FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
Number: 0-28132
Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
31-1455414
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
10200
Alliance Road, Suite 200
Cincinnati, OH
45242-4716
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(513) 794-7100
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of
the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
( Title of Class )
The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
(Name of exchange on which
listed)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K,
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant, computed using the closing
price as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. for the
Registrants Common Stock on July 31, 2008, was
$11,021,389.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common
Stock, $.01 par value, as of April 7, 2009: 9,354,782.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May 27, 2009 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this
Form 10-K
to the extent stated herein. Except with respect to information
specifically incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K,
the Definitive Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as a
part hereof.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information contained herein, this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements relating to the
Companys plans, strategies, expectations, intentions, etc.
and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are no guarantee of
future performance and are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict and actual results
could differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, the impact of competitive
products and pricing, product demand and market acceptance, new
product development, key strategic alliances with vendors that
resell the Company products, the ability of the Company to
control costs, availability of products produced from third
party vendors, the healthcare regulatory environment, potential
changes in legislation, regulation and government funding
affecting the healthcare industry, healthcare information
systems budgets, availability of healthcare information systems
trained personnel for implementation of new systems, as well as
maintenance of legacy systems, fluctuations in operating
results, effects of critical accounting policies and judgments,
changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required
by the Financial Accountings Standards Board or other similar
entities, changes in economic, business and market conditions
impacting the healthcare industry, the markets in which the
Company operates and nationally, and the Companys ability
to maintain compliance with the terms of its credit facilities,
and other risk factors that might cause such differences
including those discussed herein, including, but not limited to,
discussions in the sections entitled Part I,
Item 1 Business, Item 1A Risk
Factors, Part II, Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplemental Data. In addition, other written or oral
statements that constitute forward-looking statements may be
made by or on behalf of the Company. Readers are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which reflect managements analysis only as of the date
thereof. The Registrant undertakes no obligation to publicly
revise these forward-looking statements, to reflect events or
circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should
carefully review the risk factors described in this and other
documents Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. files from time to
time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and any Current Reports on
Form 8-K.
PART I
General
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (Streamline
Health®
or the Company) is a healthcare information
technology company, which is focused on developing and licensing
proprietary software solutions that improve document-centric
information flows and complement and enhance existing
transaction-centric hospital information systems. The
Companys workflow and document management solutions bridge
the gap between current, predominantly paper-based processes and
transaction-based healthcare information systems by
1) electronically capturing document-centric information
from disparate sources, 2) electronically directing that
information through vital business processes, and
3) providing access to the information to authenticated
users (such as physicians, nurses, administrative and financial
personnel and payers) across the continuum of care. Streamline
Healths solutions are designed for enterprise wide
deployment to seamlessly connect disparate departmental systems,
or silos of independent technologies, thereby eliminating
potential process flow Friction
PointsTM,
in a common interoperable document management workflow solution.
The Companys workflow-based solutions and services offer
solutions to specific healthcare business processes within the
Health Information Management (HIM) and revenue cycle, such as:
remote coding, abstracting and chart completion, remote
physician order processing, pre-admission registration scanning,
insurance verification, secondary billing services, explanation
of benefits processing, release of information processing and
other departmental workflow processes.
The Companys solutions and services also create an
integrated document-centric repository of historical health
information that is complementary to, and can be seamlessly
bolted on to existing transaction-centric clinical,
financial and management information systems, allowing
healthcare providers to aggressively move
1
toward fully Electronic Medical Record (EMR) processes while
improving service levels and convenience for all stakeholders.
These integrated systems allow providers and administrators to
dramatically improve the availability of patient information
while decreasing direct costs associated with document
retrieval,
work-in-process,
chart completion, document retention and archiving.
The Companys software solutions can be provided on a
subscription basis via Software as a Service (SaaS),
(sometimes referred to as Cloud Computing) which is
remotely hosted, or alternatively, licensed and installed
locally. Software as a Service (SaaS) is the
provision of dynamically scalable remote software,
infrastructure and resources as a subscription service over a
dedicated data communications line or virtual private line (VPN)
via the Internet. Users of Software as a Service need not have
knowledge of, expertise in, or control over the technology
infrastructure in the hosting center that supports
them.
Streamline Health provides hosted SaaS to The Health Alliance of
Greater Cincinnati, Catholic Healthcare West, T. J. Sampson
Community Hospital, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Patty A. Clay
Medical Center, Marion General Medical Center, the University of
California San Francisco (UCSF), Massena Medical Center,
Columbus Ohio Vital Statistics, and Childrens Medical
Center of Columbus, OH, among others. In addition, Streamline
Health has licensed its workflow and document management
solutions, which are installed at leading healthcare providers
including Parkview Health, Pro Health Care, Peace Health, Texas
Health Resources, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, the Albert
Einstein Healthcare Network, Beth Israel Medical Center, and
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, among others.
The Companys applications allow authenticated users, such
as physicians, nurses, administrative and financial personnel,
and payers with access to patient healthcare information (PHI)
that exists in disparate systems across the continuum of care
and improve operational efficiencies through business process
re-engineering and automating labor-intensive and demanding
paper environments. Streamline Healths applications and
services are complementary to existing clinical, financial and
administrative systems, and use document management and advanced
workflow tools to ensure users can electronically access both
structured (transaction-centric) and
unstructured (document-centric) patient data and all
the various forms of clinical, financial and administrative
healthcare information from a single permanent and secure
repository, including clinicians handwritten notes,
laboratory reports, photographs, insurance cards, human resource
documents, etc.
The Companys workflow solutions offer value to all of the
constituents in the healthcare delivery process by enabling them
to simultaneously access and utilize Streamline Healths
advanced workflow applications to process information, on a
real-time basis from virtually any location, including the
physicians desktop, using web-based technology. Streamline
Healths solutions integrate its own proprietary document
management platform, application workflow modules and image and
web-enabling tools that allow for the seamless merger of
back office functionality with existing Hospital
Information Systems at the desktop.
The Company offers its own document imaging/management
infrastructure (accessANYware) that is built for high volume
transaction processing and is specifically designed for the
healthcare industry. In addition to providing access to
information not previously available at the desktop, Streamline
Healths applications fulfill the administrative and
regulatory needs of the Health Information Management, Patient
Financial Services and other administrative hospital departments
such as Human Resources and Materials Management. Furthermore,
these systems have been specifically designed to integrate with
other Hospital Information Systems. For example, Streamline
Health has integrated its solutions with selected systems from
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc. (Siemens), Cerner
Corporation, and Lawson applications, (see below) thus enabling
customers to use our solutions without the expense of replacing
entire software systems to gain the benefits of our software
functionality. By offering electronic access to all the patient
information components of the medical record, this integration
completes one of the most important tasks necessary to provide a
true Electronic Medical Record. Streamline Healths systems
deliver on-line enterprise wide access to fully updated patient
information, which historically was maintained on a variety of
media, including paper, magnetic disk, optical disk, and
microfilm.
The Company operates in one segment as a provider of health
information technology solutions that streamline healthcare
information flows within a healthcare facility. The financial
information required by Items 101(b) of
Regulation S-K
is contained in Item 6 Selected Financial Information of
this
Form 10-K.
2
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year
commencing February 1 in that calendar year and ending on
January 31 of the following year.
Historically, Streamline Health has derived most of its revenues
from recurring SaaS hosting services, recurring maintenance
fees, professional services and system sales involving the
licensing, either directly or through remarketing partners, of
its workflow and document management solutions to healthcare
organizations. In a typical transaction, Streamline Health, or
its remarketing partners, enter into a fee-for-service SaaS
subscription (or perpetual license agreement for Streamline
Healths software applications and may license or sell
other third-party software and hardware components to the
healthcare organization. Additionally, Streamline Health
provides, as necessary, professional services, including
implementation, training, and product support, as well as
Business Process Management Services (BPM) consulting for custom
document workflow applications.
Streamline Health earns its highest margins on proprietary
Streamline Health software and SaaS hosting services and the
lowest margins on third-party hardware and software. Sales to
customers may include different configurations of Streamline
Health software, third party components (software and hardware),
and professional services, resulting in varying margins among
contracts. The margins on professional services revenues
fluctuate based upon the negotiated terms of the agreement with
each customer and Streamline Healths ability to fully
utilize its professional services, maintenance, and support
services staff.
In 2009, Streamline Health plans to launch its Business Process
Management Services (BPM) group, which is a dedicated consulting
department focused on delivering custom document workflow
solutions for our existing installed base of customers and new
customers who have a need for stand-alone document workflow
applications to improve departmental business processes. BPM
services include custom workflow development, business process
management, strategic planning, and custom reporting, among
other consulting services. These new services will complement
our existing professional services, which focus primarily on
installation of our standard off-the-shelf software solutions.
Beginning in 1998, Streamline Health pioneered offering
customers the ability to obtain its workflow solutions on an
application-hosting basis as an Application Service Provider
(ASP), which is now often referred in the information technology
(IT) industry as Software as a Service (SaaS). Streamline Health
established a SaaS hosting center, and installed Streamline
Healths suite of document workflow and document management
solutions within the hosting center (sometimes referred to as
ASPeN, or Application Service Provider
e-Health
Network). Under this arrangement, customers electronically
capture document-centric information at the healthcare facility
and securely transmit the data to the hosting center. The
hosting services center stores and manage the document-centric
data using Streamline Healths suite of applications, and
customers can view, print, fax, route and process the
information from anywhere using the Streamline Health
web-enabled applications. Streamline Health charges and
recognizes revenue for these hosting services on a subscription
or per transaction basis as information is captured, stored,
retrieved and processed.
The decisions by a healthcare provider to replace, substantially
modify, or upgrade its information systems are a strategic
decision and may involve a large capital commitment requiring an
extended approval process for licensed and locally installed
solutions. Since inception, Streamline Health has experienced
extended sales cycles. It is not uncommon for sales cycles to
take six to eighteen months from initial contact to the
execution of an agreement. As a result, the sales cycles for
licensed solutions can cause significant variations in
quarter-to-quarter operating results. These agreements cover the
licensing, implementation and maintenance of the system, which
typically takes place in one or more phases. The licensing
agreements generally provide for the licensing of Streamline
Healths proprietary software and third-party software with
a perpetual or term license fee on either an unlimited number of
users (site license) or a specific number of users (concurrent
users license) that is adjusted upward depending on the number
of facilities (annual operating expense model) or the number of
concurrent users (concurrent use model) using the software.
Site-specific customization, interfaces with existing customer
systems and other consulting services are sold on a fixed fee or
a time and materials basis. Alternatively, with Streamline
Healths SaaS-based hosting services solutions, the SaaS
hosting services agreements generally provide for utilizing
Streamline Healths software and third-party software on a
recurring subscription or, for smaller departmental solutions, a
fee per transaction basis.
3
The SaaS-based hosting services were designed to overcome
obstacles in the buying decision such as large capital
commitment, length of implementation, and the scarcity of time
for healthcare organization personnel to implement new systems.
Streamline Health believes that large healthcare organizations
and smaller healthcare providers are looking for this type of
subscription-based solution because of the ease of
implementation and lower entry-level costs. Streamline Health is
focused on its SaaS model of delivery and believes this business
model is especially well suited for the medium to small acute
care facility marketplace as well as the ambulatory marketplace.
The Company is actively pursuing remarketing agreements, in
addition to those discussed below, with other Healthcare
Information Systems and staff outsourcing providers to
distribute Streamline Healths SaaS-based document workflow
solutions. The Company also continues to market system sales as
appropriate to match customer needs.
Generally, revenues from licensed, locally installed systems
sales are recognized when an agreement is signed and solutions
are made available to end-users. Revenue recognition related to
routine installation, integration and project management are
deferred until the work is performed. Revenues from consulting,
training, and SaaS-based hosting services are recognized as the
services are performed. Revenues from short-term support and
maintenance agreements are recognized ratably over the term of
the agreements. Billings to customers recorded prior to the
recognition of the revenue are classified as deferred revenues.
Revenues recognized prior to progress billings to customers are
recorded as contract receivables.
In 2002, Streamline Health entered into a five year Remarketing
Agreement with IDX Information Systems Corporation, which was
subsequently acquired by GE Healthcare, a unit of the General
Electric Company in January 2006. Under the terms of the
Remarketing Agreement, IDX/GE was granted a non-exclusive
worldwide license to distribute all Streamline Health document
workflow and document management software including
accessANYwareTM,
Coding Workflow, and SaaS-based hosting services to its
customers and prospective customers, as defined in the
Remarketing Agreement. The Agreement has an automatic annual
renewal provision and, after the initial five year term, which
ended January 30, 2007, can be cancelled by IDX/GE upon
90 days written notice to the Company. This automatic
annual renewal provision now extends the agreement through
January 30, 2010. The Company has no reason to believe that
the agreement will not continue to be renewed annually or will
be terminated.
As to licensed, locally installed software, under the terms of
the Remarketing Agreement, Streamline Health records this
revenue when the solutions are made available to end-users.
Royalties are remitted to Streamline Health based upon GE
sublicensing Streamline Healths software to its customers.
Thirty percent of the royalty is due 45 days following the
end of the month in which GE executes an end-user license
agreement with its customer. The remaining seventy percent of
the royalty is due from GE, in varying amounts based on specific
milestones, 45 days following the end of the month in which
a milestone occurs.
In December 2007, Streamline Health entered into an agreement
with Emergis, Inc., which was subsequently acquired by TELUS, a
large international telecommunications corporation based in
Canada, in January 2008, under which Emergis is integrating
Streamline Healths
accessANYwareTM
document management repository and document workflow
applications into its Oacis (Open Architecture Clinical
Information System) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) solution.
In May 2008, Streamline Health and Emergis announced their
agreement to provide their integrated document management and
workflow solution at the eight hospitals representing the Centre
hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal (CHUM)
and the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC). Emergis
integrated Streamline Healths accessANYware document
management and chart completion workflow solution into its Oacis
electronic medical record solution. The integrated solution
addresses clinicians need for immediate access to patient
records in hybrid environments, where electronic health records
still coexist with paper. CHUM and MUHC will be the first sites
in Canada to deploy the integrated solution.
To date, no software revenues have been recorded for this
transaction because the contract calls for Streamline Health to
deliver a French language version of its software. It is
anticipated that a French language version will be delivered
into Beta testing sometime in the second half of 2009. Once this
version has been tested and subsequently made generally
available, the revenue can be recognized.
4
Streamline Healths quarterly operating results have varied
in the past and will continue to do so in the future because of
various reasons including: demand for Streamline Healths
solutions and services, long sales cycles, and extended
installation and implementation cycles based on customers
schedules. Sales are often delayed because of customers
budgets and competing capital expenditure needs as well as
personnel resource constraints within an integrated delivery
network.
Delays in anticipated sales or installations have a significant
impact on Streamline Healths quarterly revenues and
operating results, because substantial portions of the operating
expenses are fixed.
Healthcare
Industry Trends impacting Streamline Health
The mixed public-private healthcare system in the United States
is the most expensive in the world, with healthcare costing more
per person than in any other nation. According to the World
Health Organization, a greater portion of gross domestic product
(GDP) is spent on healthcare in the U.S. than in any other
major industrialized country in the world. As a proportion of
GDP, government healthcare spending in the United States is
larger than in most other large western countries. Streamline
Health believes its solutions can reduce healthcare costs for
its customers, as has been demonstrated in return on investment
studies performed by a number of our customers resulting in
attractive payback periods.
In spite of the amount spent on healthcare in the U.S., a 2008
report by the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation that aims
to promote a high performing healthcare system for
societys most vulnerable people, ranked the United States
last in the quality of healthcare among the 19 compared
countries. The World Health Organization (WHO), in 2000, ranked
the U.S. healthcare system 37th in overall performance
and 72nd by overall level of health (among 191 member
nations included in the study).
Current estimates by many consulting and research firms put
spending on healthcare in the U.S. at approximately 16% of
GDP. In 2007, an estimated $2.26 trillion was spent on
healthcare in the United States, or $7,439 per person.
Healthcare costs are rising faster than wages or inflation, and
the healthcare share of GDP is expected to continue its
historical upward trend, reaching 19.5 percent of GDP by
2017 and 25% by 2025.
In response to this projected growth in healthcare spending, the
healthcare industry is undergoing significant change as
competition and cost-containment measures imposed by
governmental and private payers have created significant
pressures on healthcare providers to control healthcare costs
while improving the quality patient care. At the same time, the
healthcare delivery system is experiencing a shift from a highly
fragmented group of non-allied healthcare providers to
integrated healthcare networks, which combine all of the
services, products and infrastructure necessary to address the
needs of healthcare customers. As a result, healthcare providers
are seeking to cut costs, increase productivity and enhance the
quality of patient care through improved access to information
throughout the entire hospital or integrated healthcare network.
Reforming or restructuring the private health insurance market
is often suggested as a means for achieving healthcare reform in
the U.S. A report published by the Commonwealth Fund in
December 2007 examined 15 federal policy options and concluded
that, taken together, they had the potential to reduce future
increases in healthcare spending by $1.5 trillion over the next
10 years. These options included increased use of health
information technology, among other findings.
U.S.
Government Policy and Legislative Initiatives
Healthcare reform was a major concern of the Bill Clinton
administration headed up by First Lady Hillary Clinton; however,
the 1993 Clinton healthcare plan was not enacted into law. In
2004, President Bush called for all Americans to have electronic
health records by 2014. The former president emphasized
health-care information technology in some very high-profile
speeches, including his 2007 State of the Union address, calling
it critical to making the United States health-care system more
efficient, affordable, and safe.
President Barack Obama has called for universal healthcare as a
part of his 2008 presidential campaign. The American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Stimulus Bill) was
enacted by the United States Congress and signed into law by
President Barack Obama on February 17, 2009. The provision
of the legislation that
5
addresses health information technology specifically is known as
the HITECH Act. Some highlights of President Barack Obamas
healthcare initiatives and the HITECH Act that may impact
Streamline Health are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
Primary focus in 2009 will be Electronic Health Records (EHR)
|
|
|
|
Intends to modernize U.S. healthcare system with health
information technology (HIT) investments to reduce cost and
improve quality of patient care, focusing on preventable errors
and inefficient paper billing systems
|
|
|
|
Goal of full deployment of EHR by 2014 (5 years)
|
|
|
|
$19 billion investment in HITECH Provision includes $40 thousand
per physician in EHR adoption incentives beginning in 2011
payable through 2016
|
|
|
|
HIT extension programs for regional adoption via Regional Health
Information Organizations (RHIO)
|
|
|
|
Funds earmarked to states to promote interoperable EHRs
|
|
|
|
Education programs to train clinicians in EHRs
|
|
|
|
Dramatically increase the number of HIT professionals (current
shortage to meet aggressive EHR adoption plans)
|
|
|
|
Create HIT grant and loan programs
|
|
|
|
Accelerate construction of National Health Information Network
(NHIN)
|
The Gartner Group, software industry consultants, estimates
total HIT investments were approximately $26 billion in
2007. When considering the Stimulus Bill estimate of
$19 billion in HIT investments, the Company anticipates a
dramatic increase in HIT investments above current levels.
Furthermore, the company believes the addressable market is
significant based on the Gartner Group estimates of low EHR
adoption rates of 8% of the approximately 5,000
U.S. hospitals and 17% of the 800,000 physicians.
Accordingly, Streamline Health anticipates greater demand and
additional federally initiated sources of funding for
information technology investments. We believe our solutions are
complimentary to hospital organizations plans for EHR
adoption.
Despite the enormous investments in electronic medical record
technology to date, the majority of the patient records are
still paper-based. The inefficiencies of paper-based records
increase the cost of patient care. Physicians often cannot gain
access to medical records at the time of patient visits, and
multiple users cannot simultaneously access the record when only
a single copy of the paper-based patient record is available.
Based upon Streamline Healths experience in installing its
solutions, a typical 500 bed hospital can produce 15,000 to
20,000 pages of new patient information each day even with
computerized admission, billing, laboratory and radiology
systems, and individual physician document retrieval requests
can be as high as 100 documents per physician per day. The
volume of medical images in the patient record is expanding as
well. In addition to images such as x-rays and CAT scans,
MRIs, new image forms such as digitized slides, videos and
photographs proliferate. Thus, the ability to store and retrieve
document images of voluminous paper records on a timely basis is
a critical feature of a complete EHR.
In order to simultaneously reduce costs and enhance the level of
patient care, hospitals and other healthcare providers are
requiring comprehensive, cost-effective information systems that
deliver rapid access to fully updated and complete patient
information. Traditional healthcare information systems are
inadequate because: (i) they do not capture large amounts
of the patient records which are paper-based and stored in
various sites throughout the enterprise; (ii) computerized
patient data is generated using a variety of disparate systems
which cannot share information; and (iii) multimedia
medical information such as x-rays, CAT scans, MRIs, video
and audio information are frequently inaccessible at the point
of patient care. Accordingly, hospitals and other healthcare
providers are increasing their information systems expenditures,
which have traditionally lagged behind other data-intensive
industries such as banking.
In 2007, the Medical Records Institute Survey of Electronic
Medical Record Trends and Usage reported that the top priority
for strategic decisions in Information Technology was the need
to improve clinical processes or
6
workflow efficiencies and the major factor driving Electronic
Medical Record adoption in the hospital segment was patient
safety considerations.
Streamline Health believes that the HIPAA (Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act) regulations are an
additional impetus for healthcare to embrace Streamline Health
solutions as a means of ensuring compliance with federal
regulations.
Document imaging and workflow (management) technologies are
essential elements of a complete EMR because they allow for the
storage of unstructured data (i.e., patient record elements
other than data or text, such as hand written physician or
nursing notes and physician orders, photographs, and outside
correspondence) and they enable digitized x-rays, CAT scans,
MRIs, video and audio information to be accessed and
delivered to the caregiver at the point of patient care.
Streamline Health believes the demand for its health information
document management and workflow solutions, which can supply
document-imaging capabilities to compliment the data-centric
elements of an EMR, will increase in future years.
Streamline Health believes that the HIPAA regulations are an
additional impetus for healthcare providers to embrace
Streamline Health solutions as a means of ensuring compliance
with federal regulations.
In addition to mandated HIPAA regulations, the healthcare
industry is being strongly encouraged by many professional
medical organizations to make greater use of information
technology. A report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the
National Academies, entitled To Err is Human: Building a
Better Health System, envisioned a revamped system that,
among other things, makes greater use of information technology
to enable providers and institutions to move away from
paper-based medical record systems to take advantage of new
information technology. The American Medical Association,
American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of
Physicians, American Society of Internal Medicine, and the
American College of Surgeons, issued a joint statement
supporting the IOM recommendations.
Regulatory
Matters
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
asked the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of
Sciences to design a standardized model of an electronic health
record, in a move that may help spur nationwide acceptance of
EMRs. The impact of such a change, if implemented by HHS,
on current Streamline Health solutions and services is unknown
at this time. However, Streamline Health believes that its
solutions are sufficiently flexible to accommodate changing
regulatory requirements. Patient privacy is of utmost concern,
as evidenced by current HIPAA regulations. Streamline
Healths solutions enable a healthcare organization to lock
down Protected Health Information (PHI), as defined by HIPAA, by
preventing unauthorized access and providing audit trails for
every occurrence of access to PHI.
Regulations
Relating to Confidentiality
Federal and state laws regulate the confidentiality of patient
records and the circumstances under which such records may be
released. These regulations govern both the disclosure and use
of Protected Health Information (PHI). Regulations governing
electronic health data privacy are continuing to evolve. The
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of
1996, enacted August 22, 1996, is designed to improve the
efficiency of healthcare by standardizing the interchange of
specified electronic data, and to protect the security and
confidentiality of PHI. The legislation requires that covered
entities comply with national standards for certain types of
electronic health information transactions and the data elements
used in such transactions, and adopt policies and practices to
ensure the integrity and confidentiality of PHI.
Regulations adopted pursuant to HIPAA include rules addressing
several areas. The Privacy Rule also extended the scope of
enforcement to PHI residing on non-electronic media, such as
paper, as well as to email, oral and written communications.
Streamline Health cannot predict the potential impact of new or
revised regulations that have not yet been released or made
final, or any other regulations that might be adopted. Congress
may adopt legislation that may change, override, conflict with,
or preempt the currently issued regulations. Additionally,
legislation governing the dissemination of patient health
information is also from time to time proposed and debated at
the state level. These laws or regulations, when adopted, could
restrict the ability of customers to obtain, use, or
7
disseminate PHI. Streamline Health believes that the features
and architecture of Streamline Healths solutions are such
that it currently supports or should be able to make the
necessary modifications to its products, if required, to ensure
support of the HIPAA regulations, and other legislation or
regulations.
However, if the regulations are unduly restrictive, this could
cause delays in the delivery of new versions of solutions and
adversely affect the licensing of Streamline Healths
solutions. Overall, Streamline Health believes the HIPAA
regulations will continue to stimulate healthcare organizations
to purchase computer-based EMR systems that automate the
collection, use, and disclosure of PHI, while maintaining
appropriate security and audit controls over the information.
However, there can be no assurance that an increase in the
purchase of new systems or additional use of Streamline Health
software and services will occur.
Rapid
Technological Change and Evolving Market
The market for Streamline Healths solutions and services
is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, regulatory
requirements, evolving industry standards and new product
introductions and enhancements that may render existing
solutions obsolete or less competitive. As a result, Streamline
Healths position in the healthcare information technology
market could change rapidly due to unforeseen changes in the
features and functions of competing products, as well as the
pricing models for such products. Streamline Healths
future success will depend, in part, upon Streamline
Healths ability to enhance its existing solutions and
services and to develop and introduce new solutions and services
to meet changing requirements.
Changes
and Consolidation in the Healthcare Industry
Streamline Health derives substantially all of its revenues from
providing subscription services via its SaaS-based hosting
center, the licensing of software, providing professional
services and maintenance services within the healthcare
industry. Accordingly, the success of Streamline Health is
dependent upon the regulatory and economic conditions in the
healthcare industry. Many healthcare providers are consolidating
to establish integrated healthcare delivery networks to take
advantage of economies of scale, greater marketing power and
greater leverage in negotiating with vendors who supply the
industry with the goods and services they require. The impact of
such consolidations, Streamline Health believes, will benefit
Streamline Health as more healthcare organizations investigate
methods to streamline operations, including outsourcing non-core
services to reduce costs and improve the quality of patient care
through the use of information technology, especially in the
paper intensive areas of Patient Medical Records, Patient
Financial Services, and Administrative Services.
Key
Personnel
Streamline Healths success depends, to a significant
degree, on its management, sales and technical personnel.
Streamline Health must recruit, motivate and retain highly
skilled managers, sales force, consulting and technical
personnel, including application programmers, database
specialists, consultants and system architects skilled in the
technical environments in which Streamline Healths
solutions operate. Competition for such technical expertise is
intense. Our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel
could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
Limited
Protection of Proprietary Technology
The success of Streamline Health depends on the protection of
its intellectual property rights relating to its proprietary
technology. Streamline Health relies on a combination of
confidentiality, nondisclosure, license, and employment
agreements, trade secret laws, copyrights, and restrictions on
the disclosure of its intellectual property. Notwithstanding
these precautions, others may copy, reverse engineer or design
independently, technology similar to Streamline Healths
products. It may be necessary to litigate to enforce or defend
Streamline Healths proprietary technology or to determine
the validity of the intellectual property rights of others.
Streamline Health could also be required to defend itself
against claims made by third parties for intellectual property
right infringement. Any litigation, could be successful or
unsuccessful, may result in substantial cost and require
significant attention by management and technical personnel.
8
Warranties
and Indemnities
Streamline Healths solutions are very complex and may not
be error free, especially when first released. Failure of any
Streamline Health product to operate in accordance with its
specifications and documentation could constitute a breach of
the license agreement and require Streamline Health to correct
the deficiency. If such deficiency is not corrected within the
agreed upon contractual limitations on liability and cannot be
corrected in a timely manner, it could constitute a material
breach of a contract allowing the termination thereof and
possibly subjecting Streamline Health to a financial liability.
Also, Streamline Health indemnifies its customers against
third-party infringement claims. If such claims are made, even
if they are without merit, they could be expensive to defend. If
Streamline Health becomes liable to a third-party for
infringement of their intellectual property, Streamline Health
could be required to pay substantial amounts as damages, obtain
a license to use the infringing technologies, develop its own
non-infringing technologies, or cease using the infringing
intellectual property.
Competition
Several companies historically have dominated the Clinical
Information System software market and several of these
companies have either acquired, developed or are developing
their own document management and workflow technologies. The
industry is undergoing consolidation and realignment as
companies position themselves to compete more effectively.
Strategic alliances between vendors offering health information
management workflow and document management technologies and
vendors of other healthcare systems are increasing. Barriers to
entry to this market include technological and application
sophistication, the ability to offer a proven product, a
well-established customer base and distribution channels, brand
recognition, the ability to operate on a variety of operating
systems and hardware platforms, the ability to integrate with
pre-existing systems and capital for sustained development and
marketing activities. Streamline Health believes that these
barriers taken together represent a moderate to high level
barrier to entry. Foreign competition has not been a significant
factor in the market, to date.
Streamline Health has many competitors including Clinical
Information System vendors that are larger and more established
and have substantially more resources than Streamline Health. In
addition, information and document management companies serving
other industries may enter the market. Suppliers and companies
with whom Streamline Health may establish strategic alliances
may also compete with Streamline Health. Such companies and
vendors may either individually, or by forming alliances
excluding Streamline Health, place bids for large agreements in
competition with Streamline Health. A decision on the part of
any of these competitors to focus additional resources in the
image-enabling, workflow, and other markets addressed by
Streamline Health could have a material adverse effect on
Streamline Health.
Streamline Health believes that the principal competitive
factors in its market are customer recommendations and
references, company reputation, system reliability, system
features and functionality (including ease of use),
technological advancements, customer service and support,
breadth and quality of the systems, the potential for
enhancements and future compatible products, the effectiveness
of marketing and sales efforts, price and the size and perceived
financial stability of the vendor. In addition, Streamline
Health believes that the speed with which companies in its
market can anticipate the evolving healthcare industry structure
and identify unmet needs are important competitive factors.
There can be no assurance that Streamline Health will be able to
compete successfully in the future against existing or potential
competitors.
Streamline Health believes that its principal competitors are:
Cerner Corporation; Eclipsys Corporation; Hyland Software, Inc.;
McKesson HBOC, Inc.; MedPlus, Inc. (a subsidiary of Quest
Diagnostics Incorporated); Perceptive Vision, Inc.; Siemens
Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (a subsidiary of Siemens AG); and
SoftMed Systems, Inc., (a unit of 3M).
The
Streamline Health Solution
Streamline Healths solutions and services streamline
information flows and provide health information management
workflow, Patient Financial Services and other departmental
workflow solutions for the patient and other information access
needs of hospitals and integrated healthcare delivery networks.
Streamline Healths
9
systems enable medical and administrative personnel to rapidly
and efficiently capture, store, manage, route, retrieve and
process vast amounts of clinical, financial, patient and other
information.
Streamline Healths systems: (i) capture and store
electronic data from disparate hospital information systems
through real-time, computerized interfaces; (ii) provide
applications for efficiently scanning and automatically indexing
paper-based records; (iii) allow storage of a
patients lifetime medical record on secure media which
also provides rapid access to high volumes of data enterprise
wide; (iv) provide technologically advanced workflow
automation software to facilitate the re-engineering of business
processes; and (v) incorporate physician-oriented
interfaces that allow the user to easily locate and retrieve
patient information in the hospital or clinical setting,
including the point of patient care.
Streamline Healths health information management, Patient
Financial Services, and administrative workflow solutions
provide financial, administrative, and clinical benefits to the
healthcare provider and facilitate more effective patient care.
These benefits include: (i) improved access to patient
information to assist in making informed clinical and financial
decisions; (ii) reduced costs for administrative personnel
due to increased workflow efficiency, as data can be routed
within an organization to all users who need to process that
information simultaneously or in sequence as required;
(iii) increased productivity through the elimination of
file contention by providing multiple users simultaneous access
to patient medical records; (iv) reduced costs and improved
care through the reduction of unnecessary testing and
admissions; (v) improved cash flow through accelerated
account receivable collections and reductions in technical
denials (which occur when a third-party payer refuses
payment because of the providers inability to substantiate
billing claims due to loss of portions or all of the patient
record); (vi) expedited treatment decisions, and fewer
redundant tests as a result of timely access to complete
information; (vii) fewer medical record errors by
minimizing misfiled, lost and improperly completed records; and
(viii) increased security of patient information through
improved controls on access to confidential data and the
creation of audit trails that identify the persons who accessed
or even tried to access such information.
The
Streamline Health Strategy
Streamline Healths objective is to continue to be a
leading provider of health information management, Patient
Financial Services, and administrative workflow solutions to the
healthcare industry. Important elements of Streamline
Healths business strategy include:
SaaS-based
Hosting Services
In 1998, Streamline Health was a pioneer in offering customers
the ability to obtain its document management and workflow
solutions on a remotely hosted basis via the Software as a
Service (SaaS) delivery model. Streamline Health established a
hosting center and installed Streamline Healths suite of
document workflow products, called ASPeN (Application Service
Provider
e-health
Network) within the hosting center, which utilizes Streamline
Healths web browser-enabled applications via private data
communication lines or a virtual private network (VPN) utilizing
the Internet, to deliver high quality, subscription-based
services to healthcare providers from a centrally located
hosting center. SaaS-based services enables healthcare customers
to achieve enhanced patient care, improved security, and
accessibility to patient records at significant cost savings
with minimal up-front capital investment, maintenance, and
support costs. Customers realize benefits more quickly with less
economic risk. Customers are charged on subscription, and
occasionally on a per transaction basis, which is an attractive
alternative to purchasing an in-house, locally installed system.
This SaaS-based service is made possible through the advancement
of web browser-based technology, state-of-the-art communication
technology and advanced software design.
In fiscal 2008, Streamline Health experienced a significant
growth in SaaS-based hosting services contracts and related
backlog of recurring revenue. The Company is experiencing a
dramatic shift away from its traditional purchase
model of licensed software which is locally installed at the
customers data center, towards our SaaS-based business
model. Under the SaaS-based model, recurring revenue via
subscription fees are paid monthly, quarterly or annually over
the life of the contract, which is typically five years. Start
up costs include the cost of third party components (software
and hardware) installed in the Streamline Health hosting center
that are required to host the Companys software solutions.
In anticipation of this demand, Streamline Health has realigned
its organization
10
to reduce our cost structure and cash flow needs to offset some
of the effects of the spreading out of revenue streams and
up-front cash needs of the SaaS model. A desirable byproduct of
this dramatic shift to SaaS-based services is much better
visibility for future revenue streams based on backlog
fulfillment from hosted contracts over typical five year
contract periods, as well as a high percentage of contract
renewals after the initial term.
The growth in SaaS-based hosting services is exemplified by the
eight new hosting contracts signed in 2008, which have
contributed to revenue and have a current SaaS-based hosting
backlog in excess of $13 million, which is over four times
greater than it was at the end of fiscal year 2007. Furthermore,
Streamline Health signed 10 new customer contracts in 2008 (up
from 4 new customer contracts in 2007), of which 80% were hosted
agreements, compared to only 25% hosted agreements in 2007.
Factors that we believe have contributed to this significant
shift to Software as a Service (SaaS) are:
1. SaaS-based hosted solutions are now becoming more main
stream, and market adoption has increased dramatically over the
past few years.
2. Small to mid-sized healthcare organizations do not have
the capital, or the information technology staffs to support
complex, locally installed solutions.
3. The 2008 financial crisis and credit crunch has forced
hospital organizations to reconsider their capital purchases and
look to operating lease alternatives, such as our hosted
solutions, to meet their software needs.
4. SaaS-based solutions are an excellent hedge against
future obsolescence, and provide a lower-risk alternative to
traditional licensed models.
We believe that the realignment will better focus and position
the company to take advantage of increased market opportunities
for SaaS-based services, particularly at the lower end of the
healthcare market where opportunities for these services is
growing much faster than the marketplace in general. We also
believe that our hosted solutions provide us with a significant
advantage in the marketplace, as many of our competitors do not
have a comparable offering.
Although Streamline Health enjoyed a significant increase in
SaaS-based hosting contracts, Streamline Healths largest
hosting customer did not renew its hosting agreement at the end
of July 2008. This large customer built its own
locally-installed solution after having renewed its hosting
agreement multiple times over a five and a half year period. The
termination of this agreement had a material adverse impact on
the results of operations in 2008, contributing to a shortfall
of approximately $880,000 in recurring revenues. The anticipated
shortfall in recurring revenues in 2009 due to the termination
of this contract is estimated to be approximately $1,761,000.
Counteracting this loss in recurring revenue from one large
hosting contract, the Company signed eight additional new
hosting services customers in 2008. However, the amounts of new
revenues from these eight new customers did not start
contributing to revenues until the second half of 2008 and will
continue to contribute to recurring revenues throughout 2009,
and therefore, when totally implemented by the end of 2009, will
generate revenues estimated to be approximately 85% of the
revenues attributed to the loss of the large customer.
In addition, one of the new hosting contracts signed this year
was constructed to cover up to 26 total facilities, of which
only three implementations are included in the above replacement
revenue estimate. We expect to add additional
application-hosting customers in 2009 and into the future that
will replace the recurring revenue shortfall from the loss of
the large customer, and subsequently continue to grow hosting
revenues beyond the loss in recurring revenues noted this year
and last year.
Expand
Distribution Channels
Streamline Health estimates the total market for Streamline
Healths document management solutions and services could
be in excess of $16 billion, and the market is less than
30% penetrated. Streamline Health strongly believes its highly
evolved, secure and technologically advanced web browser-based
SaaS-based hosting solutions will position Streamline Health to
take advantage of, what it continues to believe will be,
significantly increasing market opportunities for Streamline
Health and its distribution partners in the future.
11
In 2002, Streamline Health entered into a five-year Remarketing
Agreement with IDX (now GE Healthcare), which offers a wide
variety of patient care solutions to hospital organizations,
group practices, academic medical centers, and radiological
centers nationwide. At that time, IDX had installed its
solutions at more than 2,600 customer sites with systems
deployed to serve over 120,000 physicians. Under the terms of
the Agreement, IDX/GE was granted a non-exclusive worldwide
license to distribute all Streamline Health applications and
SaaS-based hosting services to its customers and prospective
customers, as defined in the Agreement. GE sells Streamline
Healths health information management and enterprise
document management and document workflow solutions as an
integrated component of the GE
Centricity®
Enterprise clinical and financial information systems. The
Agreement has an automatic annual renewal provision after the
initial five year term, which ended January 30, 2007, and
can be cancelled by GE upon 90 days written notice to the
Company. This automatic annual renewal provision now extends the
agreement through January 30, 2010. The Company has no
reason to believe that the agreement will not continue to be
renewed annually or will be terminated.
In December 2007, Streamline Health entered into an agreement
with Emergis, Inc., which was subsequently acquired by TELUS, a
large international telecommunications corporation based in
Canada, in January, 2008, under which Emergis is integrating
Streamline Healths
accessANYwareTM
document management repository and document workflow
applications into its Oacis (Open Architecture Clinical
Information System) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) solution.
In May 2008 Streamline Health and Emergis announced their
agreement to provide their integrated document management and
workflow solution at the eight hospitals representing the Centre
hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal (CHUM)
and the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC). Emergis
integrated Streamline Healths accessANYware document
management and chart completion workflow solution into its Oacis
electronic medical record solution. The integrated solution
addresses clinicians need for immediate access to patient
records in hybrid environments, where electronic health records
still coexist with paper. CHUM and MUHC will be the first sites
in Canada to deploy the integrated solution.
It is expected that this relationship with TELUS, backed by
Emergis, will enable the Company to continue its international
expansion and growth in Canada.
It is Streamline Healths intention to develop additional
remarketing alliances with other Healthcare Information Systems,
Medical Records management, and Medical Records outsourcing
vendors and to explore other means of expanding Streamline
Healths distribution channels.
Maintain
Technological Leadership Through the Development of New Software
Applications and Increased Functionality of Existing
Applications
In late 2007 and 2008, Streamline Health undertook a large-scale
development effort to refresh its entire solution suite to a new
fifth-generation architecture. Included in this massive
development effort are the consolidation of technology platforms
onto the Microsoft Dot Net platform, and the
internationalization of its software via multi-lingual
capabilities for potential new international markets.
Internationalization specifically to include French language
capabilities was a part of Streamline Healths agreement
with the Centre hospitalier de lUniversité de
Montréal (CHUM) and the McGill University Health Centre
(MUHC) via our distribution partner, Emergis, a TELUS company.
It is anticipated that the Company will deliver its new
architecture platform for Beta testing at a customer location in
the second half of 2009.
Streamline Health intends to continue its product development
efforts and increase the functionality of existing applications
along with the development of new applications using workflow
technologies. In particular, Streamline Health intends to
increase the functionality of its web-based applications.
Streamline Health has continued to add new features,
functionality and workflow applications to its suite of
products, including revenue cycle management solutions such as
remote coding, remote physician order processing, pre-admission
registration scanning, insurance verification, explanation of
benefits processing, etc. (See A brief description of
Streamline Healths solutions below.)
12
Streamline Healths core technology is a document
management-based repository, accessANYware. The accessANYware
application utilizes a common database for medical records and
patient financial services, thereby improving system
administration and eliminating redundant data entry.
Streamline Health believes only the most robust, flexible,
dependable solutions will survive in the healthcare market, and
Streamline Health has attempted to establish itself as a leader
in document management and workflow-based solutions through
strong product development.
Document
Image-Enable Clinical Data Repositories and Other Applications
Software
Today, healthcare information is often stored on numerous
dissimilar host-based and departmental systems that are spread
throughout an enterprise and are not integrated. Additionally,
these current systems do not address the data stored on paper or
the increasing volume of medical images such as CAT scans,
MRIs, digitized slides, exploratory scopes, photographs,
audio, etc. Streamline Health believes the efficiencies and
productivity of hospitals and integrated healthcare delivery
networks can be greatly enhanced by seamlessly integrating their
historical information systems with document management and
workflow applications. Physicians, clinicians, and other
healthcare users then have access to the complete patient
medical record, including the structured data, such as
laboratory results, and related unstructured data, such as a
doctors hand written notes. Streamline Health has
image-enabled many popular Hospital Information Systems, such as
those offered by Oacis (marketed by Emergis, a TELUS company),
GE Healthcare, and Cerner Corporation. Streamline Health is
marketing image-enabling technology through its Streamline
Health Integration Tools (Stream-IT) integration toolkit.
Streamline Health intends to continue to aggressively market its
unique image-enabling solutions to end-users and other
third-party software application providers. Streamline Health
has several large scale, enterprise wide image enabled sites,
including Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, which utilizes
Streamline Healths solution on over 8,000 workstations and
over 1,250 simultaneous users at any point in time.
Systems
and Services
Streamline Healths systems employ an open architecture
that supports a variety of operating systems, including
Microsoft Windows XP, and UNIX. Streamline Healths systems
can be configured with various hardware platforms, including
INTEL-compatible personal computers. Streamline Healths
systems include a user interface designed specifically by
Streamline Health for physicians and other medical and
administrative personnel in hospitals and integrated healthcare
networks. Streamline Healths health information management
workflow solutions incorporate advanced features, including
workflow and security features, which allow customers to
restrict direct access to confidential patient information,
secure Protected Health Information (PHI) from unauthorized
indirect access and have audit trail features.
A brief description of Streamline Healths solutions
follows:
Streamline Health solutions and services are built using
advanced document management and workflow automation
technologies to create robust Health Information Management
(Medical Records), Revenue Cycle, and administrative workflow
solutions. Document management technology makes paper-based
information, as well as medical images, sound and video
information as readily available and easy to process as
traditional electronic data. In addition to intelligent
electronic routing of documents, workflow automation offers
sophisticated management tools and reporting to increase
efficiency and support of business process re-engineering
efforts.
Streamline Healths solutions and services were designed to
be complementary with existing third-party Hospital Information
Systems and SaaS-based hosting services, providing value-added
functionality to these third-party applications, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The ability to gain seamless electronic access to medical
records, business office documents and medical images
(unstructured data);
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based automated chart deficiency analysis and
completion;
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based automated release of information and billing;
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based remote coding and seamless integration to
third-party encoder and abstracter software;
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based referral order capture;
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based financial screening and routing of patient
financial ability to pay information;
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based Preoperative document capture and routing for
operating room scheduling systems;
|
|
|
|
Workflow-based RAC (Recovery Audit Contractor) document tracking
and release to facilitate RAC audit mitigation; and
|
|
|
|
Computer-aided data extraction solutions using OCR technology to
scan, extract, verify, and input into existing information
systems data.
|
Streamline Health has developed innovative application tool sets
to document image and web-enable existing Hospital
Information System applications, thereby allowing users to have
a common user interface on a universal workstation. Streamline
Health has also developed its own document management middleware
to efficiently provide the object-oriented business processes
common to all of its applications, such as scanning/indexing,
faxing/printing, data archiving migration, security and
auditing. Through its application software, document management
middleware, and its workflow, image and web-enabling tools,
Streamline Health allows the seamless merging of its Medical
Record and Patient Financial Services department back
office functionality with existing clinical information
systems at the desktop.
For maximum flexibility, the Streamline Health solution
portfolio offers the following core
accessANYwareTM-based
solutions: (i) the Health Information Management (HIM)
Suite, (ii) the Patient Financial Services (PFS) Suite, and
(iii) the Enterprise Suite. In addition, Streamline Health
offers numerous document workflow solutions that are application
or department specific. Among these workflow solutions are:
(i) Chart Completion Workflow, (ii) Coding Workflow,
(iii) Release of Information Workflow, (iv) Referral
Order Workflow, (v) Financial Screening Workflow,
(vi) Cash Management Workflow, (vii) Preoperative
Workflow, (viii) Chart Tracking Workflow, (ix) RAC
Audit Workflow, and (x) Registration Scanning Workflow. In
addition, the Company offers various customized workflows
through its new Business Process Management Services Group, such
as: (i) Invoice Routing Workflow,
(ii) Tuition/Certification Workflow, (iii) New
ChargeMaster Request Workflow, (iv) Supply Chain Management
Workflow, (v) Accounts Payable Workflow, and
(vi) Human Resources Workflow.
The accessANYware family of solutions is Streamline
Healths fourth-generation document-centric repository of
historical health information that is complementary to and can
be seamlessly bolted on to existing
transaction-centric clinical, financial and management
information systems, allowing healthcare providers to
aggressively move toward a true EMR. It allows authorized users
to perform document searching, retrieval, viewing, processing,
printing and faxing, as well as report generation
all from a single login.
HEALTH
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SUITE
The HIM Suite includes accessANYware Patient
Folders, Chart Completion Workflow, Release of Information
Workflow, Coding Workflow and Chart Tracking Workflow.
accessANYware
Health Information Management (HIM)
accessANYware (HIM) is a web-enabled application
that provides hospital organizations the ability to
electronically store, search and retrieve medical records from
any location within the facility, physician offices, off-site
clinics and even from home. In addition,
accessANYware HIM provides a complete web-enabled
chart deficiency management system that includes analysis,
electronic signature and management reports all from
a single login. accessANYware HIM allows the user to
securely view the entire medical record from a visit view or a
category-based longitudinal view of historical patient
information.
Chart
Completion Workflow
The Completion Workflow application is a chart deficiency
management workflow that provides management reporting along
with providing analysts and clinicians the ability to remotely
analyze, electronically sign and complete deficient records. In
addition to a single login, Chart Completion
14
Workflow delivers a single user interface and integrated
database. Therefore, from a single system login, users with
appropriate security have the ability to search and retrieve
information regarding patients and cases (for chart analysis),
view, print and fax patient documents, as well as analyze or
complete deficient documents. The functions presented to the
user vary with the users security. For example, if the
user is a clinician,
he/she is
presented with an inbox function that displays a list of
incomplete charts (awaiting completion) and a list of
linked patients assigned to them. The clinician then
has the option to complete deficient charts or retrieve patient
information via searching or by clicking on the
linked patients within their inbox. This access may
occur from any workstation within the facility, the
physicians office, or some other remote site. With proper
security, the user is able to view, print and fax patient
information.
Release
of Information Workflow
The release workflow module fulfills internal and external
requests for patient information and allows for automatic
invoicing capability. It also provides the ability to
electronically search for, print, mail or fax information to
third parties that request copies of patient records.
Coding
Workflow
Due to an acute shortage of available coding personnel, there
currently exists a great demand for solutions to attract and
retain qualified coders and to make the coding process more
efficient. The Coding Workflow module provides workflow
automation of the coding and abstracting process by allowing
hospital personnel to electronically access documents to be
coded and abstracted from remote locations, including the
employees home. It may also be integrated with third-party
encoding or abstracting software, avoiding redundant data entry.
Chart
Tracking Workflow
Chart Tracking Workflow provides the ability to manage requests
for and track the physical location of paper records. This
workflow also allows the user to define the retention and
destruction of these paper records.
PATIENT
FINANCIAL SERVICES SUITE
The PFS Suite includes accessANYware Non Patient
Folders, and a choice of three among the following workflows:
Referral Order Workflow, Pre-Operative Workflow, Financial
Screening Workflow and Cash Management Workflow, and
administrative workflows.
accessANYware
Patient Financial Services (PFS)
accessANYware PFS is a web-based application that
allows any department of a healthcare organization the ability
to store, retrieve and process document-centric information
using a site-defined electronic folder hierarchy with a
user-friendly interface. accessANYware PFS provides
document management and workflow capabilities for a hospital
organizations enterprise-wide departmental needs, such as
Patient Financial Services, Business Office, Human Resources,
Materials Management, and virtually any other department that
has document intensive storage, retrieval and processing needs.
Cash
Management Workflow
Cash Management Workflow focuses on improving and enhancing the
cash posting, including the researching and follow up functions
within the business office for received non-standard paper
remittances. By scanning the documents into the workflow, the
manual posting is done from the image, allowing the page to be
captured and stored to the account level in the clients
accounting system.
15
Referral
Order Workflow
Referral Order Workflow ensures automated capture routing and
tracking of faxed orders from physicians offices into
client scheduling and pre-registration areas that allow
increasing volumes without adding additional staff. This saves
time spent processing paper faxes.
Financial
Screening Workflow
Financial Screening Workflow manages the rising number of
self-pay accounts that healthcare providers are experiencing by
forwarding the financial documents at the time of receipt to
insurance specialists to expedite charity care program analysis.
Pre-Operative
Workflow
Pre-Operative Workflow manages patient documents and reduces
cancelled/rescheduled surgeries by proactively providing
required document sets for the scheduled surgery facilitating
those that are missing.
RAC
Audit Workflow
RAC Audit Workflow collects, manages and allows for tracking and
release of pertinent patient documents to facilitate mitigation
of the federally mandated RAC audit program of identifying and
correcting improper Medicare payments.
Enterprise
Suite
The Enterprise Suite is a full offering of Streamline Health
solutions including the HIM Suite, the PFS Suite, and the
Streamline Health Integration Tools
(STRM-ITTM).
The
Streamline Health Integration Tools
(STRM-ITTM)
STRM-IT supports powerful image-enabling and workflow technology
that allows healthcare users to immediately and simultaneously
access any patient information, including multimedia and
paper-based information, through their existing third-party
clinical or billing applications. STRM-IT also supports direct,
secure access to the entire patient chart and physician inbox
via integration. As a result, any application across the entire
enterprise can be image-enabled, including the host Healthcare
Information Systems, Patient Billing Systems, Clinical Data
Repositories and others. When the Clinical Data Repository is
image-enabled, users can access any piece of information on the
same workstation and from the same screen display, including the
point of patient care. This means users can view traditional
electronic data and images simultaneously on the same screen
without signing in and out of multiple applications.
ASPeN...Application
Service Provider eHealth Network
Streamline Healths SaaS-based hosting services offers
healthcare organizations an ever increasing, cost-effective
solution to manage its information. Through the use of the
Internet and private line telecommunications, Streamline Health
provides its healthcare customers with fast and secure access to
its data stored at Streamline Healths hosting center, for
a monthly , quarterly or annual subscription fee. The hosted
pricing model helps its healthcare customers to overcome the
barriers of high capital and
start-up
costs as well as the technological burdens of implementing and
managing a document workflow system.
Professional
Services
Streamline Health provides a full complement of professional
services to implement its software applications. Streamline
Health believes that high quality consulting and professional
implementation services are important to attracting new
customers and maintaining existing customer satisfaction. These
services include implementation and training, project
management, business process re-engineering, and custom software
development. The implementation and training services include
equipment and software installation, system integration and
comprehensive training. The project management services include
needs and cost/benefit analysis, hardware and
16
software configuration and business process re-engineering. The
custom software development services include interface, workflow
and report development.
Business
Process Management Services (BPM)
In 2009, Streamline Health plans to launch its Business Process
Management Services (BPM) group, which is a dedicated consulting
department focused on delivering custom application solutions
for our existing installed base of customers. BPM services
include custom workflow development, business process
management, strategic planning, and custom reporting, among
other consulting services. These new services will complement
our existing professional services, which focus primarily on
installation of our standard off-the-shelf software solutions.
Research
and Development
Streamline Health continues to focus its research and
development efforts to develop new application software and
increase the functionality of existing applications. Customer
requirements and desires significantly influence Streamline
Healths research and development efforts.
Product research and development expense was $2,264,332,
$3,132,809, and $2,716,163 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
In addition, Streamline Health also capitalized approximately
$3,680,000, $2,652,000, and $2,130,000 of software development
expenditures in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Existing
Customers
Streamline Healths customers include healthcare providers
located throughout the United States. Streamline Health has
implemented or is in the process of implementing one or more of
its systems in the following representative list of healthcare
institutions:
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY
Childrens Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, TX
Christiana Care Health Services, New Castle, DE
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN
ProMedica Health Systems, Toledo, OH
Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL
Texas Health Resources, Inc., Arlington, TX
ASPeN Application-hosting Customers include:
Nationwide Childrens Hospital, Columbus, OH
Health Alliance of Greater Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
T.J. Samson Community Hospital, Glasgow, KY
Messena Memorial Hospital
Marion General Medical Center
University of California, School of Medicine,
San Francisco, CA
Pattie A. Clay Regional Medical Center, Richmond, KY
RevenueMed, Inc., Alpharetta, GA
GE Healthcare has also sublicensed Streamline Healths
suite of solutions or its SaaS-based hosting services to
fourteen healthcare organizations.
In fiscal year 2008, GE Healthcare, Childrens Medical
Center of Dallas, and Health Alliance of Greater Cincinnati,
accounted for 37%, 13% and 7%, respectively, of Streamline
Healths total revenues.
In fiscal year 2007, GE Healthcare, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
and Texas Health Resources, Inc., accounted for 38%, 12% and 7%,
respectively, of Streamline Healths total revenues.
17
In fiscal year 2006, GE Healthcare, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
and Texas Health Resources, Inc., accounted for 28%, 11% and 8%,
respectively, of Streamline Healths total revenues.
The small number of customers, the dependence on remarketing
partner GE Healthcare, and extended sales cycles has contributed
to variability in quarterly and annual operating results.
Streamline Health expects that as its customer base continues to
increase and sales through its Remarketing Agreements increase,
the actions of any one customer will have less of an effect on
its quarterly and annual operating results. The loss of a major
customer or the remarketing partner GE Healthcare could have a
material adverse effect on Streamline Health.
Signed
Agreements Backlog
See also ITEM 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Backlog, for an explanation of the current year backlog compared
with the prior year backlog.
Streamline Health enters into master agreements with its
customers to specify the scope of the system to be installed
and/or
services to be provided by Streamline Health, the agreed upon
aggregate price and the timetable for implementation. The master
agreement typically provides that Streamline Health will deliver
the system in phases, thereby allowing the customer flexibility
in the timing of its receipt of systems and to make adjustments
that may arise based upon changes in technology or changes in
customer needs. The master agreement also allows the customer to
request additional components as the installation progresses,
which additions are then separately negotiated as to price and
terms. Historically, customers have ultimately purchased systems
and services in addition to those originally contemplated by the
master agreement, although there can be no assurance that this
trend will continue in the future.
At January 31, 2009, Streamline Health has master
agreements and purchase orders from remarketing partners for
systems and related services (excluding support and maintenance,
and transaction-based revenues for the application-hosting
services) that have not been delivered, and or installed which,
if fully performed, will generate future revenues of
approximately $6,792,000. The related solutions and services are
expected to be delivered over the next two to three years.
Furthermore, Streamline Health has entered into
application-hosting agreements, which are expected to generate
revenues in excess of $13,042,000 through their respective
renewal dates in fiscal years 2009 through 2013.
Streamline Healths master agreements also generally
provide for a limited initial maintenance period and require the
customer to subscribe for maintenance and support services on a
monthly, quarterly, or annual basis. Maintenance and support
revenues for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006 were
approximately $7,331,000, $6,861,000, and $5,711,000,
respectively. Maintenance and support revenues are expected to
increase in the future. At January 31, 2009, Streamline
Health had Maintenance Agreements and purchase orders from
remarketing partners for maintenance, which if fully performed,
will generate future revenues of approximately $6,578,000,
through their respective renewal dates in fiscal year
2009-2011.
The commencement of revenue recognition varies depending on the
size and complexity of the system, the implementation schedule
requested by the customer and usage by customers of the
application-hosting services. Therefore, Streamline Health is
unable to accurately predict the revenue it expects to achieve
in any particular period. Streamline Healths master
agreements generally provide that the customer may terminate its
agreement upon a material breach by Streamline Health, or may
delay certain aspects of the installation. There can be no
assurance that a customer will not cancel all or any portion of
a master agreement or delay installations. A termination or
installation delay of one or more phases of an agreement, or the
failure of Streamline Health to procure additional agreements,
could have a material adverse effect on Streamline Healths
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Royalties
and license fees
Streamline Health incorporates software licensed from various
vendors into its proprietary software. In addition, third-party,
stand-alone software is required to operate Streamline
Healths proprietary software. Streamline Health licenses
these software products, and pays the required royalties
and/or
license fees when such software is delivered to Streamline
Healths customers.
18
Employees
As of January 31, 2009, Streamline Health had
88 full-time employees, a decrease of 23 during the fiscal
year as a result of a company-wide reorganization plan put in
place in the third quarter of 2008 in an effort to reduce costs
and improve cash flow to align with its emphasis on the
SaaS-based hosting model. In addition, Streamline Health
utilizes independent contractors to supplement its staff, as
needed. None of Streamline Healths employees are
represented by a labor union or subject to a collective
bargaining agreement. Streamline Health has never experienced a
work stoppage and believes that its employee relations are good.
Information
Copies of documents filed by Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
etc., and all amendments to those reports, if any, can be found
at the web site www.streamlinehealth.net as soon as
practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or
furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies can
be downloaded free of charge from the Streamline Health web site
or directly from the Securities and Exchange Commission web
site,
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/srch-edgar.
Also, copies of Streamline Healths annual report on
Form 10-K
will be made available, free of charge, upon written request to
the Company.
See also, PART I, ITEM 1, BUSINESS.
The following is a list of risk factors that affect the Company.
They are not listed in any particular order or relative
importance and no inferences should be given to the listing
order. In addition, risks and uncertainties not currently known
to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company, its
financial condition
and/or
operating results.
The
variability of the Companys quarterly operating results
can be
significant.
The Companys operating results have fluctuated from
quarter to quarter in the past, and the Company expects
continued fluctuations in the future. Future revenues and
operating results may vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter
as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside
the control of the Company. These factors include: the
relatively large size of customer agreements; unpredictability
in the number and timing of system sales and sales of
applications hosting services; length of the sales cycle; delays
in installations; changes in customers financial condition
or budgets; increased competition; the development and
introduction of new products and services; the loss of
significant customers or remarketing partners; changes in
government regulations, particularly as to the healthcare
industry; the size and growth of the overall healthcare
information technology markets; any liability and other claims
that may be asserted against the Company; the Companys
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; national and
local general economic and market conditions; and other factors
referenced or incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K
and any other filings by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The
Companys sales have been concentrated in a small number of
customers.
The Companys revenues have been concentrated in a
relatively small number of large customers, and the Company has
historically derived a substantial percentage of its total
revenues from a few customers. There can be no assurance that a
customer will not cancel all or any portion of a master
agreement or delay installations. A termination or installation
delay of one or more phases of an agreement, or the failure of
Streamline Health to procure additional agreements, could have a
material adverse effect on Streamline Healths business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
19
Sales
to the Companys largest application hosting client ceased
at the end of July
2008.
The Companys largest application hosting client did not
renew its hosting agreement at the end of July 2008, which
resulted in lower application hosting services revenues for the
Companys 2008 fiscal year. Although this client had
renewed its hosting agreement with the Company several times
over the previous five and a half year period, this client built
its own locally-installed solution. If the Company is unable to
replace the revenue stream from this client, which had been
approximately $1.76 million annually, the termination of
this agreement will have a material adverse effect on the
Company. Although the Company signed eight new additional
application hosting services agreements in 2008, which revenues
have not yet fully come on-line, those new contracts are
expected to generate revenues estimated to be approximately only
85% of the revenues attributable to the loss of this single
large customer. The Company needs to continue to expand its
customer base to minimize the effects of the loss of any single
customer in the future.
In
addition to direct sales, the Company relies on third party
remarketing alliances for a substantial portion of its
revenues.
The Company seeks to expand its distribution channels by
creating remarketing alliances with third parties who are
engaged in the sale of healthcare information systems, medical
records management and outsourcing, and other healthcare
information technology and patient care solutions. GE
Healthcare, the Companys major remarketing partner, could
choose to discontinue reselling Streamline Health products, and
significant customers could elect to discontinue using the
Companys products. The Company needs to ensure that it
expands its distribution channels to reduce the reliance on a
single major reseller.
The
Company could be less profitable than
expected.
Because of the relatively fixed operating expenses and overhead,
the future profitability of the Company is dependent on
increasing revenues which may not materialize as anticipated.
Because of the Companys anticipated shift in strategic
focus towards remote application hosting services (Software as a
Service (SaaS)), upon obtaining new application hosting
customers, the Company will have to expend a significant amount
of costs and time before those new customers are able to begin
using such services and the Company cannot begin to recognize
revenues from those clients until the commencement of such
services. Accordingly, the Company anticipates that its near
term cash flow, revenue and profitability may be adversely
affected by this shift in strategic focus until new hosting
customers go into production. While the Company anticipates long
term growth through increases in recurring subscription fees and
significantly improved profit visibility, the Companys
failure to successfully implement its focus on building its
application hosting services business, or the failure of such
initiative to result in improved profitability, could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity,
financial position and results of operations.
The
Company needs to manage its costs while planning for
growth.
The Company is currently experiencing a period of growth
primarily through its remote application hosting line of
business and this could continue to place a significant strain
on the Companys cash flow. This could also strain the
services and support operations, sales and administrative
personnel and other resources as they are requested to handle
the added work load with existing support resources. Streamline
Health believes that it must continue to focus on these remote
hosting services, develop new products, enhance existing
solutions and serve the needs of its existing and anticipated
customer base. The Companys ability to successfully
maintain and expand its operations will depend, in large part,
upon its ability to attract and retain highly qualified
employees. The Companys ability to manage its planned
growth effectively also will require the Company to continue to
improve its operational, management, and financial systems and
controls, to train, motivate, and manage its employees and to
judiciously manage its operating expenses in anticipation of
increased future revenues.
20
The
potential impact on the Company of new or changes in existing
federal, state, and local regulations governing healthcare
information could be
substantial.
Healthcare regulations issued to date have not had a material
adverse affect on the Companys business. However, the
Company cannot predict the potential impact of new or revised
regulations that have not yet been released or made final, or
any other regulations that might be adopted. Congress may adopt
legislation that may change, override, conflict with, or preempt
the currently existing regulations and which could restrict the
ability of customers to obtain, use, or disseminate patient
health information. Streamline Health believes that the features
and architecture of its existing solutions are such that it
currently supports or should be able to make the necessary
modifications to its products, if required, to ensure support of
HIPAA regulations, and other legislation or regulations, but
there can be no assurances.
While
new laws and regulations may increase the demand for healthcare
information technology, including the solutions offered by the
Company, such laws and regulations may have adverse consequences
on the
Company.
Legislation governing the dissemination of patient health
information is also from time-to-time proposed and debated at
the federal and state level including, but not limited to, the
healthcare initiatives set forth in The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Stimulus Bill) signed
into law by President Obama on February 17, 2009.
Notwithstanding that the Stimulus Bill places substantial
emphasis on the modernization of the U.S. healthcare system
by using healthcare information technology, with a primary focus
on electronic medical records, the Companys ability to
benefit from such initiatives is uncertain at this time. The
implementation of the provisions in the Stimulus Bill may create
new requirements for healthcare information technology that
would require the Company to incur additional research and
development expenditures to modify or expand its solutions in
order to be fully compliant. In addition, until it becomes more
clear how the government will apply its anticipated substantial
funding of these healthcare initiatives, hospitals and other
healthcare providers may delay purchases of new solutions until
additional details become known. In such event, the Company may
experience delays in entering into new agreements with existing
customers and potential new customers. The substantial sums of
money contemplated by the Stimulus Bill to be spent on
healthcare information technology further may increase
competition by attracting new and financially stronger entities
to this industry.
Streamline
Health faces significant competition, including from companies
with significantly greater
resources.
The Company currently competes with many other companies for the
licensing of similar software solutions and related services.
Several companies historically have dominated the clinical
information systems software market and several of these
companies have either acquired, developed or are developing
their own document management and workflow technologies. The
industry is undergoing consolidation and realignment as
companies position themselves to compete more effectively. Many
of these companies are larger than Streamline Health and have
significantly more resources to invest in their business. In
addition, information and document management companies serving
other industries may enter the market. Suppliers and companies
with whom Streamline Health may establish strategic alliances
may also compete with Streamline Health. Such companies and
vendors may either individually, or by forming alliances
excluding Streamline Health, place bids for large agreements in
competition with Streamline Health. A decision on the part of
any of these competitors to focus additional resources in the
image-enabling, workflow, and other markets addressed by
Streamline Health could have a material adverse effect on
Streamline Health.
The
healthcare industry is evolving rapidly, which may make it more
difficult for the Company to be competitive in the
future.
The U.S. healthcare system is under intense pressure to
improve in many areas, including modernization, universal access
and controlling skyrocketing costs of care. Streamline Health
believes that the principal competitive factors in its market
are customer recommendations and references, company reputation,
system reliability, system features and functionality (including
ease of use), technological advancements, customer service and
support, breadth and quality of the systems, the potential for
enhancements and future compatible products, the
21
effectiveness of marketing and sales efforts, price and the size
and perceived financial stability of the vendor. In addition,
the Company believes that the speed with which companies in its
market can anticipate the evolving healthcare industry structure
and identify unmet needs are important competitive factors.
There can be no assurance that Streamline Health will be able to
keep pace with changing conditions and new developments such
that it will be able to compete successfully in the future
against existing or potential competitors.
Rapid
technology changes and short product life cycles could harm
Streamline Healths
business.
The market for Streamline Healths solutions and services
is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, regulatory
requirements, evolving industry standards and new product
introductions and enhancements that may render existing
solutions obsolete or less competitive. As a result, Streamline
Healths position in the healthcare information technology
market could change rapidly due to unforeseen changes in the
features and functions of competing products, as well as the
pricing models for such products. Streamline Healths
future success will depend, in part, upon Streamline
Healths ability to enhance its existing solutions and
services and to develop and introduce new solutions and services
to meet changing requirements. The Company needs to maintain an
ongoing research and development program to continue to develop
new solutions and apply new technologies to its existing
products, but may not have sufficient funds with which to
undertake such required research and development. If the Company
is not able to foresee changes
and/or to
react in a timely manner to such developments, the Company may
experience a material, adverse impact on its business, operating
results, and financial condition.
Streamline
Healths intellectual property rights are valuable, and any
inability to protect them could reduce the value of Streamline
Healths solutions and
services.
The Company trademarks and copyrights its intellectual property,
which represents an important asset to the Company. Streamline
Health does not have any patent protection on any of its
software. The Company relies upon license agreements, employment
agreements, confidentiality, nondisclosure agreements, etc. to
maintain the confidentiality of Streamline Healths
proprietary information and trade secrets. Notwithstanding these
precautions, others may copy, reverse engineer or design
independently, technology similar to Streamline Healths
products. If the Company fails to adequately protect the
intellectual property through trademarks and copyrights, license
agreements, employment agreements, confidentiality,
nondisclosure agreements, etc., the intellectual property rights
may be misappropriated by others, invalidated, or challenged,
and our competitors could duplicate the Companys
technology or may otherwise limit any competitive technology
advantage the Company may have. It may be necessary to litigate
to enforce or defend Streamline Healths proprietary
technology or to determine the validity of the intellectual
property rights of others. Any litigation, could be successful
or unsuccessful, may result in substantial cost and require
significant attention by management and technical personnel.
Due to the rapid pace of technology change, the Company believes
its future success is likely to depend upon continued
innovation, technical expertise, marketing skills and customer
support and services rather than on legal protection of our
property rights. However, the Company has in the past, and
intends in the future, to aggressively assert its intellectual
property rights when necessary.
The
Company could be subjected to claims of intellectual property
infringement, which claims could be expensive to
defend.
While the Company does not believe that its products and
services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third
parties, the potential for intellectual property infringement
claims continually increases as the number of software patents
and copyrighted and trademarked materials continues to rapidly
expand. Any claim for intellectual property right infringement,
even if not meritorious, would be expensive to defend. If the
Company were to become liable for infringing third party
intellectual property rights, the Company could be liable for
substantial damage awards, and potentially be required to cease
using the technology, to produce non-infringing technology, or
to obtain a license to use such technology. Such potential
liabilities or increased costs could be materially adverse to
the Company.
22
The Companys customers must comply with extensive
regulations relating to confidentiality and, accordingly, the
Companys solutions must be able to assist its customers in
complying with such
regulations.
Federal and state laws regulate the confidentiality of patient
records and the circumstances under which such records may be
released. Regulations governing electronic health data privacy
are continuing to evolve. The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, enacted August 22,
1996, is designed to improve the efficiency of healthcare by
standardizing the interchange of specified electronic data, and
to protect the security and confidentiality of protected health
information. HIPAA requires that covered entities comply with
national standards for certain types of electronic health
information transactions and the data elements used in such
transactions, and adopt policies and practices to ensure the
integrity and confidentiality of PHI.
Streamline Health cannot predict the potential impact of new or
revised regulations that have not yet been released or made
final, or any other regulations that might be adopted.
Streamline Health believes that the features and architecture of
Streamline Healths solutions are such that it currently
supports or should be able to make the necessary modifications
to its products, if required, to ensure support of the HIPAA
regulations, and other legislation or regulations. However, if
the regulations are unduly restrictive, this could cause delays
in the delivery of new versions of solutions and adversely
affect the licensing of Streamline Healths solutions.
However, there can be no assurance that an increase in the
purchase of new systems or additional use of Streamline Health
software and services will occur.
Third
party products are essential to Streamline Healths
software.
Streamline Health software incorporates software licensed from
various vendors into its proprietary software. In addition,
third-party, stand-alone software is required to operate some of
the Companys proprietary software modules. The loss of the
ability to use these third party products, or ability to obtain
substitute third party software at comparable prices, could have
a material adverse affect on the ability to license Streamline
Health software.
Streamline
Healths solutions may not be error free and could result
in claims of breach of contract and
liabilities.
Streamline Healths solutions are very complex and may not
be error free, especially when first released. Although the
Company performs extensive testing, failure of any product to
operate in accordance with its specifications and documentation
could constitute a breach of the license agreement and require
Streamline Health to correct the deficiency. If such deficiency
is not corrected within the agreed upon contractual limitations
on liability and cannot be corrected in a timely manner, it
could constitute a material breach of a contract allowing the
termination thereof and possibly subjecting the Company to
liability. Also, Streamline Health sometimes indemnifies its
customers against third-party infringement claims. If such
claims are made, even if they are without merit, they could be
expensive to defend. Streamline Healths license agreement
generally limits the Companys liability arising from
claims such as described in the foregoing sentences, but such
limits may not be enforceable in some jurisdictions or under
some circumstances. A significant uninsured or under-insured
judgment against the Company could have a material adverse
impact on the Company.
The
Company could be liable to third parties from the use of the
Companys
solutions.
The Companys solutions provide access to patient
information used by physicians and other medical personnel in
providing medical care. The medical care provided by physicians
and other medical personnel are subject to numerous medical
malpractice and other claims. The Company attempts to limit any
potential liability of the Company to customers by limiting the
warranties on its solutions in the Companys agreements
with the Companys customer, the healthcare provider.
However, such agreements do not protect the Company from third
party claims by patients who may seek damages from any or all
persons or entities connected to the process of delivering
patient care. The Company maintains insurance, which provides
limited protection from such claims, if such claims against the
Company would result in liability to the Company. Although no
such claims have been brought against the Company to date
regarding injuries related to the use of our solutions, such
claims may be made
23
in the future. A significant uninsured or under-insured judgment
against the Company could have a material adverse impact on the
Company.
The
Companys remote application hosting services and support
services could experience
interruptions.
The Company provides remote hosting services for many clients,
including the storage of critical patient, financial and
administrative data. In addition, it provides support services
to clients through the client support facility. The Company has
redundancies, such as backup generators, redundant
telecommunications lines, and backup facilities built into its
operations to prevent disruptions. However, complete failure of
all generators or impairment of all telecommunications lines or
severe casualty damage to the primary building or equipment
inside the primary building housing our hosting center or client
support facilities could cause a temporary disruption in
operations and adversely affect clients who depend on the
application hosting services. Any interruption in operations at
its data center or client support facility could cause the
Company to lose existing clients, impede our ability to obtain
new clients, result in revenue loss, cause potential liability
to our clients, and increase our operating costs.
The
loss of key personnel could adversely affect Streamline
Healths
business.
Streamline Healths success depends, to a significant
degree, on its management, sales force and technical personnel.
The Company must recruit, motivate, and retain highly skilled
managers, sales, consulting and technical personnel, including
application programmers, database specialists, consultants, and
system architects who have the requisite expertise in the
technical environments in which our solutions operate.
Competition for such technical expertise is intense. The
Companys failure to attract and retain qualified personnel
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The
Company may not have access to sufficient capital to be
competitive in its
markets.
Streamline Health may need additional capital in the form of
loans or equity in order to operate and to be competitive. The
Company may be limited to the availability of such capital or
may not have any availability, in which case the Companys
future prospects may be materially impaired.
The Company must maintain compliance with the terms of its
existing credit facilities. The failure to do so could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys ability to finance
its ongoing operations and the Company may not be able to find
an alternative lending source if a default would
occur.
On January 6, 2009, the Company entered into a revised
revolving credit facility with its existing lender. Upon doing
so, the Company was able to negotiate modified terms in order to
cure the Companys previous non-compliance with the minimum
tangible net worth requirement, which non-compliance had been
previously waived. There can be no assurances that the Company
will be able to maintain compliance with all of the covenants
and other terms and conditions of this credit facility on an
ongoing basis. If not, the Company could be required to pay back
the amounts borrowed on an accelerated basis, which could
subject the Company to decreased liquidity and other negative
impacts on the Companys business, results of operations
and financial condition. Furthermore, if the Company would need
to find an alternative lending source, the Company may have
difficulty in doing so, particularly in the current credit
environment which is not favorable to borrowers. Without a
sufficient credit facility, the Company would be adversely
affected by a lack of access to liquidity needed to operate the
Companys business. Any disruption in access to credit
could force the Company to take measures to conserve cash, such
as deferring important research and development expenses, which
measures could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
24
If
the national and global financial crisis intensifies, potential
disruptions in the credit markets may adversely affect our
business, including the availability and cost of short-term
funds for liquidity requirements and our ability to meet
long-term commitments, which could adversely affect our results
of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
If internal funds are not available from operations, the Company
may be required to rely on the banking and credit markets to
meet its financial commitments and short-term liquidity needs.
The Companys access to funds under its revolving credit
facility or pursuant to arrangements with other financial
institutions is dependent on the ability of the financial
institutions ability to meet funding commitments.
Financial institutions may not be able to meet their funding
commitments if they experience shortages of capital and
liquidity or if they experience high volumes of borrowing
requests from other borrowers within a short period of time.
The
current financial crisis in the United States and globally may
have significant effects on the Companys customers and
suppliers that would result in material adverse effects on the
Companys business, operating results and stock
price.
The current financial crisis in the United States and globally
and the concern that the worldwide economy may enter into a
prolonged recessionary period may materially adversely affect
the Companys customers access to capital or
willingness to spend capital on the Companys products and
services
and/or their
levels of cash liquidity in with which or willingness to pay for
products that they will order or have already ordered from the
Company. Continuing adverse economic conditions would also
likely negatively impact the Companys business, which
could result in: (1) reduced demand for the Companys
products and services; (2) increased price competition for
the Companys products and services; (3) increased
risk of collectability of cash from the Companys
customers; (4) increased risk in potential reserves for
doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable;
(5) reduced revenues; and (6) higher operating costs
as a percentage of revenues.
All of the foregoing potential consequences of the current
financial crisis are difficult to forecast and mitigate. As a
consequence, the Companys operating results for a
particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore,
prior results are not necessarily indicative of future results
to be expected in future periods. Any of the foregoing effects
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, results of operations and financial condition and
could adversely affect the Companys stock price.
The
market price of the Companys common stock is likely to be
highly volatile as the stock market in general can be highly
volatile.
The public trading of the Companys common stock is based
on many factors, which could cause fluctuation in the price of
the Companys common stock. These factors may include,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
General economic and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
Lack of research coverage by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
Conditions or trends in the healthcare information technology
industry;
|
|
|
|
Changes in the market valuations of other companies in the
Companys industry;
|
|
|
|
Announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, divestitures, joint
ventures or other strategic initiatives;
|
|
|
|
Capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
Additional or departures of key personnel; and
|
|
|
|
Sales and repurchases of the Companys common stock.
|
Many of these factors are beyond the Companys control.
These factors may cause the market price of the Companys
common stock to decline, regardless of the Companys
operating performance.
25
The
preparation of the Companys financial statements requires
the use of estimates that may vary from actual
results.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make significant
estimates that affect the financial statements. One of the
Companys most critical estimates is the capitalization of
software development costs. Due to the inherent nature of these
estimates, the Company cannot provide absolute assurance that it
will not significantly increase or decrease such estimates upon
determination of the actual results. Any required adjustments
could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its
results of operations, and could result in the restatement of
the Companys prior period financial statements.
Changes
in accounting standards could impact the Companys reported
earnings and financial
condition.
The accounting standard setters, including the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and other regulatory bodies, periodically
change the financial accounting and reporting standards that
govern the preparation of the Companys consolidated
financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and
can materially impact how the Company records and reports its
financial condition and results of operations. In some cases,
the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard
retroactively, which could result in the restatement of the
Companys prior period financial statements.
Failure
to improve and maintain the quality of internal controls over
financial reporting could materially and adversely affect the
Companys ability to provide timely and accurate financial
information about the
Company.
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements
for the Companys third fiscal quarter ended
October 31, 2008, Management identified a deficiency in the
internal controls over financial reporting relating to the
capitalization of software development costs for the
Companys second fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008.
While such deficiency did not rise to the level of a
material weakness or significant
deficiency, an adjustment of approximately $362,000 was
made in the third quarter to capitalize certain software
development expenses that had been expensed in the second
quarter. Management cannot be certain that other deficiencies
will not arise in the future or be identified or that the
Company will be able to correct and maintain adequate controls
over financial processes and reporting in the future. Any
failure to maintain adequate controls or to adequately implement
required new or improved controls could harm operating results
or cause failure to meet reporting obligations in a timely and
accurate manner.
These
risks are not
exhaustive.
Other sections of this
Form 10-K
may include additional factors which could adversely impact the
Companys business and financial performance. Moreover, the
Company operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing
environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is
not possible for the Companys management to predict all
risk factors, nor can the Company assess the impact of all
factors on the Companys business or the extent to which
any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results
to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as
a prediction of actual results.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
staff Comments
|
None
Streamline Healths principal offices are located at 10200
Alliance Road, Suite 200, Cincinnati, OH
45242-4716.
The offices consist of approximately 21,700 square feet of
space under a lease that expires in July 2010. In addition,
Streamline Health leases dedicated collocation high security
data center space in the Cincinnati,
26
OH area, for its SaaS-based hosting services, hosting center
operations, which lease expires in June 2009, but has automatic
renewal provisions. The current rental expense for all of these
facilities approximates $421,000 annually.
Streamline Health believes that its facilities are adequate for
its current needs and that suitable alternative space is
available to accommodate expansion of Streamline Healths
operations.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Streamline Health is, from time to time, a party to various
legal proceedings and claims, which arise, in the ordinary
course of business. Streamline Health is not aware of any legal
matters that will have a material adverse effect on Streamline
Healths consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The names, ages, and positions held by the Executive Officers of
Streamline Health on April 2, 2009 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Appointed as
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(1)
|
|
Executive Officer(2)
|
|
J. Brian Patsy
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director
|
|
|
1989
|
|
Gary M. Winzenread
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Product Development and Strategy
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Joseph O. Brown, II
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President Consulting Services and Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
B. Scott Boyden, Jr.
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Donald E. Vick, Jr.
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Controller, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim Treasurer
and Interim Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All current officers of Streamline Health hold office until
their successors are elected and qualified or until any removal
or resignation. Officers of Streamline Health are elected by the
Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. For
purposes of the descriptions of the background of Streamline
Healths Executive Officers, the term Company
refers to both Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. and its
predecessors LanVision Systems, Inc. and LanVision, Inc. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents date of appointment to Registrant or its predecessor. |
J. Brian Patsy is a founder of the Company and has served
as the President and a Director since Streamline Healths
inception in October 1989. Mr. Patsy was appointed Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in March 1996. Prior to
founding Streamline Health, Mr. Patsy served in various
executive, management and engineering capacities with Wang
Laboratories, AT&T, Ameritch, the Ohio Bell Telephone
Company and the National Security Agency. Mr. Patsy has
over 35 years of experience in the information technology
industry. Mr. Patsy received a Masters of Business
Administration from Kent State University with a major in
Finance and Economics in 1976, and a Bachelor of Science Degree
in Electrical Engineering from the University of Akron in 1973.
Gary M. Winzenread joined the Company in 2007 as the Director of
Product Strategy and shortly thereafter assumed responsibility
for Product Development as well. Mr. Winzenread was a
consultant to Streamline Health in 2007, and prior to that spent
8 years as the President and CEO of Praxis Solutions, the
software development consultancy he founded in 1998. As CEO of
Praxis, he led the company through many years of growth over 50%
per
27
annum to a 40 person consultancy he successfully sold in
2004 to Number Six Software of McLean, VA, with whom he stayed
in executive capacities through 2006.
Joseph O. Brown, II joined the Company in 1991 as Director
of Information Technology. In 1998 Mr. Brown assumed
responsibility for the formation and operation of the
Application Hosting Operations known as ASPeN. In 2000 he was
appointed Chief Information Officer, and in 2007 was elected a
Vice President with responsibility for ASPeN, as well as
assuming responsibility for Product Support and Client
Professional Services. In early 2009, Mr. Brown assumed the
title of Vice President Consulting Services and Chief
Information Officer. Prior to joining Streamline Health,
Mr. Brown served with the U.S. Marine Corp as a Data
Systems Officer. Mr. Brown has over 20 years of
experience in the information technology industry.
B. Scott Boyden, Jr. joined the Company in 2008 as
Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Boyden
has assumed all responsibilities for managing and directing the
sales and marketing activities of Streamline Health.
Mr. Boyden comes to Streamline Health with more than
20 years of senior-level sales, marketing and executive
management experience in the healthcare industry. He has built
and led winning sales teams at both regional and national levels
and has a prior background of top sales performance himself.
Most recently he served as the area vice president of sales for
Misys Healthcare Systems, where he enjoyed a successful
10 year career, and was recognized as a top sales leader
and performer contributing over $100 million of sales
revenue.
Donald E. Vick, Jr. joined the Company in 1997, as
Assistant Controller. In 2002, he was appointed Controller and
Assistant Treasurer. In 2005 he was also appointed Assistant
Secretary. In 2008, he was appointed Interim Chief Financial
Officer, Interim Treasurer, and Interim Corporate Secretary.
Prior to joining Streamline Health, Mr. Vick served as
Assistant Controller of Cincom Systems, Inc., an international
software development and marketing company. Mr. Vick is a
Certified Public Accountant.
There are no family relationships between any Director or
Executive Officer and any other Director or Executive Officer of
the Registrant.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
(a) The Companys Common Stock trades on the Capital
Market tier of The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol STRM.
The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices for
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. Common Stock for each of the
quarters in fiscal years 2008 and 2007, as reported by The
NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
4th Quarter (November 1, 2008 through January 31,
2009)
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
3rd Quarter (August 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
2nd Quarter (May 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
1st Quarter (February 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008)
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
4th Quarter (November 1, 2007 through January 31,
2008)
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
3rd Quarter (August 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007)
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
2nd Quarter (May 1, 2007 through July 31, 2007)
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
1st Quarter (February 1, 2007 through April 30, 2007)
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
The market price of the Common Stock could be subject to
significant fluctuations based on factors such as announcements
of new products or customers by Streamline Health or its
competitors, quarterly fluctuations in Streamline Healths
financial results or other competitors financial results,
changes in analysts estimates of Streamline Healths
financial performance, general conditions in the healthcare
information technology industry and conditions in the financial
markets. In addition, the stock market, in general, has
experienced price and volume
28
fluctuations which have particularly affected the market price
of high technology companies and which have been often unrelated
to the operating performance of a specific company. Many
technology companies, including Streamline Health, experience
significant fluctuations in the market price of their equity
securities. There can be no assurance that the market price of
the Common Stock will not decline, or otherwise continue to
experience significant fluctuations in the future.
(b) According to the stock transfer agent records,
Streamline Health had 136 stockholders of record as of
April 7, 2009. Because brokers and other institutions on
behalf of stockholders hold many of such shares, Streamline
Health is unable to determine with complete accuracy the current
total number of stockholders represented by these record
holders. Streamline Health estimates that it has approximately
2,600 stockholders, based on information provided by the
Companys stock transfer agent from their search of
individual participants in security position listings.
(c) Streamline Health has not paid any cash dividends on
its Common Stock since its inception and does not intend to pay
any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
29
MARKET
PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY
AND RELATED STOCK MATERS
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return
on Common Stock with the cumulative total return on the NASDAQ
U.S. Total Return Index and on the NASDAQ Computer and Data
Processing Services Stock Index for the period commencing
January 31, 2004 and ending January 31, 2009, assuming
an investment of $100 and the reinvestment of any dividends.
The comparison in the graph below is based upon historical data
and is not indicative of, nor intended to forecast the future
performance of Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/31/041
|
|
1/31/051
|
|
1/31/061
|
|
1/31/071
|
|
1/31/081
|
|
1/31/091
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. Common Stock
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
99.68
|
|
|
$
|
227.27
|
|
|
$
|
183.12
|
|
|
$
|
86.04
|
|
|
$
|
57.14
|
|
NASDAQ U.S. Total Return Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
100.20
|
|
|
$
|
112.72
|
|
|
$
|
120.91
|
|
|
$
|
116.12
|
|
|
$
|
57.70
|
|
NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing Services Stock Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
103.24
|
|
|
$
|
115.73
|
|
|
$
|
128.48
|
|
|
$
|
134.57
|
|
|
$
|
84.11
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Assumes that $100.00 was invested on January 31, 2004 in
Common Stock at the closing price of $3.08 per share and at the
closing sales price of each index on that date and that all
dividends were reinvested. No dividends have been declared on
Common Stock. Stockholder returns over the indicated period
should not be considered indicative of future stockholder
returns. |
The information required above by Item 201(e) of
Regulation S-K
is not considered filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and should not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
30
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth consolidated financial data with
respect to Streamline Health for each of the five years in the
period ended January 31, 2009. The information set forth
below should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(1)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(2)
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
|
$
|
16,684
|
|
|
$
|
15,961
|
|
|
$
|
16,185
|
|
|
$
|
12,794
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
17,632
|
|
|
|
17,388
|
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
14,447
|
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
Operating profit (loss)(3)
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
Net earnings (loss)(3) &(4)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share of Common stock
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.28
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share of Common stock
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.27
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
Shares used in computing basic per share data
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
|
|
9,234
|
|
|
|
9,195
|
|
|
|
9,121
|
|
|
|
9,068
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted per share data
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
|
|
9,234
|
|
|
|
9,722
|
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
|
9,233
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of the year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
|
$
|
2,189
|
|
|
$
|
3,317
|
|
|
$
|
4,634
|
|
|
$
|
4,181
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
3,892
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
16,732
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
11,993
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
7,097
|
|
|
|
8,193
|
|
|
|
8,644
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year of
Streamline Health commencing February 1 of that calendar year
and ending on January 31 of the following year. |
|
(2) |
|
During fiscal 2008, the Company revised its historical financial
statements to reclassify revenue and costs related to certain
maintenance services. During a review of the accounting
treatment of its revenue recognition policies, the Company
determined that certain revisions to the accounting treatment of
its revenue recognition for royalty commissions paid to GE
Healthcare were necessary. The impact of the revision was an
increase in total Net Revenues and a corresponding increase in
Cost of Sales, see Note 1 to Consolidated Financial
Statements. The selected financial data presented above reflect
the revised amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Operating profit (loss) and net earnings (loss) includes a
$300,000, $100,000, $100,000, and $41,000 reduction in reserves
due to changes in estimates, in 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Net earnings in 2005 and 2004 include a tax benefit of $897,000
and $420,000, respectively, relating to the reduction in the
valuation allowances for the deferred tax assets relating to the
net operating loss carry forward based upon reasonable future
earnings before income tax projections. |
31
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
See also PART 1, ITEM 1, BUSINESS for general and
specific descriptions of Streamline Healths business.
See also PART 1, ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS for a general
description of factors that do or may affect Streamline
Healths business.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies (See also Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements)
Streamline Healths discussion and analysis of its
financial condition and results of operations are based upon its
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires Streamline Health to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities.
On an on-going basis, Streamline Health evaluates its estimates,
including those related to product revenues, bad debts,
capitalized software development costs, income taxes, warranty
obligations, support contracts, contingencies and litigation.
Streamline Health bases its estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that Streamline Health believes
are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities and revenue recognition. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Streamline Health believes the following critical accounting
policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Streamline Health records revenues for customer contracts,
including special payment agreements and royalties from
third-party resellers in accordance with Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by Statement of
Position
98-9,
SAB 104 Revenue Recognition and EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Revenue
is derived from: (i) the licensing and sale of systems,
either directly to end-users or through third-party resellers,
comprising internally developed software, third-party software
and hardware components; (ii) product support, maintenance
and professional services; and, (iii) hosting services that
provide high quality, transaction or subscriptions based
document management and workflow services from a central hosting
center. Generally, revenues from software license fees and
hardware sales to end-users are recognized when a master
agreement is signed and solutions are made available to
end-users. Revenues from agreements that contain
multiple-element arrangements are allocated to the various
elements based on the fair value of the elements. Revenues
related to routine installation and integration and project
management are deferred until the work is performed. Revenues
from consulting, education, and application-hosting services are
recognized as the services are performed. Revenues from
short-term support and maintenance agreements are recognized
ratably over the term of the agreements. Billings to customers
recorded prior to the recognition of revenue are classified as
deferred revenues. Revenues recognized prior to progress
billings to customers are recorded as contract receivables.
Under the terms of a Remarketing Agreement with GE Healthcare,
Streamline Health records this revenue when the solutions are
made available to end-users. Royalties are remitted to
Streamline Health based upon GE sublicensing Streamline
Healths software to its customers. Thirty percent of the
royalty is due 45 days following the end of the month in
which GE executes an end-user license agreement with its
customer. The remaining seventy percent of the royalty is due,
in varying amounts based on specific milestones, 45 days
following the end of the month in which a milestone occurs.
Each contract is reviewed quarterly with the appropriate
Streamline Health National Account Manager to determine the
appropriateness of the revenue recognition criteria applied to
the individual contracts based upon the most currently available
information as to the status of the contract, the customer
comments, if any, and the status of any open or unresolved
issues with the customer.
Bad
Debts
Accounts and contract receivables are comprised of amounts owed
Streamline Health for licensed software, professional services,
including maintenance services and application-hosting
activities. Contracts with individual
32
customers and resellers determine when receivables are due and
payable. In determining the allowance for doubtful accounts,
each unpaid receivable is reviewed quarterly with the
appropriate Streamline Health National Account Manager to
determine the payment status based upon the most currently
available information as to the status of the receivables, the
customer comments, if any, and the status of any open or
unresolved issues with the customer preventing the payment
thereof. Corrective action, if necessary, is taken by Streamline
Health to resolve open issues related to unpaid receivables.
During these quarterly reviews, Streamline Health determines the
required allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the unwillingness or inability of its customers
or resellers to make required payments. If the financial
condition of Streamline Healths customers or resellers
were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability
to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Streamline Healths customers typically have been
well-established hospitals, medical facilities, or major
Healthcare Information Systems companies that resell Streamline
Healths products, which have good credit histories, and
payments have been received within normal time frames for the
industry. However, some healthcare facilities have experienced
significant operating losses and limited cash resources as a
result of limits on third-party reimbursements from insurance
companies and governmental entities. Extended payment of
Streamline Health receivables is not uncommon from such
healthcare facilities.
Capitalized
Software Development Costs
Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or
Otherwise Marketed. Costs associated with the planning and
designing phase of software development, including coding and
testing activities necessary to establish technological
feasibility are classified as product research and development
and are expensed as incurred. Once technological feasibility has
been determined, a portion of the costs incurred in development,
including coding, testing, and product quality assurance, are
capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of
unamortized cost or net realizable value. Streamline Health
capitalized approximately $3,680,000, $2,652,000, and $2,130,000
in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Research and development expense, net of capitalized software
development expenditures, was $2,264,332, $3,132,809, and
$2,716,163 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Amortization is provided on a
product-by-product
basis over the estimated economic life of the software, not to
exceed three years, using the straight-line method. Amortization
commences immediately following when a product is available for
general release to customers. Unamortized capitalized costs
determined to be in excess of the net realizable value of a
product are expensed at the date of such determination.
Amortization expense was approximately $2,077,000 (including
$408,000 for impairment), $1,527,000, and $1,083,000 in 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively.
Streamline Health reviews, on an on-going basis, the carrying
value of its capitalized software development expenditures, net
of accumulated amortization. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company expensed approximately $408,000 for partial impairment
on a specific workflow product that had been under development
for the past few years. The development efforts on this product
are now temporarily on hold pending a new beta partner and final
completion. The capitalized costs relating to this product were
written down to its expected net realizable value based upon the
current future sales estimates. This impairment change is
reflected in the financial statements as capitalized software
amortization in the cost of system sales. This asset could be
further written down if future sales do not materialize as
expected.
Streamline Health believes that to replicate its existing
software would cost significantly more than the stated net book
value of $6,481,360 at January 31, 2009. Over the last
three years, Streamline Health has spent approximately
$16,575,000 in research and development, of which $8,462,000, or
51%, has been capitalized. Amortization of capitalized software
expenditures during the last three years has amounted to
approximately $4,687,000 (including $408,000 of impairment in
2008) or a net increase in capitalized software of
approximately $3,775,000 during the last three years. Many of
the programs related to capitalized software development
continue to have significant value to Streamline Healths
current solutions and those under development, as the concepts,
ideas, and software code are readily transferable and are
incorporated into new products.
33
Equity
Awards Stock-Based Compensation
The Company was required to adopt the revised standards of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires
the expensing of the fair value of the equity award effective
the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Future grants of equity
awards could have a material impact on reported expenses
depending upon the number, value and vesting period of future
awards.
Income
Taxes
In June, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No, 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income
Taxes (FIN 48), an interpretation of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes, to create a single model to address
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48
also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company
adopted FIN 48 as of February 1, 2007, as required. As
a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the changes to
the Companys reserve for uncertain tax positions was
accounted for as a $27,791 adjustment to increase the beginning
balance of retained earnings on the Companys balance
sheet. The Company believes that its income tax positions and
deductions will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate
adjustments that will result in a material change to its
financial position during the next twelve months. Therefore, no
reserves for uncertain tax positions have been recorded pursuant
to FIN 48 as of January 31, 2009.
The Company and its subsidiary are subject to U.S. Federal
income tax as well as income taxes in multiple state and local
jurisdictions. The Company has concluded all U.S. Federal
tax matters for years through January 31, 2006. All
material state and local income tax matters have been concluded
for years through January 31, 2004.
The net income tax expense was $11,700 in 2008, $11,400 in 2007,
and $31,180 in 2006. The net current deferred tax asset was
$247,000 and the non-current deferred tax asset was $1,628,000
at January 31, 2009, the net current deferred tax asset was
$185,000 and the non-current deferred tax asset was $1,690,000
at January 31, 2008. A key assumption in the determination
of the recognized tax benefit or (provision) is the amount of
the valuation allowance required to reduce the related deferred
tax assets. A valuation allowance reduces the deferred tax
assets to a level which will, more likely than not, be realized.
Whether the deferred tax assets will be realized depends on the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
the deferred tax asset become deductible. The net deferred tax
assets reflect managements estimate of the amount which
will, more likely than not, reduce future taxable income.
As of January 31, 2009, Streamline Health believes that a
valuation allowance is required to reduce a portion of the
deferred tax assets, primarily relating to certain net operating
loss carry forwards, for the following reasons:
There can be no assurance that Streamline Health will be able to
achieve consistent profitability on a quarterly or annual basis
or be able to sustain or increase its revenue growth in future
periods and believes historical operating results may not be
indicative of the future performance of Streamline Health in the
near or long-term. Streamline Health has incurred net losses as
indicated by the carry forwards of approximately $30,000,000.
Based on the expenses associated with current and planned
staffing levels, continued profitability and utilization of
carry forwards to be evaluated as more likely than
not is dependent upon increasing revenues.
As of January 31, 2009, Streamline Health estimates that a
valuation allowance of approximately $8,917,000 was required to
reduce the deferred tax assets, primarily relating to loss carry
forwards, to a level Streamline Health currently believes
will be utilized to offset future earnings before income taxes
based on the current backlog and forecasts over the next two
years. The valuation allowance is required due to the inability
to predict on a longer term basis that Streamline Health will
more likely than not attain levels of profitability
required to utilize additional carry forwards.
34
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments by Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Line of Credit
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
677,823
|
|
|
|
448,336
|
|
|
|
204,979
|
|
|
|
24,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,477,823
|
|
|
$
|
448,336
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,979
|
|
|
$
|
24,508
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
Capital Facility
Effective July 30, 2008, Streamline Health, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc., entered
into a new revolving loan agreement with Fifth Third Bank,
Cincinnati, OH, in the principal amount of $2,000,000. The
interest rate on amounts borrowed will accrue at a variable rate
based on the trailing twelve months earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). (At
January 31, 2009, the effective rate was 2.75%, prime
-1/2%). The agreement contains other covenants including:
Minimum Tangible Net Worth, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and
Funded Indebtedness to EBITDA. The loan is guaranteed by the
Registrant and is secured by a first lien on all of the assets
of the Registrant and its subsidiary. The facility expires on
August 1, 2010. The Company was in violation of certain of
these covenants as of October 31, 2008; however a waiver
was received from the bank at that time.
On January 6, 2009, Streamline Health, Inc. (the
Borrower), a wholly owned subsidiary of Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. (the Registrant), entered
into a revised revolving note with Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati,
OH. The terms of the loan remain the same as set forth in the
revolving note entered into on July 30, 2008 except that
the Borrowing Base limitation has been modified and is now set
at the lesser of 80% of the net amount of Borrowers
Eligible Accounts (less than 90 days) or 2 times trailing
twelve month EBITDA of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
compared to the previous limitation of the lesser of 80%
of the net amount of Borrowers Eligible Accounts (less
than 90 days) or the Tangible Net Worth of Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc.
In connection with entering into the revised revolving note, the
Registrant also entered into a revised continuing guaranty
agreement. The terms of the continuing guarantee agreement
modified Minimum Tangible Net Worth requirements which increases
on a periodic basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Min. Amount
|
|
|
10/31/08 through 01/30/09
|
|
$
|
1,000,000.00
|
|
01/31/09 through 04/29/09
|
|
$
|
1,500,000.00
|
|
04/30/09 through 07/30/09
|
|
$
|
1,750,000.00
|
|
07/31/09 through 10/30/09
|
|
$
|
2,000,000.00
|
|
10/31/09 through 01/30/10
|
|
$
|
2,250,000.00
|
|
01/31/09 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
2,500,000.00
|
|
Under the terms of the revised agreement, the Company was in
compliance with all of the covenants at January 31, 2009.
The Company pays a commitment fee on the unused portion of the
facility of .35%. The Company borrowed $800,000 (of the total
eligible borrowings of $1,006,000) under this working capital
facility as of January 31, 2009.
In connection with the issuance of the long-term debt in 1998,
Streamline Health issued Warrants to purchase
750,000 shares of Common Stock of Streamline Health at
$3.87 per share at any time through July 16, 2008. These
warrants expired unexercised on that date.
Operating
Leases
Streamline Health rents office, data center space and equipment
under noncancelable operating leases that expire, at various
times, during the next three fiscal years. The minimum payments,
by year, are detailed in the Contractual Obligations table
above. Streamline Health is in the process of analyzing its
options with respect to its main corporate office lease which is
up for renewal and expires in July, 2010.
35
Warranties
and Indemnities
Streamline Health provides for the estimated cost of the product
warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Should solutions
fail to meet certain performance standards for an initial
warranty period, Streamline Healths estimated warranty
liability might need to be increased. Streamline Health bases
its warranty estimates on the nature of any performance
complaint, the effort necessary to resolve the issue, customer
requirements and any potential concessions which may be required
to be granted to a customer which result from performance
issues. Streamline Healths ASPeN
application-hosting services guarantees specific
up-time and response time performance
standards, which, if not met may result in reduced revenues, as
a penalty, for the month in which the standards are not met.
Streamline Healths standard agreements with its customers
also usually include intellectual property infringement
indemnifications provisions to indemnify them from and against
third-party claims, and for liabilities, damages, and expenses
arising out of Streamline Healths operation of its
business or any negligent act or omission of Streamline Health.
To date Streamline Health has maintained the ASPeN
performance standards and has not been required to make any
material penalty payments to customers or indemnify any
customers for any material third-party claims. At
January 31, 2009 and 2008, Streamline Health has a warranty
reserve in the amount of $130,000 and $196,000, respectively.
Each contract is reviewed quarterly with the appropriate
Streamline Health National Account Manager to determine the need
for a warranty reserve based upon the most currently available
information as to the status of the contract, the customer
comments, if any, and the status of any open or unresolved
issues with the customer.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
Streamline Health does not have any off balance sheet
arrangements.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth, for each fiscal year indicated,
certain operating data as percentages:
Statement
of Operations(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(2)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Systems sales
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
Services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
Application-hosting services
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
108.3
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
Income tax net benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings(loss)
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of systems sales
|
|
|
102.4
|
%
|
|
|
96.3
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
42.8
|
%
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of application-hosting services
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Because a significant percentage of the operating costs are
incurred at levels that are not necessarily correlated with
revenue levels, a variation in the timing of systems sales and
installations and the resulting revenue |
36
|
|
|
|
|
recognition can cause significant variations in operating
results. As a result, period-to-period comparisons may not be
meaningful with respect to the past operations nor are they
necessarily indicative of the future operations of Streamline
Health in the near or long-term. The data in the table is
presented solely for the purpose of reflecting the relationship
of various operating elements to revenues for the periods
indicated. |
|
(2) |
|
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year
commencing on February 1 of that calendar year and ending on
January 31 of the following year. |
Comparison
of fiscal year 2008 with 2007
The net $1,048,000 decrease in working capital resulted
primarily from the following.
The increase in cash resulted primarily from $800,000 of net new
borrowings under the bank line of credit during the year. Cash
was also impacted by increases in collections on accounts
receivable, net of property and equipment additions and
capitalized software expenditures.
The decrease of $2,514,313 in accounts and contract receivables,
net, both current and non-current is due primarily to one large
system sale totaling nearly $1.9 million occurring in the
fourth quarter of 2007 as well as the shift in new customer
demand towards the application hosting services revenue model
and less new purchase or licensed business during
the year and fourth quarter of 2008.
The $759,105 decrease in accounts payable is due to a large
purchase of third party software related to a sale of third
party software in the last few days of fiscal year 2007, which
was not paid for until the first quarter fiscal 2008. There was
not a similar purchase at the end of fiscal 2008.
The $2,072,481 increase in deferred revenues results primarily
from the increase in prepaid customer maintenance agreements at
the end of fiscal 2008 compared with the prior year. Over
$1.3 million of this increase is attributable to one
customer who prepaid an additional two years of maintenance in
2008.
Revenues
Total revenues for fiscal year 2008 were $16,285,658 compared
with revenues of $16,684,647 in fiscal year 2007, a decrease of
approximately $399,000, or 2%. The decrease was primarily due to
an approximately 18% or $632,000 decrease in application-hosting
services revenues offset by increases of approximately $233,000,
or 8% increase in systems sales. Services, maintenance, and
support revenues remained consistent at approximately
$10.1 million in each year.
Revenues from systems sales in fiscal year 2008 were $3,249,270,
an increase of $233,175, or 8% of systems sales in fiscal year
2007. This increase was the result of a $174,000 increase in
Streamline Health software licensing revenues and approximately
$60,000 increase in hardware and third party software revenues.
Revenues from services, maintenance, and support in fiscal year
2008 were $10,124,829, which was nearly the same as the
$10,125,485 in fiscal year 2007. This resulted from a net
increase in maintenance revenues offset by lower professional
services revenues. Maintenance and support revenues in fiscal
year 2008 were $7,330,773, an increase of $469,909, or 7%, over
maintenance and support revenues in fiscal year 2007. The
increase in maintenance and support results from the addition of
new customers and expansion of existing systems by customers who
pay annual maintenance. Professional services revenues in fiscal
year 2008 were $2,794,056 compared with $3,264,621, or a 14%
decrease of $470,565 from fiscal year 2007. In 2008, the Company
entered into a large application-hosting services contract with
one particular client and due to the customer acceptance
provisions within that contract, associated professional
services revenue is deferred until all customer acceptance
provisions are met. The amount of deferred professional services
revenue relating to this contract caused the decrease from
fiscal year 2007.
Revenues from application-hosting services were $2,911,559 or a
decrease of $631,508, or 18% over fiscal year 2007. This
decrease is attributable to the loss of Streamline Healths
largest application-hosting client that did not renew its
hosting agreement at the end of July 2008 as previously
described above. Although the Company had a large increase in
the number of new application-hosting services customers during
2008, most of the incremental new revenues did not greatly
impact 2008 and will begin to contribute in 2009. Hosting
services revenues at some
37
locations are usage based and fluctuations in admissions, length
of stay, return patient visits, etc. affect the system usage and
the corresponding application-hosting services revenues.
In fiscal year 2008, three customers accounted for 25% of the
total revenues compared with 24% in fiscal year 2007, exclusive
of our remarketing partners.
Total revenues from GE were $6,069,268 in fiscal year 2008,
($893,912 was hardware and third party software sales, $679,720
was Streamline Health software, $1,536,059 was professional
services and $2,609,827 in maintenance and support revenues,
plus $349,750 of hosting revenues).
Total revenues from GE were $6,361,939 in fiscal year 2007,
($1,412,102 was hardware and third party software sales,
$1,390,991 was Streamline Health software, $1,427,922 was
professional services and $1,908,691 in maintenance and support
revenues, plus $222,233 of hosting revenues).
The decrease in GE revenues in 2008 resulted from decreased
hardware and third party software sales as detailed above offset
by increased maintenance revenues, increased professional
services and a small increase in software revenues. A
substantial portion of fiscal year total 2008 revenues came from
fulfillment of backlog and add-on business, primarily expansion
and upgrades and a large new client in the third quarter of
fiscal 2008.
Cost
of Sales
Cost of sales consists of cost of systems sales, cost of
services, maintenance and support, and cost of
application-hosting services. Cost of systems sales includes
amortization of capitalized software expenditures, royalties,
and the cost of third-party hardware and software. Cost of
systems sales, as a percentage of systems sales, varies from
period-to-period depending on hardware and software
configurations of the systems sold. The cost of systems sales as
a percentage of associated revenues in fiscal year 2008 and 2007
were 102% and 96%, respectively. The main increase in cost of
system sales resulted from over $550,000 of increased
capitalized software amortization in 2008 compared with 2007.
Cost of services, maintenance, and support includes salaries and
benefits for support and professional services personnel and the
cost of third-party maintenance contracts. Cost of services,
maintenance and support as a percentage of services, maintenance
and support revenues in 2008 and 2007 were 43% and 42%,
respectively. The higher relative cost reflects decreased
professional services revenues without a corresponding decrease
in fixed expenses. The cost of application-hosting services in
2008 and 2007 as a percentage of revenues was 42% and 31%,
respectively, and represents primarily salaries and benefits,
depreciation and the cost of the collocation high security
application hosting data center. The significantly higher
relative cost in 2008 reflects the decrease in revenues, as a
result of losing our largest application hosting customer at the
end of July, without a corresponding decrease in fixed expenses.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of personnel and related costs, travel and living expenses,
tradeshows, etc. for selling and marketing activities and
general corporate and administrative activities. In fiscal year
2008, selling, general, and administrative expenses were
$6,503,465 compared with $6,048,214 in fiscal year 2007. The
year-to-year increase is primarily attributable to increased
sales and marketing staff as the Company expanded its staff to
respond to increasing inquiries and sales opportunities,
additional expenses for tradeshows, marketing collateral and
costs associated with the focus on new market opportunities.
These increased staffing levels were reduced late in the third
quarter of 2008 as part of a company-wide reorganization plan in
an effort to reduce costs and improve cash flow to align the
Company with its emphasis on the SaaS-based hosting model.
Product
Research and Development
During 2008, Streamline Health increased its technical staff and
added additional contractors to concentrate its development
efforts primarily on its new solutions and new workflow
technologies. Product research and development expenses in
fiscal year 2008 were $2,264,332 compared with $3,132,809 in
fiscal year 2007. Streamline Health capitalized approximately
$3,680,000 in software development expenditures in fiscal year
2008, compared with $2,652,000 in 2007. The increase in
capitalized software in 2008 reflects the increased 2008
development activities related to a large-scale development
effort to refresh its entire solution suite to fifth-
38
generation architecture. Included in this development effort are
the consolidation of technology platforms onto the Microsoft dot
net platform, and the internationalization of its software for
potential new international markets. Internationalization
specifically to include French language capabilities was a part
of Streamline Healths agreement with the Centre
hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal (CHUM)
and the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) via our
distribution partner, Emergis, a TELUS company. It is
anticipated that the Company will deliver its new architecture
platform for Beta testing at a customer location in the second
half of 2009.
Operating
Profit (loss)
Operating loss in fiscal year 2008 was ($1,346,699) compared
with an operating loss of ($703,687) in fiscal year 2007. This
increased loss of $643,012 results primarily from the decreased
application hosting revenues, offset by the increased system
sales as described above. The operating loss caused by this net
decrease in revenues of approximately $397,000 was further
compounded by the increased cost of sales and selling, general
and administrative expenses noted above.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest income in fiscal 2008 was $7,865 compared with $22,256
in fiscal 2007. Interest income consists primarily of interest
on cash balances. The interest income declined during 2008
because of lower cash balances and lower interest rates.
Interest expense in 2008 was related to the working capital
facility interest and fees. Interest expense was $24,436 in
fiscal 2008 compared with $26,221 in fiscal 2007. The decrease
in the interest expense in 2008 results primarily from being
debt free early in the year.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Streamline Health is in a tax loss carry forward position with
related valuation allowances. The tax loss carry forward
approximates $30,000,000, which begins to expire in 2013.
Streamline Health also has Alternative Minimum Tax credit carry
forwards of approximately $74,000, which has an unlimited carry
forward period. The tax provisions in 2008 and 2007 are
primarily state provisions.
Net
Earnings (loss)
The net loss in fiscal year 2008 was ($1,374,970) compared with
a net loss of ($735,562) in fiscal year 2007. The increased loss
results primarily from decreased application hosting revenues,
and the related gross margin and higher operating expenses as
noted above.
Comparison
of fiscal year 2007 with 2006
Revenues
Total revenues for fiscal year 2007 were $16,684,647 compared
with revenues of $15,961,314 in fiscal year 2006, an increase of
approximately $724,000, or 5%. The increase was primarily due to
an approximately 20% or $1,716,000 increase in service,
maintenance and support revenues and an 8% or $270,000 increase
in application hosting services revenues, offset by an
approximately $1,263,000, decrease in system sales. Because
software revenues generate the highest margins the lower
software revenues contributed to a significantly reduced
operating profit for the fiscal year when compared to the prior
year.
Revenues from systems sales in fiscal year 2007 were $3,016,095,
a decrease of $1,262,697, or 30% of systems sales in fiscal year
2006 primarily resulting from the significant decrease in
software licensing revenues as discussed above.
Revenues from services, maintenance, and support in fiscal year
2007 were $10,125,485, an increase of $1,716,165, or 20% over
fiscal year 2006. Professional services revenues in fiscal year
2007 were $3,264,621, an increase of $566,694, of the
professional services revenues in fiscal year 2006. Maintenance
and support revenues in fiscal year 2007 were $6,860,864, an
increase of $1,149,471, or 20%, over maintenance and support
revenues in fiscal year 2006. The increase in professional
services revenues was due to increased customer installations.
The
39
increase in maintenance and support results from the addition of
new customers and expansion of existing systems by customers who
pay annual maintenance.
Revenues from hosting services were $3,543,067 or an increase of
$269,865, or 8% over fiscal year 2006. The increase was due
primarily to increased revenues from new customers. Hosting
services revenues at some locations are usage based and
fluctuations in admissions, length of stay, return patient
visits, etc. affect the system usage and the corresponding
hosting services revenues.
In fiscal year 2007, three customers accounted for 24% of the
total revenues compared with 26% in fiscal year 2006, exclusive
of our remarketing partners.
Total revenues from GE were $6,361,939 in fiscal year 2007,
($1,412,102 was hardware and third party software sales,
$1,390,991 was Streamline Health software, $1,427,922 was
professional services and $1,908,691 in maintenance and support
revenues, plus $222,233 of hosting revenues).
Total Revenues from GE were $4,489,531 in fiscal year 2006,
($1,003,000 was hardware sales, $919,000 was software,
$1,051,744 was professional services and $1,515,756 in
maintenance and support revenues).
The increase in GE revenues in 2007 included increased software
revenues, significantly increased hardware and third party
software sales and increased services and maintenance revenues.
A substantial portion of fiscal year total 2007 revenues came
from fulfillment of backlog and add-on business, primarily
expansion and upgrades and two new clients in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2007.
Cost
of Sales
Cost of sales consists of cost of systems sales, cost of
services, maintenance and support, and cost of
application-hosting services. Cost of systems sales includes
amortization of capitalized software expenditures, royalties,
and the cost of third-party hardware and software. Cost of
systems sales, as a percentage of systems sales, varies from
period-to-period depending on hardware and software
configurations of the systems sold. The cost of systems sales as
a percentage of associated revenues in fiscal year 2007 and 2006
were 96% and 57%, respectively. The higher costs in 2007 reflect
a significantly lower volume of Streamline Health software, with
high margins and a significantly higher volume of hardware and
third party software with significantly lower margins, when
compared with 2006 when a greater portion of system sales
included more software and less hardware and third party
software. Cost of services, maintenance, and support includes
salaries and benefits for support and professional services
personnel and the cost of third-party maintenance contracts.
Cost of services, maintenance and support, as a percentage of
services, maintenance and support revenues in 2007 and 2006 were
42% and 44%, respectively. The lower relative cost reflects
increased professional services revenues without a corresponding
increase in expenses. The cost of application-hosting services
in 2007 and 2006 as a percentage of revenues was 30% and 34%,
respectively, and represents primarily salaries and benefits,
depreciation and the cost of the collocation high security
application hosting data center. The lower relative cost
reflects increased revenues without a corresponding increase in
expenses.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of personnel and related costs, travel and living expenses,
tradeshows, etc. for selling and marketing activities and
general corporate and administrative activities. In fiscal year
2007, selling, general, and administrative expenses were
$6,048,214 compared with $5,802,656 in fiscal year 2006. The
year-to-year increase is primarily attributable to increased
sales and marketing staff as the Company expanded its staff to
respond to increasing inquiries and sales opportunities,
additional expenses for tradeshows, marketing collateral and
costs associated with the focus on new market opportunities
involving business process improvement via workflow automation
technologies.
Product
Research and Development
Product research and development expenses in fiscal year 2007
were $3,132,809 compared with $2,716,163 in fiscal year 2006.
During 2007, Streamline Health increased its technical staff and
added additional contractors to concentrate its development
efforts primarily on its new solutions and new workflow
technologies. Streamline
40
Health capitalized approximately $2,652,000 in software
development expenditures in fiscal year 2007, compared with
$2,130,000 in 2006. The increase in capitalized software in 2007
reflects the increased 2007 development activities related to
new solutions or enhancements to existing products.
Operating
Profit (loss)
Operating loss in fiscal year 2007 was ($703,687) compared with
an operating profit of $181,590 in fiscal year 2006. The
$885,277 decrease, results primarily from an approximately
$1,263,000 decrease in high margin software licensing revenues
discussed above and increased expenses during the fiscal year.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest income consists primarily of interest on cash balances.
The interest income declined during 2007 because of lower cash
balances. Interest expense in 2007 was related to the working
capital facility fee and capitalized leases. The decrease in the
interest expense in 2007 results primarily from the reduction of
the outstanding debt at the beginning of the year.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Streamline Health is in a tax loss carry forward position. The
tax loss carry forward approximates $29,000,000 at
1/31/08,
which begins to expire in 2013. Streamline Health also has an
Alternative Minimum Tax credit carry forwards of approximately
$74,000, which has an unlimited carry forward period. The tax
provisions in 2007 and 2006 are primarily state provisions.
Net
Earnings (loss)
The net loss in fiscal year 2007 was ($735,562) compared with
net earnings of $96,461 in fiscal year 2006. The decrease
results primarily from decreased software revenues, and the
related gross margin and higher operating expenses as noted
above.
Backlog
At January 31, 2009 Streamline Health has master agreements
and purchase orders from customers and remarketing partners for
systems and related services (excluding support and maintenance,
and transaction-based application-hosting revenues), which have
not been delivered or installed which, if fully performed, would
generate future revenues of approximately $6,559,000 compared
with $8,018,000 at January 31, 2008. The related solutions
and services are expected to be delivered over the next two to
three years. The decrease in the backlog is the result of a
shift in the business pattern of Streamline Heaths
recently signed contracts. In 2008, Streamline Health
experienced a large increase in new hosting business instead of
the traditional pattern of mostly new purchase or
directly licensed software contracts by its new clients. As a
result, the Streamline Health software component of this backlog
has declined and is offset by large increases in the hosting
backlog results noted below. In addition, customers contract for
maintenance and support services on a monthly, quarterly, or
annual basis. At January 31, 2009, Streamline Health had
maintenance agreements purchase orders, from customers and
remarketing partners for maintenance, which if fully performed,
will generate future revenues of approximately $6,578,000,
compared with $4,921,000 at January 31, 2008, through their
respective renewal dates in fiscal year 2009 and 2010. The
increase results from the addition of new customers or expansion
of systems with existing customers or longer term maintenance
contract commitments by customers. In 2008, maintenance and
support revenues approximated $7,331,000 compared with
$6,861,000 in 2007 and are expected to increase in fiscal year
2009. At January 31, 2009, Streamline Health has entered
into SaaS-based hosting agreements, which are expected to
generate revenues in excess of $13,042,000 through their
respective renewal dates in fiscal years 2009 through 2013. The
application-hosting backlog is $10,014,000 higher than the
$3,028,000 in 2007 due to the increased volume of new hosting
business and renewals. This is especially significant given the
loss of Streamline Healths largest hosting client in July,
2008 described previously above.
41
Below is a summary of the backlog at January 31, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
January 31, 2008
|
|
|
Streamline Health Software Licenses
|
|
$
|
1,027,454
|
|
|
$
|
1,414,196
|
|
Custom Software
|
|
|
278,416
|
|
|
|
338,583
|
|
Hardware and Third Party Software
|
|
|
561,941
|
|
|
|
1,467,340
|
|
Professional Services
|
|
|
4,691,309
|
|
|
|
4,797,638
|
|
Application Hosting Services
|
|
|
13,042,472
|
|
|
|
3,027,688
|
|
Recurring Maintenance
|
|
|
6,577,704
|
|
|
|
4,921,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
26,179,296
|
|
|
$
|
15,966,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from the GE Healthcare Remarketing Agreement for the
last three years amounted to approximately $16,921,000, or 35%
of the total revenues for the last three fiscal years.
Streamline Health relies on GE Healthcare for a significant
amount of its revenues, the loss of which would have a material
adverse affect on future results of operations.
Streamline Health believes a greater percentage of its future
revenues will come from remarketing agreements with, GE
Healthcare, and other HIS related vendors such as the Emergis,
Inc. agreement that was entered into in December 2007.
Streamline Health continues to actively pursue remarketing
agreements with other companies.
Streamline Health believes the large HIS vendors, hospitals and
integrated healthcare delivery networks now have a better
understanding of the valuable role that document management and
workflow technologies play in providing truly computerized
information and the benefits of such systems in utilizing
advanced workflow solutions. As more healthcare providers become
aware of and better understand the significant economic and
operating benefits of utilizing document management and workflow
applications, Streamline Health believes the future demand for
its solutions and services will increase.
Many companies have emerged to provide healthcare applications
through private Intranets or secure applications on the
Internet. Additionally, the traditional HIS companies have
developed clinical information systems for the Internet.
Streamline Healths applications are well suited for
integration with such clinical systems and are optimized for use
on the Internet and private Intranets. Through Streamline
Healths hosting services, hosting customers can rapidly
deploy and access healthcare information using web browser-based
technology from a central hosting center on a per transaction or
subscription basis thereby minimizing up-front capital
expenditures. Streamline Health believes healthcare
organizations will continue to increase their use of healthcare
applications through dedicated private data communications lines
and virtual private networks (VPN) via the Internet, and
Streamline Healths solutions are an integral part of
providing a complete EMR across the Internet. Streamline Health
continues to actively pursue strategic relationships with other
healthcare Application Service Providers.
Management believes that revenue growth can be fueled by: the
expansion and talent improvement of our sales force and
marketing efforts, an increase in incremental revenue from
existing and new strategic distribution partners such as
Emergis, an increase in interest by healthcare organizations in
Streamline Health solutions and services to assist in compliance
with the Federal HIPAA standards as they relate to the
confidentiality and security of medical records, and incremental
new revenues derived from new lines of business for Streamline
Health in the remote coding, revenue cycle and other workflows
for the hospital marketplace. The revenue cycle workflows are a
logical extension of the product line because of the ability of
the Financial Services departments of hospitals to access and
process patient information from the EMR. Due to an acute
shortage of available coding personnel, there currently exists a
great demand for solutions to attract and retain qualified
coders. Streamline Healths solutions make the coding
process more efficient and therefore fewer coders are needed.
Since commencing operations in 1989, Streamline Health has
incurred substantial cumulative operating losses. Although
Streamline Health achieved operating profitability during five
of the last seven years, Streamline Health incurred net losses
in most fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2000 and in the last
two fiscal years. Based upon the expenses associated with
current and planned staffing levels, profitability is dependent
upon increasing revenues. Although the Company believes that it
can return to profitability, there can be no assurance that
Streamline Health will be able to achieve consistent
profitability on a quarterly or annual basis nor be able to
sustain
42
or increase its revenue growth in future periods and believes
historical operating results may not be indicative of the future
performance of Streamline Health in the near or long-term.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
During the last five fiscal years, Streamline Health has funded
its operations, working capital needs, and capital expenditures
primarily from a combination of cash generated by operations,
and a $3,500,000 bank loan in 2004 and its current revolving
line of credit. Streamline Healths liquidity is dependent
upon numerous factors including: (i) the timing and amount
of revenues and collection of contractual amounts from
customers, (ii) amounts invested in research and
development, capital expenditures, and (iii) the level of
operating expenses, all of which can vary significantly from
quarter-to-quarter.
Streamline Healths customers typically have been
well-established hospitals or medical facilities or major HIS
companies that resell Streamline Health products, which
have good credit histories and payments have been received
within normal time frames for the industry. However, some
healthcare organizations have experienced significant operating
losses as a result of limits on third-party reimbursements from
insurance companies and governmental entities. Agreements with
customers often involve significant amounts and contract terms
typically require customers to make progress payments.
Streamline Health has no significant obligations for capital
resources, other than the $800,000 currently borrowed under its
bank line of credit, and the non-cancelable operating leases of
approximately $678,000 payable over the next three years.
Capital expenditures for property and equipment in 2009 are not
expected to exceed $1,000,000.
Net cash provided by operations in fiscal 2008 exceeded
$4,600,000, an increase of approximately $1,400,000 from
approximately $3,200,000 in the prior fiscal year. The relative
increase resulted primarily from an increase in cash provided
from Accounts, Contracts and Installment Receivables of
$2,887,373 increased cash from Deferred Revenues of $582,816
offset by the additional use of cash of Accounts Payable and
Accrued Expenses of $2,056,677. See the Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows for the individual components comprising the net
cash provided by operating activities.
During the last three years, Streamline Health has expended
approximately $2,120,000 for capital expenditures, increased its
sales and marketing expenses, product research and development
and support and consulting expenses, and made net debt
repayments of approximately $4,200,000. This resulted in
significant net cash outlays over the last three years.
Accordingly, to position the Company to achieve increasing
revenues and profitability, the Company significantly increased
sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2006 and 2007. In 2008, a
new sales leader joined the company in an effort to improve
results. Sales and marketing functions were reorganized
accordingly. Furthermore, due to the cash flow needs created by
the shift away from traditional software license purchases
towards more application hosting business, the Company scaled
back its sales and marketing expenses in the third quarter of
2008. The Company will need to selectively and prudently
increase some of these expenses again in 2009 as quality sales
talent is found in an effort to produce improved results in 2009
and beyond. However, there can be no assurance Streamline Health
will be able to do so.
At January 31, 2009, Streamline Health had cash on hand of
$3,128,801.
Notwithstanding the current levels of revenues and expenses, for
the foreseeable future, Streamline Health will need to
continually assess its revenue prospects compared to its then
current expenditure levels. If it does not appear likely that
revenues will increase, it may be necessary to reduce operating
expenses or raise cash through additional borrowings, the sale
of assets, or other equity financing. Certain of these actions
will require current lender approval. However, there can be no
assurance Streamline Health will be successful in any of these
efforts. If it is necessary to significantly reduce operating
expenses, this could have an adverse effect on future operating
performance.
43
Streamline Health believes that its present cash position,
combined with cash generation currently anticipated from
operations and the availability of the revolving credit facility
will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements for the
next twelve months. However, continued expansion of the Company
will require additional resources. The Company may need to incur
debt, obtain an additional infusion of capital, or a combination
of both, depending on the extent of the expansion of the Company
and future revenues and expenses. However, there can be no
assurance Streamline Health will be able to do so.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through
its working capital credit facility with Fifth Third Bank.
Currently, the Company does not have any financial instruments
for trading or other speculative purposes or to manage interest
rate exposure.
Streamline Health currently invests its cash balances, in excess
of its current needs in an interest bearing, or bank fee
reduction based, checking account. As such, Streamline Health
does not have any significant market risk exposure at
January 31, 2009.
44
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE COVERED BY
REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
|
|
|
46
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
48
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
49
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
for the three years ended January 31, 2009
|
|
|
50
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
51
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
52
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
65
|
|
All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they
are not applicable or the required information is included in
the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
45
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. as of January 31, 2009
and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for the
years then ended. In connection with our audits of the financial
statements, we have also audited the financial statement
schedule listed in the accompanying index. These financial
statements and schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall presentation of the financial statements and
schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. at
January 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
Chicago, Illinois
April 8, 2009
/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
46
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. for the year ended
January 31, 2007. Our audit also included the financial
statement schedule of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. listed
in item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
results of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.s operations
and cash flows for the year ended January 31, 2007, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth herein.
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 27, 2007
/s/ Ernst &
Young LLP
47
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,128,801
|
|
|
$
|
2,189,010
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$100,000
|
|
|
1,328,508
|
|
|
|
2,832,852
|
|
Contract receivables
|
|
|
502,373
|
|
|
|
1,833,842
|
|
Prepaid hardware and third party software for future delivery
|
|
|
681,540
|
|
|
|
484,247
|
|
Prepaid other, including prepaid customer maintenance contracts
|
|
|
802,951
|
|
|
|
501,803
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
247,000
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
6,691,173
|
|
|
|
8,026,754
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
2,475,928
|
|
|
|
2,235,104
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
1,405,407
|
|
|
|
1,086,691
|
|
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
737,344
|
|
|
|
731,346
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
574,257
|
|
|
|
574,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,192,936
|
|
|
|
4,627,398
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(3,625,408
|
)
|
|
|
(3,153,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567,528
|
|
|
|
1,473,723
|
|
Contract receivables, less current portion
|
|
|
321,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software development costs, net of accumulated
amortization of $8,311,760 and $6,643,235, respectively
|
|
|
6,481,360
|
|
|
|
4,878,694
|
|
Other, including deferred taxes of $1,628,000 and $1,690,000,
respectively
|
|
|
1,670,891
|
|
|
|
1,720,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,732,452
|
|
|
$
|
16,099,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
759,577
|
|
|
$
|
1,518,682
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
299,000
|
|
|
|
536,599
|
|
Accrued other expenses
|
|
|
472,113
|
|
|
|
521,210
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
5,941,837
|
|
|
|
5,183,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,472,527
|
|
|
|
7,759,824
|
|
Deferred revenues, less current portion
|
|
|
1,313,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48,842
|
|
|
|
146,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
9,635,346
|
|
|
|
7,906,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par value per
share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share,
25,000,000 shares authorized, 9,354,782 and
9,260,320 shares issued, respectively
|
|
|
93,548
|
|
|
|
92,603
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
35,820,417
|
|
|
|
35,542,222
|
|
Accumulated (deficit)
|
|
|
(28,816,859
|
)
|
|
|
(27,441,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
7,097,106
|
|
|
|
8,192,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,732,452
|
|
|
$
|
16,099,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
48
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems sales
|
|
$
|
3,249,270
|
|
|
$
|
3,016,095
|
|
|
$
|
4,278,792
|
|
Services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
10,124,829
|
|
|
|
10,125,485
|
|
|
|
8,409,320
|
|
Application-hosting services
|
|
|
2,911,559
|
|
|
|
3,543,067
|
|
|
|
3,273,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
16,285,658
|
|
|
|
16,684,647
|
|
|
|
15,961,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of systems sales
|
|
|
3,327,944
|
|
|
|
2,904,077
|
|
|
|
2,426,595
|
|
Cost of services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
4,329,026
|
|
|
|
4,220,093
|
|
|
|
3,703,727
|
|
Cost of application-hosting services
|
|
|
1,207,590
|
|
|
|
1,083,141
|
|
|
|
1,130,583
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
6,503,465
|
|
|
|
6,048,214
|
|
|
|
5,802,656
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
2,264,332
|
|
|
|
3,132,809
|
|
|
|
2,716,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
17,632,357
|
|
|
|
17,388,334
|
|
|
|
15,779,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(1,346,699
|
)
|
|
|
(703,687
|
)
|
|
|
181,590
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
|
|
22,256
|
|
|
|
77,337
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(24,436
|
)
|
|
|
(26,221
|
)
|
|
|
(131,286
|
)
|
Other income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,363,270
|
)
|
|
|
(724,162
|
)
|
|
|
127,641
|
|
Income tax (expense)
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
(11,400
|
)
|
|
|
(31,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
96,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic per common share computation
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
|
|
9,234,313
|
|
|
|
9,195,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in diluted per common share computation
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
|
|
9,234,313
|
|
|
|
9,722,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
redeemable
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
paid in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
stockholders
|
|
|
|
preferred stock
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
(deficit)
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,595
|
|
|
$
|
35,090,302
|
|
|
$
|
(26,830,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,351,318
|
|
Stock issued to Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
84,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,318
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,137
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,461
|
|
|
|
96,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,114
|
|
|
|
35,286,238
|
|
|
|
(26,734,118
|
)
|
|
|
8,644,234
|
|
Stock issued to Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
113,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,831
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,642
|
|
FIN 48 tax adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,791
|
|
|
|
27,791
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(735,562
|
)
|
|
|
(735,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,603
|
|
|
|
35,542,222
|
|
|
|
(27,441,889
|
)
|
|
|
8,192,936
|
|
Stock issued to Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
119,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,747
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,548
|
|
|
$
|
35,820,417
|
|
|
$
|
(28,816,859
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,097,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
50
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
96,461
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings(loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,369,670
|
|
|
|
2,189,981
|
|
|
|
1,819,233
|
|
Impairment loss on capitalized software development costs
|
|
|
408,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
158,747
|
|
|
|
142,642
|
|
|
|
111,137
|
|
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts, contract and installment receivables
|
|
|
2,514,313
|
|
|
|
(373,060
|
)
|
|
|
921,315
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(498,441
|
)
|
|
|
(440,620
|
)
|
|
|
(178,699
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(759,105
|
)
|
|
|
899,320
|
|
|
|
(436,177
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(286,697
|
)
|
|
|
111,555
|
|
|
|
(909,653
|
)
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
2,072,481
|
|
|
|
1,489,665
|
|
|
|
1,076,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,604,807
|
|
|
|
3,200,431
|
|
|
|
2,500,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(794,950
|
)
|
|
|
(715,053
|
)
|
|
|
(610,353
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of software development costs
|
|
|
(3,680,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,652,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,130,000
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(110,459
|
)
|
|
|
(66,537
|
)
|
|
|
(77,720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,585,409
|
)
|
|
|
(3,294,815
|
)
|
|
|
(2,818,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt and revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(1,200,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
Payment of capitalized leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147,051
|
)
|
|
|
(84,951
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock purchase plan
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
113,831
|
|
|
|
85,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
920,393
|
|
|
|
(1,033,220
|
)
|
|
|
(999,633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
939,791
|
|
|
|
(1,127,604
|
)
|
|
|
(1,317,605
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
2,189,010
|
|
|
|
3,316,614
|
|
|
|
4,634,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
3,128,801
|
|
|
$
|
2,189,010
|
|
|
$
|
3,316,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
23,883
|
|
|
$
|
27,832
|
|
|
$
|
129,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded)
|
|
$
|
(3,278
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,202
|
|
|
$
|
66,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
51
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (Streamline Health or the
Company) operates in one segment as a provider of Healthcare
Information Workflow Technology through the licensing of its
Electronic Health Information Management, Patient Financial
Services and other Workflow software applications and the use of
such applications through its application-hosting services as an
Application Service Provider. Streamline Healths solutions
enable hospitals and integrated healthcare delivery systems in
the United States to capture, store, manage, route, retrieve,
and process vast amounts of patient clinical, financial and
other healthcare provider information.
Fiscal
Year
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year
commencing February 1 in that calendar year and ending on
January 31 of the following year.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiary, Streamline
Health, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions are
eliminated.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is derived from: the licensing and sale of systems,
either directly to end-users or through third-party resellers,
comprising internally developed software, third-party software
and hardware components; product support, maintenance and
professional services; and application-hosting services that
provide high quality, transaction or subscription based document
imaging/management services from a central data center.
Streamline Healths revenue recognition policies conform to
Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by Statement of
Position
98-9,
SAB 104 Revenue Recognition and EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.
Generally, revenue from software license fees and hardware sales
to end-users is recognized when a master agreement is signed and
solutions are made available to end-users. Revenues from
agreements that contain multiple-element arrangements are
allocated to the various elements based on the fair value of the
specific elements. Revenues related to routine installation and
integration and project management are deferred until the work
is performed. Streamline Health follows this method since
reasonably dependable estimates of the revenues and costs
applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. Revenues
from consulting, education, and application-hosting services are
recognized as the services are performed. Revenues from
short-term support and maintenance agreements are recognized
ratably over the term of the agreements. Billings to customers
recorded prior to the recognition of revenues are classified as
deferred revenues. Revenues recognized prior to progress
billings to customers are recorded as contract receivables.
The Company has revised its historical financial statements to
reclassify revenue and costs related to certain maintenance
services. During a review of the accounting treatment of its
revenue recognition policies, the Company determined that
certain revisions to the accounting treatment of its revenue
recognition for royalty commissions paid to GE Healthcare were
necessary. The royalty payments made to GE Healthcare based on
the reseller agreement for maintenance contracts that were
referred by GE Healthcare to Streamline and entered into
directly between Streamline and the end customer were previously
recorded within net revenues. As the Company is obligated to
perform the services in the maintenance agreement, the Company
determined it was appropriate to recognize the amount of royalty
revenue in net revenues and the related payments as a cost of
sale at the time the payment is made. The accompanying financial
statements and notes reflect the revised amounts. The impact of
the
52
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
revision was an increase in total Net Revenues and a
corresponding increase in Cost of Sales. This revision did not
result in any charge to previously reported net income or
earnings per share.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash demand
deposits. We place our cash deposits in Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured financial
institutions. Cash deposits may exceed FDIC insured levels from
time to time.
Receivables
Accounts and contract receivables are comprised of amounts owed
Streamline Health for licensed software, professional services,
including maintenance services and application-hosting
activities and are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of
$100,000 at January 31, 2009 and $100,000 at
January 31, 2008. Contract receivables represent revenues
recognized prior to customer billings. Contracts with individual
customers and resellers determine when receivables are due. In
determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, each unpaid
receivable is reviewed quarterly with the appropriate Streamline
Health Client Manager to determine the payment status based upon
the most currently available information as to the status of the
receivables, the customer comments, if any, and the status of
any open or unresolved issues with the customer preventing the
payment thereof. Corrective action, if necessary, is taken by
Streamline Health to resolve open issues related to unpaid
receivables. During these quarterly reviews, Streamline Health
determines the required allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the unwillingness or inability
of its customers or resellers to make required payments.
Concentrations
Financial instruments, which potentially expose Streamline
Health to concentrations of credit risk, as defined by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 105, Disclosure of
Information about Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet
Risk and Financial Instruments with Concentrations of Credit
Risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable. Streamline
Healths accounts receivable are concentrated in the
healthcare industry. However, Streamline Healths customers
typically have been well-established hospitals, medical
facilities, or major Health Information Systems companies that
resell Streamline Healths solutions that have good credit
histories and payments have been received within normal time
frames for the industry. However, some hospitals and medical
facilities have experienced significant operating losses as a
result of limits on third-party reimbursements from insurance
companies and governmental entities and extended payment of
receivables from these entities is not uncommon.
To date, Streamline Health has relied on a limited number of
customers and remarketing partners for a substantial portion of
its total revenues. Streamline Health expects that a significant
portion of its future revenues will continue to be generated by
a limited number of customers and its remarketing partners.
Streamline Health currently buys all of its hardware and some
major software components of its Healthcare Information Systems
from third-party vendors. Although there are a limited number of
vendors capable of supplying these components, management
believes that other suppliers could provide similar components
on comparable terms.
Other
Current Assets
Other current assets are primarily: prepaid insurance,
commissions, maintenance, deposits, deferred Federal income tax
assets and prepaid expenses related to future revenues (See
Note 4).
53
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method, over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets. Estimated useful lives are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
3-4 years
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Office furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
Life of lease
|
|
In 2005, Streamline Health entered into a sixty-six month
operating lease for office space. In connection with the lease,
the property owner provided certain lease inducements to the
Company, including a $326,000 build out allowance and use of the
premises for six months rent free. The Company has accounted for
the value of these inducements by recording the build out
allowance as a leasehold improvement with a corresponding lease
incentive liability. The total amount of the lease payments are
amortized as rent expense on a straight line basis over the term
of the lease. The leasehold improvement asset and the lease
incentive liability are each amortized on a straight line basis
over the term of the lease to depreciation and as an offset to
rent expense, respectively. Any timing differences between the
actual monthly lease payments and the straight line rent expense
is recorded as an adjustment to the lease incentive liability.
Depreciation expense for property and equipment in 2008, 2007,
and 2006 was $701,145, $663,314, and $735,897, respectively.
Leased computer equipment and software meeting certain criteria
are capitalized and the present value of the related lease
payments is recorded as a liability. Depreciation of the
capitalized lease assets is computed on the straight-line method
over the term of the lease.
Normal repair and maintenance is expensed as incurred.
Replacements are capitalized and the property and equipment
accounts are relieved of the items being replaced or disposed
of, or if no longer of value. The related cost and accumulated
depreciation of the disposed assets are eliminated and any gain
or loss on disposition is included in the results of operations
in the year of disposal.
Capitalized
Software Development Costs
Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86,
Accounting for the Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or
Otherwise Marketed. Costs associated with the planning and
designing phase of software development, including coding and
testing activities necessary to establish technological
feasibility are classified as product research and development
and are expensed as incurred. Once technological feasibility has
been determined, a portion of the costs incurred in development,
including coding, testing, and product quality assurance, are
capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of
unamortized cost or net realizable value. Streamline Health
capitalized approximately $3,680,000, $2,652,000, and $2,130,000
in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Streamline Health reviews, on an on-going basis, the carrying
value of its capitalized software development expenditures, net
of accumulated amortization. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company expensed approximately $408,000 for partial impairment
on a specific workflow product that had been under development
for the past few years. The development efforts on this product
are now temporarily on hold pending a new beta partner and final
completion. The capitalized costs relating to this product were
written down to its expected net realizable value based upon the
current future sales estimates. This impairment change is
reflected in the financial statements as capitalized software
amortization in the cost of system sales. This asset could be
further written down if future sales do not materialize as
expected.
Amortization is provided on a
product-by-product
basis over the estimated economic life of the software, not to
exceed three years, using the straight-line method. Amortization
commences when a product is available for general release to
customers. Unamortized capitalized costs determined to be in
excess of the net realizable value of
54
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a product are expensed at the date of such determination.
Amortization expense was approximately $2,077,000, $1,527,000,
and $1,083,000 in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Research and development expense, net of capitalized amounts,
was $2,264,332, $3,132,809, and $2,716,163 in 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of the long-lived assets
periodically to determine if facts and circumstances exist that
would suggest that assets might be impaired or that the useful
lives should be modified. Among the factors the Company
considers in making the evaluation are changes in market
position and profitability. If facts and circumstances are
present which may indicate impairment is probable, the Company
will prepare a projection of the undiscounted cash flows of the
specific asset and determine if the long-lived assets are
recoverable based on these undiscounted cash flows. If
impairment is indicated, an adjustment will be made to reduce
the carrying amount of these assets to their fair value. The
Company accounts for impairment and disposal of its long-lived
assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate
fair value based on the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amount of the Companys long-term
debt approximates fair value due to the variable interest rate
associated with the debt.
Income
Taxes
The provisions for income taxes are accounted for in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. Under the asset and
liability method of Statement 109, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The Company must then
assess the likelihood that the deferred tax asset will be
recovered from future taxable income. The Company establishes a
valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all or
a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No, 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income
Taxes (FIN 48), an interpretation of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes (SFAS 109) on February 1,
2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in the financial statements in
accordance with SFAS 109 and prescribes a recognition
threshold of more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon
examination.
Stock
Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, establishes a
fair value method of financial accounting and reporting for
stock-based compensation plans.
The Company adopted the revised standards of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, effective the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006, which requires expensing the fair value of the
equity awards. The Company elected to adopt the
Modified-Prospective Transition method. Under this method, the
Company is required to recognize compensation cost for
share-based payments based on their grant-date fair value from
the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition
provisions are first applied. As a result of adopting Statement
123(R), the Company incurred total additional annual
compensation expense of $158,747 in 2008, $142,642 in 2007, and
$111,137 in 2006, respectively. The fair value of the 2008 and
2007 stock-based compensation was estimated at the date of
grants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model
55
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
with the following weighted average assumptions for each fiscal
year: risk-free interest rate of 4.25%, a dividend yield of zero
percent; a weighted average volatility factor of the expected
market price of Streamline Healths Common Stock of .771
(in 2008), .793 (in 2007) and .823 (in 2006), and a
weighted average expected life of stock options of five years
and a forfeiture rate of zero. Future grants of equity awards
accounted for as stock-based compensation could have a material
impact on reported expenses depending upon the number, value and
vesting period of future awards.
At January 31, 2009 Streamline Health had two stock-based
compensation plans, which are more fully disclosed in
Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net
Earnings (loss) Per Common Share
The net earnings (loss) per common share are computed in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 128, Earnings per Share. The basic net earnings
(loss) per common share are computed based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during each period.
The diluted net earnings (loss) per common share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if Stock Options, Stock
Purchase Plan commitments and Warrants were exercised into
Common Stock, under certain circumstances, that then would share
in the earnings of Streamline Health.
The following is the calculation of the basic and diluted net
earnings per share of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(735,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
96,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding used in basic per common share
computations
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
|
|
9,234,313
|
|
|
|
9,195,415
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,976
|
|
Warrants assumed converted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
Assumed treasury stock buyback
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(652,045
|
)
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock assumed converted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of average shares used in diluted per common share
computation
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
|
|
9,234,313
|
|
|
|
9,722,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted earnings per share exclude the effect of 634,882
outstanding stock options in fiscal 2008; 409,000 outstanding
stock options and 750,000 warrants in fiscal 2007; and 32,524
outstanding stock options in fiscal 2006 because the inclusion
would be antidilutive.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations which replaces
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. This
Statement retains the fundamental requirements in
SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting
(formerly referred to as purchase method) is to be used for all
business combinations and that an acquirer is identified for
each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer
as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in
the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as
of the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement
requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values.
This Statement requires the acquirer to recognize
acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs separately
from the business combination as period expense. This
56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Statement is effective for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The Company will implement SFAS No. 141(R) for
any business combinations occurring at or subsequent to
February 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51,
Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. This statement is
effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal
year that begins after December 15, 2008 with retrospective
application. The Company has determined there should be no
impact on its financial statements by adopting
SFAS No. 160.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to
choose to measure, at fair value, many financial instruments and
certain other items that are not currently required to be
measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial
reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate
volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related
assets and liabilities differently without having to apply
complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The statement was effective as of the beginning of
the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company determined the
adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material
impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
In February of 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff position
157-2 which
delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial
assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on a
recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. The Company determined the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material
impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Company adopted FIN 48 as of February 1, 2007, as
required. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the
changes to the Companys reserve for uncertain tax
positions was accounted for as a $27,791 adjustment to increase
the beginning balance of retained earnings on the Companys
balance sheet. The Company believes that its income tax
positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and does not
anticipate adjustments that will result in a material change to
its financial position during the next twelve months. Therefore,
no reserves for uncertain tax positions have been recorded
pursuant to FIN 48 as of January 31, 2009.
Streamline Health rents office and data center space and
equipment under noncancelable operating leases that expire at
various times through fiscal year 2011. Future minimum lease
payments under noncancelable operating leases for the next three
fiscal years are as follows: 2009, $448,336; 2010, $204,979;
2011, $24,508. Rent expense was approximately $401,000,
$415,000, and $350,000 for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
|
|
3.
|
Long-term
Debt and Capitalized Leases
|
Effective July 30, 2008, Streamline Health, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc., entered
into a new revolving loan agreement with Fifth Third Bank,
Cincinnati, OH, in the principal amount of $2,000,000. The
interest rate on amounts borrowed will accrue at a variable rate
based on the trailing twelve months earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). (At
January 31, 2009, the effective rate was 2.75%, prime
-1/2%). The agreement contains other covenants including:
Minimum Tangible Net Worth, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and
Funded Indebtedness to EBITDA. The loan is guaranteed by the
Registrant and is secured by a first lien on all of the assets
of the Registrant and its subsidiary. The facility expires on
August 1, 2010.
57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company was in violation of certain of these covenants as of
October 31, 2008; however a waiver was received from the
bank at that time.
On January 6, 2009, Streamline Health, Inc. (the
Borrower), a wholly owned subsidiary of Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. (the Registrant), entered
into a revised revolving note with Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati,
OH. The terms of the loan remain the same as set forth in the
revolving note entered into on July 30, 2008 except that
the Borrowing Base limitation has been modified and is now set
at the lesser of 80% of the net amount of Borrowers
Eligible Accounts (less than 90 days) or 2 times trailing
twelve month EBITDA of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
compared to the previous limitation of the lesser of 80%
of the net amount of Borrowers Eligible Accounts (less
than 90 days) or the Tangible Net Worth of Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc.
In connection with the entering into of the revised revolving
note, the Registrant also entered into a revised continuing
guaranty agreement. The terms of the continuing guarantee
agreement modified Minimum Tangible Net Worth requirements which
increases on a periodic basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Min. Amount
|
|
|
10/31/08 through 01/30/09
|
|
$
|
1,000,000.00
|
|
01/31/09 through 04/29/09
|
|
$
|
1,500,000.00
|
|
04/30/09 through 07/30/09
|
|
$
|
1,750,000.00
|
|
07/31/09 through 10/30/09
|
|
$
|
2,000,000.00
|
|
10/31/09 through 01/30/10
|
|
$
|
2,250,000.00
|
|
01/31/09 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
2,500,000.00
|
|
Under the terms of the revised agreement, the Company was in
compliance with all of the covenants at January 31, 2009.
The Company pays a commitment fee on the unused portion of the
facility of .35%. The Company borrowed $800,000 (of the total
eligible borrowings of $1,006,000) under this working capital
facility as of January 31, 2009.
In 1998, Streamline Health issued a $6,000,000 note which has
since been paid off. In connection with the issuance of the
note, Streamline Health issued Warrants to purchase
750,000 shares of Common Stock of Streamline Health at
$3.87 per share at any time through July 16, 2008. These
Warrants expired unexercised on that date.
During fiscal year 2005, Streamline Health acquired computer
equipment for the application-hosting services data center,
which are accounted for as capitalized leases. The amount of the
computer equipment leased assets was $267,237. The lease was
payable monthly in installments of $8,192, through August 2008;
however, the capitalized lease was paid in full during fiscal
year 2007.
Total depreciation and amortization expense on assets under
capital leases was $0 in 2008, $27,837 in 2007, and $66,809 in
2006. The net carrying value of such assets was $0 at
January 31, 2009.
The Company and its subsidiary are subject to U.S. Federal
income tax as well as income taxes in multiple state and local
jurisdictions. The Company has concluded all U.S. Federal
tax matters for years through January 31, 2006. All
material state and local income tax matters have been concluded
for years through January 31, 2004.
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted FIN 48 as
of February 1, 2007, as required. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, the changes to the Companys
reserve for uncertain tax positions was accounted for as a
$27,791 adjustment to increase the beginning balance of retained
earnings on the Companys balance sheet. The Company
believes that its income tax positions and deductions will be
sustained on audit and does not anticipate adjustments that will
result in a material change to its financial position during the
next twelve months. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain tax
positions have been recorded pursuant to FIN 48 as of
January 31, 2009.
58
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Federal tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
(11,400
|
)
|
|
|
(31,180
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
(11,400
|
)
|
|
|
(31,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state income tax (expense)
|
|
$
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax benefit (provision) for income taxes differs from
the Federal statutory rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Federal tax (expense) benefit at Statutory rate
|
|
$
|
463,512
|
|
|
$
|
246,215
|
|
|
$
|
(43,398
|
)
|
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
|
|
7,527
|
|
|
|
(28,224
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(351,282
|
)
|
|
|
(256,800
|
)
|
|
|
37,943
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
(125,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(6,510
|
)
|
|
|
(8,342
|
)
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31,180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Streamline Health provides deferred income taxes for temporary
differences between assets and liabilities recognized for
financial reporting and income tax purposes. The income tax
effects of these temporary differences are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
10,456,072
|
|
|
$
|
10,092,028
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
170,026
|
|
|
|
202,622
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
92,386
|
|
|
|
72,536
|
|
Other
|
|
|
73,549
|
|
|
|
73,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,792,033
|
|
|
|
10,440,751
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(8,917,033
|
)
|
|
|
(8,565,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2009, Streamline Health increased the
valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets primarily
related to the carry forward by $351,282 based upon reasonable
future earnings before income tax projections. A valuation
allowance of $8,917,033 is still required to reduce the deferred
tax assets, primarily relating to loss carry forwards, to a
level currently believed will be utilized to offset future
earnings before income taxes based upon the current backlog and
forecasts over the next two years. The valuation allowance is
required due to the inability to predict on a longer term basis
that Streamline Health will more likely than not
attain levels of profitability required to utilize additional
loss carry forwards.
59
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At January 31, 2009, Streamline Health had a net operating
loss carry forward of approximately $30,000,000, which begins to
expire in 2013. Streamline Health also has an Alternative
Minimum Tax credit carry forward of approximately $74,000, which
has an unlimited carry forward period. Certain changes in stock
ownership can result in a limitation on the amount of net
operating loss carry forward that can be utilized each year.
Streamline Health has established a 401(k) retirement plan that
covers all employees. Company contributions to the plan may be
made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company
matches 100% up to the first 4% of compensation deferred by each
employee in the 401(k) plan. The total compensation expense for
this matching contribution was $326,687 in 2008, $322,536 in
2007, and $291,719 in 2006.
During fiscal year 2008, three customers, exclusive of our
remarketing partners, accounted for 13%, 7%, and 6% of total
revenues. During fiscal year 2007, three customers, exclusive of
our remarketing partners, accounted for 12%, 7%, and 5% of total
revenues. During fiscal year 2006, three customers, exclusive of
our remarketing partners, accounted for 11%, 8%, and 7% of total
revenues.
During fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 our major remarketing
partner accounted for 37%, 38% and 28%, respectively of our
total revenues.
At January 31, 2009 and 2008, 46% and 48%, respectively, of
Streamline Healths accounts receivable were due from three
customers excluding remarketing partners. At January 31,
2009 and 2008 approximately, 27% and 29%, respectively, of
Streamline Healths accounts receivables were due from
remarketing partners.
|
|
7.
|
Stock-based
Compensation Plans
|
As discussed in note 1, effective February 1, 2006,
the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. Streamline Healths 1996
Employee Stock Option Plan authorized the grant of options to
employees for Streamline Healths Common Stock. The options
granted have terms of ten years or less and generally vest and
become fully exercisable ratably over three years of continuous
employment from the date of grant. At January 31, 2009,
options to purchase 139,500 shares of Streamline
Healths Common Stock have been granted and are outstanding
under the Plan. No more options can be granted under this Plan.
Streamline Healths 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan authorized the grant of options for shares of
Streamline Healths Common Stock. The options granted have
terms of ten years or less, and vest and become fully
exercisable ratably over three years of continuous service as a
Director from the date of grant. At January 31, 2009,
options to purchase 15,000 shares of Streamline Health
Common Stock have been granted and are outstanding under the
Plan. No more options can be granted under this Plan.
In May 2005, the shareholders approved the 2005 Incentive
Compensation Plan which authorizes the Company to issue up to
1,000,000 equity awards (Stock Options, Stock Appreciation
Rights (SARs), and Restricted Stock) to
directors and employees of the Company. At January 31,
2009, Options to purchase 480,382 shares of Streamline
Health Common Stock have been granted and are outstanding under
the Plan.
(a) SARs are settled in Common Stock of the Company.
Upon exercise of the SAR, the holder is entitled to receive
shares of Common Stock equal to an amount determined by
multiplying:
(b) The difference between the fair market value of a share
of common stock of the Company on the date of exercise over the
price at the date of grant; by
(c) The number of shares with respect to which the SAR is
exercised.
60
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
SARs vest when certain performance criteria are met. The
performance objectives are such that the recipient earns 100% or
0% of the number of SARs granted. Performance based SAR
expense is recognized over the performance period based on the
stock price at each reporting date, when satisfaction of the
performance criteria is deemed probable.
There are no SARs outstanding under the plan.
A summary of Streamline Healths stock option activity and
related information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of year
|
|
|
409,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
461,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
476,167
|
|
|
$
|
2.76
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
355,382
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(57,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
(31,500
|
)
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
(24,667
|
)
|
|
|
.97
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(72,500
|
)
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
(61,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
11.61
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of year
|
|
|
634,882
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
409,000
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
461,500
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of year
|
|
|
237,830
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
322,334
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
373,169
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options at year end
|
|
$
|
1,117,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,083,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at year end
|
|
$
|
418,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
854,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during
year
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intrinsic value of Options exercised during the year
|
|
$
|
100,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the 2008, 2007 and 2006 stock-based
compensation was estimated at the date of grants using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions for each fiscal year: risk-free interest
rate of 4.25%, a dividend yield of zero percent; a weighted
average volatility factor of the expected market price of
Streamline Healths Common Stock of .771 (in 2008), .793
(in 2007) and .823 (in 2006), and a weighted average
expected life of stock options of five years and a forfeiture
rate of zero.
The following table summarizes the options as of
January 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
exercise
|
|
Remaining
|
Options
|
|
options
|
|
price
|
|
life in years
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
634,882
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
(1)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
237,830
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The exercise prices range from $0.53 to $6.03, of which
414,882 shares are between $0.53 and $1.95 per share,
175,000 shares are between $2.08 and $4.35 per share, and
45,000 shares are between $5.17 and
$6.03 per share. |
61
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table is a summary of nonvested shares at
January 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-date
|
|
Nonvested Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of year
|
|
|
86,672
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
355,382
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(45,002
|
)
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of year
|
|
|
397,052
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
At January 31, 2009, there was approximately $494,000 of
compensation cost that has not yet been recognized related to
nonvested stock-based awards. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted average period of three
years.
The expense associated with stock option awards was $120,035,
$102,294 and $75,641 for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Cash received from exercise of options and the employee stock
purchase plan (Note 8) was $120,393, $113,831 and
$85,318, respectively, in 2008, 2007 and 2006.
The 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2005 Incentive
Compensation Plan contains change of control provisions whereby
any outstanding equity awards under the plans subject to
vesting, which have not fully vested as of the date of the
change in control, shall automatically vest and become
immediately exercisable. One of the change in control provisions
is deemed to occur if there is a change in beneficial ownership,
or authority to vote, directly or indirectly, securities
representing 20% or more of the total of all of Streamline
Healths then outstanding voting securities, unless through
a transaction arranged by, or consummated with the prior
approval of the Board of Directors. Other change in control
provisions relate to mergers and acquisitions or a determination
of change in control by Streamline Healths Board of
Directors.
|
|
8.
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
|
Streamline Health has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under
which employees may purchase up to 500,000 shares of Common
Stock. Under the plan, eligible employees may elect to
contribute, through payroll deductions, up to 10% of their base
pay to a trust during any plan year, July 1 through
June 30, of the following year. At June 30 of each year,
the plan issues for the benefit of the employees shares of
Common Stock at the lesser of (a) 85% of the Fair Market
Value of the Common Stock on July 1, of the prior year, or
(b) 85% of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on
June 30, of the current year. At January 31, 2009,
284,447 shares remain that can be purchased under the plan.
The Company recognized compensation expense under
SFAS 123(R) of $38,712, $40,348, and $35,496 for fiscal
years 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
During fiscal year 2008, 37,462 shares were purchased at
the price of $1.52 per share; 2007, 17,421 shares were
purchased at the price of $3.56 per share; 2006,
27,191 shares were purchased at the price of $2.26 per
share.
The purchase price at June 30, 2009, will be 85% of the
lower of (a) the closing price on July 1, 2008 ($1.63)
or (b) 85% of the closing price on June 30, 2009.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Maintenance
Agreements, Warranties, and Indemnities
Streamline Health warrants to customers that its software will
meet certain performance requirements for an initial limited
warranty period. Streamline Health has maintenance agreements to
provide services in future periods after the expiration of the
initial limited warranty period. Streamline Health invoices
customers in accordance with
62
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the agreements and records the invoicing as deferred revenues
and recognizes the revenues ratably over the term of the
maintenance agreements. Streamline Healths standard
agreements with its customers usually include intellectual
property infringement indemnification provisions to indemnify
them from and against third-party claims, and for liabilities,
damages, and expenses arising out of Streamline Healths
operation of its business or any negligent act or omission of
Streamline Health. At January 31, 2009 and 2008, Streamline
Health has a warranty reserve in the amount of $130,000 and
$196,000, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
costs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
and Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
196
|
|
Application-hosting
Services
Streamline Health enters into long-term agreements to provide
document imaging/management and workflow services to its
healthcare customers on an outsourced basis from a central data
center. Streamline Health guarantees specific
up-time and response time performance
standards, which, if not met may result in reduced revenues, as
a penalty, for the month in which the standards are not met.
Employment
Agreements
Streamline Health has entered into employment agreements with
its officers and employees that generally provide annual salary,
a minimum bonus, discretionary bonus, stock incentive
provisions, and severance arrangements.
Reserved
Common Stock
Streamline Health has reserved 1,438,947 shares of the
Common Stock authorized for issuance in connection with various
Equity Award Plans and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Litigation
There are, from time to time, claims pending against Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiary. Based on a review of
such litigation with legal counsel, Streamline Health believes
any resulting liability would not have a material effect on
Streamline Healths consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
63
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Quarterly
Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
The following sets forth selected quarterly financial
information for fiscal years 2008 and 2007. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Information have been included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues(g)
|
|
$
|
3,604
|
|
|
$
|
4,837
|
|
|
$
|
4,379
|
|
|
$
|
3,466
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
Operating profit (loss) (e, f)
|
|
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(1,347
|
)
|
Net earnings (loss) (e, f)
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
Basic net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
9,275
|
|
|
|
9,303
|
|
|
|
9,306
|
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
Stock Price(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Quarter and year-end close
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
Cash dividends declared(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues(g)
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
|
$
|
3,234
|
|
|
$
|
3,974
|
|
|
$
|
5,667
|
|
|
$
|
16,684
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
8,477
|
|
Operating profit (loss)(d)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
(1,054
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
Net earnings (loss)(d)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(1,071
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
Basic net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
(.12
|
)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
(.08
|
)
|
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
(.12
|
)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
(.08
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,211
|
|
|
|
9,225
|
|
|
|
9,245
|
|
|
|
9,254
|
|
|
|
9,234
|
|
Stock Price(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
5.80
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.80
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
3.54
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
Quarter and year-end close
|
|
$
|
4.72
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
Cash dividends declared(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Quarterly amounts may not be additive. |
|
(b) |
|
Based on data available through The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. |
|
(c) |
|
Streamline Health has not paid a dividend on its Common Stock
since its inception and does not intend to pay any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, a $100,000
favorable change in the allowance for doubtful accounts. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, a $41,000
favorable change in the estimate for miscellaneous reserves. |
|
(f) |
|
Includes in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, a $408,000
impairment charge of capitalized software development costs. |
|
(g) |
|
During fiscal 2008, the Company revised its historical financial
statements to reclassify revenue and costs related to certain
maintenance services. During a review of the accounting
treatment of its revenue recognition policies, the Company
determined that certain revisions to the accounting treatment of
its revenue recognition for royalty commissions paid to GE
Healthcare were necessary. The impact of the revision was an
increase in total Net Revenues and a corresponding increase in
Cost of Sales, see Note 1 to Consolidated Financial
Statements. The quarterly financial data presented above reflect
the revised amounts. |
64
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc.
For the three years ended January 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
costs and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosures
|
By letter dated November 13, 2007, Ernst & Young
LLP informed the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Company
that Ernst & Young LLP would resign as the independent
registered public accounting firm for the Company upon the
completion of its review of the Companys financial
statements for the interim period ended October 31, 2007
and the services of Ernst & Young LLP to the Company
would cease at that time.
The report of Ernst & Young LLP on the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2007 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer
of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to any
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.
In connection with the Companys audit for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2007, the Company has had no
disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement,
if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young
LLP would have caused it to make reference thereto in its report
on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for such
year.
During the Companys fiscal year ended January 31,
2007 and through the date of the resignation of
Ernst &Young, LLP, the Company has had no reportable
events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
The Company provided a copy of the above disclosures to
Ernst & Young LLP. Ernst & Young LLP
furnished the Company with a letter dated November 16, 2007
addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating that
it agrees with the above statements.
Prior to the resignation of Ernst & Young LLP, the
Companys Audit Committee had initiated a process of
soliciting proposals from independent registered public
accounting firms, including Ernst & Young LLP, for the
audit of the January 31, 2008 Financial Statements to be
included in the
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year then ended.
Subsequent to the termination of Ernst & Young, LLP,
the Company engaged BDO Seidman, LLP as its new Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm effective January 7, 2008.
During the Companys two most recent fiscal years prior to
the Companys engagement of BDO Seidman, LLP and through
January 6, 2008, the Company did not consult with BDO
Seidman, LLP regarding either (i) the application of
accounting principles to a specific transaction, either
completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might
be rendered on the Companys financial statements, and
neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the
Company that BDO Seidman, LLP concluded was an important factor
considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the
accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
(ii) any matter that was either the subject of a
disagreement, as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv)
of
Regulation S-K
and the related instructions to Item 304 of
regulation S-K,
or a reportable event, as that term is defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
65
|
|
Item 9A(T)
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Streamline Health maintains disclosure controls and procedures
that are designed to ensure that there is reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in Streamline
Healths Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to Streamline Healths
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure based on the definition of
disclosure controls and procedures in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e).
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired
control objectives, and management necessarily was required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship
of possible controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of Streamline Healths senior management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Streamline Healths disclosure controls and procedures to
provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives
of the disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that
evaluation, Streamline Healths management, including the
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that
there is reasonable assurance that Streamline Healths
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end
of the period covered by this report and there have been no
changes in Streamline Healths internal control or in the
other controls during the quarter ended January 31, 2009
that could materially affect, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, internal controls over financial reporting.
66
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting of Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America.
Strong internal controls is an objective that is reinforced
through our Code of Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth
our commitment to conduct business with integrity, and within
both the letter and the spirit of the law. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting includes a Control
Self-Assessment Program that is conducted annually. Management
takes appropriate action to correct any identified control
deficiencies. Because of its inherent limitations, any system of
internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well
designed, may not prevent or detect misstatements due to the
possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden or
that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur that are not
detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal
control effectiveness may vary over time.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2009, using criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) and concluded that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2009, based on these criteria.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm
regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Managements report was not subject to attestation by the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to temporary rules (Item 308T of
Regulation S-K)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits the
Company to provide only managements report in this annual
report.
This report shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, unless the registrant specifically
states that the report is to be considered filed
under the Exchange Act or incorporates it by reference into a
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
67
|
|
Item 9B
|
Other
Information
|
None
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Goverance
|
The information required by Items 401, 405 and
407(c)(3),(d)(4) and (d)(5) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths definitive proxy statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 27, 2009 from the
information appearing under the captions Election of
Directors, Board of Directors Meetings and
Committees Stock Ownership by Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management, and Compliance with
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Certain
information regarding Streamline Healths Executive
Officers is set forth in Part I, of this
Form 10-K
under the caption Executive Officers of the
Registrant.
The information relating to the Code of Ethics required by
Items 406 of
Regulation S-K
is included herein by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to this
Form 10-K.
Streamline Health has adopted the Code of Ethics that applies to
all of its directors, officers (including its chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer,
controller and any person performing similar functions) and
employees. Streamline Health has also made the Code of Ethics
available on its website at www.streamlinehealth.net and will
provide a copy, free of charge, upon request.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by Items 402 and 407(e)(4) and
(e)(5) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths definitive proxy statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 27, 2009 from the
information appearing under the caption Executive
Compensation.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Securities
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by Item 403 of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 27, 2009 from
the information appearing under the caption Stock
Ownership by Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans required by Item 201(d) of
Regulation S-K
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
securities to be
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
issued upon
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
for future issuance
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
under equity
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
outstanding
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
(excluding securities
|
Plan category
|
|
and rights
|
|
and rights
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
634,882(1, 2 & 3
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
519,618(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
634,882(1, 2 & 3
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
519,618(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 15,000 options that can be exercised under the 1996
non-employee Directors Stock Option Plan and 139,500
options that can be exercised under the 1996 Employee Stock
Option Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 480,382 options that can be exercised by directors
under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes 284,447 shares that can be issued under the 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is more fully described in
footnote 8 of the enclosed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(4) |
|
The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that
have not been approved by the Companys Stockholders. |
68
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships, Related Transactions and Directors
Independence
|
The information required by Item 404 and 407(a) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths definitive proxy statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 27, 2009 from the
information appearing under the captions Transactions with
Related Persons, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons
and Board of Directors Meetings and Committees.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for the
Company for the fiscal years 2008 and 2007 for audit and other
services provided to Streamline Health by BDO Seidman, LLP,
including its foreign affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
159,000
|
|
|
$
|
112,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
169,000
|
|
|
$
|
147,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has engaged BDO Seidman, LLP to provide tax
consulting and compliance services and consulting services
regarding the internal control audit related requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in addition to the audit of the financial
statements. The Companys Audit Committee has considered
whether the provision of the tax and consulting services is
compatible with maintaining the independence of BDO Seidman,
LLP. All fees to BDO Seidman, LLP are pre-approved by the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
Financial
Statements
(a)1. The financial statements listed in ITEM 8 in the
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 45 are
filed as part of this report.
(a)2. The Financial Statement Schedule on page 65 is filed
as part of this report.
(b). Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on page 71 of this report.
The exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference in this
report.
69
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc.
J. Brian Patsy
Chief Executive Officer
DATE: April 16, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
Brian Patsy
J.
Brian Patsy
|
|
Chief Executive Officer And Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
April 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jonathan
R. Phillips
Jonathan
R. Phillips
|
|
Director
|
|
April 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
J. VonderBrink
Edward
J. VonderBrink
|
|
Director
|
|
April 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
C. Levy
Richard
C. Levy, M.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
April 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Andrew
L. Turner
Andrew
L. Turner
|
|
Director
|
|
April 15, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jay
D. Miller
Jay
D. Miller
|
|
Director
|
|
April 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald
E. Vick, Jr.
Donald
E. Vick, Jr.
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
April 16, 2009
|
70
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
3.1(a)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a/ LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission and incorporated herein by reference from, the
Registrants (LanVision System, Inc.) Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494, as filed with the
Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
3.1(b)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc., amendment No. 1. (Previously
filed with the Commission and incorporated herein by reference
from the Registrants Form 10-Q, as filed with the
Commission on September 8, 2006.)
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants Form 10-Q, as filed with the Commission on
June 5, 2007.)
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of the Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights
of the Convertible Preferred Stock (Par Value $.01 Per Share) of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a/ LanVision Systems, Inc.
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.) Registration Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494, as filed with the
Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
4.2
|
|
Specimen Preferred Stock Certificate of Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494, as filed with the
Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
4.3
|
|
Revolving Note, and associated documents, dated January 7, 2008,
between Streamline Health, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Registrant) and the Fifth Third Bank. (Previously filed with
the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K, as
filed with the Commission on January 8, 2008.)
|
10.1#
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc.
1996 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494, as filed with the
Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.2(a)#
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc.
1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (Previously
filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference
from, the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494, as
filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.2(b)#
|
|
First Amendment to Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a/LanVision Systems, Inc. 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 4.1(b) of, the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, file number 333-20765, as filed with the
Commission on January 31, 1997.)
|
10.2(c)#
|
|
Second Amendment to Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision Systems, Inc. 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Statement on Form
S-8, file number 333-20765, as filed with the Commission on
March 1, 2001.)
|
10.3#
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc.
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc. ) Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File Number 333-01494, as filed with the
Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.4#
|
|
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan of Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10.1 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form
8-K, as filed with the Commission on May 26, 2005.)
|
71
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10.5#
|
|
Employment Agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and Donald E. Vick effective December 3, 1996.
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants
(LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2002, as filed with the Commission on April 29,
2002.)
|
10.5(a)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement between Streamline
Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. and Donald E. Vick effective
January 27, 2006 (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.4 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 8-K, as filed
with the Commission on January 31, 2006.)
|
10.6#
|
|
Employment Agreement among Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc., Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and Paul W. Bridge, Jr., effective February 1,
2004 (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants
(LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
July 31, 2004, as filed with the Commission on September 10,
2004.)
|
10.6(a)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement between Streamline
Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. and Paul W. Bridge, Jr.
effective January 27, 2006 (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10.3 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form
8-K, as filed with the Commission on January 31, 2006.)
|
10.7#
|
|
Employment Agreement among Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a/
LanVision Systems, Inc., Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and J. Brian Patsy effective February 1, 2003
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrants
(LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2004, as filed with the Commission on April 8, 2004.)
|
10.7(a)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 27, 2005 to the Employment
Agreement among J. Brian Patsy, Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. and Streamline Health Inc.
f/k/a LanVision, Inc. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 8-K, as filed
with the Commission on February 1, 2005.)
|
10.7(b)#
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated January 27, 2006 to the Employment
Agreement among J. Brian Patsy, Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. and Streamline Health, Inc.
f/k/a LanVision, Inc. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 8-K, as filed
with the Commission on January 31, 2006.)
|
10.8(a)#
|
|
Employment Agreement among Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a/ LanVision Systems, Inc., Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and Joseph O. Brown, II, effective February
1, 2004. (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants
Form 10-Q, as filed with the Commission on December 7, 2007.)
|
10.8(b)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated November 27, 2007 to the Employment
Agreement among Joseph O. Brown, II, Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. and Streamline
Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10.8(b) of the Registrants (Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc.) Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, as
filed with the Commission on April 7, 2008.)
|
10.9#
|
|
Employment agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. and Gary M.
Winzenread effective June 18, 2007. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10.1 of the Registrants Form 10-Q, as filed with the
Commission on December 7, 2007.)
|
10.9(b)#
|
|
Employment agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. and Gary M.
Winzenread effective June 1, 2008. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10 of the Registrants (Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.)
Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on June 11, 2008.)
|
10.10#
|
|
Employment agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. and B.
Scott Boyden, Jr. effective June 16, 2008. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10 of the Registrants (Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc.) Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on June
26, 2008.)
|
72
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10.11-
|
|
Registrants Guarantee of Lease Agreement between
Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. and The Western
and Southern Life Insurance Company (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10.1 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004, as filed with
the Commission on September 10, 2004.)
|
10.12(c)
|
|
First Amendment to Lease and Acceptance of Indemnification
Agreement for office space between Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary) and The Western and
Southern Life Insurance Company, effective January 31, 2005.
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, Exhibit 11.11(c) of the Registrants
(LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2005, as filed with the Commission on April 8, 2005.)
|
10.13(a)**
|
|
Reseller Agreement between IDX Information Systems Corporation
and Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. entered into
on January 30, 2002. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.11 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, as filed with the Commission
on April 29, 2002.)
|
10.13(b)
|
|
First Amendment to the Reseller Agreement between IDX
Information Systems Corporation and Streamline Health, Inc.
f/k/a LanVision, Inc. entered into on January 30, 2002
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, Exhibit 10 of the Registrants
(LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April
30, 2002, as filed with the Commission on June 4, 2002.).
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for all directors and
officers. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 8-K, as filed
with the Commission on June 7, 2006.
|
10.15#
|
|
Schedule of Directors Compensation (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit
10.14 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, as filed with
the Commission on April 8, 2005.)
|
11.1
|
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings***
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethics (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 14.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Commission
on April 8, 2004.)
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant***
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm BDO Seidman, LLP***
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm Ernst & Young, LLP***
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
|
|
|
** |
|
The Company has applied for Confidential Treatment of portions
of this agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
*** |
|
Included herein |
|
# |
|
Management Contracts and Compensatory Arrangements. |
73