Dr. Jagdish N. Sheth
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Director |
Narayanan Vaghul
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Director |
Bill Owens
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Director |
P.M. Sinha
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Director |
Suresh C. Senapaty
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, and Executive Vice President,
Finance |
Pratik Kumar
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Human Resources |
Suresh Vaswani
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
President-Global IT Service Lines, Wipro Technologies;
President-Wipro Infotech |
Vineet Agrawal
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
President, Wipro Consumer Care & Lighting |
Ranjan Acharya
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources Development |
Girish S Paranjpe
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
President-Banking, Finance and Insurance Vertical, Wipro
Technologies |
Sudip Banerjee
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
President-Enterprise Solutions, Wipro Technologies |
Dr. A.L. Rao
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
President, Technology Services and Chief Operating Officer |
Ramesh Emani
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
President-Embedded & Product
Engineering Solutions, Wipro Technologies |
Azim H. Premji has served as our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of our Board of Directors
and Managing Director (designated as Chairman) since September 1968. Mr. Premji holds a Bachelor of
Science, or B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University.
Dr Ashok Ganguly has served
as a Director on our Board since 1999. He is currently the Chairman of Firstsource Solutions Ltd (formerly ICICI OneSource Ltd) and ABP Pvt Ltd (Ananda Bazar Patrika Group)
and has been a Director on the Central Board of the Reserve Bank of India, since November 2000. Dr Ganguly also currently serves as a non-executive director
of Mahindra & Mahindra, ICICI Knowledge Park and Tata AIG Life Insurance Co Ltd and a Director on the Advisory Board of Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt Ltd.
He is a member of the Prime Ministers Council on Trade and Industry as well as the Investment Commission and the India-USA CEO Council, set
up by the Prime Minister of India and the President of the USA. He is also a member of the National Knowledge Commission to the Prime Minister.
He is a former member of the Board of British Airways Plc (1996-2005).
B.C. Prabhakar has served as a Director on our Board since February 1997. He is a practicing
lawyer since April 1970. Mr. Prabhakar holds a B.A. in Political Science and Sociology and an LL.B.
from Mysore University. Mr. B C Prabhakar serves as a non-executive Director of Automotive Axles
Limited and 3M India Limited
Dr. Jagdish N. Sheth
has served as a Director on our Board since January 1999. He is a professor at Emory University since July 1991. Dr Sheth is also on
the Boards of Cryo-Cell International Inc, Adayana Inc, Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Limited and Manipal
AcuNova Private Limited. Dr. Sheth holds a B. Com (Honors) from Madras University, an M.B.A.
and a Ph.D in Behavioral Sciences from the University of Pittsburgh.
Narayanan Vaghul has served as a Director on our Board since June 1997. He was the Chairman of
the Board of ICICI Limited since September 1985 and after its merger with ICICI Bank Limited
continues to be the Chairman of the combined entity. Mr. Vaghul is also on the Boards of Mahindra
and Mahindra Ltd., Mahindra World City Developers Limited, Nicholas Piramal India, Ltd.,
Hemogenomics Pvt. Ltd., Himatsingka Seide Limited, Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited, Air
India Engineering Services Limited, Azim Premji Foundation, Air India Air Transport Services
Limited, Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited and Air India Limited. Mr. Vaghul is also the Chairman
of the Compensation Committee of Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, Apollo Hospitals and Nicholas
Piramal India Ltd. Mr. N Vaghul is also a member of the Audit Committee in Arcelor Mittal, Air
India Limited, Nicholas Piramal India Limited and Mahindra World City Developers Limited. Mr N. Vaghul is also the lead
independent Director of our Company. Mr. Vaghul holds Bachelor (Honors) degree in Commerce from Madras University.
62
Priya Mohan Sinha became a Director of our company on January 1, 2002. He has served as the
Chairman of PepsiCo India Holdings Limited and President of Pepsi Foods Limited since July 1992.
From October 1981 to November 1992, he was on the Executive Board of Directors of Hindustan Lever
Limited. From 1981 to 1985 he also served as Sales Director of Hindustan Lever. Currently, he is
also on the Boards of ICICI Bank Limited, Bata India Limited, Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
Lafarge India Pvt. Limited and Azim Premji Foundation. Mr. Sinha holds a Bachelor of Arts from
Patna University and he has also attended Advanced Management Program in the Sloan School of
Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mr. Bill Owens has held senior leadership positions at large multinational corporations. From
April 2004 to November 2005, Mr. Owens served as Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Nortel Networks Corporation, a networking communications company. From August
1998 to April 2004, Mr. Owens served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer of Teledesic LLC, a satellite communications company. From June 1996 to August 1998, Mr.
Owens served as President, Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a research and engineering firm. Presently,
Mr. Owens serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Polycom Inc., a media communications
company; Daimler Chrysler AG, an automotive company; Embarq, Intelius and Force 10. Mr. Owens holds
a M.B.A. (Honors) degree from George Washington University, a B.S. in Mathematics from the U.S.
Naval Academy and a B.A. and M.A. in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Oxford University. Mr
Owens is a director in our company from July 1, 2006.
Suresh C. Senapaty has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President,
Finance, since January 1995 and served with us in other positions since April 1980. Mr. Senapaty
holds a B. Com. from Utkal University in India, and is a Fellow Member of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India.
Pratik Kumar has served as our Executive Vice President, Human Resources, since April 2002,
and has served with us in other positions since November 1991. Mr. Pratik Kumar holds a B. A. from
Delhi University and an M.B.A. from Xavier Labour Relations Institute (XLRI), Jamshedpur, India.
Suresh Vaswani has served as President-Global IT Service Lines, Wipro Technologies and
President of Wipro Infotech since December 2000, and has served with us in other positions since
June 1987. Mr. Vaswani holds a Bachelor of Technology, or B.Tech. from the Indian Institute of
Technology, or IIT, Kharagpur, and a Post Graduate Diploma in Management from the Indian Institute
of Management, Ahmedabad.
Vineet Agrawal has served as President of Wipro Consumer Care and Lighting since July 2002 and
has served with us in other positions since December 1985. Mr. Agrawal holds a B.Tech. from IIT,
New Delhi, and an M.B.A from Bajaj Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai.
Ranjan Acharya has served as Senior Vice President-Human Resources Development since April
2002, and has served with us in other positions since July 1994. Mr. Ranjan Acharya holds a B.S.
from Pune University and an M.B.A. from Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Pune, India.
Girish S Paranjpe has served as President Banking, Finance and Insurance Vertical of Wipro
Technologies since October 2000, and has served with us in other positions since July 1990. Mr.
Paranjpe holds a B.Com. from Bombay University and is a Fellow Member of Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India and Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India.
Sudip Banerjee has served as President-Enterprise Solutions of Wipro Technologies since
February 2002 and has served with us in other positions since November 1983. Mr. Sudip holds a
B.A. from Delhi University and Diploma in Management from All India Management Association.
Dr. A.L. Rao has served as President-Technology Services and Chief Operating Officer of Wipro
Technologies since October 2000 and has served with us in other positions since August 1980. Dr.
Rao holds a B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. in Nuclear Physics from Andhra University in India.
Ramesh Emani has served as President-Embedded and Product Engineering Solutions of Wipro
Technologies since October 2003, and has served with us in other positions since November 1983. Mr.
Emani holds a B.Tech. from Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, Hyderabad and Master of
Technology, or M.Tech. from IIT, Kanpur.
63
Compensation
Director Compensation
Our Board Governance and Compensation Committee determines and recommends to our Board of
Directors the compensation payable to our directors. All board-level compensation is subject to
approval by our shareholders. Each of our non-employee directors receive an attendance fee of $
224.82 (Rs. 10,000) for every Board and Committee meeting they attend. Our directors are
reimbursed for travel and out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their attendance at Board and
Committee meetings. Additionally, we also compensate non-employee directors by way of commission,
which is limited to a fixed sum payable as approved by the Board subject to a maximum of 1% of the
net profits of the Company as approved by the shareholders, as follows:
1. |
|
Dr. Ashok S Ganguly receives approximately $ 27,842 (Rs. 1,200,000) per year. |
|
2. |
|
Narayan Vaghul receives approximately $ 32,482 (Rs. 1,400,000) per year. |
|
3. |
|
Dr. Jagdish N. Sheth receives approximately $ 50,000 (Rs. 2,155,000) per year. |
|
4. |
|
P. M. Sinha receives approximately $ 23,201 (Rs. 1,000,000) per year. |
|
5. |
|
B. C. Prabhakar receives approximately $ 13,921 (Rs. 600,000) per year. |
|
6. |
|
Bill Owens receives approximately $60,000 (Rs. 2,568,000) per year. |
In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, we paid an aggregate of $ 207,446 (Rs. 8,923,000) as
commission to our non-employee directors.
Executive Compensation
The annual compensation of our executive directors is approved by our Board Governance and
Compensation Committee, within the parameters set by the shareholders at the shareholders meetings,
and the annual compensation of our other executive officers is approved by our Board Governance and
Compensation Committee. Remuneration of our executive officers, including our employee directors,
consists of a fixed component, performance bonus and a variable performance linked incentive. The
following two tables present the annual and long term compensation earned, awarded or paid for
services rendered to us for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 by our Executive Directors and
members of our administrative, supervisory or management bodies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation ($) |
|
|
|
Salary and |
|
Commission/In |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
allowances |
|
centives (1) |
|
Housing (2) |
|
Others |
Azim H. Premji |
|
$ |
100,004 |
|
|
$ |
556,845 |
|
|
$ |
48,724 |
|
|
$ |
15,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suresh C. Senapaty |
|
|
168,295 |
|
|
|
55,899 |
|
|
|
25,058 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pratik Kumar |
|
|
140,902 |
|
|
|
46,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vineet Agrawal |
|
|
148,779 |
|
|
|
56,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suresh Vaswani |
|
|
166,254 |
|
|
|
53,627 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudip Banerjee |
|
|
154,082 |
|
|
|
46,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Girish S. Paranjpe |
|
|
149,327 |
|
|
|
71,261 |
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. A.L. Rao |
|
|
158,676 |
|
|
|
60,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranjan Acharya |
|
|
106,621 |
|
|
|
37,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramesh Emani |
|
|
154,859 |
|
|
|
53,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
864 |
|
64
|
|
|
1. |
|
Azim H. Premji was paid commissions at the rate of 0.3% on incremental Net Profits of the
Company over the previous year. Net Profits are computed in accordance with the provisions of
the Indian Companies Act, 1956. All other executives were paid incentives under a Quarterly
Performance Linked Scheme based on achievement of pre-defined profit targets. |
|
2. |
|
The value of this perquisite accounts for more than 25% of the total value of all perquisites
and personal benefits received in fiscal 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Compensation ($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of RSUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
granted |
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
Shares Granted |
|
Grant |
|
during the |
|
|
Name |
|
benefits(1)(2) |
|
during the year |
|
Price |
|
year |
|
Grant price |
Azim H. Premji |
|
|
109,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suresh C. Senapaty |
|
|
13,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pratik Kumar |
|
|
12,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vineet Agrawal |
|
|
9,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suresh Vaswani |
|
|
13,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudip Banerjee |
|
|
13,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Girish S. Paranjpe |
|
|
13,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. A.L. Rao |
|
|
12,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranjan Acharya |
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramesh Emani |
|
|
13,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deferred benefits are payable to employees by way of our contribution to the Provident Fund
and Pension Fund. The Provided Fund is a statutory fund to which Wipro and our employees
contribute every month. A lump sum payment on separation and a Pension payment on attaining
the age of superannuation are payable from the balance standing to the credit of the Fund, as
per the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. |
|
(2) |
|
Under our pension plans, any pension that is payable to an employee is not computed on the
basis of final compensation, but on the accumulated pension fund to the credit of the employee
as the date of separation, death, disability or retirement. We annually contribute 15% of Mr.
Premjis base salary and commission earned for that year to our pension fund for the benefit
of Mr. Premji. For all other employees, we contribute 15% of their respective base salaries
to our pension for their benefit. These contributions are included in this column. |
We operate in numerous countries and compensation for our officers and employees may vary
significantly from country to country. As a general matter, we seek to pay competitive salaries in
all the countries in which we operate.
Board Composition
Our Articles of Association provide that the minimum number of directors shall be four and the
maximum number of directors shall be twelve. As of March 31, 2007, we had seven directors on our
Board. Our Articles of Association provide that at least two-thirds of our directors shall be
subject to retirement by rotation. One third of these
65
directors must retire from office at each
annual general meeting of the shareholders. A retiring director is eligible for re-election. Up to
one-third of our directors can be appointed as non-retiring directors. Currently, Azim H. Premji is
a non-retiring director.
The terms of each of our directors and their expiration dates are:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Expiration of current term of office |
|
Term of office |
Azim H. Premji
|
|
July 30, 2007
|
|
2 years and seven months |
Dr. Jagdish Sheth
|
|
Annual General Meeting 2008
|
|
Retirement by rotation |
Dr. Ashok S Ganguly
|
|
Annual General Meeting 2008
|
|
Retirement by rotation |
B. C. Prabhakar
|
|
Annual General Meeting 2007
|
|
Retirement by rotation |
N. Vaghul
|
|
Annual General Meeting 2007
|
|
Retirement by rotation |
P. M. Sinha
|
|
Annual General Meeting 2009
|
|
Retirement by rotation |
Bill Owens
|
|
Annual General Meeting 2009
|
|
Retirement by rotation |
Option Grants
There were no option grants to our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Managing Director
(designated as Chairman) in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007. Details of options
granted to other senior management executives are reported elsewhere in this Item 6 under the
section titled Share Ownership.
Option Exercises and Holdings
Our Chairman did not exercise or hold any options during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
The details of stock options held and exercised with respect to other senior management executives
are reported elsewhere in this Item 6 under the section titled Share Ownership.
Terms of Employment Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements
Under the Companies Act, our shareholders must approve the salary, bonus and benefits of all
employee directors at a General Meeting of Shareholders. Each of our employee directors have signed
an agreement containing the terms and conditions of employment, including a monthly salary,
performance bonus and benefits including vacation, medical reimbursement and pension fund
contributions. These agreements have varying terms ranging from a two to five year period, but
either we or the employee director may generally terminate the agreement upon six months notice to
the other party.
The terms of our employment arrangements with Azim H. Premji, Pratik Kumar, Suresh C.
Senapaty, Ranjan Acharya, Suresh Vaswani, Sudip Banerjee, Dr. A.L. Rao, Vineet Agrawal and Ramesh
Emani provide for up to a 180-day notice period, up to 21 days of leave per year in addition to
statutory holidays, and an annual compensation review. Additionally, employees are required to
relocate as we may determine, and to comply with confidentiality provisions.
We also have entered into agreements to indemnify our directors and officers for claims
brought under any rule of law to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. These agreements,
among other things, indemnify our directors and officers for certain expenses, judgments, fines and
settlement amounts incurred by any such person in any action or proceeding, including any action by
or in the right of Wipro Limited, arising out of such persons services as our director or officer,
including claims which are covered by the Insurance Policy on Directors and Officers Liability
Insurance taken by the Company.
Board Committee Information
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, which was formed in 1987, reviews, acts on and
reports to our Board of Directors with respect to various auditing and accounting matters. The
primary responsibilities are:
66
|
|
Auditing and accounting matters, including recommending the appointment of our
independent auditors to the shareholders |
|
|
|
Compliance with legal and statutory requirements |
|
|
|
Integrity of the Companys financial statements, discussing with the independent auditors the scope of the annual audits,
and fees to be paid to the independent auditors. |
|
|
|
Performance of the Companys Internal Audit function, Independent Auditors and accounting practices. |
|
|
|
Review of related party transactions, functioning of Whistle Blower mechanism, and |
|
|
|
Implementation of the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002 including
review on the progress of internal control mechanisms to prepare for certification under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002. |
The Chairman of the Audit Committee is present at the Annual General Meeting. All members of
our Audit Committee are independent non executive directors and financially literate. The Chairman
of our Audit Committee has the accounting or related financial management expertise.
Independent Auditors as well as Internal Auditors always have independent meetings with the
Audit Committee and also participate in the Audit Committee meetings.
Our Executive Vice President-Finance & CFO and other Corporate Officers make periodic
presentations to the Audit Committee on various issues.
The Audit Committee is comprised of the following three non-executive directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. N. Vaghul
|
|
-
|
|
Chairman of the Audit Committee |
|
|
|
Messrs. P. M. Sinha and B. C. Prabhakar
|
|
-
|
|
Members of the Audit Committee |
Our Audit Committee held five meetings during our 2007 fiscal year. Our Audit Committee has
adopted a charter. The charter is available under the investor relations section on our website at
www.wipro.com.
Board Governance and Compensation Committee
The primary responsibilities of the Board Governance and Compensation Committee are:
|
|
|
Determine and approve salaries, benefits and stock option grants to Senior
Management employees and Directors of our Company. |
|
|
|
|
Act as Administrator of the Companys Employee Stock Option Plans and Employee Stock
Purchase Plans drawn up from time to time |
|
|
|
|
Develop and recommend to the Board Corporate Governance Guidelines applicable to the
Company |
|
|
|
|
Evaluation of the Board on a continuing basis including an assessment of the
effectiveness of the full Board, operations of the Board Committees and contributions
of individual directors |
Lay down policies and procedures to assess the requirements for induction of new members on
the Board.
Our Executive Vice President-Human Resources makes periodic presentations to the Board
Governance and Compensation Committee on compensation reviews and performance linked compensation
recommendations.
All members of the Board Governance and Compensation Committee are independent non-executive
directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ashok S Ganguly
|
|
Chairman of the Board Governance and Compensation Committee |
|
|
|
Messrs. N. Vaghul and P.M. Sinha
|
|
Members of the Board Governance and Compensation Committee |
Our Board Governance and Compensation Committee held four meetings during our 2007 fiscal
year. Our Board Governance & Compensation Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a charter.
The charter is available under the investor relations section on our website at www.wipro.com.
Employees
Highly trained and motivated people are critical to the success of our business. To achieve this,
we focus on attracting and retaining the best people possible. A combination of strong brand name,
a congenial working environment and competitive compensation programs enables us to attract and
retain these talented people.
67
Our human resources department is centralized at our corporate headquarters in Bangalore
and functions across all of our business segments. We have implemented corporate-wide recruiting,
training, performance evaluation and compensation programs that are tailored to address the needs
of each of our business segments.
Recruiting
We hire entry level graduates from both the top engineering and management universities in
India, as well as more experienced lateral hires through employee referral programs,
advertisements, placement consultants, our website postings and walk-ins. To facilitate employee
growth within Wipro Limited, all new openings are first offered to our employees. The nature of
work, skill sets requirements and experience levels are highlighted to the employees. Applicants
undergo the regular recruitment process and, if selected, get assigned to their new roles.
Training
Each of our new recruits must attend an eight week intensive training program when they begin
working with us. New or recent graduates must also attend additional training programs that are
tailored to their area of technology. We also have a mandatory continuing education program that
requires each IT professional to attend at least 40 hours of continuing education classes to
improve their understanding and competency of new technologies, as well as to develop leadership
and personal self-development skills. We currently have 82 full-time faculty members to provide
these training courses. We supplement our continuing education program for existing employees by
sponsoring special programs at leading educational institutions, such as the Indian Institute of
Management, Bangalore, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Symbiosis Institute of
Business Management, Pune and others, to provide special skill set training in areas such as
Business Skills and Project management to any of our IT professionals who choose to enroll and meet
the eligibility criteria of these Institutes.
Performance Evaluations
Employees receive written performance objectives that they develop in cooperation with their
respective managers. They are measured against these criteria annually in a formal review process
which includes self-reviews and reviews from peers, managers and subordinates.
Compensation
We continually strive to provide our employees with competitive and innovative compensation
packages. Our compensation packages include a combination of salary, stock options, pension, and
health and disability insurance. We measure our compensation packages against industry standards
and seek to match or exceed them. We adopted an employee stock purchase plan in 1984. We have
devised both business segment performance and individual performance linked incentive programs that
we believe more accurately link performance to compensation for each employee. For example, we
link cash compensation to a business segments quarterly operating margin objectives.
Share Ownership
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2007, for each director and executive officer,
the total number of equity shares, ADSs and vested and unexercised options to purchase equity
shares and ADSs. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. All information with respect to the beneficial ownership of any principal
shareholder has been furnished by such shareholder and, unless otherwise indicated below, we
believe that persons named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to
all the shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to community property laws, where applicable.
The shares beneficially owned by the directors include the equity shares owned by their family
members to which such directors disclaim beneficial ownership. The number of shares beneficially
owned includes equity shares, equity shares underlying ADSs and the shares subject to vested
options that are currently exercisable. For the convenience of the readers, the stock option grant
price has been translated into U.S. dollars based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York
on March 30, 2007, for cable transfers in Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York which, was Rs. 43.10 per $ 1.00. The share numbers and percentages
listed below are based on 1,458,999,650 equity shares outstanding as of March 31, 2007.
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Equity |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
beneficially |
|
Beneficially |
|
Options |
|
Grant |
|
|
Name |
|
owned |
|
Owned |
|
Granted |
|
Price ($) |
|
Date of expiration |
Azim H. Premji (1) |
|
|
1,161,136,260 |
|
|
|
79.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Prabhakar (2) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Jagdish Sheth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ashok S Ganguly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Vaghul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Sinha |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suresh C. Senapaty |
|
|
122,300 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Pratik Kumar |
|
|
59,100 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Vineet Agrawal |
|
|
138,600 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Suresh Vaswani |
|
|
96,948 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2001 |
Sudip Banerjee |
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Girish S. Paranjpe |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Dr. A.L. Rao |
|
|
82,360 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Ranjan Acharya |
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
Ramesh Emani |
|
|
24,700 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
July 2011 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of the shares. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes 326,259,000 shares held by Hasham Traders (a partnership), of which Mr. Premji is
a partner, 325,017,000 shares held by Prazim Traders (a partnership), of which Mr. Premji is a
partner, 324,244,800 shares held by Zash Traders (a partnership), of which Mr. Premji is a partner,
38,263,000 shares held by Napean Trading Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., of which Mr. Premji is a
director, 51,014,200 shares held by Regal Investments Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., of which Mr. Premji is
a director, 38,860,600 shares held by Vidya Investment Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., of which Mr. Premji
is a director, 1,434,600 shares held jointly by Mr. Premji and members of his immediately family
and 8,316,000 shares held by the Azim Premji Foundation (I) Pvt. Ltd and 10,000 shares held by Azim
Premji Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Premji disclaims beneficial ownership of 8,316,000 shares held by
Azim Premji Foundation (I) Pvt. Ltd and 10,000 shares held by Azim Premji Foundation Pvt. Ltd. |
69
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The shares are jointly held with an immediate family member of Mr. Prabhakar. |
|
(3) |
|
The shares are jointly held with an immediate family member of Mr. P M Sinha. |
OPTION PLANS
Wipro Employee Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2005
Our Wipro Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2005, or 2005 unit plan, provides for the grant of
options to eligible employees and directors. The creation of our 2005 unit plan was approved by
our Board of Directors on June 14, 2005 and by our shareholders on July 21, 2005. Our 2005 unit
plan became effective on July 21, 2005, and unless terminated sooner, the plan will terminate
automatically on July 20, 2015. A total of 12,000,000 equity shares (as adjusted for corporate
actions from time to time) are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan.
Our Board Governance and Compensation Committee appointed by our Board of Directors administer
our 2005 unit plan. The committee has the sole power to determine the terms of the units granted,
including the exercise price, selection of eligible employees, the number of equity shares to be
covered by each option, the vesting and exercise periods, and the form of consideration payable
upon such exercise. In addition, the committee has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate the
2005 stock plan with the approval of the shareholders, provided that no such action may adversely
affect the rights of any participant under the plan. The Committee has the powers to interpret the
terms of the Plan and options granted pursuant to the Plan. The plan does not confer any right to
the participant with respect to continuing the participants status as an employee with the
Company.
Our 2005 unit plan does not allow for the transfer of options and only the participant may
exercise an option during his or her lifetime. The vesting period for the options under the plan
shall range from 12 months to not more than 84 months. A participant must exercise any vested
units prior to termination of service with us and within a specified period post separation as per
the Plan. The exercise price of options granted under our 2005 unit plan will be determined by the
committee.
Our 2005 unit plan provides that in the event of our merger with or into another corporation
or a sale of substantially all of our assets, the successor corporation shall either assume the
outstanding units or grant equivalent units to the holders. If the successor corporation neither
assumes the outstanding units nor grants equivalent units, such outstanding units shall vest
immediately, and become exercisable in full.
ADS Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2004 (ADS option)
Our ADS Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2004, or 2004 ADS unit plan, provides for the grant of
options to our eligible employees and directors. The creation of our 2004 ADS unit plan was
approved by our Board of Directors on April 16, 2004 and by our shareholders on June 11, 2004. The
2004 ADS unit plan became effective on June 11, 2004, and unless terminated sooner, the 2004 ADS
unit plan will terminate automatically on June 10, 2014. A total of 12,000,000 ADSs, representing
12,000,000 equity shares (as adjusted for corporate action from time to time), are currently
reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan.
Our Board Governance and Compensation Committee appointed by our Board of Directors administer
the 2004 ADS unit plan. The committee has the sole power to determine the terms of the units
granted, including the exercise price, selection of eligible employees, the number of ADSs to be
covered by each ADS option, the vesting and exercise periods, and the form of consideration payable
upon such exercise. In addition, the committee has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate the
stock plan provided that no such action may adversely affect the rights of any participant under
the plan. The Committee has the powers to interpret the terms of the plan and the ADS options
granted pursuant to the plan. The plan does not confer any right to the participant with respect
to participants status as an employee with the Company.
Our 2004 ADS unit plan does not allow for the transfer of units and only the participant may
exercise an option during his or her lifetime. The vesting period for the options under the plan
shall range from 12 months to not more than 84 months. A participant must exercise any vested
options prior to termination of service with us and within a specified period post separation as
per the Plan. The exercise price of options granted under our 2004 ADS unit plan will be
determined by the committee.
Our 2004 ADS unit plan provides that in the event of our merger with or into another
corporation or a sale of substantially all of our assets, the successor corporation shall either
assume the outstanding units or grant equivalent units to the holders. If the successor
corporation neither assumes the outstanding units nor grants equivalent units, such outstanding
units shall vest immediately, and become exercisable in full.
70
Wipro Employee Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2004
Our Wipro Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2004, or 2004 unit plan, provides for the grant of
options to eligible employees and directors. The creation of our 2004 unit plan was approved by
our Board of Directors on April 16, 2004 and by our shareholders on June 11, 2004. Our 2004 unit
plan became effective on June 11, 2004, and unless terminated sooner, the plan will terminate
automatically on June 10, 2014. A total of 12,000,000 equity shares (as adjusted for corporate
actions from time to time) are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan.
Our Board Governance and Compensation Committee appointed by our Board of Directors administer
the 2004 unit plan. The committee has the sole power to determine the terms of the units granted,
including the exercise price, selection of eligible employees, the number of equity shares to be
covered by each option, the vesting and exercise periods, and the form of consideration payable
upon such exercise. In addition, the committee has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate the
2004 stock plan with the approval of the shareholders, provided that no such action may adversely
affect the rights of any participant under the plan. The Committee has the powers to interpret the
terms of the Plan and options granted pursuant to the Plan. The plan does not confer any right to
the participant with respect to continuing the participants status as an employee with the
Company.
Our 2004 unit plan does not allow for the transfer of options and only the participant may
exercise an option during his or her lifetime. The vesting period for the options under the plan
shall range from 12 months to not more than 84 months. A participant must exercise any vested
options prior to termination of service with us and within a specified period post separation as
per the Plan. The exercise price of options granted under our 2004 unit plan will be determined by
the committee.
Our 2004 unit plan provides that in the event of our merger with or into another corporation
or a sale of substantially all of our assets, the successor corporation shall either assume the
outstanding units or grant equivalent units to the holders. If the successor corporation neither
assumes the outstanding units nor grants equivalent units, such outstanding units shall vest
immediately, and become exercisable in full.
2000 ADS Option Plan
Our 2000 ADS option plan provides for the grant of two types of options to our employees and
directors: incentive stock options, which may provide our employees with beneficial U.S. tax
treatment, and non-statutory stock options. Our 2000 ADS option plan was approved by our Board of
Directors in September 2000 and by our shareholders on April 26, 2000. Unless terminated sooner by
our Board, our 2000 ADS option plan will terminate automatically in September 2010. A total of
9,000,000 ADSs, representing 9,000,000 equity shares (as adjusted for corporate actions from time
to time), are currently reserved for issuance under our 2000 ADS option plan. All options under our
2000 ADS option plan will be exercisable for ADSs. Either our Board of Directors or a committee of
our Board of Directors administers our 2000 ADS option plan. The committee has the power to
determine the terms of the options granted, including the exercise prices, the number of ADSs
subject to each option, the exercisability thereof, and the form of consideration payable upon such
exercise. In addition, the committee has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate our 2000 ADS
option plan, provided that no such action may affect any ADS previously issued and sold or any
option previously granted under our 2000 ADS option plan.
Our 2000 ADS option plan generally does not allow for the transfer of options, and only the
optionee may exercise an option during his or her lifetime. An optionee generally must exercise an
option within three months of termination of service. If an optionees termination is due to death
or disability, his or her option will fully vest and become exercisable and the option must be
exercised within twelve months after such termination. The exercise price of incentive stock
options granted under our 2000 ADS option plan must at least equal the fair market value of the
ADSs on the date of grant. The exercise price of non-statutory stock options granted under our 2000
ADS option plan must at least equal 90% of the fair market value of the ADSs on the date of grant.
The term of options granted under our 2000 ADS option plan may not exceed ten years. Our 2000 ADS
option plan provides that in the event of our merger with or into another corporation or a sale of
substantially all of our assets, the successor corporation shall either assume the outstanding
options or grant equivalent options to the holders. If the successor corporation neither assumes
the outstanding options nor grants equivalent options, such outstanding options shall vest
immediately, and become exercisable in full.
2000 Employee Stock Option Plan
Our 2000 stock plan provides for the grant of stock options to eligible employees and
directors. The creation of our 2000 stock plan was approved by our Board of Directors on April 26,
2000, and by our shareholders on July 27, 2000. Our 2000 stock plan became effective on September
15, 2000, and unless terminated sooner, our 2000 stock plan will terminate automatically on
September 15, 2010. A total of 150,000,000 equity shares (as adjusted for corporate
71
actions from
time to time) are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to our 2000 stock plan. All options
under our 2000 stock plan will be exercisable for our equity shares.
Our Board Governance & Compensation Committee appointed by our Board of Directors administers
our 2000 stock plan. The committee has the power to determine the terms of the options granted,
including the exercise price, the number of shares subject to each option, the exercisability
thereof, and the form of consideration payable upon such exercise. In addition, the committee has
the authority to amend, suspend or terminate our 2000 stock plan, provided that no such action may
adversely affect the rights of any optionee under our 2000 stock plan.
Our 2000 stock plan generally does not allow for the transfer of options and only the optionee
may exercise an option during his or her lifetime. An optionee generally must exercise any vested
options within seven days of termination of service with us. If an optionees termination is due to
death, disability or retirement, his or her option will fully vest and become exercisable.
Generally, such options must be exercised within six months after termination. The exercise price
of stock options granted under our 2000 stock plan will be determined by the committee. Normally,
the term of options granted under our 2000 stock plan may not exceed seven years.
Our 2000 stock plan provides that in the event of our merger with or into another corporation
or a sale of substantially all of our assets, each option shall be proportionately adjusted to give
effect to the merger or asset sale.
1999 Employee Stock Option Plan
Our 1999 stock plan provides for the grant of stock options to eligible employees and
directors. Our 1999 stock plan was approved by our Board of Directors on April 30, 1999 and by our
shareholders on July 29, 1999. Unless terminated sooner, our 1999 stock plan will terminate
automatically on July 28, 2009. A total of 30,000,000 equity shares (as adjusted for corporate
actions from time to time) are currently reserved for issuance pursuant to our 1999 stock plan. All
options under our 1999 stock plan will be exercisable for our equity shares.
There are no stock options outstanding under this plan and we do not intend to grant options
under this plan.
Wipro Equity Reward Trust
We established the Wipro Equity Reward Trust, or WERT, in 1984 to allow our employees to
acquire a greater proprietary stake in our success and growth, and to encourage our employees to
continue their association with us. The WERT is designed to give eligible employees the right to
receive restricted shares and other compensation benefits at the times and on the conditions that
we specify. Such compensation benefits include voluntary contributions, loans, interest and
dividends on investments in the WERT and other similar benefits.
The WERT is administered by a board of trustees that generally consists of between two and six
members as appointed by us. We select eligible employees to receive grants of shares and other
compensation from the WERT and communicate this information to the WERT. We select employees based
upon various factors, including, without limitation, an employees performance, period of service
and status. The WERT awards the number of shares that each employee is entitled to receive out of
the shares we issued to the WERT at its formation. We also determine the time intervals that an
employee may elect to receive them. The shares issued under the WERT are generally not transferable
for a period of four years after the date of issuance to the employee. Shares from the WERT are
issued in the joint names of the WERT and the employee until such restrictions and obligations are
fulfilled by the employee. After the four-year period, complete ownership of the shares is
transferred to the employee.
If employment is terminated by death, disability or retirement, his or her restricted shares
are transferred to the employees legal heirs or continue to be held by the employee, as the case
may be, and such individuals may exercise any rights to those shares for up to ninety days after
employment has ceased.
The Trustees of the WERT have the authority to amend or terminate the WERT at any time and for
any reason. The WERT is subject to all applicable laws, rules, regulations and approvals by any
governmental agencies as may be required.
Item 7. Major Shareholders And Related Party Transactions
Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our
equity shares as of March 31, 2007, of each person or group known by us to own beneficially 5% or
more of our outstanding equity shares.
72
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting
and investment power with respect to such shares. Shares subject to vested options that are
currently exercisable are deemed to be outstanding or to be beneficially owned by the person
holding such options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person, but are
not deemed to be outstanding or to be beneficially owned for the purpose
of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. All information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of any principal shareholder has been furnished by such shareholder and,
unless otherwise indicated below, we believe that persons named in the table have sole voting and
sole investment power with respect to all the shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to
community property laws, where applicable. The number of shares and percentage ownership are based
on 1,458,999,650 equity shares outstanding as of March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beneficially held as of |
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Class of Security |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
% of Class |
Azim H. Premji (1) |
|
Equity |
|
|
1,161,136,260 |
|
|
|
79.58 |
|
Hasham Traders |
|
Equity |
|
|
326,259,000 |
|
|
|
22.36 |
|
Prazim Traders |
|
Equity |
|
|
325,017,000 |
|
|
|
22.28 |
|
Zash Traders |
|
Equity |
|
|
324,244,800 |
|
|
|
22.22 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 326,259,000 shares held by Hasham Traders (a partnership), of which Mr. Premji is
a partner, 325,017,000 shares held by Prazim Traders (a partnership), of which Mr. Premji is a
partner, 324,244,800 shares held by Zash Traders (a partnership), of which Mr. Premji is a partner,
38,263,000 shares held by Napean Trading Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., of which Mr. Premji is a
director, 51,014,200 shares held by Regal Investments Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., of which Mr. Premji is
a director, 38,860,600 shares held by Vidya Investment Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd., of which Mr. Premji
is a director, 1,434,600 shares held jointly by Mr. Premji and members of his immediately family
and 8,316,000 shares held by the Azim Premji Foundation (I) Pvt. Ltd and 10,000 shares held by Azim
Premji Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Premji disclaims beneficial ownership of 8,316,000 shares held by
Azim Premji Foundation (I) Pvt. Ltd and 10,000 shares held by Azim Premji Foundation Pvt. Ltd. |
Our American Depositary Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Each ADS represents
one equity share of par value Rs. 2 per share. Our ADSs are registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as of March 31, 2007, are held by approximately 20,229
holders of record in the United States.
Our equity shares can be held by Foreign Institutional Investors, or FIIs, and Non-resident
Indians, or NRIs, who are registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India, or SEBI, and
the Reserve Bank of India, or RBI. Currently, 7.85% of the Companys equity shares are held by
these FIIs, and NRIs, some of which may be residents or corporate entities registered in the United
States of America and elsewhere. We are not aware of which FIIs, NRIs hold our equity shares as
residents or as corporate entities registered in the United States.
Our major shareholders do not have a differential voting right with respect to their equity
shares. To the best of our knowledge, we are not owned or controlled directly or indirectly by any
Government or by any other corporation. We are not aware of any arrangement, the operation of which
may at a subsequent date result in a change in control, of our Company.
Related Party Transactions
Terms of Employment Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements. We are a party to various
employment and indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. See Terms of
Employment Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements under Item 6 of this Annual Report for a
description of the agreements that we have entered into with our directors and executive officers.
Item 8. Financial Information
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Please refer the following financial statements and the Auditors Report under item 18 in this
Annual Report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
Report of the independent registered public accounting firm; |
73
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006 and 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and comprehensive income for the
years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Legal Proceedings
Please see the section tiled Legal Proceedings under Item 4 of this Annual Report for this
information.
Dividends
Although the amount varies, public companies in India typically pay cash dividends. Under
Indian law, a corporation pays dividends upon a recommendation by the Board of Directors and
approval by a majority of the shareholders, who have the right to decrease but not increase the
amount of the dividend recommended by the Board of Directors. Under the Indian Companies Act,
dividends may be paid out of profits of a company in the year in which the dividend is declared or
out of the undistributed profits of previous fiscal years.
For the year ended March 31, 2005, we paid a final dividend of Rs. 2.50 per equity share. For
the year ended March 31, 2006, we paid a final dividend of Rs. 5 per equity share.
For the year ended March 31, 2007, the Board of Directors approved an interim cash dividend of
Rs. 5 per share totaling to Rs. 8,253.05. In accordance with Indian regulations an amount
equivalent to the interim cash dividend, net of taxes amounting to Rs. 7,237.88 has been
transferred to a specific bank account pending payment to the shareholders. The balance in this
bank account can only be used to pay the specified dividend, are not available for general use and
are accordingly reflected as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet.
Although we have no current intention to discontinue dividend payments, we cannot assure you
that any future dividends will be declared or paid or that the amount thereof will not be
decreased. Holders of ADSs will be entitled to receive dividends payable on equity shares
represented by such ADSs. Cash dividends on equity shares represented by ADSs are paid to the
Depositary in rupees and are generally converted by the Depositary into U.S. dollars and
distributed, net of depositary fees, taxes, if any, and expenses, to the holders of such ADSs.
The
Board of Directors has, subject to the approval of shareholders at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting in July 18, 2007, recommended a final dividend of Re. 1 per share on equity shares and ADSs
for the year ended March 31, 2007. The dividend, if declared, will be payable to the shareholders
who are on the records of the Company as on the opening hours of July 1, 2007.
Significant Changes
None.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
Price History
Our equity shares are traded on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai or BSE and The National Stock
Exchange of India Limited, or NSE. We have also applied for de-listing our equity shares from the
Kolkatta Stock Exchange Association Limited and await the approval. Our American Depository Shares,
as evidenced by American Depository Receipts, or ADRs, are traded in the U.S. on the New York Stock
Exchange, or NYSE, under the ticker symbol WIT. Each ADS represents one equity share. Our ADSs
began trading on the NYSE on October 19, 2000.
As
of March 31, 2007, we had 1,458,999,650 issued and outstanding equity shares. This includes
22,573,070 ADSs (equivalent to 22,573,070 equity shares). As of March 31, 2007, there were
approximately 197,774 record holders of our equity shares listed and traded
on the Indian Stock Exchanges and approximately 20,229 record holders of ADSs.
74
The following tables set forth for the periods indicated the price history of our equity
shares and ADSs on the BSE, NSE and the NYSE. The stock prices for the periods prior to July 2005
are re-stated to reflect the stock dividend issued by the Company in July 2005 in the ratio of 1:1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSE |
|
NSE |
|
NYSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per equity share |
|
Price per equity share |
|
Price per ADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
High (Rs.) |
|
Low (Rs.) |
|
High ($) |
|
Low ($) |
|
High (Rs.) |
|
Low (Rs.) |
|
High ($) |
|
Low ($) |
|
High ($) |
|
Low ($) |
Fiscal Year
ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
690.00 |
|
|
|
383.00 |
|
|
|
16.01 |
|
|
|
8.89 |
|
|
|
691.00 |
|
|
|
381.25 |
|
|
|
16.03 |
|
|
|
8.80 |
|
|
|
18.44 |
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
573.00 |
|
|
|
285.55 |
|
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
585.90 |
|
|
|
272.00 |
|
|
|
13.17 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
22.38 |
|
|
|
9.62 |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
389.00 |
|
|
|
200.00 |
|
|
|
8.91 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
387.50 |
|
|
|
198.00 |
|
|
|
8.88 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
12.85 |
|
|
|
5.81 |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
310.17 |
|
|
|
131.88 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
311.67 |
|
|
|
132.90 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
312.50 |
|
|
|
177.17 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
312.50 |
|
|
|
177.17 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
327.50 |
|
|
|
127.50 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
329.00 |
|
|
|
126.50 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
690.00 |
|
|
|
531.00 |
|
|
|
16.01 |
|
|
|
12.32 |
|
|
|
691.00 |
|
|
|
527.15 |
|
|
|
16.03 |
|
|
|
12.23 |
|
|
|
18.44 |
|
|
|
14.62 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
614.00 |
|
|
|
507.65 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
11.78 |
|
|
|
670.00 |
|
|
|
449.50 |
|
|
|
15.55 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
|
16.39 |
|
|
|
12.96 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
533.90 |
|
|
|
441.25 |
|
|
|
12.39 |
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
|
533.65 |
|
|
|
442.30 |
|
|
|
12.38 |
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
|
|
13.31 |
|
|
|
11.23 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
598.90 |
|
|
|
383.00 |
|
|
|
13.90 |
|
|
|
8.89 |
|
|
|
599.00 |
|
|
|
381.25 |
|
|
|
13.90 |
|
|
|
8.80 |
|
|
|
15.50 |
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
573.00 |
|
|
|
440.20 |
|
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
|
9.89 |
|
|
|
585.90 |
|
|
|
385.00 |
|
|
|
13.17 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
15.49 |
|
|
|
11.90 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
470.00 |
|
|
|
355.00 |
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
|
|
|
470.00 |
|
|
|
355.75 |
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
12.75 |
|
|
|
9.62 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
385.80 |
|
|
|
350.05 |
|
|
|
8.67 |
|
|
|
7.87 |
|
|
|
384.80 |
|
|
|
345.20 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
7.76 |
|
|
|
21.60 |
|
|
|
9.59 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388.00 |
|
|
|
285.55 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
384.90 |
|
|
|
272.00 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
22.38 |
|
|
|
17.59 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
382.50 |
|
|
|
312.50 |
|
|
|
8.77 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
380.00 |
|
|
|
305.18 |
|
|
|
8.71 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
12.55 |
|
|
|
9.81 |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(monthly for last six months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
600.00 |
|
|
|
515.00 |
|
|
|
13.92 |
|
|
|
11.95 |
|
|
|
604.80 |
|
|
|
515.00 |
|
|
|
14.03 |
|
|
|
11.95 |
|
|
|
17.24 |
|
|
|
15.13 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
618.80 |
|
|
|
531.00 |
|
|
|
14.36 |
|
|
|
12.32 |
|
|
|
609.50 |
|
|
|
527.15 |
|
|
|
14.14 |
|
|
|
12.23 |
|
|
|
16.92 |
|
|
|
14.62 |
|
February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
690.00 |
|
|
|
536.55 |
|
|
|
16.01 |
|
|
|
12.45 |
|
|
|
691.00 |
|
|
|
549.75 |
|
|
|
16.03 |
|
|
|
12.76 |
|
|
|
18.44 |
|
|
|
15.52 |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
660.00 |
|
|
|
566.10 |
|
|
|
15.31 |
|
|
|
13.13 |
|
|
|
675.00 |
|
|
|
561.35 |
|
|
|
15.66 |
|
|
|
13.02 |
|
|
|
18.00 |
|
|
|
15.25 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
614.00 |
|
|
|
542.00 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
12.58 |
|
|
|
613.90 |
|
|
|
521.65 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
12.10 |
|
|
|
16.39 |
|
|
|
14.76 |
|
November 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
604.00 |
|
|
|
523.10 |
|
|
|
14.01 |
|
|
|
12.14 |
|
|
|
670.00 |
|
|
|
449.50 |
|
|
|
15.55 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
|
16.12 |
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Source: BSE data obtained from www.bseindia.com and NSE data obtained from
www.nseindia.com. NYSE data obtained from www.finance.yahoo.com. |
Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
Markets
Trading Practices and Procedures on the Indian Stock Exchanges
BSE and NSE (Exchanges) together account for more than 80% of the total trading volume on the
Indian Stock Exchanges. Trading on both of these exchanges is accomplished on electronic trading
platforms. Trading is done on a two-day fixed settlement basis on all of the exchanges. Any
outstanding amount at the end of the settlement period is settled by delivery and payment. However,
institutional investors are not permitted to net out their transactions and must trade on a
delivery basis.
Orders can be entered with a specified term of validity that may last until the end of the
session, day or settlement period. Dealers must specify whether orders are for a proprietary
account or for a client. Exchanges specify certain margin requirements for trades executed on the
exchange, including margins based on the volume or quantity of exposure that the broker has on the
market, as well as market-to-market margins payable on a daily basis for all outstanding trades.
Trading on Exchanges normally takes place from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on all weekdays, except
holidays. Exchanges do not permit carry forward trades. They have separate margin requirements
based on the net
75
exposure of the broker on the exchange. Exchanges also have separate online trading systems
and separate clearing houses.
BSE was closed from January 11 through January 13, 1993 due to a riot in Mumbai. It was also
closed on March 12, 1993 due to a bomb explosion within its premises. From December 14 through
December 23, 1993 the BSE was closed due to a brokers strike, and from March 20 through March 22,
1995, the governing board of the BSE closed the market due to a default of one of the broker
members and due to which the trading of equity shares on the BSE has been suspended. There have
been no closures of the Indian Stock Exchanges in response to panic trading or large
fluctuations. On May 17, 2004, Exchanges have observed that there were wide fluctuations in the
prices of various securities / SENSEX/Nifty, thereby resulting in a halt in the trading activity at
the exchanges on two occasions, as per the Securities and Exchange Board of India or SEBI
prescribed guidelines on Circuit Breakers. BSE and NSE were closed on July 28, 2005 due to rain in
Mumbai. On May 22, 2006 Exchanges have observed that there were wide fluctuations in the prices of
various securities / SENSEX/Nifty, thereby resulting in a halt in the trading activity,
The stock exchanges in India now operate on a trading day plus two, or T+2 rolling settlement
systems. At the end of the T+2 period, obligations are settled with buyers of securities paying for
and receiving securities, while sellers transfer and receive payment for securities. The SEBI has
moved to a T+2 settlement system, and is subsequently planning to move to a T+1 settlement system.
In order to contain the risk arising out of the transactions entered into by the members in
various securities either on their own account or on behalf of their clients, the largest exchanges
have designed risk management procedures, which include compulsory prescribed margins on the
individual broker members, based on their outstanding exposure in the market, as well as stock
specific margins from the members. There are generally no restrictions on price movements of any
security on any given day. In order to restrict abnormal price volatility, the SEBI has instructed
the stock exchanges to apply the following price bands, calculated at the previous days closing
price as follows:
Market Wide Circuit Breakers: Market wide circuit breakers are applied to the market for
movements by 10%, 15% and 20% for two prescribed market indices; the Sensex for the BSE and the
Nifty for the NSE. If any of these circuit breaker thresholds are reached, trading on all equity
and equity derivates markets nationwide is halted.
Price Bands: Price Bands are circuit filters of 20% movements either up or down and are
applied to most securities traded in the markets, excluding securities included in the BSE Sensex
and the NSE Nifty indices and derivatives products.
Amendments to SEBI (DIP) Guidelines, 2000;
In the event of book built issues in an Initial Public Offering, or IPO, it has been decided
to increase the allocation to Retail Individual Investors (RIIs) from the existing 25% to 35%, and
to correspondingly reduce the allocation to Non-Institutional Investors (NIIs) from the existing
25% to 15%. Further, if the book built issues are made pursuant to the requirement of mandatory
allocation of 60% to QIBs in terms of Rule 19(2)(b) of the Securities Contract Regulations Rules,
1956, the respective figures shall be 30% of the RIIs and 10% for NIIs.
The RII at present is defined in value terms as one who can apply for shares up to a maximum
amount of Rs.1,00,000.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India or SEBI has introduced the regime of private
placements of securities by Indian listed companies called Qualified Institutions Placements or
QIP. The new regime has been introduced in the form of Chapter XIIIA of the SEBI (Disclosures and
Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000, or DIP Guidelines, on May 8, 2006 or the Amendment.
QIPs are basically the issue of specified securities by Indian companies to Qualified
Institutional Buyers, QIBs. The Amendment defines the specified securities as equity shares, fully
convertible debentures, partly convertible debentures or any securities other than warrants, which
are convertible into or exchangeable with equity shares at a later date.
Reduction in the bidding period
To effect a change in the existing bidding period, which may not exceed 10 business days
subject to a three day extension in case of a revision in price bands, SEBI has decided to reduce
the bidding period from the current 5-10 business day period (including holidays) to a 3-7 business
day period.
76
Disclosure of Price Band/Floor Price in case of listed companies
The existing DIP guidelines require all issuers (whether listed or unlisted) making a public
issue through the book building process to disclose the price band/floor price in the Red Herring
Prospectus / application form. SEBI has also decided to give an option to listed issuers to either
disclose the price band in the red herring prospectus or application form or to disclose the price
band/floor price at least one day before the bid opens.
Listing
The SEBI has promulgated regulations creating an independent self-regulatory authority called
the Central Listing Authority, or the CLA. No stock exchange can consider a listing application
unless it is accompanied by a letter of recommendation from the CLA. However, currently the CLA is
not fully operational. This law has since been repealed and the authority dissolved.
The National Stock Exchange of India Limited
The market capitalization of the capital markets (equities) segment of the NSE as of May 9,
2007 was approximately Rs. 35.81 trillion or approximately $ 831 billion. The clearing and
settlement operations of the NSE are managed by its wholly-owned subsidiary, the National
Securities Clearing Corporation Limited. Funds settlement takes place through designated clearing
banks. The National Securities Clearing Corporation Limited interfaces with the depositaries on the
one hand and the clearing banks on the other to provide delivery versus payment settlement for
depositary-enabled trades.
As of May 9, 2007, the NSE had 798 members comprised of 29 individual members, 736 companies,
33 firms.
Bombay Stock Exchange Limited
The estimated aggregate market capitalization of stocks trading on the BSE as of May 9, 2007
was approximately Rs. 8.77 trillion or approximately $ 204 billion. The BSE began allowing online
trading in May 1995. As of May 9, 2007, the BSE had 854 members, comprised of 140 individual
members, 672 Indian companies, 22 partnership firms and 20 composite corporate members. Only a
member of the stock exchange has the right to trade in the stocks listed on the stock exchange.
Derivatives
Trading in derivatives in India takes place either on separate and independent derivatives
exchanges or on a separate segment of an existing stock exchange. The derivative exchange or
derivative segment of a stock exchange functions as a self-regulatory organization under the
supervision of the SEBI.
Depositories
The National Securities Depository Limited and Central Depositary Services (India) Limited are
the two depositories that provide electronic depositary facilities for trading in equity and debt
securities in India. The SEBI mandates a company making a public or rights issue or an offer for
sale to enter into an agreement with a depository for dematerialization of securities already
issued or proposed to be issued to the public or existing shareholders; The SEBI has also provided
that the issue and allotment of shares in initial public offerings and/or the trading of shares
shall only be in electronic form.
Securities Transaction Tax
A brief description of the securities transaction tax and capital gains treatment under India
law is provided under the section Taxation.
Item 10. Additional Information
Share Capital
Our authorized share capital is Rs. 3,550,000,000 divided into 1,650,000,000 equity shares of
Rs. 2/- each and 25,000,000 preference shares of Rs. 10/- each. As of March 31, 2007, 1,458,999,650
equity shares, par value Rs. 2 per share were issued, outstanding and fully paid. We currently have
no convertible debentures or warrants outstanding.
Memorandum and Articles Of Association
77
Set forth below is a brief summary of the material provisions of our Articles of Association
and the Indian Companies Act, 1956 all as currently in effect. Wipro Limited is registered under
the Companies Act, with the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, Bangalore, India, with Company No.
20800. The following description of our Articles of Association does not purport to be complete and
is qualified in its entirety by the Articles of Association, and Memorandum of Association, of
Wipro Limited that are included as exhibits to our registration statement on Form F-1 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2000.
Our Articles of Association provide that the minimum number of directors shall be four and the
maximum number of directors shall be twelve. As of March 31, 2007, we have seven directors. Our
Articles of Association provide that at least two-thirds of our directors shall be subject to
retirement by rotation. One third of these directors must retire from office at each annual general
meeting of the shareholders. A retiring director is eligible for re-election. Up to one-third of
our directors can be appointed as permanent directors. Currently, Azim H. Premji is a non-retiring
director. Our Articles of Association do not mandate the retirement of our directors under an age
limit requirement. Our Articles of Association do not require our Board members to be shareholders
in our company.
Our Articles of Association provide that any director who has a personal interest in a
transaction must disclose such interest, must abstain from voting on such transaction and may not
be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting.
The remuneration payable to our directors may be fixed by our Board of Directors in accordance
with provisions of the Companies Act, and the rules and regulations prescribed by the Government of
India.
Objects and Purposes of Our Memorandum of Association
The following is a summary of our existing Objects as set forth in Section 3 of our Memorandum
of Association:
|
|
|
To purchase or otherwise acquire and take over any lands. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on the business of extracting vegetable oil. |
|
|
|
|
To manufacture and deal in hydrogenated vegetable oil. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on business as manufacturers, sellers, buyers, exporters, importers, and
dealers of fluid power products. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on business as mechanical engineers, tool makers,
brass and metal
founders, mill-makers, mill-wrighters, machinists and metallurgists. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on the trade or business of manufacturing and distributing chemical,
synthetic and organic products. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on business as manufacturers, exporters, sellers, dealers and buyers in
all types and kinds of goods, articles and things. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on business in India and elsewhere as manufacturer, assembler, designer,
builder, seller, buyer, exporter, importer, factors, agents, hirers and dealers of
computer hardware and software and any related aspects thereof. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on research and development activities on all aspects related to products
business and objects of our company. |
|
|
|
|
To construct, equip and maintain mills, factories, warehouses, godowns, jetties
and wharves, and any other conveniences or erection suitable for any of the purpose
of our company. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on all or any of the business of soap and candle makers, tallow
merchants, chemists, druggists, dry salters, oil-merchants, manufacturers of dyes,
paints, chemicals and explosives and manufacturers of and dealers in pharmaceutical,
chemical, medicinal and other preparations or compounds, perfumery and proprietary
articles and photographic materials and derivatives and other similar articles of
every description. |
78
|
|
|
To carry on any other trade or business whatsoever as can in the opinion of us be
advantageously or conveniently carried on by us. |
|
|
|
|
To carry on the business of metal working and manufacturing. |
|
|
|
|
To acquire and take over the whole or any part of the business, property and
liabilities of any person or persons, firm or corporation carrying on any business
which we are authorized to carry on or possessed of any property or rights suitable
for our purposes. |
|
|
|
|
To manufacture or otherwise acquire and deal in containers and packing materials
of any kind. |
|
|
|
|
To apply for, purchase or otherwise acquire any patents, inventions, licenses,
concessions and the like conferring an exclusive or non-exclusive or limited right to
use, any secret or other information as to any invention. |
|
|
|
|
To purchase or otherwise acquire, manufacture, and deal in all raw materials,
stores, stock-in-trade, goods, chattels and effects. |
|
|
|
|
To enter into any partnership or any arrangement for sharing profits, union of
interests, joint ventures, reciprocal concession or otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
To purchase or otherwise acquire all or any part of the business, property and
liabilities of any person, company, society, for all or any of the purposes within
the objects of our company. |
|
|
|
|
To enter into any arrangement with any Governments or authorities. |
|
|
|
|
To provide for the welfare of persons in the employment of our company, or
formerly engaged in any business acquired by our company, and the wives, widows,
families or dependants of such persons. |
|
|
|
|
To undertake, carry out, promote and sponsor rural development, including any
program for promoting the social and economic welfare or uplift of the public in any
rural area. |
|
|
|
|
To undertake, carry out, promote and sponsor or assist in any activity for the
promotion and growth of the national economy and for discharging what the directors
may consider to be the social and moral responsibilities of our company to the public
or any section of the public. |
|
|
|
|
To undertake and carry on the business of providing all kinds of information
technology based and enabled services in India and internationally, electronic remote
processing services, eServices, including all types of Internet-based/ Web enabled
services, transaction processing, fulfillment services, business support services
including but not limited to providing financial and related services of all kinds
and description including billing services, processing services, database services,
data entry business-marketing services, business information and management services,
training and consultancy services to businesses, organizations, concerns, firms,
corporations, trusts, local bodies, states, governments and other entities; to
establish and operate service processing centers for providing services for back
office and processing requirements, marketing, sales, credit collection services for
companies engaged in the business of remote processing and IT enabled services from a
place of business in India or elsewhere, contacting and communicating to and on
behalf of overseas customers by voice, data image, letters using dedicated
international private lines; and to handle business process management, remote help
desk management; remote management; remote customer interaction, customer
relationship management and customer servicing through call centers, email based
activities and letter/fax based communication, knowledge storage and management, data
management, warehousing, search, integration and analysis for financial and non
financial data. |
|
|
|
|
To act as information technology consultants and to operate a high technology data
processing center for providing information processing, analysis, development,
accounting and business information and data to customers in India and
internationally; to carry on the business of gathering, collating, compiling,
processing, analyzing, distributing, selling, publishing data and information and
including conduct of studies and research, and marketing of information and services
and providing access to information regarding financial operations and management,
financial services, investment services business and commercial operations, financial
status, creditworthiness and rating, consumer responses and management of businesses
of all kinds and descriptions by whatever name called. |
79
|
|
|
To carry on the business as Internet service provider and undertake any and all
kinds of Internet/web based activities and transactions; to design, develop, sell,
provide, maintain, market, buy, import, export, sell and license computer software,
hardware, computer systems and programs products, services and to give out computer
machine time and to carry on the business of collecting, collating, storing, devising
other systems including software programs and systems. |
|
|
|
|
From time to time, to subscribe or contribute to any charitable, benevolent or
useful object of a public nature. |
Description of Equity Shares
Dividends
Under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, unless our Board of Directors recommends the payment of
a dividend, we may not declare a dividend. Similarly, under our Articles of Association, although
the shareholders may, at the annual general meeting, approve a dividend in an amount less than that
recommended by the Board of Directors, they cannot increase the amount of the dividend. In India,
dividends generally are declared as a percentage of the par value of a companys equity shares. The
dividend recommended by the Board, if any, and subject to the limitations described above, is
distributed and paid to shareholders in proportion to the paid up value of their shares within 30
days of the approval by the shareholders at the annual general meeting. Pursuant to our Articles of
Association, our Board of Directors has discretion to declare and pay interim dividends without
shareholder approval. Under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 read with the listing agreements entered
into with Indian stock exchanges, dividends can only be paid in cash to the registered shareholder
at a record date fixed on or prior to the annual general meeting or to his order or his bankers
order.
The Companies Act provides that any dividends that remain unpaid or unclaimed after the 30-day
period are to be transferred to a special bank account. We transfer any dividends that remain
unclaimed for seven years from the date of the transfer to the Investor Education and Protection
Fund created by the Indian Government. After the transfer to this fund, such unclaimed dividends
can not be claimed.
Under the Companies Act, dividends may be paid out of profits of a company in the year in
which the dividend is declared or out of the undistributed profits of previous fiscal years. Before
declaring a dividend greater than 10% of the par value of its equity shares, a company is required
under the Companies Act to transfer to its reserves a minimum percentage of its profits for that
year, ranging from 2.5% to 10%, depending upon the dividend percentage to be declared in such year.
The Companies Act further provides that, in the event of an inadequacy or absence of profits
in any year, a dividend may be declared for such year out of the companys accumulated profits,
subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
the rate of dividend to be declared may not exceed 10% of its paid up capital or the
average of the rate at which dividends were declared by the company in the prior five
years, whichever is less; |
|
|
|
|
the total amount to be drawn from the accumulated profits earned in the previous years
and transferred to the reserves may not exceed an amount equivalent to 10% of its paid up
capital and free reserves, and the amount so drawn is to be used first to set off the
losses incurred in the fiscal year before any dividends in respect of preference or equity
shares are declared; and |
|
|
|
|
the balance of reserves after withdrawals shall not fall below 15% of its paid up
capital. |
We are subject to taxation for each dividend declared, distributed or paid for a relevant
period by our company.
Bonus Shares
In addition to permitting dividends to be paid out of current or retained earnings as
described above, the Companies Act permits a company to distribute an amount transferred from the
general reserve or other permitted reserves, including surplus in the companys profit and loss
account, to its shareholders in the form of bonus shares (similar to a stock dividend). The
Companies Act also permits the issuance of bonus shares from a share premium account. Bonus shares
are distributed to shareholders in the proportion recommended by the Board of Directors.
Shareholders on record on a fixed record date are entitled to receive such bonus shares.
Audit and Annual Report
80
At least 21 days before the Annual General Meeting of shareholders (excluding the days of
mailing and date of the meeting,), we must distribute to our shareholders a detailed version of our
audited Indian GAAP balance sheet and profit and loss account and the related reports of our Board
of Directors and the Auditors, together with a notice convening the general meeting. Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has permitted dispatch of abridged financial statements to
shareholders in India in lieu of detailed version of financial statements. Under the Companies Act,
a company must file the balance sheet and annual profit and loss account presented to the
shareholders within 30 days of the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting with the Registrar of
Companies.
A company must also file an annual return containing a list of the companys shareholders and
other company information within 60 days of the conclusion of the meeting.
Consolidation and Subdivision of Shares
The Indian Companies Act permits a company to split or combine the par value of its shares,
provided such split or combination is not made in fractions. Shareholders of record on a fixed
record date are entitled to receive the split or combination.
Preemptive Rights, Issue of Additional Shares and Distribution of Rights
The Companies Act gives shareholders the right to subscribe for new shares in proportion to
their respective existing shareholdings unless otherwise determined by a special resolution passed
by a General Meeting of the shareholders. Under the Companies Act, in the event of an issuance of
securities, subject to the limitations set forth above, a company must first offer the new shares
to the shareholders on a fixed record date. The offer must include: (i) the right, exercisable by
the shareholders of record, to renounce the shares offered in favor of any other person; and (ii)
the number of shares offered and the period of the offer, which may not be less than 15 days from
the date of offer. If the offer is not accepted, it is deemed to have been declined. The Board of
Directors is authorized under the Companies Act to distribute any new shares not purchased by the
preemptive rights holders in the manner that it deems most beneficial to the company. Holders of
ADSs may not be permitted to participate in any such offer.
If we ever plan to distribute additional rights to purchase our equity shares, we will give
prior written notice to the depositary bank and we will assist the depositary bank in determining
whether it is lawful and reasonably practicable to distribute rights to purchase additional ADSs to
holders.
The depositary bank will establish procedures to distribute rights to purchase additional ADSs
to holders and to enable such holders to exercise such rights if it is lawful and reasonably
practicable to make the rights available to holders of ADSs, subject to all of the documentation
contemplated in the deposit agreement (such as opinions to address the lawfulness of the
transaction). You may have to pay fees, expenses, taxes and other governmental charges to
subscribe for the new ADSs upon the exercise of your rights. The depositary bank is not obligated
to establish procedures to facilitate the distribution and exercise by holders of rights to
purchase new equity shares directly, rather than new ADSs.
The depositary bank will not distribute the rights to you if:
|
|
|
we do not timely request that the rights be distributed to you or we request that
the rights not be distributed to you; |
|
|
|
|
we fail to deliver satisfactory documents to the depositary bank; or |
|
|
|
|
it is not reasonably practicable to distribute the rights. |
The depositary bank will sell the rights that are not exercised or not distributed if such
sale is lawful and reasonably practicable. The proceeds of such sale will be distributed to
holders as in the case of a cash distribution. If the depositary bank is unable to sell the
rights, it will allow the rights to lapse.
Voting Rights
At any General Meeting, voting is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded by a shareholder
or shareholders present in person or by proxy holding at least 10% of the total shares entitled to
vote on the resolution or by those holding shares with an aggregate paid up capital of at least Rs.
50,000. Upon a show of hands, every shareholder entitled to vote and present in person has one vote
and, on a poll, every shareholder entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy has voting
rights in proportion to the paid up capital held by such shareholders. The Chairman of the Board
has a deciding vote in the case of any tie. Any shareholder of the company may appoint a proxy.
The instrument appointing a proxy must be delivered to the company at least 48 hours prior to
the meeting. A proxy
81
may not vote except on a poll. A corporate shareholder may appoint an
authorized representative who can vote on behalf of the shareholder, both upon a show of hands and
upon a poll.
Ordinary resolutions may be passed by simple majority of those present and voting at any
General Meeting for which the required period of notice has been given. However, certain
resolutions such as amendments of the Articles and changes in certain clauses in the Memorandum of
Association, commencement of a new line of business, the waiver of preemptive rights for the
issuance of any new shares and a reduction of share capital, require that votes cast in favor of
the resolution (whether by show of hands or poll) are not less than three times the number of
votes, if any, cast against the resolution. As per the Companies Act, not less than two-third of
the directors of a public company shall retire by rotation and be appointed by the shareholders in
the general meeting.
Liquidation Rights
Subject to the rights of creditors, employees and the holders of any shares entitled by their
terms to preferential repayment over the equity shares, if any, in the event of our winding-up, the
holders of the equity shares are entitled to be repaid the amounts of paid up capital or credited
as paid up on those equity shares. All surplus assets after payments to the holders of any
preference shares at the commencement of the winding-up shall be paid to holders of equity shares
in proportion to their shareholdings.
Preference Shares
Preference shares have preferential dividend and liquidation rights. Preference shares may be
redeemed if they are fully paid, and only out of our profits, or out of the proceeds of the sale of
shares issued for purposes of such redemption. Holders of preference shares do not have the right
to vote at shareholder meetings, except on resolutions which directly affect the rights of their
preference shares. However, holders of cumulative preference shares have the right to vote on every
resolution at any meeting of the shareholders if the dividends due on the preference shares have
not been paid, in whole or in part, for a period of at least two years prior to the date of the
meeting. Currently, we have no preference shares issued and outstanding.
Redemption of Equity Shares
Under the Companies Act, unlike preference shares, equity shares are not redeemable.
Liability on Calls
Not applicable.
Discriminatory Provisions in Articles
There are no provisions in our Articles of Association discriminating against any existing or
prospective holder of such securities as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number
of shares.
Alteration of Shareholder Rights
Under the Companies Act, the rights of any class of shareholders can be altered or varied with
the consent in writing of the holder of not less than three-fourths of the issued shares of that
class or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of
the issued shares of that class if the provisions with respect to such variation is contained in
the memorandum or articles of the company, or in the absence of any such provision in the
memorandum or articles, if such variation is not prohibited by the terms of issue of the shares of
that class.
Under the Companies Act, the Articles may be altered only by way of a special resolution.
Meetings of Shareholders
We must convene an annual general meeting of shareholders within six months after the end of
each fiscal year and may convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders when necessary or
at the request of a shareholder or shareholders holding at least 10% of our paid up capital
carrying voting rights. The annual general meeting of the shareholders is generally convened by our
Secretary pursuant to a resolution of our Board of Directors. Written notice setting out the agenda
of the meeting must be given at least 21 days, excluding the days of mailing and date of the
meeting, prior to the date of the general meeting to the shareholders of record. Shareholders who
are registered as shareholders on a pre-determined date are entitled to such notice or their
proxies and have a right to attend or vote at such meeting. The annual general meeting of
shareholders must be held at our registered office or at such other place
within the city in which the registered office is located. Meetings other than the annual
general meeting may be held at
82
any other place if so determined by our Board of Directors. Our
Articles of Association provide that a quorum for a general meeting is the presence of at least
five shareholders in person.
Additionally, shareholder consent for certain items or special business is required to be
obtained by a postal ballot. In order to obtain the shareholders consent, our Board of Directors
appoint a scrutinizer, who is not in our employment, who, in the opinion of the Board, can conduct
the postal ballot voting process in a fair and transparent manner in accordance with the provisions
of Companies (Passing of the Resolution by Postal Ballot) Rules, 2001.
Limitations on the Rights to Own Securities
The limitations on the rights to own securities, including the rights of non-resident or
foreign shareholders to hold the securities, imposed by Indian law are discussed in Item 10 of this
Annual Report, under the section titled Currency Exchange Controls and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Voting Rights of Deposited Equity Shares Represented by ADSs
Under Indian law, voting of the equity shares is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded by
a member or members present in person or by proxy holding at least 10% of the total shares entitled
to vote on the resolution or by those holding an aggregate paid up capital of at least Rs. 50,000.
A proxy may not vote except on a poll.
As soon as practicable after receipt of notice of any meetings or solicitation of consents or
proxies of holders of shares or other deposited securities, our Depositary shall fix a record date
for determining the holders entitled to give instructions for the exercise of voting rights. The
Depositary shall then mail to the holders of ADSs a notice stating (a) such information as is
contained in such notice of meeting and any solicitation materials, (b) that each holder on the
record date set by the Depositary therefore will be entitled to instruct the Depositary as to the
exercise of the voting rights, if any, pertaining to the deposited securities represented by the
ADSs evidenced by such holders of ADRs, and (c) the manner in which such instruction may be given,
including instructions to give discretionary proxy to a person designated by us.
On receipt of the aforesaid notice from the Depositary, our ADS holders may instruct the
Depositary on how to exercise the voting rights for the shares that underlie their ADSs. For such
instructions to be valid, the Depositary must receive them on or before a specified date.
The Depositary will try, as far as is practical, and subject to the provisions of Indian law
and our Memorandum of Association and our Articles of Association, to vote or to have its agents
vote the shares or other deposited securities as per our ADS holders instructions. The Depositary
will only vote or attempt to vote as per an ADS holders instructions. The Depositary will not
itself exercise any voting discretion.
Neither the Depositary nor its agents are responsible for any failure to carry out any voting
instructions, for the manner in which any vote is cast, or for the effect of any vote. There is no
guarantee that our shareholders will receive voting materials in time to instruct the Depositary to
vote and it is possible that ADS holders, or persons who hold their ADSs through brokers, dealers
or other third parties, will not have the opportunity to exercise a right to vote.
Register of Shareholders; Record Dates; Transfer of Shares
We maintain a register of shareholders. The register of shareholders in electronic form is
maintained through the National Securities Depository Limited and the Central Depository Services
(India) Ltd. For the purpose of determining the shares entitled to annual dividends, the register
is closed for a specified period prior to the annual general meeting. The date on which this period
begins is the record date. To determine which shareholders are entitled to specified shareholder
rights, we may close the register of shareholders. The Companies Act requires us to give at least
seven days prior notice to the public before such closure. We may not close the register of
shareholders for more than thirty consecutive days, and in no event for more than forty-five days
in a year. Trading of our equity shares, however, may continue while the register of shareholders
is closed.
Shares held through depositaries are transferred in the form of book entries or in electronic
form in accordance with the regulations laid down by SEBI. Transfers of beneficial ownership of
shares held through a depository are exempt from stamp duty. Transfers of equity shares in
book-entry form require both the seller and the purchaser of the equity shares to establish
accounts with depository participants appointed by depositories established under the Depositories
Act, 1996. Upon delivery, the equity shares shall be registered in the name of the relevant
depository on our books and this depository shall enter the name of the investor in its records as
the beneficial owner. The transfer of beneficial ownership shall be effected through the records
of the depository. The beneficial owner shall be entitled to all rights and benefits and subject
to all liabilities in respect of his securities held by a depository.
83
The requirement to hold the equity shares in book-entry form will apply to the ADS holders
when the equity shares are withdrawn from the depository facility upon surrender of the ADSs. In
order to trade the equity shares in the Indian market, the withdrawing ADS holder will be required
to comply with the procedures described above.
Following the introduction of the Depositories Act, 1996, and the repeal of Section 22A of the
Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, which enabled companies to refuse to register
transfers of shares in some circumstances, the equity shares of a public company are freely
transferable, subject only to the provisions of Section 111A of the Companies Act. Since we are a
public company, the provisions of Section 111A will apply to us. Our Articles of Association
currently contain provisions which give our directors discretion to refuse to register a transfer
of shares in some circumstances. Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of Section 111A(2)
of the Companies Act, our directors may refuse to register a transfer of shares if they have
sufficient cause to do so. If our directors refuse to register a transfer of shares, the
shareholder wishing to transfer his, her or its shares may file a civil suit or an appeal with the
Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal.
Pursuant to Section 111A(3), if a transfer of shares contravenes any of the provisions of the
Indian Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, or the regulations issued thereunder, or
the Indian Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, or any other Indian laws, the
Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal may, on application made by the company, a
depositary incorporated in India, an investor, the Securities and Exchange Board of India or other
parties, direct the rectification of the register of records. The Company Law Board or National
Company Law Tribunal may, in its discretion, issue an interim order suspending the voting rights
attached to the relevant shares before making or completing its investigation into the alleged
contravention. Notwithstanding such investigation, the rights of a shareholder to transfer the
shares will not be restricted.
Under the Companies Act, unless the shares of a company are held in a dematerialized form, a
transfer of shares is effected by an instrument of transfer in the form prescribed by the Companies
Act and the rules thereunder together with delivery of the share certificates. Our transfer agent
for our equity shares is Karvy Computershare Pvt. Limited located in Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Company Acquisition of Equity Shares
Under the Companies Act, approval of at least 75% of a companys shareholders voting on the
matter and approval of the High Court or National Company Law Tribunal of the state in which the
registered office of the company is situated is required to reduce a companys share capital. A
company may, under some circumstances, acquire its own equity shares without seeking the approval
of the High Court or National Company Law Tribunal. However, a company would have to extinguish the
shares it has so acquired within the prescribed time period. A company is not permitted to acquire
its own shares for treasury operations.
An acquisition by a company of its own shares that does not rely on an approval of the High
Court/National Company Law Tribunal must comply with prescribed rules, regulations and conditions
of the Companies Act. In addition, public companies which are listed on a recognized stock exchange
in India must comply with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy-back of
Securities) Regulations, 1998, or Buy-back Regulations. Since we are a public company listed on two
recognized stock exchanges in India, we would have to comply with the relevant provisions of the
Companies Act and the provisions of the Buy-back Regulations.
Disclosure of Ownership Interest
Section 187C of the Indian Companies Act requires beneficial owners of shares of Indian
companies who are not holders of record to declare to the company details of the beneficial owner.
Any person who fails to make the required declaration within 30 days may be liable for a fine of up
to Rs. 1,000 for each day the declaration is not made. Any lien, promissory note or other
collateral agreement created, executed or entered into with respect to any share by the registered
owner thereof, or any hypothecation by the registered owner of any share, pursuant to which a
declaration is required to be made under Section 187C, shall not be enforceable by the beneficial
owner or any person claiming through the beneficial owner if such declaration is not made. Failure
to comply with Section 187C will not affect the obligation of the company to register a transfer of
shares or to pay any dividends to the registered holder of any shares. While it is unclear under
Indian law whether Section 187C applies to holders of ADSs of the company, investors who exchange
ADSs for the underlying Equity Shares of the Company will be subject to the restrictions of Section
187C. Additionally, holders of ADSs may be required to comply with such notification and disclosure
obligations pursuant to the provisions of the Depositary Agreement to be entered into by such
holders, the company and a depositary.
Provisions on Changes in Capital
Our authorized capital can be altered by an ordinary resolution of the shareholders in a
General Meeting. The additional issue of shares is subject to the preemptive rights of the
shareholders and provisions governing the issue of
84
additional shares are discussed in Item 10 of this Annual Report. In addition, a company may
increase its share capital, consolidate its share capital into shares of larger face value than
its existing shares or sub-divide its shares by reducing their par value, subject to an ordinary
resolution of the shareholders in a General Meeting.
Takeover Code and Listing Agreements
Under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and
Takeovers) Regulations, 1997, or Takeover Code, upon the acquisition of more than 5%,10%,14%,54% or
74% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a publicly-listed Indian company, a purchaser is
required to notify the company and the company and the purchaser is required to notify all the
stock exchanges on which the shares of such company are listed. An ADS holder would be subject to
these notification requirements.
Upon the acquisition of 15% or more of such shares or voting rights, or a change in control of
the company, the purchaser is required to make an open offer to the other shareholders, offering to
purchase 20% of all the outstanding shares of the company or such number of shares that will result
in the public shareholding not falling below the minimum public holding requirement, whichever is
lower. Since we are a listed company in India, the provisions of the Takeover Code will apply to
us. If an acquirer holding more than 15% but less than 55% of shares acquires 5% or more shares
during a fiscal year, the acquirer is required to make a public announcement offering to purchase
from the other shareholders at least 20% of all the outstanding shares of the company at a minimum
offer price determined pursuant to the Takeover Code. Any further acquisition of outstanding shares
or voting rights of a publicly listed company by an acquirer who holds more than 55% but less than
75% of shares or voting rights also requires the making of an open offer to acquire such number of
shares as would not result in the public shareholding being reduced to below the minimum specified
in the listing agreement. As per the amendment effective May 26, 2006, if a Company has made a
public issue offering 10% capital to public in India or has obtained relaxation from SEBI, the
above limits of 75% shall be read as 90% in such cases. Where the public shareholding in a target
company may be reduced to a level below the limit specified in the listing agreement the acquirer
may acquire such shares or voting rights only in accordance with guidelines or regulations
regarding delisting of securities specified by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. In
addition, no acquirer may acquire more than 55% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a
publicly listed company through market purchases or preferential allotments. Any such acquisition
beyond 55% is required to be divested in a manner specified in the Takeover Code. Since we are a
listed company in India, the provisions of the Takeover Code will apply to us and to any person
acquiring our equity shares or voting rights in our company. However, the Takeover Code provides
for a specific exemption from this provision to an ADS holder and states that this provision will
apply to an ADS holder only once he or she converts the ADSs into the underlying equity shares.
An acquirer is required to disclose the aggregate of the pre and post acquisition of
shareholding and voting rights of the acquirer to the target company when such acquisition
aggregates to 5%, 10%,14%,54% and 74% of the voting rights. The creeping acquisition limits
provided under SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997, have been
changed to 5% with effect from October 1, 2002 in any fiscal year.
Although the provisions of the listing agreements entered into between us and the Indian Stock
Exchanges on which our equity shares are listed will not apply to equity shares represented by
ADSs, holders of ADSs may be required to comply with such notification and disclosure obligations
pursuant to the provisions of the Depository Agreement to be entered into by such holders, our
company and a depositary.
The Takeover Code permits conditional offers as well as the acquisition and subsequent
delisting of all shares of a company, and provides specific guidelines for the gradual acquisition
of shares or voting rights. Specific obligations of the acquirer and the Board of Directors of a
target company in the offer process have also been set out. Acquirers making a public offer are
also required to deposit into an escrow account a percentage of the total consideration, which
amount will be forfeited if the acquire does not fulfill his obligations. In addition, the
Takeover Code introduces the chain principle by which the acquisition of a holding company will
obligate the acquirer to make a public offer to the shareholders of each listed subsidiary
companies.
The general requirements to make such a public announcement do not, however, apply entirely to
bail-out takeovers when a promoter is taking over a financial weak company, but not to a sick
industrial company pursuant to a rehabilitation scheme approved by a public financial institution
or a scheduled bank. A financial weak company is a company which has at the end of the previous
financial year accumulated losses, which have resulted in the erosion of more than 50% but less
than 100% of the total sum of its paid up capital and free reserves at the end of the previous
financial year. A sick industrial company is a company registered for more than five years which
has at the end of any financial year accumulated losses equal to or exceeding its entire net worth.
The Takeover Code does not apply to acquisitions involving the acquisition of shares, as follows;
|
|
|
by allotment in a public/rights issue (subject to compliance with certain terms and conditions); |
85
|
|
|
pursuant to an underwriting agreement; |
|
|
|
|
by registered stockbrokers in the ordinary course of business on behalf of customers; |
|
|
|
|
in unlisted companies provided it does not result in an indirect acquisition of a listed entity; |
|
|
|
|
pursuant to a scheme of reconstruction or amalgamation; |
|
|
|
|
pursuant to a scheme under Section 18 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special
Provisions) Act, 1985; or; |
|
|
|
|
in terms of the guidelines or regulations regarding delisting of securities
specified or framed by SEBI. |
The Takeover Code does not apply to acquisitions in the ordinary course of business by public
financial institutions either on their own account or as a pledge. The tender offer requirements
under the Takeover Code do not apply to the acquisition of ADSs so long as such ADSs are not
converted into equity shares. However, the acquisition of ADSs (irrespective of conversion into
underlying equity shares) is subject to disclosure and reporting requirements under the Takeover
Code.
A listed company can be delisted under the provisions of the SEBI (Delisting of Securities)
Guidelines, 2003, which govern voluntary and compulsory delisting of shares of Indian companies
from the stock exchanges.
Amendment to the SEBI (Delisting of Securities) Guidelines, 2003
In order to simplify the existing framework with respect to Compulsory Delisting and make it
possible for stock exchanges to delist the Companies which are noncompliant with the provisions of
Listing Agreement, it has been decided to amend the SEBI (Delisting Of Securities) Guidelines,
2003. The amendment seeks to ensure adequate and wide public notice of the fact of delisting and
disclosure of the fair value through newspapers and notice boards/trading systems of the stock
exchange upon delisting of a security. The amendment also seeks to determine the fair value of
securities by persons appointed by the stock exchange out of a panel of experts, which shall also
be selected by the stock exchange.
Minimum Level of public shareholding
In order to ensure availability of floating stock on a continuous basis and to bring about
greater transparency in respect of disclosure of shareholding pattern of companies, Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) vide its circular dated April 13, 2006, (as amended), has decided to
bring in the following policy changes to the continuous listing requirements:
All listed companies , other than those mentioned hereunder, will be required to ensure
minimum level of public shareholding at 25% of the total number of issued shares of a class or kind
for the purpose of continuous listing:
|
|
|
Companies which, at the time of initial listing, had offered less than 25% but not less
than 10% of the total number of issued shares of a class or kind, in terms of Rule 19(2)(b)
of Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules 1957 (SCRR) or companies desiring to list their
shares by making an Initial Public Offering (IPO) of at least 10% in terms of Rule 19(2)(b)
of SCRR. |
|
|
|
|
Companies which have, irrespective of the percentage of their shares with public at the
time of initial listing, reached a size of 20 million or more in terms of number of listed
shares and Rs. 10 billion or more in terms of market capitalization. |
The companies falling in the above categories will be required to maintain the minimum level
of public shareholding at 10% of the total number of issued shares of a class or kind for the
purpose of continuous listing. The aforesaid requirement of maintaining minimum level of public
shareholding on a continuous basis will not be applicable to government companies (as defined under
Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956), infrastructure companies (as defined under clause
1.2.1(xv) of the SEBI (DIP) Guidelines, 2000) and companies referred to the Board for Industrial
and Financial Reconstruction.
The public shareholding for the purpose of continuous listing, will continue to comprise of
shares held by entities other than promoters and promoter group. It shall not include the shares
held by custodians against which depository receipts are issued overseas. The terms Promoter and
Promoter group shall have the same meaning as is assigned to them under the SEBI (Disclosure &
Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000.
86
Increasing the public shareholding to the minimum level
As a result of the above circular there may be two categories of companies, viz., those which
are non-compliant and those which may subsequently become non-compliant on account of factors such
as compliance with directions of a court, tribunal, regulatory or statutory authority, compliance
with SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997, re-organization of
capital by way of a scheme of arrangement, etc.
SEBI decided to provide a transparent mechanism to such noncompliant companies for enabling
them to graduate to the level of compliant companies. The mechanism for increasing the public
shareholding to the minimum level will inter alia provide for various modes of issuing shares in
domestic market and reasonable time period, as approved by Specified Stock Exchange. This
disclosure requirement applies to Wipro and we are complaint with this regulation.
Material Contracts
We are a party to various employment arrangements and indemnification agreements with our
directors and executive officers. See Terms of Employment Arrangements and Indemnification
Agreements under Item 6 of this Annual Report for a further description of the employment
arrangements and indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our directors and
executive officers.
Currency Exchange Controls
Foreign Investments in India are governed by the provisions of Section 6 of the Foreign
Exchange Management Act (FEMA) 1999 and are subject to the Regulations issued by the Reserve Bank
of India under FEMA 1999. The Regulations have been published pursuant to Notification No. FEMA
20/2000-RB dated May 3, 2000. The Foreign Direct Investment Scheme under the Reserve Banks
Automatic Route enables Indian Companies (other than those specifically excluded in the scheme) to
issue shares to persons resident outside India without prior permission from the RBI, subject to
certain conditions. General permission has been granted for the transfer of shares and convertible
debentures by a person resident outside India as follows: (i) for transfers of shares or
convertible debentures held by a person resident outside India other than NRI, to any person
resident outside India and (ii) NRIs are permitted to transfer shares or convertible debentures of
Indian company to other NRIs.
A person resident outside India may transfer securities of an Indian company to a person
resident in India by way of gift. However, where such transfer is not by way of gift, prior
approval of the RBI is necessary only if certain prescribed conditions are not met. . For transfer
of existing shares or convertible debentures of an Indian company by a person resident in India to
a person resident outside India by way of sale, the transferor shall make an application to
Authorized Dealer for permission subject to certain conditions being met. In cases where such
conditions are not met, approval of the Central Government and the Reserve Bank of India may be
also required.
General
Shares of Indian companies represented by ADSs may be approved for issuance to foreign
investors by the Government of India under the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and
Equity Shares (through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993, or the 1993 Regulation, as
modified from time to time, promulgated by the Government of India. The 1993 Regulation is distinct
from other policies or facilities, as described below, relating to investments in Indian companies
by foreign investors. The issuance of ADSs pursuant to the 1993 Regulation also affords to holders
of the ADSs the benefits of Section 115AC of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 for purposes of the
application of Indian tax law.
The Reserve Bank of India, or RBI, has issued a notification directing that Indian companies
may utilize up-to 100 percent of proceeds realized from the sale of ADSs for overseas investments.
In February 2002, the RBI issued a circular stating that the terms of Regulation 4A of the
Reserve Bank of India Notification No. FEMA 20/2000-RB dated May 3, 2000, as amended by
Notification No. FEMA 41/2001-RB dated March 2, 2001, allow a registered broker to purchase shares
of an Indian company on behalf of a person resident outside of India for the purpose of converting
those shares into ADSs/GDSs. However, such conversion is subject to compliance with the
provisions of the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through
Depository Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993 and the periodic guidelines issued by the Central
Government. This would mean that ADSs converted into Indian shares may be converted back into ADSs,
subject to the limits of sectoral caps.
87
The Operative Guidelines for the limited two-way fungibility under the Issue of Foreign
Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (Through Depository Receipt Mechanism) Scheme 1993
has also been approved by the Government of India.
These guidelines provide that a re-issuance of ADSs/GDSs is permitted to the extent of
ADSs/GDSs, have been redeemed for underlying shares and sold in the domestic market. The
re-issuance must be within the specified limits. The conditions to be satisfied in this regard are:
(i) the shares are purchased on a recognized stock exchange; (ii) the Indian company has issued
ADS/GDS, (iii) the shares are purchased with the permission of the custodian of the ADSs/GDSs of
the Indian company and are deposited with the custodian; and (iv) the number of shares so purchased
shall not exceed the number of ADSs/GDSs converted into underlying shares.
The procedure for conversion of shares into ADSs/GDSs is as follows: (i) on request by the
overseas investor for the acquisition of shares for re-issuance of ADSs/GDSs, the SEBI registered
broker will purchase shares from a stock exchange after verifying with the custodian as to the
availability of Head Room (i.e., the number of ADSs/GDSs originally issued minus number of
ADSs/GDSs outstanding further adjusted for ADSs/GDSs redeemed into underlying shares and registered
in the name of the non-resident investor(s)); (ii) an Indian broker purchases the shares in the
name of the overseas depository; (iii) after the purchase, the Indian broker places the domestic
shares with the custodian; (iv) the custodian advises the overseas depository on the custody of
domestic shares and to issue corresponding ADSs/GDSs to the investor; and (v) the overseas
depository issues ADSs/GDSs to the investor.
Transfer of ADSs and Surrender of ADSs
A person resident outside India may transfer the ADSs held in Indian companies to another
person resident outside India without any permission. A person resident in India is not permitted
to hold ADSs of an Indian company, except in connection with the exercise of stock options. An ADS
holder is permitted to surrender the ADSs held by him in an Indian company and to receive the
underlying equity shares under the terms of the Deposit Agreement. Under Indian regulations, the
re-deposit of these equity shares with the depositary to ADSs may not be permitted.
Sponsored ADS
The amendment to the FEMA regulations permit an issuer in India to sponsor the issue of ADSs
through an overseas depositary against underlying equity shares accepted from holders of its equity
shares in India for offering outside of India. The sponsored issue of ADSs was possible only if the
following conditions are satisfied: There have been amendments to the Issue of Foreign Currency
Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares (through Depository Receipt Mechanism), Scheme 1993 and
primarily the amendments were on the Eligibility of Issuer, Eligibility of Subscriber, Pricing of
the offerings, and Voting Rights.
|
|
|
the price of the offering is determined by the managing underwriters of the offering; |
|
|
|
|
the ADS offering is approved by the FIPB; |
|
|
|
|
the ADS offering is approved by a special resolution of the shareholders of the
issuer in a general meeting; |
|
|
|
|
the facility is made available to all the equity shareholders of the issuer; |
|
|
|
|
the proceeds of the offering are repatriated into India within one month of the closing of the offering; |
|
|
|
|
the sales of the existing equity shares are made in compliance with the Foreign
Direct Investment Policy (as described above) in India; |
|
|
|
|
the number of shares offered by selling shareholders are subject to limits in
proportion to the existing holdings of the selling shareholders when the offer is
oversubscribed; and |
|
|
|
|
the offering expenses do not exceed 7% of the offering proceeds and are paid by
shareholders on a pro-rata basis. |
The issuer is also required to furnish a report to the RBI specifying the details of the
offering, including the amount raised through the offering, the number of ADSs issued, the
underlying shares offered and the percentage of equity in the issuer represented by the ADSs.
Conditions for issuance of ADS/GDS outside India by Indian Companies
Eligibility of issuer: An Indian Company, which is not eligible to raise funds from the Indian
Capital Market including a company which has been restrained from accessing the securities market
by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) will not be eligible to issue ADS/GDS apart
from Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds.
Eligibility of subscriber: Erstwhile Overseas Corporate Bodies (OCBs) who are not eligible to
invest in India through the portfolio route and entities prohibited to buy, sell or deal in
securities by SEBI will not be eligible to subscribe to (i) Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and
(ii) ADS/GDS
88
Pricing: The pricing of ADS/GDS and Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds should be made at a price
not less than the higher of the following two averages:
(i) The average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the related shares
quoted on the stock exchange in India during the six months preceding the relevant date;
(ii) The average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the related shares
quoted on a stock exchange in India during the two weeks preceding the relevant date.
The relevant date means the date thirty days prior to the date on which the meeting of the
general body of shareholders is held, in terms of section 81 (IA) of the Companies Act, 1956, to
consider the proposed issue.
Foreign Direct Investment
In July 1991, the Government of India raised the limit on foreign equity holdings in Indian
companies from 40% to 51% in certain high priority industries. The RBI gives automatic approval for
such foreign equity holdings. The Foreign Investment Promotion Board, or FIPB, currently under the
Ministry of Finance, was thereafter formed to facilitate companies to make long-term investments in
India. Foreign equity participation in excess of 51% in such high priority industries or in any
other industries up to Rs. 6 billion is currently allowed only with the approval of the FIPB.
Proposals in excess of Rs. 6 billion require the approval of the Cabinet Committee on Foreign
Investment. Proposals involving the public sector and other sensitive areas require the approval of
Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs. These facilities are designed for direct foreign investments
by persons who are not residents of India who are not NRIs, or FIIs (as each term is defined
below), or foreign direct investors. The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, a part of
the Ministry of Industry, issued detailed guidelines in January 1998 for consideration of foreign
direct investment proposals by the FIPB, or the Guidelines. Under the Guidelines, sector specific
guidelines for foreign direct investment and the levels of permitted equity participation have been
established. In March 2000, the RBI issued a notification that foreign ownership of up to 49%, 50%,
51%, 74% or 100%, depending on the category of industry, would be allowed without prior permission
of the RBI. The issues to be considered by the FIPB, and the FIPBs areas of priority in granting
approvals are also set out in the Guidelines. The basic objective of the Guidelines is to improve
the transparency and objectivity of the FIPBs consideration of proposals. However, because the
Guidelines are administrative guidelines and have not been codified as either law or regulations,
they are not legally binding with respect to any recommendation made by the FIPB or with respect to
any decision taken by the Government of India in cases involving foreign direct investment.
In May 1994, the Government of India announced that purchases by foreign investors of ADSs as
evidenced by ADRs and foreign currency convertible bonds of Indian companies will be treated as
direct foreign investment in the equity issued by Indian companies for such offerings. Therefore,
offerings that involve the issuance of equity that results in Foreign Direct Investors holding more
than the stipulated percentage of direct foreign investments (which depends on the category of
industry) would require approval from the FIPB. In addition, in connection with offerings of any
such securities to foreign investors, approval of the FIPB is required for Indian companies whether
or not the stipulated percentage limit would be reached, if the proceeds therefrom are to be used
for investment in non-high priority industries.
In July 1998, the Government of India issued guidelines to the effect that foreign investment
in preferred shares will be considered as part of the share capital of a company and will be
processed through the automatic RBI route or will require the approval of the FIPB, as the case may
be. Investments in preferred shares are included as foreign direct investment for the purposes of
sectoral caps on foreign equity, if such preferred shares carry a conversion option. If the
preferred shares are structured without a conversion option, they would fall outside the foreign
direct investment limit but would be treated as debt and would be subject to special Government of
India guidelines and approvals.
Over a period of time, the Government of India has relaxed the restrictions on foreign
investment. Subject to certain conditions, under current regulations, foreign direct investment in
most industry sectors does not require prior approval of the FIPB or RBI, if the percentage of
equity holding by all foreign investors does not exceed specified industry specific thresholds.
Purchases by foreign investors of ADSs are treated as direct foreign investment in the equity
issued by Indian companies for such offerings. Foreign investment up to 100% of companys share
capital is currently permitted in the IT industry.
Subsequent Transfers
Restrictions for subsequent transfers of shares of Indian companies between residents and
non-residents were relaxed significantly as of October 2004 in sectors other than the financial
services sector. As a result, for a transfer between a resident and a non-resident of securities
of an Indian in the IT sector, no prior approval of either the RBI or
89
the Government of India is required, as long as certain conditions are met. These conditions
include compliance, as applicable, with pricing guidelines and the ownership restrictions based on
the nature of the foreign investor. Transfers of shares from residents to non-residents which
trigger the provision of the Takeover Code require prior approval of the Government of India or the
RBI. If a sale or purchase is conducted on a stock exchange at prevailing market prices, the
pricing guidelines will be deemed satisfied. For off-market, negotiated transactions, the
guidelines require a transaction price based on the prevailing market price.
Transfers between two non-residents are not subject to RBI approvals or compliance with
pricing guidelines. However, for industries other than the IT sector, approval of the Government
of India would be required if the transferee of shares have an existing venture in India in the
same field, unless the existing venture is sick or defunct or the investment of the parties in the
existing venture is less than 3%.
Investment by Non-Resident Indians
A variety of facilities for making investments in shares of Indian companies is available to
individuals of Indian nationality or origin residing outside India, or NRIs. These facilities
permit NRIs to make portfolio investments in shares and other securities of Indian companies on a
basis that is not generally available to other foreign investors. A Non-Resident Indian (NRI) or a
Person of Indian Origin (PIO) resident outside India may invest by way of contribution to the
capital of a firm or a proprietary concern in India on a non-repatriation basis. These facilities
are different and distinct from investments by Foreign Direct Investors described above. Indian
companies are now allowed, without prior Government of India approval, to invest in joint ventures
or wholly-owned subsidiaries outside India. The amount invested may not exceed two times the net
worth of the company or its equivalent in a financial year. RBI no longer recognizes Overseas
Corporate Bodies, or OCBs as an eligible class of investment vehicle under various routes and
schemes under the foreign exchange regulations.
NRIs are permitted to make investments through a stock exchange, or Portfolio Investments on
favorable tax and other terms under Indias Portfolio Investment Scheme. Under the scheme, an NRI
can purchase up to 5% of the paid up value of the shares issued by a company, subject to the
condition that the aggregate paid up value of shares purchased by all NRIs does not exceed 10% of
the paid up capital of the company. The 10% ceiling may be exceeded if a special resolution is
passed in a general meeting of the shareholders of a company, subject to the overall ceiling of
Foreign Direct Investment limit.
Investment By Foreign Institutional Investors
In September 1992, the Government of India issued guidelines which enable foreign
institutional investors or FIIs, including institutions such as pension funds, investment trusts,
asset management companies, nominee companies and incorporated/institutional portfolio managers, to
invest in all the securities traded on the primary and secondary markets in India. Under the
guidelines, FIIs are required to obtain an initial registration from the SEBI and a general
permission from the RBI to engage in transactions regulated under FEMA. FIIs must also comply with
the provisions of the SEBI Foreign Institutional Investors Regulations, 1995. When it receives the
initial registration, the FII also obtains general permission from the RBI to engage in
transactions regulated under FEMA. Together, the initial registration and the RBIs general
permission enable the registered FII to buy (subject to the ownership restrictions discussed below)
and sell freely tradable securities issued by Indian companies; realize capital gains on
investments made through the initial amount invested in India; subscribe or renounce rights
offerings for shares; appoint a domestic custodian for custody of investments held; and repatriate
the capital, capital gains, dividends, income received by way of interest and any other
compensation received towards the sale or renunciation of rights offerings of shares. As of
December 2003, the RBI vide A.P. circulars No. 53 and 54 have permitted such registered FIIs or
sub- accounts of FIIs as well as unincorporated entities abroad to buy or sell equity shares and
debentures of Indian companies (excluding those in the print media sector), units of domestic
mutual funds, dated Government Securities and Treasury Bills through stock exchanges in India at
the ruling market price, invest or trade in exchange traded derivative contracts, and also to buy
or sell shares and debentures etc. of listed and unlisted companies otherwise than on stock
exchanges at a price approved by SEBI/ RBI as per the terms and conditions prescribed.
Ownership Restrictions
SEBI and RBI regulations restrict investments in Indian companies by FIIs and NRIs or
collectively, Foreign Direct Investors. Under current SEBI regulations applicable to Wipro Limited,
subject to the requisite approvals of the shareholders in a General Meeting, Foreign Direct
Investors in aggregate may hold no more than 49% of a companys equity shares, excluding the equity
shares underlying the ADSs. However, under Vide Notification No. FEMA.45/2001-RB dated September
20, 2001 under Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a person resident
outside India) Regulations, 2001, the limit of FII investment in a company has been linked to
sectoral caps/statutory ceiling as applicable to the concerned industry subject to obtaining the
approval of the shareholders by a special resolution. NRIs in aggregate may hold no more than 24%
of a companys equity shares, (subject to obtaining
90
the approval of the shareholders by a special resolution) excluding the equity shares
underlying the ADSs. Furthermore, SEBI regulations provide that no single FII may hold more than
10% of a companys total equity shares and no single NRI may hold more than 5% of a companys total
equity shares. There is uncertainty under Indian law about the tax regime applicable to FIIs which
hold and trade ADSs. FIIs are urged to consult with their Indian legal and tax advisers about the
relationship between the FII guidelines and the ADSs and any equity shares withdrawn upon surrender
of ADSs.
More detailed provisions relating to FII investment have been introduced by the SEBI and RBI
with the introduction of the SEBI Foreign Institutional Investors Regulations, 1995 and the RBI
circulars in this regard. These provisions relate to the registration of FIIs, their general
obligations and responsibilities, and certain investment conditions and restrictions. The SEBI
registered FII shall restrict allocation of its total investment between equities and debt in the
Indian capital market in the ratio of 70:30. The FII may form a 100% debt fund and get such fund
registered with SEBI.
Registered FIIs may trade in all exchange traded derivative contracts on the stock exchanges
in India subject to the position limits as prescribed by SEBI from time to time. The SEBI has also
permitted private placements of shares by listed companies with FIIs, subject to the prior approval
of the RBI under FEMA. Such private placement must be made at the average of the weekly highs and
lows of the closing price over the preceding six months or the preceding two weeks, whichever is
higher.
Open market purchases of securities of Indian companies in India by Foreign Direct Investors
or investments by NRIs and FIIs above the ownership levels set forth above require Government of
India approval on a case-by-case basis.
The Reserve Bank of India in circular No. 44 dated December 8, 2003 has imposed certain
restrictions on OCBs in making any new investments as well as on the sale or transfer of shares
held by them.
Government of India Approvals
Approval of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board, or FIPB, for foreign direct investment by
ADS holders is required. Specific approval of the Reserve Bank of India, or RBI, will have to be
obtained for:
|
|
|
any renunciation of rights in the underlying equity shares in favor of a person
resident in India; and |
|
|
|
|
the sale of the underlying equity shares by a person resident outside India to a
person resident in India and vice versa if the prescribed conditions for such
sale/purchase are not met. |
In such cases, the foreign investor would have to apply to the Reserve Bank of India by
submitting Form TS1, which requires information as to the transferor, the transferee, the
shareholding structure of the company whose shares are to be sold, the proposed price and other
information. The Reserve Bank of India is not required to respond to a Form TS1 application within
any specific time period and may grant or deny the application at its discretion. Exceptions to
this requirement of Reserve Bank of India approval include sales made in the stock market through a
registered Indian broker, through a recognized stock exchange in India at the prevailing market
rates, or if the shares are offered in accordance with the terms of an offer under the Securities
and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.
The proceeds from any sale of the underlying equity shares by a person resident outside India to a
person resident in India may be transferred outside India after receipt of Reserve Bank of India
approval (if required), and the payment of applicable taxes and stamp duties.
No approval is required for transfers of ADSs outside India between two non-residents. Any
person resident outside India who desires to sell equity shares received upon surrender of ADSs or
otherwise transfer such equity shares within India should seek the advice of Indian counsel as to
the requirements applicable at that time.
Overseas investment Liberalization
|
|
|
Regulation 6 of the Notification No.FEMA.120/RB-2004 dated July 7, 2004 to read
with Circular No. 42 dated May 12, 2005 and monetary policy pronouncement of April,
2007 of Reserve Bank of India in terms of which an Indian entity is permitted to invest
up to 300 per cent of their net worth in overseas Joint Ventures and/or Wholly Owned
Subsidiaries (JV/WOS) in any bonafide business activity under automatic route.
Accordingly, under the automatic route for overseas investment, eligible Indian
companies are permitted to invest in overseas in JV/WOS up to 300 per cent of their net
worth. It was further clarified by the Reserve Bank of India that the ceiling is not
applicable to the investments made out of balances held in EEFC accounts and out of the
proceeds of ADR / GDR issue, as hitherto. This enables Authorized Dealers |
91
|
|
|
to allow remittances under automatic route up to 300 per cent of the net worth as on the
date of the last audited balance sheet of the investing companies, after considering the
proposals received in form ODA. |
|
|
|
|
With a view to grant more operational flexibility to the corporates in India it
has been decided to further liberalize the various Regulations as under: |
|
|
|
|
Presently, only promoter corporates are permitted to offer guarantees on behalf
of their Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (WOSs) or Joint Ventures (JVs), under the Automatic
Route and issue of personal, collateral and third party guarantees requires prior
approval of Reserve Bank (RBI) and is considered by them, on a case by case basis. |
|
|
|
|
With a view to simplify the procedure, RBI has decided to enlarge the scope of
guarantees covered under the Automatic Route. Accordingly, Indian entities may offer
any forms of guarantee corporate or personal, primary or collateral, guarantee by the
promoter company, guarantee by group company, sister concern or associate company in
India, provided that : |
|
o |
|
All financial commitments including all forms of guarantees are
within the overall prescribed ceiling for overseas investment of the Indian
party, for example, currently within 300% of the net worth of the investing
company (Indian party), |
|
|
o |
|
No guarantee is open ended, for example, the amount of the
guarantee should be specified upfront; and |
|
|
o |
|
As in the case of corporate guarantees, all guarantees are
required to be reported to RBI, in Form ODR. |
General Permission for disinvestment
Currently, in terms of Regulation 16 of Notification No.FEMA 120/RB-2004 dated July 7,
2004, all disinvestments that involve a write off i.e. where the amount repatriated on
disinvestment is less than the amount of the original investment, can be made by the Company.
|
|
|
in cases where the JV / WOS is listed in the overseas stock exchange. |
|
|
|
|
in cases where the Indian promoter company is listed on a stock exchange in India and
has a net worth of not less than Rs. 1,000 million; or |
|
|
|
|
where the Indian promoter is an unlisted company and the investment in overseas venture
does not exceed USD 10 million. |
Taxation
The following summary is based on the law and practice of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961, or
Income-Tax Act, including the special tax regime contained in Sections 115AC and 115ACA of the
Income-tax Act read with the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares
(through Depositary Receipt Mechanism) Scheme, 1993, as amended on, January 19, 2000, or the Issue
of Foreign Currency Convertible bonds and Ordinary Shares Scheme. The Income-tax Act is amended
every year by the Finance Act of the relevant year. Some or all of the tax consequences of
Sections 115AC and 115ACA may be amended or changed by future amendments to the Income-tax Act.
We believe this information is materially complete as of the date hereof, however, this
summary is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of the individual tax consequences to
non-resident holders or employees under Indian law for the acquisition, ownership and sale of ADSs
and equity shares.
Residence. For purposes of the Income-tax Act, an individual is considered to be a resident
of India during any fiscal year if he or she is in India in that year for:
|
|
|
a period or periods amounting to 182 days or more; or |
|
|
|
|
60 days or more and, within the four preceding years has been in India for a period or
periods amounting to 365 days or more. |
92
The period of 60 days referred to above shall be read as 182 days (i) in case of a citizen of
India who leaves India in a fiscal year for the purposes of employment outside of India or (ii) in
case of a citizen of India or a person of Indian origin living abroad who visits India and within
the four preceding years has been in India for a period or periods amounting to 365 days or more.
A company is a resident of India if it is incorporated in India or the control and the
management of its affairs is situated wholly in India. Companies that are not residents of India
would be treated as non-residents for purposes of the Income-tax Act.
Taxation of Distributions. As per Section 10(34) of the Income Tax Act, dividends paid by
Indian Companies on or after April 1, 2003 to its shareholders (whether resident in India or not)
are not subject to tax. However, the Company paying the dividend is subject to a dividend
distribution tax of 12.50% on the total amount it distributes, declares or pays as a dividend, in
addition to the normal corporate tax. Additionally, the Finance Act, 2006 levies a surcharge of 10%
on such tax and an additional surcharge namely education cess of 2% on such tax and surcharge,
after which the dividend distribution tax payable would be 14.03%.
Any distributions of additional ADSs or equity shares to resident or non- resident holders
will not be subject to Indian tax.
Taxation of Capital Gains. The following is a brief summary of capital gains taxation of
non-resident holders and resident employees in respect of the sale of ADSs and equity shares
received upon redemption of ADSs. The relevant provisions are contained mainly in sections 45,
47(vii)(a), 115AC and 115ACA, of the Income Tax Act, in conjunction with the Issue of Foreign
Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares Scheme.
Gains realized upon the sale of ADSs or shares that have been held for a period of more than
thirty-six months and twelve months, respectively, are considered long term capital gains. Gains
realized upon the sale of ADSs or shares that have been held for a period of thirty six months or
less and twelve months or less, respectively, are considered short term capital gains. Capital
gains are taxed as follows:
|
|
|
Gains from a sale of ADSs outside India, by a non-resident to another non-resident are not
taxable in India. |
|
|
|
|
Long term capital gains realized by a resident employee from the transfer of the ADSs will
be subject to tax at the rate of 10%. Short-term capital gains on such a transfer will be
taxed at graduated rates with a maximum of 30%. |
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital gains realized by non-resident upon the sale of equity shares obtained
through the redemption of ADSs, settlement of such sale being made off a recognized stock
exchange, are subject to tax at a rate of 10%. Short-term capital gains on such transfer will
be taxed at graduated rates with a maximum of 30%. |
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital gains realized by a non-resident upon the sale of equity shares obtained
through the redemption of ADSs, settlement of such sale being made on a recognized stock
exchange, is exempt from tax and the Short-term capital gains on such sale will be taxed at
10%. An additional tax called Securities Transaction Tax, or STT (described in detail
below will be levied at the time of settlement. |
In addition to the above rates, the Finance Act 2006 levies a surcharge of 10% on the above
taxes, in the case of resident employees or the non-resident individuals, in case their aggregate
taxable income exceed Rs. 10,00,000 during the relevant financial year and an additional surcharge
called education cess of 2% on the above tax and surcharge.
The above rates may be reduced by the applicable tax treaty in case of non-residents. The
capital gains tax is computed by applying the appropriate tax rates to the difference between the
sale price and the purchase price of the equity shares or ADSs. Under the Issue of Foreign
Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares Scheme, the purchase price of equity shares in an
Indian listed company received in exchange for ADSs will be the market price of the underlying
shares on the date that the depository gives notice to the custodian of the delivery of the equity
shares in exchange for the corresponding ADSs or the stepped up basis purchase price. The
market price will be the price of the equity shares prevailing on The Stock Exchange, Mumbai or the
National Stock Exchange. There is no corresponding provision under the Income Tax Act in relation
to the stepped up basis for the purchase price of equity shares. However the tax department in
India has not denied this benefit. In the event that the tax department denies this benefit, the
original purchase price of ADSs would be considered the purchase price for computing the capital
gains tax.
According to the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares Scheme, a
non-resident holders holding period for the purposes of determining the applicable Indian capital
gains tax rate in respect of equity
93
shares received in exchange for ADSs commences on the date of the notice of the redemption by
the depository to the custodian. However, the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and
Ordinary Shares Scheme does not address this issue in the case of resident employees, and it is
therefore unclear as to when the holding period for the purposes of determining capital gains tax
commences for such a resident employee.
The Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds and Ordinary Shares Scheme provides that if
the equity shares are sold on a recognized stock exchange in India against payment in Indian
rupees, they will no longer be eligible for the preferential tax treatment.
It is unclear as to whether section 115AC and the Issue of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds
and Ordinary Shares Scheme are applicable to a non-resident who acquires equity shares outside
India from a non-resident holder of equity shares after receipt of the equity shares upon
redemption of the ADSs.
It is unclear as to whether capital gains derived from the sale of subscription rights or
other rights by a non-resident holder not entitled to an exemption under a tax treaty will be
subject to Indian capital gains tax. If such subscription rights or other rights are deemed by the
Indian tax authorities to be situated within India, the gains realized on the sale of such
subscription rights or other rights will be subject to Indian taxation. The capital gains realized
on the sale of such subscription rights or other rights, which will generally be in the nature of
short term capital gains, will be subject to tax at variable rates with a maximum rate of 40% in
case of a foreign company and at graduated rate with a maximum of 30%, in case of resident
employees and non-resident individuals. In addition to this, there will be a surcharge of 10% in
the case of all corporate holders and in the case of non-corporate holders with an aggregate
taxable income exceeding Rs. 10,00,000 and an additional surcharge called education cess of 2% on
the above tax and surcharge.
As per Section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act, the cost of any share (commonly called a bonus
share) allotted to any shareholder without any payment and on the basis of such shareholders
share holdings, shall be nil. The holding period of bonus shares for the purpose of determining the
nature of capital gains shall commence on the date of allotment of such shares by the company.
Securities Transaction Tax: The Finance Act, 2004 has introduced certain new provisions with
regard to taxes on the sale and purchase of securities, including equity shares. On and after
October 1, 2004, in respect of a sale and purchase of equity shares entered into on a recognized
stock exchange, (i) both the buyer and seller are required to pay each a Securities Transaction
Tax, or STT at the rate of 0.075% of the transaction value of the securities, if a transaction is a
delivery based transaction i.e. the transaction involves actual delivery or transfer of shares;
(ii) the seller of the shares is required to pay a STT at the rate of 0.015% of the transaction
value of the securities, if the transaction is a non-delivery based transaction, i.e. a transaction
settled without taking delivery of the shares. The Finance Act, 2005 has increased the rate STT,
with effect from April 1, 2005, in respect of a sale and purchase of equity shares entered into on
a recognized stock exchange, to 0.1% for delivery based transactions and 0.02% for non-delivery
based transactions.
Withholding Tax on Capital Gains. Any gain realized by a non-resident or resident employee on
the sale of equity shares is subject to Indian capital gains tax, which, in the case of a
non-resident is to be withheld at the source by the buyer. However, as per the provisions of
Section 196D(2) of the Income Tax Act, no withholding tax is required to be deducted by way of
capital gains arising to Foreign Institutional Investors as defined in Section 115AD of the Income
Tax Act on the transfer of securities defined in Section 115AD of the Income Tax Act.
Buy-back of Securities. Indian companies are not subject to any tax on the buy-back of their
shares. However, the shareholders will be taxed on any resulting gains. Our company would be
required to deduct tax at source according to the capital gains tax liability of a non-resident
shareholder.
Stamp Duty and Transfer Tax. Upon issuance of the equity shares underlying our ADSs,
companies will be required to pay a stamp duty of 0.1% per share of the issue price of the
underlying equity shares. A transfer of ADSs is not subject to Indian stamp duty. However, upon
the acquisition of equity shares from the depository in exchange for ADSs, the non-resident holder
will be liable for Indian stamp duty at the rate of 0.25% of the market value of the ADSs or equity
shares exchanged. A sale of equity shares by a non-resident holder will also be subject to Indian
stamp duty at the rate of 0.25% of the market value of the equity shares on the trade date,
although customarily such tax is borne by the transferee. Shares must be traded in dematerialized
form. The transfer of shares in dematerialized form is currently not subject to stamp duty.
Wealth Tax. The holding of the ADSs and the holding of underlying equity shares by resident
and non-resident holders will be exempt from Indian wealth tax. Non-resident holders are advised
to consult their own tax advisors regarding this issue.
94
Gift Tax and Estate Duty. Indian gift tax was abolished as of October 1998. Indian Estate
Duty was abolished as of March 1985. On and after September 1, 2004, a sum of money exceeding Rs.
25,000 (approx $ 570), received by a individual without consideration will be subject to tax at
graduated rates with a maximum of 30% (excluding applicable surcharge and education cess), unless
the same was received from a relative as defined in Explanation under Section 56(v), or on the
occasion of the marriage of the Individual or under a will or by way of inheritance or in
contemplation of death of the payer. The Taxation Laws Amendment Bill, 2005 introduced in the
Parliament on May 12, 2005 proposes to levy the above tax in case the sum of money exceeds in
aggregate Rs. 50,000 in a fiscal year. We cannot assure that these provisions will not be amended
further in future. Non-resident holders are advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding
this issue.
Service Tax. Brokerage or commission paid to stock brokers in connection with the sale or
purchase of shares is subject to a service tax of 12% excluding surcharges and education cess. The
stock broker is responsible for collecting the service tax from the shareholder and paying it to
the relevant authority.
PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE INDIAN AND
THEIR LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES OF ACQUIRING, OWNING OR DISPOSING OF EQUITY SHARES OR ADSs.
Material United States Federal Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences
that may be relevant with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of equity shares or
ADSs and is for general information only. This summary addresses the U.S. federal income and
estate tax considerations of holders that are U.S. persons. U.S. persons are citizens or residents
of the United States, or corporations (or other entities treated as corporations for United States
federal income tax purposes) created in or under the laws of the United States or any political
subdivision thereof or therein, estates, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source and trusts for which a U.S. court exercises primary supervision
and a U.S. person has the authority to control all substantial decisions. This summary is limited
to U.S. persons who will hold equity shares or ADSs as capital assets.
This summary is limited to U.S. persons who will hold equity shares or ADSs as capital assets.
In addition, this summary is limited to U.S. persons who are not residents in India for purposes of
the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the
Republic of India for the avoidance of Double Taxation and the prevention of Fiscal Evasion with
respect to taxes on income. If a partnership holds the equity shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of
a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the
partnership. A partner in a partnership holding equity shares or ADSs should consult his/her/its
own tax advisor.
This summary does not address tax considerations applicable to holders that may be subject to
special tax rules, such as banks, insurance companies, financial institutions, dealers in
securities or currencies, tax-exempt entities, persons that will hold equity shares or ADSs as a
position in a straddle or as part of a hedging or conversion transaction for tax purposes,
persons that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar or holders of 10% or more, by
voting power or value, of the shares of our company. This summary is based on the tax laws of the
United States as in effect on the date of this document and on United States Treasury Regulations
in effect or, in some cases, proposed, as of the date of this document , as well as judicial and
administrative interpretations thereof available on or before such date and is based in part on the
assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be
performed in accordance with its terms. All of the foregoing is subject to change, which change
could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below.
Each prospective investor should consult his, her or its own tax advisor with respect to the
U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of acquiring, owning or disposing of equity
shares or ADSs.
Ownership of ADSs. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders of ADSs will be treated as
the owners of equity shares represented by such ADSs.
Dividends. Except for equity shares, if any, distributed pro rata to all shareholders of our
company, including holders of ADSs, the gross amount of any distributions of cash or property with
respect to equity shares or ADSs will generally be included in income by a U.S. holder as foreign
source dividend income at the time of receipt, which in the case of a U.S. holder of ADSs generally
should be the date of receipt by the depository, to the extent such distributions are made from the
current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles) of our company. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received
deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. holders. To the extent, if any, that the amount of
any distribution by our company exceeds our companys current and accumulated earnings and profits
as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, such
95
excess will be treated first as a tax-free return of the U.S. holders tax basis in the equity
shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain.
Subject to certain conditions and limitations, dividends paid to non-corporate U.S. holders,
including individuals, may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation if we are deemed to be a
qualified foreign corporation for United States federal income tax purposes. A qualified foreign
corporation includes a foreign corporation if (1) its shares (or, according to legislative history,
its ADSs) are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States or (2) it
is eligible for the benefits under a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States. In
addition, a corporation is not a qualified foreign corporation if it is a passive foreign
investment company (as discussed below). The ADSs are traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Due to
the absence of specific statutory provisions addressing ADSs, however, there can be no assurance
that we are qualified foreign corporation solely as a result of our listing on New York Stock
Exchange. Nonetheless, we may be eligible for benefits under the comprehensive income tax treaty
between India and the United States. The reduced rate of taxation will not apply to dividends
received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.Each U.S. holder should consult its own
tax advisor regarding the treatment of dividends and such holders eligibility for reduced rate of
taxation.
Subject to certain conditions and limitations, any Indian dividend withholding tax imposed
upon distributions paid to a U.S. holder should be eligible for credit against the U.S. holders
federal income tax liability. Alternatively, a U.S. holder may claim a deduction for such amount,
but only for a year in which a U.S. holder does not claim a credit with respect to any foreign
income taxes. The overall limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately
with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, distributions on equity shares or
ADSs will be income from sources outside the United States, and, for tax years beginning before
January 1, 2007, will generally be passive income, or financial services income, and for tax
years beginning after December 31, 2006, will generally be passive category income or general
category income for purposes of computing the United States foreign tax credit allowable to a U.S.
holder.
If dividends are paid in Indian rupees, the amount of the dividend distribution included in
the income of a U.S. holder will be in the U.S. dollar value of the payments made in Indian rupees,
determined at a spot exchange rate between Indian rupees and U.S. dollars applicable to the date
such dividend is included in the income of the U.S. holder, regardless of whether the payment is in
fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, gain or loss, if any, resulting from currency
exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the dividend is paid to the date such payment
is converted into U.S. dollars will be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Sale or Exchange of Equity Shares or ADSs. A U.S. holder generally will recognize gain or
loss on the sale or exchange of equity shares or ADSs equal to the difference between the amount
realized on such sale or exchange and the U.S. holders tax basis in the equity shares or ADSs, as
the case may be. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital
gain or loss if the equity shares or ADSs, as the case may be, were held for more than one year.
Gain or loss, if any, recognized by a U.S. holder generally will be treated as U.S. source passive
category income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Capital gains realized by a U.S.
holder upon sale of equity shares (but not ADSs) may be subject to certain tax in India. See
taxation Taxation of Distributions Taxation of Capital Gains. Due to limitations on foreign
tax credits, however, a U.S. holder may not be able to utilize any such taxes as a credit against
the U.S. holders federal income tax liability.
Estate Taxes. An individual shareholder who is a citizen or resident of the United States for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes will have the value of the equity shares or ADSs held by such
holder included in his or her gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes. An individual
holder who actually pays Indian estate tax with respect to the equity shares will, however, be
entitled to credit the amount of such tax against his or her U.S. federal estate tax liability,
subject to a number of conditions and limitations.
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting. Any dividends paid, or proceeds on a sale
of, equity shares or ADSs to or by a U.S. holder may be subject to U.S. information reporting, and
a backup withholding tax (currently at a rate of 28%) may apply unless the holder is an exempt
recipient or provides a U.S. taxpayer identification number, certifies that such holder is not
subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with any applicable backup withholding
requirements. Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund
or credit against the holders U.S. federal income tax, provided that the required information is
furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Passive Foreign Investment Company. A non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a passive
foreign investment company for U.S. Federal income tax purposes if either:
|
|
|
75% or more of its gross income for the taxable year is passive income; or |
96
|
|
|
on average for the taxable year by value, or, if it is not a publicly traded corporation
and so elects, by adjusted basis, if 50% or more of its assets produce or are held for the
production of passive income. |
We do not believe that we satisfy either of the tests for passive foreign investment company
status for 2005. Since this determination is made on an annual basis, however, no assurance can be
given that we will not be considered a passive foreign investment company in future taxable years.
If we were to be a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year, U.S. holders would be
required to either:
|
|
|
pay an interest charge together with tax calculated at an ordinary income rates on excess
distributions, as the term is defined in relevant provisions of U.S. tax laws, and on any
gain on a sale or other disposition of equity shares; |
|
|
|
|
if an election is made, a qualified electing fund (as the term is defined in relevant
provisions of the U.S. tax laws), include in their taxable income their pro rata share of
undistributed amounts of our income; or |
|
|
|
|
if the equity shares are marketable and a mark-to-market election is made,
mark-to-market the equity shares each taxable year and recognize ordinary gain and, to the
extent of prior ordinary gain, ordinary loss for the increase or decrease in market value for
such taxable year. |
If we are treated as a passive foreign investment company, we do not plan to provide
information necessary for the qualified electing fund election.
The above summary is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences
relating to ownership of equity shares or ADSs. You should consult your own tax advisor concerning
the tax consequences of your particular situation.
Documents on Display
This report and other information filed or to be filed by Wipro Limited can be inspected and
copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at:
|
|
100 F Street, NE Washington D.C, 20549 |
|
|
|
Northwestern Atrium Center 500 West Madison Street Suite 1400 Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511 |
Copies of these materials can also be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, at prescribed rates.
The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC
using its EDGAR system.
Additionally, documents referred to in this Form 20-F may be inspected at our corporate
offices which are located at Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560035, India.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
General
Market risk is the risk of loss of future earnings, to fair values or to future cash flows
that may result from a change in the price of a financial instrument. The value of a financial
instrument may change as a result of changes in the interest rates, foreign currency exchange
rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market risk sensitive
instruments. Market risk is attributable to all market risk sensitive financial instruments
including foreign currency receivables and payables and long-term debt.
Our exposure to market risk is a function of our investment and borrowing activities and our
revenue generating activities in foreign currency. The objective of market risk management is to
avoid excessive exposure of our earnings and equity to loss. Most of our exposure to market risk
arises out of our foreign currency account receivables.
97
Risk Management Procedures
We manage market risk through a corporate treasury department, which evaluates and exercises
independent control over the entire process of market risk management. Our corporate treasury
department recommends risk management objectives and policies which are approved by senior
management and our Audit Committee. The activities of this department include management of cash
resources, implementing hedging strategies for foreign currency exposures, borrowing strategies,
and ensuring compliance with market risk limits and policies on a daily basis.
Components of Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk arises principally from exchange rate risk. Interest rate risk is
the other component of our market risk.
Exchange rate risk. Our exchange rate risk primarily arises from our foreign exchange revenue,
receivables, forecasted cash flows, payables and foreign currency debt. A significant portion of
our revenue is in U.S. dollars while a significant portion of our costs are in Indian rupees. The
exchange rate between the rupee and dollar has fluctuated significantly in recent years and may
continue to fluctuate in the future. Appreciation of the rupee against the dollar can adversely
affect our results of operations.
We evaluate our exchange rate exposure arising from these transactions and enter into foreign
currency forward contracts to mitigate such exposure. We follow established risk management
policies, including the use of derivatives like forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge
forecasted cash flows denominated in foreign currency. As of March 31, 2006, we had forward
contracts to sell amounting to $592 million and £4 million and net purchased options to sell $254
million and £8 million. As of March 31, 2007, we had forward contracts to sell amounting to $345
million, 16 million and £88 million and forward contracts to buy amounting to $185 million. In
addition, we also had net purchased options to sell $36 million and 13 million.
In connection with cash flow hedges, we have recorded Rs. 114, Rs. 202, and Rs. 72 of net
gains/(losses) as a component of accumulated and other comprehensive income within stockholders
equity as at March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Sensitivity analysis of exchange rate risk
As at March 31, 2007, a Rs.1 increase / decrease in the spot rate for exchange of Indian Rupee
with U.S. dollar would result in approximately Rs. 160 million decrease / increase in the fair
value of the Companys forward contracts.
Interest rate risk. Our interest rate risk primarily arises from our investment securities.
Our investments are primarily in short-term investments, which do not expose us to significant
interest rate risk.
Fair value. The fair value of our market rate risk sensitive instruments, other than forward
contracts and option contracts, closely approximates their carrying value.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Not applicable.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Not Applicable
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Based on their evaluation as of March 31, 2007, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
are effective to ensure that information required to be
98
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms and that material information related to us and our consolidated
subsidiaries is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions about required disclosures.
Change in internal controls.
During the period covered by this Annual Report, there were no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Compliance with the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Rules
The Company presently complies with all the practices as
described in the final Corporate Governance Rules and Listing Standards of the New York Stock Exchange as
approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2003 and codified in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
A detailed compliance report with the final Corporate Governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange will be separately filed with the New York Stock Exchange.
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting of the company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation,
management concluded that the companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as
of March 31, 2007.
Managements assessment does not include an assessment of the internal control over financial
reporting of two entities acquired during the year ended March 31, 2007, Hydrauto Group AB and
subsidiaries and Retailbox B.V and subsidiaries, with total assets of Rs 3,842.01 million and net
revenues of Rs 4,243.85 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as
of and for the year ended March 31, 2007.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, has audited the consolidated
financial statements in this annual report on Form 20-F, and as part of their audit, has issued
their report, included herein, on (1) our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting and (2) the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of March 31, 2007.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Wipro Limited
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Wipro Limited and subsidiaries (the Company)
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The management of the Company is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion
99
on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2007,
based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The Company acquired Hydrauto Group AB and subsidiaries (Hydrauto) and RetailBox BV and
subsidiaries (RetailBox) during the year ended March 31, 2007 and management excluded from its
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
March 31, 2007, Hydrauto and RetailBoxs internal control over financial reporting associated with
total assets of Rs 3,842.01 million and net revenues of Rs 4,243.85 million included
in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended March 31,
2007. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Hydrauto and RetailBox.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of March 31,
2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,
2007, and our report dated May 21, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.
KPMG
Bangalore, India
May 21, 2007
100
Item 16 A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing reports of our financial results, audits,
internal controls, and compliance with federal procurement laws and regulations. The committee
selects the independent registered public accounting firm and approves all related fees and
compensation and reviews their selection with the Board of Directors. The committee also reviews
the services proposed to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to
ensure their independence with respect to such services.
Members of the committee are non-management directors who, in the opinion of the Board, are
independent as defined under the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board has
determined that Mr. Narayan Vaghul qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert as defined by
the applicable rules of the SEC.
Item 16 B. Code of Ethics
Our Audit Committee has adopted a written Code of Ethics, as defined in Item 406 of Regulation
S-K, applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer and all officers working in our finance, accounting, treasury, internal audit,
tax, legal, purchase, financial analyst, investor relations functions, disclosure committee
members, and senior management, as well as members of the Audit Committee and the board of
directors. Our Code of Ethics is available under the investor relations section on our website at
www.wipro.com. We will post any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Ethics at that
location on our website.
Our Audit Committee has also adopted an Ombuds process policy wherein it has established
procedures for receiving, retaining and treating complaints received, and procedures for the
confidential, anonymous submission by employees of complaints regarding questionable accounting or
auditing matters, conduct which results in a violation of law by Wipro or in a substantial
mismanagement of company resources. Under this policy, our employees are encouraged to report
questionable accounting matters, any reporting of fraudulent financial information to our
shareholders, the government or the financial markets any conduct that results in a violation of
law by Wipro to our management (on an anonymous basis, if employees so desire). Likewise, under
this policy, we have prohibited discrimination, retaliation or harassment of any kind against any
employee who, based on the employees reasonable belief that such conduct or practices have
occurred or are occurring, reports that information or participates in an investigation. Our
Ombuds process policy is available under the investor relations section on our website at
www.wipro.com.
We have also adopted an updated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to all
officers, directors and employees. Our updated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available
under the investor relations section on our website at www.wipro.com.
Item 16 C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Our Audit Committee charter requires us to obtain the prior approval of our audit committee on
every occasion that we engage our principal accountants or their associated entities and on every
occasion that they provide us with any non-audit services. At the beginning of each year, the Audit
Committee reviews the proposed services, including the nature, type and scope of services
contemplated and approves the related fees, to be rendered by these firms during the year. In
addition, Audit Committee pre-approval is also required for those engagements that may arise during
the course of the year that are outside the scope of the initial services and fees pre-approved by
the Audit Committee.
The following table presents fee for professional audit services rendered by KPMG for the
audit of the Companys annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by
KPMG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Audit fees |
|
Rs. |
17.67 |
|
|
Rs. |
48.20 |
|
Tax fees |
|
|
22.31 |
|
|
|
18.69 |
|
All other fess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
39.98 |
|
|
Rs. |
68.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
Audit services comprise fees for professional services in connection with the audit of
Companys annual consolidated financial statements and their attestation and report concerning
internal control over financial reporting, reviews of interim financial statement, as well as
audits of statutory financial statements of Wipro Limited and its subsidiaries.
Tax
services - comprise fees for tax compliance, tax assessment and tax planning services
rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services include corporate tax
services like assistance with foreign income tax, value added tax, transfer pricing study,
Government sales tax and equivalent tax matters in local jurisdictions and assistance with local
tax authority reporting requirements for tax compliance purposes.
Our Audit Committee charter requires us to take the prior approval of our Audit Committee on
every occasion we engage our principal accountants or their associated entities to provide us any
non-audit services. We disclose to our Audit Committee the nature of services that are provided and
the fees to be paid for the services. All of the non-audit services provided by our principal
accountants or their associated entities in the previous two fiscal years have been pre-approved by
our Audit Committee.
Item 16 D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
We have not sought any exemption from the listing standards for Audit Committees applicable to
us as foreign private issuer, pursuant to Rule 10(A)-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Item 16 E. Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Part III
Item 17. Financial Statements
See Item 18.
102
Item 18. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wipro Limited
In connection with the March 31, 2007 consolidated financial statements prepared under United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and discussed
the consolidated financial statements with management; (2) discussed with the auditors the matters
required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
and (3) reviewed and discussed with the auditors the matters required by NYSE listing standards.
Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors
that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States of America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bangalore, India
May 21, 2007
|
|
N.Vaghul
Chairman
|
|
P. M. Sinha
Member
|
|
B. C. Prabhakar
Member |
103
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
Management of Wipro is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the consolidated
financial statements and related notes. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and include amounts based
on judgments and estimates by management. Management is also responsible for the accuracy of the
related data in the annual report and its consistency with the financial statements.
Management maintains internal control systems designed to provide reasonable assurance that
assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed in accordance with managements authorization and
properly recorded, and accounting records are adequate for preparation of financial statements and
other financial information. These are reviewed at regular intervals to ascertain their adequacy
and effectiveness.
In addition to the system of internal controls, the Company has articulated its vision and
core values which permeate all its activities. It also has corporate policies to ensure highest
standards of integrity in all business transactions, eliminate possible conflicts of interest,
ensure compliance with laws, and protect confidentiality of proprietary information. These are
reviewed at periodic intervals.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm, KPMG. Their responsibility is to audit these statements in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and
express their opinion on the fairness of presentation of the statements.
The Audit Committee of the board comprising entirely of independent directors conducts an
ongoing appraisal of the independence and performance of the Companys internal and external
auditors and monitors the integrity of Companys financial statements. The Audit Committee meets
several times during the year with management, internal auditors and the independent registered
public accounting firm to discuss audit activities, internal controls and financial reporting
matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azim H. Premji |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
S.C. Senapaty |
|
|
Executive Vice President Finance |
Bangalore, India
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
May 21, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
104
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Wipro Limited
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wipro Limited and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended March 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated May 21, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion managements assessment of,
and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG
Bangalore, India
May 21, 2007
105
WIPRO LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4) |
|
Rs. |
8,857.70 |
|
|
|
12,412.17 |
|
|
|
287.98 |
|
Restricted cash (Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,237.88 |
|
|
|
167.93 |
|
Investments in liquid and short-term mutual funds (Note 8) |
|
|
30,315.25 |
|
|
|
32,410.43 |
|
|
|
751.98 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances (Note 5) |
|
|
20,593.11 |
|
|
|
28,466.58 |
|
|
|
660.47 |
|
Costs and earnings in excess of billings on contracts in progress |
|
|
4,336.06 |
|
|
|
5,096.48 |
|
|
|
118.25 |
|
Inventories (Note 6) |
|
|
2,064.61 |
|
|
|
4,150.37 |
|
|
|
96.30 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 21) |
|
|
168.28 |
|
|
|
381.71 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
|
Other current assets (Note 7) |
|
|
7,896.60 |
|
|
|
10,411.97 |
|
|
|
241.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
74,231.61 |
|
|
|
100,567.59 |
|
|
|
2,333.35 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 9) |
|
|
17,777.40 |
|
|
|
26,541.43 |
|
|
|
615.81 |
|
Investments in affiliates (Note 13) |
|
|
1,043.09 |
|
|
|
1,241.79 |
|
|
|
28.81 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
13.17 |
|
|
|
357.32 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 21) |
|
|
182.91 |
|
|
|
48.53 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
Intangible assets, net (Note 10) |
|
|
854.33 |
|
|
|
2,670.84 |
|
|
|
61.97 |
|
Goodwill (Note 3,10) |
|
|
7,480.85 |
|
|
|
12,697.71 |
|
|
|
294.61 |
|
Other assets (Note 7) |
|
|
1,243.97 |
|
|
|
1,958.92 |
|
|
|
45.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
Rs. |
102,827.33 |
|
|
Rs. |
146,084.13 |
|
|
$ |
3,389.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings from banks (Note 15) |
|
Rs. |
448.91 |
|
|
|
2,892.77 |
|
|
|
67.12 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
135.70 |
|
|
|
327.79 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,145.96 |
|
|
|
7,060.49 |
|
|
|
163.82 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
6,600.63 |
|
|
|
7,597.94 |
|
|
|
176.29 |
|
Accrued employee costs |
|
|
4,425.13 |
|
|
|
5,186.57 |
|
|
|
120.34 |
|
Advances from customers |
|
|
1,015.75 |
|
|
|
1,314.52 |
|
|
|
30.50 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and earnings on contracts in progress |
|
|
600.51 |
|
|
|
1,818.48 |
|
|
|
42.19 |
|
Other current liabilities (Note 11) |
|
|
6,047.95 |
|
|
|
16,623.16 |
|
|
|
385.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
23,420.54 |
|
|
|
42,821.72 |
|
|
|
993.55 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
119.95 |
|
|
|
560.46 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 21) |
|
|
127.46 |
|
|
|
463.98 |
|
|
|
10.77 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
395.04 |
|
|
|
769.91 |
|
|
|
17.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
24,062.99 |
|
|
|
44,616.07 |
|
|
|
1,035.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
shares at Rs. 2 par value: 1,650,000,000 shares authorized;
Issued and outstanding: 1,425,754,267 and 1,458,999,650 shares as
of March 31, 2006 and 2007 (Note 16,17) |
|
|
2,851.51 |
|
|
|
2,918.00 |
|
|
|
67.70 |
|
Additional paid-in capital (Note 22) |
|
|
16,521.07 |
|
|
|
24,508.45 |
|
|
|
568.64 |
|
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(2,202.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
433.70 |
|
|
|
93.77 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
Retained earnings (Note 18) |
|
|
61,160.56 |
|
|
|
73,947.92 |
|
|
|
1,715.72 |
|
Equity shares held by a controlled Trust: 7,869,060 and 7,961,760
shares as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 (Note 22) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
78,764.34 |
|
|
|
101,468.06 |
|
|
|
2,354.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
Rs. |
102,827.33 |
|
|
Rs. |
146,084.13 |
|
|
$ |
3,389.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
106
WIPRO LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services |
|
Rs. |
54,280.19 |
|
|
Rs. |
73,061.33 |
|
|
Rs. |
101,508.81 |
|
|
|
2,355.19 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
6,433.03 |
|
|
|
7,664.23 |
|
|
|
9,412.80 |
|
|
|
218.39 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
4,709.07 |
|
|
|
6,096.68 |
|
|
|
8,368.81 |
|
|
|
194.17 |
|
Products |
|
|
8,694.10 |
|
|
|
10,380.40 |
|
|
|
15,519.67 |
|
|
|
360.09 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
4,555.38 |
|
|
|
5,625.04 |
|
|
|
7,558.50 |
|
|
|
175.37 |
|
Others |
|
|
2,680.73 |
|
|
|
3,279.20 |
|
|
|
7,062.74 |
|
|
|
163.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
81,352.50 |
|
|
|
106,106.88 |
|
|
|
149,431.33 |
|
|
|
3,467.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services |
|
|
33,780.07 |
|
|
|
46,986.13 |
|
|
|
66,817.77 |
|
|
|
1,550.30 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
4,740.25 |
|
|
|
5,809.54 |
|
|
|
6,172.97 |
|
|
|
143.22 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
2,679.35 |
|
|
|
3,548.82 |
|
|
|
4,611.64 |
|
|
|
107.00 |
|
Products |
|
|
7,814.82 |
|
|
|
9,285.88 |
|
|
|
13,943.47 |
|
|
|
323.51 |
|
Consumer Care and Lighting |
|
|
2,926.22 |
|
|
|
3,556.43 |
|
|
|
4,905.14 |
|
|
|
113.81 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,914.06 |
|
|
|
2,459.93 |
|
|
|
5,749.25 |
|
|
|
133.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
53,854.77 |
|
|
|
71,646.73 |
|
|
|
102,200.24 |
|
|
|
2,371.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
27,497.73 |
|
|
|
34,460.15 |
|
|
|
47,231.09 |
|
|
|
1,095.85 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(5,466.26 |
) |
|
|
(6,764.35 |
) |
|
|
(9,172.92 |
) |
|
|
(212.83 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(3,743.60 |
) |
|
|
(5,238.97 |
) |
|
|
(7,639.23 |
) |
|
|
(177.24 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(273.54 |
) |
|
|
(202.26 |
) |
|
|
(267.71 |
) |
|
|
(6.21 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 10) |
|
|
(140.29 |
) |
|
|
(63.95 |
) |
|
|
(269.23 |
) |
|
|
(6.25 |
) |
Foreign exchange losses, net |
|
|
(92.12 |
) |
|
|
(288.49 |
) |
|
|
(235.69 |
) |
|
|
(5.47 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
75.29 |
|
|
|
70.14 |
|
|
|
221.48 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
17,857.21 |
|
|
|
21,972.27 |
|
|
|
29,867.79 |
|
|
|
692.99 |
|
Loss on direct issue of stock by subsidiary |
|
|
(206.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net (Note 19) |
|
|
798.82 |
|
|
|
1,275.86 |
|
|
|
2,666.84 |
|
|
|
61.87 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates (Note 13) |
|
|
158.08 |
|
|
|
287.97 |
|
|
|
317.88 |
|
|
|
7.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes , minority interest and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle |
|
|
18,607.53 |
|
|
|
23,536.10 |
|
|
|
32,852.51 |
|
|
|
762.24 |
|
Income taxes (Note 21) |
|
|
(2,693.57 |
) |
|
|
(3,264.73 |
) |
|
|
(3,722.61 |
) |
|
|
(86.37 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(81.21 |
) |
|
|
(1.40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
15,832.75 |
|
|
|
20,269.97 |
|
|
|
29,129.90 |
|
|
|
675.87 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.09 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
Rs. |
15,832.75 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,269.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,168.99 |
|
|
|
676.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per equity share: (Note 23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
20.42 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Net income |
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
20.45 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
11.29 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
20.17 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Net income |
|
|
11.29 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
20.20 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Weighted-average number of equity shares used in computing earnings
per equity share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1,391,554,372 |
|
|
|
1,406,505,974 |
|
|
|
1,426,709,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
1,399,846,782 |
|
|
|
1,423,679,230 |
|
|
|
1,444,467,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
107
WIPRO LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Shares held by a |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Equity Shares |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Deferred Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Controlled Trust |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income/(loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,396,554,912 |
|
|
|
465.52 |
|
|
|
7,176.68 |
|
|
|
(9.88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
918.64 |
|
|
|
37,812.87 |
|
|
|
(7,887,060 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
46,363.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends (Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,575.99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,575.99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of equity shares on exercise of options |
|
|
10,586,132 |
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
2,566.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,577.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity shares forfeited, net of issuance by Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock split effected in the form of stock dividend (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
931.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(931.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation related to employee stock incentive plan, net
of reversals (Note 22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,529.12 |
|
|
|
(3,529.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of compensation related to employee stock
incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353.86 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
15,832.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,832.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,832.75 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investment securities, net (net of tax
effect of Rs. 59.59) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging derivatives, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(945.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income/ (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(822.55 |
) |
|
|
(822.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(822.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
15,010.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,407,141,044 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,407.14 |
|
|
Rs. |
13,272.57 |
|
|
Rs. |
(3,185.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
96.09 |
|
|
Rs. |
45,138.37 |
|
|
|
(7,893,060 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(0.08 |
) |
|
Rs. |
56,728.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends (Note
17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,997.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,997.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of equity shares on exercise of options |
|
|
18,613,223 |
|
|
|
32.58 |
|
|
|
4,671.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,703.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock split effected in the form of stock dividend (Note
16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,411.79 |
|
|
|
(1,161.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity shares granted to employees by Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversals related to employee stock incentive plan, net of
issuances (Note
22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330.49 |
) |
|
|
298.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.55 |
) |
Amortization of compensation related to employee stock
incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683.78 |
|
Excess income tax benefit related to employee stock
incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
20,269.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,269.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,269.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Shares held by a |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Equity Shares |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Deferred Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Controlled Trust |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income/(loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Equity |
|
Unrealized gain on investment securities, net (net of tax
effect of Rs. 114.94) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedging derivatives, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337.61 |
|
|
|
337.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
20,607.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,425,754,267 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,851.51 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,521.07 |
|
|
Rs. |
(2,202.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
433.70 |
|
|
Rs. |
61,160.56 |
|
|
|
(7,869,060 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(0.08 |
) |
|
Rs. |
78,764.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends (Note
17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,381.63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,381.63 |
) |
Elimination of deferred stock compensation balance on
adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,202.42 |
) |
|
|
2,202.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (Note
2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of equity shares on exercise of options |
|
|
32,095,328 |
|
|
|
64.19 |
|
|
|
8,830.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,894.44 |
|
Issuance of equity shares on exercise of options through
non-recourse note (Note 22) |
|
|
1,150,055 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
(2.30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity shares forfeited, net of issuance by Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation cost related to employee stock incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,336.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,336.40 |
|
Excess income tax benefit related to employees stock
incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,168.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,168.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,168.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130.81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investment securities, net (net of tax
effect of Rs. 25.48) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedging derivatives, net
(Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130.48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216.23 |
) |
|
|
(216.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,952.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158 (net of tax
effect of Rs. 18.05) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,458,999,650 |
|
|
|
2,918.00 |
|
|
|
24,508.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.77 |
|
|
|
73,947.92 |
|
|
|
(7,961,760 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
101,468.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007 ($) (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.70 |
|
|
|
568.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
1,715.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,354.24 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
109
WIPRO LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
Rs. |
15,832.75 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,269.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,168.99 |
|
|
|
676.79 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(108.82 |
) |
|
|
(7.75 |
) |
|
|
(9.98 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,578.25 |
|
|
|
3,195.03 |
|
|
|
4,309.28 |
|
|
|
99.98 |
|
Deferred tax charge/(benefit) |
|
|
(83.05 |
) |
|
|
14.97 |
|
|
|
(28.76 |
) |
|
|
(0.67 |
) |
Unrealized exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.71 |
|
|
|
470.20 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237.72 |
) |
|
|
(549.27 |
) |
|
|
(12.74 |
) |
Loss on direct issue of stock by subsidiary |
|
|
206.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
353.86 |
|
|
|
652.23 |
|
|
|
1,336.40 |
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
Excess income tax benefit related to employee stock
incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
(158.08 |
) |
|
|
(287.97 |
) |
|
|
(317.88 |
) |
|
|
(7.38 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
81.21 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(3,833.42 |
) |
|
|
(5,362.82 |
) |
|
|
(6,551.18 |
) |
|
|
(152.00 |
) |
Costs and earnings in excess of billings on
contracts in progress |
|
|
(639.81 |
) |
|
|
(1,596.41 |
) |
|
|
(760.42 |
) |
|
|
(17.64 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(330.97 |
) |
|
|
(295.45 |
) |
|
|
(1,060.34 |
) |
|
|
(24.60 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
856.35 |
|
|
|
(2,284.40 |
) |
|
|
(1,767.84 |
) |
|
|
(41.02 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
980.64 |
|
|
|
28.23 |
|
|
|
1,497.43 |
|
|
|
34.74 |
|
Accrued expenses and employee costs |
|
|
2,317.30 |
|
|
|
3,990.98 |
|
|
|
892.79 |
|
|
|
20.71 |
|
Advances from customers |
|
|
316.89 |
|
|
|
336.62 |
|
|
|
1,383.51 |
|
|
|
32.10 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
636.76 |
|
|
|
1,630.71 |
|
|
|
2,187.77 |
|
|
|
50.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
19,006.44 |
|
|
|
20,191.67 |
|
|
|
30,161.61 |
|
|
|
699.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(6,612.81 |
) |
|
|
(7,485.94 |
) |
|
|
(11,391.63 |
) |
|
|
(264.31 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
322.00 |
|
|
|
113.25 |
|
|
|
148.87 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
14.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(70,698.67 |
) |
|
|
(58,706.63 |
) |
|
|
(123,725.63 |
) |
|
|
(2,870.66 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
66,383.54 |
|
|
|
52,043.18 |
|
|
|
121,541.75 |
|
|
|
2,820.00 |
|
Investments in inter-corporate deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500.00 |
) |
|
|
(250.00 |
) |
|
|
(5.80 |
) |
Redemption of inter-corporate deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
Purchase of intangible assets |
|
|
(280.54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(617.99 |
) |
|
|
(2,777.03 |
) |
|
|
(7,800.14 |
) |
|
|
(180.98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(11,496.07 |
) |
|
|
(17,299.05 |
) |
|
|
(21,376.78 |
) |
|
|
(495.98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares |
|
|
2,577.13 |
|
|
|
4,766.79 |
|
|
|
8,894.44 |
|
|
|
206.37 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares by a subsidiary |
|
|
266.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from/(repayments of) short-term borrowing from
banks, net |
|
|
(405.08 |
) |
|
|
(196.06 |
) |
|
|
1,825.19 |
|
|
|
42.35 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268.36 |
) |
|
|
146.78 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
Payment of cash dividends |
|
|
(7,575.99 |
) |
|
|
(3,997.74 |
) |
|
|
(8,873.30 |
) |
|
|
(205.89 |
) |
Movement in restricted cash relating to cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,237.88 |
) |
|
|
(167.93 |
) |
Excess income tax benefit related to employee stock
incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.54 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
|
|
(5,137.69 |
) |
|
|
304.63 |
|
|
|
(5,180.23 |
) |
|
|
(120.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year |
|
|
2,372.68 |
|
|
|
3,197.25 |
|
|
|
3,604.60 |
|
|
|
83.63 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(10.31 |
) |
|
|
(50.13 |
) |
|
|
(1.16 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year |
|
|
3,297.16 |
|
|
|
5,670.76 |
|
|
|
8,857.70 |
|
|
|
205.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
|
Rs. |
5,670.76 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,857.70 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,412.17 |
|
|
|
287.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
Rs. |
56.12 |
|
|
Rs. |
34.95 |
|
|
Rs. |
124.63 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
|
2,354.70 |
|
|
|
4,542.59 |
|
|
|
4,251.82 |
|
|
|
98.65 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
110
WIPRO LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in millions, except share data and where otherwise stated)
1. Overview
Wipro Limited (Wipro), together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company) is a leading India based provider of IT Services and Products, including Business Process
Outsourcing (BPO) services, globally. Further, Wipro has other businesses such as India and
AsiaPac IT Services and Products and Consumer Care and Lighting. Wipro is headquartered in
Bangalore, India.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Basis of preparation of financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Functional currency and exchange rate translation. The functional currency of Wipro and its
domestic subsidiaries is the Indian rupee, the national currency of India. The functional currency
of the foreign subsidiaries is determined based on an evaluation of the individual and collective
economic factors as discussed in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 52, Foreign
Currency Translation. The translation of the functional currency of these foreign subsidiaries into
Indian rupee is performed for balance sheet accounts using the exchange rate in effect at the
balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using an appropriate monthly
weighted-average exchange rate for the respective periods. The gains or losses resulting from such
translation are reported as a separate component of stockholders equity.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency at the rates of
exchange prevailing on the date of respective transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities in
foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on
the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange gains/(losses) are included in the statement of
income.
Convenience translation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reported
in Indian rupees. Solely for the convenience of the readers, the financial statements as of and for
the year ended March 31, 2007, have been translated into U.S. dollars at the noon buying rate in New
York City on March 30, 2007, for cable transfers in Indian rupees, as certified for customs
purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of $ 1 = Rs. 43.10. No representation is made that
the Indian rupee amounts have been, could have been or could be
converted into U.S.
dollars at such a rate or any other rate.
Principles of consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the financial
statements of Wipro and all of its subsidiaries, which are more than 50% owned and controlled. All
inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated on consolidation. The Company accounts for
investments by the equity method where its investment in the voting stock gives it the ability to
exercise significant influence over the investee. The Company does not consolidate entities where
the minority shareholders have certain significant participative rights which provide for effective
involvement in significant decisions in the ordinary course of business, Such investments are
accounted by the equity method of accounting.
Cash equivalents. The Company considers investments in highly liquid investments with
remaining maturities, at the date of purchase/investment, of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Revenue recognition. Revenue from services, as rendered, are recognized when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Revenues from software development services comprise revenues from
time-and-material and fixed-price contracts. Revenue on time-and-material contracts is recognized
as the related services are performed. Revenue from fixed-price, fixed-time frame contracts is
recognized in accordance with the percentage of completion method. Guidance has been drawn from the
Accounting Standards Executive Committees conclusion in paragraph 95 of Statement of Position
(SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, to account for revenue from fixed price arrangements for
software development and
111
related services in conformity with SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type
and Certain Production-Type Contracts. The input (cost expended) method has been used to measure
progress towards completion as there is a direct relationship between input and productivity.
Provisions for estimated losses on contracts-in-progress are recorded in the period in which such
losses become probable based on the current contract estimates. Maintenance revenue is deferred and
recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Revenue from customer training, support and
other services is recognized as the related service is performed. Costs that are incurred for a
specific anticipated contract and that will result in no future benefits unless the contract is
obtained are not included in contract costs before the receipt of the contract. However, such costs
are deferred only if the cost can be directly associated with a specific anticipated contract and
the recoverability from that contract is deemed to be probable.
Revenue from sale of products is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
the product has been delivered in accordance with sales contract, the sales price is fixed or
determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company has adopted the guidance in EITF Issue No. 00-21 for all revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables.
Based on this guidance, the Company recognizes revenues on the delivered products or services only if:
|
|
The revenue recognition criteria applicable to the unit of accounting is met; |
|
|
The delivered element has value to the customer on a standalone basis. The delivered unit will have value on a
standalone basis if it is being sold separately by other vendors or the customer could resell the deliverable on a
standalone basis; |
|
|
There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s); and |
|
|
If the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the
undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in control of the Company. |
The arrangement consideration is allocated to the units of accounting based on their fair
values. The revenue recognized for the delivered items is limited to the amount that is not
contingent upon the delivery or performance of the undelivered items.
In certain cases, the application of the contingent revenue provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-21
could result in recognizing a loss on the delivered element. In such cases, the cost recognized is
limited to the amount of non-contingent revenues recognized and the balance costs are recorded as
an asset and are reviewed for impairment based on the estimated net cash flows to be received for
future deliverables under the contract. These costs are subsequently recognized on recognition of
the revenue allocable to the balance deliverables.
Revenues from BPO Services are derived from both time-based and unit-priced contracts. Revenue
is recognized as the related services are performed, in accordance with the specific terms of the
contract with the customers.
Revenues are shown net of excise duty, sales tax, value added tax, service tax and applicable
discounts and allowances.
When the Company receives advance payments from customers for sale of products or provision of
services, such payments are reported as advances from customers until all conditions for revenue
recognition are met.
Volume discount. The Company accounts for volume discounts and pricing incentives to customers
using the guidance in EITF Issue 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products). The discount terms in the Companys
arrangements with customers generally entitle the customer to discounts, if the customer completes
a specified level of revenue transactions. In some arrangements, the level of discount varies with
increases in the levels of revenue transactions. The Company recognizes discount obligations as a
reduction of revenue based on the ratable allocation of the discount to each of the underlying
revenue transactions that result in progress by the customer toward earning the discount. The
Company recognizes the liability based on its estimate of the customers future purchases. If the
Company cannot reasonably estimate the customers future purchases, then the liability is recorded
based on the maximum potential level of discount. The Company recognizes changes in the estimated
amount of obligations for discounts using a cumulative catch-up adjustment.
112
Warranty costs. The Company accrues the estimated cost of warranties at the time when the
revenue is recognized. The accruals are based on the Companys historical experience of material
usage and service delivery costs.
Shipping and handling costs. Shipping and handling costs are included in selling and marketing
expenses.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and market value. Cost is determined
using the weighted-average method for all categories of inventories.
Investment securities. The Company classifies its debt and equity securities in one of the
three categories: trading, held-to-maturity or available-for-sale, at the time of purchase and
re-evaluates such classifications as of each balance sheet date. Trading and available-for-sale
securities are recorded at fair value. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost,
adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts. Unrealized holding gains and
losses on trading securities are included in income. Temporary unrealized holding gains and losses,
net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from income and are
reported as a part of other comprehensive income in stockholders equity until realized. Realized
gains and losses from the sale of trading and available-for-sale securities are determined on a
first-in-first out basis and are included in income. A decline in the fair value of any
available-for-sale or held-to-maturity security below cost that is deemed to be other than
temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value with a charge to the income
statement. Fair value for mutual fund units is based on published per unit value, which is the
basis for current transactions. Non-readily marketable equity securities for which there is no
readily determinable fair value are recorded at cost, subject to an impairment charge to the income
statement for any other than temporary decline in value.
Investments in affiliates. The Companys equity in the earnings/(losses) of affiliates is
included in the statement of income and the Companys share of net assets of affiliates is included
in the balance sheet.
Shares issued by subsidiary/affiliate. The issuance of stock by a subsidiary/affiliate to
third parties reduces the proportionate ownership interest in the investee. Unless the issuance of
such stock is part of a broader corporate reorganization or unless realization is not assured, the
Company recognizes a gain or loss, equal to the difference between the issuance price per share and
the Companys carrying amount per share. Such gain or loss is recognized in the statement of income
when the transaction occurs.
Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. The Company
depreciates property, plant and equipment over the estimated useful life using the straight-line
method. Assets under capital lease are amortized over their estimated useful life or the lease
term, as appropriate. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
30 to 60 years |
Plant and machinery
|
|
2 to 20 years |
Computer equipment
|
|
2 to 3 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
5 years |
Vehicles
|
|
4 years |
Computer software
|
|
2 years |
Software for internal use is primarily acquired from third-party vendors and is in ready to
use condition. Costs for acquiring this software are capitalized and subsequent costs are charged
to the statement of income. The capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful life of the software.
Deposits paid towards the acquisition of property, plant and equipment outstanding as of each
balance sheet date and the cost of property, plant and equipment not ready for use before such date
are disclosed under capital work-in-progress. The interest cost incurred for funding an asset
during its construction period is capitalized based on the actual investment in the asset and the
average cost of funds. The capitalized interest is included in the cost of the relevant asset and
is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Business combinations, goodwill and intangible assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations, the Company uses the purchase method of accounting for all business
combinations. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized and reported
apart from goodwill if they meet the criteria specified in SFAS No. 141. Any purchase price
allocated to an assembled workforce is not accounted separately.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, all assets and
liabilities of the acquired business including goodwill are assigned to the reporting units. The
Company does not amortize goodwill but instead tests goodwill for impairment at least annually,
using a two step impairment process.
The fair value of the reporting unit is first compared to its carrying value. The fair value
of reporting units is determined using the income approach based on measurement techniques such as
discounted cash flow analyses. If the
113
fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that
unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting
unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the implied fair value of the reporting
units goodwill is compared with the carrying value of the reporting units goodwill. The implied
fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a
business combination. If the carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds its implied fair
value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference is recorded.
Intangible assets acquired individually, with a group of other assets or in a business
combination are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. The intangible assets are amortized
over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits consumed in each period.
The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
2 to 5 years |
Marketing-related intangibles
|
|
2 to 20 years |
Technology-based intangibles
|
|
5 years |
Start-up costs. Cost of start-up activities including organization costs are expensed as
incurred.
Research and development. Revenue expenditure on research and development is expensed as
incurred. Capital expenditure incurred on equipment and facilities that are acquired or constructed
for research and development activities and having alternative future uses, is capitalized as
tangible assets when acquired or constructed. Software product development costs are expensed as
incurred until technological feasibility is achieved.
Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets, including certain identifiable
intangible assets, to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Such assets
are considered to be impaired if the carrying amount of the assets is higher than the future
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the assets. The impairment amount to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair
value.
The Company measures long-lived assets held-for-sale, at the lower of carrying amount or fair
value, less costs to sell.
Earnings per share. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, basic earnings per
share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and dilutive
common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, using the treasury stock method for options
and warrants, except where the results would be anti-dilutive.
Dividends. Final dividend on the common stock is recorded as a liability on the date of
declaration by the stockholders. Interim dividends are recorded as a liability on the date of
declaration by the board of directors.
Income taxes. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases and operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. The deferred tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the asset will not be realized. Excess income tax benefit on
exercise of employee stock options is credited to additional paid-in capital.
Stock-based compensation. Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123 (R)), which requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards based on the grant-date fair value of those
awards. Previously, the Company used the intrinsic value based method, permitted by Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock issued to Employees, to account for its
employee stock-based compensation plans and had adopted the pro-forma disclosure provisions of SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123).
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method. Under
this approach, the Company has recognized compensation expense for share-based payment awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of April 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value under
Black-Scholes model estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123.
114
The impact of adoption of SFAS 123 (R) using the modified prospective approach on the
Companys financial statement is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
Particulars |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
(165.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
(165.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
(165.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
(125.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per equity share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
(64.54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided in financing activities |
|
|
64.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 123(R) requires that deferred stock-based compensation previously recorded under APB
Opinion No. 25 and outstanding on the date of adoption be eliminated against additional paid-in
capital. Accordingly, the deferred compensation balance of Rs. 2,202.42 was eliminated against
additional paid-in capital on April 1, 2006.
Under APB Opinion No. 25, the Company had a policy of recognizing the effect of forfeitures only as
they occurred. Accordingly, as required by SFAS No. 123 (R), on April 1, 2006, the Company
estimated the number of outstanding instruments, which are not expected to vest and recognized a
gain of Rs. 39.09 representing the reversal of compensation cost for such instruments previously
recognized in statement of income as cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle.
Had compensation cost, for the year ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, been determined in a manner
consistent with the fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income and
earnings per share as reported would have been reduced to the pro-forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
Rs. |
15,832.75 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,269.97 |
|
Add: Stockbased employee compensation
expense included in reported net
income, net of tax effects |
|
|
353.86 |
|
|
|
619.43 |
|
Less: Stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value
based method, net of tax
effects |
|
|
(1,598.10 |
) |
|
|
(1,190.50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net income |
|
Rs. |
14,588.51 |
|
|
Rs. |
19,698.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
11.38 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
|
10.49 |
|
|
|
14.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
11.29 |
|
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
|
10.44 |
|
|
|
13.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has granted 11,376,196, 55,500 and 7,056,766 options under Restricted Stock
Unit Plans, at a nominal exercise price of Rs. 2 per share, during the years ended March 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007. Since these options have been granted at a nominal exercise price, the intrinsic
value on the date of grant approximates the fair value of the options.
Derivatives and hedge accounting. The Company purchases forward foreign exchange
contracts/option contracts (derivatives) to mitigate the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates
on accounts receivable and forecasted cash flows denominated in certain foreign currencies. The
strategy also includes purchase of series of short-term forward foreign exchange contracts which
are replaced with successive new contracts up to the period in which the forecasted transactions
are expected to occur (roll-over hedging). The Company also designates zero-cost collars, which
qualify as net purchased options, to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future foreign
currency cash inflows due to exchange rate movements beyond a defined range.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as amended, the Company recognizes all derivatives as assets or liabilities measured at their fair
value, regardless of the purpose or intent of holding them. In respect of derivatives designated
and effective as cash flow hedges, gains or losses
115
resulting from changes in the fair value are deferred and recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders equity until the hedged transaction
occurs and are then recognized in the consolidated statements of income along with the hedged item.
The Company assesses hedge effectiveness based on overall change in fair value of derivative
instrument. However, for derivatives acquired pursuant to roll-over hedging strategy, the forward
premium/discount points are excluded from assessing hedge effectiveness.
Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging derivatives and ineffective
portion of the hedging instruments are recognized in consolidated statements of income of each
period and are reported within foreign exchange gains/ (losses), net under operating expenses.
In respect of derivatives designated as hedges, the Company formally documents all
relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also formally
assesses both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether each derivative is
highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. If it is
determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, or if a derivative ceases to be a
highly effective hedge, the Company, prospectively, discontinues hedge accounting with respect to
that derivative.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the prior years consolidated financial statements and
notes have been reclassified to confirm to the current years presentation.
Recent accounting pronouncements
FASB Interpretation No. 48. In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 applies to all tax positions within the scope of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, and clarifies when and how to recognize tax benefits in the financial
statements with a two-step approach of recognition and measurement. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006, and, as a result, is effective for the Company commencing
April 1, 2007. FIN 48 also requires the enterprise to make explicit disclosures about uncertainties
in their income tax positions, including a detailed roll-forward of tax benefits taken that do not
qualify for financial statement recognition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN
48 on the consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 157. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance on determination of fair value and lays down the
fair value hierarchy to classify the source of information used in fair value measurement. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements and will
adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 159. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). This statement permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility
in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having
to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the fiscal year
beginning April 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS
No. 159 will have on our consolidated financial statements
3. Acquisitions
The Company completed the following acquisitions during the year ended March 31, 2006.
Wipro BPO
As of March 31, 2005, the Companys ownership
interest in Wipro BPO was approximately 93%. During the year ended March 31, 2006, the
Company acquired the balance 7% of the equity shares from the employee shareholders at fair
value for an aggregate consideration of Rs.852.00 million. The step-acquisition resulted in
goodwill and intangibles of Rs.304.14 million and Rs.14.86 million respectively.
mPower Software Services Inc. and subsidiaries
In December 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of mPower Software Services Inc. and
subsidiaries (mPower) including the minority shareholding held by MasterCard International in mPact
India, a joint venture between MasterCard International and mPower Inc, for an aggregate cash
consideration of Rs. 1,274.57 (including direct acquisition costs). mPower Software Services Inc.
is a US based company engaged in providing IT services in the payments service sector.
As a part of this acquisition, the Company plans to provide MasterCard a wide range of
services including application development and maintenance, infrastructure services, package
implementation, BPO and testing. The Company believes that through this acquisition, it will be
able to expand domain expertise in the payment service sector and increase the addressable market
for IT services.
116
The total purchase price has been allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
185.39 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
513.13 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(177.50 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
753.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,274.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
BVPENTE Beteiligungsverwaltung GmbH and subsidiaries
In December 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of BVPENTE Beteiligungsverwaltung
GmbH and subsidiaries (New Logic). New Logic is a European system-on-chip design company. The
consideration included a upfront consideration of Rs. 1,156.54 (including direct acquisition
costs), subject to working capital adjustments, and an earn-out of Euro 26.70 to be determined and
paid in the future based on financial targets being achieved over a 3 year period. During the year
ended March 31, 2007, the Company paid an additional consideration of Rs. 68.76 (Euro 1.18) towards
the working capital adjustment. The Company has determined that a portion of the earn-out, up to a
maximum of Euro 2.50 is linked to the continuing employment of one of the selling shareholders. The
balance earn-out will be recorded as additional purchase price when the contingency is resolved.
The Company believes that through this acquisition, it has acquired strong domain expertise in
semiconductor Intellectual Property (IP) cores and complete system-on-chip solutions with digital,
analog mixed signal and Radio Frequency (RF) design services. The acquisition also enables the
Company to access over 20 customers in the product engineering space.
The purchase price has been allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
307.15 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
117.40 |
|
Technology-related intangibles |
|
|
95.72 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(53.00 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
758.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,225.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company completed the following acquisitions during the year ended March 31, 2007.
cMango Inc. and subsidiaries
In April 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of cMango Inc. and subsidiaries
(cMango). cMango is a provider of Business Service Management (BSM) solutions. The consideration
(including direct acquisition costs) included a cash payment of Rs. 884.25 and an earn-out of USD
12.00 to be determined and paid in the future based on specific financial targets being achieved
over a two year period. The earn-out will be recorded as additional purchase price when the
contingency is resolved.
The Company believes that through this acquisition it will expand its operations in the
Business Management Services sector. This acquisition also enables the Company to access over 20
customers in the Business Management services sector.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
(23.08 |
) |
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
132.64 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(46.42 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
821.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
884.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
RetailBox BV and subsidiaries
In June 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of RetailBox BV and subsidiaries
(Enabler). Enabler is in the business of providing comprehensive IT solutions and services. The
consideration (including direct acquisition costs) included a cash payment of Rs. 2,442.12 and an
earn-out of Euro 11.00 to be determined and paid in the future based on specific financial targets
being achieved over a two year period. The earn-out will be recorded as additional purchase price
when the contingency is resolved.
117
Through this acquisition the Company aims to provide a wide range of services including Oracle
retail implementation, digital supply chain, business optimization and integration. Further,
through this acquisition, the Company aims to expand domain expertise both in the retail and
technology sectors and obtain a presence in five different geographical locations.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
388.88 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
297.92 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(104.27 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
1,859.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
2,442.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Switchgear Limited
In May 2006, the Company acquired a substantial portion of the business of North-west
Switchgear Limited a manufacturer and distributor of switches, sockets and miniature circuit
breakers (collectively the products) under the trademark/ brand name North-West. The
consideration (including direct acquisition costs) included a cash payment of Rs 1,131.66 and an
earn-out of Rs. 200.00 to be determined and paid in the future based on achievement of a specified
revenue levels over a period of four years. Further, the Company has entered into a non-compete and
manufacturing agreement with the sellers. Under the manufacturing agreement, the seller will
manufacture the products for the Company based on certain assets and employee retained by the
seller. The manufacturing agreement is for a period of five years. Amounts paid by the Company for
such manufacturing services will be recorded through the income statement. The earn-outs which are
not linked to any post-acquisition services by the seller will be recorded as additional purchase
consideration when the contingency is resolved.
Based on the guidance in EITF Issue No. 98-3, Determining Whether a Non-monetary Transaction
Involves Receipt of Productive Assets of a Business, the Company has accounted for this transaction
as an acquisition of a business. A significant portion of the consideration has been allocated to
the trademark/brand name North-West.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets |
|
Rs. |
33.75 |
|
Marketing-related intangibles |
|
|
1,097.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,131.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Saraware Oy
In June 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of Saraware Oy (Saraware) a Company
involved in providing design and engineering services to telecom companies. The Company acquired
Saraware for an aggregate consideration of Rs. 947.25 (including direct acquisition costs) and an
earn-out of Euro 7 to be determined and paid in future based on financial targets being achieved
over a period of 18 months. In addition, amounts collected against certain specific reward/
incentive assets at the acquisition date are payable to the sellers. The Company has paid Rs.
148.92 against specific reward/ incentives collected and Rs. 19.33 (Euro 0.33) as earn-out against
targets achieved during the period ended March 31, 2007. The earn-out and the additional payments
are recorded as additional purchase price when the related contingencies are resolved.
Through this acquisition the Company aims to expand its presence in the engineering services
space in Finland and the Nordic region.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
186.98 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
254.72 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(89.15 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
762.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,115.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
118
Quantech Global Services
In July 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of Quantech Global Services LLC and
Quantech Global Services Ltd (Quantech). Quantech provides computer aided design and engineering
services. The consideration includes upfront cash payment of Rs. 142.00 (including direct
acquisition costs), a deferred cash payment of USD 3.00 and an earn-out to be determined and paid
in the future based on specific financial targets being achieved over
a period of 36 months. The earn-out will be recorded as
additional purchase price when the contingency is resolved.
Through this acquisition, the Company aims to strengthen its presence in the mechanical
engineering design and analysis services sector.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
(230.33 |
) |
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
45.92 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(16.07 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
481.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
281.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrauto Group
In November 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of Hydrauto Group AB (Hydrauto).
Hydrauto is engaged in the production, marketing and development of customized hydraulic cylinders
solution for mobile applications such as mobile cranes, excavator, dumpers and trucks. The
consideration (including direct acquisition cost) included cash payment of Rs. 1,412.17. Through
this acquisition the Company aims to gain an entry into Europe, access to a customer base built
over the past few decades and complementary engineering skills.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
201.81 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
73.57 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(24.76 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
1,161.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
1,412.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
3D Networks
In November 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of the India, Middle East and SAARC
operations of 3D Networks and Planet PSG. 3D Networks provides business communication solutions
that include consulting, voice, data and converged solutions and managed services. These
specialized solutions are deployed in the ITES/IT, Telecom, Banking and Finance, Government and
Service segments. Planet PSG provides professional services on voice and speech platforms in the
Asia Pacific region. The consideration (including direct acquisition cost) included upfront cash
payment of Rs. 903.95 and a maximum earn-out of U.S. dollars 43.78 to be determined and paid in the future
based on achieving certain agreed financial targets over a 24 months period. The earn-out will be recorded as
additional purchase price when the contingency is resolved. The Company believes
that this acquisition is a strategic fit as it complements Wipros existing practice capabilities
and differentiates Wipro as the most comprehensive IT Solutions provider across segments.
The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair value |
|
|
Net tangible assets/(liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
507.77 |
|
Customer-related intangibles |
|
|
136.24 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(45.86 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
305.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
903.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
For all
the above acquisitions completed during the year ended March 31, 2007, the purchase consideration has
been allocated on a preliminary basis based on managements estimates. The Company is in the
process of making a final determination of the carrying value of assets and liabilities, which may
result in changes in the carrying value of net assets recorded. Finalization of the purchase price
allocation, which is expected to be completed during the period ending June 30, 2007 may result in
certain adjustments to the above allocations.
119
4. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 comprise of cash, cash on deposit with
banks and highly liquid investments.
5. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company maintains
an allowance for doubtful accounts based on financial condition of its
customers and aging of the accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are generally not
collateralized. The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at the beginning of the year |
|
Rs. |
720.02 |
|
|
|
846.54 |
|
|
|
1,115.78 |
|
Additional provision during the year, net of collections |
|
|
151.89 |
|
|
|
275.24 |
|
|
|
280.02 |
|
Bad debts charged to provision |
|
|
(25.37 |
) |
|
|
(6.00 |
) |
|
|
(149.68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the year |
|
Rs. |
846.54 |
|
|
|
1,115.78 |
|
|
|
1,246.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Stores and spare parts |
|
Rs. |
198.02 |
|
|
Rs. |
297.72 |
|
Raw materials and components |
|
|
692.01 |
|
|
|
1,584.13 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
288.73 |
|
|
|
491.21 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
885.85 |
|
|
|
1,777.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
2,064.61 |
|
|
|
4,150.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
Rs. |
1,107.18 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,359.05 |
|
Prepaid rentals for leasehold land |
|
|
74.89 |
|
|
|
596.53 |
|
Due from officers and employees |
|
|
753.68 |
|
|
|
884.31 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
467.19 |
|
|
|
711.45 |
|
Balances with statutory authorities |
|
|
130.76 |
|
|
|
207.12 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,388.89 |
|
|
|
1,591.01 |
|
Interest-bearing corporate deposits |
|
|
500.00 |
|
|
|
650.00 |
|
Advance income taxes |
|
|
3,670.89 |
|
|
|
4,844.25 |
|
Deferred contract costs |
|
|
339.59 |
|
|
|
397.44 |
|
Derivative asset |
|
|
338.11 |
|
|
|
378.51 |
|
Others |
|
|
369.39 |
|
|
|
751.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,140.57 |
|
|
|
12,370.89 |
|
Less: Current assets |
|
|
(7,896.60 |
) |
|
|
(10,411.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
1,243.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,958.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Investment Securities
Investment securities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006 |
|
|
As of March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Holding Gains |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Holding Gains |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in liquid
and short-term mutual
funds |
|
Rs. |
29,816.83 |
|
|
Rs. |
498.42 |
|
|
Rs. |
30,315.25 |
|
|
Rs. |
31,841.47 |
|
|
Rs. |
568.96 |
|
|
Rs. |
32,410.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
Dividends from available-for-sale securities during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007 were Rs. 679.36, Rs. 862.60 and Rs. 1,685.93 respectively and are included in other
income.
9. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Land |
|
Rs. |
1,261.14 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,571.07 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
4,590.53 |
|
|
|
6,095.44 |
|
Plant and machinery |
|
|
5,545.08 |
|
|
|
7,870.93 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
2,996.87 |
|
|
|
3,933.58 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
6,761.66 |
|
|
|
8,732.29 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
1,324.31 |
|
|
|
1,821.38 |
|
Computer software for internal use |
|
|
1,793.37 |
|
|
|
2,831.09 |
|
Capital work-in-progress |
|
|
6,248.52 |
|
|
|
10,189.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,521.48 |
|
|
|
43,045.23 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(12,744.08 |
) |
|
|
(16,503.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
17,777.40 |
|
|
Rs. |
26,541.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, is Rs. 2,437.96, Rs. 3,101.23 and Rs. 3,930.56 respectively. This includes Rs. 194.91, Rs. 205.93
and Rs. 385.61 as depreciation of capitalized internal use software, during the years ended March
31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Information regarding the Companys intangible assets acquired either individually or in a
business combination consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Gross carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Technology-based
intangibles |
|
Rs. |
130.02 |
|
|
Rs. |
34.07 |
|
|
Rs. |
95.95 |
|
|
Rs. |
130.02 |
|
|
Rs. |
71.40 |
|
|
Rs. |
58.62 |
|
Customer-related
intangibles |
|
|
1,050.27 |
|
|
|
600.39 |
|
|
|
449.88 |
|
|
|
2,147.45 |
|
|
|
937.29 |
|
|
|
1,210.16 |
|
Marketing-related
intangibles |
|
|
382.43 |
|
|
|
73.93 |
|
|
|
308.50 |
|
|
|
1,480.48 |
|
|
|
78.42 |
|
|
|
1,402.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
1,562.72 |
|
|
Rs. |
708.39 |
|
|
Rs. |
854.33 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,627.935 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,087.11 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,670.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amortization expense for intangible assets is set out below:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending March 31, |
|
Amount |
|
|
2008 |
|
Rs. |
492.02 |
|
2009 |
|
|
460.19 |
|
2010 |
|
|
350.57 |
|
2011 |
|
|
152.75 |
|
2012 |
|
|
55.57 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,159.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
2,670.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
The movement in goodwill balance is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at the beginning of the year |
|
Rs. |
5,614.98 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,480.85 |
|
Goodwill relating to acquisitions (Note 3) |
|
|
1,851.01 |
|
|
|
5,392.77 |
|
Adjustment relating to finalization of purchase
price allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103.60 |
) |
Tax benefit allocated to goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.40 |
) |
Effect of translation adjustments |
|
|
14.86 |
|
|
|
(57.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the year |
|
Rs. |
7,480.85 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,697.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
Goodwill as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 has been allocated to the following reportable
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
IT Services and
Products |
|
Rs. |
2,742.39 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,502.71 |
|
BPO Services |
|
|
3,982.00 |
|
|
|
3,982.00 |
|
India and AsiaPac IT Services and
Products |
|
|
756.46 |
|
|
|
1,044.63 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
7,480.85 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,697.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Statutory dues payable |
|
Rs. |
1,820.99 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,634.92 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
3,044.10 |
|
|
|
4,573.00 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,237.88 |
|
Warranty obligations |
|
|
664.86 |
|
|
|
742.03 |
|
Derivative liability |
|
|
12.53 |
|
|
|
109.89 |
|
Others |
|
|
505.47 |
|
|
|
1,325.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
6,047.95 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,623.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The activity in warranty obligations is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at the beginning of the year |
|
Rs. |
357.36 |
|
|
|
361.08 |
|
|
|
664.86 |
|
Additional provision during the year |
|
|
373.46 |
|
|
|
601.20 |
|
|
|
827.32 |
|
Reduction due to payments |
|
|
(369.74 |
) |
|
|
(297.42 |
) |
|
|
(750.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the year |
|
Rs. |
361.08 |
|
|
|
664.86 |
|
|
|
742.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Operating Leases
The Company leases office and residential facilities under cancelable and non-cancelable
operating lease agreements that are renewable on a periodic basis at the option of both the lessor
and the lessee. Rental payments under such leases were Rs. 566.85, Rs. 848.85 and Rs. 1,412.25 for
the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Details of contractual payments under non-cancelable leases are given below:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending March 31,
2008 |
|
|
394.66 |
|
2009 |
|
|
358.07 |
|
2010 |
|
|
340.91 |
|
2011 |
|
|
279.35 |
|
2012 |
|
|
247.25 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
953.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
2,573.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid rentals for leasehold land represent leases obtained for a period of 60 years and
90 years. The prepaid expense is being charged over the lease term and is included under other
assets.
122
13. Investments in Affiliates
Wipro GE Medical Systems (Wipro GE)
The Company has accounted for its 49% interest in Wipro GE by the equity method. The carrying
value of the investment in Wipro GE as of March 31, 2006 and 2007, was Rs. 841.57 and Rs. 1,119.65,
respectively. The Companys equity in the income of Wipro GE for years ended March 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007 was Rs. 125.95, Rs. 259.16 and Rs. 302.22 respectively.
In March 2004, 2005 and 2006, Wipro GE had received tax demands aggregating Rs.843.81,
including interest, from Indian income tax authorities for the financial years ended March 31,
2001, 2002 and 2003. The tax demands were primarily on account of transfer pricing adjustments and
denial of export benefits and tax holiday benefits claimed by Wipro GE under Indian Income Tax Act,
1961 (the Act). Additionally, in December 2006, Wipro GE received tax demands aggregating
Rs.132.42, including interest, from Indian income tax authorities for the financial years ended
March 31, 2004 on similar grounds. Wipro GE has appealed against the said demands before the first
appellate authority. The first appellate authority vacated the tax demands for the years ended
March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004. The income tax authorities have filed an appeal for the year
ended March 31, 2001.
Considering the facts and nature of disallowance and the order of the appellate authority
upholding the claims of Wipro GE, Wipro GE believes that the final outcome of the disputes should
be in favour of Wipro GE and will not have any material adverse effect on the financial position
and results of operations. The range of loss due to this contingency is between zero and the
amount of demand raised.
WeP Peripherals (WeP)
The Company previously accounted for its 36.9% interest as of March 31, 2006 in WeP by the
equity method. The carrying value of the equity investment in WeP Peripherals as of March 31, 2006
was Rs. 201.52.
In December 2006, the Company sold a portion of its interest in WeP Peripherals for a
consideration of Rs. 160.00 and recorded a net gain of Rs 40.16. Subsequent to this sale, the
Companys ownership interest in WeP Peripherals is reduced to 15% and the Company does not have the
ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of WeP
Peripherals. Accordingly, the Company has subsequently accounted for the balance investment of Rs.
79.86 under the cost method.
WM Net Serv
The Company has accounted for its 80.1% ownership interest in WM NetServ by the equity method
as the minority shareholder in the investee has substantive participative rights as specified in
EITF Issue No. 96-16, Investors Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the
Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights.
The carrying value of the equity investment in WM Net Serv as of March 31, 2007 was Rs. 122.14. The
Companys equity in the loss of WM Net Serv for year ended March 31, 2007 was Rs. 24.50.
14. Financial Instruments and Concentration of Risk
Concentration of risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments in
liquid and short-term mutual funds, other investments securities, derivative financial instruments,
accounts receivable and corporate deposits. The Companys cash resources are invested with
financial institutions and commercial corporations with high investment grade credit ratings.
Limits have been established by the Company as to the maximum amount of cash that may be invested
with any such single entity. To reduce its credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of customers. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of the accounts receivable
as of March 31, 2006 and 2007 and revenues for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Derivative financial instruments. The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations on
foreign currency assets and forecasted cash flows denominated in foreign currency. The Company
follows established risk management policies, including the use of derivatives to hedge foreign
currency assets and foreign currency forecasted cash flows. The counter party is a bank and the
Company considers the risks of non-performance by the counterparty as non-material. The forward
foreign exchange/option contracts mature between one to twelve months and the forecasted
transactions are expected to occur during the same period.
123
The following table presents the aggregate contracted principal amounts of the Companys
derivative contracts outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sell |
|
$ |
592.23 |
|
|
$ |
345.00 |
|
|
|
£ |
4.00 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
87.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchased options (sell) |
|
$ |
254.00 |
|
|
$ |
36.00 |
|
|
|
£ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written options (sell) |
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with cash flow hedges, the Company has recorded Rs. 113.81, Rs. 202.34, and
Rs. 71.86 of net gains/(losses) as a component of accumulated and other comprehensive income within
stockholders equity as at March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
The following table summarizes activity in the accumulated and other comprehensive income
within stockholders equity related to all derivatives classified as cash flow hedges during the
years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance as at the
beginning of the
year |
|
Rs. |
1,058.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
113.81 |
|
|
Rs. |
202.34 |
|
|
Net gains
reclassified into
net income on
occurrence of
hedged transactions |
|
|
(1,058.97 |
) |
|
|
(113.81 |
) |
|
|
(202.34 |
) |
Deferred
cancellation losses
relating to
roll-over
hedging |
|
|
(159.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair
value of effective
portion of
outstanding
derivatives |
|
|
273.41 |
|
|
|
202.34 |
|
|
|
71.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain/(losses) on
cash flow hedging
derivatives,
net |
|
|
(945.16 |
) |
|
|
88.53 |
|
|
|
(130.48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at the
end of the
year |
|
Rs. |
113.81 |
|
|
Rs. |
202.34 |
|
|
Rs. |
71.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006 and 2007 there were no significant gains or losses on derivative
transactions or portions thereof that have become ineffective as hedges, or associated with an
underlying exposure that did not occur.
15. Borrowings from Banks
The Company has an Indian line of credit of Rs. 6,985.50, a US line of credit of US$ 25.00 and
a UK line of credit of GBP 6 from its bankers for working capital requirements. All the lines of
credit are renewable annually. The Indian line of credit bears interest at the prime rate of the
bank, which averaged 8.5% for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007. The US line of credit bears
interest at 60 basis points over the US$ London Inter-Bank Offered Rate and UK line of credit bears
interest at 70 basis points over the GBP London Inter-Bank Offered Rate. The facilities are secured
by inventories, accounts receivable and certain property and contain financial covenants and
restrictions on indebtedness. During the year ended March 31, 2007, as a part of its acquisition,
the Company assumed bank borrowings amounting to Rs. 366 and Rs. 459 for Saraware and Hydrauto
Group respectively.
16. Stock Dividend
In June 2004, the members of the Company approved a stock dividend in the ratio of 2
additional equity shares or ADS for every equity share or ADS held. Accordingly, the Company has
issued 465,631,260 additional shares and has transferred an amount of Rs. 931.26 from retained
earnings to equity shares. Share and per share data for all periods reported have been adjusted to
reflect the stock dividend. In accordance with the shareholders approval, capitalization of
retained earnings aggregating Rs. 931.26 has been recorded during the year ended March 31, 2005.
124
In July 2005, the members of the Company approved a stock dividend, effective August 24, 2005,
in the ratio of 1 additional equity shares or ADS for every equity share or ADS held. Accordingly,
the Company issued 705,893,574 additional shares and has transferred an amount of Rs. 1,161.75 from
additional paid in capital and Rs. 250.04 from retained earnings, to equity shares. The allocation
between additional paid in capital and retained earnings is in line with the local statutory
accounts. Share and per share data for all periods reported have been adjusted to reflect the stock
split effected in the form of stock dividend. In accordance with the shareholders approval,
capitalization of additional paid in capital and retained earnings aggregating Rs. 1,411.79 has
been recorded in the year ended March 31, 2006.
17. Equity Shares and Dividends
Currently, the Company has only one class of equity shares. For all matters submitted to vote
in the shareholders meeting, every holder of equity shares, as reflected in the records of the
Company on the date of the shareholders meeting shall have one vote in respect of each share held.
In October 2000, the Company made a public offering of its American Depositary Shares, or
ADSs, to international investors. The equity shares represented by the ADS carry similar rights as
to voting and dividends as the other equity shares.
In July 2005, the members of the company approved for increase in authorized capital of the
Company from 750,000,000 to 1,650,000,000.
Dividends are paid in Indian rupees. Indian law mandates that any dividend, exceeding 10% of
the equity shares, can be declared out of distributable profits only after the transfer of up to
10% of net income computed in accordance with current regulations to a general reserve. Also, the
remittance of dividends outside India is governed by Indian law on foreign exchange. Dividend
payments are also subject to applicable taxes.
In the event of liquidation of the affairs of the Company, all preferential amounts, if any,
shall be discharged by the Company. The remaining assets of the Company, after such discharge,
shall be distributed to the holders of equity shares in proportion to the number of shares held by
them.
The Company paid cash dividends of Rs. 7,575.99, Rs. 3,997.74 and Rs. 8,128.58 during the
years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. The dividends per share were Rs. 4.84, Rs. 2.50 and Rs.
5 during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Additionally, in March 2007,
the Board of Directors of the Company approved an additional cash dividend of Rs. 5 per share
totaling Rs. 8,253.05. In accordance with Indian regulations, an amount equivalent to the
additional cash dividend, net of taxes, amounting to Rs. 7,237.88 has been transferred to a
specific bank account pending payment to the shareholders. The balance in this bank account can
only be used to pay the specified dividend, is not available for general use and is accordingly
reflected as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet.
18. Retained Earnings
Retained earnings as of March 31, 2006 and 2007, also include Rs. 922.01 and Rs. 1,084.49
respectively, of undistributed earnings in equity of affiliates.
19. Other Income, Net
Other income consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
Rs. |
35.79 |
|
|
Rs. |
198.09 |
|
|
Rs. |
682.51 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(56.12 |
) |
|
|
(34.95 |
) |
|
|
(260.81 |
) |
Dividend income |
|
|
679.36 |
|
|
|
862.60 |
|
|
|
1,685.93 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities, net |
|
|
35.59 |
|
|
|
237.72 |
|
|
|
549.27 |
|
Others |
|
|
104.20 |
|
|
|
12.40 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
798.82 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,275.86 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,666.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
20. Shipping and Handling Costs
Selling and marketing expenses for the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, include
shipping and handling costs of Rs. 356.96, Rs. 555.37 and Rs. 807.03 respectively.
21. Income Taxes
Income taxes have been allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
Rs. |
2,693.57 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,264.73 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,722.61 |
|
Stockholders equity for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits relating to employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69.34 |
) |
|
|
(64.54 |
) |
Adjustments to initially apply SFAS No. 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.05 |
) |
Unrealized gains on investment securities, net |
|
|
59.59 |
|
|
|
114.94 |
|
|
|
25.48 |
|
Tax benefit allocated to goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
Rs. |
2,753.16 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,310.33 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,651.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes relating to continuing operations consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
Rs. |
1,642.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,605.19 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,574.59 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,133.65 |
|
|
|
1,644.57 |
|
|
|
2,176.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
2,776.62 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,249.76 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,751.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
(70.45 |
) |
|
|
(7.82 |
) |
|
|
(0.95 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(12.60 |
) |
|
|
22.79 |
|
|
|
(27.81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83.05 |
) |
|
|
14.97 |
|
|
|
(28.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
Rs. |
2,693.57 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,264.73 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,722.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation between the provision of income tax of the Company and amounts
computed by applying the Indian statutory income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income
before taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
|
Rs. |
18,607.53 |
|
|
Rs. |
23,536.10 |
|
|
Rs. |
32,852.51 |
|
Enacted income tax rate in India |
|
|
36.59 |
% |
|
|
33.66 |
% |
|
|
33.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed expected tax expense |
|
|
6,808.50 |
|
|
|
7,922.25 |
|
|
|
11,058.15 |
|
Effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income exempt from tax |
|
|
(4,706.64 |
) |
|
|
(5,129.26 |
) |
|
|
(7,498.43 |
) |
Basis differences that will reverse during the tax
holiday period |
|
|
245.03 |
|
|
|
291.24 |
|
|
|
526.12 |
|
Income taxed at higher rates |
|
|
111.59 |
|
|
|
229.95 |
|
|
|
124.56 |
|
Loss on direct issue of stock by
subsidiary |
|
|
75.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes relating to prior years |
|
|
122.23 |
|
|
|
(175.15 |
) |
|
|
(701.90 |
) |
Effect of change in tax rates |
|
|
(9.62 |
) |
|
|
17.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses disallowed for tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.37 |
|
|
|
197.31 |
|
Others, net |
|
|
46.74 |
|
|
|
(2.81 |
) |
|
|
16.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
Rs. |
2,693.57 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,264.73 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,722.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A substantial portion of the profits of the Companys India operations are exempt from
Indian income taxes being profits attributable to export operations and profits from undertakings
situated in Software Technology and Hardware Technology Parks. Under the tax holiday, the taxpayer
can utilize an exemption from income taxes for a period of any ten consecutive years. The Company
has opted for this exemption from the year ended March 31, 1997, for undertakings situated in
Software Technology and Hardware Technology Parks. Profits from certain other undertakings are also
eligible for preferential tax treatment. In addition, dividend income from certain category of
investments is exempt from tax. The aggregate rupee and per share (basic) effects of these tax
exemptions, are Rs. 4,706.64 and Rs. 3.39 per share for the year ended March 31, 2005, Rs. 5,129.26
and Rs. 3.64 per share for the year ended March 31, 2006 and Rs. 7,498.43 and Rs. 5.26 per share
for the year ended March 31, 2007.
126
The components of the net deferred tax asset are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
Rs. |
105.44 |
|
|
Rs. |
217.14 |
|
Accrued expenses and
liabilities |
|
|
224.28 |
|
|
|
313.46 |
|
Carry-forward capital losses |
|
|
56.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carry-forward business losses |
|
|
917.37 |
|
|
|
1,019.20 |
|
Others |
|
|
60.91 |
|
|
|
69.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,364.26 |
|
|
|
1,618.86 |
|
Less: valuation allowance |
|
|
(524.55 |
) |
|
|
(531.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
Rs. |
839.71 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,087.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
Rs. |
22.43 |
|
|
Rs. |
79.88 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
202.01 |
|
|
|
560.03 |
|
Amortizable goodwill |
|
|
63.60 |
|
|
|
84.80 |
|
Undistributed earnings of
affiliates |
|
|
153.49 |
|
|
|
196.83 |
|
Unrealized gains on investment securities,
net |
|
|
174.45 |
|
|
|
199.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liability |
|
|
615.98 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,121.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets / (liabilities) |
|
Rs. |
223.73 |
|
|
Rs. |
(33.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realizability of remaining deferred tax assets, management considers
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of
future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences and loss
carry-forwards become deductible or utilizable. Management considers the scheduled reversal of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making
this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future
taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management
believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible
differences and loss carry-forwards utilizable, net of the existing valuation allowances at March
31, 2007. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in
the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carry-forward period are reduced.
Upon acquisition of Wipro Nervewire, New Logic, Saraware and Hydrauto, the Company was
entitled to utilize tax benefits of Rs. 264.55, Rs. 280.75, Rs. 26.60 and 74.80 respectively, on
pre-acquisition carry-forward business losses. Based on projections of future taxable income and
tax planning strategies management believes that the Company will be able to realize tax benefits
only to the extent of Rs. 172.36 on the pre-acquisition carry-forward losses. Consequently, the
Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the remaining amount. Reversal, if any, of the
valuation allowance would be recorded as a reduction of goodwill arising from the respective
acquisitions.
The carry-forward business losses as of March 31, 2007, expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending March 31: |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Rs. |
24.00 |
|
2014 |
|
|
28.00 |
|
2015 |
|
|
66.00 |
|
2024 |
|
|
315.00 |
|
2025 |
|
|
209.00 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,703.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
3,345.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in valuation allowance of Rs. 229.16 for the year ended March 31, 2006 is on
account of valuation allowance of Rs. 199.76 recognized on the deferred tax assets on
pre-acquisition carry-forward business losses of New Logic and valuation allowance of Rs. 29.40
recognized on operating losses of certain subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2006. The
increase in valuation allowance of Rs. 6.58 for the year ended March 31, 2007 is on account of
pre-acquisition losses / operating losses of subsidiaries of Rs. 62.84 offset by a reversal of
valuation allowance, on realization, in respect of capital loss of Rs. 56.26.
A significant portion of income before income taxes is from Indian sources.
The Company indefinitely reinvests eligible earnings of foreign subsidiaries, and accordingly, has
not recorded any deferred taxes in relation to such undistributed earning of its foreign
subsidiaries. It is impracticable to determine the undistributed earning and the additional taxes
payable when these earnings are remitted.
127
The Company is subject to a 15% branch profit tax in the US to the extent the net profit
during the fiscal year attributable to its US branch are greater than the increase in the net
assets of the US branch during the fiscal year, computed in accordance with the Internal Revenue
Code. As of March 31, 2007, the US branchs net assets amounted to approximately $ 155. The
Company has not triggered the branch profit tax and intends to maintain the current level of its
net assets in the US as is consistent with its business plan. Accordingly, a provision for branch
profit tax has not been recorded as of March 31, 2007.
22. Employee Stock Incentive Plans
Wipro Equity Reward Trust (WERT). In 1984, the Company established a controlled trust
called the WERT. Under this plan, the WERT would purchase shares of Wipro out of funds borrowed
from Wipro. The Companys Compensation Committee would recommend to the WERT, officers and key
employees, to whom the WERT will grant shares from its holding. The shares have been granted at a
nominal price. Such shares would be held by the employees subject to vesting conditions. The
shares held by the WERT are reported as a reduction from stockholders equity.
The movement in the shares held by the WERT is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Shares held at the beginning of the year |
|
|
7,887,060 |
|
|
|
7,893,060 |
|
|
|
7,869,060 |
|
Shares granted to employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Grants forfeited by employees |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares held at the end of the year |
|
|
7,893,060 |
|
|
|
7,869,060 |
|
|
|
7,961,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wipro Employee Stock Option Plan 1999 (1999 Plan). In July 1999, the Company established
the 1999 Plan. Under the 1999 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 30 million equity
shares to eligible employees. Employees covered by the 1999 Plan are granted an option to purchase
shares of the Company subject to the requirements of vesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
out of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
price |
|
|
life(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
8,365,265 |
|
|
Rs. |
171 181 |
|
|
Rs. |
181 |
|
|
18 months |
|
|
|
11,916,150 |
|
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
26 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(76,440 |
) |
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600,138 |
) |
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(4,086,872 |
) |
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,056,358 |
) |
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
4,201,953 |
|
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
6 months |
|
|
|
9,259,654 |
|
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
14 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
4,201,953 |
|
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
6 months |
|
|
|
6,959,606 |
|
|
Rs. |
309 421 |
|
|
Rs. |
311 |
|
|
14 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
out of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
price |
|
|
life(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
4,201,953 |
|
|
Rs. |
171 181 |
|
|
Rs. |
181 |
|
|
6 months |
|
|
|
9,259,654 |
|
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
14 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(91,462 |
) |
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224,530 |
) |
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(4,110,491 |
) |
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,056,811 |
) |
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,978,313 |
|
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
3 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,978,313 |
|
|
Rs. |
309 421 |
|
|
Rs. |
312 |
|
|
3 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
remaining |
|
|
Shares arising |
|
Range of exercise |
|
average exercise |
|
contractual |
|
|
out of options |
|
prices |
|
price |
|
life(months) |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
3,978,313 |
|
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
3 months |
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(75,795 |
) |
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(3,902,518 |
) |
|
|
309 421 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2005,
2006, and 2007, was Rs. 702.25, Rs. 1,191.78, and Rs. 731.40, respectively. As of March 31, 2007
options outstanding and exercisable under the 1999 Plan had an intrinsic value of Rs Nil and Rs
Nil, respectively. As of March 31, 2007, the unamortized stock compensation expense under the 1999
Plan is Rs Nil.
Wipro Employee Stock Option Plan 2000 (2000 Plan). In July 2000, the Company established the
2000 Plan. Under the 2000 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 150 million equity shares
to eligible employees. Employees covered by the 2000 Plan are granted options to purchase equity
shares of the Company subject to vesting.
Stock option activity under the 2000 Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
out of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
price |
|
|
(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
514,800 |
|
|
Rs. |
172 255 |
|
|
Rs. |
230 |
|
|
57 months |
|
|
|
31,135,056 |
|
|
|
264 396 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
59 months |
|
|
|
13,627,098 |
|
|
|
397 408 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
42 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(67,050 |
) |
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,892,582 |
) |
|
|
264 396 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(965,950 |
) |
|
|
397 408 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(54,854 |
) |
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,061,976 |
) |
|
|
264 396 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
out of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
price |
|
|
(months) |
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
392,896 |
|
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
45 months |
|
|
|
26,180,498 |
|
|
|
264 396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
47 months |
|
|
|
12,661,148 |
|
|
|
397 408 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
30 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
165,876 |
|
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
45 months |
|
|
|
15,729,818 |
|
|
|
264 396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
47 months |
|
|
|
8,862,804 |
|
|
Rs. |
397 408 |
|
|
Rs. |
399 |
|
|
30 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
out of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
price |
|
|
(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
392,896 |
|
|
Rs. |
172 255 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
45 months |
|
|
|
26,180,498 |
|
|
|
265 396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
47 months |
|
|
|
12,661,148 |
|
|
|
397 458 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
30 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(18,000 |
) |
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(790,554 |
) |
|
|
265 396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(831,625 |
) |
|
|
397 458 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(82,320 |
) |
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,243,687 |
) |
|
|
265 396 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,929,556 |
) |
|
|
397 458 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
292,576 |
|
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
37 months |
|
|
|
20,146,257 |
|
|
|
265 396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
35 months |
|
|
|
9,899,967 |
|
|
|
397 458 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
19 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
186,732 |
|
|
|
172 255 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
36 months |
|
|
|
16,165,662 |
|
|
|
265 396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
38 months |
|
|
|
9,899,967 |
|
|
Rs. |
397 458 |
|
|
Rs. |
399 |
|
|
19 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
remaining |
|
|
Shares arising |
|
Range of exercise |
|
average exercise |
|
contractual life |
|
|
out of options |
|
prices |
|
price |
|
(months) |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
292,576 |
|
|
|
172-255 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
37 Months |
|
|
|
|
20,146,257 |
|
|
|
265-396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
35 Months |
|
|
|
|
9,899,967 |
|
|
|
397-458 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
19 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(91,924 |
) |
|
|
172-255 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(973,249 |
) |
|
|
265-396 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,634 |
) |
|
|
397-458 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(175,802 |
) |
|
|
172-255 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,729,437 |
) |
|
|
265-396 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,312,435 |
) |
|
|
397-458 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
24,850 |
|
|
|
172-255 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
23 Months |
|
|
|
|
1,443,571 |
|
|
|
265-396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
23 Months |
|
|
|
|
1,486,898 |
|
|
|
397-458 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
7 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
24,850 |
|
|
|
172-255 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
22 Months |
|
|
|
|
1,443,571 |
|
|
|
265-396 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
23 Months |
|
|
|
|
1,486,898 |
|
|
|
397-458 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
7 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2005,
2006, and 2007, was Rs. 262.46, Rs. 985.69, and Rs. 7,240.43, respectively. As of March 31, 2007
options outstanding and exercisable under the 2000 Plan had an intrinsic value of Rs 668.18 and Rs
668.18, respectively. As of March 31, 2007, the unamortized stock compensation expense under the
2000 Plan is Rs Nil.
Stock Option Plan (2000 ADS Plan). In April 2000, the Company established the 2000 ADS Plan.
Under the 2000 ADS Plan, the Company is authorized to issue options to purchase up to 9 million
American Depositary Shares
130
(ADSs) to eligible employees. Employees covered by the 2000 ADS Plan are granted an
option to purchase ADSs representing equity shares of the Company subject to the requirements of
vesting.
Stock option activity under the 2000 ADS Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
life (months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
429,300 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
$ |
4.32 |
|
|
54 months |
|
|
|
3,392,022 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
45 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(24,750 |
) |
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,301,322 |
) |
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
404,550 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
42 months |
|
|
|
2,030,700 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
33 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
197,956 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
42 months |
|
|
|
1,546,300 |
|
|
$ |
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
33 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
life (months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
404,550 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
42 months |
|
|
|
2,030,700 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
33 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and lapsed during the year |
|
|
(48,000 |
) |
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(117,650 |
) |
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(641,858 |
) |
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
238,900 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
31 months |
|
|
|
1,208,842 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
21 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
176,938 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
|
31 months |
|
|
|
911,621 |
|
|
$ |
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
21 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
Range of exercise |
|
|
average |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
prices |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
life (months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
238,900 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
31 months |
|
|
|
1,208,842 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
21 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
122,250 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769,403 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
116,650 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
19 months |
|
|
|
439,439 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
11 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
116,650 |
|
|
|
3.46 5.01 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
19 months |
|
|
|
439,439 |
|
|
|
5.82 6.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.15 |
|
|
11 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2005,
2006, and 2007, was Rs. 232.55, Rs. 181.02, and Rs. 325.08, respectively. As of March 31, 2007
options outstanding and exercisable under the
ADS Plan had an intrinsic value of Rs 241.27 and Rs 241.27, respectively. As of March 31,
2007, the unamortized stock compensation expense under the ADS Plan is Rs Nil.
131
Restricted Stock Unit Plans: In June 2004, the Company established a rupee option plan titled
Wipro Restricted Stock Unit Plan (WRSUP 2004) and a dollar option plan titled Wipro ADS Restricted
Stock Unit Plan (WARSUP 2004). The Company is authorized to issue up to 12 million options to
eligible employees under each plan. Options under the plan will be granted at a nominal exercise
price (par value of the equity shares).
These options vest over a period of five years from the date of grant. Upon vesting the
employees can acquire one equity share for every option. The options are subject to forfeiture if
the employee terminates employment before vesting. The excess of market price on the date of grant
over the exercise price payable by the employees is recognized as compensation cost. The Company
has elected to amortize the compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Stock option activity under WRSUP 2004 plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
Exercise price |
|
|
(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the year |
|
|
9,792,596 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
72 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(272,940 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
9,519,656 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
66 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
Exercise price |
|
|
(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
9,519,656 |
|
|
Rs. |
2 |
|
|
66 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the year |
|
|
55,500 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
72 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(694,572 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(1,282,410 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
7,598,174 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
54 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
518,321 |
|
|
Rs. |
2 |
|
|
54 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
of options |
|
Exercise price |
|
(months) |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
7,598,174 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the year |
|
|
2,492,560 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(553,836 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(2,036,918 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
7,499,980 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
195,982 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Stock
option activity under WARSUP 2004 plan is as follows:
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
Exercise price |
|
|
(months) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the year |
|
|
1,583,600 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
72 months |
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(47,500 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
1,536,100 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
66 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(months) |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
Exercise price |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
1,536,100 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
66 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(148,440 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(386,940 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
1,000,720 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
54 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
116,400 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
54 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
of options |
|
Exercise price |
|
(months) |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
1,000,720 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the year |
|
|
918,130 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
(196,620 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(170,900 |
) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
1,551,330 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
122,980 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2005: In July 2005, the Company established a new option plan
titled Wipro employee Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2005 (WRSUP 2005). The Company is authorized to
issue up to 12 million options to eligible employees under the plan. Options under the plan will be
granted at a nominal exercise price (par value of the equity shares).
These options vest over a period of five years from the date of grant. Upon vesting the
employees can acquire one equity share for every option. The options are subject to forfeiture if
the employee terminates employment before vesting. The excess of market price on the date of grant
over the exercise price payable by the employees is recognized
as compensation cost. The Company has elected to amortize the compensation cost on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period.
133
Stock option activity under WSRUP 2005 plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Shares arising out |
|
|
|
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
of options |
|
Exercise price |
|
(months) |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the year |
|
|
3,640,076 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Exercised during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited during the year |
|
|
(193,192 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the year |
|
|
3,446,884 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the
year ended March 31, 2005,
2006, and 2007 was Rs. 319.23, Rs. 458.00 and Rs. 511.92, for each option respectively.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006,
and 2007, was Rs. Nil, Rs. 632.22, and Rs. 1,282.41, respectively. As of March 31, 2007 options
outstanding and exercisable under the RSU Plan had an intrinsic value of Rs 7,162.67 and Rs 193.34,
respectively. As of March 31, 2007, the unamortized stock compensation expense under the RSU Plan
is Rs 4,198.59 and the same is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period of
approximately 3.8 years.
Total stock compensation cost recognized under the employee stock incentive plans is Rs.
353.86, Rs. 652.23 and Rs. 1,336.40, respectively during the year ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007 respectively. The compensation cost has been allocated to cost of revenues and operating
expenses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
Rs. |
238.27 |
|
|
Rs. |
437.20 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,044.83 |
|
Selling and
marketing
expenses |
|
|
49.20 |
|
|
|
75.16 |
|
|
|
168.95 |
|
General and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
66.39 |
|
|
|
139.87 |
|
|
|
122.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
353.86 |
|
|
Rs. |
652.23 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,336.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the stock option activity table for 1999 Plan, 2000 Plan and 2000 ADS Plan, the
Company previously had not reflected the impact of options lapsed. Additionally, the Company had
not reported the correct weighted average contractual life for the 2000 Plan and 2000 ADS Plan.
During the year ended March 31, 2007, the disclosures have been suitably amended. These matters
had no impact on the amounts reported in the financial statements.
Modification of Employee Stock Incentive Plans
During the year ended March 31, 2007, through a short-term inducement offer, the Company
agreed to an arrangement whereby if certain vested options were exercised within the offer period
through financing by an independent third-party financial institution, the Company would bear the
interest obligation relating to this financing. The loan by the third-party financial institution
is with no recourse to the Company. 11,879,065 options were exercised during the offer period. The
Company has accounted for this arrangement as a short-term inducement resulting in modification
accounting. Accordingly, incremental compensation cost of Rs. 86.45 has been recorded.
Additionally as a part of this arrangement 1,150,055 other vested options were exercised by
certain employees through a non-recourse interest free loan aggregating Rs. 326.17 by a controlled
trust. Even though this transaction does not represent an exercise for accounting purpose, to
reflect the legal nature of shares issued, an amount of Rs. 2.30, equivalent to the par value of
shares issued has been transferred from additional paid-in capital to common stock.
23. Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of net income and equity shares used in the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per equity share is set out below:
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
Rs. |
15,832.75 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,269.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,168.99 |
|
Effect of dilutive instruments of subsidiary |
|
|
(27.97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (adjusted for full dilution) |
|
Rs. |
15,804.78 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,269.97 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,168.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of equity shares outstanding |
|
|
1,391,554,372 |
|
|
|
1,406,505,974 |
|
|
|
1,426,709,163 |
|
Effect of dilutive equivalent shares-stock options |
|
|
8,292,410 |
|
|
|
17,173,256 |
|
|
|
17,758,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of equity shares and equivalent
shares outstanding... |
|
|
1,399,846,782 |
|
|
|
1,423,679,230 |
|
|
|
1,444,467,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares held by the controlled WERT have been reduced from the equity shares outstanding
and shares held by employees subject to vesting conditions have been included in outstanding equity
shares for computing basic and diluted earnings per share.
Options to purchase 12,661,148, Nil and Nil equity shares were outstanding during the year
ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, but were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average
market price of the equity shares.
24. Employee Benefit Plans
Gratuity. In accordance with applicable Indian laws, the Company provides for gratuity, a
defined benefit retirement plan (Gratuity Plan) covering certain categories of employees. The
Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees, at retirement or termination of
employment, an amount based on the respective employees last drawn salary and the years of
employment with the Company. The Company provides the gratuity benefit through annual
contributions to a fund managed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). Under this plan,
the settlement obligation remains with the Company, although the Life Insurance Corporation of
India administers the plan and determines the contribution premium required to be paid by the
Company.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158),
which amends SFAS No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This standard requires that companies record an
asset or liability on the consolidated balance sheet equal to the over or under funded status of
their defined benefit and other postretirement benefit plans effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2006. For each plan, the funded status is defined by SFAS No. 158 as the
difference between the fair value of plan assets (for funded plans) and the respective plans
projected benefit obligation. The projected benefit obligation represents a liability based on the
plan participants service to date and their expected future compensation at their projected
retirement date. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 158 and recognition of the funded status on the
companys consolidated balance sheet, all previously unrecognized amounts (unrecognized gains or
losses and prior service cost) as well as subsequent changes in funded status are reflected in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, in the stockholders equity.
The incremental impact of applying SFAS No. 158 on individual line items in the consolidated
balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
After Application |
|
|
Application of |
|
|
|
|
|
of SFAS No. |
|
|
SFAS No. 158 |
|
Adjustments |
|
158 |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
16,481.41 |
|
|
|
141.75 |
|
|
|
16,623.16 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
42,679.97 |
|
|
|
141.75 |
|
|
|
42,821.72 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
482.03 |
|
|
|
(18.05 |
) |
|
|
463.98 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
44,492.37 |
|
|
|
123.70 |
|
|
|
44,616.07 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
217.47 |
|
|
|
(123.70 |
) |
|
|
93.77 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
101,591.76 |
|
|
|
(123.70 |
) |
|
|
101,468.06 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
146,084.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,084.13 |
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Change in the benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) at the beginning of the year |
|
Rs. |
634.46 |
|
|
Rs. |
755.93 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
163.52 |
|
|
|
192.67 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
45.66 |
|
|
|
55.16 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(47.08 |
) |
|
|
(77.10 |
) |
Actuarial loss/(gain) |
|
|
(40.62 |
) |
|
|
100.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO at the end of the year |
|
|
755.93 |
|
|
|
1,026.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year |
|
|
597.73 |
|
|
|
656.16 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
53.11 |
|
|
|
58.82 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
52.40 |
|
|
|
89.14 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(47.08 |
) |
|
|
(77.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at the end of the year |
|
|
656.16 |
|
|
|
727.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(99.77 |
) |
|
|
(299.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss/(gain) |
|
|
58.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial cost |
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability |
|
Rs. |
(37.12 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(299.82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is the summary of amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income / (loss) as of
March 31, 2006 and 2007 that have not yet been recognized in the consolidated statements of income
as components of net gratuity cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
Rs. |
|
|
|
Rs. |
137.54 |
|
Net prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
Net transitional obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
Rs. |
|
|
|
Rs. |
141.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gratuity cost for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
Rs. |
114.88 |
|
|
Rs. |
163.52 |
|
|
Rs. |
192.67 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
31.56 |
|
|
|
45.66 |
|
|
|
55.16 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(29.49 |
) |
|
|
(30.58 |
) |
|
|
(42.24 |
) |
Amortization of transition liabilities |
|
|
10.96 |
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
|
(4.00 |
) |
Adjustments(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gratuity cost |
|
Rs. |
127.91 |
|
|
Rs. |
188.94 |
|
|
Rs. |
124.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Till March 31, 2006 for a certain category of employees, the Company
previously recorded and disclosed a defined benefit plan as a defined contribution plan. During the
year ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded an adjustment of Rs 77.55 as a credit to the income
statement to record this plan as a defined benefit plan. The impact of this adjustment is not
material to the income statement, accrued liability/(prepaid asset) and the overall financial
statement presentation. |
136
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
Rate of increase in compensation
levels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Rate of return on plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
The weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic gratuity cost are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Discount rate |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Rate of increase in compensation
levels |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Rate of return on plan assets |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
The Company assesses these assumptions with its projected long-term plans of growth and
prevalent industry standards. The Company estimates the long-term return on plan assets based on
the average rate of return expected to prevail over the next 15 to 20 years in the types of
investments held. As of March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, a significant portion of the plan assets
were invested in debt securities.
Accumulated benefit obligation was Rs. 458.41 and Rs. 737.63 as of March 31, 2006 and 2007
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Expected contribution to the fund for the year ending March 31, 2008 |
|
Rs. |
195.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected benefit payments from the fund for the year ending March 31: |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
216.84 |
|
2009 |
|
|
200.11 |
|
2010 |
|
|
219.80 |
|
2011 |
|
|
270.31 |
|
2012 |
|
|
332.38 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,644.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,884.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
The expected benefits are based on the same assumptions used to measure the companys benefit
obligations as of March 31, 2007.
Superannuation. Apart from being covered under the Gratuity Plan described above, the
employees of the Company also participate in a defined contribution plan maintained by the Company.
This plan is administered by the LIC and ICICI. The Company makes annual contributions based on a
specified percentage of each covered employees salary. From April 1, 2005, the Company
discontinued superannuation contributions for certain category of employees and paid such
contribution amounts as cash compensation to the employees. The Company has no further obligations
under the plan beyond its annual contributions.
Provident fund. In addition to the above benefits, all employees receive benefits from a
provident fund, a defined contribution plan. The employee and employer each make monthly
contributions to the plan equal to 12% of the covered employees salary. A portion of the
contribution is made to the provident fund trust established by the Company, while the remainder of
the contribution is made to the Governments provident fund. The Government mandates the annual
yield to be provided to the employees on their corpus. The Company has an obligation to make good
the shortfall, if any, between the yield on the investments of trust and the yield mandated by the
Government.
The Company contributed Rs. 995.93, Rs. 1,035.78 and Rs. 1,407.00 to various defined
contribution and benefit plans during the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Defined contribution |
|
Rs. |
868.02 |
|
|
Rs. |
846.84 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,282.96 |
|
Defined benefit |
|
|
127.91 |
|
|
|
188.94 |
|
|
|
124.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
995.93 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,035.78 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,407.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
25. Related Party Transactions
The Company has the following transactions with related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Wipro GE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sale of computer equipment and
administrative and management support services |
|
Rs. |
111.68 |
|
|
Rs. |
114.01 |
|
|
Rs. |
29.24 |
|
Rent, travel and related expenses |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of software |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WeP Peripherals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sale of computer equipment and
services |
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
|
19.67 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
Fees received for usage of trade mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for services |
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of printers |
|
|
176.79 |
|
|
|
118.88 |
|
|
|
193.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azim Premji Foundation (entity controlled by principal
shareholder of the Company): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sale of computer equipment and services |
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal shareholder: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of lease rentals |
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
The Company has the following receivables from related parties, which are reported as
other assets/other current assets in the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Wipro GE |
|
Rs. |
51.70 |
|
|
Rs. |
3.88 |
|
WeP Peripherals |
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Azim Premji Foundation |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
55.93 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has the following payables to related parties, which are reported as other
current liabilities in the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
WeP Peripherals |
|
Rs. |
38.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
38.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26. Sale of accounts receivable / employee advances
From time to time, in the normal course of business, the Company transfers accounts
receivables and employee advances (financials assets) to banks. Under the terms of the
arrangements, the Company surrenders control over the financial assets and accordingly the
transfers are recorded as sale of financial assets. The sale of financial assets may be with or
without recourse. Under arrangements with recourse, the Company is obligated to repurchase the
uncollected financial assets, subject to limits specified in the agreement with the banks.
Additionally, the Company retains servicing responsibility for the transferred financial assets.
Gains and losses on sale of financial assets are recorded based on the carrying value of the
financial assets, fair value of servicing liability and recourse obligations. Loss on sale is
recorded at the time of sale.
During the years ended March 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company transferred financial assets
of Rs. 737.80, Rs. 258.67 and Rs. 480.00 respectively, under such arrangements and has included the
proceeds in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
This transfer resulted in loss of Rs. 42.03, Rs. 9.28 and Rs. 8.60 for the years ended March 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007 respectively, which is included in general and administrative expense. As at
March 31, 2006 and 2007, the maximum amounts of recourse obligation in respect of the transferred
financial assets are Rs. 20.40 and Rs. 48.00 respectively.
138
27. Commitments and Contingencies
Capital commitments. As of March 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had committed to spend
approximately Rs. 1,714.22 and Rs. 3,432.25 respectively, under agreements to purchase property and
equipment. These amounts are net of capital advances paid in respect of these purchases.
Other commitments. The Companys Indian operations have been established as a Software
Technology Park Unit under a plan formulated by the Government of India. As per the plan, the
Companys India operations have export obligations to the extent of 1.5 times the employee costs
for the year on an annual basis and 5 times the amount of foreign exchange released for capital
goods imported, over a five year period. The consequence of not meeting this commitment in the
future, would be a retroactive levy of import duty on certain computer hardware previously imported
duty free. As of March 31, 2007, the Company has met all commitments required under the plan.
As of March 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company had contractual obligations to spend approximately
Rs. 1,946 and Rs. 3,160.18 respectively; under purchase obligations which include commitments to
purchase goods or services of either a fixed or minimum quantity that meet certain criteria.
Guarantees. As of March 31, 2006 and 2007, performance and financial guarantees provided by
banks on behalf of the Company to the Indian Government, customers and certain other agencies
amount to approximately Rs. 2,941.20 and Rs. 3,013.11 respectively, as part of the bank line of
credit.
Contingencies and lawsuits. The Company had received tax demands from the Indian income tax
authorities for the financial years ended March 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 aggregating to Rs. 8,100.49
(including interest of Rs. 750.38). The tax demand was primarily on account of denial of deduction
claimed by the Company under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act 1961, in respect of profits earned
by its undertakings in Software Technology Park at Bangalore. The Company had appealed against
these demands. The first appellate authority has vacated the tax demands for the years ended March
31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The income tax authorities have filed an appeal for the year ended March
31, 2001 and 2002.
In December 2006, the Company received an additional tax demand of Rs. 3,027.20 (including
interest of Rs. 753.09) for the financial year ended March 31, 2004 on similar grounds as earlier
years. The Company has filed an appeal against this demand.
Considering the facts and nature of disallowance and the order of the appellate authority
upholding the claims of the Company, the Company believes that the final outcome of the above
disputes should be in favor of the Company and there will not be any material impact on the
Companys financial position and results of operations. The range of loss relating to these
contingencies is between zero and the amount of the demand raised.
Certain other income-tax related legal proceedings are pending against the Company. Potential
liabilities, if any, have been adequately provided for, and the Company does not currently estimate
any incremental liability in respect of these proceedings.
Additionally, the Company is also involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and
proceedings, including patent and commercial matters, which arise in the ordinary course of
business. There are no such matters pending that the Company expects to be material in relation to
its business.
28. Segment Information
The Company is currently organized by the following segments: (a) Global IT Services and
Products (comprising of IT Services and BPO Services segments) (b) India and AsiaPac IT Services
and Products (c) Consumer Care and Lighting and (d) Others.
The Chairman of the Company has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM)
as defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The
Chairman of the Company evaluates the segments based on their revenue growth, operating income and
return on capital employed. The management believes that return on capital employed is considered
appropriate for evaluating the performance of its operating segment. Return on capital employed is
calculated as earnings from continuing operations before interest expenses, tax, minority interests
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle divided by the average of the capital
employed at the beginning and at the end of the year.
Operating segments with similar economic characteristics and complying with other aggregation
criteria specified in SFAS No. 131 have been combined to form the Companys reportable segments.
Consequently, IT Services and BPO services qualify as reportable segments under Global IT Services
and Products.
139
The IT Services segment provides research and development services for hardware and software
design to technology and telecommunication companies and software application development services
to corporate enterprises. The BPO services segment provides Business Process Outsourcing services
to large global corporations.
As discussed in Note 3 on Acquisitions, between March 2006 and March 2007, the Company made
several acquisitions. The operations of mPower, New Logic, cMango, Enabler, Saraware Oy and
Quantech, which represent a component of IT Services and Products, are currently being reviewed by
the CODM separately and have accordingly been reported separately as Acquisitions.
The India and AsiaPac IT Services and Products segment focuses primarily on addressing the IT
and electronic commerce requirements of companies in India, Middle East and Asia Pacific region.
The Consumer Care and Lighting segment manufactures, distributes and sells soaps, toiletries,
lighting products and hydrogenated cooking oils for the Indian market.
Others consist of business segments that do not meet the requirements individually for a
reportable segment as defined in SFAS No. 131. Corporate activities such as treasury, legal and
accounting, which do not qualify as operating segments under SFAS No. 131 have been considered as
reconciling items.
Information on reportable segments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
AsiaPac IT |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services and |
|
|
Care and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Lighting |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Entity Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
54,236.07 |
|
|
|
6,477.15 |
|
|
|
60,713.22 |
|
|
|
13,403.17 |
|
|
|
4,555.38 |
|
|
|
2,680.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,352.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
(44.12 |
) |
|
|
(24.11 |
) |
|
|
(8.62 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(6.74 |
) |
|
|
39.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
54,256.08 |
|
|
|
6,433.03 |
|
|
|
60,689.11 |
|
|
|
13,394.55 |
|
|
|
4,555.15 |
|
|
|
2,673.99 |
|
|
|
39.70 |
|
|
|
81,352.50 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
(33,780.07 |
) |
|
|
(4,740.25 |
) |
|
|
(38,520.32 |
) |
|
|
(10,494.17 |
) |
|
|
(2,926.22 |
) |
|
|
(1,914.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,854.77 |
) |
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(3,121.70 |
) |
|
|
(101.77 |
) |
|
|
(3,223.47 |
) |
|
|
(1,150.26 |
) |
|
|
(876.68 |
) |
|
|
(184.10 |
) |
|
|
(31.75 |
) |
|
|
(5,466.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(2,225.94 |
) |
|
|
(513.16 |
) |
|
|
(2,739.10 |
) |
|
|
(787.66 |
) |
|
|
(82.26 |
) |
|
|
(126.93 |
) |
|
|
(7.65 |
) |
|
|
(3,743.60 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(273.54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273.54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273.54 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(52.00 |
) |
|
|
(70.00 |
) |
|
|
(122.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140.29 |
) |
Exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92.12 |
) |
|
|
(92.12 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
14.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.56 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
19.11 |
|
|
|
17.54 |
|
|
|
16.87 |
|
|
|
75.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income of segment (1) |
|
|
14,817.39 |
|
|
|
1,007.85 |
|
|
|
15,825.24 |
|
|
|
969.67 |
|
|
|
670.81 |
|
|
|
466.44 |
|
|
|
(74.95 |
) |
|
|
17,857.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of segment |
|
|
29,297.05 |
|
|
|
8,747.54 |
|
|
|
38,044.59 |
|
|
|
5,676.32 |
|
|
|
1,670.62 |
|
|
|
1,948.26 |
|
|
|
24,735.32 |
|
|
|
72,075.11 |
|
Capital employed |
|
|
21,289.71 |
|
|
|
8,122.14 |
|
|
|
29,411.85 |
|
|
|
1,594.54 |
|
|
|
936.44 |
|
|
|
1,403.21 |
|
|
|
24,479.91 |
|
|
|
57,825.95 |
|
Return on capital employed |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
10,765.92 |
|
|
|
977.11 |
|
|
|
11,743.03 |
|
|
|
2,292.42 |
|
|
|
263.66 |
|
|
|
507.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,806.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and
investments in liquid and
short-term mutual funds |
|
|
3,877.87 |
|
|
|
1,519.93 |
|
|
|
5,397.80 |
|
|
|
101.85 |
|
|
|
142.63 |
|
|
|
493.40 |
|
|
|
22,492.67 |
|
|
|
28,628.35 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,666.79 |
|
|
|
515.74 |
|
|
|
2,182.53 |
|
|
|
93.32 |
|
|
|
65.54 |
|
|
|
47.90 |
|
|
|
48.67 |
|
|
|
2,437.96 |
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AsiaPac IT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Care and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Lighting |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Entity Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
72,591.13 |
|
|
|
470.20 |
|
|
|
7,664.23 |
|
|
|
80,725.56 |
|
|
|
16,477.08 |
|
|
|
5,625.04 |
|
|
|
3,279.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,106.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
(172.15 |
) |
|
|
(1.88 |
) |
|
|
(37.78 |
) |
|
|
(211.81 |
) |
|
|
(2.34 |
) |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
208.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
72,418.98 |
|
|
|
468.32 |
|
|
|
7,626.45 |
|
|
|
80,513.75 |
|
|
|
16,474.74 |
|
|
|
5,625.24 |
|
|
|
3,284.58 |
|
|
|
208.57 |
|
|
|
106,106.88 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
(46,605.98 |
) |
|
|
(380.15 |
) |
|
|
(5,809.54 |
) |
|
|
(52,795.67 |
) |
|
|
(12,834.70 |
) |
|
|
(3,556.43 |
) |
|
|
(2,459.93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,646.73 |
) |
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(3,863.85 |
) |
|
|
(28.92 |
) |
|
|
(49.45 |
) |
|
|
(3,942.22 |
) |
|
|
(1,391.59 |
) |
|
|
(1,160.42 |
) |
|
|
(236.26 |
) |
|
|
(33.86 |
) |
|
|
(6,764.35 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(3,345.48 |
) |
|
|
(47.01 |
) |
|
|
(751.52 |
) |
|
|
(4,144.01 |
) |
|
|
(841.24 |
) |
|
|
(102.22 |
) |
|
|
(112.02 |
) |
|
|
(39.48 |
) |
|
|
(5,238.97 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(202.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202.26 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(8.00 |
) |
|
|
(17.76 |
) |
|
|
(4.94 |
) |
|
|
(30.70 |
) |
|
|
(12.00 |
) |
|
|
(21.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.95 |
) |
Exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(288.49 |
) |
|
|
(288.49 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
|
|
9.27 |
|
|
|
13.21 |
|
|
|
11.11 |
|
|
|
25.99 |
|
|
|
70.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income of segmen(1) |
|
|
18,400.50 |
|
|
|
(2.05 |
) |
|
|
1,011.00 |
|
|
|
19,409.45 |
|
|
|
1,404.48 |
|
|
|
798.13 |
|
|
|
487.48 |
|
|
|
(127.27 |
) |
|
|
21,972.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of segment |
|
|
40,062.66 |
|
|
|
3,341.01 |
|
|
|
11,426.57 |
|
|
|
54,830.24 |
|
|
|
8,322.33 |
|
|
|
2,344.75 |
|
|
|
2,410.94 |
|
|
|
34,919.08 |
|
|
|
102,827.34 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
14,674.20 |
|
|
|
432.35 |
|
|
|
849.12 |
|
|
|
15,955.67 |
|
|
|
3,350.62 |
|
|
|
563.75 |
|
|
|
723.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,593.11 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and
investments in liquid and short-term
mutual funds |
|
|
5,000.57 |
|
|
|
245.69 |
|
|
|
4,097.57 |
|
|
|
9,343.83 |
|
|
|
240.81 |
|
|
|
178.03 |
|
|
|
367.89 |
|
|
|
29,042.39 |
|
|
|
39,172.95 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,128.92 |
|
|
|
59.41 |
|
|
|
623.80 |
|
|
|
2,812.13 |
|
|
|
117.05 |
|
|
|
81.73 |
|
|
|
58.87 |
|
|
|
31.45 |
|
|
|
3,101.23 |
|
Capital employed opening |
|
|
21,289.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,122.14 |
|
|
|
29.411.85 |
|
|
|
2,245.41 |
|
|
|
936.44 |
|
|
|
1,403.21 |
|
|
|
23,829.04 |
|
|
|
57,825.95 |
|
Capital employed closing |
|
|
27,777.90 |
|
|
|
3,049.94 |
|
|
|
10,337.07 |
|
|
|
41,164.91 |
|
|
|
3,124.13 |
|
|
|
1,309.70 |
|
|
|
1,790.09 |
|
|
|
32,080.06 |
|
|
|
79,468.89 |
|
Average capital employed |
|
|
24,533.81 |
|
|
|
1,524.97 |
|
|
|
9,229.61 |
|
|
|
35,288.38 |
|
|
|
2,684.77 |
|
|
|
1,123.07 |
|
|
|
1,596.65 |
|
|
|
27,954.55 |
|
|
|
68,647.42 |
|
Return on capital employed |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
India and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AsiaPac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global IT Services and Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Care and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Lighting |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Entity Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
96,688.37 |
|
|
|
4,820.44 |
|
|
|
9,412.80 |
|
|
|
110,921.61 |
|
|
|
23,888.48 |
|
|
|
7,558.50 |
|
|
|
7,062.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,431.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
(140.57 |
) |
|
|
(15.03 |
) |
|
|
(23.85 |
) |
|
|
(179.45 |
) |
|
|
(25.07 |
) |
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
|
197.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
96,547.80 |
|
|
|
4,805.41 |
|
|
|
9,388.95 |
|
|
|
110,742.16 |
|
|
|
23,863.41 |
|
|
|
7,562.91 |
|
|
|
7,065.80 |
|
|
|
197.06 |
|
|
|
149,431.33 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
(62,671.33 |
) |
|
|
(4,146.44 |
) |
|
|
(6,172.97 |
) |
|
|
(72,990.74 |
) |
|
|
(18,555.11 |
) |
|
|
(4,905.14 |
) |
|
|
(5,749.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,200.24 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
(4,882.83 |
) |
|
|
(116.82 |
) |
|
|
(100.02 |
) |
|
|
(5,099.67 |
) |
|
|
(2,067.89 |
) |
|
|
(1,482.75 |
) |
|
|
(477.84 |
) |
|
|
(44.77 |
) |
|
|
(9,172.92 |
) |
General and administrative
expenses |
|
|
(4,230.46 |
) |
|
|
(511.59 |
) |
|
|
(982.52 |
) |
|
|
(5,724.57 |
) |
|
|
(1,198.32 |
) |
|
|
(120.04 |
) |
|
|
(500.35 |
) |
|
|
(95.95 |
) |
|
|
(7,639.23 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(267.71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267.71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267.71 |
) |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220.11 |
) |
|
|
(5.09 |
) |
|
|
(225.20 |
) |
|
|
(32.04 |
) |
|
|
(4.33 |
) |
|
|
(7.66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269.23 |
) |
Exchange rate fluctuations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235.69 |
) |
|
|
(235.69 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
12.92 |
|
|
|
80.61 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
93.63 |
|
|
|
29.08 |
|
|
|
18.74 |
|
|
|
50.54 |
|
|
|
29.49 |
|
|
|
221.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income of segment(1) |
|
|
24,508.39 |
|
|
|
(108.94 |
) |
|
|
2,128.45 |
|
|
|
26,527.90 |
|
|
|
2,039.13 |
|
|
|
1,069.38 |
|
|
|
381.24 |
|
|
|
(149.86 |
) |
|
|
29,867.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of segment |
|
|
53,475.17 |
|
|
|
11,406.08 |
|
|
|
7,816.36 |
|
|
|
72,697.61 |
|
|
|
12,525.54 |
|
|
|
4,676.63 |
|
|
|
6,499.63 |
|
|
|
49,684.73 |
|
|
|
146,084.13 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
19,275.43 |
|
|
|
1,095.75 |
|
|
|
1,097.06 |
|
|
|
21,468.24 |
|
|
|
5,053.64 |
|
|
|
723.33 |
|
|
|
1,221.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,466.58 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and
investments in liquid and short-term
mutual funds |
|
|
6,137.25 |
|
|
|
2,455.60 |
|
|
|
420.78 |
|
|
|
9,013.63 |
|
|
|
887.81 |
|
|
|
357.98 |
|
|
|
251.24 |
|
|
|
34,311.94 |
|
|
|
44,822.60 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,710.70 |
|
|
|
176.84 |
|
|
|
616.66 |
|
|
|
3,504.20 |
|
|
|
168.03 |
|
|
|
103.76 |
|
|
|
139.05 |
|
|
|
15.52 |
|
|
|
3,930.56 |
|
Capital employed opening |
|
|
27,777.90 |
|
|
|
3,049.94 |
|
|
|
10,337.07 |
|
|
|
41,164.91 |
|
|
|
3,124.13 |
|
|
|
1,309.70 |
|
|
|
1,790.09 |
|
|
|
32,080.06 |
|
|
|
79,468.89 |
|
Capital employed closing |
|
|
37,403.64 |
|
|
|
10,257.15 |
|
|
|
6,456.04 |
|
|
|
54,116.83 |
|
|
|
5,717.95 |
|
|
|
3,093.82 |
|
|
|
4,417.08 |
|
|
|
37,903.41 |
|
|
|
105,249.09 |
|
Average capital employed |
|
|
32,590.78 |
|
|
|
6,653.54 |
|
|
|
8,396.55 |
|
|
|
47,640.87 |
|
|
|
4,421.04 |
|
|
|
2,201.76 |
|
|
|
3,103.59 |
|
|
|
34,991.73 |
|
|
|
92,358.99 |
|
Return on capital employed |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating income of segments is after recognition of stock compensation expense
arising from the grant of options: |
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
IT Services |
|
Rs. |
297.55 |
|
|
Rs. |
539.71 |
|
|
|
1,151.06 |
|
BPO
Services |
|
|
12.62 |
|
|
|
22.77 |
|
|
|
48.89 |
|
India and
AsiaPac IT Services
and Products |
|
|
19.02 |
|
|
|
39.64 |
|
|
|
79.56 |
|
Consumer Care
and Lighting |
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
9.02 |
|
|
|
23.29 |
|
Others |
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
16.63 |
|
|
|
13.15 |
|
Reconciling
items |
|
|
14.34 |
|
|
|
35.10 |
|
|
|
20.45 |
|
The Company has four geographic segments: India, the United States,
Europe and Rest of the world.
Revenues from the geographic segments based on domicile of the customer are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
India |
|
Rs. |
19,349.64 |
|
|
Rs. |
21,803.91 |
|
|
Rs. |
30,650.06 |
|
United States |
|
|
41,811.59 |
|
|
|
53,481.07 |
|
|
|
72,846.27 |
|
Europe |
|
|
16,602.35 |
|
|
|
24,310.22 |
|
|
|
36,972.00 |
|
Rest of the world |
|
|
3,588.92 |
|
|
|
6,511.68 |
|
|
|
8,963.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
81,352.50 |
|
|
Rs. |
106,106.88 |
|
|
Rs. |
149,431.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Companys current assets and current liabilities approximate their
carrying value because of their short term maturity. Such financial instruments are classified as
current and are expected to be liquidated within the next twelve months.
142
Item 19. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
1.1
|
|
Articles of Association of Wipro Limited, as amended (1) |
1.2
|
|
Memorandum of Association of Wipro Limited, as amended (1) |
1.3
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Wipro Limited, as amended (1) |
2.1
|
|
Form of Deposit Agreement (including as an exhibit, the form of American Depositary Receipt) (1) |
2.2
|
|
Wipros specimen certificate for equity shares (1) |
4.1
|
|
1999 Employee Stock Option Plan (1) |
4.2
|
|
2000 Employee Stock Option Plan (1) |
4.3
|
|
Wipro Equity Reward Trust (1) |
4.4
|
|
2000 ADS Option Plan (3) |
4.5
|
|
Wipro Employee ADS Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2004 (4) |
4.6
|
|
Wipro Employee Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2004 (5) |
4.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, as amended (3) |
4.8
|
|
Form of Agreement for Appointment/Re-appointment of Executive Directors (5) |
4.9
|
|
Sample Letter of appointment to Non Executive Directors (5) |
4.10
|
|
Wipro Employee Restricted Stock Unit Plan 2005 (6) |
11.1
|
|
Code of Ethics for Principal and Finance Officers (2) |
12.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act |
12.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act |
13
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act |
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
99.1
|
|
Wipros Ombudsprocess (2) |
99.2
|
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics |
99.3
|
|
Amendment No.1 to the Charter For The Audit Committee Of The Board Of Directors
Of Wipro Limited filed as exhibit no. 99.3 of 20-F filed on June 13, 2005 |
99.4
|
|
Board Governance and Compensation Committee Charter (6) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form F-1 (File No. 333-46278) in the form declared effective September 26, 2000. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Registrants Annual Report on Form 20-F
filed on June 9, 2003. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Registrants Annual Report on Form 20-F
filed on May 17, 2004. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-8 filed on February 28, 2005. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Registrants Annual Report on Form 20-F
filed on June 13, 2005. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with the Registrants Annual Report on Form 20-F
filed on June 22, 2006. |
143
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form
20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its
behalf.
For Wipro Limited
|
|
|
|
|
Bangalore, India
|
|
/s/ Azim H. Premji
|
|
/s/ Suresh C. Senapaty |
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
May 30, 2007
|
|
Azim H. Premji,
Chairman and Managing Director
|
|
Suresh C. Senapaty,
Executive Vice President, Finance |
144